I can see bishop taking it to another level by making the this battery even more stream lined and lighter. Essentially making the battery completely flush with the machine in a few months time.
thats the thing I was wondering how the balance/top weight was with the way the battery sits atop the rca but I think you're right they'll probably make it where it looks more like one piece down the road like the flux or exo
Good to see you my Friend…Thanks for the Content Man..Recently just got a Fk Irons Xion pen and it is Amazing ..with the 3.2 stroke they say you can’t do lines but I lined Great with it..The Power Wand batteries last forever..Great Products
@@andrewplaisance8282 depends on your style..I Have both,I use my Flux with 4.0 stroke for Color and packing Blacks and I use my Xion Pen with the 3.2 Cam on it for my Smooth black and Grays but if you get use to the Flux you can shade with it also
Hey friend I have one more question, The powerwand packer or the flux? For bng realism and in general as an all-around machine? Thanks for your videos!
I think both would be good as all rounder machine. I used Flux allot and it was good. I have never tried to connect it to apps and all the firmware ,but I heard that many artists had allot of problems with it draining the battery and messing up somehting. so I'm not too sure if that's still an issue or not. and if you're even looking for all those digital gives and app adjustments / connections. IF not then it's good! Power wand is definitely easier to work with. lighter/more ergonomic and together with Eikon battery (what I think is much better quality then any others out there) As it goes for black ang gray work I think it might be a little easier to achieve it with - Flux. Lines and solid packing would be a bit easier with Wand.
Thanks so much for taking the time to make your reviews! I have a sol nova 3.5 (not unlimited) and am considering getting either bishop packer or sol nova unlimited 4.0 - I mostly do fine lines with 3rl, 5rl and find it hard to get good black lines in one pass with my current sol nova. Any thoughts on which you’d recommend?
hey. I would probably go for bishop Packer, it would be more powerful than 3,5 solnova. And should be good for any lines. I do work mostly with bishop shader, and it does work good for fine lines and is smooth, but I think it's about same like solnova 3.5. if you want something little more puncher - packer would be good! it's also smaller size (more like solnova) compare to Unlimited.
I only have the packer power wand cause it's the one I use the most but since I already own the liner and shader I didn't want to have to buy the new battery system since I have the critical batteries I actually use the liner wand alot for thick linework and dotwork stuff
Can you please test to see if you can remove the motor like the original bishop wands I am very curious to see if there is still access to the push rod from.the inside. For cleaning etc
Yes, I believe so. There's a thread that you can unscrew and open it to clean the rod. But I only tried it on one machine, wasn't sure if that's somehting what should or shouldn't happen. So didn't wanted to open all of them.
Have you tried the Ultron 2 yet? I'm considering getting one. The big heavy stainless grips are really appealing. Also, do you have a PowerBox 5? On the fence, whether or not I should toss one in with the order.
I have used ultron2 model. To be honest I didn't felt crazy difference from the previous model, little more powerful, but nothing mindblowing to me... to keep coming back to it. Saying that , I had a ultron2 test model that was more than 2 years ago. It's high possibility that there has been many changes/upgrades in the function and it's completely different machine now. Those large heavy grips are awesome tho! and I haven't tried powerbox5.
Thank you for the review! I love seeing your content! I have a question, is the vibration of the machine still the same as with the bishop wand? I can imagine that a smaller machine produces more vibrations/ cancels less vibrations. Best regards!
Thankyou! I'm not sure what vibration is Bishop wand, as I never had it, but I think it's probably same as the same motor is used. There's almost none of it.
Between the shorty and the full sized battery, wich one do you run the most and/or is one better then the other in any way? Thanks in advance for anyone that wants to answer this q 🙏🏽
Mostly I use full size battery as it lasts easy 8+ hours. it's better for me as it's all has covered, I don't need to mess around with changing batteries and can do full day tattoo. Weight wise it's not too crazy difference. Of course smaller one is more comfortable / ergonomic and easier to use, but lasts around 4 hours, so I have to change it anyways. Performance wise both exactly the same, great steady power!
