WIFI 7 Is Fast 5.7 Gbps Max 320Mhz band This Monkeys does Not know anything. 2.5Gbps is Wifi6E Maximum output. 2401Mbps. 160Mhz wide 6ghz. WIFI6 AX support 160Mhz Width 5Ghz band Including DFS channels 52 - 141. Netgear Axe 300 allow DFS. NETGEAR rax20 firmware 1.64 allow DFS as long is program as Euro.
It seems like Wifi 7 is still in early adopter phase where the differences are negligible due to the lack of devices that supports it. Thanks for sharing your findings!
That TP-Link Wifi7 design looks great, wouldnt look out of place on any set up ! Not a bad price too, shame about those enhanced LAN ports not being there 😞 Great video, thanks for sharing Vegas Mike !!! 🙂
It's a pretty sleek router and performs well for the price. The BE800 and BE900 are even better looking with some cool features like a digital clock and weather reports. Also those models have 10gig LAN ports! I'm hoping TP-Link sends me one for review! Thanks for watching Bob! 😀
I have a maybe niche question about this and Wifi 7 in general. On previous generations, I've always separated out my bands by SSID, so I could connect to the faster 5GHz band as whenever I noticed a device slowing down connectivity wise I had found it had hopped to the 2.4GHz band, and that always fixed it for me. I know Wifi 7 combines 3 bands and communicates over all at once, but that's only for Wifi 7 devices obviously. What about older AC or AX devices? Will I no longer be able to separate bands for them and have to rely on (imo unreliable) band steering?
You can separate all 3 bands if you want. I recommend combining the 2.5 and 5Ghz bands for faster speeds ( Smart Connect ). Older devices will connect to the 2.4 or 5Ghz bands. Also enable the IoT network on the 2.4Ghz only for some IoT devices that only use 2.4Ghz. Hope this helps.
Right now neither for me personally, unless I uad zero other options like my current router dying, but even then I got some older equipment that I could make work. I really wish pfsense had vetter wireless support because its a MUCH better router/firewall solution, even if its overkill for most people. It just doesn't support mesh, just wireless APs with different ssids If I had no oither option then I would look into WiFi 7. The abulity to combine all the frequencies to get the fastest speeds is just an awesome addition, but mostly for LAN reasons. With that said, it wouldn't be to link and thats pricey and 8ts the cheapest option. I would try to hold off a year because I wouldn't want to have to uograde in say, 2 years because local data transfers will (or should) be faster with a device that has WiFi 7 capabilitie WITH the eight router. . That would have been the better test IMO although the Asus would probably still win because no actual WiFi 7 end devices to really test if the difference is substantial or not. One thing is for sure, a lot more research would have to be done if I had no other option. Qirhout dojng that uts hard to say with 100 percent certainty but thats the main WiFi 7 feature I'm looking forward ro. 2.4ghz has great range bit the slowest speeds. 5ghz doesn't have great coverage and was kimited in what channels you could use due to other devices like land kine phones. I haven't personally seen 6ghz in action. Im sure its great, until everyone has it. At least you have more channel options though.
What is your source that you cited as "independent research" for performance numbers? Maybe I missed it? The "independent" part is actually up to the audience to decide - "independent" would mean "conflicts of interest provided by the data originator are disclosed so your can determine that their results are independent of confounding factors", not "this publication is independent from me" A quick google search would seem to point to dong knows tech
In your video "Get Faster PS5 Internet gaming speed port forwarding explained (2024)" when doing the testing with the PS5 you were receiving 526.7 Mbps (DL) and 97.7 Mbps (UL). Now you're dramatically improved that with 859.7Mbps (DL) and 108.7 Mbps. I guess my question here is what else did you need to do to improve on your original speeds? Was it hardware related? Both were hardwired.
It's hardware related. I have not port forwarded the TP-Link router yet. If it stays with these speeds I won't bother port forwarding. The BE550 has excellent wired performance. Thanks for watching Kevin! Have a great day!
