'Not Charity, Right': Supreme Court's Big Alimony Order For Muslim Women | SC Verdict | News18

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2024
  • A divorced Muslim woman can seek alimony from her husband under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure - the law related to maintenance for wives - the Supreme Court ruled today. The big judgment came as a bench of Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice Augustine George Masih dismissed a Muslim man's petition challenging a direction to pay his wife maintenance after divorce.
    "We are hereby dismissing the criminal appeal with the major conclusion that Section 125 would be applicable to all women and not just married women," Justice Nagarathna said. Justice Nagarathna and Justice Masih delivered separate, but concurrent, judgments.
    #muslim #divorce #alimony #news18
    n18oc_politics
    News18 Mobile App - onelink.to/des...

ความคิดเห็น • 237

  • @lakshmirao4409
    @lakshmirao4409 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

    No matter how much BJP do these group of women don't appreciate. So sad

    • @vivekvardhan2778
      @vivekvardhan2778 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bro by default they are PeaceFools. At least now they will not have multiple marriages.

    • @VinodBandari-ps5yd
      @VinodBandari-ps5yd หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      bjp is setting its own cremation by keep luring muslims😢

    • @rishabh8355
      @rishabh8355 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@VinodBandari-ps5yd It won't just wait another 1 year..If Hindus just stay united in HP and Maharashtra...UCC will be a reality in 2025- mark my words.

    • @SRRMCS
      @SRRMCS หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      they continue to vote for congress

    • @VinodBandari-ps5yd
      @VinodBandari-ps5yd หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@rishabh8355 thanku sir 🙏

  • @AarJay8587
    @AarJay8587 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Govt is too soft.. should abolish all personal laws and make India true secular

    • @jimmatrix7244
      @jimmatrix7244 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Rightly said.

  • @mruthyunjayasiddalingaiah7489
    @mruthyunjayasiddalingaiah7489 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    *The Fall of Europe(Thread)*
    I wish Europeans had listened to what an Italian writer Oriana Fallaci said 25 years ago in her book *The Rage and The Pride*
    She had predicted 25 years ago that soon Europe would fall into Islam because of the liberal democracy of Europe😡

    • @sriranga1000
      @sriranga1000 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All non Islamic nations around the world including India must pass a resolution in UN to expel all Islamists and force Muslim countries to accept them .If they don’t stop all food grain exports to them .until they accept these people

  • @baburajankalluveettilanarg2222
    @baburajankalluveettilanarg2222 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Great Verdict. Muslim woman also eligible to get Justice.

    • @sriranga1000
      @sriranga1000 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      With this all Muslim women must back BJP .if menfolk give triple talaq which is banned file cases . in courts .

    • @VJ38
      @VJ38 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Do Dharma without fear or reward. That is what is needed

    • @jimmatrix7244
      @jimmatrix7244 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@sriranga1000 Keep dreaming of Muslim vote. Govt have built home for them but they voted en bloc for opposition.

    • @chitukurisrinivas5152
      @chitukurisrinivas5152 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@jimmatrix7244 Yes they will not vote for BJP

    • @k.r.seetharaman8855
      @k.r.seetharaman8855 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They will never vote for BJP

  • @veenagpati
    @veenagpati หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    They want secularism, they got secularism.. Now only seculars cry about it. Beauty of Indian secularism 😂

    • @mohammadbilal9618
      @mohammadbilal9618 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Means no hindu rashtra and mosque demolition 😂😂

    • @veenagpati
      @veenagpati หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mohammadbilal9618it means, no more 4 wives, no more waqf board, no more reservations in the name of religion and also dismantling all those illegal mosques built on temples or anywhere else 😂.

  • @vsb2534
    @vsb2534 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    I wish the Honourable SC will dismiss all the review petitions if filed.

  • @ranjitlalloo6188
    @ranjitlalloo6188 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Kamru has not left Madressa!

