Sound and sober analysis as always Mr Zola Majavu. I ve always listened to u when adjudication matters of soccer. One lawyer that I can hire anytime if I am in troble with the law
What is the meaning of the word "impartial"? I'm asking because I think your problem is the use of the word willy-nilly. Well, there's nothing impartial on Zola's analysis and have never been impartial at any moment on his analysis. He's always been for the state and has made his side clear from the get-go. I can't dispute his eloquence, though, but it must be clear that his analysis is one-sided, and his double standards are showing in this particular interview.
My mind is always blown by these ppl. If Mjiyako was a rouge lawyer, how would Ntanzi stop him from appearing a million times, since when he tried to voice it the magistrate would say, "you can't talk to me coz you have a lawyer". So then what exactly was he to do??
Kelly will be arrested. They firstly want to deal with the killer first so that it will be easy to connect Kelly on this. They will connect Kelly through witnesses of the state once the trial within a trial is concluded and the state call other witnesses who borrowed Kelly the money to pay the killers. One of the witnesses is a Nigerian drug dealer who gave Kelly the money. It is also said that he also connected Kelly to the killers. Wait and see. Kelly will join Dr Makudubane, Rosemary and many more women criminals.
The statement read by Mogolo in Oct was prepared by Gininda during the trial .The case was messed up by these corrupt cops.Now Gininda came as an investigating officer with a statement which surprises.Why didn't he arrested Kelly as a mastermind
I find his statement that says if the confession is ruled admissible, then its game over for 1 and 2 a bit inaccurate. This is an extract from an article entitled: Tha law of evidencein South Africa. "Evidence at a trial within trial is not per se admissible at the main trial, whether the confession is allowed or excluded. If the confession is ruled admissible at the trial within a trial, the evidence to prove the confession still has to be led at the main trial." It says that the confession has to be tested, my own understanding
This is a classic example of being “schooled” by a biased “teacher”. Mr Majavu has been for the states case from the beginning. The week has not been favourable for the defence but there definitely are legal principles that substantiate their case and the evidence that they wish to bring before the court. I have never heard Mr Majavu speak on all the inconsistencies between the police officers that testified, the lack of evidence that places the accused in the crime scene and the continued change of the murder weapon being a revolver and a 9mm simultaneously. This is how our brothers get wrongfully convicted for things they didn’t do.
Nobody said Senzo was killed by a revolver, a witness said he saw a revolver, what is factual is that ballistic evidence found that Senzo was shot and killed by 9mm to this date the defence has not rebutted that evidence. To add to that, when you are investigating a case when a witness says he only saw one person it doesn’t mean that it was only that person, you need to widen your investigation more people could be involved ,the crime scene itself will give you a lead. In the crime scene a 9mm projectile was found which was collected and tested and found to be of a 9mm which was found in possession of accused no3, circumstantial evidence suggests that it is the firearm that killed Senzo. The scene of crime will guide your investigation, not emotions or hearsay’s , we should open our minds and critically think before we comment.
The moment i heard that Kelly is not in the witness list and there is no intention to call her, I knew something is brewing! If the confessions stand Kelly wiill be next!
The problem is if this advocate mjiako was being forced on him .my thinking is yes he fired him on the 27 gininda and his guys would have sorted him out when they got back , hence advocate came again to represent him again and again
Let's wait for next week and see what's going to prevail guys this case is complicated especially for us lay people somewhere we are consumed by what we want to hear more than what is factual that's normal that's what life is
All I’m assessing is that Gininda is a criminal and he should not be allowed to work in the state where he will be held accountable for poor behaviour and his actions are being investigated by independent counsel
But then just throwing allegations around, which are being denied, wont help either. Its up to the defence to prove that the confessions should not stand
Remember Majavu is a beneficiary of the gravy train, im sure he's friends with Gininda et el. He's no legal eagle, just another crony with ties to politicians
Court works with evidence, not your word against his. That is why you see Adv Baloi bringing thousand witnesses. How many cases you know has been thrown out of court because of not suffient evidence.
