Good day sir. I am here cause I saw you on iimpct media. You seem to be one whom is seeking truth. From riverside, I too, hope to bring light into our darkness.
Haha 👍 AoC already provides, when not in govt territory: Article IV. The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different states in this union, the free inhabitants of each of these states, paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from Justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states; and the people of each state shall have free ingress and regress to and from any other state ...
Was so excited to see A31 come charging back to life with new ep few months back! I always tuned in live n was active in chat back in the day.. Just wondering where things are at with the case? Been anxiously waiting but haven't found any updates or new episodes in months tho.. 😢 Any updates to share? What happened to the A31 reboot? Hope y'all are well..
I understand your angle with the state citizenship route, but it seems impossible to me. It's overly complex and it's ummm, confused .. because you take the stand of a superior entity, a state citizen, yet you plead/appeal to the inferior entity, the US and their US citizens, to make things the way you see fit, to agree with your view. With your approach, it seems that you'd need a strong+functional+operational common law California state govt first, that would hear your arguments and decide against inferior federal powers. It's so confused. It's like asking termites to stop nibbling on your house, or asking cats to stop chasing mice. The feds won't submit because that's contrary to their design, contrary to their nature. They're not interested in truth, they're in the business of obfuscating it. They're not interested in law, they're interested in making you obey. They're not interested in America, they're subject to global schemes, designs, and powers; ie, bankers and their corporations. They're employees, and employees have no authority. They only have duties to their employer. Employees are not, and cannot, be officials. I appreciate the effort, but in my experience, they will only toy with you and screw you around whenever and however they want. And it seems to me that you don't seem to grasp the true foundations of American law and govt structure properly. Though I agree with your views on statehood that was on equal footing with the original 13. I have similar wishes as you, but as I see it, the proper order is to first deny US jurisdiction, because the govt can never prove territorial or personal jurisdiction. I mean, first, stop their authority by demonstrating their inability to ever establish proper jurisdiction, and then go build your California. It's 100x more simple, and it is in the proper order. You want to burden THEM with the responsibility of proving things, not yourself! 😊 In everything they do, THEY must prove everything. You don't have to prove anything to anyone. When they are bound in their proper box, you can be whatever California citizen you want.
@@chadkline4268 "state Citizen" is the word you're misspelling. That's the way Citizen is spelled in Article 4. So the Feds are supposed to understand what that is. Certainly John Jay understood, in his written opinion from Chisholm vs. Georgia. That's where he talked about the Sovereignty of the people - sounding an awful like the 9th Amendment. And for instance, the California Constitution, in every form recognizes that the people are Sovereign...a point reiterated in Yick Wo vs. Hopkins... But as it was explained in VanValkenberg vs. Brown - 14 th Amendment US citizens - aren't them. So one needs to force the adversaries to acknowledge who you are, and where. So you establish the facts, in the record, in a way that they can't dispute. If they argue, you can ask questions. Who are these people of California? How did you determine that I'm not one of them? If there are no such people - then they're admitting to being bandits, acting in a strictly de facto manner. In my experience, they're looking for easy meals, not 'bad meat'. They don't want to create a record or precedents that will be adverse to themselves. They definitely don't want to take on personal liability.
Protect yourself At ALL Times, Champ! Watch out for fouls! They dont mind cheating and refs are 'paid for', already. Don't leave it to the judges! Knock 'em OUT!
Good day sir. I am here cause I saw you on iimpct media. You seem to be one whom is seeking truth. From riverside, I too, hope to bring light into our darkness.
Hello Corey I just watched you on impact media I saw that you put in your TH-cam so that's the part I'm going to follow thank you for being so kind
Glad to see you’re still on your mission! Oath keeper
To impact media I listened to your California DMV thing I wish you the best in this fight I subscribed to your channel that was an interesting podcast
Haha 👍
AoC already provides, when not in govt territory:
Article IV. The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different states in this union, the free inhabitants of each of these states, paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from Justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states; and the people of each state shall have free ingress and regress to and from any other state ...
Watching you for years missed the picnic 5 years ago
Fight the good fight
Was so excited to see A31 come charging back to life with new ep few months back! I always tuned in live n was active in chat back in the day.. Just wondering where things are at with the case? Been anxiously waiting but haven't found any updates or new episodes in months tho.. 😢 Any updates to share? What happened to the A31 reboot? Hope y'all are well..
Found you on IIMpctmedia. Subbed.
I can't find it. Can you provide the link? Thanks
Nice! How is it going?
We just posted a podcast at agenda31.org
👍Good luck Corey....loud and clear from Northern California 707.
Let's go
I understand your angle with the state citizenship route, but it seems impossible to me. It's overly complex and it's ummm, confused .. because you take the stand of a superior entity, a state citizen, yet you plead/appeal to the inferior entity, the US and their US citizens, to make things the way you see fit, to agree with your view. With your approach, it seems that you'd need a strong+functional+operational common law California state govt first, that would hear your arguments and decide against inferior federal powers. It's so confused. It's like asking termites to stop nibbling on your house, or asking cats to stop chasing mice. The feds won't submit because that's contrary to their design, contrary to their nature. They're not interested in truth, they're in the business of obfuscating it. They're not interested in law, they're interested in making you obey. They're not interested in America, they're subject to global schemes, designs, and powers; ie, bankers and their corporations. They're employees, and employees have no authority. They only have duties to their employer. Employees are not, and cannot, be officials. I appreciate the effort, but in my experience, they will only toy with you and screw you around whenever and however they want. And it seems to me that you don't seem to grasp the true foundations of American law and govt structure properly. Though I agree with your views on statehood that was on equal footing with the original 13.
I have similar wishes as you, but as I see it, the proper order is to first deny US jurisdiction, because the govt can never prove territorial or personal jurisdiction. I mean, first, stop their authority by demonstrating their inability to ever establish proper jurisdiction, and then go build your California. It's 100x more simple, and it is in the proper order. You want to burden THEM with the responsibility of proving things, not yourself! 😊 In everything they do, THEY must prove everything. You don't have to prove anything to anyone. When they are bound in their proper box, you can be whatever California citizen you want.
@@chadkline4268 "state Citizen" is the word you're misspelling. That's the way Citizen is spelled in Article 4. So the Feds are supposed to understand what that is. Certainly John Jay understood, in his written opinion from Chisholm vs. Georgia. That's where he talked about the Sovereignty of the people - sounding an awful like the 9th Amendment. And for instance, the California Constitution, in every form recognizes that the people are Sovereign...a point reiterated in Yick Wo vs. Hopkins... But as it was explained in VanValkenberg vs. Brown - 14 th Amendment US citizens - aren't them. So one needs to force the adversaries to acknowledge who you are, and where. So you establish the facts, in the record, in a way that they can't dispute. If they argue, you can ask questions. Who are these people of California? How did you determine that I'm not one of them? If there are no such people - then they're admitting to being bandits, acting in a strictly de facto manner. In my experience, they're looking for easy meals, not 'bad meat'. They don't want to create a record or precedents that will be adverse to themselves. They definitely don't want to take on personal liability.
Let´s go Corey!!!
iiMPCT MEDIA sent me!
Protect yourself At ALL Times, Champ!
Watch out for fouls!
They dont mind cheating and refs are 'paid for', already.
Don't leave it to the judges!
Knock 'em OUT!
Outstanding sir