Completely forgot to mention in the video, but this guitar came with 9s and they just felt so stupidly slinky and unstable. Kinda played like shit. First thing I did was put on a set of D’Addario XS 11-49s, and the increased tension made this guitar play beautifully. I’d highly recommend higher gauge strings than you may be used to for shorter scale guitars like jags and mustangs. I’ve heard that Fender offsets in general are actually designed to be used with higher gauge strings, and I’ve heard/watched/had many occurrences of just going up 2-3 gauges in string size fixing a majority of “out of the box” problems. IMO kinda ridiculous Fender just puts 9s on everything, regardless of whether it serves the guitars function or not.
I agree that 9s on everything is ridiculous, for Strats and Teles I can understand it, but Offsets with the proper vibrato should come with 11-49s at the very least. Guild puts 11-49s on their guitars stock and the ones with JM style vibratos stay in tune beautifully right out of the box.
Yeah, that's ridiculous. The lightest set I'd use would be a 10-52, but usually I use 11-54s. You'd think Fender would take the minute to throw some decent gauge strings on their offsets so they actually feel and sound decent out of the box or off the wall.
I actually use 9’s on my mustang, but I also have years of experience setting guitars up. It is a unique little beast. Mine has the jazzmaster tremolo, roller bridge, and dual p90’s (yes actual p90’s, not jazzmaster pickups) but I did all the mods myself. In most cases though I agree, short scales often need thicker strings. The middle position is absolutely golden on it, a beautiful clean tone there
I honestly loved how messy and incontrollable the distortion tones sounded. Sure, needs a lot eq to remove some of the annoying frequencies that. But i love the raw vibe it brings
Always a pleasant surprise whenever you drop guitar reviews/demos. Also great intro demo, probably the best I've heard of your solo stuff from your vids tbh
I took advantage of my switches and rhythm circuit. The rhythm circuit "hears" all pickup combinations, and it gives me the choice of brighter or darker tones for my selection. The pickup selector switches are changed to double-throw switches and put the pickups in series when they're both in the down position. the "choke' switch is a phase switch for the bridge pickup, now. Lotsa tones.
@@HDD1234-h4oDanza Del Petrolero by Los Mirlos. This band called LA LOM has a cover on TH-cam that my version was based off of, highly recommended checking them out th-cam.com/video/CCVvkWhV_zE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=v-M871bxDRoG1G0I
@@thekipinator7660ha! Saw LA LOM live this year and heard the intro and thought “man, that’s giving LA LOM vibes big time….” So this was satisfying comment to see!
Having watched your vids before this calmer approach is much better. Have seen purists drag this guitar but props for actually buying it and giving a fair review. I dare say most jazz/jag players don’t use the rhythm switch. I personally really like it but don’t care if someone likes this style instead, more offset styles the better.
Agreed. This is a good thing if it means more people pick up offset guitars. The extra switches on Jazzmasters/Jaguars/Mustangs can be pretty intimidating for people.
@@silverman169agreed with this. My CME jazzmaster is perfect because I don’t like the rhythm circuit. The only “quirky” offset switching I like is the mustang. The out of phase is cool.
I love my squire jaguar 70s classic vibe. I love it for it's rhythm/lead to get a jazzy bass and it's strangle switch to get sweet crisp highs like a Spanish classical. I'm struggling to like those guitars. I feel Ike they should have named them something else? Not that they are bad, they just are not really a jaguar. Maybe they should call them panthers or cheetahs
How does the neck feel? I need a Jaguar but tend to prefer the satin modern C. I’m not opposed to adding a rhythm circuit to a Player II but would rather it come stock.
i have one too. the neck got sticky on me after a year so i ended up using a green 3m dish sponge to make it faster. i love the shape and i have a disability that makes playing super painful. this is the only guitar i can play for more than an hour without pain. after a shim and setup it has the lowest action ive ever played in my life. flatter than you think it would be though!
@@denyel_ thanks for the tips. I prefer a chunky neck to the modern super thin ones. I think over time I'm going to try to get a bit of gloss off that neck and shim it up. It's perfectly playable now, just a basic glance. I can get the whammy spring to buzz a tiny bit playing bass e or f in rhythm going for super bass. I'm learning toward adding the bridge palm muting hardware to the bridge later too, and a bit of locktight to the bridge screws to be safe.
@@CJ-jh9ri The classic vibe necks are definitely not satin finish. And they can feel a bit sticky, especially in hot / humid weather. So if you don't like gloss necks, the Squier CV neck might not suit you. You might be better off with the Squier J Mascis Jazzmaster has a more of a satin neck C shaped neck, with jumbo frets, and that neck plays great. There's a bit less issues with the trem/tuning on that, that the Squier CV Jaguar. You could look at the previous Vintera Jaguars too. Can get them on sale, now the Vintera II are out, but I prefer the Vintera I Jaguars.
Nice job maestro! I also join the group that really enjoyed the “distorted“ sounds (VERY “Sorry Ma…” era Replacements noises - which I think were mostly P90 Les Paul noises) For my money, that thing could almost go into the paranormal phylum considering how they’ve configured it. Also, kudos on your choice of string gauge. I tend to use the scale length to choose how thick the wires are going to be. That’s what I have on my jag. Sadly, even though it doesn’t have the rhythm circuit, I feel any jag missing the “strangle switch” is missing out on the whole jag deal (high pass filter). For example, if you have say a Pog, a compressor, and some delay/verb seasoned to taste, you get a free Rickenbacker 12 string! Again, nice job !
I understand removing the rhythm circuit. The tone knob achieves the same sound. I do not understand removing the strangle switch. You need that one for sure, and at that point you might as well add the second parallel/series switch like the Marr Jaguar. Sadly the Squier CV Jaguars seem to have it right - Even if you want a "modern high performance" one! The Contemporary Jaguar is awesome. I actually like the Player II otherwise, I don't mind it looking like a Jazzmaster, but... I'd need the strangle added as a push/pull knob.
Get a CV Squier and upgrade the pups. I know nobody out there wants to show up with ‘Squier’ on the headstock, but i use my guitar for making music, so Idgaf 😂
If they added the additional plate and had a three way that did warm, normal, and bright it would have all of the basic jaguar tones without the messy switching.
Nice review/demo. "We Are Sex Bob-omb" was a nice surprise. I'm honestly pretty impressed with the clean/overdriven tones. They have that classic jangle, but sound like they'd cut through a mix really easily. I feel you on the aesthetics and "unnecessary" features, though. I picked up a used Kurt Cobain model like 10 years ago, and like how it retains more of the classic Jaguar look while swapping out the lower switches for a 3-way Gibson toggle. I just use that to flip between pickups, then keep my rhythm circuit dialed all the way down and use it as a kill switch. It's the best "Fender with humbuckers" guitar I've ever owned, but I still tend to prefer a Telecaster for clean single-coil sounds. Nice playing, too, btw.
