Go to ground.news/startalk to stay fully informed on the latest Space and Science news. Subscribe through our link for 50% off unlimited access to the Vantage plan this month.
WAIT JUST A DOG GONE MINUTE ! ! ! I thought for the sake of being Concise. It was "Anomalous" not Aerial. Because of the trans medium nature of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon like UFO's and USO's. .... maybe check that device in your pockets, mines an android, and NASA says my data is Correct , amateurs 😂
For a show you say is all about being Correct. Then Diss those Android devices in your pocket. MY ANDROID DEVICE SAYS YOU'RE ALL INCORRECT !!! Because my understanding is it's Anomalous, not Aerial. Because of the trans medium nature of the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon. And NASA AGREES WITH ME 😂 .... amateurs
10 minutes into it and you guys missed two important points. 1. no money for the app is a lame or lack of imagination excuse. Crowdfund it, I bet millions and millions of people would contribute to it, especially if it will be public. 2, No one asked the question, about him at NASA checking the data! What data, the one leaked and public, or all the data that Pentagon stated in the congress hearing that it has and it is classified?
You guys completely fumbled on the conspiracy & eyewitness section. There are so much overt things & even with the strongest evidence/claims, you could have definitely come up with counter arguments. Instead, you go for the easiest discredited/dismissed ones. There's a reason why majority and masses of people are much more swayed by the evidence of NHI v.s. than your explanations. I would re-think your methods of staying on the grounded/skeptical side. Hugely missed opportunity.
@jasonpaul5431 lol he literally has never said that. In fact he's emphatically stated the very real difference between men and women in sports, but offered that a hormone measurement technique may be used to solve the problem, which he also admits would be weird but also interesting to see. Not once did he ever say there was no difference. Get your facts straight.
Science really is mind blowing when you realize how simple it is. The reaction Chuck had was how I felt when I was studying electrical engineering, it blew my mind how simple the math of electricity is to understand but yet so mysterious and complicated at the same time.
I'd rather Neil not discuss this topic since he already dismissed it on multiple occasions even with more whistleblowers coming out and to bring on someone from NASA to solidify his point of it being nothing to see here is ridiculous. Just clown activity here and nothing scientific
He is the type of individual that even if an alien sat right in front of him - he would deny and ask for more data and more proof such has checking its DNA, and even when the DNA is non human he will find a reason to say it's a sub human DNA and etc... he will never in his life admit to aliens, religion, or anything that isn't covered by human made science. Shows how some folks who think they are "intelligent" have still not evolved to have an open mind to learn beyond their human limits.
I love the way Chuck can take this information and distill it down to such simple language and put it into a single statement. He does hang out with some very smart folks and I think the title of comedian under sells him enormously. Keep up the good work.
As people full of themselves do. There are geniuses and then there are these people. People who let the fame and compliments of their “greatness” go to their head. They’re the typical ‘laugh at everyone I don’t believe’ sort. Honestly if aliens visited they’d be so advanced that they could simply spy on us through another dimension. We have absolutely nothing to pick up on that so it really does not matter if there’s no data, they could be watching you right now and you’d never know no matter how much equipment you have.
Feel like we've seen Chuck's scientific understanding grow as this channel goes on. Love to see it. Happy holidays gentlemen thank you for doing what you do!
I was just thinking this the other day! I don't know anything about Chuck's background with science, but it seems that while he's not academic in any particular scientific field, he's clearly becoming more and more fluent and is able to grasp increasingly more complicated concepts.
The acronym UAP stood for "unidentified aerial phenomenon" until December 2022, when the Pentagon updated its terminology to "unidentified anomalous phenomenon:::ACCORDING TO:CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY
Yes because there are anomalous phenomena occurring in aerial and underwater settings. Used to be distinguished as UFO/USO to differentiate between flying or submerged objects, but since they changed the terminology from UFO to UAP, it only made sense to alter it slightly to include the other facet(s) of phenomena we can't currently explain.
You mean like 'swamp gas' in the middle of North Dakota or Nevada? Get out of here with that 'natural phenomena BS. People are not as dumb as you and they all want to make them out to be.
@@francistremblay8098 That is such a stoopid statement, used to stifle the real subject. There is no need to bring up the sightings that are of no interest. No one is talking about, or wants to study natural phenomena. The only topic, the only things that should be discussed is credible UFO data! There is no need to use the term, credible UFOs are 1%. One percent of what, why lump credible UFOs with non-credible UFOs. It designed to not take the topic seriously. Credible UFOs are 100% of credible UFOs, just focus on that!
I mean, yeah, get better data but here there's nothing interesting being said at all. Not even speculation on any anomalous events really. Even with more data one might still be required to use their creative abilities. I wonder maybe this podcast is just a joke. That would make more sense. I have heard many others who are also not "conspiracy theorists" have much more interesting things to say about the possibilities out there but also use the "art of description" which as we all know is very much a part of the scientific process and method. This interview feels like a cliff notes version of what not to say on the topic. Which basically means any thoughtful speculation is not allowed. This reminds me of Latour and his criticism of modernism for falling short in the realm of describing phenomena before settling on labels and categories where critical judgment can be made hastily and without much effect. The UAP category supercedes the phenomenon. And that's definitely an issue.
Your talks are always enligtening, especially those little clarifications/explainers you do on the little stuff... I agree with Chuck, with all these beautiful and super intelligent ways and tools designed and built to understand our universe, how can one not love science...
In order to study them scientifically you need evidence. Right now the only evidence is blurry video and pictures, eyewitness testimony, and a lot of weird stories. It's hard to really make heads or tails out of any of it. There's hardly any scientific evidence that stands up to any sort of rigor, that's why it's not studied. There's anomalous stuff, sure, but until you can get firm data on it there's nothing to study.
They are actually heavily debunked. When millions of dollars go toward debunking phenomenon that has zero evidence to support it then it generally loses funding
Nasa did a non classified review...thats as worthless as a broken toilet...everyone laughed at bill Nelson when he already admitted to the fact nasa did not have access to the classified uap data, which is 99% of it for the cases we actually care about...and this guy just confirmed it 5 seconds in...didn't have a clearance...these fools are modern day hynek and swamp gas...and hynek had a breakdown after lying so much when he found out even he was being played the whole time...regretted what he did ...same thing will happen with tyson in several years...when people try to engage with tyson about specifics from fravors case for example, he doesnt even know the first detail about it...just insults fravor by saying he misidentified something...when fravor and his wing woman with 2 weapons officers, and another plane flown by Chad underwood literally chased the thing with eyes on confirming all the multiple sensor data...tyson doesn't know any of it...hes modern day bluebook
The reason why "it shows capabilities beyond our current technology" it's because the data f*ck*ng sucks! He explained this. yet it went in one ear out the other.
I’m so thankful to have people like you helping people like me. Explain what’s going on without all the propaganda just clear on facts. I love it. Thank you so much.
@@normanwolfe7639 No. YOU need evidence, I dont, I have seen the beings themselves up close in daylight while drinking tea on my roof terrace. And yes I did attempt to take a video with a £1200 camcorder. They apparently do not like being filmed. There are many of us, but you go ahead and be sceptical, despite also, such things as the Senate hearings and the released airforce videos, where it is CLEAR that the craft exhibit capabilities no military currently has.
@@normanwolfe7639 If I tell you that I have had many girlfriends, you are likely to give me the benefit of the doubt. It is only your mindset and mainstream world view that stops you also entertaining that I have seen NHI. I have.
@@jackyboy5424 No, that is just a claim you have not backed up. I am not religious and you are generalising without any data behind you. You're welcome.
He’s definitely holding back info on the tic tac. Those pilots were flying top of the line aircraft’s. They had all the data they needed not to mention their own eyes
He's not holding back a damned thing, and no they didn't have all the data needed. You are just misinformed. And their own eyeballs and interpretations are not reliable evidence in this particular discussion. Compelling evidence, maybe, but not good evidence.
