It’s a bizarre history. One of CD’s selling points upon introduction was its greater dynamic range. Then the loudness wars started, and this was completely forgotten. Then after that, the vinyl revival started, but still as a bit of a niche product for those with refined tastes, and guess what? The *less* dynamically compressed masterings were now relegated to vinyl. So I’m actually curious what the DR rating of this album’s vinyl version is, because of this one is just as compressed as the new digital versions, we will be able to conclude that vinyl is fully back in the mainstream again. 😝
As someone that remembers listening to Talking Heads on cassette, with the headphones that came with my Walkman, while mowing the lawn, pretty much everything sounds better now.
If you're nostalgic for that time, check out the koss KPH 40. They may look cheap but they sit right next to my $300 headphones, Plus they scale well on amplifiers.
@@asherfilms923 I second your opinion . Koss kph30i sound bloody good. They teleport me back to 90s. I was forever hunting for “THAT “ sound and have various mid-fi (read below $500) cans and none sound as engaging and musical as these do
The elephant in the room that wasn’t mentioned is that the original mix was from a Sony PCM-3324 DASH recorder, which has a maximum resolution of 48k 16bit. Any version claiming higher resolution than that has been upsampled
My older brother and his friend rented Stop Making Sense on VHS back in 1987. They were cool enuff to let me watch with them. My 14 yr old brain was blown away. I remember hopping on the bus and buying Fear of Music and Speaking in Tongues on LP later that week. I still have them. What a trip to discover and work through Talking Heads' catalogue at that age. Life-long fan ever since.
It should be pointed out that a track being "high dynamic range" is not necessarily a universal good. It's great in a quiet listening environment, but in a car or a bus, you end up turning up the volume to hear the quiet sections, and then get your head blown off by the loud sections. It's almost like there need to be separate masters, labeled as such, depending on the use case.
HUGE thing to also note is that Talking Heads have had quite the good track record as far as new mixes on new formats go, more so than most artists. The surround mixes are superb!
John - this is the most IMPORTANT and REVELATORY video you've ever made! I couldn't understand why my original CD's sounded better than my supposed new 'Remastered' CD's and Hi Rez file downloads. It's like when we were duped into believing that digital was always better than analog in the '80's. I'm off to buy up all the cheap, original early NON remastered CD versions!
Yep. Will be Rosetta Stones of playback never to be heard via streamingm and without vinyl pink noise and mastering format constraints. Good luck finding them mind.
DR is the current elephant in the room and 800 pound gorilla. When overly compressed it ruins everything regardless of production, engineering, format or hi-fi system.
As a recording artist and studio producer, I enjoyed this quite a lot. Compression is a tool to be used delicately. It is necessary to balance dynamics between sole tracks so that they balance each other in the mix. But overall dynamic range compression can be a terrible thing if done without sensitivity. It's a testament to the engineers that recorded it and later mastered it that a live recording back in the 80s was recorded so well. Because it's usually live recordings that suffer badly under the compression tool as a producer tries to account for live variables. Anyway, it's great to watch that live Blu-ray. We forget how brilliant and innovative Talking Heads were. My fav band... Prince's Sign of the Times. Another brilliant live concert movie....❤
excellent ! my friends made me believe that “ THAT SOUND” you are not able to find in new hi res music is purely nostalgia , but I was convinced that my CDs from early 90s actually sounded better
As I've said before, it's not about the format, it's about the music. In my case I have many LPs which never came out on CD - and now in 2023 I have many CDs that aren't available on LP. I think loudness wars did enormous damage to the CD format's reputation. At my age I have a pretty big collection, and for music that I really love I usually have several CD editions, often the LP as well. For me, in pretty well 90% of cases, it's the pre-loudness war CDs which come out on top and get played the most. In recent years, I've kind of developed a new hifi mentality - that my system is there to "serve my collection". As I can't have all the music I love in perfect sound then I need that can handle just about everything.
We need more videos like this John. A fascinating discussion on the merits of good mastering vs, bit rate and audio format. The more people realise this the sooner we can move away from remastered dynamically compressed releases.
You know, modern sound engineers must deeply consider the way people listen to music. Mono playback on cell phones and Bluetooth speakers adds the risk of phase cancellation which can compromise audio quality. Of course, this is not an excuse for poor audio mastering on a vinyl record.
Perhaps a blind audition of the same song from this album and see who can distinguish the different compression rates. In the end more than 90% is still decided by the music.
I try to avoid re-masters if possible, as it's as you say, a fancy way of saying "made louder". The best sounding CDs are generally the ones made in the 80s and early 90's, after that it's pot luck on how good a job they have done. It's why vinyl often sounds better than CD, because they have to master it differently so it works on vinyl. Great video JD. Music first, mastering second, format last.
Great video. With all the technical advancements I hoped that the loudness wars would be well and truly over by now. At the very least there could be two versions: the highly compressed version and what I call the musical version.
THANK YOU!!! Garbage in = garbage out. The only other thing I'd mention, that will drive you crazy, is that sometimes you can have a recording that shows greater dynamic range not because it is less compressed but because it's been messed with, maybe resampled or high or low pass filtered or something else, which has caused what are called "overshoots." They don't improve the actual dynamics, they just push the average volume of everything down because of these very transient spikes. These often are coming from copies of copies of master tapes... meaning that it may register as greater dynamic range, but have more tape hiss. ...Then again, NO tape hiss may indicate aggressive noise reduction has been used, which can dull the highs... I love this hobby, and I hate it, all at the same time. I wish record labels would release absolutely flat dumps of their master tapes and let US choose to "remaster" them ourselves if we wanted.
After this video I am considering to create 1000 accounts to subscribe again with each one of them. Your Channel and work is like an oasis inside the hottest desert. Thanks for this darko. Kudos from Athens Greece
I remember the day I first got my hands on Sony’s Minidisc. Handheld & automotive derived. That was a step up from ordinary CD’s in the late 90’s. Then i heard an SA-CD in a local hi-fi shop. Damn that was like hearing the instruments live in your ear.. Great episode 👍
Sad that SACD was never adopted as the new industry standard from CDs like DVD to Blu Ray was 🙁 Those SACDs that were released were always sold as luxury products requiring very expensive niche market players 🙄
I seen stop making sense in the theatre 1984 in a small rural town. It was electric, the projectionist turned the movie off at one point and lectured everyone to sit down and stop dancing
I am doing the laundry and I had to pause and give you a huge HUG because this is VERY important stuff that no one seems to care about these days..back to laundry.