So I have the BE24000 aka the BE900 and I feel like I can't get the speeds that I am supposed to despite having a 1gb plan. I have only gotten over the 1gb surprisingly somehow once in the year I've had it which is sad to be honest lol. For a router that is said to be capable of up to about 24GB, getting 800 to 900 plus is not it! I think TP-Link lies about their speeds for their products.
My ISP only promises 940 up and down and I probably get 910 or 900 on average. There are other factors like end devices and other hardware, like switches.
Asus doesn't have a subscription plan , I miss spoke sorry. Linksys has a subscription plan as well as TP-Link and Netgear. For some reason I got Netgear and ASUS mixed up. Lol! I have way too many routers in my home! Thanks for watching and for catching my mistake! Have a great day Thom!
Great review thanks 🙏🏻 👍🏻 i have question in that if i have a wifi 6e phone and connect it to the tp link be9300, would it perform at the 6e standard or revert down to wifi6? So i guess i should ask does the be9300 support all the wifi standards 4,5,6,6e and 7 or is 6e excluded? I think that seems not clear on wifi 7 in general and wpuld be beneficial for consumers to know in general, if indeed it does support it then companies should say that it supports all previous standards.
It supports Wi-Fi 6e. It depends on your end device and your ISP max speeds. I have 1gig speeds so I can only achieve 1gig internet speeds. I would probably just stick with Wi-Fi 6e for now. Wi-Fi 7 isn't supported by enough end devices. Thank you for watching!
I am extremely skeptical of your 2.4Ghz results. Every other device has trouble getting over 200 Mbps down, and you're getting 700 on upload . It is typically hard to get good upload speeds on mobile clients (because of antenna array), and should be your first sign of an error. I would validate that portion of the testing to make sure that 5 and 6 Ghz were indeed disabled.
I did multiple tests and my device was connected to the 2.4ghz band. The 700Mbps upload was the average of all the tests. Thanks for watching I really appreciate it.
@UltimateTechHub I believe that you are genuine, but I also believe there is an error here. 2.4 Ghz is simply not capable of those kinds of speeds. Certainly not from a mobile device (possibly from one high-end MIMO to another). It should be a red flag to you thar your 2.4 Ghz upload was higher than the 5 Ghz. Please re-check and validate that all other frequencies are disabled.
Definitely not. If I sponsor a company I always reveal that in the video and description. Funny thing is the wifi7 router is just ok compared to the wifi6e router. However the wired speeds are better on the wifi7 router. Probably better hardware. Thanks for watching and for commenting.
I don't get something. Someone please help me understand. I have an older WiFI 6 router (Archer AX10) and I'm getting nearly double the WiFi speeds, 20 feet from the router (800 Mbps+) than this newer, fancier router, and I also have a 1 Gbps connection. Why??
It depends on different factors like interference, the devices your connecting to and the band or bands your connecting to. If your getting 800 Mbps your on the 5Ghz band and thats some solid speeds. I've tested this router again a few different times and achieved around 800 Mbps on the 5Ghz band and 920 Mbps when using the smart connect which combines the 2.4 and 5Ghz bands. If your using smart connect then that's exactly why your getting 800 Mbps. Thanks for watching and check out this archer router! th-cam.com/video/Kf82zuJ1Zd8/w-d-xo.html
Why are you speed testing on the internet? You should be testing it locally using something like a locally hosted open speed test server to make sure you are testing the speed of the wifi equipment...
@@paulandrew76 I got the German AVM FRITZ!Box 7590. 6 years old. but can keep up with alot of the new things 😀 thank you very much for your kind words here.
I'm sorry, you tested its WiFi 7 performance with WiFi 6E devices and are disappointed with its performance on 6 GHz? Besides the devices you name in your comment below, there are multiple BE9300 adapters on the market which (theoretically) would let a PC achieve 5.7Gbps, that would be an actual test of its WiFi 7 speed. Also, it looks like you tested the 2.5Gbps Ethernet ports against your 1Gbps internet line and found that they achieved somewhat near 1Gbps. Did you test between two 2.5Gbit PCs using like iPerf, or copying a file?
