Child Thing A Trump parody sing along to the Trogg’s Wild Thing Child Thing Child Thing Child Thing You make a lie sing You make everything goofy Child Thing Child Thing Sycophants love you But they wanna know for sure So come on, lie just Right They love you Child Thing Child Thing Child Thing You make those lies sing You make everything goofy Child Thing Child Thing I think you lose D But I wanna know for sure So come on, lie just Right You lose me Child Thing Child Thing Child Thing You sure make lies sing You make everything goofy Child Thing Come on, come on, child thing Take it, take it, child thing Child Thing Oh, child thing Oh, child thing Come on, come on, child thing Child Thing Child-
Ticking A Trump parody sing along to Elton John’s Ticking “An obnoxious spoiled child” they call you in the press reports You’ve never taken interest unless in subjects that you’ve sought So what was it that brought the Fed cars flashing up your drive? To notify the community of one matter in which you lied. Any church on any Sunday won’t find Donald within No, his sole concern is competition. He only cares to win Now blood stains an old man whose face is on a gun And his parents rarely thought of him; s’why he’s their troubled son “Now you’ll never get elected” Jack Smith said. Remember Jack Smith said (remember Jack Smith said) Ticking, ticking (ticking ticking) Get this straight, your time is through Politically you’re dead Hear it, hear it, your clock is ticking
Where Ever Evil is Satan is always Present. No Repubican is a Friend of God. To BELIEVE ANY THING A REPUBLICAN STATE YOU ARE LISTENING TO THE WORDS OF SATAN. TO THE FOOLS THAT BELIEVE IN TRUMP ARE TRUE FOOLS BECAUSE THEY ARE FOLLOWING SATAN.
Political language... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. George Orwell
I wish you’d be diligent and watch the entire 8 hours, then you can see for yourself…there was no crime. Go watch it. That’s why & how MSM keeps deceiving the masses. They rely on clips here and there, but most are too lazy to sit thru, watch, listen, put feelings aside, analyze, and conclude.
@@rolltide2798 You saw a fraudulently edited video, using clips from a 24hr raw video that is available for public viewing. If you took the time to watch what was happening before and after the clip of the ballot boxes being taken out from under the table, then you would understand how you were tricked into believing a lie. I'm sure that you don't want to know the truth, you prefer to believe the edited version, because you can't admit that you were so gullible. Also, the "USB stick", that Giuliani said "was being passed around like crack cocaine", which you believed, was a ginger mint! Please open your eyes.
@@mercedesQare you really laughing? No, you’re using an emoji because you’re childish. There is a crime and I’m going to enjoy watching the next few months.
@@ianjedi1282 I was actually cracking up! Y’all are amusing. 🍿 I’m ready and excited for the next few months. Deep inside I know y’all have a good working brain; once it all unfolds I’m sure you’ll get on the right side of history. Im rooting’ for ya! Not too loud though, there’s still high potential for let-down. Ps. Google “creepy Joe”, and look at the images. Just look, and think.
Yes a plan to protest against the government and we have the right to , the whole show was staged and there I plenty of evidence that it staged by the shadow government,
100% Unbelievable that any of these courts are bothering to hear any of this NONSENSE. From this, to hearing the others hearing on whether we even have a 14th amendment to whether a sitting president can in fact order a hit on civilians without facing prosecution, to allowing an indicted criminal to threaten judges, witnesses; in direct violation of their pre-trial release without BOND REVOKATION???? To letting a narcissist, speak during closing statements knowing full well he will only use it as an opportunity to flame the fires which they fail to PUT OUT!!! This is the most ridiculous crap I have ever seen. This has really exposed just how bad this judicial system is.
You couldn't be more wrong. This judge is moving the due process along at a very good pace, especially considering the number of co-conspirators. If you want to site a judge who is dragging ass, look to Eileen Cannon in Florida, overseeing the stolen documents case. There is only one major defendant, Donald Trump. And a special counsel Jack Smith said, this is not a complicated case. This case should have been adjudicated and finished a couple of months ago. Judge Cannon is biased, corrupt, and even more so incompetent.
actually it is great this happened so that we the American people can see how corrupt these sickos really are and hopefully Trump can trump them with his trump card becoming president 2024-
This is a very serious case, from what you have stated you think that Trump won the election, he didn’t and he has done every possible thing to steal the election! He should be going to prison! Not another occupation the White House! And if the Supreme Court does what the should do, they should disqualify him from being on the ballot!
Wow- this is one smart lawyer with solid legal arguments. Ms. Willis and her team are probably a little worried. I’ll be interested in hearing how they intend to respond.
Even if Ms Willis is removed from the case against trump please understand that the evidence against trump is complete therefore trump will still be found guilty🤣🤣🤣
Lol. I dont know why i read these comments and get frustrated and depressed over some of the idiotic opinions. This is not about how you or I "feel" about Trump and his fellow co-conspirators, this is about the law, and the allegations of how it was violated. I look back on the few times i have found myself in a courtroom in front of a judge, and i think " these people are being treated with kid gloves, people who have already pleaded out know what they did was illegal so that doesnt help these defendants try to bs their way out of being tried in a court of law. Indeed this does not resemble "civil disobedience or free speach" it appears to resemble a conspiracy of crimes commited to overthrow a fair and valid American Presidential election .
Like where would this protection against "civil disobedience" end. If some mob boss conspired to have the mayor shot during an election cycle, is that "civil disobedience" simply because it involves politics. The whole point of RICO is to hold people accountable for instigating criminal behaviour and their involvment said criminal enterprise, and they want to argue that oh it doesn't apply because the behaviour could be , if looked at sideway, political.... come on.
