In fact, King George III was not treating the Colonies fair. He treated them more like slave labor. They could never get ahead. They would manipulate trade deals so we always owed more to the Crown and could never seem to get out of debt. We were dealing in tobacco, rum and cotton and every time we got the short end of the stick.
Peggy! It’s not uncommon to die on the toilet. The bearing down (from trying to push out a constipated bit of fecal matter), can increase the blood pressure which can then dislodge a clot or piece of place that can then travel to the brain, lung, or other parts of the body, causing a stroke.
Actually King Edward VII was crowned at 59, the oldest to be crowned to date, Charles if he outlives his mother will be 70 and counting. However, when George IV was around 50 he became "de facto" King as his father, George III was declared incompetent due to dementia so a Regency was formed and George IV was the Regent.
@@Yasin_2312 Thanks. However, Charles if he outlives his mother will be the oldest as he is already past 70 as his mother is the oldest Monarch in English history. Until Charles, Edward VII was the longest reigning heir as he was born heir and took the crown at 59. Charles became heir at 3 and William IV became heir at 54, when his brother George IV took the crown from their father.
@@janefelix3821 he won’t be king because Queen Elizabeth II is inevitable. She will outlive everyone. Even Prince William, Prince George, even you, even me, and every human ever
George iv is where the nursery rhyme comes from Georgie-porgie puddin' & pie, kissed the girls and made them cry, but when the boys came out to play Georgie-porgie ran away
Victoria was the last of the Hanoverians. Like her predecessors she had a very strained relationship with most of her children, including the Prince of Wales (later Edward VII).
@@gidzmobug2323 George III was Hanover too. Victoria was the last Hanover because the children take the father's family so her son was a Saxe-Colmburg Goethe. During WW1 her grandson, George V changed it to Windsor.
What a change in tone George VI was, a man who truly loved his children. The British royal family has had the good fortune of several great "resets" after bad leaders, including Victoria not long after George IV and George VI after his brother Edward VIII and father George V.
George III was a great king. If he didn't bet on the responsibility that came with his power, the whole kingdom would've been bankrupt long before George IV took the throne. His subjects adored him, he avoided war for as long as he could, and if involved, he did everything he could to support his army. There's actual evidence that the king kept a list of war expenses- so he wasn't just sitting around letting his docile prime minister do his will, he lifted his finger and when needed the extra hand, called for different ideas. He wasn't bad at all.
Don't forget his bloody son King George II and his blood son the Duke of Cumberland. He killed all the innocent women and children of the Highlands in Scotland. They went out and shot them. They captured the men and took them as slaves or imprisoned them.
yeah, his story is actually the one i sympathize with the most. he not only had a terrible childhood, but his mental illness became the only thing he was known for. you really dont hear a lot about the george, that made sure that the woman who had tried to murder him got proper care, the george who said right after almost being stabbed ”the poor creature is mad! do not hurt her, for she has not hurt me!!”. you also dont hear about the george, who was a caring and loving father (something very unusual for royalty) and a faithful husband, nor about the george who was tortured horribly by so-called doctors that george the fourth hired to ”fix” his mental illness. i wish someone would talk more about that george. thats the george i want to hear more about.
Yeah Charles V had ever other European Monarch in history beat. At his zenith he owned virtually all of continental Europe other than France, Scandinavia, and Russia. At least 60% of the Americas, and even the Philippines. The first Empire on which the sun truly never set.
George 1: I took the throne of England, just cuz I was Protestant A German prince who's English stank King George number one. George 2: I like to argue, now that's clear Especially with my father here And before I died of diarrhea I fought with my son. George 3: I broke records with my sixty year reign. George 4: And I broke the scales with my giant frame.
Fun Fact: In the Brighton Pavilion, The once Prince George 4th had built a tunnel reaching from the Pavillion palace to Maria Fitzherbert's house which was around the corner and George used to secretly meet with Maria in the tunnel.
I heard about it from another documentary and followed up on it. The story goes that In August 2016 bones were found under the Leineschloss castle during a renovation project and they were believed to be the remains. Testing proved the bones came from 5 different Human skeletons along with some animal bones. The other part of the story is that when he was caught in the act of trying to elope more or less with the Princess out of the castle, he was caught by the guards and George Louis had him murdered and the corpse dumped in the Leine River. His body was never found. Makes sense. I always had a hard time believing that somebody could just stash a rotting corpse under some wooden floor boards in a house and NOBODY notice the smell???
How come it always seemed like these kings had no trouble having children out of wedlock but could never had children with their actual wives?? And NOT from lack of trying 😂
In modern times, fertility problems are a two-way street; 50% of the time, something's wrong w/ the guy; 50% of the time, something's wrong w/ the gal. I don't see why it would be any different in earlier times; sometimes women were just 'barren' just as men are sometimes 'impotent.' For example, William III & Mary II had no children b/c Mary had suffered an early miscarriage which rendered her infertile. Earlier, Charles II's wife Catherine of Braganza is assumed to be infertile, since she never had any pregnancies while Charles had plenty of illegitimate children. Or even going back to Henry VIII; his early fertility problems w/ Catherine of Aragon probably had to do w/ Catherine (Catherine was quite a bit more inbred than Henry was, & supposedly she liked fasting even while pregnant). By the time Henry manages to annul his marriage to Catherine, he's in his 40s. Men in their 40s can suffer a dramatic loss of fertility. It seems possible to me that he fathered Elizabeth & Ed while subfertile. He was also becoming quite obese at this age, & obesity can also dramatically lower male fertility. He was certainly impotent by the time he married Catherine Howard. In the case of George IV & his wife, it had nothing to do w/ fertility; they simply hated each other, & literally the only night they could be bothered to sleep w/ each other was their wedding night, which just so happened to produce Charlotte of Wales. George's brothers, at the time of Charlotte's untimely death, were either unmarried (as they preferred the bachelor life) or in marriages as equally miserable as his own. By the time they *do* contract marriages, most of them are, like Henry VIII, in their 40s or older. B/c the Hanoverians tend to be a bit heavy-set & corpulent themselves, some of them may have been infertile themselves at the time. Enough of them managed to father children to keep the line going, however. There are still male-line Hanoverians alive today, even; the descendants of Queen Victoria's uncle Ernest Augustus, who succeeded William IV in Hanover due to the practice of Salic Law in those territories.
King William IV who had 10 children with actress Dorothea Bland did not marry until he was 53 figuring that being the third son, chances are neither he nor any of his issues would make it to be ruler. However, since his older brother George, son #1, hated his wife, he only produced two legitimate children, and one died before the age of 1, common in those days. So everyone banked on Charlotte being a future Queen, especially once she married and became pregnant by 19. When she died in childbirth to a stillborn, it mean that there were no legitimate grandchildren for King George III. Since George's (son) wife was 48, she could not produce any more children and his second son, Frederick passed without children. So there was a rush for the other sons to produce an heir. William did marry and had 2 children, but they died by age 2, again common. By this time he was around 57, so his fertility was in question. So the remaining 3 sons, each had on child, given they were also around 50. So the child from the oldest of those three was Victoria, daughter of son #4, Edward, who died before Victoria turned 1, thus no younger brother to displace her. Victoria did her primary job as Queen and had 9 children, so no heir issues, as did all the future rulers, except for Edward VIII, who led to a scandal with an American divorcee, but that is another story.
@@janefelix3821 actually George IV only had one kid, Princess Charlotte. Also, Princess Charlotte married at twnery, suffered a miscarriage, became pregnant again, but died after childbirth at 21.
