using more pictures and videos as examples helps us in understanding things better rather than going word to word and it also keep us engaged rather than distracting
Those methods described were developed by Taylor for the circumstances of his time. However, what it is missing so very often is what he said to be the foundation of a real scientific management, namely: "The principal object of management should be to secure the maximum prosperity for the employer, coupled with the maximum prosperity for the employee" (The Principles of Scientific Management, F.W. Taylor, 1919, first paragraph). This founding principle is the base for systemic thinking as well. It is sad to see how management discipline derailed because Taylor is remembered for the methods and not the principles.
Hi... Can you please please please.. explain to me.... Why they say .." Taylor did not differentiated between the principle of analysis and principle of action"
Thank you, Maktoum. I grew up between Boston and New York City but my accent has softened a bit from living in many different parts of the US over the years.
That's so cool, thank you. I'm software engineer, but I have interest in information theory and systems theory in general. That's why I realized that I have interest in organizations (and even organic systems) either. Do you plan to make videos about cybernetic and more videos about systems theory?
Thanks for the question. I'm not going to make more about systems theory but I do have two related videos. One is on Loose Coupling and the other is on Partial Inclusion. Those are concepts related to systems theory that Karl Weick articulated.
Hey, don't know if you're still answering here, but could you specify what's meant with the fact that Taylor wanted the improvement on the highest level possible, as opposed to Spear & Bowen who wanted it the lowest level possible?
This is historically inaccurate and typical of confused, unfair comments on Taylor. The problems highlighted in this video - like alienation of workers and reduced bargaining power brought on by de-skilling of work - were being raised by Marx before Taylor was born! Taylor analysed the parts that made up a task, but he didn't come up with specialisation and division of labour. Smith was writing about this a century before Taylo's work. It's also not true that Taylor thought workers should just get on with the work. He specifically told managers to encourage workers to come up with ideas for method improvement - but only to implement the ideas after they were properly tested. This is the exact same approach used by Lean manufacturers today, including Toyota, Nissan and Honda. No worker is allowed to deviate from the prescribed method for their task. They have to suggest ideas. Early 20th Century manufacturers in the US didn't follow Taylor's prescriptions, they just cherry-picked the parts they liked.
Could you please provide a bit of scientific background in support or your view. This rule of thumb approach takes us back to Taylor as he is seen today with well presented evidence such as in this video.
@@BerHarSenSam Hi Harber, I'm not so much stating a view as stating verifiable facts. Smith wrote extensively about division of labour in The Wealth of Nations in 1776. Marx criticised the horrors of mid nineteenth century factory work in Das Kapital, published in 1867 when Taylor was a child. Taylor's Principles of Scientific Management (1911) makes the points I set out above. He said, ‘It is true that with scientific management the workman is not allowed to use whatever implements and methods he sees fit in the daily practise of his work. Every encouragement, however, should be given to him to suggest improvements, both in methods and in implements. And whenever a workman proposes an improvement, it should be the policy of the management to make a careful analysis of the new method…’ [The Principles of Scientific Management, Dover Publications 1998 pg 67]. The Principles of Scientific Management is also available free on Amazon kindle. It's less than 100 pages long and is one of the most significant works in the history of management but few people take the time to read what Taylor actually said. The rules of thumb approaches you mention offer simple, easy explanations. Unfortunately, they're also wrong. But why let the facts spoil a good story... Hope this helps. Paul
you have to pay people more because you want to hang on to the best talent and skill. If you don't they will end up being absorbed by competitors and this is why we have a brain drain in Africa 9:40
I have been looking up public admin videos all night for my test tmw. This was actually one of the most enjoyable video. I was able to gain such a better understanding. Thank you!
Frederic Taylor's first job as a foreman of a machine shop. He applied his organizational skills to finding the most efficient way to cut metal and along the way invented High Speed Steel. You can read his research report that was originally published in 1906 as a kindle book. "On The Art Of Cutting Metals" by Frederic Taylor.
I remember in the movie THE FOUNDER, Dick McDonald ran the original McDonald's kitchen like an assembly line. He even drew out the kitchen layout on a tennis court and had the workers shadow their job and kept erasing and moving kitchen appliances till everything moved smoothly. For some odd reason, I find this topic of making things more efficient super interesting.
