@@patldennisSure do and without a doubt those that grew up with computers, internet, cell phones and social media (and I've been an R&D Electrical/Software engineer 25 years now), have been taught WHAT to think instead of HOW. So many can't do their job without being told every step of the way by a computer. I compare it to the introduction of calculators enabling people to never learn the skills required for mathematics. Now when faces with a real world problem they can't even figure it what numbers and operator to input. Perhaps this is also why they've deemed math racist. Anything that teaches one to learn HOW to think, to make your brain develop a skill, to make your head hurt, is frowned upon because the elite intent upon ruling this world want to OWN you, to be your Savior. They've done this with a myriad of things and none of you want to see what people HAD before all the tech. People just blindly follow along never developing a myriad of skills. All the while being encouraged and rewarded by your future owners knowing it'll be decades before the younger generation realise they've never known what they never had. We ALL think we Kno it all when we're younger. Once we're older and begin to acquire wisdom, only THEN do we see. This time around tho, the ones intent on keeping this generation from learning how to THINK are filling their head with WHAT to think and it's near impossible to convince someone they've been fooled. Good luck my friend and God bless. I promise you'll Kno by the time you've reached middle age. Unfortunately by then, there will be two more generations indoctrinated to believe WHAT to think that won't believe a word you will say. Without a doubt big tech AI after learning how to play chess and other human games have now been utilised to learn a new game. A game of "deeducate, own and control all of humanity" without them ever suspecting a thing. Even eagerly run towards having every moment of your entire lifetime controlled until such time as assisted suicide becomes mandatory for those deemed non compliant or to old to contribute to society. You're headed for the most evil time in human history. So evil that even athiests will be praying they were wrong.
my own family thinks I'm a whacko for believing the Bible. at least I know what shape the earth is... I don't wanna start no fights, just wanted to vent. thanks
Their crazy idea is that a new-born child, is born with '' the Sin ''' Therefore , he or she will die ! How can a new born child have a sin ? Not logical. The sin is from the tree of knowledge... numerous Sumerians Mythology images has the same Tree of knowledge ( 4100-1750 BCE ) . The Sumerian story was adapted, manipulated for the Hebrew Bible.
This video is a wonderful example that religions can progress only with great lies. Science can't, only truth is the base of science. Without truth science can't progress.
Jason if you're going to use scripture to counter every evidence based scientific statement that contradicts it, you;re going to have to explain to people why they should believe your scripture. PLEASE DO SO.
EasyTiger10: Have you noticed that there really is no serious evidence that's ever presented for evolution? Lofty declarations yes there's plenty of that but evidence....nothing.
No argument on Dr. Lisles video has provided a genuine counter argument- it has just been people using foul language and making derogatory statements. I believe the apologetic employed here is aimed at the Church specifically- hence the biblical emphasis. Dr. Lisle has done other talks and written articles and book resources that are more technical and aimed at the skeptic with no church background. Watch Dawkins debate Alastair mcgrath and you will learn something about good, healthy and reasonable debate- TH-cam community needs to be more relaxed, composed and gentle with each other. Peace :)
Initially he says that those who don't believe in God make their own rules and behave as they wish because they answer only to themselves. But then he says our values are intrinsically instilled by God, which means EVERYONE has values. So, Dr. Lisle, which one is it? Moral behavior is not driven by contingencies. Christians may say that the reason they behave morally is because of what they get when they die, afterlife.(which by the way would be quite immoral and selfish), but moral behavior is driven by our emotions, particularly empathy and sympathy, NOT rules or laws.
headoverheels I'd like to try and answer your concern. But first I want to ask you; why, in an evolutionary world view would you have moral laws? That is to say, who decides who's morally right, and who's wrong?
I'll address those one at a time. You say that humans are smart enough to come up with morals, which I don't agree with. If humans were to decide on what's wright and wrong we would have different moral codes throughout history, and in different parts of the world. But that is not the case. Doesn't it bother you that in general, with few delusional exceptions, throughout all of history murder has been considered morally wrong, everywhere on earth, and in the universe? Shouldn't that have evolved already, or since, if we live in an evolutionary universe? Morality is inconsistent with a changing universe.
But WHY is it not ok to for one human to kill another? In a Christian world view man is made in the image of God, and as such is higher than any other created thing. It is wrong to kill on impulse because we are all equal, and only God has the right to pronounce judgment. But in an evolutionary world view, that doesn't matter. If we're all made from the same bacteria, than who's to say why it's ok to kill and eat a cow, and it's not ok to kill and eat a human. If we're all animals, than what's the difference?
***** I say world view because we can both look at the same evidence and see two different explanations for it. I see comets and that tells me that the universe is young, you see comets and believe in an oort cloud. Because we look at evidence from different perspectives we have different world views. I look at it, read what the bible says and see that the evidence is consistent with what I read, and then I look at the history of bible vs man and see that bible has been right even when it's been mocked. The bible tells us that the world is a sphere long before the people discovered ways to confirm it, and the fact that the universe is expanding (that is to say all galaxies are moving away from each other), the secular scientists are just now seeing that it's true, but the bible has foretold it long ago. Therefore, what I'm challenging is your world view, not the theory itself.
***** Of course evidence is open for interpretation. That's why science books are constantly revised. If science was not open for interpretation they would never have to be revised. Scientists discover new things, they assume they work a certain way, they interpret the data and draw certain conclusions based on those assumptions. Sometimes those assumptions are wrong, and their interpretations are flawed and they come up with things they did not expect. When they see this they go back to the drawing board make some new assumptions and hope that this time they get it right. Those assumptions are what I want to challenge. For starters, how is it that laws of logic are even possible? In a christian worldview laws of logic stem from the mind of God, they are a reflection of the way God thinks. And since we are made in the image of God we are able to have and comprehend laws of logic, we know that a car cannot be in a parking lot and not in a parking lot at the same time. But in a chance universe, why would there be laws at all? Why is it that laws don't change with time? I can say with certainty that gravity will work the same today and tomorrow as it has yesterday because it says "God upholds all things by the power of his word", and "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever." God does not change, and He has promised us a certain degree of uniformity. He promised that the basic cycles will remain the same yesterday today and until judgment day. (Genesis 8:22) But in a chance universe, how can you be certain that next time you wake up gravity won't randomly stop working? How can you be certain that 2+2 will be 4 tomorrow or next week? If it's a chance universe, it might add up to 3 on Thursdays from now on.
Have come to the understanding that Genesis 1:1 that I have always read “In the beginning” when I understand that the actual translation from Hebrew should read “In a beginning”. How do you respond to this translation?
I also notice at 16:31 he says that Jesus says to Nicodemus if you don't believe when I talk about Earthly things how would you believe when I talk about Heavenly things. In Luke 16:31 Jesus says this "He said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.'" In both cases Jesus us discussing the issue of unbelief
Dr. Lisle, I have recently come across a few of your lectures and I must say I am impressed. Genesis 1:4 fascinates me. And God saw the light, that [it was] good: and God divided the light from the darkness. Notice that God divides the light from the darkness. He does not separate it as one of your audience mentioned. This means that the light and the dark are still connected but divided. We know from scripture that Light represents good and darkness represents evil. I believe that this is the point at which God created the Kingdom of Light and the kingdom of darkness and the two kingdoms exist, for now, side by side, interacting, until the kingdom of darkness has served it's purpose and is destroyed or separated for all eternity. Interestingly God calls the light day and the darkness He calls night. Then in Thessalonians we are told, Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness. (1Thess 5:5 [KJV])
Andre Mouton I believe the verse is literal but also prophetic in that it prophesied the first thing that would happen on day 1 (first 1k years) would be the fall of man, good and evil being divided. Good commentary!
Andre Mounton, Apostle Paul is teaching God's Torah ~ Instruction ~ "Law" ~ Word ~ because it is *ETERNAL* . The "church" didn't read all of the beloved Peter's words regarding Paul's letters, so they are in the *ERROR OF THE WICKED* unto their own *DESTRUCTION* for *NOT* taking Paul's letters back to the OT Scripture in which he is *ALWAYS* referring. Here are *WHO* the "children of the LIGHT" are, my sweet friend, and they are making a comeback today in a big way. They speak according to the LAW and the TESTIMONY and God *IS* with them, and we are for *SIGNS and MIRACLES* Isaiah 8 10 Take counsel together, and it shall come to nought; speak the word, and it shall not stand: *for God is with us* . 18 *Behold, I and the children whom the Lord hath given me are for signs and for wonders* in Israel from the Lord of hosts, which dwelleth in mount Zion. 19 And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead? -------------->>>>>>>>>>>>20 *To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them* . 21 And they shall pass through it, hardly bestead and hungry: and it shall come to pass, that when they shall be hungry, they shall fret themselves, and curse their king and their God, and look upward. 22 And they shall look unto the earth; and behold trouble and darkness, dimness of anguish; and they shall be driven to darkness. In verse 20, do you see that word *TESTIMONY* that is used there? it is only used *THREE* times in *ALL* of Scripture. Twice in Isaiah 8 and once in Ruth ~ when it speaks of the REMOVING of the SHOE for a *TESTIMONY* ~ and *PURCHASE* or *REDEMPTION* price........ So, *THIS* is *EXACTLY* what it is going to mean to have the *TESTIMONY* of JESUS/ YAHSHUA the MESSIAH......... The "church" is in *darkness* and are *DRUNKEN* in the night (see also Isaiah 28 for the DRUNKARDS ~~ *WOE* to them!) they will be taken as a thief in the night and *sudden destruction* will come upon *THEM* Why does Apostle Paul use the terminology *DRUNKEN* in the night? He is teaching God's *ETERNAL* WORD Deuteronomy 29 -------------->19 *And it come to pass, when he heareth the words of this curse, that he bless himself in his heart, saying, I shall have peace, though I walk in the imagination of mine heart, to add drunkenness to thirst* : 20 The Lord will not spare him, but then the anger of the Lord and his jealousy shall smoke against that man, and all the curses that are written in this book shall lie upon him, *and the Lord shall blot out his name from under heaven* . 21 And the Lord shall separate him unto evil out of all the tribes of Israel, according to all the curses of the covenant that are written in this book of the law: Now, review what I JUST said with the *dead* church from the book of the Revelation. They have a "name" that they live, but they are *DEAD* ...... He is going to come to *THEM* as a thief in the night ~~~ but to those who *OVERCOME* ~~ their name will *NOT* be "blotted out" ....... VERY SAME terminology that Apostle Paul is also using..... because *THIS* is what he is also teaching. God's *WORD* ~~ His *TORAH* ~~ His *INSTRUCTION* is *ETERNAL* and *NONE* of us get to "make it up as we go along" ........ *RELIGION* is the *WIDE* path to *DESTRUCTION* Thus the strong admonition from the book of the Revelation for us to come *OUT* of it........... Bless you in LOVE and in *TRUTH* Sanctify them in *TRUTH* ~~~ *THY* WORD is TRUTH I would like to suggest the following teaching: *The Chronological Gospels: The Life and 70 WEEK Ministry of THE Messiah* by A Rood Awakening
Mr. Mouton, I came back here to show you something *else* too. Here are the "heads" of the *BEAST* as shown to John on the Isle of Patmos: 1 Egypt, 2. Assyria, 3 Babylon, 4. Medo-Persia, 5 Greece and 6. Rome. (At the time John wrote this the kingdom "is") Encompassing *ALL* of *CHURCHIANITY*
Unfortunately, there is a movement in the Christian church to compromise the clear teaching of the Bible. Yet, Proverbs 23:7 says that whatever a man thinks in his heart, so is he. Our beliefs do have consequences. If we can't believe Genesis, why should we believe anything else?
***** Your message prompted an old but precious memory in me and I want to share it with you. The Bible stands. The Bible stands like a rock undaunted, mid the ranging storms of time, it's pages burn with the truth eternal, and they glow with a light sublime. The Bible stands like a mountain towering, far above the works of man, it's truth, by none, ever was refuted, and destroy it they never can. The Bible stands and it will forever, when the world has passed away, by inspiration it has been given all it's precepts I will obey. The Bible stands every test we give it for it's authors divine by grace alone, I expect to live it and to prove it and make it mine. chorus The Bible stands though the hills my tumble it will firmly stand when the earth shall crumble I will plant my feet on it's firm foundation for the Bible stands.
this is your mind on religion.... If his mind wasn't trapped in a dogma he had pounded into his head since he could breath....he may have been a great theoretical physicist....instead, he just critiques science in a defense of the dogma.
+ophirdog He has a hard enough time facing down astronomy students or anyone who is educated in physics. I saw him get confronted once, and he simply dismissed it as a 'faith problem'.