Hi Anrijs, Thanks for these reviews as always. I have the Wand Liner. I thought it was just for lining and I heard you say it’s good for blackout work. I did a small area for black and noticed it packed it in very quickly but I was a afraid to keep going for fear of damaging the skin. Your saying it’s ok for large black areas?
it all depends on your technique. there's a possibility to damage the skin, but also it could be really good and fast colour packer. I'm sure there's people who can even do soft black and gray with liner machine. so all just depends on what you prefer. Best advice would be to try on some friend or existing customers to colour some areas with it , and maybe other areas with different machine (that you think is better) and then check how it looks when they come back.
Thank you very much, great video covered everything ,helped me a lot on my decision. One question , the shader is a direct hit? I heard that it has like a "brushed" motor and the others dont. Did you feel like it had a "give" to it? Also compared to the stigma force what would you say?
Thank-you for watching, glad to hear it helped. I think it is more direct drive, then with give. But it's possible it has a little slight one, if other people says it is - ''brushed'' then I would believe them more then me hehe... I cannot tell that well. Compered to Stigma force - This is definitely more solid / durable feel to it. More Ergonomic and easier to hand. As for a hit - from what I can remember it's similar, but Bishop seams to be more smoother overall.
The older Wand will not work with this one, but will work with any RCA powerpack. Critical has also these type of packs RCA mode. larger and smaller ones with all the bluetooth etc - Critical Connect.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo Thanks fo the response Anrijs! I've heard that the older wands together with the regular powerpacks lose a lot of their torque and power, i've used my bishop with an RCA cable. Would you say it's worth the investment? Or should I just stick with the old Bishop and just buy a regular critical powerpack? I'm really tired dealing with chords, i'm a pepper shading artist and b&g and it gets in my way so much it's fucks up my shading from time to time.
Hello i have the unlimited nova 3.5 and I use it only for Black and grey what you like The most for this type øf work sol nova or bishop shader? I dont know if to buy it or keep The nova i dont have problem with the read øf voltage but I wanna know if the shader îs more good
compare to Unlimited 3.5 - I think this Bishop shader is more softer and more precise for smaller lines (like 1-5 liners) With bishop i'm a bit slower, but work is smoother. But I mostly still use Cheyenne as I'm more used to it, I like the punch. My work is a bit heavier hitting in some areas lining. If you're happy with your machine I don't think there will be mega upgrade , but if you want somehting more softer like (Cheyenne spirit) then Bishop shader is cool Hope that helps.
Hey Anrijs, thanks for the video. I am currently working with sol nova unlimited 3.5 and i am looking for a second machine that compliments it. Would the shader be comparable? Both have 3.5mm stroke. I do mainly black and grey work with only small to medium lines. Or should i go with sol nova unlimited 4.0mm to compliment my 3.5?
I think solnova unlimited 4.0.mm might be too heavy for black and gray and small lines. and I don't think there will be that much of a difference in performance then 3.5 mm. If you feel that you need second machine - I would probably go for one of the wand machines - shader will be softer, (I think even softer then sol nova unlimited) That could be good for you to achieve even smoother black and gray. but you can also get shader wand, that's going to be much faster for lining , and also for solid blacks would be good! smooth shading however will be harder to achieve with that one.
I sold my nova unlimited 3.5 for a wand packer. That thing does everything. Smooth b&g. Pepper shading. Thin and bold lines. It’s the best allrounder machine i’ve found so far.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo thank you for your answer. TH-cam didnt give me a notification. I think i will get the wand shader then. Do you think the fk irons exo with 3.2mm stroke would be good too? I heard it has a very strong motor. Maybe too strong. It is getting a better power bolt now aswell. Have a great day.
@@JOKE485 i would not want to sell my 3.5 i tried a lot of machines and the sol nova unlimited is my favorit so far. I am torn between fk irons exo 3.2mm and bishop wand shader 3.5mm. Exo has a much stronger motor. And i am a bit worried it might be too much for layering. Bit if the sol nova 3.5 and the wand shader are basically the same machine i dont really want that.