Yeah, they are looking for the very thinnest of political or legal fig leaves because that's all they have, just a little bit of parsley to cover their testicles while they dangle in the breeze.
The head cracker, he didn’t even lie about that. The courts refusal to allow them to present fraud evidence in court does not mean he lied. To the contrary, the courts should be held liable for their part in denying his day in court. Why didn’t they let him present evidences if they were so convinced he was just making it up? Well, a lot of us sat thru the public hearings: we heard the witnesses, and saw MANY of the evidences….hours upon hours worth! We cannot unsee what we saw.
Mr. SPECIAL PROSECUTOR/Ms Wiilis you gave THE exact explanation for not turning evidence over for the current YSL rico case. The defense had to request time & after time (MONTHS & Months). Is this the "Georgia" Fani Willis way?
@@MarionQuintero767 Save this screenshot, because hes disqualified himself a second time by taking millions in foreign bribes. It's not going to age well for ya.
God can’t imagine how this judge could bear to sit & listen to this lawyer with verbal diarrhoea. How about you put a stop to it bring the trial forward, after all Fanni was prepared to go to trial in October 23. Save the sanity of all Americans who are trying to make sense of this garbage spilling out of this lawyers mouth. Get a jury to decide
a grand jury already decided not to bring charges last year buuuuut, Biden admin had other ideas and thats when Fani decided to go ahead anyways and charge Trump in a haste,remember Fanis big unusual breaking news 11 at night announcing indictments. Its all political and Fani is being used as a willing participant as a political hack.
Wouldn't these issues be brought up in the trial?? Why do they have to prove Rico at this stage of the game? People have already been charged. Someone please explain.
Well RICO should not be applied just because the SA thinks it should. Their interpretation is flawed and they are twisting the process. It should be extreamly hard to push any RICO case on anyone.
So, RICO which is for organized crime is used in Georgia to curtail freedom of speech, assembly, and civil disobedience? Why use RICO and not rely on something else?
Trump wasn't exercising freedom of speech. As president who'd just been voted out of office, he called GA's Sec of State demanding he invent 11,780 votes so he could steal the election. Then he coordinated with Chesebro (who took a plea deal) to send fake electors who claimed he'd won when they all were well aware trump flat lost Georgia and the general election as a whole
Freedom of speech does not cover trying to reverse the results of a free and fair election. Four of Trumps co conspirators have already pled guilty. They did that because the evidence against them was clear cut.
There may have been videos destroyed and they may have had revelance here. The response from Fani should be open and forthcoming instead of dodging the requests. They had meetings at the Whitehouse so what became of any of those work materials and what was discuessed at the Whitehouse relating to this case? Was there any communications with Jack Smith or his staff once the case was filled? That is why no one trusts the Government's Judical Branches at any level, anymore.
It is in law, illegal for the US Congress to interfere in a States legal proceedings. The proper body to look into questions of prosecutor malfeasance is the appeals court, if Trump loses. That is the law. Period. Congress is out of its jurisdiction to even consider trying to gain access to the information in an active investigation
@@lindseyedwards9677 There was no crime, and she proceeded anyway. Remember Russia, Russia, Russia? A LIE fabricated and paid for by the DNC. This is common knowledge by now. No consequences. How these people are allowed to pull cases out of their asses (& their lovers’), spend millions of tax payer dollars, for sham charges, is besides many of us. Did you watch the entire hearing, before suggesting I “educate” myself. They couldn’t even specify the “crime” he supposedly committed; I think the judge was surprised himself at how stupid all of this is. They weren’t prepared. Now she’s being investigated for her bias, and rightfully so. 🍿 😎 I’m proud of MY leader. Yours on the other hand, child molesters. I hope you get on the right side of history while you still can. This will not age well for y’all. Stop repeating everything you hear, jumping in without basis, talking without researching-because those of us who know, know.
Curious how Trump's defences in his multiple cases never involve him simply saying that he never did it. Rather every submission to the court is based on legal niceties, the constitution, immunity or some other way of preventing the case being heard in the first place.
Only one problem…there was no crime. That’s why they have to pull all of that. There’s no evidence of anything because no crime was committed. They can’t prove “the” crime they allege.
There was no crime!!! Yeah, right, pure as the driven snow, the orange one. Although I must say that, if he has not committed any crimes, it should be easy enough to get the case(s) dismissed shouldn't it? You'd better ask him why this seems an impossible task.
I do not believe it is legal for GA to get documents or viewing documents from Congress until that information is put into the NARA and they file a FOIA to get or view that information. The J6 committee is not a law enforcement agency. It is Congress.
Regulation of Federal Elections: The Constitution grants Congress the authority to regulate the times, places, and manner of federal elections (Article I, Section 4). This power allows Congress to set standards and rules for federal elections, including measures to prevent interference. In order words, the topic is far too vast for a quick answer. Elections have very special rights in many places in constitutions around the worlds. Not just ours. It is possible they did have the right they claim. It would make more sense they they would be right on this topic then you. Right? Given the forum...
@@houseofpainINKS That is a really bad argument. Very close to just "childish." You must think about outcomes before you speak. 1) I posted about the law of the U.S. You have every right to get off your A, go to law school, and do something about the nation's "wrongness." 2) Your comment again sounds so foolish to me. It really does. OMG. It offers information that goes nowhere! Nowhere!! It neither adds nor subtracts, since the law is the law. It will exist regardless of your belief in it. Think for a moment before making "shock" value comments or buzzword comments. DEFINITIONS AND FACTS ARE HARD TO ARGUE AGAINST! The laws in the nation in effect at this time are actual and factual. You, however, think that governments are "wrong more times than not" while offering no source of overwhelming, clear, or convincing evidence, so-basic B. The level of anarchy you summon just from being ignorant Since you clearly take the position that the government is bad more than 50% of the time, give me facts! How is the government wrong today to explain? How are you verifying that information? There will be follow-up questions and citation checks for a licensed attorney! Please show your work. (I am being sarcastic.) Also, how bad is "wrong" for you? "Nuremberg trials" level bad! The "Tuskegee Syphilis Study" Level BAD! What is "wrong" for you? Thank God, you don't get a say in this matter at all. You get one vote. Law School is a good START to understanding our nation.
