Not odd at all. It's called "Covering Your Own Ass". The recipe is simple - all you need to do is cover yourself in slimy weasel juice, be a complete disgusting simp to the McCartheystic Witchfinder MeToo Bowel-Movement, and there you have it. Nothing odd about the behavior of these precious AAA Hollywood Stars at all - in fact it was completely predictable.
I find it entertaining that these celebs act like this is all new information. I'm an everyday American and I've known all of his creepiness since I was a child. Not only Woody, but especially Roman Polanski. They didn't care, it was all about the honor of being in his movies, and they ignored all the creepy things.
BTW Woody was cleared during a divorce/custody hearing, not a criminal court. Remember he did marry a person whom he'd met when they were 7 years old, who had abandonment issues. That is called taking advantage of the situation.
You're right. He was not cleared by a criminal court. You know why? Because he was never even charged as the DA had no credible evidence to even charge him. None. So, by this, he was effectively cleared. Do some research outside the HBO hit piece and Farrow hagiography. Oh, and the whole Woody-Soon Yi thing, of which I am sure you rely on misinformation, it is not relevant to whether he molested a child. At all.
@Sarina Singh In what realm did you work with sexual abuse survivors because it is very rare for a prosecutor to decline to prosecute anyone if there is enough evidence to convict. In cases of sexual abuse, it is the alleged victim who might decline to testify for emotional reasons (which is perfectly reasonable). However, it is those cases where the DA often has no choice but to drop the case because they have no choice (no complaining witness). That is not what happened in this case. As I said above, this was not a matter of Maco deciding not to go to trial; his office never even pushed for Allen's arrest. The reason for this was simple -- his office did not have enough evidence to charge Allen, much less prevail at trial. There was never an arraignment or an indictment. Thus, whether or not the case should go to trial was never an issue since there was no charge in the first place. But Maco needed to save face after some outcry from people who did not know the facts and who did not understand the law (or care one way or the other). Maco had wanted to make a name for himself by gaining the conviction of a famous film director, so I am sure that he was very disappointed that the Yale-New Haven team concluded that the allegation of abuse was unfounded. That is, for his career, he wanted the abuse to have happened. So, Maco came up with the phony statement that they wanted to spare Dylan Farrow more trauma. It didn't make sense then and it makes less sense now especially since we know a lot more about what happened. Certainly, we now know that Mia Farrow did not care at all about traumatizing her daughter when she put her through hours and hours of videotaping (naked for some reason during a portion of it) in order to get her to say what she wanted her to say and present it to the police (and who in the f*** does that?), and through Dylan's speaking with the Yale-New Haven team and others many, many times. But, suddenly, Maco did not want to traumatize the child by putting her through a trial where she almost definitely would have testified in camera (away from judge and jury)? Nonsense. It's tough because if you watch Woody Allen films, Mia Farrow always came across as so sweet and lovely. But if you delve into the facts, including with respect to how she got and treated her adopted children, her own personal life and her own infidelities, the only conclusion one can come to is that she is a cruel, narcissistic sociopath who to this day makes sure that Dylan never lives a normal life.
All of them knew about woody Allen long before all this and they still chose to work with him. When his daughter spoke out against him the first time everyone dismissed her and her brother. The reason they're all suddenly turning their backs on him is because they trying to Save face
Lee Lee who cares what you think they do not condone what he did I do not think they should feel guilty at all the past cannot be undone Dylan holds no ill will towards them
@@aprilgosa5779 Dylan has continually tried to shame actors working with Woody. Educate yourself as to Samantha Geimer (Polanski's victim) & her attitude to the Farrows
I don’t think anyone was “gaslit” into believing he was a good guy. ALL the actors who worked with him were most likely aware of the allegations. They should all hand their acting fees over to RAINN.
Or, there is no reason for anyone to be ashamed of working with Woody Allen because the publicly available information points to his not having committed this alleged crime, one for which he was never even arrested, much less charged after a thorough investigation by the CT authorities.
My impression was that everybody in Hollywood wanted to be in Woody Allen’s movies. Some of the movies garnered Oscars. And they all want Oscars. In the HBO documentary Farrow vs Allen the only actor to stand by Woody was Diane Keaton. Here’s hoping both Woody Allen and Dylan Farrow get every source of help available to them.
The overwhelming evidence points to the likelihood that this alleged event of abuse never happened. So what kind of help do you think Woody Allen needs? No other allegations of abuse before or since. Dylan obviously needs help but until she realizes that her mother was the abuser, and as long as she insists that her happiness is tied with everyone in the world shaming Woody Allen, she will never heal.