This is such a sad way to look at work and workers. Workers should be able to change the steps they execute their work with, as long as they meet their commitments.
yeah very useful summarized everything in a few minute which allows me to have more time to do other things on my project about him keep up the good work!
would you please upload few videos related to organizational thinkers; 1). Mary Parker Follett -> Dynamic Administration; 2). Mayo and others -> Human relation school; 3). Chester Barnard; 4). Behavioral approach; and 5). Herbert Simon -> Decision Making. Plz if its possible for u then then plz try to upload it as early as possible. Thank You.
This was good detailed explanation of the concept. From where you took all this information and examples ? I would like to know about the references please
Excellent content. Thank you! Especially the video work and photos - how do you get those effects? looks like a blurred background blown up of the same image in the foreground?
I am just starting to learn - Wirecast etc. I would love to chat with you for a few minutes at some time. Contact info on LinkedIn - Brian Collyer - Las Vegas :)
can you tell me are these following his 4 principles: 1. diviosn of labor 2.hierarchy 3.selection, training nad compensation 4.time and motion studies pls answer it as soon as possible, its my presentation is tomorrow!
Free PDF download of the 5 Essential Communication Skills for Professionals: bit.ly/2K9Gile-QuickGuide
That helped me alot in preparing my exam. Very good explained. I like the style of your Videos, pleasent voice too!
I'm glad the videos have helped you, Wellgunde. Thanks for the encouragement!
I am taking an operation management course from Coursera and I come across your video. I love it. Thank you!!
You did an exceptional job in making this concept clear for me. God bless you
Thank you, Yolandia. I appreciate the kind words.
What is the difference between the scientific management theories and modern management theories? Who are the relevance proponent.
Please answer
Thank you so much, I am studying about Taylor at a Federal University here in Brazil. Your video helped me a lot, I really aprecciated it!
I'm glad the video helped you study, Nicolas.
Thanks bruh♥️
Many generations will be thankful to you
using more pictures and videos as examples helps us in understanding things better rather than going word to word and it also keep us engaged rather than distracting
This is my favorite video by you so far, it was really engaging and you explained everything so clearly
this gave me a clear understanding on the models of management. thank you sir.
Those methods described were developed by Taylor for the circumstances of his time. However, what it is missing so very often is what he said to be the foundation of a real scientific management, namely: "The principal object of management should be to secure the maximum prosperity for the employer, coupled with the maximum prosperity for the employee" (The Principles of Scientific Management, F.W. Taylor, 1919, first paragraph). This founding principle is the base for systemic thinking as well. It is sad to see how management discipline derailed because Taylor is remembered for the methods and not the principles.
Great points Matias, I fully agree. It's a shame people can't be bothered to read his work instead of making videos about what the think he said. Paul
Thank you so much, best description on youtube.
Glad it helped!
Thank you for sharing this video.
Thank you very much, that was so helpful for my exam.
Happy to help!
Hi... Can you please please please.. explain to me.... Why they say .." Taylor did not differentiated between the principle of analysis and principle of action"
Great...best visuals to explain what ur saying
Thank you for the kind words, Adrian. I'm glad the visuals were helpful.
great explanation and a very cool and understandable accent. great work thanks
Thank you, Maktoum. I grew up between Boston and New York City but my accent has softened a bit from living in many different parts of the US over the years.
So how is his scientific management principles relevant to morden managers
Thank you so much! Incredible video!
Thank you, sir, for such an amazing lesson.
That's so cool, thank you. I'm software engineer, but I have interest in information theory and systems theory in general. That's why I realized that I have interest in organizations (and even organic systems) either. Do you plan to make videos about cybernetic and more videos about systems theory?
Thanks for the question. I'm not going to make more about systems theory but I do have two related videos. One is on Loose Coupling and the other is on Partial Inclusion. Those are concepts related to systems theory that Karl Weick articulated.
Kindly would you explain to me the theories associated with the development and practice of scientific management as I prepare for my exams
Hey, don't know if you're still answering here, but could you specify what's meant with the fact that Taylor wanted the improvement on the highest level possible, as opposed to Spear & Bowen who wanted it the lowest level possible?
Thank you very much for this focused video and key points elaborated
My pleasure. :-)
how did you do it can you share with me , thank you
very clear cut explanation brother....
Glad you liked it, Nikhil. Thanks for your encouragement.
props to u this video was lit really good explanation from the start up
Thanks!
The of you are explanation is very good. l liked it.
Very informative. Thanks
Thansk you very much for this,.
You're welcome.
keep going it's really helpful to know about scientific management theory , keep sharing your information
Appericiate your work welll done
thank you ....
