What Is NASA Actually Doing On The Moon
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
- Thanks to our guest contributor, Jatan Mehta from Moon Monday. Subscribe to the Moon Monday blog and newsletter at this link: jatan.space/su...
Sources for today's video:
Moon Monday #189: The next lunar missions by Intuitive Machines for NASA CLPS, and more things that orbit Luna jatan.space/mo...
Moon Monday #191: A stream of CLPS and Artemis lunar mission updates jatan.space/mo...
Moon Monday #166: An intuitive 98% success, Artemis updates, and more jatan.space/mo...
NASA is funding a Moon mission to the magnetic swirl of Reiner Gamma jatan.space/na...
►Sign up for the weekly Space Race newsletter here: www.thespacera...
►Become a member today: / @thespaceraceyt
►Support the channel by purchasing from our merch store: shop.theteslas...
► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
► Patreon: / thespacerace
► X/Twitter: / thespaceraceyt
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Tesla Space: / theteslaspace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslasp...
Business Email: sean@creatormill.com
#Spacex #Space #Mars
Thanks to our guest contributor, Jatan Mehta from Moon Monday. Subscribe to the Moon Monday blog and newsletter at this link: jatan.space/subscribe
Better than Rocket is here
Easy lift off
Easy land on with antigravity Spaceship
No Fire
No Explosion
No Flame
Just Spin and
Lift off
Powered by Baterry
Work base on Gravity just spinning by using Battery
can fly in bad weather, plunge in the ocean even in outer space
Can lift more than 100 Ton
Earth which weight predict 600 trillion ton does not fall at the Sun because of centrifugal in orbitting, on the contrary it does not be thrown far go out the orbit line of hold by gravity at the Sun as orbit center. Gravity and centrifugal is equal called Equillibrium, thats why until now Earth which we was inhabited always rotate and circulate the Sun. Now we justly take example : how if the gravity used and centrifugal is negated? The Earth will float far leave the Sun. So that centrifugal can be used to fly far away if gravity eliminated. Finally how to eliminate gravity?
It’s way rotate part of aircraft by horizontal. When that rotation faster centrifugal force getting greater and the gravity getting smaller, finally it lose the gravity and the aircraft start flying. Of course people would surprise: how the aircraft can keep rotate without fulcrums? Thats why we named that aircraft Shuttling System that is aircraft likes two disc adjoining attached in the midle as fulcrums:
A. The Top part, we name Positive rotate to right, and the edges is getting thicker and havier.
B. The Buttom part, we name Negative rotating to left, and the edges is getting thicker and havier.
C. Middle Part , we name Neutral, air crew placed and also machine and everythings turning Negative and Positive at the same time.
The aircraft can liftup added with explosion from the engine. However that aircraft construction later, let the engineer doit it, and we are sure the aircraft will bulletproof and also waterproof.
.
.
In modern civilization where human being generally using flying saucer as vehicle, will a lot of change in lives either in materialism and in psychological. In materialism area will apply the change in life like.
People no longger need roadway and rel road which spend large of energy, money, places, things and time, object place and time. People would utilize that area for habitat or for other need:
The key to NASA’s moon landing would be to avoid BOEING.
8:08 - The Fouth Mission????
Who does your QA, Boeing?
How does a Falcon 9 launch a moon lander?
May the Fouth be with you!
@@Freakcent 😂
Fuhst mission, theud mission, fouth mission
Feyd mission. Probably Rautha.
We should never have left the moon to begin with the Apollo moon program should have continued on NASA leaving the moon was a big mistake NASA better not cancel the Artemis program either we need to get humans further and deeper into space.
No it happened way earlier than it should've and was completely unnecessary post the Moon Landing. So much other stuff was going on that required more attention and we didn't have the proper ability to sustain a Lunar program in terms of technology, money, and knowledge back then.
We should have never faked the moon landings to beat the soviets only on the minds of the people. That was a propaganda race instead of a space race, a technology race. The longest the lie is maintained, the hardest will be accept the truth.
the fact that we haven't even seen a crewed Artemis launch is like crazy imagine that the scientist's grandparents beat them to the moon with lesser resources and potato pcs and these guys are crying about saying their launchpad wont be ready until 2027.
@@waspsandwich6548 yeah the lunar landings were just short trips of research and collecting samples before the soviets did. Artemis intends to make moon a permanent settlement but even with nowadays technology they have still failed in adhering to their timeline. i wouldn't be surprised if space x gets there before the Artemis considering their launchpad wont be ready until 2027.
@@skgamer-zs6en It's because they don't even have a tenth of the same budget as they did during the Apollo program
Not if the FAA has anything to say about it.
