Why Frederick Douglass Never Smiled In Pictures
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
- Frederick Douglass was the most photographed American in the 19th century, having his portrait taken more times than all the U.S. presidents of his time. But in almost 200 photographs, Douglass never smiled. That was on purpose. Here’s why.
Subscribe for more videos: ajplus.co/subs...
Follow us on Instagram: / ajplus
Like us on Facebook: / ajplusenglish
Follow us on Twitter: / ajplus
In his time period their wasn't anything to smile about
True but almost every person doesn't smile in photos back then because from what I understand you had to remain still for a long period in order to get the photo.
He had a white wife. That's something to smile about. 😂
@@jasonfink985 so you're saying he was the 1st basketball star...😏
Generally speaking there's not too much to smile about now either, when factoring in all the variables of oppression as well as considering our communal plight that we all continue to share as Americans of African descent.
🎶🎵🎶"Steal away! Steal away! Steal away to JESUS!"
JESUS had delivered us! It was time to sing and shout! We left JESUS behind, or the REVIVAL would have been ongoing!
Marian Anderson
"No matter how big a nation is, it is no stronger than its weakest people, and as long as you keep a person down, some part of you has to be down there to hold him down, so it means you cannot soar as you might otherwise."
💯💯💯👌👌👌🤌🤌🤌👏👏👏😎😎😎🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️❤️✊️✊️✊️
“I have no love for America, as such, I have no patriotism. I have no country.”
-Fredrick Douglas
"For revolting barbarity and shameless hypocrisy America reigns without a rival."
-Frederick Douglass
Wow! Powerful words!!!!!
That's about right.
He could go back to Africa...why he didn't ?
@@kathygaither5746 about right for HIS TIME and experience. We live in a world that Mr.Douglass could have only dreamed of and even that was beyond
He was a very handsome and intelligent man whose pictures portray a warrior willing to go to any length for his cause.
Agree. He could easily been a womanizer but was a one woman man. His second wife after the death of the mother of his four children was white. They were only married a couple yrs when he passed.
@@debrapaulino918 I'm not sure about the one woman man part. He did his first wife real dirty.
It is cool you recognize his good looks n determination...I've listened to George foreman preach n he mentions his good looks from time to time
So you were there?
@@ninaj.4885Really? Tell us about it.
“Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope.” - Robert F Kennedy
...which would then rapidly extinguished by the feudal class hiding behind mega c0rporations
Every tone was a testimony against slavery, and a prayer to God for deliverance from chains. Frederick Douglass
I hear the mournful wail of millions! Frederick Douglass
In the early days of photography, no one was obsessed with fake SMILING as Americans are now. Edward S Curtis took volumes of photographs of Native Americans and you’d be hard pressed to find anyone smiling in his pictures. Photography was complicated and expensive and used to record one’s likeness. It wasn’t on their phones and wasn’t just a light activity. Much preparation had to be applied. No one smiled for photographs back then.
Just say you didn’t watch the video.
@@AttaManhe's right tho.
If you fid smile, it simply resulted in a distraction in your facial features. Everyone held completely STILL for ALL PHOTOS.
It was not a good time to smile. That was the message.
My father was born in 1942, and he still doesn't smile on pictures, when we ask him to smile,you can tell it's fake,so we don't 😊
He was a handsome man.
This man knows the value of timing emotions in crucial situations.
I don’t expect him to smile after how he was treated
I contrast his quiet strength, maintaining his dignity.
A handsome elegant Ancestor who didn't play
Nobody smiled in oil portraits either.
What the f, NOBODY smiled in photos back in those days.
You people can be so numb and ignorant. This revisionist history you want to portray will never take the place of truth.
True. Smiling and showing of one's teeth in pictures was considered rude in this period, by everyone.
This was an excellent presentation. Thank you
A photograph speaks a thousand words that is powerful to the core.
DOUGLAS WAS SPIRITUALLY GUIDED 👍🏼🍃💓🙏🏽
Pride ❤ Pride ❤ Intelligence. Frederick was a Wiseman ❤ Honesty ❤ still miss you ❤
People generally didn't smile in photos back then, in part because of how long it took.
He's beautiful
Actually, daguerrotype picture-taking was completely unlike today's digital photos. It could not capture fleeting smiles and other nuances. One had to sit stock-still, holding a single pose for lengthy periods of time, to capture a daguerrotype image ...which is why smiles were absent in the final picture
Thank you, i enjoyed learning from this video. It was informative.
Nobody was smiling in a single photo that was show 🤣
Back then, it took a very long time for the camera to capture anything and one single move could create a blur. It's hard to smile for a very long time and you have to concentrate on staying still as well. This is nothing but BS reporting.
White answer.
get real. none of the other photos showed smiles either. grow up
Please forward this video to the 'Essence Awards' website, public relations, marketing. They need a lesson.