I've tested between two 2.5g pcs using iPerf and got speeds of 2.5gbps with very low UDP jitter. If you want to watch that video I can send you the link. The 6Ghz band performs well but just not with my wifi6e end devices. I'm getting a new laptop soon that will have a wifi7 NIC so my testing would be way better with the 6Ghz band. Wifi7 is the future but we have to wait until our end devices catch up and faster ISP speeds ( 1-3 gig fiber ) Thanks for watching.
Either of these routers are really good and you'll get fast wireless and fast wired speeds. The TP-Link router is my recommendation because it's Wi-Fi7. Check out my product links in the description. Thanks for watching!
@@UltimateTechHub Thank you so much for the video and useful information you provided. I just ordered this router model, but in some of the TH-cam videos, mostly from Chinese TH-camrs, I saw that they couldn't connect to the 6 GHz channel with devices that had Wi-Fi 6E. That's why I had this question and wanted to make sure if this router supports Wi-Fi 6E or not. My own phone is Galaxy S22 Ultra, which supports Wi-Fi 6E.
@alisarani8971 China hasn't authorized the 6 GHz band for Wi-Fi; I understand they use it for 5G mobile instead. That's why your Chinese TH-camrs can't access 6 GHz on Wi-Fi 6E devices, as 6E by definition includes 6 GHz; without the extra band it's just Wi-Fi 6. They won't be able to use 6 GHz on Wi-Fi 7 either; there are some Wi-Fi 7 routers specific to China that offer its improved encoding at 2.4 & 5 GHz, but don't have 6 GHz.
Im not that impressed if you have 2.5gb internet your not even getting half of it. With a clear shot 10ft away. What's with the 700mpbs upload and download is in the 500s? That makes no sense it should be the other way around. I would think you should get at least 1gb. They probably have encryption WPA3 on it and it eats your speeds up to encrypt the data.
Yes WPA3 is on. And yes it didn't make sense with the faster 700mbps and 500mbps down up but its what my tests revealed. It could be my Samsung S23 as well. I get the feeling these newer phones are just not ready for the 6GHz band yet. Maybe a software update will fix it.
@@UltimateTechHub I do consider the fact that you don't have a wifi 7 device also so of course there'll be some serious lost there. I just got upgraded to 1gbps charter and was very confused because I actually lost 100mbps going to wifi 6 from 5. I turned off the extra security and my speeds doubled. It has a massive impact on performance they should make that known.
@faithfulservantofchrist9876 That's true, the new security protocols can have a huge impact on your speeds. We are currently reviewing a TP-Link Deco Mesh WiFi 6e system . Keep an eye for my review. Thanks for watching and for commenting. Have a great day !
Wif-Fi 7 supported devices are available. And wifi7 uses the 6Ghz band like Wifi 6e. Heres the list. Asus ROG Phone 7 Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro Asus Zenfone 10 Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra Google Pixel 8 Google Pixel 8 Pro Motorola Edge 50 Ultra Motorola Edge+ Nubia Z50S Pro OnePlus 12 OnePlus 12R OnePlus Ace 3 OnePlus Open Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Disabled in the firmware) Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 (Disabled in the firmware) Vivo X Fold3 Vivo X Fold3 Pro Vivo X100 Vivo X100 Pro ZTE nubia Red Magic 9 Pro ZTE nubia Red Magic 9 Pro+ ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra
Actually useful for PC-VR streaming. You could use speeds like that if you want to stream 4k/8k in the future. For 8k and 120 fps you would need something like 480 Mb/s per eye so totally 960 Mb/s so this is actually still not enough throuput.
Lol! It's the speed that I got. I ran more than 3 speed tests on the 2.4Ghz band because it seemed strange but after the 7th or 8th test it was about the same speed every time. Anyways, its a very good router but a Wi-Fi 6e router would work better for most people. thanks for watching.
Subscription is a free money to all these companies. They will milk and dime every single penny from consumers and stupid consumers sometimes go blindly paying for something that should have been default included to begin with. This is main reason I am switching all my networking gears to Unifi product. They are certainly bit more expensive but you don't get any of these subscriptions nonsense once you buy the hardware.