My sister had convinced me there were drones over my house. I kept seeing them. Was filming them, watching my CCTV cameras, posting stuff online, and even submitting FBI tips. One night while it was 10°F, I stood outside for 13 minutes straight trying to get a high quality image or video, because everything I kept getting was blurry and distorted. One of the "drones" flew straight towards my house, and as it got closer, I immediately realized it was an airplane. I put 2 and 2 together and realized that aircraft were in an approach path to the airport from my house. I was able to verify eventually that everything I saw was an airplane or helicopter. Now when I see something flying over my house, I check a flight app and figure out immediately which aircraft it is. After trying to tell my family of my discovery, they called me insane saying that I just don't know if they are all planes. Yep. I'm the nut, despite all this evidence of airplanes.
I would urge people to listen to the 60 minutes interview with 2 pilots who described their UAP experiences in detail. Very credible eyewitness, this wasn’t the Russians or Chinese, not saying extraterrestrial but give it a watch
30:45 ok this is definitely not a natural phenomenon because I saw that lightning looking orb in my room in 2010. No windows were open and concrete walls+ceiling. I woke up and lied like 15 minutes in the bed. A female friend was studying for the exam and I woke up early to study at 6am because we had a little argument last night and couldn't focus studying. I was yawning and turning in the bed and she was seated at the foot of the bed and that light orb was hovering above her head. As soon as I saw it started to raise slowly. It was the size of a big orange and glowing like a lamp but rather different light and wasn't disturbing my eyes. It was half transparent and the bottom part had thread like object with a whiter glow. In 6-7 seconds it passed through the ceiling like a ghost and disappeared. No windows were open at that time and she didn't even notice that object. I didn't tell this to her because I didn't want to scare her or think that I am crazy. Don't tell me this thing wasn't intelligent.
@ I know what I saw and I have no reason to lie let me put that first. Aside from that, have you ever considered our 200 yo technology may not be advanced enough to surpass their defense systems? Last month I have seen many people uploaded plasma orb videos very similar to what I saw. We cannot understand what they are with the data we have, so there is no evidence for UAP’s therefore all people who report weird stuff must be crazy huh? This is extremely biased and goes against the spirit of scientific discovery. All this narrative seems so wrong and misleading tbh.
We would love to see you and Steven Greer talk to each other. That would be great interview he is the Aficionado on these drones and well-known to be. What do you think about an interview with him we would all like to see that I think I don't know if I really can't speak for everybody but the people paying attention all this he's coming forward on the as the aficionado very publicly
0:58 I think it has evolved to „Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon” instead of „aerial” as these objects seem to be trans-something (sorry I am not a native speaker, but the something stands for - it can both move in the air and under the water).
Most likely because it's unexplainable in terms of natural phenomenons. This doesn't mean it's aliens or even drones though. It could be just phenomenoms we don't fully understand that take place on earth.
Why would the government hide this stuff? In the intelligent community knowledge is power. So people hang on to stuff they know because they know stuff you don't.
I saw something that looked like what people call ball lightning. I was sitting in the living room and it was raining outside. There was some thunder and lightning. Something, like a bright light, went past me from my left side and went into the kitchen. I wasn't alone, other people saw it too.
@@tims8603I believe you because a similar incident happened to me several years ago. My sister and I were sitting at the kitchen table in front of a large window with blinds. We heard a loud noise like thunder then a lightning strike hung between the two of us. She saw a white light and I saw blue. As quickly as it appeared it disappeared. We checked to see if anything was damaged. We were fine and it was as if it never happened. I have often wondered how did lightning get into the house and not damage anything. I was shocked when Neil described the incident on the airplane. Could this be a combination of a miracle and new physics? I don’t follow this podcast but happened to watch it today. Go figure?
@@nubnsista How do you know he hasn't? If he did would you believe his thoughts on what people are seeing? I don't know about you but most of them would choose to believe the "more exciting" theories
9:27 - my response: it IS hard to pull your phone out and capture a good pic/vid of a unknown spacecraft moving at very high speeds. #1. You’re already in shock of what you’re seeing. #2 you’re almost never prepared for a moment that last a few seconds.
But planes could be like Teslas and have cameras recording everything in cyclic buffer. The main message is to do that kind of thing so we can finally have more data than just radar and eye witnesses.
Unknown spacecraft don't fly at very high speeds, in fact they don't even exist. All the spacecraft are known and accounted for, and 'fly' at normal speeds.
They’re not saying this technology doesn’t exist, they’re saying it isn’t aliens. And it isn’t. But stick to listening the random TH-camrs that confirm your bias and not actual scientists.
or you’re just mad that reality isn’t matching your delusions. people think “scientist” get paid by the government to lie. buddy we barely get paid. let alone by uncle sam. reality is often disappointing. aliens exist for sure but not in the sense of little creatures visiting earth in ships. maybe the mission to the moons of jupiter will find evidence of life but we won’t see extraterrestrials ever.
As much as you would like to believe everything a witness says is true, the DATA says witnesses are notoriously unreliable. Scientists aren't trying to dismiss anything. The simple fact that no one can produce any evidence of intelligent life from another planet causes the issue to dismiss itself.
29:50 - I once saw such ball of light crashing onto my balcony's floor, it was so crazy, saw it like a meter away from me from within my house, it was a stormy weather type of day and it was raining I think, thank god I did not go outside else I don't wanna think what could happen, it even left a black burn marks on the floor outside, it was gigantic in size, about almost one meter long diameter and it was all full of lightnings inside that made it white/blue in color or something, it was like 15 - 20 years ago maybe so I don't recall exactly but yeah most of it I can recall and it was so crazy.
@@vonNeumannProbed Yeah, it was most likely what he described but its extremely rare once in a lifetime kind of thing that can happen to see such thing for a small percentage of people, I am both super lucky to see it that close but also super lucky to not get hit by it thankfully thank god.
@@THome92 Why not? why would I lie? one meter is gigantic for such ball of lightning at least in my eyes it felt pretty big to witness infront of me, well as for the black marks it left, it was actually logical for it not to cause too much damage and only to leave the burning marks on the floor the same size of it which was an almost one meter long burning marks from it.
@@MrRandomPlays_1987 It may be once in a lifetime for you, however 1 in 20 people approximately have seen ball lightning in their life. I would hardly call that rare.
Thank you for talking about this topic! It's our right to know the truth of our reality. We are not a lone according to recent UAP Congressional Hearings. We need transparency from our government. The media needs to talk more about UAPs. Exposure will help lead to more disclosure.
Neil is wrong. "A" no longer stands for "aerial" phenomena, since they're not necessarily aerial (some are underwater or transmedium). So "A" now stands for "anomalous" phenomena to cover those as well.
@@Yes-gp1bt The names are an absolutely crucial distinction. Neil is basically instructing people to look for a submarine in the sky. Do you have a particular vested interest in spreading misinformation, or are you simply a narcissist who felt called out?
@@subject8332 People keep changing the terminology to create less controversy. If you’re so bothered by everything being absolutely correct, then god help your soul. It should have just stayed as UFO.
loved the dark matter and energy casual chat 😊The beauty of sience is not knowing how stuff works, but making educated (philosophical) guesses about it and keep the wondering alive
There is less evidence for the existence of Dark Matter than there is for visitation. Let that sink in friend. Dark Matter is still pure math and we have not been able to experimentally confirm it's existence. Dark Matter should be treated with the same skepticism as visitation until we know more.
I do agree, and since you seem to know a lot about the subject(just a curious gal), do you think the sort of obsession humans, and the pop culture, have on extra perceptual beings is too much? Because personally, I feel it's been overused and overdone and maybe it's time to start focusing more on fixing the human impacts on the planet.
@@ThegamingsquadLOve-kg1yq all these recent sightings and mainstream conversations about the true nature of reality help to expand the Veiw of ourselves and capabilities which will go a long way to healing our current treatment of the planet
Reports of UFO's are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns-the ones we don't know we don't know. And if one looks at these UFO images, it is the latter category that tends to be the difficult ones.
These guys saying why would they light up like a plane. Probably the same reason a soldier uses camo; to blend in with surroundings🤯. Considering how smart these guys are they can sure be fairly ignorant of really basic logic.
Here's my take on their reasoning: I think most planes (if not all) in the sky are tracked by towers. So, if something that was not registered for flight enters the aerial space they would know immediately it's either rogue plane or UFO (mimicking)
How does a light blend in with an object’s surrounding of darkness? No lights = can’t be seen. Lights = can be seen. Did you even think about what you just wrote?