I agree, I think the Kurt Cobain Jaguar is the perfect blending of modern appointments and vintage looks for a Jaguar. I just really really really wish it came in at LEAST one other color option. Would be a day one purchase for me if it came in another color, even a simple one like white.
Great playing. Right up my street! This is much more like your trad Jaguar than anything that Fender have been putting out for the same price point up until now. As you say, it lacks the extra switching and cool chrome stuff, but at least it's recognisably a Jaguar!
Honestly those distorted tones are excellent. Some people don’t like jazzmaster/jag sound. I love it for its percussive intensity the harder you play really comes out great.
Thanks for playing some nice clean tones. I'm a jazz player, no pedals. So, clean tones are what I'm looking for. Most guys are showing how they can riff through all their pedals and I can't tell a thing about the guitar. Very nice video. I think I'm gonna spend my money on one of these. It will be nice to play jazz on a guitar clear enough to heat all the notes.
Jags are known for being super bright and thin, the classic player special from the 2010s had super hot pick ups that were great with distortion, I guess these guitars are trying to pick up where those left off. Even the jazzmaster pick ups from that line were awesome, bands like whirr, superheaven, movements used those special classic players
I like that you chose the yellow. I like that you cuss because the music community on TH-cam has become too corporate and sterile. I would go with the Jazzmaster over the jag, but good vid man man. Well done.
Nice review, and examples. I have a modded 70s classic vibe. Q pickups, locking tuners, tremolo. It’s my favorite guitar right now. And yes the 9 gauge was ridiculous. 11s for me too Don’t use the rhythm circuit either
a 3 way toggle is so limiting for a jag. I love the rhythm circuit and i use the strangle switch regularly to sit in the mix better in jams. I also modded the wiring so when both PU switches are down they are put in series instead of off. Really thickens up the tone and gets a good volume boost to hit my overdrive harder. All that said, i really love the tones you are getting out of this one. Seems like its a great guitar. I can understand the appeal of having a streamlined Jag with more focus on build quality and comfortable playing.
Excellent review. Straight forward and balls honest. I think I'm gonna pick up a coral red one. And I'll probably do what I always do to Tele's..........swap in a 4 way switch for the in-series tone in the 4th position (very useful at gigs) WTF. It may even allay your concerns about the distortion sounds in that position. BTW, yeah on the 11s. Already use the DAddario XS 11-49 ones on all my electric guitars (hell, XS's on my mando and acoustics too)
I bought one and love it. Did you notice Fender moved the tremolo closer to the bridge for better string angle? Mustang bridge is also much nicer than the traditional Jag bridge. I miss the chrome on the upper pickguard, but oh well. Pick-ups are detailed and modern sounding, really like everything about this guitar.
hi you have just convinced me about this guitar so just ordered one same colour,that princetone amp your useing how you finding it i have the deluxe reverb blonde for 2 years now but to be honest bit worried if it gos wrong out of garrantee now,all the best to you.
@@michaelread3706 the Princeton is good, I’ve had a Tonemaster deluxe since 2019 that still performs well to this day, I don’t really have any worries of the longevity of the Tonemaster amps considering my personal experience with them
@@thekipinator7660 hi thanks for the reply thats all interesting i have heard some go wrong and thay cant be repaired not here in the uk anyway fender are not suplying the digital prossesors think thats bad for fender rearly,hope your still enjoying your jaguar im looking forward to getting mine this week,all the best.
Look into swapping the 3way to a 4way switch and you can put both pickups in series humbucking mode for a Les Paul Junior kind of vibe. Johnny Marr signature model has the 4-way switch and Telecasters use them a lot so you can find schematics either place.
Question. I have the same Surfeybear reverb unit. Do you prefer it to the Princeton's reverb? Was considering getting a Princeton or another low watt amp w/built in spring reverb as the Surfeybear takes up a ton of space on the pedalboard.
@@kevinkeith3530 if you want that brighter, more prominent spring reverb “drip” then the surfybear will triumph really any modern amp’s spring reverb. The spring reverb in my Princeton, Twin, and Deluxe is a bit dark and just barely has any of that “drip” to the point where it’s not really noticeable live. And that’s not to say it’s bad, it’s a good reverb, it’s just going to be a different sound that you can’t tweak. There’s a pedal from Source Audio called True Spring that is a compact digital spring reverb pedal that recreates the drip pretty well, I’d check one of those out if you want a more compact pedal. Ultimately if the SurfyBear reverb unit is the sound you’re looking for, I don’t think a Princetons reverb is really comparable to it. I’d still try it if you can, you might like it, it’s just darker and not as “surfy”
Pro tip! Buy the chrome plate for the jaguar rhythm switch without the ciruitry, just for the looks. And then use a chrome plate from the johnny marr switchable pickups selector chrome plate. This way you could change the look to the vintage original jaguar
Would be an awesome mod project! Unfortunately after disassembling this guitar, converting it to a traditional Jaguar requires an extensive amount of routing. Even the area where the current pickup selector switch is requires some additional routing to accommodate a Johnny Marr style switch. Would be a cool project tho! Just a little more work than I would want to do on a brand new guitar personally, hope to see if someone else does that on TH-cam sometime, I’d love to see the results.
@@AndyG_ Jaguars in general aren’t great for that kind of music. The jaguars Kurt played were heavily modified and had humbuckers, really nothing like any Jaguar you’ll find just off the shelf, other than his signature jag. The Vintera Modified Jaguar has humbuckers and is great for Nirvana, but they were discontinued last year, so you might have to scrounge the internet for used ones, but I highly recommend them they’re pretty good for the money
Not blocked, but this particular design hugs the bar a lot more snug. Hasn’t loosened up at all, and doesn’t scratch up the bar where it inserts. Not entirely sure what’s different about this exact tremolo design but it’s great, prefer it over the AVRI one at the moment.