@@napoleonbonaparte7529 Thanks. The only point was that George IV's wife died a year into his reign and I'm sure there was some pressure for him to try for an heir, as any child he had would have been next in line. However, assuming he waited the customary year for morning, he would have been around 60 for a remarriage, so I'm sure that given some of his brothers produced heirs by then, William (though they died young), Edward, Ernest, and Adolphus, the need for legitimate grandchildren was not as pressing.
I think it was the fact that the "marriage pool" for royals was relatively small for so many generations, allowing for undesirable fertility issues and other genetic health problems (which can also themselves contribute to miscarriages and whatnot) to be passed down. Of course average people did not usually marry outside of their class, but even so the royal marriage pool was far smaller and had to be navigated carefully for special political reasons, too.
My husband’s niece just married Prince Christian of Hanover 3 years ago, and they’ve had twins (a boy and a girl) in the meantime, which are now cousins to my daughter, so I’ve come to be very interested in the Hanover history.
The present British royals are descendants of Mary, Queen of Scots. Hanover King George I's mother Sophia, Electress of Hanover was descended from Mary Stuart, who was her great-grandmother.
While if you want to be technical they are all descended from Elizabeth Woodville, Queen Consort to King Edward IV, as they were the great-great grandparents of Mary Queen of Scots.
@@janefelix3821 If you want to get *even more* technical, they descend from a great number of German Houses as well (that maligned connection). Of course, the future George II declared, upon his arrival to England, that he had not a drop of blood that was not English. So, how do we square these claims away? Well, both of George II's parents belonged to the House of Guelph (or Hanover, or Brunswick-Lüneburg, whichever branch-name you prefer), a House of storied history in the Holy Roman Empire; it produced 1 Emperor (Otto IV) & several Dukes of Saxony. More importantly for our question, it was also deemed noble enough for King Henry II of England to marry his eldest daughter by Eleanor of Aquitaine in to. Matilda of England dutifully married the Duke of Saxony & had several sons; Henry, count Palatine (cognatic ancestor of the Wittelsbachs), Emperor Otto IV (beloved nephew of Richard the Lionhearted), & William, duke of Lüneburg. George II traced his male-line from the later. Thus you could say, even his 'German' blood was not without some drop of English in it. Even the present dynasty has its English connections. While the 'official' name of the House is Windsor, its 'proper' name is Saxe-Coburg & Gotha (or Wettin, if you prefer the dynastic name). The branch of this family to which Prince Albert belonged was not particularly prominent, but it did have its moments; it descended in the all-male line from Frederick I, margrave of Meissen. Margrave Frederick was not much of a historical figure himself, but he was descended from the best of them; his mother was Margaret of Sicily, only surviving child of the final Hohenstaufen Emperor, Frederick II by his 3rd wife, Isabella of England, daughter of John Lackland. Since Frederick II's other legitimate line culminated in Conradin, who died at the hands of Charles of Anjou, Margaret's line is the sole surviving legitimate descent from Emperor Frederick II (tho. his bastard son Manfred became ancestor to the Aragonese royal family, & from them, the Habsburgs). Upon his half-cousin Conradin's death, Margrave Frederick was considered one of the few hopes of the Ghibelline faction (the Hohenstaufen partisans), but this never amounted to anything. No doubt, these connections are distant, but when it comes to matters of genealogical consequence, I find them interesting nonetheless...
@@jeandehuit5385 Interesting. Don't forget all of the rulers from the House of Hanover married German royalty, thus their children would be 3/4 German. The first to break from that tradition was the future Edward VII, he married Danish Royalty, but by then Germany and England began going on the outs. While Edward VII was not from the House of Hanover, technically, his mother, Queen Victoria was, it was just back then the children derived their family name from the father, even if the mother was the ruler, don't forget while Victoria was the 5th Queen Regnant of England, she was the first to produce and heir, so the others did not run into that issue.
Loves these videos. The photos are great to help tell the story and the voice is clear and easy to listen to. Thank you for helping explain the British Monarchy
Many of this is pretty inaccurate and seems to only highlight the bad things, the Hanoverians did and ignoring all the good things. Firstly George I. did not spend as little time in England as possible. He spend about 4/5 of his 13 year reign in England and only visited Hanover five times for very short time periods (after all he had lived there for 50 years before he ascended the British throne). Also he actually did speak English (and Latin and French and German and Italian and Dutch) but mostly corresponded in French with officials, which was customary at all European courts during that time and also he didn't talk much in general because he was rather shy and reserved. Also it was never proven that he killed his wife's Lover (although that's porbably what happened) and it is not known where said lover is buried as his body hasn't been found to this very day. Secondly George II. may have had mistresses but he had loved his wive Queen Caroline dearly - having mistresses was fairly normal forna King in that time. Also it should be noted that he was the last king to personally lead his troops into battle and he did not go that harsh on the Scottish because he was a tyrant but because what they did was high treason and because he was aware of the fact that should the Stuart pretender succeed to the throne there would be civil war because almost everyone in GB was against a catholic monarch so you could say he had no choice but to strike hard during that time. Also George III. did not rule more absolute than his predecessors. On the contrary he even signed over the crown estate to the parliament hereby loosing more ofnhis financial independency. Rumors that the spend money on political candidates he favoured could not be proven but what we do know is that he donated huge sums to the royal acadamy and to charity in general. He had on occasions named members of government against his will because of parliament and he also forbade extending the American colonies further to get the colonists to negotiate with native Americans instead of just stealing their land (which made him unpopular amongst the colonists). Also he pardoned two assasins who had made attempts on his life and was overall very popular in Britain during his sane periods. Also you just gotta love how the Hanoverians are painted as trying to rule absolute here while actually it was under theyr rule that Britain really became a parliamentary Monarchy. The rulers that came before them all exercised much more power and it was only during the Hanover reign that parliament and prime minister (a position established by George I.) continuusly gained more power. By the time Victoria ascended the throne the UK was a fully formed democracy and you could say that the UK owes that to the House of Hanover because they established the necessary precedences by forming goverments and listening to parliament much more than their predecessors the Stuarts.
IDK because what they did sounds just like what the Thai royals are doing to their people in the past 100 years. Being "less absolute" isn't much a credit considering the context of the world in that time--every other modern countries have progressed past absolute monarchy. One would also argue that the royal HAD TO be less absolute, for their very own survival (see France). They couldn't resist the will of the people, so they might as well did it themselves to prevent revolution i.e. death.
The climate change you mentioned a few episodes back was still in force, and was one of the major reasons for the poverty and disquiet under the Georges. This culminated in 1816, which was dubbed, "The Year Without a Summer." It was the reason for the bad harvest of that year. I recommend the song "1816: The Year Without a Summer" by Rasputina, which does a great job of capturing the horrors of the "Mini-Ice Age." It's also just a great band; I've seen them live twice and hope to do so again. I am enjoying your videos tremendously, and subscribed. Keep up the good work!
15:00 This is a bit harsh on William IV. He wasn't opposed to reform as such. However, the House of Lords repeatedly voted against the Reform Act, and William was put under pressure to create new peers to pad the House of Lords with supporters of the Act. He felt that this was an abuse of his powers and initially refused. Eventually he agreed to do it, but by then the threat was enough and the Lords relented and abstained from further votes, allowing the bill to pass. William's popularity did take a hit, but it subsequently recovered and he is generally regarded as a capable monarch at a very difficult time in history.