@@GeoRust1 The point here is: "It has blinking lights, therefore it is just another airplane" vs "It has no lights - very suspicious". Do you see the point now?
@ I’ve always seen the point. My point is that no lights = not seen. Lights = seen. How can something be suspicious if it isn’t noticed? A dark object will not be seen in the night sky, it’s pretty much that simple. Adding lights as ‘camouflage’ is counterintuitive, considering the entities would never be observed if this ‘camouflage’ was never implemented. Textbook circular reasoning.
@@GeoRust1 so you don’t think they got systems to detect these drones whether they lit or not? We’re all stuck on the fence with this one so don’t claim to know all because even your points can be countered.
he is just an astrophysicist, writer , director of the Hayden Planetarium at the Rose Center for Earth and Space and a research associate in the department of astrophysics at the American Museum of Natural History, harvard graduate,and won a few science awards, but I guess this isnot enough, I will go with some conspiracy theories because I think I know something
@@vonNeumannProbed and look at what happens when you do leak verifiable state secrets. Snowden was hunted, discredited and now lives in a dictatorship. At any point a team could pick him up and stick him in a hole never to be seen again. The cost is incredibly high - would you leak and put your name to it? I'm still skeptical about UAPs... but there just seems like a similar situation to when Mark Klein, the NSA whistleblower came out. And finally many years later, Snowden revealed the full scale of internal surveillance. Feels similar in a lot of ways about the growing momentum. But to be honest I doubt anyone who has the full picture would ever leak. It's only those with a partial view.
He is super smart. However, he is being biased about this topic. That's just a fact. Visitation is one equally reasonable possibility until we have more data. That's just how it works. Neil should say this: "Visitation is one possibility, but I remain skeptical until more convincing evidence presents itself." That's what we need. Lets move this topic forward, study it, and see where it goes. Science is the one thing absent from the UAP topic.
@@NameForgotten1 What's biased about remaining skeptical. He's not saying he doesn't think it is real. Skeptical means "having a questioning attitude or doubt toward knowledge claims that are seen as mere belief or dogma" there's nothing biased about that. Fact is there's almost no conclusive proof (that is being generous) of visitation.
Well it wouldn’t be light. They might have extra range on either side but the longer wavelengths are absorbed as heat and you wouldn’t see anything if they were there. The shorter ones, would be visible initially but then they’d simply pass through matter which in the same way wouldn’t reflect anything for any creature to see. So they could be different but they’d be in the same general area
Me and my freind saw a flying saucer for about 15 seconds on november 23 2022 around 2 pm, broad daylight. It did not move an inch it was scary idle and it was above a lowes on Chapman hyw Knoxville TN... it never moved but it definitely left reality instantly. It blinked out of existence. Now being in Tennessee wouldn't you assume that some Chinese aircraft or some aliens were observing a lowes instead of oak ridge or any of the many military bases in Tennessee? Nobody beleives me and if my freind didnt see it too i would not believe it either.
There was a famous incident where a UFO hovered above the Chicago airport (in 2006) for a few minutes and was seen by many airport personel and other people. And pics were taken.
but smart people such these 3 podcastster are too smart and too high with their position to believe, so... this why we all divided by politics around and around rather than solving it.
I find it nonsensical to believe that a civilization millions of years more advanced than us, who have mastered physics to the point of developing interstellar travel, would come across the universe to our planet only to crash in a desert.
if they use anti-gravity in the same way a jet ski rides a rough wave, its not that hard to imagine a few could crash from areas where gravity is much weaker causing them to lose control.
It's fun to think it's aliens, and in everyday conversation, I'll probably play devil's advocate and roleplay like I believe it could be aliens. But in actuality-c'mon, let's be real, lol.
In actuality, there are thousands upon thousands known reports and testimonies of people all over the world about UFO sightings, happening since forever. Even cave people documented them, within their cave drawings.
But remember that the earth has been here for 5 billion years appx. It is probably more likely the aliens found us years if not eons ago lol. I think if these ecounters are real than we are probably living in a Zoo hypothesis.
@@KC-cb7ov It has been billion of years, these are big numbers, but the universe is still very young, and since the galaxy isn't teeming with life, it's also possible that we're just among the first life forms to develop.
Even though some Android devices can even measure atmospheric data. older models at least can do that lol they probably stopped including that feature because it wasn't cost effective
Youre the dumb person they are laughing at in the video who thinks everything is a conspiracy. why would nasa downplay anything they would get a bigger budget if aliens were provable. people are dumb lol
On that last part, it's more like science is in the grip or at the mercy of these funding organisations... limited by their interests & what they're willing to fund
This is literally a first thought. Literally the first answer to the question, "Why would they produce lights on a spaceship?". Because we also have lights on our spaceships. So if Aliens aren't trying to operate incognito, then it's One of Us.
This is one thing I don't understand but maybe someone could correct me. Let's say there are somewhat advanced aliens on the other side of our galaxy, if they are looking at us right now wouldn't they see into our *past* hence we don't even exist as a civilization that could be seen to begin with? If there are aliens they would have to be *very* close to to us see our last 100-200 years of development? Before that they probably wouldn't even know we existed. Unless of course life itself was "planted" here on Earth by something else and they've been monitoring ever since, seems like a long stretch. To be fair if we ever evolve past our petty nature of being humans I'm sure that's something *we* would do in the far, far away future.
there two posibility , if they are benovalent , they would have a rule of no contact/disturbance if they are hostile they would have stealh tech there literaly no point at having christmas lights on a drone/vehicule that is use to gather information
Or they have shown themselves to other intelligent, lower advanced lifeforms, and it resulted in some terrible outcome that they now try to avoid. Think.
And you have better evidence to 100% conclude, without a doubt, that these UAP are extraterrestrial beings from another planet in the universe? Man, you should definitely report that.
@Krebssssssss it's not about 100% facts it's being smart enough to see that the limited facts that are presented represent something that needs to be taken seriously.... just because you don't like what the facts are really representing don't mean that you write it off to being something mundane or easily assume it's normal natural occurrence.
@@mmjnice97 I’m not saying that. Nobody is. That’s the point. There is nothing, no evidence to suggest that any of these phenomena are paranormal or extraterrestrial in nature. All they’re saying is we need more evidence before we draw any conclusions either way. “I don’t know what it is, therefore, it must be aliens”, is an absurd leap in logic. Yes, investigate. Yes, get more evidence. But until every possible scenario is ruled out, and we have enough evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt that whatever these anomalies are are not from our planet, then let’s stop with the “ooh, government’s hiding aliens from us” nonsense.
@@mmjnice97 the facts are that currently there isn't enough verifiable data to reach a conclusion. He said 1% of sightings are unexplained. When there's sufficient evidence is when you reach a conclusion. Before that, it's just speculation.
Most probably planes would suffer visibility or even death ray effects. The reason it's not like that on roads is the glare it would project into drivers' eyes. Better to use plants and other means, like lighter colors, but not all the way to white
@@shaunnorum05 okay, the average ice melt is 3.21sqKM per year. average home 100 sqm per home of roof. 33 homes would get you break even as far as albedo effect. The Strategic location of additional 100 to 150 buildings per 3 KM area in certain climes would drastically slow global warming. By replacing and increasing the albedo effect of earth.
@@Souljourney22 Why would it be in jeopardy? Are certain topics off limits? Do you mean to say, that you have, with scientific precision, ruled out the possibility for intelligent life across the entire universe, except for Earth? Think about how crazy what you are saying actually is.
@@NameForgotten1 Greer is one of the biggest grifters in "ufology," provides zero evidence to back up his claims, and his photos of ethereal beings have been debunked as nothing more than photos of insects. Why would NDT waste his time interviewing one of the most transparent grifters on the scene?
@@NameForgotten1 because if neil were to bring dr greer on and discuss this topic he would quickly be put in his place on how we have a long history of interactions with other beings. Neil's whole stance of nothing to see here would be exposed and therefore his whole career of telling lies to the public.
Before drones existed, the UFOs in Close Encounters of the Third Kind strikingly resembled them. As for the lights on their crafts, we can’t assume to understand their logic. Remember, the film, released in 1977, was inspired by real reported cases.
NASA needs data.. “let’s make an app!”… scrap plans to build an app that a 14 year old kid could write because of budget concerns and then totally ignores the fact that they could just set up a free email address for people the send pics to.
