Andre Agassi v Pete Sampras - Australian Open 2000 Semifinal | AO Classics
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
- Watch extended highlights of Andre Agassi and Pete Sampras' classic semi final match at the Australian Open 2000.
Make sure to subscribe to keep up with the latest Australian Open TV news: bit.ly/Australi...
Welcome To The Official Australian Open TV TH-cam Channel. Here you will find exclusive clips and footage from Australian Open tournaments as well as player interviews featuring the likes of Novak Djokovic, Serena Williams, Roger Federer, Maria Sharapova, Andy Murray, Rafael Nadal and Martina Hingis.
Facebook: / australianopen
Twitter: / australianopen
Instagram: / australianopen
7:00 "The crowd on there feet almost" everybody is legitimately sitting down... 😂😂
they are on their feet in spirit though
hard to imagine that this was 18 years ago
Jeff Lee 19(
Amen
Hard to imagine that he wasn’t far off from the meth days
Hard to imagine that Roland Garros roof will be constructed just 20 years later, while at Aus Open it was built back in 1988...
Dunno how old u r now. Imagine another 18 years like this passes, what our age will be?
This match is 22 years old and I feel like I'm watching it for the first time! Absolutely amazing tennis.....
Looking at the force of some of these blows, this could easily be today. What gladiators these two were. One of the great rivalries.
Agassi's composure at 12:47 when the chair umpire said it was clearly long is commendable. Nick kyrgios needs to watch
This match aired at like 3 am - I recorded it on VHS and watched it the next morning. Might be Agassi's best win of all time
That serve is just poetry in motion. It’s still the best single tennis shot of all time.
Best server against the best returner. Every time they played against each other`s it was really big happening.
This is Agassi's greatest win. After THAT forehand Reminds me of Novaks forehand against Fed at the US open. Somehow Andre found a way, countered with a clinical cold blooded return of a howitzer of a first serve. And instead Pete buckled. Hats off to you from a Sampras fan
You do NOT want to be serving to Andre. Best Hand-Eye ever. People get tricked into thinking that today's game is where it's at. Today's game is DIFFERENT. Very different.
Andre went in to beast mode in the 4th set.
Pete’s running forehand and his reaction at 16:27 is cold 🥶 AF!
Pete's Running Forehand was a prime example of turning defense into Offense... when on the run he could hit angles that just made opponents go "Well shit" and he's just like "Another day at the office"
@Mr Twister not whit this courtspeed
Nowadays Rafa or Djokovic play at least 10 shots like this every match. But those were the days.. Sampras was my childhood hero.
Haha. It was badass. One of the nastiest forehands ive seen in 30 years of watching tennis.
@@coolyoutuber6237 Much easier with modern rackets, balls, training.
It's so annoying to hear Sampras was the GOAT server. Well that he was but he also one of the greatest ever in all other departments. You don't become that dominating just on serve in the most competent tennis era. Sampras was great fluid athlete. Right amongst very best.
Sampras was _not_ one of the greatest ever at returns. His results on clay are not up there with the greatest ever which means he couldn't adapt his game well to that surface. He was most definitely not a perfect all around player. His serve was absolutely huge and that made his volley game a lot easier. His speed was not one of the greatest ever. His slice and drop shots weren't up there with the greatest ever, either. He had power, pretty good speed, and was a very good shot maker. His mentality might have been his biggest advantage. He was obsessed with winning and made tennis his entire life while he was playing.
@@bubufubu - Your reply is so stupidly ignorant that I’m not going to bother answering it…..wtf!!
@@steveturner609 I think his reply made a lot of sense.
@@steveturner609 it was a great reply. pete with an average serve would hold a slam or two at most. quit being a biased fanboy and wake tf up.
back when a 5 shot rally was considered unheard of
Only if you were playing Pete Sampras or one of the other great serve and volleyers. if you saw Fabrice Santoro play, he would play long points. Lendl. too.
Made my day :D
lol
And tennis was enterteining
144p squad 🤣
These two champions have no peer...20 years on and as impressive as ever! Truly blessed to have witnessed these guys in their prime 👏👏👏
Man you gotta give Andre credit at 13:00 for how he handled the over-rule on the serve; that was class rarely seen.
not much he could have done about it, act like a jerk and its the same outcome
These commentators are awesome. So much positivity and reverence for the skill.
what a match! tho the obsession with steffi's reaction is weird and annoying hahaha
@Abraham Villalobos In Agassi's book he said she would get super nervous for him, because she had no control over the outcome.
