⏰️ TIME STAMPS ⏰️ (Updated as I watch, with my opinions added) 0:00 start immediately 3:16 Witness Ryan Duncan, Detective 19:04 cross 24:24 Witness Michelle (Mickey) Marhoefer, Chief Deputy Criminal Investigator in Prosecution office 1:01:46 cross 1:15:21 jury released for sidebar extension 1:16:00 discussion about messages 1:21:24 Jury is back, return to cross 1:22:24 break 1:41:44 Witness Daniel Pardel 2:44:19 Judge gives Jury time before break 2:52:19 lunch 4:19:00 return from break 4:19:44 Jury enters 4:27:36 Judge clears courtroom 4:55:46 back 4:57:16 Witness back on the stand, cross 5:00:09 sidebar 5:01:03 Return from sidebar 5:33:16 Redirect 5:38:02 Witness Michelle Lampert 5:53:21 Done 5:57:32 Jury released for break Back from break, 6:06:34 Witness still on the stand 6:17:10 Done 6:19:31 Done 6:23:21 Done 6:28:10 cross 6:31:56 Jury excused 6:32:21 sidebar discussion extended 6:36:05 Jury enters 6:36:47 Cross continues 6:41:30 Done (She said "sure is!" 🤣) 6:44:42 redirect 6:48:24 1 cross, 1 redirect and released 6:50:03 Witness Dan Lampert 6:52:59 cross 6:55:01 Witness Deputy Traw *if I missed anything, please reply and let me know.
For everyone that was in chat the first day. The 911 call they played was NOT the daughter. The daughter did NOT find her mom dead and call 911. The husband did and called the daughter the next morning very early. The 911 call was the victim on a prior day. They were in an argument and he stormed off. She heard a gunshot and thought he shot himself. I saw so many in the chat while watching it later claiming it was the daughter finding the mom. They said who the caller was while laying foundation with the 911 dispatch. Pay attention!
After watching Day 1 of this trial, and about a third of Day 2, I'm not even sure why Daniel Howard opted to plead not guilty and take it to trial 🤷🏽♀️. This defendent is GUILTY.
Yea, when I heard that he said she got sooooo upset that he wanted to put a house that she independently had (only) put in an offer on in the divorce papers that she killed herself - I was SHOCKED!! Aside from hearing & seeing things as an LEO, simply living life should’ve given him better "reasons" than THAT!! Only a narcissist would think that was a brilliant idea…..🙄😒🙄😒🙄😒
This defense attorney is horrible! He keeps asking questions from the woman's boyfriend, saying "right?" At the end, and 5 times this far, the witnesses answer has either been "no", "incorrect," or "not true." So , as an attorney he should know never to ask a question he doesn't already know the answer to and worse yet is asking questions that you are getting the exact opposite answer of the one you want or the one that may help your client at all! He also tried to impeach a witness based on a statement her husband made to the grand jury...wtf? You cant impeach someone based on another person's statement. Duh?!?!
Glad I’m not alone. Left comment myself earlier in regard to defense attorney Johnson! Get feeling he personally thinks he’s all that - yet he’s pretty bad so far!
Ha! You think? He’s absolutely terrible! Dudes guilty! Attorney isn’t even pretending to help him get off & get away with murdering his wife! First murder trial maybe?
Different courtroom but the set up is still weird: the defendant is right next to the jury and the witnesses are on the other side of the room (still looks like a penalty box). Usually it's the opposite.
Why doesn’t this judge give the attorneys a blanket permission to approach? I’ve seen other judges tell them they don’t have to ask “permission to approach” every time. She has asked like 100 times just on one witness 😂
Somebody, usually the audio op, needs to tell this defence lawyer that he needs to be closer to the mic in front of him. They don’t work when U are 5 feet away. Also, could he try and speak clearly.