The FAA only regulates the private sector, not NASA.
@@ApolloKid1961 SpaceX Fanboys are blind ...
@@ApolloKid1961 Yea, go ask NASA to build a rocket by themselves
Lol
@@mikami5799 NASA itself is not a manufacturer but outsources the construction of rockets to commercial partners such as Boeing and SpaceX. SpaceX also has its own program. This is monitored by the FAA. Artemis is a project of NASA itself but the parts are made by contractors such as Lockheed Martin (Command Module), ESA (Service Module) and Rocketdyne (RS-25 engines).
The only way that NASA is going to get anywhere near the moon is if SpaceX takes them there.
Go back a few years and look at what Elon promised and how many timelines since lapsed and new taxpayer money got pumped into flagging projects.
They havent covered themselves in glory - or simple contract fulfillment.
Yeah, sure. Just have to solve the problem of Starship being too heavy and the payload going from the expected 150 tons to 40 tons to LEO. That and the 20+ refueling needed to land that gigantic thing on the Moon.
Turn the Bass down
We are going back to the moon!
FAA…..
Typical SpaceX Fanboy
The USA allegedly land on the moon six times between 69-72. The microprocessor had not even been imagined until the 70s. A moon landing for modern countries should be a walk in the park. Why hasn't anyone done it lately?
Yes, let's go back to the moon, this time for real !!!!!
@@jeffhatmaker817cuz Apollo was a dangerous, over budget, useless program that has a 10% chance of ending in failure. With Artemis, safety is the main priority, unlike Apollo where we basically threw stuff at the wall until it stuck. So unlike Apollo, we’re actually taking our time with safety and not doing it for prestige.
FAA...."Hold my beer"
What do you mean "it's not about flag planting" That is exactly what it is about for china.
Thank you for this in depth and fascinating video update. It is exciting to see private industry taking bold initiatives in Moon exploration.
Informative video, I'm bookmarking.
Robots are a better return on investment than humans in danger so far away with few options
It’s Hollywood directing this “returning” mission?
Hopefully China gets their first. Then it'll be a race for the first the first lunar space station/gateway, the first base and the first Mars mission.
Who else is rly excited to live in space
Me
watch the expanse show
thats the future if we dont blow ourselfs up
Good luck
Shut up kid
Nope.
Moon base, moon base, MOON BASE MOON BASE !!!!!😃
What’s everybody’s favorite CLPS lander
LM
You would like to think that they have already figured this out.... LMFAO! Yeah.....
If Ford were to reintroduce the Model T, would you drive one more now or would you still prefer a Tesla?
@TheSpaceRace. Can you clarify for me something about the Space X Starship. After they revealed the Blocks #1-#3 I started to wonder are they planning to develop each Block 1-3 to become the best version of each ship. Then do this Block 1 use for earth and lunar orbit with Block 2-3 beyond for use for Mars orbit and Beyond
About all of these weekend Robots being sent to the Moon etc...
Tesla's TeslaBot is fully automatic and almost ready to go, wouldn't it much easier to have one or two of those pushing pulling or carrying your machines to wherever they need to go? Even by Optimus walking Speeds, it'll be significantly faster getting around!
EXCELLENT, RETURN TO THE MOON & DEVELOP IT. BUT, "MARS" SORRY, WE'RE ABOUT A GENERATION "AWAY FROM TECHNOLOGY" THAT CAN SAFELY SEND HUMANS ON THAT TRIP --- AND BACK SAFELY.
I'd love a vid on why it's a space RACE. I can see it for pride, national tool, global dominance, resources, avoiding extinction.
The landing legs won't work. Fermafrost explodes in zero atmosphere when the rocket hits it. They need a flat bottom with side thrusters
It's easy to forget the smaller companies that are making our return to the moon possible. Keep up the good work, this was very informative.
I think it would be so cool if when astronauts get there and when coming back home they can bring back to Earth landers that an entity sent to the moon to explore and expired there. Like, "here's your lander/rover please find a nice place for it. :)
Excuse me, is there any mechanics system to relocate the gesture of the landing machine, when the spacecraft failed to land vertically?
Nice plans. Meanwhile they can't even build a launch platform.
6:08 If scientists can learn how it's done naturally. Maybe we can recreate it for traveling space pods or for Colonies on other planet.
Doubtful because SpaceX cant launch the Starship so how will they get the Starsjip Lunar Lander into Space
Can’t travel to an imaginary place where it was all AI CGI
Ask these big brain what will happen if the mass of the moon goes up and remember perfect is perfect
"The Fouth Misson" definitely sournds morst interersting.
Your spell checker is broken... "Fouth".
