Definitely! Lea Salonga needs more acknowledgement. A lot of people still think that Ming-Na Wen (speaking voice of Princess Mulan) and Linda Lakin (speaking voice of Princess Jasmine) sang those songs in the animated films. No offense to Ming-Na Wen and Linda Lakin. Without them, our favorite Disney Princesses would not have come alive. 👸🏽👸🏽💖
@@moonprincesst.s.h.4ever115 I agree. Let me just add Jodi Benson (The Little Mermaid) , this is when i started to notice voice actors and their amazing talents. Voiced and sang Ariel. :)
Fun fact: Notre Dame was under plans of being demolished, and Victor Hugo, who loved the place, wrote _The Hunchback of Notre Dame_ to make the landmark popular again, thus resulting in the demolition plans being thrown out.
Did you know that assassin's Creed unity is responsible for them being able to rebuild Notre Dame after the fire?? I believe they had the schematics Ubisoft for Notre Dame and it led to builders being able to rebuild Notre Dame piece by piece in the proper way.
I agree with you! That is what I was just thinking too. Twentieth Century Fox and the creator where the ones who did the job, Disney just acquired not too long ago also.
Yeah, I can't take anyone seriously who starts with Anastasia when talking about Disney films. Kinda makes it hard to trust whoever did the research for this script.
2:38 - Anna Anderson never claimed to be Anastasia, she was in a mental hospital for several year after she was found attempting to kill herself. She had total amnesia (later revealed to be caused by watching her friends and love die in an explosion at her job) and after a few years, a Russian woman saw her and proclaimed her as Anastasia. Even surviving members of house Romanov were split on the subject. The film came out after the bodies of Anastasia and her brother were found to be missing but before they were found post 2000.
Wrong. Not only did Anna Anderson claim to be Anastasia, she filed a lawsuit to attest to that claim. Of course, she was mentally unwell, and it's hard to say how much of her claim was herself and how much was suggested by others.
She didn't initially claim she was that's true, then she went back and forth but later fully embraced the identity and basically lived off it for the rest of her life.
The stories of Duchess Eleanor of Aquitaine are facinating. She was mother to King Richard the Lionheart, married King Louis of France before moving over to King Henry of England, many of her children became the heads of many of the royal houses of Europe and if it wasn't for Eleanor we wouldn't have a Lancelot in the King Arthur tales. She read the original tales and decided they needed more spice so she had her court poet write in Lancelot and the lovers triangle was born.
She was also a ruler in her own right, being the heiress to the kingdom of Aquitaine, the biggest dukedom. Her court was very focussed on the arts, she really encouraged the art of the troubadours. She was adamant to rule her lands herself and not let them be ruled by her husband, thus loosing their own identity. She went with her first husband, the king of France, on crusade to the holy land. Then she got her marriage annulled after 15 years, and married Henry Platangenet right away. He, I believe, was some 10 years younger than she. She bore him 8 children, led her oldest sons on a rebellion against their own father, got locked away by Henry for 15 years in a convent, and lastly survived her husband. She was brilliant!!!
Yes, Richard was the third son, and John the fifth (fourth legitimate). The first died in a campaign against their father, Henry II. Before all the family feuding, Eleanor had married Henry (then just a Duke) just six weeks after annulling her marriage to the King Louis VII of France, a huge insult to him. At the time, England and Aquitaine controlled more of France than France did. Oh, and no British nobility could speak the peasant Anglo-Saxon-Dane language of the country, since they were all Norman French. The first British King who spoke a modern version of English was Henry IV around 1400, about 350 years after William the Bastard took advantage of Harold Godwinson's victorious but depleted army (after defeating the Danes way up north) at the Battle of Hastings (way down south). By the way, Harold II was the last English king to sit on the British throne, nearly 1000 years ago. The rest have been French-Normans, Scots, a Dutch husband (William) and Germans (House of Hanover, renamed Windsor).
@@joannefalkinder393 Yes he did, during the Great Rebellion of 1173-74. Also, after Young King Henry died while fighting Richard in 1183, Henry II asked Richard to cede Aquitaine to John, since Richard was already heir to England, Normandy and Anjou. Aquitaine in the southwest was the largest and richest duchy in France, and belonged to Richard's mother, Eleanor, whom Henry had put in prison for the Rebellion. Richard refused, allied against Henry with Philip II of France, and drove Henry to his death in 1189 after forcing him to surrender Aquitaine and name him the rightful heir.
Nice video. Speaking of "The emperor's new groove", Among the characters eliminated in the transition from the musical to the slapstick comedy are two women: the emperor's betrothed, Nina, who was supposed to be voiced by Hill House's haunted mom, Carla Gugino , and Mata, a llama shepherdess who - we suppose - would have ended up becoming empress after the redemption of Kuzco. Mata was supposed to be a sarcastic and outspoken character who could help the emperor lama understand his mistakes and become a better person. The name was then kept for the maid of the inn where the protagonists meet / clash with the couple formed by Yzma and Kronk. And speaking of Kronk: his character was included in the cast after the plot twist; initially Yzma would have been flanked by an animated talisman, which, tired of the emperor's methods, would have plotted behind him with the witch to get him out of the way. Hucua, this is its name, has been supplanted by this year's model, Kronk, but still makes an appearance on the dinner table, in the form of a harmless candlestick.
Kind of glad they left the girls out in this case. The film has absolutely nothing to do with romance and it’s probably better that way. However, kuzco does get a love in interest in the show Emperor’s New School, Malina. Mata…Nina…Malina…huh. Tho idk how that show ended (i think it was disney’s traditional two season cancellation)
Definitely give credit to Disney creators to Atlantis, hunchback of Notre Dame, and of course princess and the 🐸. It's amazing they at least put as much effort as they can in a magical way.
Notre Dame, after seeing it in the animated movie for years and then to go to the cathedral was amazing. They really captured the beauty of Notre Dame de Paris
Actually... As a Parisian myself, I do know that the historical accuracy of the Hunchback goes further than just the cathedral. Indeed, years ago, archeologists found two bodies entertwined together, a diformed male and a young woman, whose neck had been broken... Do what you like with this fact... :)
Another correct thing about Brave is during the brief highland dance scene. All current Scottish Highland dancers would agree that the costumes and moves are correct.