This defense attorney gross. Reeks of desperation. Trying to get this officer say Kendi exaggerating. She did opposite. She was clearly scared but really didn’t say much. He had to pull some of the info out of her. She wasn’t frantic and going on about what happened. She just wanted to get away from there.
TITLE 18 CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS CHAPTER 40 HOMICIDE 18-4012. EXCUSABLE HOMICIDE. Homicide is excusable in the following cases: 1. When committed by accident and misfortune in doing any lawful act by lawful means, with usual and ordinary caution, and without any unlawful intent. 2. When committed by accident and misfortune, in the heat of passion, upon any sudden and sufficient provocation, or upon a sudden combat when no undue advantage is taken nor any dangerous weapon used, and when the killing is not done in a cruel or unusual manner. History: [I.C., sec. 18-4012, as added by 1972, ch. 336, sec. 1, p. 931.]
Where do these defendants find these defense attorneys? 🤪 This guy is terrible! Must think he’s pretty cool doing this all by himself. Guess it’s a good reason for appeal!
This defense attorney sucks. He says partial sentence moves on asks questions that don’t seem have any bearing. I think his client guilty but this lawyer is pathetic. He tries to infer something that not true. Nothing brings any doubt to fact that Kendi would not shoot self or that Dan was controlling a-hole most of marriage and killed her. He tries to testify regarding text and twist what it says.
This attorney is like a child. Is this all he has? Do wish witness would be stronger. Answering I guess so to one of his questions was weak. Was with Kendi talking to get most out of divorce. It really doesn’t matter though. No she did t like dan. He isn’t likable. Doesn’t mean she’s lying.
And she was in a marriage with a control freak a narcissist. His money was his money her money was their money. He made her pay for all groceries and then woukd complain about what she bought. He used his money for his toys. Made plenty of money but told step daughter they were poor so had to use only wood stove to heat and she and mother responsible to keep it going. He degraded her all the time. Yes maybe should divorce him sooner instead of finding comfort in another man but he murdered her because he is a nasty POS.
You either just trying to be a smart arse or really believe this. If you do you have issues. Murder not justified if spouse cheats and was nit crime of passion. He felt he owned her and his dare she divorce him and no way she getting any if the assets. He planned on her dying.
⏰️ TIME STAMPS ⏰️
(Updated as I watch, with my opinions added)
0:00 start immediately
3:16 Witness Ryan Duncan, Detective
19:04 cross
24:24 Witness Michelle (Mickey) Marhoefer, Chief Deputy Criminal Investigator in Prosecution office
1:01:46 cross
1:15:21 jury released for sidebar extension
1:16:00 discussion about messages
1:21:24 Jury is back, return to cross
1:22:24 break
1:41:44 Witness Daniel Pardel
2:44:19 Judge gives Jury time before break
2:52:19 lunch
4:19:00 return from break
4:19:44 Jury enters
4:27:36 Judge clears courtroom
4:55:46 back
4:57:16 Witness back on the stand, cross
5:00:09 sidebar
5:01:03 Return from sidebar
5:33:16 Redirect
5:38:02 Witness Michelle Lampert
5:53:21 Done
5:57:32 Jury released for break
Back from break, 6:06:34 Witness still on the stand
6:17:10 Done
6:19:31 Done
6:23:21 Done
6:28:10 cross
6:31:56 Jury excused
6:32:21 sidebar discussion extended
6:36:05 Jury enters
6:36:47 Cross continues
6:41:30 Done
(She said "sure is!" 🤣)
6:44:42 redirect
6:48:24 1 cross, 1 redirect and released
6:50:03 Witness Dan Lampert
6:52:59 cross
6:55:01 Witness Deputy Traw
*if I missed anything, please reply and let me know.
Thank you so much!!
Thank you
Huge thanks😊
Thank you!
To folks having audio issues: change your phone settings to Mono Audio and use headphones. Works for every trial.
THANK YOU!!!!! 🙌🏼🙌🏼
Yes this helped!!
