Because the tuning was poorly he probably made the car heavier than stock and thats why its almost stock time. Sometimes you shouldn’t Tune some parts. But chiptuning only should make it faster. Who know what he did increase? We also dont know the weight difference of both cars. But lets say they where the same weight. The Audi would have won here either way. Because at this point Newtonmeters make a big difference.
@@raiiiarthe average is around a 12.1 at 114mph bone stock, but some are doing 11.8 stock. Something is very off with this one, first of all he didn’t even use launch control.
Nah, something is seriously wrong here Just saw a video from carwow doing a similar drag The m340i absolutely Smoked the S5 and C43 This one prolly has a very basic tune or something cause that barely performing better than a stock one
@@nodnarbz_1327Not just that. Even when both going hybrid turbo the S5 is actually more powerful since the single turbo's housing got milled out for a much bigger internal. Overall B9 RS is a lost cause with that semi-neutered EA839 2.9 V6TT.
@@nodnarbz_1327 lol every one that has an RS5 could've bought an S5, not every S5 nerd can buy an RS. they're different cars, and if you're little tuner racer boi, buy the S5. leave the RS5 to people with actual money
I mean it just depends on what car got tuned better its not like it's stock vs stock. This guy tuned his m340i and it still runs 12s in the quarter mile 😂😂 needs his $ back
@@ajlee6933 ooooh. Yes it is the Benchmark. But I see Hype as something thats been portrayed a certain way but in actuality it isnt. M340i is the best in its class when it comes to performance stock or tuned. These 2 cars were way more different in power than stated in the video. S5 has atleast like 550 crank whereas the m340i seems like it has inflated numbers. A M2240i stock does 12-12,2 sec quarter miles. M340i is around same weight and with 480 crank it should be in the deep 11's. All i am saying is the numbers dont match the performance
S5 owner here. Nice to see Audi finally get a win in one of these races. The tunability on these cars are really a great bang for your buck. Looks like the m340i could've used a second or two more on the brake boost/launch control. Great Run!
No offense but even as an audi fan u have to know this wasn't a real race. There is no way the bmw would lose. This "tuned" m340i ran a worse time then a stock one.
Coming from an B9 S4 owner, that M340 needs a better tune, but that S5 is MOVING for 93. I feel like he might be running an E mix. I’ve never ran below an 11.5 on 93 and I have almost the exact same mods as this S5
What Im thinking too. I own a 22 m340 xdrive with same mods Jb4, dp, intake, trans tune. 3.2 0-60 and 11.5 1/4. This video makes no sense and Im on all season tires have trouble hooking even with xdrive.
I thought that would be closer. I'm an Audi guy but thought the 340 would do better with extra torque, those side skirts are hideous however and ruin the look of that beautiful car.
Really well tuned cars. No issues in the race and both ran perfectly. That S5 hooks up well. I watch so many races with tuned cars and there is always one or both cars that absolutely shit themselves because they are poorly tuned. Good stuff Sam
really? Stock M340i does 12,2-12,5 sec 1/4 mile runs. You mean to tell me 100+ HP added reduces 1/4 mile run by 0,2-0,5 secs? Thats a well tuned car? I see stage 2's running low to mid 11's depending on elevation and fueling
@@zafert85 stock M340 in all the most perfect situations and prepped surfaces will run those. So many variables in these races that I wouldn’t look too deep into those but rather how they perform. You need to remember, I believe he’s getting his data from a vbox or something similar. To be honest, not even sure what kind of tires the M340 is running. That should be one of everyone’s first mods if looking to go fast
@@kawailauaelanihe doing 3.57 0-60 and 12 1/4 My bone stock doing 3.75 and 12.0 1/4, he should bring car to real tunner, or check for deffects, bm3 st2 doing 11.2 in every m340i
@@zafert85correct me if I'm wrong but the 340i has a B58 right? If it's a very well tuned car how in the hell does it only make 20tq over hp? My supra has the same engine and it makes over 40tq over hp. Also the specs show the 340i has a trans tune and Sam was manually switching gears when he had traction off, with a trans tune once you turn traction control off it puts it into "race mode" where it'll redlines every gear before switching on it own
Sam you know I'm a huge VW fan so I'll always root for them. Although, I was expecting the BMW to win, but I didn't expect them to get spanked 4 times in a row. Would it be any different if the S5 was the Sportback version?
if your expectations was about bmw winning,well...u are not really a fan of VAG. cuz if u really are,u know that this cars when they are tuned properly kills competition..so no fear when comes to losing.the ea839evo is much more capable than b58. like daza its more capable despite displacement than s58,these are facts.