I want to convert to Darwinism. I am tired of being ridiculed. All I need is for someone to give me SCIENTIFIC evidence that the trivial mutations we can observe are able to make the big changes we can't observe (i.e. generate new organic structures and systems). Sadly, no one, so far, has been able to do that.
There is certainly a middle ground no one seems to discuss. Genesis account is a common near eastern motif the Hebrew took to make their own. It is not a scientific description on the origins of the universe. Neo-Darwinian evolution on the other hand, purports geochemistry suddenly turned into biochemistry, simply by the passing of time. Fact is we don’t have an answer.
You know Genesis 8:22 Talks about seed time and harvest. Proverbs 8:22 Says God created Wisdom and with Her by His side He created everything else. Proverbs 18:22 Says that a man should find a wife. Leviticus 18:22 Says "'Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable. So what does all of this say? A man places a seed into a woman and the baby or the (crop) becomes full grown then the birth or the (harvest) occurs. The harvest could never occur if the seed was placed into a man and a woman has no seed to place into another woman. What's interesting in this video he says at 8:22 Jesus talks about marriage.
Dr. Jason Why is it when the bible in genesis has stated The earth was created in 6 days But we as Chestens have to believe The earth is not 4.5 bilion years old Yet we know When God created and made the univerce he ceated time he crated light God said Let there be light And the whole univerce was lit up. So stars God created that were billion of light years away could be seen By us. When Adem was created he was a fully grown man When the fruit trees in the graden of Eden were creaated in the garden of Eden They were fully grown fruit trees. Yet We as christens Still do not belive the earth was fully grown When God created it Because the concept is be on us that God can make the earth to be fully grown in 6 days and it is bilions of years old And god did this for us. So us as Man could live on it.
@@walkergaryaBEFORE computers, internet, cell phones and social media were used to deeducate a generation while locking God out of everywhere, lying, deceiving, debauchery and immorality weren't a way of life. These behavior were met with shame by friend, family and society. It kept everyone in check. (We used to be able to pump gas and THEN go in to pay because we TRUSTED ONE ANOTHER)... I lettered on the future team in high school (1985). We didn't have school shootings then she had guns in school... Racism was waning as per Dr King's character not skin color. Neither of my two best friends of 30 years I carpooled to college with are white. NOW look what we've got! Sidewalks in Every small town used to be filled with people socializing. Everyone knew each other. Now everyone is greedy and full of pride and just waiting for anyone to drop their guard (or wallet) in order to TAKE and then celibrate someone's misfortune. Like it better this way huh? Don't worry, God has a special place for each of us and ironically enough it's where each of us wants to be.
Great sales pitch. "Believe us with zero evidence or burn in hell!" Seriously just have your god go take a walk down any street in any major city 200 ft tall and creating life out of nothing and I will worship him.
'' Time is near'' ! This particular phrase has been repeated for centuries and centuries ! When asked when it might come, you never , never, never , have a clear answer ! But, it is coming !....
@@RayB1656 2 Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.
I certainly have no quarrel with the Christian faith. Faith is personal. My only objection, criticism in this particular case one example, is when Dr.Lisle mentioned without any explanation, that God had provided a ''temporary light'' for three days before the creation of the Sun ! This is speculation, sorry, it is a ''shot in the dark" ! Why God would have created the Sun , three days after the first day, when he already knew that the Sun was needed for gravity, light, warm.. and in the entire Universe, the stars (the suns) all came before the planets... Why making things more complicated than they are ! I believe that the Late Bronze Age Bible writers were probably confused and really had no idea about the movement in the night sky above or the entire Cosmos, during that era...
Everything in Genesis is relevant. The days of Creation are literal 6 days. The seventh day is still holy and set apart. The tithe is still binding faith and obedience of Abraham modeled the true experience with God. But how many let tradition shape and mold their spiritual Journey. And Gods word is not studied deeply but people just follow what their pastor tells them. We are not called to change American this is Zionism. We’re called to follow God individually and obey his commandments and walk humbly with God.
It constantly surprises me that there are people with lots of scientific credentials and background who also believe in creationism. Scientists deal in disciplines for which they can see and inspect evidence. If they were doing an experiment they would make predictions and conclusions based on the results. And then they say they believe in the creation, for which there is no visible evidence or explanations... and they refute evolution, for which there is masses of sound scientific evidence.
TOJOADAMS Are you talking about Convict Kent Hovind's "offer"? www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind.html ...his offer is a joke. No surprise there since he's the one who cooked it up.
CD: "It constantly surprises me that there are people with lots of scientific credentials and background who also believe in creationism" An interesting question would be how are credentials and such... meaningful in an evolution system, that is mindless and random? CD: "Scientists deal in disciplines for which they can see and inspect evidence. If they were doing an experiment they would make predictions and conclusions based on the results" And creationist don't? I think there is some bias here. Even if we conceded that creationist scientist didn't do these things why would it be wrong in an evolution system? CD:"And then they say they believe in the creation, for which there is no visible evidence or explanations…" The creationist and the evolutionists are privy to the same evidence. That's why I contend that the debate over evolution vs. creation is not over facts but between world-views. The naturalist will ultimately view the evidence from a pre-committment to naturalism, while the creationist (Christian) has a pre-commitment to Jesus Christ. CD: "and they refute evolution, for which there is masses of sound scientific evidence" Is there really sound evidence? I'm still unconvinced and there is nothing in the naturalist worldview that would obligate me to think otherwise. Common ancestry is not surprising seeing as God created all things, even still the Genesis account indicates that all living things came from the same place, the ground. I still struggle with the bacteria to men paradigm, definitely don't see that happening. Doesn't seem too sound to me. But you are welcome to counter that as I am dumb creationist after all. Cheers.
Unless you claim to be a clone of your mother or father...... Each person is slightly different than their parents so your existence proves evolution. Dumbass.....lol O wait, you might be one of those bozos like Cameron and Comfort....aka Crocoduck Man and Banana Man
As a creationist I understand that your statement is indicative of "unargued prejudicial conjecture", which as you may or may not be aware, influences your world view. If you watched the video, you must have heard that he is an Astronomer, with a PHD from Colorado University. The idea that he is a "comedian" in your view certainly clarifies your bias, as well as your attempt to discredit him by using ad hominem. Nice going!
To me, it's even simpler to be an 'originist' ... I focus on not just how life emerges from inert matter, but the impossibility of the steps before that, such as the formation of the first protein molecule by Mother Nature. Ditto for the origin of planets, stars: no one can explain 'how' but only 'we may assume'. Eg., it's assumed the universe was filled with hydrogen. How did this occur? Where did the elements originate? Mother Nature? And, of course, we even note that in the past few decades three Nobel Prizes were awarded that 'proved' big bang cosmology have been proven falsified.Despite chemical evolution of first molecule is impossible, and scientific law disproves life from inert matter, this is the foundation of classical macro evolution! Events that never occurred are the basis of assumptions atop assumptions. No wonder the first step of inert > life is largely ignored as non-essential in the evolution debate.Either God as creator is a myth or Mother Nature is. Both can't be correct. And don't start on aliens or parallel universes, people.
I believe every word in the BIBLE. If you study IT enough, you will know the difference when IT is being literal, and when you are reading poetry, and when IT is making comparisons. Study your BIBLE! ITS not made up.
God, our Creator and Father gave the man a physical body, soul and a spiritual body, while animals have a physical body and soul only, whereas the plants, insects and possibly the reptiles only have a physical body.
If animals have a physical body and a soul therefore mankind should not be killing animals ! This would be logical. However, in the Bible , when the Hebrews were attacking a city , they would killed all the men, woman, ''animals'' burning the crops and keeping the virgins for the soldiers... This is very confusiing !!!
@@RayB1656 Yes, that way was meant the world to be by God The Creator, however, beginning with Adam and later continuing with Sodom&Gomorrah the people disobeyed God, atitude which brought death in the World, whereas Noah,s Flood reduced the oxigen in the air, from then on, with less oxigen in the cells, the human body needed more fuel\calories which are found in animal meet, that"s the reason why from then on God allowed to chase animals and eat, as God said, from then on, the animals will fear the man and run or fight. But as God created the Earth the lion was laying down with the lamb and was total peace in the world. And then Christ came and said: Peace l give you, l am the truth, the way, the life! Peace Brother, may God be blessed forevermore!
@@robertdumicz7309 I have some difficulty with your above explanation. I respect your faith , however , what your are mentioning is not in the Bible stories... you are trying to explain something which is not real. First, the Flood !. This is well-known today , the ''flood story '' was taken from the Sumerians ( Gilgamesh ) , a story of the rising waters of the Black Sea, about 9000 or 10000 years ago , it was adapted for the Hebrews tribes. Lots of ruins and ancient cities at the bottom of the Black Sea, today... Most experts are saying that the water would have been rising at about two feet per day . Furthermore, also, the Ark , came to rest on Mt Ararat, which is south of the Black Sea....A '' Flood '' covering the entire earth, for 50 days , would have destroyed all the plants and trees on the planet...nothing to eat, to cultivate for decades and decades. Man wouldn't have survived... The Bronze Age ancient Bible is very different ( written at about 700 BCE ) from the New Testament, which was written at about 200 years A.D., in Greek. .
@@RayB1656 I don't use the Bible in that case, but as l do mostly to the God deniers l use science, as there were discovered fossils of giant insects and animals and is known that only a greater part of oxigen in the air could allow insects to grow bigger than they are nowadays, here's the evidence, the atmosphere was richer in oxigen back then. Furthermore you're only assuming that all the plants would die under water, so, is that a proven fact..? For even if it'd be a proven fact, what makes you belive that the allmighty God, The One Who was able to create the Universe as we know it, couldn't hold the plants alive for 50 days or even resurrect them just as Christ did with Lazarus who was dead for 4 days already and begun to stink..? Or should God mention the fact that He recreated the plants on Earth after Noah's Flood, if that's the thing He did..? Noah have had anyway lots of seeds and plants on the Ark, couldn't he have had all the seeds for each plant..? That's another posibility you seem to never have thought of... So think please out of the box, additionaly l have to add that there is scientific and even visual evidence for Noah's Flood and even a number of YT videos presenting that evidence, so isn't exactly the very thing you ask for and belive in, just and only what you see..? So since you don't belive in God, why don't you trust the evidence you pretend to belive in..? Furthermore if that would be just a local flood God wouldn't advice Noah to build a boat which takes years but would simply tell him to move on... So you see my friend, you use faulty logic, most probably in an atempt to keep your world view intact, with the purpose (l suppose) to still pretend there'd be no sin and we'd be ok to do whatever we please as long we don't break the earthly laws... No my friend, there are additionaly over 300 testimonies and legends about the great flood allover the Earth so they couldn't describe a local flood at the Black Sea where l happen to be born and have spent my childhood too. Along with my faith we have the science and evidence to sustain it, while you only have the denial even of the very science and evidence you seem to preach and pretend to belive in...
@@robertdumicz7309 You have quite a bit of statements in your answer ! Two examples = even if Noah would have had some seeds on board, it would have taken time to have a crop., many weeks and months ! How do they live in the meantime ? Second example = the '' local flood'' your mentioned, this was the flooding of the Black Sea, where thousand and thousand of people was living in the valley, ( today the Black Sea ) , it is the Gilgamesh story from the Sumerians ! If you would take the time to read it, you would see the exact story of the Bible's Flood. Again, the Hebrews tribes during their captivity took that epic story and adapted the account for themselves. Let me know if your are familiar with Sumerian Mythology, their writings and science ( 4100-1760 BCE ) . I am a researcher , only. I do not have an agenda ! I try only to observe , to understand the world around me. From the very small ( subatomic particles ) to the very large, the expanding universe and everything in between. Most of us, do have Neanderthal Man DNA in our blood. Neanderthal man, 300,000 to 27000 years ago. This is now proven. Any genetic labs can verify this. Would you give an explanation to this , since this is do change quite a bit the Genesis Bible story ??? This is not a ''trap'' I would like your opinion, only. The Bible writers from 700 BCE couldn't have known this biological fact, that why there is no mention of it. If you would have been born in an Arabic country, you would be, today, a follower of the Islamic faith , just like the one billion and a half which believes in the All-Knowing and the last God on earth, Allah . They believe this is the only true God. Religion is complex.
Soundmman Take your best most knowledgeable evolutionists and pit them against Jason Lisle, Kent Hovind, Don Patton, Hugh Ross and for a WWE smack down, Stephen Meyer. 5 names, 5 people, 5 experts that collectively can destroy every evolutionist in every field on earth combined.
