Kill Team Battle Report | Hive Fleet Vs Phobos Strike Team | Critical Ops

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 31

  • @slair417
    @slair417 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    In my opinion your format for kill team battle reports is the best so far. Quick videos with an entire view of the board and all rolls that go into each decision made. Very nice.

    • @XenoCake
      @XenoCake 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Totally agree with the OP

  • @alessandrobussoletti9384
    @alessandrobussoletti9384 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    So nice seeing Phobos being played! Great content:)

  • @slair417
    @slair417 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I would really enjoy a deep dive into the phobos faction from you guys. In this video alone you put into concept some moves I didn't consider that really elevated the team performance. Rievers are definitely going to be in my mind for more matches, plus the non reciprocal shooting plays with the marksman.

  • @TheRainfield
    @TheRainfield ปีที่แล้ว +2

    quickly becoming one of my favorite Battle report channel. I love the format and accuracy in displaying rules and explaining them quickly.

  • @TobyOHara
    @TobyOHara ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is just great! Love the style of battle report, and I have a place in my heart for the Phobos.

  • @davidmoss9733
    @davidmoss9733 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just found your channel. Great work on the batrep format and I really enjoyed your style of reviewing the Archon team too. Thanks!

  • @patricklittleton6090
    @patricklittleton6090 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great voice over work, Evan.

  • @MichaelWalshMusic
    @MichaelWalshMusic ปีที่แล้ว

    Just come across this channel. I like the concise format you've gone for. Got yourselves a new sub.

  • @havelock1982
    @havelock1982 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm really enjoying your battle reports. Thank you!

  • @citizendisco
    @citizendisco ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice to see the Phobos doing well!

  • @jackalcoyote8777
    @jackalcoyote8777 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love the narration and the format. Some of the paint jobs bother me, though. Or maybe it's just the lighting making it look strange?

  • @elderbasilisk1534
    @elderbasilisk1534 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great job with the Phobos win! Reivers are definitely key to Makita the team work.

  • @themister-ov8eh
    @themister-ov8eh ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ok how did your friend paint that terinid. I need to know how he got that sparkling effect

  • @dmrhett408
    @dmrhett408 ปีที่แล้ว

    great work, excited for more in the future. Let's see some Krieg!

  • @DodgethisCZ
    @DodgethisCZ ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome report! Is there achance we will see phobos team again soon? :)

    • @KimerexProjekt
      @KimerexProjekt  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Always. Holidays are shaping up to record a bunch of games we release over time.

    • @DodgethisCZ
      @DodgethisCZ ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KimerexProjekt thats perfect thank you very much. I need to learn them and main them :) Btw do you know when we should get balance notes for Kill Team? Is it regular or more random?

    • @KimerexProjekt
      @KimerexProjekt  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DodgethisCZ no set schedule, but usually 4 times a year. Should still have one left this year, but i don't know.

  • @BarcelPL
    @BarcelPL ปีที่แล้ว

    Also - a stealth assault charge cost 3AP (Guerilla Warfare to change into Engage, Charge, Fight) in total, unabling you to capture a point after.

    • @KimerexProjekt
      @KimerexProjekt  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The trick is with the wording between core rules for activation and the wording for stealth assault.
      In core, it reads like after the unit is activated you choose the order to change to.
      And Stealth is triggered when the activation happens.
      It makes it sound like if the unit was in conceal as activation begins, the ability can be used before the order is determined.
      The Designer Notes for the ability may lean it the other way.
      Feels like a GW grey writing issue, but your way is probably right, since there is little reason to bring up the "charge from conceal" idea in the designer notes.

    • @BarcelPL
      @BarcelPL ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KimerexProjekt Even more so when you consider Spec Ops upgrades - one of them lets you Guerilla for 0AP and other Charge from conceal.
      But yeah, GW and their legaleze rulewriting :/

  • @philippesimpson
    @philippesimpson ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic battle report!
    Where does those lovely objective markers come from?

    • @KimerexProjekt
      @KimerexProjekt  ปีที่แล้ว

      Over on Amazon
      -Jucoci Objective Point Markers 6PCS Set Objective Marker Compatible with WH40k Wargame (Miniature Not Included) a.co/d/0k2EzcH

  • @bbiaso
    @bbiaso ปีที่แล้ว

    Where did you guys get that awesome terrain from?

    • @KimerexProjekt
      @KimerexProjekt  ปีที่แล้ว

      It's Games Workshop terrain. I painted it.

  • @BarcelPL
    @BarcelPL ปีที่แล้ว

    Phobos Sergeant (any) must be more than 3" from any enemy operative - not sure if your's was in TP2

  • @acecab5397
    @acecab5397 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lol is that Marksman looking extremely nearsighted? Poor guy didn't see a charge attack coming.

    • @KimerexProjekt
      @KimerexProjekt  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Knew it was coming. Just assumed a point blank attack against a bug would be fine. The emperor's grace was not with him that day. lel.

  • @benrunciman4399
    @benrunciman4399 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can't wait for the next bat rep. great show