Most of the actors and actresses who worked with Woody Allen knew about the allegations and also that Woody had been investigated. They knew that he was innocent. Furthermore, Michael Caine did his research on Woody and saw that he was innocent and so did Rebecca Hall, who decided to stop mistreating Woody. The thing is that when people take the minimum of time to do their research on Woody Allen and Mia Farrow, people immediately see who is the liar and the liar is Mia Farrow and her puppets clan. Those who claim that they regret working with Woody are sheeps who are too cowards to have the balls to stand up to the media mob and to the Hollywood trend cliques of loving and hating whoever it is trendy to love and hate. Also, Soon-Yi Previn is not Woody Allen's adoptive daughter, she is the adoptive daughter of Andre Previn who is her only father. So those who claim that she is his adoptive daughter speak rubbish since Woody only raised Moses, Dylan, and Ronan and had nothing to do with the other kids whom Mia was the sole caretaker. Woody Allen was investigated by the authorities and proven innocent many years ago; the authorities were relentless and hostile toward him. And not only that, I find it ironic and hypocritical how people are so ready to spit on Woody Allen, yet they do nothing regarding Mia Farrow and her multiple controversies both within her family and in her life regarding how she was abusive and mistreated her adopted kids, among them Soon-Yi Previn and Moses Farrow; both who denounced her lies and support Woody Allen. People who want to know accurate facts on Woody Allen and his life should consult the documentary "By The Way Woody Allen is Innocent". It covers extensively all the facts around Woody. Read also Moses Farrow's blog and Soon-Yi Previn's interview. They are excellent accounts on life around Woody and Mia. As to why I support Woody Allen's innocence, here are the reasons: 1)Dylan Farrow switched the abuse locations multiple times over the years (tv room, staircase, etc.); which shows she doesn't make sense. 2)The idea of attacking Dylan during a custody battle doesn't make sense. 3)Mia Farrow claiming first thing first that Woody had assaulted Soon-Yi Previn. 4)Sordid history in the Farrow family of violence and abuse, such as her brother John Charles Villers-Farrow who was arrested and jailed for abuse on two children. Whereas nothing in Woody's family. 5)Abuse account from Soon-Yi and Moses regarding Mia Farrow. 6)The constant surveillance of Woody by everyone in the Farrow house. Which would have made it impossible for him to hurt Dylan. 7)No sign of abuse after medical investigations. 8)Shifted story from the nanny. 9) Dylan Farrow's habit of reinventing her story and her problem of making difference between fantasy and reality. Alongside her mom's manipulative/invasive videotape recordings and personal statements. 10)Overcontrolling nature of Mia on her kids. Alongside her demeaning nature of Soon-Yi Previn by calling her vile names when Soon-Yi is very intelligent, mature, and educated. 11)The statement "I like to cheat on my stories." from Dylan. 12)The train set being claimed by Dylan as a small train set, but as revealed by the nanny, it was a massive model for a child to sit on and to travel around rails. A set used in the living room, Mia's room and in any big space. Which would make its use in the attic small space impossible. 13)Woody had no problem adopting his kids. And his private life has always been pristine and exemplary. Whereas Mia's life has always been plagued with problems. Especially with her adopted children who either died or which she neglected and abandoned. 14)The authorities investigations were extensive and rigorous. And the authorities were very unpleasant toward Woody. 15)The manipulative and tabloid nature of Ronan Farrow 16)The culture of Mia Farrow of reprojecting on others what she did (Especially her history of hurting others). 17)Judge Wilkes's history of thoughtless decision. 18)Maureen Orth's presence in the battle (dubious behaviour, lies, bias on Mia, and attacks on others like Michael Jackson with BS and racist lies) 19)Dylan saying to the pediatrician for the first time that Woody only touched her shoulder. 20)Dylan's "Mommy wants me to lie." 21)Dylan saying on Oct 30 that she recanted her testimony. With Mia saying to the social workers that nothing had happened to her. That Woody did not hurt her. 22)Dylan's flagrant inconsistencies both as a child and as an adult. Her habit of treating her "trauma" as a "spectacle show." 23)Dylan, Mia, and Ronan exploiting this situation like prima donnas. Always courting cameras and hogging the spotlight while Woody is silenced. 24)60 minutes Video 25)Woody never having any history of violence or abuse in his private and personal life. 26)Woody's claustrophobia making him incapable of entering that small attic space. 27)Conflicting testimonials of the babysitters regarding Woody and Dylan. One of them saying the actress pressured her to attack Woody Allen. 28)Soon-Yi's concerns and facts about Mia Farrow and violence toward her. 29)Mia's sordid way of treating her adopted kids like toys and political and PR images, constantly renaming them. 30)Mia's game of reinventing her history and life to her image and narcissism. 31)The nannies denouncing Mia as a bully who ordered the adopted children to be domestics and servants and who assaulted them; while the biological ones were well treated. 32)Soon-Yi and Moses both confirming Mia was violent. Alongside the nannies.
Kudos for what? Not having the strength of character to learn facts before cowtowing to the Farrow lynch mob? Do the research. Based on the publicly available evidence, it it much more likely than not (much more) that this alleged event of abuse did not happen.
The fact that these accusations were unsubstantiated and and he was not charged of any wrongdoing, so now these Hollywood morons are jumping on Dylan Farrow's bandwagon? Sounds succs to me there.
Let's forget the courts, the judges, the investigators, the judicial system and let's all believe in... Dylan. These Hollywood snowflakes are annoying.
Dylan who says that she wishes she'd had her day in court but lies about the Connecticut statute of limitations which actually still allows her to take civil action
That's weak sauce. She has lied by saying all statutes of limitation have passed as an excuse for not suing. Since Allen cannot be criminally charged, all she has is a civil suit and wouldn't prevailing in one lend credibility to her claim and be of some solace, like Fred Goldman after he sued OJ? Moreover, there is a much lower standard of proof in a civil case - preponderance of the evidence as opposed to beyond a reasonable doubt. It is obvious why the Farrows don't sue - they would lose complete control over the narrative. The court of public opinion requires only emotion, not evidence. If they sued, Woody Allen would get to mount a defense, impeach their witnesses and evidence (or lack thereof), present his own witnesses and evidence and experts. And he would get to assert counterclaims. The Farrows cannot have that. Why? Because no reasonable trier of fact would find in their favor and Mia Farrow would be exposed as the deceitful, narcissistic sociopathic liar and abuser that she is.
@@Abc12316383 Well she knows perfectly well that she could still have him criminally charged. She works with Donna Palumbo as part of the Jane Doe No More foundation - so she's absolutely aware that her accusation qualifies as 1st Degree Felony Kidnapping in Connecticut, for which there is no statute of limitations. Dylan lies about the statute of limitations because she is a liar
The actors back then, as now, all know how these cowardly monsters are. And they know who the current ones are now. Aside from the children, the adults in the sociopathic industry are not victims.
