I don't understand why you all TH-camr historians don't put your facts sources in the description?? It is always good practice to mention the references.
I'm a Buddhist nun from Srilanka and our great historical chronical Mahavamsa has a several chapters dedicated to Ashoka. And I believe most of the historical facts the world know by now are either taken from Ashokan rock edicts or from Mahavamsa. If there are other sources I think you should better mention them in your narrative. It is true that a king has always limitaitons in following parama ahinsa and an emperor is even less capable. However Ashoka contributed a lot for Buddhism by holding the third sangha council since Lord Buddha's passing away and it is as a result of that council that he sent missionaries to seven areas including Srilanka. By this time both his son and daughter had enetered the order pf sangha and Srilanka received both of them, first Maha Mahinda thero his son, along with Buddhism and then hos daughter Sanghamiththa theri with a sapling of the Bodhi tree under which Lord Buddha attained Buddhahood. The countries which received Buddhism from Ashoka still remains Buddhist to this day so unlike the empire of Alexander the great which collapsed soon after his demise the dharma empire of Ashoka the great still remains well intact today. Making him quite close to a chakravarti raja mentioned in Buddhism. (But not completely). P. S - it's better if you include references to your information under the video description.
@@LucknowPropertiesPlotHouseBuyisne ye bi kaha Bindusar ki wife Brahmin thi lekin woh toh ek Jain thi saathi pura mourya Empire buddist or Jain the naaki vedic or hindu
I am a Theravada Buddhist from Sri Lanka. According to Sri Lankan books, he became a Buddhist after the Kalinga War. He propagated Buddhism, so he was called Dharmashoka. Ashoka Chandashoka Dharmashoka .... It is mentioned in the books that Ashoka did not wars after becoming a Buddhist. I'm not saying I'm 100% right. .. I have little knowledge of Indian historical sources. Which Indian source mentions that Ashoka fought wars after the Kalinga war......................... Mahindra Thero, the son of Emperor Ashoka, brought Buddhism to our country. In ancient times, the people of Sri Lanka called India as Jambudhveepa. According to our books, Emperor Ashoka built 84000 Buddhist temples all over Jambudhveepa. Buddhism was given to many Buddhist countries in the world Emperor Ashoka. He is a hero to Theravada Buddhists.
No worries Bro His Legacy is unmatched its natural that south indians and odias hate him we hindus and buddhists are one Ashoka was shavite even after becoming buddhist
Why did he have to destroy the Kalinga (BlackLinga) empire? Just to promote Buddhism and appease Bhikkus, He tried to destroy the Linga worship religion which is from Kalinga and Telinga (Trilinga) Desam. The Kalingas were a very rich empire with rich trade history with South East Asia for thousands of years. Any Indonesian and Malaysian always refer to dark or Indian-looking people as Keling. After the Kamboja/Saka/Aryan invasion into India everything changed. The Kalingas fleed to Southeast Asia or Bangladesh, some even migrated to the Hinterlands or South India to save themselves. You see alot of Shaivite temples in the south and also as far as Champa (Vietnam) as they brought the Linga culture with them. Every King was always power-hungry.@@animeworldixr
Hello ..I'm a srilankan and as you all know buddhism is the religion of majority here. Buddist monk called "Mahinda" The son of Ashoka the great came here and established buddhism as a result of 3rd 'dharma sangayana' which was conducted by king Ashoka.And dear Keerthi I think it's not that much fair to judge a great king by some information you collected from various types of resources. There could be so much untold , unwritten stories in history that you probably can't explain in a couple of minute youtube video.It's almost been 2000 years do you think people who had been lived through all those years didn't notice a single thing you say? Don't know whether stories we've been told true or a lie but forever greatfull for bringing buddhism here for the sake of politics or with the thought of spreading buddhism. ps. Be aware before beliving everything that random youtube historians say.This video is filled with lack of information and biased (why I say it's biased ; I've seen hefty amount of people's hate towards king Ashoka for the fact that he converted in to a buddhist.And most of them are hindu people.Can't help with that. Can't change history.Pleas don't hate someone just because they don't belong to the same religion as yours.) I'm amazed of amount of people that compliment these kind of videos without any kind of research . Hope people will do more quality contents.
Wow Keerthi is so knowledgeable , wow she exposed hard working historians who spend their entire lives studying and yet dont know what happened soo many years ago , yet she with her infinite knowledge knows everything
Please note that most of the historical texts and legacies about Ashoka the great had been found in srilankan budddhist texts and mahavamsa . So under the british colonel era they adopted these theories and stories to made the current indian incomplete history .(the current indian history is a british made one and disorted the srilankan history also ) The written sources about Ashoka you can find out by referring the srilankan historical books and inscriptions❤
@@soulflower2021 No wonder they want Persians, Greeks and Brits to call the nation Bharat. *Rig Veda 10.23.4* "In this rain, Indra throws drops of moisture on his yellow beard" *Rig Veda 1.130.8* “Indra defends his Ārya worshiper. He consumes the malignant; he tore off the b_______ skin; and him who delights in cruelty.” *Rig Veda 2.20.7* “Indra, slayer of Vṛitra, destroyer of cities, scattered the b______-sprung servile.” *Rig Veda 3.34.9* "Indra gained possession of the Sun, Horses, Cow. He struck the Dasyus, and gave protection to the Ārya tribe." *Rig Veda 9.73.5* “They have roared in unison, burning up riteless men, Blowing away the b______ skin which Indra hates.”
Don't believe this propanda video.i agree ki voh maa baap ke marne ke baad cruel ho gaye the.but vo bynature aise nahi the . agar vo itne hi cruel hote toh baba sahab bhim rao ambedkar jaise log ashoka chakra ko national flag mai add kyu karvaate.isliye sirf baba sahab bhim rao ambedkar ji par hi bharosa karo.aur kisi propanganda video par nahi
She says let us assume on every point and she tries to paint a different picture...if she's such a great historian why doesn't she write a book and mention all the edicts and challenge the old versions???
Impressive explanation. Many stories have been added with so called secularism by our historians, but now things are changing with the reality coming out. 😇😇😇
Mate dont beleive everything you hear blindly most of the things she told has no proof except buddhist sources plus fun fact these so called sources were many years after Ashokas death. In Ashokas time there as no concept of religion like today everyone followed dharma or sanatan or mixture of indic faiths people say Ashoka was a buddhist but no one will tell even after becoming buddhist Ashoka was a Shavite Ashoka own son was devotee of Mahadev @@amoghaudupa
@amoghaudupa74 Probably he was not... and this story was formed to create an impression that Hindus are the one to be blamed and should be converted to Buddhism.
In the book Ashoka Vadan, Emperor Ashoka has been described as very cruel because by showing him cruelty, he wanted to prove that he was initially angry and later became a Buddhist. He gave up his anger. If you want to know the true history of Emperor Ashoka, then Know them from inscriptions not from books
My grandfather had read alot about Ashoka and even he told something really similar to what you have mentioned in the video. Good to know, that my grandfather was reading through the right sources.
@@Keerthihistory One thing u missed you telling history with this timeline ur absolutely wrong these are now Religion . According to timeline of that history Sanatan was Civilization people only had Culture according to weather Jainism, buddisum, Ajivika's, Charvakas these are school's of thoughts these people were learning in that time because of them we are still in the way of Sanatan these people always question we Answered and we lerned these are not Religion just a school of thoughts
@@KeerthihistoryWow you are so knowledgeable , wow you expose hard working historians who spend their entire lives studying and yet dont know what happened soo many years ago , yet you with your infinite knowledge know everything
@@vissapragadasatyanarayana2750yes he is because in inscription there was no mention that chandragupta was Jain's or ajivik . Even Jain word was not spoken at that time. Which proves that chandragupta was Buddhist. For more information search SCIENCE JOURNEY channel.
@@vissapragadasatyanarayana2750 But the point is whether King Ram was already Hindu when he started Ramayan war...? (Logic lovers stay away from this ques😅)
Buddhism is not actually meaning the follower of gautam buddha gautam buddha never created any religion he just give knowledge and shows the path of peace innerself
Gautam Budhha just showed the path to Moksh. He did not give a full-fledged religion encompassing all relations of family life and social order. In fact he asked to never indulge in Sex and just do meditation. He had opposed the entry of women in Buddhist order.
There will be 2 earthquakes in Alaska ( 7.6 and 7.3) After that children will go missing. It will be Jesus who is coming with promised redemption! Our God has revealed all those details to his prophets right now and He is coming in promised redemption. But governments will say it was UFO. Now you have been told in advance, so do not be deceived. Only God knows the future. Jesus loves you, accept him as your Saviour and be safe! We are in the last pages of the Bible now. What saves us is the faith that Jesus He bled and died on the cross, and he was resurrected three days later. His blood cleansed us from our sins so that we can stand in front of God blamelessly. Believe in what he has done for us with the full heart, confess your sins to him and pray, build a relation with him. Ask him to come into your heart. It is God's grace that saves you. It's nothing that you can do but what he has done for us. No works required. Call upon him as Your Lord and Saviour!(see also Bible, 1 Corinthians 15:1:6)
@@Keerthihistorynice made up stories, now I want you to provide evidences about the whole video you have made up and if you're such sure then do a debate not with me , I have a guy to do with , If you are ready for it then say it I'll let you the name
@@scoobyaura-fr6dm You are simply being emotional.Ashoka's atrocities are mentioned in Ashokavadana which were written in Pali by Buddhist monks.If you want to find fault then go after the writers.
Really it's bizarre to know the facts of Ashoka, how wrongly we were taught about him in our history books. Thankyou Keerthi for tracing out the facts and wide opening our eyes😢
BRO PLEASE DON'T BELEIVE HERE BLINDLY PEOPLE DON'T REALISE THAT THERE WAS NO CONCEPT OF RELIGION LIKE TODAY ALL FOLLOWED DHARMA OR MIXTURE IF INDIC FAITHS ASHOKA ONE SON WAS SHAVITE AND FUN FACT MOST OF THE CALLED SOURCES WHICH WRITE BAD ABOUT ASHOKA WERE WRITTEN IN 5TH OR 6TH CENTURY CE 600 YEARS AFTER ASHOKA YOU ONLY TELL HOW AUTHENTIC THEY ARE IT IS NOT WRITTEN IN ANY OF HIS RICK EDICTS ABOUT KILLINGS OF AJIVIKAS AND JAIN PAINTER ANOTHER FUN FACT THERE IS NO WHERE WRITTEN ASHOKA LEFT HINDUISM EVEN AFTER BECOMING BUDDHIST HE WAS A SHAVITE AND USED TO FEED 100 BRAHMINS ASHOKA IS GOAT 🗿 🇮🇳 PROUD TO BE BIHARI 🇮🇳 JAI HIND JAI BHARAT 🇮🇳
In the time of Ashoka, Hindus faced terrible oppression. Ashoka aimed to convert everyone to Buddhism, and many of our sacred texts were destroyed by Buddhists. They almost wiped out Hinduism from our land. But in Kalinga, people fought fiercely to keep their beliefs alive. The entire state resisted, even children joining the struggle to defend Hinduism. Later, Sri Sri Adi Shankaracharya emerged, spreading Hinduism's message across the country once more. Against all odds, Hinduism rose again, reclaiming its place in our land.
We have been taught Indian history in the wrong words. The historians made certain people as 'great' and conveniently ignored the real heroes in our history, this might be for their vested interests. When I was a student of history I had many questions appeared in my mind which was unanswered. Now I am getting answers one by one. The time is up to rewrite our history with the actual incidents without any dilution. Thanks to Keerthi for providing such valuable information. Jai Bharat Mata 🙏.
@@KeerthihistoryWow you are so knowledgeable , wow you expose hard working historians who spend their entire lives studying and yet dont know what happened soo many years ago , yet you with your infinite knowledge know everything
Please realise the context , even if you read romila thapar she mentions even "Dhamma". Policy wasn't a religious move but a political move to enhance the position and influence of Ashoka ..@funtimefunny2153
@@jinkigang when you devote yourself to a specific religion it means you follow the believe and customs of that religion in later and spirit , so draw a corollary between Ashoka and Chandragupta maurya...Chandragupta accepted jainism and moved to perform the extreme practice of starving upto death and died ..this was expected of Ashoka too if his voice of conscience resulted in change of heart but these are debatable topics ...open to views
Like Samrat Ashoka Maurya the great,King Raja Raja cholan I the great was also highly supports the Buddhism even though he was a shaivaite Hindus and he gave a land in Aanaimangalam to the Buddhist monks🇮🇳🚩👑🐯🐅⚔️🕉️☸️❤️🔥!
@@harsh6764King Raja Raja cholan i the great(Ponniyin Selvan):-The spiritual successor of Samrat Ashoka Maurya the great because he was also loves and helps both the Hindus and the Buddhists in his own Empire like him🇮🇳!
