every (kulli) does not always mean every: surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every. surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything. another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels. another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY. oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden" imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!” still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
@@tayfunsaral5024 بيننا وبينكم السلف Don't mix sunnah with bid'ah. Allah will ask you about this on the day of resurrection Don't mix linguistic bid'ah with shar'i. Fear Allah. All you're doing is fatwa shopping and mixing things. Bring the salaf. What happened to the books written about bid'ah? البدع والنهي عنها by ibn waddaah. Do you seriously think the Prophet ﷺ would leave something good? Do you think the companions would leave something good? what happened to the ayah اليوم أكملت لكم دينكم The innovators will not be allowed to drink from the fountain on the day of resurrection, if you want to be from those, go ahead.
@@tayfunsaral5024If you understand basics Arabic and Urdu Language, do attend the ongoing series of Aqeedah Al Wasatiayh by @hunainhabib, he has clarified all your misunderstanding about your quoted evidences, you do not even understand them properly. Don't be too quick to judge before you listen to salafi, May Allah increase you in beneficial knowledge and it's understanding and in goodness and may Allah guide you and us all Aameen.
@mewzi exactly brother, in fact the narration you quoted was clearly about every bidah. So this deviant ( innovator) try play is devil tricks to mislead the people ( try to play smart ) . In top of that, the context of the hadith was about the khawarij who start the bidah of congregation zikr. So it is clearly about every bidah because the khawarij taught that they were doing something good by doing congregational zikr but Abdullah ibn Umar ( may Allah be pleased with him ) correct them by saying ; " every biddah is misguidance even if people thing is good " .
Imaam Maalik rahimahullah said: "He who innovates an innovation in Islaam regarding it as something good, has claimed that Muhammad ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ has betrayed his trust to deliver the message as Allaah says: {This day have I perfected for you your religion}. [Surah al-Maaidah (5): 3] And whatsoever was not part of the religion then, is not part of the religion today." [al-I'tisaam (1/17)]
Salamah al-Hamdani reported: We used to sit by the door of Abdullah ibn Mas’ud, may Allah be pleased with him, before dawn prayer. When he came out, we would walk with him to the mosque. Abu Musa al-Ash’ari came to us and he said to him, “O Abu Abdur Rahman, I recently saw something in the mosque that I detested and yet, praise be to Allah, I saw nothing but good.” Ibn Mas’ud said, “What was it?” Abu Musa said, “If you wait long enough, you will see it. I saw people sitting in the mosque in circles waiting for prayer. A man in each circle had pebbles and he would tell them to exalt Allah one hundred times and they would do so, then declare there is no God but Allah one hundred times and they would do so, then glorify Allah one hundred times and they would do so.” Ibn Mas’ud said, “What did you say to them?” Abu Musa said, “I did not say anything to them. I was waiting for your opinion or order.” Ibn Mas’ud said, “Would you not order them to count their sins and guarantee for them that their good deeds would not be wasted?” We went along with him until he reached one of these circles and he stood over it, saying, “What is this I see you doing?” They said, “O Abu Abdur Rahman, they are pebbles by which we count the exaltation of Allah, declaration of His oneness, and His glorification.” Ibn Mas’ud said, “Count your sins, for I guarantee that none of your good deeds will be wasted. Woe to you, nation of Muhammad! How quickly do you run to your destruction! Here are his companions, may Allah be pleased with them, numerous around you, these are his clothes yet to fade, these are his utensils yet to break. By the One in whose hand is my soul, perhaps you are upon a religion better guided than the religion of Muhammad? Or have you opened the door of misguidance?” They said, “By Allah, O Abu Abdur Rahman, we intended nothing but good.” Ibn Mas’ud said, “How many intend good but are not right! The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, informed us that people would recite the Quran and it would not reach beyond their throats. By Allah, I do not know that perhaps many of them are among you!” Then he turned away from them. ‘Amr ibn Salamah said, “We saw most of them in these circles attacking us on the day of Nahrawan with the Khawarij.” Source: Musnad al-Dārimī 211 Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
When i saw it, i was completely shocked! Even in the hadith it says very clearly that EVERY innovation is misguidance. May Allah guide us all och protect us from bidah amin🤲🏼❤️
Brother you cannot read a hadith in isolation , needs to be read in conjunction with Quran, we have the notion of abrogation in the deen , certain things that were permitted in the beginning of the deen became forbidden
@@abumaliha7266 just like faris hammadi mentioned, these things are not bidah. I agree that you shouldn’t look a hadith in isolation but i am writing about this particular video, which is ”good” and bad bidah video. There is no good bidah, and the guy mentioned ”good” bidah when in fact it is not bidah and there no such thing as a ”good” bidah. The things he mentioned about taraweeh, Quran etc, are good things that happened but it is not BIDAH. The wording is wrong.
every (kulli) does not always mean every: surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every. surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything. another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels. another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY. oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden" imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!” still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
every (kulli) does not always mean every: surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every. surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything. another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels. another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY. oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden" imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!” still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
نقول كما قال الإمام مالك: «من ابتدع في الإسلام بدعة يراها حسنة فقد زعم أن محمداً - صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم - خان الرسالة لأن الله يقول: {الْيَوْمَ أَكْمَلْتُ لَكُمْ دِينَكُمْ} [المائدة: ٣] فما لم يكن يومئذ ديناً فلا يكون اليوم ديناً»، اللهم ثبتنا على كتابك وسنة نبيك محمد صلى الله عليه وجانبنا البدع والضلال
every (kulli) does not always mean every: surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every. surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything. another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels. another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY. oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden" imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!” still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
@@tayfunsaral5024Imam Shafi’i meant it in a linguistic sense. The hadith in Tirmidhi is clarified at the end of the video, where it mentions SUNNAH not BIDAH 😂
every (kulli) does not always mean every: surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every. surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything. another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels. another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY. oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden" imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!” still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
@@tayfunsaral5024 a silly statement to make. I expect nothing less from a Jahmi. The prophet ﷺ said to follow his sunnah and the sunnah of his rightly guided caliphs after him. Where did he include your Sufi saints? Or those 12 imams of the Shia? Or Al Ashari? If you're going to be pedantic then it can work both ways. The fact is the prophet ﷺ described bid'a to be the worst of all affairs and the fact that it doesn't scare you and that you are contesting this hadith, seeking ways to legitimise your deviant beliefs, means you are a qualified and certified Mubtadi. May Allah guide you and guide us. Ameen.
@@kab1r oke never listen to ibn taymiyyah, ibn baz, ibn uthaymeen, fawzaan or albani ever again. they are not the first 3 generations. also, im a maturidi, not jahmi. i know your scholars only lied about our aqeedah, thats why you hate us obviously. but for your information. 1. we accept yad as an attribute of Allah, we accept highness (uluw) as an attribute of Allah. we accept all asma wal sifat, not just 7. we also accept sifat that we dont get from the aql but also from the naql. we dont believe the quran was created, its the eternal kalam of Allah. what else.. what else is a common lie told about ashariyyah and maturidiyyah.. idk, this is all i can think of right now. doesnt matter tho, i clarified them. and btw, i gave quran, and hadith. i included scholars, yes because the scholars are the ones who interpret the quran and sunnah. just like your scholars try to do. anyway, goodluck. try to disprove me, or show me any evidence against me. dont come here, talking bullshit, not knowing shit. talking bad and lie. oke, be smart.
Jazakallahu khaira , I learnt something new today , I did not knew about the sunnah of khulafa al rashideen. Its always interesting to learn the matters of aqeedah. ❤
Jazaka Allah khair brother. Such responses must be published so that people know truth from falsehood. We live in a time in which there are many who support their beliefs with lies.
every (kulli) does not always mean every: surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every. surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything. another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels. another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY. oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden" imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!” still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
Yasir qadhi has defeated the Saudi political Salafi phenomena, that’s what you guys hate him. Lol “Quran and sunnah”, but according to “which” scholars ? Yasir qadhi has exposed the breadth of 1400 years of Islamic scholarship.
وروى الحافظ أبو نعيم في كتابه حلية الأولياء ج 9 ص76 عن إبراهيم بن الجنيد قال: حدثنا حرملة بن يحيى قال: سمعت محمد بن إدريس الشافعي رضي الله عنه يقول: البدعة بدعتان، بدعة محمودة، وبدعة مذمومة، فما وافق السنة فهو محمود، وما خالف السنة فهو مذموم، واحتج بقول عمر بن الخطاب في قيام رمضان (نعمت البدعة هي
every (kulli) does not always mean every: surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every. surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything. another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels. another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY. oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden" imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!” still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
every (kulli) does not always mean every: surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every. surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything. another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels. another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY. oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden" imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!” still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
As for the Shariah, then the Bidah is described as follows, and it is the most comprehensive and concise description, as mentioned by Shaykh Salih al-Fawzaan حفظه الله. It has 8 characteristics: 1. It is done to seek reward from Allah, The Most High. 2. It is introduced into the Religion. 3. It may resemble the shariah in some of the aspects 4. There is no supporting text from the Quran. 5. There is no supporting text from the Sunnah. 6. There is no supporting text from the Sahabah. 7. There is no (Asl) origin in the Religion for it. 8. There is no (Kayfiyah) manner in the religion regarding it.
أريد بالبدعة في الحديث: ما ليس له أصل في الدين، وهو المراد بقوله (كل محدثة ... ) إلخ، وأما الأمور الموافق لأصول الدين، فغير داخل فيها وإن أحدث بعده - صلى الله عليه وسلم -. قلت: وهذا هو الموافق لقوله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - (وسنة الخلفاء) فليتأمل.
Every innovation IN Deen is misguidance, not innovations for the promotion and preservation of Deen. Example. I decide to make Tuesday nights fiqh classess in the masjid. Innovation? Yes. For the sake of preserving Deen? Yes.
