Channel patron, Snow Rang3r, has pointed out that my database of pricing is out-of-date. The TT2 is now $5,995 instead of $5,500 as quoted in this video. The Yggy OG is also $2,595 rather than the $2,199 I had in the database which is the Less Is More version price. Apologies for two errors in a single video!! The good news is that my conclusions remain consistent despite these updated prices. The Yggy is still better value financially and sonically than the Spring and the TT2's amplifier is still way ahead of what's possible with the May KTE and a $500 amplifier.
There's definitely some truth to that and it depends on what people expect and value from headphones/speakers. I find that I consistently like the same DACs on my speaker setup that I like with my headphones
Fair review I thought . I’ve got the kte May atm, and I slightly prefer it over the tt2 but it is close as to preference, as you rightly said. I do think the spring dac in a hifi makes lots of sense and disagree on your point on that dac, but I know you don’t deal with speakers, since in the U.K. at least one version of it - spring 3 level 2 sounds better than the Denafrips Pontus 2 for similar money imo.
There's definitely nothing wrong with the Spring. I just think the Yggy OG offers better value for money performance because they're on par or perhaps the Yggy is a bit better (this will be somewhat preferential) and it's cheaper
@@PassionforSound thanks Lachlan, I never got to try that one. One things for sure never discount Chinese at this quality, as some American and British people do.
Absolutely! Making judgements about products based on their origin is a mistake IMO. China have invested a huge amount in their manufacturing capabilities and often have better capabilities than other countries. Likewise, countries like the USA and UK have their fair share of crappy products too
Thanks for the informative review! Considering either Denfarips or Holo DAC now from Musician Draco. Just curious if the review was done with speakers or headphones as I saw one comment here saying this review was done via headphones?
This review was with headphones, but having tested with both, I've found that headphones and speakers reveal the same things about the products in the source chain and headphones actually provide greater insight about things like resolution and detail retrieval because they're not working to overcome the room acoustics.
It depends more on what you're driving with it and what sound you're after. Pairing DACs and amps is less about the synergy between the two and more about the resultant sound you want from your system.
Nice review. Appreciate the no bull approach and that you clearly define differences that you observe between products. Having options that suit ones' taste and preference is a good thing and it's nice to kinow that even at this level, there are choices avaibable to suit a variety of tastes and budgets.
That's really well stated. There's rarely a right or wrong / good or bad in this hobby. It's all preferential and also depends on the other pieces in the system.
Interesting review! I think at this level it really come down to personal preference... I'm owning TT2 and Spring 3 KTE at the moment, and I feel I enjoy Spring more than TT2, for that smoother sound :) I'm using Spring with Soloist 3xp / Feliks Euforia as headphone amp
@@PassionforSound I think I just feel TT2 a little bit dry, especially with the build in amp, I'm using ZMF Verite Closed or Arya Stealth version, which headphones you used in your review?
@@PassionforSound I think my feeling is really subjective, because as you know Spring is really huge in size, I can't put them side by side on my desk to do a AB test, I just use them in different room for different occasions... I will find some time to do a comparison again with the tracks you used in your review
I definitely agree that the TT2 can sound a bit drier. I did my testing with a mixture of the Elites, Susvaras and Verite Open (and maybe others). I can definitely understand people preferring the smoother tonality of the Spring, but I like the extra energy and detail from the TT2. Some of it could depend on musical tastes too.
@@PassionforSound Agree, I find myself enjoy Spring more on some old Chinese pop vocals, which mostly were not quite good recorded, and Spring is more forgiving for those tracks, but if I'm listening to classic music, I prefer TT2 for more detail
And for 10 grand more one can hear the thoughts of a singer :))) Great review, thank you very very much! Yggy is back on my shopping list all of a sudden, hmmm...
I was curious about R2R Dacs after trying out different mid level Dacs in my system such as Chord 2qute, Simaudio moon 380 dsd and Hegel HD25, I decided to buy the spring 3 Kte WO ever listening to it. The first 2 weeks with it were disapointing, but it does change quite a bit over time. I had to reposition my speakers and my acoustical settings. After 1 month of use I would say that it's the best Dac that I ever had in my system, it's detail retrieval is better than all of my previous Dacs, but Without it being in your face. The only Dac that I tried briefly in my system that was better is Metronome "le Dac", but it costs double and I'm not sure which is more enjoyable to listen to. Over all a great buy, but not my last Dac.
I own both TT2 and M-Scaler and May L2. I have a different perception from you: I find the May to be more airy and spacious, more grainy, more "analogue" and the TT2 combo to be more punchy, detailed, but with a narrower soundstage and element separation. As you said though, at this level it's just a matter of personal preference...
Sometimes the terms we use to describe things can mean different things for different people (and there's no right or wrong). Glad you shared your impressions though because it might help others. For the record, I do think the May is an outstanding DAC!
This leads into the whole oversampling discussion. Obviously, he doesn't perfer NOS sound. Spring 3 has none, May is limited. I wonder why he didn't run either through the Mscaler in his review? Or perhaps why he didn't use hqplayer. This is why the holo products can go up to 1.5m taps as an input because quite frankly, oversampling should be done externally with a product desinged for it. The May only does it because of the AKM chips inside had that functionality, but it is marginal at best. Also realize, that the amps he is using aren't in the same category as these products so it's ability to highlight the diffrerences should be taken into account. I have questions about the Burson (love them) chain being. Perhaps trying it on other amps may show something else. He has AAS, forgot which one, looks like a Pendant(?) behind him. What is interesting is he is the first reviewer to really call out a huge difference between the Spring and the May. This is surprising, even to Kitsune which makes me think that there may be something else going on. Not to take anything away from the Yaggy. It is a good device, but like the Chord it has better oversampling built in than either of the Holo products and without taking that into consideration or adjusting for it, I understand his views, but depending on your setup your milage will varry. Personally, I would rather spend $250 for hqplayer than $5k for an mscaller, but that is just me.
Hi Roger, you're making a bunch of incorrect assumptions here. I tested the DACs using the Burson Soloist GT and Sparkos Labs Aries - both top tier headphone amps. The amp behind me is a Bottlehead Mainline, not an AAS amp - it's excellent, but not as good as the other two I mentioned. The reason I didn't test the Holo DACs with the M-Scaler is because it completely changes the cost of the system. As I showed on screen and discussed, due to the need to invest in an amp for the Holo DACs (not needed with the TT2), the cost of adding an M-Scaler takes it into a different category. It's also a non-ideal setup due to the limited output from the M-Scaler to non-Chord DACs. Finally, the same upsampling that will improve the Holo DACs will improve other DACs too like the TT2 for example. Suggesting that a DAC needs extreme upsampling to sound it's best basically means that people are forced to spend more than the list price to get the performance they're expecting. That's a drawback to me, particularly if the other options at the same price sound great with no added fuss or expense.
These were demo units that had been reviewed by at least one prior reviewer and likely listened to by Hugo from Indie HiFi as well. Which is to say that I don't know for certain, but there would have been plenty of time to get through the major changes of burn-in (if needed) because the majority of change happens early in the process.
@Robert M: I read from one commenter's post on another TH-cam audiophile review of the Holo Audio MAY that HIS experience with his MAY KTE DAC was such that it took him the better part of 900 (yes, NINE-HUNDRED) hours' worth of break-in-time before his MAY finally cleared the break-in goal posts and began sounding, to his ears, remarkably and sublimely MUSICAL, to the point where listening to music moved him to tears. His MAY had THAT much of an emotional impact on his listening experience. He very clearly stated that, when getting a MAY, we "have to GRIND OUR WAY through the lengthy break-in process" before we can truly begin to appreciate what the MAY can do. Here, copied/pasted, are his own words: Jeff Trimm9 months ago (edited) - in response to "THE KING IS CROWNED - HOLO AUDIO MAY DAC REVIEW" - on TH-cam by NEW RECORD DAY (Ron) "Fantastic review! I'm a new Holo May KTE owner, and I think you nailed it. One comment to current and prospective owners on burn-in: I bought a Holo May KTE and got it a few days before Christmas, 2020. It has been my personal experience that 500 hours is not sufficient for burn-in. At least in my experience, it took 900-1000 hours before the MAY's sound-stage, imaging and tone quality really opened up & started sounding truly beautiful and startlingly lifelike. Up until this point, I would get a day or two where it would seem to make a big improvement, only to regress in sound-stage, tonal and sound quality. There were a lot of ups and downs for me, and then starting around 900 hours or so, everything really started to gel in an incredible way. The transformation at this point has not been subtle. I can only say that whatever sound you hear and impressions you have of the Holo May KTE when listening to it when it has undergone fewer than 900-1000 hours of burn-in, is only a facsimile of what it will sound like after it has truly and finally broken in. You have to grind through the hours to get the payoff though. In my case, 39 days of 24x7 play. It seems insane to require that much break-in time, and YHMV (Your Hourage May Vary), but this has been my experience with my KTE edition with all of its upgraded caps and fuses inside it. When fully burned in, it is a truly magical and beautiful-sounding source with a realism that is startling, coupled with a lovely natural tone. Also, don’t skimp on the USB cable if USB is going to be your source. I’m running a Shunyata Sigma USB cable, and it is worth every penny. Also, per the review, the quality of the streamer, Ethernet cables, and even the network switch all have non-trivial impacts on the sound. I have a SotM switch/cabling running into an Auralic Aries G2. The resolution of the Holo May KTE is such as to make audible the positive impact of all of these up-stream upgrades. Anyway in summary, when getting this device brand-new from the factory, be sure you grind through the burn-in hours, potentially 1000 of them, to unlock the ultimate sound-capability of this beguiling DAC, at least in its KTE form. Don't pass judgment until after you have done the leg-work, and then be prepared to be gob-smacked. The transformation in those last 100 hours is magical." End of copied/pasted report.
The May is a top tier DAC so it will definitely scale along with better amps (and the Bliss might best the Soloist GT - I'm not sure). That said, other DACs like the TT2 will also scale with better amps so adding a different amp won't change things in any absolute ways. In short, May is definitely excellent and deserves to be considered alongside the other great DACs on the market, but I don't see it as definitively better than the equivalent competition regardless of the amp used.
I am expecting delivery of the holo cyan 2 tomorrow - it's NOS only and wayyyy less expensive. This will be my first r2r dac and to say I'm on tenterhooks in anticipation of finally getting my hands on it would be an understatement. I feel like I've got "detail retrieval" exhaustion from years of D/S dacs, so we shall see if having things a bit "smoothed over" is actually as good for me as I imagine it to be or not. My current dac is "hot" with 5v output, too, and it's annoying af in combination with my amp, even with its volume control. I also ordered a passive attenuator to see if this helps - it should but who knows?
@@PassionforSound thank you! So far I don't hate it :D It's only been a few hours but I've already had some "wow! are you kidding?!" good moments, some "huh???" odd moments, and some moments where I hear no difference to my old dac at all. The main quality that strikes me, though, is while it sounds overall brighter than my last dac, it's surprisingly easy to listen to. I would not call it smoothed over though - it just seems more refined and at ease - more "competent", like it doesn't need to push so hard? The dynamics and control with complex recordings is far and away the biggest improvement, so let's see if the few odd bits work themselves out with a few more hours of use (primarily nasal/buzzy/lost sounding vocals on a few older recordings - really weird effect)
My pleasure. The May is a brilliant DAC, but the Yggy OG is still my preference over the Spring and therefore at the price point it's one of my top recommendations
I only had the May for a short time so didn't compare directly, but I have a DDC with the Yggy now and it still doesn't match the TT2 so it also wouldn't match the May. I love the Yggy, but it's not on the level of that next tier of performance
Hi Lachlan, I'm Khiem, your audiophile friend from Head-fi and Facebook. I have not heard the Spring KTE or the May, but I am currently using the Spring Lv2. One thing I noticed that was not covered in your review is that my Spring sounds SIGNIFICANTLY better when using the I2S input compared with other inputs. I'm not saying the I2S will transform the Spring into total different beast. Just a thing that I found out after 2 years living with my Spring and have tried it with various inputs/systems. Nevertheless, superb and informative review as always! Your feedback is spot on!
Hi Khiem, thanks for commenting and letting me know it's you! That's great info for others using / trying the Spring. Thanks for sharing that experience!
O-type are a toroidal transformer, just a different shape than the regular toroidal. Kind of like a straight six vs V6 engine - both are still 6-cylinder engines
Even though this review is two years old, it is right in target for me. I own a Yggy+ but the Holo Cyan 2 is being massively hyped right now, and I’ve never considered units from Holo before. I’m very curious to hear your opinion. After: I’m sticking with my Yggy, but I sure wish I had the scratch to spend $10,000 USD on each component in my system. I envy your experience of the TT2 + MScaler.
Thank you for another great and thoughtful review. After reading / watching a number of excellent reviews about the Spring Dac I was ready to pull the trigger. However, after watching your review, your clear descriptions and your reasoning I decided to go with the Hugo TT2. While I obviously do not have the benefit of being able to compare the Spring to the TT2, I can say that I am extremely happy with my decision. The TT2 really is a marvel. It is versatile and can drive anything. I even enjoy the DCA Stealth with it, which I usually have connected to my tube amp. Thank you for your guidance with your excellent reviews.
Another Excellent review. Based on your recommendation I got the Chord Hugo TT2, and I’m smitten with it, but based on all the reviewers, I was just about to trade it in for the hollow audio combo, but after listening to this review, I decided to just save for the M Scaler. So, thank you so much!!
This review is excellent and also an honest effort put into making a fair comparisons but it is clearly a good example of personal preference. Contrast this review of the Holo May compared to the Chord Hugo TT2 to the review of the Holo May by Golden Sound who compared it against the Chord Dave a yet higher end DAC from Chord Audio and Golden Sound found the Holo May far more to his own personal taste all around. Both reviews well presented by two of who I consider some of the best and fairer audio equipment reviewers in TH-cam channels and they continue to be top reviewers in my own personal opinion…. But as they themselves often state on their reviews, it all comes down to personal preference…. so for anyone interested on selecting and purchasing from any of these DACS, we must take the conclusions of all these reviews with a grain of salt and just judge them as good and honest opinions. And is good to listen to a variety of opinions to help us arrive at the best possible solution for our own personal use specially if listening in person to the various equipment options is not possible.
100%! We can only ever discuss what we like and why (hopefully with comparisons for context). It's so important to get to know a reviewer's preferences and how they align with your own. For the record, I do think the May is a brilliant DAC.
My review was not intended to see how to squeeze the maximum performance put of these DACs, it was to compare them in similar setups to see what people could expect. Many people will not be using these in systems with HQ Player or an M-Scaler so taking time in an already long review to deep dive in upsampling doesn't make sense
This channel is really good. What would make it even better is adding reviews and discussions of integrated amps, power amps, pre amps, cables, speakers etc etc.
Glad you like the channel. Unfortunately, I have limited space and a small child. Neither is conducive to having large amps and speakers around. Maybe in the future...
Unfortunately, it seems the fact that I didn't rave about their DACs made Holo Audio a bit grumpy so I'm not sure if I'll be able to get a Bliss demo unit from the local distributor ☹️
I haven't, but I also probably wouldn't because the M-Scaler is limited on its output to non-Chord DACs. It needs the dual BNC setup to hit the highest sample rates so you're hobbling it somewhat when using with other DACs. Of course, for those with Chord DACs and others, that could.make sense, but not to use the M-Scaler only with a non-Chord DAC. Better to go for HQ Player with the Holo gear and that should reap excellent rewards.
Ideally I'd have liked to know your impression of feeding the MAY KTE an upsampled feed when comparing to TT2 w mscaler .. Either feed MAY from m mscaler or via software (eg Audirvana, HQplayer etc). Late comment on this upload lol!, ... sorry as clearly too late to check. Just thought I'd share this comment as I did acquire a MAY KTE and do via Audirvana feed and upsampled feed and do notice a difference to detail retrieve and no loss in the richness of the sound. I do however use primarily for speaker vs headphones listening. Thx and love your videos!
Based on many people's suggestions, the May might sound a bit better with upsampler inputs, but the M-Scaler isn't the ideal source for this because it's severely limited when used with non-Chord DACs. The May is definitely an outstanding DAC whether you're using it with upsampled content or not so I think you can buy with confidence and then decide later if you prefer upsampling via Audirvana or just the bit-perfect output
R2R technology, including the May, apparently gives you a more realistic rendition of music with things like resonances, air around instruments and spatial placement being more life-like than Delta-Sigma. It could possibly be due to the high amount of digital processing involved in D/S DACs. In your opinion, is the Hugo TT2 able to compete with the May when it comes to these nuances or does it, in comparison, sound "flatter", more digital/processed and more synthetic?