![[FULL EP.73] เปิดบ้าน 70 ล้าน "แป้ง Zbing" ยกมาทั้งญี่ปุ่น l เคหสถานบานปลาย l One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YBnJhTt07Pg/mqdefault.jpg)
It is actually a very good price considering just the value of having the (4) 2.5 Gb switching ports.
Yes, the wired 2.5gig connections make it a great value. Thanks for watching I really appreciate it.
@@UltimateTechHub Thanks for the great review.
Let me get this straight you have tested wifi 6 against wifi 7 without using ANY wifi 7 capable devices !!!!! ?????
Does the Asus tuf Gaming A16 laptop support wifi 7, since it says it supports wifi 6e if you know maybe a 2024 model came out. Can I hope so?
You can replace your laptop’s current Wi-Fi card with an Intel BE200 card, thus turning your laptop into a proper Wi-Fi 7 device.
WIFI 7 Is Fast 5.7 Gbps Max 320Mhz band This Monkeys does Not know anything.
2.5Gbps is Wifi6E Maximum output. 2401Mbps. 160Mhz wide 6ghz.
WIFI6 AX support 160Mhz Width 5Ghz band Including DFS channels 52 - 141. Netgear Axe 300 allow DFS.
NETGEAR rax20 firmware 1.64 allow DFS as long is program as Euro.
It seems like Wifi 7 is still in early adopter phase where the differences are negligible due to the lack of devices that supports it. Thanks for sharing your findings!
I didn’t know Gavin Belson had a tech channel, subscribing now
good stuff Mike, Trying to use less WiFi but it is hard to do with speeds like this on the horizon
Your just like William who doesn't use Wi-Fi! Lol! I on the other hand, I love me some Wi-Fi! Thanks for watching Mike! 😉
That TP-Link Wifi7 design looks great, wouldnt look out of place on any set up ! Not a bad price too, shame about those enhanced LAN ports not being there 😞 Great video, thanks for sharing Vegas Mike !!! 🙂
It's a pretty sleek router and performs well for the price. The BE800 and BE900 are even better looking with some cool features like a digital clock and weather reports. Also those models have 10gig LAN ports! I'm hoping TP-Link sends me one for review! Thanks for watching Bob! 😀
And I’m still on WiFi 6.
Hard to keep up with new stuff. :)
Good content as always, Mike. 👍🏼
Thanks for watching Paul, I really appreciate the support! 😀👍
I have a maybe niche question about this and Wifi 7 in general. On previous generations, I've always separated out my bands by SSID, so I could connect to the faster 5GHz band as whenever I noticed a device slowing down connectivity wise I had found it had hopped to the 2.4GHz band, and that always fixed it for me. I know Wifi 7 combines 3 bands and communicates over all at once, but that's only for Wifi 7 devices obviously. What about older AC or AX devices? Will I no longer be able to separate bands for them and have to rely on (imo unreliable) band steering?
You can separate all 3 bands if you want. I recommend combining the 2.5 and 5Ghz bands for faster speeds ( Smart Connect ). Older devices will connect to the 2.4 or 5Ghz bands. Also enable the IoT network on the 2.4Ghz only for some IoT devices that only use 2.4Ghz. Hope this helps.
would be interesting to see how much better the newer quad band routers are compared to the Tri-band
Me too.
BE550 is the obvious choice especially with the future proofing.
Yes it is and the wired speeds are very good too!
@@UltimateTechHub Just ordered it. Thanks for the great review.
Right now neither for me personally, unless I uad zero other options like my current router dying, but even then I got some older equipment that I could make work. I really wish pfsense had vetter wireless support because its a MUCH better router/firewall solution, even if its overkill for most people. It just doesn't support mesh, just wireless APs with different ssids
If I had no oither option then I would look into WiFi 7. The abulity to combine all the frequencies to get the fastest speeds is just an awesome addition, but mostly for LAN reasons. With that said, it wouldn't be to link and thats pricey and 8ts the cheapest option. I would try to hold off a year because I wouldn't want to have to uograde in say, 2 years because local data transfers will (or should) be faster with a device that has WiFi 7 capabilitie WITH the eight router. .
