ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Inside the Chieftain's Hatch, Panzer 1 Pt 2.
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ธ.ค. 2019
- They've lowered the music a tad. Part 2 of a 2-part overview from Panzermuseum Munster. This is a Wargaming funded video. Do a solid, if you haven't done so already, go try the game out, the link will associate the player with this product and reinforce that it should continue. tanks.ly/WoTCh...
For clarification and full disclosure, ITCH now comes from two sources. The original WoT-funded and produced, such as this one, and my independent Patreon/TH-cam funded ones, such as the Panzer 61. This is obviously one of the former.
![Exclusive! น้องลิกก้า&น้องโรร่า มาแล้ว!! [cc] แดนแพทตี้ SS2 | EP.48 |](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UmlpJhRekyY/mqdefault.jpg)
“Oh bugger the tank is on fire”
Ah my favorite words
I've missed it. It's been awhile since he's done one.
TH-cam: _Video came out 27 minutes ago_
Also youtube: _Zack Bauer commented 11 hours ago_
Me: _Visible confusion_
@@jakobc.2558 Patreon or something?
Its almost as satisfying as "lets get this on tray.nice!"
@@d34thnote79 Yes the Chieftain post videos early to his discord.
Just yeet the seat when the tank is burning.
It is also the melee weapon
@@Osmosium2507 Or a shield for the deadly Spanner and Seat combination.
@@MikaelKKarlsson The _Schraubenschlüssel-und-Sitztechnik_ has been forbidden in warfare since the 1790s! Even Hitler's troops would never have dared to use it.
7.62 might never burn
On this tank
@@mr.waffentrager4400 That engine and fuel tank certainly will, though.
Versailles treaty, " Germany, don't build any tanks".
Germany, " nope, only tractors.
Machine guns? No they help unload grain.
Lol
@@dubspool We meed some form of pest control.
Versailles Treaty, “Sure looks tankish, you sure that’s not a tank!”
Germany, “Yep. It’s grey, so it’s obviously a tractor!”
Versailles Treaty, “Good, we’ll report nothing to see here, just be careful, looks tankish.”
Germany, “Disagree, it’s definitely Grey.”
@@RandomboiSam "Have you seen how many boars we have to deal with?!?"
Nicholas: "oh bugger the tank is on fire"
Me: beats the table with excitement..
Much better now with lowered music, looking forward to the next one!
why do they need music when the chieftain speaks? Its just incredibly annoying... And the worst thing is...its a 4-bar phrase that repeats again and again and again....till U go crazy. Its a shame, because I love the episodes with the chieftain.
I never really was bothered
music for Intro and Outro only, dammit!
The Panzer 1. It's bigger on the inside.
For sure, still not certain how he fit inside, let alone had space around him.
I'm sure it'd have more stuff cluttering the inside if it weren't stripped out interior, still its kinda roomy in there, poor guys then get stuck into more cramped LARGER tanks, go figure...
@@Feiora Well I think a large reason for that is that bigger tanks tended to have at least 30 mm cannons on them, not twin 7.62 mm MGs, so you had to leave room for the recoil, normal man could take the recoil of the MGs, sure his shoulders would be sore but nothing would really be broken. However cannons especially the later war heavier cannons could seriously injure or even kill a man if they got hit with breach recoiling backwards so you had to leave room for that.
The Tardis tank!!
Haha or as clara put it, smaller on the outside
I'm sure the doctor wouldn't be too fond of the nazis using tardis tech though
So how come we don't have the Chieftain as a TC in game? Imagine the crew voice chatter: "Feck, Airse, the fecking tank's on fecking fire".
Let's try this again. This tank is really small. Those tanks are far away....
All fun and games til it goes on fire and the TC clambers out in clumsy fashion instead of putting it out
Hot damn, when you slammed that hatch down I imagined the mechanics standing outside flinching.^^ They really love these things dearly, I know how they looked at us when we were climbing on the Panzer IV and the Panther.
