Imo, it has gotten way tougher now. I think mid-table teams of today will beat elite teams of the past with how much intensity, physicality and discipline they have.
@@Gantaipao the elite team of the past would need to be familiar with the tactics of the modern mid-table team. They would need to go into the game with the intention of parking the bus. The Milan of Maldini would never do that against the likes of De Zerbi's Brighton. And by the time Capello or Ancelotti realize it's better to sit back, they'd already be 2 or 3-0 down. THe mid-table team would be in full control, and the older elite team would need to go out and play. Only to concede even more.
That's pure ignorance Very much like Americans saying they could rule football because their record at the Olympics suggests they have the best athletes( which is actually down to USA having the most investment in development of sports) But their record in football shows that it could not be further from the truth. They have been contesting in football far longer than even Germany, who actually ended up with the best overall record in football history, along with Italy and Brazil! Football isn't athletic game Yes athletics has its part but if it's not matched with skill, it's useless So ur thinking that today's teams will destroy old teams, even Elite ones, is a sign of pure ignorance and utter stupidity and is a sign of the modern age society which trashes and limitlessly glorifies and exaggerates the present teams and players If anything, if the facilities, amenities, options and opportunities available to the present crop of players were available to the older generations, they would have been even more unstoppable! And comparing the football, it's become utterly predictable and thus far too easily beatable for teams willing to take risks Bayer Leverkusen proved that last season. But ur comment is a good indicator of the ignorance and arrogance and stupidity of society today. Note: Just cz u don't like it dsnt make it any less true! So stfu and shove ur insults and abuses and comments up ur m0m's 🍑 u 💩 s
@@vespasiancloscan7077 Ur comment is a good case of being able to showcase one's true self with a few sentences. U were able to prove that simultaneously showcase ur ignorance, arrogance and stupidity as well prove that u are a perfect eg of the members of today's society, which has devised ways to Gaslight their own Brains into mistaking their ignorance and stupidity for intelligence and smarts and using this arogance founded on ignorance and stupidity to spread popular agenda in return for clout or in this case, few likes. The fact that you still managed only one( prob ur own) as at the time of writing this comment, is truly pathetic. And also prove that y'all don't know 💩 about the game u talked much about 😂! Ur comment encapsulates the modern football fan who doesn't knw 💩 about the game and just compares players based on raw stats and not even consider comprehensive stats and feels the need to trash older generations of football to feel better about themselves and the teams and players they support! Forget the elite teams, even the mid table sides of old times would eat today's so called top teams for breakfast cz the only thing that today's football is good at, is being predictable And once you understand and memorize a few patterns of play you will be able to destroy teams with ease even if they are the elitest of elite teams And its so hilarious that trds 💩 of football fans like urself are oblivious to what's happening in the football world Every single week we see countless eg of big teams destroyed by smaller teams with their own identity who exploit the robotic nature of football of big teams especially to beat them Even Carlo Ancelotti's success and Xabi Alonso's success is proof Both allow creative freedom and allow players to express themselves and make them believe in themselves and was duly rewarded - one with the best season in history of Bundesliga The other with 2 UCL titles in recent years. But still y'all have audacity to say 💩 like this. Why? Because y'all are sht 💩 for brains! Note: Just cz u don't like it dsnt make it any less true! So stfu and shove ur insults and abuses and comments up ur m0m's 🍑 u trds 💩 So 💀💀💀💀💀
Doesn't matter how many arguments you have to defend modern football, watching R9, Kaka,Henry, CR7 or Ronaldinho dribbling and scoring insane goals was way better than watching f*cking Jack Grealish passing it backwards 50 times and then Haaland scoring 3 tap-ins. It's like a watching dagestani wrestlers in UFC laying on their opponents for 25 minutes, ofc they will win but it has 0 enterntaiment value to it, just like peps ball.