I wound up making a Jaguar from parts, finishing it myself, as a lockdown project because I'd had so many bad experiences with bad fretwork on Squier Jags - but at the time, it was so hard to get a legit single coil Fender Jag for under a grand. If the Player II had been around a few years earlier, I wouldn't have bothered making my Jag. If I had to choose between vintage control plates + humbuckers, or the Player II without the plates but keeping the single coils...I'd go Player II all day, because the Player II has the essential pieces I care about: the single coil Jag pickups, the scale length, the trem. That's the core of the sound and feel I get when playing my Jag. That being said, personally, I *do* use the rhythm circuit and the strangle switch extensively in my playing, because I like having the onboard ability to change how my guitar is sitting in the mix. But based on my experience and the conversations I've had with other players, I think I'm in the minority - a number of Jag players never use those switches, or in some cases even tape them off. So I find it kinda funny hearing other folks (not you) complain about the missing switches on the Player II Jag, when the control setup on this model is what probably 95% of guitarists are used to using. Any idea on how the pickups in this Jag compare to the Pure Vintage '65 set? I've got the '65s in my Jag, and like you, I find that a number of higher-gain, more aggressive classic distortions don't play particularly well with this guitar. However, I can get a lovely, airy, even heavy crunch with Tubescreamer-style overdrives; I'm mostly using the Hardwire CM-2 with more mid-hump-y settings.
@@iankinzel the jag you can see me playing at 1:08 had pure vintage 65s in it, and while I sold it and can’t compare them side to side I would say these pickups are very very different. A lot warmer and kinda fat sounding. I eventually sold that other jag bc I just wasn’t happy with the sound, not to knock the 65s but they just weren’t for me, and just did not work with the sounds I needed for my band. I personally prefer these way better…but I prefer the look and feel of that other jag lol I mean it’s just so fucking badass looking, was just too expensive itself to be worth changing the pickups in. In my dream world I’d have that jag but with these player ii pickups in it instead.
@thekipinator7660 Yeah, my Jaguar with the 65s felt way too bright and way too low-output until (a) I got more comfortable using the controls, which a Jaguar really demands in a way other guitars don't; and (b) I built a couple make-shift wooden pickup mounts out of popsicle sticks so that I could set the pickups higher. That's really interesting to hear the difference on the Player II. Truth be told, I'm not too picky about tone - as long as something is well-built and reasonably articulate, I'll figure out how to play with what I've got. So by now, the way I play my Jag is based on the sound and feel of those 65s. But I would have been perfectly happy with a Player II like yours - and the sound is light years ahead of my experience with the Squier Jags.
@@iankinzel out of all of the Squier classic vibe models, the Jaguar has been consistently the weakest option as it tends have the worst qc, at least in my experience/opinion. I’ve personally never liked the pickups, and almost every example I’ve tried in stores desperately needed shimming, as the factory seems to have a hard time getting the neck pocket angle correct consistently. This comment section is filled with people telling me that the Squier classic vibe is better, and I just don’t agree. Sure it has the looks. But I don’t feel right recommending a product that requires work/fixing right out of the box. Easy work or not, I feel better off recommending someone a quality product rather than a project. And I’m sure some people get lucky with a good one and I’m glad, but I just wish there was a larger variety of options for jags in general compared to strats and teles, and right now I just personally feel this is the strongest option price/quality wise. Also I applaud you for having that mindset, of learning to work with what you have. Sometimes I feel like I get a new piece of gear and expect it to write songs for me, or just pump out the exact tones I want for me without really learning the piece of gear first, and I know a lot of musicians/gearheads fall into that often without really thinking about it. I’m sure your jag build is killer, and best of all it’s a one of a kind with an owner that took the time to get to know it and adapted to it. You sound like you have a great relationship with your instrument, which is more than most people make effort at doing
Break out a router and route the body so you can "upgrade" the controls to old school ones. Buy the chrome plates, etc., modify the pickguard to accomodate, and solder all the correct electronic parts into it and make it your own.
Almost nobody does point-blank distortion nowadays because hard clipping distortion on most circuits kill your mids (save for certain genres). High gain applications now typically involve stacking a bunch of low gain pedals with a Tube Screamer in between.
Quite confused by this Jag. I'm a Strat and Tele owner and some of the reasons I'd pick one of these up is, the shorter scale and rhythm circuit. Basically just having 2 strat pickups with a Tele three way switch seems like worst of all worlds. Is it just the offset vibe and shorter scale?
@@DanCThorpe it’s the shorter scale and offset body shape, and the vibrato unit, which has a very unique feel and smoothness, and because of its design it’s easy hold the whammy bar while you strum and play the entire time while staying very smooth, which opens a lot of doors for full chord vibrato embellishments in your playing
great video, your guitar looks Beautifull, the tones are pretty great..... the playability should be really good, 24 inches scale is so fun (I have a Duo sonic), probably istalling a dmazio hot rail on the bridge will help to convert that guitar into a perfect tool for giging, cheers bro!! (I think the best improvement was to change the bridge and to move it closer ot tremolo system....probably now is more stable than the player series I )
I don't know man the indie tones part sounds really good with some dirt on it. I don't know if it's your playing or what but your dirt sounds great dude.
Was torn between the yellow and the red (got the red). Miss the extra chrome but it's such a fun and likable instrument. I threw on some 10-52s and it feels better than the strings it shipped with. Thanks!
Great review. As you prove here these things sound and play really great. Have to be played to be believed. In person they’re way better than on paper. Head and shoulders better than the prior player. If I didn’t already have a classic vibe I’d very likely pick one of these up. Compared to the CV I think the Player 2 has better pickups and real rosewood neck and smoother trem. CV has all the switching on board though so in my book it gets the edge I can definitely see a lot of folks going for the player over the Vintera 2 though - imo the maple boards just don’t work and a lot of people would prefer the simpler switching of the P2
@@jessethetodd was super disappointed with the look of the new vintera ones, I agree the maple boards just do not work at all. I hope they do the Vintera Modified thing again, and offer an alternative Jaguar in some way
The Player line is basically Fender's equivalent of like, Squier's Affinity line or something (and Vintera/VII being like, the equivalent of the Classic Vibe). Stuff that's a bit more simplified down so that new players can jump in. I guess my real issue is that spending like, $300 for a decent but dumbed-down guitar for a beginner is fine; spending almost three times that for the same concept doesn't make much sense to me, but I'm not in marketing or brand strategy or any of that nonsense, so what do I know. I decided to just save up a bit more money and imported a Japanese Jaguar and got everything I wanted out of a Jaguar. That being said, that yellow is pretty rad, and the pickups don't sound all that bad.
@@tonytaormina4759 I just put on shoes and step on one end firmly while I pull really hard on the other end with my hand and bend it! Takes a couple tries to get it to bend right and it’s kinda caveman but it works! Most people just bend it really hard by hand, I’m not strong enough to do that but this method should work
I have Fender Player 1 jaguar from a few years ago and seems to be more universal with Bridge Humbucker pick up so it can fit to those grunge, punk and dirty fuzzy tones too with great sound evenly with melodic indie or soft sounds. This one player 2 I wouldn’t buy, I like to have more universal sound to easily switch to more heavy sounds.