As a kid, I hated that movie's title because it confused me with this dynasty. Now I think it describes the Hanoverians better than most history textbooks.
@@schoolssection The Bourbon restoration was largely pressured onto the French people by outside forces. The people barely tolerated Louis XVIII, but then his power hungry brother Charles X tried to take France back to more absolutist rule (instead of the new constitutional system). The French public and legislature furiously rebelled and then declared the leader of the House of Orleans, Louis Philippe as the new king. Charles X was forced to abdicate and LP had many of his court thrown into prison. 18 years later though, LP was overthrown after he lost public support. A republic was in place for about 4 years, then Napoleon III seized power and became Emperor after the public overwhelmingly approved a referendum (apparently legitimate).
The modern Royal Family is called Windsor, because in 1917 King George V change his house name from Hanover to Windsor. Which simultaneously ended British and German relations during the last year of World War I.
That was because of the anti-German sentiment in the British Empire during World War I. Dropping completely their German name was for their own sake of survival as the have witnessed how many other the once so powerful European Royal houses have been taken down by revolution and war...
@@fawziabdulhamid5186. At the same time Czar Nicholas II changed the name of his capital city from "St. Petersburg" to "Petrograd" for the same reason. After that time the city was renamed "Leningrad" but now it is called by its original name "St. Petersburg". It is no longer the capital city of Russia.
@@ingriddubbel8468 The Hanover dynasty ended upon Victoria's death. The reigning house became the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha when her son Edward VII became the monarch.
Yes, but she changed her name and is usually seen as the first monarch of the house Saxe-coburg Gotha. The same house that still rules to this day but changed there name to Windsor during the first war to distance themselves from Germany and to seem more British.
Ironic how George III was called mad yet he sounds like the most normal and reasonable person in the family. And even his madness can be explained by the at best ineffective treatments from his doctors
@@maryannlockwood7806 Samuel Francis Smith completed the lyrics of "America (My Country, 'Tis of Thee)" in 30 minutes. It was first performed in public on July 4, 1831.
I am surprised that you do not mention the fact that the melody from God Save the King was used for a very popular American song, My Country tis of Thee. It is a very popular patriotic song that more Americans know by heart than The Star Spangled Banner.
The main focus of this video is the monarchy of the United Kingdom, not the de facto national anthem of the United States before the adoption of "The Star-Spangled Banner".
L B I have read that the melody was from an originally English drinking song. When my grandfather immigrated from England to the USA in about 1903, He & his very English brother in law went to a the theater for some vaudeville entertainment. At the beginning of the performance, the audience rose and sang The National Anthem, but my grand father & his friend sang “God Save The Queen”, and were then THROWN out of the theater by the other audience members!!! There was no insult intended, they just sang it from habit!
4:59 France Austria vs Britain Prussia Seven years war 6:41 stamp act 6:20 enclosure act 6:59 1776 7:29 James cook australia 10:16 Ireland rebelled 1798 11:47 Britain won Napoleonic war
0:30)It was Henri I, II, III, IV, V, & VI. Norman French was spoken in the royal court. 0:46)German was spoken from George I to Queen Victoria. About 200 years. 10:18)What was called a rebellion in Ireland is self defense.The leaders were murdered! 1155 AD, the English Pope Adrian IV (AKA Nicholas Breakspear)made Henri II, overlord of Ireland. France also had Henri I, II, III, and IV. Jean I & II (John). The reason George V dropped the name Saxe-Coburg - Gotha is simple. The First London Blitz was done with Zeppelins & Gotha bombers.There was the 4 engine Gotha Giants. His brother-in-law changed his name from Battenburg to Montbatten.
Sooo-we actually have more information on George 3. It is suspected he had bipolar disorder. But one of the meds to treat porphyria had the side effect of blue urine.
William IV never married his mistress Dorothea Jordan. He had just lived with her for 20 years. P.S. at 4:54 Russian Orthodoxy is NOT Catholicism. Ever heard of the Great Schism?
And so began the Hanover gang, George One and George Two - grim Then George the Third was quite absurd - Till I replaced old him. King George the Fourth, and known henceforth, was angry, fat and cross - Hang on! It’s true you beat Napoleon, but were mostly a dead loss - Bang on. Old William Four was a sailor - Ahoy - It’s nearly the end of the story-a As onto the scene comes the best loved queen; hail to Queen Victoriaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
@@khalilissa5283 Henry Stephen henry richard john oi henry Edward Edward Edward richard henry Henry henry Edward Edward richard henry henry Edward Mary Elizabeth James Charles Charles James Anne Mary George George George George William
I love this, and truth to be told i love the way you explain History. Question tho have you talked about the Prime Ministers of England yet? If not, can you please? 🙂😗
SOPHIA DOROTHEA: I WAS THE SAD ONE CAROLINE OF ANSBACH: I WAS THE BAD ONE CHARLOTTE OF MECKLENBURG-STRELITZ: I WAS THE MAD ONE MARIA FITZHERBERT + CAROLINE OF BRUNSWICK: AND I WAS THE FAT ONE DOROTHEA JORDAN + ADELAIDE OF SAXE-MEININGEN: AND I WAS THE FAT ONE
He brought one mistress to England. The "elephant" was a half sister (illegitimate I believe). She's often mistakenly called his mistress however, there are documents where George I says they share the same blood.
George II became king in June of 1727 or June 11th/22nd at 43 until October30th age 44 (not 47) and was king until October 25th 1760(age 76). he was Unpopular as king until 1743. George participated at the Battle of Dettingen June 27th 1743, and thus became the last British monarch to lead an army in battle. He ruled as king for over 33 years and for the first 14 years of his reign sir Robert Walpole(born August 26th 1676)was still the first official Prime minister of Great Britain r. April 3rd 1721(age 44)to February 11th 1742(age 65) for over 20 years,he died March 18th 1745 age 68. Who served at most 19 years in parliament before becoming the first prime minister and in time was succeeded by William Pitt the elder July 30th 1766(age 57) to October 14th 1768(age 59) who did serve in the army from c. 1730(age 22) until 1734(age 26) During the seven years war May 17th 1756 to February 10th he more less controlled the privy purse of Parliament or Secretary of State form December 1756(age 48)to April 6th 1757(age 48), June 27th 1757(age 48)to October 6th 1761(age 52) who died May 11th 1778(age 69) his son was William Pitt the younger who died January 23rd 1806(age 46) while in office as prime minister of Great Britain December 19th 1783(age 24) January 1st 1801(age 41), prime minister of the united kingdom January 1st 1801(age 41) to March 14th 1801( 41), May 10th 1804(age 44) to January 23rd 1806(age 46). Chancellor of the Exchquer July 10th 1782(age 23) to March 31st 1783(age 23), December 19th 1783(age 24) to March 14th 1801(age 41), May 10th 1804(age 44) to January 23rd 1896(age 46).