@@tsdvaksExactly 💯. I don't know what their problem is. Fake nostalgia? Propaganda and narratives, viewing only one team or one league or too much gambling addiction that makes them miss every single detail in football matches
No, it's other teams trying to copy managers like Mourinho instead of managers like Klopp. The best way to beat a Pep team is by pressing the hell out of them and not letting them play. Pep prefers the opponents sitting back. There's a looong way from one box to the other.
That so so true. I watch people try to imitate barca and man city especially with those back passes and fail miserable. You can't copy high IQ players while you're a bunch of dunderheads!
Klopp, Mourinho and Ancelotti would beg to differ. They are the only ones who could actually compete with him, especially Klopp. I mean in the last 6 years, I’ve enjoyed the Liverpool vs City games more than any other game. Explosive, non stop, end to end offensive football that you couldn’t take your eyes off. For me it proved that the opposition needs to challenge his style and play better games, and when they do it can be incredibly entertaining. He hasn’t ruined football, other managers and teams need to step up and try to actually play against his system.
People immediately think of Carlo parking the bus for 210 minutes against Pep and then winning on penalties, but who's the manager most successful against Pep? Klopp. That's the best way to play against him, and it's not boring at all.
Back in the day. The game has always evolved. It will evolve again when a team outwits the "method". It always happens. England were humbled in their furst World Cup in 1950. The Herrera Catenaccio of the 1960s was undone by Beckenbauer and Cruyff in the 1970s. Tippy tappa of Spain (2010) was undone by 2020. Every wave evolves. Let's hope it happens again soon with some flair.
i mean the prologue sounds like a bit of an absurd argument once you consider that guardiola and messi coincided and the formers philosophy didn't really change, but I do get the point and somewhat agree. Of course a ball retaining winger is somewhat of a boring concept and personally I have watched significantly less football over the last couple of years, which has however less to do with static posession based play and more to do with ownership structures changing andthe hypercommercialization, taking football away from the fans and burdening players to sickening degrees, with overstuffed schedules. Back to the point: I think the meta of what is possible within systems based approaches has come to an equilibrium in which goals are more likely to happen due to individual errors, which in turn tho will yield a higher demand for flashier players that can take on opponents 1on1, case in point in players musiala, yamal, wirtz and doku or kudus. All much more duel driven or rather better at ball control than the current generation of mbappes, sanés and so on. Couple other points: A lot of the stuff your mentioning is nostalgia based or based on highlight reels, that do not reflect the entirety of a 90 minute game back then. Also I think one should remeber that Peps style of play used to be called beautiful foortball when it first emerged onto the scene and appeared to be a refreshing change from the way the game was played back then. It's probably just that stuff becomes boring to watch when you're a) being overexposed to it and b) have a lot of copy cats creating cheap knock-offs of style. That was way to much text for a sport I've kinda stopped watching, but yeah nice video, fun point of discussion, Pep should be brought to the Hague
Very well said mate, you make some very valid points. I think the full 90 back then was more rough and rugged and so individual flair was also a lot easier to come by back then? It’s interesting because football will continue to evolve no matter what and as someone else said it comes it waves, the control based systems will eventually wither away and a new style will come back etc
The thing thats ruined football is very very simple. Terrible refereeing, dishonest and cajoling players for fouls, and players wearing shin pads the size of emoticons and moaning about challenges. The problem is the game has become borderline non-contact. The judgement of what is and isnt a foul is terrible. Too often i see the ball collected well and truly yet the ref calls a foul. Bring back challenges and you will bring back dribblers. Everyone know just stands off and compresses.
