I'm so glad someone finally recognised the circling approach at 11:34 - I've seen this doing the rounds on the internets recently and people think it's a really bad mistake or something. It's just a missed approach at minimums when the pilot determines a circling approach can't be carried out. I guess ILS and GLS approaches are all people see these days so something like this video look odd. Gone are the days of routine non-precision, circling approaches, etc.
@@TheEstampe 737 by the looks of the window opening handle, the trim buttons on the yoke and I think I can hear the trim wheels spinning too. I recognise that sound anywhere.
Great video, Cpt. Joe! Regarding snow on the wings, nothing gets me angrier quicker than a blatant disregard for life as demonstrated BY THE PILOT by taking off with contaminated wings. The Pilot definitely knows better, and I hope he was reprimanded for this very dangerous and stupid action. If I were a passenger on that plane, I would have raised a ruckus in order to stop the takeoff attempt. I really would not care if I got arrested, because I'd rather be alive in jail than DEAD from another's stupidity.
Me too! No excuse for that nonsense. Once I was off the plane I'd be writing angry letters to the airline, the airport, the FAA (assuming US), and anywhere else I can think of. I don't care how long the queue at de-icing is. I'd rather sit on a long line and miss a connection than come to a really abrupt stop and die a short way beyond the end of the runway. Grrrr.
@@flywithcaptainjoe Hi joe My name is Kuldeep. Your videos are very informative. I enjoy them lot. I have question about route taken by a aircraft. Air France 777 & Air Tahiti nui 787 left Vancouver Canada for Paris one after another. After one hour they were flying approximately 200 km apart from each other over Alberta Canada. I have seen on Flightradar24. Same origin Same destination Same time Why they took different routes Appreciate in advance.
I really love when Joe activates full german mode like at minute 5.30 "Eieiei". This always makes me lose it since I'm german too and that mentality just hits different lol. Like in the debrief with "Ach du scheiße". I really enjoy those videos especially because of all the knowledge being shared with us. Great video, more of it please!!!!
@@flywithcaptainjoe Oops :-) I did not recognize your accent. LOL! I noticed some light accent, but I used to work with German colleagues and have some German friends and heard a little stronger accent. I thought you are Australian or from another region of the UK.
Back when I was flying as a young man in a 1959 Bonanza I subscribed to a few aviation magazines mostly to find out about "fly ins" events. But one thing I still vividly remember were the accounts of civilian aircraft mishaps and crashes. I learned a lot from those articles. Sadly I lost my medical and had to sell the plane but now I'm old and really enjoy this interwebby thingy with all sorts of aviation channels. Thanks Captain Joe!
@@flywithcaptainjoe can you please make a video explaining the radio section in the cockpit like near the pedestal like the VHF1 and that kind of stuff. That would be really helpful!
Then we come to the serious question. If you are a passenger on the plane @ 13:05, should you stand up, make a scene, and basically make taxiing to departure impossible? I live close to the arctic circle, so it isn't impossible that I find myself on a flight like this.
Great diversity of aircraft types. Especially loved that last one. Folks in South San Francisco will tell you when a 747 leaves SFO, you can just about shake hands with the pilots as they climb out to the west. 🤣
Was just going to say the same thing. I'm not sure which year it was because they had UA747's several years including 2014 and 2015, but I think those were with the new tail livery.
Of all the things I've seen that would make me afraid to fly, it's that takeoff with a wing covered in ice. Negligence on the part of the captain and the crew and in full view of everyone in the cabin.
I'm not afraid of flying, but that's a situation where I'd have immediately (knowing exactly what I'm doing, and doing it on purpose) become a "disruptive passenger" in the hopes that it gets that flight sent back to the gate. I'd rather be in jail because I disrupted a flight than in a bunch of pieces on the ground because some captain didn't take the time to AT LEAST brush the snow off the wings to see if there's any ice below it, and I know for a fact that I'd be able to get lawyers good enough to help me prove that I was in the right for doing what I did. So would I plead guilty to disrupting a flight? I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not sure if I should plead guilty (after all, I did do the thing they're accusing me of) or plead innocent due to extenuating circumstances (I had VERY GOOD reasons to do what I did). Either way, I'd be additionally suing the airline for operating their aircraft in an unsafe manner, for enough money to cover whatever fines the airline may have put against me, my legal fees for both court cases (where I was the disruptive passenger and where I'm suing the airline) and an additional large sum of money, and for the right to do business with that airline again in the future once the legal troubles are sorted out to the satisfaction of myself and optionally the airline (basically that last bit is suing the airline to prevent them from putting me on a list of people they won't sell tickets to).
These one-minute debrief videos you make are a lot of fun. I’m not a pilot and no one would ever allow me to be one but your eye to detail in these videos is incredible and one doesn’t need to be a pilot to appreciate that.
10:47. look at the top of the fin, where the leading edge rudder counterbalance is. At this time point, there is a momentary right rudder input (visible light can be seen for a moment). This causes a tip stall to the right wing and outcome.
You are supposed to use rudder and NO aileron near the stall. If you have heard the phrase ‘tip stall’ you are being miss-informed, it is big with model aeroplane people. Look up real world pilot handling in stall training, don’t take my word for it. Near the stall the airflow is breaking up near the upper trailing edge, a down aileron will then stall the wing up to the aileron hinge and the wing will drop making that stall a hundred times worse. *Instant response* is required to save the day, nose hard down and hard rudder on the side with the high wing. Once a spin develops on landing you *are* going to hit the ground nearly vertical. That pilot probably had been developing bad habits for a long time and had been getting away with it. Instructor check rides stop that.
