I like how people keep saying the extra space in these concepts can be used to increase comfort by giving back legroom and seat space. We all know that what will really happen is the airlines will take that extra space, cram it full of more seats, and possibly take away some of the existing legroom we still have even more.
Yes but also no. Kinda depends on the way demand goes. If you're flying because you have to or on a budget its all about the lowest price. Right now the options are pretty limited if you want more comfort. You can't really go get a private jet. However if you can offer people the same price ticket as a conventional jet with way more comfort they will be willing to shell out 100 extra dollars
@@SubaruPieter flying wing means no other surfaces than a wing. Blended body means the fuselage and wing provide lift, with a possible empennage providing control surfaces. A flying wing will have no rearward stabilizers, vertical, horizontal, or combo, and in general won't have any sort of clear distinction between fuselage and wing
What's the difference between a "normal viewer" and a "serious player". Seem like two completely categories from the start. You're not talking about some lame ass building block game crap are you? Man, go play flight sim 24 and stop playing lame crap.
Funny comment...none of these will fly. Some companies are looking at the "flattened", V shape planes for the DISTANT future, but the rest are generic, "give us the money, and then...!" investor bait.
Eviations' Alice seems really promising for low volume short haul flights. And Boeing's a Sugar volt concept is likely to make it further in the prototype phase. Boeing and Airbus's blended wing concepts will likely see further study.
@@andrewyork3869The Way SUGAR VOLT works is that a hybrid system is integrated into the two onboard engines so that during take off, the electric drive can assists the traditional fuel powered turbine and in the air, the fuel burning part of the engine can lessen its load with the hybrid electric drive driving the turbofan with the fuel burning core only lighting up when necessary to save fuel. As both systems are integrated into both engines, it’s never actually carrying around extra unused engines, it’s simply using a hybrid system to determine the delivery levels to both the electric and fuel burning sections of the engines. So it’s really not carrying any extra weight, or at least not enough to offset the fuel savings resulting from the hybrid drive system.
The sugervolt concept seems interesting since most of the harmful pollution occurs when at high altitudes since co2 remains in the stratosphere much longer than the troposphere.
To name an example of the type of engineering challanges associated with these concepts, most BWBs (the Boeing one most certainly) have very poor static stability, and therefore, to meet requiments, extensive reliance on computer stabilization is needed. This approach made sense when these concepts were first envisioned, as everyone assumed future planes will rely extensively on computers. Today, I'd say having planes that rely extensively on MCAS with steroids, seems farther away now than it was in the past...
@@ingo6295 Awesome, it would enable some really cool interior concepts as it has the space to allow for awesome first class amenities and the open space where it Transitions from a single traditional cabin to two split, could be used as communal space as you find on Dubai Airlines A380 Where they have a bar but, on level more accessible to passengers
One of the major issues the flying wing designs may encounter is actually reduced passenger comfort. People at the edges may experience greater acceleration as the plane banks.
The Eviation Alice is already in service from Prescott, AZ to both Denver and LAX. I can't post the pics, but I delivered the batteries to the Prescott Airport more than a year ago.
Awesome video, I love efficient plane concepts. One nitpick: there are no electric engines, just motors. Engines are mechanical and rely on compression. All engines are motors but not all motors are engines.
Shuutttup. Are you base enough to think air fight on a commercial scale could go electric? Also, do you realize electric batteries cause as much pollution as regular means of energy? Bro. Get a grip.
@@Gdub33 How about you actually read what I said and calm down. I just pointed out the difference between an 'engine' and a 'motor'. I'm well aware that electric flight is a long way from going commercial. That said, there's nothing wrong with designing airplanes that save fuel by being more aerodynamic and efficient.
@@Gdub33 Also you're wrong. Batteries over time pollute WAY less than burning fuel. A passenger jet emits 2 tons of CO2 per hour, your car only emits 4 tons in a whole year. Now realize that there are tens of thousands of planes in the sky at all times year round and you'll understand why people are trying to make a change.
@@nathanchildress5596 bro no they don't. You're thinking of like regular batteries. It's not financially feasible to develop a full battery. Plus it would be almost as toxic for the environment. I don't think you understand the scale these batteries would have to be. Enjoy your pipe dream.