XG, progressive passes per minute, passes per defensive action, automating the play, fitness over creativity, risk avoidance over excitement, Signing instead of developing, early money destroying potential and every manager playing a 5-4-1 defensively, into a 2-3-5 offensively, for fear of being sacked. All these things are to blame for football being incredibly boring, and maybe Pep is treated unfairly as a target of it. However, he is the one manager who encompasses every one of these traits. The modern game, and the modern managers, all in one man. So however unfair it is, the anger is more directed at everything he represents, rather than him individually. I never thought I'd call a team scoring 100 goals per season boring, but it is, simply because its not 100 goals, its the same 5 goals, scored over and over again. And the funniest part is, being Cruijff's biggest fan and cheerleader, Cruijff would despise it. He wrote in detail about Van Gaal's unappealing "militaristic" approach, saying it was more like a machine than a spectacle. Pep's statistics obsession and demand for total obedience is far, far more militaristic and mechanical than Van Gaal ever was. I look forward to the next trend, because this one has gone on far, far too long.
That because he is winning for long time. If mourinho stays with Chelsea and wins title for 10 years he will also be called ruining football with his defending game. The thing i like about pep is he polish young talented player more than ruining it. Player like Foden, Alvarez, Doku rather unknown before , now they are almost world class player. Even Halland got preserve well from injury. There are exception like grealish but a least with Pep 95% become better player ,5% ruin.
Well pep had messi and he was was allowed to be free . It really depends on the players he has in his disposal.If he had neymar or hazard type he would let them play freely too(pep allows foden to roam in the middle while being at rw so he does give players freedom,it really dependa on pep). Plus those players who create magic are very rare in football history, rn lamine yamal looks like that type of player.
I think this perspective is quite narrow. Standardization and codification is the way of the world, it always has been. Whether it was Napoleonic Civil Code or the Code of standards in various countries or Assembly lines or superhero genre. Everything works on one thing - a standard code to follow. It makes things easier, more easy to control and more easy to understand for the layman. Yes it makes everything quite predictable but because now you and I can understand it better. Earlier these players were magicians and we would keep thinking how to do what they do. Now we know what exactly they are doing, it becomes all about can we do it. The thing becomes easier to learn which is why there are so many actually good world class young talents these days. Plus for you and me it might be entertainment but for them, its a job. More they win, more they earn. And they need to make sure their chances are better. Depending on one person to magically carry the game is not good chances. You need an efficient system to boost your chances. But there are still avenues for players to have flair in the system but they have to find the right mix.
great teacher your man is. never ruined the game, he had just made it more predictable, boring & unwatchable at times. a bit of a control freak pep is. his interpretation of cruyffs philosophy is what we get.
Dear poacher and everybody here i know you people feel kinda intellectual and advocator for the sport by saying Pep ruined football but this narrative come from guardiola teams is so flawless and solid to win but unfortunately he is managing a lowfan base club city , this annoys everybody deeply , for the matter of fact he positively impact the game and never try to supress individualism , the best examples for this is pep get the best out of the best player in the sport messi he allow and help high technique players like busquets , dani , busi , sane ,xavi , ineista , lewa , debruyne , david silva , bernardo , arijen robben to demonstrate their skill and potential , robben , interms of group he managed a barca team that plays most beautifully football nobody has played in past , not playing in present and will not play in future Still i admit the collective flair has been faded from football that's not the fault of one bald man but its an apparent reality that players today are not skillful as back in the dates the clear example for this is the brazil national team [which has nothing to do guardiola ]is declined so badly He is the greatest innovator , best tactician, and expert to get best out of players
here people from birth even at small age started practicing in academys from childhood onwards its like robotic , artificial perfomrance with no skills
honestly I totaly agree with this video, I wish i was born to see the R9, Ronaldhino, Kaka, and more other talented players. Also pep's style of play is very boring to me, thers's no more flair and joyness in the beautiful sport we call football. But i'm glad i got to see CR7 and Messi play.