I'm glad America got it's freedom The Hanoverians reaved My country, but We Scot's endured. The painting used in this video at 6.56, in the background there are only Union Jack and English flags.. no Scottish, Welsh or N.Irish flags in sight. This should speak volumes historically, about who was really wielding power over "the Empire"! Wonderful video as always :)
I took the throne of England Just ’cos I was protestant A German, a prince whose English stank, King George number one. I like to argue, now that’s clear Especially with my father here And when he died of diarrhoea I fought with my son. I broke records with my sixty year reign And I broke the scales with my giant frame. Born to rule over you King George four, three, one and two You had to do what we told you to Just because our blood was blue. I was a hunk, girls adored me Ladies all swooned before me They would do anything for me Or I’d have their husbands killed. Had a war with Prince Charles Bonnie Everyone said that I was f-f-funny I spent everyone’s money Our subjects were not thrilled. I was the sad one, I was the bad one I was the mad one, and I was the fat one. We were born to rule over yGeorges one, three, four and two. England’s kings, though we were German too Him, then him, then me, then you. (We were born) Born to rule over you (born to rule) Gorged on fruit then I died on the loo. People hated us, and we hated them too. Born to rule over you. Born to rule over you Me I was as batty as a bonkers kangaroo. Me I would have been more at home in a zoo And now, now our song is through. Yeah… Georges. (Banana.)
the point you have forgotten, to mention, is that the electorate-kingdom of hannover shared the same monarch....until victoria became queen of the UK.... the madness of george III, could have been heridetary or like the habsburgs and other royal dynasties, close inbreeding..., its seldom even mentioned....
This is both simplistic and delusional in its descriptions of events, entirely ignoring important constitutional developments and the importance of, and affection with which these monarchs were held. George III (Farmer George) was much more popular and important than depicted. This work also takes on a decidedly anti-monarchical tone.
They’re royal families who 1)Rarely chose their wife, so their offspring is related to the wife they didn’t want 2)They lived away from them, raised by government officals, so they didn’t grow up with them, raising them
Ashley Liss. Dying in the toilet is not as rare as one might imagine. Forceful bearing down can often cause a rise in blood pressure, the elevated blood pressure can dislodge a blood clot, and then the elevated pressure pushes the clot to the lungs or brain or some other vital organ. When blood pressure is elevated, think of a water/lawn hose that’s being deliberated twisted or depressed to increase the forcefulness of the water flow to wash off an area or stain/debris from the sidewalk.
Plus a lot of the German states were Protestant too, i.e. Prussia, Hesse, Hanover (for a while the same King was also the English King), Denmark, to name a few.
George hated George while George in the other hands hates George and George as well.
Thats a lot of georges
You forgot George. He hated George's son George and his cousin George so much that George didn't speak to George, George, and George for years
@Johnny Yes! Let us Raise the Glass and Say a Toast! TO ALL THE GEORGES! YOU CAN NEVER HAVE TOO MANY! CHEERS, EVERYONE! 🍻
I am currently dying EDIT: Grammar
It's a George Problem. Rich Men didn't want to pay tax.
"It's a Hannover family tradition that fathers and sons hated each other" Pffftttt!!! That got me rolling on the floor
George I : I was the sad one
George II: I was the bad one
George III: I was the mad one
George iv: and I was the fat one
George's name is the curse...
Weren't George I and George II equally bad?
Queen Victoria: im all of that
George Washington: I was the rebellious one- wait I wasn't in this song
This was never part in the script
George 1 was the bad one
I dont blame George for hating his father, I would hate my father too if he imprisoned my mother.
#Facts!!!
Henry II: First time?
Which one
@Syndicalist Juelz ik just a joke
"Why did America revolt against George III?"
"Because they want their tea cheap."
And that's the tea
In fact, King George III was not treating the Colonies fair. He treated them more like slave labor. They could never get ahead. They would manipulate trade deals so we always owed more to the Crown and could never seem to get out of debt. We were dealing in tobacco, rum and cotton and every time we got the short end of the stick.
Nah we just throw that shit in the harbor
I can't blame them. I'm very thrifty... And I'm a proud American...
I know this is a joke but no American revolt against George lll because he took there right and money greedy
Can ya blame them that shit can be expensive if it's all they could drink especially those without a real, clean, proper water source.
"He died. On the toilet."
But... why? And how? And why specifically on the toilet? _Don't leave us like this-_
Peggy! It’s not uncommon to die on the toilet. The bearing down (from trying to push out a constipated bit of fecal matter), can increase the blood pressure which can then dislodge a clot or piece of place that can then travel to the brain, lung, or other parts of the body, causing a stroke.
Called a Code Brown......valsalva
Bonnie Long Yes! And it can also stimulate your vagus nerve causing a heart attack.
I don't know, history buffs like me and her just like saying it.
He had a Royal Flush.
I'm obssesed with these videos 😩💙
Same
Saaammmmmme
Ikr!😍👌🏾
Right? I love to look to the men of old for vigor in the current struggle of life
Me too 😪😂!
George IV :Finally after 58 years i am ki-
Prince charles:Hold my beer!
Actually King Edward VII was crowned at 59, the oldest to be crowned to date, Charles if he outlives his mother will be 70 and counting. However, when George IV was around 50 he became "de facto" King as his father, George III was declared incompetent due to dementia so a Regency was formed and George IV was the Regent.
@@janefelix3821 William IV was actually the the oldest crowned to date. He was crowned at 64
@@Yasin_2312 Thanks. However, Charles if he outlives his mother will be the oldest as he is already past 70 as his mother is the oldest Monarch in English history. Until Charles, Edward VII was the longest reigning heir as he was born heir and took the crown at 59. Charles became heir at 3 and William IV became heir at 54, when his brother George IV took the crown from their father.
@@janefelix3821 yes that’s true
@@janefelix3821 he won’t be king because Queen Elizabeth II is inevitable. She will outlive everyone. Even Prince William, Prince George, even you, even me, and every human ever
The hannover gang! George george george george will victoria!
I was searching for a Horrible Histories reference.
I am wanting more horrible histories references
Yes
Horrible Histories reference! Please be my friend!
"I was the sad one"
"And I was the bad one"
"I was the MAD ONE!"
"And I was the fat one"
"Born to rule all over you, King George I, IV, III and II"
“He died. On the toilet”
...he what?
Died while attending Chamber Bussiness
Yeah. The toilet. That’s where he died.
tyrion approves
Canela Escobar Stanke If it’s good enough for The King of Rock n’ Roll, it’s good enough for any king.
This is crappy
George iv is where the nursery rhyme comes from
Georgie-porgie puddin' & pie,
kissed the girls and made them cry,
but when the boys came out to play
Georgie-porgie ran away
Lmfao
yuck
Anyone else hear the Toto song in their head as they read that?
Victoria was the last of the Hanoverians. Like her predecessors she had a very strained relationship with most of her children, including the Prince of Wales (later Edward VII).
Princess caroline is married into the house of Hanover
@@maggiemae7749 Yes, but her husband is a descendant of George III, not of Victoria.
@@gidzmobug2323 George III was Hanover too. Victoria was the last Hanover because the children take the father's family so her son was a Saxe-Colmburg Goethe. During WW1 her grandson, George V changed it to Windsor.
What a change in tone George VI was, a man who truly loved his children. The British royal family has had the good fortune of several great "resets" after bad leaders, including Victoria not long after George IV and George VI after his brother Edward VIII and father George V.
@@thunderbird1921it’s just sad that George VI was a good man, but married a narcissist (the Queen Mother)
George III was a great king. If he didn't bet on the responsibility that came with his power, the whole kingdom would've been bankrupt long before George IV took the throne. His subjects adored him, he avoided war for as long as he could, and if involved, he did everything he could to support his army. There's actual evidence that the king kept a list of war expenses- so he wasn't just sitting around letting his docile prime minister do his will, he lifted his finger and when needed the extra hand, called for different ideas. He wasn't bad at all.
Fr preach
People only remember the time he was mad but he's one of our best kings we had
Fax
As an American, I can see that some people are just braindead.
God save the King th-cam.com/video/6oB3vAnfV9w/w-d-xo.html🇬🇧
The part on George III is a bit harsh. You should have mentioned how successfull his reign actually was.