@@aceadam1828 The sol nova unlimited is certainly your go to machine for smooth B&G. The bishop packer is sorta the same but has a different motor and battery, in my opinion the bishop shader is better just because I can see the voltage adjustment, it weights less, is smaller and especially the new power wands they have, have a lot more battery capacity and is just more efficient to clean and wrap imo aswell.
Thankyou. I'm not sure as I've never had Bishop before, but It's really soft, it would surprise me if it's louder. of course all depends on voltage and cartridge.
@@fuelshop4774 it's not at all, barley can hear it. (that's what I said, that it would surprise me if it's lauder then V6) check out in the video when I turn it on.
I'm not sure on technical information - motor / weight / size etc... all that you can check and compare machines yourself. (all technical information is available in their websites) but to work with I think Sol Nova feels more quicker , sharper , punchier.. 3.5mm Wand is softer machine and smoother shades is easier to achieve. but some lining and solid black areas would be easier with Solnova. That will be both on around - 7-8V Of course on lower or higher voltages individually they might be around the same.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo thank you for taking your time to answer ! I’ve been tempted to buy the shader, but this lubrification thing puts me off. Your video on the Solnova 3.5 was instrumental in me buying it, thank you!
whichever works for you. everyone would have different preferences. I would recoment to start around 6.5 and slowly go up every 5-10 minutes or so. You should be able to tell when it's a good voltage for your technique , hand movement and speed.
these will not work with old wand, (and I don't even know if you can get these ones separately) But Critical RCA batteries will work with previous wands. It's pretty much same batterie packs like these , just with different connection.
Super helpful video!! I hope you make comparison of fk iron EXO and BISHOP power wand..coz for me i dont want to regret which one should i buy and still confucing which one is better to buy 👻 thanks and more power to your channel anrijs!
Hey, I probably not going to make EXO review. But from what I feel compare to other wireless machines - performance wise it would be about the same machine. between the same stroke (small/medium/long) machine for both then I would probably choose PowerWand over the EXO, it's about 2 years newer machine, I think the finish is just better including full voltage readouts. About batteries, I think critical is better quality as a brand as they have been specialising in tattoo power supplies for 10+ years. from what I've heard - there been many reports of FK packs malfunction after all the firmware updates and connection them to apps etc.. Not sure if it's still a case or all fixed, but i guess if it works good it gives more options with connection to app , readouts, digital give etc.. (but how practical all that is I'm not able to comment) Critical pack has only bluetooth option for now to connect with pedal.
I would say yes. Definitely on top 3 machines in my opinion. Simple, easy to use, reliable, works great and battery life is great too. Only downside that i can think of - all the additional grips out of stock always and almost impossible to get anywhere outside of US.
yes, you can shade with it. you can check Bishop instagram for artists what uses their machines , I'm sure some of them using 4.2 for it. But I think if smooth shades is what you're looking to do - it will be easier to use 3.5
haha, I bet it is. I would probobly just keep sol nova... Bishop packer of course is awesome machine, and smaller/lighter then sol nova unlimited. + rca connection and few extras. Could be faster on lining with it too. but I think sol nova is a great machine too. so If I wouldn't have extra $ to spend, I would probably just keep that one. unless you are looking to get second machine or somehting little harder hitting.
Bro you are awesome. Do videos like this and answer all the questions from us is priceless. Thank you so much for share your knowledge and experiences. Bless from chile 🗿🍀
@@olivierbilodeau1952 you did not buy the power wand for 800 you bought the original for 800. The power wand costs roughly 1800cad and can only be bought through bishop currently so that being said you will have to add on a terrif tax once it comes into canada probably putting this machine bundle at about 2000$ cad. Bishop has recently started selling the powerwand with rca adapters making it cheaper now to own all 3 but still costing a hefty 4k most likely after all shipping and taxes paid into Canada. Currently no Canadian distributor is selling the powerwand I have spoken with 2 major suppliers in canada and they will eventually have them but not anytime soon. Hopefully in the future bishop will release all new machines with the custom critical battery fitting these machines have
Theyre website says choose liner, packer, or shader. I cant find anywhere specific that it says how it changes configuration. Are these cock suckers trying to play on words and get us to buy 1 thinking it does all three, than to only try and rope us in to buying three of these because weve already invested in one of them? If this is the case this is some real shady buisness tactics.