The scholars and schools of the Sunni mainstream understood that newly innovated matters in the religion that do not go against the injunctions and principles of the Qur’an, the Sunna, and the consensus of scholarship, are permitted and not considered misguidance. In support of this is the Prophet’s narration: The Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and give him peace) said, “Whoever adds to this affair of ours (i.e., the religion of Islam) that which is not from it, it is rejected.” [Bukhari and Muslim] He also said, “Whoever starts a good practice (sunna) in Islam has the reward of it and the reward of all who follow it without decreasing from their reward whatsoever….” [Muslim]
Interpretation of religious text, cultural and regional differences, historical differences, schools of thought, contemporary issues, political factors, globalisation & communication, and individual beliefs amongst other things...and here you are giving your audience a single narrow minded version of your understanding/interpretation as the gospel for a community of a Billion. This is grade F at school level.
I see. Your claim to speak on behalf of 1.8 billion current Muslims and the countless generations before indicates you have unparalleled enlightenment, challenging the knowledge of millions of scholars and thinkers. @@Let-the-Sunnah-go-forth
That implies those who have come to different conclusions than yours do not follow the Prophet (s.a.w.). Isn't that the major issue here? Everyone claims to follow the Quran and Sunnah, but will not allow any room for differences. @@Let-the-Sunnah-go-forth
Thank you!!! I even liked that video! I was ready to start discussing of it, but now I realize that I forgot I am ignorant and need to seek knowledge! Thank you!!!
Narrated Rifa`a bin Rafi` Az-Zuraqi: One day we were praying behind the Prophet. When he raised his head from bowing, he said, "Sami`a l-lahu liman hamidah." A man behind him said, "Rabbana wa laka l-hamdu, hamdan kathiran taiyiban mubarakan fihi" (O our Lord! All the praises are for You, many good and blessed praises). When the Prophet completed the prayer, he asked, "Who has said these words?" The man replied, "I." The Prophet said, "I saw over thirty angels competing to write it first." Prophet rose (from bowing) and stood straight till all the vertebrae of his spinal column came to a natural position. Sahih al Bukhari 799 This is a newly invented thing which the prophet approved of.
@@HaramainExperienceAs long as there are roots in the Qur'an and sunnah praiseworthy innovations can exist such was proposed by the classical scholars.
Imam Maalik rahimahullah said: حدثنا أحمد بن عمر بن أنس نا الحسين بن يعقوب نا سعيد بن فحلون نا يوسف بن يحيى المغامي نا عبد الملك بن حبيب أخبرني بن الماجشون أنه قال قال مالك بن أنس من أحدث في هذه الأمة اليوم شيئا لم يكن عليه سلفها فقد زعم أن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم خان الرسالة لأن الله تعالى يقول {حُرِّمَتْ عَلَيْكُمُ الْمَيْتَةُ وَالدَّمُ وَلَحْمُ الْخِنْزِيرِ وَمَا أُهِلَّ لِغَيْرِ اللَّهِ بِهِ وَالْمُنْخَنِقَةُ وَالْمَوْقُوذَةُ وَالْمُتَرَدِّيَةُ وَالنَّطِيحَةُ وَمَا أَكَلَ السَّبُعُ إِلَّا مَا ذَكَّيْتُمْ وَمَا ذُبِحَ عَلَى النُّصُبِ وَأَنْ تَسْتَقْسِمُوا بِالْأَزْلَامِ ذَلِكُمْ فِسْقٌ الْيَوْمَ يَئِسَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنْ دِينِكُمْ فَلَا تَخْشَوْهُمْ وَاخْشَوْنِ الْيَوْمَ أَكْمَلْتُ لَكُمْ دِينَكُمْ وَأَتْمَمْتُ عَلَيْكُمْ نِعْمَتِي وَرَضِيتُ لَكُمُ الْإِسْلَامَ دِينًا فَمَنِ اضْطُرَّ فِي مَخْمَصَةٍ غَيْرَ مُتَجَانِفٍ لِإِثْمٍ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ} فما لم يكن يومئذ دينا لا يكون اليوم دينا “Whoever among this ummah innovates something today which was not practiced by the Salaf, has accused the Prophetصلى الله عليه و سلم of treachery because Allah said “…This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion…..” So what was not religion then, is not religion today” [Ibn Hazam quoted it with his chain in al Ahkam fe Asool al Ahkam vol 6 page 791, quoted by as-Shaatibin Al-‘Itisaam 1/38, Shaykh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer Amanpoori said the chain is hasan. see Majalla as-Sunnah no.69 page no.3]
The problem that faces the Ummah today is these Asaghir who speak about deen without ilm, as soon they learn some books and small treatise they thought they are learned, Allaahul mustaan, If you want to learn sit with senior scholars and ahlul ilm and remain silent for a long time. May Allaah guide this social media wannabe da'ee.
Btw, what he meant by “the scholars of the salaf divided bidah into good bidah and bad bidah” is a particular statement of imam shafi’i. I’m sure you’re gonna find it.
@@courierton9217Shafi is not a sahabah. But he is one of the biggest scholars of Islam, upon the way of the Salaf. So you’re dismissive attitude toward him is unwarranted. That being said, if Shafi’i indeed did say this, it needs to be clarified what he meant by it. And if the meaning is indeed that there are “good bida’ah” then this would oppose the understanding of the Sahabah, and this would be a mistake on his part. Scholars make mistakes. But that’s getting ahead of ourselves. First the initial poster needs to provide evidence that Shafi’i indeed did say such a thing. Wallahu Alam
What r u talkin about?? Mauwleed is not even celebrated in the time of the 4 imam. ( including imam syafee rahimahullah time) mawleed is clearly an inovation
When Imam Ash-Shafi'i divided Bid'ah into good, he meant something else and he never allowed us to bring this things into the religion like this. Those who don't have knowledge or have evil motives, use this Imam as a tool to spread evil. Umar ibnul Khattab also said this is a good Bid'ah, does this mean he was innovating or promoting innovation? No. Because he meant something else.
ash-Shaafi’ee - may Allaah have mercy upon him - said the famous saying: "whosoever declares something good has made it part of the sharee’ah," he also said in Ar-Risaalah (pg.507), "declaring things good (istihsaan) is a form of exercising desires" Imam Al Shafi'i May Allah have mercy on him is free from your poor understanding and whatever evil you attribute to him.
So how do you explain that your are uae but in uae mawlid is official holiday & celebrated by rulers? What about MBS who makes dua with hands raised after salah & there are pics & videos to show this? Please answer these
Great video! Thank you! I would love to meet you one day as I live in the U.A.E as well. Sharjah! Lived here my whole life! Even if it's for 15 minutes i'd appreciate it! As Salaam O Alaikum! :)
Here for contextual Mundhir b. Jarir reported on the authority of his father: While we were in the company of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) in the early hours of the morning, some people came there (who) were barefooted, naked, wearing striped woollen clothes, or cloaks, with their swords hung (around their necks). Most of them, nay, all of them, belonged to the tribe of Mudar. The colour of the face of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) underwent a change when he saw them in poverty. He then entered (his house) and came out and commanded Bilal (to pronounce Adhan). He pronounced Adhan and Iqima, and he (the Prophet) observed prayer (along with his Companion) and then addressed (them reciting verses of the Holy Qur'an): '" 0 people, fear your Lord, Who created you from a single being" to the end of the verse," Allah is ever a Watcher over you" (iv. 1). (He then recited) a verse of Sura Hashr:" Fear Allah. and let every soul consider that which it sends forth for the morrow and fear Allah" (lix. 18). (Then the audience began to vie with one another in giving charity.) Some donated a dinar, others a dirham, still others clothes, some donated a sa' of wheat, some a sa' of dates; till he (the Prophet) said: (Bring) even if it is half a date. Then a person from among the Ansar came there with a money bag which his hands could scarcely lift; in fact, they could not (lift). Then the people followed continuously, till I saw two heaps of eatables and clothes, and I saw the face of the Messenger (ﷺ) glistening, like gold (on account of joy). The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: He who sets a good precedent in Islam, there is a reward for him for this (act of goodness) and reward of that also who acted according to it subsequently, without any deduction from their rewards; and he who sets in Islam an evil precedent, there is upon him the burden of that, and the burden of him also who acted upon it subsequently, without any deduction from their burden. Sahih Muslim, 1017 a In-Book Reference: Book 12, Hadith 88 USC-MSA web (English) reference: Book 5, Hadith 2219 (deprecated numbering scheme)
Hii What about Muhammad nabi (saw) birthday celebration Mowluth ect. Plz reply to me Iam see more videos some people say is good some people say bidha. Plz reply correct reply
wallahi brother Faris we live in a weird time, people are litrally attacking our brothers just for not agreeing with the LGBTQ people, and even our muslim brothers are acting like khwarij attacking each others leaders.
In reality, when someone believe there is good bida’, there will be no bad bida’, or at least we almost not heard about bad bida’ from them, even if someone from them telling mankind all religion is true is okay for some them…
Ya Akhi. Can you expound on whether Omar RA did the taraweeh 20 rakah plus 3 witr in jama'ah. If that is a Sunnah of Muhammad sallahu alaihi wasallam. Performed regularly by the hanafi followers to today.
I found an authentic Hadith in Muwatta Imam Malik, where it's written that Umar ibn Al-Khattab started Qiyam Al-Layl (Taraweeh) for 11 Rakah (8+3). But he himself never prayed with them, he said that praying Qiyam Al-Layl at the last part of night is more better than this (congregational) Taraweeh prayer.
