Genuine and accurate review. He’s gonna be like Sargon where the no stats and single target make him niché. Might be a fun dueling commander but he won’t be much better than Alex with Liu Che in the field.
I like your thinking. Very controversial too :)) I did a 180 degree turn on him. I am definitely going to get him. Not 100% sure who he will replace though lol
A balance of aoe type damage to one Commander, thinking my main guy guan has zero heath boost, thinking about the token shield and defence boost as better than nothing, potential when fighting from a ball, the rage rebuff from the talent tree, balancing his weaknesses via specific pairings Most of all I think I'm inclined to prefer aoe Commanders, but had time to reflect on the massive damage he does even as a single target Commander overall What's your rating of William Wallace. I sense you're not convinced hehe
@@deckheroesstrategyandtips I think overall I’d give Willy a 7 or 8. He’s not bad but he’s not amazing and it’s certainly TBD when testing is done and we see how he really works with LC or the rally commander they’ll be releasing. For me it’s a matter of sustainable value. If it’s not a large improvement to a march it’s usually not worth the investment to me. Maybe the pairings will surprise me but unless it’s vastly better than LC/Alex (my best march) I’d rather save the universals and run Guan/Scip. Lastly, he’s only good in a ball if expertised. Hermann Prime is great in a ball but the value is all in the first skill (poison stacks, big AOE). Other meta commanders (Zhuge, LC, Joan… Nevsky) have their ball value in the first skill as well. So I dunno. I can be wrong and I’ll happily invest if he’s awesome, but I really do think he’ll be like Sargon. Useful, cool, interesting… not valuable. I’ll never forgive myself for expertising him 😂 thank for taking the time to listen and respond man. Got a new subscriber
The sargon mistake still burns me too lol. Sargons biggest problem is being a single damage Commander who does that damage too slowly. But that's a huge problem. I remember him being recommended by sponsored creators and they're still doing what they do I cannot see how the 1v1 stats won't be amazing, but will defo be interesting
![William Wallace is NOT a Must-Max | New Infantry Commander First Impressions [Rise of Kingdoms]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0yWNIDOBij8/mqdefault.jpg)
Genuine and accurate review. He’s gonna be like Sargon where the no stats and single target make him niché. Might be a fun dueling commander but he won’t be much better than Alex with Liu Che in the field.
I like your thinking. Very controversial too :))
I did a 180 degree turn on him. I am definitely going to get him. Not 100% sure who he will replace though lol
What was it that made you change your view? Smite tree or just smite synergy?
A balance of aoe type damage to one Commander, thinking my main guy guan has zero heath boost, thinking about the token shield and defence boost as better than nothing, potential when fighting from a ball, the rage rebuff from the talent tree, balancing his weaknesses via specific pairings
Most of all I think I'm inclined to prefer aoe Commanders, but had time to reflect on the massive damage he does even as a single target Commander overall
What's your rating of William Wallace. I sense you're not convinced hehe
@@deckheroesstrategyandtips I think overall I’d give Willy a 7 or 8. He’s not bad but he’s not amazing and it’s certainly TBD when testing is done and we see how he really works with LC or the rally commander they’ll be releasing.
For me it’s a matter of sustainable value. If it’s not a large improvement to a march it’s usually not worth the investment to me. Maybe the pairings will surprise me but unless it’s vastly better than LC/Alex (my best march) I’d rather save the universals and run Guan/Scip.
Lastly, he’s only good in a ball if expertised. Hermann Prime is great in a ball but the value is all in the first skill (poison stacks, big AOE). Other meta commanders (Zhuge, LC, Joan… Nevsky) have their ball value in the first skill as well.
So I dunno. I can be wrong and I’ll happily invest if he’s awesome, but I really do think he’ll be like Sargon. Useful, cool, interesting… not valuable. I’ll never forgive myself for expertising him 😂 thank for taking the time to listen and respond man. Got a new subscriber
The sargon mistake still burns me too lol. Sargons biggest problem is being a single damage Commander who does that damage too slowly. But that's a huge problem. I remember him being recommended by sponsored creators and they're still doing what they do
I cannot see how the 1v1 stats won't be amazing, but will defo be interesting