Elections-the conduct of elections-is expressly non-political. If tRump disputed the count, it is not political speech and can’t be awarded any kind of immunity. Politics is about getting policy done. There is indeed a policy of holding elections, and it was done when the Constitution (state or federal) was promulgated-and of course by every state as each one confederated. There is no politics necessary with respect conducting an election-not anymore: that policy is done-politics in this respect is over and done wth. If tRump claims to have a fiduciary obligation to question the vote-count, it’s still not political: even if it were part of a president’s responsibility to investigate the conduct of an election -which, naturally, is a forbidden conflict of interest-the matter still wouldn’t be political. It would be a criminal matter, not a political one. The politics of getting the policy of prohibiting the corruption of elections done has already been done. No politician has automatic authority or license to get this policy done again when it has already been done, although a politician or candidate may propose, on campaign or as elected member of a legislative assembly, to review, renew or rescind that policy in the usual legislative way-but that’s not what tRump was doing when he sweated the Georgia official to rig the vote-count in his favour. It’s amazing to me that anyone would make the case that any candidate in a public election has any reason whatsoever to participate in the conduct of that election. There is no ‘right to dissent’ in this respect, certainly not for a candidate -all of whom must swear to understand and uphold the restrictions (such as of conflict of interest) required of them-who is actually running in a particular election. “The statute doesn’t apply…” Yeah, I’ll say! It doesn’t apply to tRump’s fantasies about getting away with trying to corrupt an election vote-count (worse that it was a count in an election in which he was a candidate).
I agree. I don’t like Trump but from what I’ve heard and read, for the most part these are witch hunts to keep him from the presidency. If the Supreme Courts don’t shoot down a couple of these cases, it will create more harm for the democracy than Trump will ever be able to do in 4 years. One thing for sure, though, if SCOTUS rules against Trump, no one wins save the lawyers.
Seems all their doing is pleading for the courts to throw out certain indictments against their client, in order to be charged with something else,Buying time and a redo of starting over. Then again, the state can modify its indictments and at a later date impose it in as the case moves forward with proof.. Let's get to the trial already, their arguments are a waste of time, what can or can't be charged here. Let the judge set it aside yet keeping the charges as they stand. Allowing both sides to prove their points in the court room.
There are processes and procedures to be followed and one of the types of pretrial motions that can be put forward is one to have the charges dismissed because they do not fit the facts of the case. This is that hearing and you'd better believe trumps lawyers are going to use every potential motion they can, even if they're non-sensical.
@@marylamb7707 Trump pressured the georgia secretary of state to "find the votes", the call was recorded and anyone who isn't a faux news viewer heard the tape. He was also involved in a scheme to present fake electoral college voters. There was very clearly a crime with trump's involvement. While due process of the law is essential, the facts pretty clearly show that trump commited crimes, conspired and convinced others to commit crimes on his behalf and general managed an enterprise whose sole purpose was criminal. At this point its a question of how involved was trump and how much jail time is he going to get.
They owe damages caused by the act. Criminal acts causing damages may require or mean penal liability as well as civil remedy. They all had a simular reason for participating in Jan. 6 even in violations of the before mentioned acts in civil and crimnal civil and penal liability. All 'that' actually took placed but can we say that the damages which resulted was planned. Nevertheless! There is an argument for whatever civil damages which may have resulted. Unfortunately! We can be thankful that the F.B.I. had in place means necessary to separate a civil disobedient act from all criminal acts which 'not' may have took place'. But what actually took place in the mist of the good committed by the bad. The bottom line is this! Anytime an American citizen in this country causes civil or criminal liability damages to the innocent. There must always be relief afforded to those damaged. All of what I am saying may differ from what's being discussed hear the argument for relief will and should never change but continue to remain the bedrock of the American Justice system. Thanks.
Yes, Ms. Fani Willis who specializes in RICO violations "misunderstood" the statute. These defense lawyers are trying to change the definitions of statutes in their favor and not offering fact.
Typical Trump lawyer, representing Trump. Pick pieces or parts out and find argument Not defining its entirety. Good try, but this won't fly, not even close, Move on and move forward..
Why the f'k aren't you covering the Dominion VS court proceedings? The outcome of that law suit is paramount to the entire basis of this criminal case. All of the defendants in this case acted in good faith because GA's electronic voting systems are Swiss cheese and we all know it.
These people knew what they were doing was wrong They asked secretary of state to violated his Oath of officers and commit crimes, taking votes away from one candidate to another candidate is wrong no if and and buts they knew what they were doing, these people Broke the law, It's like a person under age with a gun got from a friend, shoots kills a person The person who gave underage a gun, that person is an assessor's to the crime. No matter how little a person did, if they called one person and threaten a person, another sends a text message, Another goes to the home of a person. Everyone did an illegal thing to receive an certain out come all people who participated are guilty of crimes. Their relationship was to get Trump election by stealing votes.
@@annjordan6408, nobody asked you and your opinion means less than zero to me. We see things entirely differently. That BS narrative isn't what played out in front of me on election night so, you're dead wrong. Nobody asked anybody to "take votes away" from anybody, ever. Trump called and ask the Rat faced boy to "find" the votes, not steal the votes. There were legitimate challenges to a fraudulent election on Swiss Cheese voting machines and blatant ballot stuffing in Fulton and DeKalb counties. The Dominion law suit challenge to the obvious gaping holes in the security of the Dominion machines is quintessential to proving that those challenges were legitimate. Have a nice day but f'k entirely and completely off. Thank you very much.