Perfect, John. You nailed it. 'Brick-Walled' digitally mastered recordings that are massively compressed have been, sadly, ubiquitous for a good number of years now. I'm a 40-yr. plus audio engineer/musician/producer and will always go for the original 'red book' mastered CD, as I'm less likely to get an album that comes up, when analyzed, as almost a complete black audio wave graph w/ the very occasional 'peak' which usually ends up being untethered sibilance. (Same goes for the vinyl version - give me, in most instances - the first pressing w/ original mastering).
I think you only have to look at how the vast majority of people consume music today. Either cheap ear buds, car stereos or Bluetooth speakers. If music was not heavily compressed, then it would not work well on these devices as they can’t reproduce the full dynamic range. The Bluray of the film is most probably going to be played on a sound system that has decent speakers and probably as sub, so will benefit for a higher range. Who knows maybe one day in the future we can have variable dynamic range to optimise to our listening equipment and environment.
Very true. Although pop music singles are all about shifting units on what ever format. Streaming has compounded that ability for top selling artists at the expense of less commercial yet more creative ones 🙁
In 1983, I was the Production Coordinator for a Mattel commercial being filmed at Hollywood Center Studios' lot. (formerly Coppola's old Zoetrope Studios) The Director of the commercial was Jordan Cronenweth who was also the DP. At that point Jordan was best known as the DP for the pivotal Blade Runner movie. Early afternoon of each day, we would wrap for the day and run over to the Pantages to join the other cameramen, Grips and Gaffers who had been prelighting all day in anticipation of that night's performance which was shot for the three nights. Being on that stage with Demme, Jordan and Byrne who was a part of the visuals and creative, was one of the highlights of my career. Being a huge talking Heads fan, I had already purchased tickets for two of the three shows. Being in the audience to see those shows after a couple of pops at the nearby Frolic room was sublime. Looking forward to buying the new 4k, Dolby Atmos DVD.
I have the Blu ray and it is one of my best sounding concert Blu rays. Possibly the best. Pink floyds delicate sound of thunder is pretty high up there too
Your conclusion will hopefully reach a huge number of people and prevent arguments over which format is best etc. Compressing the dynamic range just makes for fatiguing listening. Great video. Your best.
The master mix is KING. You can not get better audio, regardless of format, than what is on the mix. I am a firm believer that a standard CD is more than good enough. Most of the bad rep of CD audio was due to bad master mixes being used.
Yes, yes, YES!! I’ve been proclaiming this for years, that it’s not the format, but the mastering that you are really hearing. Compression does bring forth more details, like a magnifying glass, but at a great loss of dynamics and is fatiguing. Sadly I have SACDs where the audio wavetops are flatlined and audibly distorted. It’s a crime that I cannot get my money back on what is a clearly defective hi-res product. I love this episode! I only wish you had recorded the vinyl and measured the DR.
Tidal used to have original and remastered versions of a lot of stuff. Universally, the originals were better even with background noise. Now it’s usually only the remasters, which have quite heavy noise reduction. They generally sound less engaging.
John, this is a superb and much needed explanation of the ultimate importance of mastering and of dynamic range. There is one significant omission that I would urge you to clarify, if possible, which is the difference between dynamic range compression and file compression of a digital format recording. Understanding that distinction is essential for understanding your overall argument.
Really enjoyed this one. It is about time someone started talking about mastering and dynamic range. It is a travesty that for all advancements made most music (IMO at least) sounds worse now than it is did 30 years ago. I cannot imagine record labels stopping the 'Make it louder' request so maybe the best we can hope for is an additional mastering? Kind of surprised that artists are not on this, surely they would want their music to sound as good as it possibly could?
My problem with vinyl is quality of the pressing differs. Ive heard vinyls that sounds very good. But most of the music i listen to, is pressed bad on vinyl. All tho CDs sounds better no matter the vinyl quality, by my experience. But somtimes i buy my jazz/blues on vinyl and everything else on CD.
@Darko Audio 100% agree. The recording and the master are the most important factors for the final quality, much more than the format. In the other side, regarding the dynamic range, the vinyl is the physical format more limited.
Great article. Please do more like this. I ripped the Blue ray using "DVD Audio Extractor" and measure a DR of 14 on my 24 bit rip, not the 13 you mention.
Lucky me I have plenty of CDs from the 80th and 90th.Nice clip you going back to the basics and that is Music and how it's recorded! That was always my first priority and the HiFi system came afterwards. If you had good recorded Music then even a mediocre system sounded good. Some people forget that and chase the holy grail!
Excellent set of examples. Also helps me understand why my original LPs of Pink Floyd from the 1970s sound better than the recent vinyl remasters. Off loaded a new copy of DSOTM to my brother to play on his Rega TT, phono stage and Naim Muso with its digital amp as it’s not up to my pure analogue vinyl set up.
I gotta hand it to ya man. I'm not always into some of the equipment you reviw; but, gosh darnit, it's videos like these that keep me coming back for more. In a hot and stuffy room, you are the rush of cool, fresh air that comes through when I feel like I'm about to pass out. Thanks to you and your team for all the work you put in on these vids! Always appreciate them!
God damn, John. Sometimes you post a video that just resonates with the nerd me, and this is a great example. Thanks for taking us down the DR rabbit hole. Amazing. Thank you.
Thank you, thank you, thank you. Finally a video that talks about the elephant in the room. The recording quality is the all of it. All these crazy arguments about MQA ( I have MQA and like it) and other high rez wars. Many, or most modern recordings are murderously compressed, there's no audiophile quality music to be had. I finally decided I wasn't going to let recording quality dictate what I listen to musically, and that changed my perspective. I now buy equipment that has nice tone and doesn't punish me too much with bad recordings.
There were analog cassette versions released in 1984 in the US with pretty good dynamic range, one with the LP tracks, and a special edition with "extended" (i.e., not edited) tracks.
I normally always give a thumb button for your videos John. But just had to slam the button for the mention/nod to good old VHS and the absolute legend that was Laserdisc! Love that format
Here here! Spot on. Dynamics really matter. Some of the worst recordings I've ever heard have close to zero dynamic range. Completely unnatural artificial just yuck.
Mixing and mastering engineers are just as important to the end product as the musicians. If you want to delve further I recommend ’The Mixing Engineers Handbook’ by Bobby Owinski. He explains the tools and how engineers use them to create different audio experiences, covering instrument placement, use of space, compression, equalisation and more. The stylistic choices the mixing and mastering engineers make ultimately affect your listening experience and how you engage with the music.