I don't think there's anything hidden. it's 3 machines. configurations are the same, the differences are in in Stroke. and you can pick which one suitable more for you. Technically you don't need 3 machines. That's why it is this way. You pick the one you would normally use, or the stroke you would prefer, that's just more easier way to explain - liner/shader or packer. But some people do lines with shader, some do packing with liners etc... so it all depends on your preferences. Tattooers should be familiar with all that before buying / investing in machines.
Bro , STOP, 1,200? What is it made solid gold? No thanks. Like u said. Artists can work with any set up. As long as its a relieble motor spinning inside its good. I found an 85 dollar rotary from a chineese company that made me put my Cheyenne down for good. 85 dollars and i been running it for over 2 years now. This is for ducks.
Yeah, agree price is cosmic. I do believe the quality is also much much better then any knockoff machines. With all the wireless setup / 2 batteries , chargers all the cables etc. I think it's ok price compare to other machines and if buying things separately. The battery packs is also powersuppluy / pedal / cable all in one. Tiny pack what delivers smooth power to your machine. I'm glad you're happy with your 85$ machine! I personally tried few of cheaper machines and wasn't the biggest fan to be honest. but of course I could work it. I guess same goes with everything. You can buy much cheaper replica shoes and walk around happily or you can buy originals that could be 5 times the price or even more. Whenever the preference and what makes you happy.
Hi,how would you compare these to the Cheyenne hawk pen?
So happy to see you review these machines would love to see you tattoo with these machines
Thankyou! Yeah I’ll upload some of the video/s soon too. Already filmed some , but thought this will be too long video to include that material.
I can see bishop taking it to another level by making the this battery even more stream lined and lighter. Essentially making the battery completely flush with the machine in a few months time.
thats the thing I was wondering how the balance/top weight was with the way the battery sits atop the rca but I think you're right they'll probably make it where it looks more like one piece down the road like the flux or exo
hay man you still in Liverpool?
Good to see you my Friend…Thanks for the Content Man..Recently just got a Fk Irons Xion pen and it is Amazing ..with the 3.2 stroke they say you can’t do lines but I lined Great with it..The Power Wand batteries last forever..Great Products
Would you still recommend the fk irons xion pen? Or should I get the flux?
@@andrewplaisance8282 depends on your style..I Have both,I use my Flux with 4.0 stroke for Color and packing Blacks and I use my Xion Pen with the 3.2 Cam on it for my Smooth black and Grays but if you get use to the Flux you can shade with it also
@@fanboyslayer338 I want something that's going to punch heavy lines for neo traditional & new school
Think my heart is set on the flux. Also checking out the bishop line!
Hey friend I have one more question, The powerwand packer or the flux? For bng realism and in general as an all-around machine? Thanks for your videos!
I think both would be good as all rounder machine.
I used Flux allot and it was good. I have never tried to connect it to apps and all the firmware ,but I heard that many artists had allot of problems with it draining the battery and messing up somehting.
so I'm not too sure if that's still an issue or not. and if you're even looking for all those digital gives and app adjustments / connections. IF not then it's good!
Power wand is definitely easier to work with. lighter/more ergonomic and together with Eikon battery (what I think is much better quality then any others out there)
As it goes for black ang gray work I think it might be a little easier to achieve it with - Flux.
Lines and solid packing would be a bit easier with Wand.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo thank you very much for the info!
Thanks so much for taking the time to make your reviews! I have a sol nova 3.5 (not unlimited) and am considering getting either bishop packer or sol nova unlimited 4.0 - I mostly do fine lines with 3rl, 5rl and find it hard to get good black lines in one pass with my current sol nova. Any thoughts on which you’d recommend?
hey. I would probably go for bishop Packer, it would be more powerful than 3,5 solnova. And should be good for any lines. I do work mostly with bishop shader, and it does work good for fine lines and is smooth, but I think it's about same like solnova 3.5. if you want something little more puncher - packer would be good! it's also smaller size (more like solnova) compare to Unlimited.