The creators of Disney's "Lilo and Stitch" wanted to animate an authentic Hawaiian hula accurately to be included in their film. They went a hula school in Hawaii to see what goes into creating one. They talked to the headmaster about the different steps for the hands and feet that women would use in a real hula as a tutorial. After they recorded the hula they wanted on videotape, the director told all the animators to draw every single hand, feet, body, and head gesture accurately. As a result, most Hawaiians agree that the hula used in that film was real. Even the song, "He Mele No Lilo," was sung in Hawaiian having a male lead and a Hawaiian children's choir. When the movie was released, Disney also made a version using the Hawaiian language as a tribute to the people of those beautiful islands and their culture. The people of Hawaii were pleased with the movie. Ever since that film has been released, one can find many short videos of people recreating the hula in "Lilo and Stitch." Finally, I cannot believe that Disney wants to do a live action remake using a lot of CGI. It's not been a good move on Disney's part, and they should focus on creating new content instead of rehashing the same movies with these endless and pointless remakes.
According to ALL film development pieces AND an in-film map of the Encanto stating its founding, Pedro died in 1900. So the triplets were born on the first anniversary of the Thousand Days' War. That means the majority of the movie takes place in 1951. It also means Bruno is a month and a half older than Héctor Rivera (b. November 30, 1900).
I acknowledge that this might be an unpopular opinion, but I don’t really like people including films like Anastasia In Disney movie categories. I know Disney owns the studio, but it’s just different. If Disney ever buys AMC, are we gonna give “Breaking Bad” as an answer when someone asks us what our favorite Disney show is? And Princess Leia is not a Disney princess. There. That felt good.
True but that’s why they specifically mentioned that they’re including Fox in this when they normally wouldn’t. Mostly bc Anastasia was pretty perfect for this video, it was hard to leave out.
"And Princess Leia is not a Disney princess" The moment Disney made a movie with her in it is the moment she became a Disney princess... sorry to break it to you Lol Anastasia however is not since Disney didn't make the film. they just own the rights to it.
We are confused me as a young kid precisely because she was not a Disney princess in anyway shape or form, yes, Disney owns the property now, but still, she is not a Disney princess in the way most other Disney princesses are princesses. She’s not damsel on distress, OK she is in the first movie, but she’s more of a political princess, a concept I would not come to understand, for at least another 10 years, first saw snapshots of Star Wars when I was about five or so, so you’re taking another 5 to 10 years before I realize what a political princess is, and was the only thing she hasn’t common with most Disney princesses is that she’s most of the time wearing some thing that looks like a dress
honestly that is a blink and you'll miss it detail of the video. They have grounds to put it in the video and I don't dispute that but it'll never really be disney... at least not until Anastasia starts showing up in the official disney princess line-ups.
Okay soooo… French history scholar here. The Notre Dame we see in the film is exceedingly accurate to Notre Dame in the 20th century - not as much the Notre Dame of the story’s setting (January 1482). The spire Quasimodo summits at the climax of “Out There” is actually based on the one that stood on the cathedral in 1995, when the film was animated - which was the 19th century Viollet le Duc spire. Although interesting in its own right (and incidentally purchased with donations solicited by interest in Victor Hugo’s Notre Dame de Paris book, on which Hunchback of Notre Dame was based) it differs on several counts from the 13th century spire that would have crowned the church when (if) Quasimodo actually resided there. The most notable example is probably the statues of the 12 apostles, which le Duc’s design added. Also, fwiw, the statues Esmeralda encounters in the church would have probably still had their original paint on them at that point. Much like Hellenistic statues, medieval stone statues were often very colorful when they were new!
They won't. Because it's a 25 year old film that has no chance of making successful merchandise anymore. Also, just because Disney owns the rights to the movie doesn't make it a Disney movie.
@@vetarlittorf1807 Disney actually thanked me for being an Anastasia fan. That’s the same thing as having Nickelodeon without the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles or DC without Shazam
I have recently started to write historical fiction and I am thinking of writing a story based on something that happened during the time periods one of these Disney movies is set in. Thank you for this video Emily. ❤
It'll be interesting if they do Encanto 2 how they work it. Colombia was in the middle of another civil war (La Violencia) during the time when the original movie takes place in the early 1950s.
Damn it, I also started crying during the Encanto scene again! That is the only scene in that movie (or any other movie) that has made me cry every time!
to add to the fiction parts of "Anastasia" 1. the party held at 1916 to celebrate "300 years of good family rule" (the latter part of the quote + "spark of unhappiness" already a fiction) was actually a combo of the *1913 Romanov Tercentary* and the infamous *1903 Winter Palace Costume Ball* (hence why everyone except Nicholas were in 17th century attire, while Dagmar's outfit was a recreation of a photo currently in the UK's Royal Collection) 2. Vlad's line of Anastasia as "the heir to the Russian throne" is untrue, as the Pauline Laws state that *the imperial succession is strictly male line* (a reactionary rule in the aftermath of Paul's mother Catherine the Great's reign) 3. the Dowager Empress's fond references to Alexandra, as *Dagmar never liked Alix of Hesse as her daughter-in-law* 4. as the daughter of a Tsar, Anastasia was *entitled to wear cloth of silver* as the main material of imperial court gown. Also, Anastasia is not entitled to wear a "tiara Russe" (tiara in the kokshnik manner) due to her unmarried status (hence she should be *wearing her hair in a plait* ); normally *kokoshniks were mainly made of stiff material, the jewels were merely embedded in, and there should be a floor-length veil*
to your second point: IF Anastasia was truly alive at that time, then she would technically be the last known member of royal blood, so until she married and had a male heir, then yes. She would be the heir to the throne of Russia. Besides, Catherine the Great was an Empress, so why couldn't Anastasia be one (had the revolution not occurred, that is)
@@eternasapphiremoon81 1. Anastasia's NOT the last known member of the Romanov family AT THE TIME, as *Nicholas II had surviving brothers, uncles, cousins, & nephews* who have much higher claims than Anastasia; to reiterate the Pauline Laws, *strict male line succession* à la Japan, and only then can they entertain female succession if truly there were no more males left 2. your argument is weak: 2.a. Catherine was a *Romanov by marriage* ; she was born a German princess by the name of *Sophie Friederike Auguste von Anhalt-Zerbst-Dornburg* 2.b. *Catherine only became Empress Regnant via coup d'état* , not helped by the fact that her husband Peter III was unpopular with all sectors of Russian society, specially the military (due to his open Prussian sympathies and a huge Frederick fanboy)
And right before that, he mentions the play with "that Oedipus thing"-he and Meg saw Oedipus Rex, one of the more famous classic Greek plays (famous in part because of Freud naming a... certain complex after him, which makes his line, "Man, I thought I had problems!" way funnier imo).
Mulan is one of my favorite Disney films and I respect them for doing their research. Most people don't know that she was a real person who actually existed and could have been executed since women were not allowed to join the army in China.