  • @amajitsingh2802
    @amajitsingh2802 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    When will Muslim women get 72 studs

    • @suketalloli6743
      @suketalloli6743 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      😂😂spot on

    • @Roy_Rintesh
      @Roy_Rintesh หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      😂😂😂

    • @mahalaxmiiyer4800
      @mahalaxmiiyer4800 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂

    • @madhavrekwar3552
      @madhavrekwar3552 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Never 😂😂😂😂😂 I heard she will be queen of that herd who will sent one hoor each day to her husband 😂😂

    • @mohammadbilal9618
      @mohammadbilal9618 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      When hindu women got 1024 apsar in swarglok 😂😂

  • @kamaleshchakraborty7751
    @kamaleshchakraborty7751 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Kamru zu is highly communal in his heart, he pretends to be a progressive secularist, but exposes his religious fanatism.

    • @madhavrekwar3552
      @madhavrekwar3552 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂😂😂😂they think nobody notices

    • @big0561
      @big0561 หลายเดือนก่อน

      *মালটা কোলকাতায় থাকে*

  • @sriranga1000
    @sriranga1000 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Why aBJP is delaying implementing UCC .and two child norm ?

    • @JustMe54328
      @JustMe54328 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bcz BJP dosent want to abolish HUF

    • @madhavrekwar3552
      @madhavrekwar3552 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@JustMe54328😂😂😂😂😂if they worry about Hindus they would have tax relief for middle class...bjp is the most secular party did more damage to majority of this country than congress..

    • @JustMe54328
      @JustMe54328 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@madhavrekwar3552 they don’t give a crap about middle class Hindus, they worry about the rich ones - they have significant HUF wealth

    • @JustMe54328
      @JustMe54328 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@madhavrekwar3552 😂u should mingle more with the rich to c how it helps

    • @RichiAnand95
      @RichiAnand95 หลายเดือนก่อน

      60% HINDUS Aagainst It !!! Fix it First

  • @chrissingh4730
    @chrissingh4730 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    But not one of the Muslims vote for Modiji! Bjp never hurt Muslim but they prefer to sell their votes to Rahul Nehru/Mainos.

    • @vish2553
      @vish2553 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sammyjahanmunshi3555don’t be an idiot. This old law was brought by congress and bjp influenced the court . Bjp is fighting for ucc. Not congress. Or courts.

    • @vish2553
      @vish2553 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sammyjahanmunshi3555 yeap🥱 for no reason Muslim houses are bulldozed. Victim card number one comes out! Many more cards in the wallet 😳

    • @mohammadbilal9618
      @mohammadbilal9618 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@vish2553when court released electral bonds then andhbhakt be like judge pappu hoga aur ab court bjp influenced hai 😂😂

    • @vish2553
      @vish2553 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mohammadbilal9618 write in English and not Hinglish and don’t laugh at yourself.

    • @periwinkleee2024
      @periwinkleee2024 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bulldozed for wat illegal occupant's
      Have u ever thought how pak or other muslim countries treat minorities
      Be great full atleast u can comment in social media without anyt​@@sammyjahanmunshi3555

  • @jyotiraju8910
    @jyotiraju8910 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This verdict for my Muslim Sister & daughter I wish no Talak or divorce hope for their betterment you must educate yourself & society. See this law from eyes of a Father of daughter.

    • @madhavrekwar3552
      @madhavrekwar3552 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Worry about ur community 😂😂😂😂😂when Hindus killed on road where were u....stop this nonsense and throw ur supiority complex...becoz of people like u lower class hindu suffer

  • @nrusimha11
    @nrusimha11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "They want secularism, they got secularism.. Now only seculars cry about it. Beauty of Indian secularism "

  • @raghavarao2439
    @raghavarao2439 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Secular?? Not for congress

  • @RAMESH-js9lc
    @RAMESH-js9lc หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Do you think they care for the court?😅
    Muslim is just a few years away from installing his own sharia courts. Just a matter of time.