Fans who resent the chessification of football just don't understand the game well enough to enjoy the smart aspects of it. They want the raw, primitive aspects, because those take less thinking. I get how it's "less fun" in a way. Playing chess or video games online was more fun to me when none of my friends or I knew what we were doing. Then as you become better it becomes more about the meta, automatisms and consistency. The flipside of it is that nobody enjoys being a crap player, or watching crap plays. I can't rewatch games from the "golden days" of the 00s. Everything seems amateurish. Huge gaps between the lines, nobody pressing smartly, nobody understands space. The "genius" midfielders were great at playing with the ball, not at understanding the game. Pirlo was great at pinging a long ball, but not necessarily at doing it at the right time. Not in the mid 00s, at least. Zidane had great ball control, but he would constantly rush passes to his forwards and lose the ball. Ronaldinho would constantly attempt one dribble too many for no reason, and lose possession. For every pretty highlight reel, there's hundreds of minutes of bad football. I remember a play from a United - Milan game back then. Cristiano's on the ball, stuck on the sideline, facing the wrong way. He's being half-arsedly "pressed" by Pirlo & a team mate, maybe Gattuso. They're neither committing to the challenge, nor allowing themselves enough distance to react. Nowadays, young Cristiano would be in a pickle. Best he could hope for would be a throw-in, or passing it backwards. Instead he managed to wiggle his way out, and not through some great show of a skill either. Awkward, poorly coached duels between world class players used to happen over and over again back then.
No , reason people start watching football are individuals, unless ur just supporting ur home team for the sake of it. Individual superstars make football beautiful. Reason i and many even atarted to watch it are players like henry, ronaldinho, zidane , etc not because of team winning some giant vases and cups. Without individual brilliance football is just what women say it is: stupid boring game where 22 grown men chase after ball for 90 minutes. I dont want my team to win and be boring and ugly, i want my team to have superstars and play beautiful football with smile on their faces.
@@giorgimurjikneli2206 Total football or tiki taka is the right way to play football, it's a system which brings out the best in every single player on the team, a system which makes every single player participate in attack and defense, there's a reason why Barcelona were so beautiful to watch as they embodied this philosophy. You grew up in an era were teams would have only one player running the show but that style is obsolete, there's a reason why football peaked in the era of Tiki taka it's simply because the style was more enjoyable to watch on one Barcelona team you had the brilliance of Lionel Messi, David Villa, Iniesta, Xavi, Bosquet, Valdez, Dani Alves all of them working together to produce magic
@@princesally743 no, football did not peak during tiki taka. It destroyed football. Peak football was 90s till 2010. Wengers arsenal played more bueatiful football and they had geniuses like henry and bergkamp. It was true combination of beautiful teamplay and individual mastery. Guardiola only wanks on messi. Every other footballer, he sucks the soul out of them. Guardiola is messis pussy
A team sport involves individuals. Imagine an education system where all teachers had to teach the exact same way. Or a team of artists having to paint the exact same way. It would be monotonous and robotic. Carlo is the ultimate OG. he finds a system for the players he has. And allows the ballers to do their thing and adapts his system for them
Imo, it has gotten way tougher now. I think mid-table teams of today will beat elite teams of the past with how much intensity, physicality and discipline they have.
Yeah, they’re better athletes, the players have so much more to soak in nowadays aswell, football IQ needs to be top
It depends.
If the elite team literally defense and depend on individual skills rely on Counter like Chelsea did.
They could win.
@@Gantaipao the elite team of the past would need to be familiar with the tactics of the modern mid-table team. They would need to go into the game with the intention of parking the bus. The Milan of Maldini would never do that against the likes of De Zerbi's Brighton.
And by the time Capello or Ancelotti realize it's better to sit back, they'd already be 2 or 3-0 down. THe mid-table team would be in full control, and the older elite team would need to go out and play. Only to concede even more.
That's pure ignorance
Very much like Americans saying they could rule football because their record at the Olympics suggests they have the best athletes( which is actually down to USA having the most investment in development of sports)
But their record in football shows that it could not be further from the truth.
They have been contesting in football far longer than even Germany, who actually ended up with the best overall record in football history, along with Italy and Brazil!