Sheikh Al Islam Imam Nawiwi put into 2 categories.Actually he said but wrong and bit right because Salaf take many Imam Nawiwi's sources like Sharah Muslim etc.Shafi scholars believe there are 2 types of Bidah.But are there good bidahs too? I am a Shafi and honestly I am not confirmed because there are many sources which says there are.I will mention an example which was said by Imam Nawiwi about Umar Ibn Khattab RA said about 20 rakah salah "what a beautiful innovation it is" and there are many others which are mentioned by Sheikh Al Islam Imam Nawiwi,Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani etc may Allah pleased with all of them But what is the drifference between good and bad bidah? According to Imam Shafi,Imam Nawiwi,Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani and others may allah pleased with them.If that Bidah is opposite to the religion and what Prophet and Allah(quran) said then that bidah is haram.If a bidah makes a muslim to make more closer to the religion then it's good bidah. And allah knows best i am researching about this topic soo i am not sure too that is it really allowed or not.Soo please don't follow what i said before confirmation or if you know anything about this topic then please tell me.May allah reward you thank you
You are celebrating a day that first and foremost, the Prophet himself ﷺ nor the Sahaba celebrated. Secondly, there are no records of his ﷺ birth, so we don’t know exactly what day he ﷺ was born. Celebrating mawlid is clear cut bid’ah and you have no evidence to support your claim, while there are many against you. May Allāh the Most High guide us all.
They twist imaam Shafi'is words, thats why majority of the major Ashari scholars are all Shafi'is. Like Al Ghazali, Suyuti, Fakhr ud Dihn ar Razi, Subki, etc...
Those who claimed that they follow the (ijtihaad) of Uthman, may Allah be pleased with him, by giving second Adaan on Friday, they don't even follow that correctly... Because the second Adaan was given in the market, in the time of Uthman, may Allah be pleased with him...But they give BOTH ADAAN IN THE MOSQUE...So, they don't follow him either.
No such thing as bidah “hasanat” this is what the mubtadi use to justify their innovations. The ones that study bidah will find that every bidah is a bound for the Nār. And the athar of Umar and taraweeh is not evidence of “bidah hasanah” because congregational taraweeh was established in the prophets ﷺ time. Therefore, Umar revived a sunnah. But ofc due to people not understanding the arabic language, they take the words of umar and twist it to justify their heinous crimes of bidah.
Makes no sense what this brother saying , you can introduce a second athan, so we can now add an extra rakat for the jummah salat?? The very concept of abrogation in its essence is based on change .
And who introduced this second athan? It was one of the four khalifas, Uthman Radiallahu anhu, the prophet ﷺ commanded us to follow his sunnah and the way of the four khalifas.
It was narrated from 'Abdur-Rahman bin 'Amr As-Sulami that: He heard Al-'Irbad bin Sariyah say: "The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) delivered a moving speech to us which made our eyes flow with tears and made our hearts melt. We said: 'O Messenger of Allah. This is a speech of farewell. What did you enjoin upon us?' He said: 'I am leaving you upon a (path of) brightness whose night is like its day. No one will deviate from it after I am gone but one who is doomed. Whoever among you lives will see great conflict. I urge you to adhere to what you know of my Sunnah and the path of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs, and cling stubbornly to it. And you must obey, even if (your leader is) an Abyssinian leader. For the true believer is like a camel with a ring in its nose; wherever it is driven, it complies." Sahih (Darussalam) Sunan Ibn Majah, 43 In-Book Reference: Introduction, Hadith 43 English Reference: Vol. 1, Book 1, Hadith 43
Thats a false understanding of you. No one can add any rakat to salat since it is an act of worship. For the adhan is also an act of worship for the muadhin but if it requires to add a second adhan for the people to hear then this dos not fall under bid'ah or changing the religion since it is a necessity. Also the prophet s.a.w. said to follow the rightly guided caliph's they know the religion better then anyone.
I don’t mind ignorant people; afterall, we’re all ignorant to some extent. What really annoys me is when the ignorant run their mouth thinking they know. Ugh..
Brother your take on Andrew Tate and Sneako and popular revert celebrities will be much appreciated because I feel it’s important for young Muslim men to be receiving information from brothers such as yourself over such figures. You are clearly educated and you ARE promoting Islam and keeping it pure. However what do you think about the war room? Is this promoting Islam? May Allah swt guide Tate and such reverts BUT do you know who is in charge of the war room? An occultist named Iggy Semmelweis
IslamQA website clearly says there's ''good'' and ''bad'' bid'ah. I don't understand why there are many many contradictions in islam, even between salafis, sunnis, etc.
There are no contradictions in Islam. And I just went to IslamQA, and typed in “good bidaah”, and the first two answers matched exactly with this video. You’re either very confused, or are intentionally trying to put doubts into peoples hearts. If it’s the latter, may Allah deal with you
Imam Shafi said: “Bidah is of two types: praiseworthy and blameworthy” Abu Nu'aym related it in his book Hilyat al-Awliya. Imam Bayhaqi, Imam Nawawi, Ibn Hajr and the vast majority of the greatest scholars agree there is good biddah. Sahabah like Umar even used phrases like “excellent biddah” in sahih bukhari. Imam shafi is from the SALAF!!! We have been instructed to take our understanding from the salaf, NOT these TH-cam wahabi dajaals. Stay away from this minority sect - wahabism.
What act did Umar say was a good bidah? It was Taraweeh. Taraweeh was done during the life of the Peophet, as he himself prayed it. Therefore, he's not using the technical definition of it being a bidah..... therefore it makes no sense for someone to come out and say that Umar said innovations were good.
@@liby254 so I guess sahabah made no sense, the salaf made no sense, all the classical scholars made no sense, who all said there is good biddah. Only in modern times, I guess only wahabies make sense when they make excuses in order try to reject good biddah. 🤷🏼♂️
@@waqasriaz3497 name me 1 sahaba which said that innovations (used in the techical sense) is good. Just 1. And provide the full reference below when you quote it. I'll be waiting for your respone... And I want a full reference. Ibn Umar, one of the major Sahaba said that EVERY innovation is bad - even if every person was to thing it was good...... Imaam Maalik rahimahullah said: "He who innovates an innovation in Islaam regarding it as something good, has claimed that Muhammad ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ has betrayed his trust to deliver the message as Allaah says: {This day have I perfected for you your religion}. [Surah al-Maaidah (5): 3] And whatsoever was not part of the religion then, is not part of the religion today."
What about congregational dua after every salat. Its very common within the Desi Masjids. (Mainly speak Urdu as the masjid's main language, English is secondary as a common language if people don't speak Urdu).
every (kulli) does not always mean every: surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every. surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything. another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels. another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY. oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden" imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!” still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
It is a bidah. Congregation dua is bidah. Here for the proof : From Abu Uthmaan an-Nahdi who said: ‘A worker for Umar bin al-Khattab wrote to Umar saying that there are a group of people who gather together to make Dua’ for the Muslims and the leader.’ So Umar -Radi Allaahu anhu- wrote to him: ‘Bring them to me with yourself.’ The man came and Umar said to the doorman, prepare the whip. When they entered upon Umar -Radi Allaahu anhu- he descended upon their leader by hitting him with the whip.’ [ Collected by Ibn Abi Shaybah (8/558) from Muwayeeyah bin Hisham who said Sufyaan narrated to us from Sa’eed al-Jareeree from Abi Uthmaan, & its chain is Hasan.] So don't play intention to the first reply that person is playing the trick of the devil . There is nothing such as "good bidah " . Every single companion did a criticism of bidah .
@user-rs7fr9we2p most of the South Asians are Hanafi or Shafi. I take back what I say about Congregational Dua. Unrelated a big problem within the South Asian/Desi Muslim community is people bringing over their homeland bidaah like the Deobandis for example and just enforcing beliefs with no basis on people. So within any masjid keep to yourself and don't blindly follow. Unrelated but some Pakistani guy in my college once told me that 80% of the Islamic knowledge that remains is in Urdu and alot of knowledge in Arabic is lost. Where did you get that information from. What basis does this belief stand on.
Ustaadh, in the UK , these sentences - P** OFF - This is what p**sed me off Is considered VULGAR language, I know in other countries they dont consider it foul language however, the viewers from the UK wont understand this and end up thinking you're using bad language
I understand exactly what you are saying, I realize this in the UK, I was very shocked to find out what it means to them, because in my country it is not a swear word, I guess this is a learning experience for most people around the world, and they should know that he did not mean it in the way it is taken in the UK. There are other words that really offended other cultures as well that I don't want to get into. But I think the brother now knows, but people from different cultures also need to understand other cultures, and not too be overly offended. And think badly of others.
God bless u brother Fa4is. Not even a single word was correct on that video. Allah guides Ummah to the true path. Please please please, do some good research and ask authentic schoolers before doing any video. U r going to be asked on the day of judgment.
As salam u alaikum warahmatullah. th-cam.com/video/_H9G56xYNrU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=n5RaNhQxXVsJ571U This is by far the best refutation of Bid'ah Hasanah i have listened to so far. All of the arguments of Ahlul Bid'ah are refuted by Sheikh Abu Hakeem Bilal Davis(may Allah preserve him). He explains in details some of the unclear Kalam of the Salaf which the Ahlul Bid'ah cling on to inorder to prove their case. But Alhamdulillah these claims have been proved to be false.
every (kulli) does not always mean every: surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every. surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything. another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels. another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY. oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden" imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!” still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
Subhen’Allah this is why you should not talk about knowleg. You have bidah in the sharia meaning and you have bidah in the arabic meaning. They are talking about the bidah in the arabic meaning not in the sharia meaning! Pls Learn befor speaking jahil
that video you show can open doors to more bida'a, since some ignorant muslims can feel they are doing the right thing according to their wishes or the waswas of Shaytan. This kind of video is tragic ! spred ignorance with appearance of wisdom !! astaghfirullah !
