oh you sell a course too based on your understanding of someones work or you discovered it on your own ? h3h3h3h3hh3hh33h3h3h3 no wonder the views are needed .....
My courses are based on the information accepted by the most respected technical analysis certification programs of the world and scientific insights from fields that intersect the financial markets. Low financial cost and low opportunity cost as well, like any good educational material should be.
After reading through all the comments now I understood why traders fail,90% of them knows nothing about history of trading and they're not interested in searching for how those theories comes into existence. And since he's promising them holy grail,then let the 90% failure rate keep increasing. Thank you once again for sharing.
I tried to study ICT concept while ago..I agree with you, he overcomplicate things. Too many terms for simple things. The real challenge was studying your method, which is very complex and different from the ones offered out there, but truly mind-blowing. It's a shame you don't make more videos, because absorbing information from your channel is really satisfying. I found the video course 'Advanced Fractal Trading' truly stimulating. It's just a pity that I still struggle to find valid resources to study the various topics you mention in the videos. Anyway, thank you for all the work that you've done over the years.
You made me believe in ICT more and more. How can to one a person to collect all these theories, as you claim, and form one simplified theory? forever ICT and so many thanks to Michael J. Huddleston great person on bad earth planet
One simplified theory? No, he complicates these simple ideas a lot. He didn't collect many too. It's basically the Wyckoff bull/bear trap pattern all over the place.
Bro! A while back you published something like this that was about 30 min in length. That one video helped me make sense on the 2022 mentorship and I musta watched it 50 times.. lol thank you!
I apreciate your obiectivity about ICT concepts and all your vision. I'm an profitable trader, thanks to ICT. For me, it worked. Like human anatomy. First, you see the body and after you identify the organs and viscers. In my perceptions, I didn't think that he bring something new in the market science. But he formed a proper language and system for his mind for trading succes. A system that he choose to share on his channel. For me it worked. P.s. I also learn from your channel too. You have gold materials here. Thanks a lot and keep up the good work!
Like I said in the video, if his jargon helps you in some way, by all means use it. Renaming of concepts is definetely not a new thing in technical analysis. My problem with this is that he claims to be the inventor of things he clearly hasn't invented, and that ends up making traders seeing him as the only reliable source of information, which is obviously misleading. This new language game would not be a problem if all these claims surrounding "the algorithm" or how ICT coded it, and how he was kidnapped by market makers and etc were not made. I mean, come on...
@fractalflowpro yap. I understand perfectly what you say. I think it's important for you and others that ICT has bypolar disorder. I don't know If he was "grandoman" with what he invented in the middle of one of his crise, but.. He has his issues :))
@@fractalflowpro No he doesn't. He claims things he actually found which you can not find anywhere else but he actually says that he digs into the reasons why price does what it does. And using his concepts I have been able to accurately predict price on a daily basis, not perfectly but more often than not. I spent around 8 years going through "gurus" before finding ICT who actually knows what he's talking about.
Lmao, I thought I will only be refreshing information I already understand... well it's time to refresh it a couple more times with this video. Much appreciated 👍
with all my respect to you. ict is giving us a successful model for trading, and that is all we want. I noticed in the video that you try so hard to cancel the spill of ict but anyone who used Michael's methods even for once will just be amused by your words. if you really want to get to Michael's level, try to create a practical model of yours and share it with us to back test it. that will be much more efficient.
I don't think it's very practical to spend months learning something that can be learned in minutes. Apparently you didn't watch the video because Michael's methods are not really his. He created a new language for old ideas, which is ok. This happened many times in the past. The issue is how he justifies it, and how you and other young retail traders validate his ideas. He probably didn't teach you the limitations of the backtest for example, or the intricacies of trading performance. Now you see him as the only reliable source of information, and that's why you get upset when someone challenges your deeply held beliefs. By the way, we don't have to create anything. The theories and methods of trading that are accepted by the serious technical analysis community are well-established. ICT is an isolated internet phenomenon.
@fractalflowpro you see buddy, when I (an inexperienced young retail trader) look for a model which works in market and it is profitable that is all I care about and even you and all other trader are the same. I'm not interested in the trading literature who said what and who did what, which most of this video consists of. I want that model and simply Michael has it. The concepts are not original, who cares, it works.
With all due respect, but just in the way you talk I can tell you don't know how to validate if something is "profitable" or not. You may think this is self-evident, but it isn't. That's part of the problem. Like I said, the concepts themselves are not a problem, and if they help you, by all means use them. The problem is that you are going to be blind to other opportunities and other pieces of knowledge that ICT doesn't talk about. I know you are desperate to find something that "works" and simplify your life, but that's part of the illusion in the ICT method, and in other trading channels as well. The relentless seeking for the simple thing that works consistently. Ironically, the hard way is actually easier in the end.