@@harsh6764 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 The man who caused the death of more than 2 lakh people in the Kalinga war despite being a practising Buddhist just bcoz he wanted to conquer it... The man who wiped out the Ajivika sect by killing 18000 Ajivikas and Jains just bcoz they showed the Buddha in a negative light... The man who ordered every single Jain monk to be executed just bcoz they showed the Buddha bowing down before a Jain Tirthankara... The man who killed 6 of his brothers to claim the throne... Morally, do you think such a man is great?? He was a great conqueror for he expanded the Mauryan Empire , but he was never, is never and will never ever be a great man for his violent ways... On the other hand, Chhatrapathi Shivaji Maharaj fought to protect Bharat and Hindu dharma by laying out the platform for Hindavi Swarajya... He respected women and severely punished the people who violated the honour of women... He also facilitated the reconversion of people to Hinduism from Islam... He protected Hindu temples as well... Chhatrapathi Shivaji Maharaj was the leader of the people... Ashoka was not... I am not a Marathi... I am a Kannadiga... I don't give a damn about linguistic differences... My nation and dharma comes first to me and I will celebrate every single warrior who fought to protect our nation and civilization... Whether it's Chhatrapathi Shivaji Maharaj, Maharana Pratap, Chhatrapathi Sambhaji Maharaj, Raja Suheldev, Immadi Pulakeshin, Raja Raja Chola, Sri Krishna Deva Raya, etc... Chhatrapathi Shivaji Maharaj was the leader of the people... Ashoka was a violent and ruthless man... It's a shame that you don't want to accept Chhatrapathi Shivaji Maharaj who protected your ancestors, but will happily accept Ashoka who wiped out an entire philosophy (Ajivikas)
There isn't a historical record or inscription that explicitly portrays Ashoka as an evil king. Ashoka is generally regarded as a ruler who underwent a transformation towards a more compassionate and tolerant governance after the Kalinga War. Different historical accounts and interpretations may vary, but the majority view Ashoka as a significant figure in promoting peace and Buddhism. Which historians book have you read as source... And what percentage of Authenticity...??
maharaja pushymitra shunga ne fir ye poori bharat mai faila hua bhudism jo violence se failaya tha nasht kiya ukhad feka bharat se or vapas sanatan dharm ki sthapana kari
contemprary history chutiye, hamare aur bhot mahan raja the bharat ke , vo mahan hai sanatan dharm ke rakshak unhe padho asli contempray history padho, or vo ghatiya insan romila thappar ke bare mai padho , pata chal jayega sab sach
Ramaayan is also a legendary poem written by valmiki😂😂😂😂 Then how raam n ,hanumaan is came into existence 😂😂😂😂😂 Ganesh with the head of elephant,hanumaan flying without wings😂😂😂😂 Please elaborate this subjects into next videos
TRUE ONE OF HIS SON WAS ALSO A SHAVITE PEOPLE DON'T REALISE THAT THERE WAS NO CONCEPT OF RELIGION LIKE TODAY ALL FOLLOWED DHARMA OR MIXTURE IF INDIC FAITHS AND FUN FACT MOST OF THE CALLED SOURCES WHICH WRITE BAD ABOUT ASHOKA WERE WRITTEN IN 5TH OR 6TH CENTURY CE 600 YEARS AFTER ASHOKA YOU ONLY TELL HOW AUTHENTIC THEY ARE ANOTHER FUN FACT THERE IS NO WHERE WRITTEN ASHOKA LEFT HINDUISM EVEN AFTER BECOMING BUDDHIST HE WAS A SHAVITE AND USED TO FEED 100 BRAHMINS
This is a new form of toppling the history. This madam is always doing this in all the historical events on the behest of vested interest. One should analyse what is true and what is correct by exploring the historical events
I thought I would not br studying history after 10th but here I am watching your videos because they are so interesting. Thank you for this knowledge, Keerthi ma'am 🙏 Please keep making such informative videos and letting us know the truth.
Bro this a propoganda channel dont take her seriously . Asokavadana is not a historical document its a religious text written 400yrs after asoka death. And its full of magical miracle moral stories like asoka walking on water, flying in sky, healing diseased monks just by toching. That violence part is also a fabricated moral story to warn people that who accepted buddism when they deviate towards violence karma hits them and suffers more(like ashoka brother death)
@@KeerthihistoryAshoka did what Indian's King never did, in this land not a single king killed any civilian they always respted everyone and we have 100s evidence to say our kings never tried to king there brothers to take over all the power
There will be 2 earthquakes in Alaska ( 7.6 and 7.3) After that children will go missing. It will be Jesus who is coming with promised redemption! Our God has revealed all those details to his prophets right now and He is coming in promised redemption. But governments will say it was UFO. Now you have been told in advance, so do not be deceived. Only God knows the future. Jesus loves you, accept him as your Saviour and be safe! We are in the last pages of the Bible now. What saves us is the faith that Jesus He bled and died on the cross, and he was resurrected three days later. His blood cleansed us from our sins so that we can stand in front of God blamelessly. Believe in what he has done for us with the full heart, confess your sins to him and pray, build a relation with him. Ask him to come into your heart. It is God's grace that saves you. It's nothing that you can do but what he has done for us. No works required. Call upon him as Your Lord and Saviour!(see also Bible, 1 Corinthians 15:1:6)
@@Keerthihistorybecause of asoka we knew the history of Gupta empire, Maurya empire,nanda empire and all those empire till 7AD so pls don't compare asoka with anyone and give him respect as a god
Can please include the historical evidence that crown Prince Sushima was out of patliputra when bindusara died. Because I remember reading that Sushima was unable to counter the rebels and was called back and Ashoka was send in his stead. Plus Ashoka already had support of lots of ministers. Because his horoscope said he would be a chakravarti samrath.
I am not aware of all the edicts, but knowledge which I got till now is that although Ashoka had kept his sword but he was ready to take it whenever a threat approached. How can we expect a ruler to follow the path of non violence to complete extent ? Either he would have given up his kingdom like Buddha, only then we could imagine that all the violence which he did after convertiong to Buddhism was not ethical ? How can we forget a ruler has two religions, one which he follows personally and other which he has towards his subjects? It's relevant even now. Even if he would have completely discarded the violence, he would have been responsible for the fall of the empire, like Firoz Tughlaq? He is surrounded by both the sides. You will all never spare him. Before blindly following anyone, just have fact check and form your own opinion. History is not that much easy and straight forward as you all are taking it.
What danger did mauryan empire had from kalinga? ashoka massacred the common people of kalinga. That's not a warrior's religion. That was a tyrant's cruelty. This has nothing to do with buddhism, whether he adopted it before or after. The truth is common people were massacred by the tyrant ashoka.
Thank you for sharing the truth. I am from Odisha and as an Odia I feel ashamed of my own people who believe in the lie. The Kalinga war has many untold stories we will never know. We all know winner writes the history. Here we heard from our ancestors that Ashoka only stopped the warWhen normal people joined the war with whatever weapon they had. When all men were either dead or captured. River Daya was red with blood. When the whole Royal Family was massacred but the people refused to lose and choose to die with respect because Ashoka was not a human he was a demon. When they saw old men and young boys fighting, they stopped.
@@kanishkkumar5431 Even if you ignore the video, it is true that normal citizens of kalinga were fighting against ashoka at the end. They didn't even have weapons. That shows the cruelty of ashoka. Fighting against an army is one thing but massacring normal citizens is very very inhumane and cruel thing to do. Who did he want to rule over after killing the citizens? Truth is the level of cruelty that has happened inside india (whether by british or by kings such as ashoka) is on par with hitler's concentration camps. I'm not arguing whether ashoka was already a buddhist or he adopted buddhism later, i dont care about it. None of it changes the cruelty he did. Whole rivers were red with blood during that battle.
@@jinkigang not sure who you are calling terrorists. ashoka was the terrorist in his story, not the common people of kalinga. He murdered the common people whom he wanted to rule in the end.
@@krato6468 at that time ..peoples of every indian state. .fighted against themselves. ... What's so new about it ... even bengali and biharis fighted against maratha cruelty
yeah keep idolizing a tyrant who killed the common people whom he wanted to rule. Battle for thrones are fought between armies, not by massacring the common people. What ashoka did in kalinga is tyranny and cruelty. The only other who did such things were muslim invaders, britishers and hitler. that's what ashoka was during that war.
@@SreeRamakrishnaNagulakondaBut king Sri Krishna Devararaya of vijayanagara Empire killed our Prince Veerasekhara cholan(one of the chola descendanst)very mercilessly in 1529🇮🇳!
Enlightened Moggaliputta Thero converted King Asoka, and helped to be a better person after the Kalinga War. King Asoka's son and daughter visited Sri Lanka, and they coud confirm what happened. Later developed texts could try to change the history to insult King Asoka. A lot of texts have changed in India to change the history to protect caste system, etc.
@@smlanka4uking Devanampiya Tissa of Anuradhapura:-The 1st srilankan king who was converted to Theravada Buddhism by prince Mahinda Maurya and Princess sanghamitra(children of Samrat Ashoka Maurya the great)was mentioned in the book named,"The Mahavamsa"🇮🇳🇱🇰🦁☸️👑⚔️❤️🔥!
@@kishorek2272, Asoka ended the wars which Chandragupta Maurya and Brahamana Chanakya started from Magadha. Maha Padmananda (Porus) and the other 8 regional kings in Magadha lost the power because they were trying to stop Alexander the great. Hindus came from Thakshila (Pakistan), and they took the Magadha Kingdom from the people who spoke Prakrit Languages. And then, they have developed new text to make their own history in India. Some stories are older than the evolution of Humans. They have tried to make a founder of Jainism. And they have copied the story of Rama-Panditha in Jataka tale to make a new story to make the Budhha and Avatar of Vishnu. Also, their new stories have tried to adopt the Buddha's teachings. They have destroyed the history of India. But Sri Lankan texts have details about the early Kings in India. Uggasena was the first Nanda king, and he took the power from Kalashoka according to the texts. He was the newphew of Maha Padma Nanda because he married his daughter Dhurdhara. Likely, Chandragupta married Dhurdhara later. Brahamins have tried to Brahamanize a lot of cultures and knowledge systems while trying to change the mindset of normal people.
Amidst The Tense Of thousands of names of kings that crowds the columns of world history. the name of "Ashoka The Great " shines & shines almost alone like a star ✨
Only one inscription where tell about Ashoka Wel..! if you anyone have doubt regarding Ashoka.. considered the divanapiaya inscription everything has been tel abt Ashoka.. most of scholars said after the Kalinga war.... Ashoka didn't conquer any kind war because he move to buddist that the reason but who knows... After the kaligha war also ahokaa wil conquer the World.. different types of historien tel different types of thoughts Note it.😂 Freiends History is not wht happened history is wht we write that is the history...😢 4:38
You can know the history of Emperor Ashoka only from his inscriptions. If you know from Buddhist books then you will be very confused because in Buddhist books he was described as cruel because they want to show that he was cruel and later became Buddhist. In the inscription of Emperor Ashoka, there is mention of his living brothers. You can read in inscription number five which is the inscription of Kalsi.
Thanks for this post, I came to about this at least 10 years back. Even after the kalinga (Malinga) war, based on one of his inscriptions, he has mentioned that he won’t hesitate to rise his sword again. This Ashoka is a waste fellow.
Hello Keerthi Mam, History is one of the subjects I hate the most during schools because they make us to remember things by heart, but your way of teaching and explaining makes History interesting to me....Kudoos to you and keep working!
Bro this a propoganda channel dont take her seriously . Asokavadana is not a historical document its a religious text written 400yrs after asoka death. And its full of magical miracle moral stories like asoka walking on water, flying in sky, healing diseased monks just by toching. That violence part is also a fabricated moral story to warn people that who accepted buddism when they deviate towards violence karma hits them and suffers more(like ashoka brother death)
@Keerthihistory remember ashoka is not monk. He is just average human who just understand basic at the end of his life. Previous buddhism ruin by mahadeva than he wave war on. After win he see the thing of indian didn't see. Fake buddhism is different from real buddhism. He devote himself to understand real buddhism and later wanna pure it to all real buddhism. Most of indian who hold other religious covert to real buddhism but keep their own agenda and mislead people. It lead to anger of the king and order to massacre any fake buddhism. Later he understand his anger might lose his buns to wish to become bodhisatva in order to become buddha. So he stop kill and using prison or deportation. 😂🎉 while you didn't know the difference between average buddhist and understand basic buddhist than you spread misinformation😂🎉. At the end ashoka is beginner of real buddhism because he wish to be bodhisatva. Average human has anger , hate is normal thing. Those fake buddhism is not innocent, spreading misinformation , gather coup etc😂 Indian but need foreigners to tell. Unbelievable😂🎉
Hey she gave ample reference. I also have read scholarly articles. It's established history that Ashoka was rogue. He killed many after being Buddhist. His intent was to use the ideology not follow it.