Go out tonight with your phone and zoom in on any type of light far away, maybe a star, myabe a streetlight very very far away and tell me what do you see? Better yet record it and post it
@@dankfarrik8376 We don't hate Neil. We just want them to take the topic more seriously. I mean, the universe is massive. Visitation is not impossible. Let's study the 1% of cases, develop better data collection methods, and see what we find. Right?
@@dankfarrik8376 People throughout history that speak the truth generally are ill-received. Just look at Galileo and what the church did to him for questioning their teachings.
@@NameForgotten1 isn't that exactly what they are doing? Even you have to admit that if 99% of the cases are BS, or explained by conventional means, the topic has a serious credibility problem.
@@vonNeumannProbed String Theory appears to be pure math. Experimentation keeps giving non-conclusive results, and then we move the goal post. However, people are generally attacked when they suggest that String Theory appears to be a dead end. It's okay to be wrong! And if this is true, it doesn't mean that everything string theorists have done is meaningless. The same holds true for this topic. Maybe we don't find Aliens in the data, but the topic has been attacked and ridiculed to death and many people aren't even interested in exploring it. I mean, I am always shocked when scientists (regardless of field) say that we have found no evidence of life outside Earth in our own solar system. Like, WTF are you talking about? Have we really explored our own solar backyard to a sufficient extent to pretend that life won't be found? I mean, we have explored so little, and seen almost nothing, and many scientists will push this dogmatic approach. Our telescopes have seen maybe 10% (wag) of our solar system in any real detail. We've yet to land on all the planets and explore further. Yet, people say these astounding things. We NEED to study this topic. There IS evidence that suggests we need to focus our attention on it until we understand what's happening. "Swamp Gas" is not good enough.
Go to ground.news/startalk to stay fully informed on the latest Space and Science news. Subscribe through our link for 50% off unlimited access to the Vantage plan this month.
ground news invokes "AI" as a catch for investors and ultimately contributes to the AI slop we're seeing ruin the internet.
WAIT JUST A DOG GONE MINUTE ! ! !
I thought for the sake of being Concise. It was "Anomalous" not Aerial. Because of the trans medium nature of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon like UFO's and USO's.
.... maybe check that device in your pockets, mines an android, and NASA says my data is Correct , amateurs 😂
For a show you say is all about being Correct.
Then Diss those Android devices in your pocket.
MY ANDROID DEVICE SAYS YOU'RE ALL INCORRECT !!!
Because my understanding is it's Anomalous, not Aerial. Because of the trans medium nature of the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon.
And NASA AGREES WITH ME 😂
.... amateurs
10 minutes into it and you guys missed two important points. 1. no money for the app is a lame or lack of imagination excuse. Crowdfund it, I bet millions and millions of people would contribute to it, especially if it will be public. 2, No one asked the question, about him at NASA checking the data! What data, the one leaked and public, or all the data that Pentagon stated in the congress hearing that it has and it is classified?
stop conflating UFOs with ALIENs you BOTs
He literally looks like this emoji 🥸
You look like this emoji 🤓
😂
Emojis are weird, man.
Invented by French Astrophysicist Francois T EmoJi, suspiciously.
rofl 🥸🥸🥸🥸🥸
You guys completely fumbled on the conspiracy & eyewitness section. There are so much overt things & even with the strongest evidence/claims, you could have definitely come up with counter arguments. Instead, you go for the easiest discredited/dismissed ones. There's a reason why majority and masses of people are much more swayed by the evidence of NHI v.s. than your explanations. I would re-think your methods of staying on the grounded/skeptical side. Hugely missed opportunity.
Well this is coming from a guy that thinks there is no difference between men and women in sports.
@@jasonpaul5431is this all you focus on and talk about? Seems like you should step back and reflect on what actually affects your life.
@@willib32he made bigotry great again
@jasonpaul5431 lol he literally has never said that. In fact he's emphatically stated the very real difference between men and women in sports, but offered that a hormone measurement technique may be used to solve the problem, which he also admits would be weird but also interesting to see. Not once did he ever say there was no difference. Get your facts straight.
Science really is mind blowing when you realize how simple it is. The reaction Chuck had was how I felt when I was studying electrical engineering, it blew my mind how simple the math of electricity is to understand but yet so mysterious and complicated at the same time.
Like, it’s there, and says so much but how does it say it?
Niel: *Makes joke*
Chuck: 😂
Chuck: *Makes joke*
Niel: 😂
David the entire time: 🥸
😂❤
Lolol that’s what I said. He really didn’t laugh at all 🥸
I was getting the feeling he was getting mad at niel
Merry christmas and happy holidays Neil ❤ and Chuck 🎉
Have a very merry Christmas 🎄
It's a pegan day!
@@Amsterdam-s4s 2 weeks in my neighborhood!
Sycophant 🙄
Merry Christmas 🎄
I'd rather Neil not discuss this topic since he already dismissed it on multiple occasions even with more whistleblowers coming out and to bring on someone from NASA to solidify his point of it being nothing to see here is ridiculous. Just clown activity here and nothing scientific
Agreed. So disappointing
More gaslighting.🤦♀️
He is the type of individual that even if an alien sat right in front of him - he would deny and ask for more data and more proof such has checking its DNA, and even when the DNA is non human he will find a reason to say it's a sub human DNA and etc... he will never in his life admit to aliens, religion, or anything that isn't covered by human made science. Shows how some folks who think they are "intelligent" have still not evolved to have an open mind to learn beyond their human limits.
It makes sense not to believe in something until there's sufficient evidence. Being open minded is important but being skeptical is just as important.
Wanted to pull my hair out hearing Some of the things they were saying. Gaslighting to the max
I love the way Chuck can take this information and distill it down to such simple language and put it into a single statement. He does hang out with some very smart folks and I think the title of comedian under sells him enormously.
Keep up the good work.
I'm glad the tic-tac is just so simply explained now.......not ahhh ha ha ha ha ha ha ha 🤣 😆😂😆😂......not
Ohh it's swamp Gas there you go 🙀 ahhh ha ha ha ha ha
FN clown 🤡 show
What a disappointment they just keep laughing instead of going to the hearth of the matter.
Exactly my thoughts. A lot of fluff wasting our time.
weak podcast.
As people full of themselves do.
There are geniuses and then there are these people.
People who let the fame and compliments of their “greatness” go to their head.
They’re the typical ‘laugh at everyone I don’t believe’ sort.
Honestly if aliens visited they’d be so advanced that they could simply spy on us through another dimension.
We have absolutely nothing to pick up on that so it really does not matter if there’s no data, they could be watching you right now and you’d never know no matter how much equipment you have.
Hearth? Heart?
because its a joke if you think aliens are here.
Feel like we've seen Chuck's scientific understanding grow as this channel goes on. Love to see it. Happy holidays gentlemen thank you for doing what you do!
I was just thinking this the other day! I don't know anything about Chuck's background with science, but it seems that while he's not academic in any particular scientific field, he's clearly becoming more and more fluent and is able to grasp increasingly more complicated concepts.
People don't know Chuck's been doing startalk for 14 years with Niel.
Chuck has the two most important qualities for learning science. Curiosity and enthusiasm.
The acronym UAP stood for "unidentified aerial phenomenon" until December 2022, when the Pentagon updated its terminology to "unidentified anomalous phenomenon:::ACCORDING TO:CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY
now is drone
It’s always ufo
This Spergel guy is a joke.
Yes because there are anomalous phenomena occurring in aerial and underwater settings. Used to be distinguished as UFO/USO to differentiate between flying or submerged objects, but since they changed the terminology from UFO to UAP, it only made sense to alter it slightly to include the other facet(s) of phenomena we can't currently explain.
and they push it into plasmaaaa plasmaaaaa phenomenon
You shouldn't ignore things you don't understand. @neil. So damned true. Thanks for finally hearing out and expert.
Most sightings can be related to poorly understood natural phenomena.
Tell that to the people involved in the USS Nimitz incident.
You mean like 'swamp gas' in the middle of North Dakota or Nevada? Get out of here with that 'natural phenomena BS. People are not as dumb as you and they all want to make them out to be.
Definitely not the tic tac UFO case.
