I think there's an argument that the risky Germany picks are not as risky as for some other teams. They will be playing in the first matches of each gameday during the group stages, so you'll always have the opportunity to sub them off if they don't do anything. If you've got Fernandes waiting on your bench for the end of each matchday, then a punt on a high-ceiling but risky player like Sané or Gündogan feels more reasonable. This reasoning also makes risky Belgium and Portugal players even more risky - they play at the end of each matchday, so you won't be able to replace them if they blank. I've been playing UCL fantasy for a couple of years and the different structure to FPL makes the decision making very different.
What do you mean won't be able to replace them? You can sub out any player after full time and before kick off of the next game? Nobody plays at the same time during the group stages Example Lukaku 5pm and Mbappe 8pm on the same day (17th). You just sub out Belgium players immediately after full time but before the France game kicks off at 8pm? Portugal play on the 18th anyway How is having Portugal and Belgium and different to Germany and Portugal?
@@nezkeys79 because if your German player blanks, chances are that literally all of your other players are yet to play, since Germany are the very first game of matchday one, so you can sub them on in their place. Portugal are literally the last team to play in matchday one, so if you bring on your portugese player and they blank, you're stuck with their points. Belgian players aren't as risky portugese ones because of this, but they're still riskier than say german or english players
@jacklee469 ah that doesn't really bother me. You can have your players all spread out or go front and back yeah. I'm just picking good players with good fixtures so don't care about that
There's only one sub deadline for each day (kickoff of first match), so you couldn't sub Belgian players out for French ones. So on the last day of MD1 you have to take a punt on Portugal players (you won't even see lineups) and hope they do well, because you won't be able to replace them. Worst case scenario is they don't feature at all and you end up with a 0.
i think you should have made this list according to 2 categories. 1 for ppl who will make limitless on gw2 and wc on gw3 and 2 for ppl who will do limitless 3 and wc on knockout stage. with that list players like calhanoglu, szoboslai etc who has easy gw1 and hard gw2 should be s tier for ppl who will follow the 1st step, but risky for ppl who will follow the 2nd step, i think its an idea you may think inorder to remake a list, akways friendly proposal :)
@@ProClubsHighlights I don't know, here in Spain the news and reports give more chance to Fabian or Mikel merino (mostly to Fabian). If Olmo plays should be in a forward position. Anyways let's see if the friendly of tonight give us some idea of the lineups
¿No crees que Dani Olmo tiene la oportunidad de empezar los partidos como extremo izquierdo en lugar de los tres mediocampistas? realmente está en debate
@@sinfulxsalty Puede ser, a de la fuente le gusta mucho olmo, pero creo que Nico Williams y lamine yamal por las bandas crean más peligro que Olmo, y de delantero centro Morata parece fijo.
Calhanoglu played yesterday against Italy and performed well but didn't get any goal contribution and the game ended up 0-0. In the other side, Shaqiri scored a penalty against Estonia and ended up 4-0. I would value more Shaqiri right now but anyways decide yourself based on your feelings.
@@eric.g.s2417look at the opposition of both players though ....I think age could work against shaqiri and calhanoglu isn't much attacking....both players take all set pieces and it's your preference at the end of the day
what do you think about Mudryk? He is playing in a weak group and against a Belgium with a weak defense? And do you think Vitinha is a good pick for inly 6Million?
I'd say don't go for Vitinha.... he's not too attacking.....he took corners in the last friendly but that was because Bruno Fernandes wasn't playing until the second half.
saka is a great pick but bellihngham has to be risky or solid at best because southgate said he will not play any friendlies so we don't know where he will play and as southgate is a negative manager he might stick him with rice as a dm and foden will play as an attacking mid. Also with Germany with the home advantage and same number of predicted goals gundogan has to be a solid pick at least. Georgia are predicted to lose against turkey(less chance of keeping clean sheet and less number of goals predicted) so you have to put calhanoglu in solid and guller in risky at least, he is a mil less than kvara as well. Trossard should be at least a tier above because he can score as well as give assists even though he didn't had a good qualifier numbers. Sane should be avoid, he was on bench in the recent friendlies and was not predicted to start.
