Something always seemed a bit "off" about many videos I've seen promoting socialism, and you've just clarified it for me. Many of these videos start off by pointing out the problems of capitalism (and I know there are many), but then go on to compare the real problems of capitalism against an idealized version of socialism. They never seem to compare the real problems of capitalism against the real problems of socialism. I can't believe I didn't see how disingenuous this trick is.
In my country, every topic, every single one (except for religion, we're a very religious country, Nigeria) in education starting from primary 1 (to Americans that should be 1st grade of elementary school) every single topic must have 10 - 20 advantages and disadvantages listed underneath, no single topic, including freaking maths and English is exempted except religious studies and over here, private schools are much more regarded and sort after than public school by a large margin, the difference between both of them is the difference between public toilets and your own personal toilet... so the government can't really do anything to change this standard... And the points under both advantages and disadvantages must be different from another point so you won't divide one point into three to fill up space, if you can't get up to 10, you have to defend it to the CEO of the school, the principal of the school, the head of department academics and head of department operation and the vice principal... This kinda made it very hard for socialism and communism to get anywhere because we immediately realized how fucked up it was without any utopian sugarcoating once we got to the demerits, well, I figured that out immediately I heard the definition (I was a comic artist since primary three (3rd grade for Americans), not really a good one but enough to sweeten the heads of my mates and seniors at that time and I got paid for it, so when I saw the definition of socialism and communism, I was immediately like fuck off, we were taught capitalism first so I knew what I was doing was capitalism and once I compared it with socialism, yeah, it stopped making sense immediately, plus we over here in Africa know how bad government handles everything, I told you about public schools earlier)... So teachers couldn't sneak in their own curriculum because they have rules they have the follow as well as a format (and cameras in classes) and they have to submit their notes to the school to approve including how they're going to explain it, do anything different and yeah, you would be lucky to get a job as a personal tutor.. teachers aren't the ones responsible for researching so they don't have academic freedom because that belongs to researchers... Teachers are offering a service and just like a food company can't justify poisoning their products by calling it a trademark and masseuse can't justify chopping out people's limbs and calling it freedom of expression, teachers can't do the opposite of the service that they're paid to do and justify it with freedom of speech... Just because they speak doesn't mean they have freedom to say anything... It's like saying just because an interpreter speaks, he can interprete whatever the fuck he wants... They have a specific job to do, this also applies to lecturers and professors... They only academic freedom in research not when they're teaching students otherwise a professor can start peer reviewing an already defended theory whilst teaching the students because he was butt hurt that he was debunked by the research during the real peer review and the students won't know that his counters have already been debunked or/and would be too afraid to counter his counter because of his title and power... Please, people need to stop using freedom of speech and academic freedom anyhow... It's dumb and very illogical and doesn't work in any other industry... A linguist as freedom when he's researching a language but not when he's interpreting one... An academician as freedom when he's doing academic researches not when he's freaking teaching because he has to teach what as already been agreed to be taught and then as just one person can't go against that to a bunch of kids who don't know anything about the matter...
Anyways, I had a point I was going for before that massive tangent... People should start requiring pros and cons for everything they want to believe in (that's why reviewers are very important)... If someone is tearing apart capitalism just to say socialism is better, the person as to first prove that socialism can solve the failings of capitalism mentioned whilst doing the same thing capitalism does at the very least half as good (it doesn't have to do it just as good or better), in other words, they need to be able to run both of them in a competition... But most importantly, nothing is perfect, so the person has to be able to talk about the demerits of socialism and it has to be an exhausted list otherwise you have to go look for it yourself... And never believe anything as true no matter how sad it is without evidence or at least a very logical and we'll thought out iron proof hypothesis which is very hard to get so evidences are better... Every point as to be peppered with well explained examples, hypothesis and evidences and not just a picture flashing on your screen...
@@johnnycrown5097 I live in South Africa and we have a very left-leaning government so I feel your pain. It's really good that they teach critical thinking from a young age in your country, because they sure don't teach it in our schools. I only got to learn critical thinking as a second year philosophy student.
@@marcusmoonstein242 and the saddest part about south Africa is that if the leftist communist race baiting academicians of the west had just left south Africa the fuck alone when south Africa gained it's independence, south Africa would have broken Africa out of the 3rd world status... But no, these leftists professors introduced racial hatred and communism to south African schools and politicians then the leftist media and social media prevented the west from knowing anything that is going on in South Africa because they have nothing that would help the left going on there... Now, south Africa isn't even mentioned anymore in the west, just like Libya, they tossed it away and even the afrocentric racist black Americans stopped used south Africa as the mother land of Africa and have transfered that privilege to central Africa because they can also claim that capitalism is destroying those countries too, a two for one special... They're doing the same in Ghana, Ghana that became one of the richest country in Africa almost overnight stupidly allowed themselves to be infiltrated by the left and now they're having problems... It's even sipping into my country's mainstream politics... Our president removed the subsidy of fuel as soon as he entered, immediately skyrocketing the price of fuel under one evening and never brought in any replacement so we're suffering here from fuel price that literally tripled in price over night and us still climbing with nothing to safe us in sight... Only for a brainless useless female newly appointed minister to say the dumbest thing ever... Women should be provided palliatives by the government because of the subsidy removal and never gave any reason why apart from fallopian tubes and women somehow most affected... She didn't realize she's literally saying all men should pay all women for both sexes suffering together through the tripled prices of fuel and she said it so matter of factly... She also was too dumb to realize that palliatives to all women who are half if the population is more expensive than just returning the subsidy, it would be much more cheaper, sensible and impartial to just put the subsidy back... She was so stupid that for a good while, I actually thought she was trolling and she just wanted to show Nigerians how funny one our minister is, but she just kept on going and realized this brainless woman is serious... Seriously, the left destroys everything it touches and that's why I hate when antiwoke pundits say some if not most of the leftist have good intentions and are just trying to do good things but their generosity and morality is being taken advantage of by the left... No, they're not, because if they had any good intentions to speak of, why don't they check up on the things they were once supporting rather than deleting it from their brain once the media stops talking about it because everything has gone to shit so the media wants to hide the repercussions and these leftists don't even bother check up on it again until someone on the right reminds them about or the media finds something to exploit from the once current thing and then they inform their leftist sheep's to get ready to support the next current thing, that's when the leftist sheep's remember what they once left behind... If they had any good intentions, they would have been following up on it ...
Well, for starters they're arguing for socialism, something even Marx looked down upon, as the end goal of human development. Which to me, a russian having studied Marxism-Leninism for a bit, sounds so backwards, "dumb muricans again" just comes to mind on it's own.
Palestinians are not all muslims, there are queer Palestinians also, supporting an ethnic group doesn't really hold up with this video but your misconception does show your preconceived notions on groups and why or why not they are supported
@@ehannasir8464nice try bucko. The part of Palestine they’re specifically talking about is the Gaza Strip. The Gaza Strip is ruled with an iron first by Hamas. Hamas is a Muslim extremist group that outlaws homosexuality (without trial mind you, all they have to do is suspect that you’re gay). According to lgbt Gazans that have left Gaza, Hamas punishes homosexuality, typically by death. Even in the West Bank, by all accounts the more moderately governed section of Palestine, there have been many accounts of gays being beheaded, imprisoned, or thrown from buildings without the government explaining why or looking into what happened. Even though they claim that homosexuality isn’t illegal or legal in the West Bank. When people talk about countries and their views, they tend to talk about the people in charge of the country. The people in charge of Palestine kill gays. Every other Muslim extremist group in the 21st century has been known to outlaw homosexuality and kill known gays. And in fact, it’s been speculated in many articles you can find online by looking up this subject, that many of the killings of gays aren’t even done by those that govern palestine, but by Palestinian civilians who know they won’t get charged for murder if it’s against a gay person. Who cares if not every single person in Gaza isn’t a Muslim, it’s a Muslim territory and it’s led by Muslim extremists. And if you can’t get any support from the government, you may as well be all alone.
@@ehannasir8464 please bro stop the cap. most Palestinians ARE muslims and fully support all its views, just because 'some' of them arent doesnt mean im gonna support a very inhumane group.
When it comes to religion, politics, or philosophy the Left adopts the old Henry Ford attitude: “You can have it any way you want, as long as its Left.”
Don't rope a good man like Henry Ford into this by misquoting him! Are the 'left' jokingly commentating on assembly line efficiency? Huh? Did you maybe just open up azquotes and pick the first one you saw that sounded like it as relevant? Hmm?!
@@ivoryas1696 The original Model T only came in black. Ford received many requests to put out a different color, to which he replied "You can have it in any color, as long as it's black."
When I first heard about the "Islam is right about women" posters, I wanted to award a Nobel Prize to whoever came up with it. Pure genius. "It's OK to be white" was also a stroke of genius. Both exposes the insanity of the left quite well.
@kasketbase8741 The left doesn't want to admit that Islam treats women like shit. They do actually know that women are second class citizens in Islam though, so they find the statement mysoginistic but can't admit it, so they generally just have a minor fit when they see it. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Absolutely hilarious to see a lefty asked why they have an issue with the statement.
For me this also has a lot to view with how left leaning people view culture. They see it as different flavors of ice cream. Distinct but ultimately interchangeable. Anyone who has actually interacted significantly with more than 1 culture knows this is bullocks. A far better analogy would be that cultures are completely different types of food. You would not serve, prepare, or store a pizza, salad, and ice cream in the same way and if you did you be seen as crazy
Exactly. Culture is more than food and family get-togethers. Culture includes norms about what is considered polite or rude, moral or immoral, late or punctual, fair or unfair, normal or deviant, everything. Trying to get a lot of people with radically different cultures to function together is a really difficult goal to implement. Shared norms make everything easier even if we assume that any given set of norms is axiomatically no better or worse than any other; doubly so if each group believes its own norms are superior.
Many "left-leaning" people don't view culture that way, it seems like a mass generalisation. You didn't mention anyone extreme, but those who are just "leaning" left. I myself lean rather left in a lot of ways, but I don't believe cultures are interchangeable, and I imagine many think the same way.
@@PoliostasisI do feel forced by the lack of statistical evidence presented to admit that OP commenter probably came to that conclusion anecdotally; however, general claims can be made about groups while acknowledging exceptions. For example, the statement "Asian men are shorter on average" is made no less true by the fact that you might happen to know a tall Asian guy. If there is statistical evidence supporting the claim that OP commenter made about the left generally tending to view culture(s) a certain way, then it can still be generally true in regards to the group despite the existence of certain exceptions.
leftist way of viewing culture is very colonisalist if you think about it. they hijack other peoples culture to push their own agendas then discard them when it doesnt fit their agendas. they wear cultures as costumes and it's pretty disrespectful imo. my culture isnt their costume to use and abuse.
I think it’s slightly different but the general point you made is true. They tend to falsely try and equate race with culture. I.E. if you admit there are bad cultures they’ll accuse you of racism. Like no Emily, cultures are a thing that exist separately. Wahabiist islam is an awful violent and hateful culture. That doesn’t mean Arabs are those things, most Arabs aren’t wahabiist. And not all wahabiist Muslims are Arab. They really only do this so they can call you a racist and end the conversation there without having to acknowledge the point you’re trying to make. They tend to do that with a lot of things in fact….
it's always funny watching the initial responses to the flyers that came up in UK. one karen said "I feel like this should be illegal, but I'm unsure why. It just has to be racist." I don't think you could have found a better example of cognitive dissonance if you tried.
if you think islam is roughly equivalent to the standard views of women in 1950's america then you must either know nothing of islam or nothing of the way we used to view women here in the US.