Kendy He was the longest reigning King and third longest reigning monarch in British History!
Don't forget his bloody son King George II and his blood son the Duke of Cumberland. He killed all the innocent women and children of the Highlands in Scotland. They went out and shot them. They captured the men and took them as slaves or imprisoned them.
yeah, his story is actually the one i sympathize with the most. he not only had a terrible childhood, but his mental illness became the only thing he was known for. you really dont hear a lot about the george, that made sure that the woman who had tried to murder him got proper care, the george who said right after almost being stabbed ”the poor creature is mad! do not hurt her, for she has not hurt me!!”. you also dont hear about the george, who was a caring and loving father (something very unusual for royalty) and a faithful husband, nor about the george who was tortured horribly by so-called doctors that george the fourth hired to ”fix” his mental illness. i wish someone would talk more about that george. thats the george i want to hear more about.
He also loved his wife and didnot have any whores.
:)
"George ruled the largest empire that had ever been seen"
Genghis Khan and Charles V of Spain and Austria: "hold my beer"
Charles 2 enters chat... Really come on people
Yeah Charles V had ever other European Monarch in history beat. At his zenith he owned virtually all of continental Europe other than France, Scandinavia, and Russia. At least 60% of the Americas, and even the Philippines. The first Empire on which the sun truly never set.
Catherine the Great: Hold my Vodka
@@dabi410 Nope, she ruled only Russia
msinvincible2000 Russia, is big af
George 1: I took the throne of England, just cuz I was Protestant
A German prince who's English stank
King George number one.
George 2: I like to argue, now that's clear
Especially with my father here
And before I died of diarrhea
I fought with my son.
George 3: I broke records with my sixty year reign.
George 4: And I broke the scales with my giant frame.
Fun Fact: In the Brighton Pavilion, The once Prince George 4th had built a tunnel reaching from the Pavillion palace to Maria Fitzherbert's house which was around the corner and George used to secretly meet with Maria in the tunnel.
That part about George I murdering his wife's lover and burying him under her bedroom floor is crazy. I've never heard of anything like that. 😂😅🤣
Chauntel Shannon the story of Sophia Dorothea is really sad, but incredibly interesting
Proves the usually saying of Americans will drive you nuts in George 3 he took it literally.
Henry the 8th probably would have done that to his 5th wife Catherine Howard if see didn't execute her
Wonder if she knew it? When did she know it? Or did the smell tip her off?
I heard about it from another documentary and followed up on it. The story goes that In August 2016 bones were found under the Leineschloss castle during a renovation project and they were believed to be the remains. Testing proved the bones came from 5 different Human skeletons along with some animal bones.
The other part of the story is that when he was caught in the act of trying to elope more or less with the Princess out of the castle, he was caught by the guards and George Louis had him murdered and the corpse dumped in the Leine River. His body was never found.
Makes sense. I always had a hard time believing that somebody could just stash a rotting corpse under some wooden floor boards in a house and NOBODY notice the smell???
How come it always seemed like these kings had no trouble having children out of wedlock but could never had children with their actual wives?? And NOT from lack of trying 😂
In modern times, fertility problems are a two-way street; 50% of the time, something's wrong w/ the guy; 50% of the time, something's wrong w/ the gal. I don't see why it would be any different in earlier times; sometimes women were just 'barren' just as men are sometimes 'impotent.'
For example, William III & Mary II had no children b/c Mary had suffered an early miscarriage which rendered her infertile. Earlier, Charles II's wife Catherine of Braganza is assumed to be infertile, since she never had any pregnancies while Charles had plenty of illegitimate children.
Or even going back to Henry VIII; his early fertility problems w/ Catherine of Aragon probably had to do w/ Catherine (Catherine was quite a bit more inbred than Henry was, & supposedly she liked fasting even while pregnant). By the time Henry manages to annul his marriage to Catherine, he's in his 40s. Men in their 40s can suffer a dramatic loss of fertility. It seems possible to me that he fathered Elizabeth & Ed while subfertile. He was also becoming quite obese at this age, & obesity can also dramatically lower male fertility. He was certainly impotent by the time he married Catherine Howard.
In the case of George IV & his wife, it had nothing to do w/ fertility; they simply hated each other, & literally the only night they could be bothered to sleep w/ each other was their wedding night, which just so happened to produce Charlotte of Wales. George's brothers, at the time of Charlotte's untimely death, were either unmarried (as they preferred the bachelor life) or in marriages as equally miserable as his own.
By the time they *do* contract marriages, most of them are, like Henry VIII, in their 40s or older. B/c the Hanoverians tend to be a bit heavy-set & corpulent themselves, some of them may have been infertile themselves at the time. Enough of them managed to father children to keep the line going, however. There are still male-line Hanoverians alive today, even; the descendants of Queen Victoria's uncle Ernest Augustus, who succeeded William IV in Hanover due to the practice of Salic Law in those territories.
King William IV who had 10 children with actress Dorothea Bland did not marry until he was 53 figuring that being the third son, chances are neither he nor any of his issues would make it to be ruler. However, since his older brother George, son #1, hated his wife, he only produced two legitimate children, and one died before the age of 1, common in those days. So everyone banked on Charlotte being a future Queen, especially once she married and became pregnant by 19. When she died in childbirth to a stillborn, it mean that there were no legitimate grandchildren for King George III. Since George's (son) wife was 48, she could not produce any more children and his second son, Frederick passed without children. So there was a rush for the other sons to produce an heir. William did marry and had 2 children, but they died by age 2, again common. By this time he was around 57, so his fertility was in question. So the remaining 3 sons, each had on child, given they were also around 50. So the child from the oldest of those three was Victoria, daughter of son #4, Edward, who died before Victoria turned 1, thus no younger brother to displace her. Victoria did her primary job as Queen and had 9 children, so no heir issues, as did all the future rulers, except for Edward VIII, who led to a scandal with an American divorcee, but that is another story.
@@janefelix3821 actually
George IV only had one kid, Princess Charlotte.
Also, Princess Charlotte married at twnery, suffered a miscarriage, became pregnant again, but died after childbirth at 21.
@@napoleonbonaparte7529 Thanks. The only point was that George IV's wife died a year into his reign and I'm sure there was some pressure for him to try for an heir, as any child he had would have been next in line. However, assuming he waited the customary year for morning, he would have been around 60 for a remarriage, so I'm sure that given some of his brothers produced heirs by then, William (though they died young), Edward, Ernest, and Adolphus, the need for legitimate grandchildren was not as pressing.
I think it was the fact that the "marriage pool" for royals was relatively small for so many generations, allowing for undesirable fertility issues and other genetic health problems (which can also themselves contribute to miscarriages and whatnot) to be passed down. Of course average people did not usually marry outside of their class, but even so the royal marriage pool was far smaller and had to be navigated carefully for special political reasons, too.
George II died fulfilling his 'duty'
My husband’s niece just married Prince Christian of Hanover 3 years ago, and they’ve had twins (a boy and a girl) in the meantime, which are now cousins to my daughter, so I’ve come to be very interested in the Hanover history.
The present British royals are descendants of Mary, Queen of Scots.
Hanover King George I's mother Sophia, Electress of Hanover was descended from Mary Stuart, who was her great-grandmother.
While if you want to be technical they are all descended from Elizabeth Woodville, Queen Consort to King Edward IV, as they were the great-great grandparents of Mary Queen of Scots.
