Wow your amazing. I love how that you are so educated in so many subjects concerning the bible. It's hard to find someone that you can learn so much from. I have learned alot from your channel. We are still doing better but still desire your prayers. God bless your ministry of love!
Another excellent video! For modern critics of modern text criticism, the qualities required for textual authenticity are: 1) Number (quantity of manuscripts and readings) 2) Variety (the geographical distribution of the readings) 3) Continuity (canonicity and acceptance by the Christian Church throughout the ages) 4) Reasonableness 5) Context 6) Antiquity 7) Content. When all these factors are considered, Codex B and Codex Aleph, on which almost all modern Bible versions are based, fulfill only one of these seven qualities (#6). The much-maligned Johannine Comma fulfills four of these qualities, # 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. However, if 250 AD is regarded as "antiquity" then it fulfills this also. It should also be noted that the Bible itself nowhere states that the Greek must always be primary and Latin always be secondary. To always accept the Greek reading over the Latin reading is axiomatic, and if one accepts such readings as Acts 8:37 and I John 5:7, then in these instances at least, for the TR the Latin witness trumps the Greek witness.
Recently learned that the Church of England was DOCTRINELY the SAME as the Catholic, so it made politicially correct sense for them to use the word "Church" that WASN'T in the greek, that way they would line up with the acceptable used word as the Catholics, Wiclift translated from Catholic Latin & used Church, Tyndall who translated directly from the greek used Congregation. Thus MOST historicially when they read or use "Church" it designates WHERE to GO, biblicially as Tyndal translated it would mean the individuals.
Thanks for your message and your bible reviews i know have added 1611 ruchman tbs westminster and jay green interlinial by jay green.Please do instant referance kjv bible for wow affect.
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa The following article makes an excellent case for use of the Byzantine text. byzantinetext.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/editions-rp-11-appendix.pdf
There are 3 or 4 editions of the Majority Text and there are SEVERAL editions and revisions of the "Received Text" ( i.e. "TR"). 500 languages? What is odd is that- the "errors" that were said to be in Tyndale's translation of the New Testament are now ACCEPTED in the Catholic Bible ( NAB) of today. I have seen what the Wycliffe Bible looked like ( writing-wise), and it is just scribble nonsense. BUT if you get a copy with MORDERN lettering- even with the OLD spelling- it is a VERY readable Bible translation. Some people are willing to admit to translational mistakes..... others are not.
Hi Mr.Steve. Could you tell me where I could get A sheet of paper or a book that tells you the archaic words for the King James Bible? Thank you so much for ur help...🙏✅
I noticed that you have the NIV on your desk that is as thick as an encyclopaedia. Are you an NIV believer of that text? That is a very bad transliteration of the manuscripts that it cam from.
Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism. I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin, but not the Greek so out it goes. Good will towards men Doxology in Matthew Without cause God manifest in the flesh Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin, so out they go The PA and Mark 16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek and Latin so out they go. Even the “not yet” found in the two of the earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8 some throw out. If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a problem, what would you see as a problem?
One thing about the TR is that it emphasizes the biblical and ancient practice of Isopsephy or what we commonly know as Gematria. Which is the simple method of allocating numbers to letters to form mathematical equations in any given language. We can see this very evidently in Revelation 7:4 with the number 144,000 being described as ρμδ to write out 144,000 instead of what many modern Greek NT's put instead is ἑκατὸν τεσσεράκοντα τέσσαρες χιλιάδες and completely getting rid of the original text. This comes from a viewpoint of belief that Greek Isopsephy and Hebrew Gematria is some sort of "kballah" or some other weird nonsense which has nothing to do with Gematria/Isopsephy. The "Scholars" of so called "Higher and Textual Criticism" have completely erased a biblical doctrine and ancient practice in the process.
Wow your amazing. I love how that you are so educated in so many subjects concerning the bible. It's hard to find someone that you can learn so much from. I have learned alot from your channel. We are still doing better but still desire your prayers. God bless your ministry of love!
Thank you! You too!
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Did Early Church Father Cyprian really quote from 1 John 5:7 in his letter on the Unity of the Church?
Another excellent video! For modern critics of modern text criticism, the qualities required for textual authenticity are: 1) Number (quantity of manuscripts and readings) 2) Variety (the geographical distribution of the readings) 3) Continuity (canonicity and acceptance by the Christian Church throughout the ages) 4) Reasonableness 5) Context 6) Antiquity 7) Content. When all these factors are considered, Codex B and Codex Aleph, on which almost all modern Bible versions are based, fulfill only one of these seven qualities (#6). The much-maligned Johannine Comma fulfills four of these qualities, # 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. However, if 250 AD is regarded as "antiquity" then it fulfills this also. It should also be noted that the Bible itself nowhere states that the Greek must always be primary and Latin always be secondary. To always accept the Greek reading over the Latin reading is axiomatic, and if one accepts such readings as Acts 8:37 and I John 5:7, then in these instances at least, for the TR the Latin witness trumps the Greek witness.
Thanks for the education pastor.
Your welcome!