@@onuohafamily it doesn’t say awhp. it says to the brakes. so calculate drive train loss and you’re at around 420. audi says 476 hp too not awhp. so they both making around the same to the wheels.
Something is wrong at that bmw. They have similar power, audi have MORE transmission losses due to torsen (real) PERMANENT AWD. What i was expected was audi to be first at 60ft/launch, but to be slightly passed at the end. But what i've seen was something like +30-50bhp for audi.. which is strage, at least.
this kinda proofs my point - i always said that tuned cars with the same amount of HP deliver the same track performance. So i guess the weight is key to win the race
No. These cars are both Turbo 6 cylinders so they have similar powerbands. But It's all the powerband. Look at a Dyno chart. Peak horse power is peak power, but if have to rev a car all the way out like a GT350 to make that peak power, your not going to be the fastest. You could be faster making less peak power, but more power for more of the rev range, and be a lot faster.
Problem is we don’t know real performance figures, torque figures from s5 suggest hp output mentioned might be rather conservative. Wish the cars performance stats were more transparent for fair comparison.
True the numbers come from 034s dynos not this individual s5 dynos which could be running more power since it varies car to car. 034 also seems to underrate their tunes I know for stage 1 they claim 360ish wheel but most people get around 380 when they dyno it themselves.
Somethings off, no way a S5 will hang with a B58 with similar mods. Also please stop manually shifting the ZF8 speed, just put it in sport auto and let the computer strategy shift on its own.
Not even a bmw fan but its obvious the audi is pushing way more power.Ive seen this race so many times at the drag strip and power for power the audi is no match.Great win for the audi today tho,both are great cars.
Why didn’t they use launch control on the M340i? It ran slower than some bone stock ones. The average 1/4 is 12.1 at 114mph, and some are doing 11.8 bone stock. Adding an intake does not help these on the stock turbo, the stock intake is best, most tuners will tell you this. Also you need to shift them at 6k rpm as the baby turbo loses efficiency there.
Something's not adding up. Love the S5...miss mine. I had the exact same tune. We all know the M340i should be smoking the S5 though. Bolt on for bolt on, the M340i just makes more power and is a faster car.
Something’s wrong , I ran a 3.7 stock in my xdrive m340. I now run 3.1 tuned on e40, 93 I was like 3.4 , my 60-130 is 8.1 … that m340 ain’t performing like it should. The roll was worse than j thought
U would think wrong has proven in the 100s of other videos. This vid is an anomaly as seen in the many comments. This "tuned" m340i ran a worse time then a non tuned m340i
I think I'm becoming older as I appreciate Sam's car reviews, but the aspects of speed such as the 0 to 60 and quarter-mile times simply don't hold significance for me anymore. Particularly during regular driving, a difference of a second or so is hardly noticeable and doesn't have any importance.
BMW was in manual- made it slower. BMW worse tires- made it slower. Audi is not on e85 nor is it making 580 hp stop being salty. S5 on dragy with a 93 tunes can do 11 second flat- tuned audis are beasts
U obv haven't seen the new xdrive bmws vs qauttro. This vid is an anomaly as stated in the comments just go watch any carwow race the m3 xdrive launched harder then a rs5 performance or rs6 or rs7
Imo it’s the opposite bmw is not making as much power as claimed. But the Audi could be making more since the tuners 034 tend to underrate their tunes.
Numbers are straight off 034s charts about 403 wheel and 476 crank. If anything the bmw wasn’t pushing as much as claimed imo. I have an s4 with same mods as the s5 in the video and against my friends stage 2 m340i we’re pretty much dead even but he starts to pull top end. Prob a shit tune in the m340 imho but very happy to see the s5 beat an m340! Made my day 😂.
@@MMPGAMMINGyes, theese 340i times are the same as stocks. 12.3 is stock time. Dont know what they have done but there is not 480hp, might be 400 but yes😂
I don’t know about the BMW, but assuming the Audi is Stage 2 tuned and likely on E85 based on the BHP number. 3.3 and 11.3 seems to be in the right vicinity compared to my S4 time. It could be a tad quicker if DA is better. Nice video 💪
I’m actually pretty lost. Can someone explain why this TUNED m340 is running stock m340 times? Something is definitely not right 3.5 0-60 Is stock x-drive times 12 second 1/4 is stock times aswell.
