Epic book. masterpiece. thx for sharing it. The Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU) is a philosophical and theoretical framework proposed by Christopher Michael Langan. It aims to integrate aspects of cognitive science, metaphysics, and cosmology to provide a comprehensive understanding of reality. Langan's theory posits that reality is a self-processing, self-referential system, where the structure of reality mirrors the cognitive processes of a hypothetical "Supreme Mind." The CTMU incorporates concepts from mathematics, logic, and information theory to elaborate on the nature of existence and consciousness. It's a complex and ambitious theory that seeks to address fundamental questions about the nature of reality and the mind.
Because it tracks your data lol, your phone has access to your microphone and creates a transcription, and markets data to you based off your transcripts and device usage
Yes, the universe can work that way. Like what you have described has happened to several times. Had an unresolvable question, taken a walk to create space, walked down a street with a book shop on that street an energy within as if guides my attention to it and into the store I look at a bookshelf across the shop space I look at a shelf and a particular book I walk over to it and pull it off the shelf, open it up and simply read the first paragraph I sight,. "All communication is metaphorical" the exact information I need to unblock the phycological obstacle. I was able to move forward because I read that sentence from a book called Therapeutic Metaphors. That happened around 1996-1997. I am just discovering Chris Langan's CTMU. Because it showed up on my TH-cam also. I also believe as he seems to believe that the universe is intelligent and is Host. I don't understand his model my cognitive logos its lexicon dose to understand all the language used to describe his model. But what I can understand seems interesting. I do detect from my learnings it could do with some more meat on the bone relating to the structure of mind. A mention of Gurdjieff's Three Laws, the law of three the law of seven and the law of one would help bridge this gap and help to enlighten the reader to the egos need to recede in order better be receptive to the Higher order. I know that to be true. I think Dark energy maybe the hard drive metaphorically speaking that Intelligence operates from and transfers though the duality of energy and mass via Cosmic Foam/Quantum Foam within both the atom and within the fabric of empty space. After that story I sheared I went on to map the basic structure of the 108 egoic mind sets. I then went on to seek what like existed toward understanding the divide between mind and Host. I chose to look at the constants in nature and chose Temperature. This is what I uncovered via a little perspicacity within mind the idea to find a third implicate math that may lead to understanding the connection to the invisible. The Dark energy number. {.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000138} Rule one: A number viewed from the hundred's Column must be counted three times as if it has the same count in the ten's Column and the units Column. A number viewed in the tens Column must be counted two times as if it has the same count in the tens Column as if in the units Column. And the units are counted once. Rule two: Any number/ numbers on the other side of the decimal point, is treated differently. They are simply added to create a sum tally number. Apply rule one and rule two: -273.15 Absolute Zero. -274.15 One degree below. -275.15 Two degrees below. -276.15 Three degrees below. 2 = 6 Zero's, 7 = 14 Zeros, 3 = 3 Zero's, (decimal point) 1 + 5 = 6. -273.15 (6 + 14 + 3 + 6 = 29) Twenty-nine zeros. 2 = 6 Zero's, 7 = 14 Zeros, 4 = 4 Zero's, (decimal point) 1 + 5 = 6. -273.15 (6 + 14 + 4 + 6 = 30) Thirty-zeros. 2 = 6 Zero's, 7 = 14 Zeros, 5 = 5 Zero's, (decimal point) 1 + 5 = 6. -273.15 (6 + 14 + 5 + 6 = 31) Thirty-one zeros. 2 = 6 Zero's, 7 = 14 Zeros, 6 = 6 Zero's, (decimal point) 1 + 5 = 6. -273.15 (6 + 14 + 6 + 6 = 32) Thirty-two zeros. 29 + 30 + 31 + 32 = 122 Fifty-four elemental parts are said to make up the standard model of particle physics. Yes, there is a 54 within the number pattern on the left-hand side of the decimal point. 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 54. Rule two: Any number/ numbers on the other side of the decimal point is treated differently. They are simply added to create a sum tally number. 1 + 5 = 6 1 + 5 = 6 1 + 5 = 6 1 + 5 = 6 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 = 24 How many quantum fields are there? The answer is 24. The quarks and leptons are fermions, which is why they have antimatter counterparts, and the W boson comes in two equal-and-opposite varieties (positively and negatively charged), but all told, there are 24 unique, fundamental excitations of quantum fields possible. 1 +1 +1 1+1 +1 decimal point 1 + 5 1 +1 +1 1+1 +1 decimal point 1 + 5 1 +1 +1 1+1 +1 decimal point 1 + 5 1 +1 +1 1+1 +1 decimal point 1 + 5 .......... 24 ................................... 