Op-Amp (Operational Amplifier) Practice Problems

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 พ.ค. 2024
  • Josh stated in the op-amp intro tutorial that operational amplifiers (op-amps) are really quite easy because of the two golden rules of op-amps but didn't give any examples of how to use those rules. In this tutorial, Josh goes through three practical operational amplifier practice problems to show how to utilize those rules to simplify circuit analysis with op-amps.
    Parts of the video:
    0:00 Introduction
    0:30 Review of the 2 Golden Rules
    0:55 First Practice Problem
    4:45 Second Practice Problem
    7:33 Third Practice Problem
    10:27 Summary
    11:54 The toast will never pop up
    Missed the op-amp introduction tutorial? Check it out here: www.circuitbread.com/tutorial...
    For electronics tools, tutorials, equations and more check out our site: www.circuitbread.com
    And check out our Friends of CircuitBread, who offer special discounts, product samples, resources and more to our users: www.circuitbread.com/friends
    CircuitBread is joining the fight to help people more easily learn about and use electronics. With an ever-growing array of equations, tools, and tutorials, we're striving for the best ways to make electronics and electrical engineering topics more accessible to everyone. Come learn electronics with us!
    Connect with CircuitBread:
    Discord ➤ / discord
    Instagram ➤ / circuitbread
    Facebook ➤ / circuitbread
    Twitter ➤ / circuitbread
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 107

  • @memirandawong
    @memirandawong ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Mistakes make this learning experience even more real!

  • @sirhuman560
    @sirhuman560 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    amazing explanation and bringing us in your mind to let us learn how to think while solving problems. thank you!

  • @monfry2675
    @monfry2675 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    All understandable in a easy way ! Thanks good buddy !

  • @sunrayseducation
    @sunrayseducation ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir, thank you for this explaination and including the mistakes that I do.

  • @zjmullan
    @zjmullan ปีที่แล้ว +6

    great video man, reminded me of how the ideal op-amp calculations work after almost a year of not doing them

  • @andrewpervez3009
    @andrewpervez3009 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent and straight forward. Thank you.

  • @maneki9neko
    @maneki9neko 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    very clear explanation. Thank you for taking the time out of your life to do this.

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are very welcome

  • @phionadesitter1203
    @phionadesitter1203 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    excellent explanation 👍🏽

  • @menkveld3565
    @menkveld3565 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I never understood anything about those things. Seeing those 2 rules being applied made it all click. Thanks!

  • @INONAuto
    @INONAuto 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i am writing on the 9th nov ,you saved me from lot of anxiety

  • @memirandawong
    @memirandawong ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Truth be known, I'm obsessed with this device (and the transistor, LOL). I was a circuit board designer (mechanical layout of circuits) for years and was always impressed by the many uses I've see with op-amps. This video instills great confidence! Thank you for the time you put into making these videos!

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice! Op-amps were so confusing to me at first but once I started to figure them out and saw how incredibly useful they are, I admit I got a bit obsessed as well.

    • @followthetrawler
      @followthetrawler 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I was also a PCB layout draughtsman - never ceases to amaze me how we were just seen as monkeys with tape (yes I am that old) when in fact we could quite often have to fully understand the circuit design to lay it out properly - we in fact had the same skills as the circuit designer - and then some. Nice video chap.

  • @Bianchi77
    @Bianchi77 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cool video, well done, thank you for sharing it :)

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching!

  • @boonedockjourneyman7979
    @boonedockjourneyman7979 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good job.

  • @thomaslacey1001
    @thomaslacey1001 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks 👍

  • @birdyjr1153
    @birdyjr1153 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Seeing you get a bit lost in the solution made me feel slightly better about myself, lol. But it was well explained, and I've subscribed to your channel.

  • @chuckbenedict7235
    @chuckbenedict7235 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I was confused about the sign of example 1 until I realized equation 2 should be (0-V0 ) = (50 microamps)(25K ohms), yielding V0=-1.25V. The voltage drop across the 25K resistor is 0-V0, which is the tricky part. In example 2, its strange to think about negative resistance (IMHO), so I'd suggest R = -V0/i1. It's the same math, just seems to better reflect what is happening in the circuit. In example 3, I believe the equation to compute V0 should be 2-V0 = (1mA)(5K) = -7V.