@@arjun111she is referring to stone inscriptions of Chand Ashok (that is chandal Ashok)......... Stone inscriptions are not from WhatsApp University..... This stone inscriptions are lying here and there in India for more than 2000 years under the soil..... I think you have graduated from leftist University and Bheemte University......😡😠
Ashoka knew what is kshethriya dharma and strategic king who ahead of his times He is Indeed Great ruler of Bharat but only our conspiracy historians who hate Bharatiya culture spread such controvery theories .Thanks for you spreading Truth with your big voice Every Bharathiya culture tradition given different methods for happy life
@@KeerthihistoryWow you are so knowledgeable , wow you expose hard working historians who spend their entire lives studying and yet dont know what happened soo many years ago , yet you with your infinite knowledge know everything
@@KeerthihistoryWow you are so knowledgeable , wow you expose hard working historians who spend their entire lives studying and yet dont know what happened soo many years ago , yet you with your infinite knowledge know everything
I am from Kalinga modern day Odisha. Please make a video on Kharabela the kaligna king who dig out Ashoka Buddhism philosophy and reestablished the Sanatan Dharam.
@@jinkigang bro watch the vid ashoka wasn't great at this point i don't think there is much difference btw him & Auranzeb . hatsoff to kalinga for fighting this tyrant
Source neutral research and analysis from primary sources of history..... U just go to Pakistan and resemble it ... Go to shreelankaa ❤ ... Kya bhai😂😂😂😂😂
@@subhashgupta1006 when someone speaks they need credibility.. Is she a historian? What qualification does she have. What research has she used? Why does her position contradict what historians have said. Did she found new data?
@@ayanrushd4800 what kind of history do you want ? Or in which status ? Let me clear u bro , the primary sources of history writing were written by European ( imperialist historians ) and it was Euro centric approach ,, then r.s. sharma, rumila Thapar etc have used secondary sources of history writing, and they have only explained their interpretations at all times but never visited those places or tried to put their efforts to find real history 😕 ... Today technology and social media awareness and internet connectivity helped them to try to tell the truth Bro history has a lots of interpretation but need to be a curious and logistic to find out the truth 🤔
The problem with Santani historians is that they are more of "Kathawachak" than historians. No inscription read here as a reference which is an integral part of credibility. 1.Ashoka was a lay budhist before Kalinga war. His father was an Aajeevak and Mauryans were also Buddhist Not Sanatani. 2. Alexander Cunningham was the historian who discovered history of Ashoka. No Indian was aware of such a great emperor. 3. The fact she's trying to say are based on a scripture Ashokawadana not an inscription. If you read Ashokan inscription his teaching ideas prove him to be greatest emperor of all time. But for very obvious reasons since he was a Buddhist so these "Sanatanis" never like him and try to demean him in every possible way. 4. Ashoka was fond of his brothers he made an artificial Hill called "Bhikuna" Pahar for him brother the remains are still there. 5. He sent his daughter and Son for propagation of Dhamma in Srilanka without any violence he spread Dhamma every where such a great king he was. 6. His rock inscriptions, Stupa are rich cultural heritage of India. 7. Just imagine the Sanatanis who were not aware of the existence of great king are now writing fictional stories to prove that he was cruel king??? 8 These Brahmins even called Ashokan pillar as " "Bheem ki Gada" how talented they are.??? The only talent they hv is to prove others evil and hijack the heritage of Buddha.
Mauryan empire were not buddist at all. Chandragupt was hindu who is after passing his throne to son adopted Jainism not buddism. His son was hindu Ashoka started as hindu and become buddist. Ashokas descendents were also Hindu go search 1st shunga emperor he rages war against buddism 149bce and Tibetian account clearly mentioned him. If you do not trust your country account.
😂😂 mourya empire established by chanakya , not Ashok 😂😂 . Ambedkar Navayan organisation product probelm. Yes Ashok inscription and historical literature indicate he was Buddhist before Kalinga war
Buddha darshan is darshan which takes many things from Sanatan Dharma. Four tatva, dev, devi, dhyan. Buddha learned Dhyan from his brahmin guru and in Buddha darshan most followers were brahmin . This is truth
Moral of the vedio : every person who had a Great prefix was a merciless maniac ...... prime examples Alexander,Akbar and Ashoka . Western historians think More land under control means more greatness 😂. And can't bear Purushottam das slayed their Boy...😅
Actually, his step brother announced as crown prince he fought his brother for the high king's position because of some ministers who seen Ashoka as a more capable king and wanted him to rule this under their influence he fought with susima and won the empire and took whole empire under his control even the people of Empire wanted him to be the king..
It was an honest and logical explanation by Keerthi. However, there are at least two things she was wrong in her research. First, a Buddhist merchant and second; that Ashoka was himself a Buddhist when kalinga war happened. The rest of the information that she has provided are true and I appreciate her. Well done Keerthi 😊🙏
@@janhvisinghchauhan9224 Very true Janhvi. That was my point. Anybody can be a Buddhist because it doesn't have religion and caste system. He was a merchant by caste and later on he became Buddhist while Keerthi didn't realise that unfortunately. However, I follow Keerthi History and I always do that 😊
Mam you also provide information that Samrat Ashoka alone did he really built 84000 Buddhist monasteries? According to Leftists those 84000 Buddhist temples destroyed by Brahminical forces During ancient Times whether it is true or fake? If Ashoka alone really built 84000 buddhist viharas now only few of them survived but later what happened to those Buddhist temples? Now where are they? Dr Ambedkar in his books said all ancient Buddhist structures destroyed by islamic Invasions but his so called followers deliberately argue paralogically those Buddhist structures vandalised by brahminical forces itself Plz you do video regarding this topic Keerthi mam 🙏
The Brahmins led by Pushyamitra Shunga decimated Buddhism but the OBCs are fools to politically support the rightists who surprisingly deny their rights blatantly. It's travesty of truth and distortion of history by the Neo-Nazi party as a part of their conspiracy of false propaganda and subsequent monarchy.
Could you provide your fact checking links? I mean I am sure you did not go and read those inscriptions on those stones. Where is this data coming from?
I don't know how historically true all that she said is, and if this is inscribed on monuments, how could it remain unknown - hidden in plain sight? However, I personally never considered King Ashoka great. Even a 5-year-old child may know that aggression and violence are WRONG....and it took him killing millions to realize that? 🤔🤔
Though I have completed my class 12 with science but I was always interested about history since childhood.....love how u have correctly explained the wrong stuffs which are still being taught....keep up this amazing work ma'am ❤
@@jinkigang No indian king had killed common people except ashoka. Ashoka was a terrorist and tyrant. Kalinga war wasn't a war between two armies. He massacred the common people of the region literally making their rivers red in blood. The only other ones who did similar were muslim invaders and british and hitler. If you want to idolize hitler or ashoka is your wish. By the way, no one is saying anything against buddhism, it is a peaceful religion and everyone respects buddhism. But ashoka was like hitler.
Ashoka is considered great because of the expansion in the form of politics and religion he has achieved. The transformation in his later life where he contributed greatly in sending peace messages and expanding Buddhism is remarkable. In he early life it is very much well know that he was also a chand ashoka.
You probably did not understand her video otherwise this irrelevant comment of urs wouldn't be sent as reply... U should patiently watch the video... Complete video
There will be 2 earthquakes in Alaska ( 7.6 and 7.3) After that children will go missing. It will be Jesus who is coming with promised redemption! Our God has revealed all those details to his prophets right now and He is coming in promised redemption. But governments will say it was UFO. Now you have been told in advance, so do not be deceived. Only God knows the future. Jesus loves you, accept him as your Saviour and be safe! We are in the last pages of the Bible now. What saves us is the faith that Jesus He bled and died on the cross, and he was resurrected three days later. His blood cleansed us from our sins so that we can stand in front of God blamelessly. Believe in what he has done for us with the full heart, confess your sins to him and pray, build a relation with him. Ask him to come into your heart. It is God's grace that saves you. It's nothing that you can do but what he has done for us. No works required. Call upon him as Your Lord and Saviour!(see also Bible, 1 Corinthians 15:1:6)
I salute you Keerthi for your study and bringing the truth to new generation. 100 slaps on the authors of NCERT books who distorted history and write Akbar the great or Ashoka the great
@Keerthihistory Thank you so much for highlighting the importance of a nuanced perspective in history education, which was never told in today's history books. It is evident that contemporary history books may sometimes present a biased or incomplete narrative. In the case of Rani Lakshmi Bai, acknowledging the role of Jhalkari Bai is indeed crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the events. Additionally, the Battle of Bhima Koregaon, where 500 Mahars triumphed over a significant Peshwa force, is a significant historical event that deserves recognition. The need for a more balanced and inclusive approach to historical documentation is essential to provide a holistic view of the past. Revisiting and rewriting history books with accurate and unbiased information would contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of historical events.
Great content..! Appreciate your efforts to put ur views strongly. I would also like mention a small piece of advice to all listeners that we all are free to give opinion wch may wrong or right bcz no body knows the real fact but we must respect all the religion and take away good lessons from Them wch taught by lord Ram, Krishna, Budha, Mahavir, Nanak, Kabir, Jesus, Prophet Mohammad . Then only we.can make this planet more beautiful to live else we will be keep fighting until we die..! Jai Hind..!
Wow wonderful explanation. But why this truth was hidden and why we taught the different ways of teaching. Most of the Indian history was written by the different ways of schools and made us read so. Wonderful and detailed information you have given. Thank you 🙏
Imao she completely lias The archaeological study proves that Asoka already a big heart king with his prãjà and with his family don't believe anyone with blind eye do u r own RESEARCH
Who destroyed Buddhism from root level from India. It looks like you are a supporter of those people.. History was written as per individual opinions and feelings and perceptions. It looks like you are following negative part of it. Interpretations were changing and want to show new ways to attract people to get fame in society to get awards. You are talking about more than 2000 years back history which was completely contaminated. Refer to the recent history of Gandhiji, Nehruji, can you say who wrote correctly, people are writing as per their wish. Don't waste your time by creating such negative videos. Even you can't judge or find correct things for recent things. Do you know your great grand Father and mother's names. Understand the reality. First understand yourself and your history. Then think about more than 2000 years old history.
Whoever does your the animation on your videos should do a whole movie or series on Indian history. I always feel our country has so many stories that never get depicted properly
Such an amazing and eye opening video. Yes, I did hear about this unknown side of Ashoka's Buddhism but not very detailed like this. Can you also make a video on Ashoka's wives, please? About Vedisa Devi, Karuvaki, Padmavati and the evil Tishyaraksha?
Its good you're bringing up the historical knowledge to all of us, and it would be great to mention your source of knowledge and the incriptions you're talking about !
if you believe this video to contain misinformation here are the timestamps and faults. I've researched extensively for 4 days and this is what I found - 1:56 - 1) Susima was never crown prince. It was never decided who was more worthy to be the king Susima or Ashoka, The mauryan court was divided into 2 one that favored Ashoka and one that favored Susima not only them the other brothers also wanted and fought for the throne. 2:13 2) There is no solid evidence suggesting that the Greeks helped Ashoka in the Assasination of Susima. 2:17 3) It hasn't been proved if Susima was assassinated or died in battle due to lack of evidence. 2:28 4) According to her it was a civil war, then how is it possible that Ashoka was the one that killed each of his brothers and not other soldier 2:50 5) Ashoka's Hell wasn't an actual place as no location has been described and no sites have been dug. Ashoka's hell was an imaginary place for the sinners, It was a concept to improve morality among citizens. 3:27 6) Ashoka's early regime describes the fight among the brothers for the throne and Ashoka's hunger for territory, which we have been taught correctly in our textbooks. It didn't include any sort of torture, just war. 3:20 7) Chandashoka as earlier I mentioned refers to the war hungry Ashoka, brutal in nature (which we have been taught in the textbooks). 7:00 8) Ashoka did release the prisoners of the Kalinga war. 5:13 9) Look at the text carefully it mentions I've been a Buddhist layman for 2 and half years "BUT FOR A YEAR I DID NOT MAKE MUCH PROGRESS" The Kalinga war ended at 261BCE which came first And 260BCE was the date the edict was written in which was a gap for 1 year, this is not particularly a mistake but it does tell us he was Buddhist before the Kalinga war but after it he had finally started acting non violent and became a true Buddhist. 6:23 10) Ashoka didn't kill all his brothers, he defeated most of them and others were killed during the war by common soldiers and not Ashoka particularly. 7:27 11) The hostility is not even present, the lines tell us that god tells ashoka to calm down and apologise so to prevent violence. There is no hostile tone present. 7:57 12) There are no accounts that suggest a war that Ashoka fought or initiated after the Kalinga war. 8:15 13) The Ashokavadna is not corroborative evidence as its a prashasti and much has been exaggerated. And no other historical evidence suggests that Ashoka ordered the killing of Ajvikas 8:35 14) There are no historical evidences that support this legend written in the Ashokavadna and thus is considered a false narrative by historians. mam I believe, this is just a mistake, Kindly reassure your data and sources. These mistakes that I pointed out have been gathered from Wikipedia, Quora, Chat GPT etc. I have tried my best to separate the biased and exaggerated data.