Talisman theory bro. A star player is involved in every goal, then their team only needs to score once for you to get the points. If there’s multiple good players it’s more difficult to predict who will get the points.
How would playing Foden and Bellingham together in a midfield 3 make Southgate a negative manager lol, that’d be a very aggressive and attacking midfield
@@croissantpower mate you are confusing the two parts- southgate inherently is a negative manager and plays defensive. Second thing I was mentioning was that he can play rice and Bellingham as DMs(very less chance of Bellingham playing as a DM but we will not know cause he will not play both the friendlies). A player can play a different role for a club but and his country. zinchenko plays as a midfielder for ukraine a lot of times rather than a RB but grimaldo who is very attacking LB has not played an attacking role in spain. Bellingham has scored goals for real madrid but MIGHT play a defensive role for england. Saka however always plays as a right winger which is same as his position for arsenal and he also had 8 goal contributions in the qualifiers so he can score goals. I am not an aresnal fan btw. Southgate will most likely have one player going forward in the midfield so it's not clear whothat player is. Hope you got my point of view.
Only idiots don't know where Bellingham will play... He will play the exact same role he pays for Madrid.. No10.. which suits England perfectly... Just like he does for Madrid he can run into the space when Kane drops deep .. While when he drifts left to let Vinicius cut inside... Foden can cut inside... Even if Foden or Parmer were better No10s, Bellingham wood still be playing no10 as his style suits the Kane and the left winger perfectly. . As a bonus all of this makes TAA the perfect partner for Rice... With TAA, Rice can play a kind of double pivot bringing the best out of Rices game slowing him to go forward... While when it's TAA time to go forward he can support Saka on the right... Since walkers job is not to attack/support but to cover England's weakness at the back... Pace.... While on top of all of this, TAA can play a deep lying playmaker role...
As Georgian I advice you to not take him, he plays as CM for NT and he hasn't played for a while and can be out of form + might not even start or play full game and he can't get stats
I personally do yes. If Germany score (big if btw, their attack is not that good) then it could easily be any one of 6/7 players, that will often be substituted and rotated anyway. With Kvara you have guaranteed 90 minutes every game, on set pieces, and the talisman of the team. If Georgia score, Kvara is involved. Just my opinion ofc!
@@FPLMate do u rlly think an attack of sane through the left, havertz through the middle, wirtz on the right and gundo and musiala as cams is bad, imo one of the best attacks in the competition
Atm, I've got Maignan for GK, Hernandez, VVD, Frimpong and Grimaldo for defence, Bellingham, Wirtz, Szoboszlai and Bruno in Midfield, Mbappe and Kane up top and my subs is Sels, Mittelsdadt, Schmid and Unal which I won't sub on really
@@oli181 hey how’s that work can you change your whole bench in a gw without points hits like fpl ? I want to bench mbappe and fernades then sub in possibly and yeah may do whole bench so have built a solid 15 but can you change them all ? Thanks if you get back 👌
That defence looks waaay too expensive in my opinion. And having double french and Dutch defence too, they even play each other MD2 so seems very risky. The most expensive defender I have is 4.5 and that’s allowed me to have: Rodri, Shaqiri, Wirtz, Saka, Fernandes, Kane, Mbappe and Lukaku
@@oli181 True tbf, I think I have got a solid 15 man squad with Sels,Mittelsdadt,Schmid and Unal in subs but not sure, I might have to sell either Theo Hernandez, VVD, Frimpong or Grimaldo but not sure on what to do fully
Porn bots are getting too good for the content moderators, or not enough monitors. They have even managed to sometimes message something kinda related to the video content.
I have a big doubt England and Belgium play on 17 but it says that I can sub between England and Belgium players. Is it possible or I didn't understand the graphics well ?