@Abraham Villalobos When he was.
This hardcourt is as fast as yesteryear grass! Makes today's wimbledon look like green clay.
At that time, Aus open was one of the slowest hard court on tour. This allows Agassi to be highly competitive with Sampras and Rafter a year later.
@@kidpagronprimsank05 And yet, it was so much faster than today's "fast" courts…
@@J.-M. definitely agree with you. Now you have Djoko defending 20ft behind the baseline. Kinda ridiculous.
Plus flat shots
Wow, exactly.
That shot by agassi during 0-2 in the third set tiebreak was TOTALLY in
This one-‘’best serve’’ against ‘’best return’’ is a stereotype,both had a complete game-look how many baseline strokes Pete could win,here or even against Chang, Muster,Courier Kafelnikov or how strong,especially on the second part of his career could Andre serve,how many types of play could everyone hit,great players,great personalities,now both rich family men,enjoying their life
The days before the players went to the towel after every serve or point or bounced the ball 15 times before serving. Sampras: one bounce, then serve, no towel, repeat.
When the longest rally is 4 shots, you don't really need time between points.
@@Dan-dd8cf There were longer rallies than that, but when you have the best serve of all time plus an incredible net and transition game, why would you want to stay back and rally with Agassi?
3 Minute Poetry Analysis That’s not the point though he’s saying the points were short so they don’t need the towels.
@@SJ-di5zu Sampras as well as the majority of players in those days never went for a towel between points regardless of the length of the rallies. It just was not part of the game.
This is the dark ages before the renaissance of Fedalovic.
The Sampras serve is a thing of beauty
and the follow up as well. I just love attacking tennis, enforcing your will on the opponent. Just a beauty.
The picture quality from the vaults here are absolutely superb. Pity Wimbledon simply can't be bothered to do the same. For instance, why not put extended highlights of the 1999 Wimbledon final?
Best match I have ever watched. Two of the greatest with absurd level of quality in play. Best returner in history vs best server of all time. 18:44 is just sick from Andre.
I agree completely. I think its the best match of their rivalry, atleast in grand slam competition.
Both were great in this match, but my god, Andres groundies were incredible this match.
I am Spanish, i loved Nadal and i love Alcaraz. But how i wish he can return the half good Agassi did... I remember Agassi was becoming a new star right in my time as young tennis player (teenager with very good level). We all the kids in our team loved Agassi.
For me Alcaraz have a lot of room to improve his return shot. Maybe his worst part together with serve. All the other shots are just amazing and unique. Thats why he is a highlights maker machine.
I loved how Nadal return too. But in this era no doubt, Nole is the best returner...
What always amazes me is the Agassi Ability to shot the ball so close to his body. He dont need that great leg´s play. Also how soon he always shot.
Djoko is an amazing returner but oh boy Agassi's returns against a server as brilliant as Sampras were astonishing. The best returner in the game ever.
Wow! That guy Sampras knew how to serve and that guy Agassi knew how to return! Who said tennis is at it’s best now?
Sam Ahmed. Appreciate all eras.
The Supernatural. Tennis is definitely not at its worst!
Federer
Pete sampras only knew how to serve
The game is so boring
well maybe todays players just return every shot better than before
Um .. they are pro. They know how to serve and return for sure lol
We don’t see Sampras hit a groundstroke until 9 minutes into the video. LOL
He won a lot rallies against Andre each time they met,there are plenty of footage on TH-cam
@GTS Rubbish.Watch the 1996 Masters Final against Becker in Hannover - one of the greatest matches ever played, with many great rallies.
@@martydav9475 so why didn't he win nothing on clay?
@@matteo964 He won the Italian Open. That's the 2nd biggest tournament on clay. He won a Davis Cup final against Russia on clay. He had the mind of a champion. Don't count Sampras out. He was written off in 2002 and played the tournament of his life to win the U.S Open for the 5th time!
@@alanchong7513 yeah. One of the GOATs defence for a bad clay performance is winning a masters tournament once.
All time classic!
But seriously, these commentators are a bloody pain in the arse....
Never seen a better server than Pistol Pete. First serve sublime, second serve equally so. Most beautiful action as well, spare, graceful and impossible to tell the direction.
Great match, great highlights! But what I LOVE the most is that they DID NOT ASK for the fucking towel between every single ball.
