Futaba 4PM/T4PM vs. Sanwa MT-S - Best-midrange RC radio transmitter?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ส.ค. 2024
  • Affiliate links:
    Futaba 4PM: bit.ly/2zr7p78
    Sanwa MT-S: bit.ly/2WUHT3e
    Time to do a heads-up comparison review video between the new Futaba 4PM/T4PM and the Sanwa MT-S. Let's find out which radio transmitter is better?
    #Futaba #Sanwa
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 81

  • @teneridertravels
    @teneridertravels 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is SO helpful! Thanks, subscribed!

  • @robbryan3044
    @robbryan3044 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great video...information people NEED to make a proper decision. A little over a year ago, I was looking to upgrade to a higher-quality Tx, and I played the same "Futaba vs Sanwa" game, although I was considering the MT-44, as opposed to the MT-S. They were fairly even, except in one majorly-important category - receivers - which was the deciding factor. If I planned on never owning more than 5 RCs, the Sanwa would have probably won. However, in knowing that I'd have '6 or more', the Futaba became the more cost efficient option. I decided to take my comparison one step higher, putting the MT-44 against the 7PX. Once I started realizing that I could easily end up with more than 7 RCs, even the 7PX was less costly. While not all of my vehicle's receivers have been switched to Futaba, I will state that, between my off-road & on-road vehicles, my bashers, my crawlers, and my boats, I currently have 11 completed vehicles/vessels, with 6 (or is it 7...I'm blanking at the moment) more either enroute, being built, or about to be started. The Futaba proved to be the (much) better, smarter, and overall-less-costly option.

  • @modelaircraft6576
    @modelaircraft6576 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good review I went from spektrum surface radio to Futaba surface radio, best decision I ever made I love my Futaba

  • @jonathanconway
    @jonathanconway 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review! I am going to buy a Futaba as I have always had them and I was interested in the Sanwa but this just made me mind up as I do believe the Futaba is a supreme brand.

  • @durgadude1
    @durgadude1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great vid as always. Think it may be worth noting all the sanwa compatible rx out there for great value. A real bonus if youre keeping multiple runners

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good call!

  • @alexs15scalerc36
    @alexs15scalerc36 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video! I came across your channel and find your content very interesting. I have a question? I purchased my first 5th scale and it came with Flysky FS-GT3B RC Transmitter Receiver 2.4Ghz 3 Channel. I am looking to upgrade to the next level. What transmitter would you recommend for me to purchase between Futaba , fly sky, and or Sanwa brand? Thks

  • @MrMaximuskodrata
    @MrMaximuskodrata 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice info. Have you compare Sanwa M17 with Futaba 7PXR ?

  • @davidakerman79
    @davidakerman79 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the video

  • @aviano72
    @aviano72 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have the stick version of the Futaba, 4GRS and it's grrreat.
    Do check out Flysky Noble Nb4 if you can in the future.

  • @hrd4603
    @hrd4603 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Could you do a comparison video between the Futaba 4PM and the new Sanwa MT-5 please?

  • @FlightLogProductions
    @FlightLogProductions 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve never found any usable purpose for telemetry outside of temp sensor for Nitro engine..
    I know it’s old, but would the Sanwa M11X be considered better than these? Looking at getting a used one.

    • @andyhookigs4586
      @andyhookigs4586 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is very useful mate. If you use for example a traxxas sensor around the engine, you can adjust it proper without use always with you a thermometer and you know when you must to stop for not burn anything. As well can be used for electric cars brushess where the motor heats more than a brushed motor.

  • @isaiahfurrow7414
    @isaiahfurrow7414 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sanwa MT-S is not available now, nothing between the $100 & $400 price points... do you suppose another $250ish radio is on the way?

  • @lawrencewinter
    @lawrencewinter 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey thanks for the review. I have a MT-s and it's great. The recievers are a little pricey, but I guess that's standard for any radio. I have recently been given a yokomo yd2 rx dift chassis. This is a high end chassis I believe. I wonder if the mt-s is going to be a suitable radio for drifting, or if it needs something higher end. For racing the MT-s is just great to be honest

  • @manelcamposcosta
    @manelcamposcosta 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are you sure the mts doesn't have ABS or did I misunderstood

  • @NODTHEROD
    @NODTHEROD 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    its been a few months now, do you still have/use/race 4pm ? is sanwa still a better race radio in your opinion ? can you tell the difference in response time between the radios?

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the difference is pretty imperceptible, I still got both. they're both good radios, the 4PM is higher end and nicer, but more expensive

  • @Firewlkre
    @Firewlkre 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Radio testing is definetly your niche.I really appreciate your testing and i' m sure others do to.I am wondering are these 2 radios light years ahead of the RC6GS and FS-GT5 (that you have also tested)and worth the xtra money for the average basher occasional track use?

