The use of the decanter is very odd, since they pulled it from the considerably more expensive Edradour IBISCO bottlings (I thought they would be reserved for the 25+ Premium Edradour bottlings).
I quite agree with you, Jason, that the decanter bottles are just a waste of (our) money. Ucf collection bottles are perfectly fine, and those could even ditch the cardboard tube although then there may be issues with sunlight given the uncoloured glass. I'd rather have undecorated labels than pay for (even ai) artworks because I'm buying a bottle of whisky not a picture. Yes, some labels are pretty but many others are not, and whether tasteful or tasteless (aesthetically) they all are without taste (organoleptically). That's an interesting and very plausible explanation re. why some Ben Nevis are only a little peated. I've tried far fewer (2?) than you but from what (little) I've read it's a distillery with great potential appeal to my whisky inclinations--grubby, savoury, etc. "Clean", unpeated Ben Nevis seems often to taste of liquorice-flavoured boiled sweets/hard candy.
Nice review, Jason :) I had a sample of this Ben Nevis last week and my thoughts and feelings about it pretty much mirror the ones you have shared in the review. The dacanter bottle is absolutely not needed. The simple packaging of "The Un-chillfiltered Collection" is perfectly fine by me, especially if I don't have to pay extra for a fancy lump of glass. As for the taste of the whisky: almost textbook, young, modern, sherried dram. The distillery character is swamped by the casks influence but still that subtle whiff of smoke in the finish is pretty nice. The only think I absolutely didn't like was the sharp nip in the taste. To me it wasn't anything like white pepper but more like hot sting. All in all, decent whisky and OK-ish value, given the current state of the market. Still, I would be more happy with a bottle of Ben Nevis with at least 2 more years worth of maturation in ex-bourbon or refill sherry casks. Cheers!
Good upload thx jason
Here we call ash that gets on your food rocky mountain salt & pepper
Its good for you lol
interesting!!
The use of the decanter is very odd, since they pulled it from the considerably more expensive Edradour IBISCO bottlings (I thought they would be reserved for the 25+ Premium Edradour bottlings).
odd - isn't it
I quite agree with you, Jason, that the decanter bottles are just a waste of (our) money. Ucf collection bottles are perfectly fine, and those could even ditch the cardboard tube although then there may be issues with sunlight given the uncoloured glass. I'd rather have undecorated labels than pay for (even ai) artworks because I'm buying a bottle of whisky not a picture. Yes, some labels are pretty but many others are not, and whether tasteful or tasteless (aesthetically) they all are without taste (organoleptically).
That's an interesting and very plausible explanation re. why some Ben Nevis are only a little peated. I've tried far fewer (2?) than you but from what (little) I've read it's a distillery with great potential appeal to my whisky inclinations--grubby, savoury, etc. "Clean", unpeated Ben Nevis seems often to taste of liquorice-flavoured boiled sweets/hard candy.
interesting - "Clean", unpeated Ben Nevis seems often to taste of liquorice-flavored hard candy.
thanks!
Nice review, Jason :)
I had a sample of this Ben Nevis last week and my thoughts and feelings about it pretty much mirror the ones you have shared in the review. The dacanter bottle is absolutely not needed. The simple packaging of "The Un-chillfiltered Collection" is perfectly fine by me, especially if I don't have to pay extra for a fancy lump of glass. As for the taste of the whisky: almost textbook, young, modern, sherried dram. The distillery character is swamped by the casks influence but still that subtle whiff of smoke in the finish is pretty nice. The only think I absolutely didn't like was the sharp nip in the taste. To me it wasn't anything like white pepper but more like hot sting.
All in all, decent whisky and OK-ish value, given the current state of the market.
Still, I would be more happy with a bottle of Ben Nevis with at least 2 more years worth of maturation in ex-bourbon or refill sherry casks.
Cheers!
yes very true - The distillery character is swamped here by the cask influence
Ben Nevis is nice but the younger bottlings are hurting its reputation. They need to go for a 12 or 14 year to make it shine
I am not really sure about that - but we will see!