Andre's return of serve is godly. A lot of guys have had great serves. Many have had great forehands or backhands, but nobody, i mean nobody, ever has had as good of a return as Andre Agassi.
The hand eye and quickness to take 130 mph bb's and consistently pick them off is imo the most unique weapon in the history of tennis.
Keep in mind Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic fans, that Andre had to not only make contact with bomb serves, but had to put the return either by someone, or hit it within two feet of the other side of the net because people actually serve and volleyed back then. Todays players have the whole court to get the ball back into.
@Vif Mrt Dude youre just insane, and have no idea what youre talking about.
Smarten up bud lol.
Please upload highlights of Federer vs. Safin 2005 semifinals!
Should be easy to find.
What a game that was. What a game
@@nonyelumnwanekezie8444 Yes it was a great match.Federer had a match point in the fifth, but Safin deserved to win.
marty dav did he actually? If Federer had a match point he also deserved to win
@@martydav9475 No; it was in the 4th set when Federer had match point.
Agassi the best of the best
For all those complaining about hating serve volley here, I can only assume they want everyone to play exactly the same way, not to have any independent thinkers or different strategies. Well I suppose they can take comfort in the fact the authorities feel the same way, considering all of the changes they made to ensure that.
I love serve & volley. Beautiful scientific art.
Tell me..did they really show the first point on Agassi's serve directly in the third set (9 minutes into a 25 min odd highlights reel)? I'm not sure because I fell asleep a couple of times in between.
@@virajvibhute8510 don't worry, they have care centers for the demented nowadays my friend
@@anonymousLeroy spot on
Burns Tennis if anyone ever needs a great example of a false dichotomy fallacy, i will just direct 'em to your comment.
What a serve Sampras had it was awesome 👏
For me, this was the best match ever, never felt this emotion again
Very much agree. I taped this on VHS and it was a match I always watched again and again. Contrast of styles between two legends.
Como te encuentro acá Seba .... le añadiría la semifinal de Australia del 2005 safin Federer ... y la final del 2012 obvio novak Rafa
@@marcoparodi7815 🙂🎾
What I think Andre has done is just push the Sampras patience as much as he could and at the same time not lose his ... And he got what he totally deserve ❤️
Hard to fathom how Sampras lost this match. He had it in his pocket and yet Agassi was able to take it away from him. Kudos to Agassi for fighting all through that fourth set, especially during the tie breaker. That running forehand @3 all should have demoralised Agassi, but it didn’t. A little bit of luck with that net cord during the immediate next point, but all the credit to Agassi
Even Andre won this.... Sampras in his prime was the best player that I have ever seen play that game.
now this is what you call a classic!!!
Is there anything better then when Andre strikes the ball?
I cant find anyone
These commentators are really hamming it up.
Sampras service is the best of all time.
Not so. Many players now serve the same fast/hard well placed balls. It's just back then there weren't many that did that. And, players, after watching Agassi, now are able to return such serves a bit more than back then.
@@markuse3472 that's because of the racket and string technology. If you look at serve wins, holds and second serve wins/ace percentage Sampras peaks.
Only real debate could be whose a better server (Isner/Sampras)
Ivo Karlovic.
The strength of his service comes from the angle he generates from the sideward rotation of his body.
@@markuse3472 you're wrong. No other player has had the placement and power combined that pete had on first and second serve. Add in the fact that pete always threw his toss in the same spot regardless where he was going made it unreadable. It's by far the best. That's why hell forever be the best player ever on grass.
For someone who calls Pete Sampras a’’quitter’’,here the stats for the best ever after loosing the first set:
1)Laver 0,520
2)Borg 0,438
3)Sampras 0,436
4)Lendl 0,434
5)Nadal 0,429
6)Federer 0,419
7)Djokovic 0,417
15)Agassi 0,373
So who is the ‘’Quitter’’?
Everyone below Laver.
Back injury in the summer of 99 really set Pete back. That summer of 1999, arguably was the best tennis Pete ever played. Had the injury not occurred, he was definitely the favorite player to win the US Open.
mrbobevans and he would have won here too had the injury not occurred
@@maturanita Excuses. Pete lost period. Agassi with better conditioning clearly.
If agassi could serve and volley better and move a little better, he would have ruled till the late 2000s
Part of tennis my friend
@@TrungVu-nq9en He also had the spine condition thing, that was a big part of it
How I do miss watching fast courts.