That would have been the better test IMO although the Asus would probably still win because no actual WiFi 7 end devices to really test if the difference is substantial or not.
One thing is for sure, a lot more research would have to be done if I had no other option. Qirhout dojng that uts hard to say with 100 percent certainty but thats the main WiFi 7 feature I'm looking forward ro. 2.4ghz has great range bit the slowest speeds. 5ghz doesn't have great coverage and was kimited in what channels you could use due to other devices like land kine phones. I haven't personally seen 6ghz in action. Im sure its great, until everyone has it. At least you have more channel options though.
Wish you had 2.5gbe service. That way we could actually see if it's full speed.
Waiting for Google Fiber...we get it next year! Then we'll see the 2.5g speeds!
What is your source that you cited as "independent research" for performance numbers? Maybe I missed it?
The "independent" part is actually up to the audience to decide - "independent" would mean "conflicts of interest provided by the data originator are disclosed so your can determine that their results are independent of confounding factors", not "this publication is independent from me"
A quick google search would seem to point to dong knows tech
Thanks for watching!
Great reviews, following closely from Africa. Is this Gavin Belson from Silicon Valley series??
I've heard that a few times! Lol! Thanks for watching from Africa!
In your video "Get Faster PS5 Internet gaming speed port forwarding explained (2024)" when doing the testing with the PS5 you were receiving 526.7 Mbps (DL) and 97.7 Mbps (UL). Now you're dramatically improved that with 859.7Mbps (DL) and 108.7 Mbps.
I guess my question here is what else did you need to do to improve on your original speeds? Was it hardware related? Both were hardwired.
It's hardware related. I have not port forwarded the TP-Link router yet. If it stays with these speeds I won't bother port forwarding. The BE550 has excellent wired performance. Thanks for watching Kevin! Have a great day!
@@UltimateTechHub Now that's interesting. Are you sure you're not using uPnP for the ports?
So I have the BE24000 aka the BE900 and I feel like I can't get the speeds that I am supposed to despite having a 1gb plan. I have only gotten over the 1gb surprisingly somehow once in the year I've had it which is sad to be honest lol. For a router that is said to be capable of up to about 24GB, getting 800 to 900 plus is not it! I think TP-Link lies about their speeds for their products.
My ISP only promises 940 up and down and I probably get 910 or 900 on average. There are other factors like end devices and other hardware, like switches.
What subscription services does the Asus option require? I dont see any, but you said they have them...
Asus doesn't have a subscription plan , I miss spoke sorry. Linksys has a subscription plan as well as TP-Link and Netgear. For some reason I got Netgear and ASUS mixed up. Lol! I have way too many routers in my home! Thanks for watching and for catching my mistake! Have a great day Thom!
Great review thanks 🙏🏻 👍🏻 i have question in that if i have a wifi 6e phone and connect it to the tp link be9300, would it perform at the 6e standard or revert down to wifi6?
So i guess i should ask does the be9300 support all the wifi standards 4,5,6,6e and 7 or is 6e excluded?
I think that seems not clear on wifi 7 in general and wpuld be beneficial for consumers to know in general, if indeed it does support it then companies should say that it supports all previous standards.
It supports Wi-Fi 6e. It depends on your end device and your ISP max speeds. I have 1gig speeds so I can only achieve 1gig internet speeds. I would probably just stick with Wi-Fi 6e for now. Wi-Fi 7 isn't supported by enough end devices. Thank you for watching!
I am extremely skeptical of your 2.4Ghz results. Every other device has trouble getting over 200 Mbps down, and you're getting 700 on upload . It is typically hard to get good upload speeds on mobile clients (because of antenna array), and should be your first sign of an error. I would validate that portion of the testing to make sure that 5 and 6 Ghz were indeed disabled.
I did multiple tests and my device was connected to the 2.4ghz band. The 700Mbps upload was the average of all the tests. Thanks for watching I really appreciate it.
@UltimateTechHub I believe that you are genuine, but I also believe there is an error here. 2.4 Ghz is simply not capable of those kinds of speeds. Certainly not from a mobile device (possibly from one high-end MIMO to another). It should be a red flag to you thar your 2.4 Ghz upload was higher than the 5 Ghz.