@@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 Thanks for the resume. The rudder input was whilst the wings were level, and induced the tip stall. (the term tip stall is referenced in both FAA-H-8083-3B, and the UK CFS AP3456 Chap 6).
You are a national /global treasure..! You motivated me to get over my fear of the medical exam and finally start flying after 30 years of only dreaming of it. Got my PPL 2 months ago and still learning from you with every video. Thank you for everything you do for aspiring and experienced pilots. 💗
14:20 I believe this might be Fleet Week in San Francisco. For the airshow United usually sends one of their aircraft to perform and they usually used the 747 before they retired them.
Based on the livery it couldn’t have been part of the farewell tour. This was a demonstration United does every year during San Francisco Fleet Week. The next one is happening in 3 weeks and I’ll be there!
Yep. The 747 is footage from a Fleet Week demo from some years back. United is a main sponsor of the Fleet Week event here in San Francisco and every year they do this flyover right before the Blue Angels start their show. This year, it was a 787 Dreamliner
4:03 That's here in New Zealand! I recognised the fire truck paint scheme, then noticed the official, who, as their vest indicates, is part of Omaka Aviation, located in Blenheim, New Zealand.
Always look forward to your videos, and love getting your take on these short clips. Was delighted to catch your landing at LAX on a livestream - hope you enjoyed your few days in the city! 🙂
I'm not sure but I think the deice one at 13:06 was a case where he went through de-icing but the mix wasn't strong enough for the extra cold temperatures that day and his IFR release was delayed (or something) so quite a bit of time passed between de-icing and take-off so it started to refreeze again. On top of that, the jet blast of the plane before him melted the snow that was forming which quickly refroze as ice.
Hey Joe for “too strong winds” 3:50 wouldn’t it make more sense if the rudder were fully deflected left. It’s clear that the wind was coming from the right which would cause the aircraft to weathercock into the wind so shouldn’t the correct rudder input be to the left to keep the nose aligned with centerline…?
The STOL plane (at 3:50) has flaperons, not ailerons. If you look a few seconds later (4:55, i.e. after the wind turns him) he does actually have full right aileron input, so the right wing looks neutral because the other wing has full-down deflection. I can't tell if this is a Zenith CH701 or 750; if it's the former, it has manual flaps, so he should have retracted them immediately, to help his braking, and maybe give him a bit extra aileron authority.
I do want to point out that your second example at 1:40 has flames for a different reason that's also really interesting if you don't know! High-performance piston engines will run with a lot of extra fuel in the mixture to help cool the cylinders and pistons by adding mass to the combustion process. this unburnt fuel is then ignited off the hot manifold the same way as the spitfire. I find it interesting, and something probably a lot of people are unaware of. if you tried to change the air-fuel ratio to get rid of the fire, you would melt the engine
Yes rejected take offs are dangerous but I'm so glad that in this instance there was a competent pilot who knew how to handle the situation and resolve it safely..
4:15 - with a right crosswind your nose will be into the wind. Therefore you would need left rudder and right aileron for proper decrabbing. You keep saying he would need right rudder.
That last one was spectacular. I love seeing stuff like that. My grandfather loves to tell the story of the famous barrel roll over lake Washington that he was lucky enough to have seen. Also living close to jblm I get to see some low maneuvers by some military aircraft.
I've just found this terrific channel! You have such brilliant content, presented with humour; and as a retired teacher of 35 years, I can add that your measured, clear way of explaining things is very helpful. Thank you Captain Joe. I'm subscribing today. From Brisbane.💛💚
About the 747 flyover in San Francisco… United has been the sponsor of many Fleet Week events, and they got to show off their -400 in full landing configuration every event. It was, as you well said, breathtakingly beautiful
14:24 could have also been during „Fleet Week“ in San Francisco. An indication is the high amount of boats on the water. When I was there in 2016 they also flew a jumbo low over the bay on every day of the event. I guess they do this every year.
I was taught in the sim to fully land when seeing birds in very short finals for the exact reason we saw on the video. Actually it happened to me once and we hit a large seagull with the left main gear. After being cleaned and inspected, we continued normally. Passengers were really thankful their flight was not cancelled!!!
@@kenmore01 I‘ve never had any issues with LAX personally. Seems like a nice airport, but I’ve also only been through it a few times. My local airport (and where I work) is San Jose (SJC), but I mostly fly out of SFO due to the prices being lower and it having more flight options.
@@triple7marc Passing through is okay which is what most people do I guess. Actually staying in L.A. and leaving the airport by rental car and coming back days later and dealing with the mass confusion is the worst!
@@kenmore01 I've never had to get a rental car but I've left via bus before and my girlfriend's car at one point as well. The airport itself doesn't seem too bad but I may have just gone during less busy times.
Great content. As a student pilot it's definitely helpful to see some of the wrong ways to do things, and the professional explanation of what went wrong. Thank you!!