U can't get into anything with ur eyes half closed...that being said,u have to learn to dig deep and ask yourself "where does these concepts originate?"...never outsource some of the decisions to anyone....thank u Fractal Flow
Hey there, I am one of Fractal Flow Pro courses student... as a man of science I really admire how you approach financial market scientifically( I dont think there is other ways to approach it if we want consistence profit).MAYBE you are the only valid teacher out there. Your courses are eye opening. I admit that I am newbie for trading and I hadn't opened real account yet, I am in learning phase. But it is the best an average person could get. Who on earth ( youtube) approach the market in so many field of science ( except pros in the industry) from neuroscience to Finance from logic to physics and so on U blown my mind. I want to hear from you other things beyond financial market sincerely. Ps please recommend us other learing material that could help us. Keep it up we need you!
Fractal Flow layouts out his assertions with a thorough, well organized treatise. I am an ICT proponent, not because of the man, but because the patterns and strategies resonate with me, though I prefer one or two of his "mentee's" for my guidance. I've also been able to become consistent using these concepts. I had no doubt ICT concepts were not original, and having had exposure to other theories along the way (awareness not working skill), Fractal Flow lays out a master course in trading theory history which I believe successfully makes his case that ICT concepts are not new. He is correct in saying terminology for the same concepts change over time (anyone who remembers mainframes (centralized computing), migration to distributed computing, then virtualization, then lastly cloud computing (centralized computing once again) understands this. After watching FF's video, I'm not quite sure what he's trying to accomplish is any more deep than to refute the claim that ICT is original...he does not deny at all that his concepts (as labeled) work, but that we as traders should not take anything ICT says as original ideas...and therefore be open-minded to dive deeper, to learn more, and to incorporate the best of multiple concepts to MAKE our strategy, our own. For those of us living off of our trading, or serious about it, how could we not gift this to ourselves. I would be remiss if I also failed to mention, Fractal Flow sells content as well. So we all must take this into account as we listen. Regardless, I highly recommend giving this video a watch. You'll learn something and hopefully be motivated to continue growing beyond surface level concepts. Cheers.
It seems that order blocks and breaker blocks are based on the same market structure? First, there’s a liquidity sweep, followed by a BOS. Is the difference in the candles used to define the zones?
Your videos always make my day :) i tried for 4 years to become a successful trader but due to low capital, being in university and etc. i couldn't make it, but your videos still made a great impact on my precision in entries and also the integration is what really works! but i yet to learn and develop strategies that actually works... Anyway, thanks for your great educational videos and dedication behind it, i really hope it really pays off well for you too!
Very clear explanation of what is actually going in i,e old technical analysis ideas that work sometimes. I am interested in the course you mentioned on your site on Footprint, will do that next. Thanks a lot.
Saying ICT not new does not mean you make things more learnable! I know all of those before him using the same concepts. They made simple concepts like hell! ICT distilled them and organized coherently with logic. Take wickoff schematic it is just theory that never comes to reality! Making things very complicated... I learned more from ICT than all those before him combined!
@@mrsmile5280 ICT gives credit to Wyckoff for initially showing him his MMxM models (the mountains/valleys in price). Where he's not legit is when he claims to have over 2000 trading books and he still credits very few people. So I can understand both the love and hate sentiments for ICT, but he does this on purpose and it clearly works on social media. In fact, if you want to learn something from ICT, it's not trading, but how to draw a crowd and make money on their emotional reaction to outlandish claims. ICT says, "This baker has plenty of yeast" but I think Fractal Flow Pro might have even more breadth of concepts than ICT.
1:05:06 is a good example of where it's important to drill down if you believe the time frame is of interest. Wednesday 2024-10-23 made a low. On Thursday, that low reversed at 12h00 after touching the 30m FVG. The order flow chart shows the same 30 min FVG with the stacked imbalance noted at 1:05:20. This move coincides with a fork sliding parallel just below the median line center of the fork from the last expansion move shown here: Mon 2024-10-21 16:30, Tue 2024-10-22 09:00, Tue 2024-10-22 14:00 and 5901.00, 5861.00, 5904.25. I don't find the order flow concepts useful because the charts are too messy with colors, but perhaps it makes sense to others. Unfortunately, I'm not sure it was available before 1996, which is the date that ICT says he started sharing his ideas after discovering them and I believe he says that if these tools had been available (for example bookmap), he would have used them. In this case, I tend to agree with Andrews and ICT that paying attention to the day of the week (i.e. time) and using the fractal nature of price to go down the time frame to reduce risk are important. We know that Wednesday is a high probability pivot/reversal day (high or low of the weekly range). So we expect that any run on Thursday lower can be an opportunity to pick up more for a Friday.
I studied Andrews from Morge, and I don't recall this elements of time being used with this much significance. The auction market theory and market profile, out of which the other order flow tools come from, were created in the 80's.
@@fractalflowpro Andrews has a page in his course about collecting daily pivot statistics and he gives some of them as example asking his students to note the time and count the number of times that situation occurs. ICT seems to have followed the directions even on intraday charts and even though he claims to have been driving around in a truck delivering candies and soda with his QuoTrek device and looking for payphones to enter orders, he does say that if the order flow tools were available, he would have probably used them. The time component is interesting. Some traders think they can go in and make money when they have time, but if they collect statistics on when the market will actually move, they could reduce the psychological problems of entering the market at inopportune time and waiting in agony as their trades fail.