@@dreamercross When the Jaguar was first designed, these were added to help “concentrate” the magnetic field of the pickup, reducing hum and resulting in a brighter more “focused” sound. They were thought to look like claws holding the pickups, which inspired the name of the guitar being the Jaguar
to me it sounds more like a jazzmaster, it lacks the agresiveness and sharpness of other jaguars but still sound great just different to the other jaguars
@@claesvanoldenphatt9972 my non-copyright take on “Danza Del Petrolero” by Los Mirlos! My cover is very similar to the cover by La Lom: th-cam.com/video/CCVvkWhV_zE/w-d-xo.html
Hypothetically I wonder if you could save money by starting with the Player II as your base model and swapping in some of the electronics it’s missing. Because it looks pretty sharp and clearly plays and sounds pretty good.
@@josephabrams3051 unfortunately the body isn’t routed for those missing electronics. I actually considered doing this, and the routing job by a pro would’ve been about $200, plus the costs of the new hardware and parts, and then the work of perfectly matching everything up. It’s definitely a doable project, but just a little too much for me to want to do with a new guitar. Doing modifications like these significantly plummet a product’s resale value too, which I rely on in order to try all the gear I try. Waiting for someone else on TH-cam to do it so I can watch tho!
It sounds pretty good. As cool as the OG style jag is, fender knows all those switches are not popular. I personally think they should have went with an LP style switch on the upper horn so it’s more out of the way though.
@@chainsawenthusiast you can find a Fender Blacktop Jaguar used pretty easily online which is exactly that, both on reverb and guitar center, usually between $400-600 used, and there’s also a limited edition Player Jaguar HH that was just discontinued this summer but can be found on reverb and sometimes guitar center used and brand new usually between $600-850ish
@@TheMarko086 I wouldn’t say one is better than the other, they just have very different applications they’re better at. I’d recommend this guitar if you’re mostly playing clean to overdriven, and the modified if you’re mostly playing overdriven and distorted. Clean tones are okay on the modified, but they’re definitely it’s weak point
I guess my only real question with this is... are the pickups comparable to that of a "real" Jaguar (I hate how elitist that sounds, but you get what I mean). Am i going to get that trebley, spanky, crisp, squishy and clear tone that Jaguars are known for? I honestly don't play very heavy music (i have a muff fuzz, but that only gets used when i feel like playing grunge), so that clean tone and the light drive tone has to be really good to justify getting one of these... Should I get one of these and then change the pickups to some higher end Fender Jaguar set? Or would that be a waste of money? Huge thanks if you answer because getting a "real" jaguar these days is a pain in the ass!
@@AlbinoTuxedo they’re noticeably fatter sounding than “real” jaguar pickups but I don’t think this should negatively affect their perceived sound/quality to Jaguar purists. These pickups should please really anyone, I wouldn’t recommend changing them out. And typically i find the pickups to be the weak point in a majority of the past player series models, especially the strats, but for this specific model i think they will please anyone!
Completely forgot to mention in the video, but this guitar came with 9s and they just felt so stupidly slinky and unstable. Kinda played like shit. First thing I did was put on a set of D’Addario XS 11-49s, and the increased tension made this guitar play beautifully. I’d highly recommend higher gauge strings than you may be used to for shorter scale guitars like jags and mustangs. I’ve heard that Fender offsets in general are actually designed to be used with higher gauge strings, and I’ve heard/watched/had many occurrences of just going up 2-3 gauges in string size fixing a majority of “out of the box” problems. IMO kinda ridiculous Fender just puts 9s on everything, regardless of whether it serves the guitars function or not.
I agree that 9s on everything is ridiculous, for Strats and Teles I can understand it, but Offsets with the proper vibrato should come with 11-49s at the very least.
Guild puts 11-49s on their guitars stock and the ones with JM style vibratos stay in tune beautifully right out of the box.
Putting 9’s on a short scale guitar should be a crime.
@@thekipinator7660 absolutely. Mine also came with 9s. Immediately swapped out for 11s.
Yeah, that's ridiculous. The lightest set I'd use would be a 10-52, but usually I use 11-54s.
You'd think Fender would take the minute to throw some decent gauge strings on their offsets so they actually feel and sound decent out of the box or off the wall.
I actually use 9’s on my mustang, but I also have years of experience setting guitars up. It is a unique little beast. Mine has the jazzmaster tremolo, roller bridge, and dual p90’s (yes actual p90’s, not jazzmaster pickups) but I did all the mods myself. In most cases though I agree, short scales often need thicker strings. The middle position is absolutely golden on it, a beautiful clean tone there
The most unhinged but honest review, thanks dude
Hitting us with the cumbia sicodelica!
More people need to hear it man, that stuff’s the shit!
I honestly loved how messy and incontrollable the distortion tones sounded. Sure, needs a lot eq to remove some of the annoying frequencies that. But i love the raw vibe it brings
Me too i like that sound
Always a pleasant surprise whenever you drop guitar reviews/demos. Also great intro demo, probably the best I've heard of your solo stuff from your vids tbh
I took advantage of my switches and rhythm circuit. The rhythm circuit "hears" all pickup combinations, and it gives me the choice of brighter or darker tones for my selection. The pickup selector switches are changed to double-throw switches and put the pickups in series when they're both in the down position. the "choke' switch is a phase switch for the bridge pickup, now. Lotsa tones.
That sounds pretty sweet. Did you mod those in or are they native features?
Amazing intro brother, would love to hear some Caifanes soon!! Cheers from Texas hermano :)
Caifanes is da best
Really solid review man, really appreciate it. Also as a funk player I'm really grateful for you throwing in some funk tones 🤘
Bet you didn’t expect to hear that shit as the intro
what song was that? your band? it sounded so cool
@@HDD1234-h4oDanza Del Petrolero by Los Mirlos. This band called LA LOM has a cover on TH-cam that my version was based off of, highly recommended checking them out
th-cam.com/video/CCVvkWhV_zE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=v-M871bxDRoG1G0I
Shit got me rock solid dude no lie solid chub
@@thekipinator7660 PERU MENTIONED!!!! MI PAÍS MI PAÍS
@@thekipinator7660ha! Saw LA LOM live this year and heard the intro and thought “man, that’s giving LA LOM vibes big time….” So this was satisfying comment to see!