    • @mustafanaber
      @mustafanaber 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      thanks for corrections, It made me understand. But In example 3, third equation; where is 5V comes from? Am I missing something?

    • @andy2a2m
      @andy2a2m 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      from what you said 2-V0=5V, V0 will be -3V not -7V

    • @100subswovideos2
      @100subswovideos2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the answer is actually 7 volts

    • @gsiqhaiqj1169
      @gsiqhaiqj1169 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mustafanaber 1mA*5k ohms

  • @remcooosten2542
    @remcooosten2542 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nice video, thanks.
    In the last example, I think you have 1mA flowing through 2kΩ + 5kΩ, which gives us 1mA * 7kΩ = 7V

    • @gsiqhaiqj1169
      @gsiqhaiqj1169 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      we dont know the voltage between the non inverting input and output, but we know that between the non inverting input and ground we have a 2V voltage drop, therefor we can calculate the curent that goes from node that connects the 2K and 7K resistor to the ground, which is 2V/2k=1mA. If 1mA exists that node, then 1mA needs to entry that node, and the only way is through the 7k resistor (KCL)

  • @klevisimeri607
    @klevisimeri607 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you!

  • @armisol2380
    @armisol2380 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    how do u calculate in the third practice problem the 2 volts. cause i dont understand that part

    • @bunnie7556
      @bunnie7556 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So because there is a voltage divider you use Vin ( R2 / R1 + R2 ) to get Vout. Which is 3v ( 8k / 4k + 8k ) giving you Vout of 2v.

  • @astrophotographysometimes2303
    @astrophotographysometimes2303 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    at 9:08 why did he find the current across i1?

  • @adarshsk099
    @adarshsk099 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why in second problem o -vo was taken but in last problem it was opposite?

  • @monoc4d
    @monoc4d ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video... I was struggling with op amps, your video help me enormously.
    I have a question. How at 6:41 you get negative R? I rewatch that part many many times and still don't understand.
    Thanks!!!

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi there! This is a problem that I've seen a lot and have definitely done myself. It goes back to first step where we show the equation as (0 - Vo)/R = i1 It is very easy to drop the 0 and forget that the negative sign stays! So that's where it's simplified to -Vo/R=i1 and then that negative sign switches over to the other side. Does that help?

    • @magicflour
      @magicflour ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Another way to state it is that (conventional) current always flows from a higher voltage to a lower voltage. So the zero volts at V+ *has* to be higher than what Vo is. Thus Vo must be negative valued.

    • @prabhjotsingh6941
      @prabhjotsingh6941 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@CircuitBread if we subtracted 2v from Vo in equation that would give -3v. is this correct?

  • @michaeldrake2512
    @michaeldrake2512 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This doesn’t have nearly enough views! I would literally lose sleep over how op-amps worked and circuit analysis in general. Thanks to this I’ll sleep peacefully now.
    I really feel that the theory for electronic circuits is made overly complicated by those that are teaching this but the way you’ve explained this was straight to the point!
    Perhaps that’s something to do with limited application of their skills outside of an academic course.
    I think it’s brilliant you leave your mistakes in because, even though it’s simple algebraic operation still so easy to make a mistake. Seeing the reasoning is good

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! I'm still self conscious of my mistakes but I hope they help people somehow. And, particularly, I'm glad this was helpful to you!