Like crew chiefs everywhere, it's their baby and someone else just gets to borrow it from time to time.
It's a retired machine of war, made out of armor steel, I don't think you can break the hatches and ports so easily. Running engine, perhaps.
@@Zamolxes77 Most of them were wrecks and were lovingly restored by Bundeswehr mechanics and members of the Panzermuseum Supporters Club. They are pretty protective about them.^^
He lopped off the back of the chair, pushed open the hatches, and, after getting out, slam dunked the hatch like Shaq. I died. 🤣
@@Zamolxes77 never underestimate a soldiers ability to break stuff.
"The seat is simple but functional"
well.. yes.. it's a seat...
*sound of german engineers all over the place being triggered*
I see. The seat is made out of seat
@@hpoelies (Flashback to the old _Top Gear_ episode where they discover that the car they're reviewing, in which they don't like the seats very much, won an award from "a panel of German seat experts".)
**Inside the Chieftain's Hatch**
Don't worry about the alway on air conditioning, the war will be over by Christmas!
Yeah, but which Christmas?
Hmm, maybe thats why they sent so many ferdinands onto the eastern front! The tank turns jnto an instant campfire for warmth, just add mild elevation!
omg the music is actually at a good volume for a change! I don't have to mess with volume settings for every interlude!
A good volume for the music would be 0.
@@Kalumbatsch oddly the corrupt number of interludes is also 0!
I wouldn't know, my ears are atill bleeding from the last videos.
You guys should take a look at a little application called "sound locker". It allows you to cap the volume at a certain level and works quite nicely.
Bruh.... you must have been on twitter before Elon brought it to have complained about crap like this. Prolly a huge fan of Disneys Strange World as well.
Hope you are not still going to parties complaining two years later
"this is actually somewhat easier to get out of than you might think"
* almost kills himself *
@BlackDeathViral03 he hit many things several times in his way out and the final jump was not... Let's say "smooth" 😂
@BlackDeathViral03 it's cute how we really care about his safety and well being
@BlackDeathViral03 "another"?
Cant wait to finally see the Panzer IV and I know they have one in Munster....
Yey my favourite.tanks the for the heads up xd
It's also a working one, so that's cool. It stands right across from their Befehlspanther, was sitting on it while filming MHV. There is a huge sign right in front of it saying "Don't touch these museum pieces". The looks of the people when they saw us on the tanks were great. xD Sadly I forgot to get into one, our drone pilot jumped into the Comet and rotated the turret...which quite surprised everyone of the staff as no one had checked ever if that was actually possible. Though I have to say seeing that 17pdr swinging in your direction is a disconcerting sight...
@@HistoryGameV Just hoping that they had checked the 17 pdr was cleared given their surprise at the turret moving.
@@HistoryGameV Yes, a 17pdr swinging in your direction is always disconcerting especially if its loaded and the gunner is pissed at you...
@@Feiora *laughs in armor-piercing discarding sabot
Oh I've been looking forward to this. The inside of these just-pre-war tanks says so much about the design ethos of the country of manufacture, and the priorities of the army who's having them made.
Meanwhile, in America: Okay, but can’t you fit like two or three more machine guns on it?
M2 Medium: *I want to die*
- Why did the Germans named a model of their Radios "FU2"
- Because the British had a radio model named "FU"
...
... Ok, ok... I'm going now :P
:P
Nice.
Hans, sitting in the turret: May I have some vision ports to my left and to the right?
Tank designers: ...no
That is a nice hatch to get out if the tank is on fire :D
I remember how critical the mechanics looked at us when we were climbing around on the tanks a year ago. They are tanks, they don't break easily, but nonetheless someone definitely wasn't happy about the Chieftain slamming that hatch down hard. xD
"Oh Bugger, the tank is on fire!"
Literally music to my ears, I even have a shirt with those very words.
It does cause a significant emotional event in long-time viewers!