I absolutely think the TT2 competes on those factors. "Traditional" DS designs using ESS, AKM, Cirrus Logic chips, etc. definitely fall short in those areas, but the TT2 (and all Chord DACs) are designed very differently despite technically being DS. I feel like the May produces a little more space perhaps, but the tonality, resonance and texture of the sounds are a little better from the TT2 so both are excellent and on par with (for me) the TT2 being slightly better due to having just that touch more accuracy on the tonality and texture/micro details
@@PassionforSound Thank you very much for your reply. I have been considering saving for a May but my issue with it would be that I wouldn't want to spend any more money on my set-up (that would be a huge expense on its own) and as you've rightly pointed out in your video, the May would require an amp alongside it that would be good enough not to hold it back... All of a sudden the TT2 looks like a better option, I just wasn't sure about how close these two products are to each other, i.e. if the May offers something that the Hugo's digital processing simply cannot match (some people claim the May is uncannily life-like). Also, there are people who claim that the May is even better than the Dave which would imply that the TT2 is not in the same league.
Having spent the time I did with the May and TT2 side-by-side, I really don't get the assertions that the May is somehow superior to the Dave when it only just matched the TT2 to my ears. It's possible that people aren't taking into account factors like system synergies (how well the DAC and amp suit each other sonically, which headphones are used, and even the interconnects used) so it's absolutely possible that an optimised May is better than a TT2 or Dave, but the reverse would also be true that an optimised TT2 will be better than a non-optimised May. Something else to consider is whether they are using headphones or speakers for their listening. I haven't tried the May with speakers so it's possible that alters things. Finally, as for the processing side of things, remember that it's ALL digital audio so both DACs are processing the data (and heavily). The May is often cited as sounding best with upsampled audio from HQ Player while the TT2 is doing much the same thing internally (although HQ Player is theoretically more powerful). Rob Watts' design of the Chord DACs is all about maximising the accuracy of the analog waveform - i.e. ensuring precise reconstruction from the samples to the sound. I think we sometimes feel like R2R DACs are somehow keeping things more analog, but the reality is that it all comes from a set of samples so the more precision and processing that goes into the reconstruction process, the better. I don't say this to suggest that the TT2 is automatically better in that regard so much as to say that when we're talking digital audio, more processing might actually be preferableand shouldn't be seen as a negative.
@@PassionforSoundIt's always a pleasure listening to and reading your opinions, but I must say it is doubly so now that I've spent a while on the Head-Fi forum where there are at least a few individuals who seem hell-bent on defending their preconceived notions of what's right and wrong in the audio world :) You're right about the consensus being that the May truly spreads its wings when used with the HQ Player. My understanding was that a truly NOS DAC like the May has less digital processing involved as it doesn't oversample by default and as such doesn't need to deal with as many issues as a D/S DAC (noise etc.). On top of that, because it has a natural high-frequency roll-off it inevitably produces a slightly different sound which is liked by some and perhaps for one reason or another sounds more realistic to some people (well, there's nothing particularly interesting about the roll-off but if the smaller amount of digital processing results in more life-like sound then I thought that this could be a game-changer). Following from that, I would think that an ideal situation would be a NOS DAC with oversampling via software such as HQ Player, because: 1. It gives you the option to experience NOS whenever you feel like it (unavailable on other types of DAC); 2. You get a more pure base sound which you then oversample with highly customisable software). As I've said, I've not experienced any of this so I have no idea how this theory translates into reality and whether all this hassle is worth it. Because of my limited budget, I am considering getting a TT2. My headphones are also easy to drive and this combo takes care of any potential questions like "Is my amp good enough?", "What if I used different interconnects?" :) I thought that I would first check with you, however, to see how big or small a potential gap is between these devices. To be fair, it would need to be pretty big for me to want to save so much more money to get a May AND an amplifier. Especially since it's possible to get a TT2 second-hand at a decent price. I have a D90 now and an Ares II - the Ares II makes me miss the D90's resolution and precision while the D90 lacks the "time domain" of the Ares and sounds a bit lifeless/soulless. Instead of being happy with both devices they have made it almost impossible for me to enjoy either of them, hehe, which just means that I've learnt somehing new and it's time for a vertical, as opposed to a horizontal, change. I hope that I won't be disappointed with what the TT2 brings to the table. :)
If you want a balance point between the D90 and Ares II (that's better than both), it's very hard to go wrong with the TT2. As you say, avoiding the issue of interconnects and DAC/amp synergy is a huge bonus too. Keep in mind that you can get the same HQ Player benefits with the TT2 as you can with the May (even though they process the incoming signal differently). The May has a slightly fuller, slower (not in a bad way) sound, but I can't imagine anyone being unhappy with either so I think you're making a great choice.
Nice review. I did order a KTE Spring 3 a few weeks back during Black Friday sales and still currently waiting for it to arrive. I was looking for something different and not a Delta Sigma based DAC. I currently run a Chord Hugo 2 as my DAC through to various amps such as JDS Labs El Amp, Gustard H16, WA7 Fireflies and Sennheiser HDV820. Before making my decision I was testing between the Spring 3 KTE and the Chord TT2. Ended up with the Spring 3. Smooth and pleasing yet still spacious and impactful when needed. It was different which is what I was after. TT2 still had the Chord house sound just taken up to the next level. Next week I am hoping to try both the Soloist GT and GSX Mini. There is only a $100 difference between them here in NZ. Soloist does have extra features and probably a better volume control for the high output voltage of the Spring 3.
I have the Spring KTE for 3 months now, and after testing many high end dacs recently in my system, I can definitively say is the best dac I've heard so far including the May as well. I'm guessing this reviewer may have received a defective unit, because, is super resolving, the separation is simply amazing, and the sound balance is fantastic.
I'm very comfortable that it wasn't a defective product. It's more likely a question of the products used with the DACs and also whether you're using speakers or headphones. There are a number of R2R DACs which are incredibly popular with speaker users, but which I haven't particularly liked in my dedicated headphone system. Ultimately, if you're happy with what you've got, that's great and we might just have different tastes. To your point, Recce, it's great that you could try a few different DACs and choose the one that suited you most.
As you clearly stated, it must be the products used with the dac. Because I've tried many hi-end dacs lately and one of the strengths of the Spring 3 dac is separation and depth, as well as a very well balance natural sound.
Hey brother. Is the May and spring a bit less dynamic than the Yggy? That is are the May and spring a bit soft in attack? I think R2R discreet DACs are being a bit overhyped as the flavor of the last year or so. Some say the May and Spring are a bit of ‘ pipe and slippers’. Too soft and not energetic enough.
I feel like the Spring definitely fits this description in relation to the Yggy OG. The May has a better sense of energy to me and is a DAC that I really like. If not for the TT2, the May is what I would own. I definitely think the Spring was overhyped.
I'm not certain, but it is a demo unit that had been with another reviewer before me and likely had also been used by Hugo from Indie HiFi before he sent it out. I doubt it has any more significant improvement to show and it sounded excellent at it was.
I bought a Holo May KTE .. has 230 hrs on it .. it’s in a system with Aries G2.1 , Hugo2 , Modright KWH225i Integrated Hybrid Amp,Boenicke W8se+ speakers . Less Loss Filters and cabling .. Lush ^3 USB and Intona Profesional USB cables And it is an awesome DAC ..soundstage is awesome
@@PassionforSound it is .. but i agree with you that my Hugo2 .. on some tracks i prefer .. so i will be looking for a Used TT .. or maybe a Dave .. but i have yet to hear a Mola Mola .. would love a direct comparison video .. of a chip based DAC .. for a system with a May .. to be a super detailed DAC
@@PassionforSound hi have you ever tried the Lush ^2 or ^3 USB cables .. i have had the ^ 2 in a past set up .. sold it to a friend when i no longer needed it .. have had the ^3 running since i got the May .. The Intona Professional version USB just showed up .. and while it cost double in price .. they are both going to be kept .. they are very different Lush is well Lush .. and Intona is really kinda freaking me out .. i have been going back and forth between the 2 for hours .. it needs some hours on it .. but this is a detail oriented cable top to bottom .. never heard anything this revealing
Thanks Carlos! I didn't bother trying it because the M-Scaler provides predictable benefits regardless of the DAC you feed it into. I.e. better spatial details, more depth in the soundstage and a smoother but still detailed and textured sound.
I've come back and rewatched this review over the past 2 years a few times as I purchased the Spring 3 KTE 2 years ago. I question whether or not the Spring 3 was reviewed before or after the 500 hr burn in period as that will make a big difference. Furthermore, I also question how one can give such a praising review for the May which is only slightly better than the Spring 3 (about a 10% difference) reference GoldenSound. Imo, I would have preferred the review done w/ the 500 hr burn in period and a blind test comparison w/ the Yggy. I'd also like to add that both the May & Spring 3 greatly benefit from OS via HQPlayer which was another reason why I went w/ the Spring 3 vs the May bc if you are going to OS you will get better performance w/ HQPlayer that even out classes the M-Scaler. Another point about the voltage and pre-amp is not generally needed if you are paring the May or Spring 3 w/ a decent quality amp rather than a budget amp. A lot of negative bias in this review that is highly misleading.
From your comment, it sounds like you're discussing the performance of the Spring vs other DACs without having compared them for yourself. Also, all DACs can benefit from the use of HQ Player so the benefits gained when using HQP on the Spring will lift the alternative DACs (e.g. May or TT2) by the same amount. There's also the cost and hassle of HQ Player to account for. I had nothing against these DACs coming in and I really enjoyed the May. I still feel though that the Spring was/is overpriced and was well over hyped at the time.
@@PassionforSound Ok lets keep this simple; plz explain how you can praise the May (nearly double the cost) vs the Spring when the performance SQ difference is present but very very small which is the consensus of many who have had the opportunity to compare both and confirmed? Not to mention if you look at your past content your attitude has always been positive and praising even when it was a piece of gear that maybe didn't fit for you but you rehashed the HYPE-TRAIN comment at least twice in this video as a very negative view but again looping back to praise the May? So I do stand by my statement, highly misleading. "I still feel though that the Spring was/is overpriced and was well over hyped at the time." It was HYPED bc the Spring 3 comes very very close the performance of the May which is nearly double the cost. Furthermore, had you kept your previous review format and concluded that the Spring 3 didn't quite meet your expectations but you actually did prefer the May that would have been the more traditional approach for what you are known for but you clearly have some sort of negative bias. Perhaps rather than responding/rebuttal; go back and rewatch this review and listen to yourself, its not good. To be clear I have no issues w/ you not liking the Spring vs the Yggy thats totally fine. It's your negative bias that has compromised your judgement to give an honest review to the ppl consuming your content.
@heyguyslolGAMING there's no doubt I approached this differently to some other reviews. The reason was that, at the time, the Spring 3 was being way over-hyped and (at the time) I felt it needed a strong counterpoint.
I find it impossible to work in percentages with audio gear, particularly when the differences are as intangible as they are here. There's a realism and liveliness to the sound of the May that's not there in the Spring for me. It's a significant jump in the sense that I wouldn't buy a Spring, but it's absolutely buy a May.
sorry, could you share what was your suggestion to serve as a balanced output for the Spring 3 instead of its pre-amp option please? I couldn't catch it. thank you.
Another great and professional review. I am awaiting my Denafrips Pontus II and stepping up from the Ares, and looking forward to your reviews on these products.
I wish the TT2 alone would do it for me, but after trying other dedicated class a amps, it’s clear it’s not beefy enough to make the Susvaras really sing. Have you ever tried the XLR outs from the TT2 into the Susvara? Supposedly that provides it more power but not sure if it helps at all in reality.
I did try the XLR outputs and felt that it made no noticeable difference. I agree that the Susvaras need a warmer/richer amp to be their best. TT2 is just too dry/neutral for the Susvaras IMO
It's very hard to isolate the performance of particular inputs (at a subjective level) from the performance of the DACs. For me, both devices performed very well via USB using my setup which is a regular PC, JCat audio USB card and Curious Evolved USB cable
@@PassionforSound thanks, Please one more question. Saw you like the Curious Evolved which on my system was too bright for my ear. I have Verity CB and Atrium and looking to upgrade my system to the TT2/mscaler. To your ear how do the cans sound on the TT2 on the warmer setting. I love the TT 2/ mscaler potential in all respects and am only cautious about tone. I am getting encouraged to drive the 100+ miles to have a listening test. TIA
I love the TT2, but it is a very neutral sounding DAC and headphone amp so keep that in mind. What's your current source chain where the Curious Evolved was too bright?
@@PassionforSound thanks for the get back. My source is a zen mini with a separate linear power supply though a Final Touch Audio USB to a Phoenix through another FTA USB to an Auris D2D DAC through LessLoss RCAs to an Auris HA2 SE amp with a Mallard input tube and Telefunken power tubes all NOS dating to the ‘60s. The system also has a LessLoss 640x C-Mark firewall on the power inlet to the DAC. The FTAs, along with the Phoenix mitigated the sibilance and the LessLoss significantly reduced noise and enhanced clarity. All of course to my ear. What got my attention to the TT2/m was 1) your review 2) Moon audio in the USA, where I cut my teeth, so to speak, and who endorsed Chord from the beginning 3) my Mojo which is connected to an A&K and which sounds very musical to my ear and last 4) another audio analyst said his favorite combination of all his high end cans, including the Susvara, with the TT2/ mscaler is the Verity CB with the TT2 cross feed set at 2 and the warm filter setting. Also Drew at Moon audio has a video up where he prefers the TT2/ mscaler to the Dave ,alone, because of the warmth. So the stars seemed to align around the chord.
Haha. Yes, luckily no real trains were harmed in the making of this review. Glad you appreciated the honest opinion. No doubt some will perceive it differently to me, but I definitely expected a lot more after hearing the rave reviews.
Nice Review, but, I think you completely miss the main selling point of the Holo DACs, and that is to use them specifically with HQPlayer in NOS mode. I have yet to meet anyone who owns a HOLO and is not using HQPlayer. It is the combo of HQPlayer feeding the HOLO May which blows the doors off the TT2 +MScaler combo and directly competes with a DAVE+MScaler If you can still try it, upsample to DSD512 with poly-sinc-ext2 using the ASDM7ECv2 modulator. Those settings are stunningly good.
I've sent the Holo units back, but I think buying a product where you have to then use a specific piece of software (that's not free), and a piece of software with a very convoluted interface, has its own drawbacks. I'm not criticising the use of HQ Player, but reviewing the product not the potentially tweaked and maximum possible performance source chains. If I started down that path we'd have to start talking about similar tweaks for every other product too and that opens up WAY too many variables for a manageable length video. Not to mention that there are many people looking for a DAC to connect to a streaming device or transport where HQ Player might not be an option
@@PassionforSoundI agree with this. I do not want to spend £6K on a DAC, just to have to use HQP to make it sound best. It already should sound amazing for £6K!
I can't compare it to a Gungnir unfortunately, but I will compare to Bifrost 2 which Jason Stoddard considers a mini Yggy (and with good reason it turns out)
Excellent review as always. I have a pair of Acoustic Energy active speakers and I need a dac, a preamp and a headphone amp. Price notwithstanding what would you choose between an all in one solution like the hugo tt2 and a burson soloist 3X preamp/hp amp + qutest dac combo? On SQ alone… I will be listening mainly to speakers and quite rarely through hp so the dac and pre sections are more important than the hp amp one.Thanks
Hi Lachlan. A couple of days ago I eventually bought the TT2 in part also thanks to you. I'm very, very happy so far😊One more question if you don't mind. If you had the chance to compare, did you find the XLR outputs better sounding than the RCA ones on the TT2? My active speakers have both XLR and RCA inputs, I presently use a pair of RCA's from the TT2 in to the speakers since I don't have a pair of XLR yet. Any thoughts on this? Thank you very much
So glad you're enjoying the TT2. I haven't found any difference between the RCA and XLR outputs. I believe Rob Watts actually favours the single ended outputs (6.3mm and RCA)
The Qutest is around about the same level as the Schiit Yggy, although I've never directly compared - this is based on other comparisons I've done (like Qutest vs Gungnir Multibit).
Interesting review. I’ve been following reviews and forums for the Spring and the May for a few months and it seems that those who have committed to a May and own TT2 eventually move away from using the TT2 as their main after a few months. Another common theme in the forums is burn in. Most people love the sound of the Spring and May out of the box but after some burn in time ( or running time) they found that it opens up more and exposes more detail. It could be subjective but at least with my mid-fi gear burn in does help with some negative qualities I remember from initial impressions. A few people have suggested 1000 hrs for the May to open up (which assuming reasonable listening patterns) is 6-12 months, but the most common number I’ve seen is 200 hours. I’m not advocating that you can only review things that are fully burned in, and I know you do spend a fair amount of time reviewing a product so that you do let the electronics settle, but its something worth doing a follow up with older units. I think the main reason why people would prefer the Spring or May aside from that 3d space is the timbre from NOS. Most people say that it sounds very “natural”, like “real music”, like “analogue”. There are better DACs I’ve read about, the WaveDream, the Tambaqui. But they’re far more expensive . The Terminator II is probably on equal footing. Anyway, great review and I hope to see more high end DAC reviews.
Thanks for the thoughtful comments. I believe both of these DACs had already been fairly well used by the time they reached me. Probably not 1000 hours, but I'd also highly doubt the validity of those claims. Burn-in is definitely real, but in my experience the vast majority of any impact from burn-in will happen quite early with only subtle differences evolving after that. I agree that R2R and NOS are all about tonality which is why I do prefer these over most delta sigma DACs I've heard. They just don't stack up (to me at least) when compared to Schiit's Multibit approach or Chord's WTA filtering and high tap approach. I hope to review the Pontus and Terminator in the future 🤞🤞
@@PassionforSound Disclaimer: I ordered a May which will come in January, so I did quite a bit of research before the purchase. Also this is just an opinion based on the opinion of others. Some believe that the choice of amp can make a difference in the details of the May and Spring, using the Burson may not have the best synergy. That being said, some people on forums recommended even more expensive amps.
There's no doubt that system synergy is real and important, but I used multiple amps including the Soloist GT, Sparkos Labs Aries, Bottlehead Mainline and Elekit TU-8200R (modified). The reality is that it's often about personal tastes and preferences. A system synergy that I think is perfect may still not appeal to others and that's totally fine. If people say review X is wrong because they didn't use amp Y it's a bit misleading because it all comes back to personal preference which are inevitably variable from one person to the next
@@PassionforSound The burn-in in May is difference. It sounded great out of the box but the first 100 hours or so the sound change all over the place. Sometime its better sometime its worst. After about 200-300 hours it start to get stable and then continually improves. Now the more I listen to it the better its get. This is the only gear I have that do this to me and needed this much burn in. Even my tube amplifier burn in quicker than the May. If you look inside the May then its kind of make sense why it needed a lot of burn in. There seems to be a lot of power filtering and large capacitors inside. Holo May is also the only DAC I can think of that has 4 transformers. We do know that these can change the sound characteristics quite a bit as electricity is being passed through them.
The BIG question I dare to ask (only now) is, what power cords were used with these DACs? I strongly suspect that the Spring was the one most affected by this important aspect...
I was using the stock power cords with all of these. I didn't have any high end power cables at that time. It's also worth noting that I would always match cables (power, interconnects, USB) when comparing devices. I have 2-3 of all my main cables for this reason
Maybe one more thing... Owners of those Holo DACs report that they need at least 500-600 hours of burn-in, before they fully reveal their sound. Some even mention 800-1000 hours without turning them off, so esentially more than a month of uninterrupted playing. Do you know, how old these ladies were before you got them?
Scenario... I have the Arya Stealth. Bitcoin hit's 100k. I spend 10k to improve the Arya to the max. Order of what I value the most: 1 - Timbre or "accuracy" or "realism" 2 - Soundstage or "3D" or "holographic" 3 - Detail or "resolution" What system(s) do I go with?
Good review and even for me the May did not made me fall off the chair when I listened to it first. Having said that, when comparing TT2 + external upsampler Mscaler, please consider this combo of Holo May + external upsampler HQplayer ($250) .. and only then being a fair comparison, the game is on :-) I found this combo did lost a bit of timber but was on steroids in terms of dynamics, impact, layering, resolution, clarity. Kindly let us know if you are able to compare. Cheers
Hi Ganesh, I can't make that comparison because the May was only on loan. However, I also didn't choose to explore the HQPlayer route because the TT2 was better to my ears without any upsampling so you could equally buy a TT2 and use HQPlayer to get even better results. I still think the May is a wonderful DAC and for those who don't need the pre-amp or headphone amp capability of the TT2, I'd always recommend the May as a great choice.
Got it, thanks. Also if you can get hold of Rockna wavelight DAC which is comparably priced then please share your thoughts on them as well, looking forward to that. According to the HQPlayer team, HQp works well only with certain DACs i.e. many Holo & TotalDAC models and few other DACs. I didn't ask the technicalities on why only certain DACs are recommended to be paired but this is a confirmed positioning from HQp team. I know it might sound bit unintuitive :-) but it seems to be the case. May out of the gate is good but does not live up to the hype considering my preference but when HQp adds to the mix then this completely extracts every bit of May's and the song's potential. Sorry, didn't mean to talk about an up-sampler in this DAC section but thought it is relevant to share it
Thank you for letting me know. It's taken a long time to get it where it is now and I'm happy with the results 🙂 I actually just added a print of one of my photos in that blank section of wall on the left so you'll see that in the videos coming soon too
@@PassionforSound. Of course. You’ve done a great job and I look forward to your extensive review of the DCA STEALTH once you get it of course to test. :)
@Passion for Sound, please add your setup to the video description. What headphones did you use? First, thank you for your review! That said, I think it's a bit odd to pair a $5500 DAC with a $1000 amp. It would be interesting to hear what you think of the May with something like the LTA MZ3 or a DNA Stratus, or other amp in that class.
Hi Henrik, I don't test with just one setup which is why I don't list a setup - it would be too long and complex. Also, I tested these DACs with the Soloist GT (not the basic Soloist) and Sparkos Labs Aries so $2.5k and $3k amps as well as the Bottlehead Mainline and Elekit TU-8200R.
The Burson headphone amp is what degraded the May DAC, IMO. Also, you did not explain what the M-Scaler is, and can a similar device be used with the May DAC?
The Burson Soloist GT is on par or better than other amps at the same level (Ferrum Hypsos & Orr, Benchmark HPA4, Holo Bliss, etc.) so it wasn't a limiting factor. Even if it were a limiting factor, the TT2 would have been equally limited when comparing both DACs via the Soloist. I didn't explain the M-Scaler because I have a dedicated video doing that and need to keep videos to a watchable length. It's not really a product that works optimally with non-Chord products, but you can use HQPlayer to get similar results with the May.
Great review! Any chance you could do a quick setup reveal before the review, i.e what source, cables, headphones. I can only assume you're using quality components but everything before and after the DAC can greatly affect the overall sound impressions in my opinion.
I'll see if can do something in the future. The challenge with it is that I don't only use one setup for testing. I'll generally use 2-3 headphones at a minimum and 2-3 amps for a DAC review like this one. I do use just one setup for my note taking part where I describe the comparisons, but that's just to illustrate what I've heard across multiple setups.
I tried OS and NOS (as I think I discussed in the video). I provided very high quality sources to all devices tested and, keep in mind, that the benefits gained by one DAC when fed a higher quality signal will also translate to other DACs receiving the same high quality signals. I didn't test with HQ Player partly for the reason above (same benefits apply to all devices so the differences remain), but also because that immediately limits the options for people using the DAC to being fed only from a computer.
@@PassionforSound I 'm happy to see if you make a vid about comparing yggy vs spring3 KTE(w/ HQplayer). Because it is on different league when you using it. Thank you for your response :)
Were you able to consider the various levels for the May (:1, 2, or L3), and which were you reviewing? Sorry, if you mentioned it - it's a long video to try and find
Interesting! Based off of your awesome reviews and recommendations I picked up the Meze Elite w/ silver upgrade cable and Burson Soloist GT w/ 5a super charger. Loving them so far! Currently switching between the Bifrost 2 and the VMV D1se to see which one I prefer. Open to investing in a new dac if it is a better match for my amp and HPs. Is there a dac that would get me close to the TT2 quality? Should I try the Chord Qutest? Will it be a upgrade or a side grade to the Bifrost 2? What gave me confidence in my amp purchase was when you compared the GT to the TT2 and said it was pretty much equal with the deference coming down to preference. After watching this review, this doesn’t seem to be the case. Seem like the TT2 is easily better than the GT? Especially if there is no reasonably priced dac to pair with the GT to compete with the TT2. Now I am wondering if I should have gone with the TT2? Wish I had a easy way to compare these expensive products before purchasing them. Anyway, thanks for the advice!
That's an interesting (and probably fair) conclusion you've drawn about the TT2 and the GT, but I do think it's very close to the TT2 rather than your understandable conclusion from this video. There are soany variables to consider when reviewing or listening to multiple devices at once and the May + GT combo is a bit different than the TT2 + GT combo. The GT is a slightly punchier sounding amp than the TT2 amp so it is still different, but I do rate them on par and use the GT quite a lot still even though I have the TT2 so that's a good indicator of the quality. As to your question, the Qutest will be a nice upgrade over the Bifrost 2. I can't speak to the D1se as I haven't yet been able to try it. The TT2 is still the best DAC I've tried for the price, but it might be redundant getting a DAC and amp when you have the GT. The Holo Audio May KTE would definitely be another recommendation. If it wasn't clear from this review, I think it's a great DAC for those who already have an amp.
@@PassionforSound thanks for the clarification. I really do appreciate you taking the time to respond to my questions. I know you must be FLOODED with them. Your commitment to your community is not lost on me! This is one one of the reasons I went with your recommendations. Your passion (no pun intended) really shines through! I think I am going to grab the Qutest next week, test it out, settle on the DAC that pairs the best with the Meze / GT, and then enjoy the setup for many years to come. The upgrade from the A90 to the GT was not subtle! It was an improvement on every level. Much more than any DAC I added. To think… this upgrade path was sparked by your Elden Ring HP video! 😁
Hi Lachlan. Nice review. Have you tried running your headphones out of the balanced outputs on the TT2? If you haven’t I suggest it. Just my 2cents about the May is that there’s people running it into Benchmark THX amps that are very flat and the warmth added by the May might be just benefiting them. Totally agree the TT2 is a fabulous dac and hope Chord make the Mojo2 a killer product. Keep up the great work.
Hi Glen, glad you're liking the channel! I tested the XLR outputs of the TT2 for the Susvara review and found no significant difference if using the same cable. You might actually find that the wire used for the twin XLR connections might be imparting the favourable qualities because (if I recall correctly) Rob Watts actually runs everything (including speakers) from the 6.3mm outputs because they're a more direct, simple signal path and therefore preferable. Personally I heard no noticeable difference when the same wire type was used for XLR and 6.3mm.
@@PassionforSoundhmm... I believe I read somewhere that chord doesnt believe in balanced designs. If you need balanced anything you dont have enough power for your (perfectly clean) single ended signal😂
Yep. Chord are among a number of companies who favour a good single ended amp design over balanced because it can create a simpler and more transparent signal path. For the record, I think it all comes down to each individual circuit as I've heard fantastic balanced designs too.
@@PassionforSound looking forward to it. I really think we ought to work something out with Schiit about sending you those other two flavors as cards and letting you play around with them. The OG is really unique in its presentation, but the LIM is just so special in how it sound so "correct."
Great review, i recently bought a Spring 3 KTE, it sounds quite natrual to my ears. Few points i want to lay out: 1、Total production costs of a "ture discrete resistor ladder dac" is pretty high,higher than the chip based Schiit products;2、A true "NOS R2R" dac is hard to find at this price level, even Rockna uses its internal OS;3、I once heard the TT2, the sound is kind of "digital" to me. Anyway very honest review, keep fighting towards 20K subs!
Just need to mention one more point, about Spring 3 is lacking detail compare to schiit ygg, that is impossible to my understanding. The "more detail" you heard from YGG could be its harmonic distortion since the measurement of ygg show that(schiit does their own honest maesurement report), but lower THD doesn't mean it sounds bad.
Hi Max, they're very good points about the R2R being more expensive to produce. For me it is all about the sound quality produced and not the technology used which is why I favour the Yggy OG. There will also always be personal tastes and system synergy to consider so if you're enjoying the sound and you're happy, that's all that matters. 🙂
This reviewer obviously likes DETAIL so I'm not surprised he preferred DACs that bring out details. R2R DACs are generally for people who prefer smoothness and overall musical enjoyment. When I hear music presented in a way that I can forget about instrument location/placement, specific details, etc. and just am able to enjoy and take in the music, that's the hallmark of a great DAC for me. But then, I'm not a reviewer so it is what it is, for me. I'm biased as I own the Spring 3 KTE but it really requires a long burn-in so not sure if the reviewer had a 'good' unit for comparison purposes. I've owned Chord products (Hugo 2) and they are ultra detail retrieval monsters; I hear sounds that I've never heard before on my recordings. But the overall sound was just not pleasing for me and sounded dry and not enjoyable. That's why I moved to R2R DACs and they sounded better for my ears. But then I also use a tubed headphone amp so perhaps I'm in the group of people who prefer a warm and rich sound vs. a more analytical sound.
The unit I had was a demo unit that had been in action for an extended period before I received it so burn-in isn't a factor. I think you're right though that I value detail and imaging accuracy when listening. I don't like overly dry or analytical sound, but I use my choice of amps and headphones to colour the sound to my tastes and I personally believe in having a DAC that is as neutral (not souless or analytical) as possible to then add the colouration after it. With all that said, what matters most is that you're enjoying your setup. It does sound like you enjoy a richer, smoother sound and it's great that you've identified that and that you're sticking to what you enjoy. Happy listening! 🙂
Another excellent review. I agree with the hype train analogy, it's funny how people develop polarising views and strong language regarding the performance of certain products. When you get the chance to listen to the product yourself and compare the SQ to your own experiences the hyped expectation is never met. Great DACs sound great, that's it. The actual audio differences between good hifi DACs, streamers etc is so subtle most of us would fail blind testing, yet the price differences are ridiculous. Anyone who uses language like 'night and day' and 'leaves it for dead' when comparing expensive DACs/streamers is someone you should not be listening to.
There's a lot of truth in this! There are some notable exceptions, but they're just that - exceptions. I think it's quite telling how quickly a lot of these "best DAC ever" type devices don't get talked about within 5-6 months of the initial hype.
@@PassionforSound True, and its funny how people talk up DACs they've never heard. I have a simple Eversolo A6, I use it for transport only into a Michi P5 preamp. The background is black ink, the vocals sublime and the instruments are 99.9% as good as I've heard on any system at any show (I have ATC's). Yet people say the A6 is 'night and day' to the master or the new wider model. Without even bothering to sample the other models I can tell you the difference would not be night and day and It would be very hard to tell the difference. A nice, neat data transfer with low jitter is what you want and all you need and the A6 achieves that very well. People lose their heads, you can't make it sound better with fancier equipment, it's just data.
You could still be missing out. He used the Burson Grand Tourer as the headphone amp to pair with the May. A different amp could noticeably change the way it sounds.
That's true that amps can change the way it sounds, but I also tried the DACs with the Sparkos Labs Aries, Bottlehead Mainline and Elekit TU-8200R with no change tou preferences on any of them. If anything it reaffirmed my views because none of those amps are as transparent as the GT and therefore make the Spring sound more muted and the May was largely unaffected so the gap between the May and TT2 remained. I think the TT2 is still the best choice for both sound quality and value for money (DAC, preamp and headphone amp)
Glad you're enjoying the amp! I used the Elites and Susvaras about equally I'd say. I also had the Lirics, Verite Closed and Verite Open during the time I was auditioning the Holo DACs
I recently picked up a holo spring 3 level 1 in the second hand market. The only dacs I have to compare it too are the bifrost 2/64 and the Burson composer. The Holo ( 2nd hand) at 2 x the price of the bifrost 2/64 is a steal in my opinion. It beats the 2/64 thoroughly imo in all areas except the bass where the 2/64 is just a touch tighter. It is definitely! worth 2 x the price but not 3.5 times ( normal retail price). If you can pick up one of these at a good price in the 2nd hand market I would definitely consider it. You have next to no chance picking up a good second hand yiggy in Australia.
No. I find the M-Scaler to be pretty wasted on non-Chord devices because the output sample rate is severely limited. I used a Volumio Primo to upsample to 768kHz though and it made some nice improvements
Upscaling into the Holo dacs (while the dac is in NOS mode of course) is the preferred sound to my ears, and most others as well as the owner of Kitsune HiFi. I use my Roon Rock to upscale to 768, gives me just a tiny bit more sparkle (detail) up top and separation between instruments. I had the Dave/Mscaler in house for a month or more, I wouldn’t trade my Spring 3 KTE for it as an even swap for just listening (obviously I would do that trade and sell the chord gear and rebuy the Holo Audio dac and put the extra money into more gear - I’m not certifiably insane yet). Chord DAC’s are great but not as enjoyable for my ears with TOTL hp’s like the Susvara and such.
I didn't bother with the M-Scaler into the May because it doesn't make sense as a combination when the M-Scaler is limited. I'd be more inclined to save a bunch of money and go with something like the Volumio Primo and run that in upsampling mode to a full 768kHz as discussed in the vid. 🙂
@@PassionforSound (1) Try the HQPlayer with the May. The designer of HQPlayer uses the Holo DACs as a reference. Upsampling to DSD256 using good EC modulators on HQPlayer sounds amazing on the May (2) In your input setup, is the May’s clock the master or is the source’s clock the master? (3) IMHO, it is wrong to pair the $5,500 Holo May DAC with a $500 preamp. Proper matching makes a huge difference. For example: I found that I got better SQ out of the May paired with the $2,500 Holo Serene than with the $17,000 Audio Research Ref 6SE preamp. Either ways, I’d say a $500 preamp is a no-go.
I don't have the DACs here anymore to test that, but I also don't particularly like the overly complex setup in HQ Player and therefore don't consider it in my reviews as many people want products they can just plug in and enjoy.
Great review as always Lauchlan. You basically answered my question of whether or not I should sell my TT2 and M scaler to buy the May KTE. I think I'd prefer the detail over the slight bass bump and warmth of the May. Just curious, which filters did you try when listening with the TT2, was it mostly incisive? Wondering if filters 3 or 4 got similar results to the warmth of the May. Cheers.
Glad you liked the review! I only really use filter 1 for TT2 on its own or filter 2 when using the M-Scaler (both incisive). Filters 3 & 4 might provide a hint of smoothness, but they don't change the presentation of the sound enough to match the fullness of the May. I personally think you're making the right choice by keeping the TT2 (I really wanted to prefer the May just for something different) and I'd recommend getting the extra warmth/fullness further down the source chain with your amp or transducers because you can never regain that extra detail that the May loses compared to the TT2, but adding some richness is easy to do.
I've played with HQ Player and really didn't like the complexity (i.e. too many variables to fiddle with). There's no doubt that upsampling can improve the sound, but the improvement will generally be consistent across all DACs so if it improves the May by 10%, it will improve the TT2 by 10% too (and any other high sample rate capable DAC)
@@PassionforSound if you want to be surprised, grab your tt2 and feed it via Foobar 2000 with pggb add in installed. It is free up to 2 million taps. Let me know if you are as surprised as I have been....
Thanks for the suggestion, but part of why I love the TT2/M-Scaler is the simplicity of the setup. I use Room as my audio player and JRiver as my library manager. I don't really want to go down the path of adding anymore playback software at this point.
If You put silver IC in system from occ silver neotech the same like inside wiring of spring 3 KTE this dac starts to shine with open holographic deep soudnstage when the other dac shitt and chord start to scream and unnantural sound with occ sliver. System matching and matching cabling is the key to get the best sound from spring dac. Spring 3 KTE has the most natural timbre of all dacs that i tried ca. 15 dacs(gustard, chord, shitt, denafrips, lampizator, smsl, topping) and most engaging i guess. When you hear guitar, drums, violin its sounds the most life like compare too other dacs that i tried. I never try holo may KTE so far....thanks for review
I think every system has its own cables synergies so this is true for any DAC where choosing the right interconnects can bring the best out of each different device. For example, I really like the Supra Sword interconnects on the Schiit DACs, but the Curious XLR on the TT2.
That's not really fair to say. The holo audio dac uses very very expensive materials and has proven you only get a little more performance but it jacks up the price by thousands more. Silver isn't beneficial at all as copper already conducts more than enough. I agree occ copper is better than ofc but even that doesn't matter because the industry standard is ofc copper and having a tiny piece of cabling that's expensive isn't going to change that the product overall is built with plain copper.
@@V1ralB1ack let me tell You i know many audiophiles that for 2% in sound quality inmproovement of example dac, source, amp can kill You 😄 and belive me when you have all chain audio (amp, dac, cables, speakers in system thet is very revealing) at very high level you will here the difernce bitwin better caps, occ silver etc inside dac, source, speakers etc. Other thing - This 2% of improvement is giving 2% more emotions. Thats how it works in audiophile world. But personally in holo spring lvl2 vs lvl 3 is more diffrence then 2% i think much like 15 %(for my scale, for my ears, for my connection to what i hear) but once again you need to have very good all audio chain, very revealing. Peace ✌
I think Mike's point is about optimising the whole chain. I definitely agree that balancing the quality across across the whole source chain is more valuable than a single perfect component though
I haven't tried the Conductor yet, but having used the Composer and Soloist, I can say that the amp stage will be excellent, but not to the level of the TT2 and the DAC will be solid, but limited by the fact that it's a delta sigma, chip based DAC and won't match what Schiit Multibit or Chord DACs can do
@@PassionforSound True, the fact that Timber, Space, sound punch, depth, resolution is excellent and top of that OP amp rolling allows to match the DAC output to your choice of preferred tone makes it an excellent DAC for any system match. PS: try rolling op amps with Sparkos lab's and Burson V6, it really opens up and is superb 👍.
Great video and review... as usual 🎉👍👏!! Viewing this Mar. 05, 2024 for first time. You got me thinking about the Yggi OG 🤔. Looking to upgrade from Gen 1 Topping D90. I have DDC Singer SU-2 using I2S... which I've enjoyed for many years! Yggi OG doesn't have I2S. Would it still be worth using my DDC with AES interface on Yggi OG?? Thanks much for any input / advice!!
My pleasure! It was possibly an over-correction of the hype at the time, but I still feel the same about them: May is excellent as a standalone DAC and Spring is still overpriced IMO.
Another excellent objective review! As much as I've been enjoying the Bifrost 2, I've been wondering if moving to a higher end dac would be worthwhile. The Yiggy is the natural inclination since I love the BF2. I was interested in the Denafrips Pontus II, and was also looking at the Holo Spring 3. Your comments about the Spring 3 vs the Yiggy have really helped clear the muddy waters. Now I wonder which version of Yiggy is best......!
Glad you found it helpful! I'd have loved to compare all three Yggy flavours, but shipping costs, parts costs and COVID in general got in the way. In the upcoming Yggy OG review, I have compared the Bifrost 2 and Yggy in detail. Hopefully that's some help 🙂
Yes and no (not trying to be obtuse). The BF2 is incredibly good for the money. The Yggy is definitely better, but it's also huge. For me, if you have the space and the budget and you're looking for a DAC that can easily be endgame then go for the Yggy. It's not the best DAC I've heard, but it's really good enough that you could stop seeking more IMO
Good comprehensive review. 👍. Thank you. The May KTE is Holo Audio’s flagship DAC. The Chord Dave is the their flagship. Then how good do you find the Dave. It would be interesting how you find the Denafrips Terminator plus😎👍
I don't really see any point in combining the May and the M-Scaler. The M-Scaler is limited in its output to non-Chord DACs and I personally wouldn't recommend it as a pair with anything non-Chord.
@@PassionforSound Thank you, I do understand that the M-scaler puts out half of the (what evers) to non-cord products or products without 2 BNC connections and if the next time you talk about the M-scaler you could go over what it does. Also the difference between what the M-scaler does and what local oversampling does. Thanks again.
Have you checked out my M-Scaler review? I covered most of those questions there I think. As to the difference between upsampling with the M-Scaler vs software or other methods, it just comes down to the quality of the algorithm used as the number of times the samples are refined (1,000,000 times in the M-Scaler)
Your whole section about the tt2 sounding better than out of the soloist just kinda points to the soloist being a massive bottle neck for both dacs here....
Not really, Bob. The TT2 internal stage is better than almost any other HP amp you could think of because it doesn't rely on the transfer of signal via 2 pairs of connectors, 1 pair of cables and a whole lot of circuitry in an external amp - it's a short, simple path that produces astounding clarity and transparency. The Soloist GT and Sparkos Labs Aries are both amps that I used for the testing and are both world class headphone amps.
@@PassionforSound Yup it might have advantage in that, but external amps have their own power supplies unlike this dac that have 1 power supply for everything and this in theory can result in much weaker dynamics and transients that can result in anemic sound that everybody describes about Chord Internal amps. Mate, it seems you dont have your own opinion and you just biasedly gonna praise Chord stuff... If their amp idea would be so great, everyone would be make it something like that... Chord is apple in audiophile community and everything Rob Watts saying is a gospel and everybody else is wrong according to him and cult following. Maybe im wrong, but you give those vibes. Denafrips atleast is less bullshit of a company that will make as good product as possible while Chord will make product as cheap as possible to get higher margins possible.
I think you need to do some deeper research into the design decisions that Rob Watts has put into the TT2, Eternal. Everything has been considered to make it an outstanding all-in-one product. Between the super capacitors, the discrete analog output that separates the DAC and analog stages, the attention to noise floor and intermodulation distortion across the whole device make for an astonishing final product. That said, I'm always excited to find something better. As I said in this review, I actually wanted the May to be better - I was excited to take the next step, but it just didn't stack up to the same level even when using $2500-3000 USD amps
@@PassionforSound yes, but confirmation bias can be very strong... As i said: Rob Watts is not a genius, otherwise lot of people will be doing same stuff as he is doing... Why do you think Chord, Benchmark is using switched mode power supplies? Because those are much cheaper and require less costly enclosure! Separate amps also use a lot more space and also have much better wolume controls than digital controls used in dacs that bring noise up. There is nothing grounbreaking in Chord dacs except filters that create different sound signature...
You really need to do more research. The only piece of this I agree with (after extensive research and comparisons) is that the use of SMPSs is disappointing on some of their products (it's not relevant to the TT2).
I tried it. It wasn't anything exceptional. Hyped ? Yes a bit. Bad ? No. And I compared it on headphones. I'm sure on speakers the difference would be even more obvious in space and soundstage (comparing vs dave+mscaler) Holo sounds like a typical R2R non oversampling dac. A good one (very good), yes but nothing more.
@@PassionforSound I want to make it clear. I was testing May kitsune :), and still I think that it's a bit overhyped. Very dood dac but... I really want to try comparision on speakers, as I'm pretty sure that the difference would be stagering. Maybe someday
I do believe that speaker listening might make a significant difference with these, but I'm not setup to test that theory. Thanks for clarifying though!
The May definitely improves with an upsampled signal, but the gap between the May and the TT2 remains the same (i.e. upsampling is not more beneficial for the May than any other DAC I've tried)
Channel patron, Snow Rang3r, has pointed out that my database of pricing is out-of-date. The TT2 is now $5,995 instead of $5,500 as quoted in this video. The Yggy OG is also $2,595 rather than the $2,199 I had in the database which is the Less Is More version price. Apologies for two errors in a single video!! The good news is that my conclusions remain consistent despite these updated prices. The Yggy is still better value financially and sonically than the Spring and the TT2's amplifier is still way ahead of what's possible with the May KTE and a $500 amplifier.
I would like to hear your opinion and comparsion of mola dac.
I'm keen to try the mola mola too!
I have the Yggy and TT2, Yggy cannot compare to TT2, sorry for saying that…
It's all a matter of personal preference so no apologies needed 🙂 and I do agree. Yggy is great, but TT2 is on a different level
There's definitely some truth to that and it depends on what people expect and value from headphones/speakers. I find that I consistently like the same DACs on my speaker setup that I like with my headphones
Passion, you have just saved me a lot of money. I almost bought the Spring 3 KTE until I saw your fantastic review. Thank you.
So glad I could help. To be clear, I think May is brilliant, but Spring is vastly overrated IMO.
@@PassionforSound Thank you.
It's times like these I am reminded that I'm very much a novice in this hobby. Very thorough review as always, good job 👍
No sweat and my pleasure 🙂🙂
Fair review I thought . I’ve got the kte May atm, and I slightly prefer it over the tt2 but it is close as to preference, as you rightly said. I do think the spring dac in a hifi makes lots of sense and disagree on your point on that dac, but I know you don’t deal with speakers, since in the U.K. at least one version of it - spring 3 level 2 sounds better than the Denafrips Pontus 2 for similar money imo.
There's definitely nothing wrong with the Spring. I just think the Yggy OG offers better value for money performance because they're on par or perhaps the Yggy is a bit better (this will be somewhat preferential) and it's cheaper
@@PassionforSound thanks Lachlan, I never got to try that one. One things for sure never discount Chinese at this quality, as some American and British people do.
Absolutely! Making judgements about products based on their origin is a mistake IMO. China have invested a huge amount in their manufacturing capabilities and often have better capabilities than other countries. Likewise, countries like the USA and UK have their fair share of crappy products too
Really like your ability and willingness to learn. Your honesty is also much appreciated.
Always have to keep an open mind 🙂
Great review. Detailed and straight forward!! One of the best review I watched on Spring 3 and May.
So glad you liked it!
Great review! All the best for the New Year.
Thanks Monty. You too!
Nice review mate.. subscribed -
Got the spring3 kte
Glad you liked the review! Thanks for the sub!
Thanks for the informative review! Considering either Denfarips or Holo DAC now from Musician Draco.
Just curious if the review was done with speakers or headphones as I saw one comment here saying this review was done via headphones?
This review was with headphones, but having tested with both, I've found that headphones and speakers reveal the same things about the products in the source chain and headphones actually provide greater insight about things like resolution and detail retrieval because they're not working to overcome the room acoustics.
I have the May KTE and use i2s which really opens it up
It's a shame I didn't have a good I2S source to try at the time
great review as always, i'm wondering what amp you think is good with yggdrasil?
It depends more on what you're driving with it and what sound you're after. Pairing DACs and amps is less about the synergy between the two and more about the resultant sound you want from your system.
Thank you for answering one more question is there a difference between Yggdrasil+ and Yggdrasil og? @@PassionforSound
The Yggy+ is the new version with the more modular chassis. You can buy the OG, LIM and MIB versions within the Plus platform.
thank you so much I really appreciate your time and effort you put on this channel keep it up mate@@PassionforSound
My pleasure. Happy listening!
Congrats on 20K!
Thank you! It kind of snuck up on me after all that! 🙂
I've got a celebratory giveaway coming in the next video though...
Lachlan, your honesty is incredibly refreshing, another outstanding review! Happy Holidays from your friends in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Thank you, Chris! Happy holidays to you too! 🎅🤶
Nice review. Appreciate the no bull approach and that you clearly define differences that you observe between products. Having options that suit ones' taste and preference is a good thing and it's nice to kinow that even at this level, there are choices avaibable to suit a variety of tastes and budgets.
That's really well stated. There's rarely a right or wrong / good or bad in this hobby. It's all preferential and also depends on the other pieces in the system.
@@PassionforSound Yep, it is about synergy and if that can be achieved then it;s an OMG, HC, WTFJH experience.
Solid train B roll
Thanks Randy! I thought it illustrated the point nicely 😉
Interesting review! I think at this level it really come down to personal preference... I'm owning TT2 and Spring 3 KTE at the moment, and I feel I enjoy Spring more than TT2, for that smoother sound :) I'm using Spring with Soloist 3xp / Feliks Euforia as headphone amp
That's really interesting, Alex. Do you find the TT2 too aggressive or something? Which headphones do you have?
@@PassionforSound I think I just feel TT2 a little bit dry, especially with the build in amp, I'm using ZMF Verite Closed or Arya Stealth version, which headphones you used in your review?
@@PassionforSound I think my feeling is really subjective, because as you know Spring is really huge in size, I can't put them side by side on my desk to do a AB test, I just use them in different room for different occasions... I will find some time to do a comparison again with the tracks you used in your review
I definitely agree that the TT2 can sound a bit drier. I did my testing with a mixture of the Elites, Susvaras and Verite Open (and maybe others). I can definitely understand people preferring the smoother tonality of the Spring, but I like the extra energy and detail from the TT2. Some of it could depend on musical tastes too.
@@PassionforSound Agree, I find myself enjoy Spring more on some old Chinese pop vocals, which mostly were not quite good recorded, and Spring is more forgiving for those tracks, but if I'm listening to classic music, I prefer TT2 for more detail
Thank you, I have been waiting for the review on these DACs. Great job.
Thank you! Glad you liked it
And for 10 grand more one can hear the thoughts of a singer :))) Great review, thank you very very much! Yggy is back on my shopping list all of a sudden, hmmm...
Haha. Now that would be interesting - a digital to analog and psychic converter.