Football isn't athletic game
Yes athletics has its part but if it's not matched with skill, it's useless
So ur thinking that today's teams will destroy old teams, even Elite ones, is a sign of pure ignorance and utter stupidity and is a sign of the modern age society which trashes and limitlessly glorifies and exaggerates the present teams and players
If anything, if the facilities, amenities, options and opportunities available to the present crop of players were available to the older generations, they would have been even more unstoppable!
And comparing the football, it's become utterly predictable and thus far too easily beatable for teams willing to take risks
Bayer Leverkusen proved that last season.
But ur comment is a good indicator of the ignorance and arrogance and stupidity of society today.
Note: Just cz u don't like it dsnt make it any less true!
So stfu and shove ur insults and abuses and comments up ur m0m's 🍑 u 💩 s
@@vespasiancloscan7077
Ur comment is a good case of being able to showcase one's true self with a few sentences.
U were able to prove that simultaneously showcase ur ignorance, arrogance and stupidity as well prove that u are a perfect eg of the members of today's society, which has devised ways to Gaslight their own Brains into mistaking their ignorance and stupidity for intelligence and smarts and using this arogance founded on ignorance and stupidity to spread popular agenda in return for clout or in this case, few likes.
The fact that you still managed only one( prob ur own) as at the time of writing this comment, is truly pathetic.
And also prove that y'all don't know 💩 about the game u talked much about 😂!
Ur comment encapsulates the modern football fan who doesn't knw 💩 about the game and just compares players based on raw stats and not even consider comprehensive stats and feels the need to trash older generations of football to feel better about themselves and the teams and players they support!
Forget the elite teams, even the mid table sides of old times would eat today's so called top teams for breakfast cz the only thing that today's football is good at, is being predictable
And once you understand and memorize a few patterns of play you will be able to destroy teams with ease even if they are the elitest of elite teams
And its so hilarious that trds 💩 of football fans like urself are oblivious to what's happening in the football world
Every single week we see countless eg of big teams destroyed by smaller teams with their own identity who exploit the robotic nature of football of big teams especially to beat them
Even Carlo Ancelotti's success and Xabi Alonso's success is proof
Both allow creative freedom and allow players to express themselves and make them believe in themselves and was duly rewarded
- one with the best season in history of Bundesliga
The other with 2 UCL titles in recent years.
But still y'all have audacity to say 💩 like this.
Why?
Because y'all are sht 💩 for brains!
Note: Just cz u don't like it dsnt make it any less true!
So stfu and shove ur insults and abuses and comments up ur m0m's 🍑 u trds 💩
So 💀💀💀💀💀
Doesn't matter how many arguments you have to defend modern football, watching R9, Kaka,Henry, CR7 or Ronaldinho dribbling and scoring insane goals was way better than watching f*cking Jack Grealish passing it backwards 50 times and then Haaland scoring 3 tap-ins. It's like a watching dagestani wrestlers in UFC laying on their opponents for 25 minutes, ofc they will win but it has 0 enterntaiment value to it, just like peps ball.
Spot on
Islam, Umar and Zabit are and were entertaining af tho. But I get your point
You’re comparing highlight reels to a 90 min game…
@@tsdvaksExactly 💯. I don't know what their problem is. Fake nostalgia? Propaganda and narratives, viewing only one team or one league or too much gambling addiction that makes them miss every single detail in football matches
Have you watched a complete 95 minutes game ever?
example brazil is not "brazil" anymore like bruh where is the magic
Facts
Pep never ruined football it's other teams playing like Barca or city and failing to do so
No, it's other teams trying to copy managers like Mourinho instead of managers like Klopp. The best way to beat a Pep team is by pressing the hell out of them and not letting them play. Pep prefers the opponents sitting back. There's a looong way from one box to the other.
That so so true. I watch people try to imitate barca and man city especially with those back passes and fail miserable. You can't copy high IQ players while you're a bunch of dunderheads!
I think Pep is one of the very few people that make modern football entertaining. I am a Bayern fan, but I enjoy watching City play.