Great video and reminder - I agree 100%. Recording and mastering quality and choices can absolutely have a greater impact than delivery format. In my library I can think of an album stored as MP3 (MP3 was all that was offered of this particular title) that sounds better in terms of sound quality, compression be damned, than some other albums I own presented via FLAC.
Fantastic example of how mastering is so much more important than format. It's always the source material that is the most important, regardless of platform.
I consider myself an audiophile....which is the only real criteria for who is and who isn't one, if you think about it. I have some fairly high end equipment and speakers. Maybe I don't have golden ears. Probably don't. But in general the format the music comes in doesn't seem to matter to me. I like to think I can tell MP3 from CD or hi-res but I'm not sure I'd pass a blind test to prove it. The two things that consistently make a difference to me is the quality/production/engineering of the music and the level of dynamic range compression. I hear folks say that badly produced/recorded music can be corrected with the proper gear and set up. I call BS on that. Garbage in; garbage out. I hear folks say the same about dynamic range compression. I call BS on that too. I do not think that it is even physically/scientifically possible. Even with a lack of golden ears, I can easily detect and do not like overly DR compressed music unless I'm in the car or just have it playing in the background. (Of course judiciously used DR compression, especially with classical music is fine.) Soooo, for me the quest for recordings, regardless of the format, is for those that are not overly DR compressed or that are produced/engineered better. And I don't enjoy the quest. It isn't part of the fun.
I have the original DVD of, Fleetwood mac. The dance. I pop the disc in just to listen to, Gypsy in pcm. It sounds much better than the version on, Tidal. I've had the disc for about 30 years. It was the first DVD i bought.
So after seeing this vlog I searched my dvd’s and found the copy of Stop making Sense with 16 songs on it. It features also the 2.0 stereo option! I will start listening to it again, thanks to you. Special mentioning for my late Dog who seemed to like this dvd too because he tore the outside apart. Makes it a special ripped edition for me.
An old sound engineer friend of mine from Olympic studios in Barnes used the term "compressed the shit of it", in this case especially for the single "Peaches" by The Stranglers. As mentioned this was meant to make it "pop", back then it was for radio more than anything else.
You've summed up what I've been doing for the last few years or so...buying old non remastered CDs because they don't make my ears bleed. Of course music from around 1998 onwards is mastered very loud
Great discussion, John. Mastering and Remastering are so important. Tastes change over the years, for better or worse, and unfortunately many of us have got used to hearing dynamic range compression aka loudness on modern recordings, such that when an older recording gets remastered it often comes not only with compression, but also top end and low end boost to bring it in line with 'modern' tastes, which can skew the balance of an original mix. Contemporary medium to hi end audio (whether through speakers or headphones/earbuds) is much more revealing - I heard a hi-res audio file recording of Floyd's Dark Side on a hi end system a few years ago, and there was noticeable sub rumble on 'Us and Them' which may have been present on the original master but probably inaudible in 1973. Older CDs and LPs often seem quieter - they probably are - but once you dial your ears in, and you're digging the music, all can be forgiven.
The engineering and mastering makes it huge difference. I've heard some great recordings on vinyl EPS that sound better than the original album versions. Even when the original version is played on much more expensive turntables they don't sound as good as the EP played on lesser equipment. The dynamic range on some of the better mastered CDs from the 80s & 90 are amazing.
The sad truth is that whatever format one buys, a dynamically compressed new remastering may be used in all of them, so they literally sound the same. If each format were being used to its full potential, only then would it make sense to compare them, and/or extol the superiority of one over the other.
You should try the original album .I have found over time that the new high priced special 180 gram albums suck and that the old albums sound better if you can buy a original release copy. The best sounding album i have is a old RCA Elvis record and i am not a huge fan of Elvis just that the record sounds amazing it was done using tube equipment mastered.
Excellent follow-up article where you found the DR of the vinyl to be 13. That's the one piece i felt you were missing in this video which is that, digitally cut or not, different masters are often used to create the vinyl. Ideally, taking into account the limitations (and strengths) of the vinyl medium. Thanks for the follow-up article acknowledging those things!
I enjoyed the readable, shorter edition of this review and I enjoyed the video too. Joking aside, years ago I bounced a copy of the VHS to cassette and that faithfully represents the full film with intros and without song edits. I was really annoyed when the very latest came out and doesn’t offer the walk on and intro of David Byrne before playing his tape. I used to buy bootleg tapes of concerts and the best thing about those is the difference in performance, talking to the crowd and tuning before the the song. I digress. Great job as always John.
I have been avoiding new remasters whenever I can because I find that new masters are louder but not as spacious. So I asked my daughter who is going to school to be a sound engineer and she explained this same thing. She said that the 2 main reasons are 1. if it does not sound loud it will not play on radio and 2. people today tend to prefer louder over spaciousness.
Thank you for having the knowledge and skill to understand this stuff and taking the time to put it into words. I have been listening to music for over 40 years, but I could never explain to my friends why some older "inferior" recordings sounded better to me the "superior" new remastered ones. I could describe the loudness wars to some degree, but I didn't have any numbers to "show" people what I thought I was hearing. A big example that I know well is the difference between a cassette recording I made for myself from Rush's _Grace Under Pressure Tour_ stereo VHS release (released in 1986) vs. the remastered official CD version (released in 2006). The newer version, although cleaner, has too much low end in addition to just the compressed dynamic range. Best way for me to describe what I'm hearing is to say it sounds like, at the time of remastering, they tried as hard as they could to try to make Geddy's 1980s Steinberger bass sound like his 2005 Fender Jazz bass. Same effect on the drums, too, in that they sound more like DW drums than Tama drums -- all tone and no attack. They're kind of tubby and lack the growl I expect. Anyway, thank you again. I'll be using the DR Loudness database to inform my future music purchases.
How to mesure the DR of a Vinyl? I guess that it will depend on the equipment a lot compared to the CD, digital, blue ray, that the file can be analyzed ‘as it is’
It's common for mastering engineers to create different masters for vinyl releases that don't feature the heavy compression techniques used for CD's or downloads. Your vinyl edition of the 2023 album might very well have more dynamic range than the hi-res files. It would be an interesting check if you can be arsed to rip the vinyl of course! Great video , thanks.
Yep, I watch videos here of high end audio systems and often they are playing awful recordings that the mastering has ruined, or featuring singers that forced the sound engineers to auto tune and play all sorts of games with. If you cannot hear the difference between good mastering and bad, don't spend $5,000 on a pair of speakers, pay $100 for some Sony bookshelf speakers and call it a day.
