A life was lost due to someone running a stop 🛑 sign.I see it every day,drivers running stop signs and red lights. I have even seen someone run a red light going south on Bailey Ave @ Kensington.There was a police car on Kensington and they chose not to do anything.Traffic police are few and mostly missing from the roadways.Sad times on the streets of WNY.
I hate to say it, but she did right this time. Tragedy is not a lotto ticket. Insurance is shy high already. Money wont heal the wounds. The lawyers get most of it anyway.
Emotional damage is vague, subjective, difficult to quantify, difficult to prove, and therefore prone to abuse and hyperbole and I don't feel is appropriate for a court to adjudicate. To award damages based on grief would incentivize people to exaggerate their grief for money or vengeance against whoever may be indirectly responsible by negligence for their relative's death. We don't have blood monitors of their neurotransmitter levels so how do we know how much serotonin or cortisol a particular individual is has in their system? And a jury of non-psychologists are supposed to assess the mental consequences of a tragedy to such precision so as to award potentially millions of dollars on that? Victims' emotional rights should not have a major place in an impartial justice system. That is a common defense of the death penalty. That the victims' families want it. They may want it but the emotions of people directly affected by something should not usually influence what is supposed to be an impartial and dispassionate exercising of law. My view is that families will want money and vengeance and neither of those motivations is congruent with a fair court system. And in these cases the revenge would usually be against people for negligence and not malice. Vengeance over malice is one thing but vengeance over an accident is quite another. Malice is difficult for me to forgive, albeit not impossible and I try in the best Christian way I can, but accidental harm I can forgive easily but I feel many others cannot.
All this woman does is line her own pockets. She could care less about New Yorkers.
She's the governor of liquor!!
remember this when she next asks for your vote
Oh wahhhh, you'll still vote the same.
Protects insurance companies and other entities.
The govern NYC and California don’t give dam about the public
ITS ALMOST LIKE THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY HAS THE POLITICANS BOUGHT AND PAID FOR. FUCKING WEIRD.
So corporations are now legislators.
What a cruella thing to do!
If she were to suddenly meet her own Luigi nobody would be surprised and nothing of value would be lost.
Trying to make money off the dead bodies .
Even better yet: Tell Gov. Hochul, it's a new type of Bail Reform.
A life was lost due to someone running a stop 🛑 sign.I see it every day,drivers running stop signs and red lights. I have even seen someone run a red light going south on Bailey Ave @ Kensington.There was a police car on Kensington and they chose not to do anything.Traffic police are few and mostly missing from the roadways.Sad times on the streets of WNY.
You brought it upon yourselves
@ ,those who voted for her and other Democrats are the ones who brought it on!
I hate to say it, but she did right this time. Tragedy is not a lotto ticket. Insurance is shy high already. Money wont heal the wounds. The lawyers get most of it anyway.
Was it okay for her to talk smack about her now constituents?
If I ever die in a situation like this, please don't let them use it to get rich. You can't put a price on life.
Emotional damage is vague, subjective, difficult to quantify, difficult to prove, and therefore prone to abuse and hyperbole and I don't feel is appropriate for a court to adjudicate. To award damages based on grief would incentivize people to exaggerate their grief for money or vengeance against whoever may be indirectly responsible by negligence for their relative's death. We don't have blood monitors of their neurotransmitter levels so how do we know how much serotonin or cortisol a particular individual is has in their system? And a jury of non-psychologists are supposed to assess the mental consequences of a tragedy to such precision so as to award potentially millions of dollars on that?
Victims' emotional rights should not have a major place in an impartial justice system. That is a common defense of the death penalty. That the victims' families want it. They may want it but the emotions of people directly affected by something should not usually influence what is supposed to be an impartial and dispassionate exercising of law. My view is that families will want money and vengeance and neither of those motivations is congruent with a fair court system. And in these cases the revenge would usually be against people for negligence and not malice. Vengeance over malice is one thing but vengeance over an accident is quite another. Malice is difficult for me to forgive, albeit not impossible and I try in the best Christian way I can, but accidental harm I can forgive easily but I feel many others cannot.
yeah they can protect themselves by NOT killing people lololol