It’s 2024 and the CX 5 is still here. As hard as Mazda has tried to discontinue it, they can’t. It’s still their best selling model. We love our 2024. It’s a classic and will never be replaced for what it has been and still is. 👍
This is a great car. My brother’s owned 2. I personally find the gauge cluster pretty dated, infotainment frustrating to use, and the steering way to heavy. Also the cargo space compared to competitors is on the small side. Other than that, great little crossover - neither ever gave my brother any problems (2015 and 2021)
I hardly ever use the gauge cluster as I'm always looking at the HUD. The infotainment isn't the worst,but could use an update. I'd like if the screen was touch screen as well as rotary dial.
This is the best driving and most premium in the class but where it falls short compared to its competitors is gas mileage and interior space. The others all have more room/storage or better mpg with hybrid option/CVT. If those are not important then this is the best option for the money in my opinion.
This is it. Right here. Doesn't matter how good the drive is, if your back seat passenger feel like they're in Camaro, whats the point? And if you dont have passengers, why a CUV in the first place.
@@NoodlesExtraMSG for small/new family its a great car, still has utility while retain driving dynamic n sporty feels. none of the competitors like tucson,sportage,crv, rav 4 has this sporty feels and performance with good build quality and low NVH. obviously mazda has to make compromises such as outdated tech and old drivetrain to keep the price as it is.. also 2nd row may not be the best in its class but its still doable, plus camaro cant fit a whole bicycle even folding the back seats
@@NoodlesExtraMSG why an SUV? Because when you’re 70 they are easier to get in and out of. You sit higher on the road for better vision. You can load groceries and other items more easily than in the trunk of a sedan. That’s why. It’s just my wife and I and we own another larger SUV to haul people. It’s roomy and comfortable.Most people have two cars these days, it’s 2024. At its affordable price point, the CX 5 offers a sporty, fun driving, European style vehicle. It’s a niche’ product.
The Achilles heel of the CX-5 is indeed the mpg. My 2024 Carbon (naturally aspirated) edition has been getting around 24-25 mpg in winter and 26-27 mpg in spring in combined local (around 60%) and highway. Some of my co-workers have other CUV's and achieve signficantly better mileage (say, 30 mpg plus). However, they all wish that their vehicle had more power. Not so with the CS-5. Off the line, the clutch design puts me ahead of everyone else (okay, not including Tesla or Porshe,etc.) even with me just touching the gas pedal. Passing on the highway is a dream as is entering a 55-mph road (even when not in Sport mode). Give me this naturally-aspirated 2.5L 6-speed (traditional) transmission over 99% of competitors [no, over all others. Keep your CVT's, your 1.5L with turbo, even your hybrids with unproven long-term reliability] In case you can't tell: I LOVE MY CX-5!!!
Thanks, I'm the happy owner of a 2019 CX-5 Signature with over 58,500 trouble free miles so far. I think it's the best CUV in it's class for the money and competes with others costing $10-15,000 more. Like the new CX-50, but I think the CX-5 is still a little better. I'm looking forward to seeing the hybrid version of the CX-50. Hopefully soon.
If youre used to the cx5, Id say stick with it. The cx50 has stiffer suspension in the rear to tow more. Ive heard ride quality suffers because of that. At the very least test drive the two back to back to compare.
I have the 2019 gt turbo. Would buy this model again. Better mileage than RDx and faster acceleration. While some complain about cargo space, it has more than the x3. Just took a trip to Florida from Ontario. On the highway, I was getting 33 miles per gallon. Then seat could be longer for thigh support. I also spend some time with the 2022 signiture. Mazda has fixed the seat. The ride is more compliant over bumps. Not that the 2019 is punishing.
I really like my cx5 premium plus, bought it new almost 2 years ago. I think I'm going to drive this one into the ground LOL, but seriously as a daily driver this thing is awesome, I do wish these were about the same size as the Honda CRV
If the CX-5 is the best, it just got dethroned by the CX-50. The -50 has more versatility than the -5 and I think the -50 looks better. I would happily trade my 2016 CX-5 Touring AWD on a CX-50 Grand Touring or CX-9 Touring (both AWD). I have no qualms w/the infotainment and don't necessarily need the Bose opton.
Test drive them both, the CX50 has stiffer suspension in the rear so it can tow more, Ive heard multiple reports of a pretty subpar ride quality compared to the CX5 bc of that
@@DailyMotorNo you are absolutely wrong. I own a 2022 cx5 signature and my friend owns a 2023 cx50 gt without turbo. I can tell you the the steering wheel in the 5 is much more heavy than the 50. I also own a 2013 ford fusion i can feel the steering wheel in cx5 is more heavier than fusion. I think the the fusion is same as cx50 for steering wheel, which is the perfect. The steering wheel in 5 is just a bit too heavy.