Bidah is Bidah that's all no good and bad Bidah astagfirulla those who r did biddah they all are misguided Kullu biddathin jalala va kulla jalalathin finnar
What about the Khalifa Umar bin Al Khattab may Allah be pleased with him starting the Taraawiih congregation Prayers? Didn't he start those as a mass congregation prayer in Ramadan when it did Not exist as a Congregation prayer at the time of the Prophet Salla Allahu 'alaihi wa 'ala Aalihi wa sallam, saying about it "نِعْمَ البِدْعَةُ هَذِهِ" (translated: what a good Bida'a that is), as it was narrated in Sahih Al-Bukhaari ? Please, your assertions are false. There is a thing as a good Bida'a. Otherwise, you are claiming to have more knowledge than the second Caliph. And please don't respond by saying that he meant Bida'a in the meaning that it is a "new thing" and not in a religious sense, as some people who want to treat their readers as idiots have claimed. It is a new introduction in religious ritual. It is a Novel Religious ritual. You cannot claim novelty as an attribute of the Taraawih prayer, but dismiss religiosity as an attribute. That is the epitome of Al-Tahaafut (Incoherence).
The prophet ﷺ said 'every bid'ah is misguidance'. And the tarawih was already prayed by the prophet ﷺ. If you actually read the seerah you'd know that, and umar revived it in the time of his ruleship, he did not come up with something new. Fear Allah, don't speak without knowledge.
@@petrolmoney77 Read my comment carefully. And I did watch the video. There was NO congregational Tarawih prayer at the time of the Prophet Salla Allahu alaihi was ala aalihi wasallam. Khalifa Umar bin Al Khattab instituted that. And called it "نعم البدعة هذه".
So Al Albaani considered the Mihrabs a bi’dah. Since you’re a Salafi and hold Al Albaani (a zahari/ salafi/ halabi/ ghar muqallid scholar) in a high standard, his fatwa is analogous to the brother you’re critiquing regarding minarets. Sounds like Al Albaani has a similar methodology as the brother. Imam Shafi is the one who delves into this fiqhi topic of what is Bi’dah good and bad. Just say that you’re a pseduo salafi/ wahabi. Be with the majority of the ummah. Mawlid is a valid opinion (Ibn Hajar, Imam Suyuti, Imam Nawawi etc.). Those who don’t believe in it is also a valid opinion, but is wrong to say that a Muslim who participates in mawlid is a kaffir or musrik. Why don’t your critique the actual bi’dah of the gulf states that own you and prop you up to spread their pseduo salafi agenda. The majority of the student of knowledge and ulema of the true athari/salafi Aqidah warn about people like you who hide and pretend to be part of the school of thought, but you are actually creating, spreading and establishing bi’dah yourself, becoming/ proclaiming to be a fifth Madhab. Shaykh Asrar Rashid goes into depth of Islamic history and refutes people like Faris. Same with Mohammed Hijab, Hamza Yusuf, Daniel Haqiqajou and others. People are starting to you for the Madkhali boot locker you are. If you existed during the inquisitions of the Mutazlia movements within the old Caliphates of the past, you would part of those who would imprison and slander and takfir the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah Wa Jamaah like Ibn Hanbal, Ibn Taymiyyah, Al Ghazali, etc. You are repeating the same signs of the old caliphates who where puppets of rulers who wanted to things based on their desires and not abided by the religion. Beware of scholars or students of knowledge who are deeply tied to the agenda of governments, movements, jihadi groups and western influences. Find the middle path as within our tradition of Ahlul Sunnah Wa Jamaah.
You have never heard this in your life because all you do, brother, is follow your contemporary sheikhs . You have isolated these hadith and used your own interpretation to make a conclusion. This is incorrect Please look into the classical scholars interpretation
@Farishammadi shukrun for you answer my brother. Please confirm who should Interpretate the sayings of the prophet salalahualaywasalam ? Ibn usaymeen Albani Abdul wahab Or Classical scholars who the entire ummah agree upon? Allah subhantallah bless you
@@traditionalmiddlepath3773 The words of Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم are very clear to understand and needs no further explanation just as the companions understood from them. من احدث في امرنا هذا ما ليس منه فهو رد. Who invents in this matter of ours (Islam), what's not from it, is rejected (by Allah). Sahih Bukhari and Muslim. من عمل عملا ليس عليه امرنا فهو رد. Whoever does something which is not from our matter (Islam), is rejected (by Allah). Sahih Muslim. اياكم ومحادثات الامور. Don't you dare bring or do innovations. Sunan Abi Dawood Sahih. كل بدعة ضلالة. All innovation is misguidance. Same source as above. On top of that, there is a Sahih Hadith in Sunan ad darimi in which Abu Musa al ashari saw people in a masjid in circles with pebbles, doing zikr of Allah in a way which was never done in vast numbers (100 times or more) He didn't like this and went to Ibn Masood, they both are from the major sahabas. Ibn masood came and he scolded all of them for doing something which was not from the Sunnah of the Prophet. This is clear proof that all Sahabah were against bidah even it was something related to zikr of Allah. This Hadith is easy to find.
![Shaykh Nasiruddin Al-Albani [RA]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IojPF1F6WT8/mqdefault.jpg)
![ILLSLICK X YOUNGOHM - We're The same [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yUJNkobYR0E/mqdefault.jpg)
Ibn 'Umar رضي الله عنه said:
"Every bid'ah is a misguidance even if the people see it as hasanah (good)"
[al-Sunnah by al-Marwazi 82 with Sahih Isnad]
every (kulli) does not always mean every:
surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every.
surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything.
another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels.
another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY.
oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on
doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."
and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden"
imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!”
still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
@@tayfunsaral5024 بيننا وبينكم السلف
Don't mix sunnah with bid'ah. Allah will ask you about this on the day of resurrection
Don't mix linguistic bid'ah with shar'i. Fear Allah. All you're doing is fatwa shopping and mixing things. Bring the salaf. What happened to the books written about bid'ah? البدع والنهي عنها by ibn waddaah. Do you seriously think the Prophet ﷺ would leave something good? Do you think the companions would leave something good? what happened to the ayah
اليوم أكملت لكم دينكم
The innovators will not be allowed to drink from the fountain on the day of resurrection, if you want to be from those, go ahead.
@@tayfunsaral5024 I see no good from a person who wants to go against what ibn 'umar said, he knows better than us
@@tayfunsaral5024If you understand basics Arabic and Urdu Language, do attend the ongoing series of Aqeedah Al Wasatiayh by @hunainhabib, he has clarified all your misunderstanding about your quoted evidences, you do not even understand them properly. Don't be too quick to judge before you listen to salafi, May Allah increase you in beneficial knowledge and it's understanding and in goodness and may Allah guide you and us all Aameen.
@mewzi exactly brother, in fact the narration you quoted was clearly about every bidah. So this deviant ( innovator) try play is devil tricks to mislead the people ( try to play smart ) . In top of that, the context of the hadith was about the khawarij who start the bidah of congregation zikr. So it is clearly about every bidah because the khawarij taught that they were doing something good by doing congregational zikr but Abdullah ibn Umar ( may Allah be pleased with him ) correct them by saying ; " every biddah is misguidance even if people thing is good " .
Imaam Maalik rahimahullah said:
"He who innovates an innovation in Islaam regarding it as something good, has claimed that Muhammad ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ has betrayed his trust to deliver the message as Allaah says:
{This day have I perfected for you your religion}. [Surah al-Maaidah (5): 3]
And whatsoever was not part of the religion then, is not part of the religion today."
[al-I'tisaam (1/17)]
جزاك اللهُ خيرًا
Wallah this is why we need ulama, anyone with a little knowledge can missguide many, subhan allah
The TikTok is 100% correct. Fairy man who made this video is the wrong one here.
@@ImranZDTVthe one in the wrong is you. You try to embed your misguidance in the Ummah and then try to claim innovations are allowed.
Salamah al-Hamdani reported: We used to sit by the door of Abdullah ibn Mas’ud, may Allah be pleased with him, before dawn prayer. When he came out, we would walk with him to the mosque. Abu Musa al-Ash’ari came to us and he said to him, “O Abu Abdur Rahman, I recently saw something in the mosque that I detested and yet, praise be to Allah, I saw nothing but good.” Ibn Mas’ud said, “What was it?” Abu Musa said, “If you wait long enough, you will see it. I saw people sitting in the mosque in circles waiting for prayer. A man in each circle had pebbles and he would tell them to exalt Allah one hundred times and they would do so, then declare there is no God but Allah one hundred times and they would do so, then glorify Allah one hundred times and they would do so.” Ibn Mas’ud said, “What did you say to them?” Abu Musa said, “I did not say anything to them. I was waiting for your opinion or order.” Ibn Mas’ud said, “Would you not order them to count their sins and guarantee for them that their good deeds would not be wasted?” We went along with him until he reached one of these circles and he stood over it, saying, “What is this I see you doing?” They said, “O Abu Abdur Rahman, they are pebbles by which we count the exaltation of Allah, declaration of His oneness, and His glorification.” Ibn Mas’ud said, “Count your sins, for I guarantee that none of your good deeds will be wasted. Woe to you, nation of Muhammad! How quickly do you run to your destruction! Here are his companions, may Allah be pleased with them, numerous around you, these are his clothes yet to fade, these are his utensils yet to break. By the One in whose hand is my soul, perhaps you are upon a religion better guided than the religion of Muhammad? Or have you opened the door of misguidance?” They said, “By Allah, O Abu Abdur Rahman, we intended nothing but good.” Ibn Mas’ud said, “How many intend good but are not right! The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, informed us that people would recite the Quran and it would not reach beyond their throats. By Allah, I do not know that perhaps many of them are among you!” Then he turned away from them. ‘Amr ibn Salamah said, “We saw most of them in these circles attacking us on the day of Nahrawan with the Khawarij.”
Source: Musnad al-Dārimī 211
Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani
I want him to tell us good sin and bad sin next.
Next they(the innovators) will say doing takfir of rulers is a good sin 😂😂😂
A good bid'a and a bad bid'a, as if you say good evil and bad evil, evil is evil.