    • @madhavrekwar3552
      @madhavrekwar3552 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂😂true.. hindus are the most stupid community..read the comments..not a single muslim girl praising the verdict..but hindus😂😂😂😂begani shadi me abulla dewana

    • @k.r.seetharaman8855
      @k.r.seetharaman8855 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In Kerala TN and TN iti s already happening

  • @ObamacareMishra
    @ObamacareMishra หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    MANDATORY Standing ovation for A. Ranga Sir!!. GOLDEN WORDS

  • @rubinatabassum5620
    @rubinatabassum5620 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Welcome step.Time to restore our dignity...years and years running around from pillar to post will come to an end...We women are equal respectful citizens of our country ...A ray of hope after a long journey.

    • @RAMESH-js9lc
      @RAMESH-js9lc หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No use. Your men will not adhere to the rule and not many can go to court.
      Yours is a different world.

    • @periwinkleee2024
      @periwinkleee2024 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only after u come out from hijab u people can really be equal

  • @tsgopalakrishnan
    @tsgopalakrishnan หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Shame on all The Indians calling themself as SECULAR, having denied this to a section of the population for so long. *The laws are not SECULAR, still we call ourself secular*

  • @restaurantmasala9461
    @restaurantmasala9461 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Kamru please stop Talking Nonsens!

    • @madhavrekwar3552
      @madhavrekwar3552 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂😂this is his job...

  • @raghavarao2439
    @raghavarao2439 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Appeasement not secularism

  • @thotasaitejapatel
    @thotasaitejapatel หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Bring #ucc

  • @colorgrower
    @colorgrower หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Assdin owaisi and his followers may now move to paxtan or any other OIC country. If a Muslim wants 4 alimony payments let him free in paxtan

  • @vivekdixit4622
    @vivekdixit4622 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    बिना तलाक़ के जिन औरतों को पति और उसका परिवार छोड़ देते हैं उनके लिए भी कोई कानूनी बाध्यता तय होना चाहिए। तलाक के बिना दूसरी शादी भी नहीं कर सकती है और गुजारा चलाने के लिए कोई रकम भी नहीं मिलती है।

  • @k.r.seetharaman8855
    @k.r.seetharaman8855 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    RAHUL Gandhi and Congress would bring a new bill to negate this judgement in the budget session of the parliament

  • @goduguravishankar5837
    @goduguravishankar5837 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Great news of judgement of ముస్లిం women

  • @KSNRajuKalidindi
    @KSNRajuKalidindi หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very good judgment.

  • @k.r.seetharaman8855
    @k.r.seetharaman8855 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    TMC and DMK would file review petition in SC

  • @sufeeljan3245
    @sufeeljan3245 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Rahul sir is telling truth...

  • @peacepeace8059
    @peacepeace8059 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A Muslim can be extremists or Munafiq there is no middle path for Muslim.

    • @taahadar6115
      @taahadar6115 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Islam itself supports middle path

    • @peacepeace8059
      @peacepeace8059 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@taahadar6115 Is this a Taqiyya, you are trying on me? Or you are a munafiq?

    • @RAMESH-js9lc
      @RAMESH-js9lc หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@taahadar6115. 😅 this is like saying Islam means peace....

    • @deepakb.277
      @deepakb.277 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most violent cult on earth you cannot believe on these B ..srds they will backstab you

    • @taahadar6115
      @taahadar6115 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@RAMESH-js9lc and there is nothing wrong in it you can say

  • @rajx7120
    @rajx7120 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Constitution is supreme. Not personal laws !

    • @mohammadbilal9618
      @mohammadbilal9618 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ye baat hindu rashtra ke time bhi bol diya karo

  • @astee.007
    @astee.007 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    why on the earth we need to bring UCC, if someone wants to be in shit let it be it is not our job to enlighten people, if they want rights let the Muslim women fight.

  • @ranjitlalloo6188
    @ranjitlalloo6188 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Go home Kamru, making no sense!