@@Gdub33 It's not MY pipe dream fool, all I originally said was "I love efficient plane concepts." I have no skin in the game, I could care less what your opinion is, especially because you won't state any figures to back up your point, and most of all because you're being a dick.
The Bird of Prey design was more or less in my previous designs at Kerbal Space Program. I used to attach lifter wings(servos or elevons) back on back instead of a large wing and a small servo, in order to reach higher speeds and have less drag while having most control. Resulting say, 4 elevons working oppositely, say 2 pairs lifting up, while 2 pairs giving downforce, with one up-one down setting, the craft avoids the need of additional airbrakes since the drag is sufficient to slow down. Another 500kg advantage minimally. Glad to see some business bosses dropping into idea.
More on that, by designing craft that has enough control, and giving slight symmetrical bend to the wings eliminates the need of vertical wingtail. Much or less like Bayraktar airstrike drones.
especially considering, it would be able to operate it's engines at altitudes where there is not enough oxygen for conventional jet engines, but the air resistance is much lower and speed of sound is higher.
The problem with batteries when flying airplanes is the fact that when they deplete .... you still carry the massive extra weight to lug around. This will reduce efficiency drastically. Right now, you carry 10 tons of jet fuel (or however much you need for your trip) and you actually burn it, causing the weight of the plane to be drastically reduced during flight thus allowing for efficient operation. Dragging really heavy empty batteries around (no matter how short or long is your trip) will probably offset the benefits of electric engines by a whole lot. The possible outcome is that the plane would have to carry a lot less passengers given its size, the tickets will be expensive and it would likely be just a "luxury" experience for a select few.
What a manufacturer would promise: "A blended wing body design provides an exceptionally comfortable cabin layout, enabling passengers to benefit from additional legroom and larger aisles for *more personal comfort.* " Ryanair: *hold my beer...*
I see A.I. taking over plane development and the major of other products we develope. We're living in the"future" from us who are a bit older. Wild times ahead, to say the least.
I always enjoy when airplane manufacturers present concept planes as if airlines give a crap about passenger experience. Yea, they COULD have all those cool visibility enhancements and tech, OR they could stick hundreds of people inside a dark tube with seats that don’t fit the human body and make way more money
That both A and B have similar looking concepts kinda tells you what's coming up. They must build full sized testbed planes to be tried out by real people. I believe when we move away from the "tube with wings" styling this is how aircraft will look like.
This is very exciting!! I was born in the 70's----thinking that we'd be flying planes like this by now----but -----between all the wars, "fight against drugs", pandemics, housing crisises, religious dogma and fascination with sports & the entertainment industry----no wonder we're moving at a snails pace. DISTRACTIONS! ---We have to inspire the children right now!!
Very interesting video, good summary of futuristic designs. As a part of my MSc in Aircraft Design I worked on a project similar to the Boeing Sugar Volt. An important issue it had was with the landing gear design, particularly its stowage since the high wing location deprived the design of a “natural” place to retract the landing gear into in the wings.
Im sure you and the whole aviation industry in general is working hard for a better flight experience, but i gotta ask whats going on with making flights a bit faster Or in other words are the engineers working on reducing sonic boom for the commercial front?
@@primeanomalous4275 Hello, good point! To be honest, speed is not a concern these days. In fact, many of these new concepts trade a bit of speed for a lot more efficiency. The rationale is that even if the aircraft cruise speed is 10% lower, your trip time will mostly not be affected because most of the time of your journey is spent commuting to/from airports, in the airports and waiting around rather than flying. Also, if we wanted to cross the transonic regime into supersonic flight, efficiency goes through the window and costs through the roof.
@@jibeneyto91 So no hybrid energy recovery, for maintaining efficiency? & Man, LA to London in under 3 hrs is too tempting tho🙈 hope some more innovation and of course political/economical feasibility as well change... and new fuel sources come to light making supersonic flights a reality in this generation atleast..
@@jibeneyto91 Dont you think its time for establishing aviation consortiums which developed new and cheaper jetfuel to get rid of the economic problem of flying. Tackle the problem at root level and give the Arabs and politicians the middle finger.
@@FoundAndExplained Nothing actually. I just felt futuristic concept planes that are huge and weirdly good are missing. But, reality and time factor need to be considered too.