Technically yes Anastasia is now a Disney Princess, but she wasn’t when the film originally came out. Edit: I didn’t watch to where she said they were gonna add the movies from Fox.
People bitching about Anastasia not being Disney literally weren't paying attention to the beginning of the video when she said they are also considering Fox films as well.
If guys didn’t know but many Fox animated films like Anastasia, Robots, Ice Age, Rio, or Epic is now considered Disney films cuz they Disney has the rights to Fox
They still didn’t make it. That’s like saying a sports team owner should take credit for championships they didn’t own the team for and therefore they didn’t build
not exactly, any movie made by pixar pre acquisition is called a pixar film, like the first toy story, any movie made after the acquisition is a disney-pixar film you don't call art made by da vinci a Smith piece if some guy named smith owns it, the credit goes to creators how is this a difficult concept?
This was an interesting video, so, thanks Ms Mojo and a happy saturday to You as well , hope i see You soon for more fun videos like this one, take care and God bless You.
Notre Dame means "Our Lady" in French in case you didn't know that. Historical details in Disney movie rock big time. 👍🏼if you're a Disney fan and a history expert at the same time.
I can't say that I am surprised at any one of these. The first ones on this list I knew. As you went down the list I had no idea. Interesting history lesson for those I didn't know.
I'm from Taiwan and familiar with Chinese culture growing up, but only realized today it didn't make sense for Mulan to cut her hair as men also had long hair then, and there's a saying that body, hair, skin are from our parents, and we shall not harm/damage them
In some cultures people cut their hair as a sign of mourning. Do you by chance know if this holds true for the era of Chinese culture Mulan takes place in? Perhaps it was a symbolic gesture of Milan mourning her old life and coming to terms with potentially never seeing her family again.
@@rockinrootbeer1795 yes, but if it were, it'd be very disrespectful for her to do that while none of her elders passed away at that time, and I think that scene in the movie is trying to show her transform into a soldier/recruit, ie. a man
Mulan has a lot of historical accuracies/references, but a lot of inaccuracies. For example, in the Xiongnu, the northern civilization China is fighting in the movie, also where Xiong Yu’s name comes from, women were sometimes soldiers! That’s why Xiong Yu isn’t that surprised that Mulan was a girl!
Thank you for pointing that out, I was going to say the exact same thing on the civilization, it was a Mongol civilization, and yes, we talked about in my two semesters of Mongol in history. My college days are long, a bit insane, and sometimes convoluted, but that sticks in my mind. If I remember, properly, it existed before Timin, the proper name of Genghis Khan. Please burn dictation for screwing any of this up.
okay Moana has been my second favorite Disney Movie for Years now (2nd only to Sleeping Beauty for PURELY nostalgic reasons lol) because of its representation of my culture (however stylized and inaccurate lol) and lovable characters that remind me of members of my own family... Now knowing the basis of the story was based on an actual event of unknown origin... I love it even more now!
I love this! One thing tho… Polynesians didn’t “colonize” the islands. We have migrated to those places to settle when no one else were around there. Did Polynesian places get colonized, yes but it wasn’t us.
Historical fact: the story of Anastacia, a girl claimed to have survived the murder of the Imperial Czar's family, turned out she was not a relation. Recent genetic testing proved she had no genetic relationship to the Romanov family.
You have missed the Disney movie UP based on real mountain called Roraima tepuy in Venezuela South America. Disney animators spent a month on the top of the mountain to experience the habitat, there is a documentary about it and the movie is exactly how the mountain is, I have been there
This way place of "Coco" and "Encanto" is a double choice to vote but in equal I consider them both😱😱😱 With placing a film in seventh place I get way more thoughts between Cars, Moana and Brave.
Another great story!!! Thank you so much for yet another wondrous, cool, awesome, beautiful.... adventure-time !! I can't wait!!! to possibly see what's next. Good luck and be safe.🤓❣️❣️
"Anastasia" was not put out by Disney. It was created by Don Bluth who also did "Thumbelina" and was distributed by 20th Century Fox. Regardless, they should have not taken such creative license with a true life personage. My girls loved this movie which came out in 1998, but the remains of the family, except for the two youngest members had been confirmed by DNA in 1997. While Anastasia and her brother's bodies were not found and positively identified until 2007, there was enough information to know she had not survived the massacre.
I think the idea behind Shanu (spelled that wrong 😅) was based on Ghengus Khan (maybe spelled that right?) so looking at it from that perspective for historical accuracy may be worth while
Kid Danger: *wearing his big trucker pup outfit and puts his hoof on his face* I love "The Empireor's new groove" and the one on #9, I haven't seen in forever! So, i'll say the 2 i just said.
Pocahontas should’ve be on the list, even though the movie overall isn’t historically accurate, it however accurately portrayed both the natives and the colonialist as trying to fight for raw materials and crops. Also the Mulan story is fictional but it inspired other young female warriors to stop an invasion in China.
Wanted to let you know a fact about Anna Anderson. Anna NEVER pretended she was Anastasia (ok, she kind of did, hear me out). Anna was going through amnesia and the people would tell her things like "You look like princess Anastasia" "You sound like princess Anastasia" "You're DEFINITELY princess Anastasia", and she slowly started believing that she WAS princess Anastasia. (Not trying to defend Anna, just teaching you facts)
The best part is she was told this in a mental institution, by a lady in waiting for an entirely different Royal court. And people started off saying you look like Tatiana and then a lady and waiting for the princess Tatiana said that she was far too short to be Tatiana so in the middle she changed it to oh I never said Tatiana I said Anastasia. So one mental patient told another mental patient that they look like a princess convinced people that they looked like this princess and then in the middle of this ruse they changed up the princess
@@iamchristian1129 not exactly, any movie made by pixar pre acquisition is called a pixar film, like the first toy story, any movie made after the acquisition is a disney-pixar film you don't call art made by da vinci a Smith piece if some guy named smith owns it, the credit goes to creators how is this a difficult concept?
it’s a shame really bond only won because its association with the classic franchise I think other than that dos oruguitas would have won. But it’s nominated for an ama!
While I love Mulan, the only really accurate part is the fact it's based on a ballad. I got interested in Chinese history randomly, and now I see so many problems, it makes me sad. The shrine to the ancestors should be in the house, cutting hair was a sign of cutting relationships specifically that between parents and children, the outfits were wrong for the time period I'm pretty sure, the whole matchmaker scene, and a few other things. I still love Mulan, but it makes me sad the animaters didn't dig that deep into ancient Chinese culture.