@@Finwolven yes
Everyone upvote for him to do inside the hatch of the t28 super heavy tank that sits outside one musium. (Was only 1 of 2 produced
Oh the tank that somehow got lost in a field for a few decades
Behind a shrubbery!!!😁
It looks like one of the few old tanks that would be fun to drive.
Music and transitions were much nicer. Please give them a thank you for listening to the feedback.
I'll thank them when they remove the still extremely annoying music entirely.
@@im8015 Exactly.
Music= YUK
If my memory serves, I remember reading the Panzer I stationed in Nanking City during the siege, held off numbers of Japanese attacks, and managed to take out two Japanese tanks. And it was finally destroyed by field artillery.
Would not be surprising considering that the bulk of the Japanese armour at the time were Type 94 tankettes.
The Type 94 was basically designed to be a larger Carden-Loyd. Leaving it smaller and more lightly armed and armoured than a Panzer I.
Interesting comment about the engine air intake coming through the crew compartment. The US M60A3 had a similar arrangement, except the crew could unbolt and flip the intake covers so then the engine would draw air from outside of the tank, for cold weather or maybe chemical threat. When the tank became a giant Dutch oven in the summertime (NTC!) it was nice to have some air flowing through the turret.
I was not expecting the back of the driver's seat to pop off like that, pretty cool.
I wonder if the viewing port being on the back of the turret is based on the idea of giving the commander a view of a direction the driver can't see in.
Yes, also it could be for observation during travel. Since the turret seem to be easy enough to swing around, maybe they would travel with the guns pointing backwards ? Another possible role could be for defense, to give the commander an option of defending the tank towards the back. Since is such a low to the ground tank, an enemy soldier could have jumped very easily on the engine deck with a satchel charge or grenades to take out the tank.
@@Zamolxes77 Or to observe flag signals from the troop leader?
@@Zamolxes77 Why would you drive with the turret facing backwards? It's not French!
@@Mr-Trox I could not fit in a pz I, unless you cut me in half, lengthwise and sideways :)
Field of view is important when driving, to observe the road and obstacles, that back vision slit seems to be very big, so it would considerable increase commander field of view to assist the driver ?
If you were just driving you'd be head out.
I imagine in a lot of combat they were head out as well, the Germans were big proponents of situational awareness.
I don`t know how you always manage to escape, so graceful, from a tank on fire. Every time!!
'Oh bugger, the guitar is on fire' would be music to my ears..
The turret monster has little bite, unlike the era Soviet 45mm cannons.
osp80 Panzer 2
Nice Dismount Chieftain ! Thank you for the Tour .
For those interested in such things, the Panzer I was also used to mount a 15cm field howitzer, including the carriage, for use in the mobile artillery role. Known as the sIG 33 or Bison, it was considered successful because it could deployed and withdraw much more quickly than could a towed weapon. On the other hand, it was recognised early on the the weapon was a bit too much for the little tank chassis to handle. There is video on TH-cam of one of these things being use and the recoil makes the chassis jump quite violently which, I’m sure, would have been potentially dangerous to the crew:
tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/nazi_germany/SiG-33_Bison.php
God help the driver when that 15cm goes bang
@@looinrims He might not even have been in the vehicle at the time or he might have had his hatch closed.
TheThirdMan don’t matter if he’s there the recoil the tank feels is gonna lurch
@@looinrims Yeah, whatever. I looked it up; the driver was seated _underneath_ the gun carriage. The whole SiG 33 gun was placed onto the PzKpfw I chassis and some thin armour plating was added. When the gun fired, the crew was normally standing in the normal position for serving an artillery howitzer. Whether or not the driver remained in his position, I don't know. What I do know is that the recoil, unsurprisingly, made the whole vehicle jump. I doubt if the driver would have been any worse off that anyone else. At least he couldn't fall out and he was well protected from the muzzle blast.
Oh I'm slightly worried because this mechanized militaristic gun-carrying vehicle is expelling huge waves of heat from a burst of incendiary flames
Translation: oh bugger the tank is on fire
nice
nice
nice
nice
Zingggg kaboom! The 6 pounder just hit panzer delete.