Regards the Spitfire startup. Depending on which version, this looks like a later one and may not be applicable and I'm not hearing the bang, but used a Coffman starter. This is basically an explosive into one of the cylinders to give the initial momentum to start (like a jump start). This could produce the flame as the hot gasses leave the engine, and as Joe says ignite some unburnt fuel before the Merlins engine fully starts and burns it's fuel. However, this appears engine is being cranked.
Hi Captain, two questions: 1. 06:52 Wasn't it a CAT-III landing which (allegedly, since I have never experienced one) is always a bit "harder"? 2. 10:11 Isn't the correct procedure in case of stall spin rather to apply opposite rudder (left in this case)? Thank you.
10:47 I think the wind got slower as the plane was losing altitude...you really need to take advantage of the headwind to make really short landing, but it can be treacherous
The STOL incident at 11 minutes was actually caused by the use of the ailerons to correct for wing drop instead of the rudder. As the AOA increases you can clearly see the large aileron movements inducing drag and creating the yawing moment. These loss of control incidents are the result of a basic lack of understanding of low speed aerodynamics.
4:33 wouldn't the rudder be deflected to the left when the wind was coming from the right? Or in other words: shouldn't the rudder deflect as if it was lose and moved by the wind? 11:35 aerosucre, no suprise :'D
Thank you for the video sir! The 777 landing, while not "hard", looked horribly awkward. I can't imagine that was anything other than a couple of tense moments in the cockpit. Thanks again :)
The united flyby is an annual tradition during the fleet week airshow in San Francisco in early October. They have used every widebody jet Over the years and do multiple passes.
Excellent video. I love the 747 Queen of the Skies, flew as a passenger United several times between Chicago ORD and Hong Kong HKG, including that last second right turn into the HKG runway. So sad to see her go. At least she's still carrying cargo.
I'm not sure how many people know this ... the 747 was a time machine. Several times, we took off from HKG at 0910 local time and landed at ORD at 0900 local time, 10 minutes "back in time".
Greetings Captain, Thank you! I enjoy the debrief and getting a better understanding of viral aviation clips. What is your thoughts on this years space tourism flights including SpaceX Inspiration4 flight?
#10:12 My guess is that this was caused by headwind gradient . The plane is at stall as it comes down. Inertia tries to keep the plane at the same ground speed. As it comes down the headwind will decrease because of friction with the ground so as this factors in the wing stalls.
You mentioned the super connie, back when Qantas flew them they renowned for having unreliable engines. They joked it was the best 3 engine plane that they ever had
A good pilot is always learning - true to the bone, dear Sir (: love the debrief videos, it is a content of great educational value, the more there will be, the better (: make sure to take enough rest!
5:30 that sas pilot had the momentum of the jet on his side.. he could just flare out and land... was there another reason for his/hers goaround i wonder? doubt those birds would be visible from the cockpit...
Tons of VOR approaches at airports I've flown at that bring you in at odd angles to the runway with no possible way to land directly, circling approaches only. pretty common at small airports actually (or it used to be before GPS and shutting down the VORs). Some such approaches bring you into the runway more than 45deg off centerline, and at the middle of the runway.
On that "circling approach", in the mountainous western parts of the USA at some secondary airports we have approaches that are not aligned with a runway and so they are not intended to be a straight in approach to land.(often these are VOR based) These approaches only get you to a low altitude where you can see the airport, after that you can either circle or side step depending on the exact approach. Also in the USA once you see the airport and start the circle to land you must maintain visual contact, if you loose sight of the airport environment you must execute a missed approach.
Dear cpt joe I recently promoted to first officer in air india . I see your videos and way you tell things related to airplanes help me alot in clearing my exams Thanku
Great assessments, however the first STOL video with the blue Zenaiar CH-701 missed a very important point and one that I believe is most responsible for the nose over. Check the elevator in the full up position, it should have gone full forward after touchdown. I used to own one of these and that and the ailerons were both something one had to be cautious with during any type of wind.
I loved flying on the 747, had room to move around on those long haul flights which I really appreciated. Added to which they are a beautiful plane . Flew on a Dreamliner recently and hated it , barely room to get to the loo ( I know they are more environmentally friendly , but. ) . Not looking forward to my next flight on one.
That reason why you hated your experience on the 787 (dreamliner) is probably down to choices the airline made, not Boeing. Also, you might try a 777, the more recent stretched and ER versions are almost as big as a 747, the only real difference is the more advanced avionics and the fact that it only needs two (absolutely massive) engines to get it safely into the air. EDIT: Reason you might like a 787 on a different airline is that the airline is the entity that determines the cabin layout, Boeing just puts the passenger cabin together like the airline ordered it. The 747 was usually operated as a 3-class plane (economy, business, 1st class), but the 787 is usually operated as a 2-class plane (just economy and business) since it typically operates on shorter routes (yes, trans-atlantic is a "shorter route" compared to what the 777 ERs and other long-range variants are doing).
The seaplane taking of was in the Netherlnds a couple of years ago. It took of from the Noordzeekanaal near Zaandam. It was during a military festival. We were actually in a rowing boat when it landed besides us!
It is interested to watch the rudder of the STOL plane that crashed at 10:49. It looks like the pilot abruptly put in right rudder, which combined with the low airspeed, caused the right wing to stall and drop. Instead of countering with left rudder to stop it, it seems he put in left aileron which further increased the angle of attack of the right wing and worsening its stall.