I was curious about R2R Dacs after trying out different mid level Dacs in my system such as Chord 2qute, Simaudio moon 380 dsd and Hegel HD25, I decided to buy the spring 3 Kte WO ever listening to it.
The first 2 weeks with it were disapointing, but it does change quite a bit over time.
I had to reposition my speakers and my acoustical settings.
After 1 month of use I would say that it's the best Dac that I ever had in my system, it's detail retrieval is better than all of my previous Dacs, but Without it being in your face.
The only Dac that I tried briefly in my system that was better is Metronome "le Dac", but it costs double and I'm not sure which is more enjoyable to listen to.
Over all a great buy, but not my last Dac.
Glad you're enjoying the Spring! Thanks for sharing your experiences
I own both TT2 and M-Scaler and May L2.
I have a different perception from you: I find the May to be more airy and spacious, more grainy, more "analogue" and the TT2 combo to be more punchy, detailed, but with a narrower soundstage and element separation.
As you said though, at this level it's just a matter of personal preference...
Sometimes the terms we use to describe things can mean different things for different people (and there's no right or wrong). Glad you shared your impressions though because it might help others.
For the record, I do think the May is an outstanding DAC!
This leads into the whole oversampling discussion. Obviously, he doesn't perfer NOS sound. Spring 3 has none, May is limited. I wonder why he didn't run either through the Mscaler in his review? Or perhaps why he didn't use hqplayer. This is why the holo products can go up to 1.5m taps as an input because quite frankly, oversampling should be done externally with a product desinged for it. The May only does it because of the AKM chips inside had that functionality, but it is marginal at best.
Also realize, that the amps he is using aren't in the same category as these products so it's ability to highlight the diffrerences should be taken into account. I have questions about the Burson (love them) chain being. Perhaps trying it on other amps may show something else. He has AAS, forgot which one, looks like a Pendant(?) behind him. What is interesting is he is the first reviewer to really call out a huge difference between the Spring and the May. This is surprising, even to Kitsune which makes me think that there may be something else going on. Not to take anything away from the Yaggy. It is a good device, but like the Chord it has better oversampling built in than either of the Holo products and without taking that into consideration or adjusting for it, I understand his views, but depending on your setup your milage will varry. Personally, I would rather spend $250 for hqplayer than $5k for an mscaller, but that is just me.
Hi Roger, you're making a bunch of incorrect assumptions here. I tested the DACs using the Burson Soloist GT and Sparkos Labs Aries - both top tier headphone amps. The amp behind me is a Bottlehead Mainline, not an AAS amp - it's excellent, but not as good as the other two I mentioned.
The reason I didn't test the Holo DACs with the M-Scaler is because it completely changes the cost of the system. As I showed on screen and discussed, due to the need to invest in an amp for the Holo DACs (not needed with the TT2), the cost of adding an M-Scaler takes it into a different category. It's also a non-ideal setup due to the limited output from the M-Scaler to non-Chord DACs.
Finally, the same upsampling that will improve the Holo DACs will improve other DACs too like the TT2 for example. Suggesting that a DAC needs extreme upsampling to sound it's best basically means that people are forced to spend more than the list price to get the performance they're expecting. That's a drawback to me, particularly if the other options at the same price sound great with no added fuss or expense.
Hi Marco, I tried both. Which would you say do you prefer?
@@simonprice2923 the tt2 is gaaaaawn 😜 that says it all.
I’ve heard that the Spring requires a long burn in period like up to 400-500 hours!
How long did it burn in before you did your review?
These were demo units that had been reviewed by at least one prior reviewer and likely listened to by Hugo from Indie HiFi as well. Which is to say that I don't know for certain, but there would have been plenty of time to get through the major changes of burn-in (if needed) because the majority of change happens early in the process.
@Robert M: I read from one commenter's post on another TH-cam audiophile review of the Holo Audio MAY that HIS experience with his MAY KTE DAC was such that it took him the better part of 900 (yes, NINE-HUNDRED) hours' worth of break-in-time before his MAY finally cleared the break-in goal posts and began sounding, to his ears, remarkably and sublimely MUSICAL, to the point where listening to music moved him to tears. His MAY had THAT much of an emotional impact on his listening experience. He very clearly stated that, when getting a MAY, we "have to GRIND OUR WAY through the lengthy break-in process" before we can truly begin to appreciate what the MAY can do. Here, copied/pasted, are his own words:
Jeff Trimm9 months ago (edited) - in response to "THE KING IS CROWNED - HOLO AUDIO MAY DAC REVIEW" - on TH-cam by NEW RECORD DAY (Ron)
"Fantastic review! I'm a new Holo May KTE owner, and I think you nailed it. One comment to current and prospective owners on burn-in: I bought a Holo May KTE and got it a few days before Christmas, 2020. It has been my personal experience that 500 hours is not sufficient for burn-in. At least in my experience, it took 900-1000 hours before the MAY's sound-stage, imaging and tone quality really opened up & started sounding truly beautiful and startlingly lifelike. Up until this point, I would get a day or two where it would seem to make a big improvement, only to regress in sound-stage, tonal and sound quality. There were a lot of ups and downs for me, and then starting around 900 hours or so, everything really started to gel in an incredible way. The transformation at this point has not been subtle. I can only say that whatever sound you hear and impressions you have of the Holo May KTE when listening to it when it has undergone fewer than 900-1000 hours of burn-in, is only a facsimile of what it will sound like after it has truly and finally broken in. You have to grind through the hours to get the payoff though. In my case, 39 days of 24x7 play. It seems insane to require that much break-in time, and YHMV (Your Hourage May Vary), but this has been my experience with my KTE edition with all of its upgraded caps and fuses inside it. When fully burned in, it is a truly magical and beautiful-sounding source with a realism that is startling, coupled with a lovely natural tone. Also, don’t skimp on the USB cable if USB is going to be your source. I’m running a Shunyata Sigma USB cable, and it is worth every penny. Also, per the review, the quality of the streamer, Ethernet cables, and even the network switch all have non-trivial impacts on the sound. I have a SotM switch/cabling running into an Auralic Aries G2. The resolution of the Holo May KTE is such as to make audible the positive impact of all of these up-stream upgrades. Anyway in summary, when getting this device brand-new from the factory, be sure you grind through the burn-in hours, potentially 1000 of them, to unlock the ultimate sound-capability of this beguiling DAC, at least in its KTE form. Don't pass judgment until after you have done the leg-work, and then be prepared to be gob-smacked. The transformation in those last 100 hours is magical." End of copied/pasted report.
Thanks for the great work!
Wondering how the May benefits paired with Holo Audio's Bliss amp rather than the Soloist
The May is a top tier DAC so it will definitely scale along with better amps (and the Bliss might best the Soloist GT - I'm not sure).
That said, other DACs like the TT2 will also scale with better amps so adding a different amp won't change things in any absolute ways.
In short, May is definitely excellent and deserves to be considered alongside the other great DACs on the market, but I don't see it as definitively better than the equivalent competition regardless of the amp used.
@@PassionforSound Thanks for the thoughtful response! Makes sense
How these dacs compare with HoloAudio Cyan 2 ?
I haven't tried the Cyan 2 - sorry
I am expecting delivery of the holo cyan 2 tomorrow - it's NOS only and wayyyy less expensive. This will be my first r2r dac and to say I'm on tenterhooks in anticipation of finally getting my hands on it would be an understatement. I feel like I've got "detail retrieval" exhaustion from years of D/S dacs, so we shall see if having things a bit "smoothed over" is actually as good for me as I imagine it to be or not.
My current dac is "hot" with 5v output, too, and it's annoying af in combination with my amp, even with its volume control. I also ordered a passive attenuator to see if this helps - it should but who knows?
I hope you love the Cyan 2!
@@PassionforSound thank you! So far I don't hate it :D It's only been a few hours but I've already had some "wow! are you kidding?!" good moments, some "huh???" odd moments, and some moments where I hear no difference to my old dac at all. The main quality that strikes me, though, is while it sounds overall brighter than my last dac, it's surprisingly easy to listen to. I would not call it smoothed over though - it just seems more refined and at ease - more "competent", like it doesn't need to push so hard? The dynamics and control with complex recordings is far and away the biggest improvement, so let's see if the few odd bits work themselves out with a few more hours of use (primarily nasal/buzzy/lost sounding vocals on a few older recordings - really weird effect)
Great review , have you heard merason frerot Dac? What are your thoughts? Looking for Dac in 1500-2000 range
Glad you liked the review. I haven't heard the Merason Frerot - sorry.
This really helped reassure me that the gumbi mb or Yggy are the way to go. Thank you!
My pleasure. The May is a brilliant DAC, but the Yggy OG is still my preference over the Spring and therefore at the price point it's one of my top recommendations
@@PassionforSound have you tried a decent ddc with the yggy to see if it can come close to the may? Would be interesting
I only had the May for a short time so didn't compare directly, but I have a DDC with the Yggy now and it still doesn't match the TT2 so it also wouldn't match the May. I love the Yggy, but it's not on the level of that next tier of performance
@@PassionforSound that’s fair, you get what you pay for! Happy listening!
You too 🙂🙂
Hi Lachlan, I'm Khiem, your audiophile friend from Head-fi and Facebook. I have not heard the Spring KTE or the May, but I am currently using the Spring Lv2. One thing I noticed that was not covered in your review is that my Spring sounds SIGNIFICANTLY better when using the I2S input compared with other inputs.
I'm not saying the I2S will transform the Spring into total different beast. Just a thing that I found out after 2 years living with my Spring and have tried it with various inputs/systems.
Nevertheless, superb and informative review as always! Your feedback is spot on!
Hi Khiem, thanks for commenting and letting me know it's you! That's great info for others using / trying the Spring. Thanks for sharing that experience!
You need to get the very latest USB module. That makes a huge difference in how the USB input sounds.
9:55 - I'm fairly sure the May DAC uses Otype flat wire transformers, not Toroidals.
O-type are a toroidal transformer, just a different shape than the regular toroidal. Kind of like a straight six vs V6 engine - both are still 6-cylinder engines
Even though this review is two years old, it is right in target for me. I own a Yggy+ but the Holo Cyan 2 is being massively hyped right now, and I’ve never considered units from Holo before. I’m very curious to hear your opinion.
After: I’m sticking with my Yggy, but I sure wish I had the scratch to spend $10,000 USD on each component in my system. I envy your experience of the TT2 + MScaler.
The Yggy+ is brilliant! I'm yet to hear a Cyan 2, but I doubt it will surpass the Yggy so much as maybe match it. Enjoy!
And now, 2 years later, we have the Cyan 2 for far less money. It Would be great 👍 if you could review that one in comparison.
I'd love to, but Holo cracked it over this review and now I can't get access to any of their gear... Not a brand I particularly want to recommend.
@@PassionforSound I understand; they should certainly accept your opinion. And I totally 💯 agree with your conclusion in this review!
@jos5067 thanks for confirming my thoughts. It's always nice to get additional opinions.
Thank you for another great and thoughtful review. After reading / watching a number of excellent reviews about the Spring Dac I was ready to pull the trigger. However, after watching your review, your clear descriptions and your reasoning I decided to go with the Hugo TT2. While I obviously do not have the benefit of being able to compare the Spring to the TT2, I can say that I am extremely happy with my decision. The TT2 really is a marvel. It is versatile and can drive anything. I even enjoy the DCA Stealth with it, which I usually have connected to my tube amp. Thank you for your guidance with your excellent reviews.
So glad I could help. I think you've made a fantastic choice that can be your centre-piece in your audio chain for years to come
Another Excellent review. Based on your recommendation I got the Chord Hugo TT2, and I’m smitten with it, but based on all the reviewers, I was just about to trade it in for the hollow audio combo, but after listening to this review, I decided to just save for the M Scaler. So, thank you so much!!
I'm glad I could help and I think you've made the right decision! Enjoy! 🙂
Are you allready using the signalist hq player?
It has upsampling that mimics the m-scaler.
Maybe just untill you saved enough?😅
@@tdfmike3915 I’m ripping the M scaler benefits already he he he he
This review is excellent and also an honest effort put into making a fair comparisons but it is clearly a good example of personal preference. Contrast this review of the Holo May compared to the Chord Hugo TT2 to the review of the Holo May by Golden Sound who compared it against the Chord Dave a yet higher end DAC from Chord Audio and Golden Sound found the Holo May far more to his own personal taste all around. Both reviews well presented by two of who I consider some of the best and fairer audio equipment reviewers in TH-cam channels and they continue to be top reviewers in my own personal opinion….
But as they themselves often state on their reviews, it all comes down to personal preference…. so for anyone interested on selecting and purchasing from any of these DACS, we must take the conclusions of all these reviews with a grain of salt and just judge them as good and honest opinions. And is good to listen to a variety of opinions to help us arrive at the best possible solution for our own personal use specially if listening in person to the various equipment options is not possible.
100%! We can only ever discuss what we like and why (hopefully with comparisons for context). It's so important to get to know a reviewer's preferences and how they align with your own.
For the record, I do think the May is a brilliant DAC.
Did you try either of these DACs with HQPlayer?
I didn't, but I did feed them both using the very good upsampling from the Volumio Primo and it does improve the sound (as discussed in the video)
@@PassionforSound If you didn't use HQPlayer or at least the M scaler i don't think the upsampling can be qualified as very good.
My review was not intended to see how to squeeze the maximum performance put of these DACs, it was to compare them in similar setups to see what people could expect. Many people will not be using these in systems with HQ Player or an M-Scaler so taking time in an already long review to deep dive in upsampling doesn't make sense
This channel is really good. What would make it even better is adding reviews and discussions of integrated amps, power amps, pre amps, cables, speakers etc etc.
Glad you like the channel. Unfortunately, I have limited space and a small child. Neither is conducive to having large amps and speakers around. Maybe in the future...
Hi, great review as always! Any plans on doing a review on the Holo Bliss headphone amplifier?
Unfortunately, it seems the fact that I didn't rave about their DACs made Holo Audio a bit grumpy so I'm not sure if I'll be able to get a Bliss demo unit from the local distributor ☹️
I wonder if anyone's tried the M Scaler with Holo Audio Spring or May DACs.
If so, what were your impressions? thx...
I haven't, but I also probably wouldn't because the M-Scaler is limited on its output to non-Chord DACs. It needs the dual BNC setup to hit the highest sample rates so you're hobbling it somewhat when using with other DACs. Of course, for those with Chord DACs and others, that could.make sense, but not to use the M-Scaler only with a non-Chord DAC.
Better to go for HQ Player with the Holo gear and that should reap excellent rewards.
OHH Shit!! Finally! Waited so long for this review!
Hope you like it then 🤞
Ideally I'd have liked to know your impression of feeding the MAY KTE an upsampled feed when comparing to TT2 w mscaler .. Either feed MAY from m mscaler or via software (eg Audirvana, HQplayer etc). Late comment on this upload lol!, ... sorry as clearly too late to check. Just thought I'd share this comment as I did acquire a MAY KTE and do via Audirvana feed and upsampled feed and do notice a difference to detail retrieve and no loss in the richness of the sound. I do however use primarily for speaker vs headphones listening.
Thx and love your videos!
Based on many people's suggestions, the May might sound a bit better with upsampler inputs, but the M-Scaler isn't the ideal source for this because it's severely limited when used with non-Chord DACs.
The May is definitely an outstanding DAC whether you're using it with upsampled content or not so I think you can buy with confidence and then decide later if you prefer upsampling via Audirvana or just the bit-perfect output
R2R technology, including the May, apparently gives you a more realistic rendition of music with things like resonances, air around instruments and spatial placement being more life-like than Delta-Sigma. It could possibly be due to the high amount of digital processing involved in D/S DACs. In your opinion, is the Hugo TT2 able to compete with the May when it comes to these nuances or does it, in comparison, sound "flatter", more digital/processed and more synthetic?
I absolutely think the TT2 competes on those factors. "Traditional" DS designs using ESS, AKM, Cirrus Logic chips, etc. definitely fall short in those areas, but the TT2 (and all Chord DACs) are designed very differently despite technically being DS. I feel like the May produces a little more space perhaps, but the tonality, resonance and texture of the sounds are a little better from the TT2 so both are excellent and on par with (for me) the TT2 being slightly better due to having just that touch more accuracy on the tonality and texture/micro details
@@PassionforSound Thank you very much for your reply. I have been considering saving for a May but my issue with it would be that I wouldn't want to spend any more money on my set-up (that would be a huge expense on its own) and as you've rightly pointed out in your video, the May would require an amp alongside it that would be good enough not to hold it back... All of a sudden the TT2 looks like a better option, I just wasn't sure about how close these two products are to each other, i.e. if the May offers something that the Hugo's digital processing simply cannot match (some people claim the May is uncannily life-like). Also, there are people who claim that the May is even better than the Dave which would imply that the TT2 is not in the same league.