24 The component on the right-hand side of the decimal point 1 + 5 = 6 reminds me of M -Theory five maths unified by one math making six maths. You may sense that my focus is oriented towards the idea that Dark energy is a deeper mechanical implicate order responsible for Hosting energy and mass linked to the atomic level of the universe's operation. Basically, I am searching for a hidden implicit in math. A third implicate math that I suspect involves Cosmic foam energy with mass that pop's in and out of existence continuously. My model goes a little deeper and ends at a thirteen-point structure within the 0138 component of the dark energy number. If you study the book Gurdjieff: COSMIC SECRETS and work out for yourself this component I reveal after this paragraph. From author Russell A. Smith and his Book Gurdjieff: COSMIC SECRETS. page: 109 DO TI LA DO ..... TI ..... SO ..... ..... ..... LA DO FA ..... ..... DO ..... ..... TI ..... MI SO ..... TI ..... ..... LA ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... LA ..... DO ..... ..... ..... ..... TI ..... ..... MI SO ..... ..... TI DO ..... ..... SO ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... LA ..... DO TI RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... ..... DO ..... ..... MI ..... SO ...... ...... TI ..... LA DO ..... MI ..... SO ..... ..... TI ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO ..... TI RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI ..... SO ..... ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... LA ...... ..... DO ..... ..... ..... ..... MI ..... SO ..... ..... ..... TI ..... ..... LA DO ..... ..... MI ..... SO ..... ..... ..... TI ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO FA ..... ..... DO ..... ..... ..... ..... SO ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ...... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI ..... MI SO ..... TI ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... MI ..... ..... SO ..... ..... ..... TI ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... DO ..... ..... LA ..... DO ..... ..... MI ...... ...... SO ..... ..... ..... TI ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... ..... DO ..... FA ..... LA ..... DO ..... ..... MI ..... ..... SO ..... ..... ..... TI ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... ..... DO ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI ..... ..... MI SO ..... ..... TI ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... ..... DO ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... MI ..... SO ..... ..... ..... ..... .... TI ..... DO ..... ..... SO ..... ..... ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ...... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... That do you note? If you count all the DO RE MI FA SO LA TI The count is 121 one short of 122 the one hundred and twenty-two count of zeros in the dark energy number. What remains is one zero and a one three eight. If we continue our lateral think process, we can think of the 0 1 3 8 as thirteen zeros and now we can view two patterns of zeros a thirteen pattern and a pattern of 121 zeros. My thinking is. Because we live in a three-dimensional world the thirteen maybe linked to a Cartesian plane with an X, Y, Z three-dimensional lattice. This thirteen point model with a zero at the centre and two points each side of the zero in the X plain and Y plane and the Z plane evenly spaced apart could be thought of as like a latus like a quantum mechanical lates. The electron cloud passes through the proton within the atom. So is it possible the nine energies that make possible the expressions of human personality stem from the atoms that makeup the human body. I suspect our quantum biology is very complex.
Question... could these blank spaces be linked to the nine energies the nine points of the Enneagram model? # + # + # + # + # + # + # + # + # = 9 S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7 # , P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7 # , # , D3, D4, D6, D6, # # , # , # , F4, F5, # , #
my interpretation of the ctmu, is that everyting in reality is"saying": i seem to be a verb: interacting, processing, no nouns anywhere, never met a noun yet
The noun is reality as a whole. That's what makes it a "global operator descriptor" and a primary identity operator, of which there is only one. However, it defines itself internally, making it variegated within it's internal stratifications (and the various "quanta" within it can also be identified as static "objects", but special kinds of objects, obviously).
Having read this very, very slowly dozens of times, it is quite fun to be able to understand it at full speed here. Very good job reading a text that is difficult to read.
@@Ghanzo Really? Are you sure? The pronunciation is a bit variable (I know it says this at the top, but not sure how the variation would happen). In any case, it is fantastic.
@@konberner170 yes I was the one who ran it through the program. Have you heard of gpt4? OpenAI the company that made that has some other services as well, one of them is a text to speech. By using a program that communicates with their api you can turn any text into a voice. It is indeed amazing how far its come.