@@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 Yes, that was my point. You never use aileron to try to recover from a stall because it just makes the dropped wing stall harder for the reasons I described.
@@c5ec5e Rudder did not stall the wing, rudder is what you are supposed to use near the edge of disaster for roll correction. If a wing drops hard opposite rudder will recover it especially if some forward stick is added. His rudder input was right rudder ! ! ! 😧 when the right wing had *already dropped* significantly and the plane was starting to go downhill fast. It all went wrong initially from a slight right wing down roll/slight wing drop when you can see hard up left aileron applied (on the side nearest to the camera) meaning of course hard down on the right. With the wing over that aileron 100% stalled the increased wing drop raised the local angle of attack and made the stall much worse and brought on an incipient spin only stopped by the ground impact. Fly safe.
@@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 Improper use of rudder will absolutely stall a wing and it did so in this case. Uncoordinated flight caused by too much or too little rudder is the leading cause of fatal stall/spin accidents. In this case, the pilot was right on the edge of stalling, so when he kicked in uncoordinated right rudder, the right wing retreated from the relative wind, which caused it to stall and drop. This is basic aerodynamics. If you don't think improper use of rudder will stall a wing, read up on what a cross-control stall is. You will learn a lot and maybe save your life if you are actually a real pilot and not just playing a sim.
@@c5ec5e I’ve used a bootload of rudder and back stick to enter spins in training and am aware of stall turns and hammerheads but haven’t done them, well I might have done stall turns many decades ago but I forget. There are extremes and exceptions to every principle but you can enter a spin with the ball perfectly in the middle if you don’t dot *all* the i’s and cross all the t’s as well. Have fun flying.
This is how you do a "reaction video". Fantastic content Captain!
Agreeee
Que haces aquí Heikki, crack
Yea....other "reaction" videos are just people looking at the screen motionless and speechless
Yes, i agree 👍👍
😊👌🏽🤗
I'm so glad someone finally recognised the circling approach at 11:34 - I've seen this doing the rounds on the internets recently and people think it's a really bad mistake or something. It's just a missed approach at minimums when the pilot determines a circling approach can't be carried out. I guess ILS and GLS approaches are all people see these days so something like this video look odd. Gone are the days of routine non-precision, circling approaches, etc.
Sad but true fact yes😕
Anyone recognizes the plane they are flying? It doesn't look very modern.
@@TheEstampe 737 by the looks of the window opening handle, the trim buttons on the yoke and I think I can hear the trim wheels spinning too. I recognise that sound anywhere.
It’s obviously a circling approach if you’re a pilot. I wish you luck on your private license when your older.
@@TheEstampe that looks like a 737.
I LOVE IT!!
You're supposed to relax and chill, but no! Even on your layovers ur creating awesome content for us! Thank you!
Thanks for appreciating that😉
Great video, Cpt. Joe!
Regarding snow on the wings, nothing gets me angrier quicker than a blatant disregard for life as demonstrated BY THE PILOT by taking off with contaminated wings. The Pilot definitely knows better, and I hope he was reprimanded for this very dangerous and stupid action.
If I were a passenger on that plane, I would have raised a ruckus in order to stop the takeoff attempt. I really would not care if I got arrested, because I'd rather be alive in jail than DEAD from another's stupidity.
Me too! No excuse for that nonsense. Once I was off the plane I'd be writing angry letters to the airline, the airport, the FAA (assuming US), and anywhere else I can think of. I don't care how long the queue at de-icing is. I'd rather sit on a long line and miss a connection than come to a really abrupt stop and die a short way beyond the end of the runway. Grrrr.
Try flying on Greenland in the winter. There is not enough de -icing in the world to remove all the snow.
Please do more of these Joe! I followed your "adventures" in Redondo Beach. How was your food at Joe's?
Joe's was amazing, hence the name :) Thanks for the feedback!
@@flywithcaptainjoe lol
Captain Joe ur gf will be mad at at u now😂
@@flywithcaptainjoe sir Joe love you to do video with mentor pilot and Sir Kelsey of 74 gear.
@@flywithcaptainjoe Hi joe My name is Kuldeep. Your videos are very informative. I enjoy them lot.
I have question about route taken by a aircraft. Air France 777 & Air Tahiti nui 787 left Vancouver Canada for Paris one after another. After one hour they were flying approximately 200 km apart from each other over Alberta Canada. I have seen on Flightradar24.
Same origin Same destination Same time
Why they took different routes
Appreciate in advance.
I really love when Joe activates full german mode like at minute 5.30 "Eieiei". This always makes me lose it since I'm german too and that mentality just hits different lol. Like in the debrief with "Ach du scheiße". I really enjoy those videos especially because of all the knowledge being shared with us. Great video, more of it please!!!!
You caught me there😉
@@flywithcaptainjoe Oops :-) I did not recognize your accent. LOL! I noticed some light accent, but I used to work with German colleagues and have some German friends and heard a little stronger accent. I thought you are Australian or from another region of the UK.
Nice format! Cool!
Hey it’s emo Nemo
Shut up
@@behindthen0thing525 nah
I love it when Captain Joe says ´meaning’ because you know that your about to get a great explanation! And your gonna learn a lot!
That’s fantastic feedback! Thanks I‘ll point that out more in future videos😉👍🏻
Back when I was flying as a young man in a 1959 Bonanza I subscribed to a few aviation magazines mostly to find out about "fly ins" events. But one thing I still vividly remember were the accounts of civilian aircraft mishaps and crashes. I learned a lot from those articles. Sadly I lost my medical and had to sell the plane but now I'm old and really enjoy this interwebby thingy with all sorts of aviation channels. Thanks Captain Joe!
It just makes my day when captain Joe uploads! Thanks for keeping us entertained and sharing your knowledge with us Capt.Joe!
Thanks man!
@@flywithcaptainjoe can you please make a video explaining the radio section in the cockpit like near the pedestal like the VHF1 and that kind of stuff. That would be really helpful!
Then we come to the serious question. If you are a passenger on the plane @ 13:05, should you stand up, make a scene, and basically make taxiing to departure impossible?
I live close to the arctic circle, so it isn't impossible that I find myself on a flight like this.
Great diversity of aircraft types. Especially loved that last one. Folks in South San Francisco will tell you when a 747 leaves SFO, you can just about shake hands with the pilots as they climb out to the west. 🤣
14:25 That is 2010 Fleet Week from SF. It was a majestic flyby!
Was thinking the same thing - I vividly remember this flight at Fleet Week
Was just going to say the same thing. I'm not sure which year it was because they had UA747's several years including 2014 and 2015, but I think those were with the new tail livery.
@@SierraGolfNiner I think I saw it in 2014/2015 or maybe even slightly later.
@@baomao7243yes, they did it often in the Fleet Week, probably every year, when United still had 747s in service.
@@boring-hc3pu I vividly remember watching that United 747 do low altitude slow flight over the Golden Gate.
Awesome !
A 74 Gear styled video, love it!
Of all the things I've seen that would make me afraid to fly, it's that takeoff with a wing covered in ice. Negligence on the part of the captain and the crew and in full view of everyone in the cabin.
I'm not afraid of flying, but that's a situation where I'd have immediately (knowing exactly what I'm doing, and doing it on purpose) become a "disruptive passenger" in the hopes that it gets that flight sent back to the gate.
I'd rather be in jail because I disrupted a flight than in a bunch of pieces on the ground because some captain didn't take the time to AT LEAST brush the snow off the wings to see if there's any ice below it, and I know for a fact that I'd be able to get lawyers good enough to help me prove that I was in the right for doing what I did.
So would I plead guilty to disrupting a flight? I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not sure if I should plead guilty (after all, I did do the thing they're accusing me of) or plead innocent due to extenuating circumstances (I had VERY GOOD reasons to do what I did).
Either way, I'd be additionally suing the airline for operating their aircraft in an unsafe manner, for enough money to cover whatever fines the airline may have put against me, my legal fees for both court cases (where I was the disruptive passenger and where I'm suing the airline) and an additional large sum of money, and for the right to do business with that airline again in the future once the legal troubles are sorted out to the satisfaction of myself and optionally the airline (basically that last bit is suing the airline to prevent them from putting me on a list of people they won't sell tickets to).
I'd hand that video to the aviation authorities as soon as the plane landed, if it landed.
These one-minute debrief videos you make are a lot of fun. I’m not a pilot and no one would ever allow me to be one but your eye to detail in these videos is incredible and one doesn’t need to be a pilot to appreciate that.
10:47. look at the top of the fin, where the leading edge rudder counterbalance is. At this time point, there is a momentary right rudder input (visible light can be seen for a moment). This causes a tip stall to the right wing and outcome.
Also, wouldn’t you also want full left rudder to get out of the stall?
You are supposed to use rudder and NO aileron near the stall. If you have heard the phrase ‘tip stall’ you are being miss-informed, it is big with model aeroplane people. Look up real world pilot handling in stall training, don’t take my word for it.
Near the stall the airflow is breaking up near the upper trailing edge, a down aileron will then stall the wing up to the aileron hinge and the wing will drop making that stall a hundred times worse. *Instant response* is required to save the day, nose hard down and hard rudder on the side with the high wing. Once a spin develops on landing you *are* going to hit the ground nearly vertical.
That pilot probably had been developing bad habits for a long time and had been getting away with it. Instructor check rides stop that.
@@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 Thanks for the resume. The rudder input was whilst the wings were level, and induced the tip stall. (the term tip stall is referenced in both FAA-H-8083-3B, and the UK CFS AP3456 Chap 6).
@@David-lb4te Never used in CAA publications and in UK training. Rudder input does not affect angle of attack, aileron does, that is how they work.
9:37 to do 2 necessary and 5 other steps to save everyone on the plane in a split second is just proffesional level of every pilot!!! good job guys :)
You are a national /global treasure..! You motivated me to get over my fear of the medical exam and finally start flying after 30 years of only dreaming of it. Got my PPL 2 months ago and still learning from you with every video. Thank you for everything you do for aspiring and experienced pilots. 💗
Yeah Buddy!!! This is what I was looking forward to 😍😍😍 ( specially for your YAIIIII....captain) 💜 It!
Which recorder is better?
th-cam.com/video/iRFdZyxJL-s/w-d-xo.html
Oh yeah, I love those YAIII moments too 😅
That's why I love debriefs: genuine reactions. It's funny, entertainment, and instructive. We need more!
14:20 I believe this might be Fleet Week in San Francisco. For the airshow United usually sends one of their aircraft to perform and they usually used the 747 before they retired them.