Please stop saying he was cleared, he was not. The DA of Connecticut believed him to be guilty but thought it would damage Dylan to go through a court case. Even a judge stated he was unfit to parent and that the allegations against him were credible. His team span the lack of court case as him being cleared but it never happened.
DAs don't decide guilt. Judges do. The appellate judges stated that contact with Woody was necessary for Dylan's therapy. They would never make such a decision if they thought he was guilty.
Woody Allen absolutely was cleared by two extensive investigations. What the DA actually said was that because there was overwhelming reasonable doubt as to Allen's guilt, and that a conviction was therefore extremely unlikely, there was no point in putting Dylan through the rigors of a trial. The judge presiding over the custody hearing never said Allen "was unfit to parent". He awarded Mia custody (which was the obviously ruling since the children had always lived with Mia and custody courts are predisposed to disrupting childrens' environment as little as possible.) Mia winning custody had nothing to do with the judge believing Allen to be guilty, despite the Farrow's dishonest spin. As another commenter states, the judge was agnostic as to Allen's guilt or innocence. Judge Wilke did declare that it was extremely unlikely that Allen could ever be convicted, and the DA actually quoted the judge's declaration extensively in his official prosecutorial declination (which makes zero mention of Dylan's supposedly fragile state of mind)
@@FLK-BC Justice Elliott Wilk rejected Allen's bid for custody of the three children and rejected the allegation of sexual abuse [against her mother], denied Allen immediate visitation rights with Dylan, saying of Allen's behavior toward Dylan that it was "grossly inappropriate and that measures must be taken to protect her"
@@emmathompson7706 That's a cherry picked misrepresentation of Judge Wilke's ruling. Once again, Woody losing his custody bid had nothing to do with abuse allegations. If Woody & Mia had been anonymous people named Steve & Linda, with the same custody arrangement and zero accusations of abuse, "Linda" would still have been awarded custody for the simple fact that she had always had custody and "Steve" never cohabitated or spent the night. That's how custody courts work. There were never any accusations of "sexual" abuse against Mia - I'm not sure where you're even getting that. Wilke "denied Allen immediate visitation" - meaning that he ordered a temporary six month stay on visitation so that Dylan could receive therapy about the whole ordeal. Honestly ask yourself: What sane judge who actually believed a child had been molested by her father would halt visitation for six months so that the victim could go to counseling before being reunited what the her molester? How does that possibly make sense? As for the quote about Woody's "grossly inappropriate" behavior, if you'd actually read the full ruling then you'd know that Wilke based that statement directly on the expert opinion and testimony of Dr Coates and Dr Leventhal, both of whom testified that Dylan had not been molested and that Woody's "inappropriate" behavior towards Dylan was in no way sexual (his behavior was only "inappropriate" in that by focusing so much on Dylan he risked making other kids feel neglected and potentially extracted an emotional burden from Dylan to match his attention to her)
So, the fact that all the way back in the 90s , Allen groomed, and seduced his then underage adopted daughter Soon Yee, eventually marrying her, ,wasn’t enough to stop these actors from deciding to work with him later?????
@Lola Blakeslee Soon'Yi was 20 years old in her senior year of highschool and that's when they started talking to each other, but their sexuaI relationship started when she was 21 and in college. 21 is not underage
This comment thread is a perfect example of how the whole notion that Woody has somehow had a stranglehold on the narrative is such a farce. If Woody and his enablers had control of people's understanding of events, then why oh why oh why have so many people spent the last 3 decades perpetuating utter falsehoods at Woody's expense? Woody was *not* Soon-Yi's adopted father. That sort of marriage would never be legally recognized. Soon-Yi was *not* underaged. Like other's have correctly pointed out, she was 20 her senior year of high school. If Allen really employs an army of propagandists to twist facts, then why do 9 out of 10 people believe the underaged/adoptive daughter bs?
@@gheller2261 Apparently Hall reneged almost immediately after making her initial comments. Caine likely didn't feel that way all along, but in the height of the MeToo movement he probably figured it would be career suicide to do otherwise.
Rebecca Hall not only rejected him I remember she even donated her wages from one of his movies to the metoo movement. When did she renege on her comments? I can't find it anywhere on the net.
I was so Young , that was a different time, I will be giving my salary to every charity EVERYWHERE but my accountant can get me a tax break.. so yay for me.
Exactly. Woody pays his actors the min wage stipulated by the SGA. So a bunch of multi millionares donate their $160,000ish salary, get a write off that probably saves them money in the long run, and then get to bask in headlines abouy how 'virtuous' they are, and we're somehow supposed to be impressed
Obviously he wrote them all. Absolutely anytime people bring up facts that you're too lazy to look up yourself, there's always a sinister conspiracy afoot.
There are like a hand full of profiles that are defending him in almost every single comment and video about this subject, so yeah its either Woody Allen or pedos just like him. They love defending their own behind a faceless avatar.
A Manhattan socialite held a dinner party and lots of rich Manhattanites attended. What's your point? Was everyone at the party a pedo?? Even Chelsea Handler??? Even Katie Couric????
Oh, I don't know. Perhaps it is because, by his own admission, Bill Cosby serially molested woman for decades by drugging them whereas Woody Allen has a single allegation of child molestation in his 85 years for which he was never charged and two independent investigations that concluded that the abuse did not happen. Little things like that.