Silver discs appearing out of nowhere full of lights is not what I would call a natural phenomena
@@francistremblay8098 That is such a stoopid statement, used to stifle the real subject.
There is no need to bring up the sightings that are of no interest. No one is talking about, or wants to study natural phenomena. The only topic, the only things that should be discussed is credible UFO data!
There is no need to use the term, credible UFOs are 1%. One percent of what, why lump credible UFOs with non-credible UFOs. It designed to not take the topic seriously. Credible UFOs are 100% of credible UFOs, just focus on that!
I mean, yeah, get better data but here there's nothing interesting being said at all. Not even speculation on any anomalous events really. Even with more data one might still be required to use their creative abilities. I wonder maybe this podcast is just a joke. That would make more sense. I have heard many others who are also not "conspiracy theorists" have much more interesting things to say about the possibilities out there but also use the "art of description" which as we all know is very much a part of the scientific process and method. This interview feels like a cliff notes version of what not to say on the topic. Which basically means any thoughtful speculation is not allowed. This reminds me of Latour and his criticism of modernism for falling short in the realm of describing phenomena before settling on labels and categories where critical judgment can be made hastily and without much effect. The UAP category supercedes the phenomenon. And that's definitely an issue.
I love that Chuck's voice goes up 3 octaves when hearing about the deepest bass note ever. The wavelength as long as the universe.🤯
Your talks are always enligtening, especially those little clarifications/explainers you do on the little stuff...
I agree with Chuck, with all these beautiful and super intelligent ways and tools designed and built to understand our universe, how can one not love science...
It is easier to mock these phenomena, rather than go after them and study them scientifically.
Did you not play the TH-cam ? Thats all they talked about.
In order to study them scientifically you need evidence. Right now the only evidence is blurry video and pictures, eyewitness testimony, and a lot of weird stories. It's hard to really make heads or tails out of any of it. There's hardly any scientific evidence that stands up to any sort of rigor, that's why it's not studied. There's anomalous stuff, sure, but until you can get firm data on it there's nothing to study.
He literally studies them for a living just say you didnt watch the video lol
They are actually heavily debunked. When millions of dollars go toward debunking phenomenon that has zero evidence to support it then it generally loses funding
Study them ya, go after them probably not
Merry Christmas Neil & Chuck
He avoided replying to questions about the UAP hearings and if the UAP show capabilities beyond our current technology….!!
Because its a loaded question.
You got to prove it isnt our senses misunderstanding what ur seeing first. He explains this.
Nasa did a non classified review...thats as worthless as a broken toilet...everyone laughed at bill Nelson when he already admitted to the fact nasa did not have access to the classified uap data, which is 99% of it for the cases we actually care about...and this guy just confirmed it 5 seconds in...didn't have a clearance...these fools are modern day hynek and swamp gas...and hynek had a breakdown after lying so much when he found out even he was being played the whole time...regretted what he did ...same thing will happen with tyson in several years...when people try to engage with tyson about specifics from fravors case for example, he doesnt even know the first detail about it...just insults fravor by saying he misidentified something...when fravor and his wing woman with 2 weapons officers, and another plane flown by Chad underwood literally chased the thing with eyes on confirming all the multiple sensor data...tyson doesn't know any of it...hes modern day bluebook
The reason why "it shows capabilities beyond our current technology" it's because the data f*ck*ng sucks!
He explained this. yet it went in one ear out the other.
Why you assume its beyond our technology? Maybe we don't yet know what military can do?
I am so grateful for this podcast
Merry Christmas Neil, Chuck and viewers. 🙌
Thank you Dr.Neil, Lord Nice and Dr.David Spergel. Happy Holidays to All!
I’m so thankful to have people like you helping people like me. Explain what’s going on without all the propaganda just clear on facts. I love it. Thank you so much.
Happy Holidays to the StarTalk team and all the people who enjoy these episodes.
I’ve been waiting for a episode W neillll for so long lets goooo and u got chuck nice in here too 🔥🔥
Never mind UAP's, many of us have seen the beings themselves in daylight at close quarters, more than people realise.
Ok. But need evidence. Not anecdotal experiences.
@@normanwolfe7639 No. YOU need evidence, I dont, I have seen the beings themselves up close in daylight while drinking tea on my roof terrace. And yes I did attempt to take a video with a £1200 camcorder. They apparently do not like being filmed. There are many of us, but you go ahead and be sceptical, despite also, such things as the Senate hearings and the released airforce videos, where it is CLEAR that the craft exhibit capabilities no military currently has.
@@normanwolfe7639 If I tell you that I have had many girlfriends, you are likely to give me the benefit of the doubt. It is only your mindset and mainstream world view that stops you also entertaining that I have seen NHI. I have.
People claim to see a lot of things. Usually, when someone see something that appear super natural, it coincides with their religious beliefs as well.
@@jackyboy5424 No, that is just a claim you have not backed up. I am not religious and you are generalising without any data behind you. You're welcome.
He’s definitely holding back info on the tic tac. Those pilots were flying top of the line aircraft’s. They had all the data they needed not to mention their own eyes
they have no time they explained that.. they on a mission from a to b all timed.
There are great explanations of all of those videos, that all do not include anything anomalous.
He's not holding back a damned thing, and no they didn't have all the data needed. You are just misinformed. And their own eyeballs and interpretations are not reliable evidence in this particular discussion. Compelling evidence, maybe, but not good evidence.
@ I’m not arguing with ai
@@NEBULABURNA I don't know if that is a compliment or an insult?
My sister had convinced me there were drones over my house. I kept seeing them. Was filming them, watching my CCTV cameras, posting stuff online, and even submitting FBI tips. One night while it was 10°F, I stood outside for 13 minutes straight trying to get a high quality image or video, because everything I kept getting was blurry and distorted. One of the "drones" flew straight towards my house, and as it got closer, I immediately realized it was an airplane. I put 2 and 2 together and realized that aircraft were in an approach path to the airport from my house. I was able to verify eventually that everything I saw was an airplane or helicopter. Now when I see something flying over my house, I check a flight app and figure out immediately which aircraft it is.
After trying to tell my family of my discovery, they called me insane saying that I just don't know if they are all planes. Yep. I'm the nut, despite all this evidence of airplanes.
Aliens are just like Jesus people just want to believe they are real and get angry when you ask for evidence lol
I can't believe people in your family still believe airplanes are real.
LMAO My family made fun of me when I told them colors are determined by the wavelength of light. Asked what I had been smoking.
@@IanDavidOnDU ahaha i like this one.
Agent reverse psy op guy
I would urge people to listen to the 60 minutes interview with 2 pilots who described their UAP experiences in detail. Very credible eyewitness, this wasn’t the Russians or Chinese, not saying extraterrestrial but give it a watch
Do they have evidence?
and watch the two uap us congressional hearings ,, i dont know how some people dont believe somethings going on
startalk on christmas eve....thank you!
30:45 ok this is definitely not a natural phenomenon because I saw that lightning looking orb in my room in 2010. No windows were open and concrete walls+ceiling. I woke up and lied like 15 minutes in the bed. A female friend was studying for the exam and I woke up early to study at 6am because we had a little argument last night and couldn't focus studying. I was yawning and turning in the bed and she was seated at the foot of the bed and that light orb was hovering above her head. As soon as I saw it started to raise slowly. It was the size of a big orange and glowing like a lamp but rather different light and wasn't disturbing my eyes. It was half transparent and the bottom part had thread like object with a whiter glow. In 6-7 seconds it passed through the ceiling like a ghost and disappeared. No windows were open at that time and she didn't even notice that object. I didn't tell this to her because I didn't want to scare her or think that I am crazy. Don't tell me this thing wasn't intelligent.
Consider the fact that military sensory data including video evidence is not enough to definitively confirm a UAP. So nice story bro.
@ I know what I saw and I have no reason to lie let me put that first. Aside from that, have you ever considered our 200 yo technology may not be advanced enough to surpass their defense systems? Last month I have seen many people uploaded plasma orb videos very similar to what I saw. We cannot understand what they are with the data we have, so there is no evidence for UAP’s therefore all people who report weird stuff must be crazy huh? This is extremely biased and goes against the spirit of scientific discovery. All this narrative seems so wrong and misleading tbh.
That’s your eyes adjusting to light lol
Where’s the evidence lol
That sounds iffy.