@@RosenrotRtLiebchen87 men didn't even cut their hair so the whole cut hair scene is redundant. It's meant to make her look manly, but just putting it up is what they did. But I suppose they needed something to show her abondonong her femininity.
there actually was a hunchback in that era in france, during the construction of notre dame, but he was a stone mason, he was a shy awkward worker, he was not held prisoner to te church by any of the clergy.
When I heard that line in princess and the frog I just thought they were talking about her gender it took me a few years of growing up to realize what it actually ment
anastasia is a 20th Century Fox movie. it doesn’t matter that disney owes them now, it wasn’t made by them. it really sucks that an animated movie can’t be good in their own rights without being associated to disney 🙄
Same with Fern Gully All Dogs Go To Heaven, A Troll in Central Park, Thumbelina... All were amazing films. Yes they were done by 20th Century Fox. But since the company was bought by Disney, they are under that umbrella, same with Lucasfilm. (yes Lucasfilm made Star Wars, Indiana Jones, etc..and yet they are now Disney properties and still their own entities)
Some of these I did not actually know. I knew the detail to Notre Dame was accurate and quite unique. But I think some of us are missing the point of this list. It's not top 10 Disney princesses. Or top 10 Disney movies. It's historical accuracies in Disney movies. So can we all agree we have different stances on Anastasia. Though to be fair she was a real life princess so the moniker Disney princess seems more respectful consider the movie owned by Disney and she is a princess. Therefore by all technicalities she is a Disney character who is a princess but that's a lot to say so Disney princess would be easier and more precise. Or you could say Disney owned princess if you wanted to be more practical but still respectful.
Golly, it’s soooo nice how Disney went out of their way to accurately depict their southern neighbour🇲🇽while going completely half-assed on depicting their northern neighbour🇨🇦☹️.
Aladdin doesn't present anything resembling the vandalism theory. The sphinx would have been under construction 4,5000 years ago, the purported act of vandalism is from 1378. Aladdin presents it as an accident by a sculptor, not an intentional defacing by Muhammad Sa'im al-Dahr millennia later. There's no agreed cause, but wind damage is more likely. The story about Napoleon's troops shooting it off that was taught in schools for decades is nothing but a story, sketches from before Napoleon's birth showed the sphinx noseless.
I know Disney acquired Fox and so, now, they own Anastasia, but it's not a Disney movie and you even used it in the thumbnail. I love that movie and I think it's underrated. So, let's give credit where credit is due.
These are the few things Disney did right! I mean come on! Anastasia couldn't possibly survive being shot, dismembered, and dumped in a well covered in cement!
Nothing in Anastasia is accurate she didn't survive the massacre, and Rasputin wasn't evil and was killed before the massacre took place. The title character is suffering from amnesia, not a fraud. So it doesn't equal a historical accurate detail.
I always love it when animated films have historical details to their stories! and since Anastasia is on this list Rest In Peace Angela Lansbury.
I KNEW that was her voice!
Beginning clip... I went ... "angela" sad sigh. I've never seen it but i knew she voiced in it.
In this video: Cant help but notice Lea Salonga's voice singing "Reflection (Mulan)" and " A Whole New World (Aladdin)" , such a fantastic singer.
The only one who did two disney princess singing voice.
Definitely! Lea Salonga needs more acknowledgement. A lot of people still think that Ming-Na Wen (speaking voice of Princess Mulan) and Linda Lakin (speaking voice of Princess Jasmine) sang those songs in the animated films.
No offense to Ming-Na Wen and Linda Lakin. Without them, our favorite Disney Princesses would not have come alive. 👸🏽👸🏽💖
@@egisantoso949 sings so good, Disney asked for her twice.
@@moonprincesst.s.h.4ever115 I agree. Let me just add Jodi Benson (The Little Mermaid) , this is when i started to notice voice actors and their amazing talents. Voiced and sang Ariel. :)
i was about to say that.
Fun fact: Notre Dame was under plans of being demolished, and Victor Hugo, who loved the place, wrote _The Hunchback of Notre Dame_ to make the landmark popular again, thus resulting in the demolition plans being thrown out.
I don't think I ever knew that! Thanks for sharing!
@@rebekahhesketh1220 I didn’t know that either
Thanks
Wowsers
Did you know that assassin's Creed unity is responsible for them being able to rebuild Notre Dame after the fire?? I believe they had the schematics Ubisoft for Notre Dame and it led to builders being able to rebuild Notre Dame piece by piece in the proper way.
I realize Anastasia now belongs to Disney but Disney can't take any credit for the research that went into that movie.
exactly, owned by is not the same as made by
we don't say that paintings are the work of the collectors who buy them do we? it's absurd
I agree with you! That is what I was just thinking too. Twentieth Century Fox and the creator where the ones who did the job, Disney just acquired not too long ago also.
Exactly. It may be owned by Disney, but that doesn't make it a Disney movie.
My thoughts as well.
Yeah, I can't take anyone seriously who starts with Anastasia when talking about Disney films. Kinda makes it hard to trust whoever did the research for this script.
2:38 - Anna Anderson never claimed to be Anastasia, she was in a mental hospital for several year after she was found attempting to kill herself.
She had total amnesia (later revealed to be caused by watching her friends and love die in an explosion at her job) and after a few years, a Russian woman saw her and proclaimed her as Anastasia.
Even surviving members of house Romanov were split on the subject. The film came out after the bodies of Anastasia and her brother were found to be missing but before they were found post 2000.
Wrong. Not only did Anna Anderson claim to be Anastasia, she filed a lawsuit to attest to that claim. Of course, she was mentally unwell, and it's hard to say how much of her claim was herself and how much was suggested by others.
The Russian royal family was related to the british royal family though queen victoria and they had hemophilia.
She didn't initially claim she was that's true, then she went back and forth but later fully embraced the identity and basically lived off it for the rest of her life.
The dos oruguitas scene from encanto gets me every time!! I literally cry like a baby every time I see it! ❤️❤️
Ugh me too.
The stories of Duchess Eleanor of Aquitaine are facinating. She was mother to King Richard the Lionheart, married King Louis of France before moving over to King Henry of England, many of her children became the heads of many of the royal houses of Europe and if it wasn't for Eleanor we wouldn't have a Lancelot in the King Arthur tales. She read the original tales and decided they needed more spice so she had her court poet write in Lancelot and the lovers triangle was born.
She was also a ruler in her own right, being the heiress to the kingdom of Aquitaine, the biggest dukedom. Her court was very focussed on the arts, she really encouraged the art of the troubadours. She was adamant to rule her lands herself and not let them be ruled by her husband, thus loosing their own identity. She went with her first husband, the king of France, on crusade to the holy land. Then she got her marriage annulled after 15 years, and married Henry Platangenet right away. He, I believe, was some 10 years younger than she. She bore him 8 children, led her oldest sons on a rebellion against their own father, got locked away by Henry for 15 years in a convent, and lastly survived her husband. She was brilliant!!!