For everyone that was in chat the first day. The 911 call they played was NOT the daughter. The daughter did NOT find her mom dead and call 911. The husband did and called the daughter the next morning very early. The 911 call was the victim on a prior day. They were in an argument and he stormed off. She heard a gunshot and thought he shot himself. I saw so many in the chat while watching it later claiming it was the daughter finding the mom. They said who the caller was while laying foundation with the 911 dispatch. Pay attention!
It took me a minute to figure that out.
Thank you for this
Different courtroom, same audio issues.
It's horrible with headphones!!
I thank Law & Crime for your presentation However, could you PLEASE do something about the audio, Thank you!!
What a joke the defence lawyer is. He makes absolutely no sense in his cross.
After watching Day 1 of this trial, and about a third of Day 2, I'm not even sure why Daniel Howard opted to plead not guilty and take it to trial 🤷🏽♀️. This defendent is GUILTY.
His type always do. Think they should get away with it
Absolutely, @@traveltm!
Yea, when I heard that he said she got sooooo upset that he wanted to put a house that she independently had (only) put in an offer on in the divorce papers that she killed herself - I was SHOCKED!! Aside from hearing & seeing things as an LEO, simply living life should’ve given him better "reasons" than THAT!! Only a narcissist would think that was a brilliant idea…..🙄😒🙄😒🙄😒
this court room seems like a cozy little house i like it
No prison cell is worth the hope that you MIGHT gain another $1,000,000, especially when the other option is a lifetime in that cell.
She should have moved out first and then file for a divorce. This is always the proper order when you deal with an abusive spouse.
Hindsight is 20/20.
The audio is horrible. 😭
Bigtime😮
Even then with closed captions it was not great. Sad case but jeeze fix the audio problems
This defense attorney is horrible! He keeps asking questions from the woman's boyfriend, saying "right?" At the end, and 5 times this far, the witnesses answer has either been "no", "incorrect," or "not true." So , as an attorney he should know never to ask a question he doesn't already know the answer to and worse yet is asking questions that you are getting the exact opposite answer of the one you want or the one that may help your client at all!
He also tried to impeach a witness based on a statement her husband made to the grand jury...wtf? You cant impeach someone based on another person's statement. Duh?!?!
lol. He’s a bit of a train wreck isn’t he
Glad I’m not alone. Left comment myself earlier in regard to defense attorney Johnson! Get feeling he personally thinks he’s all that - yet he’s pretty bad so far!
That style of leading questions is annoying but appropriate for cross examination.
@@DRobb-zi2rj yes!! It’s pretty embarrassing when you think you’re ALL THAT when you’re actually “anything but”.
This cross is asinine. I wonder if defendant thinks it is going well.
Most news media uses captioning….some courtroom mics are inadequate….thanks
The sound is horrible- at least if they used the mikes it might improve.
Defense atty is unorganized and seems unprepared
Ha! You think? He’s absolutely terrible!
Dudes guilty! Attorney isn’t even pretending to help him get off & get away with murdering his wife! First murder trial maybe?
Sounds like this was taped in the seventies lol
It is an old building, it echos
Why bother to stream if it can’t be heard?
I have no issues with the Audio, maybe its because im listening on noise cancelling headphones.
Different courtroom but the set up is still weird: the defendant is right next to the jury and the witnesses are on the other side of the room (still looks like a penalty box). Usually it's the opposite.
Why doesn’t this judge give the attorneys a blanket permission to approach? I’ve seen other judges tell them they don’t have to ask “permission to approach” every time. She has asked like 100 times just on one witness 😂
The audio on this is horrible. Unwatchable in my opinion
I like when they dress the defendant up like an attorney, does that work 🤪
Somebody, usually the audio op, needs to tell this defence lawyer that he needs to be closer to the mic in front of him. They don’t work when U are 5 feet away. Also, could he try and speak clearly.
It’s a trial. Not a tv show, You are the eves dropper, not a ticket holder.