Shame they do not fly under the bridge, it can be done in flight sim:p
Based on the livery it couldn’t have been part of the farewell tour. This was a demonstration United does every year during San Francisco Fleet Week. The next one is happening in 3 weeks and I’ll be there!
Yep. The 747 is footage from a Fleet Week demo from some years back. United is a main sponsor of the Fleet Week event here in San Francisco and every year they do this flyover right before the Blue Angels start their show. This year, it was a 787 Dreamliner
Love these 1 min briefs - good variety, and useful safety lessons, all in one. Thanks Cpt. Joe. Cheers.
4:03 That's here in New Zealand! I recognised the fire truck paint scheme, then noticed the official, who, as their vest indicates, is part of Omaka Aviation, located in Blenheim, New Zealand.
Always look forward to your videos, and love getting your take on these short clips. Was delighted to catch your landing at LAX on a livestream - hope you enjoyed your few days in the city! 🙂
I'm not sure but I think the deice one at 13:06 was a case where he went through de-icing but the mix wasn't strong enough for the extra cold temperatures that day and his IFR release was delayed (or something) so quite a bit of time passed between de-icing and take-off so it started to refreeze again. On top of that, the jet blast of the plane before him melted the snow that was forming which quickly refroze as ice.
Hey Joe for “too strong winds” 3:50 wouldn’t it make more sense if the rudder were fully deflected left. It’s clear that the wind was coming from the right which would cause the aircraft to weathercock into the wind so shouldn’t the correct rudder input be to the left to keep the nose aligned with centerline…?
No, the wind is coming FROM the right, meaning it will blow the plane to the left and applying right rudder would correct it back to the centreline.
@@leannexu3362 Don't light aircraft have a tendency to whether vane into the wind?
@@hellvetica3235 Oh, I don’t know about that. But seeing as they did use right rudder it seems like here it wasn’t the case
You inspire me of becoming a pilot captain Joe. I just love you .....
The STOL plane (at 3:50) has flaperons, not ailerons. If you look a few seconds later (4:55, i.e. after the wind turns him) he does actually have full right aileron input, so the right wing looks neutral because the other wing has full-down deflection. I can't tell if this is a Zenith CH701 or 750; if it's the former, it has manual flaps, so he should have retracted them immediately, to help his braking, and maybe give him a bit extra aileron authority.
I do want to point out that your second example at 1:40 has flames for a different reason that's also really interesting if you don't know! High-performance piston engines will run with a lot of extra fuel in the mixture to help cool the cylinders and pistons by adding mass to the combustion process. this unburnt fuel is then ignited off the hot manifold the same way as the spitfire.
I find it interesting, and something probably a lot of people are unaware of. if you tried to change the air-fuel ratio to get rid of the fire, you would melt the engine
Yes rejected take offs are dangerous but I'm so glad that in this instance there was a competent pilot who knew how to handle the situation and resolve it safely..
Great video Joe :) always loved this series, hope you continue it. one question regarding the calls that you offer, how long do the calls last?
30 minutes to an hour
4:15 - with a right crosswind your nose will be into the wind. Therefore you would need left rudder and right aileron for proper decrabbing. You keep saying he would need right rudder.
Yes! I am still a student but I know to use into-wind aileron (first time on a crosswind TO I was slow removing it and flew off to the right. Eek!)
That last one was spectacular. I love seeing stuff like that. My grandfather loves to tell the story of the famous barrel roll over lake Washington that he was lucky enough to have seen. Also living close to jblm I get to see some low maneuvers by some military aircraft.
Normally I’m not a fan of “Reaction Videos”. But yours are very informative and educational. Keep them coming.
Joe, you are simply a super super pilot and have also been a perfect instructor. Kudos!
This is a great series Joe! Keep it up
@4:58 it seems left wing aileron is down, while right wing aileron is neutral - so maybe something broke down and half-worked?
I've just found this terrific channel! You have such brilliant content, presented with humour; and as a retired teacher of 35 years, I can add that your measured, clear way of explaining things is very helpful. Thank you Captain Joe. I'm subscribing today.
From Brisbane.💛💚
About the 747 flyover in San Francisco… United has been the sponsor of many Fleet Week events, and they got to show off their -400 in full landing configuration every event. It was, as you well said, breathtakingly beautiful
Thanks for the insight!
reminds me back in the dark ages, my hometown got a sneak preview of the 777. they did a test flight overhead.
14:24 could have also been during „Fleet Week“ in San Francisco. An indication is the high amount of boats on the water.
When I was there in 2016 they also flew a jumbo low over the bay on every day of the event.
I guess they do this every year.
I was taught in the sim to fully land when seeing birds in very short finals for the exact reason we saw on the video. Actually it happened to me once and we hit a large seagull with the left main gear. After being cleaned and inspected, we continued normally. Passengers were really thankful their flight was not cancelled!!!
14:22 That "Yes!" when he sees the 747 gets me every time lol
Captain we need more of these videos!!!Informative and sometimes hilarious.
Glad that Joe uploaded! Makes my day!
I was having some sort of inner feeling to push that plane into the right position when It tipped over, unfortunately I can't do that
Absolutely fantastic Captain! This one was the best one yet! Many thanks
I LOVE these debriefs! Welcome to California, I'm sure you've already gone planespotting at the In-N-Out Burger next to LAX 😂
Yes Sir! Milkshake and a Burger! Love it!