    • @ranjitlalloo6188
      @ranjitlalloo6188 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yasmeen no facts! Stuck in the past !

  • @jktonse
    @jktonse หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Screw tightening by Supreme court....

  • @patrickspeedo
    @patrickspeedo หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wooow what a super verdict

  • @kidiyoormadhukar
    @kidiyoormadhukar หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    but in 2024 election Muslim women did not vote for BJP

    • @vsb2534
      @vsb2534 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They will never but enjoy all the benefits given by BJP

    • @harshit3980
      @harshit3980 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This right is given by SC not bjp😅

    • @k.r.seetharaman8855
      @k.r.seetharaman8855 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not only in 2024 in the forth coming elections also they would not vote for BJP

    • @mohammadbilal9618
      @mohammadbilal9618 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's the decision of court chaatu not your paw paw 😂😂

    • @asht7899
      @asht7899 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's so true. India is doing so much for Muslim women. Still they don't show their support.

  • @chandrasekharrao130
    @chandrasekharrao130 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why not? They are also Indian women

  • @brs99999
    @brs99999 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This verdict should have come before the election.

  • @tafseerhasan4535
    @tafseerhasan4535 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Remarriage of divorced sisters would be more difficult.

  • @ranjitlalloo6188
    @ranjitlalloo6188 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Kamru please start using your brain!!!

  • @devdasshegde2799
    @devdasshegde2799 หลายเดือนก่อน

    People who didn't want to live together with Hindus demanded separate country and opted to migrate to Pakistan Those opted to live with India are bound by Indian law framed under Indian constitution.

  • @nalindesai09
    @nalindesai09 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Propagating, preaching & Praying is allowed for all religious belief and no one can stop this as per constitution! Constitution doesn’t allow conversion by alluring, Force, deceit or cheat etc and also donot allow anyone to block traffic for praying out side on the road! Where in the Constitution written that personal laws of Muslims can prevail upon constitutional laws? Or how any constitution would consider personal laws as Religious laws?

  • @user-pt6te7ew1g
    @user-pt6te7ew1g หลายเดือนก่อน

    A SECULAR CAN NOT BE EITHER A MUSLIM OR COMMUNIST.

  • @sridharan2445
    @sridharan2445 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A community without gratitude, religion first, nation second, they will remain second for the rest of their life.

  • @devidast1123
    @devidast1123 หลายเดือนก่อน

    'Words, words, words' as Prince Hamlet said to Horatio in Hamlet.

  • @Dicloxacillin_dexmedetomidine
    @Dicloxacillin_dexmedetomidine หลายเดือนก่อน

    India is not a secular country
    Definition of secularism is the principle of separation of the state from religious institutions.
    India me har cheez me religion gusa dete hai
    So don't call a India a secular country but it is opposite

  • @thenazeer
    @thenazeer หลายเดือนก่อน

    May be rajiv gandhi had balls to stand against stealing of money from men. 😅😅😅😂

  • @zenogany2198
    @zenogany2198 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    👍

  • @DeepakK-qg7ms
    @DeepakK-qg7ms หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did the SC smash Islamic Patriarchy by passing this historic judgement

  • @mruthyunjayasiddalingaiah7489
    @mruthyunjayasiddalingaiah7489 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Muslims selective appeasement was started from Gandhiji's DNA even prior to independence and the same Legacy continued with Nehru's DNA. The same Legacy continued by Nehru's Dynasty. I don't know who gave the title of Mahatma and Father of the Nation to Gandhiji. Indian Congress was established by Videshi and now run by Videshi origins as Islamic National Congress. Maximum genocide of Hindus happened right from Gandhiji's period till UPA period.*Please listen to this Vedio without fail to know more about it 🙏*

    • @Zenith_5-r9l
      @Zenith_5-r9l หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Is modi g paying half of his salary to her wife 😂😂😂??