Basing your stats off of the qualifiers is not enough data (specifically talking about the Canaloglu section) He is a monster for ball recoveries for Inter and takes all set pieces including pens, in UCL fantasy he can get double digit hauls from ball recoveries alone sometimes lol
@@aleksajankovic6644 Btw if you're picking Jorginho for penalties, he's not on them, he got that taken away from him after he missed too many of them for Italy. I'd downgrade him and improve Sels, who's not going to play
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 87 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ก้องชัย vs โชคปรีชา"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YN6e7HVnekw/mqdefault.jpg)
I think there's an argument that the risky Germany picks are not as risky as for some other teams. They will be playing in the first matches of each gameday during the group stages, so you'll always have the opportunity to sub them off if they don't do anything. If you've got Fernandes waiting on your bench for the end of each matchday, then a punt on a high-ceiling but risky player like Sané or Gündogan feels more reasonable.
This reasoning also makes risky Belgium and Portugal players even more risky - they play at the end of each matchday, so you won't be able to replace them if they blank.
I've been playing UCL fantasy for a couple of years and the different structure to FPL makes the decision making very different.
What do you mean won't be able to replace them?
You can sub out any player after full time and before kick off of the next game? Nobody plays at the same time during the group stages
Example Lukaku 5pm and Mbappe 8pm on the same day (17th). You just sub out Belgium players immediately after full time but before the France game kicks off at 8pm? Portugal play on the 18th anyway
How is having Portugal and Belgium and different to Germany and Portugal?
@@nezkeys79 because if your German player blanks, chances are that literally all of your other players are yet to play, since Germany are the very first game of matchday one, so you can sub them on in their place. Portugal are literally the last team to play in matchday one, so if you bring on your portugese player and they blank, you're stuck with their points.
Belgian players aren't as risky portugese ones because of this, but they're still riskier than say german or english players
@jacklee469 ah that doesn't really bother me. You can have your players all spread out or go front and back yeah. I'm just picking good players with good fixtures so don't care about that
There's only one sub deadline for each day (kickoff of first match), so you couldn't sub Belgian players out for French ones.
So on the last day of MD1 you have to take a punt on Portugal players (you won't even see lineups) and hope they do well, because you won't be able to replace them. Worst case scenario is they don't feature at all and you end up with a 0.
@lynette4119 what an awful rule change then. It has never ever been like this. What will be wil be
i think you should have made this list according to 2 categories. 1 for ppl who will make limitless on gw2 and wc on gw3 and 2 for ppl who will do limitless 3 and wc on knockout stage. with that list players like calhanoglu, szoboslai etc who has easy gw1 and hard gw2 should be s tier for ppl who will follow the 1st step, but risky for ppl who will follow the 2nd step, i think its an idea you may think inorder to remake a list, akways friendly proposal :)
Wouldnt avoid Guler and Trossard but all in all good picks👍
Fair enough, I see some people are predicting better minutes for Guler and Trossard than perhaps I am!
As a Spaniard, I can say that Olmo is a solid one but a little risky because he's not very likely to be starting all games
I think rodri pedri and olmo should be the 3 mids
@@ProClubsHighlights I don't know, here in Spain the news and reports give more chance to Fabian or Mikel merino (mostly to Fabian). If Olmo plays should be in a forward position. Anyways let's see if the friendly of tonight give us some idea of the lineups
@@ProClubsHighlights Olmo plays as part of the front 3, not in midfield. Olmo and Pedri in the same midfield would be too unbalanced anyway
¿No crees que Dani Olmo tiene la oportunidad de empezar los partidos como extremo izquierdo en lugar de los tres mediocampistas? realmente está en debate
@@sinfulxsalty Puede ser, a de la fuente le gusta mucho olmo, pero creo que Nico Williams y lamine yamal por las bandas crean más peligro que Olmo, y de delantero centro Morata parece fijo.
Great tier list Dan
Who's a better option between Calhanoglu and Shaqiri? Both 6.5m and talismanic
Calhanoglu played yesterday against Italy and performed well but didn't get any goal contribution and the game ended up 0-0. In the other side, Shaqiri scored a penalty against Estonia and ended up 4-0. I would value more Shaqiri right now but anyways decide yourself based on your feelings.