Unfortunately many leftoids seem to think that way, though it's funny they loathe 1950s American society yet absolutely get defensive over Islam at any given opportunity.
Bro gave you sources go read them if you disagree. Your in the same aisle as the leftists just parrot what you hear without looking at it with any detail. He is quite obviously well researched and read the Quran to find out what Muslims believe and gave the sources for the parts he read.
I would argue that in general women viewed THEMSELVES more highly in the 1950's, and their behavior elicited more respect from men than their behavior gets them today (broadly speaking).
It's a hybrid word. Means _both_ "perfect place" (actually "Eutopia") _and_ "no place" (actually "Outopia"). The use of the word "Utopia" automatically implies that "perfect place" = "no place", but that's still something that can be argued about if you're aware of the implication.
The last bit of the video is insanely accurate, especially the picture. They will pretend to denounce both sides but they still make it glaringly obvious to anyone paying attention that they just want to blatantly hate the right without being associated with people who literally share the same rhetoric and behavior they exhibit.
One thing that confuses me about many Muslim women is when they wear the head scarf at the same time as wearing skin tight jeans. Don't get me wrong, I'm a fan of Middle Eastern women in tight jeans, but isn't the head scarf supposed to symbolize or be for modesty? Does not compute 🤯
Remember humans as intelligent agents will always try to game every system they are a part of. This is why socialism does not work, it assumes good faith. If I am a prophet of a new morality system and say " do not spill blood of your enemies" then guess what... 100 years after my death there will be an army that solely uses blunt weapons... cause hey, yes I am causing internal damage and break bones, but amount of blood spilled is actually rather miniscule.
As muslim men i also confused like why ??? the prophet said don't wear clothes that to tight you can see your body outline to him it the same as not wearing anything
yeah I have heard imams in Memri writhe about it, calling them whores and that they need to be cursed aloud at in the streets. Muslims are pretty cucked as well tbh I had seen some Muslim countries and they suffered just as much social degradation as the West when it comes to Family values, only thing left holding and is a red line is matters of doctrinal faith.
Nonetheless Muslims still have actual reactionary movements against modernism that are legit theocratic in their goals and ideals, Osama bin Laden comes to mind.
Yeah I don’t think he read those Quran verses he was talking about💀 Islam hasn’t had a reformation like Judaism or Christianity. So the original beliefs are still *technically* canon. We certainly didn’t have multiple wives or marry ten year olds in 1950s America lol
@@CTzons That doesn't mean anything meaningful to me. Like, never in my life have I heard a Muslim say that another Muslim was too extreme, only saying so to others. There's a lack of gate keeping in that direction.
"Islam is right about women" is definitely about hating one side, and there's nothing wrong with that. I'd say more likely a bash on Islam and modern "intersectionality" thinking Islam is in any way compatible with Western Society. Also, Islam's views on women are not even remotely close to 1950's Western views, they're much more radical.
no they are not radical, you have probably never ever read quran or any hadith or anything like that but someone elses thoughts about those things. Educate yourself
@@emirefe5452bro, the Quran allows you to beat your wife and also allows you to have sex with slaves of war, there are hadiths of Muhammad sleeping with women the same day he killed their husbands
@@emirefe5452 Sahih Bukhari (6:301) - "[Muhammad] said, 'Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?' They replied in the affirmative. He said, 'This is the deficiency in her intelligence.'" Ishaq 734 - "As for Ali, he said, 'Women are plentiful, and you can easily change one for another.'" Quran (53:27) - "Those who believe not in the Hereafter, name the angels with female names." Quran (5:6) - "And if ye are unclean, purify yourselves. And if ye are sick or on a journey, or one of you cometh from the closet, or ye have had contact with women, and ye find not water, then go to clean, high ground and rub your faces and your hands with some of it" From the Hadiths and Quran. Will you deny them as truth?
In truth, trying to make a utopia a reality is 100% impossible. There is always something in that utopia that will never ever happen, and no matter which side its coming from, any utopia can be seen as a dystopia for other people. I personally don't want a utopia. Why? Cause life would inevitably become boring & thus the personal meaning of life for everyone will eventually die.
This is a very fascistic way of thinking! The understanding of pain and struggle. The willingness to surpass it in order to better yourself. Accepting ALL of the beauty AND the brutality of nature. Joining arms with your folk and kin, and helping one another back up when you stumble... THAT is Fascism!
Agreed, any cognition we could have of a perfect system it is still our perception. Even if we had a group agree and build conceptually a perfect system it's their perception. And another group or individual may see it as not perfect. Not a utopia but rather a nightmare.
In high school civics class my teacher gave groups of four people a big piece of paper to make a 10 part bill of rights for a utopia and gave us an hour to do it. No one was able to do it and that was the point.
Expanding on the "red vs. blue" problem is that A and B are actually pulling from a *shared* pool, which means A will accelerate the depletion of subgroup that rolled lower. Imagine taking two sets of 20 dice, rolling them, and having A and B take turns picking one die, with the goal of having the highest final total. A simply picks the highest roll, while B alternates between one set and the other. If one group has less high rolls, both A and B picking from it will deplete the good to acceptable rolls, and every turn where B has to pick from it anyway gives A another chance to poach one of the remaining high rolls from the other group.
Islam is Right About Women, depending on interpretation criticises every subject within the statement, alongside the above doublethink or cognitive dissonance, it mocks Islam for its views on women, it mocks women for being inferior, and it mocks those who hold both Women are equal and that Islam is good.
@wheezy Mohammad claimed once that the testimony of a man is worth twice that of a woman in court. This is according to a hadith if I remember correctly.
@@Cecilia-ky3uw if i rember, there are 34 situations where women get more, and 4 for men, while the 4 are also supposed to benift women, according to sharia scholars.
@@introboy1 I'm fairly sure the exact statement there did mention the women should be 2 to 'remind' each other, implying that they very well are dumber, and signifigantly so. This is wikipedia's rendition 'O you who believe! When you contract a debt for a fixed period, write it down. Let a scribe write it down in justice between you. Let not the scribe refuse to write as Allah has taught him, so let him write. Let him (the debtor) who incurs the liability dictate, and he must fear Allah, his Lord, and diminish not anything of what he owes. But if the debtor is of poor understanding, or weak, or is unable himself to dictate, then let his guardian dictate in justice. And get two witnesses out of your own men. And if there are not two men (available), then a man and two women, such as you agree for witnesses, so that if one of them (two women) errs, the other can remind her' and yes it was a quran verse, sorry on that. This one does nit speak of historical blackmailing, it talks about the women erring or being mistaken.
@@introboy1 less memory can be taken as less intelligent because memory is a very important part of intelligence. The euphemism interpretation sounds to me like a stretch made by, as you say 'some' scholars. And the fact aisha exists as a counterexample should not somehow mean that the verse isnt referring to women as inferior- we still have people nowadays thinking women are much dumber than men even though that is demonstrably not true. Aisha is also an inidividual so she can oppose the norm-and the prophet's wife at that. In any case the quran and hadith is ridden with contradictions, there is a doctrine of abbrogation just because so many verses said a then later verses said b in a vague manner.
This video makes a pretty bad flaw with “1950’s traditional conservatives would somewhat agree with Islam’s view on women.” I am a Christian conservative, someone who would be strawmanned as a Christian nationalist, but Islam is horridly wrong about women because it does not focus on actually stable marriages, but instead on domination and having the men lead.
something wrong with having the husband lead the family? having the man lead is what God intended, he is responsible for everything, he is there to guide her and their children and he is responsible to provide for the family, does that mean shes somehow inferior? no just because he leads doesnt mean she has no word in what goes on in the family, she also got responsibilities. if you strictly think marriage is suppose to be like an army boot camp or an authoritarian regime, then thats exactly what islam wants you not to do. because there is no love there. oh and also if you questioned, "what if the man doesnt know how to lead" then islam clearly stated that you just cant marry, as clearly youre not ready for that, and that goes for the woman too.
I put up posters around my local community college back in the day, I remember on of the teachers there mentioned “extremism on campus” and “getting to the bottom of it”. Of course nothing happened. I scouted camera locations and did my homework
I wasn't the person(s) who posted it everywhere or any other potentially psuedo-legal activity, but I was the one who originally came up with the meme. I figured I would wait until someone noticed that part of the video was sarcasm to confirm this. Yes, this video is basically IIRAW as explained by its creator.
i have this thing in my country's supreme court were people say "oh there arent any judges who are from a certain ethnic group and thats why it should be reformed". they just try to elect the best judges and they happened not to belong to that ethnic group.
7:04 isn't strictly true, many Russian natives were killed by the Bolsheviks for simply being Russians, 'Racist' as a term was coined by Trotsky as a way to shame native Russians for having interests in their own as opposed to the other peoples of the former Russian Empire. They used foreign mercenaries in the form of the Cheka where Chinese nationals were used as a secret police, loyal to the state alone. The Han Chinese majority often led pogroms in ethnic minority areas of China that prefered their traditions to Socialism. Commies have been hella racist, the guys behind it just have control of the publishing houses.
Yeah the “at least communists aren’t racist” people conveniently forget that Marx himself said that Jews would likely be incompatible with a Marxist society. And we all know what the communists did with people who they felt were “incompatible” with the revolution. (And if you don’t, here’s a hint: genocide. The same exact thing the literal Nazis did)
It's filled with religious zealots and incels complaining about women sleeping around, whilst they enable men sleeping around. It's sad and pathetic that red pill has made men extremely braindead and hive minded, it's like feminism all over again but in reverse.
Well, specifically they want to destroy the West and anything they associate with it. While christianity is less of a western ideal and is closer to something that has minimal identity beyond just absorbing whatever is around it, that thus means it sponged up western culture and therefore has to go.
Unless Is like... 1750's view or earlier. Seriously, Islam Is so behind culturally Is amusing why people even defend Palestine. I for my part have NEVER liked that place because they just seemed to disrespect core values on others.
@@N12015 they're proud of killing ex Muslims. They're also proud of human sacrifice which what their conflicts basically are "we MUST win and die for this stupid cause" which is why I do not care about that entire fucking region
I have to disagree on " islams View of woman is much like the one in the 50s" its not it does infact share similiarities bout is still unique and in some points absolutely different from westerners understandijg of woman
I mean this is basically just a dead horse at this point and it's not even funny. It's pretty obviously contradictory to be about 'women's and LGBT right' while also sucking up to a group that largely wants women to stay in the kitchen and for homosexuals to not exist.
11:09 imma be honest bro but where do you see so hard racist or nazis in any kind of big community. Maybe on telegram some larp nazis but i live in middle europe and i have never seen a person openly advocating for these right wing stand points. Fuck even Generation Identity are much much more tame then these opinions.
I think Family Guy actually indirectly proved Utopian thinking is dumb in the Episode where Lois adopted a Decluttering Narrative and had a blank, empty house at the end.
I disagree as an ex Muslim Islam claims that most of who go to hell are women That women should cover her face and every bit of her body and of she didn't she is a whore and even can be killed or beaten like in iran Also islam says that relationship between a man and a wife is a relationship between a boss and a slave That a woman should obey het husband no matter what Should obey her father too You should see more hadeth (الحديث والسنة النبوية) Quaran doesn't say everything And finally islam is actually closer to a socialist state than a Capitalist one
I disagree as a muslim Islam claims that women are most of those to get in BOTH hell and heaven Women should cover their heads although its debatable between those who say the whole face of just hair but most of the scholars agreed that just covering the hair is enough... and there is no punishment mentined for those who dont wear it in the qur'an nor in hadith, and the laws that force it are purely extremist The relationship between a man and a woman in marriage is based on love, respect and gender-roles, while the husband has an othority arround the house, its a bit of a streach to call it a slave/boss relationship... While the woman have to obey her husband, however she must not put herself as a subject to abuse in any kind, and seek help Men and women should obey their parents as long as they arent abusive... No, contrary to socialist views islam is very capitalist, however it does have some socialist characteristics...
