if they arent made by ingeneer you are just gonna expect a crash these plane concept u saw in that video are made by proffesional aircraft designer/ingeneers
Embraer (a Brazilian aircraft manufacturer, the same company that created the KC-390) also has a futuristic airplane project that is being developed in partnership with uber. The name of the plane is Embraer X
major problem with vertical take off is the aircraft being caught in a reciprocating votrex which actually is caused from the downward air pressure making it back up above and into the intake system. That problem is very serious, usually happens around vertical structures like walls, valleys. harsh side way wind gust can cause instabilities of these levitating devices.
Full self flying would be a lot easier than self driving. Without pedestrians, dogs, rubbish trucks, potholes, cyclists etc it would be much easier to build the software. Avoiding other flying objects would be easy, as they would all have to have transponders. By limiting when and how they land you could reduce the dangers of being close to earth. Compared to trying to navigate a suburban neighbourhood it would be a breeze!
You say that but how often do you see a car broken down on the side of the road? Quite a bit, right? Now imagine that car breaking down way up in the sky, bud.
DarkSide Blues Two Huge reasons why commonplace flying cars will never happen 1) Liability. If you think your auto insurance is expen$ive, just imagine it for flying cars! 2) There are power lines almost everywhere - too many to avoid 100% of the time
Loved that one line about being based on birds in flight. last i checked....ALL aircraft happen to be based off of birds in flight. Just felt like the dumbest thing to say
Excellent video, I go for that which is the safest to ride & that which can get me to My destination the fastest, thanks for sharing, God bless & more success for us! Alleluia! Amen!
I think the A380 has proven that sticking a thousand people into a plane is not the way to go. Smaller versions of blended wing designs are the way to go and having seats with windows that look forward would be awesome!
Just so you are aware VTOL does not stand for "vertical take off on launch" lol... the correct words are "vertical take-off and landing". If you don't even know that, then it does not bode well for how much you understand anything you are discussing in this video.
True, I just wonder though. If that's what Aston Martin are calling it in their press release, if that's where the researcher got the information from. So we don't know if the channel just made that up, or it's the actual Aston Martin abbreviation.
2:32 "And do away with the idea of a vertical tail entirely, instead they turn and bank". Huh. You mean just how aviation did for the last century? 'kay then. Someone been skipping basic flight class.
@Griffin Engle Sure, but most people know also that when an aircraft is tilting, it's to initiate a turn, and not for starting a barrel roll. In that case, lateral stability is guaranteed by his swept wing and variable twist of the wing. I don't like when they oversimplified a smart design.
most of these concept just have no space for fuel tanks; wonder how can they fly long distances (forget about heavy and dangerous batteries for electric engine)
As you have observed, how effectively the micro-steam rises vertically to the sky and forms clouds, which move (float and move) through modules of different cloud configurations. However, there are many ways to land, including rainfall (vertical landing) and so on. It's exciting to learn, forget, and relearn for our impromptu VTOL, but don't replicate nature as a good example of how we develop different ways of flying different from birds. Kudos!
My passengers transfer flight destinations at 43k feet ..🐦. sometimes some passengers🎁 have to jog back quickly through the pressure tunnel case to grab their bottle of cheer 🤸🏼
2024 here. How many of these made it? All but two of these were supposed to be in production by now and I haven't seen or heard of a single one reaching production yet.
We need to abandon this idea of flying cars. There are so many factors working against it ever becoming reality. At least in the next 50+ years. These startups need to stop wasting their money. Don't they think huge corporations wouldn't already be on it if they saw it as viable?
The factors stopping it from happening is the completely different needs of the two concepts, cars need to stick to the road like glue and planes need every bit of lift you can design into them.....Someone will crack it soon as technology advances and I for one will be first in the que for a go!....
Flying on lithium batteries, no thanks. With an EV there's a small chance you could escape as the thing bursts (explodes) into flame, at 30 000 feet what chance is there?
What research is being done into making aviation fuel from vegetable oil? Diesel engines can be run on vegetable oil. Jet kerosene is not that different to diesel oil, and growing the plants consumes CO2 from the atmosphere. So whats happening in this direction?