I think this guy is actually Elvis Costello's younger brother. I originally purchased this LP shortly after it came out. I also have the 1999 CD version. Got to see the movie "premier" at the Terrace Theater in Minneapolis MN in 1984. (David Byrne introduced his parents who were in the audience.) And the original concert at Forest Hills in NYC in summer of 1983. One of my favorite concerts...EVER.
As usual great presentation based on solid facts. It's great to hear some good feedback around Blu-ray Audio as it really is a neglected format. Thanks for honestly assessing this new release with pure objectivity. BTW, It was also a fabulous concert too that played only once in Australia in 1984 - before the movie or soundtrack (AND you think you are getting crusty...) Cheers from Oz
Agree but Blu Ray Audio only is such a niche market now that streaming services are mass market & generate huge amounts of money in monthly subscriptions. I have just a very few discs. Lionel Richie & Bob Marley greatest hits which do sound excellent 👍
Good explanation. But don’t blame mastering engineers for making that choice with high compression, they are told to do so by label managers. I’ve seen interviews with Bernie Grundman, Kevin Grey, Bob Ludwig and others - all of them told that compression is bad and they don’t like it. But labels tend to want the album to sound loud. Bernie once said that he presented his version of the mastering to the label representative and heard next: this is very good, we like it but make it louder. And it doesn’t work that way, unfortunately - you can’t make it sound good and loud (compressed).
Rick Rubin being one of the worst offenders who is still pushing it to this day since it's obviously a winning solution for him considering his financial situation.
Radio Swiss Classis is an internet radio station which at 96 kbps AAC serves music at a very good technical quality just because none or only slight compression has been applied. "Why is the volume level of Radio Swiss Classic set lower than that for other stations? The music we play on our station goes through only the bare minimum of technical adjustment, so that you can enjoy its range to the fullest. This means that pianissimo and fortissimo alike sound almost as if you were in a concert hall. Why don’t you offer a higher streaming quality than 128kbps MP3? In view of the very rapid pace of technical progress, a gradual increase in streaming quality is likely in the medium term, but no definite plans have yet been made. Improving streaming quality means that we will need more bandwidth for each station, and that means much higher costs. However, only a small proportion of our listeners - those with the corresponding hi fi equipment - will be able to benefit from the marginal improvement in sound quality. Our 96kbps AAC+ stream offers a slightly better-quality sound, if you would like to try it."
A case could be made that some/many audiophiles actually have very poor hearing. That repeated/obsessional listening to music could've 'also' detrimentally affected their auditory faculties. Audiophiles reside more in their 'internal memories of music' than external stimuli. This causes a futile dilemma they're always trying to 'fix'. A problem that 'normies' don't experience. Because their connection 'or frustration' with music hasn't been so deeply internalised. As modern Western society looks towards disenfranchised groups, those that think or hear differently. Possibly Audiophiles are another 'on the spectrum' group. A compulsive, neurodivergent clique. Making up for their perceived 'lack' with obsessional and overcompensating behaviours.
Just a couple of things to add. 1) Mastering engineers provide a service. They can advise, but if their client (label, artist or both) demand their music is as loud as other artist’s on the radio or streaming, a mastering engineer who didn’t deliver that would never work. 2) Sadly our brain perceives loud as better. In my work I sometimes have to compare the same audio clip. It is essential to level match the two clips. If you don’t you almost always perceive the slightly lower level clip as weak, insipid. The louder clip is ‘ear candy’. Yes, once you have bought something and want to listen to it multiple times the loudness quickly grates and is tiring. But when you are auditioning some audio, the louder it is the more likely you will choose it. Which is why most artists and labels are locked into this loudness addiction.
Just dug out my copy of Stop Making Sense and the original shrink wrap is still clinging on. The original price sticker says £6.29 and there is a date of 21185 which I'm assuming as 2nd November 1985. It's playing as I speak and despite a little surface noise sounds good on my budget setup. not looking to add the re-mastered version. Isn't most of the 're-mastered' thing just a sales ploy?
Unfortunately most of todays music is compressed & most of the stereo image is gone. Which I think because the majority of people ( Younger Generation) are just listening to music either through a mono bluetooth speaker or direct from their phone speaker. So that is what engineers are catering for. The technology is 100% there for mastering engineers to have a very wide dynamic range & stereo image. But that would sound worse. Rick Beato just done a fantastic video in regards to why does music from 50 years ago sound better than todays music.
"He's doing God's work" that made me laugh. Thank you for this video. I agree 100%. A crappy recording/engineering/mastering will always sound crappy. Thanks again!
I feel like this is the definitive case study on why vinyl or bit rate alone will not guarantee the best audio quality. Bravo!
Au contraire...😂
@@eespinosa64 🤣
It’s a bizarre history. One of CD’s selling points upon introduction was its greater dynamic range. Then the loudness wars started, and this was completely forgotten. Then after that, the vinyl revival started, but still as a bit of a niche product for those with refined tastes, and guess what? The *less* dynamically compressed masterings were now relegated to vinyl. So I’m actually curious what the DR rating of this album’s vinyl version is, because of this one is just as compressed as the new digital versions, we will be able to conclude that vinyl is fully back in the mainstream again. 😝
It's hardware that's gonna get you the desired result, forget the formats it's all in the hardware...
@@jerryscanassomeone didn’t watch the video 🙄
As someone that remembers listening to Talking Heads on cassette, with the headphones that came with my Walkman, while mowing the lawn, pretty much everything sounds better now.
If you had have listened without mowing the lawn pretty much everything would have sounded better then too
If you're nostalgic for that time, check out the koss KPH 40. They may look cheap but they sit right next to my $300 headphones, Plus they scale well on amplifiers.
I've got a copy of TNOTBITH on cassette and it sounds incredible. Actually my favorite TH album.
@@asherfilms923 I second your opinion . Koss kph30i sound bloody good. They teleport me back to 90s. I was forever hunting for “THAT “ sound and have various mid-fi (read below $500) cans and none sound as engaging and musical as these do
The elephant in the room that wasn’t mentioned is that the original mix was from a Sony PCM-3324 DASH recorder, which has a maximum resolution of 48k 16bit. Any version claiming higher resolution than that has been upsampled
Exactly 👏 exactly 👏 exactly 👏 thank you. Came here to say just this.
My older brother and his friend rented Stop Making Sense on VHS back in 1987. They were cool enuff to let me watch with them. My 14 yr old brain was blown away. I remember hopping on the bus and buying Fear of Music and Speaking in Tongues on LP later that week. I still have them. What a trip to discover and work through Talking Heads' catalogue at that age. Life-long fan ever since.