Having watched your vids before this calmer approach is much better. Have seen purists drag this guitar but props for actually buying it and giving a fair review. I dare say most jazz/jag players don’t use the rhythm switch. I personally really like it but don’t care if someone likes this style instead, more offset styles the better.
Agreed. This is a good thing if it means more people pick up offset guitars. The extra switches on Jazzmasters/Jaguars/Mustangs can be pretty intimidating for people.
@@silverman169agreed with this. My CME jazzmaster is perfect because I don’t like the rhythm circuit. The only “quirky” offset switching I like is the mustang. The out of phase is cool.
Can confirm I have a jazzmaster and never use the rhythm switch
Have a Jaguar with humbuckers on my wish list. I have a 70’s Classic Vibe currently.
I love my squire jaguar 70s classic vibe. I love it for it's rhythm/lead to get a jazzy bass and it's strangle switch to get sweet crisp highs like a Spanish classical. I'm struggling to like those guitars. I feel Ike they should have named them something else? Not that they are bad, they just are not really a jaguar. Maybe they should call them panthers or cheetahs
How does the neck feel? I need a Jaguar but tend to prefer the satin modern C. I’m not opposed to adding a rhythm circuit to a Player II but would rather it come stock.
i have one too. the neck got sticky on me after a year so i ended up using a green 3m dish sponge to make it faster. i love the shape and i have a disability that makes playing super painful. this is the only guitar i can play for more than an hour without pain.
after a shim and setup it has the lowest action ive ever played in my life. flatter than you think it would be though!
@@denyel_ thanks for the tips. I prefer a chunky neck to the modern super thin ones. I think over time I'm going to try to get a bit of gloss off that neck and shim it up. It's perfectly playable now, just a basic glance. I can get the whammy spring to buzz a tiny bit playing bass e or f in rhythm going for super bass. I'm learning toward adding the bridge palm muting hardware to the bridge later too, and a bit of locktight to the bridge screws to be safe.
@@CJ-jh9ri The classic vibe necks are definitely not satin finish. And they can feel a bit sticky, especially in hot / humid weather. So if you don't like gloss necks, the Squier CV neck might not suit you. You might be better off with the Squier J Mascis Jazzmaster has a more of a satin neck C shaped neck, with jumbo frets, and that neck plays great. There's a bit less issues with the trem/tuning on that, that the Squier CV Jaguar. You could look at the previous Vintera Jaguars too. Can get them on sale, now the Vintera II are out, but I prefer the Vintera I Jaguars.
Best review I’ve seen in ages. Thanks for your honesty and input.
“don’t be a dick.” Words to live by. Good message, bro (not being sarcastic either).
The fact that your played Freaking Me Out by the Frights makes this the best demo out right now 🏄🏼♂️
Marc Ribot gets some lovely distorted tones out of his jag 👌
Jaguars have FANGS
Nice job maestro! I also join the group that really enjoyed the “distorted“ sounds (VERY “Sorry Ma…” era Replacements noises - which I think were mostly P90 Les Paul noises) For my money, that thing could almost go into the paranormal phylum considering how they’ve configured it.
Also, kudos on your choice of string gauge. I tend to use the scale length to choose how thick the wires are going to be. That’s what I have on my jag. Sadly, even though it doesn’t have the rhythm circuit, I feel any jag missing the “strangle switch” is missing out on the whole jag deal (high pass filter). For example, if you have say a Pog, a compressor, and some delay/verb seasoned to taste, you get a free Rickenbacker 12 string!
Again, nice job !
Cool review. Great color. I prefer the simplified specs. Time to jump on a Jag & JM for me.
I also like how minimalistic Jaguar looks without all metal parts and switches
That intro song is so fire
Anybody knows the name of the song?
Wonderful clean tones.
I understand removing the rhythm circuit. The tone knob achieves the same sound. I do not understand removing the strangle switch. You need that one for sure, and at that point you might as well add the second parallel/series switch like the Marr Jaguar.
Sadly the Squier CV Jaguars seem to have it right - Even if you want a "modern high performance" one! The Contemporary Jaguar is awesome.
I actually like the Player II otherwise, I don't mind it looking like a Jazzmaster, but... I'd need the strangle added as a push/pull knob.
Jazzmasters also have a rhythm circuit
@@TheloniousBosch The chrome
Get a CV Squier and upgrade the pups. I know nobody out there wants to show up with ‘Squier’ on the headstock, but i use my guitar for making music, so Idgaf 😂
If they added the additional plate and had a three way that did warm, normal, and bright it would have all of the basic jaguar tones without the messy switching.
Nice review/demo. "We Are Sex Bob-omb" was a nice surprise. I'm honestly pretty impressed with the clean/overdriven tones. They have that classic jangle, but sound like they'd cut through a mix really easily.
I feel you on the aesthetics and "unnecessary" features, though. I picked up a used Kurt Cobain model like 10 years ago, and like how it retains more of the classic Jaguar look while swapping out the lower switches for a 3-way Gibson toggle. I just use that to flip between pickups, then keep my rhythm circuit dialed all the way down and use it as a kill switch. It's the best "Fender with humbuckers" guitar I've ever owned, but I still tend to prefer a Telecaster for clean single-coil sounds.
Nice playing, too, btw.
I agree, I think the Kurt Cobain Jaguar is the perfect blending of modern appointments and vintage looks for a Jaguar. I just really really really wish it came in at LEAST one other color option. Would be a day one purchase for me if it came in another color, even a simple one like white.
Great playing. Right up my street! This is much more like your trad Jaguar than anything that Fender have been putting out for the same price point up until now. As you say, it lacks the extra switching and cool chrome stuff, but at least it's recognisably a Jaguar!
Honestly those distorted tones are excellent. Some people don’t like jazzmaster/jag sound. I love it for its percussive intensity the harder you play really comes out great.
sick playing in the beginning!
Great review!!!
Thanks for playing some nice clean tones. I'm a jazz player, no pedals. So, clean tones are what I'm looking for. Most guys are showing how they can riff through all their pedals and I can't tell a thing about the guitar. Very nice video. I think I'm gonna spend my money on one of these. It will be nice to play jazz on a guitar clear enough to heat all the notes.
Jags are known for being super bright and thin, the classic player special from the 2010s had super hot pick ups that were great with distortion, I guess these guitars are trying to pick up where those left off. Even the jazzmaster pick ups from that line were awesome, bands like whirr, superheaven, movements used those special classic players
Hialeleahma-lelalalealealeah yellow
I call it Banana Cream
I like that you chose the yellow. I like that you cuss because the music community on TH-cam has become too corporate and sterile. I would go with the Jazzmaster over the jag, but good vid man man. Well done.