The Alice Communer is just interesting looking but stupid fantasy. No "future" designs made by pure designers ever came close to reality. Also it is not really aerodynamic... TF-X is a complete inefficient idea producing unnecessary pollution.
M'y Idea for bullet create bullet Can pénétrate twenty walls by its power this gun must bé build by Big power to shot and bullet must have power to exit from body and wall
It's still using a propeller way, My way levitation levitating invention no weight in flying up . My way no wings just flying 8n no weight way. Want this 10 m$ first .
That's why they are autonomous, the owner won't be flying it, a computer will. Personally, I don't understand the idea of flying cars really. Why use it as a car when you can fly to within walking distance of your destination? form you driveway to the parking lot of your workplace for example.
14:03 when are people going to realize this is the worst idea ever, ignore the fact that you gotta worry about other drivers hitting it “if they did the damage would be very expensive to the point insurance would be like nope” but let's say you're at the grocery store and some idiot hit it with a cart, instead of a scratch of paint you're gonna cost 10,000x 1 to x6
Doesn't work like that, solar panels can surly power your house but to power engines not possible any time soon and you would lose power in night (i i get that you comment was joke)
Solar panels are not as efficient as some people would have you believe. To power just one of those electric engines on a commercial aircraft, you would need 10 times the surface area of solar panels than the entire surface area of the plane.
Cargo carriage using helium filled balloons type airships are not covered here. It has been shown that when speed is not important that the operational cost and fuel consumption of these kinds of vehicles are much reduced and make them worthwhile. They seem to be much more feasible compared to the 15 types shown here.
Shaun stoping by with good checks post a recent trip. . And with an update and waiting for good calendar. Go good things and mobiles and Moto and droid. And go Timex and Casio. And go good home things and gm. And go Zeniths and LG and RCA
in the future . the size of a minibus. flying drones. I think they will make trips from one city to another. and these tools. they will have electrical and solar system supports. They will be able to transport very cheaply.
I see this video was uploaded 3 years ago, but having watched it, it seems older than 3 years. I mean, the predicted introduction of some of these concepts has already passed.
@@BallMuncher555 agreed.......I was just kidding......although I hear that Elon Musk is working on flying cars, and although not practical, there are decent new models of "jet packs."
Actually it was the French Government NOT requiring Air France to reinforce the under fuselage due to a previous fire on Concord, due to runway debris, apparently PARTS 'sometimes' fall off I forget which, but I know that NO lives were lost) were ALLOWED to blow off the safety mod due to cost, The plane has been a money lover for ages, BUT a prestige platform.
El sello de campera militar verde esuna mano y bebe no sigfica Unicef la mano es planeta 🌎 y ese nino de10 años soy yo hay dobre signicado e Otro símbolo es unicef I
teleportation is impossible as i heard because it would means transporting at mega high speed your atoms without just changing a single thing so what you expect is just being desintegrated after your teleportation
My whole life I've been seeing cool CGI of pie in the sky concepts and a rare physical prototype that never goes into regular use.
But how about that acronym, eh?
if they arent made by ingeneer you are just gonna expect a crash these plane concept u saw in that video are made by proffesional aircraft designer/ingeneers
Some of these designs were probably published in scientific American magazine in early 2000s, they are still not in production
Go Good
UT plz provide 40x
Embraer (a Brazilian aircraft manufacturer, the same company that created the KC-390) also has a futuristic airplane project that is being developed in partnership with uber. The name of the plane is Embraer X
VTOL = vertical take off and landing. Not vertical takeoff on launch.
Smert
I heard that too LOL
major problem with vertical take off is the aircraft being caught in a reciprocating votrex which actually is caused from the downward air pressure making it back up above and into the intake system. That problem is very serious, usually happens around vertical structures like walls, valleys. harsh side way wind gust can cause instabilities of these levitating devices.