    • @dev7155g
      @dev7155g หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Zenith_5-r9lit was a child marriage, and couple is victim not culprit in child marriage

    • @dev7155g
      @dev7155g หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@Rahil_Shiekh5 it was a child marriage, and couple is victim not culprit in child marriage

    • @dev7155g
      @dev7155g หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ghandhi and Nehru were not freedom fighters they were stooge of Britishers, was any congressi tested Kala panni or Britishers bullets? Why secular congress supported khilafat movement? What is indian muslims concern with khilafat? Why congress created Islamic Pakistan but not Hindu rastra? Ghandhi was black mailer of Hindus by fasting for maintain his status of mahatma

    • @peacepeace8059
      @peacepeace8059 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@dev7155gbut according to Islam rap***, a child is halal.

  • @nareshpatel5787
    @nareshpatel5787 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You cannot expect honesty from Islamist
    No matter where they are, they will play their propaganda

  • @chrissingh4730
    @chrissingh4730 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oh its a shame that not one Muslim vote for Modi!!

  • @SomTugnait
    @SomTugnait หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Something that is round will always be a square in some people's eyes... try convincing them with facts to no avail...

  • @churabhok2869
    @churabhok2869 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about south Indian Mamas marrying their nieces or relatives? 😂

  • @vaidyasethuraman452
    @vaidyasethuraman452 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Unless legally India liberates the uneducated women of Islam, with laws and judgements like this, forget India as a composite civic society striving to survive as a nation. We will be a Pakistan in 30 years.

  • @vivekthakur6172
    @vivekthakur6172 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Go read crpc -125 first, it's not a new law, Supreme Court judgement just explain 125 nothing more, kam se kam news Banane se pahle law to padh lo😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @vishwanathmohite8379
    @vishwanathmohite8379 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not judgement delivered, secularism delivered from supreme court 😊

  • @subratasen044
    @subratasen044 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congress had done a mess

  • @saiswadhin3100
    @saiswadhin3100 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rahul ji you are just wasting your precious energy on people with Jalebi mentality. You will get confused the way they have confused the nation😂 😂😂😂

  • @shishupalsingh98
    @shishupalsingh98 หลายเดือนก่อน

    अगर महिलाओं को डीवी एक्ट में भरण पोषण मिल रहा है तो 125 में भरण पोषण देने में दिक्कत क्यों होनी चाहिए।

  • @Naresh-hh9bx
    @Naresh-hh9bx หลายเดือนก่อน

    One step toward s secularism

  • @VJ38
    @VJ38 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Applaud BJP for steering such issues, to ban many regressive practices that were going on under pure money and muscle power of Imams and their sychophants. Dismantling all the ills within Islam , with no regard for political gains or losses, is the requirement of the day , for to teach many what secularism means and how secular will be various religions under a Hindu rashtra.

  • @celinafernandes9992
    @celinafernandes9992 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So happy the anchor tried to silence Kamri

  • @freesoul3160
    @freesoul3160 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yasmeen farukhi iss topic par kafi sari debates m gayi aur har jagah boli k 10000 files lakar dikha sakti hu k alimony mil rahi h, lekin as a proof kisi bhi debate m ek bhi file nahi layi

  • @kunhabdullakuniyil7925
    @kunhabdullakuniyil7925 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This Anchor looks RSS, he says "your prime minister Indira Gandhi" and he hate secularism. Some communal guys enjoys any verdict affecting Muslims in India. Please let us live our way

    • @Zacklee99
      @Zacklee99 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Really bro. This very ruling itself shows secularism of india. And there is no your way or my way in india. There is one only one way described by constitution. As requested by many people right. Save democracy save constitution.

  • @madhavrekwar3552
    @madhavrekwar3552 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To the majority of this country -
    Begani shadi me abdulla dewana
    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @sameer26121980
    @sameer26121980 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So, shall we implement strict sharia law on all Muslims in India?
    Like how they do in Saudi Arabia?
    Punishments for theft, cut hand, etc.
    If they want Muslim laws separate, give them whole, not selective laws.