Yes, Richard was the third son, and John the fifth (fourth legitimate). The first died in a campaign against their father, Henry II. Before all the family feuding, Eleanor had married Henry (then just a Duke) just six weeks after annulling her marriage to the King Louis VII of France, a huge insult to him. At the time, England and Aquitaine controlled more of France than France did. Oh, and no British nobility could speak the peasant Anglo-Saxon-Dane language of the country, since they were all Norman French. The first British King who spoke a modern version of English was Henry IV around 1400, about 350 years after William the Bastard took advantage of Harold Godwinson's victorious but depleted army (after defeating the Danes way up north) at the Battle of Hastings (way down south). By the way, Harold II was the last English king to sit on the British throne, nearly 1000 years ago. The rest have been French-Normans, Scots, a Dutch husband (William) and Germans (House of Hanover, renamed Windsor).
@@annamo9354 she was put under house arrest. Went to a convent when John was on the throne
@@fmmaj9noname332 Richard didn't like his father, but didn't campaign again him.
@@joannefalkinder393 Yes he did, during the Great Rebellion of 1173-74. Also, after Young King Henry died while fighting Richard in 1183, Henry II asked Richard to cede Aquitaine to John, since Richard was already heir to England, Normandy and Anjou. Aquitaine in the southwest was the largest and richest duchy in France, and belonged to Richard's mother, Eleanor, whom Henry had put in prison for the Rebellion. Richard refused, allied against Henry with Philip II of France, and drove Henry to his death in 1189 after forcing him to surrender Aquitaine and name him the rightful heir.
Nice video. Speaking of "The emperor's new groove", Among the characters eliminated in the transition from the musical to the slapstick comedy are two women: the emperor's betrothed, Nina, who was supposed to be voiced by Hill House's haunted mom, Carla Gugino , and Mata, a llama shepherdess who - we suppose - would have ended up becoming empress after the redemption of Kuzco. Mata was supposed to be a sarcastic and outspoken character who could help the emperor lama understand his mistakes and become a better person. The name was then kept for the maid of the inn where the protagonists meet / clash with the couple formed by Yzma and Kronk. And speaking of Kronk: his character was included in the cast after the plot twist; initially Yzma would have been flanked by an animated talisman, which, tired of the emperor's methods, would have plotted behind him with the witch to get him out of the way. Hucua, this is its name, has been supplanted by this year's model, Kronk, but still makes an appearance on the dinner table, in the form of a harmless candlestick.
Kind of glad they left the girls out in this case. The film has absolutely nothing to do with romance and it’s probably better that way. However, kuzco does get a love in interest in the show Emperor’s New School, Malina. Mata…Nina…Malina…huh.
Tho idk how that show ended (i think it was disney’s traditional two season cancellation)
The fact that y’all used a clip from weird history made me so happy 😂
❤❤
Same!!!! Love weird history lol
😁I caught that, too
Also with Anastasia, Disney also acquired their first *Dr. Suess movie* Horton Hears a Who
Definitely give credit to Disney creators to Atlantis, hunchback of Notre Dame, and of course princess and the 🐸. It's amazing they at least put as much effort as they can in a magical way.
Notre Dame, after seeing it in the animated movie for years and then to go to the cathedral was amazing. They really captured the beauty of Notre Dame de Paris
0:00 RIP Angela Lansbury
She will be missed
I will miss her. That was a coincidence at the start of the video to put her there, lol!
RIP Angela Lansbury grandmama Romanov in Anastasia! Died just days before her 97th birthday.
yeah, a huge peice of childhood is gone. it seems to be 2022's theme taking people who are legendary.
yes
Actually... As a Parisian myself, I do know that the historical accuracy of the Hunchback goes further than just the cathedral. Indeed, years ago, archeologists found two bodies entertwined together, a diformed male and a young woman, whose neck had been broken... Do what you like with this fact... :)
Another correct thing about Brave is during the brief highland dance scene. All current Scottish Highland dancers would agree that the costumes and moves are correct.
The creators of Disney's "Lilo and Stitch" wanted to animate an authentic Hawaiian hula accurately to be included in their film. They went a hula school in Hawaii to see what goes into creating one. They talked to the headmaster about the different steps for the hands and feet that women would use in a real hula as a tutorial. After they recorded the hula they wanted on videotape, the director told all the animators to draw every single hand, feet, body, and head gesture accurately.
As a result, most Hawaiians agree that the hula used in that film was real. Even the song, "He Mele No Lilo," was sung in Hawaiian having a male lead and a Hawaiian children's choir. When the movie was released, Disney also made a version using the Hawaiian language as a tribute to the people of those beautiful islands and their culture. The people of Hawaii were pleased with the movie. Ever since that film has been released, one can find many short videos of people recreating the hula in "Lilo and Stitch."
Finally, I cannot believe that Disney wants to do a live action remake using a lot of CGI. It's not been a good move on Disney's part, and they should focus on creating new content instead of rehashing the same movies with these endless and pointless remakes.
There has been no official word they are even interested in a live action Lilo and Stitch. So that is just a rumor right now at best.
Encanto is also known to be set in the late 40s and early 50s. This means that Alma lost Pedro in the early 1900s!
I’m assuming you mean Encanto? Maybe autocorrect?
@@persassyjackson8 yeah they mean encanto
According to ALL film development pieces AND an in-film map of the Encanto stating its founding, Pedro died in 1900. So the triplets were born on the first anniversary of the Thousand Days' War. That means the majority of the movie takes place in 1951.
It also means Bruno is a month and a half older than Héctor Rivera (b. November 30, 1900).
I acknowledge that this might be an unpopular opinion, but I don’t really like people including films like Anastasia In Disney movie categories. I know Disney owns the studio, but it’s just different. If Disney ever buys AMC, are we gonna give “Breaking Bad” as an answer when someone asks us what our favorite Disney show is? And Princess Leia is not a Disney princess. There. That felt good.
True but that’s why they specifically mentioned that they’re including Fox in this when they normally wouldn’t. Mostly bc Anastasia was pretty perfect for this video, it was hard to leave out.
@@Miyanoai14 they should keep Fox in their Disney related video from now on.
"And Princess Leia is not a Disney princess"
The moment Disney made a movie with her in it is the moment she became a Disney princess... sorry to break it to you Lol
Anastasia however is not since Disney didn't make the film. they just own the rights to it.