Statistically more reliable, cheaper to insure, tax, service, maintain. I own a 5-series BMW touring and VERY tempted to switch from the "premium" brand to Mazda's CX-5. I question what exactly I'm paying for with BMW as it gets older. Bits going wrong that shouldn't. They have rested on their laurels sadly and cheaped out.
great car but i thought it was too small for my needs as a roadtrippable vehicle, missing proper LKA, panoramic moonroof, no hybrid power train. if everything i just mentioned is of no issue to you then the cx5 or cx50 is perfect for every single one of your needs period.
@@chriskelly509my statment on the vehicles size is why I don't view the cx as a good road trip fit. Everything else i mention are what I also consider its other faults.
@@andrewthaboss6643 I don't know I went from Arkansas to California and back in one and it wasn't that bad but to each their own, but I will agree that I do wish the CX-5 was more along the lines the same size as the Honda CRV that would make it perfect
@@chriskelly509 that's great. My needs probably differ from yours tho. Specifically i needed a vehicle that can handle 5 ppl and all their snowboarding gear on a roadtrip.
Ford still has poor reliability, go look at the forums and see for yourself. For long term ownership, I wouldn't buy any car with direct injection and turbo-charged (or super-charged) engine.
It’s 2024 and the CX 5 is still here.
As hard as Mazda has tried to discontinue it, they can’t. It’s still their best selling model.
We love our 2024. It’s a classic and will never be replaced for what it has been and still is. 👍
I still prefer it over the CX-50!
This is a great car. My brother’s owned 2. I personally find the gauge cluster pretty dated, infotainment frustrating to use, and the steering way to heavy. Also the cargo space compared to competitors is on the small side. Other than that, great little crossover - neither ever gave my brother any problems (2015 and 2021)
I hardly ever use the gauge cluster as I'm always looking at the HUD. The infotainment isn't the worst,but could use an update. I'd like if the screen was touch screen as well as rotary dial.
@@chriskelly509the 2024 has a “touch screen” option which works for Apple Car Play. Personally, the only time I use that feature, is for navigating .
This is the best driving and most premium in the class but where it falls short compared to its competitors is gas mileage and interior space. The others all have more room/storage or better mpg with hybrid option/CVT. If those are not important then this is the best option for the money in my opinion.
This is it. Right here. Doesn't matter how good the drive is, if your back seat passenger feel like they're in Camaro, whats the point? And if you dont have passengers, why a CUV in the first place.
@@NoodlesExtraMSG for small/new family its a great car, still has utility while retain driving dynamic n sporty feels. none of the competitors like tucson,sportage,crv, rav 4 has this sporty feels and performance with good build quality and low NVH. obviously mazda has to make compromises such as outdated tech and old drivetrain to keep the price as it is.. also 2nd row may not be the best in its class but its still doable, plus camaro cant fit a whole bicycle even folding the back seats
maybe just because you want to. But you can go for the cx60 which has all that you mentioned above, and pay the price for it.
@@NoodlesExtraMSG why an SUV? Because when you’re 70 they are easier to get in and out of. You sit higher on the road for better vision.
You can load groceries and other items more easily than in the trunk of a sedan. That’s why.
It’s just my wife and I and we own another larger SUV to haul people. It’s roomy and comfortable.Most people have two cars these days, it’s 2024.
At its affordable price point, the CX 5 offers a sporty, fun driving, European style vehicle.
It’s a niche’ product.
The Achilles heel of the CX-5 is indeed the mpg. My 2024 Carbon (naturally aspirated) edition has been getting around 24-25 mpg in winter and 26-27 mpg in spring in combined local (around 60%) and highway. Some of my co-workers have other CUV's and achieve signficantly better mileage (say, 30 mpg plus).
However, they all wish that their vehicle had more power. Not so with the CS-5. Off the line, the clutch design puts me ahead of everyone else (okay, not including Tesla or Porshe,etc.) even with me just touching the gas pedal. Passing on the highway is a dream as is entering a 55-mph road (even when not in Sport mode). Give me this naturally-aspirated 2.5L 6-speed (traditional) transmission over 99% of competitors [no, over all others. Keep your CVT's, your 1.5L with turbo, even your hybrids with unproven long-term reliability]
In case you can't tell: I LOVE MY CX-5!!!
Thanks, I'm the happy owner of a 2019 CX-5 Signature with over 58,500 trouble free miles so far. I think it's the best CUV in it's class for the money and competes with others costing $10-15,000 more.
Like the new CX-50, but I think the CX-5 is still a little better. I'm looking forward to seeing the hybrid version of the CX-50. Hopefully soon.
If youre used to the cx5, Id say stick with it. The cx50 has stiffer suspension in the rear to tow more. Ive heard ride quality suffers because of that. At the very least test drive the two back to back to compare.