I watched a video from Michael where he explicitly said that the order flow tools are just a distraction, leading to the idea of how volume is problematic, as if price action were a complete form of information. It's also flawed because it's secondary information. If you want the statistics about time, then the intradayseasonals.com is a great choice.
ICT Trader basically copied a lot of old trading concepts and give them a new name and the worst part is that they think market is moving because of ict and algos 😂
Is there anyway for you to change the format of the bluried background! I love your way of describing the subject but can not stay focus because my brain is always searching to clear my vision, very distracting. keep up the good work
@@fractalflowpro It does like a flashlight effect on the black background, all the window frame or picture are really clean (my resolution are HD1080 that is not the problem). Don't bother with me if you never had that request, I will try to listen to it or find another place to see and learn these teaching, thank you.
@@fractalflowpro It's OK, It my problem with my vision and normally we don't like to talk about our problems. Just wishing you could do your video without the glowing effect on black background, I have to blink my eyes often and try to tell my brain that it is not my eye who does this effect and focus on the teaching, but I keep loosing moment on this teaching, sorry.
Love the video. Thank you What do you think about 2024 ict strategy, what time frame do you trade , if you trade ? The questions are not to attack you just cusrious ?
Hello, thanks for a video, amazing as always!) Could you also make videos where you would more preciesly talk about Auction Market therory (including market, volume profile, etc.), and Market Cycles and Cycle analisys?
Bro, I don't know what are you proving right now in this video. But, before 1 year ago, I was nothing in trading, and there are 92% traders is in loss in F&O in India. I learned SMC and ICT concepts and now I can catch big moves, direction of the market, from where the market is going up & down, when there is nothing showing on chart. Market exactly touch those levels whom I marked. I know you're promoting your ideas ajd courses, obviously everyone wants to earn money by criticising another. Believe me, you should learn ICT and SMC from Michael 🙏🙏🙏 I'll watch your complete video thank you.
Congratulations @TheOptionsExpert, you are doing that using old technical analysis concepts without realizing it, and because you have learned these concepts under a new language from ICT, now you think he is the only reliable source of information, and you will believe whatever it is that he says. This is the problem.
hate to break it to you but you just got lucky. try comming back to this exact comment in 3 years, and I can almost guarantee you with 97% certainty that you are not better off then you are now. Trading on pure TA is just simply not profitable on the long term.
It's not just about being profitable. It's about outperforming the market on a risk-adjusted basis in a way that justifies the opportunity cost of not leaving your money in the benchmark, or worse yet, in an institution that does that.
Great work here, but you left out the most important aspect of algorithmic signatures..... TIME... I'd encourage you to investigate this most important element further and make a follow up video. You will find some very interesting things..... Good hunting :)
Bill Williams was important for the use of fractals in trading, so it deserves a lot of respect in my view. Some of his ideas were good, but many were not unfortunately. Especially his use of technical indicators like the alligator and the "awesome" oscillator, which have nothing to do with fractal geometry. If you really want to get into this I recommend the Edgar Peters' book called Fractal Market Analysis.
Most of the patterns revolve around the basis of Wyckoff and Steidlmayer. Renaming of stuff is not new in technical analysis. The problem I see is the claims around inventing it and the way algorithms work.
@@fractalflowpro That's great, please also talk about positinal risk, and how we should evaluate whether or not we should hold a trade or take the profit? Thanks! 🙏
i remeber 10 dats ago i watched a video about daily bias or something and u put a link of ict course .. is what u r saying that people got the wrong understanding of ict concepts or ict is wrong ? xD
That video was a brief summary. At the time I didn't know that ict traders claimed ict invented all this stuff and "coded the algorithm". That's why I made this one. And to answer your question: Both.
Trying to teach the truth to the ICT minions is actually an exercise in futility. They already have surgically removed their brains and shipped them through FedEx, UPS, DHL and USPS to their brain-washer in chief ICT. However, I admire your effort and attempt in saving them, sadly to no avail.
Yes I know, but this stuff has been bothering me for a while now, and since I have a channel with a relatively large reach, I feel the responsability to share this. You're right though.
you prepare this to say ICT is wrong. but he is the only one who teaches all these staff collections for free before nothing is free.. so we all respect ICT.
Did you notice this video is free? And like I said in the video, learning for free is not good if it has a high opportunity cost. ICT takes one year to explain something that can be explained in 10 minutes.
Great video. However, I don't think ICT ever claimed to be the creator of any of these concepts just the terminology and simplification as far as I know. You didn't have to expose bro like that😭
@@fractalflowpro True lol that's been his bio kind of thing. But again the term "Smart Money Concept" in trading was never used which technically makes him the inventor and the way he puts it too makes it easier to understand. Which makes him say "I am the engineer" plus let's be fair he probably wants to take credit for whoever uses these concepts after him reviving these concepts back to trading (or at least trend it for some traders) and that's why he says "I am the mentor of your mentor" I fully agree with your content tho all these concepts where created 100s of years ago and he probably shouldn't be taking all the credit, but I personally seen so many traders actually willing to learn these concepts again in depth because of ICT, if you know what I mean. In reality tho you should never try to outshine your master and you should always give them the credit. In this case he didn't, I agree but he did create a new trend which makes him say all of that and I think those masters would be proud.
