Swan Ganz Numbers: presented by Dr. Gallagher's Neighborhood

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 42

  • @KINGSPOINT.NY.2024
    @KINGSPOINT.NY.2024 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Been an IR RN for 12 years and am transitioning to the Cath lab...this is a great educational video ..Thanks and Cheers from NYC!!

  • @johnpalmer330
    @johnpalmer330 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    This has been incredibly helpful during my transition to CVICU. Thank you!

    • @cathimoore7788
      @cathimoore7788 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi John!!! You're in CVICU now? PM me on FaceBook! Dr Moore

  • @hiuwong6746
    @hiuwong6746 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for explaining this so well, I was pulling my hair for the past few days trying to understand the purpose of PAPs

  • @danyjamal6471
    @danyjamal6471 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for your magnificent video.
    During swan ganz placement do you have any recommendations to increase the likelihood of placing the catheter in the pulmonary artery?
    1. Should you thread the catheter slowly?
    2. Should you place the patient supine or upright?

  • @husnihassan9037
    @husnihassan9037 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    How's my heart?
    Doc: Ok.

  • @LY43537
    @LY43537 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for breaking this down and explaining it from a physiologic stand point. Much appreciate it!

  • @vivianfox3794
    @vivianfox3794 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for this, it’s very concise and informative

  • @Emily-ok5sh
    @Emily-ok5sh 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm trying to determine the necessity of this. I was informed of the RHC, but not keeping this device in my body for over three days

  • @DigitalAndInnovation
    @DigitalAndInnovation 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @4:57 "Oops stupid me I gave a bunch of Neo" priceless

  • @thefarmingnurse
    @thefarmingnurse 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can we get this video updated with a clearer camera?

  • @mikewest9017
    @mikewest9017 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent Presentation!

  • @mohammadghani6835
    @mohammadghani6835 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice presentation. Thank you, Sir.

  • @drgaganvelayudhan1733
    @drgaganvelayudhan1733 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for the video. The concept of the ratio was very useful. My queries. So if the ratio is maintained and patient is hypotensive giving more fluids should help? Likewise if the ratio is bad inotropes or mechanical supports would be necessary?

    • @drgaganvelayudhan1733
      @drgaganvelayudhan1733 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      What would be case if both were combined. Say a patient with preexisting LV dysfunction with significant blood loss during surgery? How would these pressures and corresponding ratios look like?

  • @brandonmerrill6557
    @brandonmerrill6557 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    God bless you- cardiac nurse

  • @stormofbrain
    @stormofbrain 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dr. Gallagher Thank you for the video. Could I ask you a little bit to understand more? If the ratio systemic/pulmonic is bad then the starling curve is bad...meaning even increase volume the cardiac output would not increase? Anything else? Any advice on topic I could read? Thank you very much

    • @DrGallaghersNeighborhood
      @DrGallaghersNeighborhood  10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's basically it, you keep loading and loading and the heart just plain can't pump it out so the heart overfills. Good luck and thanks for the question.

  • @outdaridhh8045
    @outdaridhh8045 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please,clearly explain and point to specific figures

  • @maardavid
    @maardavid 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks! Beautiful video!

  • @grangrampa832
    @grangrampa832 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video very informative!

  • @masimo_spo2
    @masimo_spo2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like my ratio swan numbers at all the time

  • @vector222
    @vector222 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Not a great talk, unfortunately. Needs some differentiation vis a vis the fact that pressure is not synonymous with filling because compliance is variable. Any swan talk nowadays needs to include concepts like RV luxury perfusion in diastole, post vs pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension, interventricular dependence, how PAD is only a rough surrogate for wedge pressure, continuous vs cold injectate cardiac output measurement, complications, limitations, etc

    • @DrGallaghersNeighborhood
      @DrGallaghersNeighborhood  4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Vector222 is absolutely right. Make that video and post the link to it here and I will direct them to that video. Thank you!

  • @durdaanaosuagwu8587
    @durdaanaosuagwu8587 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you, Not sure how you got the ratio? Can you explain?

  • @kellycracraft3229
    @kellycracraft3229 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you for your video. The amount of times you said "ok" I found to be a little distracting, but overall good material.

    • @DrGallaghersNeighborhood
      @DrGallaghersNeighborhood  4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      You are correct, I said OK too many times. I will try to improve that in future videos.

    • @mallorylemman4467
      @mallorylemman4467 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Omg same. After the 5000th " ok" I felt my eye twitch lol

    • @md2rn2np2broadcaster
      @md2rn2np2broadcaster 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I didn't even notice. Thank you Doc. Now for the CCRN

    • @husnihassan9037
      @husnihassan9037 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Give him a break. Imagine the number of times he had to do rounds, give and receive reports, etc. "Ok" is pretty ingrained.

    • @asharamachandra1780
      @asharamachandra1780 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DrGallaghersNeighborhood thank you Dr. Gallagher for the video. You sounded great.

  • @estherdelarosa9016
    @estherdelarosa9016 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Need clarity on how to calculate the ratio…

  • @poppadoc5614
    @poppadoc5614 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice presentation thank you sir.

  • @marcoontiveros2464
    @marcoontiveros2464 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    so good, thanks

  • @LukeWorsfold-j8u
    @LukeWorsfold-j8u ปีที่แล้ว

    can you say "ok" a few more times...?

  • @fleekpharma189
    @fleekpharma189 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Politically correct.

  • @virginiah9967
    @virginiah9967 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok!

  • @saralucas1
    @saralucas1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok

  • @david1913
    @david1913 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok

  • @eeroth42
    @eeroth42 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok