Mozart Piano Concerto No 24 K 491 in C minor Víkingur Ólafsson Paavo Järvi Philharmonia
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ธ.ค. 2021
- Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Klavierkonzert nr. 24 in c-Moll, KV 491
Piano Concerto No 24 K 491 in C minor
Víkingur Ólafsson, piano
Paavo Järvi conducts Philharmonia Orchestra
the best of Mozart piano concertos
I would put this work as top masterpiece out of Mozart's piano concertos.
One big 'success' moment in my life was when I met a retire methodist minister. He learnt I enjoyed Mozart and he hummed a tune, the opening bars of the andante from this piece. He said he always wanted to know what it was, was it Mozart? I told him straight away. He rang me later to thank me as he had bought a record (vinyl) of this concerto. He was amazed a 15 year old knew this piece. Serendipity I suppose.
I'm always amused by the variety of comments about a performance, when a glowing opinion is followed by "this is rubbish". "Everybody's entitled to an opinion...even when it's wrong!" I'm not a musician and therefore unqualified to make judgments about the quality of a performance, I'm just someone who loves to listen.
One year ago I was on a consert with Vikingur in Stockholm, where he played Mozart, and only Mozart. In my opinion he has a special connection to Mozart, and I love his interpretation in this 24:th piano consert.
Thank you for this. It's an exceptionally sensitive and dramatic performance of this powerful work.
Thank you for posting this marvelous performance. Hats off to Maestros Olafsson and Jarvi!
00:03 I. Allegro
13:27 II. Larghetto
21:23 III. Allegretto
Sublime work by MOZART!
Though not an expert of the music by Mozart, this seems quite a wonderful interpretation to me. I've just had the pleasure to hear Vikingur live a couple of weeks ago. However, that was Bach he played 😉
Qué maravillosa invención en 20:56. El acompañamiento justo, sutil.
Thanks for this masterwork! 🎹🎼🖤
One of the best interpretation of this beautiful Mozart´s piano concerto. Thanks for sharing.
What a talent and deep, thoughtful artistry. For me, one of if not the most musical pianist of his generation
Hardly
Outstanding.
Mozart❤❤❤❤!!
好棒.......謝謝 !!
❤ thank you
24:47 I find this variation to be very interesting. The root note is A-Flat, not C.
Romanticismo temprano, Mozart siempre un adelantado, lastima su corta vida
What's the cadenza played by Olafsson here? I don't think I've heard it before.
👆🏼also wondering.. unless he wrote his own?
It's his own original cadenza
Who wrote the first cadenza?
Whos cadenza is he playing?
Dry and mechanical
💗
Olaffson is the 2024 goat
is this suppose to be fugue or battle of wits at hinata's house
I've just compared Víkingur Ólafsson with Lang Lang in rendering this work (especially the cadenza part). Really interesting. They're both unconventional interpreters of Mozart's works. Again, elegance should not be a MUST in interpreting Mozart's works. Rachmaninoff and Karajan played Mozart in a rather heavy-handed yet moving way. A greater variety of rendition might be needed...BTY, I'm delighted to see pianists using unusual cadenzas, but I feel like...something's missing in Víkingur's cadenzas. When you change your emotion from one state to another, there should be a reasonable transition. If the transition isn't used properly, the flow of music sounds a bit unnatural or blunt. One of the things that confuse me is that Víkingur just used around 72 seconds in doing his first cadenza. I don't think the time was sufficient for a perfect cadenza.
I don’t like the piano version at 11:10.
Mozart is definitely not his strong point. It lacks the delicacy of touch of the music of the classical period, sometimes it abuses the use of the pedal, the cuts sound aggressive and dry. Great pianist but for other periods. Just as Horowitz, Argerich and Rubinstein were specialists in the romantic period, for Mozart there are great specialists such as Gulda, Uchida, Brendel, Barenboim, Perahia.
Yes, but Wolfgang would have been tickled by it. For sublime, try Mao Fujita
th-cam.com/video/sjlGS5T4WJs/w-d-xo.html
Totally disagree.
The pianist has no lyricism or life in his playing.
We all look forward to being moved to tears by your own performance.
@@davidlilley2522 haha,this was good answer-but-Nadine has a good comment,the pianist is playing
like chickens pick,pick,pick,pick........
Fine conductor, weak soloist…
Well, I liked the soloist very much.
And weakest of all: your wholly non-specific "review". What gives, people? Laughable, if we were to pay any attention to such silliness. And FYI, a fourth period in the ellipsis at the end of your sentence is warranted, to be grammatically correct, representing a full stop. Evidently, perfection is not as easy as you'd have us believe.
Fan boi… (.) Your essay is lacking proper research and citations {🤓}
Quality in keeping with the quality of the soloist…🍆
Very uneven and rude touch. Of course, with such crooked fingers...
"Кривые пальцы" сильно сказано! Надо бы еще вам, кривой критик, добавить, что у него еще и очки на носу. Тогда бы полностью унизили пианиста. Позор!
Don't ever stop, any of you! Love