  • @kamalamuthappen8606
    @kamalamuthappen8606 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bring ucc immediately

  • @MrRaghavann
    @MrRaghavann หลายเดือนก่อน

    First there should be a population among muslims which accepts the secular laws of India. Atleast majority of muslims. You allow them non secular teachings right from childhood, and suddenly ask them to follow secular laws.😂😂

  • @soniadhonde2969
    @soniadhonde2969 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Gen Secy SDPI couldnt manage to make a single valid argument!! Kuch bhi bol rahi hain...

  • @jaab007
    @jaab007 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not an appropriate decision. Why laws are implemented gender specific. When Constitution permits religious personal laws how SC can over ride that. If its appropriate then how person like Hema Malini and Dharmendra got married when already one of them was already married. Whether personal laws of Islam will be taken up and imposed on non Islamic people. Every religion has personal laws in India. A Christian cannot marry outside the Church. If that happens then the Christian who does is exterminated from the Church records. In such case not even the Indian Constitution protect such Christian.

  • @Spoilt_
    @Spoilt_ หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is trumpeting, joy Marketing ...
    Muslim women have been granted Maintenance under Crpc 125 since 90's...

  • @PP-zr3ih
    @PP-zr3ih หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can anybody tell me in Hindus why illegitimate child not eligible to be a coparcener in HUF property..
    Then these peoples are talking about UCC and article 44
    Where is BJP s ucc..this is also injustice in Hindus..

  • @sangeethaamotilal8119
    @sangeethaamotilal8119 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When some want to stick on to their customs and traditions, let Hindus also be permitted to go back to having unaccountable number of wives, why restrict them to one.
    For Hindus from unaccountable to one, but for muslims not from four to one.

    • @moonchild_ankita
      @moonchild_ankita หลายเดือนก่อน

      TF It should be one for everyone. Be humane and monogamous.

    • @sangeethaamotilal8119
      @sangeethaamotilal8119 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@moonchild_ankita I was just being sarcastic.

    • @moonchild_ankita
      @moonchild_ankita หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sangeethaamotilal8119 oh.. okay. i was truly disgusted. . .

  • @jaharlalsamaddar9855
    @jaharlalsamaddar9855 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please invite NAZIS ELAHI KHAN Advocate for such debate on line

    • @deepakb.277
      @deepakb.277 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kaun hain yeh chu?

  • @madhavrekwar3552
    @madhavrekwar3552 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂😂😂😂😂india is not secular country.. accept the fact😂😂😂😂😂secular country has balsfemy law😂😂😂😂where are secular /feminist/ freedom of speech 😂😂😂😂

  • @shirishkotecha
    @shirishkotecha หลายเดือนก่อน

    What ever you give muslims they will never appreciate....

  • @PP-zr3ih
    @PP-zr3ih หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can anybody tell me in Hindus why illegitimate child not eligible to be a coparcener in HUF property..
    Then these peoples are talking about UCC and article 44

  • @ranjitlalloo6188
    @ranjitlalloo6188 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Kamru ignorant analyst!!

  • @kcommon3552
    @kcommon3552 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you, Supreme Court of India🇮🇳, for the good judgment! Yes Muslim must have the same rights as non-muslims women.

  • @79narasingh
    @79narasingh หลายเดือนก่อน

    UCC Is most emergency in India......