It should be pointed out that a track being "high dynamic range" is not necessarily a universal good. It's great in a quiet listening environment, but in a car or a bus, you end up turning up the volume to hear the quiet sections, and then get your head blown off by the loud sections. It's almost like there need to be separate masters, labeled as such, depending on the use case.
This loudness war is a plague … fueled by the adoption of crappy Bluetooth mono speakers and crappy in ear headphones …
HUGE thing to also note is that Talking Heads have had quite the good track record as far as new mixes on new formats go, more so than most artists. The surround mixes are superb!
John - this is the most IMPORTANT and REVELATORY video you've ever made!
I couldn't understand why my original CD's sounded better than my supposed new 'Remastered' CD's and Hi Rez file downloads. It's like when we were duped into believing that digital was always better than analog in the '80's.
I'm off to buy up all the cheap, original early NON remastered CD versions!
Yep. Will be Rosetta Stones of playback never to be heard via streamingm and without vinyl pink noise and mastering format constraints. Good luck finding them mind.
And you may ask yourself: “What is the dynamic range like?”
I see what you did there...
DR is the current elephant in the room and 800 pound gorilla. When overly compressed it ruins everything regardless of production, engineering, format or hi-fi system.
As a recording artist and studio producer, I enjoyed this quite a lot. Compression is a tool to be used delicately. It is necessary to balance dynamics between sole tracks so that they balance each other in the mix. But overall dynamic range compression can be a terrible thing if done without sensitivity. It's a testament to the engineers that recorded it and later mastered it that a live recording back in the 80s was recorded so well. Because it's usually live recordings that suffer badly under the compression tool as a producer tries to account for live variables. Anyway, it's great to watch that live Blu-ray. We forget how brilliant and innovative Talking Heads were. My fav band... Prince's Sign of the Times. Another brilliant live concert movie....❤
excellent !
my friends made me believe that “ THAT SOUND” you are not able to find in new hi res music is purely nostalgia , but I was convinced that my CDs from early 90s actually sounded better
As I've said before, it's not about the format, it's about the music.
In my case I have many LPs which never came out on CD - and now in 2023 I have many CDs that aren't available on LP.
I think loudness wars did enormous damage to the CD format's reputation.
At my age I have a pretty big collection, and for music that I really love I usually have several CD editions, often the LP as well. For me, in pretty well 90% of cases, it's the pre-loudness war CDs which come out on top and get played the most.
In recent years, I've kind of developed a new hifi mentality - that my system is there to "serve my collection". As I can't have all the music I love in perfect sound then I need that can handle just about everything.
We need more videos like this John. A fascinating discussion on the merits of good mastering vs, bit rate and audio format. The more people realise this the sooner we can move away from remastered dynamically compressed releases.
You know, modern sound engineers must deeply consider the way people listen to music. Mono playback on cell phones and Bluetooth speakers adds the risk of phase cancellation which can compromise audio quality. Of course, this is not an excuse for poor audio mastering on a vinyl record.
Perhaps a blind audition of the same song from this album and see who can distinguish the different compression rates. In the end more than 90% is still decided by the music.
I try to avoid re-masters if possible, as it's as you say, a fancy way of saying "made louder". The best sounding CDs are generally the ones made in the 80s and early 90's, after that it's pot luck on how good a job they have done. It's why vinyl often sounds better than CD, because they have to master it differently so it works on vinyl. Great video JD. Music first, mastering second, format last.
... and aren't lots of modern vinyl pressings done from masters produced for CDs in years gone by? that's what i've often heard and read.
@@yobgolI understand this is because the original analogue oxide tape masters are in such poor condition.
Excellent discussion! There are very few remasters that are better than the original as most modern sound engineers appear to be idiots now.
If "nothing beats the sound of vinyl" then surely we would all be listening to.............nothing! 🙃
I saw the movie in Ann Arbor in a theater when it came out. Nobody was in their seats, everyone up and dancing. We were all high as kites.
People really underestimate dynamic range. That's why I hunt old unremastered CD.
Great video. With all the technical advancements I hoped that the loudness wars would be well and truly over by now. At the very least there could be two versions: the highly compressed version and what I call the musical version.
THANK YOU!!! Garbage in = garbage out.
The only other thing I'd mention, that will drive you crazy, is that sometimes you can have a recording that shows greater dynamic range not because it is less compressed but because it's been messed with, maybe resampled or high or low pass filtered or something else, which has caused what are called "overshoots." They don't improve the actual dynamics, they just push the average volume of everything down because of these very transient spikes.
These often are coming from copies of copies of master tapes... meaning that it may register as greater dynamic range, but have more tape hiss.
...Then again, NO tape hiss may indicate aggressive noise reduction has been used, which can dull the highs...
I love this hobby, and I hate it, all at the same time. I wish record labels would release absolutely flat dumps of their master tapes and let US choose to "remaster" them ourselves if we wanted.
After this video I am considering to create 1000 accounts to subscribe again with each one of them. Your Channel and work is like an oasis inside the hottest desert. Thanks for this darko. Kudos from Athens Greece
I remember the day I first got my hands on Sony’s Minidisc. Handheld & automotive derived. That was a step up from ordinary CD’s in the late 90’s. Then i heard an SA-CD in a local hi-fi shop.
Damn that was like hearing the instruments live in your ear..
Great episode 👍
Sad that SACD was never adopted as the new industry standard from CDs like DVD to Blu Ray was 🙁
Those SACDs that were released were always sold as luxury products requiring very expensive niche market players 🙄
I seen stop making sense in the theatre 1984 in a small rural town. It was electric, the projectionist turned the movie off at one point and lectured everyone to sit down and stop dancing
I am doing the laundry and I had to pause and give you a huge HUG because this is VERY important stuff that no one seems to care about these days..back to laundry.
John airs the record industry dirty drawers-we do our,uh..laundry.
Perfect, John. You nailed it. 'Brick-Walled' digitally mastered recordings that are massively compressed have been, sadly, ubiquitous for a good number of years now. I'm a 40-yr. plus audio engineer/musician/producer and will always go for the original 'red book' mastered CD, as I'm less likely to get an album that comes up, when analyzed, as almost a complete black audio wave graph w/ the very occasional 'peak' which usually ends up being untethered sibilance. (Same goes for the vinyl version - give me, in most instances - the first pressing w/ original mastering).
I think you only have to look at how the vast majority of people consume music today.
Either cheap ear buds, car stereos or Bluetooth speakers. If music was not heavily compressed, then it would not work well on these devices as they can’t reproduce the full dynamic range.
The Bluray of the film is most probably going to be played on a sound system that has decent speakers and probably as sub, so will benefit for a higher range.