Recently learned that the Church of England was DOCTRINELY the SAME as the Catholic, so it made politicially correct sense for them to use the word "Church" that WASN'T in the greek, that way they would line up with the acceptable used word as the Catholics, Wiclift translated from Catholic Latin & used Church, Tyndall who translated directly from the greek used Congregation. Thus MOST historicially when they read or use "Church" it designates WHERE to GO, biblicially as Tyndal translated it would mean the individuals.
Thanks for your message and your bible reviews i know have added 1611 ruchman tbs westminster and jay green interlinial by jay green.Please do instant referance kjv bible for wow affect.
Amen!
So simplifying it, we can start with Majority text then sub group Byzantine text then further sub group Textus Receptus? Or is that too simplified?
Good
Any good entry level books on this subject you would recommend?
Most any Jack Moorman book, and Thomas Holland’s Crowned With Glory.
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa thank you, I somehow missed your reply til now.
Nice work mate, well done. I am a bit smarter now 🍾
Amen
So the benzytine text is the most accurate group of texts representing the whole majority text ?
Pretty much, with some nuances.
But this youtube video does not mention the differences.
Hey pastor, wondering if i could set up a phone call with you about this issue. Namely KJV questions.
Check our Church website
Did Early Church Father Cyprian really quote from 1 John 5:7 in his letter on the Unity of the Church?
Sure seems he did.
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa The following article makes an excellent case for use of the Byzantine text.
byzantinetext.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/editions-rp-11-appendix.pdf
Hi pastor i was looking for a kjv with classic images like the 1600'1700 modern leather bible
Humble Lamb edition
barnes and noble has a gustav dore Bible
Would nrsv be a good translation or is there a other translation based on the textus receptus that you like other than kjv thanks
MEV, NKJV, or kjver
The Geneva Bible is also based on the Textus Receptus. It is older than the KJV.
Please explain kjv has 678 verses but niv has 666 verses in Mark..
They call niv best.So niv people have the mark of the best in there hand.
Yikes!
Do you have video on hebrica Stuttgartensia or Samaritan Torah or etc? On OT study
Maybe the stuttgartensia
What are your thoughts on the Bogomils?
Done vids on them.
I thought the TR was Erasmus
Long story.
There are 3 or 4 editions of the Majority Text and there are SEVERAL editions and revisions of the "Received Text" ( i.e. "TR").
500 languages?
What is odd is that- the "errors" that were said to be in Tyndale's translation of the New Testament are now ACCEPTED in the Catholic Bible ( NAB) of today.
I have seen what the Wycliffe Bible looked like ( writing-wise), and it is just scribble nonsense. BUT if you get a copy with MORDERN lettering- even with the OLD spelling- it is a VERY readable Bible translation.
Some people are willing to admit to translational mistakes..... others are not.
Hi Mr.Steve. Could you tell me where I could get A sheet of paper or a book that tells you the archaic words for the King James Bible? Thank you so much for ur help...🙏✅
David Daniels at Chick or David Cloud at O Timothy them. Trinitarian Bible Society has a free one I think. God bless!
New Life Of Albany Ga. Thank yo for ur quick reply and info...✅ blessings to you and urs ..
Thank you Steve I got one from chick publications, about archaic words ...much appreciated..✅
I looked up September 18, 2021 and found nothing haha.
Hmm...
Did you consider the exact time? It was an event to remember! 😄
I noticed that you have the NIV on your desk that is as thick as an encyclopaedia. Are you an NIV believer of that text? That is a very bad transliteration of the manuscripts that it cam from.
I use it for comparison purposes usually.
@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Ok was just wondering.
Why some have problems with Reasoned eclecticism.
I John 5:7 is found in a majority of the Latin,
but not the Greek so out it goes.
Good will towards men
Doxology in Matthew
Without cause
God manifest in the flesh
Are a majority in the Greek but not in the Latin,
so out they go
The PA and Mark
16:9-20 are a majority in both the Greek
and Latin so out they go.
Even the “not yet” found in the two of the
earliest(P66.P75) in John 7:8
some throw out.
If as an orthodox Christian you don't see a
problem,
what would you see as a problem?
ALL printed editions of the Greek New Testament are an Eclectic Text.
@@---zc4qt What methodology do they use to choose is the issue. in other words, with all due respect your statement is nugatory.
@@jamessheffield4173 Thank you for insulting me. It just shows the type of person you are.
@@---zc4qt I said with all due respect and nugatory is not an insult. FYI What kind of person I am doesn't change facts. May God bless you real good.
There are two text types. The Bible and corrupted Bibles.
One thing about the TR is that it emphasizes the biblical and ancient practice of Isopsephy or what we commonly know as Gematria. Which is the simple method of allocating numbers to letters to form mathematical equations in any given language. We can see this very evidently in Revelation 7:4 with the number 144,000 being described as ρμδ to write out 144,000 instead of what many modern Greek NT's put instead is ἑκατὸν τεσσεράκοντα τέσσαρες χιλιάδες and completely getting rid of the original text. This comes from a viewpoint of belief that Greek Isopsephy and Hebrew Gematria is some sort of "kballah" or some other weird nonsense which has nothing to do with Gematria/Isopsephy. The "Scholars" of so called "Higher and Textual Criticism" have completely erased a biblical doctrine and ancient practice in the process.