The MOST USED Wildlife Filmmaking Ultra-Telephoto Lens!! | Canon CN20x50 50-1000mm
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 มิ.ย. 2024
- 💭 Comment - Let us know what you think of the Canon CN20 down below!
📦 Order here - buff.ly/3xAukXF
🔔 Subscribe - buff.ly/2ymYMJQ
---------------------------------------------------
Product Links:
Home Page - buff.ly/2W2OIlx
Canon CN20 - buff.ly/3xAukXF
Denz Handle - buff.ly/3tHNaLv
Tiffen 127mm Clear - buff.ly/3Hy3HYk
Canon 127mm Clear - buff.ly/3xwrZgG
Canon Site - buff.ly/39sTzDk
CVP Canon Content - buff.ly/3bMYVaD
Canon CN20 Videos
1 - buff.ly/3nd0i7X
2 - buff.ly/3xwrYJE
3 - buff.ly/3mSvSY7
---------------------------------------------------
Piece To Camera Kit:
Canon C200 (PTC) - buff.ly/3sqTgOI
Sigma Art 50mm f/1.4 EF - buff.ly/3vXM1zy
Sennheiser MKE 600 - buff.ly/3k4GYHE
CueScript EMC15 Teleprompter - buff.ly/3cVRWxj
Sachtler Ace XL Tripod System - buff.ly/3sIoTDm
Aputure 200D - buff.ly/3m9i0cY
Aputure Light Dome II - buff.ly/37OyU8e
Amaran P60c - buff.ly/3w2zbjl
Studio / B-Roll Kit:
RED KOMODO - buff.ly/3vSdZMY
Sachtler Video 18 S2 - buff.ly/3yV1tNr
Zeiss Otus EF Set - 28, 55, 85 - buff.ly/3gaMHuC
Zeiss Milvus 100mm - buff.ly/3CMYFUO
Aputure 600D Pro - buff.ly/3AMP5zw
Litepanels Gemini 1x1 Soft - buff.ly/3jUsbze
Aputure LS 60x - buff.ly/3mpG1wg
Quasar Science Rainbow 2 Linear - buff.ly/3CPyJbJ
Quasar Science Double Rainbow Linear - buff.ly/3u4j5Ff
---------------------------------------------------
Follow us on:
/ cvptv
/ cvpgroup
/ cvpgroup
/ jakerratcliffe
/ joefcannon
---------------------------------------------------
Chapters:
Intro - 00:00
The Zoom Range - 00:32
The Form Factor - 02:13
The Operation - 02:55
The Image Quality - 04:50
Context - 06:52
Outro - 07:35
#CN20 #20xZoom #CinemaZoom - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
Just got one for Father’s Day. My kids sold lemonade for 40 years.
On a serious note I’d love to get this lens one day. Right now my sigma 150-600 with 2x teleconverter will have to do.
First time I saw this lens was when a BBC crew was filming a nature show in my local stomping grounds. They had it on every time I ran into them over a month long period. I remember looking the lens price up when I got home and it was about $70,000 USD. Then I added up the price of the lens, the RED camera , their tripod system and all the accessories. Had to be at least $125,000 - $150,000 setup they had on various sticks and shooting for 8 hours a day or more. They also used a $400,000 remote controlled camera head on a large gimbal / jib on a boat. All of this and a crew for a month....to shoot ONE episode of a series. So yes it's true, it's very expensive to shoot high quality nature programs.
Always thought of this lens as outrageously expensive but your review of it made me think of it in a very different light.
It is expensive but really there’s nothing else really like it! Hell of a technical achievement from Canon. Thanks for watching, Jake
Great video, thank you so much 🙏 . A camera system of dreams for wildlife filmmakers, a dream that can never come true for me. But at least it's so great that other wildlife filmmakers are using this system to show people in high resolution details and fascination of beautiful animals live on earth.
Suuuper interesting review of such an amazing lens 👌🏼
This lens is the real deal ! 👍 Total Perfection ! 👍
Great lens for special productions! We actually bought one from CVP back in the day, and we have it for rental! Located in Budapest, Hungary.
What a cool lens! Thanks for covering it!
Thanks for watching Ben! Jake
Very good Ttelephoto lens. Thanks!
sounds great. Ill take 3.
Great video and what a great lens! Thanks for sharing - and what a huge price googling now it’s about £65,000 may be a great one to rent
Ahh, another lens I can TOTALLY AFFORD
That is a beast.
Thank you for sharing.
Be lucky stay safe, keep cool
Thanks for watching Will, you too. Jake
A roll looks very contrasts today for some reason! Not sure if testing a new camera or something. Great review though!
I love your reviews
Thanks for watching Adam! Jake
Wow! Awesome lens… I’ll take two please :)
Looking for the length of the 19mm rod that is holding up the lens
WANTTTTTTTT
How much is full set? Lens, servo, tripod, head, handle, sony body?
which b4 lens does it compare to?
In comparison, the resolution of Sony 200-600 and Sigma 60-600 was much better.