Thank you that’s really helpful!
@@angelcakeisgood if you want less effort but still packs it in. Fkirons flux or exo… insane but need to be experienced
@@Rometorflux/exo are rubbish compared to the power of the packer wand
I only have the packer power wand cause it's the one I use the most but since I already own the liner and shader I didn't want to have to buy the new battery system since I have the critical batteries I actually use the liner wand alot for thick linework and dotwork stuff
Yeah if you already have it , no point buying this combo version.
Can you please test to see if you can remove the motor like the original bishop wands I am very curious to see if there is still access to the push rod from.the inside. For cleaning etc
Yes, I believe so. There's a thread that you can unscrew and open it to clean the rod.
But I only tried it on one machine, wasn't sure if that's somehting what should or shouldn't happen.
So didn't wanted to open all of them.
Which one should I buy: Flux or Bishop 4.2 ?
Have you tried the Ultron 2 yet? I'm considering getting one. The big heavy stainless grips are really appealing.
Also, do you have a PowerBox 5? On the fence, whether or not I should toss one in with the order.
I have used ultron2 model. To be honest I didn't felt crazy difference from the previous model, little more powerful, but nothing mindblowing to me... to keep coming back to it. Saying that , I had a ultron2 test model that was more than 2 years ago. It's high possibility that there has been many changes/upgrades in the function and it's completely different machine now. Those large heavy grips are awesome tho! and I haven't tried powerbox5.
Thank you for the review! I love seeing your content!
I have a question, is the vibration of the machine still the same as with the bishop wand? I can imagine that a smaller machine produces more vibrations/ cancels less vibrations.
Best regards!
Thankyou! I'm not sure what vibration is Bishop wand, as I never had it, but I think it's probably same as the same motor is used. There's almost none of it.
So I have a magi.I don't know how to tell what stroke it has ,so I can get the wand in same stroke.thank you for your time in advanced
I'm sure there should be some guidance online about magi machines and their stroke.
I haven't used them to help you.
Between the shorty and the full sized battery,
wich one do you run the most and/or is one better then the other in any way? Thanks in advance for anyone that wants to answer this q 🙏🏽
Mostly I use full size battery as it lasts easy 8+ hours. it's better for me as it's all has covered, I don't need to mess around with changing batteries and can do full day tattoo. Weight wise it's not too crazy difference. Of course smaller one is more comfortable / ergonomic and easier to use, but lasts around 4 hours, so I have to change it anyways. Performance wise both exactly the same, great steady power!
Hi Anrijs, Thanks for these reviews as always.
I have the Wand Liner. I thought it was just for lining and I heard you say it’s good for blackout work. I did a small area for black and noticed it packed it in very quickly but I was a afraid to keep going for fear of damaging the skin. Your saying it’s ok for large black areas?
it all depends on your technique. there's a possibility to damage the skin, but also it could be really good and fast colour packer.
I'm sure there's people who can even do soft black and gray with liner machine. so all just depends on what you prefer. Best advice would be to try on some friend or existing customers to colour some areas with it , and maybe other areas with different machine (that you think is better) and then check how it looks when they come back.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo Thank you Anrijs, I will definitely try that out.. and as always, thanks for your content.
Thank you very much, great video covered everything ,helped me a lot on my decision. One question , the shader is a direct hit? I heard that it has like a "brushed" motor and the others dont. Did you feel like it had a "give" to it? Also compared to the stigma force what would you say?
Thank-you for watching, glad to hear it helped. I think it is more direct drive, then with give. But it's possible it has a little slight one, if other people says it is - ''brushed'' then I would believe them more then me hehe... I cannot tell that well.
Compered to Stigma force - This is definitely more solid / durable feel to it. More Ergonomic and easier to hand.
As for a hit - from what I can remember it's similar, but Bishop seams to be more smoother overall.
I have a Shader and It feels like a Machine with a Give, you can also hear it when it touch the skin. Anyway great machine!