@@Shawnchapp That's Not How Da Force Works! Anastasia = Disney Princess
We are confused me as a young kid precisely because she was not a Disney princess in anyway shape or form, yes, Disney owns the property now, but still, she is not a Disney princess in the way most other Disney princesses are princesses. She’s not damsel on distress, OK she is in the first movie, but she’s more of a political princess, a concept I would not come to understand, for at least another 10 years, first saw snapshots of Star Wars when I was about five or so, so you’re taking another 5 to 10 years before I realize what a political princess is, and was the only thing she hasn’t common with most Disney princesses is that she’s most of the time wearing some thing that looks like a dress
Mama Odie in ‘The Princess and the Frog’ was an underrated character. So funny!
she truly was a underrated character 😔
She is my inspiration! I wanna live in a broken ol' boat in a tree in a bayou!
The movie is also underrated.
i love the movie
For the last time, Anastasia is not a Disney movie! It’s a Don Bluth animated film!
Disney acquired it with Fox. They literally mentioned it in the video.
@@siniebeck4821 agreed
@@adriangarcia543 just because it doesn’t make sense to you it makes sense to others.
@@adriangarcia543 Yeah
honestly that is a blink and you'll miss it detail of the video. They have grounds to put it in the video and I don't dispute that but it'll never really be disney... at least not until Anastasia starts showing up in the official disney princess line-ups.
Originally Anastasia wasn't from Disney, but with fusion this movie is part of the Disney , really good movie though
The video mentioned that…
Okay soooo…
French history scholar here. The Notre Dame we see in the film is exceedingly accurate to Notre Dame in the 20th century - not as much the Notre Dame of the story’s setting (January 1482).
The spire Quasimodo summits at the climax of “Out There” is actually based on the one that stood on the cathedral in 1995, when the film was animated - which was the 19th century Viollet le Duc spire. Although interesting in its own right (and incidentally purchased with donations solicited by interest in Victor Hugo’s Notre Dame de Paris book, on which Hunchback of Notre Dame was based) it differs on several counts from the 13th century spire that would have crowned the church when (if) Quasimodo actually resided there. The most notable example is probably the statues of the 12 apostles, which le Duc’s design added.
Also, fwiw, the statues Esmeralda encounters in the church would have probably still had their original paint on them at that point. Much like Hellenistic statues, medieval stone statues were often very colorful when they were new!
I wonder how long Disney has been waiting to add Anastasia to their repertoire of Disney princesses.
I just posted they are making a new anatacisa
They won't. Because it's a 25 year old film that has no chance of making successful merchandise anymore. Also, just because Disney owns the rights to the movie doesn't make it a Disney movie.
@@vetarlittorf1807 They released a Funko of her. You are racist against Anastasia.
@@vetarlittorf1807 Disney actually thanked me for being an Anastasia fan. That’s the same thing as having Nickelodeon without the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles or DC without Shazam
@@kikicallahan3662 Lol. I don't think you know what racist means...
I have recently started to write historical fiction and I am thinking of writing a story based on something that happened during the time periods one of these Disney movies is set in. Thank you for this video Emily. ❤
It'll be interesting if they do Encanto 2 how they work it. Colombia was in the middle of another civil war (La Violencia) during the time when the original movie takes place in the early 1950s.
You could say it was a “Maledicto”
Damn it, I also started crying during the Encanto scene again! That is the only scene in that movie (or any other movie) that has made me cry every time!
R.I.P. Angela Lansbury
she was the mrs potts and the duchess
to add to the fiction parts of "Anastasia"
1. the party held at 1916 to celebrate "300 years of good family rule" (the latter part of the quote + "spark of unhappiness" already a fiction) was actually a combo of the *1913 Romanov Tercentary* and the infamous *1903 Winter Palace Costume Ball* (hence why everyone except Nicholas were in 17th century attire, while Dagmar's outfit was a recreation of a photo currently in the UK's Royal Collection)
2. Vlad's line of Anastasia as "the heir to the Russian throne" is untrue, as the Pauline Laws state that *the imperial succession is strictly male line* (a reactionary rule in the aftermath of Paul's mother Catherine the Great's reign)
3. the Dowager Empress's fond references to Alexandra, as *Dagmar never liked Alix of Hesse as her daughter-in-law*
4. as the daughter of a Tsar, Anastasia was *entitled to wear cloth of silver* as the main material of imperial court gown. Also, Anastasia is not entitled to wear a "tiara Russe" (tiara in the kokshnik manner) due to her unmarried status (hence she should be *wearing her hair in a plait* ); normally *kokoshniks were mainly made of stiff material, the jewels were merely embedded in, and there should be a floor-length veil*
to your second point: IF Anastasia was truly alive at that time, then she would technically be the last known member of royal blood, so until she married and had a male heir, then yes. She would be the heir to the throne of Russia. Besides, Catherine the Great was an Empress, so why couldn't Anastasia be one (had the revolution not occurred, that is)
@@eternasapphiremoon81
1. Anastasia's NOT the last known member of the Romanov family AT THE TIME, as *Nicholas II had surviving brothers, uncles, cousins, & nephews* who have much higher claims than Anastasia; to reiterate the Pauline Laws, *strict male line succession* à la Japan, and only then can they entertain female succession if truly there were no more males left
2. your argument is weak:
2.a. Catherine was a *Romanov by marriage* ; she was born a German princess by the name of *Sophie Friederike Auguste von Anhalt-Zerbst-Dornburg*
2.b. *Catherine only became Empress Regnant via coup d'état* , not helped by the fact that her husband Peter III was unpopular with all sectors of Russian society, specially the military (due to his open Prussian sympathies and a huge Frederick fanboy)
She literally says “We are also including movies from the fox acquisition”
80: I remember Angela Lansbury was in Anastasia. Rest In Peace
On the topic of damaged works of art, there is also that statue the Hercules accidentally breaks while skipping a stone! 😂
And right before that, he mentions the play with "that Oedipus thing"-he and Meg saw Oedipus Rex, one of the more famous classic Greek plays (famous in part because of Freud naming a... certain complex after him, which makes his line, "Man, I thought I had problems!" way funnier imo).
Mulan is one of my favorite Disney films and I respect them for doing their research. Most people don't know that she was a real person who actually existed and could have been executed since women were not allowed to join the army in China.
Technically yes Anastasia is now a Disney Princess, but she wasn’t when the film originally came out.
Edit: I didn’t watch to where she said they were gonna add the movies from Fox.
Okay the one thing that drives me crazy is the fact that Anastasia is not a Disney movie.