@@annjordan6408 U are thinking cuz Trump called the govenor of Georgia and told him we only need 11000 something votes then that's the crime. They can get u all believing something else that's cuz they lie by omission. Trump already knew they stole the election and he was giving him a chance to come clean but he wasn't going to cuz there's to many to go down and they believe they will get away with it. Trump knew before he was elected the first time they were going to steal it cuz they had no choice. That's y they stopped counting in 4 states and that's y Trump and certain in the military set the plan to get the data in real time. Then u give it to those in he military and they have been working behind the scenes since Trump started in office
How about votes being ran 2 and 3 times not to mention ballots being pulled from under tables and scanned after the polling place was shutdown due to a busted pipe or the woman on you tube making a video showing how they fill out ballots GA election has more shady people I. It than a Biden family reunion
Political language... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind. George Orwell
I have a $20 bill I got somehow from change or ATM with a red stamp that says "Donald Trump House " with and arrow pointing at the white house! any trump lovers want to buy it for a souvenir? because that's as close as he have to even thinking about the white house again!!!
The goal is to grind it down and delay.
When is this child acts going to end. This makes our country look like idiots
To many lawyers making to much money
Child Thing
A Trump parody sing along
to the Trogg’s Wild Thing
Child Thing
Child Thing
Child Thing
You make a lie sing
You make everything goofy
Child Thing
Child Thing
Sycophants love you
But they wanna know for sure
So come on, lie just Right
They love you
Child Thing
Child Thing
Child Thing
You make those lies sing
You make everything goofy
Child Thing
Child Thing
I think you lose D
But I wanna know for sure
So come on, lie just Right
You lose me
Child Thing
Child Thing
Child Thing
You sure make lies sing
You make everything goofy
Child Thing
Come on, come on, child thing
Take it, take it, child thing
Child Thing
Oh, child thing
Oh, child thing
Come on, come on, child thing
Child Thing
Child-
Ticking
A Trump parody sing along to
Elton John’s
Ticking
“An obnoxious spoiled child” they call you in the press reports
You’ve never taken interest unless in subjects that you’ve sought
So what was it that brought the Fed cars flashing up your drive?
To notify the community of one matter in which you lied.
Any church on any Sunday won’t find Donald within
No, his sole concern is competition. He only cares to win
Now blood stains an old man whose face is on a gun
And his parents rarely thought of him; s’why he’s their troubled son
“Now you’ll never get elected” Jack Smith said.
Remember Jack Smith said (remember Jack Smith said)
Ticking, ticking (ticking ticking)
Get this straight, your time is through
Politically you’re dead
Hear it, hear it, your clock is ticking
Agree, lock the dunce up already.
Trump does not think that any law applies to him!
Devil is always sneaking in with some lame excuses for corruption . Smdh!
Where Ever Evil is Satan is always Present. No Repubican is a Friend of God. To BELIEVE ANY THING A REPUBLICAN STATE YOU ARE LISTENING TO THE WORDS OF SATAN. TO THE FOOLS THAT BELIEVE IN TRUMP ARE TRUE FOOLS BECAUSE THEY ARE FOLLOWING SATAN.
Judge just make a judgment get this case to court in front of a jury tomorrow
threatening and committing bodily harm are no different under the law!
One judge that you should not try to BS is Scott McAfee.
That is a big question.
What did they talk about for eight hours?
Political language... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.
George Orwell
Their cruise to see the aurora perhaps?
\
Sex
I wish you’d be diligent and watch the entire 8 hours, then you can see for yourself…there was no crime. Go watch it. That’s why & how MSM keeps deceiving the masses. They rely on clips here and there, but most are too lazy to sit thru, watch, listen, put feelings aside, analyze, and conclude.
Well he forgot about ruby freeman and her daughter being harassed and threatened by your clients
I would dig a little more on that one ... she wanted to come forward at first then fbe feds got to her.. don't believe me there are under cover video
That’s B.S.
We saw what those 2 women did. They belong in prison.
@@rolltide2798Gingermintgate. They were passing around vote-flipping ginger mints provided by Hugo Chavez.
@@rolltide2798 You saw a fraudulently edited video, using clips from a 24hr raw video that is available for public viewing.
If you took the time to watch what was happening before and after the clip of the ballot boxes being taken out from under the table, then you would understand how you were tricked into believing a lie. I'm sure that you don't want to know the truth, you prefer to believe the edited version, because you can't admit that you were so gullible.
Also, the "USB stick", that Giuliani said "was being passed around like crack cocaine", which you believed, was a ginger mint! Please open your eyes.
The entire defense is a stretch.
Biden/ Harris getting 81,000,000 votes is the stretch of the century.
And prosecution impossible without a crime 😂
@@mercedesQare you really laughing? No, you’re using an emoji because you’re childish. There is a crime and I’m going to enjoy watching the next few months.
@@ianjedi1282 I was actually cracking up! Y’all are amusing. 🍿 I’m ready and excited for the next few months. Deep inside I know y’all have a good working brain; once it all unfolds I’m sure you’ll get on the right side of history. Im rooting’ for ya! Not too loud though, there’s still high potential for let-down.
Ps. Google “creepy Joe”, and look at the images. Just look, and think.
The entire prosecution is a stretch.
In the first slide, these are not isolated instances of illegal actions. There was a plan and coordination between people.