Please re-check and validate that all other frequencies are disabled.
TP-Link by default has “smart connect” on, so he probably was connected to 5ghz even though the SSID said 2.4ghz.
Whaahahaa, definitely not sponsored 😉
Definitely not. If I sponsor a company I always reveal that in the video and description. Funny thing is the wifi7 router is just ok compared to the wifi6e router. However the wired speeds are better on the wifi7 router. Probably better hardware. Thanks for watching and for commenting.
what happend to the 15 dollar router with very long range ? 250 to 500 only for wifi ? what is a good cheapo right now in the EU ?
Only the s24 ultra is wifi 7 compatible. The regular s24 and s24 plus are limited to wifi 6e
Pixel 8 is Wi-Fi 7
oneplus phones has had wifi 7 for a while now. ugh disklike samsung phones btw
I don't get something. Someone please help me understand. I have an older WiFI 6 router (Archer AX10) and I'm getting nearly double the WiFi speeds, 20 feet from the router (800 Mbps+) than this newer, fancier router, and I also have a 1 Gbps connection. Why??
It depends on different factors like interference, the devices your connecting to and the band or bands your connecting to. If your getting 800 Mbps your on the 5Ghz band and thats some solid speeds. I've tested this router again a few different times and achieved around 800 Mbps on the 5Ghz band and 920 Mbps when using the smart connect which combines the 2.4 and 5Ghz bands. If your using smart connect then that's exactly why your getting 800 Mbps. Thanks for watching and check out this archer router! th-cam.com/video/Kf82zuJ1Zd8/w-d-xo.html
Why are you speed testing on the internet? You should be testing it locally using something like a locally hosted open speed test server to make sure you are testing the speed of the wifi equipment...
I never use WiFi. but thank's for the video 😀
I know you don't use Wi-Fi but thanks for watching William! I appreciate the support! 😄
How about a 56k Robotics Modem review for Bill? 🤣
@@paulandrew76 I got the German AVM FRITZ!Box 7590. 6 years old. but can keep up with alot of the new things 😀 thank you very much for your kind words here.
I'm sorry, you tested its WiFi 7 performance with WiFi 6E devices and are disappointed with its performance on 6 GHz? Besides the devices you name in your comment below, there are multiple BE9300 adapters on the market which (theoretically) would let a PC achieve 5.7Gbps, that would be an actual test of its WiFi 7 speed. Also, it looks like you tested the 2.5Gbps Ethernet ports against your 1Gbps internet line and found that they achieved somewhat near 1Gbps. Did you test between two 2.5Gbit PCs using like iPerf, or copying a file?
I've tested between two 2.5g pcs using iPerf and got speeds of 2.5gbps with very low UDP jitter. If you want to watch that video I can send you the link. The 6Ghz band performs well but just not with my wifi6e end devices. I'm getting a new laptop soon that will have a wifi7 NIC so my testing would be way better with the 6Ghz band. Wifi7 is the future but we have to wait until our end devices catch up and faster ISP speeds ( 1-3 gig fiber ) Thanks for watching.
Can’t test super fast routers with such a slow internet connection
1gbps Internet speed is not slow but yes I would prefer to test at 2gbps if I had the option. Thanks for watching and for commenting.
@@UltimateTechHub It is slow considering testing wifi 7 tech
@devanshsuman7442 Yes I agree. It's the cheapest wifi7 router available but you don't get what you pay for.
@@devanshsuman7442bruh more than 90% of people don't own 1gig LMAO
Thanks
Thanks for watching Markc3571 I really appreciate it! 😄
I want to upgrade my router but what the best to buy it. I have wifi 6 router right now .
Either of these routers are really good and you'll get fast wireless and fast wired speeds. The TP-Link router is my recommendation because it's Wi-Fi7. Check out my product links in the description. Thanks for watching!
i have a question :
tp link be9300 can support wifi 6e on 6ghz for wifi 6e devices like galaxy s22 ultra ?