I ended up with an IS500 but I was eyeballing an S5 for a while! M340i new styling isn't my favorite. If it looked like the previous gen I might have bought it. Anyways, very interesting result.
Nice runs! The driver in the Audi should probably sit closer to the steering wheel so his arms are positioned in the way if there’s an emergency, he can maneuver much much better then how he‘s positioned.
Are the interior cameras the same? I noticed the BMW had a much quieter interior than the S5 and not sure if that's camera quality or the actual cabin noise levels of both cars.
The weight is negligible between S4/S5 coupe/SB vs M340i/440i. I thought the Audi would edge but not put a car or two. I think this shows a difference in tunes. Stop making excuses for the 340 because yall either use BM or MHD.
Yes, I have a 2020 M340ixdrive with same type of mods but, on a JB4 and consistently run sub 12 on the quarter. So with an actual tune this should have been a much closer race. Don't know who would win, but definitely closer results. Could also be in need of a driver upgrade as the launch seemed really soft in the M340.
Stock they run 12.3. DA will play a role, in the summer heat. But yeah stage 2 should run like 11.6-7. Something up with the s5, most likely running e85 or wmi. Stock b9.5 turbo won't run 11.3 on 93.
@@JayRM714 S5 has outdated interior , it’s slower , transmission is ass , it’s a Volkswagen with an Audi badge , why would anyone pick that over the B58s power & reliability
@@kevinsalesconsultant Why you stalking me? lol thats kinda weird bud... And I literally was talking about the two cars in the video. I literally said that particular bmw looks tacky af which it does because of the weird kit it has. And this audi is super clean.
@@JayRM714 says the one that initially came to my comment and started talking shit 🤣🤣 bro this shits too funny , but stock for stock bmw taking that dub & you know it
Love the match ups and your channel, but why do you insist on doing the shifting in some of your match-ups? Let the car use it's own optimized shift points. Feels like you're adding another variable to the equation that doesn't need to be there.
The algorithm suggested that I think outside the box, which is why I like a tuned Camaro SS with an automatic transmission. It's slower, but plenty of money remains in my wallet. 😜😜
The S5 launch like a slingshot
Why is homeboy sitting 10 miles behind the wheel?
The 340 barely ran faster than the stock quarter mile time lol, time to swap tunes!
The S5 is clean as fuck, looks amazing.
Something is not right with the m340i. It's pretty much runnin stock times
Because the tuning was poorly he probably made the car heavier than stock and thats why its almost stock time.
Sometimes you shouldn’t Tune some parts. But chiptuning only should make it faster. Who know what he did increase? We also dont know the weight difference of both cars. But lets say they where the same weight. The Audi would have won here either way. Because at this point Newtonmeters make a big difference.
@@nigels6786 prob because he doesn’t know how to use paddles
It looks like the owner of the bmw forgot to move his seat forward after Sam drove in. Maybe he couldn’t press the throttle all the way to the floor.
it's like his arms were trying to catch up to the steering wheel as his m340i was trying to keep up with the S5!
LMAO
LMAOOOO IM DED
It's like all that you wrote is an excuse 😂😂...
This tunned M340i has same 1/4 mile time as a stock one 😂
I think I made 12.4 with one stock
@@raiiiarthe average is around a 12.1 at 114mph bone stock, but some are doing 11.8 stock. Something is very off with this one, first of all he didn’t even use launch control.
ur just bmw fan
@@sanyaaaaaxs No, this is the truth.
Can we all agree that sam is one of the worst drivers on TH-cam 😂😂
Nah, something is seriously wrong here
Just saw a video from carwow doing a similar drag
The m340i absolutely Smoked the S5 and C43
This one prolly has a very basic tune or something cause that barely performing better than a stock one
ur just a fanboy lol
Wow i was really expecting the opposite! Ive been in a tuned rs5 and they are ridiculous! This s5 seems to be a beast as well!
I here tuned S5 will hurt some RS5 owners feeling lol. They're impressive
M340i has same 1/4 mile time as a stock one😂
@@nodnarbz_1327 Same here and I agree
@@nodnarbz_1327Not just that. Even when both going hybrid turbo the S5 is actually more powerful since the single turbo's housing got milled out for a much bigger internal. Overall B9 RS is a lost cause with that semi-neutered EA839 2.9 V6TT.