That’s why it’s a RICO case
Yes a plan to protest against the government and we have the right to , the whole show was staged and there I plenty of evidence that it staged by the shadow government,
The real plan and coordination is among the DNC, always has been…approved and paid for.
Between all these people?
Where?
Pecuniary harm to citizens whose votes are not respected,includes physical potential as well. All
This is insane that the judge has let this go on this long. It's a joke. A very serious one.
100% Unbelievable that any of these courts are bothering to hear any of this NONSENSE. From this, to hearing the others hearing on whether we even have a 14th amendment to whether a sitting president can in fact order a hit on civilians without facing prosecution, to allowing an indicted criminal to threaten judges, witnesses; in direct violation of their pre-trial release without BOND REVOKATION???? To letting a narcissist, speak during closing statements knowing full well he will only use it as an opportunity to flame the fires which they fail to PUT OUT!!! This is the most ridiculous crap I have ever seen. This has really exposed just how bad this judicial system is.
You couldn't be more wrong. This judge is moving the due process along at a very good pace, especially considering the number of co-conspirators. If you want to site a judge who is dragging ass, look to Eileen Cannon in Florida, overseeing the stolen documents case. There is only one major defendant, Donald Trump. And a special counsel Jack Smith said, this is not a complicated case. This case should have been adjudicated and finished a couple of months ago. Judge Cannon is biased, corrupt, and even more so incompetent.
actually it is great this happened so that we the American people can see how corrupt these sickos really are and hopefully Trump can trump them with his trump card becoming president 2024-
This is a very serious case, from what you have stated you think that Trump won the election, he didn’t and he has done every possible thing to steal the election! He should be going to prison! Not another occupation the White House! And if the Supreme Court does what the should do, they should disqualify him from being on the ballot!
Lock him up already
Lock him up already!
For what? What law did he break ? I have been tring to find a law and i havent been able to can you point me to it so i can read it
Wow- this is one smart lawyer with solid legal arguments. Ms. Willis and her team are probably a little worried. I’ll be interested in hearing how they intend to respond.
they will respond with lies and propaganda lol
Even if Ms Willis is removed from the case against trump please understand that the evidence against trump is complete therefore trump will still be found guilty🤣🤣🤣
Thanks for streaming this
The judge is not sapost to be working with the DA against the people this is not fair and impartial this must stop now
Judges Needs to Fear Making Obvious Bad Decisions
Lol. I dont know why i read these comments and get frustrated and depressed over some of the idiotic opinions. This is not about how you or I "feel" about Trump and his fellow co-conspirators, this is about the law, and the allegations of how it was violated. I look back on the few times i have found myself in a courtroom in front of a judge, and i think " these people are being treated with kid gloves, people who have already pleaded out know what they did was illegal so that doesnt help these defendants try to bs their way out of being tried in a court of law. Indeed this does not resemble "civil disobedience or free speach" it appears to resemble a conspiracy of crimes commited to overthrow a fair and valid American Presidential election .
I hear ya!
Like where would this protection against "civil disobedience" end. If some mob boss conspired to have the mayor shot during an election cycle, is that "civil disobedience" simply because it involves politics. The whole point of RICO is to hold people accountable for instigating criminal behaviour and their involvment said criminal enterprise, and they want to argue that oh it doesn't apply because the behaviour could be , if looked at sideway, political.... come on.
Fair and valid vwhat a load of crap
Any intelligent person in America knows that the election was rigged
God help America
It's Civil disobedience to lie about vote counting?
Yeah, they are looking for the very thinnest of political or legal fig leaves because that's all they have, just a little bit of parsley to cover their testicles while they dangle in the breeze.
The head cracker, he didn’t even lie about that. The courts refusal to allow them to present fraud evidence in court does not mean he lied. To the contrary, the courts should be held liable for their part in denying his day in court. Why didn’t they let him present evidences if they were so convinced he was just making it up? Well, a lot of us sat thru the public hearings: we heard the witnesses, and saw MANY of the evidences….hours upon hours worth! We cannot unsee what we saw.
Mr. SPECIAL PROSECUTOR/Ms Wiilis you gave THE exact explanation for not turning evidence over for the current YSL rico case. The defense had to request time & after time (MONTHS & Months). Is this the "Georgia" Fani Willis way?
Well try it is not true
@@simeconazole LOL. Pot calling the kettle black maybe? The word you are looking for is hypocrisy.
IFf trumps lived in Georgia, he'd be in big trouble then... @@simeconazole
There is no way he’s running ever agin
Round 1 DING DING! &&&& Trump WINS the Iowa Caucuses!!!
@@MarionQuintero767 Save this screenshot, because hes disqualified himself a second time by taking millions in foreign bribes. It's not going to age well for ya.
Georgia just bring this whole case forward to next month & get it over with.
When in 2134 will we get to the sentencing phase?
So any state can interpret the law any way they want. And add things on to the original statue???
Oh way to go what about the Freeman family
81 million votes my ASS!
Well said
God can’t imagine how this judge could bear to sit & listen to this lawyer with verbal diarrhoea.
How about you put a stop to it bring the trial forward, after all Fanni was prepared to go to trial in October 23.
Save the sanity of all Americans who are trying to make sense of this garbage spilling out of this lawyers mouth.
Get a jury to decide
a grand jury already decided not to bring charges last year buuuuut, Biden admin had other ideas and thats when Fani decided to go ahead anyways and charge Trump in a haste,remember Fanis big unusual breaking news 11 at night announcing indictments. Its all political and Fani is being used as a willing participant as a political hack.
Juries decide facts. Judges rule on law. The facts are against Trump; therefore, he continually argues that various laws do not apply to him.
Get me 12 thousand votes
All made up by lying dems! Nice try.
Case Should be dismissed period for all .pathetic what Willis has done.