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      light years, yes. worth it, no probably not.

  • @jerryvolpini7987
    @jerryvolpini7987 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent review! Personally, I prefer the Futaba - Performance, styling, features, adjustability, value, it has it all! That being said, both radios are so close, I dont really think you can go wrong with either 👍

  • @sidlauskis
    @sidlauskis ปีที่แล้ว

    I am from europe, Futaba 4PM 230 euro, Sanwa MT-44 250 euro. What you tnink is better radio for those money. Would you recomend getting futaba or it is Sanwa still better in 2022?

  • @FranBushardt
    @FranBushardt 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have the T4PM and I run the 3 Energizer Lithium Batteries and Generally 1 Night a Week and with these Batteries, I can almost run 4-5 Months before replacement! OUTSTANDING BATTERIES that I HIGHLY RECOMMEND!

  • @patdonovan5106
    @patdonovan5106 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the review found a mts with 2 rx482 receivers for 160 is this a good deal and re the rx482 receivers compatible with the mts

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yes and yes

    • @patdonovan5106
      @patdonovan5106 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks im really liking it much better than flysky gt5 i had

  • @DaedalEVE
    @DaedalEVE 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ordered the Futaba based on this.

  • @MrBonger88
    @MrBonger88 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I prefer the feel of the Sanwa MT44 over the Futaba 4PM. I know exactly what you’re saying when you used the word vague. It also feels better in my hand. My first Sanwa was an Airtronics XL2P 27mhz. I loved that radio. Weird thing is, I prefer Futaba for flying. I wish Sanwa had a 7 channel pistol grip like Futaba

  • @rhinusbreedt9772
    @rhinusbreedt9772 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Would love to know how the flysky noble nb4 compare to these two? Especially with speed latency? Ect?

    • @MRPB54
      @MRPB54 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ybrcracing4899 what recievers does the NB4 use ?

  • @nickf7883
    @nickf7883 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Have you ever tried the Flysky Noble NB4? Looks good on paper.

    • @rhinusbreedt9772
      @rhinusbreedt9772 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Would love to know how these compare..

    • @choke666
      @choke666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      FLYSKY BY FAAAR! I'VE NEVER HAD ANY PROBLEMS, AND ITS ERGONOMIC AS WELL AS AMBIDEXTROUS.

  • @chriscarr1647
    @chriscarr1647 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What are your thoughts on the FlySky Noble NB4 vs these?

    • @rcbashtrax9177
      @rcbashtrax9177 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Best radio by far..

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      never used one, don't know

    • @choke666
      @choke666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      EXACTLY !!! FLYSKY NOBLE ALL THE WAY. I HAVE HAD 1 FOR A YR AND A HALF, I RUN 6 OF MY CARS ON IT. YOU CAN FEEL THE WEIGHT AND BUILD. ITS A SOLID RADIO.

  • @stephenhenry9814
    @stephenhenry9814 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    One would think it’s about time for Sanwa to release an update to their entry-level line seeing the MT-S has been out for close to 5 years. I think the fact that being that old in comparison but still pretty comparable says a lot in itself.

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agree 100%. The MT-S was great when it was first released, but it's getting pretty long in the tooth. Hopefully they release something this year.

  • @daveX81
    @daveX81 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Here Futaba Receiver cost up to two times more. It’s even possible to buy a good Sanwa compatible Receiver for 25.
    In the meantime the Sanwa MT-44 cost here the same as the T4PM. With the 334 Receiver the T4PM is much more expensive as the MT-44 with the 481.
    BTW it’s really difficult to understand the differences with Futaba Receiver…
    If I wouldn’t got a really good offer for a uses T4PM I would definitely pick a MT-44.

  • @isaiahfurrow7414
    @isaiahfurrow7414 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    We have a couple MX-V radios, amd a handful of recievers for those, as well as a Spektrum DX3S(from the first batch like 13-14 yrs ago), and a handful of Spektrum recievers....
    Seems the Sanwa radios above the entry level don't all support the recievers that the MX-V used.... someday we might upgrade those to something shiny and new, but at this point they work fine, so I'm thinking of snagging a DX5C for this summmer to add to our radio collection...

  • @johnmiller4553
    @johnmiller4553 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    GREAT STUFF 🤙🤙🤙🤙🤙🤙🤙🤙🤙🤙

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thank you!

  • @8ightgeek
    @8ightgeek 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mt44 or the 4pv

  • @pmanzoogirl4311
    @pmanzoogirl4311 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ever tried the flysky noble nb4?

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      not yet

    • @pmanzoogirl4311
      @pmanzoogirl4311 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RazorRC hopefully one day! Great video, keep them coming. Thank you from the rc community

    • @choke666
      @choke666 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      IT ROCKS! (FLYSKY NOBLE) I USE MINE ON 6 OF MY CARS. BUTTER SMOOTH AND AMBIDEXTROUS.