Yes they are implicating themselves. Criminal minds are dangerous and they are desrepecting the Law and the Officials who are working on this case. They act like repeated offenders with many lies.
Even the HC doesn't admit the confessions,the case might still go back to the main trial & state still has to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt by calling more witnesses,but it might also be the end of the state's case
Zola is a conflicted party in this conversation as he's on or had at some stage an instruction to safeguard KK's interests in this matter (people should remember the watching brief contracting).
To me Baloyi somehow has an upper hand regarding the guilt of the 5accused but Gininda is turning the lens to then also capture Kelly as the master mind and Baloyi is not happy about that,he once said Kelly is not in his list of testifying.Ratha really has a big challenge as the onus is on him to rule.
It's so funny, two intruders came in , demanded money and phones. Tall and short. Two not five. Accused one and two made confession long before main trial began. Confession statements are taken, one in front of a magistrate, the other not involving any Magistrate..even the testimony of the magistrate is absolutely irregular, who is mjiako, why is the state not bringing advocate mjiako together with the instructing attorney... Is mjiako a criminal who will be sent in jail after appearing in Court, we don't know..if the accused person says he was assaulted by five police officers, Gininda say OB entries don't reflect assault and the body of accused persons did not show injuries... Who is going to say , they were not assaulted when these confessions are full of irregularities. For Gininda to say I'm a good cop , I wouldn't have allowed assault of accused person, while misleading the public about who Killed Senzo don't make him a good cop to me
To be honest ladies and gentlemen please find the confession of Desei Luphondo which was obtained by Gininda nake manupilatism, Desei Luphondo was assaulted and confession was obtained under duress Gininda denied assault singing the good cop by virtue of evidence and accuracy of fact thus proven track records of corrupt mind Gininda
So this "expert" is saying Gininda saying "He didn't have the budget for that" without any proof that he said anything R3mil, this will be taken as it is.
But how common is it that people confess then suddenly change and say they were forced.who stand to benefit from such a u turn ,I think certainly not the defence!!
None of them filled a statements on Kelly Khumalo. They are refutting their own statements. Accused number 2 didn't say she heard or was personally hired by Kelly
Elton say it all but people don't want that Mr majavu doesn't know what he is talking about, he thinks gininda will admit those allegations. How could Ntanzi prove that he was offered 3m cause gininda was the one in charge, I think mr majavu is sacred of gininda
The orchastratorsnto the contractual murders and other people who were in the property as well the neighbour and their uncle were all mastermind. Fear nothing Thobane attorney the must be inside..gulukutu. The challenge of our constitution is even perpetrator are to be respected and they are also given certain rights that we all need to be subjected to.
All of a sudden it doesn't make sense to me, how can you beat someone to make a confession, after the confession, the person has already implicated himself, then you sweet talk him, promise him 3m to implicate others, this doesn't make sense, it would make sense if he said I was offered 3m to make the confession, I refused the money, then they beat me until I confessed. Not that I was 1st beaten, then I signed, then the beater comes with a soft voice to offer 3m
I agree with you. Why would he offer him 3m 4days after the confession. Those criminals know the law very well and they know what to say (lie) and when.
Very well said and it make sense what you saying but if I'm not wrong he was beaten many times at different place , remember there was one time ntanzi said gininda said once he signs the docs the assault will stop, i think there was another time that he mentioned the money. I MIGHT BE WRONG BUT I THINK THAT IS HOW I FOLLOWED THIS CASE. 👍
It’s clear Mr Majavu is on the side of state,I got tired of his explanation,it is as if defence don’t have a case because the accused voluntarily made confession in the presence of a magistrate according to him.
i am not shocked of this as this judge was a witness for the state adding on what ever baloyi was saying and showing no respect at all for mninis ,mshololo,steve and mngo , now its more interesting as to how the state is going to tatoo ntanzi,put on him a gold tooth and let him wear the hat that the expect of the state said its not belonging to the accused
She will be charged. The state want to use this case to get to Kelly. Contract killing cases are very difficult to prosecute. Since the killers denied any relationship with their contractor. It allow the master mind to walk free. Only if the killers accept that they were hired to kill then it become easy to prosecute the master mind.