@@Ghanzo My Nephew works as one of the top 5 guys at OpenAI, but I had not heard of this text to speech product. Amazing stuff. For a real challenge, I wonder how it could to on Nietzsche's _Beyond Good and Evil_ ?
Man🙏So, So thankful for this I was trying to hear My Big TOE of Mr Tom Campbell But no lock But this.. Wow Just found that the only way l can absorb and truly comprehend this book content, Is Staying super relaxed almost asleep, with earphones At very low volume, And feeling that lm taking the shape of every word.. I can not explain how deep is the knowledge that Mr Langan share to Humanity.. My deepest thanks “
Glad you're enjoying! I've found in the past that listening to audiobooks multiple times, even when not understanding, eventually helps develop an understanding
Official Answer: "Why not convey this in a simpler way?" #1- Model: Syntactically and semantically valid and well formed. Computer science considers this the most basic requirement for programming. #2- Language: Sinvariant construction overall makes the theoretic conveyance self-recursive and closed. #3- Words: Specifically used and intentional the lofty and cranial lexicon employed arent just to sound smart. They must be and cannot be otherwise because they are Universally Descriptive nomological covariant. Those are the 3 requirements of a supertautology. Universal - Closed - Consistent
Robert anton wilson paraphrased: interacting processing; i can only tune in interacting processing; not only do i seem to be a verb, but the whole scenario universe seems to be a verb... i see no nouns, only verbs, non simultaneously apprehended
So there's the ultimate Telon or highest in which all other telons like us (I'm gonna butcher the spelling) come from and this is a type of telonicity (I'm gonna butcher words altogether) where is the teletinivity scales up into the one ultimate telon. Thus we find out identity in the ulitmate telon. Thus, we represent the whole like a fractual? And we can even see this play out like a language? For instance the scaling up turns the tree into a forrest and a forrest into an eccosystem etc the higher you scale up? Like it scales up into oneness. Oh That makes a lot of sense. Edited to add more ideas.
Great! O I'm an analytic idealist. I'm familiar with pancomputationalism, And most of the configurations of pantheism, from the begining ,this sounds like interesting and penetrating analysis.
Just beginning listening and this appears compatible with the informational lattice of Information Theory, the Syntergic Theory of Jacobo Grinberg, Wolfgang Pauli’s Pauli Matrices, and Carl Jung’s collective unconscious. Excited to hear more about neural correlates of (individual and cosmic) consciousness! Thanks for sharing. 👏
I was recently watching a youtube space channel I rather enjoy, and they were talking about some post-Big Bang era before there were even atoms or photons - and they actually said it "lasted 340,000 years". even I was like well that's just bullshit how could you even begin to measure time without light or matter?
These modern mathematical physicists do not comprehend creation's beginning exists in a timeless, eternal state: intelligent infinity which birthed intelligent energy. Parts of galaxies exist still in this manner (think: center). See The Ra Material.
I get the gist of it, but riddle me this, if so much thought, mental sight, and effort went into writing the book , why no effort or thought to simply convey the concept using simple metaphors alongside the formal descriptions
It can’t be expressed in a TH-cam comment as brief as this one must be but the gravitational force of Langan’s explanation of explanation will be and in fact is felt by posterity for generations onward. What humanity needs now is an answer to the heart, for the mind is now satisfied. Man’s heart is too broken to appreciate this knowledge at the moment. This must and will be addressed by Its own will helped by the will of God.
@@jeffreyjdesir I get that the point of the CTMU and Chris is to remove irrational thought by providing a thorough logical proof of god and so eliminate the need for faith and the bloodshed that comes with it, but you still have to be careful for it not to become a cult built of worship or the framework of the CTMU will yield the same level or war and suffering as other irrational religions
@@STONECOLDET944 true, we can attribute superior value to anything and typically the more abstract the more justified we feel in killing each other over it (ideals, conceptions of God, class, race, etc)...fortunately coherent language itself provides the means of balance as a bonus to being also the answer. This is indeed a foundation for conceptuslizing world peace but we must remember the world consists of higher order telors made in the image of God who deserve our love and prosperity.