Who knows maybe one day in the future we can have variable dynamic range to optimise to our listening equipment and environment.
Very true. Although pop music singles are all about shifting units on what ever format.
Streaming has compounded that ability for top selling artists at the expense of less commercial yet more creative ones 🙁
In 1983, I was the Production Coordinator for a Mattel commercial being filmed at Hollywood Center Studios' lot. (formerly Coppola's old Zoetrope Studios) The Director of the commercial was Jordan Cronenweth who was also the DP. At that point Jordan was best known as the DP for the pivotal Blade Runner movie. Early afternoon of each day, we would wrap for the day and run over to the Pantages to join the other cameramen, Grips and Gaffers who had been prelighting all day in anticipation of that night's performance which was shot for the three nights. Being on that stage with Demme, Jordan and Byrne who was a part of the visuals and creative, was one of the highlights of my career. Being a huge talking Heads fan, I had already purchased tickets for two of the three shows. Being in the audience to see those shows after a couple of pops at the nearby Frolic room was sublime. Looking forward to buying the new 4k, Dolby Atmos DVD.
Roon also analyses dynamic range and can display this information for each album, so no need for additional software or expense
Roons display of dynamic range is crap. They use the wrong algorythm.
I have the Blu ray and it is one of my best sounding concert Blu rays. Possibly the best. Pink floyds delicate sound of thunder is pretty high up there too
Your conclusion will hopefully reach a huge number of people and prevent arguments over which format is best etc. Compressing the dynamic range just makes for fatiguing listening.
Great video. Your best.
The master mix is KING. You can not get better audio, regardless of format, than what is on the mix. I am a firm believer that a standard CD is more than good enough. Most of the bad rep of CD audio was due to bad master mixes being used.
Yes, yes, YES!! I’ve been proclaiming this for years, that it’s not the format, but the mastering that you are really hearing. Compression does bring forth more details, like a magnifying glass, but at a great loss of dynamics and is fatiguing. Sadly I have SACDs where the audio wavetops are flatlined and audibly distorted. It’s a crime that I cannot get my money back on what is a clearly defective hi-res product. I love this episode! I only wish you had recorded the vinyl and measured the DR.
Depeche Mode Sacd's. Dynamically destroyed mid 2000s horror shows. A QED.
Tidal used to have original and remastered versions of a lot of stuff. Universally, the originals were better even with background noise. Now it’s usually only the remasters, which have quite heavy noise reduction. They generally sound less engaging.
Hi John, your videos are always great, but this one was outstanding! Please more of these!
John, this is a superb and much needed explanation of the ultimate importance of mastering and of dynamic range. There is one significant omission that I would urge you to clarify, if possible, which is the difference between dynamic range compression and file compression of a digital format recording. Understanding that distinction is essential for understanding your overall argument.
Really enjoyed this one. It is about time someone started talking about mastering and dynamic range. It is a travesty that for all advancements made most music (IMO at least) sounds worse now than it is did 30 years ago.
I cannot imagine record labels stopping the 'Make it louder' request so maybe the best we can hope for is an additional mastering? Kind of surprised that artists are not on this, surely they would want their music to sound as good as it possibly could?
Majority of artists make most of their money through concerts now. New albums are often concert promos....
My problem with vinyl is quality of the pressing differs. Ive heard vinyls that sounds very good. But most of the music i listen to, is pressed bad on vinyl. All tho CDs sounds better no matter the vinyl quality, by my experience.
But somtimes i buy my jazz/blues on vinyl and everything else on CD.
@Darko Audio 100% agree.
The recording and the master are the most important factors for the final quality, much more than the format.
In the other side, regarding the dynamic range, the vinyl is the physical format more limited.
Great article. Please do more like this. I ripped the Blue ray using "DVD Audio Extractor" and measure a DR of 14 on my 24 bit rip, not the 13 you mention.
Paul from PS Audio discussed this same topic in his video today...very helpful!!
Lucky me I have plenty of CDs from the 80th and 90th.Nice clip you going back to the basics and that is Music and how it's recorded! That was always my first priority and the HiFi system came afterwards. If you had good recorded Music then even a mediocre system sounded good. Some people forget that and chase the holy grail!
I don’t think I’ve ever heard a remastered album that sounds better than the original.
Excellent set of examples. Also helps me understand why my original LPs of Pink Floyd from the 1970s sound better than the recent vinyl remasters. Off loaded a new copy of DSOTM to my brother to play on his Rega TT, phono stage and Naim Muso with its digital amp as it’s not up to my pure analogue vinyl set up.
I can’t stress enough how extremely well explained is the issue here. I can’t wait for the continuation!
I gotta hand it to ya man. I'm not always into some of the equipment you reviw; but, gosh darnit, it's videos like these that keep me coming back for more. In a hot and stuffy room, you are the rush of cool, fresh air that comes through when I feel like I'm about to pass out. Thanks to you and your team for all the work you put in on these vids! Always appreciate them!
God damn, John. Sometimes you post a video that just resonates with the nerd me, and this is a great example. Thanks for taking us down the DR rabbit hole. Amazing. Thank you.
Thank you, thank you, thank you. Finally a video that talks about the elephant in the room. The recording quality is the all of it. All these crazy arguments about MQA ( I have MQA and like it) and other high rez wars. Many, or most modern recordings are murderously compressed, there's no audiophile quality music to be had. I finally decided I wasn't going to let recording quality dictate what I listen to musically, and that changed my perspective. I now buy equipment that has nice tone and doesn't punish me too much with bad recordings.
Recording and mastering are two different things. The recording can be stellar, then ruined by heavy handed mastering for loudness.
This is my favorite video of yours to date. Bravo on comparing the music recordings instead of component review. Love it!
There were analog cassette versions released in 1984 in the US with pretty good dynamic range, one with the LP tracks, and a special edition with "extended" (i.e., not edited) tracks.
I normally always give a thumb button for your videos John. But just had to slam the button for the mention/nod to good old VHS and the absolute legend that was Laserdisc! Love that format
Here here! Spot on. Dynamics really matter. Some of the worst recordings I've ever heard have close to zero dynamic range. Completely unnatural artificial just yuck.
Sometimes I think that John forgot more about audio than I will ever know. I really enjoy these audio knowledge drops and learning something new.
Mixing and mastering engineers are just as important to the end product as the musicians. If you want to delve further I recommend ’The Mixing Engineers Handbook’ by Bobby Owinski. He explains the tools and how engineers use them to create different audio experiences, covering instrument placement, use of space, compression, equalisation and more. The stylistic choices the mixing and mastering engineers make ultimately affect your listening experience and how you engage with the music.