Hybrid of plane and blimp, turbine engines recessed inside, heat of engine exhaust utilized as part of lift
Full self flying would be a lot easier than self driving. Without pedestrians, dogs, rubbish trucks, potholes, cyclists etc it would be much easier to build the software. Avoiding other flying objects would be easy, as they would all have to have transponders. By limiting when and how they land you could reduce the dangers of being close to earth. Compared to trying to navigate a suburban neighbourhood it would be a breeze!
and where
You say that but how often do you see a car broken down on the side of the road? Quite a bit, right? Now imagine that car breaking down way up in the sky, bud.
@@kellyhiggins5703 😲
Yeah. People can barely drive. Lets allow them to fly.
DarkSide Blues Two Huge reasons why commonplace flying cars will never happen 1) Liability. If you think your auto insurance is expen$ive, just imagine it for flying cars! 2) There are power lines almost everywhere - too many to avoid 100% of the time
Speak for yourself......
of course
Let them fly, then there will be alot less stupid people on the planet 👌
I don't see an issue
Already amazed. But go ahead and amaze me some more. hahaahaahaahaha Can anyone EVER have enough amazement ???????????????????????
VTOL stands for Vertical Take-Off and Landing, not vertical take-off on launch. Come-on.
Terrafugia sounds like a crazy Chinese spy scheme. 😂
Loved that one line about being based on birds in flight. last i checked....ALL aircraft happen to be based off of birds in flight. Just felt like the dumbest thing to say
If you see this
I Hope you have a great day and your family lives great #StaySafe#icareabyou#Blacklivesmatter✊🏻✊🏼✊🏽✊🏾✊🏿
Same to you!!!
Ok
@@benjithetruth2.0i subbed
Excellent video, I go for that which is the safest to ride & that which can get me to My destination the fastest, thanks for sharing, God bless & more success for us! Alleluia! Amen!
I think the A380 has proven that sticking a thousand people into a plane is not the way to go. Smaller versions of blended wing designs are the way to go and having seats with windows that look forward would be awesome!
Just so you are aware VTOL does not stand for "vertical take off on launch" lol... the correct words are "vertical take-off and landing". If you don't even know that, then it does not bode well for how much you understand anything you are discussing in this video.
He is reading from a script. Relax. He probably does not even have a pilot's license. He is an actor.
True, I just wonder though. If that's what Aston Martin are calling it in their press release, if that's where the researcher got the information from.
So we don't know if the channel just made that up, or it's the actual Aston Martin abbreviation.
Wow im early the last time i was this early there were still prop planes
They still have prop planes...
Meet George Jetson...🎵🎵🎵🎵
If they indefinitely suspended a project, yet are planning to resume that project later...that's not fucking indefinite!!
I think every vehicle airplane whatever flies should absolutely positively must have a onboard alcohol tester
Here are the Top 10.... Graphic, naturally, says Top Fives.... Begining with number 15.
*visable confusion*
Imagine if road fraud still existed even after everyone was in the air.
@6:38, Airbus DOESN'T just make planes.
The blended wing body configuration was invented decades ago by Liebeck and continued by Boeing
The wasteful wool correlatively dream because pheasant immunochemically object since a wise cowbell. bite-sized, irritating caravan
Yes , i want , give me all of them
2:32 "And do away with the idea of a vertical tail entirely, instead they turn and bank". Huh. You mean just how aviation did for the last century? 'kay then. Someone been skipping basic flight class.
@Griffin Engle Sure, but most people know also that when an aircraft is tilting, it's to initiate a turn, and not for starting a barrel roll. In that case, lateral stability is guaranteed by his swept wing and variable twist of the wing. I don't like when they oversimplified a smart design.
www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/programs_projects/PRANDTL/overview.html
First one here yes
Aww man
Hatten die Horton Brüder bereits als funktionierende Segelflieger gebaut und für sowas braucht man Heute die Nasa 2:16
I'm sure Charlie sheen is the narrator here😂
Pretty sure.
Concept = Science fiction cos most of these just won't fly - pardon the pun.
I feel the same
It’s Vertical Takeoff Or Landing no vertical takeoff on launch
its the same
XPECTED my bad didn’t know but still think it’s vertical takeoff or landing maybe I’m wrong correct me if I am
The title of this video should be "Things that were Delayed"
I think everything on earth could be labelled similarly at the moment
Cannot believe how far we have come! Can't wait!
most of these concept just have no space for fuel tanks; wonder how can they fly long distances (forget about heavy and dangerous batteries for electric engine)
Meu like é o 8,4 mil!