When teams don't park the bus yes
Klopp, Mourinho and Ancelotti would beg to differ. They are the only ones who could actually compete with him, especially Klopp. I mean in the last 6 years, I’ve enjoyed the Liverpool vs City games more than any other game. Explosive, non stop, end to end offensive football that you couldn’t take your eyes off. For me it proved that the opposition needs to challenge his style and play better games, and when they do it can be incredibly entertaining. He hasn’t ruined football, other managers and teams need to step up and try to actually play against his system.
People immediately think of Carlo parking the bus for 210 minutes against Pep and then winning on penalties, but who's the manager most successful against Pep? Klopp. That's the best way to play against him, and it's not boring at all.
1 league title in 9 years is success?
@@jzinterview 12 wins and 7 draws in 30 games against Pep. Nobody has a better record.
Back in the day. The game has always evolved. It will evolve again when a team outwits the "method". It always happens. England were humbled in their furst World Cup in 1950. The Herrera Catenaccio of the 1960s was undone by Beckenbauer and Cruyff in the 1970s. Tippy tappa of Spain (2010) was undone by 2020. Every wave evolves. Let's hope it happens again soon with some flair.
Spot on there.
The sport is getting boring to watch
Boxing 🥊
i mean the prologue sounds like a bit of an absurd argument once you consider that guardiola and messi coincided and the formers philosophy didn't really change, but I do get the point and somewhat agree. Of course a ball retaining winger is somewhat of a boring concept and personally I have watched significantly less football over the last couple of years, which has however less to do with static posession based play and more to do with ownership structures changing andthe hypercommercialization, taking football away from the fans and burdening players to sickening degrees, with overstuffed schedules. Back to the point: I think the meta of what is possible within systems based approaches has come to an equilibrium in which goals are more likely to happen due to individual errors, which in turn tho will yield a higher demand for flashier players that can take on opponents 1on1, case in point in players musiala, yamal, wirtz and doku or kudus. All much more duel driven or rather better at ball control than the current generation of mbappes, sanés and so on.
Couple other points: A lot of the stuff your mentioning is nostalgia based or based on highlight reels, that do not reflect the entirety of a 90 minute game back then. Also I think one should remeber that Peps style of play used to be called beautiful foortball when it first emerged onto the scene and appeared to be a refreshing change from the way the game was played back then. It's probably just that stuff becomes boring to watch when you're a) being overexposed to it and b) have a lot of copy cats creating cheap knock-offs of style.
That was way to much text for a sport I've kinda stopped watching, but yeah nice video, fun point of discussion, Pep should be brought to the Hague
ah shit the tippy tappa comment guy expressed my point much simpler
Very well said mate, you make some very valid points. I think the full 90 back then was more rough and rugged and so individual flair was also a lot easier to come by back then? It’s interesting because football will continue to evolve no matter what and as someone else said it comes it waves, the control based systems will eventually wither away and a new style will come back etc
The thing thats ruined football is very very simple. Terrible refereeing, dishonest and cajoling players for fouls, and players wearing shin pads the size of emoticons and moaning about challenges.
The problem is the game has become borderline non-contact. The judgement of what is and isnt a foul is terrible. Too often i see the ball collected well and truly yet the ref calls a foul. Bring back challenges and you will bring back dribblers. Everyone know just stands off and compresses.
XG, progressive passes per minute, passes per defensive action, automating the play, fitness over creativity, risk avoidance over excitement, Signing instead of developing, early money destroying potential and every manager playing a 5-4-1 defensively, into a 2-3-5 offensively, for fear of being sacked.
All these things are to blame for football being incredibly boring, and maybe Pep is treated unfairly as a target of it. However, he is the one manager who encompasses every one of these traits. The modern game, and the modern managers, all in one man. So however unfair it is, the anger is more directed at everything he represents, rather than him individually.