  • @Ayushmishra-gz4pg
    @Ayushmishra-gz4pg หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Alimony is not charity, its extortion. Whether muslim or Hindu

    • @ANKITKUMAR-mo7zo
      @ANKITKUMAR-mo7zo หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂

    • @aakasamantha
      @aakasamantha หลายเดือนก่อน

      But who is stopping one from taking/giving a prenuptial or for that matter, staying single? Alpha men walk alone. 😎

    • @vsb2534
      @vsb2534 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It looks personal experience 😅

  • @jaharlalsamaddar9855
    @jaharlalsamaddar9855 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congress party is not secular & congress top leader is not secular sinve NEHRU ONWARD........PLEASE SEE THE DECENDANTS TREE

  • @gajanandsharma5695
    @gajanandsharma5695 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What interesting i find on every news channel in debate is that anchor debates with that community perssons where debate is not allowed you have to follow what has been written and i see they speak bakwas in debates...so i ask ancchor are they fool to invite them or just for TRP

  • @thotasaitejapatel
    @thotasaitejapatel หลายเดือนก่อน

    #reliefformuslimwomen

  • @RichiAnand95
    @RichiAnand95 หลายเดือนก่อน

    जिसका डर राहुल को था वो ही कोर्ट ने किया !! ये संविधान बचाना था !!
    वकाफ़ एक्ट , Warship Act , Tample Tax ( Jijiya Tax )

  • @jaharlalsamaddar9855
    @jaharlalsamaddar9855 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BANNED SARIYATI LAW....

  • @kidiyoormadhukar
    @kidiyoormadhukar หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Congress Party and Muslims now miss Rajiv Gandhi . Had been PM ,he would have ameneded the constitution to nullify this SC ruling on alimoney to Muslim women. Where is Rahul Gandhi ?

    • @vsb2534
      @vsb2534 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes sir. You are absolutely correct. Muslim women are lucky that he is not alive and his son is not 😅

    • @k.r.seetharaman8855
      @k.r.seetharaman8855 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rahul Gandhi and Congress would bring a new bill to negate the judgement in the Budget Session of the parliament

  • @mohan33367.
    @mohan33367. หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir, This Kamru appears to be Carnivorous when he says he eats Congis.

  • @jaharlalsamaddar9855
    @jaharlalsamaddar9855 หลายเดือนก่อน

    why are you quoting tribal ...

  • @PP-zr3ih
    @PP-zr3ih หลายเดือนก่อน

    Then why bjp not ready to bring ucc

  • @ramaraocheepi7847
    @ramaraocheepi7847 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congress rep is dodging with irrelevant retherics with ref to secularism. Muslim women are never treated as equal to Muslim men. Shivshankar introduction is insightful. Muslim men never ever allow the present SC verdict come into force.

  • @AarJay8587
    @AarJay8587 หลายเดือนก่อน

    BJP Govt could have implemented UCC at the beginning of second term.. all other development and reforms can be implemented with hanged majority...

  • @achalprakash3598
    @achalprakash3598 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Stop saying ‘viewers’ over and over again. Very annoying

  • @thotasaitejapatel
    @thotasaitejapatel หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congress is khangress only but atleast support womenmuslims also

  • @vc2616
    @vc2616 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🕉🙏

  • @chrissingh4730
    @chrissingh4730 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rahul, your show here will NOT give votes to Modiji. You are annoying the Muslims.
    Go out there among the people like Burkee Dutt who successfully scored votes for the Nehru/ Mainos. Please change your tactics.

  • @visitwave
    @visitwave หลายเดือนก่อน

    Now non godi media must celebrate and intwrview with champions of secularism from all walks of like
    UPA INDIA block
    Burkha Dhatt
    Bhara Bhaskar
    Khajdeep Desai
    ArfaKhanum Bharwani
    Sonakshi Sinha
    etc

  • @roopd3312
    @roopd3312 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fiir bhi vote congress ko hi degi

  • @user-eh7pn4tz2e
    @user-eh7pn4tz2e หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    nice one sir
    @mruthyunjayasiddalingaiah7489
    6 hours ago
    The Fall of Europe(Thread)
    I wish Europeans had listened to what an Italian writer Oriana Fallaci said 25 years ago in her book The Rage and The Pride
    She had predicted 25 years ago that soon Europe would fall into Islam because of the liberal democracy of Europe

  • @ranjitlalloo6188
    @ranjitlalloo6188 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yasmeen comes with no facts ! Stuck in the past!