Have you checked the dynamic range on the vinyl ?
Is this possible with the software ?
Great video and reminder - I agree 100%. Recording and mastering quality and choices can absolutely have a greater impact than delivery format. In my library I can think of an album stored as MP3 (MP3 was all that was offered of this particular title) that sounds better in terms of sound quality, compression be damned, than some other albums I own presented via FLAC.
Amazingly informative. I love this album and cherish my original CD
Fantastic example of how mastering is so much more important than format. It's always the source material that is the most important, regardless of platform.
I consider myself an audiophile....which is the only real criteria for who is and who isn't one, if you think about it. I have some fairly high end equipment and speakers. Maybe I don't have golden ears. Probably don't. But in general the format the music comes in doesn't seem to matter to me. I like to think I can tell MP3 from CD or hi-res but I'm not sure I'd pass a blind test to prove it.
The two things that consistently make a difference to me is the quality/production/engineering of the music and the level of dynamic range compression.
I hear folks say that badly produced/recorded music can be corrected with the proper gear and set up. I call BS on that. Garbage in; garbage out.
I hear folks say the same about dynamic range compression. I call BS on that too. I do not think that it is even physically/scientifically possible.
Even with a lack of golden ears, I can easily detect and do not like overly DR compressed music unless I'm in the car or just have it playing in the background. (Of course judiciously used DR compression, especially with classical music is fine.)
Soooo, for me the quest for recordings, regardless of the format, is for those that are not overly DR compressed or that are produced/engineered better. And I don't enjoy the quest. It isn't part of the fun.
I have the original DVD of, Fleetwood mac. The dance. I pop the disc in just to listen to, Gypsy in pcm. It sounds much better than the version on, Tidal.
I've had the disc for about 30 years. It was the first DVD i bought.
So after seeing this vlog I searched my dvd’s and found the copy of Stop making Sense with 16 songs on it. It features also the 2.0 stereo option! I will start listening to it again, thanks to you. Special mentioning for my late Dog who seemed to like this dvd too because he tore the outside apart. Makes it a special ripped edition for me.
Die Zeit, die man verschwendet, über das „richtige“ Format zu diskutieren, fehlt am Ende zum Musik hören. 😂 Good vid again. 🎶
This actually did make sense
And I still would like to know what the DR of that first edition in Vinyl is!!! Please!!!
What a great video. Really enjoyed watching this and the journey and explanation of this album.
An old sound engineer friend of mine from Olympic studios in Barnes used the term "compressed the shit of it", in this case especially for the single "Peaches" by The Stranglers. As mentioned this was meant to make it "pop", back then it was for radio more than anything else.
Great track that Peaches.
You've summed up what I've been doing for the last few years or so...buying old non remastered CDs because they don't make my ears bleed. Of course music from around 1998 onwards is mastered very loud
Thank you so much for clarifying on the most important aspect of sound quality!
Great discussion, John. Mastering and Remastering are so important. Tastes change over the years, for better or worse, and unfortunately many of us have got used to hearing dynamic range compression aka loudness on modern recordings, such that when an older recording gets remastered it often comes not only with compression, but also top end and low end boost to bring it in line with 'modern' tastes, which can skew the balance of an original mix. Contemporary medium to hi end audio (whether through speakers or headphones/earbuds) is much more revealing - I heard a hi-res audio file recording of Floyd's Dark Side on a hi end system a few years ago, and there was noticeable sub rumble on 'Us and Them' which may have been present on the original master but probably inaudible in 1973. Older CDs and LPs often seem quieter - they probably are - but once you dial your ears in, and you're digging the music, all can be forgiven.
The engineering and mastering makes it huge difference. I've heard some great recordings on vinyl EPS that sound better than the original album versions. Even when the original version is played on much more expensive turntables they don't sound as good as the EP played on lesser equipment. The dynamic range on some of the better mastered CDs from the 80s & 90 are amazing.
Bagged myself an original early UK CD. What an amazing sounding album!
The sad truth is that whatever format one buys, a dynamically compressed new remastering may be used in all of them, so they literally sound the same. If each format were being used to its full potential, only then would it make sense to compare them, and/or extol the superiority of one over the other.
You should try the original album .I have found over time that the new high priced special 180 gram albums suck and that the old albums sound better if you can buy a original release copy. The best sounding album i have is a old RCA Elvis record and i am not a huge fan of Elvis just that the record sounds amazing it was done using tube equipment mastered.
Most o f the best sounding LPs I have are 50s 60s pressings. Ben E. King on Polydor, Nina Simone on Marble Arch, Muddy on Chess etc etc.
Excellent follow-up article where you found the DR of the vinyl to be 13. That's the one piece i felt you were missing in this video which is that, digitally cut or not, different masters are often used to create the vinyl. Ideally, taking into account the limitations (and strengths) of the vinyl medium. Thanks for the follow-up article acknowledging those things!
Yes agree.
Where is this follow up? I don't see it on Darkos YT channel.
I enjoyed the readable, shorter edition of this review and I enjoyed the video too. Joking aside, years ago I bounced a copy of the VHS to cassette and that faithfully represents the full film with intros and without song edits. I was really annoyed when the very latest came out and doesn’t offer the walk on and intro of David Byrne before playing his tape. I used to buy bootleg tapes of concerts and the best thing about those is the difference in performance, talking to the crowd and tuning before the the song. I digress. Great job as always John.
Kudos to you! I think this is one of your best segments.
I have been avoiding new remasters whenever I can because I find that new masters are louder but not as spacious. So I asked my daughter who is going to school to be a sound engineer and she explained this same thing. She said that the 2 main reasons are 1. if it does not sound loud it will not play on radio and 2. people today tend to prefer louder over spaciousness.
Not only my favourite music/movie but also great technical content - perhaps my favourite video so far!
I like this guy. He's more "sensible" than many others in YT audiophile space.
Thank you for having the knowledge and skill to understand this stuff and taking the time to put it into words. I have been listening to music for over 40 years, but I could never explain to my friends why some older "inferior" recordings sounded better to me the "superior" new remastered ones. I could describe the loudness wars to some degree, but I didn't have any numbers to "show" people what I thought I was hearing. A big example that I know well is the difference between a cassette recording I made for myself from Rush's _Grace Under Pressure Tour_ stereo VHS release (released in 1986) vs. the remastered official CD version (released in 2006). The newer version, although cleaner, has too much low end in addition to just the compressed dynamic range. Best way for me to describe what I'm hearing is to say it sounds like, at the time of remastering, they tried as hard as they could to try to make Geddy's 1980s Steinberger bass sound like his 2005 Fender Jazz bass. Same effect on the drums, too, in that they sound more like DW drums than Tama drums -- all tone and no attack. They're kind of tubby and lack the growl I expect.