Well, he got out of the tank, okay. But you get the feeling he'd soon what until a Panzer III turns up.
Thank you for your excellent efforts. May I suggest you kill the music whilst you speak? Silence is golden plus it allows concentration.
He doesn't have any choice over the music, as its put on by wargaming's team
that was a swift escape... that the chair actually falls of is pretty neat.. also the hatch seems to be pretty big... seems good for 35...
Who else thinks it was actually kinda badass when he just un-expectedly popped that chair off and hopped out
Chieftain, please persuade WG to change to background music. The music got old quite badly. Besides that, great video 👍🏻
In his latest Q & A he said that they've not done a Inside the Chieftain's Hatch with Wargaming in 2 years, so the ones that are coming out now - like this one - were made a couple of years ago.
th-cam.com/video/sBQxYHB3GAA/w-d-xo.html
.
We need an oh bugger the tank is on fire T-shirt
Just 'Oh bugger...' with a burning tank. Could be different tanks every few weeks.
Umm. There is one. I'll put it back on sale in a few weeks
Honestly, I never thought 'Adorable' would get applied to a TANK.... But here we are.
DFX2KX the Panzer 1 though is very cute
Much better than pt 1, though I wish they would have placed the bloopers better so they are not buried under the links at the end.
Thank you for lowering the music a tad...any chance of dropping it a tad more? Also can't see the blooper due to the ads in the way. AS for the content, really enjoyed seeing it, thank you! Really surprised how ergonomic the Panzer 1 is!
I want a spaag modded for infantry fighting , soft targets and light "hard" targets and stationary targets like above ground bunkers. I would love to see how duel smooth bore gau 8s , with high velocity fin stabalized Saboted, depleted uranium tipped darts would work ...give them a needle sharp tip to have the smallest surface area possible when impacting a target so the projectiles energy is focused onto a pinpoint sized area, it should penitrate very well . plus the D.U. tip would react with any ferus alloys , making any steel hit ignite. Throw a small diameter tungsten alloy shaft into the mix and there would be a high density high mass object punching through after the d.u. reacts . if it does not react it obviously will help the dart tip punch through whatever needs punching through at 4000-6000 rpm.
Put a new turret on a modern mbt chassis,with external guns in armored shrouds , internally designed to hold the ammo feeding shoots and controls and a single gunner just to make sure malfunctions are cleared and everything is working well . also to manually operate the guns if need be. Then the driver in the chassis obviously...the rest of the space could be used for the massive ammo storage needed....seems to me that if a small glob of molten copper at 8000fps can punch through modern tank armor, 100 high density darts at around 5000fps would too. And with that value of fire , the same spots will likely be hit repeatedly thus increasing damage and the likelyness of total destruction.
Rolling thunder and BRRRrrrttt!
what the fuck
@@zerodiniro3273 what the fuck what? That would be alot of fun to play with
Imagine parking a KV-1 or an IS-3 next to a Pzkw I back in 1935.
10 years is not a lot of time to go from a 7mm machine gun to a 122mm cannon
The air intakes were for removing fumes and gases from the compartment. Just like a ventilator fan. Granted, you can shut the ventilator off when it's really cold. Which is nice.
More Japanese tank reviews needed , the experimental ones with the tiny hatches please Nick
Great video! I always liked the early German tanks (Panzer I, II, III and IV). And the Panzer I looked almost cute xD
Will there be a "Inside the Chieftain's Hatch" of the Panzer II?
“Oh bugger the tank is on fire” I sure hope someone made a mod to use that in WoT for fires lol
All in all a very good tank. If you think about it this tank is a bit ahead of it's time; The details prove that point. Bravo, ye ole German tank engineers!
To Chieftain and the team, please never remove the music from the videos. I have been watching these Chieftain's hatch videos since the first one and the music is so iconic to me now. It's like your favorite TV theme tune, so nostalgic.