Guys, thanks again for such a wonderful podcast👍👏😃
Dr.Neil, thanks so much for this awesome Christmas gift............
Saying that you don't have enough data on the tic tac event is ludicrous, the speed the distance and location were all verified and documented
Data were not kept after each missions, so no data was available from that time.
Meaning there’s something there, and also meaning, we have no idea what it is. Both things can co-exist.
It was not aliens.
Saying NASA is transparent is crazy
@@DamonKing-jr7kg Never A Straight Answer
I truly enjoyed your conversations and apprciated your insight offering a practical perspective.
Very enjoyable. Great show Neil and Chuck.
The reason the aliens are in a locked box, is that they want to maintain Schrodinger's uncertainty. 😉
Merry christmas to all 🎉🎉🎄🎄🎁🎁
3:09 he knows he is told not to talk about it
sure🤣
I wonder who is funding these guys? Maybe the same people who's narrative is, "nothing to see here"
Why they keep complete silence about the recent US congressional hearing on "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena" or UAP?
We call them frauds.
Who is keeping it quiet? It's all there, just like every other hearing. Go look at it
There was nothing, all talk, like what happen to Grusch.
@@joekey8464 so why isn't he locked up for lying to Congress under oath?
If they were completely quiet there would not be discussions and useless hearings about it. That would be by definition.
More and more chuck surprises me. Not to say i had assumed he ain't smart, but he keeps punching knowledge with the best punchers. Respect.
We would love to see you and Steven Greer talk to each other. That would be great interview he is the Aficionado on these drones and well-known to be. What do you think about an interview with him we would all like to see that I think I don't know if I really can't speak for everybody but the people paying attention all this he's coming forward on the as the aficionado very publicly
hahahahha good luck with that this tyrant (NDT) wouldnt do a legit interview without motives you got to be kidding me right hahaha
Merry Christmas Y'all 🎄
This is internet after all so FU and Merry Christmas🖕🏾
Chuck has improved
I love neil degrasse tyson!!!!!!!!!❤❤❤❤
You should do one about ball lightning.
0:58 I think it has evolved to „Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon” instead of „aerial” as these objects seem to be trans-something (sorry I am not a native speaker, but the something stands for - it can both move in the air and under the water).
There isn't an english word (that I know of) for something that travels in both air and water.
Most likely because it's unexplainable in terms of natural phenomenons. This doesn't mean it's aliens or even drones though. It could be just phenomenoms we don't fully understand that take place on earth.
They call it either “trans-medium” or “all domain” to encompass movements from space, atmosphere, water, different dimensions etc.
@ yeah, trans-medium is the word I was looking for. Thank you!
I love the language they speak, in order for a person to appreciate this type of videos and information, they have to be thirsty for knowledge 😅
Why would the government hide this stuff? In the intelligent community knowledge is power. So people hang on to stuff they know because they know stuff you don't.
I saw something that looked like what people call ball lightning. I was sitting in the living room and it was raining outside. There was some thunder and lightning. Something, like a bright light, went past me from my left side and went into the kitchen. I wasn't alone, other people saw it too.
Most likely a lense flare
@@FloridaJordann From what? The drapes were closed. No one had anything with a lens. This was in the mid 1960s.
And how much did you drink before you observered this phenomenon? 😊
@@tims8603I believe you because a similar incident happened to me several years ago. My sister and I were sitting at the kitchen table in front of a large window with blinds. We heard a loud noise like thunder then a lightning strike hung between the two of us. She saw a white light and I saw blue. As quickly as it appeared it disappeared. We checked to see if anything was damaged. We were fine and it was as if it never happened. I have often wondered how did lightning get into the house and not damage anything. I was shocked when Neil described the incident on the airplane. Could this be a combination of a miracle and new physics? I don’t follow this podcast but happened to watch it today. Go figure?
@@syngonsmythe38 I was something like 9 or so.
Why doesn’t Neil go to New Jersey to check out the drones?
The drone occurance only happen one day. It's not a Disney attraction. 😂
because hes a fraud... its very well known now that neil is a fraud...
@@WookiRahhyee.. he sold his soul
@@nubnsista How do you know he hasn't? If he did would you believe his thoughts on what people are seeing? I don't know about you but most of them would choose to believe the "more exciting" theories
@@WookiRahh 😂
Thank you for this!
9:27 - my response: it IS hard to pull your phone out and capture a good pic/vid of a unknown spacecraft moving at very high speeds. #1. You’re already in shock of what you’re seeing. #2 you’re almost never prepared for a moment that last a few seconds.
Same with videotaping an airplane at night almost an impossible task
I can’t even get a good pic of my dog most of the time! 😂
But planes could be like Teslas and have cameras recording everything in cyclic buffer. The main message is to do that kind of thing so we can finally have more data than just radar and eye witnesses.
Unknown spacecraft don't fly at very high speeds, in fact they don't even exist. All the spacecraft are known and accounted for, and 'fly' at normal speeds.
But...the drone vids?
Those eyebrows are out of this world and I love them
It's the choice of mustache style that has me wondering why
whoever your audio guys is….give them a raise!
These are the last guys we need hear anything regarding UAP....they are trying to dismiss it.They will never acknowledge the data from the pilots.
They’re not saying this technology doesn’t exist, they’re saying it isn’t aliens. And it isn’t.
But stick to listening the random TH-camrs that confirm your bias and not actual scientists.
Eye witness accounts are not sufficient data points
So true...
or you’re just mad that reality isn’t matching your delusions. people think “scientist” get paid by the government to lie. buddy we barely get paid. let alone by uncle sam. reality is often disappointing. aliens exist for sure but not in the sense of little creatures visiting earth in ships. maybe the mission to the moons of jupiter will find evidence of life but we won’t see extraterrestrials ever.
As much as you would like to believe everything a witness says is true, the DATA says witnesses are notoriously unreliable.
Scientists aren't trying to dismiss anything.
The simple fact that no one can produce any evidence of intelligent life from another planet causes the issue to dismiss itself.
29:50 - I once saw such ball of light crashing onto my balcony's floor, it was so crazy, saw it like a meter away from me from within my house, it was a stormy weather type of day and it was raining I think, thank god I did not go outside else I don't wanna think what could happen, it even left a black burn marks on the floor outside, it was gigantic in size, about almost one meter long diameter and it was all full of lightnings inside that made it white/blue in color or something, it was like 15 - 20 years ago maybe so I don't recall exactly but yeah most of it I can recall and it was so crazy.
That makes no sense. At all.
Balcony
Crash
Gigantic
1 meter
Black mark
Sounds like it should have nuked your balcony.
Sounds like ball lightning, which has been enter/occur in homes and leave similar markings. Completely natural phenomenon, albeit rare.
@@vonNeumannProbed Yeah, it was most likely what he described but its extremely rare once in a lifetime kind of thing that can happen to see such thing for a small percentage of people, I am both super lucky to see it that close but also super lucky to not get hit by it thankfully thank god.
@@THome92 Why not? why would I lie? one meter is gigantic for such ball of lightning at least in my eyes it felt pretty big to witness infront of me, well as for the black marks it left, it was actually logical for it not to cause too much damage and only to leave the burning marks on the floor the same size of it which was an almost one meter long burning marks from it.
@@MrRandomPlays_1987 It may be once in a lifetime for you, however 1 in 20 people approximately have seen ball lightning in their life. I would hardly call that rare.
Thank you for talking about this topic! It's our right to know the truth of our reality. We are not a lone according to recent UAP Congressional Hearings. We need transparency from our government. The media needs to talk more about UAPs. Exposure will help lead to more disclosure.
Yeah, our Congress is a real brain trust.
Neil is wrong. "A" no longer stands for "aerial" phenomena, since they're not necessarily aerial (some are underwater or transmedium). So "A" now stands for "anomalous" phenomena to cover those as well.
Yes, correct. Bottom line is, these people are a part of the cover up.
That was actually the most correct thing he said in the whole episode.
Congrats, you’re a genius. Pat yourself on the back and tell your mom you’re done living in her basement.
@@Yes-gp1bt The names are an absolutely crucial distinction. Neil is basically instructing people to look for a submarine in the sky. Do you have a particular vested interest in spreading misinformation, or are you simply a narcissist who felt called out?