Anyway, thank you again. I'll be using the DR Loudness database to inform my future music purchases.
How to mesure the DR of a Vinyl? I guess that it will depend on the equipment a lot compared to the CD, digital, blue ray, that the file can be analyzed ‘as it is’
It's common for mastering engineers to create different masters for vinyl releases that don't feature the heavy compression techniques used for CD's or downloads. Your vinyl edition of the 2023 album might very well have more dynamic range than the hi-res files. It would be an interesting check if you can be arsed to rip the vinyl of course! Great video , thanks.
I'd bet my house on it.
What is the app in use on the iPhone at 16:26?
Yep, I watch videos here of high end audio systems and often they are playing awful recordings that the mastering has ruined, or featuring singers that forced the sound engineers to auto tune and play all sorts of games with.
If you cannot hear the difference between good mastering and bad, don't spend $5,000 on a pair of speakers, pay $100 for some Sony bookshelf speakers and call it a day.
High quality mastering blows delivery formats out of the water.
I think this guy is actually Elvis Costello's younger brother.
I originally purchased this LP shortly after it came out.
I also have the 1999 CD version.
Got to see the movie "premier" at the Terrace Theater in Minneapolis MN in 1984.
(David Byrne introduced his parents who were in the audience.)
And the original concert at Forest Hills in NYC in summer of 1983.
One of my favorite concerts...EVER.
As usual great presentation based on solid facts. It's great to hear some good feedback around Blu-ray Audio as it really is a neglected format. Thanks for honestly assessing this new release with pure objectivity. BTW, It was also a fabulous concert too that played only once in Australia in 1984 - before the movie or soundtrack (AND you think you are getting crusty...) Cheers from Oz
Agree but Blu Ray Audio only is such a niche market now that streaming services are mass market & generate huge amounts of money in monthly subscriptions.
I have just a very few discs. Lionel Richie & Bob Marley greatest hits which do sound excellent 👍
It's all in the mastering period !!!!!
90%
Good explanation. But don’t blame mastering engineers for making that choice with high compression, they are told to do so by label managers. I’ve seen interviews with Bernie Grundman, Kevin Grey, Bob Ludwig and others - all of them told that compression is bad and they don’t like it. But labels tend to want the album to sound loud. Bernie once said that he presented his version of the mastering to the label representative and heard next: this is very good, we like it but make it louder.
And it doesn’t work that way, unfortunately - you can’t make it sound good and loud (compressed).
Rick Rubin being one of the worst offenders who is still pushing it to this day since it's obviously a winning solution for him considering his financial situation.
Not only loud but 50 minutes of playing time on each side of the lp 😂
Fatiguing masters on lossless file formats will still be fatuiging.
Oh, bolloc**. My audiophile road has just got bumpier 😂
Radio Swiss Classis is an internet radio station which at 96 kbps AAC serves music at a very good technical quality just because none or only slight compression has been applied.
"Why is the volume level of Radio Swiss Classic set lower than that for other stations?
The music we play on our station goes through only the bare minimum of technical adjustment, so that you can enjoy its range to the fullest. This means that pianissimo and fortissimo alike sound almost as if you were in a concert hall.
Why don’t you offer a higher streaming quality than 128kbps MP3?
In view of the very rapid pace of technical progress, a gradual increase in streaming quality is likely in the medium term, but no definite plans have yet been made. Improving streaming quality means that we will need more bandwidth for each station, and that means much higher costs. However, only a small proportion of our listeners - those with the corresponding hi fi equipment - will be able to benefit from the marginal improvement in sound quality. Our 96kbps AAC+ stream offers a slightly better-quality sound, if you would like to try it."
A case could be made that some/many audiophiles actually have very poor hearing.
That repeated/obsessional listening to music could've 'also' detrimentally affected their auditory faculties.
Audiophiles reside more in their 'internal memories of music' than external stimuli.
This causes a futile dilemma they're always trying to 'fix'. A problem that 'normies' don't experience.
Because their connection 'or frustration' with music hasn't been so deeply internalised.
As modern Western society looks towards disenfranchised groups, those that think or hear differently.
Possibly Audiophiles are another 'on the spectrum' group. A compulsive, neurodivergent clique.
Making up for their perceived 'lack' with obsessional and overcompensating behaviours.
Just a couple of things to add. 1) Mastering engineers provide a service. They can advise, but if their client (label, artist or both) demand their music is as loud as other artist’s on the radio or streaming, a mastering engineer who didn’t deliver that would never work.
2) Sadly our brain perceives loud as better. In my work I sometimes have to compare the same audio clip. It is essential to level match the two clips. If you don’t you almost always perceive the slightly lower level clip as weak, insipid. The louder clip is ‘ear candy’.
Yes, once you have bought something and want to listen to it multiple times the loudness quickly grates and is tiring. But when you are auditioning some audio, the louder it is the more likely you will choose it.
Which is why most artists and labels are locked into this loudness addiction.
The space between the songs matters ! One of the most inventive with respect to this is Pixies Doolittle. Genius.
Just dug out my copy of Stop Making Sense and the original shrink wrap is still clinging on. The original price sticker says £6.29 and there is a date of 21185 which I'm assuming as 2nd November 1985. It's playing as I speak and despite a little surface noise sounds good on my budget setup. not looking to add the re-mastered version. Isn't most of the 're-mastered' thing just a sales ploy?
Excellent video John. This one really made me think as well as being informative. 🙂
Stop Making Sense Blu-ray? Check. Blu-ray compatible USB disc drive? Check. Time to learn how to rip audio from a Blu-ray disc. Thanks for the tip!
Unfortunately most of todays music is compressed & most of the stereo image is gone. Which I think because the majority of people ( Younger Generation)
are just listening to music either through a mono bluetooth speaker or direct from their phone speaker. So that is what engineers are catering for.
The technology is 100% there for mastering engineers to have a very wide dynamic range & stereo image. But that would sound worse.
Rick Beato just done a fantastic video in regards to why does music from 50 years ago sound better than todays music.
Sat a couple rows behind you at the screening in Berlin today. I had an absolut blast, what a great piece of music and movie material.
"He's doing God's work" that made me laugh. Thank you for this video. I agree 100%. A crappy recording/engineering/mastering will always sound crappy. Thanks again!