@jeffreyjdesir consider this hypothetically, let's say hypothetically that these higher order telors that you might consider to be " Angels " did explicitly and provably make contact with us, if then again hypothetically that love is what they hold most value in, then how would that be compatible for us? Almost all high intelligence relationships are monogamous so how could a higher order telor have an essentially polygamous relationship with people and have that be beneficial for us ? Considering consciousness is a scale, so is the emotional complexity of an entity, the more intelligent and concious a entity is, the more monogamous it is, so if you project that onto a people's hypothetically explicit provable relationship with these telors, it mirrors the vast amount of psychological problems that come with person to person everyday relationships, so proving and communicating with God and these higher order telors , might exacerbate chaos and suffering in the world.
Along side Chuck, The Pageau brothers (Eastern Orthodox) are great thinkers to further understand Chris Langan's theory of everything because a lot of it sounds a lot like the Church fathers like Gregory of Nissa, Maximus the Confessor and even people like Dante.
Epic book. masterpiece. thx for sharing it.
The Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe (CTMU) is a philosophical and theoretical framework proposed by Christopher Michael Langan. It aims to integrate aspects of cognitive science, metaphysics, and cosmology to provide a comprehensive understanding of reality. Langan's theory posits that reality is a self-processing, self-referential system, where the structure of reality mirrors the cognitive processes of a hypothetical "Supreme Mind." The CTMU incorporates concepts from mathematics, logic, and information theory to elaborate on the nature of existence and consciousness. It's a complex and ambitious theory that seeks to address fundamental questions about the nature of reality and the mind.
I like it. It dovetails perfectly into another analysis of reality Analytic idealism. They are both compatible as far as I can tell.
I started reading this out loud and gave up. The next day this video shows up on my TH-cam. God my algorithm knows me well.
Because it tracks your data lol, your phone has access to your microphone and creates a transcription, and markets data to you based off your transcripts and device usage
Yes, the universe can work that way. Like what you have described has happened to several times. Had an unresolvable question, taken a walk to create space, walked down a street with a book shop on that street an energy within as if guides my attention to it and into the store I look at a bookshelf across the shop space I look at a shelf and a particular book I walk over to it and pull it off the shelf, open it up and simply read the first paragraph I sight,. "All communication is metaphorical" the exact information I need to unblock the phycological obstacle. I was able to move forward because I read that sentence from a book called Therapeutic Metaphors. That happened around 1996-1997.
I am just discovering Chris Langan's CTMU. Because it showed up on my TH-cam also. I also believe as he seems to believe that the universe is intelligent and is Host. I don't understand his model my cognitive logos its lexicon dose to understand all the language used to describe his model. But what I can understand seems interesting.
I do detect from my learnings it could do with some more meat on the bone relating to the structure of mind. A mention of Gurdjieff's Three Laws, the law of three the law of seven and the law of one would help bridge this gap and help to enlighten the reader to the egos need to recede in order better be receptive to the Higher order. I know that to be true.
I think Dark energy maybe the hard drive metaphorically speaking that Intelligence operates from and transfers though the duality of energy and mass via Cosmic Foam/Quantum Foam within both the atom and within the fabric of empty space.
After that story I sheared I went on to map the basic structure of the 108 egoic mind sets. I then went on to seek what like existed toward understanding the divide between mind and Host. I chose to look at the constants in nature and chose Temperature. This is what I uncovered via a little perspicacity within mind the idea to find a third implicate math that may lead to understanding the connection to the invisible.
The Dark energy number.
{.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000138}
Rule one: A number viewed from the hundred's Column must be counted three times as if it has the same count in the ten's Column and the units Column. A number viewed in the tens Column must be counted two times as if it has the same count in the tens Column as if in the units Column. And the units are counted once.
Rule two: Any number/ numbers on the other side of the decimal point, is treated differently. They are simply added to create a sum tally number.
Apply rule one and rule two:
-273.15 Absolute Zero.
-274.15 One degree below.
-275.15 Two degrees below.
-276.15 Three degrees below.
2 = 6 Zero's, 7 = 14 Zeros, 3 = 3 Zero's, (decimal point) 1 + 5 = 6. -273.15 (6 + 14 + 3 + 6 = 29) Twenty-nine zeros.
2 = 6 Zero's, 7 = 14 Zeros, 4 = 4 Zero's, (decimal point) 1 + 5 = 6. -273.15 (6 + 14 + 4 + 6 = 30) Thirty-zeros.