I wounder if the internal air exchange was because of river crossings.
Spin the turrett around backwards and the visibility issues are solved. May not be the best way to charge into battle however. Thanks for this very rare look inside the Panzer I. Very cool.
Been looking forward to this for a long time!
I'm pretty sure looking at the shot over your shoulder of that thing squatting here that this is how the daleks in Doctor who were invented. The resemblance is astonishing
Yes, that is actually true, the inventor of the Daleks had seen these tanks in newspapers etc.
i've heard that the point of the engine intake from the crew compartment was for ventilation. I had read somewhere that the old landships did a similar thing because it reduced the buildup of gunsmoke inside the vehicle. one variant did away with this and then had ventilation issues. If you dont intake from the crew compartment you then need additional mechanical ventilation for the tank. Dont have any good sources to point you to unfortunately, but hopefully you'll encounter something about that in your research.
That does make sense.
.
All the “landships” had serious ventilation problems.
The engine was in the middle of the crew compartment where it rattled away emitting all kinds of fumes: leaky exhausts, lubricant fumes, petrol fumes, lots of heat... engines 100 years age were rather primitive (with the possible exception of ones used by Hispano Suiza but those cars probably cost as much as a tank).
The crews were widely reported to find the temperature inside the things almost intolerable no matter the time of year. Then you have the seating arrangement - except for commander and driver in the front no-one had a seat. That’s six+ guys with motion sickness, muggy heads and splitting headaches from CO poisoning, trying hard not to vomit and sweating absolute buckets being lurched around without warning because they couldn’t see where they were going all in a metal box full of sharp steel projections that had no suspension at all - and the engine sitting there smugly waiting to burn anyone who fell against it or the exhaust.
After a very few hours in the thing crews would often stagger out and collapse from heat exhaustion, CO poisoning and if they’d been in action cordite fumes. The Whippet (was ever a tank less fittingly named) had another crew incapacitating trick up its sleeve. The two engines were in the front in their own box, but they still leaked fumes and heat into the crew compartment. And the two exhausts pointed almost directly at said compartment. Such was the pleasure of being a Whippet crew that each tank sometimes had two crews who would operate it on alternate days. This was to allow a crew a whole day to recover from what their tank had done to them.
Though maybe the German A7 was even worse - 18 to 20 crew who had all the fun the landship crews did, in a vehicle prone to falling over if it tried to drive along an incline. Such as the edge of a shell-hole.
@@tlw4237 I don't imagine they had in real protection against gases used chemical warfare either.
.
@@BobSmith-dk8nw They had standard issue gas masks as far as I know, another miserable thing to use.
I might be wrong, but I can’t recall tanks encountering gas. Gas wasn’t much use as a defensive weapon because if you used it too close to your own lines it affected your troops just as much as the enemy. Mustard, a particularly unpleasant and persistent compound, would be ruled out because if it settled in your trench you might as well just hand the trench over to the enemy because it’s no use to your side any more.
By the time tanks were used in effective numbers the entente wouldn’t have needed to use gas in attacks much except maybe to suppress German artillery batteries behind the lines. The tanks were far more effective, especially in their morale effect on German infantry who, despite the invention of the Tank Gewehr and K bullets, often had little to counter them with. Tanks also had the advantage that they were unlikely to cause your own side many casualties or hamper your activities.
@@tlw4237 Yes. I can't recall any mention of tanks and gas. It occurred to me though as I was reading about the hellish conditions inside these machines that ... oh ... and here's one more thing they - might - have to deal with.
One problem for the Germans using Gas - was that the winds of the world predominantly flow from west to east, so while dumping gas onto enemy trenches and rear areas might not be so bad to your own troops - who would of course be prepared for dealing with the gas - that would give you most of no-mans land as a buffer. I would also imagine that wind conditions would play a part in conducting a battle in which they were planning on using gas.
I could imagine them using gas as a defensive weapon if dumped onto enemy assembly areas and artillery - but it may not have been something they wanted to deal with when their own troops were unprepared for gas - and of course - the enemy would be dictating the moment of attack.