@@monk9948 if you believe this video to contain misinformation here are the timestamps and faults. I've researched extensively for 4 days and this is what I found - 1:56 - 1) Susima was never crown prince. It was never decided who was more worthy to be the king Susima or Ashoka, The mauryan court was divided into 2 one that favored Ashoka and one that favored Susima not only them the other brothers also wanted and fought for the throne. 2:13 2) There is no solid evidence suggesting that the Greeks helped Ashoka in the Assasination of Susima. 2:17 3) It hasn't been proved if Susima was assassinated or died in battle due to lack of evidence. 2:28 4) According to her it was a civil war, then how is it possible that Ashoka was the one that killed each of his brothers and not other soldier 2:50 5) Ashoka's Hell wasn't an actual place as no location has been described and no sites have been dug. Ashoka's hell was an imaginary place for the sinners, It was a concept to improve morality among citizens. 3:27 6) Ashoka's early regime describes the fight among the brothers for the throne and Ashoka's hunger for territory, which we have been taught correctly in our textbooks. It didn't include any sort of torture, just war. 3:20 7) Chandashoka as earlier I mentioned refers to the war hungry Ashoka, brutal in nature (which we have been taught in the textbooks). 7:00 8) Ashoka did release the prisoners of the Kalinga war. 5:13 9) Look at the text carefully it mentions I've been a Buddhist layman for 2 and half years "BUT FOR A YEAR I DID NOT MAKE MUCH PROGRESS" The Kalinga war ended at 261BCE which came first And 260BCE was the date the edict was written in which was a gap for 1 year, this is not particularly a mistake but it does tell us he was Buddhist before the Kalinga war but after it he had finally started acting non violent and became a true Buddhist. 6:23 10) Ashoka didn't kill all his brothers, he defeated most of them and others were killed during the war by common soldiers and not Ashoka particularly. 7:27 11) The hostility is not even present, the lines tell us that god tells ashoka to calm down and apologise so to prevent violence. There is no hostile tone present. 7:57 12) There are no accounts that suggest a war that Ashoka fought or initiated after the Kalinga war. 8:15 13) The Ashokavadna is not corroborative evidence as its a prashasti and much has been exaggerated. And no other historical evidence suggests that Ashoka ordered the killing of Ajvikas 8:35 14) There are no historical evidences that support this legend written in the Ashokavadna and thus is considered a false narrative by historians. mam I believe, this is just a mistake, Kindly reassure your data and sources. These mistakes that I pointed out have been gathered from Wikipedia, Quora, Chat GPT etc. I have tried my best to separate the biased and exaggerated data.
@@monk9948 then start by reporting her. Channels that are spreading fake news are being deleted but we need a plausible cause and I just gave you more than 10, I already reported her, now it's your turn.
Wow, what a fake University 😂😂😂.... U taking reference from ashokavdana (which is written some 1500 years later after Ashoka death)😂😂😂... Ashoka built four caves for ajivikas in barabar .... Shame on you...
I am from Karnataka recently watched a videos of Dharamendra Kumar’s sir. Channel “ Mysorina Kathegallu” he explains well. He goes the places and explains and shows the evidence Bloody shit she is lying by showing piece of paper that is no where found. There are four ancient places found related to Buddhism 1. Sanathi. Yadir 2. Maski Raichur 3. Rajaghatta Doddaballapur 4. Kanagina Halli. There are few more . She is spreading lies.
Perhaps historical narratives could have been framed to emphasize promoting the ideals of peace, nonviolence, and ahimsa to children. Instead of imparting stories filled with bloodshed, torture, killings and to focus on narratives that highlight the values of harmony and compassion might have been a more constructive approach.
Though I am not a historian, but from the childhood I had a feeling that, the disarmament on being a buddhist follower and making friendship to all other kings were the first blunder after Chandragupta and Chanakya made United Bharat. Ashoka's policy actually made the unifying power of the mighty Mourya Dynasty... Which may be considered to be a turning point of Bharat's Destiny
There is no evidence as Hinduism is not old, it came into existence through Buddhism but mixer many religions like Jainism, parsi, sramana+ ajivika. Sankracharya was a Buddhist that's why he founded 4 maths not temple, but during his tenure a new tradition came into existence which is nath tradition and later on converted into shaivism. All big Hindu temples were once jains temple, and Jain temple has unique architect. What Hinduism says, avatars says meri pooja Karo moksh pao. To understand the truth you should read and save one old edition of Valmiki ramayana as in recent years vulgar things and deleting,meaning of words like non-veg and alcohol have been changed.
@@rockdstone4863 Actually, to correct you, hinduism is actually way older than buddhism and jainism and many others.... like all the abrahmic religions are derived from zoroastrianism, which also existed before christianity and islam... many common tales are there between both of these old religions, and between norse and greek civilizations as well... alongside , Sanskrit is actually the mother of all the Indian languages.... you can actually google the facts I mentioned as I believe you have access to internet... anyway, at the end of the day, Ashoka is a respectable figure and we must respect him for the contributions he made for our country.... his reign and policies were great.... let's agree on facts and disagree on opinions! good luck!
Suggest me few topics for next videos please ❤️
If british had never come to India
Women Scholars of ancient india
India's if no foreign invasion happened
Actual story of Alluri Seetharamaraju..
Who ruled Kerala during ancient times and how it ruined.
I don't understand why you all TH-camr historians don't put your facts sources in the description?? It is always good practice to mention the references.
Because she wants to create propoganda 😂
Yes what is your base. What kind of research you did.
Ashoka is actually a butcher
Source : trust me bro
And that's the best point. People believe history is black and white . History is also politics in the past.
Ashoka is the only king who is worthy of being given the title 'The Great'
I'm a Buddhist nun from Srilanka and our great historical chronical Mahavamsa has a several chapters dedicated to Ashoka. And I believe most of the historical facts the world know by now are either taken from Ashokan rock edicts or from Mahavamsa. If there are other sources I think you should better mention them in your narrative. It is true that a king has always limitaitons in following parama ahinsa and an emperor is even less capable. However Ashoka contributed a lot for Buddhism by holding the third sangha council since Lord Buddha's passing away and it is as a result of that council that he sent missionaries to seven areas including Srilanka. By this time both his son and daughter had enetered the order pf sangha and Srilanka received both of them, first Maha Mahinda thero his son, along with Buddhism and then hos daughter Sanghamiththa theri with a sapling of the Bodhi tree under which Lord Buddha attained Buddhahood.
The countries which received Buddhism from Ashoka still remains Buddhist to this day so unlike the empire of Alexander the great which collapsed soon after his demise the dharma empire of Ashoka the great still remains well intact today. Making him quite close to a chakravarti raja mentioned in Buddhism. (But not completely).
P. S - it's better if you include references to your information under the video description.
Thanks for the details. However, her only point is that he was already a Buddhist before the war. Yes, we can ask for references.
This info she got is from tv series and nothing else. She is not a historian of any kind. TH-cam People are making myths according to their taste.
@@LucknowPropertiesPlotHouseBuyisne ye bi kaha Bindusar ki wife Brahmin thi lekin woh toh ek Jain thi saathi pura mourya Empire buddist or Jain the naaki vedic or hindu
New history
reference is stone edicts of ashoka not half baked stories from Mahavamsa
History can't be change even after you try your hard to do it .😊
Ashoka was great King and will be forever 💙
I am a Theravada Buddhist from Sri Lanka.
According to Sri Lankan books, he became a Buddhist after the Kalinga War.
He propagated Buddhism, so he was called Dharmashoka.
Ashoka
Chandashoka
Dharmashoka ....
It is mentioned in the books that Ashoka did not wars after becoming a Buddhist.
I'm not saying I'm 100% right. ..
I have little knowledge of Indian historical sources.
Which Indian source mentions that Ashoka fought wars after the Kalinga war.........................
Mahindra Thero, the son of Emperor Ashoka, brought Buddhism to our country.
In ancient times, the people of Sri Lanka called India as Jambudhveepa.
According to our books, Emperor Ashoka built 84000 Buddhist temples all over Jambudhveepa.
Buddhism was given to many Buddhist countries in the world
Emperor Ashoka.
He is a hero to Theravada Buddhists.
No worries Bro His Legacy is unmatched its natural that south indians and odias hate him we hindus and buddhists are one Ashoka was shavite even after becoming buddhist
True , after the war of kalinga he did so many good things for all the people inside his empire and international trade
@@animeworldixr
Thank you brother.
We respect Hinduism... It is our own thing.
Why did he have to destroy the Kalinga (BlackLinga) empire? Just to promote Buddhism and appease Bhikkus, He tried to destroy the Linga worship religion which is from Kalinga and Telinga (Trilinga) Desam. The Kalingas were a very rich empire with rich trade history with South East Asia for thousands of years. Any Indonesian and Malaysian always refer to dark or Indian-looking people as Keling. After the Kamboja/Saka/Aryan invasion into India everything changed. The Kalingas fleed to Southeast Asia or Bangladesh, some even migrated to the Hinterlands or South India to save themselves. You see alot of Shaivite temples in the south and also as far as Champa (Vietnam) as they brought the Linga culture with them. Every King was always power-hungry.@@animeworldixr
@@animeworldixrfk your Buddhism
Hello ..I'm a srilankan and as you all know buddhism is the religion of majority here. Buddist monk called "Mahinda" The son of Ashoka the great came here and established buddhism as a result of 3rd 'dharma sangayana' which was conducted by king Ashoka.And dear Keerthi I think it's not that much fair to judge a great king by some information you collected from various types of resources. There could be so much untold , unwritten stories in history that you probably can't explain in a couple of minute youtube video.It's almost been 2000 years do you think people who had been lived through all those years didn't notice a single thing you say? Don't know whether stories we've been told true or a lie but forever greatfull for bringing buddhism here for the sake of politics or with the thought of spreading buddhism.
ps. Be aware before beliving everything that random youtube historians say.This video is filled with lack of information and biased (why I say it's biased ; I've seen hefty amount of people's hate towards king Ashoka for the fact that he converted in to a buddhist.And most of them are hindu people.Can't help with that. Can't change history.Pleas don't hate someone just because they don't belong to the same religion as yours.) I'm amazed of amount of people that compliment these kind of videos without any kind of research . Hope people will do more quality contents.
He accepted Buddhism for his use but still he spread it because he wanted the support of the people of his country
Mahinda or Mahendra is not son of Ashoka! No such proof exists externally! They were just Buddhist monks
@@pawannnnnnnnnnnnngMaybe... but anyway buddhism is such a great gift we got from India.❤
Wow Keerthi is so knowledgeable , wow she exposed hard working historians who spend their entire lives studying and yet dont know what happened soo many years ago , yet she with her infinite knowledge knows everything
keerthi conviction towards BJP & Sangha's so adorable 😊
Please note that most of the historical texts and legacies about Ashoka the great had been found in srilankan budddhist texts and mahavamsa . So under the british colonel era they adopted these theories and stories to made the current indian incomplete history .(the current indian history is a british made one and disorted the srilankan history also ) The written sources about Ashoka you can find out by referring the srilankan historical books and inscriptions❤
Respect for great asoka his symbol of lion is our national symbol🙏🙏🙏🙏
Right it's to me like Germany would put hakkenkruz in their flag 💀
@@soulflower2021 No wonder they want Persians, Greeks and Brits to call the nation Bharat.
*Rig Veda 10.23.4* "In this rain, Indra throws drops of moisture on his yellow beard"
*Rig Veda 1.130.8* “Indra defends his Ārya worshiper. He consumes the malignant; he tore off the b_______ skin; and him who delights in cruelty.”
*Rig Veda 2.20.7* “Indra, slayer of Vṛitra, destroyer of cities, scattered the b______-sprung servile.”
*Rig Veda 3.34.9* "Indra gained possession of the Sun, Horses, Cow. He struck the Dasyus, and gave protection to the Ārya tribe."
*Rig Veda 9.73.5* “They have roared in unison, burning up riteless men, Blowing away the b______ skin which Indra hates.”
@@user-k4d-e59mo28oc what is this gibberish you are spewing here ? ..loser chutiya with bad understanding of Vedas
Don't believe this propanda video.i agree ki voh maa baap ke marne ke baad cruel ho gaye the.but vo bynature aise nahi the . agar vo itne hi cruel hote toh baba sahab bhim rao ambedkar jaise log ashoka chakra ko national flag mai add kyu karvaate.isliye sirf baba sahab bhim rao ambedkar ji par hi bharosa karo.aur kisi propanganda video par nahi
Chandal Ashok murdered his 99 Brothers and he is Great?