@@cake_farts There's is a Hadith that says "إن أقلّ ساكني الجنة النساء" Meaning that the least of heaven are women So no not the most of heaven are women that's wrong Secondly about the punishment for women who don't cover their hair There's alot about المتبرجة Or women who basically don't follow the Islamic hair cover and face cover like they don't even smell haven And finally the relationship between man and woman in islam may be based on love but as I said man is always the boss to an extreme end
@@waltermodel9730 There is no punishment in the Quran about this and could I get a Hadith source for the first argument? Btw the man isn’t even really supposed to be that extreme, divorce like in many other societies is in Islam, if a man is tough then go ahead and by all means divorce.
@@mcshakatar9866 Ok here is the hadith يا معشر النساء تصدقن وأكثرن من الاستغفار فإني رأيتكن أكثر أهل النار، فقالت امرأة منهن جزلة وما لنا يا رسول الله أكثر اهل النار، قال: تكثرن اللعن وتكفرن العشير.
I'll admit I was moving toward being a leftist over a few months until I saw his bit on how it's bad to listen to the other side. Turned me so off the socialist part of the web that I ended up over on this side of the internet.
@@oscarwind4266same for me. I was already a bit doubtful, but I thought many of the ideas were interesting. And then I realized how cultish it all is, and decided to avoid getting trapped by looking into all sorts of different ideologies
@@tchop6839 any advice? looking for reliable right- and left-wing creators, but most right ones I find (probably due to youtube only pushing extremists from either side) really, _really_ hate me for being trans. so I can't stomach it, unfortunately. aside from that Sean from AJW, Kieth Woods are much more agreeable, but it stops there as it was a recommendation from a right-leaning person (go figure).
@@hope-cat4894dev is an idiot who calls himself a centrist but always gives the milk toast fence sitting takes that somehow always end up falling on the side of the left Sure he’s not cultish and he has decent takes every blue cheese moon but most of the time he starts off with the stupidest fence sitting takes and always ends his point with some leftist take Dev Suggs booty
I love how this simple statement can just stunlock any intersectionalist. Because it’s such an obvious contradictory statement to their ideology that they can’t even comprehend it without breaking their delusions. It’s honestly hilarious.
I am amused and bemused that Mormonism as listed in that Beliefs chart has its belief in Spirit Rest and Spirit Prison conflated with the Gnostic views of the Catholics regarding Heaven, Purgatory, and Hell. They're not the same thing, particularly given in Mormonism Spirit Rest and Spirit Prison are not permanent, nor is the ultimate destination of souls a binary Heaven or Hell.
I mean, aside from saying Mormonism this is actually a good interpretation of what I believe as a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, so thanks! Lots of people don't even bother to find out.
The different flavors of schizo and crazy that a bunch of crazy schizos just made up and have no reason to believe fundamentally don't really matter. Until they come up with a ubiquitous, consistent, agreed upon and evident truth, none of them should be pointing the finger at anyone else nor complaining about each other when they're all doing the same thing.
In the point you made about diversity, the argument goes that having people from different backgrounds (diversity) allows you to see a problem from different perspectives, as people are from different backgrounds and ask different questions. Nonetheless, I do find it a little suspicious that according to academic institutions, most "good" actions that a business can do are also correlated with being more successful.
The misconception is that diversity of backgrounds, like race or gender, is the same thing as diversity of thought. This isn’t necessarily true, you could easily find people of diverse backgrounds who think pretty much the same. Each person, regardless of background (which diversity today generally means race, gender, and sometimes sexuality), has a unique perspective. Often the left creates echo-chambers disguised as “diversity”. This is when a group that appears diverse all thinks the same leftist ideology. This pushes out those with diverse thoughts and creates a way to keep people in line while appearing to be well meaning and benevolent- but it isn’t at all, sadly.
@@jasonyork9966 >Muh fasheesm You don't know what Fascism is! And as to your example, having a staff that is multiethnic or multicultural is POISON and very quickly devolves into racial conflict, thuggery, or even SLAVERY; especially so when YOUR OWN ethnic group is underrepresented and self-hating! Ethnic commonality is the CORE of a good team! You don't need to artificially boost a given group's variable input and interaction. There are going to be plenty of diverse backgrounds and outlooks even in a group of all, say, Ethiopian or Chinese people...
diversity of idea does not stem from diversity of skin color. it stems from diversity of experience. If you take a team of a black guy, a white guy, a hispanic, an indian, and an asian, and pit them against a team of a mechanic, an engineer, a businessman, an accountant, and a artist and challenge them to come up with the next best product. Which team are you betting your money on?
As great as diversity is, unity is what really holds a business together. Many studies who say more successful businesses are more diverse don’t realize it’s because they can afford to have diversity. It’s like saying successful businesses sell 30 different products. There’s so much work you’ll have to do to reap the benefits from both, and most smaller businesses just can’t afford that.
@@MentisWave Tbf, You made a MASSIVE mistake. Muslims are NOT like 50's western countries, they're like Medieval western at best, clearly pre reissonanse.
"Everyone is correct." "No they aren't." Either they are and I'm incorrect so they aren't. Or they aren't and I'm correct then they also aren't. The correct paradox.
2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1
You can also say : Islam is wrong about women. It will have the same effect.
I've watched a couple of your videos and you got a sub outta me. But can I just say real quick... bruh you gotta look up how to correctly pronounce "fallacy". Once you get that down, your videos will be perfect. 😆
A side note: “having one’s cake and eating it, too” is a weird phrase because to think that it is an either/or is a false dichotomy since, even though I do not eat cake, I can have a slice and eat it at the same time. It is a weird idiom for something that is supposed to be logically contradictory.
usually when two actions are put together with and that means that the first one takes place first. You cannot eat the cake and then proceed to have it
Mentís what would be the objection to even theoritical socialism and communism worker owning the means of production and the stateless moneyless classes society I have my own but I want to know yours as i think there a objection to it even in theory
The biggest problem is that there is no actual way to achieve the "stateless" part. Progressive wealth redistribution requires a large form of authority and force to implement since people are not naturally willing to give up their private property. So once seizing the means of production starts, rather than going away the state does exactly the opposite and starts ballooning until it becomes a dictatorship.
@@MentisWave my objection to it even in theory is the moneyless part as with that we’re dealt with the economic calculation problem that also apply to a market socialist it’s also one of the reason why commune and worker co-op fail as there dealt with that as well as even close to market ones like Yugoslavia
American politics are, Head numbing. Like i live in bosnia. And i allways watched western media and like 10 years ago alot of these political things were at a minimum. Like i never got my fyp flooded with political content but now everything is political. And i see almost all of it is from america. And i see alot of the same kind of american politics seep thru to other places like india, as toxic as it is, again 10 years ago it was kinda calm, unlike now with the almost genocidal takes on muslims. You know as i ser the internet grow i kinda thing goverments are pushing agendas onto people. Mostly under developed people under eighteen. Thats why i see most of the people argueing in comments on videos are like teens or something. Im not good at english and cant really get my point thru but i hope you can understand what im saying, you can ask questions in the comments
@@LocalBosnian-99World Economic Forum. Basically a conglomerate of those asset management companies (Blackrock, Vanguard, etc.) discussing to many influential people (elite class) about “improving the state of the world”. Many doomer takes like living in a pod and eating bugs came from their lectures.
Anyways, I had a point I was going for before that massive tangent... People should start requiring pros and cons for everything they want to believe in (that's why reviewers are very important)... If someone is tearing apart capitalism just to say socialism is better, the person as to first prove that socialism can solve the failings of capitalism mentioned whilst doing the same thing capitalism does at the very least half as good (it doesn't have to do it just as good or better), in other words, they need to be able to run both of them in a competition... But most importantly, nothing is perfect, so the person has to be able to talk about the demerits of socialism and it has to be an exhausted list otherwise you have to go look for it yourself... And never believe anything as true no matter how sad it is without evidence or at least a very logical and we'll thought out iron proof hypothesis which is very hard to get so evidences are better... Every point as to be peppered with well explained examples, hypothesis and evidences and not just a picture flashing on your screen...
Friendly reminder that the Quran is arranged by subject, not chronologically, the later verses abrogate the earlier ones, and much Islamic doctrine comes from the hadiths. That’s where we get the less-than western rule that Muslims are free to 🍇 any woman who doesn’t wear a hijab.
He is using poling data, so the majority of Muslims do have a standardized opinion on women. You also have all of the religious texts to interpret to understand the religion of islams take on women, regardless of if most people agree with it or not.
In my country, every topic, every single one (except for religion, we're a very religious country, Nigeria) in education starting from primary 1 (to Americans that should be 1st grade of elementary school) every single topic must have 10 - 20 advantages and disadvantages listed underneath, no single topic, including freaking maths and English is exempted except religious studies and over here, private schools are much more regarded and sort after than public school by a large margin, the difference between both of them is the difference between public toilets and your own personal toilet... so the government can't really do anything to change this standard... And the points under both advantages and disadvantages must be different from another point so you won't divide one point into three to fill up space, if you can't get up to 10, you have to defend it to the CEO of the school, the principal of the school, the head of department academics and head of department operation and the vice principal... This kinda made it very hard for socialism and communism to get anywhere because we immediately realized how fucked up it was without any utopian sugarcoating once we got to the demerits, well, I figured that out immediately I heard the definition (I was a comic artist since primary three (3rd grade for Americans), not really a good one but enough to sweeten the heads of my mates and seniors at that time and I got paid for it, so when I saw the definition of socialism and communism, I was immediately like fuck off, we were taught capitalism first so I knew what I was doing was capitalism and once I compared it with socialism, yeah, it stopped making sense immediately, plus we over here in Africa know how bad government handles everything, I told you about public schools earlier)... So teachers couldn't sneak in their own curriculum because they have rules they have the follow as well as a format (and cameras in classes) and they have to submit their notes to the school to approve including how they're going to explain it, do anything different and yeah, you would be lucky to get a job as a personal tutor.. teachers aren't the ones responsible for researching so they don't have academic freedom because that belongs to researchers... Teachers are offering a service and just like a food company can't justify poisoning their products by calling it a trademark and masseuse can't justify chopping out people's limbs and calling it freedom of expression, teachers can't do the opposite of the service that they're paid to do and justify it with freedom of speech... Just because they speak doesn't mean they have freedom to say anything... It's like saying just because an interpreter speaks, he can interprete whatever the fuck he wants... They have a specific job to do, this also applies to lecturers and professors... They only academic freedom in research not when they're teaching students otherwise a professor can start peer reviewing an already defended theory whilst teaching the students because he was butt hurt that he was debunked by the research during the real peer review and the students won't know that his counters have already been debunked or/and would be too afraid to counter his counter because of his title and power... Please, people need to stop using freedom of speech and academic freedom anyhow... It's dumb and very illogical and doesn't work in any other industry... A linguist as freedom when he's researching a language but not when he's interpreting one... An academician as freedom when he's doing academic researches not when he's freaking teaching because he has to teach what as already been agreed to be taught and then as just one person can't go against that to a bunch of kids who don't know anything about the matter...
I like to add a "What if" to IIRAW this makes it less confrontational to people you can have a discussion with but still short circuits the right kinds of people.