2 = 6 Zero's, 7 = 14 Zeros, 5 = 5 Zero's, (decimal point) 1 + 5 = 6. -273.15 (6 + 14 + 5 + 6 = 31) Thirty-one zeros.
2 = 6 Zero's, 7 = 14 Zeros, 6 = 6 Zero's, (decimal point) 1 + 5 = 6. -273.15 (6 + 14 + 6 + 6 = 32) Thirty-two zeros.
29 + 30 + 31 + 32 = 122
Fifty-four elemental parts are said to make up the standard model of particle physics. Yes, there is a 54 within the number pattern on the left-hand side of the decimal point. 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 7 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 = 54.
Rule two: Any number/ numbers on the other side of the decimal point is treated differently. They are simply added to create a sum tally number.
1 + 5 = 6
1 + 5 = 6
1 + 5 = 6
1 + 5 = 6
6 + 6 + 6 + 6 = 24
How many quantum fields are there? The answer is 24.
The quarks and leptons are fermions, which is why they have antimatter counterparts, and the W boson comes in two equal-and-opposite varieties (positively and negatively charged), but all told, there are 24 unique, fundamental excitations of quantum fields possible.
1 +1 +1 1+1 +1 decimal point 1 + 5
1 +1 +1 1+1 +1 decimal point 1 + 5
1 +1 +1 1+1 +1 decimal point 1 + 5
1 +1 +1 1+1 +1 decimal point 1 + 5
.......... 24 ................................... 24
The component on the right-hand side of the decimal point 1 + 5 = 6 reminds me of M -Theory five maths unified by one math making six maths.
You may sense that my focus is oriented towards the idea that Dark energy is a deeper mechanical implicate order responsible for Hosting energy and mass linked to the atomic level of the universe's operation. Basically, I am searching for a hidden implicit in math. A third implicate math that I suspect involves Cosmic foam energy with mass that pop's in and out of existence continuously.
My model goes a little deeper and ends at a thirteen-point structure within the 0138 component of the dark energy number. If you study the book Gurdjieff: COSMIC SECRETS and work out for yourself this component I reveal after this paragraph.
From author Russell A. Smith and his Book Gurdjieff: COSMIC SECRETS.
page: 109
DO
TI
LA DO
..... TI .....
SO ..... .....
..... LA DO
FA ..... ..... DO
..... ..... TI .....
MI SO ..... TI
..... ..... LA .....
RE ..... ..... ..... .....
..... FA ..... LA ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... TI .....
..... MI SO ..... ..... TI
DO ..... ..... SO ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... LA ..... DO
TI RE ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI .....
..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... ..... DO
..... ..... MI ..... SO ...... ...... TI .....
LA DO ..... MI ..... SO ..... ..... TI
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO
..... TI RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI .....
SO ..... ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... LA ...... ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... MI ..... SO ..... ..... ..... TI .....
..... LA DO ..... ..... MI ..... SO ..... ..... ..... TI
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO
FA ..... ..... DO ..... ..... ..... ..... SO ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... TI ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ...... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI .....
MI SO ..... TI ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... MI ..... ..... SO ..... ..... ..... TI .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... DO
..... ..... LA ..... DO ..... ..... MI ...... ...... SO ..... ..... ..... TI .....
RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... ..... DO
..... FA ..... LA ..... DO ..... ..... MI ..... ..... SO ..... ..... ..... TI .....
..... ..... ..... ..... TI ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... TI .....
..... MI SO ..... ..... TI ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... FA ..... ..... ..... LA ..... ..... ..... DO
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... MI ..... SO ..... ..... ..... ..... .... TI .....
DO ..... ..... SO ..... ..... ..... RE ..... ..... ..... ...... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
That do you note?
If you count all the DO RE MI FA SO LA TI
The count is 121 one short of 122 the one hundred and twenty-two count of zeros in the dark energy number. What remains is one zero and a one three eight. If we continue our lateral think process, we can think of the 0 1 3 8 as thirteen zeros and now we can view two patterns of zeros a thirteen pattern and a pattern of 121 zeros.
My thinking is. Because we live in a three-dimensional world the thirteen maybe linked to a Cartesian plane with an X, Y, Z three-dimensional lattice. This thirteen point model with a zero at the centre and two points each side of the zero in the X plain and Y plane and the Z plane evenly spaced apart could be thought of as like a latus like a quantum mechanical lates.