Very true Kelly is the problem here if they admit the confusion that means Kelly will be arrested and if they don't they will have to let 5 accused go so state will be in trouble for keeping those man in jail.
I appreciate the News Room for inviting such a competent and excellent legal expert who can analyze and explain the law in such a excellent manner .
Thankyou mr.Majavu for explaining everything so well.we get tired of all these so called experts.
Kudos to Zola Majavu. What a brilliant explanation
Very well explained to us laymen when it comes to this case, thank you Mr Majavo, much respect and appreciation
Thanks Zola for educating us. You indeed understand the law
Sound and sober analysis as always Mr Zola Majavu. I ve always listened to u when adjudication matters of soccer. One lawyer that I can hire anytime if I am in troble with the law
Well explained, we are learning a lot about law from Mr Majavu. Thank you.
Now this is a proper analysis and discussion. Thanks Zola!
What a legend! Best interview I've heard in a long time! 'Borrowed robes'.
Eloquently elaborated, processes explain impartiality by Counsel Majavu
What is the meaning of the word "impartial"? I'm asking because I think your problem is the use of the word willy-nilly. Well, there's nothing impartial on Zola's analysis and have never been impartial at any moment on his analysis. He's always been for the state and has made his side clear from the get-go. I can't dispute his eloquence, though, but it must be clear that his analysis is one-sided, and his double standards are showing in this particular interview.
Really layman's terms explanation thank you Zola
My mind is always blown by these ppl. If Mjiyako was a rouge lawyer, how would Ntanzi stop him from appearing a million times, since when he tried to voice it the magistrate would say, "you can't talk to me coz you have a lawyer". So then what exactly was he to do??
Iv been waiting for him to come on & say something.. Compliments of a new season Mr majavu
Why Gininda failed to arrest Kelly it's show clear that there is something wrong. Gininda wrote the statement as he see this case is going somewhere
It's Npa who release arrest warrant.. Not police
Kelly will be arrested. They firstly want to deal with the killer first so that it will be easy to connect Kelly on this.
They will connect Kelly through witnesses of the state once the trial within a trial is concluded and the state call other witnesses who borrowed Kelly the money to pay the killers. One of the witnesses is a Nigerian drug dealer who gave Kelly the money. It is also said that he also connected Kelly to the killers. Wait and see. Kelly will join Dr Makudubane, Rosemary and many more women criminals.
Remember when they mentioned that a junior or intern in the npa issued a warrant of arrest for people who were inside the house.
@@kats0077correct maybe some people will understand that npa issues that warrant
The statement read by Mogolo in Oct was prepared by Gininda during the trial .The case was messed up by these corrupt cops.Now Gininda came as an investigating officer with a statement which surprises.Why didn't he arrested Kelly as a mastermind
Very sober legal interpretation
Very eloquent statement from Zola Majavu
I find his statement that says if the confession is ruled admissible, then its game over for 1 and 2 a bit inaccurate.
This is an extract from an article entitled: Tha law of evidencein South Africa.
"Evidence at a trial within trial is not per se admissible at the main trial, whether the confession is allowed or excluded. If the confession is ruled admissible at the trial within a trial, the evidence to prove the confession still has to be led at the main trial."
It says that the confession has to be tested, my own understanding
Mr Majavu knows his story, I enjoyed listening to this interview
His captured that one.......
Explained beautifully in layman's terms Mr Majavu
This is a classic example of being “schooled” by a biased “teacher”. Mr Majavu has been for the states case from the beginning. The week has not been favourable for the defence but there definitely are legal principles that substantiate their case and the evidence that they wish to bring before the court. I have never heard Mr Majavu speak on all the inconsistencies between the police officers that testified, the lack of evidence that places the accused in the crime scene and the continued change of the murder weapon being a revolver and a 9mm simultaneously. This is how our brothers get wrongfully convicted for things they didn’t do.