Believing in religion is like deciding to be a Jedi. Reasonable people just want to get by. After an entire existence as a species with these loons we've clearly naturally acclimated. It's like letting the bum piss on the street. It's not our job to set them straight, and if anything-Who are they hurting anyway?
I wonder why it's so hard for people to just treat each other with a base line level of respect or empathy. I don't need some sanctimonious moron OR a 2000 year old scriptura to tell me how to be a good person lol.
He's correct that huge gaps in unemployment can be beneficial to large corporations since it allows them to get away with undercutting. However he is wrong on the cause of it, which is that said large corporations lobby for policies like absurd startup fees for new businesses that prevent competition which stifles job growth. So basically he is right about a lot of the problems we see, but wrong on the cause and wrong on the solution -which would be anti-corruption acts and killing a lot of said startup fees.
@@MentisWave wait are you saying the cause of is cause large corporation lobby or second thought is be a bit more clear on that and if so what did second thought said the cause was
@@markgel9510 His argument if you don't want to watch his video is pretty much "Everything bad in society is capitalisms fault, pay no attention to what the government is doing."
@@MentisWave so I guess it was in the lines of corporation always bad cause the existence of them cause climate change and exploit third world country and government always good as it a protector from it
You're lucky can criticize them with more less risk than anybody who live here. Hope anybody who wrong open their eye after watching this People who make such critics such those are subjected to flagellating, imprisonment, Excluded to vote and to be voted, and marked as Khafir for life Way too much worse than some devout muslims who commit billions dollar Ponzi-Scam , Child sex predators, and Sex-slave traffickers here I'll be waiting for next quality content, best regard for all
Are you pro-Islam, or mostly anti-Islam and just granting them this one thing? There are four sides to this debate ("against islam and women"/crazy rightist, pro-Islam, pro-Feminist, and "for Islam and women"/crazy leftist). IMO the "Islam" and "Feminist" perspectives don't really need to be talked about because they're well-understood; it's the two "crazy" positions that are worth bringing up and contrasting with each other and the two simpler positions. (I am a little concerned about my use of "Feminist" here because some might understand it as a synonym for "crazy leftist". But there doesn't seem to be a better term for the idea that women should have quite as much freedom as men, respecting them as roughly equal to men on the whole while still expecting them to be different from men.)
according to Islam women should cover their heads although most of the scholars agreed that just covering the hair is enough, and there is no punishment mentined for those who dont wear it in the qur'an nor in hadith, and the laws that force it are purely extremist. in islam the relationship between a man and a woman in marriage is based on love, respect and gender-roles, while the husband has an othority arround the house, some wrongfully call it a slave boss relationship, while the woman have to obey her husband she must not put herself as a subject to abuse in any kind, and seek help. so yes, islam is right about women.
@@roywempor8395 - Not wearing a head covering is considered sin, I.E they go to hell for it, not to mention, even though there's no punishment prescribed, they are typically put to death in Islamic states. Also, in islam, women are said to be half that of men, because they're stupid; They fill up hell, you're allowed to beat them if they don't have sex with you, you can rape them if they aren't muslims, you can have multiple wives, you can marry them when they're children and likely many more abhorrent things. Islam views women as lesser than, you can't get around that.
As a Democrat and an atheist, I can avoid this. Hating something someone else appreciates does not mean I hate that person. I would love it if we could be friends and only their own limits are defined by their beliefs, not mine. If it’s just an opinion, that’s fine it’s intuitive. If it’s a religion, even though it’s intuitive to think religiously, the specifics were given by other humans to these people, who, regardless of whether they are right or wrong, are only holding this opinion because it needs to be right, not because it is right. I don’t like Judaism, I would likely never follow it. Does that make me a neo-nazi? If you’re responding logically, the answer should be no. Therefore, in this case I could say Islam is wrong about woman and that I don’t like or even hate Islam, and it would still be illogical to say that I hate Muslims and especially to say that I want them dead. There, no more doublethink, and I didn’t have to deny my morals of “be kind to anyone, if possible.”
If you say theistic views of women are anti women and people who are anti women are evil, then agree Islam has these (very conservative) theistic views then it follows that Muslims are evil by default.
Congrats on being a non-crazy leftist! Really frustrating how each side is presented the craziest contingent of the other side as "what you're fighting against", isn't it?
@@Tzizenorec That’s true. I obviously don’t think everyone should think alike, but there is a certain level of disagreement that is unsalvageable, and most people fall into that camp. I’m a Democrat mostly because I see people there who could be less extreme than most Republicans in their political views (lifestyle-wise the Republicans are probably better) but I acknowledge that they’re also pretty extreme currently. I’ve also been watching a lot of philosophical content and have thought about how silly demanding respect through power or fear is. That’s why at most I get a little frustrated in my comments, maybe sometimes a little condescending, but that’s only when I feel really disrespected or the other person isn’t quite getting what I’m saying. Otherwise, I’m very charitable and always try to defuse heated situations. Being moderate in opinion, but more in the way of being anti-extremist than pro-extremist (the latter is achieved by indifference) is what I promote.
Not gonna lie I just found your channel and this video got me, because from a young age I always disagreed with islam and I actually live at the moment in a Country thats half islamic. But how you use somthing inciteful to speak into a valid point that are profound is honestly really impressive and somthing I don't think I've seen much or at in the modern world. Your whole point kinda reminds me of how I always found it strange that Homosexuals would try to push Christianity into marrying them. I am not a Christian and have nothing against Gay People, (actually had a few friends in those type of relationships even though its illegal here) but I do know the Bible very well and have read it multiple times, it doesn't speak "well" of them, condeming them and even saykng they should be killed. So them trying to push a religion that is fundamentally to its core against how they Live was always strange to me and I didn't know what to say, because I know in general people don't read the Bible as much as I and my friends have. Hell I even had a friend who would hound me on why I don't believe in religion, yet she was dating a girl. Great video and I'm probably one of your easiest subscribers. Edit: I feel with this kind of skill in your speaking level, you should do more than just youtube videos, maybe finances would be an issue but somthing like holding speak events possibly.
Coming from the south, most people here don’t read ANY part of the Bible unless it’s broken up into inspirational quotes or read to them by a preacher. This makes it a lot easier for them to ignore specific parts that they don’t like, because they can simply avoid that part of the Bible. It’s also very common to find people that attend church “just in case” meaning they don’t actually believe most of what they’re being told, but they’ve decided it’s better than being atheists since all atheists go to hell.
Thats a great quote at the end. If diversity happens naturally and by accident, just leave it alone. Don't use skin color and history to force people together, you might make things worse.
No def not based. They went too far in the other direction. So far in fact that Muhammad both approved of beating women until their skin turned green (sahih al Bukhari 5825) and having child brides. He himself married a 6 year old child while at age 53, and had relations with her at age 9 (sahih al Bukhari 5134 & 6130). The happy medium is Biblical Christianity where Men are called to love and protect their wives, but also be the leaders of the household, and women are called to honor and respect their husbands and listen to their leadership. (Ephesians 5:21-33)
Isn't it equally utopian to believe that other races will be happy (mainly African, Latin, and Mediterranean people) will be fine and cool with being a permanent underclass they have no hope of going out of it.. on the basis of it being "meritorious". Because all that says is that they didn't try hard enough or aren't virtuous enough as a collective racial group. Thats just putting salt into the wound by calling them morally or physically incapable of doing as good as a Asian, Jewish or White person.
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. [Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3371] @@TheWayoftheSith
Something always seemed a bit "off" about many videos I've seen promoting socialism, and you've just clarified it for me. Many of these videos start off by pointing out the problems of capitalism (and I know there are many), but then go on to compare the real problems of capitalism against an idealized version of socialism. They never seem to compare the real problems of capitalism against the real problems of socialism. I can't believe I didn't see how disingenuous this trick is.
In my country, every topic, every single one (except for religion, we're a very religious country, Nigeria) in education starting from primary 1 (to Americans that should be 1st grade of elementary school) every single topic must have 10 - 20 advantages and disadvantages listed underneath, no single topic, including freaking maths and English is exempted except religious studies and over here, private schools are much more regarded and sort after than public school by a large margin, the difference between both of them is the difference between public toilets and your own personal toilet... so the government can't really do anything to change this standard... And the points under both advantages and disadvantages must be different from another point so you won't divide one point into three to fill up space, if you can't get up to 10, you have to defend it to the CEO of the school, the principal of the school, the head of department academics and head of department operation and the vice principal...
This kinda made it very hard for socialism and communism to get anywhere because we immediately realized how fucked up it was without any utopian sugarcoating once we got to the demerits, well, I figured that out immediately I heard the definition (I was a comic artist since primary three (3rd grade for Americans), not really a good one but enough to sweeten the heads of my mates and seniors at that time and I got paid for it, so when I saw the definition of socialism and communism, I was immediately like fuck off, we were taught capitalism first so I knew what I was doing was capitalism and once I compared it with socialism, yeah, it stopped making sense immediately, plus we over here in Africa know how bad government handles everything, I told you about public schools earlier)... So teachers couldn't sneak in their own curriculum because they have rules they have the follow as well as a format (and cameras in classes) and they have to submit their notes to the school to approve including how they're going to explain it, do anything different and yeah, you would be lucky to get a job as a personal tutor..
teachers aren't the ones responsible for researching so they don't have academic freedom because that belongs to researchers... Teachers are offering a service and just like a food company can't justify poisoning their products by calling it a trademark and masseuse can't justify chopping out people's limbs and calling it freedom of expression, teachers can't do the opposite of the service that they're paid to do and justify it with freedom of speech... Just because they speak doesn't mean they have freedom to say anything... It's like saying just because an interpreter speaks, he can interprete whatever the fuck he wants... They have a specific job to do, this also applies to lecturers and professors... They only academic freedom in research not when they're teaching students otherwise a professor can start peer reviewing an already defended theory whilst teaching the students because he was butt hurt that he was debunked by the research during the real peer review and the students won't know that his counters have already been debunked or/and would be too afraid to counter his counter because of his title and power...
Please, people need to stop using freedom of speech and academic freedom anyhow... It's dumb and very illogical and doesn't work in any other industry... A linguist as freedom when he's researching a language but not when he's interpreting one... An academician as freedom when he's doing academic researches not when he's freaking teaching because he has to teach what as already been agreed to be taught and then as just one person can't go against that to a bunch of kids who don't know anything about the matter...
Anyways, I had a point I was going for before that massive tangent... People should start requiring pros and cons for everything they want to believe in (that's why reviewers are very important)... If someone is tearing apart capitalism just to say socialism is better, the person as to first prove that socialism can solve the failings of capitalism mentioned whilst doing the same thing capitalism does at the very least half as good (it doesn't have to do it just as good or better), in other words, they need to be able to run both of them in a competition... But most importantly, nothing is perfect, so the person has to be able to talk about the demerits of socialism and it has to be an exhausted list otherwise you have to go look for it yourself... And never believe anything as true no matter how sad it is without evidence or at least a very logical and we'll thought out iron proof hypothesis which is very hard to get so evidences are better... Every point as to be peppered with well explained examples, hypothesis and evidences and not just a picture flashing on your screen...
@@johnnycrown5097 I live in South Africa and we have a very left-leaning government so I feel your pain. It's really good that they teach critical thinking from a young age in your country, because they sure don't teach it in our schools. I only got to learn critical thinking as a second year philosophy student.