I personally prefer Shaqiri, as he plays in a more advanced position for open play goal contributions as well as set pieces.
@@eric.g.s2417 thank you
@@FPLMate Shaqiri it is
@@eric.g.s2417look at the opposition of both players though ....I think age could work against shaqiri and calhanoglu isn't much attacking....both players take all set pieces and it's your preference at the end of the day
what do you think about Mudryk? He is playing in a weak group and against a Belgium with a weak defense? And do you think Vitinha is a good pick for inly 6Million?
I'd say don't go for Vitinha.... he's not too attacking.....he took corners in the last friendly but that was because Bruno Fernandes wasn't playing until the second half.
saka is a great pick but bellihngham has to be risky or solid at best because southgate said he will not play any friendlies so we don't know where he will play and as southgate is a negative manager he might stick him with rice as a dm and foden will play as an attacking mid. Also with Germany with the home advantage and same number of predicted goals gundogan has to be a solid pick at least. Georgia are predicted to lose against turkey(less chance of keeping clean sheet and less number of goals predicted) so you have to put calhanoglu in solid and guller in risky at least, he is a mil less than kvara as well. Trossard should be at least a tier above because he can score as well as give assists even though he didn't had a good qualifier numbers. Sane should be avoid, he was on bench in the recent friendlies and was not predicted to start.
Talisman theory bro.
A star player is involved in every goal, then their team only needs to score once for you to get the points. If there’s multiple good players it’s more difficult to predict who will get the points.
How would playing Foden and Bellingham together in a midfield 3 make Southgate a negative manager lol, that’d be a very aggressive and attacking midfield
@@croissantpower mate you are confusing the two parts- southgate inherently is a negative manager and plays defensive. Second thing I was mentioning was that he can play rice and Bellingham as DMs(very less chance of Bellingham playing as a DM but we will not know cause he will not play both the friendlies). A player can play a different role for a club but and his country. zinchenko plays as a midfielder for ukraine a lot of times rather than a RB but grimaldo who is very attacking LB has not played an attacking role in spain. Bellingham has scored goals for real madrid but MIGHT play a defensive role for england. Saka however always plays as a right winger which is same as his position for arsenal and he also had 8 goal contributions in the qualifiers so he can score goals. I am not an aresnal fan btw. Southgate will most likely have one player going forward in the midfield so it's not clear whothat player is. Hope you got my point of view.
@@notionvids2935 I was only making the point playing Bellingham next to rice would be a negative move
Only idiots don't know where Bellingham will play...
He will play the exact same role he pays for Madrid.. No10.. which suits England perfectly...
Just like he does for Madrid he can run into the space when Kane drops deep ..
While when he drifts left to let Vinicius cut inside... Foden can cut inside...
Even if Foden or Parmer were better No10s, Bellingham wood still be playing no10 as his style suits the Kane and the left winger perfectly. .
As a bonus all of this makes TAA the perfect partner for Rice...
With TAA, Rice can play a kind of double pivot bringing the best out of Rices game slowing him to go forward... While when it's TAA time to go forward he can support Saka on the right... Since walkers job is not to attack/support but to cover England's weakness at the back... Pace....
While on top of all of this, TAA can play a deep lying playmaker role...
should I take rodri and bellingham or saka and wirtz
Hi Dan, what are your thoughts on Girogi Chakvetadze for Georgia. Played really well this season for Watford and he is a cheap starter for Georgia.
don't talk about him!!!
I need my hidden gem to stay HIDDEN 😂😂
@@fpl_djhammer lol🤣🤣🤣🤣
As Georgian I advice you to not take him, he plays as CM for NT and he hasn't played for a while and can be out of form + might not even start or play full game and he can't get stats
Vitinha is my hidden gem lol 💎
Baumgartner is one to watch. Austria will surprise people this tournament.
Like him as a differential
What about Patrick Wimmer?
is he nailed??