Did you murder your Brothers to become Great?
She says let us assume on every point and she tries to paint a different picture...if she's such a great historian why doesn't she write a book and mention all the edicts and challenge the old versions???
She is graduated from WhatsApp University 😅😄
That's because only Communists and urban Naxals are allowed to write History, and their source is their imagination 😂
@@opkhanna6521whatsapp has a lot of Information but you are educated in imagination University 😂
She failed in 10th
Part of propaganda to rewrite history
Whats App University Graduate🎓
Sold People Trying To Manipulate History📖 Ashoka He Is Great Warrior And Empire Of India 🇮🇳
Yes She is WhatsApp University graduate 😂
Cry harder kiddo
But the whole point is whether king Ashoka was already a Buddhist when he started the Kalinga war?.
You should read NCERT than said anything about her
Jalil na😂😂😂😂😂 go read history.and that time budhism was not a different relgion as of now
Impressive explanation. Many stories have been added with so called secularism by our historians, but now things are changing with the reality coming out. 😇😇😇
❤
@@Keerthihistory so that means Ashoka the great is actually Ashoka not so great
Mate dont beleive everything you hear blindly most of the things she told has no proof except buddhist sources plus fun fact these so called sources were many years after Ashokas death. In Ashokas time there as no concept of religion like today everyone followed dharma or sanatan or mixture of indic faiths people say Ashoka was a buddhist but no one will tell even after becoming buddhist Ashoka was a Shavite Ashoka own son was devotee of Mahadev @@amoghaudupa
@@Keerthihistoryfake history brahminism dharma taller plz debate with science journey and
@amoghaudupa74
Probably he was not...
and this story was formed to create an impression that Hindus are the one to be blamed and should be converted to Buddhism.
After all that "Ashoka will always be the Great King in the Entire Indian History", all hail to Chakravarthy Samrath Ashok
Why not chandragupta and Bindusara the great? Because they were hindus
@@dreamingaboutjungkook3930Chandragupta us always mentioned above Ashoka
Bundusara was nothing compared to both if them
@Dharmic_Arya Ashoka conquered in a different way
He had the biggest empire for any Indian
There were not 😂@@dreamingaboutjungkook3930
chandragupta accepted Jainism and bindusara was
ajeevika. And Buddhism is also dharmic tradition don't treat it like it is different from Hinduism
In the book Ashoka Vadan, Emperor Ashoka has been described as very cruel because by showing him cruelty, he wanted to prove that he was initially angry and later became a Buddhist. He gave up his anger. If you want to know the true history of Emperor Ashoka, then Know them from inscriptions not from books
😂😂 Ashok inscription mentioned he was Buddhist before Kalinga war .
Mourya empire established by chanakya , not Ashok 😂😂
Chandragupta maurya guide by chanakya@@Upanishad11
@@krishi.0 😂😂 idiot
@@krishi.0 idiot, history and intellectual communists terror have difference 😂😂
My grandfather had read alot about Ashoka and even he told something really similar to what you have mentioned in the video. Good to know, that my grandfather was reading through the right sources.
🫶
@@Keerthihistory One thing u missed you telling history with this timeline ur absolutely wrong these are now Religion . According to timeline of that history Sanatan was Civilization people only had Culture according to weather Jainism, buddisum, Ajivika's, Charvakas these are school's of thoughts these people were learning in that time because of them we are still in the way of Sanatan these people always question we Answered and we lerned these are not Religion just a school of thoughts
@@KeerthihistoryWow you are so knowledgeable , wow you expose hard working historians who spend their entire lives studying and yet dont know what happened soo many years ago , yet you with your infinite knowledge know everything
Same here
@@KeerthihistoryWhats App University Graduate🎓
Sold People Trying To Manipulate History📖 Ashoka He Is Great Warrior And Empire Of India 🇮🇳
this so chosen twist of history...she is just protecting Hinduism...
Absolute non-sense explanation without any references.
But the whole point is whether king Ashoka was already a Buddhist when he started the Kalinga war?.
@@vissapragadasatyanarayana2750yes he is because in inscription there was no mention that chandragupta was Jain's or ajivik . Even Jain word was not spoken at that time. Which proves that chandragupta was Buddhist. For more information search SCIENCE JOURNEY channel.
@@vissapragadasatyanarayana2750 But the point is whether King Ram was already Hindu when he started Ramayan war...?
(Logic lovers stay away from this ques😅)
As per Sri Lanka Ashoka converted to Buddhism before Kalinga war
@@JohnnieWalker-pw5yj no he is not because there is no such thing as hinduism and only gods exist at that time
A liar with such confidence can't be easily avaialble.
😂
😂😂😂 correct 💯
Isiliye to isko award diya pheku ne😂😂😂
Teri kyu jal rahi hai, tu toh jihadi religion se hai na 😁😁😁😁😁
Better than Halaala product 😂
References, trust me bro?
Yeah :- "trust me bro" ...
If you don't trust - you are anti-national, hinduphobic, go back to Pakistan/Britian
It's impossible for neo Buddhist to accept truth even after gaving evidence
Mam , what you mentioned the inscriptions, any references for these?
Source trust me bro 😂😂
Reference:- Trust me bro
@@cyrilmatthew2995 HAHAHAHAH....what a reliable source, where is this located "Trust me Bro"
He had refered Buddhist scripture of Srilanka...
@AnonymousTraveler-ze2vm In Ashokvardhana-his deeds had been described.
Mahavamsa also discusses about cruelity of Ashok.
Buddhism is not actually meaning the follower of gautam buddha gautam buddha never created any religion he just give knowledge and shows the path of peace innerself
👍👍👍
Gautam Budhha just showed the path to Moksh.
He did not give a full-fledged religion encompassing all relations of family life and social order.
In fact he asked to never indulge in Sex and just do meditation.
He had opposed the entry of women in Buddhist order.
Next topic - Romani gypsies persecution (indian origin dalit, banjara and lohar community living in Europe)killed by nazis, Christian missionaries.
Noted
@@Keerthihistory thanks keerthi 🕊️ you are doing a great job 👍👍👍
Nice topic
There will be 2 earthquakes in Alaska ( 7.6 and 7.3) After that children will go missing. It will be Jesus who is coming with promised redemption! Our God has revealed all those details to his prophets right now and He is coming in promised redemption. But governments will say it was UFO. Now you have been told in advance, so do not be deceived.
Only God knows the future. Jesus loves you, accept him as your Saviour and be safe! We are in the last pages of the Bible now. What saves us is the faith that Jesus He bled and died on the cross, and he was resurrected three days later. His blood cleansed us from our sins so that we can stand in front of God blamelessly. Believe in what he has done for us with the full heart, confess your sins to him and pray, build a relation with him. Ask him to come into your heart. It is God's grace that saves you. It's nothing that you can do but what he has done for us. No works required. Call upon him as Your Lord and Saviour!(see also Bible, 1 Corinthians 15:1:6)
Banjara, great warrior made by birth criminals by British
Lohar are not dalits, they are वैश्य, doing manufacturing of irons
A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes----Mark Twain
💯
@@Keerthihistorynice made up stories, now I want you to provide evidences about the whole video you have made up and if you're such sure then do a debate not with me , I have a guy to do with , If you are ready for it then say it I'll let you the name
Exactly what's happening with this sort of misinformed videos.
@@scoobyaura-fr6dm You are simply being emotional.Ashoka's atrocities are mentioned in Ashokavadana which were written in Pali by Buddhist monks.If you want to find fault then go after the writers.
@@MakyMcthug Who is misinformed,you or her?
Really it's bizarre to know the facts of Ashoka, how wrongly we were taught about him in our history books. Thankyou Keerthi for tracing out the facts and wide opening our eyes😢
BRO PLEASE DON'T BELEIVE HERE BLINDLY PEOPLE DON'T REALISE THAT THERE WAS NO CONCEPT OF RELIGION LIKE TODAY ALL FOLLOWED DHARMA OR MIXTURE IF INDIC FAITHS ASHOKA ONE SON WAS SHAVITE AND FUN FACT MOST OF THE CALLED SOURCES WHICH WRITE BAD ABOUT ASHOKA WERE WRITTEN IN 5TH OR 6TH CENTURY CE 600 YEARS AFTER ASHOKA YOU ONLY TELL HOW AUTHENTIC THEY ARE IT IS NOT WRITTEN IN ANY OF HIS RICK EDICTS ABOUT KILLINGS OF AJIVIKAS AND JAIN PAINTER ANOTHER FUN FACT THERE IS NO WHERE WRITTEN ASHOKA LEFT HINDUISM EVEN AFTER BECOMING BUDDHIST HE WAS A SHAVITE AND USED TO FEED 100 BRAHMINS
ASHOKA IS GOAT 🗿 🇮🇳
PROUD TO BE BIHARI 🇮🇳
JAI HIND JAI BHARAT 🇮🇳
BRO PLEASE DON'T BELEIVE HER BLINDLY MOST OF THE SO CALLED BUDDHIST SOURCES SHE MENTIONED WAS WRITTEN IN 5TH OR 6TH CENTURY CE 600 YEARS AFTER ASHOKA
In the time of Ashoka, Hindus faced terrible oppression. Ashoka aimed to convert everyone to Buddhism, and many of our sacred texts were destroyed by Buddhists. They almost wiped out Hinduism from our land. But in Kalinga, people fought fiercely to keep their beliefs alive. The entire state resisted, even children joining the struggle to defend Hinduism.
Later, Sri Sri Adi Shankaracharya emerged, spreading Hinduism's message across the country once more. Against all odds, Hinduism rose again, reclaiming its place in our land.
@@ghoshsuman9495Read major edict 3 of ashoka
We have been taught Indian history in the wrong words. The historians made certain people as 'great' and conveniently ignored the real heroes in our history, this might be for their vested interests. When I was a student of history I had many questions appeared in my mind which was unanswered. Now I am getting answers one by one. The time is up to rewrite our history with the actual incidents without any dilution. Thanks to Keerthi for providing such valuable information. Jai Bharat Mata 🙏.
Meh. Historical RE-visionism, driven largely by modern day politics.
Everytime I fell in love with the analysis, with history, the broken myths and in love with keerthi .. ❤
🫶
@@KeerthihistoryWow you are so knowledgeable , wow you expose hard working historians who spend their entire lives studying and yet dont know what happened soo many years ago , yet you with your infinite knowledge know everything
Please realise the context , even if you read romila thapar she mentions even "Dhamma". Policy wasn't a religious move but a political move to enhance the position and influence of Ashoka ..@funtimefunny2153
@@jinkigang when you devote yourself to a specific religion it means you follow the believe and customs of that religion in later and spirit , so draw a corollary between Ashoka and Chandragupta maurya...Chandragupta accepted jainism and moved to perform the extreme practice of starving upto death and died ..this was expected of Ashoka too if his voice of conscience resulted in change of heart but these are debatable topics ...open to views
Ashoka neither before nor after Kalinga favoured non violence ( as per hard working historians not my view )
Like Samrat Ashoka Maurya the great,King Raja Raja cholan I the great was also highly supports the Buddhism even though he was a shaivaite Hindus and he gave a land in Aanaimangalam to the Buddhist monks🇮🇳🚩👑🐯🐅⚔️🕉️☸️❤️🔥!
Ashoka is not great
@amoghaudupa7450 Ashoka is Great and he will be forever. He is greater than shivaji. Ashoka is considered as Greatest kings of all time in the world
@@harsh6764King Raja Raja cholan i the great(Ponniyin Selvan):-The spiritual successor of Samrat Ashoka Maurya the great because he was also loves and helps both the Hindus and the Buddhists in his own Empire like him🇮🇳!
@@harsh6764 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The man who caused the death of more than 2 lakh people in the Kalinga war despite being a practising Buddhist just bcoz he wanted to conquer it... The man who wiped out the Ajivika sect by killing 18000 Ajivikas and Jains just bcoz they showed the Buddha in a negative light... The man who ordered every single Jain monk to be executed just bcoz they showed the Buddha bowing down before a Jain Tirthankara... The man who killed 6 of his brothers to claim the throne... Morally, do you think such a man is great?? He was a great conqueror for he expanded the Mauryan Empire , but he was never, is never and will never ever be a great man for his violent ways...
On the other hand, Chhatrapathi Shivaji Maharaj fought to protect Bharat and Hindu dharma by laying out the platform for Hindavi Swarajya... He respected women and severely punished the people who violated the honour of women... He also facilitated the reconversion of people to Hinduism from Islam... He protected Hindu temples as well... Chhatrapathi Shivaji Maharaj was the leader of the people... Ashoka was not... I am not a Marathi... I am a Kannadiga... I don't give a damn about linguistic differences... My nation and dharma comes first to me and I will celebrate every single warrior who fought to protect our nation and civilization... Whether it's Chhatrapathi Shivaji Maharaj, Maharana Pratap, Chhatrapathi Sambhaji Maharaj, Raja Suheldev, Immadi Pulakeshin, Raja Raja Chola, Sri Krishna Deva Raya, etc...