Tom- Evolution is no longer a debate, it is Proven Fact. All Life Sciences are based on Evolution. Break through your childhood religious indoctrination and educate yourself with real knowledge that has Evidence. Jason Lisle is a Joke and Kent Hovind is a Jailbird!
Soundmman 1 Kent Hovind is in jail correct, but he could be a talking pigeon for all it matters. And Patton, Meyer, and Ross? Whats your excuse for the evidence they present? In fact just those 3 alone destroy evolution. You say evolution is no longer a debate? how about this? http : // ncse.com/evolution "What is Evolution?In the biological sciences, evolution is a scientific theory that explains the emergence of new varieties of living things in the past and in the present; it is not a "theory of origins" about how life began."The NCSE National Center for Science Education defines evolution as above.... Now this is because they legally can't because in a court of law when asked to present evidence they can not prove evolution. So you disagree with the NCSE? Not a shock you evolutionists disagree with basic logic, preponderance of evidence and simple reasoning. You want to believe so badly in evolution you bold face ignore even basic science such as causality and say there was a big bang from nothing. You cant get something from nothing. How can you evolutionists claim to love science when you completely ignore something basic like causality. The very science you guys claim to be masters of is kicking your evolutionary theory in the balls lol.
Soundmman 1 One more thing, I am obviously a creationist so it's not shocking that I would be on this page watching the content. You however are obviously an evolutionist, shouldnt you be out trying to find a way to mathematically disprove Stephen Meyer's mathematical proof life can not have evolved on it's own from nothing? I mean the only reason imo that an evotard would hang out on comment section for a video he completely disagrees with is because he is insecure in his own thinking. Which you are, which is why you are here. You are looking for that one thing that proves to you that God is real. But you wont find it, because even if you did you don't want to believe it. But you want me to join you in your religious beliefs in evolution to bolster your self assurance that you are on the right path. No damn way son..... No damn way... lol
Tom- Every newborn baby on the planet is born an Atheist. There is no such thing as a Christian baby. Unfortunately a horrifying percentage of those babies are brainwashed with Bronze Age fairy tales before they can think for themselves. This is what happened to You.
Harry Andruschak Exodus 3:14 and John 8:58... God says, I AM. He just is. We aren't called to understand everything, just believe. However, I totally get how the answer I just gave won't suffice for everyone. But God was not created, He just always existed. Beyond our understanding does not make it untrue.
Genesis 1:1---In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. 3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning―the first day. As we all know, evening is the setting of the Sun in the West and Morning is the rising of the SUN from the East. So, how can there be evening & morning in the first day, 2nd & 3rd when the SUN is ONLY created on the 4 Day...???
If you actually watched the video before trying to tear it up, the concept of a temporary light source existing until the institution of the sun as the permanent "light bearer" was discussed at least twice as a possibility for the answer to your question. I would respectfully suggest you ask God. After all, He was there.
Mistakes in the Bible...............1. In science the Sun formed first then the surrounding planets but in Genesis the Earth was created first then the Sun. One mistake................... 2. If the Sun was created on the 4th day, then all the water appear on the 2nd and 3rd day would have been frozen. second mistake................... 3. God created two large lights (ie the sun and moon) on the 4th day. Science discovery that the Moon is NOT a light. There is only one large light in our solar system ie the Sun. To be more accurate, all those stars in the distance galaxies are also large lights and there are billions and billions of them. Thus God created two large lights is incorrect.................. 4. In Genesis God made the Sun and moon on 4th day but there is morning and evening on the 1st 2nd and 3rd. That's another mistakes................... 5. God created plants and trees on the 3rd day before the Sun. That's a mistake as plants and trees require sunlight to grow. It does not happened that way................... 6. God rested on the 7th day. Even today, many new animals and species came into existence from the day of Earth existence. That's a mistake................... 7. God made man from dirt or earth (earth element) and his breath (wind element). That does not made a living human being. Why...? Because there is two missing elements ie fire and water elements. Water elements are blood and water content. 70-80% of our human content consists of water. And fire element is our body heat resulting in our body temperature. Without body heat, our limbs movement will become stiff and blood will clot very easily. Very big mistake indeed.
Atheist must admit, that, it take's a LOT of blind faith to be an "Atheist." The evidence is clearly on the " creationist" side. Bible prophesy proves, the future was written before it happened. When it says God rested the Seventh day. It doesn't mean he was tired. It means he ceased from all his labour.
Agreed. The math for nucleotide bases (the G.A.C.T.'s in DNA) to "accidentally" fall into place to string up amino acids into useful proteins is 1/10^77 for ONE to happen, and there's 3 billion of them in the human genome, many interdependent on another, so multiple "accidents" would have to have happened at the same time, thus propelling those odds against (1/10^77) exponentially. Even at one mutation per second, which is unrealistic given lifespan, there's only been 10^16 seconds since the atheists' "big bang" - so it's mathematically impossible for evolution to have happened - with abiogenesis being a prerequisite to that (meaning, life can't accidentally "evolve" until it first exists, which failed Darwinism doesn't attempt to explain). In fact Darwin and his contemporaries referred to cells as simple little blobs, not the awesome, intentional machines we see that they are.
@@Stormvetprime01 Anything above 1x10^52 is considered absurd odds by scientists, meaning it cannot,, and will not, ever happen. I wouldn't bet on the odds you provided......... Fearfully and wonderfully made, indeed.
@@Stormvetprime01The odds of the particular sperm fertilizing the particular egg to make you are astronomically low, but it happened, due to materially determined chemical causes. You don’t understand probability.
I find it quite astonishing that anyone with any analytical intelligence can possibly believe in such ludicrous, childish, fantasy nonsense. Totally bewildering.
This is no surprise ! Man is afraid to die, he just can't believe that he is only part of an evolutive , a natural- selection system. He wants to live forever. An invisible man in the sky from the Bronze Age era , is the perfect answer ! Furthermore, he is also egoistic and self-serving, he can have a conversation with GOD and demand things !!!
Cornflower Right, "religion" don't matter. Jesus, the Apostles was against "religion. Unless Jesus was crazy or a liar, HE MATTERS. For Jesus is the one that warned us of "Hell Fire." If I'm wrong, what have "I" to lose. But, if your wrong? Just say, God, if you are real, reveal yourself to me, and Jesus, show me your Son. He can and will. Admit you are a sinner, you need a Saviour. You can't save yourself.1st CORTHIANS ch 15 vs 1,2,3,4. ROMANS ch 10.... For "WHOSOEVER," shall call upon the name of the Lord "SHALL BE SAVED." No If's, and's or buts, "SHALL BE SAVED."..Doesn't matter what you've done. It's a matter of "who" you receive as Saviour. No one has ever come to Jesus and been turned away. Then, your life will take on a whole New meaning. Your eye's will be opened, and the Bible will take on a whole New meaning for you. COME.
Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Matthew 11:28 KJV Jesus lives Jesus Christ is Lord For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Romans 3:23 KJV Jesus loves you repent You're a sinner in need of a Savior That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. Romans 10:9-10 KJV
1. He has critical thinking ability, now swayed by billions of dollars yearly that support a scientifically disproven worldview of inert matter becoming life2. He has the ability to test the Bible for himself as a record of history, etc., and come to the conclusion it really is the Word of God: that God actually confirms it as history, and whatever He wants to convey to humans.He may well be a human genius, but because of points 1 and 2, he is also one of God's geniuses, which anyone can become who accepts that Jesus is actually God, that His work is the penultimate Work in history. Which, of course, His enemies have long attacked as 'myths' 'just one of many teachings,' etc.
why genesis did not matter? it was attributed to "Moses" who did not know how to write. He left the ten commandment to god to write it because he did not know how to write. so who wrote genesis? no one knows; it is NOT credible .
albert sneij Just because a man did not know how to write at one point of his life does not discredit all future written works by him. I am positive that at one point you were illiterate as well. Just as I, and every other human on this planet were.
This is absolutely a dishonest and b******* comment because everybody knows that the scripture is clear that God inspired men to write this book... for example at the end of the book of Daniel Daniel actually asks God "what did I just write?" because inspired by God's power to write what God wanted in the scriptures.. I thought everybody understood this what is wrong with people?
+albert sneij Genesis is fake, but all the biblical recordings surrounding the Egyptian kings has ALL been vetted through archaeology as scientifically accurate. Strange Moses chose to make a bunch of stuff up about creation then accurately describe Egyptian Kings, names of cities, etc. If you can believe that you can believe in unicorns.
+Roman Bespartochnyy Why did Moses ever have to touch a pen and parchment? They had scribes. Moses would have been the writer, the scribe would have acted as the type writer. The type writer does not author anything on it's own. the author does.
Tom Clancy sure we can believe in unicorns because in 1611 when this kjv Bible was written the word meant rhinoceros ... I thought you people were educated and knew these kind of things wow.
This guy is so literal in his interpretation of the Bible, if he had lived during Jesus' time, he would have been one of the Pharisees that Jesus rebuked.
American Dreamerz, Then you don't know what the Pharisees were teaching. The Pharisees were making up their *OWN* rules called takanot and ma'asims that come from the ORAL "law", the Talmud, Mishna, what the "sages say" and so forth. These were the *traditions of men* that were heavy burdens to bear ~~~ *BONDAGE* ... because God's *ETERNAL* WORD is His *PERFECT LAW OF LIBERTY* .... and His WORD is *ETERNAL* See sir, *NONE* of us get to make it up as we go along. *RELIGION* is the *WIDE* path to *DESTRUCTION* Jesus (His Hebrew name YAHSHUA literally meaning *Salvation* ) was teaching the *SAME* WORD as the Father, and that is what He tells the Pharisees over and over. That *IF* they knew the Father then they would *KNOW* Him because He came to say the SAME that was since the *BEGINNING* Jesus/ Yahshua/ LITERAL Salvation *IS* the *WORD* made *FLESH* sir Allow me to illustrate something to you: Here are the "heads" of the BEAST as shown to John (BY YAHSHUA) on the Isle of Patmos: 1 Egypt, 2. Assyria, 3 Babylon, 4. Medo-Persia, 5 Greece and 6. Rome. (At the time John wrote this the kingdom "is") Encompassing *ALL* of *CHURCHIANITY*
"There's no astronomical basis for [7 days in a week]" The reason they adopted the number seven was that they observed seven celestial bodies - the sun, the moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. ... The Babylonians divided their lunar months into seven-day weeks, with the final day of the week holding particular religious significance.
It is no small amount of irony that he obtained a PhD from secular institutions and trades on this credential, but then goes around telling everyone that his alma mater is flat wrong about everything.
Why did he spend all that time studying for his PhD and then give it all away to preach. I guess intelligence does not necessarily come with common sense.
Jesus warned his disciples to be beware of false teachers and false prophets. Below are some of questions regarding Genesis 1 about God created the universe in 6 days and mankind................ Question #1 : Genesis 1 stated God created Earth, heavens, Sun, Moon and stars. But on which day did God create Mars, Venus, Jupiter, Mercury, Saturn, & other sister planets...?................ Question #2 : If Eve was created by GOD from Adam's rib, was Eve's DNA the same as Adam's DNA...?................... Question #3 : In Genesis 1:16 God made the Sun and moon on 4th day but why there is morning and evening on the 1st 2nd and 3rd. If God's light created morning and evening on 1st 2nd & 3rd, then is this God's light still exist today...? If this light still exist, pls identify where this God's light is...?....................... Question #4 : God made two large lights. But the Moon is not a large light as it does not emits it's own light. if Moon is considered as large lights, Jupiter has at least 67 moons. Uranus has 27。Saturn has 62 moons.... so there are more than 2 large lights.............. Question #4 : God created Adam & Eve from dust and Adam's rib, how could both be human beings without blood in their body.......
MultiVinniemac logic and reasoning. example. Through archaeology nearly every claim in the bible has been proven accurate. King David was thought to be a myth, then they found concrete archaeological evidence that he did in fact exist. Joshuas alter has been found. Want something more impressive? The story of Moses crossing the red sea, and the army of egypt being swallowed up by the parted waters.... They found the remains of those chariots whose wheels dated back to that dynasty off the coast of the gulf of Aqaba. Or how about the remains of the cities Sodom And Gemmorrah, and the fact that they are blanketed in billions of 99.9 % pure sulfur pebbles that couldn't have naturally occurred there. These are things that unless you just have no common sense or reasoning ability make you have to stop and ask yourself if it could be true. Otherwise how do you discredit a book whose accounts always stand the test of archaeology? Then you have guys like Stephen Meyer, Don Patton and Jason Lisle all PHds in their field dropping bombs on evolution. My question is after researching all these things how do you not know the bible is the word of God? The only person who would ask such a thing is a person who knows nothing of these things. So perhaps that is my answer to your question.