@@janefelix3821 If you want to get *even more* technical, they descend from a great number of German Houses as well (that maligned connection).
Of course, the future George II declared, upon his arrival to England, that he had not a drop of blood that was not English. So, how do we square these claims away?
Well, both of George II's parents belonged to the House of Guelph (or Hanover, or Brunswick-Lüneburg, whichever branch-name you prefer), a House of storied history in the Holy Roman Empire; it produced 1 Emperor (Otto IV) & several Dukes of Saxony.
More importantly for our question, it was also deemed noble enough for King Henry II of England to marry his eldest daughter by Eleanor of Aquitaine in to. Matilda of England dutifully married the Duke of Saxony & had several sons; Henry, count Palatine (cognatic ancestor of the Wittelsbachs), Emperor Otto IV (beloved nephew of Richard the Lionhearted), & William, duke of Lüneburg. George II traced his male-line from the later.
Thus you could say, even his 'German' blood was not without some drop of English in it.
Even the present dynasty has its English connections. While the 'official' name of the House is Windsor, its 'proper' name is Saxe-Coburg & Gotha (or Wettin, if you prefer the dynastic name). The branch of this family to which Prince Albert belonged was not particularly prominent, but it did have its moments; it descended in the all-male line from Frederick I, margrave of Meissen.
Margrave Frederick was not much of a historical figure himself, but he was descended from the best of them; his mother was Margaret of Sicily, only surviving child of the final Hohenstaufen Emperor, Frederick II by his 3rd wife, Isabella of England, daughter of John Lackland.
Since Frederick II's other legitimate line culminated in Conradin, who died at the hands of Charles of Anjou, Margaret's line is the sole surviving legitimate descent from Emperor Frederick II (tho. his bastard son Manfred became ancestor to the Aragonese royal family, & from them, the Habsburgs). Upon his half-cousin Conradin's death, Margrave Frederick was considered one of the few hopes of the Ghibelline faction (the Hohenstaufen partisans), but this never amounted to anything.
No doubt, these connections are distant, but when it comes to matters of genealogical consequence, I find them interesting nonetheless...
@@jeandehuit5385 Interesting. Don't forget all of the rulers from the House of Hanover married German royalty, thus their children would be 3/4 German. The first to break from that tradition was the future Edward VII, he married Danish Royalty, but by then Germany and England began going on the outs. While Edward VII was not from the House of Hanover, technically, his mother, Queen Victoria was, it was just back then the children derived their family name from the father, even if the mother was the ruler, don't forget while Victoria was the 5th Queen Regnant of England, she was the first to produce and heir, so the others did not run into that issue.
Loves these videos. The photos are great to help tell the story and the voice is clear and easy to listen to. Thank you for helping explain the British Monarchy
Many of this is pretty inaccurate and seems to only highlight the bad things, the Hanoverians did and ignoring all the good things.
Firstly George I. did not spend as little time in England as possible. He spend about 4/5 of his 13 year reign in England and only visited Hanover five times for very short time periods (after all he had lived there for 50 years before he ascended the British throne). Also he actually did speak English (and Latin and French and German and Italian and Dutch) but mostly corresponded in French with officials, which was customary at all European courts during that time and also he didn't talk much in general because he was rather shy and reserved. Also it was never proven that he killed his wife's Lover (although that's porbably what happened) and it is not known where said lover is buried as his body hasn't been found to this very day.
Secondly George II. may have had mistresses but he had loved his wive Queen Caroline dearly - having mistresses was fairly normal forna King in that time. Also it should be noted that he was the last king to personally lead his troops into battle and he did not go that harsh on the Scottish because he was a tyrant but because what they did was high treason and because he was aware of the fact that should the Stuart pretender succeed to the throne there would be civil war because almost everyone in GB was against a catholic monarch so you could say he had no choice but to strike hard during that time.
Also George III. did not rule more absolute than his predecessors. On the contrary he even signed over the crown estate to the parliament hereby loosing more ofnhis financial independency. Rumors that the spend money on political candidates he favoured could not be proven but what we do know is that he donated huge sums to the royal acadamy and to charity in general. He had on occasions named members of government against his will because of parliament and he also forbade extending the American colonies further to get the colonists to negotiate with native Americans instead of just stealing their land (which made him unpopular amongst the colonists). Also he pardoned two assasins who had made attempts on his life and was overall very popular in Britain during his sane periods.
Also you just gotta love how the Hanoverians are painted as trying to rule absolute here while actually it was under theyr rule that Britain really became a parliamentary Monarchy. The rulers that came before them all exercised much more power and it was only during the Hanover reign that parliament and prime minister (a position established by George I.) continuusly gained more power. By the time Victoria ascended the throne the UK was a fully formed democracy and you could say that the UK owes that to the House of Hanover because they established the necessary precedences by forming goverments and listening to parliament much more than their predecessors the Stuarts.
Hey! Is there any sources that could back up what you’ve written? Is wikipedia reliable, or is there some form of books about this?
@@saarana Wikipedia is not reliable. I don't know anyone that uses that anyone tbh.
IDK because what they did sounds just like what the Thai royals are doing to their people in the past 100 years. Being "less absolute" isn't much a credit considering the context of the world in that time--every other modern countries have progressed past absolute monarchy.
One would also argue that the royal HAD TO be less absolute, for their very own survival (see France). They couldn't resist the will of the people, so they might as well did it themselves to prevent revolution i.e. death.
So sad , I think Charlotte would’ve been an amazing Queen but history would’ve taken a different turn tho
The climate change you mentioned a few episodes back was still in force, and was one of the major reasons for the poverty and disquiet under the Georges. This culminated in 1816, which was dubbed, "The Year Without a Summer." It was the reason for the bad harvest of that year.
I recommend the song "1816: The Year Without a Summer" by Rasputina, which does a great job of capturing the horrors of the "Mini-Ice Age." It's also just a great band; I've seen them live twice and hope to do so again.
I am enjoying your videos tremendously, and subscribed. Keep up the good work!
15:00 This is a bit harsh on William IV. He wasn't opposed to reform as such. However, the House of Lords repeatedly voted against the Reform Act, and William was put under pressure to create new peers to pad the House of Lords with supporters of the Act. He felt that this was an abuse of his powers and initially refused. Eventually he agreed to do it, but by then the threat was enough and the Lords relented and abstained from further votes, allowing the bill to pass. William's popularity did take a hit, but it subsequently recovered and he is generally regarded as a capable monarch at a very difficult time in history.
Hanoverians, more like Hangoverians
Oh no...
As a kid, I hated that movie's title because it confused me with this dynasty. Now I think it describes the Hanoverians better than most history textbooks.
Meanwhile in France everyone in France: no more queen and king
Didn't the frogs restore monarchy several times?
But yes to an emperor!
@@schoolssection The Bourbon restoration was largely pressured onto the French people by outside forces. The people barely tolerated Louis XVIII, but then his power hungry brother Charles X tried to take France back to more absolutist rule (instead of the new constitutional system). The French public and legislature furiously rebelled and then declared the leader of the House of Orleans, Louis Philippe as the new king. Charles X was forced to abdicate and LP had many of his court thrown into prison. 18 years later though, LP was overthrown after he lost public support. A republic was in place for about 4 years, then Napoleon III seized power and became Emperor after the public overwhelmingly approved a referendum (apparently legitimate).
Love this serie. Tbh i was expecting a mention of the cunning butler of the prince regent.
Lol, Black Adder FTW
That is what I was thinking!
George: We hail Prince George! We hail Prince George! Blackadder: We hate Prince George! We hate Prince George!
