Unfortunate that even to get 20% of the amount the complainant has to knock on the doors of the SC. Even after knocking, the HC has been directed to look into the case, afresh. It may again take min of 5 years. The litigants may hv to spend their entire life perhaps to get the amount or even their legal heirs. It's because of inordinate delay the common man is losing confidence in our justice system. In my two cases one involving Rs.4L, the complaint losing interest n in another case of Rs.20L, the complainant lost interest n didn't pursue further. Common experience says timeline to be fixed n each case must hv limitation to appeal say in such cases HCs to be the last stage for appeal n not SC. SC should hear only constitutonal issues.
Section 148 of NI Act should be implemented seriously and mandatorily to avoid escape from liability under cheque. Now a days SC viewing the cases very liberally rather than seriously. As a result, victim should suffer further more because of such liberal view and accused take undue benefit out of such liberal view. As a result, justice to the victim further delayed. It us nothing but adding salt to pain.
This video has been helpful cause I'm already working on the same case. Also I have a doubt if someone holds your property documents without your consent, what action can be taken?
Need to know legal opinion incase where Devlooers and Builders run financial ponzi schemes of lucrative interest rate of return for heavy investment and later on stop paying and responding?
Flourish beyond Skies. Amazing content
Unfortunate that even to get 20% of the amount the complainant has to knock on the doors of the SC. Even after knocking, the HC has been directed to look into the case, afresh. It may again take min of 5 years.
The litigants may hv to spend their entire life perhaps to get the amount or even their legal heirs.
It's because of inordinate delay the common man is losing confidence in our justice system.
In my two cases one involving Rs.4L, the complaint losing interest n in another case of Rs.20L, the complainant lost interest n didn't pursue further.
Common experience says timeline to be fixed n each case must hv limitation to appeal say in such cases HCs to be the last stage for appeal n not SC.
SC should hear only constitutonal issues.
Section 148 of NI Act should be implemented seriously and mandatorily to avoid escape from liability under cheque. Now a days SC viewing the cases very liberally rather than seriously. As a result, victim should suffer further more because of such liberal view and accused take undue benefit out of such liberal view. As a result, justice to the victim further delayed. It us nothing but adding salt to pain.
TH-cam has been flooded with various cases and legal practices. Your forte is daily updates, please continue the good work.
fabulous English Skill, Nice Explanation
No use for this case. Court will not give the judgement before spending the all the money and you will never get the amount. Time waste case in court
Good explanation
It is not left to the discretion of judge whether to levy 20% compensation under section 148. Supreme Court judgement is erred
Please take up the consumer court judgements on contract act and RBI guidelines on auction procedure and observation of consumer court or civil court.
Please discuss such judgments on our core law subjects taught in law colleges and also asked in competitive exams more frequently
Nice
Kindly keep updating sister but please in Hindi by which every practioner may understand easily
How many years cheque bounced case will take ?
On electronic evidence pls
Yes videos on evidence act imp section like 32,9 etc
This video has been helpful cause I'm already working on the same case. Also I have a doubt if someone holds your property documents without your consent, what action can be taken?
Can you please share the cause title of the case
Can you plz share the Judgment....
Verdict please
Please give me the citation.
Case number details..
Need to know legal opinion incase where Devlooers and Builders run financial ponzi schemes of lucrative interest rate of return for heavy investment and later on stop paying and responding?