Thanks for the tutorials. I went back to the 738 just don't like being in the A320. Plus we have the 777, MAX and (78?) coming so lots of tasty Boeings to fly
I know nobody cares because all of you here have higher and beefy GPUs than mine but I made my Fenix A320 run smoothly on my MSFS. I have a GTX 1650 so I had to downsize some of the liveries and cockpit textures so it could run smoothly on 1080p. I used the program Ordenador that you will find on Nexus mods. It's a really simple program and I guarantee using it if you're downloading Liveries with either "4K" or "8K" textures on them.
THIS is the comment I was looking for. Getting a laptop today hopefully but it's not a full fledged gaming laptop, it does have a 3050 but with very Low TGP as it's a creator-oriented laptop. Glad to hear it's possible to run it on 1650. Hope it runs on my new machine too 🤞. Again, much thanks for the assuring comment.
@@hiteshkumarsingh4587 rtx3050 is worse than my rtx 2070 and i am struggle to run msfs 2020 in 2k + low settings, especially on big planes like a320neo in bad weather. It's playeble, but no near at 60 fps. But in small planes i can rise settings to medium and get somewhere around 50 - 60 fps.
About the ECAM message. I believe you can pause the Fenix from the MCDU in either CONFIG or MAINT, then it should say Flight Freeze, enable that. That might fix the issue with the fuel.
Didn’t know spoilers deploy on reverse thrust if not set, thx for video. Quick question any manual brake application overrides the auto braking ? Or is it more subtle than that ?
Does it matter what viewpoint I use while landing? I feel like I either float the landing or bang it with the fenix. This doesn't happen with other planes like the PMDG/FBW. Thanks!
For the "decel" Callout I always looked at the Autobrake. I knew it isn't what the callout means, but as in the sim you can't really feel deceleration and my sim somehow often removed the armed autobrake I always looked at that to verify it's actually on
My guess is that if you are on a stabilized approach and this warning shows up you should keep going for the land, if the fuel is low the go around feels like a risk.
Let’s think about it for a second. You’re on approach and get a warning. Regardless of what it is, what would seem the natural response? Keep it in the air or put it on the ground? On the ground you got many more options, thus there’s a natural tendency to keep going and land. Of course you Analyse the situation, but the only reasons not to land are if the safety of the landing is not guaranteed or if the approach becomes destabilized. Especially for low fuel, why would you go around? The safest option is right in front of you.
@@Jannik_Stein to sum things up - in case of a warning you don't reject your current state, but you get your aircraft in the most safest position. For take-off it will be on the ground. For landing it will be on the ground. Unless, of course, something prevents you to safely be on the ground, then you will have to be in the air. Like too much speed during take off or unstabilized approach or gear/brakes/whatever failure during landing.
Thanks for the tutorials. I went back to the 738 just don't like being in the A320. Plus we have the 777, MAX and (78?) coming so lots of tasty Boeings to fly
I know nobody cares because all of you here have higher and beefy GPUs than mine but I made my Fenix A320 run smoothly on my MSFS. I have a GTX 1650 so I had to downsize some of the liveries and cockpit textures so it could run smoothly on 1080p. I used the program Ordenador that you will find on Nexus mods. It's a really simple program and I guarantee using it if you're downloading Liveries with either "4K" or "8K" textures on them.
THIS is the comment I was looking for. Getting a laptop today hopefully but it's not a full fledged gaming laptop, it does have a 3050 but with very Low TGP as it's a creator-oriented laptop. Glad to hear it's possible to run it on 1650. Hope it runs on my new machine too 🤞. Again, much thanks for the assuring comment.
@@hiteshkumarsingh4587 rtx3050 is worse than my rtx 2070 and i am struggle to run msfs 2020 in 2k + low settings, especially on big planes like a320neo in bad weather. It's playeble, but no near at 60 fps. But in small planes i can rise settings to medium and get somewhere around 50 - 60 fps.
Fantastic video, great teaching style - it's a pleasure to learn from you
About the ECAM message. I believe you can pause the Fenix from the MCDU in either CONFIG or MAINT, then it should say Flight Freeze, enable that. That might fix the issue with the fuel.
Thank you, Emanuel. You are a real teacher!
That De-Crab skills are just perfect
Didn’t know spoilers deploy on reverse thrust if not set, thx for video. Quick question any manual brake application overrides the auto braking ? Or is it more subtle than that ?
In the Airbus the brakes are also linked by wires, so any pressure on the Pedals should disconnect the Autobrake.
Finally the one I was waiting for!
Where did you see a recommendation of 300 ft for AP DISC ?
Hi, Emanuel! Can you make a short tutorial about the IRS INIT page on the MCDU?
Does it matter what viewpoint I use while landing? I feel like I either float the landing or bang it with the fenix. This doesn't happen with other planes like the PMDG/FBW. Thanks!
For the "decel" Callout I always looked at the Autobrake. I knew it isn't what the callout means, but as in the sim you can't really feel deceleration and my sim somehow often removed the armed autobrake I always looked at that to verify it's actually on
Thank you for your tutorial
Great would be, if possible, to see you’re control inputs by the joystick via software
3rd Comment😅: When the Fuel Caution came on, shouldn't you have initiated a go around? I thought that is what the landing inhibit is for
It does not make sense to go around when fuel is low!
My guess is that if you are on a stabilized approach and this warning shows up you should keep going for the land, if the fuel is low the go around feels like a risk.
Let’s think about it for a second. You’re on approach and get a warning. Regardless of what it is, what would seem the natural response? Keep it in the air or put it on the ground? On the ground you got many more options, thus there’s a natural tendency to keep going and land.
Of course you Analyse the situation, but the only reasons not to land are if the safety of the landing is not guaranteed or if the approach becomes destabilized.
Especially for low fuel, why would you go around? The safest option is right in front of you.
@@A330Driver during takeoff you also stop for any caution... but yeah when thinking about it it makes a lot more sense to land.
@@Jannik_Stein to sum things up - in case of a warning you don't reject your current state, but you get your aircraft in the most safest position. For take-off it will be on the ground. For landing it will be on the ground.
Unless, of course, something prevents you to safely be on the ground, then you will have to be in the air. Like too much speed during take off or unstabilized approach or gear/brakes/whatever failure during landing.