Bill Cosby was tried, evidence was heard and witnesses heard by a jury, and he was found guilty after the proper legal process was completed. And Cosby had not one, or even two, but multiple women accusing him, on different occasions at different times. But they all told similar stories. It was many incidents, many individual crimes committed against several women. There was definitely a pattern there. Allen has been accused by only one person - a person who could have been convinced by her mother that this crime happened. I do believe that Dylan truly believes it happened to her. She's not to blame. I believe that Farrow is behind all of this. In any case, no police charges were ever laid against Allen. They investigated but it never made it as far as that. Of course, it's possible they got it wrong and charges should have been laid, and Allen's case tried in court. But that didn't happen. Nor has Dylan ever brought a civil suit either. And several people involved in the case, including older brother Moses who was there that day, and nannies employed by Farrow, have claimed that they don't believe it happened, and there was no opportunity for Allen to do it. And remember, this is the only criminal allegation ever made about Allen. And it centers on one particular day and incident. So this is in no way at all like the Cosby case.
@@liampatrick3110 All the evidence - and there's a lot of evidence - suggests that Allen is innocent. Are you suggesting that people should simply be presumed guilty?
Good to see these celebrities realize that embroiling and marrying children and teens, abusing one’s daughters whether adopted or effectively, is cruel and gross. Good for you all FOR STANDING UP AGAINST THIS. Many of us like this author have never watched an instant of this home wrecker’s movies since. Turn this dude OFF! Protect the children, respect their mothers, GOOD FOR YOU!!!
You must embrace the logic of the MeToo Bowel-Movement! You must drink the Farrow Cool-Aid! Ask NO questions, give up all your rights. Sanity - your Time's Up.
didnt brooke shields play his girlfriend in a movie and she even was inyroduced in the film as his 17 yr. old girlfriend going on a double date. granted that was risque in a movie scene but elvis moves prisicilla 15 yrs old into his fathers house that is in his backyard. that must have raised some eyebrows. he was in his late 20s but you wonder what kind of parents allowed that anyway.
I have a new joke to crack.....I once said Kate Winslet is worth all of the money....I now say Kate Winslet is not worth all of the frigging money. Please tell Kate Winslet to never ever approach the proximity of Kansas/Missouri/Nebraska/Oklahoma....if she wants to shake it in Chicago/or proximity thereof.....idk
Nope. Natalie Portman jumped on the "I believe you" bandwagon without learning the facts. Dylan Farrow wants everyone to "believe" her. However, mere belief in doesn't make something true. People often believe things and later find out they are wrong. The overwhelming publicly available evidence points to this alleged event of abuse not happening. Dylan Farrow likely has false memories planted in her brain by her controlling mother and nurtured within her from age 7 on. Do some research. The story of this one time in 85 years of life molestation during a custody battle under the noses of a house full of people has never made sense. And the facts show why.
Why don't the celebrities who won Oscar's sell them for a cause. Unfortunately the award looks so good on their mantelpiece. These people are either self-serving or stupid. Either way, their opinions are irrelevant
Is anyone else who thinks .... That young girl doesn't ACTUALLY HAVE TO be telling the truth. Because people say awful things about that but Job Mia F. Yeah know what I mean?
To be honest the marriage hi has with his Soon-Yi is super bizzare, they have 2 adopted kids.... after I look into what happened to Dylan...I can't help but wonder what the hell goes on in Woody's household....
@@rl12345 but you’ve just projected yours and I’ve just projected mine (by even commenting) sooooo THATS what everybody does, & Woody Allen projected who really is on the inside as well, THATS what we’re all doing - we’re all projecting onto each other GET IT❓💔🥺😫
The actors join in solidarity AFTER working with Woody Odd
Yeah
Not odd at all. It's called "Covering Your Own Ass". The recipe is simple - all you need to do is cover yourself in slimy weasel juice, be a complete disgusting simp to the McCartheystic Witchfinder MeToo Bowel-Movement, and there you have it. Nothing odd about the behavior of these precious AAA Hollywood Stars at all - in fact it was completely predictable.
@@baronmunchausen9252 what agent or manager wouldn't try to get their client to dissociate from Woody?
Who cares about facts in the face of fashion?
When they're unpopular they ditch them
To be fear ppl can realize their mistakes and bad choices it’s called growth
I find it entertaining that these celebs act like this is all new information. I'm an everyday American and I've known all of his creepiness since I was a child. Not only Woody, but especially Roman Polanski. They didn't care, it was all about the honor of being in his movies, and they ignored all the creepy things.
Woody was cleared; Polanski was found guilty. Big difference!!
BTW Woody was cleared during a divorce/custody hearing, not a criminal court. Remember he did marry a person whom he'd met when they were 7 years old, who had abandonment issues. That is called taking advantage of the situation.
@@Lynzae He married a 27 year old
You're right. He was not cleared by a criminal court. You know why? Because he was never even charged as the DA had no credible evidence to even charge him. None. So, by this, he was effectively cleared. Do some research outside the HBO hit piece and Farrow hagiography. Oh, and the whole Woody-Soon Yi thing, of which I am sure you rely on misinformation, it is not relevant to whether he molested a child. At all.
@Sarina Singh In what realm did you work with sexual abuse survivors because it is very rare for a prosecutor to decline to prosecute anyone if there is enough evidence to convict. In cases of sexual abuse, it is the alleged victim who might decline to testify for emotional reasons (which is perfectly reasonable). However, it is those cases where the DA often has no choice but to drop the case because they have no choice (no complaining witness). That is not what happened in this case.
As I said above, this was not a matter of Maco deciding not to go to trial; his office never even pushed for Allen's arrest. The reason for this was simple -- his office did not have enough evidence to charge Allen, much less prevail at trial. There was never an arraignment or an indictment. Thus, whether or not the case should go to trial was never an issue since there was no charge in the first place.