When i saw it, i was completely shocked! Even in the hadith it says very clearly that EVERY innovation is misguidance. May Allah guide us all och protect us from bidah amin🤲🏼❤️
Brother you cannot read a hadith in isolation , needs to be read in conjunction with Quran, we have the notion of abrogation in the deen , certain things that were permitted in the beginning of the deen became forbidden
@@abumaliha7266 just like faris hammadi mentioned, these things are not bidah. I agree that you shouldn’t look a hadith in isolation but i am writing about this particular video, which is ”good” and bad bidah video. There is no good bidah, and the guy mentioned ”good” bidah when in fact it is not bidah and there no such thing as a ”good” bidah. The things he mentioned about taraweeh, Quran etc, are good things that happened but it is not BIDAH. The wording is wrong.
every (kulli) does not always mean every:
surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every.
surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything.
another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels.
another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY.
oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on
doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."
and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden"
imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!”
still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
@@Madmarkhor there are more scholars who disagree with faris than agree. i just gave u daleel. do what u want, i dont care
@@tayfunsaral5024dont tire yourself bro, even if you give a thousand dalil they're not gonna listen. They need guidance not dalil.
Jazakallahu Khair for clarifying this. May Allah guide that brother and those like him..Ameen.
every (kulli) does not always mean every:
surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every.
surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything.
another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels.
another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY.
oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on
doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."
and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden"
imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!”
still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
@@tayfunsaral5024Why yu trynna misguide the people?
@@tayfunsaral5024May Allah deal with you jaahil
نقول كما قال الإمام مالك: «من ابتدع في الإسلام بدعة يراها حسنة فقد زعم أن محمداً - صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم - خان الرسالة لأن الله يقول: {الْيَوْمَ أَكْمَلْتُ لَكُمْ دِينَكُمْ} [المائدة: ٣] فما لم يكن يومئذ ديناً فلا يكون اليوم ديناً»، اللهم ثبتنا على كتابك وسنة نبيك محمد صلى الله عليه وجانبنا البدع والضلال
Jazakallah Khairan for providing us with the clear message
every (kulli) does not always mean every:
surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every.
surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything.
another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels.
another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY.
oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on
doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."
and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden"
imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!”
still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
@@tayfunsaral5024Imam Shafi’i meant it in a linguistic sense.
The hadith in Tirmidhi is clarified at the end of the video, where it mentions SUNNAH not BIDAH 😂
Jazak Allahu Khayran, I saw this video and was very confused thank you for the clarification
Jazakallah khayr. Every bid'a is misguidance > anything anyone says
every (kulli) does not always mean every:
surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every.
surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything.
another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels.
another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY.
oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on
doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."
and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden"
imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!”
still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
@@tayfunsaral5024 a silly statement to make. I expect nothing less from a Jahmi. The prophet ﷺ said to follow his sunnah and the sunnah of his rightly guided caliphs after him. Where did he include your Sufi saints? Or those 12 imams of the Shia? Or Al Ashari? If you're going to be pedantic then it can work both ways. The fact is the prophet ﷺ described bid'a to be the worst of all affairs and the fact that it doesn't scare you and that you are contesting this hadith, seeking ways to legitimise your deviant beliefs, means you are a qualified and certified Mubtadi. May Allah guide you and guide us. Ameen.
@@kab1r oke never listen to ibn taymiyyah, ibn baz, ibn uthaymeen, fawzaan or albani ever again. they are not the first 3 generations. also, im a maturidi, not jahmi. i know your scholars only lied about our aqeedah, thats why you hate us obviously. but for your information. 1. we accept yad as an attribute of Allah, we accept highness (uluw) as an attribute of Allah. we accept all asma wal sifat, not just 7. we also accept sifat that we dont get from the aql but also from the naql. we dont believe the quran was created, its the eternal kalam of Allah. what else.. what else is a common lie told about ashariyyah and maturidiyyah.. idk, this is all i can think of right now. doesnt matter tho, i clarified them. and btw, i gave quran, and hadith. i included scholars, yes because the scholars are the ones who interpret the quran and sunnah. just like your scholars try to do. anyway, goodluck. try to disprove me, or show me any evidence against me. dont come here, talking bullshit, not knowing shit. talking bad and lie. oke, be smart.
Jazakallahu khaira , I learnt something new today , I did not knew about the sunnah of khulafa al rashideen. Its always interesting to learn the matters of aqeedah. ❤
just that pro-bidah guy's creepy exaggerated smile helped convince me even more that his message is sinister.
lol it's funny but you are right
Jazaka Allah khair brother. Such responses must be published so that people know truth from falsehood. We live in a time in which there are many who support their beliefs with lies.
every (kulli) does not always mean every:
surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every.
surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything.
another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels.
another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY.
oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on
doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."
and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden"
imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!”
still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
Yasir qadhi has defeated the Saudi political Salafi phenomena, that’s what you guys hate him. Lol “Quran and sunnah”, but according to “which” scholars ?
Yasir qadhi has exposed the breadth of 1400 years of Islamic scholarship.
Exactly, taraweeh is not bidah since the Prophet ( Peace and Blessings be upon him ) himself used to pray taraweeh.
Baraka Allahubfik akhi, I was waiting for the brother to answer on this
SubhanAllah wal Hamdulillah wa Allahu Akbar
وروى الحافظ أبو نعيم في كتابه حلية الأولياء ج 9 ص76 عن إبراهيم بن الجنيد قال: حدثنا حرملة بن يحيى قال: سمعت محمد بن إدريس الشافعي رضي الله عنه يقول: البدعة بدعتان، بدعة محمودة، وبدعة مذمومة، فما وافق السنة فهو محمود، وما خالف السنة فهو مذموم، واحتج بقول عمر بن الخطاب في قيام رمضان (نعمت البدعة هي
Educational. Jazakallah khair.
every (kulli) does not always mean every:
surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every.
surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything.
another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels.
another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY.
oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on
doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."
and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden"
imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!”
still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
This is innovators best argument 😂
every (kulli) does not always mean every:
surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every.
surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything.
another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels.
another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY.
oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on
doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."
and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden"
imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!”
still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
As for the Shariah, then the Bidah is described as follows, and it is the most comprehensive and concise description, as mentioned by Shaykh Salih al-Fawzaan حفظه الله.
It has 8 characteristics:
1. It is done to seek reward from Allah, The Most High.
2. It is introduced into the Religion.
3. It may resemble the shariah in some of the aspects
4. There is no supporting text from the Quran.
5. There is no supporting text from the Sunnah.
6. There is no supporting text from the Sahabah.
7. There is no (Asl) origin in the Religion for it.
8. There is no (Kayfiyah) manner in the religion regarding it.
Next they(the innovators) will say doing takfir of rulers is a good sin 😂😂😂
Jazaaka Allaahu khayran brother..Allaah yahfadak
أريد بالبدعة في الحديث: ما ليس له أصل في الدين، وهو المراد بقوله (كل محدثة ... ) إلخ، وأما الأمور الموافق لأصول الدين، فغير داخل فيها وإن أحدث بعده - صلى الله عليه وسلم -. قلت: وهذا هو الموافق لقوله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - (وسنة الخلفاء) فليتأمل.
Abdullah Ibn Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said:“Every Bidah (innovation) is misguidance, even if the people think it is good.
Jazakallahu khaira for clearing these matters of aqeedah for us. May Allah accept it from you and preserve you Aameen .
Allahuma barik
Every innovation IN Deen is misguidance, not innovations for the promotion and preservation of Deen.
Example. I decide to make Tuesday nights fiqh classess in the masjid. Innovation? Yes. For the sake of preserving Deen? Yes.
Exactly!!!!!
They removed my comment on Instagram when I quoted Imam Malik. Subhan Allah weird world.
The scholars and schools of the Sunni mainstream understood that newly innovated matters in the religion that do not go against the injunctions and principles of the Qur’an, the Sunna, and the consensus of scholarship, are permitted and not considered misguidance.
In support of this is the Prophet’s narration:
The Messenger of Allah (may Allah bless him and give him peace) said, “Whoever adds to this affair of ours (i.e., the religion of Islam) that which is not from it, it is rejected.” [Bukhari and Muslim]
He also said, “Whoever starts a good practice (sunna) in Islam has the reward of it and the reward of all who follow it without decreasing from their reward whatsoever….” [Muslim]
May Allaah preserve you Ustadh
JazakAllah khair for clearing up these mistakes the brother made. May Allah Bless you immensely.
Ma sha allah
Interpretation of religious text, cultural and regional differences, historical differences, schools of thought, contemporary issues, political factors, globalisation & communication, and individual beliefs amongst other things...and here you are giving your audience a single narrow minded version of your understanding/interpretation as the gospel for a community of a Billion. This is grade F at school level.
I see. Your claim to speak on behalf of 1.8 billion current Muslims and the countless generations before indicates you have unparalleled enlightenment, challenging the knowledge of millions of scholars and thinkers. @@Let-the-Sunnah-go-forth
That implies those who have come to different conclusions than yours do not follow the Prophet (s.a.w.). Isn't that the major issue here? Everyone claims to follow the Quran and Sunnah, but will not allow any room for differences. @@Let-the-Sunnah-go-forth
Thank you!!! I even liked that video! I was ready to start discussing of it, but now I realize that I forgot I am ignorant and need to seek knowledge! Thank you!!!
So why does saudi follow 20 rakats sunnah of hadhrat umar,which has been going on for yeaaaars
Subhan Allah you teach them 👍 my brother ♥️
Narrated Rifa`a bin Rafi` Az-Zuraqi:
One day we were praying behind the Prophet. When he raised his head from bowing, he said, "Sami`a l-lahu liman hamidah." A man behind him said, "Rabbana wa laka l-hamdu, hamdan kathiran taiyiban mubarakan fihi" (O our Lord! All the praises are for You, many good and blessed praises). When the Prophet completed the prayer, he asked, "Who has said these words?" The man replied, "I." The Prophet said, "I saw over thirty angels competing to write it first." Prophet rose (from bowing) and stood straight till all the vertebrae of his spinal column came to a natural position.