Yes, absolutely. It works great on the 6Gz band and all 6GHz supported devices. Thank you for watching I really appreciate it!
@@UltimateTechHub Thank you so much for the video and useful information you provided. I just ordered this router model, but in some of the TH-cam videos, mostly from Chinese TH-camrs, I saw that they couldn't connect to the 6 GHz channel with devices that had Wi-Fi 6E. That's why I had this question and wanted to make sure if this router supports Wi-Fi 6E or not. My own phone is Galaxy S22 Ultra, which supports Wi-Fi 6E.
@alisarani8971 China hasn't authorized the 6 GHz band for Wi-Fi; I understand they use it for 5G mobile instead. That's why your Chinese TH-camrs can't access 6 GHz on Wi-Fi 6E devices, as 6E by definition includes 6 GHz; without the extra band it's just Wi-Fi 6. They won't be able to use 6 GHz on Wi-Fi 7 either; there are some Wi-Fi 7 routers specific to China that offer its improved encoding at 2.4 & 5 GHz, but don't have 6 GHz.
Im not that impressed if you have 2.5gb internet your not even getting half of it. With a clear shot 10ft away. What's with the 700mpbs upload and download is in the 500s? That makes no sense it should be the other way around. I would think you should get at least 1gb. They probably have encryption WPA3 on it and it eats your speeds up to encrypt the data.
Yes WPA3 is on. And yes it didn't make sense with the faster 700mbps and 500mbps down up but its what my tests revealed. It could be my Samsung S23 as well. I get the feeling these newer phones are just not ready for the 6GHz band yet. Maybe a software update will fix it.
@@UltimateTechHub I do consider the fact that you don't have a wifi 7 device also so of course there'll be some serious lost there. I just got upgraded to 1gbps charter and was very confused because I actually lost 100mbps going to wifi 6 from 5. I turned off the extra security and my speeds doubled. It has a massive impact on performance they should make that known.
@faithfulservantofchrist9876 That's true, the new security protocols can have a huge impact on your speeds. We are currently reviewing a TP-Link Deco Mesh WiFi 6e system . Keep an eye for my review. Thanks for watching and for commenting. Have a great day !
Asus doesn't charge for its internet protection service
Yes I know, I misspoke. Sorry. But the others do charge unfortunately. Thanks for watching!
Asus does NOT charge anything extra for their corporate grade security.
Yes I miss spoke but the other router companies do charge for the extra stuff that should be free.
no devices yet supports wifi 7 so thats useless. Devices can only connect limited to wifi 6 frequency.
Wif-Fi 7 supported devices are available. And wifi7 uses the 6Ghz band like Wifi 6e. Heres the list.
Asus ROG Phone 7
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro
Asus Zenfone 10
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra
Google Pixel 8
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
Motorola Edge+
Nubia Z50S Pro
OnePlus 12
OnePlus 12R
OnePlus Ace 3
OnePlus Open
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra (Disabled in the firmware)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 (Disabled in the firmware)
Vivo X Fold3
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
Vivo X100
Vivo X100 Pro
ZTE nubia Red Magic 9 Pro
ZTE nubia Red Magic 9 Pro+
ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra
No device uses these speeds.
Actually useful for PC-VR streaming. You could use speeds like that if you want to stream 4k/8k in the future. For 8k and 120 fps you would need something like 480 Mb/s per eye so totally 960 Mb/s so this is actually still not enough throuput.
What's wrong with the audio?
Nothing, sounds good.
@@UltimateTechHub get your ears checked
2.4g speed is hella sketchy
Lol! It's the speed that I got. I ran more than 3 speed tests on the 2.4Ghz band because it seemed strange but after the 7th or 8th test it was about the same speed every time. Anyways, its a very good router but a Wi-Fi 6e router would work better for most people. thanks for watching.
Subscription is a free money to all these companies. They will milk and dime every single penny from consumers and stupid consumers sometimes go blindly paying for something that should have been default included to begin with. This is main reason I am switching all my networking gears to Unifi product. They are certainly bit more expensive but you don't get any of these subscriptions nonsense once you buy the hardware.