@@fractalflowpro True lol that's been his bio kinda of thing. But again the term "Smart Money Concept" in trading was never used which technically makes him the inventor and the way he puts it too makes it easier to understand. Which makes him say "I am the engineer" plus let's be fair he probably wants to take credit for whoever uses these words after him reviving these concepts back to trading (or at least trend it for some traders) and that's probably why he says "I am the mentor of your mentor" I still fully agree with your content tho, in reality you should never try to outshine your master and you should always give them the credit for everything you learned from them. The problem with most people is that they misinterpret the fact that he created these concepts which is not true most of the stuff he refers to was already created. I think what he's trying to say is that he created a new way for traders to understand those concepts. This happens in every industry and people call themselves the creators of that new project and there's nothing wrong with that. Because I don't think he wanted to call himself the inventor without thinking that people will find out these concepts were already created by someone else, simply just an alleyway to those concepts. I personally seen so many traders that were willing to unlearn some of the stuff that was already out in order to learn Michael's concepts of trading and they became profitable because the problem wasn't the concepts itself it was learning it.
thank u brother i had an strategy that is absolutely incredible but iwas always saying to my self i need ict education to complete my trading life but after i watched your video i will stick to my strategy only
Im new to trading, and ive started learning from TJRs bootcamp, and i believe he uses "ict" concepts. How am i supposed to learn technical analysis when every single mentor and strategy and concept has been debunked for being useless, or old etc. it seems like there is no real way to trade
@@fractalflowproseems like all the mentors I've seen people recommend are all frauds, or using debunked strategies, or have some sort of issue. I really am serious about getting into trading but it's difficult finding good advice on the internet, would you advise any good strategies/people to look into??
What I do here in the channel is to explain the theories and strategies that are accepted by the serious technical analysis community. You can't go wrong if you learn the work of the great names like Charles Dow, Elliott, Wyckoff, Steidlmayer and so on. An additional thing, and this is what I do here as well, is to provide scientific insights on why certain things work and others don't. You shouldn't believe people because you like their personality, or because they have showed you some sort of short term results, or because they have made some sort of promise. Good education is the one that you can verify for yourself without any sort of dependence on someone else. Beyond that, knowledge is only one of the variables in this. There are many others, some of which you can control, some of which you cannot.
@@fractalflowproIt's going to be difficult to get an unbiased opinion, but would you recommend learning about the works of the people you named, and then doing your course, or should I learn the works and apply it to my existing knowledge of ICT concepts
I don't suggest you purchase my course right away. You can watch the many courses I have produced here in the channel for free. The paid courses are more specific. The problem with ICT is not the concepts because they are very old ideas renamed. The problem is the narrative ICT uses to justify the new language and the way new traders like you will validate these ideas. There are several cognitive biases involved in this, and that a beginner will simply not understand (yet).
Alright, what about the GEM 💎 of Putting all our charts in the New York Time 😅😂🤣😎 for sure I know what ever we try to invent currently are already done by the people before us 📌📸🚀❤️
Ok so I guess the algorithm that moves the market as ICT claims doesn’t exist. But we are certain the algorithm that brought me to his content, abuse by a lot of arising Gurus on TH-cam does.
haha yes. There are algorithms in the market, but they compete with one another, they have different roles, they are very complex and they were definetely NOT coded by ICT.
How do you guys that dont like ict have the nerve to discredit him whilst using his name and brand for clout. Michael Huddleston has given years of material for free and continues to do so.
I wish all the inquisitive traders can come to this channel and devour every single video for at least 10 times. Your level of mastery in explaining all this always amazes me. But 90% of them will find it boring because they're mentally lazy and t ain't ready to learn. Thank you for putting in the work,we love you 🎉🎉🎉
Putting aside the fact that describing the market (even its past, let alone its future) will never be fully achieved with a single theory, there is also a discrepancy between the actual statistical effectiveness of a given method and our subjective trust in it. Honestly, I am not interested at all in who uses which methods, with what effectiveness and final results, as that's their personal matter. In fact, it's even better that everyone wants to find their own individual perspective. However, Mr. ITC, his strange behavior, and the cult he tries to create around himself completely discourage me from engaging with him.❤
Recalling that price action and volume are secondary information, you're right. There is no theory that will ever describe the market perfectly. It's always speculation.
@@fractalflowpro I would even say that I would blindly take a method that manages to describe the past in 30% and is supplemented with good risk management. Because if someone has set up their strategy in such a way that they can explain every event from the past with it, it means that they have just created an algorithm that controls the market. But unfortunately only the one that has already taken place earlier.