@@marcusmoonstein242 and the saddest part about south Africa is that if the leftist communist race baiting academicians of the west had just left south Africa the fuck alone when south Africa gained it's independence, south Africa would have broken Africa out of the 3rd world status... But no, these leftists professors introduced racial hatred and communism to south African schools and politicians then the leftist media and social media prevented the west from knowing anything that is going on in South Africa because they have nothing that would help the left going on there... Now, south Africa isn't even mentioned anymore in the west, just like Libya, they tossed it away and even the afrocentric racist black Americans stopped used south Africa as the mother land of Africa and have transfered that privilege to central Africa because they can also claim that capitalism is destroying those countries too, a two for one special...
They're doing the same in Ghana, Ghana that became one of the richest country in Africa almost overnight stupidly allowed themselves to be infiltrated by the left and now they're having problems...
It's even sipping into my country's mainstream politics... Our president removed the subsidy of fuel as soon as he entered, immediately skyrocketing the price of fuel under one evening and never brought in any replacement so we're suffering here from fuel price that literally tripled in price over night and us still climbing with nothing to safe us in sight...
Only for a brainless useless female newly appointed minister to say the dumbest thing ever... Women should be provided palliatives by the government because of the subsidy removal and never gave any reason why apart from fallopian tubes and women somehow most affected... She didn't realize she's literally saying all men should pay all women for both sexes suffering together through the tripled prices of fuel and she said it so matter of factly... She also was too dumb to realize that palliatives to all women who are half if the population is more expensive than just returning the subsidy, it would be much more cheaper, sensible and impartial to just put the subsidy back... She was so stupid that for a good while, I actually thought she was trolling and she just wanted to show Nigerians how funny one our minister is, but she just kept on going and realized this brainless woman is serious...
Seriously, the left destroys everything it touches and that's why I hate when antiwoke pundits say some if not most of the leftist have good intentions and are just trying to do good things but their generosity and morality is being taken advantage of by the left... No, they're not, because if they had any good intentions to speak of, why don't they check up on the things they were once supporting rather than deleting it from their brain once the media stops talking about it because everything has gone to shit so the media wants to hide the repercussions and these leftists don't even bother check up on it again until someone on the right reminds them about or the media finds something to exploit from the once current thing and then they inform their leftist sheep's to get ready to support the next current thing, that's when the leftist sheep's remember what they once left behind... If they had any good intentions, they would have been following up on it ...
Well, for starters they're arguing for socialism, something even Marx looked down upon, as the end goal of human development. Which to me, a russian having studied Marxism-Leninism for a bit, sounds so backwards, "dumb muricans again" just comes to mind on it's own.
...and in 2023 we have arrived at
"Queers for Palestine"
Queer should be considered a slur as it means weird.
Palestinians are not all muslims, there are queer Palestinians also, supporting an ethnic group doesn't really hold up with this video but your misconception does show your preconceived notions on groups and why or why not they are supported
@@Astolfo2001queer used to mean odd as in a strange thing happening why would that be a slur
@@ehannasir8464nice try bucko. The part of Palestine they’re specifically talking about is the Gaza Strip. The Gaza Strip is ruled with an iron first by Hamas. Hamas is a Muslim extremist group that outlaws homosexuality (without trial mind you, all they have to do is suspect that you’re gay). According to lgbt Gazans that have left Gaza, Hamas punishes homosexuality, typically by death. Even in the West Bank, by all accounts the more moderately governed section of Palestine, there have been many accounts of gays being beheaded, imprisoned, or thrown from buildings without the government explaining why or looking into what happened. Even though they claim that homosexuality isn’t illegal or legal in the West Bank. When people talk about countries and their views, they tend to talk about the people in charge of the country. The people in charge of Palestine kill gays. Every other Muslim extremist group in the 21st century has been known to outlaw homosexuality and kill known gays. And in fact, it’s been speculated in many articles you can find online by looking up this subject, that many of the killings of gays aren’t even done by those that govern palestine, but by Palestinian civilians who know they won’t get charged for murder if it’s against a gay person. Who cares if not every single person in Gaza isn’t a Muslim, it’s a Muslim territory and it’s led by Muslim extremists. And if you can’t get any support from the government, you may as well be all alone.
@@ehannasir8464 please bro stop the cap. most Palestinians ARE muslims and fully support all its views, just because 'some' of them arent doesnt mean im gonna support a very inhumane group.
When it comes to religion, politics, or philosophy the Left adopts the old Henry Ford attitude: “You can have it any way you want, as long as its Left.”
Don't rope a good man like Henry Ford into this by misquoting him! Are the 'left' jokingly commentating on assembly line efficiency? Huh? Did you maybe just open up azquotes and pick the first one you saw that sounded like it as relevant? Hmm?!
Unless your Muslim. Gays for Gaza will always be amazing.
@@culturalliberator9425
TIL Gays for Gaza
@The2012Aceman
Wait... what was he talking about there?
@@ivoryas1696 The original Model T only came in black. Ford received many requests to put out a different color, to which he replied "You can have it in any color, as long as it's black."
When I first heard about the "Islam is right about women" posters, I wanted to award a Nobel Prize to whoever came up with it. Pure genius.
"It's OK to be white" was also a stroke of genius.
Both exposes the insanity of the left quite well.
How is the first one expose the left?
@kasketbase8741 The left doesn't want to admit that Islam treats women like shit. They do actually know that women are second class citizens in Islam though, so they find the statement mysoginistic but can't admit it, so they generally just have a minor fit when they see it. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Absolutely hilarious to see a lefty asked why they have an issue with the statement.
For me this also has a lot to view with how left leaning people view culture. They see it as different flavors of ice cream. Distinct but ultimately interchangeable.
Anyone who has actually interacted significantly with more than 1 culture knows this is bullocks. A far better analogy would be that cultures are completely different types of food. You would not serve, prepare, or store a pizza, salad, and ice cream in the same way and if you did you be seen as crazy
Exactly. Culture is more than food and family get-togethers. Culture includes norms about what is considered polite or rude, moral or immoral, late or punctual, fair or unfair, normal or deviant, everything. Trying to get a lot of people with radically different cultures to function together is a really difficult goal to implement. Shared norms make everything easier even if we assume that any given set of norms is axiomatically no better or worse than any other; doubly so if each group believes its own norms are superior.
Many "left-leaning" people don't view culture that way, it seems like a mass generalisation. You didn't mention anyone extreme, but those who are just "leaning" left. I myself lean rather left in a lot of ways, but I don't believe cultures are interchangeable, and I imagine many think the same way.
@@PoliostasisI do feel forced by the lack of statistical evidence presented to admit that OP commenter probably came to that conclusion anecdotally; however, general claims can be made about groups while acknowledging exceptions. For example, the statement "Asian men are shorter on average" is made no less true by the fact that you might happen to know a tall Asian guy. If there is statistical evidence supporting the claim that OP commenter made about the left generally tending to view culture(s) a certain way, then it can still be generally true in regards to the group despite the existence of certain exceptions.
leftist way of viewing culture is very colonisalist if you think about it.
they hijack other peoples culture to push their own agendas then discard them when it doesnt fit their agendas.
they wear cultures as costumes and it's pretty disrespectful imo. my culture isnt their costume to use and abuse.
I think it’s slightly different but the general point you made is true. They tend to falsely try and equate race with culture. I.E. if you admit there are bad cultures they’ll accuse you of racism. Like no Emily, cultures are a thing that exist separately. Wahabiist islam is an awful violent and hateful culture. That doesn’t mean Arabs are those things, most Arabs aren’t wahabiist. And not all wahabiist Muslims are Arab. They really only do this so they can call you a racist and end the conversation there without having to acknowledge the point you’re trying to make. They tend to do that with a lot of things in fact….
it's always funny watching the initial responses to the flyers that came up in UK.
one karen said "I feel like this should be illegal, but I'm unsure why. It just has to be racist."
I don't think you could have found a better example of cognitive dissonance if you tried.
if you think islam is roughly equivalent to the standard views of women in 1950's america then you must either know nothing of islam or nothing of the way we used to view women here in the US.
Unfortunately many leftoids seem to think that way, though it's funny they loathe 1950s American society yet absolutely get defensive over Islam at any given opportunity.
Fr, when he said that I was like - "doesn't Islam encourage stonings and wife beatings?" 💀
Bro gave you sources go read them if you disagree. Your in the same aisle as the leftists just parrot what you hear without looking at it with any detail. He is quite obviously well researched and read the Quran to find out what Muslims believe and gave the sources for the parts he read.
I would argue that in general women viewed THEMSELVES more highly in the 1950's, and their behavior elicited more respect from men than their behavior gets them today (broadly speaking).
I think you misunderstood the statement
Incidently the name Utopia (non place or nowhere) is a meme in its own right.
It's a hybrid word. Means _both_ "perfect place" (actually "Eutopia") _and_ "no place" (actually "Outopia").
The use of the word "Utopia" automatically implies that "perfect place" = "no place", but that's still something that can be argued about if you're aware of the implication.
The last bit of the video is insanely accurate, especially the picture. They will pretend to denounce both sides but they still make it glaringly obvious to anyone paying attention that they just want to blatantly hate the right without being associated with people who literally share the same rhetoric and behavior they exhibit.
One thing that confuses me about many Muslim women is when they wear the head scarf at the same time as wearing skin tight jeans. Don't get me wrong, I'm a fan of Middle Eastern women in tight jeans, but isn't the head scarf supposed to symbolize or be for modesty? Does not compute 🤯
Remember humans as intelligent agents will always try to game every system they are a part of.
This is why socialism does not work, it assumes good faith.
If I am a prophet of a new morality system and say " do not spill blood of your enemies" then guess what... 100 years after my death there will be an army that solely uses blunt weapons... cause hey, yes I am causing internal damage and break bones, but amount of blood spilled is actually rather miniscule.
As muslim men i also confused like why ??? the prophet said don't wear clothes that to tight you can see your body outline to him it the same as not wearing anything
One part for culture. One is for fetish fuel. One because of westernization.
yeah I have heard imams in Memri writhe about it, calling them whores and that they need to be cursed aloud at in the streets.
Muslims are pretty cucked as well tbh I had seen some Muslim countries and they suffered just as much social degradation as the West when it comes to Family values, only thing left holding and is a red line is matters of doctrinal faith.
Nonetheless Muslims still have actual reactionary movements against modernism that are legit theocratic in their goals and ideals, Osama bin Laden comes to mind.
Man this painted Islam in a extremely positive view of Islam. It is way, way, way harsher than the 50s.
Yeah I don’t think he read those Quran verses he was talking about💀 Islam hasn’t had a reformation like Judaism or Christianity. So the original beliefs are still *technically* canon. We certainly didn’t have multiple wives or marry ten year olds in 1950s America lol
@@bigpapi6688if you think we have those over here, come to Iraq then. These things only exist in Extreme places such as Afghanistan and Pakistan
@@bigpapi6688 but you still did marry 14 year olds in 1950s... So dont try to be on some moral highground xD
@@bigpapi6688People married 13 year olds often. Not quite 10, but we’re just splitting hairs now
@@CTzons That doesn't mean anything meaningful to me. Like, never in my life have I heard a Muslim say that another Muslim was too extreme, only saying so to others. There's a lack of gate keeping in that direction.
"Islam is right about women" is definitely about hating one side, and there's nothing wrong with that. I'd say more likely a bash on Islam and modern "intersectionality" thinking Islam is in any way compatible with Western Society.
Also, Islam's views on women are not even remotely close to 1950's Western views, they're much more radical.
no they are not radical, you have probably never ever read quran or any hadith or anything like that but someone elses thoughts about those things. Educate yourself
@@emirefe5452bro, the Quran allows you to beat your wife and also allows you to have sex with slaves of war, there are hadiths of Muhammad sleeping with women the same day he killed their husbands
@@emirefe5452Islam is a cult of death and a plague on the world.
