New Jerusalem Bible Reader's Edition

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.ย. 2024
  • A review of the New Jerusalem Bible, Reader's Edition (1985, Darton, Longman & Todd - a British edition) and a comparison with the Doubleday Jerusalem Bible. Also, a discussion about what makes a Bible a "reader's edition."
    #newjerusalembible #jerusalembible #biblereview
    R. Grant Jones' excellent and extremely useful channel:
    / rgrantjones
    St. Irenaeus Ministry video: What Bible Should I Use:
    • What Bible Should I Us...

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @rachelkarslake7787
    @rachelkarslake7787 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for showing the British version. I have never seen that one reviewd.
    I love The New Jerusalem Bible! It's, honestly, my favorite translation. But, I gave my copy to a young teenager who was newly baptized and without a Bible.

    • @ma-mo
      @ma-mo  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What a great way to "lose" a Bible!

  • @tudormiller887
    @tudormiller887 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have a copy of the blue one. I'm not a praticising Roman Cathlolic I actually want to convert to Judaism just like the actress Felicity Kendall did 40 years ago. She was born & raised as a Roman Catholic. The Torah is quite different from the Old Testament though.I always thought Roman Catholics read from the King James Bible like the Protestants. Now I realize both denominations all worship, pray & read from different bibles. 😊

    • @ma-mo
      @ma-mo  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Perhaps the Bibles aren't all THAT different.

  • @joest.eggbenedictus1896
    @joest.eggbenedictus1896 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Those look like interesting copies, and I think that leather version is quite unique! Have never seen either of those formats.

  • @ThriftStoreBibles
    @ThriftStoreBibles ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I really dig the layout of the JB - maybe just move the refs to the inside to get the main text away from the gutter. I'm keeping an out for one! Mostly I just come across "reader's editions" that don't have the notes, which I want. I'm not concerned about them being liberal or conservative - I like a mix of both in my library. Continuing to pray that you may heal and be able to hold that JB with both hands again soon!

    • @ma-mo
      @ma-mo  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for the prayers, Scott. If I come across another JB I'll surely grab it for you.

  • @DavidWilson-hd6iz
    @DavidWilson-hd6iz ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think the NLT Catholic Holy Bible Readers Edition is also double column. Which doesn't really explain anything. Apparently some people have problems reading long sentences and lose their place. The Readers Bible I use is a hardcover edition of the NKJV you showed. I love it. That's partly because lots of letters and numbers in a reference text "scratch my eyes" and distract me.

    • @ma-mo
      @ma-mo  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm with you on the eye scratching.

  • @stuartskooler
    @stuartskooler ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great post sir. Thanks to watching your review I bought the CTS (Catholic Truth Society) standard edition as I live in 🇬🇧 . The font is bit small but I wear glasses to read. But lay out is single column and so readable for a newbie .

    • @ma-mo
      @ma-mo  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, Stuart!

  • @dalecaldwell
    @dalecaldwell ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ah. An anti-readers edition, perhaps. The Doubleday Readers Edition continues the single column tradition. And it's often found in a paperback at very low prices. I had for a while a compact readers edition which was quite wonderful. For some strange reason, I have it no longer.

  • @manfredcaranci6234
    @manfredcaranci6234 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    While you will indeed find that the NJB translation tends more towards the literal than does the JB, it loses its edge by incorporating, albeit at a relatively mild level, gender-neutral language that was NOT present in the original (1966) JB. I have the NJB "full-sized" edition (1985), comparable to your JB, with ALL the book intros, footnotes, cross-references; it has the single column format you so like, with verse numbers in the margins. I've owned the NJB since 1987; I have a love/hate relationship with it, due mainly to its gender-neutral language, however restrained it may be. The notes are indeed more liberal than those in the 1966 JB.
    And while I do not own or have online access to a RNJB, I have no plans to acquire one because it's even more gender-neutral in its translation and continues its leftward swing in its notes. Admittedly, from what I've gleaned online, there was an attempt at being even more literal than the 1985 NJB, and maybe it succeeded, but that would likely be its only strong point, IMHO. Also, it removed the name "Yahweh" from the OT, breaking with its predecessors.

    • @ma-mo
      @ma-mo  2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thanks for your insights. I find I rarely even open the NJB, while I quite enjoy the Jerusalem Bible, still.

  • @juanalaniba9723
    @juanalaniba9723 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where can I buy this new Jerusalem bible, with side readings, footnotes and gold edge.

    • @juanalaniba9723
      @juanalaniba9723 ปีที่แล้ว

      I saw your Jerusalem bible is complete

    • @ma-mo
      @ma-mo  ปีที่แล้ว

      It would have to be from a used bookseller. I see many editions on ebay, for instance. Luckily there are many still out there!