What exactly is pound-feet of thrust? Thrust is in pounds or Newtons, But torque is foot-pounds. So at what RPM is the peak torque?
Luetin music in the background! It’s 40K time!
As you have observed, how effectively the micro-steam rises vertically to the sky and forms clouds, which move (float and move) through modules of different cloud configurations. However, there are many ways to land, including rainfall (vertical landing) and so on. It's exciting to learn, forget, and relearn for our impromptu VTOL, but don't replicate nature as a good example of how we develop different ways of flying different from birds. Kudos!
you should have included pak ta (the thumbnail) and the other airbus shown at 2:53
Ooooo
Wait... I recognize you... are you the simple history narrorator?
L
The problem with the electric jet is it probably needs fossil fuels to charge the battery!
No, once you thaw out your wind mills they can be used to charge it.
My passengers transfer flight destinations at 43k feet ..🐦. sometimes some passengers🎁 have to jog back quickly through the pressure tunnel case to grab their bottle of cheer 🤸🏼
(1:46) Thrust is not measured in lb.-ft. Torque is measured in lb.-ft.
In stones per gallon, you mean.
'they will finish testing late 2019.. old vid
Airbus have been on about that configuration since the mid 90s, been promising soon since then.
4:40 this is shameful
Top Fives release a Top Ten and starts with Top 15
The narrator's pronunciation of Prandtl is bothering me haha.
Check my SCI-FI render 😎
when passenger airlines finally catch up to the military with flying wing designs 60 years later
everyone : wow so inavative new technology
They go on about what an awesome weapon the replacement for the t-38 Talon will be. Don't they know that the t-38 is a TRAINING aircraft?
Practically no research went into the development of this video.
We need more blended wing bodys!
tb2
This is the Top Fives channel and yet, this is a Top 15. Mein gott. I will literally send anthrax gummy bears to your abode.
ITS THUNDERBIRD 2 !!😶
2024 here. How many of these made it? All but two of these were supposed to be in production by now and I haven't seen or heard of a single one reaching production yet.
We need to abandon this idea of flying cars. There are so many factors working against it ever becoming reality. At least in the next 50+ years. These startups need to stop wasting their money. Don't they think huge corporations wouldn't already be on it if they saw it as viable?
The factors stopping it from happening is the completely different needs of the two concepts, cars need to stick to the road like glue and planes need every bit of lift you can design into them.....Someone will crack it soon as technology advances and I for one will be first in the que for a go!....
Flying on lithium batteries, no thanks. With an EV there's a small chance you could escape as the thing bursts (explodes) into flame, at 30 000 feet what chance is there?
The t-7 red hawk is supposed to be a trainer not a fighter
Jet thrust measured in lbs.ft??? VTOL, vertical takeoff on launch??? Huh, really???
What research is being done into making aviation fuel from vegetable oil? Diesel engines can be run on vegetable oil. Jet kerosene is not that different to diesel oil, and growing the plants consumes CO2 from the atmosphere. So whats happening in this direction?
The Alice Communer is just interesting looking but stupid fantasy. No "future" designs made by pure designers ever came close to reality. Also it is not really aerodynamic...
TF-X is a complete inefficient idea producing unnecessary pollution.
M'y Idea for bullet create bullet Can pénétrate twenty walls by its power this gun must bé build by Big power to shot and bullet must have power to exit from body and wall
It's still using a propeller way,
My way levitation levitating invention no weight in flying up .
My way no wings just flying 8n no weight way.
Want this 10 m$ first .
They look cool
Why am I not comfortable with any corporation which is willing to bring out anything named "Project Alice",....
Flying personal vehicles. You'll need to bury ALL of the overhead power lines.
Imagine the multi-vehicle pile-ups in poor weather ;-)
That's why they are autonomous, the owner won't be flying it, a computer will.
Personally, I don't understand the idea of flying cars really. Why use it as a car when you can fly to within walking distance of your destination? form you driveway to the parking lot of your workplace for example.