No, indeed. It wasn't produced by Disney at the time. They've bought it now, though.
They did say in the intro they will be including films from Fox acquisition.
@@katepausig8562 true
That's true she was a real person just like pocahontas nobody thinks about that
People bitching about Anastasia not being Disney literally weren't paying attention to the beginning of the video when she said they are also considering Fox films as well.
“You’re a very good actress. Best yet in fact, but I’ve had enough.”
I will never have enough of Angela Lansbury.
The ice blocks in Frozen was actually the first thing that came to my mind.
That part makes me want to cry every time I watch it in Encanto
I ❤️ when Disney movies are based on real events and people!
I was literally thinking of the long pause earlier today
If guys didn’t know but many Fox animated films like Anastasia, Robots, Ice Age, Rio, or Epic is now considered Disney films cuz they Disney has the rights to Fox
They still didn’t make it. That’s like saying a sports team owner should take credit for championships they didn’t own the team for and therefore they didn’t build
@@DigiRangerScott PREACH IT!💪🐺✊
not exactly, any movie made by pixar pre acquisition is called a pixar film, like the first toy story, any movie made after the acquisition is a disney-pixar film
you don't call art made by da vinci a Smith piece if some guy named smith owns it, the credit goes to creators
how is this a difficult concept?
@@RosenrotRtLiebchen87 Pixar films were always called Disney-Pixar films because they were partners from the very start.
This was an interesting video, so, thanks Ms Mojo and a happy saturday to You as well , hope i see You soon for more fun videos like this one, take care and God bless You.
Notre Dame means "Our Lady" in French in case you didn't know that. Historical details in Disney movie rock big time. 👍🏼if you're a Disney fan and a history expert at the same time.
I can't say that I am surprised at any one of these. The first ones on this list I knew. As you went down the list I had no idea. Interesting history lesson for those I didn't know.
I'm from Taiwan and familiar with Chinese culture growing up, but only realized today it didn't make sense for Mulan to cut her hair as men also had long hair then, and there's a saying that body, hair, skin are from our parents, and we shall not harm/damage them
In some cultures people cut their hair as a sign of mourning. Do you by chance know if this holds true for the era of Chinese culture Mulan takes place in? Perhaps it was a symbolic gesture of Milan mourning her old life and coming to terms with potentially never seeing her family again.
@@rockinrootbeer1795 yes, but if it were, it'd be very disrespectful for her to do that while none of her elders passed away at that time, and I think that scene in the movie is trying to show her transform into a soldier/recruit, ie. a man
Mulan has a lot of historical accuracies/references, but a lot of inaccuracies. For example, in the Xiongnu, the northern civilization China is fighting in the movie, also where Xiong Yu’s name comes from, women were sometimes soldiers! That’s why Xiong Yu isn’t that surprised that Mulan was a girl!
Thank you for pointing that out, I was going to say the exact same thing on the civilization, it was a Mongol civilization, and yes, we talked about in my two semesters of Mongol in history. My college days are long, a bit insane, and sometimes convoluted, but that sticks in my mind. If I remember, properly, it existed before Timin, the proper name of Genghis Khan. Please burn dictation for screwing any of this up.
The movie you featured in the thumbnail is more 20th Century Fox and Don Bluth than true Disney…
okay Moana has been my second favorite Disney Movie for Years now (2nd only to Sleeping Beauty for PURELY nostalgic reasons lol) because of its representation of my culture (however stylized and inaccurate lol) and lovable characters that remind me of members of my own family... Now knowing the basis of the story was based on an actual event of unknown origin... I love it even more now!
I love this! One thing tho… Polynesians didn’t “colonize” the islands. We have migrated to those places to settle when no one else were around there. Did Polynesian places get colonized, yes but it wasn’t us.
Historical fact: the story of Anastacia, a girl claimed to have survived the murder of the Imperial Czar's family, turned out she was not a relation. Recent genetic testing proved she had no genetic relationship to the Romanov family.
I'm Norwegian and both my father and grandfather cut ice on a lake like they do in Frozen.
You have missed the Disney movie UP based on real mountain called Roraima tepuy in Venezuela South America. Disney animators spent a month on the top of the mountain to experience the habitat, there is a documentary about it and the movie is exactly how the mountain is, I have been there
This was beautifully done.
Rip Dame Angela Lansbury 😭🙏
Voice of ms Potts ( beauty and the beast) and in Anastasia ( the Queen I think
She was an amazing actress
Not only was she a great actress, but you are actually correct! She was Dowager Empress Marie!
No mention of Beauty and the Beast's cups forming the Eiffel Tower before it was built?
This way place of "Coco" and "Encanto" is a double choice to vote but in equal I consider them both😱😱😱
With placing a film in seventh place I get way more thoughts between Cars, Moana and Brave.
Another great story!!! Thank you so much for yet another wondrous, cool, awesome, beautiful.... adventure-time !! I can't wait!!! to possibly see what's next. Good luck and be safe.🤓❣️❣️
Amazing video ms mojo, fantastic job.
"Anastasia" was not put out by Disney. It was created by Don Bluth who also did "Thumbelina" and was distributed by 20th Century Fox. Regardless, they should have not taken such creative license with a true life personage. My girls loved this movie which came out in 1998, but the remains of the family, except for the two youngest members had been confirmed by DNA in 1997. While Anastasia and her brother's bodies were not found and positively identified until 2007, there was enough information to know she had not survived the massacre.
I think the idea behind Shanu (spelled that wrong 😅) was based on Ghengus Khan (maybe spelled that right?) so looking at it from that perspective for historical accuracy may be worth while
Corrections: Shan-Yu and Genghis Khan.
Kid Danger: *wearing his big trucker pup outfit and puts his hoof on his face* I love "The Empireor's new groove" and the one on #9, I haven't seen in forever! So, i'll say the 2 i just said.
Pocahontas should’ve be on the list, even though the movie overall isn’t historically accurate, it however accurately portrayed both the natives and the colonialist as trying to fight for raw materials and crops. Also the Mulan story is fictional but it inspired other young female warriors to stop an invasion in China.
Pocahontas isn’t accurate at all and many Native Americans have said it’s a great disservice to them
Encanto makes me cry everytime when I hear dos oruguitas and see them about to kill pedro
Another interesting fact about Disney's Mulan, she is the only Disney Princess with a body count. Truly a beautiful and smart bad***! 👸🏽🐉🗡
1. Anastasia
2. Frozen
3. Pocahontas
4. Mulan
I love history in movies 😍 especially if they do it well.
Disney's Pocahontas movie actually offended the Powhatan nation because it was so inaccurate.