@@nodnarbz_1327 lol every one that has an RS5 could've bought an S5, not every S5 nerd can buy an RS. they're different cars, and if you're little tuner racer boi, buy the S5. leave the RS5 to people with actual money
A fan of both cars, but there’s something satisfying about watching the hype car lose. Great races!
I mean it just depends on what car got tuned better its not like it's stock vs stock. This guy tuned his m340i and it still runs 12s in the quarter mile 😂😂 needs his $ back
I own a b58. I agree. Everyone hypes us up but we’re not that fast on 93. We start waking up with ethanol
Hype car? The fuck does that even mean?
@@zafert85he’s saying the M340i is the benchmark in this class. Which is why I find something to be off about this race.
@@ajlee6933 ooooh. Yes it is the Benchmark. But I see Hype as something thats been portrayed a certain way but in actuality it isnt. M340i is the best in its class when it comes to performance stock or tuned. These 2 cars were way more different in power than stated in the video. S5 has atleast like 550 crank whereas the m340i seems like it has inflated numbers. A M2240i stock does 12-12,2 sec quarter miles. M340i is around same weight and with 480 crank it should be in the deep 11's. All i am saying is the numbers dont match the performance
S5 owner here. Nice to see Audi finally get a win in one of these races. The tunability on these cars are really a great bang for your buck. Looks like the m340i could've used a second or two more on the brake boost/launch control. Great Run!
I can’t wait to go big turbo in the spring
These things are a blast to drive and quite the head turner😁
@@S5_Nigee agreed, just went went hpfp today. Good luck with your build!
Something is wrong, it did the race in same time as a stock 340i😂
No offense but even as an audi fan u have to know this wasn't a real race. There is no way the bmw would lose. This "tuned" m340i ran a worse time then a stock one.
We have mild tuned 340i's here that are doing 10.9-11.5 here . Surprising result
Yes stock resaults😂
On what surface/ conditions?
On E
Coming from an B9 S4 owner, that M340 needs a better tune, but that S5 is MOVING for 93. I feel like he might be running an E mix. I’ve never ran below an 11.5 on 93 and I have almost the exact same mods as this S5
Yeah those are def E85 times. Very interesting.
s4 = 4 doors i put BM's on the grill weekly on cruise night
What Im thinking too. I own a 22 m340 xdrive with same mods Jb4, dp, intake, trans tune. 3.2 0-60 and 11.5 1/4. This video makes no sense and Im on all season tires have trouble hooking even with xdrive.
I thought that would be closer. I'm an Audi guy but thought the 340 would do better with extra torque, those side skirts are hideous however and ruin the look of that beautiful car.
The s5 is the one with the extra torque not the 340
Lol I wanted to disagree about the side skirts but they look like burnt bacon strips😂
He kept using the shift pedals if he was in automatic he would get the Audi
Really well tuned cars. No issues in the race and both ran perfectly.
That S5 hooks up well.
I watch so many races with tuned cars and there is always one or both cars that absolutely shit themselves because they are poorly tuned. Good stuff Sam
really? Stock M340i does 12,2-12,5 sec 1/4 mile runs. You mean to tell me 100+ HP added reduces 1/4 mile run by 0,2-0,5 secs? Thats a well tuned car? I see stage 2's running low to mid 11's depending on elevation and fueling
@@zafert85 stock M340 in all the most perfect situations and prepped surfaces will run those. So many variables in these races that I wouldn’t look too deep into those but rather how they perform. You need to remember, I believe he’s getting his data from a vbox or something similar.
To be honest, not even sure what kind of tires the M340 is running. That should be one of everyone’s first mods if looking to go fast
@@kawailauaelanihe doing 3.57 0-60 and 12 1/4
My bone stock doing 3.75 and 12.0 1/4, he should bring car to real tunner, or check for deffects, bm3 st2 doing 11.2 in every m340i
@@zafert85correct me if I'm wrong but the 340i has a B58 right? If it's a very well tuned car how in the hell does it only make 20tq over hp? My supra has the same engine and it makes over 40tq over hp. Also the specs show the 340i has a trans tune and Sam was manually switching gears when he had traction off, with a trans tune once you turn traction control off it puts it into "race mode" where it'll redlines every gear before switching on it own
This is sarcasm right? There isn't a single audi that can beat a bmw with the same tunes done. Or stock vs stock
Weird quarter mile times for m340i. Stock trim can get 12 flat
Yea this makes 0 sense that would be the first m340i on a stage 2 that is a 12 sec quarter mile car.😂
It has to be the higher elevation. Quickest times on TH-cam are at sea level ✌🏽 even the Audi has better quarter mile than that.