Man, your clean tones are sweet! Maybe try backing the tone off on the distorted tones to get it a little more "meaty?"
I kinda like using the rhythm circuit on my Jazzmaster. I don't get why Fender would leave out a feature that makes Jags and JMs unique in that way.
I agree with the pick ups .Wish they had the rhythm circuit ,It`s what Jaguars are ,You play amazing young man,Most honest review on Player II Jags.
Nice review, and examples.
I have a modded 70s classic vibe.
Q pickups, locking tuners, tremolo. It’s my favorite guitar right now.
And yes the 9 gauge was ridiculous. 11s for me too
Don’t use the rhythm circuit either
A Jag without all the appointments is like a woman without lipstick, eyeliner and eyelashes.
My man just pulled out the frights and mt eddy for the demos… nice
@@rokomouth A+ for catching that
a 3 way toggle is so limiting for a jag. I love the rhythm circuit and i use the strangle switch regularly to sit in the mix better in jams. I also modded the wiring so when both PU switches are down they are put in series instead of off. Really thickens up the tone and gets a good volume boost to hit my overdrive harder.
All that said, i really love the tones you are getting out of this one. Seems like its a great guitar. I can understand the appeal of having a streamlined Jag with more focus on build quality and comfortable playing.
Excellent review. Straight forward and balls honest.
I think I'm gonna pick up a coral red one.
And I'll probably do what I always do to Tele's..........swap in a 4 way switch for the in-series tone in the 4th position (very useful at gigs)
WTF.
It may even allay your concerns about the distortion sounds in that position.
BTW, yeah on the 11s. Already use the DAddario XS 11-49 ones on all my electric guitars (hell, XS's on my mando and acoustics too)
love yo vids btw keep it up
Psychedelic Cumbia in the intro is INSANE
I really like the yellow. Some extra chrome would look better though. I wonder how it compares with the Vintera model or the Professional model?
I bought one and love it. Did you notice Fender moved the tremolo closer to the bridge for better string angle? Mustang bridge is also much nicer than the traditional Jag bridge. I miss the chrome on the upper pickguard, but oh well. Pick-ups are detailed and modern sounding, really like everything about this guitar.
hi you have just convinced me about this guitar so just ordered one same colour,that princetone amp your useing how you finding it i have the deluxe reverb blonde for 2 years now but to be honest bit worried if it gos wrong out of garrantee now,all the best to you.
@@michaelread3706 the Princeton is good, I’ve had a Tonemaster deluxe since 2019 that still performs well to this day, I don’t really have any worries of the longevity of the Tonemaster amps considering my personal experience with them
@@thekipinator7660 hi thanks for the reply thats all interesting i have heard some go wrong and thay cant be repaired not here in the uk anyway fender are not suplying the digital prossesors think thats bad for fender rearly,hope your still enjoying your jaguar im looking forward to getting mine this week,all the best.
does the trem bar affect the sound when bending since its in between the strings planning to buy..
@@outcast6103 Not at all because it’s located behind the bridge.
Look into swapping the 3way to a 4way switch and you can put both pickups in series humbucking mode for a Les Paul Junior kind of vibe. Johnny Marr signature model has the 4-way switch and Telecasters use them a lot so you can find schematics either place.
How's the neck. did it need leveling and crowning, or does it play well out of the box?
@@ronc1231 nope very well dressed and edges are rolled
im so fucking bummed this doesnt sound good distorted. it checks all my other boxes, plus it looks gorgeous.
Spot on!!!! The Jazzmaster is also best for clean tones.
Yo is that Scott Pilgrim music in the distorted tones
@@sanfran216 yes
I find your funky tone great. You get it only with the amp set up?
Where do i get that shirt?
Question. I have the same Surfeybear reverb unit. Do you prefer it to the Princeton's reverb? Was considering getting a Princeton or another low watt amp w/built in spring reverb as the Surfeybear takes up a ton of space on the pedalboard.
@@kevinkeith3530 if you want that brighter, more prominent spring reverb “drip” then the surfybear will triumph really any modern amp’s spring reverb. The spring reverb in my Princeton, Twin, and Deluxe is a bit dark and just barely has any of that “drip” to the point where it’s not really noticeable live. And that’s not to say it’s bad, it’s a good reverb, it’s just going to be a different sound that you can’t tweak. There’s a pedal from Source Audio called True Spring that is a compact digital spring reverb pedal that recreates the drip pretty well, I’d check one of those out if you want a more compact pedal. Ultimately if the SurfyBear reverb unit is the sound you’re looking for, I don’t think a Princetons reverb is really comparable to it. I’d still try it if you can, you might like it, it’s just darker and not as “surfy”
Pro tip! Buy the chrome plate for the jaguar rhythm switch without the ciruitry, just for the looks. And then use a chrome plate from the johnny marr switchable pickups selector chrome plate. This way you could change the look to the vintage original jaguar
That's a sick idea actually. Could probably get away with buying a johnny Marr pick guard replacement and adding the chrome
This body doesn't have any routing on the upper bout so you wouldn't be able to put the switch or wheels in.
Would be an awesome mod project! Unfortunately after disassembling this guitar, converting it to a traditional Jaguar requires an extensive amount of routing. Even the area where the current pickup selector switch is requires some additional routing to accommodate a Johnny Marr style switch. Would be a cool project tho! Just a little more work than I would want to do on a brand new guitar personally, hope to see if someone else does that on TH-cam sometime, I’d love to see the results.
Lovely demo
I bought my jaguar and I absolutely love it
I subscribed because you said, ‘I bought the guitar with my own money and I’ll say whatever the fuck I want’. Legend ✌️ from Australia 🇦🇺
So do any Jaguars play nirvana well or is it just this player 2 model that's not great for it?
@@AndyG_ Jaguars in general aren’t great for that kind of music. The jaguars Kurt played were heavily modified and had humbuckers, really nothing like any Jaguar you’ll find just off the shelf, other than his signature jag. The Vintera Modified Jaguar has humbuckers and is great for Nirvana, but they were discontinued last year, so you might have to scrounge the internet for used ones, but I highly recommend them they’re pretty good for the money
playing is top notche!
Great video man!
The trem bar is blocked like in the Johnny Marr jag? I had three jaguars, and trem used to move in ll of them.
Not blocked, but this particular design hugs the bar a lot more snug. Hasn’t loosened up at all, and doesn’t scratch up the bar where it inserts. Not entirely sure what’s different about this exact tremolo design but it’s great, prefer it over the AVRI one at the moment.