Having spent the time I did with the May and TT2 side-by-side, I really don't get the assertions that the May is somehow superior to the Dave when it only just matched the TT2 to my ears.
It's possible that people aren't taking into account factors like system synergies (how well the DAC and amp suit each other sonically, which headphones are used, and even the interconnects used) so it's absolutely possible that an optimised May is better than a TT2 or Dave, but the reverse would also be true that an optimised TT2 will be better than a non-optimised May.
Something else to consider is whether they are using headphones or speakers for their listening. I haven't tried the May with speakers so it's possible that alters things.
Finally, as for the processing side of things, remember that it's ALL digital audio so both DACs are processing the data (and heavily). The May is often cited as sounding best with upsampled audio from HQ Player while the TT2 is doing much the same thing internally (although HQ Player is theoretically more powerful). Rob Watts' design of the Chord DACs is all about maximising the accuracy of the analog waveform - i.e. ensuring precise reconstruction from the samples to the sound. I think we sometimes feel like R2R DACs are somehow keeping things more analog, but the reality is that it all comes from a set of samples so the more precision and processing that goes into the reconstruction process, the better. I don't say this to suggest that the TT2 is automatically better in that regard so much as to say that when we're talking digital audio, more processing might actually be preferableand shouldn't be seen as a negative.
@@PassionforSoundIt's always a pleasure listening to and reading your opinions, but I must say it is doubly so now that I've spent a while on the Head-Fi forum where there are at least a few individuals who seem hell-bent on defending their preconceived notions of what's right and wrong in the audio world :)
You're right about the consensus being that the May truly spreads its wings when used with the HQ Player.
My understanding was that a truly NOS DAC like the May has less digital processing involved as it doesn't oversample by default and as such doesn't need to deal with as many issues as a D/S DAC (noise etc.). On top of that, because it has a natural high-frequency roll-off it inevitably produces a slightly different sound which is liked by some and perhaps for one reason or another sounds more realistic to some people (well, there's nothing particularly interesting about the roll-off but if the smaller amount of digital processing results in more life-like sound then I thought that this could be a game-changer).
Following from that, I would think that an ideal situation would be a NOS DAC with oversampling via software such as HQ Player, because: 1. It gives you the option to experience NOS whenever you feel like it (unavailable on other types of DAC); 2. You get a more pure base sound which you then oversample with highly customisable software).
As I've said, I've not experienced any of this so I have no idea how this theory translates into reality and whether all this hassle is worth it.
Because of my limited budget, I am considering getting a TT2. My headphones are also easy to drive and this combo takes care of any potential questions like "Is my amp good enough?", "What if I used different interconnects?" :)
I thought that I would first check with you, however, to see how big or small a potential gap is between these devices. To be fair, it would need to be pretty big for me to want to save so much more money to get a May AND an amplifier. Especially since it's possible to get a TT2 second-hand at a decent price.
I have a D90 now and an Ares II - the Ares II makes me miss the D90's resolution and precision while the D90 lacks the "time domain" of the Ares and sounds a bit lifeless/soulless. Instead of being happy with both devices they have made it almost impossible for me to enjoy either of them, hehe, which just means that I've learnt somehing new and it's time for a vertical, as opposed to a horizontal, change. I hope that I won't be disappointed with what the TT2 brings to the table. :)
If you want a balance point between the D90 and Ares II (that's better than both), it's very hard to go wrong with the TT2. As you say, avoiding the issue of interconnects and DAC/amp synergy is a huge bonus too.
Keep in mind that you can get the same HQ Player benefits with the TT2 as you can with the May (even though they process the incoming signal differently).
The May has a slightly fuller, slower (not in a bad way) sound, but I can't imagine anyone being unhappy with either so I think you're making a great choice.
Nice review. I did order a KTE Spring 3 a few weeks back during Black Friday sales and still currently waiting for it to arrive. I was looking for something different and not a Delta Sigma based DAC. I currently run a Chord Hugo 2 as my DAC through to various amps such as JDS Labs El Amp, Gustard H16, WA7 Fireflies and Sennheiser HDV820. Before making my decision I was testing between the Spring 3 KTE and the Chord TT2. Ended up with the Spring 3. Smooth and pleasing yet still spacious and impactful when needed. It was different which is what I was after. TT2 still had the Chord house sound just taken up to the next level. Next week I am hoping to try both the Soloist GT and GSX Mini. There is only a $100 difference between them here in NZ. Soloist does have extra features and probably a better volume control for the high output voltage of the Spring 3.
I have the Spring KTE for 3 months now, and after testing many high end dacs recently in my system, I can definitively say is the best dac I've heard so far including the May as well. I'm guessing this reviewer may have received a defective unit, because, is super resolving, the separation is simply amazing, and the sound balance is fantastic.
I'm very comfortable that it wasn't a defective product. It's more likely a question of the products used with the DACs and also whether you're using speakers or headphones. There are a number of R2R DACs which are incredibly popular with speaker users, but which I haven't particularly liked in my dedicated headphone system.
Ultimately, if you're happy with what you've got, that's great and we might just have different tastes.
To your point, Recce, it's great that you could try a few different DACs and choose the one that suited you most.
As you clearly stated, it must be the products used with the dac. Because I've tried many hi-end dacs lately and one of the strengths of the Spring 3 dac is separation and depth, as well as a very well balance natural sound.
Were you using speakers or headphones, Nicolas? I believe the speaker experience might be very different
Hey brother. Is the May and spring a bit less dynamic than the Yggy? That is are the May and spring a bit soft in attack?
I think R2R discreet DACs are being a bit overhyped as the flavor of the last year or so.
Some say the May and Spring are a bit of ‘ pipe and slippers’. Too soft and not energetic enough.
I feel like the Spring definitely fits this description in relation to the Yggy OG. The May has a better sense of energy to me and is a DAC that I really like. If not for the TT2, the May is what I would own. I definitely think the Spring was overhyped.
Lachlan I have read a lot about the May needing a LOT of running in. Any idea how much running in (ie burn in) the unit has had?
I'm not certain, but it is a demo unit that had been with another reviewer before me and likely had also been used by Hugo from Indie HiFi before he sent it out. I doubt it has any more significant improvement to show and it sounded excellent at it was.
I bought a Holo May KTE .. has 230 hrs on it .. it’s in a system with Aries G2.1 , Hugo2 , Modright KWH225i Integrated Hybrid Amp,Boenicke W8se+ speakers . Less Loss Filters and cabling .. Lush ^3 USB and Intona Profesional USB cables
And it is an awesome DAC ..soundstage is awesome
Sounds like a great setup. The May KTE is a brilliant DAC.
@@PassionforSound it is .. but i agree with you that my Hugo2 .. on some tracks i prefer .. so i will be looking for a Used TT .. or maybe a Dave .. but i have yet to hear a Mola Mola .. would love a direct comparison video .. of a chip based DAC .. for a system with a May .. to be a super detailed DAC
I'd love to try a Mola Mola too. Maybe on 2022...
@@PassionforSound hi have you ever tried the Lush ^2 or ^3 USB cables .. i have had the ^ 2 in a past set up .. sold it to a friend when i no longer needed it .. have had the ^3 running since i got the May .. The Intona Professional version USB just showed up .. and while it cost double in price .. they are both going to be kept .. they are very different Lush is well Lush .. and Intona is really kinda freaking me out .. i have been going back and forth between the 2 for hours .. it needs some hours on it .. but this is a detail oriented cable top to bottom .. never heard anything this revealing
Thanks for letting me know about them..I haven't heard of those before so I will check them out if I get the chance
Great review!! What about the May plus the M-Scaler? How does that sound?
Thanks Carlos! I didn't bother trying it because the M-Scaler provides predictable benefits regardless of the DAC you feed it into. I.e. better spatial details, more depth in the soundstage and a smoother but still detailed and textured sound.
I've come back and rewatched this review over the past 2 years a few times as I purchased the Spring 3 KTE 2 years ago. I question whether or not the Spring 3 was reviewed before or after the 500 hr burn in period as that will make a big difference. Furthermore, I also question how one can give such a praising review for the May which is only slightly better than the Spring 3 (about a 10% difference) reference GoldenSound. Imo, I would have preferred the review done w/ the 500 hr burn in period and a blind test comparison w/ the Yggy. I'd also like to add that both the May & Spring 3 greatly benefit from OS via HQPlayer which was another reason why I went w/ the Spring 3 vs the May bc if you are going to OS you will get better performance w/ HQPlayer that even out classes the M-Scaler. Another point about the voltage and pre-amp is not generally needed if you are paring the May or Spring 3 w/ a decent quality amp rather than a budget amp. A lot of negative bias in this review that is highly misleading.
From your comment, it sounds like you're discussing the performance of the Spring vs other DACs without having compared them for yourself. Also, all DACs can benefit from the use of HQ Player so the benefits gained when using HQP on the Spring will lift the alternative DACs (e.g. May or TT2) by the same amount. There's also the cost and hassle of HQ Player to account for.
I had nothing against these DACs coming in and I really enjoyed the May. I still feel though that the Spring was/is overpriced and was well over hyped at the time.
@@PassionforSound Ok lets keep this simple; plz explain how you can praise the May (nearly double the cost) vs the Spring when the performance SQ difference is present but very very small which is the consensus of many who have had the opportunity to compare both and confirmed?
Not to mention if you look at your past content your attitude has always been positive and praising even when it was a piece of gear that maybe didn't fit for you but you rehashed the HYPE-TRAIN comment at least twice in this video as a very negative view but again looping back to praise the May? So I do stand by my statement, highly misleading.
"I still feel though that the Spring was/is overpriced and was well over hyped at the time." It was HYPED bc the Spring 3 comes very very close the performance of the May which is nearly double the cost.
Furthermore, had you kept your previous review format and concluded that the Spring 3 didn't quite meet your expectations but you actually did prefer the May that would have been the more traditional approach for what you are known for but you clearly have some sort of negative bias.
Perhaps rather than responding/rebuttal; go back and rewatch this review and listen to yourself, its not good. To be clear I have no issues w/ you not liking the Spring vs the Yggy thats totally fine. It's your negative bias that has compromised your judgement to give an honest review to the ppl consuming your content.
@heyguyslolGAMING there's no doubt I approached this differently to some other reviews. The reason was that, at the time, the Spring 3 was being way over-hyped and (at the time) I felt it needed a strong counterpoint.
how much better is the May than the Spring in terms of percentages in your opinion?
I find it impossible to work in percentages with audio gear, particularly when the differences are as intangible as they are here. There's a realism and liveliness to the sound of the May that's not there in the Spring for me. It's a significant jump in the sense that I wouldn't buy a Spring, but it's absolutely buy a May.
sorry, could you share what was your suggestion to serve as a balanced output for the Spring 3 instead of its pre-amp option please? I couldn't catch it. thank you.
I don't recall, David, but it was likely a Singxer SA-1, Burson Soloist 3XP or similar
Another great and professional review. I am awaiting my Denafrips Pontus II and stepping up from the Ares, and looking forward to your reviews on these products.
I'm very keen to try the Pontus and Terminator too. Enjoy your Pontus II!
I wish the TT2 alone would do it for me, but after trying other dedicated class a amps, it’s clear it’s not beefy enough to make the Susvaras really sing. Have you ever tried the XLR outs from the TT2 into the Susvara? Supposedly that provides it more power but not sure if it helps at all in reality.
I did try the XLR outputs and felt that it made no noticeable difference. I agree that the Susvaras need a warmer/richer amp to be their best. TT2 is just too dry/neutral for the Susvaras IMO
which do you find the better dac between the Holo May KTE Level 3 or Denafrips Terminator 2?
I haven't tried the Terminator 2 - sorry!
Great review. Please, how do the USB connections compare between the May and TT2?
It's very hard to isolate the performance of particular inputs (at a subjective level) from the performance of the DACs. For me, both devices performed very well via USB using my setup which is a regular PC, JCat audio USB card and Curious Evolved USB cable
@@PassionforSound thanks, Please one more question. Saw you like the Curious Evolved which on my system was too bright for my ear. I have Verity CB and Atrium and looking to upgrade my system to the TT2/mscaler. To your ear how do the cans sound on the TT2 on the warmer setting. I love the TT 2/ mscaler potential in all respects and am only cautious about tone. I am getting encouraged to drive the 100+ miles to have a listening test. TIA
I love the TT2, but it is a very neutral sounding DAC and headphone amp so keep that in mind. What's your current source chain where the Curious Evolved was too bright?
@@PassionforSound thanks for the get back. My source is a zen mini with a separate linear power supply though a Final Touch Audio USB to a Phoenix through another FTA USB to an Auris D2D DAC through LessLoss RCAs to an Auris HA2 SE amp with a Mallard input tube and Telefunken power tubes all NOS dating to the ‘60s. The system also has a LessLoss 640x C-Mark firewall on the power inlet to the DAC. The FTAs, along with the Phoenix mitigated the sibilance and the LessLoss significantly reduced noise and enhanced clarity. All of course to my ear.
What got my attention to the TT2/m was 1) your review 2) Moon audio in the USA, where I cut my teeth, so to speak, and who endorsed Chord from the beginning 3) my Mojo which is connected to an A&K and which sounds very musical to my ear and last 4) another audio analyst said his favorite combination of all his high end cans, including the Susvara, with the TT2/ mscaler is the Verity CB with the TT2 cross feed set at 2 and the warm filter setting. Also Drew at Moon audio has a video up where he prefers the TT2/ mscaler to the Dave ,alone, because of the warmth. So the stars seemed to align around the chord.
PS I mostly Ron burned CDs on the Zen therefore my great interest in the mscaler.
The Fat Controller grew cross with Lachlan...thank you for a rose-lens-free review!
Haha. Yes, luckily no real trains were harmed in the making of this review.
Glad you appreciated the honest opinion. No doubt some will perceive it differently to me, but I definitely expected a lot more after hearing the rave reviews.
Nice Review, but, I think you completely miss the main selling point of the Holo DACs, and that is to use them specifically with HQPlayer in NOS mode. I have yet to meet anyone who owns a HOLO and is not using HQPlayer. It is the combo of HQPlayer feeding the HOLO May which blows the doors off the TT2 +MScaler combo and directly competes with a DAVE+MScaler If you can still try it, upsample to DSD512 with poly-sinc-ext2 using the ASDM7ECv2 modulator. Those settings are stunningly good.
I've sent the Holo units back, but I think buying a product where you have to then use a specific piece of software (that's not free), and a piece of software with a very convoluted interface, has its own drawbacks. I'm not criticising the use of HQ Player, but reviewing the product not the potentially tweaked and maximum possible performance source chains. If I started down that path we'd have to start talking about similar tweaks for every other product too and that opens up WAY too many variables for a manageable length video. Not to mention that there are many people looking for a DAC to connect to a streaming device or transport where HQ Player might not be an option
@@PassionforSoundI agree with this. I do not want to spend £6K on a DAC, just to have to use HQP to make it sound best. It already should sound amazing for £6K!
Can’t wait to view your Yggdrasil review. Hope you can compare it to the Gungnir.
I can't compare it to a Gungnir unfortunately, but I will compare to Bifrost 2 which Jason Stoddard considers a mini Yggy (and with good reason it turns out)
Excellent review as always. I have a pair of Acoustic Energy active speakers and I need a dac, a preamp and a headphone amp. Price notwithstanding what would you choose between an all in one solution like the hugo tt2 and a burson soloist 3X preamp/hp amp + qutest dac combo? On SQ alone… I will be listening mainly to speakers and quite rarely through hp so the dac and pre sections are more important than the hp amp one.Thanks
The TT2 is still the easy winner here because the DAC and preamp stages are outstanding even without the HP amp.
@@PassionforSound Thank you👍
Hi Lachlan. A couple of days ago I eventually bought the TT2 in part also thanks to you. I'm very, very happy so far😊One more question if you don't mind. If you had the chance to compare, did you find the XLR outputs better sounding than the RCA ones on the TT2? My active speakers have both XLR and RCA inputs, I presently use a pair of RCA's from the TT2 in to the speakers since I don't have a pair of XLR yet. Any thoughts on this? Thank you very much
Another thing, do you think that a LPSU added to the TT2 will improve sound quality over the stock one? Sorry and thanks
So glad you're enjoying the TT2. I haven't found any difference between the RCA and XLR outputs. I believe Rob Watts actually favours the single ended outputs (6.3mm and RCA)
How does the Chord Qutest compare?