And Is sudakov is a good pick for 7m?
Wimmer I like, Sudakov I’m not so keen on
@@FPLMate Are Wimmer is sure starter???
Defo GK vid please ! Really struggling wity that 1 !
Do you really think Kvara is a better pick than gundo?
Gundogan is a better pick in my opinion as he's on set pieces for Germany
@@Joshunderwood_qh5ed yh 100% agree, thats why I Wonder why he dont rate gundo, as he is playing as a 10 and on pens
I personally do yes. If Germany score (big if btw, their attack is not that good) then it could easily be any one of 6/7 players, that will often be substituted and rotated anyway.
With Kvara you have guaranteed 90 minutes every game, on set pieces, and the talisman of the team. If Georgia score, Kvara is involved.
Just my opinion ofc!
@@FPLMate Very true there, I think either pick is good tho
@@FPLMate do u rlly think an attack of sane through the left, havertz through the middle, wirtz on the right and gundo and musiala as cams is bad, imo one of the best attacks in the competition
Ofc give me def and gks❤️❤️
Thoughts on Xhaka as a differential? Good first 2 fixtures (strategy), assists and ball recoveries
Mid
Dhaka would be a solid. Pick if shaqiri wasn't in the picture
@@chrisantony6218
Who is better and why
Shaqiri or rodri ?
Doesn't modric always turn up in major comps tho?
I love modric and im wondering if he worth it also, i kinda wanna pick him just cause i like him😅
How many dice can we make during a gw ? Is only one per gw then like points hits like fpl ? Thanks
Atm, I've got Maignan for GK, Hernandez, VVD, Frimpong and Grimaldo for defence, Bellingham, Wirtz, Szoboszlai and Bruno in Midfield, Mbappe and Kane up top and my subs is Sels, Mittelsdadt, Schmid and Unal which I won't sub on really
This game has manual substitutions, you ideally need a solid 15-man squad.
@@oli181 hey how’s that work can you change your whole bench in a gw without points hits like fpl ? I want to bench mbappe and fernades then sub in possibly and yeah may do whole bench so have built a solid 15 but can you change them all ? Thanks if you get back 👌
@@james.m1086you can sub on any player as long as they haven’t played yet
That defence looks waaay too expensive in my opinion. And having double french and Dutch defence too, they even play each other MD2 so seems very risky.
The most expensive defender I have is 4.5 and that’s allowed me to have: Rodri, Shaqiri, Wirtz, Saka, Fernandes, Kane, Mbappe and Lukaku
@@oli181 True tbf, I think I have got a solid 15 man squad with Sels,Mittelsdadt,Schmid and Unal in subs but not sure, I might have to sell either Theo Hernandez, VVD, Frimpong or Grimaldo but not sure on what to do fully
You missed Tielemans his in hot form at the moment club and country 🙏 good video Mate !
I love tielemans. You think he will start in first match?
Man he should start am not to sure his form is 🔥
He's not a starter
@@FPLLuisB yeah, i hope he gets some minutes at least
@@blackluke789 a Shame. For 6m i think chances of good points are decent
Think you’ve got a lot wrong here
I think, barela olmo mctominay and kroos are too high
And Gundo, calha, Trossard are too low
Fair enough, football is a game of opinions!
@@FPLMate indeed it is! Keep up the content though I’m always open to be challenged in my thinking it’s all part of the process
i was about to write basically exactly this lmao
Shaqiri or jorghino????
I was looking around the app and can't find the prizes. Somebody remind me why we're doing this Pool?
Fun? 😅
What is all of these comments bro 🫣😳
Porn bots are getting too good for the content moderators, or not enough monitors. They have even managed to sometimes message something kinda related to the video content.
Mate i have a question. What is considered as a ball recovery in fantasy?
Tackles and interceptions
what about Tielemans 6m, scores goals and ball recoveries and good fixture
0 goals and 13 ball recoveries in the 6 games he played in qualifiers
@@george-cx4ev scored two in last game
Is zinchenko a good option?