Very informative. Thank you!
It is about making money....lets get real
The main vehicle still has a very high centre of gravity & narrow landing legs, not ideal for landing on the moon!
Still no flight 5. Space x moon landing.
The FAA will never grant licence....
Just started watching the vid, it's crazy how things have changed. A national space agency hired a private agency to run experiments, which hires another private agency to deliver the payload to space.
Project Apollo involved 400,000 people working at major contractors such as Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft Company, Rocketdyne, Grumman Aircraft Corporation, IBM, Motorola, MIT University and 20,000 other subcontractors. So nothing new here.
were going to the moon (2024) after some slight delay, we are finally going to the moon(2032) Lets go get in orbit and look at the moon (2045
We went to the moon a century ago but we don't go there anymore because it's too expensive (2069).
Why did they have to quit ksp 2? :(
I’m a big fan on this 10 min as much information as possible but I think people will like less subjects with more details. 10 mins seems good. 👍
This will also give you more videos 🎉
I wonder if it is theoretically plausible to generate energy out of solar wind. So imagine solar panels on asteroids that can absorb the kinetic energy of a wider range of particles other than photons, namely gamma radiation electrons, betta radiation protons...
The energy in those particles is a TINY fraction of that in the photons from the Sun, so there's no point.
Nothing. Nobody is in the moon.
Umm Artemis is done as a program.
SLS, Orion, and especially Starliner are all a hair's breadth from being cut.
NASA can't even go to the bathroom, let alone the moon.
Yet they have been to the moon 9 times and landed on it 6 times.
When it gonna be cancelled??? Lets mate bet😂
With the current budget it will be postponed at most a few times. If you cancel it then all is lost and that seems to me a bad plan. Look at it positively.
Still no flight 5
MagneTOMeter
The key is FAA interfearnce.
The FAA has no authority over NASA.
China just unvield there own space suit
Moon suit
probably a stolen Apollo space suit ?...
Da moon!!! 😎
Interesting projects, but that remarks how far we are STILL to put REALLY a man on the moon...
There have actually been 12 people on the moon.
Sigh
@@ApolloKid1961 as Mark Twain said: "It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled"
Do you want to bet that in this decade not even an astronaut will put a foot on the moon? (and for the first time)
@@transfer.85 Photos of the landing sites were taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), the Chinese lunar satellite Chang'e 2 the Indian lunar satellite Chandrayaan-2 the South Korea’s Danuri probe and the Japanese SELENE lunar probe.
Magnetic anomaly? Shades of 2001: a Space Odyssey....
Let's hope there is a solar storm while the robot is in the magnetic anomaly area. Then we get data on how much protection it would afford a surface operation during lunar storms.
Anyway, thanks for the update on upcoming lunar robotic missions. Sounds like some fun times ahead.
Lunar storms? There is no atmosphere there!
Your first line "NASA is returning to the Moon this decade" is wishful thinking if you're talking about human landing. If they were just duplicating the Apollo 11 landing that MIGHT be possible. But they are trying to do WAY more than that, and they're trying to do it for a fraction of the cost and number of people working on it.
Apollo 11 landed on the moon, as did Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17.
@@ApolloKid1961 of course; I wasn't denying that. But the Artemis program is vastly more ambitious (and difficult), making their timeline ridiculously optimistic.
@@michaelnoble2432 What is most ridiculous is their budget.
@@ApolloKid1961not sure if you think the Artemis budget is high or low? Adjusted for inflation, it's WAY less than the Apollo program (which at its peak employed around 400,000 Americans).
@@michaelnoble2432 Converted to today, the costs for project Apollo were 341 billion dollars. Artemis only gets 93 billion which forces them to use upgraded Space Shuttle parts for the SLS.
Artemis II will never reach the moon. Cost overruns, delays and total failure will keep it bound to planet Earth. Call in SpaceX and get on with it.
Please don't comment out of ignornace. SpaceX is one of many contractors involved in the Artemis program.
@@mitchdaks6363 Artemis is DOA. Continued cost over runs is killing its worth. It now cost far too much and still it has failed to produce a viable space craft. SpaceX can certainly do it more effectively, in less time and far less cost. NASA needs to be an oversite government body of the public companies spurring the future of space endeavors. You are the one who is ignorant to the fact that only fools throw good money after bad.
@@mitchdaks6363 Continued cost over runs is killing its worth. It now cost far too much and still it has failed to produce a viable space craft. SpaceX can certainly do it more effectively, in less time and far less cost. NASA needs to be an oversite government body of the public companies spurring the future of space endeavors. You are the one who is ignorant to the fact that only fools throw good money after bad.