Fully agreed sad😢but true our justice system is TOTALLY FLAWED yoh what a disgrace and embarrassment
What's your views? Who was supposed to be in the accused box, according to you?
Well said
Nobody said Senzo was killed by a revolver, a witness said he saw a revolver, what is factual is that ballistic evidence found that Senzo was shot and killed by 9mm to this date the defence has not rebutted that evidence. To add to that, when you are investigating a case when a witness says he only saw one person it doesn’t mean that it was only that person, you need to widen your investigation more people could be involved ,the crime scene itself will give you a lead. In the crime scene a 9mm projectile was found which was collected and tested and found to be of a 9mm which was found in possession of accused no3, circumstantial evidence suggests that it is the firearm that killed Senzo. The scene of crime will guide your investigation, not emotions or hearsay’s , we should open our minds and critically think before we comment.
@@JONATHANZULU-i7dmost people don't the skill to understand, there don't listen to understand
Thank you Mr Majola
Ayngeke the guy is zooming one-sided of the story or he is related if not Ratha fan
Rath fan
Atleast someone said it 😂😂
Mr Majavu, how do you explain the part where Maphiri cleaned the crime scene? Would she really clean up to cover up for the intruders? Kuningi shem!
Eixxxxx this case is taking a toll on us yhoo
Very good question
Lovely analysis.
Thank you mr majavu
Thank you mr majavu ❤
The moment i heard that Kelly is not in the witness list and there is no intention to call her, I knew something is brewing! If the confessions stand Kelly wiill be next!
Mr Majavu is very sound with his legal analysis unlike abo Elton Haart
No I think Elton says it like it is, never bias 😢
I prefer Elton Hart than this biased Majavu
@@SylviaMitchell-tz2sl very true Elton say it all
It is what you want to heae
Well said Majavu at least u broaden this issue but hopefully one day the truth will prevail
NDPP said all people were inside the house they must arrested long time ago
TJOTJO is playing a big role S A
MAJAVU I don't UNDERSTAND him wel and I also don't know THE LAW
SOON NTANZI WILL BE OUT OF THIS MESS 🤞🤞
How does this man know that Kelly Khumalo is not in the witness list
The state can't call Kelly who is implicated. They are planning to charge her later. She will be charged.
Are we still going to listen to the 3 accused persons
The problem is if this advocate mjiako was being forced on him .my thinking is yes he fired him on the 27 gininda and his guys would have sorted him out when they got back , hence advocate came again to represent him again and again
so you dispute the fact that he refuted the lawyer
Let's wait for next week and see what's going to prevail guys this case is complicated especially for us lay people somewhere we are consumed by what we want to hear more than what is factual that's normal that's what life is
Good analysis
All I’m assessing is that Gininda is a criminal and he should not be allowed to work in the state where he will be held accountable for poor behaviour and his actions are being investigated by independent counsel
You have no evidence. You also want to say Baloyi is a criminal, the magistrate is a criminal, the judge a criminal
Why don’t they bring in a lie detector test?
Its not admissible in a criminal case....Otherwise all trials would be decided via it...
That is legal naivity at its best😂😂😂..... The courts of law would be null and void if the lie detector were to be used in a trial.
True analysis indeed 👌 not like that clown Elton hart
Its a matter of what you want to hear....
I think Elton is honest not bias 😝
I prefer Elyon Hart than this biased Majavu
How do you prove that you have been offered a bribe? No cellphone to record the conversation. Haybo Majavu
But then just throwing allegations around, which are being denied, wont help either. Its up to the defence to prove that the confessions should not stand
He need to prove that he was offered the bribe. And Why will they offer you a bribe while you are confessing.
Remember Majavu is a beneficiary of the gravy train, im sure he's friends with Gininda et el. He's no legal eagle, just another crony with ties to politicians
Court works with evidence, not your word against his. That is why you see Adv Baloi bringing thousand witnesses. How many cases you know has been thrown out of court because of not suffient evidence.