@@fractalflowpro Ed, you are the only creator on YT who, although he shows new methods and theories, does not forget in the new video what he said in the previous one and connects it in a logical, organized whole. Others either produce "new revolutionary strategies that will make you never lose again" on a conveyor belt every week, or they are rigidly blindly glued to one perspective and do not want to understand that it is absolutely not that simple.
Thanks. That's part of what I aim for. People tend to assume that trading is intuitive or can simply be learned by experience. Knowledge plays a much more prominent role in comparison to other fields where experience indeed is at the center stage.
Sorry, I can't like this video from you... I usually like your videos.. I am a fan of ICT, but not more than I am of you. I came here to see how you would teach it. But instead, you spend two hours bashing on ICT. Anybody can say whatever they want about ICT. But he has created his own concept, with a collection of other concepts just like everyone else creating concepts does, making sense to him and many other traders and they are profitable with it. Every trader collects ways of trading to create their own way of trading. And so has ICT. (Him claiming he has created the algo is not my concern. My concern is his way of trading) I see this as a Like-hunt from you.. I would love you to teach your own way of trading, rather than bash others concepts.
There is no bashing at all. I explain the concepts using his terminology first, and then show where the idea comes from. Like I said in the video, the concepts are not a problem. The problem is this narrative that has hijacked the TH-cam space. I have lots of things to talk about here, but nobody will listen because new traders are indeed believing in this ridiculous narrative. Anyway, I just thought people should know this because the new traders are definetely not going after the information I have shared here. I'm also not sure why people want to defend someone who has been exposed left right and center. Maybe the backfire effect.
@fractalflowpro Fair answer and maybe it's just me being tired from hearing from usually good teachers picking apart how Michael trades. Like they are whining about he stole their thunder by taking the study of different strategies and put them under one umbrella and called it ICT. By the way.. Love your Newtonian Course, which I bought studying the Pitchfork. One of the best courses out there about the Pitchfork.
Wow! There are many people for whom the ICT methods work. You have done a great job of confusing them. You should have named this video Debunking ICT. Thanks, but no thanks!
1st of all really appreciate what you have done for trading community, I have been watching almost each video from you channel. One of the best "Technical Analysts Video" They are many TH-cam channels are suggested for any one newly walking in Trading. Your's channel is very highly recommended for newly and experience trader. My humble request so far I did not witness any one has crake W D Gann way of trading. Each You Tube channel on subject just making more confuse about the W D Gann. If possible create on W D Gann way of trading any content would be really help to each trader who is starting a new start or people are already in business.
Premium Courses and eBooks:
Fractal Trading - Mastering Price Action & Beyond shopping cart: fractal-flow-pro.teachable.com/p/fractal-trading-mastering-price-action-beyond
Strategy Store: fractal-flow.dpdcart.com/
Price Action Volumes: fractal-flow-price-action.dpdcart.com/
Institutional eBooks shopping cart: fractal-flow-institutional-trading.dpdcart.com/
Website: www.fractalflowpro.com
Contact: support@fractalflowpro.com
oh you sell a course too based on your understanding of someones work or you discovered it on your own ? h3h3h3h3hh3hh33h3h3h3
no wonder the views are needed .....
My courses are based on the information accepted by the most respected technical analysis certification programs of the world and scientific insights from fields that intersect the financial markets. Low financial cost and low opportunity cost as well, like any good educational material should be.
After reading through all the comments now I understood why traders fail,90% of them knows nothing about history of trading and they're not interested in searching for how those theories comes into existence.
And since he's promising them holy grail,then let the 90% failure rate keep increasing.
Thank you once again for sharing.
I tried to study ICT concept while ago..I agree with you, he overcomplicate things. Too many terms for simple things.
The real challenge was studying your method, which is very complex and different from the ones offered out there, but truly mind-blowing. It's a shame you don't make more videos, because absorbing information from your channel is really satisfying. I found the video course 'Advanced Fractal Trading' truly stimulating. It's just a pity that I still struggle to find valid resources to study the various topics you mention in the videos.
Anyway, thank you for all the work that you've done over the years.
I have some resources if you like.
@@fractalflowpro Sure, I'm all ears.
@@fractalflowpro I would also be interested if you don't mind
Fractal Market Analysis - Edgar Peters
The Misbehavior of Markets - Benoit Mandelbrot
The Physics of Wall Street - James Owen Wheatherall
@@fractalflowpro thank you
You made me believe in ICT more and more. How can to one a person to collect all these theories, as you claim, and form one simplified theory? forever ICT and so many thanks to Michael J. Huddleston great person on bad earth planet
One simplified theory? No, he complicates these simple ideas a lot. He didn't collect many too. It's basically the Wyckoff bull/bear trap pattern all over the place.
This is an eye opener tutorial and just saved me from investing too much time in ICT concepts which I just started. Thanks.
We appreciate all that you have been doing on this channel. I have really learnt a lot from this channel.thanks a lot prof.
Great!
Bro! A while back you published something like this that was about 30 min in length. That one video helped me make sense on the 2022 mentorship and I musta watched it 50 times.. lol thank you!