I wound up making a Jaguar from parts, finishing it myself, as a lockdown project because I'd had so many bad experiences with bad fretwork on Squier Jags - but at the time, it was so hard to get a legit single coil Fender Jag for under a grand.
If the Player II had been around a few years earlier, I wouldn't have bothered making my Jag. If I had to choose between vintage control plates + humbuckers, or the Player II without the plates but keeping the single coils...I'd go Player II all day, because the Player II has the essential pieces I care about: the single coil Jag pickups, the scale length, the trem. That's the core of the sound and feel I get when playing my Jag.
That being said, personally, I *do* use the rhythm circuit and the strangle switch extensively in my playing, because I like having the onboard ability to change how my guitar is sitting in the mix. But based on my experience and the conversations I've had with other players, I think I'm in the minority - a number of Jag players never use those switches, or in some cases even tape them off. So I find it kinda funny hearing other folks (not you) complain about the missing switches on the Player II Jag, when the control setup on this model is what probably 95% of guitarists are used to using.
Any idea on how the pickups in this Jag compare to the Pure Vintage '65 set? I've got the '65s in my Jag, and like you, I find that a number of higher-gain, more aggressive classic distortions don't play particularly well with this guitar. However, I can get a lovely, airy, even heavy crunch with Tubescreamer-style overdrives; I'm mostly using the Hardwire CM-2 with more mid-hump-y settings.
@@iankinzel the jag you can see me playing at 1:08 had pure vintage 65s in it, and while I sold it and can’t compare them side to side I would say these pickups are very very different. A lot warmer and kinda fat sounding. I eventually sold that other jag bc I just wasn’t happy with the sound, not to knock the 65s but they just weren’t for me, and just did not work with the sounds I needed for my band. I personally prefer these way better…but I prefer the look and feel of that other jag lol I mean it’s just so fucking badass looking, was just too expensive itself to be worth changing the pickups in. In my dream world I’d have that jag but with these player ii pickups in it instead.
@thekipinator7660 Yeah, my Jaguar with the 65s felt way too bright and way too low-output until (a) I got more comfortable using the controls, which a Jaguar really demands in a way other guitars don't; and (b) I built a couple make-shift wooden pickup mounts out of popsicle sticks so that I could set the pickups higher.
That's really interesting to hear the difference on the Player II. Truth be told, I'm not too picky about tone - as long as something is well-built and reasonably articulate, I'll figure out how to play with what I've got. So by now, the way I play my Jag is based on the sound and feel of those 65s. But I would have been perfectly happy with a Player II like yours - and the sound is light years ahead of my experience with the Squier Jags.
@@iankinzel out of all of the Squier classic vibe models, the Jaguar has been consistently the weakest option as it tends have the worst qc, at least in my experience/opinion. I’ve personally never liked the pickups, and almost every example I’ve tried in stores
desperately needed shimming, as the factory seems to have a hard time getting the neck pocket angle correct consistently. This comment section is filled with people telling me that the Squier classic vibe is better, and I just don’t agree. Sure it has the looks. But I don’t feel right recommending a product that requires work/fixing right out of the box. Easy work or not, I feel better off recommending someone a quality product rather than a project. And I’m sure some people get lucky with a good one and I’m glad, but I just wish there was a larger variety of options for jags in general compared to strats and teles, and right now I just personally feel this is the strongest option price/quality wise.
Also I applaud you for having that mindset, of learning to work with what you have. Sometimes I feel like I get a new piece of gear and expect it to write songs for me, or just pump out the exact tones I want for me without really learning the piece of gear first, and I know a lot of musicians/gearheads fall into that often without really thinking about it. I’m sure your jag build is killer, and best of all it’s a one of a kind with an owner that took the time to get to know it and adapted to it. You sound like you have a great relationship with your instrument, which is more than most people make effort at doing
Break out a router and route the body so you can "upgrade" the controls to old school ones. Buy the chrome plates, etc., modify the pickguard to accomodate, and solder all the correct electronic parts into it and make it your own.
Better than the last player offsets, it actually has the correct pickups this time
I like my Player II Jaguar. I don't need the fancy doohickies, I need it to have Jaguar sound and the shorter radius!
Almost nobody does point-blank distortion nowadays because hard clipping distortion on most circuits kill your mids (save for certain genres). High gain applications now typically involve stacking a bunch of low gain pedals with a Tube Screamer in between.
Quite confused by this Jag. I'm a Strat and Tele owner and some of the reasons I'd pick one of these up is, the shorter scale and rhythm circuit. Basically just having 2 strat pickups with a Tele three way switch seems like worst of all worlds. Is it just the offset vibe and shorter scale?
@@DanCThorpe it’s the shorter scale and offset body shape, and the vibrato unit, which has a very unique feel and smoothness, and because of its design it’s easy hold the whammy bar while you strum and play the entire time while staying very smooth, which opens a lot of doors for full chord vibrato embellishments in your playing
great video, your guitar looks Beautifull, the tones are pretty great..... the playability should be really good, 24 inches scale is so fun (I have a Duo sonic), probably istalling a dmazio hot rail on the bridge will help to convert that guitar into a perfect tool for giging, cheers bro!! (I think the best improvement was to change the bridge and to move it closer ot tremolo system....probably now is more stable than the player series I )
great video as always
I don't know man the indie tones part sounds really good with some dirt on it. I don't know if it's your playing or what but your dirt sounds great dude.
I've been playing offset fenders for over 30 years and gotta say, Jaguars are stellar guitars for fuzz tone...
kickass intro!
Was torn between the yellow and the red (got the red). Miss the extra chrome but it's such a fun and likable instrument. I threw on some 10-52s and it feels better than the strings it shipped with. Thanks!
@@baodo_cake I’m debating switching this one for the red one! Can’t decide 😭
@ Tortoise shell pick guard? I like how they resemble 60s custom color guitars that were left out in the sun.
Great review. As you prove here these things sound and play really great. Have to be played to be believed. In person they’re way better than on paper. Head and shoulders better than the prior player. If I didn’t already have a classic vibe I’d very likely pick one of these up.