@@nokubongashabangu2204Cela bakudlalele I Clip lapho umsolwa esekhaya kwa NONGOMA nabaphenyi, Uzoyizwa lapho eka R3Mln
Confession or admitting without anything written down your own hand writing is it possible?
Yes they are implicating themselves. Criminal minds are dangerous and they are desrepecting the Law and the Officials who are working on this case. They act like repeated offenders with many lies.
Is there any true right on the wall? Or should we wait to hear more? If then till when?
No one is going to admit he or she is offering the bribe to accuse 😂😂
Yes especially assault and bribery they will never ever admit 😢😢
Even the HC doesn't admit the confessions,the case might still go back to the main trial & state still has to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt by calling more witnesses,but it might also be the end of the state's case
Zola is a conflicted party in this conversation as he's on or had at some stage an instruction to safeguard KK's interests in this matter (people should remember the watching brief contracting).
To me Baloyi somehow has an upper hand regarding the guilt of the 5accused but Gininda is turning the lens to then also capture Kelly as the master mind and Baloyi is not happy about that,he once said Kelly is not in his list of testifying.Ratha really has a big challenge as the onus is on him to rule.
Yes Mr Majavu has broken down this to the simplest level excellently, I'm more clarified
'Justice For Senzo'....seems to be an impossibility....this case has very sadly...become a circus !!!
It's so funny, two intruders came in , demanded money and phones. Tall and short. Two not five. Accused one and two made confession long before main trial began. Confession statements are taken, one in front of a magistrate, the other not involving any Magistrate..even the testimony of the magistrate is absolutely irregular, who is mjiako, why is the state not bringing advocate mjiako together with the instructing attorney... Is mjiako a criminal who will be sent in jail after appearing in Court, we don't know..if the accused person says he was assaulted by five police officers, Gininda say OB entries don't reflect assault and the body of accused persons did not show injuries... Who is going to say , they were not assaulted when these confessions are full of irregularities. For Gininda to say I'm a good cop , I wouldn't have allowed assault of accused person, while misleading the public about who Killed Senzo don't make him a good cop to me
You are so right 👍 I agree with you 💯
To be honest ladies and gentlemen please find the confession of Desei Luphondo which was obtained by Gininda nake manupilatism, Desei Luphondo was assaulted and confession was obtained under duress Gininda denied assault singing the good cop by virtue of evidence and accuracy of fact thus proven track records of corrupt mind Gininda
So this "expert" is saying Gininda saying "He didn't have the budget for that" without any proof that he said anything R3mil, this will be taken as it is.
But how common is it that people confess then suddenly change and say they were forced.who stand to benefit from such a u turn ,I think certainly not the defence!!
Poor analysis!!!
Very poor
So gininda had this statement since 2020 but so why still Kelly is not arrested from the first place
Because the accused is now denying the confession🤷🏽♂️
Because hearsay is just that hearsay.
@@Tulan-hz6hobut accused got arrested on hearsay
None of them filled a statements on Kelly Khumalo. They are refutting their own statements. Accused number 2 didn't say she heard or was personally hired by Kelly
Elton say it all but people don't want that Mr majavu doesn't know what he is talking about, he thinks gininda will admit those allegations. How could Ntanzi prove that he was offered 3m cause gininda was the one in charge, I think mr majavu is sacred of gininda
Black with Brains,Siyabulela tatuMajavu ngalengcaciso,to Mr Tanzi there is a light at the end of each tunnel 😢ungamncami uThixo ❤
Who paid Mjiyako. We need to see the transaction of the payment for his services rendered to Ntanzi because i believe he is one of the most expensive
Someone from Mjiako attorneys would come
Then the lies of the defense would crumble
The orchastratorsnto the contractual murders and other people who were in the property as well the neighbour and their uncle were all mastermind. Fear nothing Thobane attorney the must be inside..gulukutu.
The challenge of our constitution is even perpetrator are to be respected and they are also given certain rights that we all need to be subjected to.