If someone wanted to for some reason, can you use a 3rd party battery pack with the rca connection?
Yeah, I'm pretty sure it will work with any rca battery. but I haven't tried it myself.
Do you have any links for where i can buy them in Australia please ??
I don't , as I don't sell them. But if they are available there - I think it should be in bishop website.
I have the wand packer, will old wands work with these battery packs?
The older Wand will not work with this one, but will work with any RCA powerpack.
Critical has also these type of packs RCA mode. larger and smaller ones with all the bluetooth etc - Critical Connect.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo Thanks fo the response Anrijs! I've heard that the older wands together with the regular powerpacks lose a lot of their torque and power, i've used my bishop with an RCA cable. Would you say it's worth the investment? Or should I just stick with the old Bishop and just buy a regular critical powerpack? I'm really tired dealing with chords, i'm a pepper shading artist and b&g and it gets in my way so much it's fucks up my shading from time to time.
Hello i have the unlimited nova 3.5 and I use it only for Black and grey what you like The most for this type øf work sol nova or bishop shader? I dont know if to buy it or keep The nova i dont have problem with the read øf voltage but I wanna know if the shader îs more good
compare to Unlimited 3.5 - I think this Bishop shader is more softer and more precise for smaller lines (like 1-5 liners)
With bishop i'm a bit slower, but work is smoother.
But I mostly still use Cheyenne as I'm more used to it, I like the punch. My work is a bit heavier hitting in some areas lining. If you're happy with your machine I don't think there will be mega upgrade , but if you want somehting more softer like (Cheyenne spirit) then Bishop shader is cool Hope that helps.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo thank you very much!
Will there be 1 battery or 2 battery of the same kind option? I see that power wand kit has 2 battery packs but they are different from one another.!
I'm not sure if there will be option with 2 same batteries. I think that's why all this is included in the kit , all different options.
Yes
Hey Anrijs, thanks for the video. I am currently working with sol nova unlimited 3.5 and i am looking for a second machine that compliments it.
Would the shader be comparable? Both have 3.5mm stroke. I do mainly black and grey work with only small to medium lines.
Or should i go with sol nova unlimited 4.0mm to compliment my 3.5?
I think solnova unlimited 4.0.mm might be too heavy for black and gray and small lines. and I don't think there will be that much of a difference in performance then 3.5 mm. If you feel that you need second machine - I would probably go for one of the wand machines - shader will be softer, (I think even softer then sol nova unlimited) That could be good for you to achieve even smoother black and gray. but you can also get shader wand, that's going to be much faster for lining , and also for solid blacks would be good! smooth shading however will be harder to achieve with that one.
I sold my nova unlimited 3.5 for a wand packer. That thing does everything. Smooth b&g. Pepper shading. Thin and bold lines. It’s the best allrounder machine i’ve found so far.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo thank you for your answer. TH-cam didnt give me a notification. I think i will get the wand shader then. Do you think the fk irons exo with 3.2mm stroke would be good too? I heard it has a very strong motor. Maybe too strong. It is getting a better power bolt now aswell.
Have a great day.
@@JOKE485 i would not want to sell my 3.5 i tried a lot of machines and the sol nova unlimited is my favorit so far. I am torn between fk irons exo 3.2mm and bishop wand shader 3.5mm. Exo has a much stronger motor. And i am a bit worried it might be too much for layering. Bit if the sol nova 3.5 and the wand shader are basically the same machine i dont really want that.
@@aceadam1828 The sol nova unlimited is certainly your go to machine for smooth B&G. The bishop packer is sorta the same but has a different motor and battery, in my opinion the bishop shader is better just because I can see the voltage adjustment, it weights less, is smaller and especially the new power wands they have, have a lot more battery capacity and is just more efficient to clean and wrap imo aswell.
Are you going to do a review on theAcus M1 machine? I just ordered one and I'd really love to know what do you think about it. You're a legend bro!
YES , hopefully if I will find time I will make a review on it too, I really like that machine!