I never thought I'd call a team scoring 100 goals per season boring, but it is, simply because its not 100 goals, its the same 5 goals, scored over and over again. And the funniest part is, being Cruijff's biggest fan and cheerleader, Cruijff would despise it. He wrote in detail about Van Gaal's unappealing "militaristic" approach, saying it was more like a machine than a spectacle. Pep's statistics obsession and demand for total obedience is far, far more militaristic and mechanical than Van Gaal ever was.
I look forward to the next trend, because this one has gone on far, far too long.
Pep’s teams score more… scoring is exciting… welcome to futball. Smh
That because he is winning for long time. If mourinho stays with Chelsea and wins title for 10 years he will also be called ruining football with his defending game.
The thing i like about pep is he polish young talented player more than ruining it. Player like Foden, Alvarez, Doku rather unknown before , now they are almost world class player. Even Halland got preserve well from injury. There are exception like grealish but a least with Pep 95% become better player ,5% ruin.
Well pep had messi and he was was allowed to be free . It really depends on the players he has in his disposal.If he had neymar or hazard type he would let them play freely too(pep allows foden to roam in the middle while being at rw so he does give players freedom,it really dependa on pep). Plus those players who create magic are very rare in football history, rn lamine yamal looks like that type of player.
Hey Poacher would you like collab?? Can we make videos together???
I think this perspective is quite narrow. Standardization and codification is the way of the world, it always has been. Whether it was Napoleonic Civil Code or the Code of standards in various countries or Assembly lines or superhero genre. Everything works on one thing - a standard code to follow. It makes things easier, more easy to control and more easy to understand for the layman. Yes it makes everything quite predictable but because now you and I can understand it better. Earlier these players were magicians and we would keep thinking how to do what they do. Now we know what exactly they are doing, it becomes all about can we do it. The thing becomes easier to learn which is why there are so many actually good world class young talents these days. Plus for you and me it might be entertainment but for them, its a job. More they win, more they earn. And they need to make sure their chances are better. Depending on one person to magically carry the game is not good chances. You need an efficient system to boost your chances. But there are still avenues for players to have flair in the system but they have to find the right mix.
In a way yeah, its like doing low kick over and over again... Gotta be honest
great teacher your man is. never ruined the game, he had just made it more predictable, boring & unwatchable at times. a bit of a control freak pep is. his interpretation of cruyffs philosophy is what we get.
Id rathee watch Wrexham now than Real Madrid or Man City
lol
No tiki taka on my blicky blocka
Less passy more shooty
don’t @ me
Dear poacher and everybody here i know you people feel kinda intellectual and advocator for the sport by saying Pep ruined football but this narrative come from guardiola teams is so flawless and solid to win but unfortunately he is managing a lowfan base club city , this annoys everybody deeply , for the matter of fact he positively impact the game and never try to supress individualism , the best examples for this is pep get the best out of the best player in the sport messi he allow and help high technique players like busquets , dani , busi , sane ,xavi , ineista , lewa , debruyne , david silva , bernardo , arijen robben to demonstrate their skill and potential , robben , interms of group he managed a barca team that plays most beautifully football nobody has played in past , not playing in present and will not play in future
Still i admit the collective flair has been faded from football that's not the fault of one bald man but its an apparent reality that players today are not skillful as back in the dates the clear example for this is the brazil national team [which has nothing to do guardiola ]is declined so badly
He is the greatest innovator , best tactician, and expert to get best out of players
I prefer now. I
Pep had a gold spoon his mouth from the beginning. Look at klopp and Jose complete managers
Stop talking shit. Pep built his teams from scratch, players nobody wanted.
21 subscribers and this quality is insane. Keep doing what you are doing.
Appreciate it!
You sir are a hater!
There's too much obsession with statistics and data now.