The CX-5 is also quieter
I have the 2019 gt turbo. Would buy this model again. Better mileage than RDx and faster acceleration. While some complain about cargo space, it has more than the x3. Just took a trip to Florida from Ontario. On the highway, I was getting 33 miles per gallon. Then seat could be longer for thigh support. I also spend some time with the 2022 signiture. Mazda has fixed the seat. The ride is more compliant over bumps. Not that the 2019 is punishing.
Well, the rdx is absolutely a bit faster than cx5 turbo, not the other way around at all. Just the fuel economic is opposite
I really like my cx5 premium plus, bought it new almost 2 years ago. I think I'm going to drive this one into the ground LOL, but seriously as a daily driver this thing is awesome, I do wish these were about the same size as the Honda CRV
That's why they came out with the CX-50! Slightly larger.
Waiting for our our 23 CX5 to arrive at the dealership. Traded away our Hyundai Santa Fe Sport.
I was really hoping for this CX-5 in a hybrid version. I guess I will check out the hybrid CX-50 when that become available.
If the CX-5 is the best, it just got dethroned by the CX-50. The -50 has more versatility than the -5 and I think the -50 looks better. I would happily trade my 2016 CX-5 Touring AWD on a CX-50 Grand Touring or CX-9 Touring (both AWD). I have no qualms w/the infotainment and don't necessarily need the Bose opton.
The CX-50 has that hideous thick plastic cladding. So ugly, in my opinion...only useful I supposed if you are only offroading.
You can't compare the previous verdion of cx5 (2016)with the cx50 lmao
The CX 5 is still the king outselling the CX 50 4 to 1. Look it up.
I like this a lot but I'm in between this and the cx-50
Test drive them both, the CX50 has stiffer suspension in the rear so it can tow more, Ive heard multiple reports of a pretty subpar ride quality compared to the CX5 bc of that
CX-50 also has unnecessarily heavy steering. But it does feel a bit more modern. Both cool choices. I think the CX-5 still looks classier.
@@DailyMotor the cx-5 definitely looks more luxury but I also believe the cx-50 has more trunk discs with the seats up
@@jakes5530 ride quality is more than acceptable. I think whichever is cheaper is what you should get tbh.
@@DailyMotorNo you are absolutely wrong. I own a 2022 cx5 signature and my friend owns a 2023 cx50 gt without turbo. I can tell you the the steering wheel in the 5 is much more heavy than the 50. I also own a 2013 ford fusion i can feel the steering wheel in cx5 is more heavier than fusion. I think the the fusion is same as cx50 for steering wheel, which is the perfect. The steering wheel in 5 is just a bit too heavy.
Any idea how this CX-5 stacks up against the BMW X1 or X3?
Statistically more reliable, cheaper to insure, tax, service, maintain. I own a 5-series BMW touring and VERY tempted to switch from the "premium" brand to Mazda's CX-5. I question what exactly I'm paying for with BMW as it gets older. Bits going wrong that shouldn't. They have rested on their laurels sadly and cheaped out.
agree with your praise of this car. biggest downside is lack of space
That's really been my only issue with it I wish it was the same size as a CRV and I think they would sell these things like crazy, well more crazy.
@@chriskelly509that’s why Mazda came out with the CX 50
@@jimmy5634 junk
Just heard u say the cx50 steering was too heavy, I’ll disagree with you as I’ve had 2 cx5 that we heaving than my cx50
No Honda , Toyota, Kia or Hyundai can come close.
Do u think it’s better than cx 30
great car but i thought it was too small for my needs as a roadtrippable vehicle, missing proper LKA, panoramic moonroof, no hybrid power train. if everything i just mentioned is of no issue to you then the cx5 or cx50 is perfect for every single one of your needs period.
No idea what panoramic moonroof has to deal with road trips LOL
@@chriskelly509my statment on the vehicles size is why I don't view the cx as a good road trip fit. Everything else i mention are what I also consider its other faults.
@@andrewthaboss6643 I don't know I went from Arkansas to California and back in one and it wasn't that bad but to each their own, but I will agree that I do wish the CX-5 was more along the lines the same size as the Honda CRV that would make it perfect
@@chriskelly509 that's great. My needs probably differ from yours tho. Specifically i needed a vehicle that can handle 5 ppl and all their snowboarding gear on a roadtrip.
@@andrewthaboss6643 yeah that's a lot of gear
How does it fit a reverse car seat? Back seat looks tight
Is cx5 better than the Tiguan rline
100%
These helmet cams are making it impossible for me to watch this without getting sick.
Ford still has poor reliability, go look at the forums and see for yourself.
For long term ownership, I wouldn't buy any car with direct injection and turbo-charged (or super-charged) engine.
Ford no longer owns Mazda. Mazda is strictly Japanese owned designed and built. Far superior than any Ford.
you move your head like crazy and I can't even follow the video, I don't know who told you to record like this!!!