Why doesn’t he smile in photos? It seems like the opening line of he was born into slavery and had to escape would be answer enough, but I’ll keep watching…
This dignified gentleman knew how to read and respect a room, and the times. He wasn't trying to be a supermodel, he was and still is a respected scholar.
Thank you for sharing, I really enjoyed the video. No matter how old I am, I love learning.
Almost nobody sniled in pictures in the past, not just him. My parents were born in 1924 and 1927, and in their pics, they didn't smile...that was a thing.
It is nothing special that Douglas didn't smile in his portraits.
In the 1800´s that was absolutely the norm.
It is almost impossible to find a studio portrait of that time where people smile.
Yes, but blacks were depicted as smiling, trying to indicate that slavery was not as horrific as it was. Frederick Douglass knew that and showed the opposite of what whites and blacks saw in other pictures of black people.
This
this anti American propaganda media will always find away to racially segregate and destroy US fom the inside, this mtfkr doesn't even have the balls to cover the ongoing modern slavery in their own country...
Wow@ these people.
So you think they're the ones who produced this video? So many times it's non-"these people" producing media and speaking for those people. Look at who the senior producers are for this company. And in some cases, it's your people selling narratives.
@@tonyborelli. But you clicked on "these people" 's video.
اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَسْأَلُكَ فِعْلَ الخَيْرَاتِ ، وَتَرْكَ المُنْكَرَاتِ ، وَحُبَّ المَسَاكِينَ ، وَأَنْ تَغْفِرَ لِي وَتَرْحَمَنِي ، وَإذَا أَرَدْتَ فِتْنَةَ قَومٍ فَتَوَفَّنِي غَيْرَ مَفْتُونٍ ، وَأَسْأَلُكَ حُبَّكَ ، وَحُبَّ مَنْ يُحِبّـُكَ ، وَحُبَّ كل عَمَلٍ يُقَرِّبُنِي إِلَى حُبِّـكَ
Nobody smiled in these pictures, did they? I can't think of hardly any where the person smiled.
Wrong! No one smiled back then as you saw from all the other subjects as well as FD. There was no such thing as a snapshot back then. One had to sit for TEN minutes for the image to burn into the film. It is impossible to smile for that long perfectly it would just cause a blur. Which is common in photos of that era typically of the hands. The snapshot came with the advent of the flash which burned the image instantly. This video should have been strictly about how he posed not about his lack of a smile.
Everyone posed the same for photos back then, and no one smiled in them, not even President Lincoln.
I cant help but notice you watched the PBS special on Frederick Douglas.......well done and nicely presented. Bravo
There wasn't nothing to smile during slavery.
No one smiled in photos back then. Why is this a question?!
Quit simply, there was nothing to smile about. Should he have felt grateful to be free from something that should never have happened in the first place?! Hell No! It wasn't a game for him or any other person of color at that time.
It was generally not common to smile in photos back then anyway. So he was basically doing the norm.
So you're ignoring slavery ? Typical white comment.
@@xavierclayton9990 When you make assumptions about the people you're responding to you look like a fool.... What does my comment have to do with slavery?
So, the focus was primarily on his _posing_ and facial expressions.
Excellent work.
What will make you know what is the difficult path to Paradise? It is the freeing of a sl ve. Surat Al-Balad 90:12-13
I love it!!
This was such a dope video thank u, sorry for the shadowban damn
Him and Red Foxx resemble each other
With the hell he was catching, there was nothing to smile about. How can you smile with vile beasts on your back?
Apparently , he liked Ireland. The one country where he began to feel properly free.
'Whats The Point In A Fake Smile For Freedom'.
Excellent channel 🕊
Man, people did not smile in photos back then.
I don't think it became a common practice to smile in photos until the 20th century.
This is a factual misrepresentation. Virtually NO photographic subjects EVER smiled when they were photographed until the early 20th century! Speculation as to why Douglass didn't smile is nonsense.
Frederick Douglas explicitly disliked it when an artist depicted him with a slight smile. In one letter, Douglas expressed frustration that the smile made it appear as if he was untroubled or unburdened by his experiences as an enslaved person. This is likely a major reason behind his love of photography as it granted him control over his own image.
There's an excellent article titled "Frederick Douglass’s Camera Obscura: Representing the Antislave “Clothed and in Their Own Form” " that explores this.
it is helping me to under stand more👍
🙏🏾✊🏾
For the title, there wasn’t anything to smile about. Slavery was very very bad! Teach the kids what it REALLY was, we don’t care about their guilty feelings. It HAPPENED and it’s HISTORY
did you say history, I am not so sure, try telling Floyd's family, and all those blacks who lost their lives at traffic stops or whilst buying ice creams, who later "couldn't breathe" once the police intervened in the name of "law enforcement".