But Maco needed to save face after some outcry from people who did not know the facts and who did not understand the law (or care one way or the other). Maco had wanted to make a name for himself by gaining the conviction of a famous film director, so I am sure that he was very disappointed that the Yale-New Haven team concluded that the allegation of abuse was unfounded. That is, for his career, he wanted the abuse to have happened. So, Maco came up with the phony statement that they wanted to spare Dylan Farrow more trauma. It didn't make sense then and it makes less sense now especially since we know a lot more about what happened. Certainly, we now know that Mia Farrow did not care at all about traumatizing her daughter when she put her through hours and hours of videotaping (naked for some reason during a portion of it) in order to get her to say what she wanted her to say and present it to the police (and who in the f*** does that?), and through Dylan's speaking with the Yale-New Haven team and others many, many times. But, suddenly, Maco did not want to traumatize the child by putting her through a trial where she almost definitely would have testified in camera (away from judge and jury)? Nonsense.
It's tough because if you watch Woody Allen films, Mia Farrow always came across as so sweet and lovely. But if you delve into the facts, including with respect to how she got and treated her adopted children, her own personal life and her own infidelities, the only conclusion one can come to is that she is a cruel, narcissistic sociopath who to this day makes sure that Dylan never lives a normal life.
All of them knew about woody Allen long before all this and they still chose to work with him. When his daughter spoke out against him the first time everyone dismissed her and her brother. The reason they're all suddenly turning their backs on him is because they trying to Save face
Lee Lee who cares what you think they do not condone what he did I do not think they should feel guilty at all the past cannot be undone Dylan holds no ill will towards them
@@aprilgosa5779 Dylan has continually tried to shame actors working with Woody.
Educate yourself as to Samantha Geimer (Polanski's victim) & her attitude to the Farrows
@@lashid4u371 exactly
I don’t think anyone was “gaslit” into believing he was a good guy. ALL the actors who worked with him were most likely aware of the allegations. They should all hand their acting fees over to RAINN.
Or, there is no reason for anyone to be ashamed of working with Woody Allen because the publicly available information points to his not having committed this alleged crime, one for which he was never even arrested, much less charged after a thorough investigation by the CT authorities.
My impression was that everybody in Hollywood wanted to be in Woody Allen’s movies. Some of the movies garnered Oscars. And they all want Oscars. In the HBO documentary Farrow vs Allen the only actor to stand by Woody was Diane Keaton. Here’s hoping both Woody Allen and Dylan Farrow get every source of help available to them.
The overwhelming evidence points to the likelihood that this alleged event of abuse never happened. So what kind of help do you think Woody Allen needs? No other allegations of abuse before or since. Dylan obviously needs help but until she realizes that her mother was the abuser, and as long as she insists that her happiness is tied with everyone in the world shaming Woody Allen, she will never heal.
Most of the actors and actresses who worked with Woody Allen knew about the allegations and also that Woody had been investigated. They knew that he was innocent. Furthermore, Michael Caine did his research on Woody and saw that he was innocent and so did Rebecca Hall, who decided to stop mistreating Woody. The thing is that when people take the minimum of time to do their research on Woody Allen and Mia Farrow, people immediately see who is the liar and the liar is Mia Farrow and her puppets clan. Those who claim that they regret working with Woody are sheeps who are too cowards to have the balls to stand up to the media mob and to the Hollywood trend cliques of loving and hating whoever it is trendy to love and hate. Also, Soon-Yi Previn is not Woody Allen's adoptive daughter, she is the adoptive daughter of Andre Previn who is her only father. So those who claim that she is his adoptive daughter speak rubbish since Woody only raised Moses, Dylan, and Ronan and had nothing to do with the other kids whom Mia was the sole caretaker.
Woody Allen was investigated by the authorities and proven innocent many years ago; the authorities were relentless and hostile toward him. And not only that, I find it ironic and hypocritical how people are so ready to spit on Woody Allen, yet they do nothing regarding Mia Farrow and her multiple controversies both within her family and in her life regarding how she was abusive and mistreated her adopted kids, among them Soon-Yi Previn and Moses Farrow; both who denounced her lies and support Woody Allen. People who want to know accurate facts on Woody Allen and his life should consult the documentary "By The Way Woody Allen is Innocent". It covers extensively all the facts around Woody. Read also Moses Farrow's blog and Soon-Yi Previn's interview. They are excellent accounts on life around Woody and Mia.
As to why I support Woody Allen's innocence, here are the reasons:
1)Dylan Farrow switched the abuse locations multiple times over the years (tv room, staircase, etc.); which shows she doesn't make sense.
2)The idea of attacking Dylan during a custody battle doesn't make sense.
3)Mia Farrow claiming first thing first that Woody had assaulted Soon-Yi Previn.
4)Sordid history in the Farrow family of violence and abuse, such as her brother John Charles Villers-Farrow who was arrested and jailed for abuse on two children. Whereas nothing in Woody's family.
5)Abuse account from Soon-Yi and Moses regarding Mia Farrow.
6)The constant surveillance of Woody by everyone in the Farrow house. Which would have made it impossible for him to hurt Dylan.
7)No sign of abuse after medical investigations.
8)Shifted story from the nanny.
9) Dylan Farrow's habit of reinventing her story and her problem of making difference between fantasy and reality. Alongside her mom's manipulative/invasive videotape recordings and personal statements.
10)Overcontrolling nature of Mia on her kids. Alongside her demeaning nature of Soon-Yi Previn by calling her vile names when Soon-Yi is very intelligent, mature, and educated.
11)The statement "I like to cheat on my stories." from Dylan.
12)The train set being claimed by Dylan as a small train set, but as revealed by the nanny, it was a massive model for a child to sit on and to travel around rails. A set used in the living room, Mia's room and in any big space.
Which would make its use in the attic small space impossible.
13)Woody had no problem adopting his kids. And his private life has always been pristine and exemplary. Whereas Mia's life has always been plagued with problems. Especially with her adopted children who either died or which she neglected and abandoned.
14)The authorities investigations were extensive and rigorous. And the authorities were very unpleasant toward Woody.