Tom Clancy Just want to say God bless you for defending the faith. Karl Marx once said, "Religion is the opiate of the people" for those afraid of the dark. It seems that "Atheism is the true opiate of the people" for those who think that if they ignore the facts that somehow they won't be held accountable at judgment. alwaysbeready.com is a good site, too.
Now is the sixth day or, the sixth Millennium. The seventh day, or day of rest represents the seventh Millennium, the Age to come. The return of Jesus Christ to set up the Kingdom of God on earth, to take up the crown of David and to rule from Jerusalem for 1000 years.
@@rossmcintyre3228 exactly. Fundies abd creationists are always trying to conyrive associations with their religion as a cultural foundation. Same fallacy as America is a Christian nation bs
The revelation in Genesis is a revelation..Purpose and motivation pre-exist design and design pre-exist structured matter. In my book, the time period between evening 6pm and morning 6 am is 12 h, ergo half a day. Nevertheless the designer lives and so remain His existing principles and laws eternal, absolute and unchanging,
Please explain how "lying" is a bad thing in your worldview if what your brain tells you is truth. Wasn't your brain the product of random chance? Would correcting my thinking on this matter prove or disprove your worldview?
Mistakes in the Bible...............1. In science the Sun formed first then the surrounding planets but in Genesis the Earth was created first then the Sun. One mistake................... 2. If the Sun was created on the 4th day, then all the water appear on the 2nd and 3rd day would have been frozen. second mistake................... 3. God created two large lights (ie the sun and moon) on the 4th day. Science discovery that the Moon is NOT a light. There is only one large light in our solar system ie the Sun. To be more accurate, all those stars in the distance galaxies are also large lights and there are billions and billions of them. Thus God created two large lights is incorrect.................. 4. In Genesis God made the Sun and moon on 4th day but there is morning and evening on the 1st 2nd and 3rd. That's another mistakes................... 5. God created plants and trees on the 3rd day before the Sun. That's a mistake as plants and trees require sunlight to grow. It does not happened that way................... 6. God rested on the 7th day. Even today, many new animals and species came into existence from the day of Earth existence. That's a mistake................... 7. God made man from dirt or earth (earth element) and his breath (wind element). That does not made a living human being. Why...? Because there is two missing elements ie fire and water elements. Water elements are blood and water content. 70-80% of our human content consists of water. And fire element is our body heat resulting in our body temperature. Without body heat, our limbs movement will become stiff and blood will clot very easily. Very big mistake indeed.
Sooooo JASON you believe what the bible says about the beginning. That's great to hear, what about the 7th day [rest,blessed and sanctified day] Gen2:1-3 which was CREATED BEFORE SIN ,I take it you are a 7th day Sabbath keeper, as opposed to a ceremonial sabbath keeper WHICH WAS NAILED TO THE CROSS, because the 7th day is a memorial of creation Exodus20:8,11.notice Gen2:1 He finished His work ON the 7th day and rested , making it a part of creation ,Beavers have been observed going into there lodge Friday evening and staying in till Saturday evening,Bees have been observed staying in there hives Saturdays ,20,000 patients in Germany had there blood pressure checked every day for 3mths, a drop in blood pressure was noted on Saturdays ,by two or three witnesses truth shall be established,AMEN Happy [creation memorial] Sabbath.
minute 19:36- 'he's God" ; Jesus is the Son of God, no where does he say he is God. Yes, it is very interesting that Jesus used the Word of God as his authority. He knew that what he was saying was the word of his Father. "My Father is greater than I" John 14:28 Also Minute 43:25 'raised himself from the dead'. ??? What does Scripture say? God raised Jesus from the dead. 1 Corinthians 15:14 ""And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith. 15 More than that, we are then found to be false witnesses about God, for we have testified about God that he raised Christ from the dead." Acts 2:32 '"This Jesus God raised up, and of that we are witnesses"
Wrong. God says there is no Savior beside Him. And yet Jesus is Savior. So Jesus is God. And He is called God with us! And that's just Matthew 1. Jesus is God in every chapter of the New Testament. Jesus submitted to the Father while on earth. He said the Father is greater, but also said they are one. You are cherrypicking and misunderstanding scripture. If Jesus is not God, there is no salvation. Only God is good, and only a perfect sacrifice is sufficient!
Dr. Jason Lisle is an incredibly smart and brave individual to make the stance he makes and I immensely respect him for what he does, despite the fact I disagree with many of his beliefs. I do not believe that a literal view of the word can give us an accurate view of God and his nature, particularly when it comes to creation. the bible is metaphorical, Jesus spoke in parables and in metaphors quiet often. In fact he almost always disagreed with a literal view of the word when he was calling out the Pharisees.
Did you mean this literally or shall we just accept your statement as the ramblings of another person who places their opinion above God's Word? Sounds like you need to read God's word more to understand that the things of the spirit are discerned by the spirit. It is foolishness to those who do not believe. How will you believe Jesus when he speaks of heavenly things but not when He speaks of earthly things??? Jesus is asking YOU this and waiting for your answer. Please direct it to Him.
@@zellerized There is no 'God's Word'. There are some people who seem to think a book written by humans replete with publishing information in the front matter is somehow the divinely commanded words of a deity, but these people are universally regarded as nutcases.
Jesus warned his disciples to be beware of false teachers and false prophets. Below are some of questions regarding Genesis 1 about God created the universe in 6 days and mankind................ Question #1 : Genesis 1 stated God created Earth, heavens, Sun, Moon and stars. But on which day did God create Mars, Venus, Jupiter, Mercury, Saturn, & other sister planets...?................ Question #2 : If Eve was created by GOD from Adam's rib, was Eve's DNA the same as Adam's DNA...?................... Question #3 : In Genesis 1:16 God made the Sun and moon on 4th day but why there is morning and evening on the 1st 2nd and 3rd. If God's light created morning and evening on 1st 2nd & 3rd, then is this God's light still exist today...? If this light still exist, pls identify where this God's light is...?....................... Question #4 : God made two large lights. But the Moon is not a large light as it does not emits it's own light. if Moon is considered as large lights, Jupiter has at least 67 moons. Uranus has 27。Saturn has 62 moons.... so there are more than 2 large lights.............. Question #4 : God created Adam & Eve from dust and Adam's rib, how could both be human beings without blood in their body.......
We are fallen Angels, been with our G*D forever, G*D made a way for us to come back to him Via Earth. The Bible says a Third of his Angels refused to come down here, luckily we did that. Adam & Eve were created on the 8the day to Bring Jesus here. Only 1% of Christians ever read the BIBLE & Studied it. Just saying. Please read & study.
Hi there, Here are the "heads" of the *BEAST* as shown to John on the Isle of Patmos: 1 Egypt, 2. Assyria, 3 Babylon, 4. Medo-Persia, 5 Greece and 6. Rome. (At the time John wrote this the kingdom "is") Encompassing *ALL* of *CHURCHIANITY*
What's so funny is that this out of work Astrophysicist, who hasn't earned a dime in his field basically since leaving college, is going around to backwater churches trying to evangelize. It's kinda hilarious.
+David Butler He graduated summa cum laudefrom Ohio Wesleyan University where he double-majored in physics and astronomy and minored in mathematics. He earned a master’s degree and a Ph.D. in astrophysics at the University of Colorado. Dr. Lisle specialized in solar astrophysics and has made a number of scientific discoveries regarding the solar photosphere including the detection of giant cell boundaries using the SOHO spacecraft, and has contributed to the field of general relativity. Also I think Dr Jason Lisle would dispute your claim that he hasn't made a dime in his field. Dr. Lisle was instrumental in developing the planetarium at the Creation Museum in Kentucky, writing and directing popular planetarium shows including “The Created Cosmos.” As Director of Research, Dr. Lisle leads ICR’s gifted team of scientists who continue to investigate and demonstrate the evidence for creation.
Randy Abell He hasn't worked in his field since 2002. While ICR may employ him, he is not active amongst his similarly educated peers. And for good reason. They all disagree with every contention he has, notably his ASC ideas. He spends much of his time visiting churches to attack evolution and putting on creationism presentations using presuppositional apologetics and what I would also call 'Total Bullshit'.
+David Butler Here's something funnier. There was a guy about 2 thousand years ago that had far less money than this out of work astrophysicist, that talked in literal dusty backwater gatherings, that became the most influential Man that ever walked the earth.
Gem Guy He died. I think you mean the general prevalence of Greek philosophy that began to spread and comprised much of the core values of the faith, which were adopted by a certain Roman emperor and declared as the state religion. I'm not sure how influential Jesus was given the fact that everything we claim to know about him is apocryphal. Rome was influential.
Genesis is a primitive attempt by an ancient storyteller to explain the appearance of creation. The story is utter nonsense that only a child would believe. I read it.
I love how he shares in a meek and gentle way, oh wait that's biblical too. I love the truth , don't you?
It's his nature, he's soft spoken, that don't make him meek anymore then a loud person means he's zealous
Absolutely love his talks on Origins. Thanks so much for uploading and God bless you Dr. Lisle in your terrific ministry.
"And you shall seek me, and find me, when you shall search for me with all your heart."
We have been lied by scientists all our lives
Do you use the internet? Mass produced food? Fossil fuels?
Science is lies! We must believe the Bible
@@patldennisSure do and without a doubt those that grew up with computers, internet, cell phones and social media (and I've been an R&D Electrical/Software engineer 25 years now), have been taught WHAT to think instead of HOW. So many can't do their job without being told every step of the way by a computer. I compare it to the introduction of calculators enabling people to never learn the skills required for mathematics. Now when faces with a real world problem they can't even figure it what numbers and operator to input. Perhaps this is also why they've deemed math racist. Anything that teaches one to learn HOW to think, to make your brain develop a skill, to make your head hurt, is frowned upon because the elite intent upon ruling this world want to OWN you, to be your Savior. They've done this with a myriad of things and none of you want to see what people HAD before all the tech. People just blindly follow along never developing a myriad of skills. All the while being encouraged and rewarded by your future owners knowing it'll be decades before the younger generation realise they've never known what they never had. We ALL think we Kno it all when we're younger. Once we're older and begin to acquire wisdom, only THEN do we see. This time around tho, the ones intent on keeping this generation from learning how to THINK are filling their head with WHAT to think and it's near impossible to convince someone they've been fooled. Good luck my friend and God bless. I promise you'll Kno by the time you've reached middle age. Unfortunately by then, there will be two more generations indoctrinated to believe WHAT to think that won't believe a word you will say. Without a doubt big tech AI after learning how to play chess and other human games have now been utilised to learn a new game. A game of "deeducate, own and control all of humanity" without them ever suspecting a thing. Even eagerly run towards having every moment of your entire lifetime controlled until such time as assisted suicide becomes mandatory for those deemed non compliant or to old to contribute to society. You're headed for the most evil time in human history. So evil that even athiests will be praying they were wrong.
my own family thinks I'm a whacko for believing the Bible. at least I know what shape the earth is... I don't wanna start no fights, just wanted to vent. thanks
Please don't say flat.
You are whacko if you believe all of the Bible. I used to be whacko too. Good news is that you CAN change by educating yourself.
I wish his slide show would have been included.
th-cam.com/video/61FKML4vHsA/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=YourOriginsMatter
How wonderful!!!!
If death is the punishment for sin, and Christians are forgiven, why do they still die?
Their crazy idea is that a new-born child, is born with '' the Sin ''' Therefore , he or she will die ! How can a new born child have a sin ? Not logical.
The sin is from the tree of knowledge... numerous Sumerians Mythology images has the same Tree of knowledge ( 4100-1750 BCE ) . The Sumerian story was adapted, manipulated for the Hebrew Bible.
Great address, but it would have been nice to see the slides he was showing.
This video is a wonderful example that religions can progress only with great lies. Science can't, only truth is the base of science. Without truth science can't progress.
Jason if you're going to use scripture to counter every evidence based scientific statement that contradicts it, you;re going to have to explain to people why they should believe your scripture. PLEASE DO SO.
EasyTiger10: Have you noticed that there really is no serious evidence that's ever presented for evolution? Lofty declarations yes there's plenty of that but evidence....nothing.
Evolution is not evidence based. It's a theory.
EVOLUTION IS OBSERVABLE IN THE FOSSIL RECORD !
Honest !
@@flihii1 This is a false statement ! It is all around you.
@@davidmahfuz9737 are there name tags on fossils? Evolution from one kind to another.