The Qutest is around about the same level as the Schiit Yggy, although I've never directly compared - this is based on other comparisons I've done (like Qutest vs Gungnir Multibit).
Interesting review. I’ve been following reviews and forums for the Spring and the May for a few months and it seems that those who have committed to a May and own TT2 eventually move away from using the TT2 as their main after a few months.
Another common theme in the forums is burn in. Most people love the sound of the Spring and May out of the box but after some burn in time ( or running time) they found that it opens up more and exposes more detail. It could be subjective but at least with my mid-fi gear burn in does help with some negative qualities I remember from initial impressions.
A few people have suggested 1000 hrs for the May to open up (which assuming reasonable listening patterns) is 6-12 months, but the most common number I’ve seen is 200 hours. I’m not advocating that you can only review things that are fully burned in, and I know you do spend a fair amount of time reviewing a product so that you do let the electronics settle, but its something worth doing a follow up with older units.
I think the main reason why people would prefer the Spring or May aside from that 3d space is the timbre from NOS. Most people say that it sounds very “natural”, like “real music”, like “analogue”.
There are better DACs I’ve read about, the WaveDream, the Tambaqui. But they’re far more expensive . The Terminator II is probably on equal footing.
Anyway, great review and I hope to see more high end DAC reviews.
Thanks for the thoughtful comments. I believe both of these DACs had already been fairly well used by the time they reached me. Probably not 1000 hours, but I'd also highly doubt the validity of those claims. Burn-in is definitely real, but in my experience the vast majority of any impact from burn-in will happen quite early with only subtle differences evolving after that.
I agree that R2R and NOS are all about tonality which is why I do prefer these over most delta sigma DACs I've heard. They just don't stack up (to me at least) when compared to Schiit's Multibit approach or Chord's WTA filtering and high tap approach.
I hope to review the Pontus and Terminator in the future 🤞🤞
@@PassionforSound Disclaimer: I ordered a May which will come in January, so I did quite a bit of research before the purchase. Also this is just an opinion based on the opinion of others.
Some believe that the choice of amp can make a difference in the details of the May and Spring, using the Burson may not have the best synergy. That being said, some people on forums recommended even more expensive amps.
There's no doubt that system synergy is real and important, but I used multiple amps including the Soloist GT, Sparkos Labs Aries, Bottlehead Mainline and Elekit TU-8200R (modified).
The reality is that it's often about personal tastes and preferences. A system synergy that I think is perfect may still not appeal to others and that's totally fine. If people say review X is wrong because they didn't use amp Y it's a bit misleading because it all comes back to personal preference which are inevitably variable from one person to the next
@@PassionforSound The burn-in in May is difference. It sounded great out of the box but the first 100 hours or so the sound change all over the place. Sometime its better sometime its worst. After about 200-300 hours it start to get stable and then continually improves. Now the more I listen to it the better its get. This is the only gear I have that do this to me and needed this much burn in. Even my tube amplifier burn in quicker than the May.
If you look inside the May then its kind of make sense why it needed a lot of burn in. There seems to be a lot of power filtering and large capacitors inside. Holo May is also the only DAC I can think of that has 4 transformers. We do know that these can change the sound characteristics quite a bit as electricity is being passed through them.
All fair points, but I believe these units were well used before arriving with me.
The BIG question I dare to ask (only now) is, what power cords were used with these DACs? I strongly suspect that the Spring was the one most affected by this important aspect...
I was using the stock power cords with all of these. I didn't have any high end power cables at that time. It's also worth noting that I would always match cables (power, interconnects, USB) when comparing devices. I have 2-3 of all my main cables for this reason
Maybe one more thing... Owners of those Holo DACs report that they need at least 500-600 hours of burn-in, before they fully reveal their sound. Some even mention 800-1000 hours without turning them off, so esentially more than a month of uninterrupted playing. Do you know, how old these ladies were before you got them?
I don't know exactly. All I know is that they were demo units that had been with at least one other reviewer before me
Scenario...
I have the Arya Stealth.
Bitcoin hit's 100k.
I spend 10k to improve the Arya to the max.
Order of what I value the most:
1 - Timbre or "accuracy" or "realism"
2 - Soundstage or "3D" or "holographic"
3 - Detail or "resolution"
What system(s) do I go with?
Chord TT2 and M-Scaler. If you have any money left, a nice pure copper litz cable. Done 🙂
Good review and even for me the May did not made me fall off the chair when I listened to it first. Having said that, when comparing TT2 + external upsampler Mscaler, please consider this combo of Holo May + external upsampler HQplayer ($250) .. and only then being a fair comparison, the game is on :-) I found this combo did lost a bit of timber but was on steroids in terms of dynamics, impact, layering, resolution, clarity. Kindly let us know if you are able to compare. Cheers
Hi Ganesh, I can't make that comparison because the May was only on loan. However, I also didn't choose to explore the HQPlayer route because the TT2 was better to my ears without any upsampling so you could equally buy a TT2 and use HQPlayer to get even better results. I still think the May is a wonderful DAC and for those who don't need the pre-amp or headphone amp capability of the TT2, I'd always recommend the May as a great choice.
Got it, thanks. Also if you can get hold of Rockna wavelight DAC which is comparably priced then please share your thoughts on them as well, looking forward to that. According to the HQPlayer team, HQp works well only with certain DACs i.e. many Holo & TotalDAC models and few other DACs. I didn't ask the technicalities on why only certain DACs are recommended to be paired but this is a confirmed positioning from HQp team. I know it might sound bit unintuitive :-) but it seems to be the case. May out of the gate is good but does not live up to the hype considering my preference but when HQp adds to the mix then this completely extracts every bit of May's and the song's potential. Sorry, didn't mean to talk about an up-sampler in this DAC section but thought it is relevant to share it
No problems at all! All conversation is welcome anywhere 🙂🙂
How would you compare the above to the Bricasti M3h? (which I have and think is fantastic; so I am curious how it compares)
I haven't heard the Bricasti to comment - sorry!
Excellent review. Great analytical description. I would love to hear your views on the Chord Dave DAC. Subscribed. You deserve a high following.
Thanks Karl! I'll see if I can get a Dave across my desk in 2022. I appreciate the support - thank you!
As usual. A lot of wonderful information to allow amazing buying power for the audiophile. :)
So glad you found it useful 🙂
@@PassionforSound I did and I also wanted to say that I love the room you have for filming your videos. The lighting and setup is quite awesome. :)
Thank you for letting me know. It's taken a long time to get it where it is now and I'm happy with the results 🙂
I actually just added a print of one of my photos in that blank section of wall on the left so you'll see that in the videos coming soon too
@@PassionforSound. Of course. You’ve done a great job and I look forward to your extensive review of the DCA STEALTH once you get it of course to test. :)
Hey hey . Got a question for you .. will you take the R26 gustard or the new gustard x30 over spring 3 ?
Yes to the R26. I'm yet to hear the X30
@Passion for Sound, please add your setup to the video description. What headphones did you use? First, thank you for your review! That said, I think it's a bit odd to pair a $5500 DAC with a $1000 amp. It would be interesting to hear what you think of the May with something like the LTA MZ3 or a DNA Stratus, or other amp in that class.
Hi Henrik, I don't test with just one setup which is why I don't list a setup - it would be too long and complex. Also, I tested these DACs with the Soloist GT (not the basic Soloist) and Sparkos Labs Aries so $2.5k and $3k amps as well as the Bottlehead Mainline and Elekit TU-8200R.
@@PassionforSound Thanks for the clarification.
The Burson headphone amp is what degraded the May DAC, IMO. Also, you did not explain what the M-Scaler is, and can a similar device be used with the May DAC?
The Burson Soloist GT is on par or better than other amps at the same level (Ferrum Hypsos & Orr, Benchmark HPA4, Holo Bliss, etc.) so it wasn't a limiting factor. Even if it were a limiting factor, the TT2 would have been equally limited when comparing both DACs via the Soloist.
I didn't explain the M-Scaler because I have a dedicated video doing that and need to keep videos to a watchable length. It's not really a product that works optimally with non-Chord products, but you can use HQPlayer to get similar results with the May.
Great review! Any chance you could do a quick setup reveal before the review, i.e what source, cables, headphones. I can only assume you're using quality components but everything before and after the DAC can greatly affect the overall sound impressions in my opinion.
I'll see if can do something in the future. The challenge with it is that I don't only use one setup for testing. I'll generally use 2-3 headphones at a minimum and 2-3 amps for a DAC review like this one. I do use just one setup for my note taking part where I describe the comparisons, but that's just to illustrate what I've heard across multiple setups.
Looking forward to some model train reviews!
Haha. That's Passion for Steam 🤣
I'm curious what settings do you use.. also curious to know how spring3 KTE is going on when HQ player used or properly high quality source used.
I tried OS and NOS (as I think I discussed in the video). I provided very high quality sources to all devices tested and, keep in mind, that the benefits gained by one DAC when fed a higher quality signal will also translate to other DACs receiving the same high quality signals. I didn't test with HQ Player partly for the reason above (same benefits apply to all devices so the differences remain), but also because that immediately limits the options for people using the DAC to being fed only from a computer.
@@PassionforSound I 'm happy to see if you make a vid about comparing yggy vs spring3 KTE(w/ HQplayer).
Because it is on different league when you using it.
Thank you for your response :)
I don't own the Spring so I can't do that - sorry
Were you able to consider the various levels for the May (:1, 2, or L3), and which were you reviewing? Sorry, if you mentioned it - it's a long video to try and find
No
I only tried the Level 3 KTE in both cases. I might be able to arrange another look at the May levels at some point.
@@PassionforSound KTE is the TOTL Build for all of the Holo Audio Dac's and based on my experience with them the upcharge is worth the money.
@@PassionforSound Thank you for the info
Interesting! Based off of your awesome reviews and recommendations I picked up the Meze Elite w/ silver upgrade cable and Burson Soloist GT w/ 5a super charger. Loving them so far! Currently switching between the Bifrost 2 and the VMV D1se to see which one I prefer. Open to investing in a new dac if it is a better match for my amp and HPs. Is there a dac that would get me close to the TT2 quality? Should I try the Chord Qutest? Will it be a upgrade or a side grade to the Bifrost 2?
What gave me confidence in my amp purchase was when you compared the GT to the TT2 and said it was pretty much equal with the deference coming down to preference.
After watching this review, this doesn’t seem to be the case. Seem like the TT2 is easily better than the GT? Especially if there is no reasonably priced dac to pair with the GT to compete with the TT2.
Now I am wondering if I should have gone with the TT2? Wish I had a easy way to compare these expensive products before purchasing them. Anyway, thanks for the advice!
That's an interesting (and probably fair) conclusion you've drawn about the TT2 and the GT, but I do think it's very close to the TT2 rather than your understandable conclusion from this video.
There are soany variables to consider when reviewing or listening to multiple devices at once and the May + GT combo is a bit different than the TT2 + GT combo. The GT is a slightly punchier sounding amp than the TT2 amp so it is still different, but I do rate them on par and use the GT quite a lot still even though I have the TT2 so that's a good indicator of the quality.
As to your question, the Qutest will be a nice upgrade over the Bifrost 2. I can't speak to the D1se as I haven't yet been able to try it. The TT2 is still the best DAC I've tried for the price, but it might be redundant getting a DAC and amp when you have the GT. The Holo Audio May KTE would definitely be another recommendation. If it wasn't clear from this review, I think it's a great DAC for those who already have an amp.
@@PassionforSound thanks for the clarification. I really do appreciate you taking the time to respond to my questions. I know you must be FLOODED with them. Your commitment to your community is not lost on me! This is one one of the reasons I went with your recommendations. Your passion (no pun intended) really shines through!
I think I am going to grab the Qutest next week, test it out, settle on the DAC that pairs the best with the Meze / GT, and then enjoy the setup for many years to come.
The upgrade from the A90 to the GT was not subtle! It was an improvement on every level. Much more than any DAC I added.
To think… this upgrade path was sparked by your Elden Ring HP video! 😁
So glad I've been able to help and especially through a video that nearly didn't get made! 🙂🙂
Interesting review!
Hi Lachlan.
Nice review.
Have you tried running your headphones out of the balanced outputs on the TT2?
If you haven’t I suggest it.
Just my 2cents about the May is that there’s people running it into Benchmark THX amps that are very flat and the warmth added by the May might be just benefiting them.
Totally agree the TT2 is a fabulous dac and hope Chord make the Mojo2 a killer product.
Keep up the great work.
Hi Glen, glad you're liking the channel! I tested the XLR outputs of the TT2 for the Susvara review and found no significant difference if using the same cable. You might actually find that the wire used for the twin XLR connections might be imparting the favourable qualities because (if I recall correctly) Rob Watts actually runs everything (including speakers) from the 6.3mm outputs because they're a more direct, simple signal path and therefore preferable. Personally I heard no noticeable difference when the same wire type was used for XLR and 6.3mm.
@@PassionforSoundhmm... I believe I read somewhere that chord doesnt believe in balanced designs.
If you need balanced anything you dont have enough power for your (perfectly clean) single ended signal😂
Yep. Chord are among a number of companies who favour a good single ended amp design over balanced because it can create a simpler and more transparent signal path. For the record, I think it all comes down to each individual circuit as I've heard fantastic balanced designs too.
Is Holo Audio based out of Hong Kong or mainland Chinia?
China, as far as I can tell
Think you'll eventually check out the Yggy LiM?
It's unlikely I'll get the LIM or MIL because I've got the OG. I'm actually just finishing the dedicated OG review now.
@@PassionforSound looking forward to it. I really think we ought to work something out with Schiit about sending you those other two flavors as cards and letting you play around with them. The OG is really unique in its presentation, but the LIM is just so special in how it sound so "correct."
I'd love to do that. I can maybe chat to them about sending the PCBs only if that's possible to save of shipping and parts cost...
Great review, i recently bought a Spring 3 KTE, it sounds quite natrual to my ears. Few points i want to lay out: 1、Total production costs of a "ture discrete resistor ladder dac" is pretty high,higher than the chip based Schiit products;2、A true "NOS R2R" dac is hard to find at this price level, even Rockna uses its internal OS;3、I once heard the TT2, the sound is kind of "digital" to me. Anyway very honest review, keep fighting towards 20K subs!
Just need to mention one more point, about Spring 3 is lacking detail compare to schiit ygg, that is impossible to my understanding. The "more detail" you heard from YGG could be its harmonic distortion since the measurement of ygg show that(schiit does their own honest maesurement report), but lower THD doesn't mean it sounds bad.
Hi Max, they're very good points about the R2R being more expensive to produce. For me it is all about the sound quality produced and not the technology used which is why I favour the Yggy OG.
There will also always be personal tastes and system synergy to consider so if you're enjoying the sound and you're happy, that's all that matters. 🙂
@@maxjiang9663 THD is not a 100% related to what information you hear. There are a lot more variables at play than a simple number.
Really hope you will get your hands on Cyan 2 :)
It's unlikely as I can't get access to Holo Audio gear without buying it secondhand
This reviewer obviously likes DETAIL so I'm not surprised he preferred DACs that bring out details. R2R DACs are generally for people who prefer smoothness and overall musical enjoyment. When I hear music presented in a way that I can forget about instrument location/placement, specific details, etc. and just am able to enjoy and take in the music, that's the hallmark of a great DAC for me. But then, I'm not a reviewer so it is what it is, for me.
I'm biased as I own the Spring 3 KTE but it really requires a long burn-in so not sure if the reviewer had a 'good' unit for comparison purposes. I've owned Chord products (Hugo 2) and they are ultra detail retrieval monsters; I hear sounds that I've never heard before on my recordings. But the overall sound was just not pleasing for me and sounded dry and not enjoyable. That's why I moved to R2R DACs and they sounded better for my ears. But then I also use a tubed headphone amp so perhaps I'm in the group of people who prefer a warm and rich sound vs. a more analytical sound.
The unit I had was a demo unit that had been in action for an extended period before I received it so burn-in isn't a factor. I think you're right though that I value detail and imaging accuracy when listening. I don't like overly dry or analytical sound, but I use my choice of amps and headphones to colour the sound to my tastes and I personally believe in having a DAC that is as neutral (not souless or analytical) as possible to then add the colouration after it.
With all that said, what matters most is that you're enjoying your setup. It does sound like you enjoy a richer, smoother sound and it's great that you've identified that and that you're sticking to what you enjoy. Happy listening! 🙂
Another excellent review.