This is good intention just like baseball.
here people from birth even at small age started practicing in academys from childhood onwards its like robotic , artificial perfomrance with no skills
Lets say the truth. He is the best manager there ever was. He has changes the game positively
honestly I totaly agree with this video, I wish i was born to see the R9, Ronaldhino, Kaka, and more other talented players. Also pep's style of play is very boring to me, thers's no more flair and joyness in the beautiful sport we call football. But i'm glad i got to see CR7 and Messi play.
No worries. Hansi Flick will save football.
Utter bullshit
Fans who resent the chessification of football just don't understand the game well enough to enjoy the smart aspects of it. They want the raw, primitive aspects, because those take less thinking.
I get how it's "less fun" in a way. Playing chess or video games online was more fun to me when none of my friends or I knew what we were doing. Then as you become better it becomes more about the meta, automatisms and consistency. The flipside of it is that nobody enjoys being a crap player, or watching crap plays.
I can't rewatch games from the "golden days" of the 00s. Everything seems amateurish. Huge gaps between the lines, nobody pressing smartly, nobody understands space. The "genius" midfielders were great at playing with the ball, not at understanding the game. Pirlo was great at pinging a long ball, but not necessarily at doing it at the right time. Not in the mid 00s, at least. Zidane had great ball control, but he would constantly rush passes to his forwards and lose the ball. Ronaldinho would constantly attempt one dribble too many for no reason, and lose possession. For every pretty highlight reel, there's hundreds of minutes of bad football.
I remember a play from a United - Milan game back then. Cristiano's on the ball, stuck on the sideline, facing the wrong way. He's being half-arsedly "pressed" by Pirlo & a team mate, maybe Gattuso. They're neither committing to the challenge, nor allowing themselves enough distance to react. Nowadays, young Cristiano would be in a pickle. Best he could hope for would be a throw-in, or passing it backwards. Instead he managed to wiggle his way out, and not through some great show of a skill either. Awkward, poorly coached duels between world class players used to happen over and over again back then.
@@vespasiancloscan7077 I agree with you, I miss some aspects of the game in the late 90s early 2000s but I also really like how the game has evolved.
who watches cricket?
Asking the same question.
Ummnn.. 300 million people watched Cwc 2023 Final
Less individual brilliance is good for the game of football because football is a team sport
That makes sense aswell tbf
No , reason people start watching football are individuals, unless ur just supporting ur home team for the sake of it. Individual superstars make football beautiful. Reason i and many even atarted to watch it are players like henry, ronaldinho, zidane , etc not because of team winning some giant vases and cups. Without individual brilliance football is just what women say it is: stupid boring game where 22 grown men chase after ball for 90 minutes. I dont want my team to win and be boring and ugly, i want my team to have superstars and play beautiful football with smile on their faces.
@@giorgimurjikneli2206 Total football or tiki taka is the right way to play football, it's a system which brings out the best in every single player on the team, a system which makes every single player participate in attack and defense, there's a reason why Barcelona were so beautiful to watch as they embodied this philosophy. You grew up in an era were teams would have only one player running the show but that style is obsolete, there's a reason why football peaked in the era of Tiki taka it's simply because the style was more enjoyable to watch on one Barcelona team you had the brilliance of Lionel Messi, David Villa, Iniesta, Xavi, Bosquet, Valdez, Dani Alves all of them working together to produce magic
@@princesally743 no, football did not peak during tiki taka. It destroyed football. Peak football was 90s till 2010. Wengers arsenal played more bueatiful football and they had geniuses like henry and bergkamp. It was true combination of beautiful teamplay and individual mastery. Guardiola only wanks on messi. Every other footballer, he sucks the soul out of them. Guardiola is messis pussy
A team sport involves individuals. Imagine an education system where all teachers had to teach the exact same way. Or a team of artists having to paint the exact same way. It would be monotonous and robotic. Carlo is the ultimate OG. he finds a system for the players he has. And allows the ballers to do their thing and adapts his system for them
1. Stats
2. System players
3. Greedy FIFA
4. Stupid fan boys
5. Too much money being paid to players and their agents.