I hope we get to see more classic matchups like this one!
Agassi's return was fucking amazing.
Thank you very much for sharing this amazing highlights in great quality
The AO was considered a "medium-slow" surface then. It's fast compared to the various color molasses hard courts we have nowadays. Honestly, red clay seems a lot faster than many so called hard courts.
This was amazing. I wish you could please do this with more Agassi matches on the channel.
This maybe isn't the greatest rivalry of all time, but for me is the best rivalry of all time, The greatest server of all time against The greatest returner of all time, Volley against Baseline... It's like fire against wind fighting each other...
16:23 thats Andy Murray playing and celebrating.
Ha, you wish. Sampras would destroy Murray.
@@robertorolfo No, he really wouldn't.
@@bsnhbksan Yes, he really would. If you can't understand why, you are seriously lost...
@@robertorolfo doubt it
@@bsnhbksan Ha, why? Do you know how many GS he won?
Agassi is king of the return serves.
*Djokovic fans inconing*
Cheetah Car Wouldn’t call him the goat personally but I’m here not to argue. He has way superior game than Djokovic though
@@sh33pyyy 'way superior' is such an overstatement, what a foolish and naive thing to say. btw. I don't even consider him goat.
Hewitt had better return.
You see how close Agassi to the line he is returning a 115mph or faster serve, wow.
The greatest of all time, Pete Sampras.
He was using a tiny 85 sq. inch Wilson pro staff here.
Never changed his tool of the trade, but still managed to win 14 grand slams.
So he used a less effective racquet to give himself a bigger challenge?
that was exactly what was used at the time, before the string tech changed.
Federer idolized Pete and copied much of his game so it can be said that Pete's game won another 20 Slams.
Factoid. In the famous 2001 Wimbledon match between Pete and Roger, both players used the same Wilson Pro Staff racquet.
@@encinobalboa he copied his game till end of 2003.as he stopped to copy his game,he started to win everything
man i love Sampras, what a player he was. However the 4th set breaker he must not lose...
In my opinion these two are the best ever. They both played when there was a great number of other great players ( McEnroe., Becker, Chang, Wilander, Lendl, Courier, Cash, Rafter, the list goes on. Everyone says Federer or Nadal are the best ever and they are great but Federer didnt have any competition for years until Nadal showed up and other than Djocvic , there just isnt the competition out there like Agassi and Sampras had to deal with. Just my opinion. This match was like watching 2 heavyweight boxers trade haymakers over and over. Unreal tennis..
Boneshaker RF beat both Pete and Andre grand slams so. Federer best themAll.
They're certainly 2 of the best players ever, but I don't think their competition was as good as the 80's, or the height of the Big 3 era. The 80's had Lendl, Mac, Connors, plus 2 years of Borg and some Wilander in the first half, and then Lendl, Becker, Edberg and Wilander in the second half. Along with assorted other very good players.
The height of the Big 3 era had arguably the three greatest players of all-time at their peaks, plus Andy Murray, who in a slightly less difficult era probably was worthy of 5-6 slams. Also Wawrinka, del Potro, Roddick, and other very good players.
The 90's saw Lendl all but done by 91. Edberg won his last slam in 92. Becker was still around, and got several good results, but he was better in his prime. Other than that it was Sampras and Agassi, and a bunch of guys who were good enough to win a slam or two, but none of them were all-time greats. Courier was the closest thing, but he only had a couple great years. I wouldn't say the 90's lacked competition by any means, but it did have a slight dearth of all time great players.
@@ChrisChinAva when agassi and sampras was old and practicly reteirment
24:13 always love the way Agassi aplause back to the crowd 👏🏾
Still watching in 2018.
Stands the test of time. A classic.
Great match from these two American rivals! Congrats to Agassi!
le service de dingue qu'il avait Sampras... (ca lui a fait gagner énormément de points, un gros atout)
sampras serve is a thing of beauty
One of the best matches in 20 years😃😄 just enjoy this match
Two of the best, in One match, Agassi vs Sampras !!!
Lucky enough to go to this match to watch these legends. I replay that running forehand from Sampras all the time 👑
commentary is a lot better these days. agassi's return of serves and pete's 2nd serve is better than today's generation. pete's forehand on the run.... good gracious.
Well Djoker has best return
@@menon_ji4984 in the current era, for sure
@@sultanabran1 Agassi himself told that Djoker has the best return. Not just return but Deep return.