Compared to the CV I think the Player 2 has better pickups and real rosewood neck and smoother trem. CV has all the switching on board though so in my book it gets the edge
I can definitely see a lot of folks going for the player over the Vintera 2 though - imo the maple boards just don’t work and a lot of people would prefer the simpler switching of the P2
@@jessethetodd was super disappointed with the look of the new vintera ones, I agree the maple boards just do not work at all. I hope they do the Vintera Modified thing again, and offer an alternative Jaguar in some way
The Player line is basically Fender's equivalent of like, Squier's Affinity line or something (and Vintera/VII being like, the equivalent of the Classic Vibe). Stuff that's a bit more simplified down so that new players can jump in. I guess my real issue is that spending like, $300 for a decent but dumbed-down guitar for a beginner is fine; spending almost three times that for the same concept doesn't make much sense to me, but I'm not in marketing or brand strategy or any of that nonsense, so what do I know. I decided to just save up a bit more money and imported a Japanese Jaguar and got everything I wanted out of a Jaguar. That being said, that yellow is pretty rad, and the pickups don't sound all that bad.
Was that the frights during the surfy tone ?
@@joshzorrill6951 yes🙀
just remind that Sonic Youth usually stripped down most of their off sets, just to simplify
I'd give a jaguar a 25,5" scale length before removing the control plates. Those are 90% of why Jags are cool in the first place IMO
did you custom bend your trem arm?
@@tonytaormina4759 yes! Usually the first thing I do with offset trem arms
@@thekipinator7660 is there a guide you follow? What tools do you use? Sorry your bend just looked perfect so was curious
@@tonytaormina4759 I just put on shoes and step on one end firmly while I pull really hard on the other end with my hand and bend it! Takes a couple tries to get it to bend right and it’s kinda caveman but it works! Most people just bend it really hard by hand, I’m not strong enough to do that but this method should work
nice song for the clean demo. what song was that?
@@badcatz at 4:36 it’s a song my band and I are working on called Soft Drinks, unreleased at the moment!
I have Fender Player 1 jaguar from a few years ago and seems to be more universal with Bridge Humbucker pick up so it can fit to those grunge, punk and dirty fuzzy tones too with great sound evenly with melodic indie or soft sounds. This one player 2 I wouldn’t buy, I like to have more universal sound to easily switch to more heavy sounds.
why do the pickup covers have the metal thingies on the side?
@@dreamercross When the Jaguar was first designed, these were added to help “concentrate” the magnetic field of the pickup, reducing hum and resulting in a brighter more “focused” sound. They were thought to look like claws holding the pickups, which inspired the name of the guitar being the Jaguar
@@thekipinator7660 that's cool, thanks for sharing!
Why was the intro cumbia? 😭
too bad the moved the trem closer to the bridge. weight?
A little over 7 lbs, super light for a jag.
bad ass intro dude
I got a Squier Jaguar, because it is a Jaguar - would not buy one of these. The Squier has a real bone nut.
to me it sounds more like a jazzmaster, it lacks the agresiveness and sharpness of other jaguars but still sound great just different to the other jaguars
If you used a bright switch with old fuzz like a Dallas Arbiter it turns the fuzz into an overdrive tone. Save money for a two for one.
Wow what song is that? 0:28
It’s a mistake to pair the stripped Jag with a DS. A Fuzzface would be way better.
@@claesvanoldenphatt9972 my non-copyright take on “Danza Del Petrolero” by Los Mirlos! My cover is very similar to the cover by La Lom: th-cam.com/video/CCVvkWhV_zE/w-d-xo.html
Hypothetically I wonder if you could save money by starting with the Player II as your base model and swapping in some of the electronics it’s missing. Because it looks pretty sharp and clearly plays and sounds pretty good.
I love hot single coils I think it’s great there’s no humbuckers on there.
You save money on it by going with the color you got, too. Weird it’s more expensive for red or burst.
@@josephabrams3051 unfortunately the body isn’t routed for those missing electronics. I actually considered doing this, and the routing job by a pro would’ve been about $200, plus the costs of the new hardware and parts, and then the work of perfectly matching everything up. It’s definitely a doable project, but just a little too much for me to want to do with a new guitar. Doing modifications like these significantly plummet a product’s resale value too, which I rely on in order to try all the gear I try. Waiting for someone else on TH-cam to do it so I can watch tho!
@@josephabrams3051 closest I’ve seen to someone do this is Ryan from 60 cycle hum
th-cam.com/video/X5FmTZt9v0w/w-d-xo.htmlsi=Ui-XIJWKGC6DGQqg
@@thekipinator7660 maybe when used ones start to show up cheap like around when they unveil player 3 haha
That would be a great guitar if they put stacked humbuckers and coil split for each pick up.
It sounds pretty good. As cool as the OG style jag is, fender knows all those switches are not popular. I personally think they should have went with an LP style switch on the upper horn so it’s more out of the way though.
That bridge makes the guitar sound tinny
I would like a Jag with the classic setup but NO chrome. Like this, but still a full Jag.
ok, but i want a tom-style bridge hardtail jag with hbs and with the easy controls please. it would be sick if fender made this.
@@chainsawenthusiast you can find a Fender Blacktop Jaguar used pretty easily online which is exactly that, both on reverb and guitar center, usually between $400-600 used, and there’s also a limited edition Player Jaguar HH that was just discontinued this summer but can be found on reverb and sometimes guitar center used and brand new usually between $600-850ish
What happened to the modified vintera jag you had? Do you still use it?
@@TheMarko086 Sold it! I buy and sell guitars regularly and unfortunately I can’t afford to keep everything, even the stuff I like
@@thekipinator7660 Awesome. So you were satisfied with it? Im thinking about pulling the trigger on it. Do you think it's better than this guitar?
@@TheMarko086 I wouldn’t say one is better than the other, they just have very different applications they’re better at. I’d recommend this guitar if you’re mostly playing clean to overdriven, and the modified if you’re mostly playing overdriven and distorted. Clean tones are okay on the modified, but they’re definitely it’s weak point
I Kinda want this thing just for that colour, and then I want to mod the heck out of it.
Someday i will buy a jaguar and switch the rithm circuit to a tremolo pedal
I guess my only real question with this is... are the pickups comparable to that of a "real" Jaguar (I hate how elitist that sounds, but you get what I mean). Am i going to get that trebley, spanky, crisp, squishy and clear tone that Jaguars are known for? I honestly don't play very heavy music (i have a muff fuzz, but that only gets used when i feel like playing grunge), so that clean tone and the light drive tone has to be really good to justify getting one of these...
Should I get one of these and then change the pickups to some higher end Fender Jaguar set? Or would that be a waste of money? Huge thanks if you answer because getting a "real" jaguar these days is a pain in the ass!
@@AlbinoTuxedo they’re noticeably fatter sounding than “real” jaguar pickups but I don’t think this should negatively affect their perceived sound/quality to Jaguar purists. These pickups should please really anyone, I wouldn’t recommend changing them out.
And typically i find the pickups to be the weak point in a majority of the past player series models, especially the strats, but for this specific model i think they will please anyone!