All of a sudden it doesn't make sense to me, how can you beat someone to make a confession, after the confession, the person has already implicated himself, then you sweet talk him, promise him 3m to implicate others, this doesn't make sense, it would make sense if he said I was offered 3m to make the confession, I refused the money, then they beat me until I confessed. Not that I was 1st beaten, then I signed, then the beater comes with a soft voice to offer 3m
I agree with you. Why would he offer him 3m 4days after the confession. Those criminals know the law very well and they know what to say (lie) and when.
Very well said and it make sense what you saying but if I'm not wrong he was beaten many times at different place , remember there was one time ntanzi said gininda said once he signs the docs the assault will stop, i think there was another time that he mentioned the money. I MIGHT BE WRONG BUT I THINK THAT IS HOW I FOLLOWED THIS CASE. 👍
It doesn't and his advocate scored an own goal by asking gininda this question. even a 7 year old child will tell you that this doesn't make sense
It’s clear Mr Majavu is on the side of state,I got tired of his explanation,it is as if defence don’t have a case because the accused voluntarily made confession in the presence of a magistrate according to him.
I see that too... I'm worried to those who think he can defend tgem
True
i am not shocked of this as this judge was a witness for the state adding on what ever baloyi was saying and showing no respect at all for mninis ,mshololo,steve and mngo , now its more interesting as to how the state is going to tatoo ntanzi,put on him a gold tooth and let him wear the hat that the expect of the state said its not belonging to the accused
It means they won't arrest her as you explain to us.
But it's a crontract killing according to him and Gery nell.
Well done Majavu we need people like you who are not biased but factual
She will be charged. The state want to use this case to get to Kelly. Contract killing cases are very difficult to prosecute. Since the killers denied any relationship with their contractor. It allow the master mind to walk free. Only if the killers accept that they were hired to kill then it become easy to prosecute the master mind.
@thandimasilela8947 Do you understand the meaning of the word BIAS, or are you just using the word willy-nilly nilly?
@thndimasilela8947
Spot on
This majavu is also biased taking the states side already
Yip sounds like it
The fact that he us even saying Kelly is not guilty tells us that he is one of them
This one is
Biased as well
Very biased,that's why he was always against Teffo
True
Osyazi mabe vumelana nomuntu echemile ngokcacile uyafana no baloi lo nogininda futhi mhlampe khona iskhundla asbhekile lo
I remember 2016 when I told my ex girlfriend that Kelly also need to be attested as she's de one behind this
Hayi Mr Majavu you believe State I don't trust you
So Majavu basically is saying these guys are guilty.
No he never said that. My advice. Listen to him again..😂
That’s exactly what he’s saying
Only that
And he is even saying Kelly is not guilty
😂😂😂😂
Kelly is NOT going to jail.(period!!!)
A REAL ANALYST....not these fly by nights Elton's, Zikalala's etc.
I think it is important to learn to criticize without insulting
Elton is true and honest he says it as it is. This one is bias sounds like he can also easily be bribed.
I prefer Elton Hart,very honest legal expect
Hayke ...Kelly is off the hook...they want to admit those confessions....but the problem is the involvement of Kelly....
You have an obsession with Kelly.
@@Tulan-hz6ho Yes of course....why not...
@@mmeme5861 enjoy it
That's how I see it,and now Majavu wants us to believe that Kelly is not guilty
Very true Kelly is the problem here if they admit the confusion that means Kelly will be arrested and if they don't they will have to let 5 accused go so state will be in trouble for keeping those man in jail.
Lobaba umngani ka chico Thwala no kk ungafa nithi akaboni nje yena mmxmmm ungidina lana
People who think this mr majavu is so good think again cause he's busy telling us hore gininda and Kelly are innocent.
You can tell which so called analysts have ties to govt and stand to benefit by not being critical of the absolute sham that is this case
Yes sounds like it.
What about the communication that she is linked by them
Ginindas friend
His analysis says it all
Like they did the pointing
😢😢😢
👏👏👏
3gininda is used to this he can twist it to suit his aĺegations
Dex
Mnxim
This guy is playing Rathas game,
True
True
True
True
Mxm