I'm in the market for a minimalist camcorder that's compatible with the CN20x50, 50-1000. Does anybody have any suggestions? Maybe not technically minimalist, just smaller.
Focus breathing is pretty catastrophic though and can be annoying sometimes… but yeah consider the amount of engineering went in to this lens it’s pretty much forgiven.
Which Miller tripod head was being used in the video?
Interesting setup and yes the CN20 is heavy
Hey Phil, It was this setup - cvp.com/product/miller_2090 Jake
@@CVPTV thanks always good to know with lenses like this
There's a Behind the Scenes clip from the BBC's Seven Worlds One Planet where a camera op has this lens as part of his rig, and he has to evade a charging elephant seal with it.
Similarly, there’s a doc on Netflix about their production of ‘Our Planet’ where you see an operator and his assistant trudging through the jungle with this lens on an F55.
Its insane what situations these lenses have been in
Any plans on reviewing the Sony Venice 2?
Yeah it’s on our list, but don’t have an ETA yet. Jake
It's not the Nikon 300mm f2.0?
The Canon website lists this lens specifically as a 4k optical resolution lens. Will this resolve 8k on a V-Raptor Rhino or 6k on a Venice 2 or V-Raptor?
yeah, productions have been using these with 8k reds for a while
03:36 I can't believe that handle is £560
then you should check the price of Nikon Z400 f2.8 lens hood price.
@@JaspreetSinghArtist LOL 600 quid for a lens hood
@@JaspreetSinghArtistFeel like I am in The Truman Show
You should see the lens price ......
Cool lens, sure its all good. But I find anything past the 200mm range, and those heat waves really effect the image quality. Now mind you, your not using this lens to check things out miles away, I get that. But this does seem like a lot of lens then what I would think would be necessary. I'd probably trade some of the reach for speed.
the heat waves you're talking about is something that can't be fixed. it's an outside factor. so I don't understand why you includes that in your complain.
@@iamwisdomsky I was using heat waves as a generic example of all the optical distortions that come with shooting something far away. The most expensive glass in the world, as you also put, cant fix that. So why pay urber amounts of money for a lens that wont do you any better?
Now I'm aware there are other applications for such a lens, like in sports broadcasting. Getting those close ups of athletes in a relatively small distance relative to the inside of a sporting arena is good.
So I'm not saying this lens has no place, however there might be better lens out there for any specific task then this one.
Yep 50-1000 probably makes more sense as a full frame focal range. Unless you’re talking about smaller objects which are less affected by atmospheric distortion by virtue of being closer
@@chrisklugh 200mm is awfully short. I've never had an issue with it.
@@benjaminmesa1089 Oh, more then agree for wildlife. I find the class 600mm good. By anything past that has rapidly depreciating returns on what you get out of it.
Remember. If you want 2x more reach on 600mm, you need 1200mm lens which would literally be twice the size of a lens with a huge price tag. Its better to go with a higher resolution camera and crop in. :)
Yo its been two weeks fam. Where is the Fuji XH2s video. I've been constantly refreshing the page every single day for that review.
Waiting for Fuji to send us a full production camera so we can finish the review off. Thanks, Jake
@@CVPTV damn they still haven't sent it? Crazy. I'll be on the lookout.
Just need to win the lottery 😢
cool, any pool man edition of this? not all the way down to bridge camera.
Barry Lyndon has entered the chat.
And I thought lenses were expensive… look at the price of that fluid head 😮
the main downside of this lens might be the soft images in the tele end
Thats not the lens, but how light/heat and air works when seen through large distances with a zoom, this can change alot regards to temperature, humidity, fog, pollution etc etc.
We can probably fly that on the movi, no?
Why I first joined CVP I was part of some testing with a dp who was balancing this with a Weapon on an ARRI maxim on a back arm attached to a Sledge for him to use in the arctic! Was an insane rig! Jake
Oh, go on, someone post the typical price ......
They are about £50,000. Jake
Too expensive.. I just use a 300 mm nikon prime for my E2 M4. And with a 2x converter, I get 1200 mm equivalent. Looks great, it's cheap for wildlife and it's F2.8.
It's not 2.8 with the 2x converter on it, and it's not a zoom
@@counterfit5 true. But who needs a zoom? Most wildlife is far away over here at all times. I now use a sigma 800 mm f5.6. Got it for 2000 euros, as good as new!
300mm 2.8 + 2x teleconverter= 600mm F 5.6, but the IQ is already soft on a full frame camera, i can't even imagine how it is on a MFT sensor.
@@pierrevilley6675 It's sharp, thanks to those old 300 mm ED glass nikkor lenses from the 80's. So good! 🙂
@@TimsWildlife Hi Tim, filming wildlife you know that they move around, so the zoom is a big plus for this lens especially with the the servo as it can be adjusted easily and quickly. I get that the prime lenses are great and offer superior image quality but are very restrictive (I use them myself), they don’t have the flexibility for story telling like this lens does. It’s nice to see that we can reach these lengths using more ‘affordable’ lenses and tele converters, but those most certainly aren’t the choice for all situations.