It would also make sense that anyone planning an attack which was going to include tanks - might not want to introduce the added complexity of dealing with gas to the, at that time, new vagaries of using tanks.
.
Much better than part 1, thank god the editor ran out of crack.
He went full tanker mode in that fire escape
I enjoy your stuff , You and Ian , do a good presentation together ! I learn a lot from ya !
British Ferrets drew in intake air through the crew compartment- awful in cold weather
Dear Editor! Nice work on toning down the music, and also on not leaning so hard on that scene transition graphic. However, one small suggestion: when Chieftain says something like "about yea far," maybe use the footage from the camera that shows _him_ for that bit, rather than cutting away to the view of the pedal box. It doesn't help much to hear him say that if you can't see what he does with his hands. :)
I saw "Inside the Panzer I" and had to see this, Nic stuffing himself in one of those ear plug caes is a must see, lol.
Why do you think (editors) we need music anyway? (We don’t.)
You should try do an inside the chieftains hatch on the Sherman jumbo at fort Snelling Minnesota
The hatch on the rear of the turret makes sense especially with such a terrible commanders hatch, if somehow infantry can get behind it, they just hop on, stick some dynamite or throw a grenade in there. I can't see infantry trying to rush it head on. Alot of early tanks had rear ports for this reason as they were used for infantry support more often.
Thank you.
Chieftain: I made note that the administrators back at World of Tanks, were analyzing if sponsoring your chanel would sell memberships of/in World of Tanks. Back in the 70's and early 80s I was known of play Panzerblitz and Panzerleader. Our game counters had attack values and defence values. And I noticed that Steve Zaloga's book on the T64 included Soviet estimates of values for attack and defence between Soviet and Western tanks. The Chieftain received a defence estimate of 3.0 where as the T 62 was 1.0 How does World of Tanks does this and does your tours of tank museums includes gathering data for game designers? That would be interesting.
Correction: How does World of Tanks do this and do your tours of tank museums include gathering information to assist game designers?
Perhaps you should lug around a 4foot 10inch mannequin to put in those small spaces to demonstrate how it pays to be short in those old tanks. ;-)
There should be a "oh bugger the tank is on fire" compilation
Turret ring looks like a constant headache for the driver. Surprised Chieftain didn't mention that. The entire time he was seated, I was expecting a minor traumatic encounter between turret ring and good officer's head.
I wanna see a compilation of all the " oh my god the tank is on fire " tests
And a video on ventilation systems on ww2 tanks. I read in a book which mentions British tank crews in Africa , that the temperature inside the tank would be 10 or more degrees higher than it was outside , and it mentions specifically crusader tanks
The only tank we've seen so far that has enough room for its crew. We could do it today, if we could design a dependable rifle caliber machine gun with a 450 CROF and an MV > 3400mps. Child's play!
"If we make it a squeeze bore, and develop a cold plasma (AKA Collapsium/Neutronium) penetrator . . . salt it with neodymium . . . use a whopping great electromagnet array . . . damn! The turret's crammed again!
"I've got it! We build machines to build the machine who'll build the machines . . .wait. Where was I again?"
The PZ I PZ II especially the in game C panzers have ever been on my favorite list. Just think they were something very interesting as with the Crusader a childhood love at Aberdeen Proving Grounds outdoor museum. Im curious as to where that 10mm shouldered bolt and lock washer to the drivers right floor went. Did the have the back support of the drivers seat wrongfully bolted in thus keeping you from a hasty evac of your flaming panzer? At any rate Thank you so very much for another tank video Sir. Always looking forward to more Target Tank Forward. Like button Hit!!! ON THE WAY!!!!
If you need a sporty yet economical tank for home use and can't find a BT this little guy will do
The more I watch these videos, the more I'm convinced I would have made a terrible tanker. I'm a big fan of tanks and armored warfare and ww2 history, but oh boy, those vehicles are too cramped, they also look like death traps, all of them. I'm a bit shorter than the Chieftain, at 6 feet, but I have bigger bulk, so it would have been terrible to escape one of these things !