This is not a trial it's a tribunal where the accusers get to make the law as they go.
False
Are we on the same planet just wow
So why did Atlanta Fulton county pay him to go to DC if he could have just got it off the internet
Wouldn't these issues be brought up in the trial?? Why do they have to prove Rico at this stage of the game? People have already been charged. Someone please explain.
Easy. There is no crime. 😂
For dismissal purposes. You can eliminate the entire trial if the method and charges do not apply.
They already have confessions and plea bargains of his co defendants. He will be found guilty very quickly-so the defense tried a dog and pony show.
@@rancors1 Willis and Wade, dog and pony….I like it! 😂😂😂
Well RICO should not be applied just because the SA thinks it should. Their interpretation is flawed and they are twisting the process. It should be extreamly hard to push any RICO case on anyone.
So, RICO which is for organized crime is used in Georgia to curtail freedom of speech, assembly, and civil disobedience? Why use RICO and not rely on something else?
Trump wasn't exercising freedom of speech. As president who'd just been voted out of office, he called GA's Sec of State demanding he invent 11,780 votes so he could steal the election. Then he coordinated with Chesebro (who took a plea deal) to send fake electors who claimed he'd won when they all were well aware trump flat lost Georgia and the general election as a whole
Because RICO is a broad sweeping blanket to cover all bases to hope something will stick
Freedom of speech does not cover trying to reverse the results of a free and fair election. Four of Trumps co conspirators have already pled guilty. They did that because the evidence against them was clear cut.
There may have been videos destroyed and they may have had revelance here.
The response from Fani should be open and forthcoming instead of dodging the requests.
They had meetings at the Whitehouse so what became of any of those work materials and what was discuessed at the Whitehouse relating to this case? Was there any communications with Jack Smith or his staff once the case was filled? That is why no one trusts the Government's Judical Branches at any level, anymore.
It is in law, illegal for the US Congress to interfere in a States legal proceedings. The proper body to look into questions of prosecutor malfeasance is the appeals court, if Trump loses.
That is the law. Period. Congress is out of its jurisdiction to even consider trying to gain access to the information in an active investigation
She should be held accountable. Another sham suit, waste of time and money… knowing there was no crime. She & lover have lots of explaining to do.
@@mercedesQAbout what Mercedes? Nothing she has done is illegal.
Take out the time to educate yourself on court procedures and laws before you rant because of your leader's indictment @@mercedesQ
@@lindseyedwards9677 There was no crime, and she proceeded anyway. Remember Russia, Russia, Russia? A LIE fabricated and paid for by the DNC. This is common knowledge by now. No consequences. How these people are allowed to pull cases out of their asses (& their lovers’), spend millions of tax payer dollars, for sham charges, is besides many of us. Did you watch the entire hearing, before suggesting I “educate” myself. They couldn’t even specify the “crime” he supposedly committed; I think the judge was surprised himself at how stupid all of this is. They weren’t prepared. Now she’s being investigated for her bias, and rightfully so. 🍿 😎 I’m proud of MY leader. Yours on the other hand, child molesters. I hope you get on the right side of history while you still can. This will not age well for y’all. Stop repeating everything you hear, jumping in without basis, talking without researching-because those of us who know, know.
Curious how Trump's defences in his multiple cases never involve him simply saying that he never did it. Rather every submission to the court is based on legal niceties, the constitution, immunity or some other way of preventing the case being heard in the first place.
The only way the left will be happy is by stealing another election. 😅
Only one problem…there was no crime. That’s why they have to pull all of that. There’s no evidence of anything because no crime was committed. They can’t prove “the” crime they allege.
There was no crime!!! Yeah, right, pure as the driven snow, the orange one. Although I must say that, if he has not committed any crimes, it should be easy enough to get the case(s) dismissed shouldn't it? You'd better ask him why this seems an impossible task.
He can’t deny what he said. He was a sitting President. His words were recorded, even in private on multiple occasions.
@@prisonersdilemma939 😂 seriously?
Remove the Judge
Is the GBI investigating Fani ?
Yes! And I hear the VIA have finally assassinated Castro
D delay, delay
If 1st admendent violation is argued, then what about all criminals caught on wiretaps. All they all not guilty???
Lol saying an election is a fraud is not a crime.
Bad man
In other words Willis and crew misunderstood the RICO statute as it applies to Trump.
but a million dollars was paid to try. Its like a Jerry Springer show.
It's a delay and harassment tactic. Shows just how evil they are.
They understood, they just failed to successfully manipulate.
Oh, that's sweet. Keep dreaming snowfklakes.
They understand it… but they are trying to twist and bend it to fit their political and biased narrative.
So what now they are trying to figure out something that will stick?
Guess he earned his $10,000 per hour.
This is a hearing on Trump’s Motion to Dismiss based on incorrect application of RICO.
Sad day when skin color rules instead of law and truth!
TRUMP 2024 LETS GO 👍
I do not believe it is legal for GA to get documents or viewing documents from Congress until that information is put into the NARA and they file a FOIA to get or view that information. The J6 committee is not a law enforcement agency. It is Congress.
Regulation of Federal Elections: The Constitution grants Congress the authority to regulate the times, places, and manner of federal elections (Article I, Section 4). This power allows Congress to set standards and rules for federal elections, including measures to prevent interference.
In order words, the topic is far too vast for a quick answer. Elections have very special rights in many places in constitutions around the worlds. Not just ours. It is possible they did have the right they claim. It would make more sense they they would be right on this topic then you. Right? Given the forum...
@ArchmageMarlock the government is not always right, on the contrary governments are wrong more times than not ,
@@houseofpainINKS
That is a really bad argument. Very close to just "childish." You must think about outcomes before you speak.
