ACLS Part 7 - Ventricular Tachycardia and PEA: presented by Dr. Gallagher's Neighborhood

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @TheWalterHWhite
    @TheWalterHWhite 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Saw a case of relatively symptomless Vtach with a malfunctioning ventricular pacemaker. I was astounded because they were talking and had no complaints of Angina, Dyspnea, or Syncope. HR was 201 < 220. Unfortunately, about an hour later the pt. coded. Gained ROSC and conciousness. Pt. then stated they wanted a DNR DNI. Coded again about 15 minutes later.

  • @markyounger1240
    @markyounger1240 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    People often think that there is an electrophysiology reason to Unsynchronize pulseless V-tach. There is not. It is just a matter of time delay. The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology just feel that here would be a delay to synchronize. If you could synchronize just as fast as unsynchonized from an EP perspective, it would be preferable or at least just as good. I don't think a lot of people understand that.

  • @ProChargedLS2
    @ProChargedLS2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I had sustained v tach back in April, not fun. Was cardioverted but thankfully I was put under for that, heard it's quite the painful experience.

  • @tulsipatel1594
    @tulsipatel1594 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Why would a pulseless v tach be shocked but not pea? Both are pulseless

    • @DrGallaghersNeighborhood
      @DrGallaghersNeighborhood  4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Pulseless V tach is a chaotic electrical rhythm that needs to be stopped (hence shock)
      PEA has ORGANIZED electrical activity therefore should not be shocked.

  • @77kachi
    @77kachi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Doctor