Oh this one is gonna help you a lot
Would mind telling me which of this channel's video is that?😅😁
did it help? are you profitable?
Best channel releasing best video as ever.🎉🎉🎉
I apreciate your obiectivity about ICT concepts and all your vision. I'm an profitable trader, thanks to ICT. For me, it worked. Like human anatomy. First, you see the body and after you identify the organs and viscers. In my perceptions, I didn't think that he bring something new in the market science. But he formed a proper language and system for his mind for trading succes. A system that he choose to share on his channel. For me it worked.
P.s. I also learn from your channel too. You have gold materials here. Thanks a lot and keep up the good work!
Like I said in the video, if his jargon helps you in some way, by all means use it. Renaming of concepts is definetely not a new thing in technical analysis. My problem with this is that he claims to be the inventor of things he clearly hasn't invented, and that ends up making traders seeing him as the only reliable source of information, which is obviously misleading. This new language game would not be a problem if all these claims surrounding "the algorithm" or how ICT coded it, and how he was kidnapped by market makers and etc were not made. I mean, come on...
@fractalflowpro yap. I understand perfectly what you say. I think it's important for you and others that ICT has bypolar disorder. I don't know If he was "grandoman" with what he invented in the middle of one of his crise, but.. He has his issues :))
Well, he should treat it then. The rest of the world cannot suffer the consequences of his issues.
@@fractalflowpro No he doesn't. He claims things he actually found which you can not find anywhere else but he actually says that he digs into the reasons why price does what it does. And using his concepts I have been able to accurately predict price on a daily basis, not perfectly but more often than not. I spent around 8 years going through "gurus" before finding ICT who actually knows what he's talking about.
Thanks to Dow, Wyckoff and Steidlmayer. Reading a few books would be sufficient.
This is the best channel to learn trading. I love your knowledge. Hahahahah, i got a plant to learn your channel all time. Thank you so much.
Thanks for the feeback
Lmao, I thought I will only be refreshing information I already understand... well it's time to refresh it a couple more times with this video. Much appreciated 👍
with all my respect to you. ict is giving us a successful model for trading, and that is all we want. I noticed in the video that you try so hard to cancel the spill of ict but anyone who used Michael's methods even for once will just be amused by your words. if you really want to get to Michael's level, try to create a practical model of yours and share it with us to back test it. that will be much more efficient.
I don't think it's very practical to spend months learning something that can be learned in minutes. Apparently you didn't watch the video because Michael's methods are not really his. He created a new language for old ideas, which is ok. This happened many times in the past. The issue is how he justifies it, and how you and other young retail traders validate his ideas. He probably didn't teach you the limitations of the backtest for example, or the intricacies of trading performance. Now you see him as the only reliable source of information, and that's why you get upset when someone challenges your deeply held beliefs. By the way, we don't have to create anything. The theories and methods of trading that are accepted by the serious technical analysis community are well-established. ICT is an isolated internet phenomenon.
@fractalflowpro you see buddy, when I (an inexperienced young retail trader) look for a model which works in market and it is profitable that is all I care about and even you and all other trader are the same. I'm not interested in the trading literature who said what and who did what, which most of this video consists of. I want that model and simply Michael has it. The concepts are not original, who cares, it works.
With all due respect, but just in the way you talk I can tell you don't know how to validate if something is "profitable" or not. You may think this is self-evident, but it isn't. That's part of the problem. Like I said, the concepts themselves are not a problem, and if they help you, by all means use them. The problem is that you are going to be blind to other opportunities and other pieces of knowledge that ICT doesn't talk about. I know you are desperate to find something that "works" and simplify your life, but that's part of the illusion in the ICT method, and in other trading channels as well. The relentless seeking for the simple thing that works consistently. Ironically, the hard way is actually easier in the end.
U can't get into anything with ur eyes half closed...that being said,u have to learn to dig deep and ask yourself "where does these concepts originate?"...never outsource some of the decisions to anyone....thank u Fractal Flow
yes!
Really Amazing Content is ahead. Commenting Before Watch this Video. 💚💚
Thank you!
Thanks a lot buddy. Needed these concepts in a well summarised manner for a while❤
This is going to save you a lot of time!
Leaving a comment for the “algo” lol
Awesome vid. So much valuable knowledge not related to ict I did not expect. Thank you FF
Great video debunking common themes which have been around for years. Well done!!
Hey there, I am one of Fractal Flow Pro courses student... as a man of science I really admire how you approach financial market scientifically( I dont think there is other ways to approach it if we want consistence profit).MAYBE you are the only valid teacher out there. Your courses are eye opening. I admit that I am newbie for trading and I hadn't opened real account yet, I am in learning phase. But it is the best an average person could get. Who on earth ( youtube) approach the market in so many field of science ( except pros in the industry) from neuroscience to Finance from logic to physics and so on U blown my mind. I want to hear from you other things beyond financial market sincerely.
Ps please recommend us other learing material that could help us. Keep it up we need you!