1) I posted about the law of the U.S. You have every right to get off your A, go to law school, and do something about the nation's "wrongness."
2) Your comment again sounds so foolish to me. It really does. OMG. It offers information that goes nowhere! Nowhere!! It neither adds nor subtracts, since the law is the law. It will exist regardless of your belief in it.
Think for a moment before making "shock" value comments or buzzword comments. DEFINITIONS AND FACTS ARE HARD TO ARGUE AGAINST! The laws in the nation in effect at this time are actual and factual. You, however, think that governments are "wrong more times than not" while offering no source of overwhelming, clear, or convincing evidence, so-basic B. The level of anarchy you summon just from being ignorant
Since you clearly take the position that the government is bad more than 50% of the time, give me facts! How is the government wrong today to explain? How are you verifying that information? There will be follow-up questions and citation checks for a licensed attorney!
Please show your work. (I am being sarcastic.)
Also, how bad is "wrong" for you?
"Nuremberg trials" level bad! The "Tuskegee Syphilis Study" Level BAD!
What is "wrong" for you?
Thank God, you don't get a say in this matter at all. You get one vote.
Law School is a good START to understanding our nation.
Not congress either. Was illegal as did not follow regulations
They brought it on their self
Guilt has to be proven not defended
Elections-the conduct of elections-is expressly non-political. If tRump disputed the count, it is not political speech and can’t be awarded any kind of immunity.
Politics is about getting policy done. There is indeed a policy of holding elections, and it was done when the Constitution (state or federal) was promulgated-and of course by every state as each one confederated. There is no politics necessary with respect conducting an election-not anymore: that policy is done-politics in this respect is over and done wth.
If tRump claims to have a fiduciary obligation to question the vote-count, it’s still not political: even if it were part of a president’s responsibility to investigate the conduct of an election -which, naturally, is a forbidden conflict of interest-the matter still wouldn’t be political. It would be a criminal matter, not a political one.
The politics of getting the policy of prohibiting the corruption of elections done has already been done. No politician has automatic authority or license to get this policy done again when it has already been done, although a politician or candidate may propose, on campaign or as elected member of a legislative assembly, to review, renew or rescind that policy in the usual legislative way-but that’s not what tRump was doing when he sweated the Georgia official to rig the vote-count in his favour.
It’s amazing to me that anyone would make the case that any candidate in a public election has any reason whatsoever to participate in the conduct of that election.
There is no ‘right to dissent’ in this respect, certainly not for a candidate -all of whom must swear to understand and uphold the restrictions (such as of conflict of interest) required of them-who is actually running in a particular election.
“The statute doesn’t apply…” Yeah, I’ll say! It doesn’t apply to tRump’s fantasies about getting away with trying to corrupt an election vote-count (worse that it was a count in an election in which he was a candidate).
There is no Rico here … the state is reaching
I agree. I don’t like Trump but from what I’ve heard and read, for the most part these are witch hunts to keep him from the presidency. If the Supreme Courts don’t shoot down a couple of these cases, it will create more harm for the democracy than Trump will ever be able to do in 4 years. One thing for sure, though, if SCOTUS rules against Trump, no one wins save the lawyers.
This defendant lawyer is reaching and a whole lot of BS
Seems all their doing is pleading for the courts to throw out certain indictments against their client, in order to be charged with something else,Buying time and a redo of starting over. Then again, the state can modify its indictments and at a later date impose it in as the case moves forward with proof..
Let's get to the trial already, their arguments are a waste of time, what can or can't be charged here.
Let the judge set it aside yet keeping the charges as they stand. Allowing both sides to prove their points in the court room.
The case is a waste of time, and money. Election interference pure and simple.
Their arguments prove there was no crime dimwit
There are processes and procedures to be followed and one of the types of pretrial motions that can be put forward is one to have the charges dismissed because they do not fit the facts of the case. This is that hearing and you'd better believe trumps lawyers are going to use every potential motion they can, even if they're non-sensical.
@@JonathanFraser-i7h
The whole trial is nonsensical. Should never have been brought.
@@marylamb7707 Trump pressured the georgia secretary of state to "find the votes", the call was recorded and anyone who isn't a faux news viewer heard the tape. He was also involved in a scheme to present fake electoral college voters. There was very clearly a crime with trump's involvement. While due process of the law is essential, the facts pretty clearly show that trump commited crimes, conspired and convinced others to commit crimes on his behalf and general managed an enterprise whose sole purpose was criminal. At this point its a question of how involved was trump and how much jail time is he going to get.
They owe damages caused by the act. Criminal acts causing damages may require or mean penal liability as well as civil remedy. They all had a simular reason for participating in Jan. 6 even in violations of the before mentioned acts in civil and crimnal civil and penal liability. All 'that' actually took placed but can we say that the damages which resulted was planned. Nevertheless! There is an argument for whatever civil damages which may have resulted. Unfortunately! We can be thankful that the F.B.I. had in place means necessary to separate a civil disobedient act from all criminal acts which 'not' may have took place'. But what actually took place in the mist of the good committed by the bad. The bottom line is this! Anytime an American citizen in this country causes civil or criminal liability damages to the innocent. There must always be relief afforded to those damaged. All of what I am saying may differ from what's being discussed hear the argument for relief will and should never change but continue to remain the bedrock of the American Justice system. Thanks.
Do you feel the same for what the BLM & Antifa did.
Yes, Ms. Fani Willis who specializes in RICO violations "misunderstood" the statute. These defense lawyers are trying to change the definitions of statutes in their favor and not offering fact.
Fishing for information that is not what they know and can spin for their doltish maghats
0:12 I was docked in Moot Court Competition for using the word “kinda.”
Conspiracy is a Rico charge Done.!