The electron cloud passes through the proton within the atom. So is it possible the nine energies that make possible the expressions of human personality stem from the atoms that makeup the human body. I suspect our quantum biology is very complex.
Question... could these blank spaces be linked to the nine energies the nine points of the Enneagram model?
# + # + # + # + # + # + # + # + # = 9
S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7
# , P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7
# , # , D3, D4, D6, D6, #
# , # , # , F4, F5, # , #
Your device is spying on you and collects data to include your conversations and keylogging.
I get ads in Spanish and am whiter than anyone
Holy shit thanks, there's no way I'd read this without a TTS
I own the book, and yeah its difficult. The TTS helps me get exposure to the information, and I think that it helps me with my reading down the road.
Mind blowing and well read and uses Terrence McKenna’s ideas about language and reality
Only video on YT i have to slow down instead of speed up
maybe not the only one ;-)
Thanks this really helped me get to sleep. Nearly a 4 hour word salad.
Walter Russell:
If i had one word to describe nature: balance
Two words: variant balance
Three words: rythmic variant balance
my interpretation of the ctmu, is that everyting in reality is"saying":
i seem to be a verb: interacting, processing, no nouns anywhere, never met a noun yet
Robert Anton Wilson on Bucky Fuller
dammit, wish i had a prize for you; well, i do have a prize but you may not like it, tiss@@bipolargamechanger
The noun is reality as a whole. That's what makes it a "global operator descriptor" and a primary identity operator, of which there is only one. However, it defines itself internally, making it variegated within it's internal stratifications (and the various "quanta" within it can also be identified as static "objects", but special kinds of objects, obviously).
It’s gives a deeper meaning to the understanding of the logos
Couldn't agree more.
Having read this very, very slowly dozens of times, it is quite fun to be able to understand it at full speed here. Very good job reading a text that is difficult to read.
Its a text to speech computer program!
@@Ghanzo Really? Are you sure? The pronunciation is a bit variable (I know it says this at the top, but not sure how the variation would happen). In any case, it is fantastic.
@@konberner170 yes I was the one who ran it through the program. Have you heard of gpt4? OpenAI the company that made that has some other services as well, one of them is a text to speech. By using a program that communicates with their api you can turn any text into a voice. It is indeed amazing how far its come.
@@Ghanzo My Nephew works as one of the top 5 guys at OpenAI, but I had not heard of this text to speech product. Amazing stuff. For a real challenge, I wonder how it could to on Nietzsche's _Beyond Good and Evil_ ?
@@konberner170 its not free, I think this cost me around 3 dollars, but Im sure it would do great
I read this and came.
Another book for those who enjoy this one is Matthieu Pageau’s “The Language of Creation”
I am greatful and enjoy listening. It's great love the depth and challenge of thought. Thank you.
54:08 To which Buddhists and Vedantans and Non-Dualists everywhere said: Yes! The difference between real and unreal is illusory!
Man🙏So, So thankful for this
I was trying to hear My Big TOE of Mr Tom Campbell
But no lock
But this.. Wow
Just found that the only way l can absorb and truly comprehend this book content,
Is Staying super relaxed almost asleep, with earphones
At very low volume,
And feeling that lm taking the shape of every word..
I can not explain how deep is the knowledge that Mr Langan share to Humanity..
My deepest thanks “
Glad you're enjoying! I've found in the past that listening to audiobooks multiple times, even when not understanding, eventually helps develop an understanding
@ on it! ❤️
Official Answer: "Why not convey this in a simpler way?"
#1- Model:
Syntactically and semantically valid and well formed. Computer science considers this the most basic requirement for programming.
#2- Language:
Sinvariant construction overall makes the theoretic conveyance self-recursive and closed.
#3- Words:
Specifically used and intentional the lofty and cranial lexicon employed arent just to sound smart. They must be and cannot be otherwise because they are Universally Descriptive nomological covariant.
Those are the 3 requirements of a supertautology.
Universal - Closed - Consistent
Robert anton wilson paraphrased:
interacting processing; i can only tune in interacting processing;
not only do i seem to be a verb, but the whole scenario universe seems to be a verb... i see no nouns, only verbs, non simultaneously apprehended
So there's the ultimate Telon or highest in which all other telons like us (I'm gonna butcher the spelling) come from and this is a type of telonicity (I'm gonna butcher words altogether) where is the teletinivity scales up into the one ultimate telon. Thus we find out identity in the ulitmate telon. Thus, we represent the whole like a fractual? And we can even see this play out like a language? For instance the scaling up turns the tree into a forrest and a forrest into an eccosystem etc the higher you scale up? Like it scales up into oneness. Oh That makes a lot of sense.