Sahih al Bukhari 799
This is a newly invented thing which the prophet approved of.
Yeah your right, the prophet approved it so it doesnt mean its a bidah rather a sunnah. Unlike all the bidah of today
@@HaramainExperienceAs long as there are roots in the Qur'an and sunnah praiseworthy innovations can exist such was proposed by the classical scholars.
Imam Maalik rahimahullah said:
حدثنا أحمد بن عمر بن أنس نا الحسين بن يعقوب نا سعيد بن فحلون نا يوسف بن يحيى المغامي نا عبد الملك بن حبيب أخبرني بن الماجشون أنه قال قال مالك بن أنس من أحدث في هذه الأمة اليوم شيئا لم يكن عليه سلفها فقد زعم أن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم خان الرسالة لأن الله تعالى يقول {حُرِّمَتْ عَلَيْكُمُ الْمَيْتَةُ وَالدَّمُ وَلَحْمُ الْخِنْزِيرِ وَمَا أُهِلَّ لِغَيْرِ اللَّهِ بِهِ وَالْمُنْخَنِقَةُ وَالْمَوْقُوذَةُ وَالْمُتَرَدِّيَةُ وَالنَّطِيحَةُ وَمَا أَكَلَ السَّبُعُ إِلَّا مَا ذَكَّيْتُمْ وَمَا ذُبِحَ عَلَى النُّصُبِ وَأَنْ تَسْتَقْسِمُوا بِالْأَزْلَامِ ذَلِكُمْ فِسْقٌ الْيَوْمَ يَئِسَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنْ دِينِكُمْ فَلَا تَخْشَوْهُمْ وَاخْشَوْنِ الْيَوْمَ أَكْمَلْتُ لَكُمْ دِينَكُمْ وَأَتْمَمْتُ عَلَيْكُمْ نِعْمَتِي وَرَضِيتُ لَكُمُ الْإِسْلَامَ دِينًا فَمَنِ اضْطُرَّ فِي مَخْمَصَةٍ غَيْرَ مُتَجَانِفٍ لِإِثْمٍ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ} فما لم يكن يومئذ دينا لا يكون اليوم دينا
“Whoever among this ummah innovates something today which was not practiced by the Salaf, has accused the Prophetصلى الله عليه و سلم of treachery because Allah said “…This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion…..” So what was not religion then, is not religion today” [Ibn Hazam quoted it with his chain in al Ahkam fe Asool al Ahkam vol 6 page 791, quoted by as-Shaatibin Al-‘Itisaam 1/38, Shaykh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer Amanpoori said the chain is hasan. see Majalla as-Sunnah no.69 page no.3]
جزاك الله خيرا
Ustaad i think saying “pissed off” can be considered a swear word in english but Allah knows best.
no it literally means making someone angry or irritated.. don't know what language you are talking about
May Allah guide him. The Truth is clear.
JazakAllah khair shaykh
May Allah bless you usthad
Wow so your more knowledgeable then imam nawawi
The problem that faces the Ummah today is these Asaghir who speak about deen without ilm, as soon they learn some books and small treatise they thought they are learned, Allaahul mustaan, If you want to learn sit with senior scholars and ahlul ilm and remain silent for a long time. May Allaah guide this social media wannabe da'ee.
Allah Mustaen
What did imam shafi say about bid3a? Would be good to research this...he is clearly a well versed scholar of islam
Btw, what he meant by “the scholars of the salaf divided bidah into good bidah and bad bidah” is a particular statement of imam shafi’i. I’m sure you’re gonna find it.
Who is shafi? Not a sahaba.
@@courierton9217Shafi is not a sahabah. But he is one of the biggest scholars of Islam, upon the way of the Salaf. So you’re dismissive attitude toward him is unwarranted. That being said, if Shafi’i indeed did say this, it needs to be clarified what he meant by it. And if the meaning is indeed that there are “good bida’ah” then this would oppose the understanding of the Sahabah, and this would be a mistake on his part. Scholars make mistakes. But that’s getting ahead of ourselves. First the initial poster needs to provide evidence that Shafi’i indeed did say such a thing. Wallahu Alam
What r u talkin about?? Mauwleed is not even celebrated in the time of the 4 imam. ( including imam syafee rahimahullah time) mawleed is clearly an inovation
When Imam Ash-Shafi'i divided Bid'ah into good, he meant something else and he never allowed us to bring this things into the religion like this.
Those who don't have knowledge or have evil motives, use this Imam as a tool to spread evil.
Umar ibnul Khattab also said this is a good Bid'ah, does this mean he was innovating or promoting innovation?
No. Because he meant something else.
ash-Shaafi’ee - may Allaah have mercy upon him - said the famous saying: "whosoever declares something good has made it part of the sharee’ah," he also said in Ar-Risaalah (pg.507), "declaring things good (istihsaan) is a form of exercising desires"
Imam Al Shafi'i May Allah have mercy on him is free from your poor understanding and whatever evil you attribute to him.
I'm shocked at what I'm hearing. Someone link the video he's watching? Im mind-blowing this is real
So how do you explain that your are uae but in uae mawlid is official holiday & celebrated by rulers?
What about MBS who makes dua with hands raised after salah & there are pics & videos to show this?
Please answer these
Great video! Thank you! I would love to meet you one day as I live in the U.A.E as well. Sharjah! Lived here my whole life! Even if it's for 15 minutes i'd appreciate it! As Salaam O Alaikum! :)
Exactly, the Prophet ( Peace and Blessings be upon him ) was "whoever revives a sunnah" not bidah . The hadith was about sadaqa ( it is not a bidah ).
Here for contextual
Mundhir b. Jarir reported on the authority of his father:
While we were in the company of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) in the early hours of the morning, some people came there (who) were barefooted, naked, wearing striped woollen clothes, or cloaks, with their swords hung (around their necks). Most of them, nay, all of them, belonged to the tribe of Mudar. The colour of the face of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) underwent a change when he saw them in poverty. He then entered (his house) and came out and commanded Bilal (to pronounce Adhan). He pronounced Adhan and Iqima, and he (the Prophet) observed prayer (along with his Companion) and then addressed (them reciting verses of the Holy Qur'an): '" 0 people, fear your Lord, Who created you from a single being" to the end of the verse," Allah is ever a Watcher over you" (iv. 1). (He then recited) a verse of Sura Hashr:" Fear Allah. and let every soul consider that which it sends forth for the morrow and fear Allah" (lix. 18). (Then the audience began to vie with one another in giving charity.) Some donated a dinar, others a dirham, still others clothes, some donated a sa' of wheat, some a sa' of dates; till he (the Prophet) said: (Bring) even if it is half a date. Then a person from among the Ansar came there with a money bag which his hands could scarcely lift; in fact, they could not (lift). Then the people followed continuously, till I saw two heaps of eatables and clothes, and I saw the face of the Messenger (ﷺ) glistening, like gold (on account of joy). The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: He who sets a good precedent in Islam, there is a reward for him for this (act of goodness) and reward of that also who acted according to it subsequently, without any deduction from their rewards; and he who sets in Islam an evil precedent, there is upon him the burden of that, and the burden of him also who acted upon it subsequently, without any deduction from their burden.
Sahih Muslim, 1017 a
In-Book Reference: Book 12, Hadith 88
USC-MSA web (English) reference: Book 5, Hadith 2219 (deprecated numbering scheme)
Hii
What about Muhammad nabi (saw) birthday celebration
Mowluth ect.
Plz reply to me
Iam see more videos some people say is good some people say bidha.
Plz reply correct reply
It is a bidah. The Prophet and the 3 best generations never practiced it.
❤❤❤
wallahi brother Faris we live in a weird time, people are litrally attacking our brothers just for not agreeing with the LGBTQ people, and even our muslim brothers are acting like khwarij attacking each others leaders.
In reality, when someone believe there is good bida’, there will be no bad bida’, or at least we almost not heard about bad bida’ from them, even if someone from them telling mankind all religion is true is okay for some them…
Faris please don’t say the mawlid is an evil innovation, it is a National holiday in the UAE. They would not condone bidah
👍
Another one told me driving is bid'a instead we shall ride hoses like the prophet pbuh
Driving isn't an act of Worship
Ya Akhi. Can you expound on whether Omar RA did the taraweeh 20 rakah plus 3 witr in jama'ah. If that is a Sunnah of Muhammad sallahu alaihi wasallam. Performed regularly by the hanafi followers to today.
I found an authentic Hadith in Muwatta Imam Malik, where it's written that Umar ibn Al-Khattab started Qiyam Al-Layl (Taraweeh) for 11 Rakah (8+3). But he himself never prayed with them, he said that praying Qiyam Al-Layl at the last part of night is more better than this (congregational) Taraweeh prayer.
Is limiting Allah to having 2 hands 🙌 a good bidah. Because ibn taymiyyah thought so
Limiting? How many hands Allah has, according to you? And what is your source?
@@udaramalam7348 the book of tawheed by Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab who adheres to the teachings of ibn taymiyyah
@@Gog3453 that is not our sources, our sources was from alquran and sunnah. So how many hands Allah has?
@@udaramalam7348 you’re line of questioning is shurk
@@udaramalam7348 spoken like a true Wahhabi
They all followed the same minhaj (Islam Iman and Ihsan)
A very good work, MashaAllah. My question: why are you accepting MBS' Bida'a?
The physical appearance of Al mahdi narrated in the hadis resemble to Muhammad Bin Salman
Which?