Higher elevation. Bmw lost
Sam you know I'm a huge VW fan so I'll always root for them. Although, I was expecting the BMW to win, but I didn't expect them to get spanked 4 times in a row. Would it be any different if the S5 was the Sportback version?
Tires swap made the biggest difference, and the Audi has even more power than stated by Sam!
@@speeddemonRS3 Usually the BMW spanks the Audi. But. in this case its a bit different.
@backtoshallabal6662 Absolutely the Audi was spanking the bimmer in every race!
The BMW does not have 480HP... stock M340i does 12,2-12,5 quarter mile runs .
if your expectations was about bmw winning,well...u are not really a fan of VAG. cuz if u really are,u know that this cars when they are tuned properly kills competition..so no fear when comes to losing.the ea839evo is much more capable than b58. like daza its more capable despite displacement than s58,these are facts.
That m340 seems slower than stock if I was that guy I’ll switch bck everything to stock and rerun lol😂
Higher elevation. Bmw lost
That Torque on the S5 is crazy
I’m not sure who who told the 340 driver that he made 480whp on 93 😂 they don’t! They make 420 at most. You need ethanol to get close to 500whp.
This car definitely isn't making 500hp! The numbers he's running is pretty close to stock in the quarter.
He might be making a little bit more than stock. I mean he is on a bm3 tune which is who I’m tuned by aswell
@diegomjangos4904 does your car run similar numbers to this m340? I was thinking a tune would out them into the 11s
@@MarcCole-xt9kb my car is making 420whp on pump 93, 470whp on e30 blend and 515whp on e50 blend
That 340i definitely only making 500 to the crank.
S5 was a bullet off the line. M340i is an amazing car but really in stock form, it's just tuned for more power. There's no magic.
Why is a fbo stage 2 M340 barely beating its stock times 💀☠ somethings off, yall cant drive, or both😭
I honestly think the stated power figures are Crank hp on the BMW and Wheel HP on the Audi.
You are right, 93 bm3 b58 doesnt make 480 awhp
Most they make are 420whp on pump gas
@@onuohafamily it doesn’t say awhp. it says to the brakes. so calculate drive train loss and you’re at around 420. audi says 476 hp too not awhp. so they both making around the same to the wheels.
no, 034 stage 2 93 says 403 awhp
which would be around 476 crank
The Audi moves out like a sculled cat!
Stock M340i quarter mile usually runs 12.2 to 12.4 seconds with all that extra mod 12.0 seconds don't make no sense.
My bone stock 2020 m340i xdrive ran 12.05 and a 3.74 0-60 on the draggy lol something is wrong
The average is 12.1 bone stock while some are doing as low as 11.8. This guy didn’t even use launch control
Something is wrong at that bmw. They have similar power, audi have MORE transmission losses due to torsen (real) PERMANENT AWD. What i was expected was audi to be first at 60ft/launch, but to be slightly passed at the end. But what i've seen was something like +30-50bhp for audi.. which is strage, at least.
Same 1/4 mile time as a stock m340i😂
Fr m340 needs a better tune. I own a stage 2 s4 and against my friends stage 2 m340i he’s a bit faster top end.
this kinda proofs my point - i always said that tuned cars with the same amount of HP deliver the same track performance. So i guess the weight is key to win the race
No. These cars are both Turbo 6 cylinders so they have similar powerbands. But It's all the powerband. Look at a Dyno chart. Peak horse power is peak power, but if have to rev a car all the way out like a GT350 to make that peak power, your not going to be the fastest. You could be faster making less peak power, but more power for more of the rev range, and be a lot faster.
The way Sam says "I messed up that one" like the mafia coming for him lol😂
Would take the better looking S5 even if it lost these races but it didn't lol. Great content gents
Dyno both of these M340i and the S5...no way that m340i making 480 hp
Based on the online tune
Yea it's still running 12s on the quarter mile makes 0 sense lol
@@G82Watts they hook up way worse
Stock 2020 m340i runs 12 sec all day..