This is not new innovation on aviation if it still needs a run way...This is just makiing old tech better...it's still a tub with jet engine running on oil...or the same helicopter with one blade or 1000...going from horse and wagon to a motorized vehicle was revolutionary to mankind...That's what we need...Different flying shapes, different powers sources, different propulsion systems that are revolutionary...Everything from scratch, never seen before, out of this world , alien to human...That's what the PhD's of this world should be shooting for...!!
In less than 20 years SpaceX has built a fleet of space crafts with recoverable/reusable rockets. They are building a low-level constellation of satellites that will bring broadband to rural areas of the world. They just started space tourism. Working on colonizing the Moon and Mars. Projected to have commercial air service by 2027 in which you can fly anywhere in the world in just 30-40 minutes. Meanwhile, we're still flying a commercial airplane design that have been around for 70 years. WTF is taking so long to improve commercial flight?
The bird plane looks interesting, but the spinning blades made me somewhat uneasy. I couldn't help imagining one of them falling off and being thrown toward the plane. The bird shape was beautiful though.
Honestly the day we see the next generation of aircraft will be so cool. Eventually we will put 777 and the common airliners of today in the past and we will be living in a whole new world. Cya in the future guys
1986 was the year that the chemical formula for Transparent Aluminum became known to science. - Three people are credited with it's discovery; Chief Engineer Montgomery Scott Doctor Leonard McCoy Lieutenant Master Helmsman Hikaru Kato Sulu
@@carlosandleon Turboprop isn't a jet, either. It's a propeller driven by a turbine engine, but because the thrust is provided by the prop and not the engine "exhaust" , it's not a jet.
Coming to SUGARVOLT. it's like flying V but not like blended wing. It has an inspiration of being hybrid but at take of, single jet engine with help of 2 electric motors could suffice. Keeping in mind the FCC's dual sustained engine rules, since electric engines are backups, there are no need for 2 jets.
I Liked The Swan Airplane In The Future, Because It Seems Like That's My Own Personal Plane Among The Aviation. BTW I Liked The V-shaped Airplane Too Because That's My Dream Plane Deployment Skill In My Magic Role Skill Called "Aviation Authority" Just Liked Whom I Played As On Mobile Legends.
While new developments in Design are essential, why not also focus on human flying habits improvements. Most people carry far too much baggage. I noticed on a recent Airbus A380 long haul flight, People carry on an average 30 kg check in & 10 kg carry on. (My wife & I each checked in 10 kg with a carry on bag of 6 kg each, a reduction of 60% weight). If we enforce a change of habit, we could reconfigure / redesign existing aircrafts to carry 40% more passengers reducing no. of flights, achieving significant emission reductions. If we can do it, anyone can. Just a shift in thinking.
I like how people keep saying the extra space in these concepts can be used to increase comfort by giving back legroom and seat space. We all know that what will really happen is the airlines will take that extra space, cram it full of more seats, and possibly take away some of the existing legroom we still have even more.
Which will reduce the price of flying and still ultimately be a positive
"Money, money, money" - airlines
Nope. Planes will need the space to store a replacement fuel that needs more than double the space
Yes but also no. Kinda depends on the way demand goes. If you're flying because you have to or on a budget its all about the lowest price. Right now the options are pretty limited if you want more comfort. You can't really go get a private jet. However if you can offer people the same price ticket as a conventional jet with way more comfort they will be willing to shell out 100 extra dollars
Yep
The most unrealistic thing about these is interior. The only innovation coming there is smaller economy seats
They already making progress, stand sit chair www.cnn.com/travel/article/standing-up-airplane-seat/index.html
@@loljewlol weird... using link did not make your post memoryholled... ah yes... YT buddies from CNN...
@@useodyseeorbitchute9450 okay bitchute. don't know what point you trying to make but sure
@@useodyseeorbitchute9450 not surprised you subscribe to a neo-nazi, but whatever 🙄
@@loljewlol I've seen my post with links wikipedia being a reason of my posts getting censored.
Deff the Flying-V! It‘s just the most beautiful concept plane I‘ve ever seen!
I agree, I am quite a fan of flying wing planes
Wtf?
@@SubaruPieter It's not a flying wing
@@cancelanime1507 how so?