  • @pauliet92
    @pauliet92 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Opened both links just bc I learned it counts

  • @GreatLakesRC
    @GreatLakesRC 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    $229 for the 4pm without receiver isn't bad. But I still think the 3PV is the best value for a basher $120 with a receiver.

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The 3PV is a good radio for sure.

  • @macayne
    @macayne 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    MT-S for $160 or 4PM for $260? Everything about the 4PM looks and seems great, but the cost difference on some sites makes it a really tough choice.

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      for $100 less, I'd get the MT-S

    • @macayne
      @macayne 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RazorRC Thanks, I really appreciate it. Keep up the great content!

  • @joevasquez1776
    @joevasquez1776 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about video on radio settings for ease of racing.

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good idea! I'm sure I'll do an RC basics video on what the different adjustments.

  • @danielchan854
    @danielchan854 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder why majority of ifmar racers use sanwa. Do you know why?

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  ปีที่แล้ว

      I think they have the best performance/feel.

  • @vlozity
    @vlozity 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    geez... why not compare it with Sanwa MT-44?

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      the MT-S costs $249 w/ receiver, the 4PM costs $259 w/ receiver. The MT44 costs $324.

    • @vlozity
      @vlozity 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RazorRC maybe from the supplier you get your gear from. My MT-44 cost me more or less than US$250 when i bought it in 2019.
      All I am saying is maybe you need to revisit this, the MT-S is an older radio like you mentioned and the 4PM is more inline with the MT-44 model.

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vlozity that’s great that you paid $250 in 2019, maybe you can post where you can pay that in 2021 and that would help people with $250 in their pocket looking for a new radio.

    • @vlozity
      @vlozity 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RazorRC well it is an lhs in my country, not sure if they ship international... The name is "Dogbone RC". i think they are the distro here in the islands.

  • @artificialintelligence8388
    @artificialintelligence8388 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    For me bottom line is the performance/response, the feeling of control over the car. Plastics, menus, features, bells and whistles are secondary. Forget the milliseconds statistical data. On the track you will feel the difference between a Sanwa vs a Futaba.

  • @flederdanielminguinidaniel1557
    @flederdanielminguinidaniel1557 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Aí mano fala rádio hk 3 10 hobby king

  • @levrone0075
    @levrone0075 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    that sanwa looks like ass, what were they thinking?

  • @BigDreamsSmallWalletRC
    @BigDreamsSmallWalletRC ปีที่แล้ว

    Sanwa is still years ahead of Futaba in the one aspect all racers care about and that's latency speed .... One is a cheetah the other a snail .... The snail being Fuuuuuutaaaaaaabaaaaaaaaa

    • @dackerman123
      @dackerman123 ปีที่แล้ว

      Years ahead? They are very close. The T-FHSS SR receivers are top of class in terms of latency.

    • @BigDreamsSmallWalletRC
      @BigDreamsSmallWalletRC ปีที่แล้ว

      ​​@@dackerman123 if you ain't first your last ... Futaba is about as fast in comparison to Radio Link 🥴🤣

  • @NoName-dn8nv
    @NoName-dn8nv ปีที่แล้ว

    After flying drones for 7 years coming back to rc cars, these surface radios are a complete ripoff. Features, latency, software its all overpriced garbage. My $200 taranis is way better than the most expensive futaba in every way but form factor. Your videos are great btw

  • @rickysnow7437
    @rickysnow7437 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    it's called latency 🤙🏼💯

  • @jrsantoyo9028
    @jrsantoyo9028 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Futaba 200$ .??? Lol

  • @choke666
    @choke666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    NOT EVEN A QUESTION. FLYSKY NOBLE!!!

  • @Bennie98
    @Bennie98 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The screen of the futaba has a slow refresh speed. The buttons are cheap expensive looking chrome plastics. And the navigation buttons are not really handy. Futaba has also got a reputation on interference when racing with multiple futaba users. So I would have never picked the Futaba. Not a sanwa fanboy though. I got myself a graupner x8n and I'm super pleased with that one. Unfortunately it is never in american reviews.

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I would like to test other brands like Ko Propo but unfortunately only like 12 people would watch them, so it just doesn't make sense for me to buy one. Even the two radios here from the biggest brands, don't really get much in the way of views.

    • @Bennie98
      @Bennie98 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RazorRC i know, and i get that. I wasn't critiquing your channel. It was just a general remark. Your reviews are mostly fine. I just wasn't agreeing with the conclusion here though. I like your different review categories like build quality and feature set and conclusion style. Keep up the good work!

    • @RazorRC
      @RazorRC  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Bennie98 thanks! didn't mean for my comment to sound harsh at all, I appreciate the feedback!

    • @Bennie98
      @Bennie98 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RazorRC It wasn't harsh. No problems here. Just making conversation! Cheers! (Y)