In Sub Continent that’s a lot in sufis barelvi
Sheikh Al Islam Imam Nawiwi put into 2 categories.Actually he said but wrong and bit right because Salaf take many Imam Nawiwi's sources like Sharah Muslim etc.Shafi scholars believe there are 2 types of Bidah.But are there good bidahs too? I am a Shafi and honestly I am not confirmed because there are many sources which says there are.I will mention an example which was said by Imam Nawiwi about Umar Ibn Khattab RA said about 20 rakah salah "what a beautiful innovation it is" and there are many others which are mentioned by Sheikh Al Islam Imam Nawiwi,Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani etc may Allah pleased with all of them
But what is the drifference between good and bad bidah? According to Imam Shafi,Imam Nawiwi,Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani and others may allah pleased with them.If that Bidah is opposite to the religion and what Prophet and Allah(quran) said then that bidah is haram.If a bidah makes a muslim to make more closer to the religion then it's good bidah.
And allah knows best i am researching about this topic soo i am not sure too that is it really allowed or not.Soo please don't follow what i said before confirmation or if you know anything about this topic then please tell me.May allah reward you thank you
Are people ignorant that Mawlid is Bida'a or do they continue to do it even after being warned it's bida'a?
Mawlid is not Haram. We are listening to Quran, listening to madih, thanking Allah. There’s nothing haram about this.
You are celebrating a day that first and foremost, the Prophet himself ﷺ nor the Sahaba celebrated.
Secondly, there are no records of his ﷺ birth, so we don’t know exactly what day he ﷺ was born.
Celebrating mawlid is clear cut bid’ah and you have no evidence to support your claim, while there are many against you. May Allāh the Most High guide us all.
❤👍👍💯💯
Salam❤
These peers and fakirs have taken the religion from Hindus
Salaam sheikh I'm just asking are You Wahhabi/Salafi?
Yes he is❤
Brother, Salafi means who follows the Quran and Sunnah on the understanding of the Sahabah and their Followes. So yes he is salafi and me too
There's a guy name hassan ali who said apparently imam shafi said there is good bidah. Is this true?
Hasan Ali is a deobandi and is the same guy that says that Tawhid isn’t mentioned in a single Hadith
Just ask him to prove it, he gonna block you or bring something up in his books and twist it
They twist imaam Shafi'is words, thats why majority of the major Ashari scholars are all Shafi'is. Like Al Ghazali, Suyuti, Fakhr ud Dihn ar Razi, Subki, etc...
Shafi is not a sahaba
Imaam Shafi'i is one of the great scholars of Islam, and he didn't introduce something new. @@courierton9217
Those who claimed that they follow the (ijtihaad) of Uthman, may Allah be pleased with him, by giving second Adaan on Friday, they don't even follow that correctly... Because the second Adaan was given in the market, in the time of Uthman, may Allah be pleased with him...But they give BOTH ADAAN IN THE MOSQUE...So, they don't follow him either.
These are too much in barelvi Sufi thing like good bidah in sub continent
They are mushrik for a reason .
Everyone in the comments needs to study this idea of bidah, bidah hasanah etc
No such thing as bidah “hasanat” this is what the mubtadi use to justify their innovations. The ones that study bidah will find that every bidah is a bound for the Nār. And the athar of Umar and taraweeh is not evidence of “bidah hasanah” because congregational taraweeh was established in the prophets ﷺ time. Therefore, Umar revived a sunnah.
But ofc due to people not understanding the arabic language, they take the words of umar and twist it to justify their heinous crimes of bidah.
@@Junuuas I said, people should study properly from scholars in their community they trust and not rely on TH-cam comments and TH-camrs
Makes no sense what this brother saying , you can introduce a second athan, so we can now add an extra rakat for the jummah salat??
The very concept of abrogation in its essence is based on change .
And who introduced this second athan? It was one of the four khalifas, Uthman Radiallahu anhu, the prophet ﷺ commanded us to follow his sunnah and the way of the four khalifas.
It was narrated from 'Abdur-Rahman bin 'Amr As-Sulami that:
He heard Al-'Irbad bin Sariyah say: "The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) delivered a moving speech to us which made our eyes flow with tears and made our hearts melt. We said: 'O Messenger of Allah. This is a speech of farewell. What did you enjoin upon us?' He said: 'I am leaving you upon a (path of) brightness whose night is like its day. No one will deviate from it after I am gone but one who is doomed. Whoever among you lives will see great conflict. I urge you to adhere to what you know of my Sunnah and the path of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs, and cling stubbornly to it. And you must obey, even if (your leader is) an Abyssinian leader. For the true believer is like a camel with a ring in its nose; wherever it is driven, it complies."
Sahih (Darussalam)
Sunan Ibn Majah, 43
In-Book Reference: Introduction, Hadith 43
English Reference: Vol. 1, Book 1, Hadith 43
Thats a false understanding of you. No one can add any rakat to salat since it is an act of worship. For the adhan is also an act of worship for the muadhin but if it requires to add a second adhan for the people to hear then this dos not fall under bid'ah or changing the religion since it is a necessity. Also the prophet s.a.w. said to follow the rightly guided caliph's they know the religion better then anyone.
@@AbuInayaAl-Athari-po3yj can you see the hadith i posted? Im not sure if it showed up since youtube sometimes deletes comments.
Second azan was for second zamat because many people couldn't participate.
If youre truely genuine. Then call ibn Taymiaa and his followers ahlul Bida as well since he divided tawheed into a trinity.
I don’t mind ignorant people; afterall, we’re all ignorant to some extent. What really annoys me is when the ignorant run their mouth thinking they know. Ugh..
@@Farishammadi see you’re not genuine 😂 if you want to play it fair, play it fair with all.
@@Let-the-Sunnah-go-forth wow what happened to every bida will lead to hell? I only smell hypocrisy and double standards from u guys 😪
@@lawlietlawliet
How did ibn Taymiyyah divide tawheed into the trinity please explain? I thought IBN Taymiyyah was a excellent reputable scholar?
Brother your take on Andrew Tate and Sneako and popular revert celebrities will be much appreciated because I feel it’s important for young Muslim men to be receiving information from brothers such as yourself over such figures. You are clearly educated and you ARE promoting Islam and keeping it pure. However what do you think about the war room? Is this promoting Islam? May Allah swt guide Tate and such reverts BUT do you know who is in charge of the war room? An occultist named Iggy Semmelweis
IslamQA website clearly says there's ''good'' and ''bad'' bid'ah. I don't understand why there are many many contradictions in islam, even between salafis, sunnis, etc.
There are no contradictions in Islam. And I just went to IslamQA, and typed in “good bidaah”, and the first two answers matched exactly with this video. You’re either very confused, or are intentionally trying to put doubts into peoples hearts. If it’s the latter, may Allah deal with you
Imam Shafi said:
“Bidah is of two types: praiseworthy and blameworthy”
Abu Nu'aym related it in his book Hilyat al-Awliya. Imam Bayhaqi, Imam Nawawi, Ibn Hajr and the vast majority of the greatest scholars agree there is good biddah.
Sahabah like Umar even used phrases like “excellent biddah” in sahih bukhari.
Imam shafi is from the SALAF!!! We have been instructed to take our understanding from the salaf, NOT these TH-cam wahabi dajaals. Stay away from this minority sect - wahabism.
💯
wahabis are misguided
What act did Umar say was a good bidah? It was Taraweeh. Taraweeh was done during the life of the Peophet, as he himself prayed it. Therefore, he's not using the technical definition of it being a bidah..... therefore it makes no sense for someone to come out and say that Umar said innovations were good.
@@liby254 so I guess sahabah made no sense, the salaf made no sense, all the classical scholars made no sense, who all said there is good biddah.
Only in modern times, I guess only wahabies make sense when they make excuses in order try to reject good biddah. 🤷🏼♂️
@@waqasriaz3497 name me 1 sahaba which said that innovations (used in the techical sense) is good. Just 1. And provide the full reference below when you quote it. I'll be waiting for your respone... And I want a full reference.
Ibn Umar, one of the major Sahaba said that EVERY innovation is bad - even if every person was to thing it was good......
Imaam Maalik rahimahullah said:
"He who innovates an innovation in Islaam regarding it as something good, has claimed that Muhammad ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ has betrayed his trust to deliver the message as Allaah says:
{This day have I perfected for you your religion}. [Surah al-Maaidah (5): 3]
And whatsoever was not part of the religion then, is not part of the religion today."
What about congregational dua after every salat. Its very common within the Desi Masjids. (Mainly speak Urdu as the masjid's main language, English is secondary as a common language if people don't speak Urdu).
every (kulli) does not always mean every:
surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every.
surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything.
another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels.
another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY.
oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on
doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."
and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden"
imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!”
still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
It is a bidah. Congregation dua is bidah. Here for the proof : From Abu Uthmaan an-Nahdi who said: ‘A worker for Umar bin al-Khattab wrote to Umar saying that there are a group of people who gather together to make Dua’ for the Muslims and the leader.’
So Umar -Radi Allaahu anhu- wrote to him: ‘Bring them to me with yourself.’
The man came and Umar said to the doorman, prepare the whip. When they entered upon Umar -Radi Allaahu anhu- he descended upon their leader by hitting him with the whip.’ [ Collected by Ibn Abi Shaybah (8/558) from Muwayeeyah bin Hisham who said Sufyaan narrated to us from Sa’eed al-Jareeree from Abi Uthmaan, & its chain is Hasan.] So don't play intention to the first reply that person is playing the trick of the devil . There is nothing such as "good bidah " . Every single companion did a criticism of bidah .
@user-rs7fr9we2p most of the South Asians are Hanafi or Shafi. I take back what I say about Congregational Dua. Unrelated a big problem within the South Asian/Desi Muslim community is people bringing over their homeland bidaah like the Deobandis for example and just enforcing beliefs with no basis on people. So within any masjid keep to yourself and don't blindly follow.
Unrelated but some Pakistani guy in my college once told me that 80% of the Islamic knowledge that remains is in Urdu and alot of knowledge in Arabic is lost. Where did you get that information from. What basis does this belief stand on.