@@SubaruPieter flying wing means no other surfaces than a wing. Blended body means the fuselage and wing provide lift, with a possible empennage providing control surfaces. A flying wing will have no rearward stabilizers, vertical, horizontal, or combo, and in general won't have any sort of clear distinction between fuselage and wing
Normal Viewers: **See this prototype planes...**
Serious Players: **Build these in Simple Planes or Kerbal Space Program**
*Big Mathis is offended*
@กล้วยหอมจอมซน nasa: cursed edition
Lol precisely
What's the difference between a "normal viewer" and a "serious player". Seem like two completely categories from the start. You're not talking about some lame ass building block game crap are you? Man, go play flight sim 24 and stop playing lame crap.
All I have to say: Wow, I can't wait to fly on those planes!
Wobwox
@@Skirbiy bot
@@Cheeeeetah
NOT to cheetah .
Test 1-2-3 .
👁
Funny comment...none of these will fly. Some companies are looking at the "flattened", V shape planes for the DISTANT future, but the rest are generic, "give us the money, and then...!" investor bait.
You never will
Eviations' Alice seems really promising for low volume short haul flights. And Boeing's a Sugar volt concept is likely to make it further in the prototype phase. Boeing and Airbus's blended wing concepts will likely see further study.
Several airlines in Africa are interested in the project, as it’s perfect for safari flights
@@FoundAndExplained come to think of it, Africa is the perfect market for these
Alice is gonna make it for sure.. one third of price for same role operating is nice.
Sugar volt doesn't make any sense, that thing is going to have 3 tons of engines that don't get used 100% of the time.
@@andrewyork3869The Way SUGAR VOLT works is that a hybrid system is integrated into the two onboard engines so that during take off, the electric drive can assists the traditional fuel powered turbine and in the air, the fuel burning part of the engine can lessen its load with the hybrid electric drive driving the turbofan with the fuel burning core only lighting up when necessary to save fuel. As both systems are integrated into both engines, it’s never actually carrying around extra unused engines, it’s simply using a hybrid system to determine the delivery levels to both the electric and fuel burning sections of the engines. So it’s really not carrying any extra weight, or at least not enough to offset the fuel savings resulting from the hybrid drive system.
The Celerra looks like a modern X-1. which makes mer really want to see it in that beautiful bright orange X-1 livery.
I gotta admit, sugar volt is an AMAZING name for a plane
The sugervolt concept seems interesting since most of the harmful pollution occurs when at high altitudes since co2 remains in the stratosphere much longer than the troposphere.
That Embraer concept is awesome.
To name an example of the type of engineering challanges associated with these concepts, most BWBs (the Boeing one most certainly) have very poor static stability, and therefore, to meet requiments, extensive reliance on computer stabilization is needed.
This approach made sense when these concepts were first envisioned, as everyone assumed future planes will rely extensively on computers. Today, I'd say having planes that rely extensively on MCAS with steroids, seems farther away now than it was in the past...
Wow!
That blended wing plane looks amazing!
Delft isn't pronounced 'dee-left' but just 'Delft' 😅. Having said that it's probably most likely to be realised.
Thanks for the tip! As an Australian I believe we had trouble with dutch words
Would it be able to fit in standard airport gates?
@@L33tSkE3t That's the principle. It's designed in a way that it would fit existing airport infrastructure.
@@ingo6295 Awesome, it would enable some really cool interior concepts as it has the space to allow for awesome first class amenities and the open space where it Transitions from a single traditional cabin to two split, could be used as communal space as you find on Dubai Airlines A380 Where they have a bar but, on level more accessible to passengers
Wouldn't bit of turbulence kill passengers it?
One of the major issues the flying wing designs may encounter is actually reduced passenger comfort. People at the edges may experience greater acceleration as the plane banks.
Love the blended wing concepts . The sugar volt reminds me of the Fokker Friendship era - on steroids . Embraeur is just stunning ! Wales UK.
The Eviation Alice is already in service from Prescott, AZ to both Denver and LAX. I can't post the pics, but I delivered the batteries to the Prescott Airport more than a year ago.
The first Alice prototype burned down and the maiden flight is scheduled for this year. So how is it already in service?
The Airbus reminds me of the McDonnell Douglas DC-10 with its number two engine up top.
I think the flying wing concept with passengers inside the wings is really super. Aviation must move forward away from the pipe with wings concept.