  • @gkdresden
    @gkdresden 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    These were more the theoretical problems with op amps. The practice problems are much different, like:
    - the input current is not really zero, especially not in the case of bjt op amps
    - in certain cases you need to take care of the input offset voltage, especially in the case if you use op amps as comparators.
    - when you operate with pulse voltages at the inputs you have to make sure, that the operating voltage stays stable, even if you need to operate with a certain capacitive load at the output. So you have to use stabilization capacitors between the Vcc and GND pin of your op amp or two of them if you operate with a symmetrical operating voltage. Otherwise your circuit will fall into oscillations
    - the nonlinearities of the op amp input circuit can demodulate rf. So if you want to build up an audio amplifier it is sometimes necessary to use a low pass filter at the signal input to suppress rf interferences to avoid that you have some closely located radio station music in the background of your audio amplifier output.
    - if you need higher voltage amplifications (for microphone or phono signals), you need to make sure, that the gain bandwidth product doesn't compromize your amplifier at the higher frequencies. Also the input referred voltage offset and noise voltage become important in such application cases.
    etc.

  • @grzesiek1x
    @grzesiek1x ปีที่แล้ว

    2:41 a small question as I have already seen similar explanation but one thing is not allowing me to sleep ;) why don't we add those resistances? I knoe that no current enter the inverting input of OpAmp but I see two resistors here 10 k and 25 k but we calculate current for the one of them 10k ? I don't get it. Normally to calculate the current I would add all resistors and divide it by the voltage right? for example 5V / 10 000 ohms + 25 000 ohms to get the total current ..or we just treat that 25k resistor as an "invisible" resistor for the moment to calculate the right output of the op-amp or something like that?

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That's a great question. The reason we only calculate the current for the 10K resistor is because, in this question, we know the voltage across the 10K resistor (because we know the voltage at the inverting input) but NOT the voltage across the 25K resistor (because we don't know Vo). So, given what information we're given, we cannot calculate the current through both of them from the beginning. But we know they have the same current through them so we find the current through the 10K resistance and, with that information, we find the voltage across the 25K resistor, giving us Vo.

  • @liliaoakeley4402
    @liliaoakeley4402 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    circuit bread #1 fan right herreeee

  • @KyleMalcolm24
    @KyleMalcolm24 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am a bit confused between Example 2 and 3. How come in example 2 it is 0 - Vo but in example 3 it is Vo - 2V? (I am asking about the Vo being subtracted vs not)

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Great question! It is somewhat arbitrary. As long as you state your current flow assumptions correctly, you can do it either way. So, in example 2, I assumed that current was flowing from the inverting input to the output. Whereas in example 3, I assumed that the current was flowing from the output to the inverting input. That's the only reason. I could have assumed the opposite and swapped those, but then the sign of the current (whether it was positive or negative) would have flipped, because my assumption of the direction would be different. Does that help?

    • @Cookingcousin
      @Cookingcousin ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m confused on that too actually, if you assumed current is flowing from high to low when solving for current down the 2kohm resistor wouldn’t it be from positive to negative across the 5kohm resistor as well (from the negative terminal to Vout)

  • @wediadi6788
    @wediadi6788 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Another method of calculating Vout using the gain of the opamp. Gain=Vout/Vin, since same current I1 is flowing through both resistors, Gain=R2I1/R1I1=R2/R1=25Kohm/10Kohm=2.5. Vout=Gain*Vin=2.5*0.5=1.25V. The sign of Vout should be negative because the input on the inverting port of the opamp is higher than that on the non-inverting. So Vout=-1.25V

    • @ufukdeniz3026
      @ufukdeniz3026 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      great explanation

  • @wediadi6788
    @wediadi6788 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    My question is why do'nt we consider the 25K resitor when we are calculating I1? Isn't the same current I1 flowing through both resistors?

    • @abrahamjones3635
      @abrahamjones3635 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's exactly what I was thinking, if you found an answer please let me know.

    • @gsiqhaiqj1169
      @gsiqhaiqj1169 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We have .5V from the source to the non inverting input, not from the source to the output. That means that between the source and non inverting output (where the potential is 0V) we have a .5V voltage drop, therefore we can calculate the current that goes through the 10K resistor. The voltage between the source and output is 0.5V+1.25V=1.75V, and if we apply ohm law we have i=1.75V/(10k+25k)=50uA, I hope this make it more clear@@abrahamjones3635

  • @WalyB01
    @WalyB01 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Putting the formula their gives your brain more power to calculate other stuff. Basically like working memory on a pc. Weirdly enough we are wired quite similarly

  • @thespencerowen
    @thespencerowen ปีที่แล้ว

    How did you get 1ma across the 5k resistor in problem 3? Shouldn't that be 0.4ma ?