15)The manipulative and tabloid nature of Ronan Farrow
16)The culture of Mia Farrow of reprojecting on others what she did (Especially her history of hurting others).
17)Judge Wilkes's history of thoughtless decision.
18)Maureen Orth's presence in the battle (dubious behaviour, lies, bias on Mia, and attacks on others like Michael Jackson with BS and racist lies)
19)Dylan saying to the pediatrician for the first time that Woody only touched her shoulder.
20)Dylan's "Mommy wants me to lie."
21)Dylan saying on Oct 30 that she recanted her testimony. With Mia saying to the social workers that nothing had happened to her. That Woody did not hurt her.
22)Dylan's flagrant inconsistencies both as a child and as an adult. Her habit of treating her "trauma" as a "spectacle show."
23)Dylan, Mia, and Ronan exploiting this situation like prima donnas. Always courting cameras and hogging the spotlight while Woody is silenced.
24)60 minutes Video
25)Woody never having any history of violence or abuse in his private and personal life.
26)Woody's claustrophobia making him incapable of entering that small attic space.
27)Conflicting testimonials of the babysitters regarding Woody and Dylan. One of them saying the actress pressured her to attack Woody Allen.
28)Soon-Yi's concerns and facts about Mia Farrow and violence toward her.
29)Mia's sordid way of treating her adopted kids like toys and political and PR images, constantly renaming them.
30)Mia's game of reinventing her history and life to her image and narcissism.
31)The nannies denouncing Mia as a bully who ordered the adopted children to be domestics and servants and who assaulted them; while the biological ones were well treated.
32)Soon-Yi and Moses both confirming Mia was violent. Alongside the nannies.
Considering how many actors Allen has worked with, this list isn’t nearly long enough. Kudos to these people though!
Kudos for what? Not having the strength of character to learn facts before cowtowing to the Farrow lynch mob? Do the research. Based on the publicly available evidence, it it much more likely than not (much more) that this alleged event of abuse did not happen.
The fact that these accusations were unsubstantiated and and he was not charged of any wrongdoing, so now these Hollywood morons are jumping on Dylan Farrow's bandwagon? Sounds succs to me there.
@Sarina Singh Yes they're spineless.
Let's forget the courts, the judges, the investigators, the judicial system and let's all believe in... Dylan. These Hollywood snowflakes are annoying.
Dylan who says that she wishes she'd had her day in court but lies about the Connecticut statute of limitations which actually still allows her to take civil action
@@pauldunn108 maybe her she meant criminal court. Maybe she wanted him in prison, civil court isn’t the same thing.
That's weak sauce. She has lied by saying all statutes of limitation have passed as an excuse for not suing. Since Allen cannot be criminally charged, all she has is a civil suit and wouldn't prevailing in one lend credibility to her claim and be of some solace, like Fred Goldman after he sued OJ?
Moreover, there is a much lower standard of proof in a civil case - preponderance of the evidence as opposed to beyond a reasonable doubt.
It is obvious why the Farrows don't sue - they would lose complete control over the narrative. The court of public opinion requires only emotion, not evidence.
If they sued, Woody Allen would get to mount a defense, impeach their witnesses and evidence (or lack thereof), present his own witnesses and evidence and experts. And he would get to assert counterclaims. The Farrows cannot have that. Why? Because no reasonable trier of fact would find in their favor and Mia Farrow would be exposed as the deceitful, narcissistic sociopathic liar and abuser that she is.
@@Abc12316383 Well she knows perfectly well that she could still have him criminally charged. She works with Donna Palumbo as part of the Jane Doe No More foundation - so she's absolutely aware that her accusation qualifies as 1st Degree Felony Kidnapping in Connecticut, for which there is no statute of limitations. Dylan lies about the statute of limitations because she is a liar
@@Abc12316383 She doesn't need to take it to court, she got everyone believed in her regardless. Bunch of sheeps.
99.9% of Hollywood Is this way. I'm not surprised at all.
The actors back then, as now, all know how these cowardly monsters are. And they know who the current ones are now. Aside from the children, the adults in the sociopathic industry are not victims.
This article should be titled Celebs Who Don't Believe In Due Process
Please stop saying he was cleared, he was not. The DA of Connecticut believed him to be guilty but thought it would damage Dylan to go through a court case. Even a judge stated he was unfit to parent and that the allegations against him were credible. His team span the lack of court case as him being cleared but it never happened.
DAs don't decide guilt. Judges do. The appellate judges stated that contact with Woody was necessary for Dylan's therapy. They would never make such a decision if they thought he was guilty.
Woody Allen absolutely was cleared by two extensive investigations. What the DA actually said was that because there was overwhelming reasonable doubt as to Allen's guilt, and that a conviction was therefore extremely unlikely, there was no point in putting Dylan through the rigors of a trial. The judge presiding over the custody hearing never said Allen "was unfit to parent". He awarded Mia custody (which was the obviously ruling since the children had always lived with Mia and custody courts are predisposed to disrupting childrens' environment as little as possible.) Mia winning custody had nothing to do with the judge believing Allen to be guilty, despite the Farrow's dishonest spin. As another commenter states, the judge was agnostic as to Allen's guilt or innocence. Judge Wilke did declare that it was extremely unlikely that Allen could ever be convicted, and the DA actually quoted the judge's declaration extensively in his official prosecutorial declination (which makes zero mention of Dylan's supposedly fragile state of mind)
@@FLK-BC Justice Elliott Wilk rejected Allen's bid for custody of the three children and rejected the allegation of sexual abuse [against her mother], denied Allen immediate visitation rights with Dylan, saying of Allen's behavior toward Dylan that it was "grossly inappropriate and that measures must be taken to protect her"
@@emmathompson7706 That's a cherry picked misrepresentation of Judge Wilke's ruling. Once again, Woody losing his custody bid had nothing to do with abuse allegations. If Woody & Mia had been anonymous people named Steve & Linda, with the same custody arrangement and zero accusations of abuse, "Linda" would still have been awarded custody for the simple fact that she had always had custody and "Steve" never cohabitated or spent the night. That's how custody courts work.