Sounds like legal lynching/shooting, but I guess that's okay, given it's all "legal".
They have no issue and are content with our children continuing to be inflicted with generational pain due to them and their ancestors.
100% 👍🏽
Smiling in a photograph was not conventional behavior in this period. I am aware of only one photograph where Lincoln has a slight smile. But the showing of teeth in photograph was considered poor taste.
Many people in early photographs didn’t smile.
He was a real one he went thru hell and stood for blacks I'm thankful
It’s funny, none of the other figures you were showing: Emily Dickinson, Abraham Lincoln, or Sojourner Truth was smiling for their portrait either. They took photographing a serious matter back then.
Very Interesting
This is complete BS. Having studied the history of photography in depth at JMU, I know for a fact that the exposure time was so long that people had to sit still for 15 minutes for a portrait. Nobody smiled because a smile cannot be held that long unless you are a Rockette.
Very few people, if any, smiled in 19th century photographs. Which makes me wonder why you had to use this particular topic to discuss Frederick Douglass.
What a handsome man though!
Clearly the man had gone through a lot
Frederick Douglas is a legend.
Lincoln never smiled in photographs either.
and they shot him
Why? What was it to smile about back then?
✊🏾❤️✊🏾
His face reminds me of football legend Jim Brown.
If you look at black peoples pictures of that time nobody smiled....tf was there to smile about?
What a legend
Did the photo media of his time require people to be motionless?
Many people don't smile in photos today. Many times I don't unless my wife forces me to because I don't think I have a nice smile. We can't draw any conclusions at all from F. Douglass not smiling. Also when I see photos from that time period, the people usually didn't smile so it might have been common at the time.
you are not wrong, what is there to smile for ...blacks were constantly beaten, raped and murdered, and lynched, it would be a miracle to smile about your own destructions. totally agree with you but in modern times, the blacks have learnt to accept their fate more willingly to accept being shot at during traffic stop for example, once they accept that, they'll be happier. Welcome to Amarika.
@@user-vc5qk9tg7uNo they weren't! I've read books written in that time frame almost more than half of black we're doing quite well. Contrary to what you been indoctrinated to believe, when I started pulling up my family records they were doing well at that time. Yes there were issues with white people coming to steal kill and destroy. But it was not as prevalent as they make it seem and we have never been a weak people. Propaganda didn't start in the last 50 years it's been here since they got here. & many weren't enslaved smh
If he lived in Africa he would have smiled
My guy would’ve killed it on instagram I tell you what
Why he doesn't have a big Hollywood movie
Great video. Of course not smiling was easier to hold for the long pose it took for a photo back then. Mr Douglas knew the power of imagery. He is not looking at you but it sure seems he is starring into ones soul.
We’re to keep god’s laws amen 💪🏾💐💕
What was there to smile about during that era????
I pretty much was sure of this already but to be sure I just did a search for "when did smiling in photos become common" and got the answer of 1920s. So FD not smiling was likely the norm... not an unusual exception.
🔥
What was there to smile about!
It is a PSYOP.
He was a freemason. Ultimately, he did more to hurt Black people.
Comment during pre-roll ads as a guess. The photos were taken on tin-type photography and required long exposure times. Pretty much no one smiled for portraits during the 1800s because it was too hard to hold still for the time required for the picture to turn out.
I was wrong. I thought tin-type lasted longer, or rather thought paper photography was developed later. Douglas even stated his intentions so there is no way to misconstrue his expression. None of us know everything. Never be afraid to admit you were wrong about something.
@@The_Opinion_of_Matt thanks
I am 60 yrs old man from Africa, I don't remember taken any pictures with a smile!
.......how in the World did Obama slip into this.
These men are _two_ different people!
Being a black person in America at a time when slavery was law would you smile?
I agree what was their to smile about in those time, not a dang thing was funny 🤫🧘🏾♀️.
fd was great.
No one smiled in their pictures back then, no one.
Cuz shit wasn't sweet back then. Also because he's a man. Stoic. Intelligent.
Because Newports made his teeth yellow
They didn't smile because you wernt supposed to smile if they did the picture would come out blurry and that wasn't just because for only blacks,also you wernt supposed to show your teeth the reason why people didn't smile back then it was considered impolite .
Neither did Lincoln. People at the time wanted to be important and serious...of all races.
F.D. clinical he was like picture this smile😠 I'm just the future picker upper.
James Van derzee
I drew Frederick Douglass when I was waiting in the welfare office one day
traditional posing, carried on through time
Investing in stocks and crypto markets is the best financial decisions any can make but the crypto market is much more better than anything else at the moment...... "" "" "" "!!!!!!!
*KAREN TUDOSE LUCY*
"" "" Search her on google by the name above she is the one guiding me through stocks market.....!!!!!
In this time nothing to smile about neither in Amerikkka
Well done!