No argument on Dr. Lisles video has provided a genuine counter argument- it has just been people using foul language and making derogatory statements. I believe the apologetic employed here is aimed at the Church specifically- hence the biblical emphasis. Dr. Lisle has done other talks and written articles and book resources that are more technical and aimed at the skeptic with no church background. Watch Dawkins debate Alastair mcgrath and you will learn something about good, healthy and reasonable debate- TH-cam community needs to be more relaxed, composed and gentle with each other. Peace :)
He presented no evidence.
It seems that most of his views actually are from Kent Hovind, except he also has some unique thoughts of his own. Great talk.
#spreadtheword
Man’s word drags you to hell, God’s Word gives you LIFE! 🙏🙏🙏🫵
Initially he says that those who don't believe in God make their own rules and behave as they wish because they answer only to themselves. But then he says our values are intrinsically instilled by God, which means EVERYONE has values. So, Dr. Lisle, which one is it? Moral behavior is not driven by contingencies. Christians may say that the reason they behave morally is because of what they get when they die, afterlife.(which by the way would be quite immoral and selfish), but moral behavior is driven by our emotions, particularly empathy and sympathy, NOT rules or laws.
headoverheels I'd like to try and answer your concern. But first I want to ask you; why, in an evolutionary world view would you have moral laws? That is to say, who decides who's morally right, and who's wrong?
I'll address those one at a time. You say that humans are smart enough to come up with morals, which I don't agree with. If humans were to decide on what's wright and wrong we would have different moral codes throughout history, and in different parts of the world. But that is not the case. Doesn't it bother you that in general, with few delusional exceptions, throughout all of history murder has been considered morally wrong, everywhere on earth, and in the universe? Shouldn't that have evolved already, or since, if we live in an evolutionary universe? Morality is inconsistent with a changing universe.
But WHY is it not ok to for one human to kill another? In a Christian world view man is made in the image of God, and as such is higher than any other created thing. It is wrong to kill on impulse because we are all equal, and only God has the right to pronounce judgment. But in an evolutionary world view, that doesn't matter. If we're all made from the same bacteria, than who's to say why it's ok to kill and eat a cow, and it's not ok to kill and eat a human. If we're all animals, than what's the difference?
***** I say world view because we can both look at the same evidence and see two different explanations for it. I see comets and that tells me that the universe is young, you see comets and believe in an oort cloud. Because we look at evidence from different perspectives we have different world views. I look at it, read what the bible says and see that the evidence is consistent with what I read, and then I look at the history of bible vs man and see that bible has been right even when it's been mocked. The bible tells us that the world is a sphere long before the people discovered ways to confirm it, and the fact that the universe is expanding (that is to say all galaxies are moving away from each other), the secular scientists are just now seeing that it's true, but the bible has foretold it long ago. Therefore, what I'm challenging is your world view, not the theory itself.
***** Of course evidence is open for interpretation. That's why science books are constantly revised. If science was not open for interpretation they would never have to be revised. Scientists discover new things, they assume they work a certain way, they interpret the data and draw certain conclusions based on those assumptions. Sometimes those assumptions are wrong, and their interpretations are flawed and they come up with things they did not expect. When they see this they go back to the drawing board make some new assumptions and hope that this time they get it right. Those assumptions are what I want to challenge. For starters, how is it that laws of logic are even possible? In a christian worldview laws of logic stem from the mind of God, they are a reflection of the way God thinks. And since we are made in the image of God we are able to have and comprehend laws of logic, we know that a car cannot be in a parking lot and not in a parking lot at the same time. But in a chance universe, why would there be laws at all? Why is it that laws don't change with time? I can say with certainty that gravity will work the same today and tomorrow as it has yesterday because it says "God upholds all things by the power of his word", and "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever." God does not change, and He has promised us a certain degree of uniformity. He promised that the basic cycles will remain the same yesterday today and until judgment day. (Genesis 8:22) But in a chance universe, how can you be certain that next time you wake up gravity won't randomly stop working? How can you be certain that 2+2 will be 4 tomorrow or next week? If it's a chance universe, it might add up to 3 on Thursdays from now on.
Have come to the understanding that Genesis 1:1 that I have always read “In the beginning” when I understand that the actual translation from Hebrew should read “In a beginning”. How do you respond to this translation?
I also notice at 16:31 he says that Jesus says to Nicodemus if you don't believe when I talk about Earthly things how would you believe when I talk about Heavenly things. In Luke 16:31 Jesus says this "He said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.'" In both cases Jesus us discussing the issue of unbelief
Dr. Lisle, I have recently come across a few of your lectures and I must say I am impressed. Genesis 1:4 fascinates me. And God saw the light, that [it was] good: and God divided the light from the darkness. Notice that God divides the light from the darkness. He does not separate it as one of your audience mentioned. This means that the light and the dark are still connected but divided. We know from scripture that Light represents good and darkness represents evil. I believe that this is the point at which God created the Kingdom of Light and the kingdom of darkness and the two kingdoms exist, for now, side by side, interacting, until the kingdom of darkness has served it's purpose and is destroyed or separated for all eternity. Interestingly God calls the light day and the darkness He calls night. Then in Thessalonians we are told,
Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness.
(1Thess 5:5 [KJV])
Andre Mouton I believe the verse is literal but also prophetic in that it prophesied the first thing that would happen on day 1 (first 1k years) would be the fall of man, good and evil being divided. Good commentary!
Andre Mounton,
Apostle Paul is teaching God's Torah ~ Instruction ~ "Law" ~ Word ~
because it is *ETERNAL* .
The "church" didn't read all of the beloved Peter's words regarding Paul's letters, so they are in the *ERROR OF THE WICKED* unto their own *DESTRUCTION* for *NOT* taking Paul's letters back to the OT Scripture in which he is *ALWAYS* referring.
Here are *WHO* the "children of the LIGHT" are, my sweet friend, and they are making a comeback today in a big way. They speak according to the LAW and the TESTIMONY and God *IS* with them, and we are for *SIGNS and MIRACLES*
Isaiah 8
10 Take counsel together, and it shall come to nought; speak the word, and it shall not stand: *for God is with us* . 18 *Behold, I and the children whom the Lord hath given me are for signs and for wonders* in Israel from the Lord of hosts, which dwelleth in mount Zion.
19 And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead?
-------------->>>>>>>>>>>>20 *To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them* .
21 And they shall pass through it, hardly bestead and hungry: and it shall come to pass, that when they shall be hungry, they shall fret themselves, and curse their king and their God, and look upward.
22 And they shall look unto the earth; and behold trouble and darkness, dimness of anguish; and they shall be driven to darkness.
In verse 20, do you see that word *TESTIMONY* that is used there? it is only used *THREE* times in *ALL* of Scripture. Twice in Isaiah 8 and once in Ruth ~ when it speaks of the REMOVING of the SHOE for a *TESTIMONY* ~ and *PURCHASE* or *REDEMPTION* price........
So, *THIS* is *EXACTLY* what it is going to mean to have the *TESTIMONY* of JESUS/ YAHSHUA the MESSIAH.........
The "church" is in *darkness* and are *DRUNKEN* in the night (see also Isaiah 28 for the DRUNKARDS ~~ *WOE* to them!) they will be taken as a thief in the night and *sudden destruction* will come upon *THEM*
Why does Apostle Paul use the terminology *DRUNKEN* in the night?
He is teaching God's *ETERNAL* WORD
Deuteronomy 29
-------------->19 *And it come to pass, when he heareth the words of this curse, that he bless himself in his heart, saying, I shall have peace, though I walk in the imagination of mine heart, to add drunkenness to thirst* :
20 The Lord will not spare him, but then the anger of the Lord and his jealousy shall smoke against that man, and all the curses that are written in this book shall lie upon him, *and the Lord shall blot out his name from under heaven* .
21 And the Lord shall separate him unto evil out of all the tribes of Israel, according to all the curses of the covenant that are written in this book of the law:
Now, review what I JUST said with the *dead* church from the book of the Revelation. They have a "name" that they live, but they are *DEAD* ...... He is going to come to *THEM* as a thief in the night ~~~ but to those who *OVERCOME* ~~ their name will *NOT* be "blotted out" ....... VERY SAME terminology that Apostle Paul is also using..... because *THIS* is what he is also teaching.
God's *WORD* ~~ His *TORAH* ~~ His *INSTRUCTION* is *ETERNAL*
and *NONE* of us get to "make it up as we go along" ........
*RELIGION* is the *WIDE* path to *DESTRUCTION*
Thus the strong admonition from the book of the Revelation for us to come *OUT* of it...........
Bless you in LOVE and in *TRUTH*
Sanctify them in *TRUTH* ~~~ *THY* WORD is TRUTH
I would like to suggest the following teaching:
*The Chronological Gospels: The Life and 70 WEEK Ministry of THE Messiah* by A Rood Awakening
Mr. Mouton,
I came back here to show you something *else* too.
Here are the "heads" of the *BEAST* as shown to John on the Isle of Patmos:
1 Egypt,
2. Assyria,
3 Babylon,
4. Medo-Persia,
5 Greece and
6. Rome. (At the time John wrote this the kingdom "is") Encompassing *ALL* of *CHURCHIANITY*
@@angelsomebody2315 But man was not created until day 6.
@@angelsomebody2315 But man wasn't created until Day 6.
Unfortunately, there is a movement in the Christian church to compromise the clear teaching of the Bible. Yet, Proverbs 23:7 says that whatever a man thinks in his heart, so is he. Our beliefs do have consequences. If we can't believe Genesis, why should we believe anything else?
Too true. Well said. People simply do not think these things through as they should. They should reflect seriously on these very important things.
***** Your message prompted an old but precious memory in me and I want to share it with you.
The Bible stands.
The Bible stands like a rock undaunted,
mid the ranging storms of time,
it's pages burn with the truth eternal,
and they glow with a light sublime.
The Bible stands like a mountain towering,
far above the works of man,
it's truth, by none, ever was refuted,
and destroy it they never can.
The Bible stands and it will forever,
when the world has passed away,
by inspiration it has been given
all it's precepts I will obey.
The Bible stands every test we give it
for it's authors divine
by grace alone, I expect to live it
and to prove it and make it mine.
chorus
The Bible stands though the hills my tumble
it will firmly stand when the earth shall crumble
I will plant my feet on it's firm foundation
for the Bible stands.
Evidence.
this is your mind on religion.... If his mind wasn't trapped in a dogma he had pounded into his head since he could breath....he may have been a great theoretical physicist....instead, he just critiques science in a defense of the dogma.
Me too
Why doesn't Dr Lisle ever debate other scientists?
ophirdog He does. And they are very interesting debates. You can find them on youtube.
Roman Bespartochnyy I can't find any. Do you have a link?
Roman Bespartochnyy I did search "Jason Lisle debate" and found none. The link you added is just three creationists discussing their views.
+ophirdog He has a hard enough time facing down astronomy students or anyone who is educated in physics. I saw him get confronted once, and he simply dismissed it as a 'faith problem'.
+Roman Bespartochnyy No he doesn't. He's never debated anyone with equal credentials. He's afraid to.
Did he just say astronaut? Really?
I want to convert to Darwinism. I am tired of being ridiculed. All I need is for someone to give me SCIENTIFIC evidence that the trivial mutations we can observe are able to make the big changes we can't observe (i.e. generate new organic structures and systems). Sadly, no one, so far, has been able to do that.
There is certainly a middle ground no one seems to discuss. Genesis account is a common near eastern motif the Hebrew took to make their own. It is not a scientific description on the origins of the universe. Neo-Darwinian evolution on the other hand, purports geochemistry suddenly turned into biochemistry, simply by the passing of time. Fact is we don’t have an answer.
Fossil sequences. Look them up. And nobody converts to Darwinism. It’s not a religion.
the patriact jacob did not follow the "christian doctrine" on marriage
You know Genesis 8:22 Talks about seed time and harvest. Proverbs 8:22 Says God created Wisdom and with Her by His side He created everything else. Proverbs 18:22 Says that a man should find a wife. Leviticus 18:22 Says "'Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable. So what does all of this say? A man places a seed into a woman and the baby or the (crop) becomes full grown then the birth or the (harvest) occurs. The harvest could never occur if the seed was placed into a man and a woman has no seed to place into another woman. What's interesting in this video he says at 8:22 Jesus talks about marriage.
The last great test for Christians will be about WORSHIPING the Creator Rev 14:7
Dr. Jason Why is it when the bible in genesis has stated The earth was created in 6 days But we as Chestens have to believe The earth is not 4.5 bilion years old Yet we know When God created and made the univerce he ceated time he crated light God said Let there be light And the whole univerce was lit up. So stars God created that were billion of light years away could be seen By us. When Adem was created he was a fully grown man When the fruit trees in the graden of Eden were creaated in the garden of Eden They were fully grown fruit trees. Yet We as christens Still do not belive the earth was fully grown When God created it Because the concept is be on us that God can make the earth to be fully grown in 6 days and it is bilions of years old And god did this for us. So us as Man could live on it.