Once in a while I have the pleasure of finding people like you online. I'd love to talk about anything!
Fractal Flow layouts out his assertions with a thorough, well organized treatise. I am an ICT proponent, not because of the man, but because the patterns and strategies resonate with me, though I prefer one or two of his "mentee's" for my guidance. I've also been able to become consistent using these concepts. I had no doubt ICT concepts were not original, and having had exposure to other theories along the way (awareness not working skill), Fractal Flow lays out a master course in trading theory history which I believe successfully makes his case that ICT concepts are not new. He is correct in saying terminology for the same concepts change over time (anyone who remembers mainframes (centralized computing), migration to distributed computing, then virtualization, then lastly cloud computing (centralized computing once again) understands this.
After watching FF's video, I'm not quite sure what he's trying to accomplish is any more deep than to refute the claim that ICT is original...he does not deny at all that his concepts (as labeled) work, but that we as traders should not take anything ICT says as original ideas...and therefore be open-minded to dive deeper, to learn more, and to incorporate the best of multiple concepts to MAKE our strategy, our own. For those of us living off of our trading, or serious about it, how could we not gift this to ourselves. I would be remiss if I also failed to mention, Fractal Flow sells content as well. So we all must take this into account as we listen. Regardless, I highly recommend giving this video a watch. You'll learn something and hopefully be motivated to continue growing beyond surface level concepts. Cheers.
It seems that order blocks and breaker blocks are based on the same market structure? First, there’s a liquidity sweep, followed by a BOS. Is the difference in the candles used to define the zones?
Oh finally I find what I need to understand this concept, thanks
Your videos always make my day :)
i tried for 4 years to become a successful trader but due to low capital, being in university and etc. i couldn't make it, but your videos still made a great impact on my precision in entries and also the integration is what really works! but i yet to learn and develop strategies that actually works...
Anyway, thanks for your great educational videos and dedication behind it, i really hope it really pays off well for you too!
That's great to know!
Thank you for explaining this so thoroughly and sharing your knowledge! you Are The Best Mentor ❤❤❤
Ed cant wait for the market microstructure course in 300 years!!😂
lol
Nice example of opportunity cost. Good one.
Very clear explanation of what is actually going in i,e old technical analysis ideas that work sometimes. I am interested in the course you mentioned on your site on Footprint, will do that next. Thanks a lot.
Whoa!!!!! You. Are. Awesome. ❤
Saying ICT not new does not mean you make things more learnable! I know all of those before him using the same concepts. They made simple concepts like hell! ICT distilled them and organized coherently with logic. Take wickoff schematic it is just theory that never comes to reality! Making things very complicated... I learned more from ICT than all those before him combined!
I agree that Wyckoff complicated stuff unecessarily, but so did ICT.
@@fractalflowproyeah but don’t forget wcykoff was legit lol
@@mrsmile5280 ICT gives credit to Wyckoff for initially showing him his MMxM models (the mountains/valleys in price). Where he's not legit is when he claims to have over 2000 trading books and he still credits very few people. So I can understand both the love and hate sentiments for ICT, but he does this on purpose and it clearly works on social media. In fact, if you want to learn something from ICT, it's not trading, but how to draw a crowd and make money on their emotional reaction to outlandish claims. ICT says, "This baker has plenty of yeast" but I think Fractal Flow Pro might have even more breadth of concepts than ICT.
@@jd01665 I agree with you about ict got some amazing skills for spotlight!
1:05:06 is a good example of where it's important to drill down if you believe the time frame is of interest. Wednesday 2024-10-23 made a low. On Thursday, that low reversed at 12h00 after touching the 30m FVG. The order flow chart shows the same 30 min FVG with the stacked imbalance noted at 1:05:20. This move coincides with a fork sliding parallel just below the median line center of the fork from the last expansion move shown here: Mon 2024-10-21 16:30, Tue 2024-10-22 09:00, Tue 2024-10-22 14:00 and 5901.00, 5861.00, 5904.25. I don't find the order flow concepts useful because the charts are too messy with colors, but perhaps it makes sense to others. Unfortunately, I'm not sure it was available before 1996, which is the date that ICT says he started sharing his ideas after discovering them and I believe he says that if these tools had been available (for example bookmap), he would have used them. In this case, I tend to agree with Andrews and ICT that paying attention to the day of the week (i.e. time) and using the fractal nature of price to go down the time frame to reduce risk are important. We know that Wednesday is a high probability pivot/reversal day (high or low of the weekly range). So we expect that any run on Thursday lower can be an opportunity to pick up more for a Friday.
I studied Andrews from Morge, and I don't recall this elements of time being used with this much significance. The auction market theory and market profile, out of which the other order flow tools come from, were created in the 80's.
@@fractalflowpro Andrews has a page in his course about collecting daily pivot statistics and he gives some of them as example asking his students to note the time and count the number of times that situation occurs. ICT seems to have followed the directions even on intraday charts and even though he claims to have been driving around in a truck delivering candies and soda with his QuoTrek device and looking for payphones to enter orders, he does say that if the order flow tools were available, he would have probably used them. The time component is interesting. Some traders think they can go in and make money when they have time, but if they collect statistics on when the market will actually move, they could reduce the psychological problems of entering the market at inopportune time and waiting in agony as their trades fail.