The modern Royal Family is called Windsor, because in 1917 King George V change his house name from Hanover to Windsor. Which simultaneously ended British and German relations during the last year of World War I.
That was because of the anti-German sentiment in the British Empire during World War I. Dropping completely their German name was for their own sake of survival as the have witnessed how many other the once so powerful European Royal houses have been taken down by revolution and war...
@@fawziabdulhamid5186. At the same time Czar Nicholas II changed the name of his capital city from "St. Petersburg" to "Petrograd" for the same reason. After that time the city was renamed "Leningrad" but now it is called by its original name "St. Petersburg". It is no longer the capital city of Russia.
Nope. After Victoria, the house name was Saxe-Coburg and Gotha from Prince Albert, Queen Victoria’s husband.
It wasn't Hanover but Saxe-Coburg Gotha
@@clivegoodman16 it never was the capital, that was always Moscow but St Petersburg was just more popular
Love your videos so much- I listen to them everyday while doing work. You’re so well-spoken !
Isn't Queen Victoria a Hanoverian?
She is but she'll be in the next video as she fit better there time and narrative-wise.
Yes but she wanted to honor Albert so the name changed to Albert's surname/ place of origin.
@@ingriddubbel8468 The Hanover dynasty ended upon Victoria's death. The reigning house became the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha when her son Edward VII became the monarch.
Technically yes
Yes, but she changed her name and is usually seen as the first monarch of the house Saxe-coburg Gotha. The same house that still rules to this day but changed there name to Windsor during the first war to distance themselves from Germany and to seem more British.
Thank you for doing these videos. I was wondering if you could do these as podcasts.
This is a great channel. It's my go to for history plus you have a great voice for narrating
If George ii was born 1683 that would of left him 44 not 47 in 1727
They changed the times in the 1700s it affected George Washington as Well he got like a year and a half younger
Liam Kirwan You got it all wrong! George II of Great Britain (1683-1760) was 43 years old in 1727, not 44.
Well at Least George I and II both brought Handel to England.
George the 3rd father wasn't George the 2nd his father Prince Fredrick of Wales died before George the 2nd look it up.
5:07
I was only a boy :'(
As the saying goes ~~~~
It's a wise man who knows
His own father ~ and a wise father who knows His own child.
Ironic how George III was called mad yet he sounds like the most normal and reasonable person in the family. And even his madness can be explained by the at best ineffective treatments from his doctors
Sheesh, our national anthem was first a jolly up song for someone who had surgery for piles. Why am I surprised? Born to rule over us my arse!
Caroleann Mc 🇺🇸 and I’d like to know who used the tune and then change the words to my country Tis of thee here in United States.🇬🇧
@@maryannlockwood7806 Samuel Francis Smith completed the lyrics of "America (My Country, 'Tis of Thee)" in 30 minutes. It was first performed in public on July 4, 1831.
It's lucky of the British monarchy to have survived the French Revolution, Napoleon, the indulgent George IV, and the two World Wars.
Don't forget the English Civil War. Britain almost became a republic permanently, but Charles II was called back in.
I wish we, in 1960's Britain, had received such a good lesson in our own history! Thank you.
God save the Queen, Author: Unknown written: September 1745
I really like these videos! They tell history that I read with a human side!
You nailed it. Yes, I think the human side of these stories make Lindsay's videos unique and different from other history channels.
GEORGE IV
WIFE: MARIA FITZHERBERT
CONSORT: CAROLINE OF BRUNSWICK
Could you make a video on Queen Charlotte, George III wife?
I am surprised that you do not mention the fact that the melody from God Save the King was used for a very popular American song, My Country tis of Thee. It is a very popular patriotic song that more Americans know by heart than The Star Spangled Banner.
The main focus of this video is the monarchy of the United Kingdom, not the de facto national anthem of the United States before the adoption of "The Star-Spangled Banner".
@@RaymondHng Don't get your knickers in a twist. I just thought it was an interesting bit of trivia about the tune.
L B I have read that the melody was from an originally English drinking song. When my grandfather immigrated from England to the USA in about 1903, He & his very English brother in law went to a the theater for some vaudeville entertainment. At the beginning of the performance, the audience rose and sang
The National Anthem, but my grand father & his friend sang “God Save The Queen”, and were then THROWN out of the theater by the other audience members!!! There was no insult intended, they just sang it from habit!
Wait you know all the words to the star spangled banner? I know like the first few words & the ending
TRUE...
4:59 France Austria vs Britain Prussia Seven years war
6:41 stamp act
6:20 enclosure act
6:59 1776
7:29 James cook australia
10:16 Ireland rebelled 1798
11:47 Britain won Napoleonic war
0:30)It was Henri I, II, III, IV, V, & VI. Norman French was spoken in the royal court.
0:46)German was spoken from George I to Queen Victoria. About 200 years.
10:18)What was called a rebellion in Ireland is self defense.The leaders were murdered! 1155 AD, the English Pope Adrian IV (AKA Nicholas Breakspear)made Henri II, overlord of Ireland. France also had Henri I, II, III, and IV. Jean I & II (John).
The reason George V dropped the name Saxe-Coburg - Gotha is simple. The First London Blitz was done with Zeppelins & Gotha bombers.There was the 4 engine Gotha Giants. His brother-in-law changed his name from Battenburg to Montbatten.
14:13 William IV did not marry Dorothea Jordan
Sooo-we actually have more information on George 3. It is suspected he had bipolar disorder. But one of the meds to treat porphyria had the side effect of blue urine.
It was actually purple urine
I piss purple da hell hunny?
Fantastic as always!! Can you do a video about the Jacobite Rebellion of the 1740's?
He died, on the toilet.
*he*
*whAT?*
4:59 King Evoker | (Minecraft) (1724-1799) "1760, the year of the dragon? he died on the toilet! usuf"
My son is very fond of your videos. It has ignited his interest in history
WILLIAM IV
WIFE: DOROTHEA JORDAN
CONSORT: ADELAIDE OF SAXE-MEININGEN
Make videos about the popes from Peter till now.
My Lord that would take her years!!!!!
King George commands and we obey, over the hills and far away
Born 2 rule over u George’s 4 3 1 & 2
You had to do what we told you to, just because our blood was blue
@@shostysboo I was the hunk girls adored me
@Sunwoo Jung they would do anything for me
I would have their husbands killed
People hated us and we hated them too
Can you do a whole video on King George III
Yes that would be nice
Poor George III...his son will be cursed
i shouldve belted his as-
William IV never married his mistress Dorothea Jordan. He had just lived with her for 20 years.
P.S. at 4:54 Russian Orthodoxy is NOT Catholicism. Ever heard of the Great Schism?
Very true and Sweden definitely wasn't Catholic either.
Bonny Prince Charlie looked so much like his Aunt, Queen Anne in the face...
11:14
Traumatized horsey.
And so began the Hanover gang, George One and George Two - grim
Then George the Third was quite absurd - Till I replaced old him.
King George the Fourth, and known henceforth, was angry, fat and cross - Hang on!
It’s true you beat Napoleon, but were mostly a dead loss - Bang on.