Mod or tuned g20 should definitely run atleast 11.5 sec range
@@kratohse 12.2 seconds stock around 11.7 average launch 11.3 perfect launch 12.0 second bad lunch
Problem is we don’t know real performance figures, torque figures from s5 suggest hp output mentioned might be rather conservative. Wish the cars performance stats were more transparent for fair comparison.
True the numbers come from 034s dynos not this individual s5 dynos which could be running more power since it varies car to car. 034 also seems to underrate their tunes I know for stage 1 they claim 360ish wheel but most people get around 380 when they dyno it themselves.
Somethings off, no way a S5 will hang with a B58 with similar mods. Also please stop manually shifting the ZF8 speed, just put it in sport auto and let the computer strategy shift on its own.
🤣🤣
@@Scharged5 exactly, S5s are slow, it’s probably e85 w bigger turbo just to hang with a b58
There's no way a real stage 2 runs still a 12 quarter mile 😂😂 very weird race
@@DippinItUp1cope
@@DippinItUp1no it’s not😂 big turbo it’s 600+ on 93 😂
There will be outrage in BMW fanboy forums. Cracking races though. Weight is becoming a thing for BMW's
Not even a bmw fan but its obvious the audi is pushing way more power.Ive seen this race so many times at the drag strip and power for power the audi is no match.Great win for the audi today tho,both are great cars.
@Gez492 the reality is this m340i is running 1/4 mile in 12 sec, just a bit quicker than a stock m340i 😂
Why didn’t they use launch control on the M340i? It ran slower than some bone stock ones. The average 1/4 is 12.1 at 114mph, and some are doing 11.8 bone stock. Adding an intake does not help these on the stock turbo, the stock intake is best, most tuners will tell you this. Also you need to shift them at 6k rpm as the baby turbo loses efficiency there.
Because they are bad drivers 😂 he even changed gears manually which also ruined times xD
Masan I should’ve went B9 but I love the B8.5
this video is a wonderful example to show the importance of a good tuning company.
Stock BMW vs tuned Audi? Is it fair?
The bmw is tuned
Something's not adding up. Love the S5...miss mine. I had the exact same tune. We all know the M340i should be smoking the S5 though. Bolt on for bolt on, the M340i just makes more power and is a faster car.
Absolutely amazing race both cars are savage 🔥🔥🔥
Amazing, audi engines tunability so good, even saw the a4 2.0 can do this fast. LOL
Thera is something clearly wrong with the m340i, it should walk the Audi if it had a real stage 2 tune with the supporting mods.
And 11.2 s 1/4 mile is stout for a stage 2 B9 3.0T vehicle.
@@salninethousand2496 11.2 is all due to a tire swap!
@@salninethousand2496stock turbo record is in the 10s on the b9. Stage 1 on ethanol runs 11.3-4
Something’s wrong , I ran a 3.7 stock in my xdrive m340. I now run 3.1 tuned on e40, 93 I was like 3.4 , my 60-130 is 8.1 … that m340 ain’t performing like it should. The roll was worse than j thought
BMW really isn’t much faster than stock with those times so idk but it got walked like a doggy
There’s no way that m340 is making those numbers … the S5 is fast but the m340 has something wrong with it .
Wow! I'm pretty sure that BMW will take it! Audi, well done!
Audi is my favorite car company for sure 😂
It’s not the cars, the car have enough power. It’s the drivers.
The problem with racing tuned cars is you rely on the owners to be honest about power output. We all know that drag racers are liars.
BMW has been served! (which rarely happens...)
034 Motorsports does not disappoint
Wonder what happened that caused the M340 to run such a slow time for the mods
something is off with this car.
@@justinbernardo8240 Yeah, the times it puts out are ridiculously slow for the mods.
i think that audi has a better awd system only way i can see the m340i win is with a better tune and tires. great run regardless love both cars
U would think wrong has proven in the 100s of other videos. This vid is an anomaly as seen in the many comments. This "tuned" m340i ran a worse time then a non tuned m340i
Damn that Quadtro
I just bought an A6 so I'm biased, audi's are just too sexy for their own good
BMW looks great. I wouldn't be caught dead in a new onwe The grills are just hideous. WTF are they thinking?!? S5... Work of Art.
bro needs a booster seat
💀💀💀 LOL
I think I'm becoming older as I appreciate Sam's car reviews, but the aspects of speed such as the 0 to 60 and quarter-mile times simply don't hold significance for me anymore. Particularly during regular driving, a difference of a second or so is hardly noticeable and doesn't have any importance.