I agree with the hype train analogy, it's funny how people develop polarising views and strong language regarding the performance of certain products. When you get the chance to listen to the product yourself and compare the SQ to your own experiences the hyped expectation is never met. Great DACs sound great, that's it. The actual audio differences between good hifi DACs, streamers etc is so subtle most of us would fail blind testing, yet the price differences are ridiculous. Anyone who uses language like 'night and day' and 'leaves it for dead' when comparing expensive DACs/streamers is someone you should not be listening to.
There's a lot of truth in this! There are some notable exceptions, but they're just that - exceptions.
I think it's quite telling how quickly a lot of these "best DAC ever" type devices don't get talked about within 5-6 months of the initial hype.
@@PassionforSound True, and its funny how people talk up DACs they've never heard.
I have a simple Eversolo A6, I use it for transport only into a Michi P5 preamp.
The background is black ink, the vocals sublime and the instruments are 99.9% as good as I've heard on any system at any show (I have ATC's). Yet people say the A6 is 'night and day' to the master or the new wider model. Without even bothering to sample the other models I can tell you the difference would not be night and day and It would be very hard to tell the difference. A nice, neat data transfer with low jitter is what you want and all you need and the A6 achieves that very well.
People lose their heads, you can't make it sound better with fancier equipment, it's just data.
Yes, hyperbole is all too common in this hobby 🙂
I really like your reviews and hope you could review the enleum amp-23r one day.
Thanks Leigh! I've never reached out to them so I might do that and see what we can arrange.
Thanks for this. I was afraid I was missing out by not having the May. TT2 seems like a good option.
You could still be missing out. He used the Burson Grand Tourer as the headphone amp to pair with the May. A different amp could noticeably change the way it sounds.
That's true that amps can change the way it sounds, but I also tried the DACs with the Sparkos Labs Aries, Bottlehead Mainline and Elekit TU-8200R with no change tou preferences on any of them. If anything it reaffirmed my views because none of those amps are as transparent as the GT and therefore make the Spring sound more muted and the May was largely unaffected so the gap between the May and TT2 remained.
I think the TT2 is still the best choice for both sound quality and value for money (DAC, preamp and headphone amp)
@@PassionforSound Hey, thanks for the response. What headphone would you say you used the most in this comparison? Was it the Meze Elites?
@@PassionforSound And I did purchase the GT after watching your review, and I must say, it is an amazing sounding amp. I absolutely love the amp.
Glad you're enjoying the amp! I used the Elites and Susvaras about equally I'd say. I also had the Lirics, Verite Closed and Verite Open during the time I was auditioning the Holo DACs
I recently picked up a holo spring 3 level 1 in the second hand market. The only dacs I have to compare it too are the bifrost 2/64 and the Burson composer. The Holo ( 2nd hand) at 2 x the price of the bifrost 2/64 is a steal in my opinion. It beats the 2/64 thoroughly imo in all areas except the bass where the 2/64 is just a touch tighter. It is definitely! worth 2 x the price but not 3.5 times ( normal retail price). If you can pick up one of these at a good price in the 2nd hand market I would definitely consider it. You have next to no chance picking up a good second hand yiggy in Australia.
Thanks for sharing your experiences with the Spring, Joel! So glad you're enjoying it and that you got it at a great price.
Did you try MScaler into the May?
No. I find the M-Scaler to be pretty wasted on non-Chord devices because the output sample rate is severely limited. I used a Volumio Primo to upsample to 768kHz though and it made some nice improvements
Upscaling into the Holo dacs (while the dac is in NOS mode of course) is the preferred sound to my ears, and most others as well as the owner of Kitsune HiFi. I use my Roon Rock to upscale to 768, gives me just a tiny bit more sparkle (detail) up top and separation between instruments. I had the Dave/Mscaler in house for a month or more, I wouldn’t trade my Spring 3 KTE for it as an even swap for just listening (obviously I would do that trade and sell the chord gear and rebuy the Holo Audio dac and put the extra money into more gear - I’m not certifiably insane yet). Chord DAC’s are great but not as enjoyable for my ears with TOTL hp’s like the Susvara and such.
I didn't bother with the M-Scaler into the May because it doesn't make sense as a combination when the M-Scaler is limited. I'd be more inclined to save a bunch of money and go with something like the Volumio Primo and run that in upsampling mode to a full 768kHz as discussed in the vid. 🙂
@@PassionforSound (1) Try the HQPlayer with the May. The designer of HQPlayer uses the Holo DACs as a reference. Upsampling to DSD256 using good EC modulators on HQPlayer sounds amazing on the May (2) In your input setup, is the May’s clock the master or is the source’s clock the master? (3) IMHO, it is wrong to pair the $5,500 Holo May DAC with a $500 preamp. Proper matching makes a huge difference. For example: I found that I got better SQ out of the May paired with the $2,500 Holo Serene than with the $17,000 Audio Research Ref 6SE preamp. Either ways, I’d say a $500 preamp is a no-go.
I don't have the DACs here anymore to test that, but I also don't particularly like the overly complex setup in HQ Player and therefore don't consider it in my reviews as many people want products they can just plug in and enjoy.
Great review as always Lauchlan. You basically answered my question of whether or not I should sell my TT2 and M scaler to buy the May KTE. I think I'd prefer the detail over the slight bass bump and warmth of the May. Just curious, which filters did you try when listening with the TT2, was it mostly incisive? Wondering if filters 3 or 4 got similar results to the warmth of the May. Cheers.
Glad you liked the review! I only really use filter 1 for TT2 on its own or filter 2 when using the M-Scaler (both incisive). Filters 3 & 4 might provide a hint of smoothness, but they don't change the presentation of the sound enough to match the fullness of the May. I personally think you're making the right choice by keeping the TT2 (I really wanted to prefer the May just for something different) and I'd recommend getting the extra warmth/fullness further down the source chain with your amp or transducers because you can never regain that extra detail that the May loses compared to the TT2, but adding some richness is easy to do.
@@PassionforSound awesome thanks. Were you using the stock BNC cables? I'm thinking of trying out Moon Audios black dragon BNC cables
I was using the Wave High Fidelity BNC cables. I haven't tried the Moon Audio Cables.
@@PassionforSound serious stuff. Worthy upgrade to stock bnc would you say? Or would it be better to invest in a LPSU
Both are worthy upgrades, but I'd probably go for the BNC cables first
Great review, the Spring 3 KTE is about 2700 USD brand new in Hong Kong here from local dealer. At that price does your recommendation change? thanks
No, I'd still buy the Schiit Yggy OG if you can get it for the same money or less. The Spring really didn't impress me. (The May did)
@@PassionforSound thanks! Hugo tt2 is 10% cheaper than May KTE here and takes up way less space. Would you recommend getting Hugo Tt2 instead?
100%. The May is great, but the TT2 is a sightly better DAC IMO and is also a top notch headphone amp and pre-amp
Very good review!
Thank you! I'm glad you liked it
Love this channel. Any thoughts on upsampling software (pggb or hqplayer) compared to the basic May or to the M scaler? Keep up the good work!
I've played with HQ Player and really didn't like the complexity (i.e. too many variables to fiddle with). There's no doubt that upsampling can improve the sound, but the improvement will generally be consistent across all DACs so if it improves the May by 10%, it will improve the TT2 by 10% too (and any other high sample rate capable DAC)
@@PassionforSound if you want to be surprised, grab your tt2 and feed it via Foobar 2000 with pggb add in installed. It is free up to 2 million taps. Let me know if you are as surprised as I have been....
Thanks for the suggestion, but part of why I love the TT2/M-Scaler is the simplicity of the setup. I use Room as my audio player and JRiver as my library manager. I don't really want to go down the path of adding anymore playback software at this point.
If You put silver IC in system from occ silver neotech the same like inside wiring of spring 3 KTE this dac starts to shine with open holographic deep soudnstage when the other dac shitt and chord start to scream and unnantural sound with occ sliver. System matching and matching cabling is the key to get the best sound from spring dac. Spring 3 KTE has the most natural timbre of all dacs that i tried ca. 15 dacs(gustard, chord, shitt, denafrips, lampizator, smsl, topping) and most engaging i guess. When you hear guitar, drums, violin its sounds the most life like compare too other dacs that i tried. I never try holo may KTE so far....thanks for review
I think every system has its own cables synergies so this is true for any DAC where choosing the right interconnects can bring the best out of each different device. For example, I really like the Supra Sword interconnects on the Schiit DACs, but the Curious XLR on the TT2.
That's not really fair to say. The holo audio dac uses very very expensive materials and has proven you only get a little more performance but it jacks up the price by thousands more. Silver isn't beneficial at all as copper already conducts more than enough. I agree occ copper is better than ofc but even that doesn't matter because the industry standard is ofc copper and having a tiny piece of cabling that's expensive isn't going to change that the product overall is built with plain copper.
@@V1ralB1ack let me tell You i know many audiophiles that for 2% in sound quality inmproovement of example dac, source, amp can kill You 😄 and belive me when you have all chain audio (amp, dac, cables, speakers in system thet is very revealing) at very high level you will here the difernce bitwin better caps, occ silver etc inside dac, source, speakers etc. Other thing - This 2% of improvement is giving 2% more emotions. Thats how it works in audiophile world. But personally in holo spring lvl2 vs lvl 3 is more diffrence then 2% i think much like 15 %(for my scale, for my ears, for my connection to what i hear) but once again you need to have very good all audio chain, very revealing. Peace ✌
@@michalryszawy Wouldn't it be better to spend the money on better major components and maybe better speakers than having 1 perfect component?
I think Mike's point is about optimising the whole chain. I definitely agree that balancing the quality across across the whole source chain is more valuable than a single perfect component though
Would love a comparison between Burson Conductor 3x Reference vs Chord Hugo TT2, Yagrasil etc.
I haven't tried the Conductor yet, but having used the Composer and Soloist, I can say that the amp stage will be excellent, but not to the level of the TT2 and the DAC will be solid, but limited by the fact that it's a delta sigma, chip based DAC and won't match what Schiit Multibit or Chord DACs can do
@@PassionforSound True, the fact that Timber, Space, sound punch, depth, resolution is excellent and top of that OP amp rolling allows to match the DAC output to your choice of preferred tone makes it an excellent DAC for any system match.
PS: try rolling op amps with Sparkos lab's and Burson V6, it really opens up and is superb 👍.
Great video and review... as usual 🎉👍👏!! Viewing this Mar. 05, 2024 for first time. You got me thinking about the Yggi OG 🤔. Looking to upgrade from Gen 1 Topping D90. I have DDC Singer SU-2 using I2S... which I've enjoyed for many years! Yggi OG doesn't have I2S. Would it still be worth using my DDC with AES interface on Yggi OG?? Thanks much for any input / advice!!
The Yggy OG is great and responds really well via the AES input from a DDC (I use the SU-6)
Honest review.dont get that every day.well done.😅
My pleasure! It was possibly an over-correction of the hype at the time, but I still feel the same about them: May is excellent as a standalone DAC and Spring is still overpriced IMO.
Another excellent objective review! As much as I've been enjoying the Bifrost 2, I've been wondering if moving to a higher end dac would be worthwhile. The Yiggy is the natural inclination since I love the BF2. I was interested in the Denafrips Pontus II, and was also looking at the Holo Spring 3. Your comments about the Spring 3 vs the Yiggy have really helped clear the muddy waters. Now I wonder which version of Yiggy is best......!
Glad you found it helpful! I'd have loved to compare all three Yggy flavours, but shipping costs, parts costs and COVID in general got in the way. In the upcoming Yggy OG review, I have compared the Bifrost 2 and Yggy in detail. Hopefully that's some help 🙂
@@PassionforSound Yes, very helpful, thanks! Looking forward to your comparison of the BF2 and Yiggy. When will you be releasing that review?
It's up on TH-cam, currently available to patrons only, but not long until it is released into the wild (about 1-2 weeks away IIRC)
@@PassionforSound The waiting is the hardest part! In a nutshell, would you say the difference in cost to go with the Yggy is well worth it?
Yes and no (not trying to be obtuse). The BF2 is incredibly good for the money. The Yggy is definitely better, but it's also huge. For me, if you have the space and the budget and you're looking for a DAC that can easily be endgame then go for the Yggy. It's not the best DAC I've heard, but it's really good enough that you could stop seeking more IMO
great comparison 👍
Thank you 🙂
Good comprehensive review. 👍. Thank you. The May KTE is Holo Audio’s flagship DAC. The Chord Dave is the their flagship. Then how good do you find the Dave. It would be interesting how you find the Denafrips Terminator plus😎👍
I'm keen to try the Dave properly (I've only used it at shows) and the Terminator too. Hopefully in 2022 I'll get the chance
What about the May and the M-scaller?
I don't really see any point in combining the May and the M-Scaler. The M-Scaler is limited in its output to non-Chord DACs and I personally wouldn't recommend it as a pair with anything non-Chord.
@@PassionforSound Thank you, I do understand that the M-scaler puts out half of the (what evers) to non-cord products or products without 2 BNC connections and if the next time you talk about the M-scaler you could go over what it does. Also the difference between what the M-scaler does and what local oversampling does. Thanks again.
Have you checked out my M-Scaler review? I covered most of those questions there I think. As to the difference between upsampling with the M-Scaler vs software or other methods, it just comes down to the quality of the algorithm used as the number of times the samples are refined (1,000,000 times in the M-Scaler)
@@PassionforSound will do, thank you
Your whole section about the tt2 sounding better than out of the soloist just kinda points to the soloist being a massive bottle neck for both dacs here....
Not really, Bob. The TT2 internal stage is better than almost any other HP amp you could think of because it doesn't rely on the transfer of signal via 2 pairs of connectors, 1 pair of cables and a whole lot of circuitry in an external amp - it's a short, simple path that produces astounding clarity and transparency.
The Soloist GT and Sparkos Labs Aries are both amps that I used for the testing and are both world class headphone amps.
@@PassionforSound Yup it might have advantage in that, but external amps have their own power supplies unlike this dac that have 1 power supply for everything and this in theory can result in much weaker dynamics and transients that can result in anemic sound that everybody describes about Chord Internal amps.
Mate, it seems you dont have your own opinion and you just biasedly gonna praise Chord stuff... If their amp idea would be so great, everyone would be make it something like that...
Chord is apple in audiophile community and everything Rob Watts saying is a gospel and everybody else is wrong according to him and cult following.
Maybe im wrong, but you give those vibes.
Denafrips atleast is less bullshit of a company that will make as good product as possible while Chord will make product as cheap as possible to get higher margins possible.
I think you need to do some deeper research into the design decisions that Rob Watts has put into the TT2, Eternal. Everything has been considered to make it an outstanding all-in-one product. Between the super capacitors, the discrete analog output that separates the DAC and analog stages, the attention to noise floor and intermodulation distortion across the whole device make for an astonishing final product.
That said, I'm always excited to find something better. As I said in this review, I actually wanted the May to be better - I was excited to take the next step, but it just didn't stack up to the same level even when using $2500-3000 USD amps
@@PassionforSound yes, but confirmation bias can be very strong... As i said: Rob Watts is not a genius, otherwise lot of people will be doing same stuff as he is doing...
Why do you think Chord, Benchmark is using switched mode power supplies? Because those are much cheaper and require less costly enclosure!
Separate amps also use a lot more space and also have much better wolume controls than digital controls used in dacs that bring noise up.
There is nothing grounbreaking in Chord dacs except filters that create different sound signature...
You really need to do more research. The only piece of this I agree with (after extensive research and comparisons) is that the use of SMPSs is disappointing on some of their products (it's not relevant to the TT2).
I tried it. It wasn't anything exceptional. Hyped ? Yes a bit. Bad ? No.
And I compared it on headphones. I'm sure on speakers the difference would be even more obvious in space and soundstage (comparing vs dave+mscaler)
Holo sounds like a typical R2R non oversampling dac. A good one (very good), yes but nothing more.
I completely agree. The Spring is a nice DAC that's over-hyped. The May is an excellent DAC by any measure I think.
@@PassionforSound I want to make it clear. I was testing May kitsune :), and still I think that it's a bit overhyped. Very dood dac but...
I really want to try comparision on speakers, as I'm pretty sure that the difference would be stagering.
Maybe someday
I do believe that speaker listening might make a significant difference with these, but I'm not setup to test that theory.
Thanks for clarifying though!
What headphone did you use the most for your testing? Was it the Meze Elites?
Elites and Susvara mostly, but also Meze Liric, Verite Open, Verite Closed and probably some others too that I've forgotten.
What if M-Scaler is combine with de Holo May ?
The May definitely improves with an upsampled signal, but the gap between the May and the TT2 remains the same (i.e. upsampling is not more beneficial for the May than any other DAC I've tried)