I also have a fertile imagination and read several books on subject, about how to make life miserable for tanks, suffice to say the people who operated them were very brave indeed and didn't have an easy job !
My Guess is that you're not 19 years old any more either ...
.
@@BobSmith-dk8nw Correct, unfortunately .... but for other reasons !
Very interesting as I never seen the interior of the Pz.Kfpw I
I have the impression that it seems to be quite tidey inside and quite and not so cramped. Perhaps it is because of the lack of equipment and ammo. The only thing really wrong is the interior as it couldn't be desert brown but ivory white. Please keep on posting....
Just a guess, but I think both the seat adjustment and the twin-handled tillers are so the driver can see when his direct vision hatch is closed. When it's closed, IIRC, he has only a tiny slit to see out of. Hard to see anything at all unless your face is right up close to it. So the seat slides way forward, putting his face several inches from it (must be very uncomfortable on rough terrain!). When he's driving as usual, the seat slides back for more space, and so he isn't driving with his face in the window, getting rain and dust all over him. The two handles are so he can reach the tillers either way. His arms aren't as long as yours; the Depression was really bad in Germany, and the people were small. Which is also part of why they didn't mind such cramped corners. You should try a Japanese tank next!
I believe (tough don't know) the term Panzer comes from Turtles. In german, the shell of a turtle is called "Schildkrötenpanzer" which could be loosely translated into shield-toad-armor. A beautiful language , so melodic and fluid ;)
Great work man. Well done. Legend
Great video. Suggestion. Can you plz do a inside chieftans hatch about the FV 4005. That would be epic.
The setting is just after evening muster at PanzerLager Schemp, close beside Kummelsdorf Fahrschule
"What kind of radio did they deliver?"
"Eff yoo two."
"What?"
"Watt?"
"What are you talking about?"
"Not Watt. It's Watts. 100 Watts, sir.""
"I don't need a drink!"
"I sure do."
"Will you just tell me the name of the radios they sent us?"
"Eff You Two!"
"Yeah? Well, Eff yoo, too!"
"Exactly."
"Do, uh, you want to get together later? Have a Schnapps, perhaps?"
"Eff you two, sir?"
"Let's just say it's not out of the question."
JagdPanzer IV - oh, please let it be...
Love the videos but something that would make the videos a bit better for me would be when you make a reference to other tanks always add an image with them.
Oh bugger the tank is on fire 🏃🏽♂️🏃🏽♂️🏃🏽♂️
@the_chieftain Considering germanys lack of experience with the tack scene of 1940 in 1935, what are the main features that they decided where keepers for future vehicles and is there any big feature they avoided in the pz 2-4 vehicles?
I believe he has a video about the development of pre-war tanks and doctrine for German vehicles on the channel that may be what you’re looking for. He also has them for the French and Italians.
I was always curious whether they replaced the box-fed MG13s with belt-fed MG34s by the time the tanks actually went to combat in Poland and France, but it would appear they didn't. I guess that was still pretty early for the MG38, and they probably needed all the production to outfit newer, better tanks, since the Pz I wasn't being used for serious front-line combat anymore, and the MG13s would work okay for the scouting duties and such they were intended for. The two-gun system is interesting. While it does give you a heavier weight of fire when needed, I suspect the real reason for having two guns is that in any kind of serious combat with nothing but air-cooled MGs as a main armament, the guns would overheat quickly (most video game players don't seem understand how serious this is, and how carefully you must handle a gun to avoid this, firing only five shot bursts with pauses in between...no spraying down the target and laying waste. If longer bursts are used (say 25 rounds, a full magazine for an MG13) you must wait 30 seconds or more for the gun to cool. if you don't, you will overheat and ruin it). Having TWO guns available allows you to switch back and forth, and let one gun cool while using the other one. I first though that maybe it was so one gun could keep firing while the other reloaded, but since the same man has to fire and load the guns, that wouldn't work well. An added benefit, in light of the limited magazine capacity, is that two guns used in sequence allows for a burst twice as long before having to stop and reload. This can be important in cases where it takes a whole magazine just to ge the fire falling where you want it, or if there is a long wave of infantry advancing, or you need to keep up bursts of cover fire. Of course hopefully you have several tanks with you as well, so someone is always shooting. I suspect that everything that I just said is also true of the twin coax MGs which were considered a major part of the armament of the early variants of the Pz III. IIRC those were also MG13s, but I may be wrong. Even if they were belt fed, the part about taking turns to let one gun cool still applies, and with the III, the loader can reload one gun while the other is being fired.