@@menon_ji4984 agassi isn't going to say his return is better than djokovic's
The Best Agassi of all Time.
Legends!!
RIP Drew Morphett. Iconic commentator.
Shame that you left out the service faults of Sampras' that were followed up by bomb second serve aces in the fourth set tiebreak. Just watching him bang down an edited two aces one would believe they were first serves when in fact they were second serves. Even with those and that freak running forehand pass Agassi remarkably found a way to snatch that tiebreak. Great match and upload nonetheless.
Yes. The measure of a highlights video is in showing that second serves WERE second serves, if only in crucial moments. No player in history hit as many great second serves under pressure as Pete Sampras, and only when you KNOW they're second serves can you truly appreciate his excellence.
Couldn't agree more with both of you.
Agassi got so lucky with that netcord/Sampras hitting the volley wide, otherwise Sampras likely would've won the match.
@@drlight6677 you create your own luck. Lol
@@drlight6677 K and Sampras got luckier because the Ump robbed Agassi of an ace. He also hit like 3 winners on the line in the first TB, which is also incredibly lucky.
I'd like to the matches of Pete vs Federer, Staffi vs Serena, at their peak time.
No one:-
Literally No one:-
This channel highlights:- ...we join the action with 4 points remaining
Is this what you call highlights?
Wow!!
With no argument, Pete Sampras is the greatest server the game has ever seen.
It is a true honor to see the greatest players of their era going toe to toe in this match. Priceless.
Amazing quality. Thanks!
That forehand at 16:20 What a beautiful angle.
I could watch that Sampras serve all day...
God, that era was so boring because of the dominance of big serves. Thankfully the sport was saved due to changes in surfaces and strings.
great contrast in styles. Sampras long and flowing. Agassi compact and efficient
Commentator: it doesn't get better than this
Me: wait till AO 2009 & 2012 😉😉
Wimby 2008?
steffi graf's smile says it all..so happy for them..
If I wanted to do a comedy sketch about Australian sports commentators I’d simply reuse this clip.
Announcers: we promise to be quiet and just watch tennis. Next point: yap yap yap.
You do realise it's an edited highlights reel? The commentary was live - the gaps have been editted out.
when you see these men played, you realized they are really the tennis gentlemen, no excuse, no mad, serve fast.
Pete's running forehand and jump smash are incredible, no one can do it today!
Federer can :/
Federer was never this good!!
no one chooses to (besides monfils). big difference.
Pete's serve actually gained momentum when it hit the ground, due to the incredible rotation he generated. The only player who can do this is Kyrgios. Nick's serve takes off when it hits the ground.
Yes Kyrgios is amazing. Prob is he has no self belief.
@@blond2282 And not great conditioning. And a tendency to hit go for broke or trick shots that look impressive, but aren't sustainable patterns that can win you the 5-7 consecutive matches needed to win tournaments very often.
Nobody's serve "gains momentum" when it hits the ground.
Raonic serve is more impressive
Got tears when Agassi nailed it
Gosh, I enjoyed these two great American tennis players more than any rivalry in tennis.
Greatest serve ever.
"You can bet Sampras will keep going for that serve" - Yea he's 6-0 up in the tiebreak, no shit he's gonna keep going for his serve. Great commentators there...
Historical match ever!!!
It took only 3 hours to play 5sets in those days😅
The average 5 set match today is between 3-4 hrs.
@@serenaistheb.o.a.t you need to allow an extra hour when Nadal plays, he spends that time picking his ass
Best server G.O.A.T
Sampras is serving every clip wtf
best decade
Where tf was the scoreline on TV back in the day?
Imagine having to actually...pay attention!
Not getting in the way!
Pay attention....
Those are the golden days of Tennis where we had champion players like Sampras Agassi Rafter Safin Hewit Krajicek Ivanisevic Henmen.. now a days we hardly have a grandslam winner other than Djokovic and Nadal..
Just look at the number of views this vid has in 2 weeks! These 2 were the GOATS imo and pure blockbuster names. Legendary rivalry that surpassed Federer Nadal imo. The perfect matchup too.
Ciaron Smith Nadal-Djokovic is the GOAT rivalry
Yes, I'd much rather watch these 2 than fed and nasal.
Once Andre got that fourth set, he knew he had Pete on the ropes. Pete looked exhausted
Icons...miss those 2.