Sorry you had to go through LAX. Did you find the signage as irritating as I always do? Love your videos!
@@kenmore01 I‘ve never had any issues with LAX personally. Seems like a nice airport, but I’ve also only been through it a few times. My local airport (and where I work) is San Jose (SJC), but I mostly fly out of SFO due to the prices being lower and it having more flight options.
@@triple7marc Passing through is okay which is what most people do I guess. Actually staying in L.A. and leaving the airport by rental car and coming back days later and dealing with the mass confusion is the worst!
@@kenmore01 I've never had to get a rental car but I've left via bus before and my girlfriend's car at one point as well. The airport itself doesn't seem too bad but I may have just gone during less busy times.
So good to here your voice man and the intro is always pleasure to watch Capt Joe.🛫
Hallo Joe! I have a question. Remember that sometimes a hard landing can cause a tire to blow? What descent rate in FPM is enough to blow a tire?
Joe your videos are so well worth the wait. Even from a hotel room your videos outclass many others. Obviously I’m quite a big fan.
Thanks Pete! Means a lot
A 1 minute debrief becomes a 15 min reaction video, I really enjoyed it, keep up the great work!
Great content. As a student pilot it's definitely helpful to see some of the wrong ways to do things, and the professional explanation of what went wrong. Thank you!!
Regards the Spitfire startup. Depending on which version, this looks like a later one and may not be applicable and I'm not hearing the bang, but used a Coffman starter. This is basically an explosive into one of the cylinders to give the initial momentum to start (like a jump start). This could produce the flame as the hot gasses leave the engine, and as Joe says ignite some unburnt fuel before the Merlins engine fully starts and burns it's fuel. However, this appears engine is being cranked.
Hi Captain, two questions: 1. 06:52 Wasn't it a CAT-III landing which (allegedly, since I have never experienced one) is always a bit "harder"? 2. 10:11 Isn't the correct procedure in case of stall spin rather to apply opposite rudder (left in this case)? Thank you.
This is your best format captain, please do more !!
10:47 I think the wind got slower as the plane was losing altitude...you really need to take advantage of the headwind to make really short landing, but it can be treacherous
Always a great day when the Captain uploads. Cheers to you from Chicago
The STOL incident at 11 minutes was actually caused by the use of the ailerons to correct for wing drop instead of the rudder. As the AOA increases you can clearly see the large aileron movements inducing drag and creating the yawing moment. These loss of control incidents are the result of a basic lack of understanding of low speed aerodynamics.
4:33 wouldn't the rudder be deflected to the left when the wind was coming from the right? Or in other words: shouldn't the rudder deflect as if it was lose and moved by the wind?
11:35 aerosucre, no suprise :'D
Thank you for the video sir! The 777 landing, while not "hard", looked horribly awkward. I can't imagine that was anything other than a couple of tense moments in the cockpit. Thanks again :)
The united flyby is an annual tradition during the fleet week airshow in San Francisco in early October. They have used every widebody jet Over the years and do multiple passes.
Excellent video. I love the 747 Queen of the Skies, flew as a passenger United several times between Chicago ORD and Hong Kong HKG, including that last second right turn into the HKG runway. So sad to see her go. At least she's still carrying cargo.
I'm not sure how many people know this ... the 747 was a time machine. Several times, we took off from HKG at 0910 local time and landed at ORD at 0900 local time, 10 minutes "back in time".
@@jimmeade2976 Detroit to Chicago. A basketball player once refused to fly because it was a time machine, in his view. 🤪🤪🤪
Kai Tak. I wish I could have plane spotted there at least once. 😳
I, too, love the 747 (except for the 747SP).
Incredible reflexes on the ANA B-788 pilot with the rejected T/O. I dont see the plane even flinching to the left. Mad props to the crew flying.
Love your videos and the stickers on your computer look so awesome!
To be found in the online shop :)
I love your videos. You put so much thought into them and you are such a great explainer!
Greetings Captain,
Thank you! I enjoy the debrief and getting a better understanding of viral aviation clips. What is your thoughts on this years space tourism flights including SpaceX Inspiration4 flight?
#10:12 My guess is that this was caused by headwind gradient . The plane is at stall as it comes down. Inertia tries to keep the plane at the same ground speed. As it comes down the headwind will decrease because of friction with the ground so as this factors in the wing stalls.
@ 7:03 .. What is that strange door with wires all over it? -security or anti-bird.?
You mentioned the super connie, back when Qantas flew them they renowned for having unreliable engines. They joked it was the best 3 engine plane that they ever had
I know😉
Looks a lovely room, I like the picture on the wall. Hope you have a nice rest.
A good pilot is always learning - true to the bone, dear Sir (: love the debrief videos, it is a content of great educational value, the more there will be, the better (: make sure to take enough rest!
5:30 that sas pilot had the momentum of the jet on his side.. he could just flare out and land... was there another reason for his/hers goaround i wonder? doubt those birds would be visible from the cockpit...
Hope you promise such videos atleast once a month, Check. A good pilot is always sharing his knowledge.
13:21 Technically, if it's snow...is it really ice?
I also love you're reaction😂
Professionals have standards.
No clickbaits, no stupidity.
On point and precise information.