I don't think the lack of vision slits is important. A Panzer I was not meant to be operated under heavy fire, it was just to offer some protection if you were taken by surprise. With the weaker armor and vulnerable points like vision slits, a light tank that found itself under machine gun fire would rarely just sit and take it, they would try to beat retreat and get under cover again. The risks of a round striking an opening were too great (this is also why the vision slits are only on the rear). Most of the time you'd be driving around between one place and another, and not under great risk in most cases. When the enemy fire started coming in, or you felt like it might, you'd button up and accept the loss of situational awareness (they hadn't really figured out how important that was yet; they still figured the tanks would basically be following their leader and attacking well defined targets directly ahead of them). In most cases though, on a Pz I you would just leave the "windows" open and avoid being shot at. Once the fire started coming in, assuming the enemy wasn't skillful enough to put the first rounds right through the openings, you'd immediately button up and either engage them with the optic sight, or retreat out of direct fire.
I've been looking forward to this...
One of the groups that shows up at Conneaut OH and Rockford IL has a Pz1 that has a 20mm cannon and an MG which I think is a 15
2:44 I think the rear port was added after the Spanish civil war experience as the tank would have been taken out by soldiers coming from behind. That is just my theory feel free to add.
Trouble is the guy in the turret has no way to traverse himself and look backwards. Making the rear vision port unusable and useless unless the guns were pointing backwards. The two-man French tanks had a similar problem if the leather strap/“seat“ across the turret ring was in use.
These 2 man crewed 1930s tanks all seem to assume that the enemy will always be in a convenient location in front of the tank. Maybe because they thought of tanks as an armoured beast steadily rolling forwards assaulting whatever was in front of it while accompanied by adequate close infantry support, like the British heavy tanks were used in 1917/18 on the Western Front.
I think Nicholas should do a video where he rocks out dancing to the cheesy music loop. For 15 minutes.
VERY impressive exit!
The seat was hillarius!!!
Re. that 75mm breech: As I understand it the OQF (Ordnance QF) 75mm was obtained by boring up an Ordnance QF six pounder, So I guess its one of them. Bet someones already pointed that out and I just haven't scrolled down far enough.
"The FU-2"
Best radio name.
Could this in theory, be fitted with a 20 mm or other caliber autocannon or anti tank riffle? If so did they do it or if not why didn't they (because they were good in a trainers tank role, and the panzer II was allready there?) Edit: i know the ausf. C has an anti tank cannon but why so late in the war?
There was some consideration given to mounting the 20mm in the hull instead of fitting a turret, it was rejected in favour of the turret option.
Let's hope you got into KPz 70
Oh bugger...wry smile...the tank is on fire.
*What’s happening? I can hear constant music on a loop in the background? Another perfectly fine video (I imagine it was, can’t watch it) ruined! Thanks editors!*
I would also imagine turning the crew compartment into the "filter" component for the air intake may have had lesd to some difficulties
Helps pull gun smoke out of the crew compartment.
The viewslits for the driver reminds me of an medieval bacinet helmet. Kinda cool 😄 they where both top armor for warriors
The radio is called an FU 2. They knew.
As usual, great tank review. 👍🏼
He said F U 2 lol i always liked this series of tanks pretty interesting