Chhatrapathi Shivaji Maharaj was the leader of the people... Ashoka was a violent and ruthless man... It's a shame that you don't want to accept Chhatrapathi Shivaji Maharaj who protected your ancestors, but will happily accept Ashoka who wiped out an entire philosophy (Ajivikas)
@@kishorek2272All Tamil king's are always supports nd Respect other Religious ~
There isn't a historical record or inscription that explicitly portrays Ashoka as an evil king. Ashoka is generally regarded as a ruler who underwent a transformation towards a more compassionate and tolerant governance after the Kalinga War. Different historical accounts and interpretations may vary, but the majority view Ashoka as a significant figure in promoting peace and Buddhism.
Which historians book have you read as source... And what percentage of Authenticity...??
Source: believe me bro 🤡🤡
Source:my followers are pure andhbhakt beleive anything that glorified hindu not any other
Cry 😂😂😂@@sarthakverma5670
maharaja pushymitra shunga ne fir ye poori bharat mai faila hua bhudism jo violence se failaya tha nasht kiya ukhad feka bharat se or vapas sanatan dharm ki sthapana kari
contemprary history chutiye, hamare aur bhot mahan raja the bharat ke , vo mahan hai sanatan dharm ke rakshak unhe padho asli contempray history padho, or vo ghatiya insan romila thappar ke bare mai padho , pata chal jayega sab sach
Can't digest a fact come to Odisha i will show you who is Ashoka we call him a chandashok a mad person who is a murder 😂
Ramaayan is also a legendary poem written by valmiki😂😂😂😂
Then how raam n ,hanumaan is came into existence 😂😂😂😂😂
Ganesh with the head of elephant,hanumaan flying without wings😂😂😂😂
Please elaborate this subjects into next videos
😂
Good one 👍
🗿🫡
Shut Your Bloody Mouth Don't you dare to say something against Sanatan Dharam . What Do You Know about Sanatan Dharam After All.
If you have problem with what she said oppose that Sanatan Dharam has no connection with whatever she said
Grandson of ASHOKA,
𝗦𝗮𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶 𝗥𝗮𝗷𝗮 was a 𝗝𝗔𝗜𝗡 shravak, He had built more than 2500 𝗝𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗬𝗔'𝗦. 🙏
TRUE ONE OF HIS SON WAS ALSO A SHAVITE PEOPLE DON'T REALISE THAT THERE WAS NO CONCEPT OF RELIGION LIKE TODAY ALL FOLLOWED DHARMA OR MIXTURE IF INDIC FAITHS AND FUN FACT MOST OF THE CALLED SOURCES WHICH WRITE BAD ABOUT ASHOKA WERE WRITTEN IN 5TH OR 6TH CENTURY CE 600 YEARS AFTER ASHOKA YOU ONLY TELL HOW AUTHENTIC THEY ARE ANOTHER FUN FACT THERE IS NO WHERE WRITTEN ASHOKA LEFT HINDUISM EVEN AFTER BECOMING BUDDHIST HE WAS A SHAVITE AND USED TO FEED 100 BRAHMINS
This is a new form of toppling the history. This madam is always doing this in all the historical events on the behest of vested interest. One should analyse what is true and what is correct by exploring the historical events
she is showing the history that you want to hear*@Kamble345
For those who are saying she did not mention the references:-
She already gave the reference in the pinned comment in the short version of this
I thought I would not br studying history after 10th but here I am watching your videos because they are so interesting. Thank you for this knowledge, Keerthi ma'am 🙏 Please keep making such informative videos and letting us know the truth.
Bro this a propoganda channel dont take her seriously . Asokavadana is not a historical document its a religious text written 400yrs after asoka death. And its full of magical miracle moral stories like asoka walking on water, flying in sky, healing diseased monks just by toching.
That violence part is also a fabricated moral story to warn people that who accepted buddism when they deviate towards violence karma hits them and suffers more(like ashoka brother death)
Well, I have not said anything, just thanked Keerthi ma'am for this knowledge @@jinkigang
But yes what you say does make sense @@jinkigang
But then why did he kill the innocent people?@@jinkigang
What excuse would you give for him killing his own brother?@@jinkigang
Not a history student but like to understand history good work
You don’t need to be a History student to understand to history of our own motherland ❤️
@@Keerthihistory nailed it ❤️
@@KeerthihistoryAshoka did what Indian's King never did, in this land not a single king killed any civilian they always respted everyone and we have 100s evidence to say our kings never tried to king there brothers to take over all the power
There will be 2 earthquakes in Alaska ( 7.6 and 7.3) After that children will go missing. It will be Jesus who is coming with promised redemption! Our God has revealed all those details to his prophets right now and He is coming in promised redemption. But governments will say it was UFO. Now you have been told in advance, so do not be deceived.
Only God knows the future. Jesus loves you, accept him as your Saviour and be safe! We are in the last pages of the Bible now. What saves us is the faith that Jesus He bled and died on the cross, and he was resurrected three days later. His blood cleansed us from our sins so that we can stand in front of God blamelessly. Believe in what he has done for us with the full heart, confess your sins to him and pray, build a relation with him. Ask him to come into your heart. It is God's grace that saves you. It's nothing that you can do but what he has done for us. No works required. Call upon him as Your Lord and Saviour!(see also Bible, 1 Corinthians 15:1:6)
@@Keerthihistorybecause of asoka we knew the history of Gupta empire, Maurya empire,nanda empire and all those empire till 7AD so pls don't compare asoka with anyone and give him respect as a god
Can please include the historical evidence that crown Prince Sushima was out of patliputra when bindusara died.
Because I remember reading that Sushima was unable to counter the rebels and was called back and Ashoka was send in his stead. Plus Ashoka already had support of lots of ministers. Because his horoscope said he would be a chakravarti samrath.
Truth is Science journey 🙏🙏🙏👍👍
that liar journey was alredy eposed way back😂😂😂 jab usko buddhist text dikhaye to manne se hi mana krr dia 🤣🤣 debate se bhag gya vo bhemta
@arjun111.absolutely right bro.🤝 She knows nothing.
I am not aware of all the edicts, but knowledge which I got till now is that although Ashoka had kept his sword but he was ready to take it whenever a threat approached. How can we expect a ruler to follow the path of non violence to complete extent ? Either he would have given up his kingdom like Buddha, only then we could imagine that all the violence which he did after convertiong to Buddhism was not ethical ? How can we forget a ruler has two religions, one which he follows personally and other which he has towards his subjects? It's relevant even now. Even if he would have completely discarded the violence, he would have been responsible for the fall of the empire, like Firoz Tughlaq? He is surrounded by both the sides. You will all never spare him.
Before blindly following anyone, just have fact check and form your own opinion. History is not that much easy and straight forward as you all are taking it.
You are right she is a one sided pleader who wants to show Ashoka was brutal,she has to consider he was emperor
What danger did mauryan empire had from kalinga? ashoka massacred the common people of kalinga. That's not a warrior's religion. That was a tyrant's cruelty. This has nothing to do with buddhism, whether he adopted it before or after. The truth is common people were massacred by the tyrant ashoka.
@@krato6468 that's what I am saying he has nothing to do with Buddhism in administration. Buddhism was his personal religious affiliation
Thank you for sharing the truth. I am from Odisha and as an Odia I feel ashamed of my own people who believe in the lie. The Kalinga war has many untold stories we will never know. We all know winner writes the history. Here we heard from our ancestors that Ashoka only stopped the warWhen normal people joined the war with whatever weapon they had. When all men were either dead or captured. River Daya was red with blood. When the whole Royal Family was massacred but the people refused to lose and choose to die with respect because Ashoka was not a human he was a demon. When they saw old men and young boys fighting, they stopped.
@@jinkigang Wdym ??
I don't see any sense in this reply for his comment 🗿
@@Utkala.editzz this video got no sense. .... spending lies and biased facts and peoples r actually believing her. .....
@@kanishkkumar5431 Even if you ignore the video, it is true that normal citizens of kalinga were fighting against ashoka at the end. They didn't even have weapons. That shows the cruelty of ashoka. Fighting against an army is one thing but massacring normal citizens is very very inhumane and cruel thing to do. Who did he want to rule over after killing the citizens? Truth is the level of cruelty that has happened inside india (whether by british or by kings such as ashoka) is on par with hitler's concentration camps. I'm not arguing whether ashoka was already a buddhist or he adopted buddhism later, i dont care about it. None of it changes the cruelty he did. Whole rivers were red with blood during that battle.
@@jinkigang not sure who you are calling terrorists. ashoka was the terrorist in his story, not the common people of kalinga. He murdered the common people whom he wanted to rule in the end.
@@krato6468 at that time ..peoples of every indian state. .fighted against themselves. ...
What's so new about it ... even bengali and biharis fighted against maratha cruelty
The way you elaborate the history is like watching an interesting movie❤
Please attach the source of information in the description ❤
Ashoka is and will always be greatest of all.
yeah keep idolizing a tyrant who killed the common people whom he wanted to rule. Battle for thrones are fought between armies, not by massacring the common people. What ashoka did in kalinga is tyranny and cruelty. The only other who did such things were muslim invaders, britishers and hitler. that's what ashoka was during that war.
Can you please provide ,from where you read this ?
Wikipedia and WhatsApp 😂
"Trust me bro"
@Kamble345 I don't understand what you mean by born sinner ... I don't owe my apology to anyone ...are you high ?
WhatsApp University
@Kamble345Rice-bowls don't apologize.
Ashoka was really a violent man
It's really disturbing to hear that he has done such atrocities
Yeah and the most kindest king in India(Bharath)is none other than King Raja Raja cholan i the great🇮🇳🚩👑🐯🐅❤️🔥!
@@SreeRamakrishnaNagulakondaBut king Sri Krishna Devararaya of vijayanagara Empire killed our Prince Veerasekhara cholan(one of the chola descendanst)very mercilessly in 1529🇮🇳!
Enlightened Moggaliputta Thero converted King Asoka, and helped to be a better person after the Kalinga War. King Asoka's son and daughter visited Sri Lanka, and they coud confirm what happened. Later developed texts could try to change the history to insult King Asoka. A lot of texts have changed in India to change the history to protect caste system, etc.
@@smlanka4uking Devanampiya Tissa of Anuradhapura:-The 1st srilankan king who was converted to Theravada Buddhism by prince Mahinda Maurya and Princess sanghamitra(children of Samrat Ashoka Maurya the great)was mentioned in the book named,"The Mahavamsa"🇮🇳🇱🇰🦁☸️👑⚔️❤️🔥!
@@kishorek2272, Asoka ended the wars which Chandragupta Maurya and Brahamana Chanakya started from Magadha. Maha Padmananda (Porus) and the other 8 regional kings in Magadha lost the power because they were trying to stop Alexander the great. Hindus came from Thakshila (Pakistan), and they took the Magadha Kingdom from the people who spoke Prakrit Languages. And then, they have developed new text to make their own history in India. Some stories are older than the evolution of Humans. They have tried to make a founder of Jainism. And they have copied the story of Rama-Panditha in Jataka tale to make a new story to make the Budhha and Avatar of Vishnu. Also, their new stories have tried to adopt the Buddha's teachings. They have destroyed the history of India. But Sri Lankan texts have details about the early Kings in India. Uggasena was the first Nanda king, and he took the power from Kalashoka according to the texts. He was the newphew of Maha Padma Nanda because he married his daughter Dhurdhara. Likely, Chandragupta married Dhurdhara later. Brahamins have tried to Brahamanize a lot of cultures and knowledge systems while trying to change the mindset of normal people.
Amidst The Tense Of thousands of names of kings that crowds the columns of world history.
the name of "Ashoka The Great "
shines & shines almost alone like a star ✨
Only one inscription where tell about Ashoka Wel..! if you anyone have doubt regarding Ashoka.. considered the divanapiaya inscription everything has been tel abt Ashoka.. most of scholars said after the Kalinga war.... Ashoka didn't conquer any kind war because he move to buddist that the reason but who knows... After the kaligha war also ahokaa wil conquer the World.. different types of historien tel different types of thoughts
Note it.😂 Freiends
History is not wht happened history is wht we write that is the history...😢 4:38
You can know the history of Emperor Ashoka only from his inscriptions. If you know from Buddhist books then you will be very confused because in Buddhist books he was described as cruel because they want to show that he was cruel and later became Buddhist.
In the inscription of Emperor Ashoka, there is mention of his living brothers. You can read in inscription number five which is the inscription of Kalsi.