How would you evacuate? How would you perform crosswind landings?
@@DinoAlberini and how safe are they
@@constellation-sj8xn who knows? Maybe safer, there aren’t serious studies about it.
They already tried doing that, But It's too impractical
It is good to see that companies are still trying to innovate these days. I particularly love that bird of prey shaped concept.
Electric blended wing designs are definitely the future of aviation.
Awesome video, I love efficient plane concepts. One nitpick: there are no electric engines, just motors. Engines are mechanical and rely on compression. All engines are motors but not all motors are engines.
Shuutttup. Are you base enough to think air fight on a commercial scale could go electric?
Also, do you realize electric batteries cause as much pollution as regular means of energy? Bro. Get a grip.
@@Gdub33 How about you actually read what I said and calm down. I just pointed out the difference between an 'engine' and a 'motor'. I'm well aware that electric flight is a long way from going commercial. That said, there's nothing wrong with designing airplanes that save fuel by being more aerodynamic and efficient.
@@Gdub33 Also you're wrong. Batteries over time pollute WAY less than burning fuel. A passenger jet emits 2 tons of CO2 per hour, your car only emits 4 tons in a whole year. Now realize that there are tens of thousands of planes in the sky at all times year round and you'll understand why people are trying to make a change.
@@nathanchildress5596 bro no they don't. You're thinking of like regular batteries. It's not financially feasible to develop a full battery. Plus it would be almost as toxic for the environment. I don't think you understand the scale these batteries would have to be. Enjoy your pipe dream.
@@Gdub33 It's not MY pipe dream fool, all I originally said was "I love efficient plane concepts." I have no skin in the game, I could care less what your opinion is, especially because you won't state any figures to back up your point, and most of all because you're being a dick.
The Bird of Prey design was more or less in my previous designs at Kerbal Space Program. I used to attach lifter wings(servos or elevons) back on back instead of a large wing and a small servo, in order to reach higher speeds and have less drag while having most control. Resulting say, 4 elevons working oppositely, say 2 pairs lifting up, while 2 pairs giving downforce, with one up-one down setting, the craft avoids the need of additional airbrakes since the drag is sufficient to slow down. Another 500kg advantage minimally.
Glad to see some business bosses dropping into idea.
More on that, by designing craft that has enough control, and giving slight symmetrical bend to the wings eliminates the need of vertical wingtail. Much or less like Bayraktar airstrike drones.
wow the Bird of Prey project is absolutely outstanding !!!
Boeing Sugarvolt is interesting. Especially the engine which functions as a jet at takeoff and operates with electrical motors at high altitude.
especially considering, it would be able to operate it's engines at altitudes where there is not enough oxygen for conventional jet engines, but the air resistance is much lower and speed of sound is higher.
The problem with batteries when flying airplanes is the fact that when they deplete .... you still carry the massive extra weight to lug around. This will reduce efficiency drastically. Right now, you carry 10 tons of jet fuel (or however much you need for your trip) and you actually burn it, causing the weight of the plane to be drastically reduced during flight thus allowing for efficient operation. Dragging really heavy empty batteries around (no matter how short or long is your trip) will probably offset the benefits of electric engines by a whole lot. The possible outcome is that the plane would have to carry a lot less passengers given its size, the tickets will be expensive and it would likely be just a "luxury" experience for a select few.
Embraer Pulse and Airbus Flying V are my two favourites.
Blended wing design is way better than other design.
I really want to travel with that flying v in the future
the private jet ones will see the light of day, my guess is the commercial airliners will
continue to retrofit old planes until they break.
wow the Bird of Prey project is absolutely outstanding !!!
The V shaped plane is my favorite.
Future airplane ✈ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐👈
What a manufacturer would promise: "A blended wing body design provides an exceptionally comfortable cabin layout, enabling passengers to benefit from additional legroom and larger aisles for *more personal comfort.* "
Ryanair: *hold my beer...*
The pilots: yeaaaaaaay
I'm eagerly looking to flying in the Otto Celera 500l. This is a great concept and its already working on FAA Certification.
Its just like a dream! I cant wait
I see A.I. taking over plane development and the major of other products we develope. We're living in the"future" from us who are a bit older. Wild times ahead, to say the least.