@@subject8332 People keep changing the terminology to create less controversy. If you’re so bothered by everything being absolutely correct, then god help your soul. It should have just stayed as UFO.
loved the dark matter and energy casual chat 😊The beauty of sience is not knowing how stuff works, but making educated (philosophical) guesses about it and keep the wondering alive
There is less evidence for the existence of Dark Matter than there is for visitation. Let that sink in friend. Dark Matter is still pure math and we have not been able to experimentally confirm it's existence. Dark Matter should be treated with the same skepticism as visitation until we know more.
A pleasure as usual!
"Three people can keep a secret... if two of them are dead..."... Thats so funny :D
and very true
Manhattan project refutes this to a large extent (compartmentalized info) , at least while it was happening.
Dr. Spock was a pediatrician who wrote a best selling book on baby and child care in 1946. the guy you’re talking about is simply Spock.
Or Mr. Spock to you, sir!🖖
OMG. This is one of ny biggest pet peeves. I hate when people call him Dr. Spock instead of Mr. Spock.
The strangest and most odd fact, is that we have NO knowledge of any extraterestrial civilisation.
That is disturbing.
Trust me , they know! But does everything get told , no - there are things out there and things discovered people don’t talk about
@@skrrtfranklincould they really keep that secret?
@@BhadBharbieBMX of course
I'm not closed minded about it, like everyone, it's well worth having a curious mind and to search for answers to things.
Howie Mandel is one smart guy.
It almost looks like those old fake mustache/glasses/big nose things.. in a good way tho.
Chuck holding it together during a gas joke opportunity is crazy
Congrats on 4 million subscribers 🎉
Am I the only one who thinks it's better to use extraterrestrial being than aliens? Because aliens feels too much like a pop culture reference.
Both will age like milk when pretty soon people realize they were here way way way before us.
Both alien and extra terrestrial suggest something foreign and non local
Extra perceptual seems more accurate
I do agree, and since you seem to know a lot about the subject(just a curious gal), do you think the sort of obsession humans, and the pop culture, have on extra perceptual beings is too much? Because personally, I feel it's been overused and overdone and maybe it's time to start focusing more on fixing the human impacts on the planet.
@@ThegamingsquadLOve-kg1yq all these recent sightings and mainstream conversations about the true nature of reality help to expand the Veiw of ourselves and capabilities which will go a long way to healing our current treatment of the planet
@@ThegamingsquadLOve-kg1yq both can exist at the same time, it doesnt have to be one or the other.
Reports of UFO's are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns-the ones we don't know we don't know. And if one looks at these UFO images, it is the latter category that tends to be the difficult ones.
OK Rumsfeld :)
Great video
These guys saying why would they light up like a plane. Probably the same reason a soldier uses camo; to blend in with surroundings🤯. Considering how smart these guys are they can sure be fairly ignorant of really basic logic.
Here's my take on their reasoning:
I think most planes (if not all) in the sky are tracked by towers. So, if something that was not registered for flight enters the aerial space they would know immediately it's either rogue plane or UFO (mimicking)
How does a light blend in with an object’s surrounding of darkness? No lights = can’t be seen. Lights = can be seen.
Did you even think about what you just wrote?
@@GeoRust1 The point here is: "It has blinking lights, therefore it is just another airplane" vs "It has no lights - very suspicious". Do you see the point now?
@ I’ve always seen the point. My point is that no lights = not seen. Lights = seen. How can something be suspicious if it isn’t noticed?
A dark object will not be seen in the night sky, it’s pretty much that simple. Adding lights as ‘camouflage’ is counterintuitive, considering the entities would never be observed if this ‘camouflage’ was never implemented. Textbook circular reasoning.
@@GeoRust1 so you don’t think they got systems to detect these drones whether they lit or not?
We’re all stuck on the fence with this one so don’t claim to know all because even your points can be countered.
Word from the UK MERRY CHRISTMAS. Is this Stanley Tucci?
Thank you Neil and Chuck for sharing so much knowledge with the public ❤
he is just an astrophysicist, writer , director of the Hayden Planetarium at the Rose Center for Earth and Space and a research associate in the department of astrophysics at the American Museum of Natural History, harvard graduate,and won a few science awards, but I guess this isnot enough, I will go with some conspiracy theories because I think I know something
How many whistleblowers have there been now? Seems a bit foolish to dismiss their claims, but time will be the ultimate judge.
@@leah.internet and how many of those whistleblowers have given any sort of verifiable evidence and not just stories? I'll wait.
@@vonNeumannProbed and look at what happens when you do leak verifiable state secrets. Snowden was hunted, discredited and now lives in a dictatorship. At any point a team could pick him up and stick him in a hole never to be seen again. The cost is incredibly high - would you leak and put your name to it?
I'm still skeptical about UAPs... but there just seems like a similar situation to when Mark Klein, the NSA whistleblower came out. And finally many years later, Snowden revealed the full scale of internal surveillance. Feels similar in a lot of ways about the growing momentum.
But to be honest I doubt anyone who has the full picture would ever leak. It's only those with a partial view.
He is super smart. However, he is being biased about this topic. That's just a fact. Visitation is one equally reasonable possibility until we have more data. That's just how it works.
Neil should say this: "Visitation is one possibility, but I remain skeptical until more convincing evidence presents itself." That's what we need. Lets move this topic forward, study it, and see where it goes. Science is the one thing absent from the UAP topic.
@@NameForgotten1 What's biased about remaining skeptical. He's not saying he doesn't think it is real. Skeptical means "having a questioning attitude or doubt toward knowledge claims that are seen as mere belief or dogma" there's nothing biased about that. Fact is there's almost no conclusive proof (that is being generous) of visitation.
The biggest reason I don’t believe that governments are covering up Aliens, is that governments are just not that good at their jobs.
that's why it's leaking? It has been leaking for decades.
The federal government has been able to keep nuclear secrets under wraps for 80 years, why not this?
Incredible podcast, thanks guys 🎉
And why do we assume visible light for aliens is in the same range of electromagnetic radiation as it is for us anyway?
Well it wouldn’t be light. They might have extra range on either side but the longer wavelengths are absorbed as heat and you wouldn’t see anything if they were there. The shorter ones, would be visible initially but then they’d simply pass through matter which in the same way wouldn’t reflect anything for any creature to see. So they could be different but they’d be in the same general area
Me and my freind saw a flying saucer for about 15 seconds on november 23 2022 around 2 pm, broad daylight. It did not move an inch it was scary idle and it was above a lowes on Chapman hyw Knoxville TN... it never moved but it definitely left reality instantly. It blinked out of existence. Now being in Tennessee wouldn't you assume that some Chinese aircraft or some aliens were observing a lowes instead of oak ridge or any of the many military bases in Tennessee? Nobody beleives me and if my freind didnt see it too i would not believe it either.
I believe you!
There was a famous incident where a UFO hovered above the Chicago airport (in 2006) for a few minutes and was seen by many airport personel and other people. And pics were taken.
but smart people such these 3 podcastster are too smart and too high with their position to believe, so... this why we all divided by politics around and around rather than solving it.
@@RickySupriyadi Sad but true - smart and dumb people tend to be divided by politics. The fatal flaw in democracy.
Yeah it was weird man these ones you see videos of aren't anything like what we saw.
Chuck periodically looking astounded and bewildered to the camera every now and then is us. 😅
I find it nonsensical to believe that a civilization millions of years more advanced than us, who have mastered physics to the point of developing interstellar travel, would come across the universe to our planet only to crash in a desert.
Maybe they do millions of trips and the fraction that crashes is statistically insignificant. Just a thought. I don’t know what’s going on.
What if they sent drones with biological robots of sorts to collect data. What did we send out to space Mars and the moon with our technology?
Think dimensions. 3 dimensions are totally different from other levels of dimension (reality).
if they use anti-gravity in the same way a jet ski rides a rough wave, its not that hard to imagine a few could crash from areas where gravity is much weaker causing them to lose control.
The aliens obviously didn't realise the Earth was flat and crashed straight into it cause of the perspective problem
wow im here way too early 😂
I have an inate distrust for anyone who, the entire time they talk about the US military, never speaks about them in any negative sense at all.