Ustaadh, in the UK , these sentences
- P** OFF
- This is what p**sed me off
Is considered VULGAR language, I know in other countries they dont consider it foul language however, the viewers from the UK wont understand this and end up thinking you're using bad language
Yeah but he is talking american english not British so ppl talking british english should have that in mind
I understand exactly what you are saying, I realize this in the UK, I was very shocked to find out what it means to them, because in my country it is not a swear word, I guess this is a learning experience for most people around the world, and they should know that he did not mean it in the way it is taken in the UK. There are other words that really offended other cultures as well that I don't want to get into. But I think the brother now knows, but people from different cultures also need to understand other cultures, and not too be overly offended. And think badly of others.
@@Qvcpvc909 Thats why I said: "I know in other countries they dont consider it foul language however, ..."
The word biddah hasanah comes from Imam Shafi. I take him before this guy.
evidence?
God bless u brother Fa4is.
Not even a single word was correct on that video. Allah guides Ummah to the true path. Please please please, do some good research and ask authentic schoolers before doing any video. U r going to be asked on the day of judgment.
Faris
This comment is in support of brother faris i believe after rereading this comment.
@@Tk-sh3bfI hope
As salam u alaikum warahmatullah.
th-cam.com/video/_H9G56xYNrU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=n5RaNhQxXVsJ571U
This is by far the best refutation of Bid'ah Hasanah i have listened to so far. All of the arguments of Ahlul Bid'ah are refuted by Sheikh Abu Hakeem Bilal Davis(may Allah preserve him). He explains in details some of the unclear Kalam of the Salaf which the Ahlul Bid'ah cling on to inorder to prove their case. But Alhamdulillah these claims have been proved to be false.
every (kulli) does not always mean every:
surah al imran:185 reads: EVERY soul shall taste death. the word used is Kullu. yes, here kullu means every.
surah ahqaf:25 reads: "Tudammiru kulla shay’in bi amri Rabbihā" or "a flood which destroys ALL things, on the command of its lord" yes here, kulla, does not mean literally everything. its a general statement. and it doesnt mean taht the flood destroyed the people on the arc, it doesnt mean the flood destroyed the earth, or the sky. it did not litterally destroy everything.
another example, surah Sad:73 reads: "Fasajadal malāikatu kulluhum ajmaʿūn" or "so ALL angels prostated together [to Adam alayhissalam]" but again, this is not literally ALL angels.
another example, this time from hadith, jami at tirmidhi 2786 reads: "Kullu ʿaynin zāniyah" or "EVERY eye commits zina" oh? even the eyes of the prophets? dont salafis claim Allah has literal eyes, well. estaghfirullah, but even those eyes?? no, again, these statements are generalizations and it does not mean literally EVERY.
oke, so that being said. if you consider, ibn hajar, or imam bayhaqi to be liars, then fine, but they have mentioned that there is good bidah in their books. but oke thats fine, lets ignore that. let just say that ibn hajar lied about or was mistaken about what imam ash shafii said. lets move on
doesnt the prophet in sahih bukhari 2692 say: "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar."
and in sahih muslim and riyad us saliheen (171) the prophet said: "Whosoever introduces a good practice in Islam, there is for him its reward and the reward of those who act upon it after him without anything being diminished from their rewards. And whosoever introduces an evil practice in Islam, will shoulder its sin and the sins of all those who will act upon it, without diminishing in any way their burden"
imam nawawi, unless he is a bad liar too, and a mushrik (btw he and ibn hajar were ashari). said in Tahdhib al-Asma wa al-Lughat: "Whatever conforms to the Sunnah is approved (mahmud) and whatever opposes it is abominable (madhmum).’ He used as his proof the statement of Umar ibn al-Khatab (رضي الله عنه) about the [congregational] supererogatory night prayers in the month of Ramadan: “What a good innovation this is!”
still not convinced? oke do what u want, but dont call us mubtadi for believing these scholars.
If there is no good bidaa why are you teaching ISLAM using WiFi is this not innovation?
Innovation in Islam. Using wifi has no relevance to bidaa in Islam
Subhen’Allah this is why you should not talk about knowleg. You have bidah in the sharia meaning and you have bidah in the arabic meaning. They are talking about the bidah in the arabic meaning not in the sharia meaning! Pls Learn befor speaking jahil
Do we still need the second azan as times have changed everyone knows the time now and only negligence stops them coming to jummah on time.
that video you show can open doors to more bida'a, since some ignorant muslims can feel they are doing the right thing according to their wishes or the waswas of Shaytan. This kind of video is tragic ! spred ignorance with appearance of wisdom !! astaghfirullah !
But then its upon them to see if what they are doing has evidence. You are making a doubt that doesn’t exist literal conjecture.
Bidah is Bidah that's all no good and bad Bidah astagfirulla those who r did biddah they all are misguided Kullu biddathin jalala va kulla jalalathin finnar
Fairs you absolutely make no sense.
What about the Khalifa Umar bin Al Khattab may Allah be pleased with him starting the Taraawiih congregation Prayers? Didn't he start those as a mass congregation prayer in Ramadan when it did Not exist as a Congregation prayer at the time of the Prophet Salla Allahu 'alaihi wa 'ala Aalihi wa sallam, saying about it "نِعْمَ البِدْعَةُ هَذِهِ" (translated: what a good Bida'a that is), as it was narrated in Sahih Al-Bukhaari ? Please, your assertions are false. There is a thing as a good Bida'a. Otherwise, you are claiming to have more knowledge than the second Caliph.
And please don't respond by saying that he meant Bida'a in the meaning that it is a "new thing" and not in a religious sense, as some people who want to treat their readers as idiots have claimed. It is a new introduction in religious ritual. It is a Novel Religious ritual. You cannot claim novelty as an attribute of the Taraawih prayer, but dismiss religiosity as an attribute. That is the epitome of Al-Tahaafut (Incoherence).
The prophet ﷺ said 'every bid'ah is misguidance'. And the tarawih was already prayed by the prophet ﷺ. If you actually read the seerah you'd know that, and umar revived it in the time of his ruleship, he did not come up with something new. Fear Allah, don't speak without knowledge.
Watch the video, he discusses it
Had you actually paid attention to the video, you wouldnt have said his
This*
@@petrolmoney77 Read my comment carefully. And I did watch the video. There was NO congregational Tarawih prayer at the time of the Prophet Salla Allahu alaihi was ala aalihi wasallam. Khalifa Umar bin Al Khattab instituted that. And called it "نعم البدعة هذه".
Brother be quiet, you don’t know anything about the sunnah.
So Al Albaani considered the Mihrabs a bi’dah. Since you’re a Salafi and hold Al Albaani (a zahari/ salafi/ halabi/ ghar muqallid scholar) in a high standard, his fatwa is analogous to the brother you’re critiquing regarding minarets. Sounds like Al Albaani has a similar methodology as the brother. Imam Shafi is the one who delves into this fiqhi topic of what is Bi’dah good and bad. Just say that you’re a pseduo salafi/ wahabi. Be with the majority of the ummah. Mawlid is a valid opinion (Ibn Hajar, Imam Suyuti, Imam Nawawi etc.). Those who don’t believe in it is also a valid opinion, but is wrong to say that a Muslim who participates in mawlid is a kaffir or musrik. Why don’t your critique the actual bi’dah of the gulf states that own you and prop you up to spread their pseduo salafi agenda. The majority of the student of knowledge and ulema of the true athari/salafi Aqidah warn about people like you who hide and pretend to be part of the school of thought, but you are actually creating, spreading and establishing bi’dah yourself, becoming/ proclaiming to be a fifth Madhab. Shaykh Asrar Rashid goes into depth of Islamic history and refutes people like Faris. Same with Mohammed Hijab, Hamza Yusuf, Daniel Haqiqajou and others. People are starting to you for the Madkhali boot locker you are. If you existed during the inquisitions of the Mutazlia movements within the old Caliphates of the past, you would part of those who would imprison and slander and takfir the ulema of Ahlul Sunnah Wa Jamaah like Ibn Hanbal, Ibn Taymiyyah, Al Ghazali, etc. You are repeating the same signs of the old caliphates who where puppets of rulers who wanted to things based on their desires and not abided by the religion. Beware of scholars or students of knowledge who are deeply tied to the agenda of governments, movements, jihadi groups and western influences. Find the middle path as within our tradition of Ahlul Sunnah Wa Jamaah.
You have never heard this in your life because all you do, brother, is follow your contemporary sheikhs . You have isolated these hadith and used your own interpretation to make a conclusion.
This is incorrect
Please look into the classical scholars interpretation
It doesn’t get more classical than the sayings of the Prophet ﷺ and his companions.
@Farishammadi shukrun for you answer my brother.
Please confirm who should Interpretate the sayings of the prophet salalahualaywasalam ?
Ibn usaymeen
Albani
Abdul wahab
Or
Classical scholars who the entire ummah agree upon?
Allah subhantallah bless you
@@traditionalmiddlepath3773
The words of Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم are very clear to understand and needs no further explanation just as the companions understood from them.
من احدث في امرنا هذا ما ليس منه فهو رد.
Who invents in this matter of ours (Islam), what's not from it, is rejected (by Allah). Sahih Bukhari and Muslim.
من عمل عملا ليس عليه امرنا فهو رد.
Whoever does something which is not from our matter (Islam), is rejected (by Allah). Sahih Muslim.
اياكم ومحادثات الامور.
Don't you dare bring or do innovations. Sunan Abi Dawood Sahih.
كل بدعة ضلالة.
All innovation is misguidance. Same source as above.
On top of that, there is a Sahih Hadith in Sunan ad darimi in which Abu Musa al ashari saw people in a masjid in circles with pebbles, doing zikr of Allah in a way which was never done in vast numbers (100 times or more)
He didn't like this and went to Ibn Masood, they both are from the major sahabas. Ibn masood came and he scolded all of them for doing something which was not from the Sunnah of the Prophet.
This is clear proof that all Sahabah were against bidah even it was something related to zikr of Allah.
This Hadith is easy to find.
Madkhali 😂
On the staright path ❤
Akhi how can i contact you?
I have some important question