Обожнюю нестандартні дизайни техніки!)
Dude. The maverick... I want to fly that every time I travel for the rest of my life.
I like blended wing designs, because they offer much space for passengers
The Batman version..now that was amazing!😂
You are producing great videos. Up there with Mentor Pilot / Simply Flying & dare I say, SkyEng. Keep up the great work 👌
I always enjoy when airplane manufacturers present concept planes as if airlines give a crap about passenger experience. Yea, they COULD have all those cool visibility enhancements and tech, OR they could stick hundreds of people inside a dark tube with seats that don’t fit the human body and make way more money
Can’t forget Boom’s Overture, the Concorde replacement
My Dream Aviation Is:
•V-shaped Plane
•Swan Boeing
•Eagle Airbus
•Diamond Wave Shaped Jetplane.
Sad that I got hyped about these projects, but realizing they might never be built.
i am thrilled to see airbus concept
Congratulations 🎉👏 of being the top comment 👍😁 (as of now 😈)
That both A and B have similar looking concepts kinda tells you what's coming up. They must build full sized testbed planes to be tried out by real people. I believe when we move away from the "tube with wings" styling this is how aircraft will look like.
KLM is my favorite concept because im dutch :D
This is very exciting!! I was born in the 70's----thinking that we'd be flying planes like this by now----but -----between all the wars, "fight against drugs", pandemics, housing crisises, religious dogma and fascination with sports & the entertainment industry----no wonder we're moving at a snails pace. DISTRACTIONS! ---We have to inspire the children right now!!
Very interesting video, good summary of futuristic designs. As a part of my MSc in Aircraft Design I worked on a project similar to the Boeing Sugar Volt. An important issue it had was with the landing gear design, particularly its stowage since the high wing location deprived the design of a “natural” place to retract the landing gear into in the wings.
Im sure you and the whole aviation industry in general is working hard for a better flight experience, but i gotta ask whats going on with making flights a bit faster Or in other words are the engineers working on reducing sonic boom for the commercial front?
@@primeanomalous4275 Hello, good point! To be honest, speed is not a concern these days. In fact, many of these new concepts trade a bit of speed for a lot more efficiency. The rationale is that even if the aircraft cruise speed is 10% lower, your trip time will mostly not be affected because most of the time of your journey is spent commuting to/from airports, in the airports and waiting around rather than flying. Also, if we wanted to cross the transonic regime into supersonic flight, efficiency goes through the window and costs through the roof.
@@jibeneyto91 So no hybrid energy recovery, for maintaining efficiency?
& Man, LA to London in under 3 hrs is too tempting tho🙈 hope some more innovation and of course political/economical feasibility as well change... and new fuel sources come to light making supersonic flights a reality in this generation atleast..
@@jibeneyto91 Dont you think its time for establishing aviation consortiums which developed new and cheaper jetfuel to get rid of the economic problem of flying. Tackle the problem at root level and give the Arabs and politicians the middle finger.
A&P here, What if the long landing gear utilize the suspension to allow it to shorten and stow in a smaller area by depressurizing the suspension.
Expected more (planes and advanced ones). But, looks simply realistic and promising. Worthy consideration content.
What planes should have I included?
@@FoundAndExplained Nothing actually. I just felt futuristic concept planes that are huge and weirdly good are missing. But, reality and time factor need to be considered too.
Maybe we can get a supersonic new generation of the Jumbo Jet!
8:45 what's that hanging on the tail wing?
Flying 'V ' is good .
This is not new innovation on aviation if it still needs a run way...This is just makiing old tech better...it's still a tub with jet engine running on oil...or the same helicopter with one blade or 1000...going from horse and wagon to a motorized vehicle was revolutionary to mankind...That's what we need...Different flying shapes, different powers sources, different propulsion systems that are revolutionary...Everything from scratch, never seen before, out of this world , alien to human...That's what the PhD's of this world should be shooting for...!!
I love All of these
the Airbus zero-e is cool
The V shape plane is the best
In less than 20 years SpaceX has built a fleet of space crafts with recoverable/reusable rockets. They are building a low-level constellation of satellites that will bring broadband to rural areas of the world. They just started space tourism. Working on colonizing the Moon and Mars. Projected to have commercial air service by 2027 in which you can fly anywhere in the world in just 30-40 minutes. Meanwhile, we're still flying a commercial airplane design that have been around for 70 years. WTF is taking so long to improve commercial flight?