Not really he wasn't played often and 100% not the favourite Vs mykolenko
Højbjerg as a differential ?
Thoughts on Eriksen for MD1?
Slovenia ain’t that well put together and I personally feel eriksen will contribute a lot in the game. I would say yes
Trossard is definitely not an avoid even at that price point
HOW YOU THINK ABOUT EREKSEN
I have a big doubt
England and Belgium play on 17 but it says that I can sub between England and Belgium players. Is it possible or I didn't understand the graphics well ?
Im guessing you have a different timezone, but it’s what day the teams play in germany that count and england play on 16th
@@lucky_luke5554ok thanks for it I was bit confused on it
so Eriksen isn't a midfielder?
What about (Nico Williams 7M Spain)?
I think you’re playing with rotation fire, but it could come off. I think I will play a little safer
how about X. Shaqiri (SUI)??
Solid
I would argue Calhanoglu not too risky
How about romania's nicolae stanciu.
Ericksen?
Bruno glazing is crazy
No mention of Shaqiri?? Why?
Because he’s not one of the most popular midfield picks
@@FPLMate Fair enough. Surprised at that. I'm going for him first match.
Excellent videos btw Dan for the Euros mate
Shaqiri a good pick?
No he retired
Yes he’s a starter for Switzerland and on good form
@@alqudzz-9864nonsense
Eriksen?
Risky
@@FPLMate why?
What about Mitrovic!
What's the league code ?
Check the video description
Basing your stats off of the qualifiers is not enough data (specifically talking about the Canaloglu section)
He is a monster for ball recoveries for Inter and takes all set pieces including pens, in UCL fantasy he can get double digit hauls from ball recoveries alone sometimes lol
Different teams = different systems. If other data is useful to you, please feel free to collect. It’s not for me though!
diaby?
Xhaka?
Meh 🤷🏽♂️
KDB OR BRUNO FERNANDES?
Big clue in the video! 😂
What if Scotland cause an upset 😅 McTominay lets go 😂🎉
Schmid in the same tier as Trossard 😢
Shaqiri or Rodri
Rodri
Are we sure Jorginho is on pens?
We’re not sure, it’s a best guess imo though
I heard it may be Chiesa but not sure
Jorginho is off pens. It's with Chiesa now.
@@biswajitkalita7816 yeah I thought so, shame Jorginho would have been a great pick
@@Frostythesnowman889 Italy's offence sucks. They won't get many penalties unless the opponents randomly start playing handball. Not a big loss
i think Jorginho is a terrible pick personally as he barely played any mins in qualifiers
Shaqiri?
Think he’s solid personally
Pickford Sels
DiMarco Tah Mittelstadt Grimaldo Hernandez
Jorginho Saka Fernandes De bruyne Rodri
Lukaku Mbappe Havertz
havertz over ronaldo nd kane?
@@uCAntCeemeyou cant afford saka + fernandes + de bruyne with kane. €3.5m difference, you know
I think Havertz will score more points than Ronaldo and something close to Kane
@@aleksajankovic6644 Btw if you're picking Jorginho for penalties, he's not on them, he got that taken away from him after he missed too many of them for Italy. I'd downgrade him and improve Sels, who's not going to play
I’d personally sell Hernandez and Grimaldo to 4.5 defenders and upgrade Sels to a 4.5 GK as he won’t start and upgrade Jorginho to a 7.0 mid
De Bruyne is just so expensive. I'd rather have Lukaku.
Only €0.5m difference! But I agree
Missing Xherdan Shaqiri and Christian Eriksen
Solid and risky
@@FPLMate could you elaborate your reasoning? Thanks
Watch Lukaku in the last World Cup. One of the worst performances ever
First to comment here 👈
👍👍👍
Worst ranking ever
You know a lot about English football, but you have absolutely no idea about European football
Yeah that’s fair 😂
I’m trying to use data and known facts to give good estimations on players from other leagues, so hopefully can still be useful.
Shaqiri?
Solid