There were never any accusations of "sexual" abuse against Mia - I'm not sure where you're even getting that. Wilke "denied Allen immediate visitation" - meaning that he ordered a temporary six month stay on visitation so that Dylan could receive therapy about the whole ordeal. Honestly ask yourself: What sane judge who actually believed a child had been molested by her father would halt visitation for six months so that the victim could go to counseling before being reunited what the her molester? How does that possibly make sense? As for the quote about Woody's "grossly inappropriate" behavior, if you'd actually read the full ruling then you'd know that Wilke based that statement directly on the expert opinion and testimony of Dr Coates and Dr Leventhal, both of whom testified that Dylan had not been molested and that Woody's "inappropriate" behavior towards Dylan was in no way sexual (his behavior was only "inappropriate" in that by focusing so much on Dylan he risked making other kids feel neglected and potentially extracted an emotional burden from Dylan to match his attention to her)
@@KPK75772 because the child was too young to testify.
So, the fact that all the way back in the 90s , Allen groomed, and seduced his then underage adopted daughter Soon Yee, eventually marrying her, ,wasn’t enough to stop these actors from deciding to work with him later?????
Soon'Yi Previn is the adopted daughter of Andre Previn, not Woody's
And she was 21 when their relationship started
@@august6389 she wasn't 21 when he took naked pictures of her he's lucky I am not Mia he would be missing an appendage
@@aprilgosa5779 she was 21, you can look this up.
@Lola Blakeslee Soon'Yi was 20 years old in her senior year of highschool and that's when they started talking to each other, but their sexuaI relationship started when she was 21 and in college.
21 is not underage
This comment thread is a perfect example of how the whole notion that Woody has somehow had a stranglehold on the narrative is such a farce.
If Woody and his enablers had control of people's understanding of events, then why oh why oh why have so many people spent the last 3 decades perpetuating utter falsehoods at Woody's expense?
Woody was *not* Soon-Yi's adopted father. That sort of marriage would never be legally recognized.
Soon-Yi was *not* underaged. Like other's have correctly pointed out, she was 20 her senior year of high school.
If Allen really employs an army of propagandists to twist facts, then why do 9 out of 10 people believe the underaged/adoptive daughter bs?
Rebecca Hall has since reneged on her rejection of Allen, just like Caine has done.
Good for them. Perhaps they actually took the time to investigate the facts and not simply rely on emotion.
@@gheller2261 Apparently Hall reneged almost immediately after making her initial comments. Caine likely didn't feel that way all along, but in the height of the MeToo movement he probably figured it would be career suicide to do otherwise.
Rebecca Hall not only rejected him I remember she even donated her wages from one of his movies to the metoo movement. When did she renege on her comments? I can't find it anywhere on the net.
@@clockwork365 I don't remember the first time, but in a recent interview for her latest movie she reiterated.
Heros come cheap in America.
How about heroEs?
These actors are air heads; There are smart thinking actors who know by the facts Woody is innocent and don’t believe
Mia’s lies.
YOU'RE the airhead!
I was so Young , that was a different time, I will be giving my salary to every charity EVERYWHERE but my accountant can get me a tax break.. so yay for me.
Exactly. Woody pays his actors the min wage stipulated by the SGA.
So a bunch of multi millionares donate their $160,000ish salary, get a write off that probably saves them money in the long run, and then get to bask in headlines abouy how 'virtuous' they are, and we're somehow supposed to be impressed
@@FLK-BC absolutely
I don't care about Celebrities at all.
We have the whole medieval witch hunt mob here!
Didn't Selena Gomez also denounce Allen after staring in A Rainly Day in New York?
No
@@MissGigglesdotcom No she didn't.
Hooray!
They did that and found out they where wrong
Yes
What a shame!!! Which actor came back to ask Mr. Allen for apologies? A mediatic lawfare.
Skip the comments...they are sad...did Woody write them?
Did Mia Farrow write yours?
Obviously he wrote them all. Absolutely anytime people bring up facts that you're too lazy to look up yourself, there's always a sinister conspiracy afoot.
There are like a hand full of profiles that are defending him in almost every single comment and video about this subject, so yeah its either Woody Allen or pedos just like him. They love defending their own behind a faceless avatar.
Monday morning quarter backing on the part of all of these actors,
The night Jeffrey Epstein hosted pals Prince Andrew and Woody Allen for dinner
Epstein hosted Prince Andrew. Lots of New York glitteratti were invited to meet the Prince including Woody.
A Manhattan socialite held a dinner party and lots of rich Manhattanites attended. What's your point? Was everyone at the party a pedo?? Even Chelsea Handler??? Even Katie Couric????
@@rl12345 so that makes it better?
@Chechi De La Rocha It makes it what it is, a large party full of lots of rich people.
An innocent man does NOT CORRUPT 2 daughters! 👿
How is it that Woody Allen is not held accountable but Bill Cosby was?
Bill is guilty and Woody is innocent.
People are just upset that Woody is innocent so they continue spreading lies about him
Oh, I don't know. Perhaps it is because, by his own admission, Bill Cosby serially molested woman for decades by drugging them whereas Woody Allen has a single allegation of child molestation in his 85 years for which he was never charged and two independent investigations that concluded that the abuse did not happen. Little things like that.
We know why!
@@Baggio10100 he's white!
Bill Cosby was tried, evidence was heard and witnesses heard by a jury, and he was found guilty after the proper legal process was completed.