Educate yourself.
@@emirefe5452 Sahih Bukhari (6:301) - "[Muhammad] said, 'Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?' They replied in the affirmative. He said, 'This is the deficiency in her intelligence.'"
Ishaq 734 - "As for Ali, he said, 'Women are plentiful, and you can easily change one for another.'"
Quran (53:27) - "Those who believe not in the Hereafter, name the angels with female names."
Quran (5:6) - "And if ye are unclean, purify yourselves. And if ye are sick or on a journey, or one of you cometh from the closet, or ye have had contact with women, and ye find not water, then go to clean, high ground and rub your faces and your hands with some of it"
From the Hadiths and Quran. Will you deny them as truth?
@@emirefe5452The view that women must cover themselves or else they’re betraying their husband or sluts isn’t radical?
In truth, trying to make a utopia a reality is 100% impossible. There is always something in that utopia that will never ever happen, and no matter which side its coming from, any utopia can be seen as a dystopia for other people.
I personally don't want a utopia. Why? Cause life would inevitably become boring & thus the personal meaning of life for everyone will eventually die.
This is a very fascistic way of thinking! The understanding of pain and struggle. The willingness to surpass it in order to better yourself. Accepting ALL of the beauty AND the brutality of nature. Joining arms with your folk and kin, and helping one another back up when you stumble... THAT is Fascism!
@@georgelincolnrockwell6248 no it isn't. and you're a moron if you truly believe the nonsense you said.
Pain and struggle created strong man
Agreed, any cognition we could have of a perfect system it is still our perception. Even if we had a group agree and build conceptually a perfect system it's their perception. And another group or individual may see it as not perfect. Not a utopia but rather a nightmare.
In high school civics class my teacher gave groups of four people a big piece of paper to make a 10 part bill of rights for a utopia and gave us an hour to do it. No one was able to do it and that was the point.
Islam walked so that Austrian Economics could run.
LOL, I shouldn't have laughed at this.
Expanding on the "red vs. blue" problem is that A and B are actually pulling from a *shared* pool, which means A will accelerate the depletion of subgroup that rolled lower.
Imagine taking two sets of 20 dice, rolling them, and having A and B take turns picking one die, with the goal of having the highest final total. A simply picks the highest roll, while B alternates between one set and the other. If one group has less high rolls, both A and B picking from it will deplete the good to acceptable rolls, and every turn where B has to pick from it anyway gives A another chance to poach one of the remaining high rolls from the other group.
Islam is Right About Women, depending on interpretation criticises every subject within the statement, alongside the above doublethink or cognitive dissonance, it mocks Islam for its views on women, it mocks women for being inferior, and it mocks those who hold both Women are equal and that Islam is good.
@wheezy Mohammad claimed once that the testimony of a man is worth twice that of a woman in court. This is according to a hadith if I remember correctly.
@@Cecilia-ky3uw if i rember, there are 34 situations where women get more, and 4 for men, while the 4 are also supposed to benift women, according to sharia scholars.
@@khalidtamer6932 wgat do you mean by "34 situations"
@@introboy1 I'm fairly sure the exact statement there did mention the women should be 2 to 'remind' each other, implying that they very well are dumber, and signifigantly so. This is wikipedia's rendition 'O you who believe! When you contract a debt for a fixed period, write it down. Let a scribe write it down in justice between you. Let not the scribe refuse to write as Allah has taught him, so let him write. Let him (the debtor) who incurs the liability dictate, and he must fear Allah, his Lord, and diminish not anything of what he owes. But if the debtor is of poor understanding, or weak, or is unable himself to dictate, then let his guardian dictate in justice. And get two witnesses out of your own men. And if there are not two men (available), then a man and two women, such as you agree for witnesses, so that if one of them (two women) errs, the other can remind her' and yes it was a quran verse, sorry on that. This one does nit speak of historical blackmailing, it talks about the women erring or being mistaken.
@@introboy1 less memory can be taken as less intelligent because memory is a very important part of intelligence. The euphemism interpretation sounds to me like a stretch made by, as you say 'some' scholars. And the fact aisha exists as a counterexample should not somehow mean that the verse isnt referring to women as inferior- we still have people nowadays thinking women are much dumber than men even though that is demonstrably not true. Aisha is also an inidividual so she can oppose the norm-and the prophet's wife at that. In any case the quran and hadith is ridden with contradictions, there is a doctrine of abbrogation just because so many verses said a then later verses said b in a vague manner.
This video makes a pretty bad flaw with “1950’s traditional conservatives would somewhat agree with Islam’s view on women.” I am a Christian conservative, someone who would be strawmanned as a Christian nationalist, but Islam is horridly wrong about women because it does not focus on actually stable marriages, but instead on domination and having the men lead.
lol, lmao
ever read the fucking bible?
@@afungi662 Colossians 3:19
As well, just for that word deployed, James 1:26.
@@Dylanbased Oh the irony
Ephesians 5:25-33
something wrong with having the husband lead the family? having the man lead is what God intended, he is responsible for everything, he is there to guide her and their children and he is responsible to provide for the family, does that mean shes somehow inferior? no just because he leads doesnt mean she has no word in what goes on in the family, she also got responsibilities. if you strictly think marriage is suppose to be like an army boot camp or an authoritarian regime, then thats exactly what islam wants you not to do. because there is no love there.
oh and also if you questioned, "what if the man doesnt know how to lead" then islam clearly stated that you just cant marry, as clearly youre not ready for that, and that goes for the woman too.
Funnily enough, women deeply enjoy utopian thinking.
Everyone does.
@@Nooy_ Women moreso. It's a big feature of their politics.
@@SomeGuyNotKnown really depends on the woman
@@Nooy_ I said moreso.
@@SomeGuyNotKnown oops read that wrong
I put up posters around my local community college back in the day, I remember on of the teachers there mentioned “extremism on campus” and “getting to the bottom of it”. Of course nothing happened. I scouted camera locations and did my homework
How is that even an extremist take? ❤😂
bluepill: IIRAW is an ironic critique of the left
redpill: IIRAW
purplepill: Is IIRAW?
blackpill: IIRAW
whitepill: IIRAW, and that's funny.
Good video, did you make IIRAW originally?
I wasn't the person(s) who posted it everywhere or any other potentially psuedo-legal activity, but I was the one who originally came up with the meme. I figured I would wait until someone noticed that part of the video was sarcasm to confirm this. Yes, this video is basically IIRAW as explained by its creator.
@@MentisWave based
@@MentisWave big fan of your seething material. Nice job :)
@@MentisWave Wow.
@@MentisWave Come up with new memes.
i have this thing in my country's supreme court were people say "oh there arent any judges who are from a certain ethnic group and thats why it should be reformed". they just try to elect the best judges and they happened not to belong to that ethnic group.
7:04 isn't strictly true, many Russian natives were killed by the Bolsheviks for simply being Russians, 'Racist' as a term was coined by Trotsky as a way to shame native Russians for having interests in their own as opposed to the other peoples of the former Russian Empire. They used foreign mercenaries in the form of the Cheka where Chinese nationals were used as a secret police, loyal to the state alone. The Han Chinese majority often led pogroms in ethnic minority areas of China that prefered their traditions to Socialism. Commies have been hella racist, the guys behind it just have control of the publishing houses.
Yeah the “at least communists aren’t racist” people conveniently forget that Marx himself said that Jews would likely be incompatible with a Marxist society. And we all know what the communists did with people who they felt were “incompatible” with the revolution. (And if you don’t, here’s a hint: genocide. The same exact thing the literal Nazis did)
Its funny how just putting a religion in the title makes half the comment section entirety braindead or super edgy.
It's filled with religious zealots and incels complaining about women sleeping around, whilst they enable men sleeping around. It's sad and pathetic that red pill has made men extremely braindead and hive minded, it's like feminism all over again but in reverse.
very good video, didn't even know (or remember) about this meme but I gotta use it now
Pretty sure you can summarize their double think via the formula "destroy Christianity".
Well, specifically they want to destroy the West and anything they associate with it. While christianity is less of a western ideal and is closer to something that has minimal identity beyond just absorbing whatever is around it, that thus means it sponged up western culture and therefore has to go.
Taking Muslim actions as how Islam views women, even the 1950s were a feminist paradise of equality by comparison.
Islam's view of women is nothing like the U.S. 1950 view of women.
Yeah, this guy sometimes says stuff like that that makes 0 sense
Unless Is like... 1750's view or earlier. Seriously, Islam Is so behind culturally Is amusing why people even defend Palestine. I for my part have NEVER liked that place because they just seemed to disrespect core values on others.
@@N12015 they're proud of killing ex Muslims. They're also proud of human sacrifice which what their conflicts basically are "we MUST win and die for this stupid cause" which is why I do not care about that entire fucking region
People keep saying this and not being specific
And years later this is still relevant
I have to disagree on " islams View of woman is much like the one in the 50s" its not it does infact share similiarities bout is still unique and in some points absolutely different from westerners understandijg of woman
I mean this is basically just a dead horse at this point and it's not even funny. It's pretty obviously contradictory to be about 'women's and LGBT right' while also sucking up to a group that largely wants women to stay in the kitchen and for homosexuals to not exist.
You kind of missed the part where koran states that women are "lesser beings".
Don't wanna be that guy, but the correct expression is *eat your cake and have it too.* Quality video, btw.
You shouldn't have been that guy, you got it wrong. It actually is "Have your cake and eat it too"
It’s an interchangeable thing actually
@@AISlopTheatre worst part is he was wrong
tis a quality video, man.
11:09 imma be honest bro but where do you see so hard racist or nazis in any kind of big community. Maybe on telegram some larp nazis but i live in middle europe and i have never seen a person openly advocating for these right wing stand points.
Fuck even Generation Identity are much much more tame then these opinions.
I think Family Guy actually indirectly proved Utopian thinking is dumb in the Episode where Lois adopted a Decluttering Narrative and had a blank, empty house at the end.
I disagree as an ex Muslim
Islam claims that most of who go to hell are women
That women should cover her face and every bit of her body and of she didn't she is a whore and even can be killed or beaten like in iran
Also islam says that relationship between a man and a wife is a relationship between a boss and a slave
That a woman should obey het husband no matter what
Should obey her father too
You should see more hadeth (الحديث والسنة النبوية)
Quaran doesn't say everything
And finally islam is actually closer to a socialist state than a Capitalist one
I disagree as a muslim
Islam claims that women are most of those to get in BOTH hell and heaven
Women should cover their heads although its debatable between those who say the whole face of just hair but most of the scholars agreed that just covering the hair is enough... and there is no punishment mentined for those who dont wear it in the qur'an nor in hadith, and the laws that force it are purely extremist
The relationship between a man and a woman in marriage is based on love, respect and gender-roles, while the husband has an othority arround the house, its a bit of a streach to call it a slave/boss relationship...
While the woman have to obey her husband, however she must not put herself as a subject to abuse in any kind, and seek help
Men and women should obey their parents as long as they arent abusive...
No, contrary to socialist views islam is very capitalist, however it does have some socialist characteristics...
@@cake_farts
There's is a Hadith that says
"إن أقلّ ساكني الجنة النساء"
Meaning that the least of heaven are women
So no not the most of heaven are women that's wrong
Secondly about the punishment for women who don't cover their hair
There's alot about المتبرجة
Or women who basically don't follow the Islamic hair cover and face cover like they don't even smell haven
And finally the relationship between man and woman in islam may be based on love but as I said man is always the boss to an extreme end
@@waltermodel9730 There is no punishment in the Quran about this and could I get a Hadith source for the first argument?