Are we still pretending that we don’t currently have craft that can fly to the moon in a few minutes and rendezvous with nonexistent personnel on one the moon bases.??
We don't have Saturn 5 anymore and Artemis isn't ready yet. There have never been moon bases.
1st
What happened to the tech. that got us there before?
Don’t need it, it’s outdated and unsafe so we replaced it with better technology
@@Quenical better technology well the Boeing starliner barely managed to get itself into space how the heck will they even manage to get people to the moon and back in one piece.
@@skgamer-zs6en Precisely because new technology is used, it has to be tested and then things can go wrong. Manned space travel is still dangerous and very expensive.
@@skgamer-zs6en Firstly, Boeing doesn’t speak for the entire space industry. And secondly, Apollo was an unsafe, over budget hunk of garbage of a program that had a 10% chance of failure in each mission and it’s honestly a miracle Apollo 13 was the worst we got (huh, a lot like Boeing, eh?). We’re simply developing safer and more reliable technology that won’t get the astronauts killed.
@@Quenical isnt Boeing tied up with Artemis program to provide the SLS so technically moon mission in most of the part is dependent on Boeing. space x's starship is stuck due to all the paper work and even after that i doubt elon will give up his craze on going to mars.
Hollywood
But why 6 times the same movie?
I burned my NASA ball-cap today. It didn't actually burn. It just sizzled, popped and produced a lot of smoke.
All this lunar colonization smacks of manifest destiny
America RAHHHHH 🦅🇺🇸
Hi Jeb
@@MixelFan95 what’s up
this decade ?? no..... I doubt it..........they are too scared.
🎉🎉🎉🎉for sure NASA will land on the moon. But no in this decade .🎉🎉🎉
Key? What key? The key is to land for real this time!
They have been there 6 times for real.
Imgaine 50 years after Columbus crossed the Atlantic and European explorers had somehow lost the technology required to sail across the atlantic ocean.
Luckily, we needn't "imgaine" any such thing, since no technology, nor the know-how behind it was ever lost.
2 tapes were overwritten and now all of a sudden all the technology is gone. Talk about taking things out of context.
@@ApolloKid1961 and there are backups of what was on there. Not to mention the erased over tapes were from _one mission_ (11). All of the tapes for Apollos 12-17 are intact.
@@thewildcellist That's right. The Slow-Scan TV images that came directly from the moon were recorded on Ampex tapes and also converted to NTSC after which those images were sent to the US. Ampex tapes were very expensive at the time and the images had also been recorded in the US, so they didn't see the problem in overwriting them. The same applied to the telemetry. This was mainly used for evaluation.
Great episode
I'm first
You 1st at being second 🥈
They are going to make a Stanley Kubrick A.I. robot.
The, "Key" to NASA's Moon Landing...
... Stanley Kubrick ;)
Kubrick was a filmmaker, not a director of live broadcasts. The FIRST moon landing was watched LIVE by 500 to 600 million people WORLDWIDE!
There were SIX moon landings. You didn't know that, did you.
May benevolent love, benevolent light, benevolent power, benevolent healing, benevolent detachment, benevolent empathy, benevolent wisdom, benevolent consciences, benevolent consciousness & benevolent spirit be seeded & fully birthed not only into this Solar System but into the entire multiverse, in all dimensions and in all of creation both above & below.
In My Heavenly Creator’s Name, in My Heavenly Father’s Name, in the 7 Spirits of the Lord Name, in the Sol/Luna/Celestial Heavens Name, in Yeshua/Jesus Christ/Christos Name I Pray. Namaste.
Do you know why each and every manned moon landing was successful? (Not Apollo 13). Because the astronauts used their brains to ensure they didn’t land on top of a giant boulder. We flew one (two) of the most advanced computers in the Universe, the human brain.
Still, they couldn't do it without the AGC.
@@ApolloKid1961 I wonder about that? Maybe it would have been a bit more problematic and yes, even when Neil Armstrong decided to change the landing spot, the onboard computer made the real adjustments with his input. I remember watching that live on TV back in the 60’s.
😅😅
Gee can't they just get a female astronaut with a yeast infection?!
Funny but in poor taste. BTW: you have a yeast "infection" too. "All" humans have yeast in them.
The Moon is flat !
The key to returning is to fake it again 😂
Why would science fake itself? That doesn't serve anyone.
Do you feel special when you say this?
Thanks for including the laugh-crying emoji. They always give a bit of extra cred to denier comments; they're just not the same without them (though more emojis would've been better).
I feel secondhand embarrassment
First :)
Your ideas are always impressive. Keep inspiring us with your creativity.😸🎁🫰