Doesn't NASA get over $50 million a day in taxes? I don't know why they need to get any tax funding from the working civilian.
14:03 when are people going to realize this is the worst idea ever, ignore the fact that you gotta worry about other drivers hitting it “if they did the damage would be very expensive to the point insurance would be like nope” but let's say you're at the grocery store and some idiot hit it with a cart, instead of a scratch of paint you're gonna cost 10,000x 1 to x6
FJB
why dont they build like solar panels into the plains
Idk lol
Doesn't work like that, solar panels can surly power your house but to power engines not possible any time soon and you would lose power in night (i i get that you comment was joke)
"plans", not "plains"
Solar panels are not as efficient as some people would have you believe. To power just one of those electric engines on a commercial aircraft, you would need 10 times the surface area of solar panels than the entire surface area of the plane.
Cargo carriage using helium filled balloons type airships are not covered here. It has been shown that when speed is not important that the operational cost and fuel consumption of these kinds of vehicles are much reduced and make them worthwhile. They seem to be much more feasible compared to the 15 types shown here.
Shaun stoping by with good checks post a recent trip. . And with an update and waiting for good calendar.
Go good things and mobiles and Moto and droid. And go Timex and Casio.
And go good home things and gm. And go Zeniths and LG and RCA
I like how most of the comments are people trying to correct the video lol 😂😂😂💯
Where is the flying saucer I was promised by year 2000?
This is BS. I want my money back.
in the future . the size of a minibus. flying drones. I think they will make trips from one city to another. and these tools. they will have electrical and solar system supports. They will be able to transport very cheaply.
Third one here
Nope you're 4th
I see this video was uploaded 3 years ago, but having watched it, it seems older than 3 years. I mean, the predicted introduction of some of these concepts has already passed.
Why the hell are you comparing "pollution" of planes and birds? How would that make sence?
That Skywhale shit is almost the designers "fuck I want that but I never can" dream, what is wrong with these people
Channel: "Top 5" Voice Intro "Here are the top 10.." Text title "Top 15"
you were trying for people to notice
Is this simple histories second account?
Not so amazed.
An absolute record for the speed of flight with a human on board!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwERi...
Great like car ,automotive,rocket , launch pad , Airport designer and engineer like me.
This is amasing
The 'Alice' commuter electric plane is the winner here, the other designs are mostly fantasy and b.s.
#14- it’s a trainer, not a fighter
They promised us jetpacks.........I WANT my jetpack! I'll settle for the flying car though....
Both jet packs and flying cars are stupid ideas that are impractical and will never make it very far.
@@BallMuncher555 agreed.......I was just kidding......although I hear that Elon Musk is working on flying cars, and although not practical, there are decent new models of "jet packs."
What / where is the vehicle shown in the thumbnail? Clickbait?
Yup it was clickbait
❤super 😱👍
The Concorde flew for four decades and would still be in operation but for the French not checking the runway for debris, as contracted to do.
French have also been paid to stop refugees coming across the Channel in small boats, but instead, they escort them.
Actually it was the French Government NOT requiring Air France to reinforce the under fuselage due to a previous fire on Concord, due to runway debris, apparently PARTS 'sometimes' fall off I forget which, but I know that NO lives were lost) were ALLOWED to blow off the safety mod due to cost, The plane has been a money lover for ages, BUT a prestige platform.
Error correction - at 14:50 - VTOL stands for Vertical Take Off Landing - not - Vertical Takeoff On Launch.
Where to put 2 engines forward for take off with 2 engines iso tail where combination of jet eng and prop engines can be retractable!
Wait you using Swiss001 footage?
illuminati
El sello de campera militar verde esuna mano y bebe no sigfica Unicef la mano es planeta 🌎 y ese nino de10 años soy yo hay dobre signicado e
Otro símbolo es unicef
I
0:10 “The top 10” and then a couple seconds later proceeds to start the list with number 15.
Imagine if someone eventually invents teleportation and all these concepts become useless! That's right, future is so unexpected
teleportation is impossible as i heard because it would means transporting at mega high speed your atoms without just changing a single thing so what you expect is just being desintegrated after your teleportation