WOW THAT KLM IS COOL!!!!!!!
The S. U. G. A. R volt is probably my favorite
The bird plane looks interesting, but the spinning blades made me somewhat uneasy. I couldn't help imagining one of them falling off and being thrown toward the plane. The bird shape was beautiful though.
I like the embraer pulse and the otto aviation celera 500l
0:53 3 pilot cockpit? is that back to past?
Excellent stuff
Weil, mega cool 😉🕊
Honestly the day we see the next generation of aircraft will be so cool. Eventually we will put 777 and the common airliners of today in the past and we will be living in a whole new world. Cya in the future guys
I like the bird of prey
The Bird of prey,, ( LOOKS LIKE A WINNER )..P,S, THERE'S MY TWO CENTS..
Hi, I enjoyed all your videos I've watched so far. Can you please make a video on alternative aircraft fuels please
Watching this video make me remember about my RC plane that I have..
It got attack by an eagle
should mention the skylon for technically being also a plane
1986 was the year that the chemical formula for Transparent Aluminum became known to science.
-
Three people are credited with it's discovery;
Chief Engineer Montgomery Scott
Doctor Leonard McCoy
Lieutenant Master Helmsman Hikaru Kato Sulu
Good video
The Celera 500L has not one, but several videos on that airplane alone. Especially since its already a full size craft in flight testing.
Pretty sure the Celera 500L “consumes 8 times less that any other jet airplane” because from the looks of it. It’s a prop plane.
Turboprops are still jet powered but you'd still be right, thr Celera indeed uses the good ol piston engine.
@@carlosandleon Turboprop isn't a jet, either. It's a propeller driven by a turbine engine, but because the thrust is provided by the prop and not the engine "exhaust" , it's not a jet.
This would be nice
it's very perfect this new aircraft
im getting exited
With the Flying V wouldn’t the G force be very bad if you are sitting in the wind, I don’t know though please correct me if I’m wrong.
I like the planes now more
Coming to SUGARVOLT. it's like flying V but not like blended wing. It has an inspiration of being hybrid but at take of, single jet engine with help of 2 electric motors could suffice. Keeping in mind the FCC's dual sustained engine rules, since electric engines are backups, there are no need for 2 jets.
wowzers they are amazing where did you find out about them
So cool!
Personally, I fly IN planes, not ON them!
my favorite aircraft is flying v
damn cool but it might be damn shaky to sit inside the wing :D 1:10
I Liked The Swan Airplane In The Future, Because It Seems Like That's My Own Personal Plane Among The Aviation. BTW I Liked The V-shaped Airplane Too Because That's My Dream Plane Deployment Skill In My Magic Role Skill Called "Aviation Authority" Just Liked Whom I Played As On Mobile Legends.
The Phoenix Lights send greetings?
I hope they'll will be real
Bonjour Found And Explained,
Bonne soirée.
Cordialement Yannick ?
Transparent aluminum?! Did a Scot and a cranky doctor travel back to Brazil and give them that molecular diagram?
0:42 How hard is it to get the names of cities right ? The city's name is DELFT and you say DEE LEF
all the aircraft is my best 1
When the 500 was landing. That is Mojave Airport/ Spaceport. You can tell by the aircraft in the background.
The hybrid sounds perfect. Electric in the air. U wont hear a peep. Sounds perfect.
Props are louder than engines
Its quite possible that the Flying V will come into service
While new developments in Design are essential, why not also focus on human flying habits improvements. Most people carry far too much baggage. I noticed on a recent Airbus A380 long haul flight, People carry on an average 30 kg check in & 10 kg carry on. (My wife & I each checked in 10 kg with a carry on bag of 6 kg each, a reduction of 60% weight). If we enforce a change of habit, we could reconfigure / redesign existing aircrafts to carry 40% more passengers reducing no. of flights, achieving significant emission reductions. If we can do it, anyone can. Just a shift in thinking.
My favorite is the sugar volt
4:45 did he say transparent aluminum star trek iv reference 😊
its ALON its a transparent aliminium ceramic its way way stronger than glass but its heavier and more expensive
“hey it’s nick here from F’ing A”