Old William Four was a sailor - Ahoy - It’s nearly the end of the story-a
As onto the scene comes the best loved queen; hail to Queen Victoriaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
William William
@@khalilissa5283 Henry Stephen henry richard john oi henry Edward Edward Edward richard henry Henry henry Edward Edward richard henry henry Edward Mary Elizabeth James Charles Charles James Anne Mary George George George George William
Henry Stephen
I love this, and truth to be told i love the way you explain History. Question tho have you talked about the Prime Ministers of England yet? If not, can you please? 🙂😗
SOPHIA DOROTHEA: I WAS THE SAD ONE
CAROLINE OF ANSBACH: I WAS THE BAD ONE
CHARLOTTE OF MECKLENBURG-STRELITZ: I WAS THE MAD ONE
MARIA FITZHERBERT + CAROLINE OF BRUNSWICK: AND I WAS THE FAT ONE
DOROTHEA JORDAN + ADELAIDE OF SAXE-MEININGEN: AND I WAS THE FAT ONE
He brought one mistress to England. The "elephant" was a half sister (illegitimate I believe). She's often mistakenly called his mistress however, there are documents where George I says they share the same blood.
Born 2 rule over you, King George 3,4,1 and 2 people hated us and we hated them too..
Horrible Histories reference
Him then him
Then me then you
I’ve never heard of king James that made the kjv being gay I. Any other research. If you could show where you got this, I’d appreciate it
Collecting coins of these monarchs makes it even more interesting to study them!!
Bonnie Prince Charlie went to Derby which is in the East Midlands [ near on middle of the UK ]
Such an informative video 🙏❤️ Thanks 😊
Hanover is a town in Pennsylvania
Thank you.Enjoyed your video and excellent
presentation ♥️
George II became king in June of 1727 or June 11th/22nd at 43 until October30th age 44 (not 47) and was king until October 25th 1760(age 76). he was Unpopular as king until 1743. George participated at the Battle of Dettingen June 27th 1743, and thus became the last British monarch to lead an army in battle. He ruled as king for over 33 years and for the first 14 years of his reign sir Robert Walpole(born August 26th 1676)was still the first official Prime minister of Great Britain r. April 3rd 1721(age 44)to February 11th 1742(age 65) for over 20 years,he died March 18th 1745 age 68. Who served at most 19 years in parliament before becoming the first prime minister and in time was succeeded by William Pitt the elder July 30th 1766(age 57) to October 14th 1768(age 59) who did serve in the army from c. 1730(age 22) until 1734(age 26) During the seven years war May 17th 1756 to February 10th he more less controlled the privy purse of Parliament or Secretary of State form December 1756(age 48)to April 6th 1757(age 48), June 27th 1757(age 48)to October 6th 1761(age 52) who died May 11th 1778(age 69) his son was William Pitt the younger who died January 23rd 1806(age 46) while in office as prime minister of Great Britain December 19th 1783(age 24) January 1st 1801(age 41), prime minister of the united kingdom January 1st 1801(age 41) to March 14th 1801( 41), May 10th 1804(age 44) to January 23rd 1806(age 46). Chancellor of the Exchquer July 10th 1782(age 23) to March 31st 1783(age 23), December 19th 1783(age 24) to March 14th 1801(age 41), May 10th 1804(age 44) to January 23rd 1896(age 46).
I meant to Say January 23rd 1806(age 46)
Times when Germanics, Anglo Saxons, Celts, And Mediteranneans had lots of ethnic wars
WOAHHHH THAT MARIA REYNOLDS, ALEXANDER HAMILTONS MISTRESS at 8:55 allow at 13:09
12:25 *if you can see it from the front wait till you see it from the back back back back* 👀
I'm glad America got it's freedom
The Hanoverians reaved My country, but We Scot's endured. The painting used in this video at 6.56, in the background there are only Union Jack and English flags.. no Scottish, Welsh or N.Irish flags in sight. This should speak volumes historically, about who was really wielding power over "the Empire"! Wonderful video as always :)
I took the throne of England
Just ’cos I was protestant
A German, a prince whose English stank,
King George number one.
I like to argue, now that’s clear
Especially with my father here
And when he died of diarrhoea
I fought with my son.
I broke records with my sixty year reign
And I broke the scales with my giant frame.
Born to rule over you
King George four, three, one and two
You had to do what we told you to
Just because our blood was blue.
I was a hunk, girls adored me
Ladies all swooned before me
They would do anything for me
Or I’d have their husbands killed.
Had a war with Prince Charles Bonnie
Everyone said that I was f-f-funny
I spent everyone’s money
Our subjects were not thrilled.
I was the sad one, I was the bad one
I was the mad one, and I was the fat one.
We were born to rule over yGeorges one, three, four and two.
England’s kings, though we were German too
Him, then him, then me, then you.
(We were born) Born to rule over you (born to rule)
Gorged on fruit then I died on the loo.
People hated us, and we hated them too.
Born to rule over you.
Born to rule over you
Me I was as batty as a bonkers kangaroo.
Me I would have been more at home in a zoo
And now, now our song is through.
Yeah… Georges. (Banana.)
OH MY GOD HORRIBLE HISTORIES FAN IN THE WILD
@@kalibronx never got over it ending. still can't watch the last episode till the end bc cry too hard
Started with the Plantagenet to play a video Game...love this channel
the point you have forgotten, to mention, is
that the electorate-kingdom of hannover shared the same monarch....until victoria became queen of the UK....
the madness of george III, could have been heridetary or like the habsburgs and other royal dynasties, close inbreeding..., its seldom even mentioned....
This is both simplistic and delusional in its descriptions of events, entirely ignoring important constitutional developments and the importance of, and affection with which these monarchs were held. George III (Farmer George) was much more popular and important than depicted. This work also takes on a decidedly anti-monarchical tone.
Sad, how can anyone hate their own kid?
They’re royal families who
1)Rarely chose their wife, so their offspring is related to the wife they didn’t want
2)They lived away from them, raised by government officals, so they didn’t grow up with them, raising them
Unless your my shoes, my son was a pain.
@@elizabeth1stofenglandirela901 All parents feel that way about their kids sometimes. It just seems so foreign to me to hate one's own child.
I just love all your 🎥 videos
I watch them for hour an sometimes more then once
He died on the toilet?!!!
Ashley Liss. Dying in the toilet is not as rare as one might imagine. Forceful bearing down can often cause a rise in blood pressure, the elevated blood pressure can dislodge a blood clot, and then the elevated pressure pushes the clot to the lungs or brain or some other vital organ. When blood pressure is elevated, think of a water/lawn hose that’s being deliberated twisted or depressed to increase the forcefulness of the water flow to wash off an area or stain/debris from the sidewalk.
Wait a minute did i heard it right
King George II died in a toilet??
Yes he died of diarrhea
@@nobodyexpectthespanishinqu3057 what a shitty death.
1:22 “I haven’t a drop of blood in my veins that is not English”
George III was actually a good king. Good video, but you were a little harsh on him.
yes
Yes
Of All The Other European Powers,All Weren't Catholic,Sweden Was Protestant(Lutheran)And Russia Was Eastern Orthodox.
Plus a lot of the German states were Protestant too, i.e. Prussia, Hesse, Hanover (for a while the same King was also the English King), Denmark, to name a few.
I enjoyed your video a lot.
Thank you for your help and efforts
Imagine some lady I know called her adorable twins Charlotte and Albert ❤️
0:27 There was someone named CNUT?
yup
[ w h e e z e ]
George II was 44 when his father died and he ascended the throne, not 47
A delightful approach! Just a note: 4.55 - Sweden and Russia were NOT Catholic.
George I Had Only One(Legitimate)Son,George II And A Daughter Sophia,Who Became Queen Consort Of Prussia.
今天中午不吃饭会去哪里上班吗💼
Music?
Can anyone find me the full version of this 2:11