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Spencer! Since we know the inverting input is at 2V and the resistor to ground is 2K ohms, we know that the current through that resistor is 1mA. As the 2K and the 5K resistors are in series, the current through the 5K resistor has to also be 2mA. And that's how we find the output voltage of the op-amp. I hope that helps!

    • @thespencerowen
      @thespencerowen ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CircuitBread Ah thank you. I was following the current from the wrong pin so I didn't notice that they were in series.

  • @georgeifarouq1082
    @georgeifarouq1082 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi for example 1 could you explain why the current going through the 10k and 25k resistors was defined by 0.5V/10k Ohms instead of 0.5V/(10k + 25k) Ohms?

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi Georgei! The important thing here is to remember that the inverting and non-inverting inputs to the op-amp are the same voltage level. Since the non-inverting input is tied to ground, you can assume that the inverting input is tied to ground. Thus, the current going through the 10K ohm resistor is found by (0.5-0)/10K. And, since you know no current goes into the input, you know that same current has to go through the 25K ohm resistor. I hope that helps!

    • @Hamza__E
      @Hamza__E ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CircuitBread I had the same question and you cleared it up perfectly! Thank you so much! Also, I just want to say how thankful I am that you answered this. Even though the video was uploaded 11 months ago.

    • @mcpoogle9058
      @mcpoogle9058 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Im actually still confused on this; if no current flows into the inputs then the only current path would be through both the 10k and 25k resistor right? So wouldnt the current flow be defined as .5 / (10k+25k) ?

    • @gsiqhaiqj1169
      @gsiqhaiqj1169 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mcpoogle9058 hi, I know this is an old comment but i will explain anyway. We have .5V from the source to the non inverting input, not from the source to the output. That means that between the source and non inverting output (where the potential is 0V) we have a .5V voltage drop, therefore we can calculate the current that goes through the 10K resistor. The voltage between the source and output si 0.5V+1.25V=1.75V, and if we apply ohm law we have i=1.75V/(10k+25k)=50uA, I hope this make it more clear

  • @magicflour
    @magicflour ปีที่แล้ว

    Another thing I would explicitly state for the pedagogy of circuit theory is that you should never do nodal analysis on Vout as it does not have the same assumptions for conventional nodes in that current does not accumulate in any node. I find that some of my tutees did not know this because it was simply implied but never clarified.

  • @Jonhalloum
    @Jonhalloum ปีที่แล้ว

    In exercise 1, since this is a non inverting amplifier, couldn’t we use (25/10)0.5 ?

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  ปีที่แล้ว

      Kinda! This is actually an inverting amplifier and the equation for Vo/Vi is -R1/R2, so we could do -(25/10)*.5 to get the final output a lot faster. For most situations, you'd just use this equation to make your life simpler, but the idea was to show how to solve for op-amp problems utilizing the characteristics of an op-amp. For this, the learning is in the process more than the result. Hope that helps!

  • @HS-cu6iw
    @HS-cu6iw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hey! love the vid! I seem to be getting -12.5V for question 1 because my i1 value is 500mu Amps, not 50mu Amps..?

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks! Did you happen to use 5V instead of .5V? That seems to be the most likely cause making your current 10x what it should be.

    • @HS-cu6iw
      @HS-cu6iw 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@CircuitBread omg i cant believe i missed the "." 😂..reminder for me to pay close attention! Thanks again, btw perfect release time; I am prepping for my exams and opamps a big chunk of it!

    • @danielkioko5378
      @danielkioko5378 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Had missed it too.