I would have thought the walking was the other way around. Nice tune
BMW was in manual- made it slower. BMW worse tires- made it slower. Audi is not on e85 nor is it making 580 hp stop being salty. S5 on dragy with a 93 tunes can do 11 second flat- tuned audis are beasts
The Audis normally get off the line better. But I expected the Bimmer to walk him down.. didn’t happen. Actually it was the Audi that walked.
U obv haven't seen the new xdrive bmws vs qauttro. This vid is an anomaly as stated in the comments just go watch any carwow race the m3 xdrive launched harder then a rs5 performance or rs6 or rs7
Well done tuning that S5!
What tire specs have the S5? They are looking very consistent.
BMW driver caught a few flies with his mouth open
12.00 sec with a tune?? That’s stock numbers 🤦🏾♂️
Bad tires
you messed up that one by driving a BMW teehee
😂😂😂😂 my bone stock m340i doing 0-60 3.75 and 1/4 mile 12 flat every single time, and here is st2 with perks doing the same? 🤡
Update, my m340 with just catless downpipe and st2 ots map doing 3s 0-60 and 11 flat 1/4 mile
The Audi is obviously making way more power than claimed.
Imo it’s the opposite bmw is not making as much power as claimed. But the Audi could be making more since the tuners 034 tend to underrate their tunes.
Why's the m340i doing stock times?
Sam great Video once again. Ive also noticed a nice Oris with an orange band throughout some of your videos, beautiful time piece!
I trade it that in for a Oris Chronograph 65 Diver + cash.
Can you guys start posting the 1/4 mile trap speed, it's interesting to know the top end difference on cars
The BMW driver could sit in the back seat. He could straighten his arms even more.
That Audi was def pushing more power than he let on
Numbers are straight off 034s charts about 403 wheel and 476 crank. If anything the bmw wasn’t pushing as much as claimed imo. I have an s4 with same mods as the s5 in the video and against my friends stage 2 m340i we’re pretty much dead even but he starts to pull top end. Prob a shit tune in the m340 imho but very happy to see the s5 beat an m340! Made my day 😂.
@@MMPGAMMINGyes, theese 340i times are the same as stocks. 12.3 is stock time. Dont know what they have done but there is not 480hp, might be 400 but yes😂
You say it’s the tires, but on a roll the Audi still takes it.
I don’t know about the BMW, but assuming the Audi is Stage 2 tuned and likely on E85 based on the BHP number. 3.3 and 11.3 seems to be in the right vicinity compared to my S4 time. It could be a tad quicker if DA is better. Nice video 💪
My full weight b9 S4 on 034 93 ron stage 2 ecu and tcu does 11.3@121 and 3.3 to 60 on the road.
@@jimmymcgoo8641 3.3 & 11.3 are totally doable on 93 S2. On E85 or E40 you might be able to shave off a couple tenths additionaly
@@Inhartcl you've got the same wheels as my S4.
Nope! Both on 93
He's since sold the S4. Was something seriously wrong with it, his stage 3 was as fast as mine is stage 2. Engine issues.
Great video bro! Love my B9🔥🔥
I bet the S5 had all the mount inserts, and other accompanying mods. Wonder if the 340 had the same. Not at all what I expected but here we are.
Gap city with the Audi. S5 all the way
The new Audis are absolute demons!!
Audi is faster to check engine light also 🏁
The b9 s4 would do him twice as bad 😂
Dp and tune who would’ve thought 😂 so original 😂
I’m actually pretty lost. Can someone explain why this TUNED m340 is running stock m340 times? Something is definitely not right 3.5 0-60
Is stock x-drive times 12 second 1/4 is stock times aswell.
Stock they run 12.3. DA will play a role, in the summer heat. But yeah stage 2 should run like 11.6-7.
