ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Swan Ganz Numbers: presented by Dr. Gallagher's Neighborhood
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 มี.ค. 2011
- A detailed look at the all important ratio between systemic and pulmonary artery pressures. When the ratio's good (say, 5 systemic to every 1 pulmonary), then you have a good Starling curve. When the ratio's bad (say 2 systemic to 1 pulmonic) then the Starling curve is bad
Been an IR RN for 12 years and am transitioning to the Cath lab...this is a great educational video ..Thanks and Cheers from NYC!!
This has been incredibly helpful during my transition to CVICU. Thank you!
Hi John!!! You're in CVICU now? PM me on FaceBook! Dr Moore
Thank you for explaining this so well, I was pulling my hair for the past few days trying to understand the purpose of PAPs
How's my heart?
Doc: Ok.
God bless you- cardiac nurse
Thank you for this, it’s very concise and informative
Thank you for breaking this down and explaining it from a physiologic stand point. Much appreciate it!
@4:57 "Oops stupid me I gave a bunch of Neo" priceless
Thank you for your magnificent video.
During swan ganz placement do you have any recommendations to increase the likelihood of placing the catheter in the pulmonary artery?
1. Should you thread the catheter slowly?
2. Should you place the patient supine or upright?
Excellent Presentation!
Very nice presentation. Thank you, Sir.
Thanks! Beautiful video!
Efkharisto!
Can we get this video updated with a clearer camera?
Great video very informative!
I'm trying to determine the necessity of this. I was informed of the RHC, but not keeping this device in my body for over three days
I like my ratio swan numbers at all the time
Please,clearly explain and point to specific figures
Nice presentation thank you sir.
Thanks for the video. The concept of the ratio was very useful. My queries. So if the ratio is maintained and patient is hypotensive giving more fluids should help? Likewise if the ratio is bad inotropes or mechanical supports would be necessary?
What would be case if both were combined. Say a patient with preexisting LV dysfunction with significant blood loss during surgery? How would these pressures and corresponding ratios look like?
Dr. Gallagher Thank you for the video. Could I ask you a little bit to understand more? If the ratio systemic/pulmonic is bad then the starling curve is bad...meaning even increase volume the cardiac output would not increase? Anything else? Any advice on topic I could read? Thank you very much
That's basically it, you keep loading and loading and the heart just plain can't pump it out so the heart overfills. Good luck and thanks for the question.
so good, thanks
Not a great talk, unfortunately. Needs some differentiation vis a vis the fact that pressure is not synonymous with filling because compliance is variable. Any swan talk nowadays needs to include concepts like RV luxury perfusion in diastole, post vs pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension, interventricular dependence, how PAD is only a rough surrogate for wedge pressure, continuous vs cold injectate cardiac output measurement, complications, limitations, etc
Vector222 is absolutely right. Make that video and post the link to it here and I will direct them to that video. Thank you!
Thank you for your video. The amount of times you said "ok" I found to be a little distracting, but overall good material.
You are correct, I said OK too many times. I will try to improve that in future videos.
Omg same. After the 5000th " ok" I felt my eye twitch lol
I didn't even notice. Thank you Doc. Now for the CCRN
Give him a break. Imagine the number of times he had to do rounds, give and receive reports, etc. "Ok" is pretty ingrained.
@@DrGallaghersNeighborhood thank you Dr. Gallagher for the video. You sounded great.
Thank you, Not sure how you got the ratio? Can you explain?
PAP:ABP
Politically correct.
Need clarity on how to calculate the ratio…
Ok!
can you say "ok" a few more times...?
Ok
ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Ok