  • @BaviBavii-jw4dn
    @BaviBavii-jw4dn หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi sir!! I'm bavithra from Tamilnadu.I had a Cadence interview on April 28. I watched your video I was very useful sir. Thankyou sir for teaching me in understandable manner.But I need your help sir I didn't have enough materials to practice these type of problems.Can you refer any book for preparing my interview sir? Thankyou sir. I hoped you will reply to my comment sir.

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I'm glad you found the information helpful! For further study, you can explore our textbooks available at www.circuitbread.com/textbooks. Utilize the search bar on the left to quickly locate topics of interest.

  • @StevieOU812
    @StevieOU812 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am confused, how can there be a -1,25 volts on the Vout? Shouldn't that be positive? Just need some help. Sorry for the dumb question.

    • @StevieOU812
      @StevieOU812 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think I get it, it is a negative signal compared to ground? Correct?

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly! 0V or ground can be somewhat arbitrary. It's just a reference point and to have a negative voltage just means the voltage is lower than that arbitrarily chosen reference voltage level.

  • @paulwood3460
    @paulwood3460 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice one. Suggest always to put a zero in front of a real number that only has a fractional part I.e 0.5 not .5
    I was scratching my head because I thought it was 5 👍

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That has caught a couple of people - I'll try to remember to do that in the future. Thanks for the feedback!

  • @andy2a2m
    @andy2a2m 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To anyone that is still confused:
    In example 1:
    the 25k ohm is the feedback resistor Rf,
    the 10k ohm is the input resistor Rin,
    Because the supply is connecting to negative side, which means the signal must be inverted and amplified,
    The multiplier is Rf / Rin = 25k ohm / 10k ohm = 2.5, again, it is inverted, so it is -2.5
    So the final answer, the output is 0.5V * -2.5 = -1.25V

    • @andy2a2m
      @andy2a2m 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In example 3, because the current path is only one way, so, we can use 1mA multiply by 2k + 5k ohms (they are in series, no current going into op amp as the rules stated), the answer is 0.001A*7000ohms, 7V !

  • @TomVanGaever
    @TomVanGaever ปีที่แล้ว

    In the first problem, the output should be -12.5V, not -1.25V. The closed loop amplification of the inverting amp is -2.5 not -0.25 (Acl = 25k/10k)

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The output should be -1.25 but you are correct about the amplification. I think the confusion comes from the input voltage, which is .5, not 5. .5 * -2.5 = -1.25

    • @test89267
      @test89267 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I also felt in this trap. Did calculations with 5v instead of .5v

  • @fernandogallardo3477
    @fernandogallardo3477 ปีที่แล้ว

    For practice problem 1, 5V/10K-ohh is not 50 micro-amps, it will give 5e-4.

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Phew, you scared me! I hate it when I mess up my math. In this case, you are correct with your math but you're reading it wrong. You're using 5V, not .5V. In the question, it is .5V/10K, which does give us 50 microamps.
      Thanks for the scrutiny and feedback, I *do* like to be corrected when there are mistakes, so don't hesitate if you see anything else that looks out of place.

  • @bilisuma_b
    @bilisuma_b 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    me waiting for the toaster to pop up...................
    what's the use of the toaster at the end? I didn't get it. 😂

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Haha, it’s amazing how many people comment on the toast not popping up. The toast/toaster is just part of our branding and we were originally going to do a bunch of different outros but never got around to it, so for a lot of our videos we just have the toast going down. I guess it adds some suspense. 😅

  • @jameskidd7906
    @jameskidd7906 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I m the 555 th person liked this vid . 555 a great symbole for the great ic 😅 thank sir for the vid

  • @mickhursey4802
    @mickhursey4802 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It would be useful for dunces like me if you explained the 'obvious'🤔 simple maths, I have no idea how you got your 5V from in the last equation

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dang! It's always hard to find the balance between boring people with too many details or confusing people with too few details. Sorry that the balance wasn't quite right for you...
      For that, what happens is that the 1mA on the right gets multiplied by the 5Kohms on the left (to cancel it out of the denominator on the left), so .001A*5000Ω = 5V.