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo 😍I can't wait!🤟🤟
Thanks for the tip I got something out of this 💪🏽🔥🔥
Great video! Are you planning to do a video about the newest tattoome machine (heropen)?
I don't have that machine myself, so no plans at the moment. but if I will get one, I will make video yes.
Do you own one,? im intrested how it is in comparison to Sol Nova.
Great video!!!!! I have a question, are these wand tattoo machines louder than the v6 bishop rotary machine?
Thankyou. I'm not sure as I've never had Bishop before, but It's really soft, it would surprise me if it's louder. of course all depends on voltage and cartridge.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo I truly appreciate your answer and honesty, so is this tattoo Machine a bit loud then?
@@fuelshop4774 it's not at all, barley can hear it. (that's what I said, that it would surprise me if it's lauder then V6) check out in the video when I turn it on.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo I will re watch it!! Thank you so so much for all your help!!!
Hi man! I am wondering how does the shader compares to the solnova 3.5?
Thank you ! 🙏
I'm not sure on technical information - motor / weight / size etc... all that you can check and compare machines yourself. (all technical information is available in their websites) but to work with I think Sol Nova feels more quicker , sharper , punchier..
3.5mm Wand is softer machine and smoother shades is easier to achieve. but some lining and solid black areas would be easier with Solnova.
That will be both on around - 7-8V
Of course on lower or higher voltages individually they might be around the same.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo thank you for taking your time to answer ! I’ve been tempted to buy the shader, but this lubrification thing puts me off.
Your video on the Solnova 3.5 was instrumental in me buying it, thank you!
@@eyesinthedarkphotography2571 that's cool! Hope you will love it.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo thank you again man, all the best to you!
Didi Moraes Tattoo is my name.. take care 🙏
Have u used the shader? What volts do u use?
Yeah, used it a bit. From 7-9 Volts mostly.
Do you prefer wand machine or avenger pro 2
Wand . I Love the Wireless options and overall build, performance and quality of the machine.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo thank for the reply 🙂🙏 currently being using bishop fantom so thinking about switching to packer wand or avenger pro 2.
I have the shader. What's a good speed to use this at?
whichever works for you. everyone would have different preferences. I would recoment to start around 6.5 and slowly go up every 5-10 minutes or so. You should be able to tell when it's a good voltage for your technique , hand movement and speed.
Can I use this bateries on old wand?
these will not work with old wand, (and I don't even know if you can get these ones separately) But Critical RCA batteries will work with previous wands. It's pretty much same batterie packs like these , just with different connection.
Thanx, Anrijs🖤
Thankyou for watching ✌️
Super helpful video!! I hope you make comparison of fk iron EXO and BISHOP power wand..coz for me i dont want to regret which one should i buy and still confucing which one is better to buy 👻 thanks and more power to your channel anrijs!
Hey, I probably not going to make EXO review. But from what I feel compare to other wireless machines - performance wise it would be about the same machine. between the same stroke (small/medium/long) machine for both then I would probably choose PowerWand over the EXO, it's about 2 years newer machine, I think the finish is just better including full voltage readouts. About batteries, I think critical is better quality as a brand as they have been specialising in tattoo power supplies for 10+ years. from what I've heard - there been many reports of FK packs malfunction after all the firmware updates and connection them to apps etc.. Not sure if it's still a case or all fixed, but i guess if it works good it gives more options with connection to app , readouts, digital give etc.. (but how practical all that is I'm not able to comment) Critical pack has only bluetooth option for now to connect with pedal.
I have all 3
Thank you 🔥
So is it still the best machine on the market after two years?
I would say yes. Definitely on top 3 machines in my opinion. Simple, easy to use, reliable, works great and battery life is great too. Only downside that i can think of - all the additional grips out of stock always and almost impossible to get anywhere outside of US.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo thank you!!!I just bought the shader and packer!!!
Can I shade with 4.2 stroke guys? Any tattooer You may know that gets smooth shades like that?
yes, you can shade with it. you can check Bishop instagram for artists what uses their machines , I'm sure some of them using 4.2 for it. But I think if smooth shades is what you're looking to do - it will be easier to use 3.5
Yes, definitely you can.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo thanks men, I appreciate that
@@uglybok2thanks bro
Keep the videos coming 🔥🔥🔥
🇱🇻🇱🇻🇱🇻
✌️✌️✌️
Great video!