Wanted to let you know a fact about Anna Anderson.
Anna NEVER pretended she was Anastasia (ok, she kind of did, hear me out). Anna was going through amnesia and the people would tell her things like "You look like princess Anastasia" "You sound like princess Anastasia" "You're DEFINITELY princess Anastasia", and she slowly started believing that she WAS princess Anastasia.
(Not trying to defend Anna, just teaching you facts)
The best part is she was told this in a mental institution, by a lady in waiting for an entirely different Royal court. And people started off saying you look like Tatiana and then a lady and waiting for the princess Tatiana said that she was far too short to be Tatiana so in the middle she changed it to oh I never said Tatiana I said Anastasia. So one mental patient told another mental patient that they look like a princess convinced people that they looked like this princess and then in the middle of this ruse they changed up the princess
@@evieveenhof9552 That's pretty interesting. Thank you for telling
@@Aldanaonair I just found it funny lol I can't believe anyone was dumb enough to think she was real. Then again it was desperate times
The first time ever we can't say Anastasia is not a Disney princess now that they own fox 🤣
I still think Coco got inspiration from The Book of Life. Highly similar
Awww the lovely Angela xx 😢😢
But, Anastasia isn't a Disney movie. What a heck Msmojo.
It is now, Since Disney bought out fox
diney owns fox so it is disney
@@iamchristian1129 not exactly, any movie made by pixar pre acquisition is called a pixar film, like the first toy story, any movie made after the acquisition is a disney-pixar film
you don't call art made by da vinci a Smith piece if some guy named smith owns it, the credit goes to creators
how is this a difficult concept?
it is an absolute crime that "dos oruguitas" didn't win the oscar, especially over that lame bond song.
I can't like this comment enough.
it’s a shame really bond only won because its association with the classic franchise I think other than that dos oruguitas would have won. But it’s nominated for an ama!
What gets me about Disney's films, they get every FOREIGN culture right, but can't do African American culture justice!
There's a theory that Moana actually died in the thunderstorm and her adventure to Te Fiti is her acceptance that she died.
While I love Mulan, the only really accurate part is the fact it's based on a ballad. I got interested in Chinese history randomly, and now I see so many problems, it makes me sad. The shrine to the ancestors should be in the house, cutting hair was a sign of cutting relationships specifically that between parents and children, the outfits were wrong for the time period I'm pretty sure, the whole matchmaker scene, and a few other things. I still love Mulan, but it makes me sad the animaters didn't dig that deep into ancient Chinese culture.
also wasn't it kinda pointless to cut her hair short to appear as a man? didn't they often have long hair tied up?
@@RosenrotRtLiebchen87 men didn't even cut their hair so the whole cut hair scene is redundant. It's meant to make her look manly, but just putting it up is what they did. But I suppose they needed something to show her abondonong her femininity.
The Hunchback some papers from the time talked about a hunchback who worked or was a foreman during the building or renovations.
Thanks!
Thank you so much for the support :)
there actually was a hunchback in that era in france, during the construction of notre dame, but he was a stone mason, he was a shy awkward worker, he was not held prisoner to te church by any of the clergy.
When I heard that line in princess and the frog I just thought they were talking about her gender it took me a few years of growing up to realize what it actually ment
anastasia is a 20th Century Fox movie. it doesn’t matter that disney owes them now, it wasn’t made by them. it really sucks that an animated movie can’t be good in their own rights without being associated to disney 🙄
Same with Fern Gully All Dogs Go To Heaven, A Troll in Central Park, Thumbelina... All were amazing films. Yes they were done by 20th Century Fox. But since the company was bought by Disney, they are under that umbrella, same with Lucasfilm. (yes Lucasfilm made Star Wars, Indiana Jones, etc..and yet they are now Disney properties and still their own entities)
I always thought brave was Irish- my Scottish granny would be so ashamed of me LOL
You forgot to mention that Coco is an actual lady in Mexico 🇲🇽 that received no credit 😢
Really?? I’m intrigued
Interesting movies with so much info.😀
Some of these I did not actually know. I knew the detail to Notre Dame was accurate and quite unique. But I think some of us are missing the point of this list. It's not top 10 Disney princesses. Or top 10 Disney movies. It's historical accuracies in Disney movies. So can we all agree we have different stances on Anastasia. Though to be fair she was a real life princess so the moniker Disney princess seems more respectful consider the movie owned by Disney and she is a princess. Therefore by all technicalities she is a Disney character who is a princess but that's a lot to say so Disney princess would be easier and more precise. Or you could say Disney owned princess if you wanted to be more practical but still respectful.
Golly, it’s soooo nice how Disney went out of their way to accurately depict their southern neighbour🇲🇽while going completely half-assed on depicting their northern neighbour🇨🇦☹️.
Anastasia wasn’t a Disney movie until the merger
Thank you !
I was gonna say this
People mistaking Anastasia as a Disney film is a major facepalm, like honestly.🤦🏽♂️
Well, technically it is one now, in the sense of being owned by Disney.
@@juanrisa945 Anastasia is and always will be a Don Bluth film, period.
A very nicely done video
Aladdin doesn't present anything resembling the vandalism theory.
The sphinx would have been under construction 4,5000 years ago, the purported act of vandalism is from 1378. Aladdin presents it as an accident by a sculptor, not an intentional defacing by Muhammad Sa'im al-Dahr millennia later. There's no agreed cause, but wind damage is more likely. The story about Napoleon's troops shooting it off that was taught in schools for decades is nothing but a story, sketches from before Napoleon's birth showed the sphinx noseless.
If only we actually knew what happened to Anastasia.
I know Disney acquired Fox and so, now, they own Anastasia, but it's not a Disney movie and you even used it in the thumbnail. I love that movie and I think it's underrated. So, let's give credit where credit is due.
These are the few things Disney did right! I mean come on! Anastasia couldn't possibly survive being shot, dismembered, and dumped in a well covered in cement!
Anastasia is a Don Bluth film.
which is a fox movie which is own by disney
Nothing in Anastasia is accurate she didn't survive the massacre, and Rasputin wasn't evil and was killed before the massacre took place.
The title character is suffering from amnesia, not a fraud. So it doesn't equal a historical accurate detail.
8:15 sadly, one can no longer properly admire the architecture of Notre Dame in person
Anastasia isn't a Disney movie, they just own it.
Hence why they said in the intro they will be including films from the Fox acquisition.
Doesn't matter if Fox and Disney have combined. Anastasia still isn't a Disney princess.
you have movies that give you an accurate piece of history
and then you have Pocahontas
fr tho
Encanto is the only animation that can make me cry
Nice