Good explanation
kapitalism at it finest, boosts creativity
yep, control and exploitation at its best, no wonder why Lenin was so fond of him.
thanks.
No problem!
Who is here for their MPA exam??
I hope it goes well for you!
@@orgcomm Thank you
This is historically inaccurate and typical of confused, unfair comments on Taylor. The problems highlighted in this video - like alienation of workers and reduced bargaining power brought on by de-skilling of work - were being raised by Marx before Taylor was born! Taylor analysed the parts that made up a task, but he didn't come up with specialisation and division of labour. Smith was writing about this a century before Taylo's work. It's also not true that Taylor thought workers should just get on with the work. He specifically told managers to encourage workers to come up with ideas for method improvement - but only to implement the ideas after they were properly tested. This is the exact same approach used by Lean manufacturers today, including Toyota, Nissan and Honda. No worker is allowed to deviate from the prescribed method for their task. They have to suggest ideas. Early 20th Century manufacturers in the US didn't follow Taylor's prescriptions, they just cherry-picked the parts they liked.
Finally, a comment from someone who understands the Theories of Organisations!
This. Love how Taylor is made out to be a villain when in reality he was not.
Could you please provide a bit of scientific background in support or your view. This rule of thumb approach takes us back to Taylor as he is seen today with well presented evidence such as in this video.
@@BerHarSenSam Hi Harber, I'm not so much stating a view as stating verifiable facts. Smith wrote extensively about division of labour in The Wealth of Nations in 1776. Marx criticised the horrors of mid nineteenth century factory work in Das Kapital, published in 1867 when Taylor was a child. Taylor's Principles of Scientific Management (1911) makes the points I set out above. He said, ‘It is true that with scientific management the workman is not allowed to use whatever implements and methods he sees fit in the daily practise of his work. Every encouragement, however, should be given to him to suggest improvements, both in methods and in implements. And whenever a workman proposes an improvement, it should be the policy of the management to make a careful analysis of the new method…’ [The Principles of Scientific Management, Dover Publications 1998 pg 67]. The Principles of Scientific Management is also available free on Amazon kindle. It's less than 100 pages long and is one of the most significant works in the history of management but few people take the time to read what Taylor actually said. The rules of thumb approaches you mention offer simple, easy explanations. Unfortunately, they're also wrong. But why let the facts spoil a good story... Hope this helps. Paul
Just because he didn't start it.. that doesn't mean he didn't do it..
good
Thank you for the encouragement.
If anyone have his document to congress send it to me please i need it for my Homewood !!
يا اخي لماذا لا توجد نسخة بالعربية
interesting
so basically, the root of Capitalism.
Not exactly. Capitalism has been around a lot longer than Taylor. He did speed up mass production a lot, however.
**1856-1915
Okay I'm going to say, ( made up) Acute-Macro - Micro Management.
you have to pay people more because you want to hang on to the best talent and skill. If you don't they will end up being absorbed by competitors and this is why we have a brain drain in Africa 9:40
An example of how scientific thinking ruin humanness
ft
No gloves when making big macs 🤮🤮🤮
I have been looking up public admin videos all night for my test tmw. This was actually one of the most enjoyable video. I was able to gain such a better understanding. Thank you!
Thanks, Rachel. Glad it was useful. Good luck on your exam.
I saw that your last video was 2 months ago so I just wanted to say that you should continue ! You do it well, mate.
Thank you for the encouragement, Yurii. I plan to make lots more videos. I'm going to start posting more this fall.
Frederic Taylor's first job as a foreman of a machine shop. He applied his organizational skills to finding the most efficient way to cut metal and along the way invented High Speed Steel. You can read his research report that was originally published in 1906 as a kindle book.
"On The Art Of Cutting Metals" by Frederic Taylor.
I didn't know that he put that out. Amazing. Thanks for the contribution!
so he was evil lol
I remember in the movie THE FOUNDER, Dick McDonald ran the original McDonald's kitchen like an assembly line. He even drew out the kitchen layout on a tennis court and had the workers shadow their job and kept erasing and moving kitchen appliances till everything moved smoothly. For some odd reason, I find this topic of making things more efficient super interesting.
I love that scene. That was a super interesting look at how these principles get put into practice.
Well this was a breath of fresh air
This is such a sad way to look at work and workers.
Workers should be able to change the steps they execute their work with, as long as they meet their commitments.