I'm only 20 minutes in and already I'm wowed
You are wowed by lies.
@@walkergarya care to explain what lies you speak of?
@@walkergaryaBEFORE computers, internet, cell phones and social media were used to deeducate a generation while locking God out of everywhere, lying, deceiving, debauchery and immorality weren't a way of life. These behavior were met with shame by friend, family and society. It kept everyone in check. (We used to be able to pump gas and THEN go in to pay because we TRUSTED ONE ANOTHER)... I lettered on the future team in high school (1985). We didn't have school shootings then she had guns in school... Racism was waning as per Dr King's character not skin color. Neither of my two best friends of 30 years I carpooled to college with are white. NOW look what we've got! Sidewalks in Every small town used to be filled with people socializing. Everyone knew each other. Now everyone is greedy and full of pride and just waiting for anyone to drop their guard (or wallet) in order to TAKE and then celibrate someone's misfortune. Like it better this way huh? Don't worry, God has a special place for each of us and ironically enough it's where each of us wants to be.
Do not be put off by the nasty comments. They will receive their just rewards. But you Dr. lisle, keep up the good work, for the time is near.
Great sales pitch. "Believe us with zero evidence or burn in hell!" Seriously just have your god go take a walk down any street in any major city 200 ft tall and creating life out of nothing and I will worship him.
th-cam.com/video/YjrxHqNy5CQ/w-d-xo.html
The *REAL* Mount Sinai
There is *MORE* coming out too.....
*repent* for the time draws neigh........
'' Time is near'' ! This particular phrase has been repeated for centuries and centuries ! When asked when it might come, you never , never, never , have a clear answer ! But, it is coming !....
@@RayB1656
2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance.
I certainly have no quarrel with the Christian faith.
Faith is personal.
My only objection, criticism in this particular case
one example,
is when Dr.Lisle mentioned without any explanation,
that God had provided a ''temporary light''
for three days before the creation of the Sun !
This is speculation, sorry, it is a ''shot in the dark" !
Why God would have created the Sun , three days after the first day,
when he already knew that the Sun was needed for gravity, light, warm..
and in the entire Universe, the stars (the suns) all came before the planets...
Why making things more complicated than they are !
I believe that the Late Bronze Age Bible writers were probably confused
and really had no idea about the movement in the night sky above
or the entire Cosmos, during that era...
Everything in Genesis is relevant. The days of Creation are literal 6 days. The seventh day is still holy and set apart. The tithe is still binding faith and obedience of Abraham modeled the true experience with God. But how many let tradition shape and mold their spiritual Journey. And Gods word is not studied deeply but people just follow what their pastor tells them. We are not called to change American this is Zionism. We’re called to follow God individually and obey his commandments and walk humbly with God.
It constantly surprises me that there are people with lots of scientific credentials and background who also believe in creationism. Scientists deal in disciplines for which they can see and inspect evidence. If they were doing an experiment they would make predictions and conclusions based on the results. And then they say they believe in the creation, for which there is no visible evidence or explanations... and they refute evolution, for which there is masses of sound scientific evidence.
If you have verifiable proof of Evolution you could be $250k richer. Just google it.
TOJOADAMS
Are you talking about Convict Kent Hovind's "offer"?
www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind.html
...his offer is a joke. No surprise there since he's the one who cooked it up.
CD: "It constantly surprises me that there are people with lots of scientific credentials and background who also believe in creationism"
An interesting question would be how are credentials and such... meaningful in an evolution system, that is mindless and random?
CD: "Scientists deal in disciplines for which they can see and inspect evidence. If they were doing an experiment they would make predictions and conclusions based on the results"
And creationist don't? I think there is some bias here. Even if we conceded that creationist scientist didn't do these things why would it be wrong in an evolution system?
CD:"And then they say they believe in the creation, for which there is no visible evidence or explanations…"
The creationist and the evolutionists are privy to the same evidence. That's why I contend that the debate over evolution vs. creation is not over facts but between world-views. The naturalist will ultimately view the evidence from a pre-committment to naturalism, while the creationist (Christian) has a pre-commitment to Jesus Christ.
CD: "and they refute evolution, for which there is masses of sound scientific evidence"
Is there really sound evidence? I'm still unconvinced and there is nothing in the naturalist worldview that would obligate me to think otherwise. Common ancestry is not surprising seeing as God created all things, even still the Genesis account indicates that all living things came from the same place, the ground. I still struggle with the bacteria to men paradigm, definitely don't see that happening. Doesn't seem too sound to me. But you are welcome to counter that as I am dumb creationist after all. Cheers.
***** What I'm talking about is the FACT that you nor anyone else has ANY evidence of evolution. Natta, Zero, Zilch.
Unless you claim to be a clone of your mother or father...... Each person is slightly different than their parents so your existence proves evolution.
Dumbass.....lol
O wait, you might be one of those bozos like Cameron and Comfort....aka Crocoduck Man and Banana Man
Wow. This comedian is hilarious! The crowd were bloody awful though.
As a creationist I understand that your statement is indicative of "unargued prejudicial conjecture", which as you may or may not be aware, influences your world view. If you watched the video, you must have heard that he is an Astronomer, with a PHD from Colorado University. The idea that he is a "comedian" in your view certainly clarifies your bias, as well as your attempt to discredit him by using ad hominem. Nice going!
To me, it's even simpler to be an 'originist' ... I focus on not just how life emerges from inert matter, but the impossibility of the steps before that, such as the formation of the first protein molecule by Mother Nature. Ditto for the origin of planets, stars: no one can explain 'how' but only 'we may assume'. Eg., it's assumed the universe was filled with hydrogen. How did this occur? Where did the elements originate? Mother Nature? And, of course, we even note that in the past few decades three Nobel Prizes were awarded that 'proved' big bang cosmology have been proven falsified.Despite chemical evolution of first molecule is impossible, and scientific law disproves life from inert matter, this is the foundation of classical macro evolution! Events that never occurred are the basis of assumptions atop assumptions. No wonder the first step of inert > life is largely ignored as non-essential in the evolution debate.Either God as creator is a myth or Mother Nature is. Both can't be correct. And don't start on aliens or parallel universes, people.
I believe every word in the BIBLE. If you study IT enough, you will know the difference when IT is being literal, and when you are reading poetry, and when IT is making comparisons. Study your BIBLE! ITS not made up.
God, our Creator and Father gave the man a physical body, soul and a spiritual body, while animals have a physical body and soul only, whereas the plants, insects and possibly the reptiles only have a physical body.
If animals have a physical body and a soul therefore mankind should not be killing animals ! This would be logical. However, in the Bible , when the Hebrews were attacking a city , they would killed all the men, woman, ''animals'' burning the crops and keeping the virgins for the soldiers... This is very confusiing !!!
@@RayB1656 Yes, that way was meant the world to be by God The Creator, however, beginning with Adam and later continuing with Sodom&Gomorrah the people disobeyed God, atitude which brought death in the World, whereas Noah,s Flood reduced the oxigen in the air, from then on, with less oxigen in the cells, the human body needed more fuel\calories which are found in animal meet, that"s the reason why from then on God allowed to chase animals and eat, as God said, from then on, the animals will fear the man and run or fight. But as God created the Earth the lion was laying down with the lamb and was total peace in the world. And then Christ came and said: Peace l give you, l am the truth, the way, the life! Peace Brother, may God be blessed forevermore!
@@robertdumicz7309 I have some difficulty with your above explanation. I respect your faith , however , what your are mentioning is not in the Bible stories... you are trying to explain something which is not real. First, the Flood !. This is well-known today , the ''flood story '' was taken from the Sumerians ( Gilgamesh ) , a story of the rising waters of the Black Sea, about 9000 or 10000 years ago , it was adapted for the Hebrews tribes. Lots of ruins and ancient cities at the bottom of the Black Sea, today... Most experts are saying that the water would have been rising at about two feet per day . Furthermore, also, the Ark , came to rest on Mt Ararat, which is south of the Black Sea....A '' Flood '' covering the entire earth, for 50 days , would have destroyed all the plants and trees on the planet...nothing to eat, to cultivate for decades and decades. Man wouldn't have survived... The Bronze Age ancient Bible is very different ( written at about 700 BCE ) from the New Testament, which was written at about 200 years A.D., in Greek. .
@@RayB1656 I don't use the Bible in that case, but as l do mostly to the God deniers l use science, as there were discovered fossils of giant insects and animals and is known that only a greater part of oxigen in the air could allow insects to grow bigger than they are nowadays, here's the evidence, the atmosphere was richer in oxigen back then.
Furthermore you're only assuming that all the plants would die under water, so, is that a proven fact..? For even if it'd be a proven fact, what makes you belive that the allmighty God, The One Who was able to create the Universe as we know it, couldn't hold the plants alive for 50 days or even resurrect them just as Christ did with Lazarus who was dead for 4 days already and begun to stink..?
Or should God mention the fact that He recreated the plants on Earth after Noah's Flood, if that's the thing He did..? Noah have had anyway lots of seeds and plants on the Ark, couldn't he have had all the seeds for each plant..? That's another posibility you seem to never have thought of...
So think please out of the box, additionaly l have to add that there is scientific and even visual evidence for Noah's Flood and even a number of YT videos presenting that evidence, so isn't exactly the very thing you ask for and belive in, just and only what you see..? So since you don't belive in God, why don't you trust the evidence you pretend to belive in..?
Furthermore if that would be just a local flood God wouldn't advice Noah to build a boat which takes years but would simply tell him to move on...
So you see my friend, you use faulty logic, most probably in an atempt to keep your world view intact, with the purpose (l suppose) to still pretend there'd be no sin and we'd be ok to do whatever we please as long we don't break the earthly laws...
No my friend, there are additionaly over 300 testimonies and legends about the great flood allover the Earth so they couldn't describe a local flood at the Black Sea where l happen to be born and have spent my childhood too.
Along with my faith we have the science and evidence to sustain it, while you only have the denial even of the very science and evidence you seem to preach and pretend to belive in...
@@robertdumicz7309 You have quite a bit of statements in your answer !
Two examples = even if Noah would have had some seeds on board, it would have taken time to have a crop., many weeks and months !
How do they live in the meantime ?
Second example = the '' local flood'' your mentioned, this was the flooding of the Black Sea, where thousand and thousand of people was living in the valley, ( today the Black Sea ) , it is the Gilgamesh story from the Sumerians ! If you would take the time to read it, you would see the exact story of the Bible's Flood. Again, the Hebrews tribes during their captivity took that epic story and adapted the account for themselves. Let me know if your are familiar with Sumerian Mythology, their writings and science ( 4100-1760 BCE ) .
I am a researcher , only. I do not have an agenda ! I try only to observe , to understand the world around me. From the very small ( subatomic particles ) to the very large, the expanding universe and everything in between.
Most of us, do have Neanderthal Man DNA in our blood. Neanderthal man, 300,000 to 27000 years ago. This is now proven. Any genetic labs can verify this. Would you give an explanation to this , since this is do change quite a bit the Genesis Bible story ??? This is not a ''trap''
I would like your opinion, only.
The Bible writers from 700 BCE couldn't have known this biological fact, that why there is no mention of it.
If you would have been born in an Arabic country, you would be, today, a follower of the Islamic faith , just like the one billion and a half which believes in the All-Knowing and the last God on earth, Allah . They believe this is the only true God.
Religion is complex.
So, Noah had dinosaurs on the Ark? Interesting..
Yes exactly, you're catching on
Baby dinosaurs, anyone? Duh.
I’m here for the lolz
Lawrence Krauss would have a Field Day with Little Jason!
Soundmman Take your best most knowledgeable evolutionists and pit them against Jason Lisle, Kent Hovind, Don Patton, Hugh Ross and for a WWE smack down, Stephen Meyer.
5 names, 5 people, 5 experts that collectively can destroy every evolutionist in every field on earth combined.
Tom- Evolution is no longer a debate, it is Proven Fact. All Life Sciences are based on Evolution. Break through your childhood religious indoctrination and educate yourself with real knowledge that has Evidence. Jason Lisle is a Joke and Kent Hovind is a Jailbird!
Soundmman 1 Kent Hovind is in jail correct, but he could be a talking pigeon for all it matters. And Patton, Meyer, and Ross? Whats your excuse for the evidence they present? In fact just those 3 alone destroy evolution.