Btw the man isn’t even really supposed to be that extreme, divorce like in many other societies is in Islam, if a man is tough then go ahead and by all means divorce.
@@mcshakatar9866
Ok here is the hadith
يا معشر النساء تصدقن وأكثرن من الاستغفار فإني رأيتكن أكثر أهل النار، فقالت امرأة منهن جزلة وما لنا يا رسول الله أكثر اهل النار، قال: تكثرن اللعن وتكفرن العشير.
@@waltermodel9730 No I want the source, book number and what not
Do a full video debunking Second Thought
I'll admit I was moving toward being a leftist over a few months until I saw his bit on how it's bad to listen to the other side.
Turned me so off the socialist part of the web that I ended up over on this side of the internet.
@@oscarwind4266same for me. I was already a bit doubtful, but I thought many of the ideas were interesting. And then I realized how cultish it all is, and decided to avoid getting trapped by looking into all sorts of different ideologies
@@tchop6839 any advice? looking for reliable right- and left-wing creators, but most right ones I find (probably due to youtube only pushing extremists from either side) really, _really_ hate me for being trans. so I can't stomach it, unfortunately. aside from that Sean from AJW, Kieth Woods are much more agreeable, but it stops there as it was a recommendation from a right-leaning person (go figure).
@@BishopShotgunShortfatotaku is pretty sympathetic to transpeople while also being willing to call out the more cultish ones.
@@hope-cat4894dev is an idiot who calls himself a centrist but always gives the milk toast fence sitting takes that somehow always end up falling on the side of the left
Sure he’s not cultish and he has decent takes every blue cheese moon but most of the time he starts off with the stupidest fence sitting takes and always ends his point with some leftist take
Dev Suggs booty
I love how this simple statement can just stunlock any intersectionalist. Because it’s such an obvious contradictory statement to their ideology that they can’t even comprehend it without breaking their delusions. It’s honestly hilarious.
Perhaps you can also do this on silence and violence and hate speech violence slogan
6:49 Glad you said this. I was beginning to think that you were claiming any Utopian or Idealist ideas were inherently bad, which would not be true.
Instead of putting it on yourself, you can say : "Do you think Islam is right about women?"
Confused is generous. They are blanking out
That family painting in the video, where did it come from, recognise it but do not know who painted or drew it
I agree the 1980s view of women is logical but Islam does not convey 1980s American standards it's clear as to men are twice as valuable
My favorite version of this is feminists being opposed to firearm ownership and rights.
Thing is, socialists compare our very controlled markets against utopian socialism making their tactics even more dirty
Its amazing how five 1-2 syllable words have caused such a lasting impact.
Same with "Its Okay To Be White."
@@haroldbalzac6336 That one sent the entire news media into hysterics! That was probably the funniest display I've ever seen.
I am amused and bemused that Mormonism as listed in that Beliefs chart has its belief in Spirit Rest and Spirit Prison conflated with the Gnostic views of the Catholics regarding Heaven, Purgatory, and Hell. They're not the same thing, particularly given in Mormonism Spirit Rest and Spirit Prison are not permanent, nor is the ultimate destination of souls a binary Heaven or Hell.
I mean, aside from saying Mormonism this is actually a good interpretation of what I believe as a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, so thanks! Lots of people don't even bother to find out.
The different flavors of schizo and crazy that a bunch of crazy schizos just made up and have no reason to believe fundamentally don't really matter. Until they come up with a ubiquitous, consistent, agreed upon and evident truth, none of them should be pointing the finger at anyone else nor complaining about each other when they're all doing the same thing.
Black Pigeon Speaks did a great video on this when it came out. Pretty much what is covered here, except his video has since gone missing on YT.
An islamic friend told me that the Koran states men have to make their wives come or it's not a valid marriage. Idk how right that is, but...
When you arrange a marriage that’s mean…
But at the same time i feel like i shouldn’t have intercourse because it’s mostly one sided in my favor.
No Qur'an doesn't say that but All classical scholars of Islamic law emphasize on men and women both enjoying the intercourse
They make their cousins cum?? Yoooo
Are there other phrases or memes which expose contradictory thinking like iiraw? I want more.
In the point you made about diversity, the argument goes that having people from different backgrounds (diversity) allows you to see a problem from different perspectives, as people are from different backgrounds and ask different questions. Nonetheless, I do find it a little suspicious that according to academic institutions, most "good" actions that a business can do are also correlated with being more successful.
The misconception is that diversity of backgrounds, like race or gender, is the same thing as diversity of thought. This isn’t necessarily true, you could easily find people of diverse backgrounds who think pretty much the same. Each person, regardless of background (which diversity today generally means race, gender, and sometimes sexuality), has a unique perspective. Often the left creates echo-chambers disguised as “diversity”. This is when a group that appears diverse all thinks the same leftist ideology. This pushes out those with diverse thoughts and creates a way to keep people in line while appearing to be well meaning and benevolent- but it isn’t at all, sadly.
@@jasonyork9966 >Muh fasheesm
You don't know what Fascism is! And as to your example, having a staff that is multiethnic or multicultural is POISON and very quickly devolves into racial conflict, thuggery, or even SLAVERY; especially so when YOUR OWN ethnic group is underrepresented and self-hating! Ethnic commonality is the CORE of a good team! You don't need to artificially boost a given group's variable input and interaction. There are going to be plenty of diverse backgrounds and outlooks even in a group of all, say, Ethiopian or Chinese people...
diversity of idea does not stem from diversity of skin color. it stems from diversity of experience. If you take a team of a black guy, a white guy, a hispanic, an indian, and an asian, and pit them against a team of a mechanic, an engineer, a businessman, an accountant, and a artist and challenge them to come up with the next best product. Which team are you betting your money on?
As great as diversity is, unity is what really holds a business together. Many studies who say more successful businesses are more diverse don’t realize it’s because they can afford to have diversity. It’s like saying successful businesses sell 30 different products. There’s so much work you’ll have to do to reap the benefits from both, and most smaller businesses just can’t afford that.
Man explained his own meme
When will you do a debunking video on some breadtuber.
That is actually the next "serious" video. So two weeks or so.
@@MentisWave Who are you debunking tell me.
Most people can probably guess, but it's going to be Vaush because I want to finish what I started with my previous video about him.
@@MentisWave Please do the gravel insuite next please.
@@MentisWave Tbf, You made a MASSIVE mistake. Muslims are NOT like 50's western countries, they're like Medieval western at best, clearly pre reissonanse.
Why'd you use footage of Heavens Gate cult when talking about the People's Temple cult?
"Everyone is correct."
"No they aren't."
Either they are and I'm incorrect so they aren't. Or they aren't and I'm correct then they also aren't.
The correct paradox.
You can also say : Islam is wrong about women. It will have the same effect.
I've watched a couple of your videos and you got a sub outta me.
But can I just say real quick... bruh you gotta look up how to correctly pronounce "fallacy". Once you get that down, your videos will be perfect. 😆
you were the creator of that all along??
love the theory behind it, well played man
THE PLUS SIZE KAREN CLIP UHM I NEED TO FIX MY RETINAS BUT GOOD POINT MADE ITS A DAMN GOOD ARGUMENT
A side note: “having one’s cake and eating it, too” is a weird phrase because to think that it is an either/or is a false dichotomy since, even though I do not eat cake, I can have a slice and eat it at the same time. It is a weird idiom for something that is supposed to be logically contradictory.
usually when two actions are put together with and that means that the first one takes place first. You cannot eat the cake and then proceed to have it
depending, the islamic view of women could be worse or better than in the 1950s, it sort of depends
Mentís what would be the objection to even theoritical socialism and communism worker owning the means of production and the stateless moneyless classes society I have my own but I want to know yours as i think there a objection to it even in theory
The biggest problem is that there is no actual way to achieve the "stateless" part. Progressive wealth redistribution requires a large form of authority and force to implement since people are not naturally willing to give up their private property. So once seizing the means of production starts, rather than going away the state does exactly the opposite and starts ballooning until it becomes a dictatorship.
@@MentisWave my objection to it even in theory is the moneyless part as with that we’re dealt with the economic calculation problem that also apply to a market socialist it’s also one of the reason why commune and worker co-op fail as there dealt with that as well as even close to market ones like Yugoslavia
American politics are, Head numbing. Like i live in bosnia. And i allways watched western media and like 10 years ago alot of these political things were at a minimum. Like i never got my fyp flooded with political content but now everything is political. And i see almost all of it is from america. And i see alot of the same kind of american politics seep thru to other places like india, as toxic as it is, again 10 years ago it was kinda calm, unlike now with the almost genocidal takes on muslims. You know as i ser the internet grow i kinda thing goverments are pushing agendas onto people. Mostly under developed people under eighteen. Thats why i see most of the people argueing in comments on videos are like teens or something. Im not good at english and cant really get my point thru but i hope you can understand what im saying, you can ask questions in the comments
You can blame the WEF for that.
@@Astolfo2001 the wef?
@@LocalBosnian-99World Economic Forum. Basically a conglomerate of those asset management companies (Blackrock, Vanguard, etc.) discussing to many influential people (elite class) about “improving the state of the world”.
Many doomer takes like living in a pod and eating bugs came from their lectures.
@@pepperonipizza8200 oh
Anyways, I had a point I was going for before that massive tangent... People should start requiring pros and cons for everything they want to believe in (that's why reviewers are very important)... If someone is tearing apart capitalism just to say socialism is better, the person as to first prove that socialism can solve the failings of capitalism mentioned whilst doing the same thing capitalism does at the very least half as good (it doesn't have to do it just as good or better), in other words, they need to be able to run both of them in a competition... But most importantly, nothing is perfect, so the person has to be able to talk about the demerits of socialism and it has to be an exhausted list otherwise you have to go look for it yourself... And never believe anything as true no matter how sad it is without evidence or at least a very logical and we'll thought out iron proof hypothesis which is very hard to get so evidences are better... Every point as to be peppered with well explained examples, hypothesis and evidences and not just a picture flashing on your screen...
Friendly reminder that the Quran is arranged by subject, not chronologically, the later verses abrogate the earlier ones, and much Islamic doctrine comes from the hadiths. That’s where we get the less-than western rule that Muslims are free to 🍇 any woman who doesn’t wear a hijab.
I see you've done the thumbnail job 👍
11:08 - Bad Meme - You are missing the /pol/ version.
I'm pretty sure the forst time I heard IIRAW was on the Dick Show, but not sure if he was the very first to coin it
I think the implication that there’s a monolithic take on “women” by all muslims is pretty misguided
Aka plausible deniability
Agreed
He is using poling data, so the majority of Muslims do have a standardized opinion on women. You also have all of the religious texts to interpret to understand the religion of islams take on women, regardless of if most people agree with it or not.
In my country, every topic, every single one (except for religion, we're a very religious country, Nigeria) in education starting from primary 1 (to Americans that should be 1st grade of elementary school) every single topic must have 10 - 20 advantages and disadvantages listed underneath, no single topic, including freaking maths and English is exempted except religious studies and over here, private schools are much more regarded and sort after than public school by a large margin, the difference between both of them is the difference between public toilets and your own personal toilet... so the government can't really do anything to change this standard... And the points under both advantages and disadvantages must be different from another point so you won't divide one point into three to fill up space, if you can't get up to 10, you have to defend it to the CEO of the school, the principal of the school, the head of department academics and head of department operation and the vice principal...