Thanks for this post, I came to about this at least 10 years back. Even after the kalinga (Malinga) war, based on one of his inscriptions, he has mentioned that he won’t hesitate to rise his sword again. This Ashoka is a waste fellow.
Hello Keerthi Mam, History is one of the subjects I hate the most during schools because they make us to remember things by heart, but your way of teaching and explaining makes History interesting to me....Kudoos to you and keep working!
Bro this a propoganda channel dont take her seriously . Asokavadana is not a historical document its a religious text written 400yrs after asoka death. And its full of magical miracle moral stories like asoka walking on water, flying in sky, healing diseased monks just by toching.
That violence part is also a fabricated moral story to warn people that who accepted buddism when they deviate towards violence karma hits them and suffers more(like ashoka brother death)
Nowadays I am starting to doubt our own education system.
Keerthi Mam please continue this spread of the untold stories and truth..
*Thats why we called ashoka is called chakravartin ashoka samrat while all other kings in india are called raja*
Thank you Keertiji for straightening the facts
Fake facts 👎
You all assols
Go to hell andhbhakt
You will jump into well if keerthi says😂
@Keerthihistory remember ashoka is not monk. He is just average human who just understand basic at the end of his life. Previous buddhism ruin by mahadeva than he wave war on. After win he see the thing of indian didn't see. Fake buddhism is different from real buddhism. He devote himself to understand real buddhism and later wanna pure it to all real buddhism. Most of indian who hold other religious covert to real buddhism but keep their own agenda and mislead people. It lead to anger of the king and order to massacre any fake buddhism. Later he understand his anger might lose his buns to wish to become bodhisatva in order to become buddha. So he stop kill and using prison or deportation.
😂🎉 while you didn't know the difference between average buddhist and understand basic buddhist than you spread misinformation😂🎉. At the end ashoka is beginner of real buddhism because he wish to be bodhisatva. Average human has anger , hate is normal thing.
Those fake buddhism is not innocent, spreading misinformation , gather coup etc😂
Indian but need foreigners to tell. Unbelievable😂🎉
WhatsApp University..
Sold people's trying to manipulate history 😂
She is graduated from WhatsApp University😂
Please have a look to Ashoka's own inscriptions and other sources like Maha Bodhivamsa
Hey she gave ample reference. I also have read scholarly articles. It's established history that Ashoka was rogue. He killed many after being Buddhist. His intent was to use the ideology not follow it.
Obvisiouly Bhimte not liking it 😂😂
@@arjun111she is referring to stone inscriptions of Chand Ashok (that is chandal Ashok).........
Stone inscriptions are not from WhatsApp University.....
This stone inscriptions are lying here and there in India for more than 2000 years under the soil.....
I think you have graduated from leftist University and Bheemte University......😡😠
Ashoka knew what is kshethriya dharma and strategic king who ahead of his times
He is Indeed Great ruler of Bharat but only our conspiracy historians who hate Bharatiya culture spread such controvery theories .Thanks for you spreading Truth with your big voice
Every Bharathiya culture tradition given different methods for happy life
True, it is always necessary to do some politics to maintain peace and stability
Otherwise....... civil wars and foreign invasions can happen easily.
@@HolNol-w7b True,that's why he became our great king ..All fault done by historians who distrot history for their propaganda
Trust me Keerthi ma'am I started beleiving ur history more than our academic books and more than our history lecturers 🎉🎉🎉
Damn! That’s scares me honestly. I really have to very careful with my informations🥺❤️🙏🏼
Damn! That’s scares me honestly. I really have to be very careful with my informations🥺❤️🙏🏼
🥺❤️🙏🏼
@@KeerthihistoryWow you are so knowledgeable , wow you expose hard working historians who spend their entire lives studying and yet dont know what happened soo many years ago , yet you with your infinite knowledge know everything
@@KeerthihistoryWow you are so knowledgeable , wow you expose hard working historians who spend their entire lives studying and yet dont know what happened soo many years ago , yet you with your infinite knowledge know everything
I am from Kalinga modern day Odisha. Please make a video on Kharabela the kaligna king who dig out Ashoka Buddhism philosophy and reestablished the Sanatan Dharam.
I am Proud as an Odia for My Ancestors who dedicated there life for Motherland. We know Ashoka was not Great Before and not today also
@@jinkigang bro watch the vid ashoka wasn't great at this point i don't think there is much difference btw him & Auranzeb .
hatsoff to kalinga for fighting this tyrant
@@rajesh1234530 if you think Ashoka was cruel after the Kalinga war
Salute for you 😂🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
She is just telling lies
you know its possible that one of Ashoka's soldier or courtiers or subject was your actual ancestor. don't get so easily persuaded
@@chanakyaprime yup ur user name tells it all 🤭
@@chanakyaprime this is rss funded media
Thanks keerthy mam for this information...love your explanation
🫶
Source: bro trust me
Yes she is WhatsApp University topper 🤣😂
Source neutral research and analysis from primary sources of history.....
U just go to Pakistan and resemble it ...
Go to shreelankaa ❤ ...
Kya bhai😂😂😂😂😂
@@subhashgupta1006 when someone speaks they need credibility.. Is she a historian? What qualification does she have. What research has she used? Why does her position contradict what historians have said. Did she found new data?
@@subhashgupta1006 so no new data but all of a sudden a youtuber who has no credibility brings up new version on history
@@ayanrushd4800 what kind of history do you want ? Or in which status ?
Let me clear u bro , the primary sources of history writing were written by European ( imperialist historians ) and it was Euro centric approach ,, then r.s. sharma, rumila Thapar etc have used secondary sources of history writing, and they have only explained their interpretations at all times but never visited those places or tried to put their efforts to find real history 😕 ...
Today technology and social media awareness and internet connectivity helped them to try to tell the truth
Bro history has a lots of interpretation but need to be a curious and logistic to find out the truth 🤔
You have given such a detailed narration on king Ashoka as if you were present during that period.
The problem with Santani historians is that they are more of "Kathawachak" than historians. No inscription read here as a reference which is an integral part of credibility.
1.Ashoka was a lay budhist before Kalinga war. His father was an Aajeevak and Mauryans were also Buddhist Not Sanatani.
2. Alexander Cunningham was the historian who discovered history of Ashoka. No Indian was aware of such a great emperor.
3. The fact she's trying to say are based on a scripture Ashokawadana not an inscription.
If you read Ashokan inscription his teaching ideas prove him to be greatest emperor of all time. But for very obvious reasons since he was a Buddhist so these "Sanatanis" never like him and try to demean him in every possible way.
4. Ashoka was fond of his brothers he made an artificial Hill called "Bhikuna" Pahar for him brother the remains are still there.
5. He sent his daughter and Son for propagation of Dhamma in Srilanka without any violence he spread Dhamma every where such a great king he was.
6. His rock inscriptions, Stupa are rich cultural heritage of India.
7. Just imagine the Sanatanis who were not aware of the existence of great king are now writing fictional stories to prove that he was cruel king???
8 These Brahmins even called Ashokan pillar as " "Bheem ki Gada" how talented they are.???
The only talent they hv is to prove others evil and hijack the heritage of Buddha.
Mauryan empire were not buddist at all. Chandragupt was hindu who is after passing his throne to son adopted Jainism not buddism.
His son was hindu
Ashoka started as hindu and become buddist.
Ashokas descendents were also
Hindu go search 1st shunga emperor he rages war against buddism 149bce and Tibetian account clearly mentioned him. If you do not trust your country account.
😂😂 mourya empire established by chanakya , not Ashok 😂😂 . Ambedkar Navayan organisation product probelm. Yes Ashok inscription and historical literature indicate he was Buddhist before Kalinga war
Buddha darshan is darshan which takes many things from Sanatan Dharma. Four tatva, dev, devi, dhyan. Buddha learned Dhyan from his brahmin guru and in Buddha darshan most followers were brahmin . This is truth
@@Upanishad11 source "Trust me bro"😅 commonest reference by Sanatuni Kathawachaks
@@AK-ct8bb urban Naxali communist propegenda 😂😂
Moral of the vedio : every person who had a Great prefix was a merciless maniac ...... prime examples Alexander,Akbar and Ashoka . Western historians think More land under control means more greatness 😂.
And can't bear Purushottam das slayed their Boy...😅
Actually, his step brother announced as crown prince he fought his brother for the high king's position because of some ministers who seen Ashoka as a more capable king and wanted him to rule this under their influence he fought with susima and won the empire and took whole empire under his control even the people of Empire wanted him to be the king..
He was exhausted with killing and became Buddhist just to relax..
It was an honest and logical explanation by Keerthi. However, there are at least two things she was wrong in her research. First, a Buddhist merchant and second; that Ashoka was himself a Buddhist when kalinga war happened. The rest of the information that she has provided are true and I appreciate her. Well done Keerthi 😊🙏
The Buddhist merchant daughter name was Devi she is from vidisha she is his first wife and Ashoka has made Sanchi stupa and barmukt stupa for her
@@janhvisinghchauhan9224 Very true Janhvi. That was my point. Anybody can be a Buddhist because it doesn't have religion and caste system. He was a merchant by caste and later on he became Buddhist while Keerthi didn't realise that unfortunately. However, I follow Keerthi History and I always do that 😊
Mam you also provide information that Samrat Ashoka alone did he really built 84000 Buddhist monasteries? According to Leftists those 84000 Buddhist temples destroyed by Brahminical forces During ancient Times whether it is true or fake? If Ashoka alone really built 84000 buddhist viharas now only few of them survived but later what happened to those Buddhist temples? Now where are they? Dr Ambedkar in his books said all ancient Buddhist structures destroyed by islamic Invasions but his so called followers deliberately argue paralogically those Buddhist structures vandalised by brahminical forces itself
Plz you do video regarding this topic Keerthi mam 🙏
The Brahmins led by Pushyamitra Shunga decimated Buddhism but the OBCs are fools to politically support the rightists who surprisingly deny their rights blatantly. It's travesty of truth and distortion of history by the Neo-Nazi party as a part of their conspiracy of false propaganda and subsequent monarchy.
Could you provide your fact checking links? I mean I am sure you did not go and read those inscriptions on those stones. Where is this data coming from?
Excellent ,Keerthi ma'am
I don't know how historically true all that she said is, and if this is inscribed on monuments, how could it remain unknown - hidden in plain sight? However, I personally never considered King Ashoka great. Even a 5-year-old child may know that aggression and violence are WRONG....and it took him killing millions to realize that? 🤔🤔
Though I have completed my class 12 with science but I was always interested about history since childhood.....love how u have correctly explained the wrong stuffs which are still being taught....keep up this amazing work ma'am ❤
keerthi conviction towards BJP & Sangha's so adorable 😊
@@jinkigang No indian king had killed common people except ashoka. Ashoka was a terrorist and tyrant. Kalinga war wasn't a war between two armies. He massacred the common people of the region literally making their rivers red in blood. The only other ones who did similar were muslim invaders and british and hitler. If you want to idolize hitler or ashoka is your wish. By the way, no one is saying anything against buddhism, it is a peaceful religion and everyone respects buddhism. But ashoka was like hitler.
Ashoka is considered great because of the expansion in the form of politics and religion he has achieved. The transformation in his later life where he contributed greatly in sending peace messages and expanding Buddhism is remarkable. In he early life it is very much well know that he was also a chand ashoka.
You probably did not understand her video otherwise this irrelevant comment of urs wouldn't be sent as reply... U should patiently watch the video... Complete video
@@tbeingsocial he is telling truth
And yes he was Buddhist even before the War , but he was not weak and whimpy.
@@tbeingsocialmaybe you should also consider what is he trying to say
There will be 2 earthquakes in Alaska ( 7.6 and 7.3) After that children will go missing. It will be Jesus who is coming with promised redemption! Our God has revealed all those details to his prophets right now and He is coming in promised redemption. But governments will say it was UFO. Now you have been told in advance, so do not be deceived.
Only God knows the future. Jesus loves you, accept him as your Saviour and be safe! We are in the last pages of the Bible now. What saves us is the faith that Jesus He bled and died on the cross, and he was resurrected three days later. His blood cleansed us from our sins so that we can stand in front of God blamelessly. Believe in what he has done for us with the full heart, confess your sins to him and pray, build a relation with him. Ask him to come into your heart. It is God's grace that saves you. It's nothing that you can do but what he has done for us. No works required. Call upon him as Your Lord and Saviour!(see also Bible, 1 Corinthians 15:1:6)
I salute you Keerthi for your study and bringing the truth to new generation. 100 slaps on the authors of NCERT books who distorted history and write Akbar the great or Ashoka the great
@Keerthihistory
Thank you so much for highlighting the importance of a nuanced perspective in history education, which was never told in today's history books. It is evident that contemporary history books may sometimes present a biased or incomplete narrative. In the case of Rani Lakshmi Bai, acknowledging the role of Jhalkari Bai is indeed crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the events. Additionally, the Battle of Bhima Koregaon, where 500 Mahars triumphed over a significant Peshwa force, is a significant historical event that deserves recognition.