    • @mickhursey4802
      @mickhursey4802 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@CircuitBread Thanks for that. Not a complaint, I loved the pace of the video just my math isn't up to scratch so ended up rather confused😮‍💨

  • @sebastiandelbanorollin5482
    @sebastiandelbanorollin5482 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How is Sergei these days?

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's complicated and I don't know how much of his personal life he'd want me to share but he's alive, healthy, and unbelievably stressed and sad. When I met him he was living in Mariupol and there'd be times we were talking during the 2014 Crimean invasion that there'd be explosions in the background, so that's why he moved to more central Ukraine. But Mariupol is where he grew up and he still has family there, so it's heartbreaking to see it as an active warzone.

    • @sebastiandelbanorollin5482
      @sebastiandelbanorollin5482 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CircuitBread sorry to hear that. send him best wishes and thanks for his great work.

  • @sejlahadzic9712
    @sejlahadzic9712 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    kilo -> k
    Kelvin -> K

  • @yahyaalhashmy1313
    @yahyaalhashmy1313 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can you explain how you dropped volts using simple math in 3rd question, when 3 volts passes 4R it drops one volt and when it passes thro 8R it drops 2V, how?... I ain't no math genius

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  ปีที่แล้ว

      The 3V are dropped over 12K ohms total. I'm not sure if it helps to think about it this way but, with 3V, it's easy to divide that 12K ohms into three parts and you will drop 1V per 4K ohms. So you'll drop one volt over that 4K resistor - giving you 2V at the non-inverting node. This is a semi-intuitive way to look at it but may not be the best when approaching it for the first time. The more rigorous way to do it would be to look at it like a voltage divider. I recommend checking out our tool on this that can help you calculate it, shows the actual equation, and can let you play with it until you get a better intuitive feel for what's going on: www.circuitbread.com/tools/voltage-divider

  • @Speed-dq2sn
    @Speed-dq2sn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🤨

  • @bendtrom7200
    @bendtrom7200 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don’t want to be the wise guy because I am not. Perhaps there is a small math error in the above video in the beginning 2:25 minutes in the video? U (Volt= V) / R (Ohm = Ω) = I (Amperes = A) therefor 5V/10KΩ i.e., 10000 Ω = 0,5 milli amperes or 0,0005 Ampere or 500µAmpers (Micro Amperes) not 50µAmpers. So 0.0005A x 25KΩ = 12,5 V not 1,25V.
    Ω=ohm symbol

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Bendt, I had no idea this was going to cause so many problems when putting this problem together but there have been many comments on this. The period in front of the .5V seems to be missed very easily. So, your math is totally right but with the wrong input. It's .5/10K not 5/10K, so the answer in the video is actually correct. I appreciate you taking the time to provide the feedback!

    • @gsiqhaiqj1169
      @gsiqhaiqj1169 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CircuitBread yeah, putting .5 instead of 0.5V was a mistake, easy to overlook the point.

  • @ChrisLee-yr7tz
    @ChrisLee-yr7tz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    9:04
    Do some quick Meth? No thanks, it's too early.

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      😂 And here I get on my kid's case for speaking clearly...

  • @ravichandransrinivasan5453
    @ravichandransrinivasan5453 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The gain is 2.5 so output voltage is -12.5 v please edit video

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  ปีที่แล้ว

      The input voltage is .5, not 5. So -2.5 *.5 = -1.25 not -12.5V - those decimal points can be easy to miss!

  • @panospanos8140
    @panospanos8140 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    whats up with the toaster

    • @CircuitBread
      @CircuitBread  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The fact that we show a toaster or that the toast doesn’t pop up?

  • @neverhavingfun
    @neverhavingfun ปีที่แล้ว

    👁🔺

  • @tensorprodukt
    @tensorprodukt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    its not 50 micro amps .. its 500 micro amps ... so the output should be -12.5 V I suppose

    • @gsiqhaiqj1169
      @gsiqhaiqj1169 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      we have 0.5 V, not 5V, it's easy to mistake because he put .5

  • @kelvinbyabato
    @kelvinbyabato 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    try to be careful with your solutions, so many errors and we are learning from you.