Unveiling Existence: Buddhism vs. Science?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ต.ค. 2024
- Buddhism is more accurate in describing the nature of existence than modern science. Here are my reasons why. What do you think?
#Science #Buddhism #Existence #Quantum #Impermanence #Interbeing #Entanglement
-----
Deepak's latest book, #QuantumBody, is now available at your favorite retailer or at amzn.to/3vW8KQn *
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases
Thich Nhat Hahn brought me to Buddhism and learning the flow and the interconnectiveness of all life
Both are concepts to what IS already🙏
Wow .
I am having almost daily
A~Ha moments as I am listening to your awesome talks.
Each new or old idea is shifting and changing within my awareness and I’m LOVING this newness of experiencing .
Now I’m going to revisit this talk and absorb more !
💜💪🏼💟✨😊👍
So much love for you Dr Chopra
Thank you💫
✨️🙏I favor the Buddhist perspective as well. The philiosophical concept of interbeing resonates deeply as the truth, as it seems that we are entangled with all of existence.✨️
....5.26....entangled.....The observer is the observed....JKrishnamurthy
Well observed, explained.
Spirituality indicates. Points
Science defines. Sri Sri
Balance:
Poorna madah, poorna midha...
I am certainly not a physicist nor am I in a position to argue with science. For myself though, I learn interesting statistics from science but my spiritual journey is anchored in the "philosophy" of Buddhism. Science offers me the intellectual way to look at that spiritual growth. Science can describe "truth." Buddhism opened up the pathways within so I could be immersed in that growth. Buddhism speaks from love and pureness. Science speaks through experiments and statistics. Buddhism isn't trying to PROVE anything, it's "offering" you a way to find your true sel
Your words~in my soul too❤
Dear doctor Chopra, I'm very moved by this video. I find absolutely beautiful your acknowledgement of the teaching on Interbeing by Tich Nath Han, and you could relate it to Science in such a perfect way! Bellissimo! Thank you!
Advitha is more convincinng to me !!
Love and gratitude ❤🙏
Though I don't know Buddah, from what you explained I side to that. Thank you Deepak for another reality, non-local perspective.🙏🙏🙏😊
I feel both complement each other actually. I see so much in both.😊 but i woukd choose Buddhism
So interesting. Thank you Deepak.
In the other aspects it seens to me that Buddhism is more complete
For me, Advaita Vedanta is closest to truth because the scriptures are focusing on consciousness and not on emptiness primarily. Buddhism is a large philosophical system, which can be described in 9 stages. The non-dual Dzogchen stage is similar to Advaita using the term "clear light" for universal consciousness. Both systems are describing the nature of existence far more accurate than modern science.
Thank you 🙏
I prefer the idea of the existence of objective reality, but our human view of this is so subjective that we can only dream of the existence of “objectivity”.
Myself am with RUMI ... 💝
Buddhism. Thank you and all the best
Thank You so much Gurudev 🙏
Hy Buddhism describes it as it is LOVE💙💙💙
Always thankful to your thought provoking talks. I think science and religion are both wonderful it seems one is dealing with observable only, while other goes beyond. I am personally intrigued with the idea of ultimate observer of the all that there is. ❤🙏🙏
What do I do knowing I have the power of the Universe?
Thank you , Deepak Chopra , for bringning the wisdom of Buddism to my awereness,... as a young man I was very impress by the Tao teh Ching wich is devote to tranformation and spontaneity for using only two words...I think the root is unique ...entangled...the old ones who sat by the fire under the stars didnt care about splitting hairs in four...modern science thinking is but a playfull puppy running after his tail...get some fresh air dear man the forest is awaiting you !
Neither Buddh ism or Science....all are relative, contextual to the real which cannot be explained in words....
There is something scientific about Buddhism.
To me, science, and Buddhism are actually complementary and share similar concepts to describe the ineffable. Science has provided some measures and evidence to back up the concepts .
To me, Buddhism can bring us to a state where we can experience ourselves looking back in recognition of who is actually looking.
Buddhism is a similar vehicle to art, both of which go beyond our current ability to articulate what we can’t yet measure in physics.
Energy and vibrations are happening, regardless of our ability to measure or speak of them. As we continue to evolve our understanding of how this energy flows the measures, too, will evolve.
Just as the skills of a master artist evolve in capacity of understanding and portraying the nuance at play in the world around us.
I don’t know a lot about Buddhism, and I’m still a very beginner in Sikhi, yet these teachings provide a lens to “see”, or intuit the interplay of teachings from all traditions and quantum mechanics.