You say evolution is no longer a debate? how about this? http : // ncse.com/evolution "What is Evolution?In the biological sciences, evolution is a scientific theory that explains the emergence of new varieties of living things in the past and in the present; it is not a "theory of origins" about how life began."The NCSE National Center for Science Education defines evolution as above.... Now this is because they legally can't because in a court of law when asked to present evidence they can not prove evolution. So you disagree with the NCSE? Not a shock you evolutionists disagree with basic logic, preponderance of evidence and simple reasoning. You want to believe so badly in evolution you bold face ignore even basic science such as causality and say there was a big bang from nothing. You cant get something from nothing. How can you evolutionists claim to love science when you completely ignore something basic like causality. The very science you guys claim to be masters of is kicking your evolutionary theory in the balls lol.
Soundmman 1 One more thing, I am obviously a creationist so it's not shocking that I would be on this page watching the content. You however are obviously an evolutionist, shouldnt you be out trying to find a way to mathematically disprove Stephen Meyer's mathematical proof life can not have evolved on it's own from nothing?
I mean the only reason imo that an evotard would hang out on comment section for a video he completely disagrees with is because he is insecure in his own thinking. Which you are, which is why you are here. You are looking for that one thing that proves to you that God is real. But you wont find it, because even if you did you don't want to believe it. But you want me to join you in your religious beliefs in evolution to bolster your self assurance that you are on the right path. No damn way son..... No damn way... lol
Tom- Every newborn baby on the planet is born an Atheist. There is no such thing as a Christian baby. Unfortunately a horrifying percentage of those babies are brainwashed with Bronze Age fairy tales before they can think for themselves. This is what happened to You.
Why does nobody want to answer the question, "Who Created God?"
Harry Andruschak Exodus 3:14 and John 8:58... God says, I AM. He just is. We aren't called to understand everything, just believe. However, I totally get how the answer I just gave won't suffice for everyone. But God was not created, He just always existed. Beyond our understanding does not make it untrue.
Austin Ruiz "Beyond our understanding does not make it untrue." Nor does it make it true?
first person I have heard who could explain the different lights from the first and fourth day.
THANK YOU FATHER, THANK YOU JESUS, THANK YOU HOLY SPIRIT YOU ARE REAT BLESS ALL THESE PEOPLE.
Gravity isn't proven either. Yes, I've taken and passed college physics courses. Look into it
Even the ancient Greeks knew about ''gravity'' ! They knew that the Earth was not flat and was orbiting around the Sun !
Nothing is proven outside math and logic. The question is what does the evidence show.
I don't understand why we can't believe in Santa Claus
I discovered who he was. Also it's not even charity. He gets paid for his work......my friend said it's his grand dad..what a joke. Nuff said.
Santa is dead!..spell it differently you get Satan..lisle is a genius!
+kevin b agreed! :)
+kevin b change letters n u get applesauce
So far ity did not woprk
Genesis 1:1---In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2
Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of
the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. 3 And God
said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the
light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God
called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.”
And there was evening, and there was morning―the first day. As we all
know, evening is the setting of the Sun in the West and Morning is the
rising of the SUN from the East. So, how can there be evening &
morning in the first day, 2nd & 3rd when the SUN is ONLY created on
the 4 Day...???
You do not need the sun for a day. All you need is a light source and a rotating planet.
Jay Hu The LIVING WORD says the earth stands still = no movement. That said God is light. I agree on that fact.
If you actually watched the video before trying to tear it up, the concept of a temporary light source existing until the institution of the sun as the permanent "light bearer" was discussed at least twice as a possibility for the answer to your question. I would respectfully suggest you ask God. After all, He was there.
God was also speaking a man made language when he did all this too.
Mistakes in the Bible...............1. In science the Sun formed first then the surrounding planets but in Genesis the Earth was created first then the Sun. One mistake................... 2. If the Sun was created on the 4th day, then all the water appear on the 2nd and 3rd day would have been frozen. second mistake................... 3. God created two large lights (ie the sun and moon) on the 4th day. Science discovery that the Moon is NOT a light. There is only one large light in our solar system ie the Sun. To be more accurate, all those stars in the distance galaxies are also large lights and there are billions and billions of them. Thus God created two large lights is incorrect.................. 4. In Genesis God made the Sun and moon on 4th day but there is morning and evening on the 1st 2nd and 3rd. That's another mistakes................... 5. God created plants and trees on the 3rd day before the Sun. That's a mistake as plants and trees require sunlight to grow. It does not happened that way................... 6. God rested on the 7th day. Even today, many new animals and species came into existence from the day of Earth existence. That's a mistake................... 7. God made man from dirt or earth (earth element) and his breath (wind element). That does not made a living human being. Why...? Because there is two missing elements ie fire and water elements. Water elements are blood and water content. 70-80% of our human content consists of water. And fire element is our body heat resulting in our body temperature. Without body heat, our limbs movement will become stiff and blood will clot very easily. Very big mistake indeed.
Many cultures have had weeks different than 7 days
Name one.
#wrong! Most languages have the name for "saturday" rooted in the concept of "SABBATH!"
The Chinese had a 10 day week before they adopted the 7 day week in 400 ce.
Atheist must admit, that, it take's a LOT of blind faith to be an "Atheist." The evidence is clearly on the " creationist" side. Bible prophesy proves, the future was written before it happened. When it says God rested the Seventh day. It doesn't mean he was tired. It means he ceased from all his labour.
Agreed. The math for nucleotide bases (the G.A.C.T.'s in DNA) to "accidentally" fall into place to string up amino acids into useful proteins is 1/10^77 for ONE to happen, and there's 3 billion of them in the human genome, many interdependent on another, so multiple "accidents" would have to have happened at the same time, thus propelling those odds against (1/10^77) exponentially. Even at one mutation per second, which is unrealistic given lifespan, there's only been 10^16 seconds since the atheists' "big bang" - so it's mathematically impossible for evolution to have happened - with abiogenesis being a prerequisite to that (meaning, life can't accidentally "evolve" until it first exists, which failed Darwinism doesn't attempt to explain). In fact Darwin and his contemporaries referred to cells as simple little blobs, not the awesome, intentional machines we see that they are.
@@Stormvetprime01 Anything above 1x10^52 is considered absurd odds by scientists, meaning it cannot,, and will not, ever happen. I wouldn't bet on the odds you provided.........
Fearfully and wonderfully made, indeed.
Lol nope. Stop trying to pretend your ignorance is equal to someone else’s knowledge.
@@Stormvetprime01The odds of the particular sperm fertilizing the particular egg to make you are astronomically low, but it happened, due to materially determined chemical causes. You don’t understand probability.
Looking above I see that 56 atheists have been ''trolling'' here. They deny God but cannot stop thinking about him 24/7 🤣🤣🤣🤣!!!!!!!!!
I am just hangin out, pissing on the dying embers of your barbaric death cult.
I'm not an atheist. But I do despise the deceitful cult of creationism
@@witssen9954 Why should I care what you assert when you obvioulsy have no clue about reality?
@@witssen9954 Go play in traffic with your plastic jesus action figure.
@@witssen9954 I would suggest that you grow up and stop believing you have an invisble friend.
I find it quite astonishing that anyone with any analytical intelligence can possibly believe in such ludicrous, childish, fantasy nonsense. Totally bewildering.
This is no surprise ! Man is afraid to die, he just can't believe that he is only part of an evolutive , a natural- selection system. He wants to live forever. An invisible man in the sky from the Bronze Age era , is the perfect answer ! Furthermore, he is also egoistic and self-serving, he can have a conversation with GOD and demand things !!!
"If God didn't get the details right in [Genesis] we're in big trouble." Oh...dear...
It's your interpretation which is in question.
I fail to see the relevance of religion in reality.
Cornflower Right, "religion" don't matter. Jesus, the Apostles was against "religion. Unless Jesus was crazy or a liar, HE MATTERS. For Jesus is the one that warned us of "Hell Fire." If I'm wrong, what have "I" to lose. But, if your wrong? Just say, God, if you are real, reveal yourself to me, and Jesus, show me your Son. He can and will. Admit you are a sinner, you need a Saviour. You can't save yourself.1st CORTHIANS ch 15 vs 1,2,3,4. ROMANS ch 10.... For "WHOSOEVER," shall call upon the name of the Lord "SHALL BE SAVED." No If's, and's or buts, "SHALL BE SAVED."..Doesn't matter what you've done. It's a matter of "who" you receive as Saviour. No one has ever come to Jesus and been turned away. Then, your life will take on a whole New meaning. Your eye's will be opened, and the Bible will take on a whole New meaning for you. COME.
Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
Matthew 11:28 KJV
Jesus lives
Jesus Christ is Lord
For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Romans 3:23 KJV
Jesus loves you repent
You're a sinner in need of a Savior
That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Romans 10:9-10 KJV
Meh. I do not need or want the crap of your bible.
He's a genius!
1. He has critical thinking ability, now swayed by billions of dollars yearly that support a scientifically disproven worldview of inert matter becoming life2. He has the ability to test the Bible for himself as a record of history, etc., and come to the conclusion it really is the Word of God: that God actually confirms it as history, and whatever He wants to convey to humans.He may well be a human genius, but because of points 1 and 2, he is also one of God's geniuses, which anyone can become who accepts that Jesus is actually God, that His work is the penultimate Work in history. Which, of course, His enemies have long attacked as 'myths' 'just one of many teachings,' etc.
So you can do better..go ahead get in line like the rest of the so called critical thinkers! hahahahha!
foreveragainOK see above..can you do any better,,,NO!
why genesis did not matter? it was attributed to "Moses" who did not know how to write. He left the ten commandment to god to write it because he did not know how to write.
so who wrote genesis? no one knows; it is NOT credible .
albert sneij Just because a man did not know how to write at one point of his life does not discredit all future written works by him. I am positive that at one point you were illiterate as well. Just as I, and every other human on this planet were.
This is absolutely a dishonest and b******* comment because everybody knows that the scripture is clear that God inspired men to write this book...
for example at the end of the book of Daniel Daniel actually asks God "what did I just write?" because inspired by God's power to write what God wanted in the scriptures.. I thought everybody understood this what is wrong with people?
+albert sneij Genesis is fake, but all the biblical recordings surrounding the Egyptian kings has ALL been vetted through archaeology as scientifically accurate. Strange Moses chose to make a bunch of stuff up about creation then accurately describe Egyptian Kings, names of cities, etc. If you can believe that you can believe in unicorns.
+Roman Bespartochnyy Why did Moses ever have to touch a pen and parchment? They had scribes. Moses would have been the writer, the scribe would have acted as the type writer. The type writer does not author anything on it's own. the author does.
Tom Clancy sure we can believe in unicorns because in 1611 when this kjv Bible was written the word meant rhinoceros ...
I thought you people were educated and knew these kind of things wow.
This guy is so literal in his interpretation of the Bible, if he had lived during Jesus' time, he would have been one of the Pharisees that Jesus rebuked.
*"This guy is so literal in his interpretation of the Bible...."* You say that like it is a bad thing, ADWS.
American Dreamerz,
Then you don't know what the Pharisees were teaching.
The Pharisees were making up their *OWN* rules called takanot and ma'asims that come from the ORAL "law", the Talmud, Mishna, what the "sages say" and so forth. These were the *traditions of men* that were heavy burdens to bear ~~~ *BONDAGE* ... because God's *ETERNAL* WORD is His *PERFECT LAW OF LIBERTY* .... and His WORD is *ETERNAL*
See sir,
*NONE* of us get to make it up as we go along.
*RELIGION* is the *WIDE* path to *DESTRUCTION*
Jesus (His Hebrew name YAHSHUA literally meaning *Salvation* ) was teaching the *SAME* WORD as the Father, and that is what He tells the Pharisees over and over. That *IF* they knew the Father then they would *KNOW* Him because He came to say the SAME that was since the *BEGINNING*
Jesus/ Yahshua/ LITERAL Salvation *IS* the *WORD* made *FLESH* sir
Allow me to illustrate something to you:
Here are the "heads" of the BEAST as shown to John (BY YAHSHUA) on the Isle of Patmos:
1 Egypt,
2. Assyria,
3 Babylon,
4. Medo-Persia,
5 Greece and
6. Rome. (At the time John wrote this the kingdom "is") Encompassing *ALL* of *CHURCHIANITY*
"There's no astronomical basis for [7 days in a week]"
The reason they adopted the number seven was that they observed seven celestial bodies - the sun, the moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. ... The Babylonians divided their lunar months into seven-day weeks, with the final day of the week holding particular religious significance.
This is the most bezare man possible. He thinks that attempting to to learn is the most evil thing humans have ever done, then he gets a PHD.