Typical Trump lawyer, representing Trump. Pick pieces or parts out and find argument Not defining its entirety. Good try, but this won't fly, not even close, Move on and move forward..
He should laugh in his face!!!
The judge just listen to the first lawyer but had questions to the second lawyer. Does he already have his decision made?
He acts like he believes them Georgie people. it’s a set up they just want to get rid of Trump. Somebody save America.
There is something off about this whole situation
This makes me wonder is it a court hearing or a rehearsal for a TV show script.
Turn off DRM on your over the air ATSC 3.0 broadcast channel.
NOTHING BUT A SHAM!
That's the China Trump motto lol.
i wanted to say i like the judgemcafee
Why the f'k aren't you covering the Dominion VS court proceedings? The outcome of that law suit is paramount to the entire basis of this criminal case. All of the defendants in this case acted in good faith because GA's electronic voting systems are Swiss cheese and we all know it.
These people knew what they were doing was wrong
They asked secretary of state to violated his Oath of officers and commit crimes, taking votes away from one candidate to another candidate is wrong no if and and buts they knew what they were doing, these people
Broke the law,
It's like a person under age with a gun got from a friend, shoots kills a person
The person who gave underage a gun, that person is an assessor's to the crime.
No matter how little a person did, if they called one person and threaten a person, another sends a text message,
Another goes to the home of a person.
Everyone did an illegal thing to receive an certain out come all people who participated are guilty of crimes.
Their relationship was to get Trump election by stealing votes.
@@annjordan6408, nobody asked you and your opinion means less than zero to me. We see things entirely differently. That BS narrative isn't what played out in front of me on election night so, you're dead wrong. Nobody asked anybody to "take votes away" from anybody, ever. Trump called and ask the Rat faced boy to "find" the votes, not steal the votes.
There were legitimate challenges to a fraudulent election on Swiss Cheese voting machines and blatant ballot stuffing in Fulton and DeKalb counties. The Dominion law suit challenge to the obvious gaping holes in the security of the Dominion machines is quintessential to proving that those challenges were legitimate.
Have a nice day but f'k entirely and completely off. Thank you very much.
@@annjordan6408 U are thinking cuz Trump called the govenor of Georgia and told him we only need 11000 something votes then that's the crime. They can get u all believing something else that's cuz they lie by omission. Trump already knew they stole the election and he was giving him a chance to come clean but he wasn't going to cuz there's to many to go down and they believe they will get away with it. Trump knew before he was elected the first time they were going to steal it cuz they had no choice. That's y they stopped counting in 4 states and that's y Trump and certain in the military set the plan to get the data in real time. Then u give it to those in he military and they have been working behind the scenes since Trump started in office
How about votes being ran 2 and 3 times not to mention ballots being pulled from under tables and scanned after the polling place was shutdown due to a busted pipe or the woman on you tube making a video showing how they fill out ballots GA election has more shady people I. It than a Biden family reunion
Doesn't mean the defl@@annjordan6408
Why do they keep saying 2022 ... There was no presidential election then
because actions to over throw the election continued for almost 3 years.
2yr primaries
Good by to trump for ever
Cry harder lefty.....Trump will be your next president!😅
Oh look! Trump won the Iowa caucuses by a landslide 🤭. That was FAST! & This rides not over. Better keep your seat belt on.
ty judge for the 6 accounts
This lawyer is full of it and he can take his foolishness and head out of here.
In my opinion, the elongated lump under Attorney Stockton's left ear should be checked.
We are looking into it very strongly. Big league.
The judge stated he would take all matters on this issue under advisement.
Seems no one wants to represent Kutti. Is there any wonder?
This requires brain energy I can never get back .
Political language... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.
George Orwell
So true. When anyone commits a crime. You know it's a crime. These people knew they were commiting a crime.
@@annjordan6408 Your saying the Trump team committed a crime
YES @@John-pd4xt
I hope trump sues them all
What is our law students , professors learning? Sounds like America!!!
"I just need to find ....11,780........votes."
This case is not a 1st amendent violation.
Do trumps lawyers know they are working for free??
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Wow. You know good and well they are not working for free.
@@edwardmaglero8738 paying in swamp suit scraps? lol.
@@edwardmaglero8738he will lose and then he won't pay. History repeats itself. Just ask Rudy.
@erikahedberg I hate that you feel that way. No I don't.
A bunch of long convoluted bs ! That’s all trump has 💁
Lock the criminal up.
Joe likes children jumping on his lap…
Who BRANDON
@@Myers70would love to see Brandon pay for his crimes.
Yes, lock up willie
Dam a month later and this might get thrown out 😂
I have a $20 bill I got somehow from change or ATM with a red stamp that says "Donald Trump House " with and arrow pointing at the white house! any trump lovers want to buy it for a souvenir? because that's as close as he have to even thinking about the white house again!!!
Fix the volume if you can post it make it so we can hear
The headline should be: Trump hires Phil Donahue in Georgia case.
😂😂😂
It's going to be glorious to see President Trump back in office!!! ❤❤❤❤❤❤
Prison
Audio is in mono?
Fani is just plain nasty when it is not called for.
Yes!!
It really seems obvious this shouldn’t be a RICO conspiracy….these people are all together and in on it, through what mind reading?
Salvatore Gravano character witness, i rest my case your honor.
This judge should recuse himself because he Donated to Willis campaign. He's a fraudulent judge.
What is your service
Where is Fani????
Judge tell this Lawyer he needs to stop wearing those shoes they are putting his toes in severe pain
Brown shoes don't make it.
Typo on the first slide. Good preparation, team Trump.
😂
I think we should apply you to a prison cell with him!
They had to dig so deep. LOL Trump 2024.
nope.