I like how they don't suck on water bottles, it's so much more dignified to drink from a cup 🤪
Defense attorney sounds like a child playing lawyer.
When did this trial start?
This is day 2
I think two days ago.
Why does it say "bathtub" in the title? Doesn't explain in description. Thx
she was found deceased in the bath by her daughter
No. He found her and called 911.
He put her in the tub staged the scene and then called 911.
@@shaunnaghher daughter did not find her.
He “found” her and called 911.
Horrible audio again
Guilty af
Audio sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! will rather watch Baldwin trial and a new trial has just started two days ago
This defense attorney gross. Reeks of desperation. Trying to get this officer say Kendi exaggerating. She did opposite. She was clearly scared but really didn’t say much. He had to pull some of the info out of her. She wasn’t frantic and going on about what happened. She just wanted to get away from there.
Where is Daniel is he a no show either..and the audio is so crappy too..
He is there sitting next to the defense attorney.
Have they fixed the sound
TITLE 18
CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
CHAPTER 40
HOMICIDE
18-4012. EXCUSABLE HOMICIDE. Homicide is excusable in the following cases:
1. When committed by accident and misfortune in doing any lawful act by lawful means, with usual and ordinary caution, and without any unlawful intent.
2. When committed by accident and misfortune, in the heat of passion, upon any sudden and sufficient provocation, or upon a sudden combat when no undue advantage is taken nor any dangerous weapon used, and when the killing is not done in a cruel or unusual manner.
History:
[I.C., sec. 18-4012, as added by 1972, ch. 336, sec. 1, p. 931.]
Volume 😮
He is so juvenile. Asking officer if story made sense to him. It’s pathetic. Have nothing so trying to say Kendi made it up.
This is so frustrating to watch. They ask 12 questions just to get basic information. This pace is killing me.
Where do these defendants find these defense attorneys? 🤪
This guy is terrible! Must think he’s pretty cool doing this all by himself.
Guess it’s a good reason for appeal!
I can’t believe how many people are saying how bad the audio is! It’s totally fine!
Maybe you guys need your hearing checked 😂
Yeah I don't have any issues with it, I don't know what people are complaining about lol
This defense attorney sucks. He says partial sentence moves on asks questions that don’t seem have any bearing. I think his client guilty but this lawyer is pathetic. He tries to infer something that not true. Nothing brings any doubt to fact that Kendi would not shoot self or that Dan was controlling a-hole most of marriage and killed her. He tries to testify regarding text and twist what it says.
Yes but
This attorney is like a child. Is this all he has? Do wish witness would be stronger. Answering I guess so to one of his questions was weak. Was with Kendi talking to get most out of divorce. It really doesn’t matter though. No she did t like dan. He isn’t likable. Doesn’t mean she’s lying.
Educated but don’t know to stand by and use the microphone
Theses law and crimes are trash lawyers listen to the words the say under the breath
I think I've seen that lady detective in another trial, perhaps.
Not guilty. Crime of passion. She cheated.
You don't get to murder people for cheating on you. Lol. It's illegal to kill human beings no matter how bad your feelings are hurt.
@@donnawhite7203 i agree. But some people do it anyway
And she was in a marriage with a control freak a narcissist. His money was his money her money was their money. He made her pay for all groceries and then woukd complain about what she bought. He used his money for his toys. Made plenty of money but told step daughter they were poor so had to use only wood stove to heat and she and mother responsible to keep it going. He degraded her all the time. Yes maybe should divorce him sooner instead of finding comfort in another man but he murdered her because he is a nasty POS.
You either just trying to be a smart arse or really believe this. If you do you have issues. Murder not justified if spouse cheats and was nit crime of passion. He felt he owned her and his dare she divorce him and no way she getting any if the assets. He planned on her dying.
@m_christine1070
Are you arguing that cheating on someone and being the victim of a murder are mutually exclusive?