Hmm, Quizno's could put a mayo dispenser on the out end of the toaster oven since the bread is moving through anyway.
Ha! Yes, I guess they could.
yeah very useful summarized everything in a few minute which allows me to have more time to do other things on my project about him keep up the good work!
Amazing!!
Thank you so much..
wow Ur voice is too sweet to concentrate lol. I like the summary. Ty for this good info
Ha! Thanks for the compliment. :-)
Apparently Iam gonna use this video for my presentation ❤️
I got 7 which is great 😉
@@ahmedlayas7644 congrats buddy!
Thank you for this very good explanation regarding scientific management.
He proposed switching form one worker to another like they were boyfriend of some popstar. Wait, are Frederick Taylor and Taylor swift related?
would you please upload few videos related to organizational thinkers;
1). Mary Parker Follett -> Dynamic Administration;
2). Mayo and others -> Human relation school;
3). Chester Barnard;
4). Behavioral approach;
and
5). Herbert Simon -> Decision Making.
Plz if its possible for u then then plz try to upload it as early as possible.
Thank You.
Good suggestions. I'll put those on the list. I'll not likely get to them soon but when I start recording again, I'll take a look at those topics.
Please try to and thanks a lot to reply. See you soon with those videos.
WOW! you just saved me for my midterm tomorrow! thank you so much, if only my Prof. could have made this as clear as you did .
Happy to help, Vanessa. :-)
This was refreshingly well explained and the information just clicked first time - thanks!
Glad it was helpful, Anna.
Your video helped me to understand Public Administration can you please make a video explaining development of phase ( roots of discipline)🙏
This was good detailed explanation of the concept. From where you took all this information and examples ? I would like to know about the references please
Pls I really enjoyed ur lecture, bt no space in asking questions dat is d problem.
employee burnpit and dehumanization (being treated like a machine) as long as you get paid though... Money is the motivation
That was great!
Got a question,:
what are the challenges of Scientific management theory in Employment relations?
I will learn all about management from you because I really trust you so much
Thanks for help ❤
Really informative and helpful. I missed this class last week, but I feel well caught up!
Glad it was helpful!
Great video! Thanks so much, it was super helpful.
well done sir.this is amazing
division of labor and specialization of tasks and increased wages.
Making my cram session a lot easier. Props to you my man lots of love x
Sir I have a question. If you are going to apply this in an organization, what type of organization do you think it would be most useful?
Today, I see it as applicable to lots of organizations from manufacturing to shipping to food.
i like the motion example of 3 nozzles instead of one
TRULY COMMENDABLE
Thanks. Glad it helped.
Hi! think he died 1915?
Yes, you are right. I had that wrong on the video. Can't change it now but you are correct.
NGL Taylor kinda pissed me off. 😅
Your videos help me a lot with my exams, thank you sir!! Please keep making these videos.
Thank you, I will.
Excellent content. Thank you! Especially the video work and photos - how do you get those effects? looks like a blurred background blown up of the same image in the foreground?
Hi Brian. Yes, that's exactly what I did. I enlarged the background image and blurred it. Do you edit video?
I am just starting to learn - Wirecast etc. I would love to chat with you for a few minutes at some time. Contact info on LinkedIn - Brian Collyer - Las Vegas :)
I have understood perfectly
machine like employess increases efficiency
McDonalds dude has no gloves on. No bueno
Bad timing on the 737 story haha 😂
Hierarchy good point. I'm taking an online class for Organizational Communication and this video has helped. High standards...
wish me luck for my exam...
can you tell me are these following his 4 principles:
1. diviosn of labor
2.hierarchy
3.selection, training nad compensation
4.time and motion studies
pls answer it as soon as possible, its my presentation is tomorrow!
nice explanation
what's the difference between Taylor and Weber?
I have a video entitled Classical Management Theory Weber, Taylor, and Fayol. Feel free to take a look.
great work. this contains almost the key point of my lesson. many thanks
Happy to help, Ray Blue. Thanks for the encouragement.
Frederick Taylor died in 1915. Not 1919...
You are correct. It's a typo on the video but it's not possible to change a video text like that once it is posted.
Super clear explanation, straight forward, engaging and interesting. Thank you!
Glad it helped, Chrissy.
Thank you for making the perfect video sir.
This scientific management we just mentioned at class today. I should've check your video earlier 🥰🤩
Excellent videos
Thanks for sharing.
Good
Thanks so much… Brilliant class ❤❤❤