Hi ! I would like to no if the book
QUANTUM BODY
Is available in FRENCH!
Thank you 🙏🏼
If we compare the concept of zero point Energy and the inter beings of Buddhism, all beings are waves of the infinity sea of zero point energy amd are all connected by the same sea of Zero point energy
I use both Buddhism and science. As you even say within this post. everything is changing. so would that not fit the model you share here on both sides, be it Buddhism and science? I would add that possible there is rules or laws, in both, however even those evolve forward and backwards for any number of reasons
Science is based on a view without observer.But without observer nothing can be observed.Therefore an existential lack is cultivated and ,as you said,it will be filled with suffering or pain, how should this be the truth?Truth means that all relevant factors of a situation are considered.The second thing is that under😢😢 these conditions of neglecting the observer,there only observations would be left.But mere observation is a part of reality or of the whole thing.There has to be something that takes all the observation up,and this is directly your mind and ultimately pure consciousness.Directly it is the mind,and this is determinated by the way it has been cultivated.This cultivation is represented through the knowledge instruments of your mememory.But how will you gain knowledge when you neglect the whole system, which takes up your observation and makes something useful out of them.This is an act of dehumanisation,taking out of the human observer.And what will they gain?Suffering and misunderstanding expressing itself in naive realism.😢
Buddisim is an observation of itself, The I am that watches changes through the the awareness of being observed, In quantum entanglement, once what is observed knows it’s being watched, the perception then becomes God knowing it self as the particle in between the space. Therefore Who I am is the dreamer of my existence.
both buddhism and quantum physics sees reality as an interdependent flux of mutual arising. they merely have different epistemological descriptions for how this happens.
For me Buddism and even Advaita vedanta teaching have more and a pristine answer about existence rather than today science. Though it has been or at least shown by some contemporary scientists like Schrödinger, a convergence between scince and spirituality. I believe that Buddhism and ancient Indian philosophy was ahead long time ago before modern science about cosmos and existence.
Buddhism. Just got done studying Quantum Mechanics. My Kundalini life force says the ancients know best.
Buddhism involves meditation which helps in understanding our inner reality and inner world. But modern science doesn't help us in regulating our thoughts, emotions or feelings.
Personal belief is what you are asking about, my belief is also closer to the Buddhist attitude as science can't prove without an observer, which would negate the proof.
I believe the world is illusion but I act as if science is right as it makes things easier to interact with.
Because the awakened individual has transcended the self (anattā) he is no longer alienated from life. Not being alienated from life means your''e fully in touch with it, as happens in a healthy relationship with one's body. When your'e alienated from your physical organism your'e cut off from its processes, your'e numb to it. The awakened individual experiences, and has long experienced, what modern physics and cosmology are now only approximating. He knows the cosmos to be fully alive and conscious, something modern science has not even remotely begun to surmise. When science does reach that threshold it will then, and only then, have a truly comprehensive vision of what life is.
I think Buddhism and science are already entangled..The inner research buddhism has done alongside the yogi's is the ultimate human universe science..The physicist that have gone beyond the senses to discover the atomic world is wonderful but it seems to be just 1 photon of entanglement..minimum 2 photons to entangle anywhere..The soul/ spirit- consciousness is ..what is..
"When the possible never ceases to be capable and Reality never ceases to be willing and able, so the possible preserves the continuity of being which in itself is inherently inexistant. The rationalists miss this point and their reason is not even able to see this misguidance".
Ibn Arabi 😅
Without the complexities of the observers there can be no understanding. The laptop sits on a table, it seems solid but is in fact mostly emptiness. Picture the atom with the electrons whirring and within that it is mostly emptiness. now add the complexities of quantum entanglement and you do not even have a clear understanding of where those electrons are. Is this not some expression of what the Buddhists call Shunyassa (sounded out to the best of my abilities) I have not had enough time to speak to Buddhists but wish to in the future, the ones I met had very nice tea and better company.
simply put, if you accept quantum entanglement it necessitates the relevance of the viewers and all of their possible entanglements (perhaps one type of karmas?)
Science... Is for keeping (religion) honest
True Science is God
(now all you need is an end-game)
Buddha spoke of Anicca and anatha impermanence and impersonal
Para mi mas sabiduria esta en la Vision del Budismo.
Buddhism makes more sense.
💋 Dr . Deepak 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 💝 Chopra ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Buddhism
👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️👁️☸️☸️