And Cosby had not one, or even two, but multiple women accusing him, on different occasions at different times. But they all told similar stories. It was many incidents, many individual crimes committed against several women. There was definitely a pattern there.
Allen has been accused by only one person - a person who could have been convinced by her mother that this crime happened. I do believe that Dylan truly believes it happened to her. She's not to blame. I believe that Farrow is behind all of this. In any case, no police charges were ever laid against Allen. They investigated but it never made it as far as that. Of course, it's possible they got it wrong and charges should have been laid, and Allen's case tried in court. But that didn't happen. Nor has Dylan ever brought a civil suit either. And several people involved in the case, including older brother Moses who was there that day, and nannies employed by Farrow, have claimed that they don't believe it happened, and there was no opportunity for Allen to do it.
And remember, this is the only criminal allegation ever made about Allen. And it centers on one particular day and incident.
So this is in no way at all like the Cosby case.
What happened to innocent until proven guilty...
Are you (seriously) suggesting Allen's INNOCENT?
@@liampatrick3110
Answer my question...
@@liampatrick3110 All the evidence - and there's a lot of evidence - suggests that Allen is innocent.
Are you suggesting that people should simply be presumed guilty?
@@FLK-BC Has you SEEN one (if not, any) of his interviews regarding the ordeal? The man OBVIOUSLY has a skeleton in his closet!! :/
@@liampatrick3110 I've seen plenty of his interviews. What specifically are you saying is smoking gun evidence that he's guilty?
Good to see these celebrities realize that embroiling and marrying children and teens, abusing one’s daughters whether adopted or effectively, is cruel and gross. Good for you all FOR STANDING UP AGAINST THIS. Many of us like this author have never watched an instant of this home wrecker’s movies since. Turn this dude OFF! Protect the children, respect their mothers, GOOD FOR YOU!!!
Woody did not marry a child.
You have been terribly misinformed.
You just don't want to know.
How is making a movie with Allen silencing his daughter?
Points Being Made it's not really they should not feel guilty for things like that but I understand it
Didn't really silence her. She went to talk shows and made $ out of her "story".
@Lola Blakeslee you're not very bright are you?
You must embrace the logic of the MeToo Bowel-Movement! You must drink the Farrow Cool-Aid! Ask NO questions, give up all your rights. Sanity - your Time's Up.
@@baronmunchausen9252 🙌🏻😂
attention Actors: those of us in the working world take jobs no matter what our boss' private life is.
didnt brooke shields play his girlfriend in a movie and she even was inyroduced in the film as his 17 yr. old girlfriend going on a double date. granted that was risque in a movie scene but elvis moves prisicilla 15 yrs old into his fathers house that is in his backyard. that must have raised some eyebrows. he was in his late 20s but you wonder what kind of parents allowed that anyway.
Brooke Shields’ mom is horrible… idk wtf she was thinking
It was Mariel Hemingway
@@Creole164 SHES DEAD
@@Creole164 idk wtf you are thinking, as it wasn't Brooke Shields, it was Mariel Hemingway.
I suspect thinking at all might not be in your skillset
Mia's revenge
A woman with an interesting family history before Woody ever came on the scene....
oh....Kate...take responsibility now...Now?!...what have you thinking , never knew before, ..... ?! come on....where are you living...?!...
I have a new joke to crack.....I once said Kate Winslet is worth all of the money....I now say Kate Winslet is not worth all of the frigging money. Please tell Kate Winslet to never ever approach the proximity of Kansas/Missouri/Nebraska/Oklahoma....if she wants to shake it in Chicago/or proximity thereof.....idk
@Lola Blakeslee on this we agree
I love Natalie Portman so much and this makes it easier
Nope. Natalie Portman jumped on the "I believe you" bandwagon without learning the facts. Dylan Farrow wants everyone to "believe" her. However, mere belief in doesn't make something true. People often believe things and later find out they are wrong. The overwhelming publicly available evidence points to this alleged event of abuse not happening. Dylan Farrow likely has false memories planted in her brain by her controlling mother and nurtured within her from age 7 on. Do some research. The story of this one time in 85 years of life molestation during a custody battle under the noses of a house full of people has never made sense. And the facts show why.
I liked her too and there she unfortunately proves to be so stupid
Can't stand her.
She's a fraud
Yeah I feel the same way ❤
Why don't the celebrities who won Oscar's sell them for a cause. Unfortunately the award looks so good on their mantelpiece.
These people are either self-serving or stupid. Either way, their opinions are irrelevant
Only cowards turn their backs on Woody.
Woody Allen is innocent!
😲😵
@@MoxieBear55 people are too fragile nowadays
I feel sorry for you
Surprised woody didn’t get arrested. I see lots of case where foster parents have sex with their foster kids and get ARRESTED
cuz he didnt do it
@@Ausgar-yc1ylDylan is his adopted child not foster
@@davidbrennan5973 Dud you READ my comment? I clearly SAID he has NO foster children. Read my comment.
Woody had NO foster children.
Is anyone else who thinks .... That young girl doesn't ACTUALLY HAVE TO be telling the truth. Because people say awful things about that but Job Mia F. Yeah know what I mean?
To be honest the marriage hi has with his Soon-Yi is super bizzare, they have 2 adopted kids.... after I look into what happened to Dylan...I can't help but wonder what the hell goes on in Woody's household....
Both kids adore their parents and comment all the time about them on social media. Quit projecting your ignorance.
@@rl12345 but you’ve just projected yours and I’ve just projected mine (by even commenting) sooooo THATS what everybody does, & Woody Allen projected who really is on the inside as well, THATS what we’re all doing - we’re all projecting onto each other GET IT❓💔🥺😫
😢
The show Loki Sucks
WA also a very close friendship with Epstein