It is no small amount of irony that he obtained a PhD from secular institutions and trades on this credential, but then goes around telling everyone that his alma mater is flat wrong about everything.
I’m sure he keep quiet about his crazy views while in grad school.
Why did he spend all that time studying for his PhD and then give it all away to preach. I guess intelligence does not necessarily come with common sense.
Jesus warned his disciples to be beware of false teachers and false prophets. Below are some of questions regarding Genesis 1 about God created the universe in 6 days and mankind................ Question #1 : Genesis 1 stated God created Earth, heavens, Sun, Moon and stars. But on which day did God create Mars, Venus, Jupiter, Mercury, Saturn, & other sister planets...?................ Question #2 : If Eve was created by GOD from Adam's rib, was Eve's DNA the same as Adam's DNA...?................... Question #3 : In Genesis 1:16 God made the Sun and moon on 4th day but why there is morning and evening on the 1st 2nd and 3rd. If God's light created morning and evening on 1st 2nd & 3rd, then is this God's light still exist today...? If this light still exist, pls identify where this God's light is...?....................... Question #4 : God made two large lights. But the Moon is not a large light as it does not emits it's own light. if Moon is considered as large lights, Jupiter has at least 67 moons. Uranus has 27。Saturn has 62 moons.... so there are more than 2 large lights.............. Question #4 : God created Adam & Eve from dust and Adam's rib, how could both be human beings without blood in their body.......
Religious folk need a life...
And we need it more abundantly
So in a christian world view the bible is the word of god, how do they know that?
MultiVinniemac logic and reasoning. example. Through archaeology nearly every claim in the bible has been proven accurate. King David was thought to be a myth, then they found concrete archaeological evidence that he did in fact exist. Joshuas alter has been found. Want something more impressive? The story of Moses crossing the red sea, and the army of egypt being swallowed up by the parted waters.... They found the remains of those chariots whose wheels dated back to that dynasty off the coast of the gulf of Aqaba. Or how about the remains of the cities Sodom And Gemmorrah, and the fact that they are blanketed in billions of 99.9 % pure sulfur pebbles that couldn't have naturally occurred there.
These are things that unless you just have no common sense or reasoning ability make you have to stop and ask yourself if it could be true. Otherwise how do you discredit a book whose accounts always stand the test of archaeology? Then you have guys like Stephen Meyer, Don Patton and Jason Lisle all PHds in their field dropping bombs on evolution.
My question is after researching all these things how do you not know the bible is the word of God? The only person who would ask such a thing is a person who knows nothing of these things. So perhaps that is my answer to your question.
Tom Clancy Just want to say God bless you for defending the faith. Karl Marx once said, "Religion is the opiate of the people" for those afraid of the dark. It seems that "Atheism is the true opiate of the people" for those who think that if they ignore the facts that somehow they won't be held accountable at judgment. alwaysbeready.com is a good site, too.
+MultiVinniemac That's the million dollar question that every sane person wants to know.
The seventh day of creation is the moment we are always living in. The now IS the Seventh day.
Now is the sixth day or, the sixth Millennium. The seventh day, or day of rest represents the seventh Millennium, the Age to come. The return of Jesus Christ to set up the Kingdom of God on earth, to take up the crown of David and to rule from Jerusalem for 1000 years.
"That's where we get the idea of 7 days in a week"
Oh yeah, that's why those days are named after pagan gods, too, I'm sure.
No connection between the two..
@@rossmcintyre3228 exactly. Fundies abd creationists are always trying to conyrive associations with their religion as a cultural foundation. Same fallacy as America is a Christian nation bs
The revelation in Genesis is a revelation..Purpose and motivation pre-exist design and design pre-exist structured matter. In my book, the time period between evening 6pm and morning 6 am is 12 h, ergo half a day. Nevertheless the designer lives and so remain His existing principles and laws eternal, absolute and unchanging,
I love this man. God created him for such a time as this.
.............. As long as Ur not cult ~ evangelist~ that discretely 'block' ~ @ a public forum ~ I don't mind :) acts 28:30 ~ Matt 7:21 +
The lie of creationism cannot be asserted or defended with honesty.
Please explain how "lying" is a bad thing in your worldview if what your brain tells you is truth. Wasn't your brain the product of random chance? Would correcting my thinking on this matter prove or disprove your worldview?
Mistakes in the Bible...............1. In science the Sun formed first then the surrounding planets but in Genesis the Earth was created first then the Sun. One mistake................... 2. If the Sun was created on the 4th day, then all the water appear on the 2nd and 3rd day would have been frozen. second mistake................... 3. God created two large lights (ie the sun and moon) on the 4th day. Science discovery that the Moon is NOT a light. There is only one large light in our solar system ie the Sun. To be more accurate, all those stars in the distance galaxies are also large lights and there are billions and billions of them. Thus God created two large lights is incorrect.................. 4. In Genesis God made the Sun and moon on 4th day but there is morning and evening on the 1st 2nd and 3rd. That's another mistakes................... 5. God created plants and trees on the 3rd day before the Sun. That's a mistake as plants and trees require sunlight to grow. It does not happened that way................... 6. God rested on the 7th day. Even today, many new animals and species came into existence from the day of Earth existence. That's a mistake................... 7. God made man from dirt or earth (earth element) and his breath (wind element). That does not made a living human being. Why...? Because there is two missing elements ie fire and water elements. Water elements are blood and water content. 70-80% of our human content consists of water. And fire element is our body heat resulting in our body temperature. Without body heat, our limbs movement will become stiff and blood will clot very easily. Very big mistake indeed.
Sooooo JASON you believe what the bible says about the beginning. That's great to hear, what about the 7th day [rest,blessed and sanctified day] Gen2:1-3 which was CREATED BEFORE SIN ,I take it you are a 7th day Sabbath keeper, as opposed to a ceremonial sabbath keeper WHICH WAS NAILED TO THE CROSS, because the 7th day is a memorial of creation Exodus20:8,11.notice Gen2:1 He finished His work ON the 7th day and rested , making it a part of creation ,Beavers have been observed going into there lodge Friday evening and staying in till Saturday evening,Bees have been observed staying in there hives Saturdays ,20,000 patients in Germany had there blood pressure checked every day for 3mths, a drop in blood pressure was noted on Saturdays ,by two or three witnesses truth shall be established,AMEN Happy [creation memorial] Sabbath.
"GENESIS MATTERS " you bet!
minute 19:36- 'he's God" ; Jesus is the Son of God, no where does he say he is God. Yes, it is very interesting that Jesus used the Word of God as his authority. He knew that what he was saying was the word of his Father. "My Father is greater than I" John 14:28 Also Minute 43:25 'raised himself from the dead'. ??? What does Scripture say? God raised Jesus from the dead. 1 Corinthians 15:14 ""And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith. 15 More than that, we are then found to be false witnesses about God, for we have testified about God that he raised Christ from the dead." Acts 2:32 '"This Jesus God raised up, and of that we are witnesses"
Wrong. God says there is no Savior beside Him. And yet Jesus is Savior. So Jesus is God.
And He is called God with us!
And that's just Matthew 1. Jesus is God in every chapter of the New Testament.
Jesus submitted to the Father while on earth. He said the Father is greater, but also said they are one. You are cherrypicking and misunderstanding scripture.
If Jesus is not God, there is no salvation. Only God is good, and only a perfect sacrifice is sufficient!
Oh, and if only God is good, as Jesus says, and Jesus is not God as you say, then you have a sacrifice that is not good. You have no saviour.
Romans 10.9 also says you can't be saved without saying Jesus is Lord, which is the Greek equivalent of YHWH.
@@GrahameGould Your bible is full of garbage and is self contradictory. Jesus, if he was ever real, was just a flesh and blood man.
Dr. Jason Lisle is an incredibly smart and brave individual to make the stance he makes and I immensely respect him for what he does, despite the fact I disagree with many of his beliefs. I do not believe that a literal view of the word can give us an accurate view of God and his nature, particularly when it comes to creation. the bible is metaphorical, Jesus spoke in parables and in metaphors quiet often. In fact he almost always disagreed with a literal view of the word when he was calling out the Pharisees.
He's smart. All con artists are generally smart. Brave? No, he's fleecing the gullible.
Did you mean this literally or shall we just accept your statement as the ramblings of another person who places their opinion above God's Word? Sounds like you need to read God's word more to understand that the things of the spirit are discerned by the spirit. It is foolishness to those who do not believe. How will you believe Jesus when he speaks of heavenly things but not when He speaks of earthly things??? Jesus is asking YOU this and waiting for your answer. Please direct it to Him.
@@davidbutler1857 and they also need lot of money !
@@zellerized There is no 'God's Word'. There are some people who seem to think a book written by humans replete with publishing information in the front matter is somehow the divinely commanded words of a deity, but these people are universally regarded as nutcases.
all true christians must start with Genesis!
Jesus warned his disciples to be beware of false teachers and false prophets. Below are some of questions regarding Genesis 1 about God created the universe in 6 days and mankind................ Question #1 : Genesis 1 stated God created Earth, heavens, Sun, Moon and stars. But on which day did God create Mars, Venus, Jupiter, Mercury, Saturn, & other sister planets...?................ Question #2 : If Eve was created by GOD from Adam's rib, was Eve's DNA the same as Adam's DNA...?................... Question #3 : In Genesis 1:16 God made the Sun and moon on 4th day but why there is morning and evening on the 1st 2nd and 3rd. If God's light created morning and evening on 1st 2nd & 3rd, then is this God's light still exist today...? If this light still exist, pls identify where this God's light is...?....................... Question #4 : God made two large lights. But the Moon is not a large light as it does not emits it's own light. if Moon is considered as large lights, Jupiter has at least 67 moons. Uranus has 27。Saturn has 62 moons.... so there are more than 2 large lights.............. Question #4 : God created Adam & Eve from dust and Adam's rib, how could both be human beings without blood in their body.......
We are fallen Angels, been with our G*D forever, G*D made a way for us to come back to him Via Earth. The Bible says a Third of his Angels refused to come down here, luckily we did that. Adam & Eve were created on the 8the day to Bring Jesus here.
Only 1% of Christians ever read the BIBLE & Studied it. Just saying. Please read & study.
Hi there,
Here are the "heads" of the *BEAST* as shown to John on the Isle of Patmos:
1 Egypt,
2. Assyria,
3 Babylon,
4. Medo-Persia,
5 Greece and
6. Rome. (At the time John wrote this the kingdom "is") Encompassing *ALL* of *CHURCHIANITY*
What's so funny is that this out of work Astrophysicist, who hasn't earned a dime in his field basically since leaving college, is going around to backwater churches trying to evangelize. It's kinda hilarious.
+David Butler
He graduated summa cum laudefrom Ohio Wesleyan University where he double-majored in physics and astronomy and minored in mathematics. He earned a master’s degree and a Ph.D. in astrophysics at the University of Colorado. Dr. Lisle specialized in solar astrophysics and has made a number of scientific discoveries regarding the solar photosphere including the detection of giant cell boundaries using the SOHO spacecraft, and has contributed to the field of general relativity.
Also I think Dr Jason Lisle would dispute your claim that he hasn't made a dime in his field. Dr. Lisle was instrumental in developing the planetarium at the Creation Museum in Kentucky, writing and directing popular planetarium shows including “The Created Cosmos.” As Director of Research, Dr. Lisle leads ICR’s gifted team of scientists who continue to investigate and demonstrate the evidence for creation.
Randy Abell He hasn't worked in his field since 2002. While ICR may employ him, he is not active amongst his similarly educated peers. And for good reason. They all disagree with every contention he has, notably his ASC ideas. He spends much of his time visiting churches to attack evolution and putting on creationism presentations using presuppositional apologetics and what I would also call 'Total Bullshit'.
Randy Abell Mind you, Lisles alma maters do not teach what Lisle now believes, so he has tossed his education aside.
+David Butler Here's something funnier. There was a guy about 2 thousand years ago that had far less money than this out of work astrophysicist, that talked in literal dusty backwater gatherings, that became the most influential Man that ever walked the earth.
Gem Guy He died. I think you mean the general prevalence of Greek philosophy that began to spread and comprised much of the core values of the faith, which were adopted by a certain Roman emperor and declared as the state religion.
I'm not sure how influential Jesus was given the fact that everything we claim to know about him is apocryphal. Rome was influential.
Behave like an onion😁 all you agnosticicures.
Genesis is a primitive attempt by an ancient storyteller to explain the appearance of creation. The story is utter nonsense that only a child would believe. I read it.
This is creepy.
What is "creepy" Tim? Why the ad hominem? Can you not take issue with an actual... "argument"?
This guy is fucking preaching! No interest whatsoever.