Edited to add more ideas.
wow thats so smart... zzz
my only question is why is chris making this so hard to understand he could be using simple words
Because if he used simple words, then it would become clear that his conclusions don’t follow from his premises.
Great! O I'm an analytic idealist. I'm familiar with pancomputationalism, And most of the configurations of pantheism, from the begining ,this sounds like interesting and penetrating analysis.
That's still what she said\lol....fix your grammar.
Just beginning listening and this appears compatible with the informational lattice of Information Theory, the Syntergic Theory of Jacobo Grinberg, Wolfgang Pauli’s Pauli Matrices, and Carl Jung’s collective unconscious. Excited to hear more about neural correlates of (individual and cosmic) consciousness! Thanks for sharing. 👏
Shades of sentient AI models….
Would like to hear Eric and Bret Weinstein ‘s review of this.
I was recently watching a youtube space channel I rather enjoy, and they were talking about some post-Big Bang era before there were even atoms or photons - and they actually said it "lasted 340,000 years". even I was like well that's just bullshit how could you even begin to measure time without light or matter?
These modern mathematical physicists do not comprehend creation's beginning exists in a timeless, eternal state: intelligent infinity which birthed intelligent energy. Parts of galaxies exist still in this manner (think: center).
See The Ra Material.
Thank you!!!
I get the gist of it, but riddle me this, if so much thought, mental sight, and effort went into writing the book , why no effort or thought to simply convey the concept using simple metaphors alongside the formal descriptions
This is the formal work. I agree a simplification is desireable tho
It can’t be expressed in a TH-cam comment as brief as this one must be but the gravitational force of Langan’s explanation of explanation will be and in fact is felt by posterity for generations onward. What humanity needs now is an answer to the heart, for the mind is now satisfied. Man’s heart is too broken to appreciate this knowledge at the moment. This must and will be addressed by Its own will helped by the will of God.
@@jeffreyjdesir I get that the point of the CTMU and Chris is to remove irrational thought by providing a thorough logical proof of god and so eliminate the need for faith and the bloodshed that comes with it, but you still have to be careful for it not to become a cult built of worship or the framework of the CTMU will yield the same level or war and suffering as other irrational religions
@@STONECOLDET944 true, we can attribute superior value to anything and typically the more abstract the more justified we feel in killing each other over it (ideals, conceptions of God, class, race, etc)...fortunately coherent language itself provides the means of balance as a bonus to being also the answer. This is indeed a foundation for conceptuslizing world peace but we must remember the world consists of higher order telors made in the image of God who deserve our love and prosperity.
@jeffreyjdesir consider this hypothetically, let's say hypothetically that these higher order telors that you might consider to be " Angels " did explicitly and provably make contact with us, if then again hypothetically that love is what they hold most value in, then how would that be compatible for us? Almost all high intelligence relationships are monogamous so how could a higher order telor have an essentially polygamous relationship with people and have that be beneficial for us ? Considering consciousness is a scale, so is the emotional complexity of an entity, the more intelligent and concious a entity is, the more monogamous it is, so if you project that onto a people's hypothetically explicit provable relationship with these telors, it mirrors the vast amount of psychological problems that come with person to person everyday relationships, so proving and communicating with God and these higher order telors , might exacerbate chaos and suffering in the world.
Huh?
My kind of vocabulary.
I wish Chuck Missler was around to hear this and comment on it (a.k.a. dumb it down for me haha)
Along side Chuck, The
Pageau brothers (Eastern Orthodox) are great thinkers to further understand Chris Langan's theory of everything because a lot of it sounds a lot like the Church fathers like Gregory of Nissa, Maximus the Confessor and even people like Dante.
Mensa IQ 'High Average' range ( 2016 ).
I’m fucking stupid
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤♾️
4:04
4:48 not completely correct
9:00 Lars of nature a language
10:35 good statement.
16:22
Incorrect and incredibly unoriginal.
Could you please tell me about your unified theory of mind and matter please?
I broke my brain. 😂🫠