This kinda made it very hard for socialism and communism to get anywhere because we immediately realized how fucked up it was without any utopian sugarcoating once we got to the demerits, well, I figured that out immediately I heard the definition (I was a comic artist since primary three (3rd grade for Americans), not really a good one but enough to sweeten the heads of my mates and seniors at that time and I got paid for it, so when I saw the definition of socialism and communism, I was immediately like fuck off, we were taught capitalism first so I knew what I was doing was capitalism and once I compared it with socialism, yeah, it stopped making sense immediately, plus we over here in Africa know how bad government handles everything, I told you about public schools earlier)... So teachers couldn't sneak in their own curriculum because they have rules they have the follow as well as a format (and cameras in classes) and they have to submit their notes to the school to approve including how they're going to explain it, do anything different and yeah, you would be lucky to get a job as a personal tutor..
teachers aren't the ones responsible for researching so they don't have academic freedom because that belongs to researchers... Teachers are offering a service and just like a food company can't justify poisoning their products by calling it a trademark and masseuse can't justify chopping out people's limbs and calling it freedom of expression, teachers can't do the opposite of the service that they're paid to do and justify it with freedom of speech... Just because they speak doesn't mean they have freedom to say anything... It's like saying just because an interpreter speaks, he can interprete whatever the fuck he wants... They have a specific job to do, this also applies to lecturers and professors... They only academic freedom in research not when they're teaching students otherwise a professor can start peer reviewing an already defended theory whilst teaching the students because he was butt hurt that he was debunked by the research during the real peer review and the students won't know that his counters have already been debunked or/and would be too afraid to counter his counter because of his title and power...
Please, people need to stop using freedom of speech and academic freedom anyhow... It's dumb and very illogical and doesn't work in any other industry... A linguist as freedom when he's researching a language but not when he's interpreting one... An academician as freedom when he's doing academic researches not when he's freaking teaching because he has to teach what as already been agreed to be taught and then as just one person can't go against that to a bunch of kids who don't know anything about the matter...
I believe cognitive dissonance is the more correct term. In place of double think.
Same thing
You mean christianity is right about women?
No.
I like to add a "What if" to IIRAW this makes it less confrontational to people you can have a discussion with but still short circuits the right kinds of people.
But is it a what if?
11:02 this cartoon features segregation as right wing racism when it was a democrat policy.
It's possible there are more average inaccuracies, but that was the clearest, easiest to pick up.
That's funny that you think journalists will have children
Believing in religion is like deciding to be a Jedi.
Reasonable people just want to get by. After an entire existence as a species with these loons we've clearly naturally acclimated. It's like letting the bum piss on the street. It's not our job to set them straight, and if anything-Who are they hurting anyway?
Wait, that was YOU?!
I wonder why it's so hard for people to just treat each other with a base line level of respect or empathy. I don't need some sanctimonious moron OR a 2000 year old scriptura to tell me how to be a good person lol.
3:30 "not as hard as people make it out to be" is just straight up wrong and disgusting
Ah I remember this meme. It was glorious
On that second thought video what were the good criticism you thought
He's correct that huge gaps in unemployment can be beneficial to large corporations since it allows them to get away with undercutting. However he is wrong on the cause of it, which is that said large corporations lobby for policies like absurd startup fees for new businesses that prevent competition which stifles job growth. So basically he is right about a lot of the problems we see, but wrong on the cause and wrong on the solution -which would be anti-corruption acts and killing a lot of said startup fees.
@@MentisWave wait are you saying the cause of is cause large corporation lobby or second thought is be a bit more clear on that and if so what did second thought said the cause was
@@markgel9510 His argument if you don't want to watch his video is pretty much "Everything bad in society is capitalisms fault, pay no attention to what the government is doing."
@@MentisWave so I guess it was in the lines of corporation always bad cause the existence of them cause climate change and exploit third world country and government always good as it a protector from it
You're lucky can criticize them with more less risk than anybody who live here.
Hope anybody who wrong open their eye after watching this
People who make such critics such those are subjected to flagellating, imprisonment, Excluded to vote and to be voted, and marked as Khafir for life
Way too much worse than some devout muslims who commit billions dollar Ponzi-Scam , Child sex predators, and Sex-slave traffickers here
I'll be waiting for next quality content, best regard for all
Mentis wave your video is good I'm muslim
I'm Christian, your Quran has contradictions
@@introboy1 Imagine being part of a religion
@@the98themperoroftheholybri33No it doesn’t, but speaking of contradictions: th-cam.com/video/RB3g6mXLEKk/w-d-xo.html
@@introboy1To be fair, believing in a soulless materialist cosmology and belonging to an organized religion aren't the only two options.
@@introboy1imagine not actually informing yourself about the beliefs of others so you just get this slop of a comment
I unironically agree that Islam is right about woman.
the state of the western man
Are you pro-Islam, or mostly anti-Islam and just granting them this one thing?
There are four sides to this debate ("against islam and women"/crazy rightist, pro-Islam, pro-Feminist, and "for Islam and women"/crazy leftist). IMO the "Islam" and "Feminist" perspectives don't really need to be talked about because they're well-understood; it's the two "crazy" positions that are worth bringing up and contrasting with each other and the two simpler positions.
(I am a little concerned about my use of "Feminist" here because some might understand it as a synonym for "crazy leftist". But there doesn't seem to be a better term for the idea that women should have quite as much freedom as men, respecting them as roughly equal to men on the whole while still expecting them to be different from men.)
according to Islam women should cover their heads although most of the scholars agreed that just covering the hair is enough, and there is no punishment mentined for those who dont wear it in the qur'an nor in hadith, and the laws that force it are purely extremist.
in islam the relationship between a man and a woman in marriage is based on love, respect and gender-roles, while the husband has an othority arround the house, some wrongfully call it a slave boss relationship, while the woman have to obey her husband she must not put herself as a subject to abuse in any kind, and seek help.
so yes, islam is right about women.
@@roywempor8395 - Not wearing a head covering is considered sin, I.E they go to hell for it, not to mention, even though there's no punishment prescribed, they are typically put to death in Islamic states.
Also, in islam, women are said to be half that of men, because they're stupid; They fill up hell, you're allowed to beat them if they don't have sex with you, you can rape them if they aren't muslims, you can have multiple wives, you can marry them when they're children and likely many more abhorrent things. Islam views women as lesser than, you can't get around that.
Youre wrong about islam 😂 and I think its quite telling that you dont adress the issue of literally beating your wife being in the religion you follow
As a Democrat and an atheist, I can avoid this. Hating something someone else appreciates does not mean I hate that person. I would love it if we could be friends and only their own limits are defined by their beliefs, not mine. If it’s just an opinion, that’s fine it’s intuitive. If it’s a religion, even though it’s intuitive to think religiously, the specifics were given by other humans to these people, who, regardless of whether they are right or wrong, are only holding this opinion because it needs to be right, not because it is right. I don’t like Judaism, I would likely never follow it. Does that make me a neo-nazi? If you’re responding logically, the answer should be no. Therefore, in this case I could say Islam is wrong about woman and that I don’t like or even hate Islam, and it would still be illogical to say that I hate Muslims and especially to say that I want them dead. There, no more doublethink, and I didn’t have to deny my morals of “be kind to anyone, if possible.”
If you say theistic views of women are anti women and people who are anti women are evil, then agree Islam has these (very conservative) theistic views then it follows that Muslims are evil by default.
Congrats on being a non-crazy leftist! Really frustrating how each side is presented the craziest contingent of the other side as "what you're fighting against", isn't it?
@@Tzizenorec That’s true. I obviously don’t think everyone should think alike, but there is a certain level of disagreement that is unsalvageable, and most people fall into that camp. I’m a Democrat mostly because I see people there who could be less extreme than most Republicans in their political views (lifestyle-wise the Republicans are probably better) but I acknowledge that they’re also pretty extreme currently.
I’ve also been watching a lot of philosophical content and have thought about how silly demanding respect through power or fear is. That’s why at most I get a little frustrated in my comments, maybe sometimes a little condescending, but that’s only when I feel really disrespected or the other person isn’t quite getting what I’m saying. Otherwise, I’m very charitable and always try to defuse heated situations. Being moderate in opinion, but more in the way of being anti-extremist than pro-extremist (the latter is achieved by indifference) is what I promote.
Is Islam wrong about women?
Yes
No
@@dhaggfaus827 Islam has high birth rates, while the West has low
Low birthrate = no future
High birthrate = guaranteed future
@@Urbanizegaming that proves absolutely nothing. that says nothing about the rights women have.
@@mwahahahahha-yb7cb wasn't talkin to u + u can't read context
Not gonna lie I just found your channel and this video got me, because from a young age I always disagreed with islam and I actually live at the moment in a Country thats half islamic.
But how you use somthing inciteful to speak into a valid point that are profound is honestly really impressive and somthing I don't think I've seen much or at in the modern world.
Your whole point kinda reminds me of how I always found it strange that Homosexuals would try to push Christianity into marrying them.
I am not a Christian and have nothing against Gay People, (actually had a few friends in those type of relationships even though its illegal here) but I do know the Bible very well and have read it multiple times, it doesn't speak "well" of them, condeming them and even saykng they should be killed.
So them trying to push a religion that is fundamentally to its core against how they Live was always strange to me and I didn't know what to say, because I know in general people don't read the Bible as much as I and my friends have.
Hell I even had a friend who would hound me on why I don't believe in religion, yet she was dating a girl.
Great video and I'm probably one of your easiest subscribers.
Edit: I feel with this kind of skill in your speaking level, you should do more than just youtube videos, maybe finances would be an issue but somthing like holding speak events possibly.
Coming from the south, most people here don’t read ANY part of the Bible unless it’s broken up into inspirational quotes or read to them by a preacher. This makes it a lot easier for them to ignore specific parts that they don’t like, because they can simply avoid that part of the Bible. It’s also very common to find people that attend church “just in case” meaning they don’t actually believe most of what they’re being told, but they’ve decided it’s better than being atheists since all atheists go to hell.
Compairing Islam to 1950s America is downplaying hard.
Thats a great quote at the end. If diversity happens naturally and by accident, just leave it alone. Don't use skin color and history to force people together, you might make things worse.
are u claiming most if not all leftist see islam as peaceful? arent u making ur life easy with that claim?
Is Islam based?
No def not based. They went too far in the other direction. So far in fact that Muhammad both approved of beating women until their skin turned green (sahih al Bukhari 5825) and having child brides. He himself married a 6 year old child while at age 53, and had relations with her at age 9 (sahih al Bukhari 5134 & 6130).
The happy medium is Biblical Christianity where Men are called to love and protect their wives, but also be the leaders of the household, and women are called to honor and respect their husbands and listen to their leadership. (Ephesians 5:21-33)
Better than modern christcuckery where she can divorce her polycule if you dare accidentally misgender her 4th transbian wife
but we must love eachother and accept eavhother and make world peaful
Btw anyone who's interested in studying the chapter 4 easily I suggest listening to Abdur Rahman Mossad's version with translation on youtube.
Now do Islam is right about gays and roofs.
THE TITLE LOOKS A BIT CONTRAVERSIAL
Isn't it equally utopian to believe that other races will be happy (mainly African, Latin, and Mediterranean people) will be fine and cool with being a permanent underclass they have no hope of going out of it.. on the basis of it being "meritorious". Because all that says is that they didn't try hard enough or aren't virtuous enough as a collective racial group. Thats just putting salt into the wound by calling them morally or physically incapable of doing as good as a Asian, Jewish or White person.
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-‘azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.
[Sahih Muslim, Book 008, Number 3371]
@@TheWayoftheSith
But Islam IS right about women.
Please debunk worker coops.
Kulaks are the prime example of why 'Eating the rich' is a bad thing actually.