8:45 - "This doesn't seem like it's dangerous"
I dunno, an engine kerploding looks pretty fucking dangerous to me
@4:56 Right aileron is neutral, left aileron is full down. Mechanical Issue?
Brilliant Video as always Joe, God Bless and God Speed brother
Another great video 😍😍👏
Can't wait to see the next video already 🙂
Tons of VOR approaches at airports I've flown at that bring you in at odd angles to the runway with no possible way to land directly, circling approaches only. pretty common at small airports actually (or it used to be before GPS and shutting down the VORs). Some such approaches bring you into the runway more than 45deg off centerline, and at the middle of the runway.
Best reactions!! Nice seeing you CJ
Loving the your name buddy!
Awesome video Captain Joe. I just love the way he reacts to the videos!!!
On that "circling approach", in the mountainous western parts of the USA at some secondary airports we have approaches that are not aligned with a runway and so they are not intended to be a straight in approach to land.(often these are VOR based) These approaches only get you to a low altitude where you can see the airport, after that you can either circle or side step depending on the exact approach. Also in the USA once you see the airport and start the circle to land you must maintain visual contact, if you loose sight of the airport environment you must execute a missed approach.
3:55 is at Omaka Blenheim New Zealand
Good to have you back Cap'n Joe.
You're my primary inspiration to become a pilot! kkep up the good work!
Dear cpt joe
I recently promoted to first officer in air india . I see your videos and way you tell things related to airplanes help me alot in clearing my exams
Thanku
Great assessments, however the first STOL video with the blue Zenaiar CH-701 missed a very important point and one that I believe is most responsible for the nose over. Check the elevator in the full up position, it should have gone full forward after touchdown. I used to own one of these and that and the ailerons were both something one had to be cautious with during any type of wind.
I loved flying on the 747, had room to move around on those long haul flights which I really appreciated. Added to which they are a beautiful plane .
Flew on a Dreamliner recently and hated it , barely room to get to the loo ( I know they are more environmentally friendly , but. ) . Not looking forward to my next flight on one.
That reason why you hated your experience on the 787 (dreamliner) is probably down to choices the airline made, not Boeing.
Also, you might try a 777, the more recent stretched and ER versions are almost as big as a 747, the only real difference is the more advanced avionics and the fact that it only needs two (absolutely massive) engines to get it safely into the air.
EDIT: Reason you might like a 787 on a different airline is that the airline is the entity that determines the cabin layout, Boeing just
puts the passenger cabin together like the airline ordered it. The 747 was usually operated as a 3-class plane (economy, business, 1st class), but the 787 is usually operated as a 2-class plane (just economy and business) since it typically operates on shorter routes (yes, trans-atlantic is a "shorter route" compared to what the 777 ERs and other long-range variants are doing).
10:12 very emotional moment. I knew the pilot-student who had the same situation. After such landing she had to clean up the cabin😁
Love these debrief ❤️ keep em comin captain
The seaplane taking of was in the Netherlnds a couple of years ago. It took of from the Noordzeekanaal near Zaandam. It was during a military festival. We were actually in a rowing boat when it landed besides us!
Can you make a video talking about the return of supersonic transport? Like the Boom project?
It is interested to watch the rudder of the STOL plane that crashed at 10:49. It looks like the pilot abruptly put in right rudder, which combined with the low airspeed, caused the right wing to stall and drop. Instead of countering with left rudder to stop it, it seems he put in left aileron which further increased the angle of attack of the right wing and worsening its stall.
Look up stall training. He should never have used aileron.
@@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 Yes, that was my point. You never use aileron to try to recover from a stall because it just makes the dropped wing stall harder for the reasons I described.
@@c5ec5e Rudder did not stall the wing, rudder is what you are supposed to use near the edge of disaster for roll correction. If a wing drops hard opposite rudder will recover it especially if some forward stick is added.
His rudder input was right rudder ! ! ! 😧 when the right wing had *already dropped* significantly and the plane was starting to go downhill fast.
It all went wrong initially from a slight right wing down roll/slight wing drop when you can see hard up left aileron applied (on the side nearest to the camera) meaning of course hard down on the right. With the wing over that aileron 100% stalled the increased wing drop raised the local angle of attack and made the stall much worse and brought on an incipient spin only stopped by the ground impact.
Fly safe.
@@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 Improper use of rudder will absolutely stall a wing and it did so in this case. Uncoordinated flight caused by too much or too little rudder is the leading cause of fatal stall/spin accidents. In this case, the pilot was right on the edge of stalling, so when he kicked in uncoordinated right rudder, the right wing retreated from the relative wind, which caused it to stall and drop. This is basic aerodynamics. If you don't think improper use of rudder will stall a wing, read up on what a cross-control stall is. You will learn a lot and maybe save your life if you are actually a real pilot and not just playing a sim.
@@c5ec5e I’ve used a bootload of rudder and back stick to enter spins in training and am aware of stall turns and hammerheads but haven’t done them, well I might have done stall turns many decades ago but I forget.
There are extremes and exceptions to every principle but you can enter a spin with the ball perfectly in the middle if you don’t dot *all* the i’s and cross all the t’s as well.
Have fun flying.
Spitfire spitting fire! Love it!
Your reactions are priceless. I absolutely love watching them 😂
I really like these. Thanks, and keep them up!