The need for a more balanced and inclusive approach to historical documentation is essential to provide a holistic view of the past. Revisiting and rewriting history books with accurate and unbiased information would contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of historical events.
Ashoka is great indeed
kim jhond u bad boy 🤣🤣
Vedic Hinduism during Ashoka's time. 😂
She is graduated from WhatsApp University😂
@@arjun111 and you from chatni university 😂😂😂
@@dragongamingyt6599😂😂😂
Great content..! Appreciate your efforts to put ur views strongly.
I would also like mention a small piece of advice to all listeners that we all are free to give opinion wch may wrong or right bcz no body knows the real fact but we must respect all the religion and take away good lessons from
Them wch taught by lord Ram, Krishna, Budha, Mahavir, Nanak, Kabir, Jesus, Prophet Mohammad . Then only we.can make this planet more beautiful to live else we will be keep fighting until we die..! Jai Hind..!
I love keerthi she explains the truth with actual facts i love you sooo much
Respect our king ashoka his symbol is out national symbol 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Wow wonderful explanation. But why this truth was hidden and why we taught the different ways of teaching. Most of the Indian history was written by the different ways of schools and made us read so. Wonderful and detailed information you have given. Thank you 🙏
It's hidden because it's like...
She is just some internet junk... Don't believe her blindly...
Imao she completely lias
The archaeological study proves that Asoka already a big heart king with his prãjà and with his family don't believe anyone with blind eye do u r own RESEARCH
She is just telling Lie
Ashoka converted after Kalinga war
Her whole video is full of lies
Who destroyed Buddhism from root level from India. It looks like you are a supporter of those people..
History was written as per individual opinions and feelings and perceptions. It looks like you are following negative part of it. Interpretations were changing and want to show new ways to attract people to get fame in society to get awards.
You are talking about more than 2000 years back history which was completely contaminated. Refer to the recent history of Gandhiji, Nehruji, can you say who wrote correctly, people are writing as per their wish.
Don't waste your time by creating such negative videos. Even you can't judge or find correct things for recent things. Do you know your great grand Father and mother's names. Understand the reality. First understand yourself and your history. Then think about more than 2000 years old history.
You are absolutely right madam many historians taught us wrong history to our country people thanks for telling the truth 🙏🙏🙏
🚩🚩So here is the PHD student of WhatsApp University founded by BJP😂😂
What is stopping you from debunking her claims with solid facts? I doubt you have that by the way
😂😂😂
Does that mean you know better.
Those Bastards who helped the British to defeat Marathas even today consider themselves as Great?
Yes you are navabaudha
That why you are so insecure of the real History
Whoever does your the animation on your videos should do a whole movie or series on Indian history. I always feel our country has so many stories that never get depicted properly
She is graduated from WhatsApp University 😂
Tibetan texts say he was Buddhist even before the Kalinga war.
Hats off you for exposing everything ❤❤❤❤
MAM WHATEVER IT MAY BE
WHAT IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE THE GREATEST EMPEROR OF INDIA IS SAMRAT ASHOKA . CAN'T CHANGE.....
Such an amazing and eye opening video. Yes, I did hear about this unknown side of Ashoka's Buddhism but not very detailed like this. Can you also make a video on Ashoka's wives, please? About Vedisa Devi, Karuvaki, Padmavati and the evil Tishyaraksha?
Will try
@@Keerthihistory your whole video is Full of lies
You're anti nationalist like soch by mohan Mangal and dhruv Rathee
Tishyraksha was not evil. She, a beautiful Yong, was forced to married with old Ashoka
She was from Kalinga. She was burned alive by Ashoka
@@trueobc5727 well if you know what she did to one of Ashoka's sons, you will retract your statement of her innocence.
Its good you're bringing up the historical knowledge to all of us, and it would be great to mention your source of knowledge and the incriptions you're talking about !
if you believe this video to contain misinformation here are the timestamps and faults. I've researched extensively for 4 days and this is what I found -
1:56 - 1) Susima was never crown prince. It was never decided who was more worthy to be the king Susima or Ashoka, The mauryan court was divided into 2 one that favored Ashoka and one that favored Susima not only them the other brothers also wanted and fought for the throne.
2:13 2) There is no solid evidence suggesting that the Greeks helped Ashoka in the Assasination of Susima.
2:17 3) It hasn't been proved if Susima was assassinated or died in battle due to lack of evidence.
2:28 4) According to her it was a civil war, then how is it possible that Ashoka was the one that killed each of his brothers and not other soldier
2:50 5) Ashoka's Hell wasn't an actual place as no location has been described and no sites have been dug. Ashoka's hell was an imaginary place for the sinners, It was a concept to improve morality among citizens.
3:27 6) Ashoka's early regime describes the fight among the brothers for the throne and Ashoka's hunger for territory, which we have been taught correctly in our textbooks. It didn't include any sort of torture, just war.
3:20 7) Chandashoka as earlier I mentioned refers to the war hungry Ashoka, brutal in nature (which we have been taught in the textbooks).
7:00 8) Ashoka did release the prisoners of the Kalinga war.
5:13 9) Look at the text carefully it mentions I've been a Buddhist layman for 2 and half years "BUT FOR A YEAR I DID NOT MAKE MUCH PROGRESS" The Kalinga war ended at 261BCE which came first And 260BCE was the date the edict was written in which was a gap for 1 year, this is not particularly a mistake but it does tell us he was Buddhist before the Kalinga war but after it he had finally started acting non violent and became a true Buddhist.
6:23 10) Ashoka didn't kill all his brothers, he defeated most of them and others were killed during the war by common soldiers and not Ashoka particularly.
7:27 11) The hostility is not even present, the lines tell us that god tells ashoka to calm down and apologise so to prevent violence. There is no hostile tone present.
7:57 12) There are no accounts that suggest a war that Ashoka fought or initiated after the Kalinga war.
8:15 13) The Ashokavadna is not corroborative evidence as its a prashasti and much has been exaggerated. And no other historical evidence suggests that Ashoka ordered the killing of Ajvikas
8:35 14) There are no historical evidences that support this legend written in the Ashokavadna and thus is considered a false narrative by historians.
mam I believe, this is just a mistake, Kindly reassure your data and sources.
These mistakes that I pointed out have been gathered from Wikipedia, Quora, Chat GPT etc. I have tried my best to separate the biased and exaggerated data.
Don't believe in the history of these youtube historians.
@@monk9948 if you believe this video to contain misinformation here are the timestamps and faults. I've researched extensively for 4 days and this is what I found -
1:56 - 1) Susima was never crown prince. It was never decided who was more worthy to be the king Susima or Ashoka, The mauryan court was divided into 2 one that favored Ashoka and one that favored Susima not only them the other brothers also wanted and fought for the throne.
2:13 2) There is no solid evidence suggesting that the Greeks helped Ashoka in the Assasination of Susima.
2:17 3) It hasn't been proved if Susima was assassinated or died in battle due to lack of evidence.
2:28 4) According to her it was a civil war, then how is it possible that Ashoka was the one that killed each of his brothers and not other soldier
2:50 5) Ashoka's Hell wasn't an actual place as no location has been described and no sites have been dug. Ashoka's hell was an imaginary place for the sinners, It was a concept to improve morality among citizens.
3:27 6) Ashoka's early regime describes the fight among the brothers for the throne and Ashoka's hunger for territory, which we have been taught correctly in our textbooks. It didn't include any sort of torture, just war.
3:20 7) Chandashoka as earlier I mentioned refers to the war hungry Ashoka, brutal in nature (which we have been taught in the textbooks).
7:00 8) Ashoka did release the prisoners of the Kalinga war.
5:13 9) Look at the text carefully it mentions I've been a Buddhist layman for 2 and half years "BUT FOR A YEAR I DID NOT MAKE MUCH PROGRESS" The Kalinga war ended at 261BCE which came first And 260BCE was the date the edict was written in which was a gap for 1 year, this is not particularly a mistake but it does tell us he was Buddhist before the Kalinga war but after it he had finally started acting non violent and became a true Buddhist.
6:23 10) Ashoka didn't kill all his brothers, he defeated most of them and others were killed during the war by common soldiers and not Ashoka particularly.
7:27 11) The hostility is not even present, the lines tell us that god tells ashoka to calm down and apologise so to prevent violence. There is no hostile tone present.
7:57 12) There are no accounts that suggest a war that Ashoka fought or initiated after the Kalinga war.
8:15 13) The Ashokavadna is not corroborative evidence as its a prashasti and much has been exaggerated. And no other historical evidence suggests that Ashoka ordered the killing of Ajvikas
8:35 14) There are no historical evidences that support this legend written in the Ashokavadna and thus is considered a false narrative by historians.
mam I believe, this is just a mistake, Kindly reassure your data and sources.
These mistakes that I pointed out have been gathered from Wikipedia, Quora, Chat GPT etc. I have tried my best to separate the biased and exaggerated data.
@@RedRebel008 I don't believe in her at all. There were lot of misinformation I agree.
@@monk9948 then start by reporting her. Channels that are spreading fake news are being deleted but we need a plausible cause and I just gave you more than 10, I already reported her, now it's your turn.
Great ❤. Bahut sunder aur gyanvardhak.❤.
This is wrong information 👎
👍
Very manipulative video
When video is about Mughals it's true but when it's Ashoka it's propaganda lol
Wow, what a fake University 😂😂😂.... U taking reference from ashokavdana (which is written some 1500 years later after Ashoka death)😂😂😂...
Ashoka built four caves for ajivikas in barabar .... Shame on you...
I am from Karnataka recently watched a videos of Dharamendra Kumar’s sir. Channel “ Mysorina Kathegallu” he explains well. He goes the places and explains and shows the evidence
Bloody shit she is lying by showing piece of paper that is no where found.
There are four ancient places found related to Buddhism
1. Sanathi. Yadir
2. Maski Raichur
3. Rajaghatta Doddaballapur
4. Kanagina Halli.
There are few more .
She is spreading lies.
Kalinga was part of the Maurya Empire, Chandragupta Maurya and Bindusara. But Kalinga revolted against Ashoka
The teachings will slowly change to reflect the real truth with more people like you shining light on the reality. ❤
the fear is completely visible
Perhaps historical narratives could have been framed to emphasize promoting the ideals of peace, nonviolence, and ahimsa to children. Instead of imparting stories filled with bloodshed, torture, killings and to focus on narratives that highlight the values of harmony and compassion might have been a more constructive approach.
Though I am not a historian, but from the childhood I had a feeling that, the disarmament on being a buddhist follower and making friendship to all other kings were the first blunder after Chandragupta and Chanakya made United Bharat. Ashoka's policy actually made the unifying power of the mighty Mourya Dynasty... Which may be considered to be a turning point of Bharat's Destiny
Didi please make a full detailed video on the great hindu heritage of kashmir ❤❤❤
Noted
@@Keerthihistory thank you so much Didi 💓
Please could you show me is there any historical or archiological proof for Hinduism existing before 10th century AD
Yes why not ancient Hindu temples having shivlinga spread all over the world
@@damnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn chomu, shiv linga is not old, ab gadhe kisi bhi cheej ko shivling Maan to koi kuch ni skt hai.
There is no evidence as Hinduism is not old, it came into existence through Buddhism but mixer many religions like Jainism, parsi, sramana+ ajivika.
Sankracharya was a Buddhist that's why he founded 4 maths not temple, but during his tenure a new tradition came into existence which is nath tradition and later on converted into shaivism. All big Hindu temples were once jains temple, and Jain temple has unique architect.
What Hinduism says, avatars says meri pooja Karo moksh pao.
To understand the truth you should read and save one old edition of Valmiki ramayana as in recent years vulgar things and deleting,meaning of words like non-veg and alcohol have been changed.
Parfect
@@rockdstone4863 Actually, to correct you, hinduism is actually way older than buddhism and jainism and many others.... like all the abrahmic religions are derived from zoroastrianism, which also existed before christianity and islam... many common tales are there between both of these old religions, and between norse and greek civilizations as well... alongside , Sanskrit is actually the mother of all the Indian languages.... you can actually google the facts I mentioned as I believe you have access to internet... anyway, at the end of the day, Ashoka is a respectable figure and we must respect him for the contributions he made for our country.... his reign and policies were great.... let's agree on facts and disagree on opinions! good luck!
Thank you akka,
I want to know about Chanakya and chanakya niti.....???Ram Ram.
Sources-Kali mata was there to see all stuff😂
Average neela gubbara thing 😃😄
@@InsaneInternet you may provide sources if any, you brust narangi condom😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@InsaneInternetsaffron terrorist 🤡