He might had bad tires
Audi the first💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
S5 B9 with 034 stage 2 with repaired turbo solenoids or the facelifted version and right shifting was always faster than the 340m
340i did the same times as stock ones, dont know what they have done but its as fast as a stock 340i😂
@@Randomdude21-e omg so funny
@@6xXMiLoOXx2 it is, says its stage 2 and run the same 12 sec quarter mile as a stock 340i…
I ended up with an IS500 but I was eyeballing an S5 for a while! M340i new styling isn't my favorite. If it looked like the previous gen I might have bought it. Anyways, very interesting result.
Nice runs! The driver in the Audi should probably sit closer to the steering wheel so his arms are positioned in the way if there’s an emergency, he can maneuver much much better then how he‘s positioned.
My f30 stage 2 runs 11.4, that m340 looked pretty slow from a dig
The M340i was smoked like a blunt.
Because it has crap tune
@@henzo7087 no its just the s5 was faster...the bmw did pretty well but it was not enough
@@alekslo6134it has a crap tune, 12 sec is almost as a stock m340i 1/4 mile
@@qwertyqwerty-zi6drnot almost, my stock m340 doing 12 every single time
And the only way an S5 will EVER beat an M340i is when it's been tuned.........OUCH............
QED
depends on the tunning BMW would always win, just bad tunning
Nice vid. Like the watch may I ask what make is it? Many thx
Seiko
Are the interior cameras the same? I noticed the BMW had a much quieter interior than the S5 and not sure if that's camera quality or the actual cabin noise levels of both cars.
It seems that Sam’s camera is tuned so we can hear him more than his surroundings in all of these videos, but who knows..
The weight is negligible between S4/S5 coupe/SB vs M340i/440i. I thought the Audi would edge but not put a car or two. I think this shows a difference in tunes. Stop making excuses for the 340 because yall either use BM or MHD.
I mean it's a tuned m340i and it's still running 12s quarter mile. That's just a bad stage 2 tune. Makes 0 sense
Yes, I have a 2020 M340ixdrive with same type of mods but, on a JB4 and consistently run sub 12 on the quarter. So with an actual tune this should have been a much closer race. Don't know who would win, but definitely closer results. Could also be in need of a driver upgrade as the launch seemed really soft in the M340.
Stock they run 12.3. DA will play a role, in the summer heat. But yeah stage 2 should run like 11.6-7.
Something up with the s5, most likely running e85 or wmi. Stock b9.5 turbo won't run 11.3 on 93.
@@Zharsergey stage 1 b9 s4 runs 11.4 so I think an 11.3 is attainable stage 2 for sure….
@@Zharsergeystock turbo record is in the 10s for the b9 3.0t platform
audi looks better, easier to drive...that is my choice. shame bmw fanboys go crazy when you like another car/brand
That bmw looks tacky af. Id take the S5 all day...
@@JayRM714 S5 has outdated interior , it’s slower , transmission is ass , it’s a Volkswagen with an Audi badge , why would anyone pick that over the B58s power & reliability
@@kevinsalesconsultant Why you stalking me? lol thats kinda weird bud... And I literally was talking about the two cars in the video. I literally said that particular bmw looks tacky af which it does because of the weird kit it has. And this audi is super clean.
@@kevinsalesconsultant And idk what video you're watching but the S5 completely walked that m340 lool
@@JayRM714 says the one that initially came to my comment and started talking shit 🤣🤣 bro this shits too funny , but stock for stock bmw taking that dub & you know it
@@kevinsalesconsultant Nobody was even talking shit, you're just sensitive about your car...
Audi torquey affffffff gonna show this to all my b9 haters
Love the match ups and your channel, but why do you insist on doing the shifting in some of your match-ups? Let the car use it's own optimized shift points. Feels like you're adding another variable to the equation that doesn't need to be there.
Finally, an Audi beating a BMW. I really think that F30 340i that you’ve had on here makes wayyyyy more power than they said lol.
Anyway good race
It’s upgraded turbo so it’s around 600+ most likely
@@thatone4Gwheel yes near there
@@thatone4G oh I thought that F30 was just bolt ons. Got it 🫡
The time here is the same as a stock 340i. Somethings wrong. 340i stock does 12.3 quarter mile
You make good videos bro!
The algorithm suggested that I think outside the box, which is why I like a tuned Camaro SS with an automatic transmission. It's slower, but plenty of money remains in my wallet. 😜😜
340, 0-100 is good, it can be a little better. But 1/4 is very bad. And what kind of software is there?
I get that stock BMS are faster than Audis but all this crying says more about BMW fan boys.. take the loss and move on.