You should do a giveaway, I need that shader
😜
Flux max or bishop packer ¿
Haven't tried Flux Max , cannot comment on it
Are you planning to ?? ;)
@@SaS-wn3dm Not really
Flux max hits harder but packs really well
@@Rometor i bought Flux Max its a strong ang gentle machine yesterday 1 bar lasted me 2/3 hours
To keep sol nova unlimited 3.5 or get the bishop packer…. Hmmmm loll hard decision
haha, I bet it is. I would probobly just keep sol nova... Bishop packer of course is awesome machine, and smaller/lighter then sol nova unlimited. + rca connection and few extras. Could be faster on lining with it too. but I think sol nova is a great machine too. so If I wouldn't have extra $ to spend, I would probably just keep that one. unless you are looking to get second machine or somehting little harder hitting.
Bro you are awesome. Do videos like this and answer all the questions from us is priceless. Thank you so much for share your knowledge and experiences. Bless from chile 🗿🍀
THANKYOU so much for watching videos and all the good words!
Wow ..owning all 3 of those would cost about 5500 $ in canada
800 each in Quebec so no, I got the liner and packer, its a great Investment for 1600$ cad
@@olivierbilodeau1952 you did not buy the power wand for 800 you bought the original for 800. The power wand costs roughly 1800cad and can only be bought through bishop currently so that being said you will have to add on a terrif tax once it comes into canada probably putting this machine bundle at about 2000$ cad.
Bishop has recently started selling the powerwand with rca adapters making it cheaper now to own all 3 but still costing a hefty 4k most likely after all shipping and taxes paid into Canada. Currently no Canadian distributor is selling the powerwand I have spoken with 2 major suppliers in canada and they will eventually have them but not anytime soon. Hopefully in the future bishop will release all new machines with the custom critical battery fitting these machines have
He’s a nice guy
😥 i need it
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
It’s worth the money guys I promise
Thank you for the cool video😀😁
Theyre website says choose liner, packer, or shader. I cant find anywhere specific that it says how it changes configuration. Are these cock suckers trying to play on words and get us to buy 1 thinking it does all three, than to only try and rope us in to buying three of these because weve already invested in one of them? If this is the case this is some real shady buisness tactics.
I don't think there's anything hidden. it's 3 machines. configurations are the same, the differences are in in Stroke. and you can pick which one suitable more for you. Technically you don't need 3 machines. That's why it is this way. You pick the one you would normally use, or the stroke you would prefer, that's just more easier way to explain - liner/shader or packer. But some people do lines with shader, some do packing with liners etc... so it all depends on your preferences. Tattooers should be familiar with all that before buying / investing in machines.
Bro , STOP, 1,200? What is it made solid gold? No thanks. Like u said. Artists can work with any set up. As long as its a relieble motor spinning inside its good. I found an 85 dollar rotary from a chineese company that made me put my Cheyenne down for good. 85 dollars and i been running it for over 2 years now. This is for ducks.
Yeah, agree price is cosmic. I do believe the quality is also much much better then any knockoff machines. With all the wireless setup / 2 batteries , chargers all the cables etc. I think it's ok price compare to other machines and if buying things separately. The battery packs is also powersuppluy / pedal / cable all in one. Tiny pack what delivers smooth power to your machine.
I'm glad you're happy with your 85$ machine!
I personally tried few of cheaper machines and wasn't the biggest fan to be honest.
but of course I could work it.
I guess same goes with everything. You can buy much cheaper replica shoes and walk around happily or you can buy originals that could be 5 times the price or even more. Whenever the preference and what makes you happy.
@@AnrijsStraumeTattoo hello Anrijs can u review tattoome +hero pen will be nice thx 🙏
@@Kolba_Team If I will ever get one I will!
critical battery setup is rubbish
shader is rubbish
liner and packer are good