It's fun to think it's aliens, and in everyday conversation, I'll probably play devil's advocate and roleplay like I believe it could be aliens. But in actuality-c'mon, let's be real, lol.
In actuality, there are thousands upon thousands known reports and testimonies of people all over the world about UFO sightings, happening since forever. Even cave people documented them, within their cave drawings.
But remember that the earth has been here for 5 billion years appx. It is probably more likely the aliens found us years if not eons ago lol. I think if these ecounters are real than we are probably living in a Zoo hypothesis.
@@KC-cb7ov It has been billion of years, these are big numbers, but the universe is still very young, and since the galaxy isn't teeming with life, it's also possible that we're just among the first life forms to develop.
Not the Android bashing 😮
Even though some Android devices can even measure atmospheric data. older models at least can do that lol
they probably stopped including that feature because it wasn't cost effective
Merry Christmas ❤😊
This guy seems to have been sent there on a downplay PR campaign 😂
Still waiting for scientifically verifiable evidence. Absent that, this video and the hearings are just talk.
Youre the dumb person they are laughing at in the video who thinks everything is a conspiracy. why would nasa downplay anything they would get a bigger budget if aliens were provable. people are dumb lol
On that last part, it's more like science is in the grip or at the mercy of these funding organisations... limited by their interests & what they're willing to fund
This is literally a first thought. Literally the first answer to the question, "Why would they produce lights on a spaceship?". Because we also have lights on our spaceships. So if Aliens aren't trying to operate incognito, then it's One of Us.
Or they’re not lights, they’re a product of their propulsion system or something like that
Aliens who have the technology to reach us wouldn't even care to be hidden from us. What's the worst we could do to them...tweet?
This is one thing I don't understand but maybe someone could correct me. Let's say there are somewhat advanced aliens on the other side of our galaxy, if they are looking at us right now wouldn't they see into our *past* hence we don't even exist as a civilization that could be seen to begin with? If there are aliens they would have to be *very* close to to us see our last 100-200 years of development? Before that they probably wouldn't even know we existed. Unless of course life itself was "planted" here on Earth by something else and they've been monitoring ever since, seems like a long stretch. To be fair if we ever evolve past our petty nature of being humans I'm sure that's something *we* would do in the far, far away future.
yep exactly
Yea, but would you really want a bunch of annoying idiots knowing you are there if you could avoid it?
there two posibility ,
if they are benovalent , they would have a rule of no contact/disturbance
if they are hostile they would have stealh tech
there literaly no point at having christmas lights on a drone/vehicule that is use to gather information
Or they have shown themselves to other intelligent, lower advanced lifeforms, and it resulted in some terrible outcome that they now try to avoid.
Think.
NASA and Tyson, the two most trustworthy😂😂Sorry , couldn’t keep a straight face!🤣🤣
And you have better evidence to 100% conclude, without a doubt, that these UAP are extraterrestrial beings from another planet in the universe? Man, you should definitely report that.
@Krebssssssss it's not about 100% facts it's being smart enough to see that the limited facts that are presented represent something that needs to be taken seriously.... just because you don't like what the facts are really representing don't mean that you write it off to being something mundane or easily assume it's normal natural occurrence.
@@mmjnice97 I’m not saying that. Nobody is. That’s the point. There is nothing, no evidence to suggest that any of these phenomena are paranormal or extraterrestrial in nature. All they’re saying is we need more evidence before we draw any conclusions either way. “I don’t know what it is, therefore, it must be aliens”, is an absurd leap in logic. Yes, investigate. Yes, get more evidence. But until every possible scenario is ruled out, and we have enough evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt that whatever these anomalies are are not from our planet, then let’s stop with the “ooh, government’s hiding aliens from us” nonsense.
Trust me, it’s not that you’re smart, it’s that you’re too dumb. You’re actually so dumb that you can’t even understand your flaws.
@@mmjnice97 the facts are that currently there isn't enough verifiable data to reach a conclusion. He said 1% of sightings are unexplained. When there's sufficient evidence is when you reach a conclusion. Before that, it's just speculation.
Will never get tired of listening to this podcast
Why can't places paint their roofs white to use the albedo effect to slow down global warming?
Most probably planes would suffer visibility or even death ray effects. The reason it's not like that on roads is the glare it would project into drivers' eyes. Better to use plants and other means, like lighter colors, but not all the way to white
The amount of surface area of roofs relative to the planets surface area is negligible. I doubt it would do anything
@@shaunnorum05 okay, the average ice melt is 3.21sqKM per year. average home 100 sqm per home of roof. 33 homes would get you break even as far as albedo effect. The Strategic location of additional 100 to 150 buildings per 3 KM area in certain climes would drastically slow global warming. By replacing and increasing the albedo effect of earth.
@@sechmascm there are 2 white gloss and flat. While gloss does 1.1% more flat would do plenty,
@@jospehjack No, it wouldn't.
When are you going to talk to Steven Greer? Thanks. You rock
he won't and never will
His career is in jeopardy if he does.
@@Souljourney22 Why would it be in jeopardy? Are certain topics off limits? Do you mean to say, that you have, with scientific precision, ruled out the possibility for intelligent life across the entire universe, except for Earth?
Think about how crazy what you are saying actually is.
@@NameForgotten1 Greer is one of the biggest grifters in "ufology," provides zero evidence to back up his claims, and his photos of ethereal beings have been debunked as nothing more than photos of insects. Why would NDT waste his time interviewing one of the most transparent grifters on the scene?
@@NameForgotten1 because if neil were to bring dr greer on and discuss this topic he would quickly be put in his place on how we have a long history of interactions with other beings. Neil's whole stance of nothing to see here would be exposed and therefore his whole career of telling lies to the public.
Neil and David have lego mustaches. Neil has nothing in the middle but tips on the side and David only has middle.
Before drones existed, the UFOs in Close Encounters of the Third Kind strikingly resembled them. As for the lights on their crafts, we can’t assume to understand their logic. Remember, the film, released in 1977, was inspired by real reported cases.
This dude clearly knows nothing about the tic tac incident. They saw with their own eyes. Video shows the range, and speeds. 😳
So here's what I got from this episode: When you see something strange, there's a bigger chance it's aliens than a miracle.
NASA needs data.. “let’s make an app!”… scrap plans to build an app that a 14 year old kid could write because of budget concerns and then totally ignores the fact that they could just set up a free email address for people the send pics to.
So uh, about them orbs though?
Go out tonight with your phone and zoom in on any type of light far away, maybe a star, myabe a streetlight very very far away and tell me what do you see? Better yet record it and post it
Scientists do not believe in blind faith. They need proof, not falsehoods.💡
UFO’s are like God, people desperately want to believe, and they get angry when their balloon is punctured.
You are not wrong, man just reading the comments here. They hate Neil so much but still come to watch his video.
@@dankfarrik8376 We don't hate Neil. We just want them to take the topic more seriously. I mean, the universe is massive. Visitation is not impossible. Let's study the 1% of cases, develop better data collection methods, and see what we find. Right?
@@dankfarrik8376 People throughout history that speak the truth generally are ill-received. Just look at Galileo and what the church did to him for questioning their teachings.
@@NameForgotten1 isn't that exactly what they are doing? Even you have to admit that if 99% of the cases are BS, or explained by conventional means, the topic has a serious credibility problem.
@@vonNeumannProbed String Theory appears to be pure math. Experimentation keeps giving non-conclusive results, and then we move the goal post. However, people are generally attacked when they suggest that String Theory appears to be a dead end. It's okay to be wrong! And if this is true, it doesn't mean that everything string theorists have done is meaningless.
The same holds true for this topic. Maybe we don't find Aliens in the data, but the topic has been attacked and ridiculed to death and many people aren't even interested in exploring it.
I mean, I am always shocked when scientists (regardless of field) say that we have found no evidence of life outside Earth in our own solar system. Like, WTF are you talking about? Have we really explored our own solar backyard to a sufficient extent to pretend that life won't be found? I mean, we have explored so little, and seen almost nothing, and many scientists will push this dogmatic approach. Our telescopes have seen maybe 10% (wag) of our solar system in any real detail. We've yet to land on all the planets and explore further. Yet, people say these astounding things.
We NEED to study this topic. There IS evidence that suggests we need to focus our attention on it until we understand what's happening. "Swamp Gas" is not good enough.