I watched a video from Michael where he explicitly said that the order flow tools are just a distraction, leading to the idea of how volume is problematic, as if price action were a complete form of information. It's also flawed because it's secondary information. If you want the statistics about time, then the intradayseasonals.com is a great choice.
Amazing Sir. It's very helpful. Thank You.❤
Thanks for the feedback
Which trading strategy is best in your opinion?
Hyper integration
Thank you so much God bless 💯
Thanks, I liked the video very much.
Old wine in new wineskins. Good to be a boomer 😀and understand the basics.
haha exactly
ICT Trader basically copied a lot of old trading concepts and give them a new name and the worst part is that they think market is moving because of ict and algos 😂
that's basically what the video is about, but it took me 2 hours to explain it lol
Xd@@fractalflowpro
😅
Exactly, that's how I knew ict is forming a cult over here.
💯 and I’ve confirmed it through reading various books even HE mentions he has read
It's insane that his channel has grown so much. That shows how much education is needed on social media.
Video is long but immense! ❤
I know... sorry about that, but I had to touch on some complicated topics. However, 2 hours for all of this is pretty short.
BRAVO!!! God bless you!
Thank you so much Sir! ❤
Good video my guy, much appreciated :)
Thank you
What are ur thoughts regarding Jason Alan Jankovskie?
Honestly I don't know him. I will look into it.
@fractalflowpro okay 🫡🫡
Excellent video!!!!!
Is there anyway for you to change the format of the bluried background!
I love your way of describing the subject but can not stay focus because my brain is always searching to clear my vision, very distracting. keep up the good work
The background is not blurred at all. Check the video quality you are watching. That might be the problem.
@@fractalflowpro It does like a flashlight effect on the black background, all the window frame or picture are really clean (my resolution are HD1080 that is not the problem). Don't bother with me if you never had that request, I will try to listen to it or find another place to see and learn these teaching, thank you.
Sorry I don't know how to solve your problem. Nobody has ever made this request.
@@fractalflowpro It's OK, It my problem with my vision and normally we don't like to talk about our problems. Just wishing you could do your video without the glowing effect on black background, I have to blink my eyes often and try to tell my brain that it is not my eye who does this effect and focus on the teaching, but I keep loosing moment on this teaching, sorry.
I'm sorry
Your content is Gold 🎉 Can you please use more example with real chart from trading-view.
Love the video. Thank you
What do you think about 2024 ict strategy, what time frame do you trade , if you trade ?
The questions are not to attack you just cusrious ?
The 2024 strategy is the same of before, and the same of all that will come in the future.
I did learn more technic in your channel thanks❤🎉
THANK YOU SO MUCH BRO LOVE AND SUPPORT FROM PHILIPPINES 🇵🇭
Hello, thanks for a video, amazing as always!)
Could you also make videos where you would more preciesly talk about Auction Market therory (including market, volume profile, etc.), and Market Cycles and Cycle analisys?
Yes!
@@fractalflowpro Thanks!) Your videos are helping a lot and really are graal for a new trader
You are the best!!!!
Thank you
great sir! you tought a very important lesson sir ! you are great.
Thank you
Bro, I don't know what are you proving right now in this video. But, before 1 year ago, I was nothing in trading, and there are 92% traders is in loss in F&O in India. I learned SMC and ICT concepts and now I can catch big moves, direction of the market, from where the market is going up & down, when there is nothing showing on chart. Market exactly touch those levels whom I marked. I know you're promoting your ideas ajd courses, obviously everyone wants to earn money by criticising another. Believe me, you should learn ICT and SMC from Michael 🙏🙏🙏 I'll watch your complete video thank you.
Can u recommend some ict and smt concept videos...
@@SriRam-vc3qoare you from India bro...
Congratulations @TheOptionsExpert, you are doing that using old technical analysis concepts without realizing it, and because you have learned these concepts under a new language from ICT, now you think he is the only reliable source of information, and you will believe whatever it is that he says. This is the problem.
hate to break it to you but you just got lucky. try comming back to this exact comment in 3 years, and I can almost guarantee you with 97% certainty that you are not better off then you are now. Trading on pure TA is just simply not profitable on the long term.
It's not just about being profitable. It's about outperforming the market on a risk-adjusted basis in a way that justifies the opportunity cost of not leaving your money in the benchmark, or worse yet, in an institution that does that.
Should you learn all of those trading theories, or is it better to just specialize in one? For example only to learn wyckoff and not Elliot waves
Learn all of them and try to integrate the essence of each
definetely perfect,thank you so much
Thanks for the feedback
Great work here, but you left out the most important aspect of algorithmic signatures..... TIME... I'd encourage you to investigate this most important element further and make a follow up video. You will find some very interesting things..... Good hunting :)
Hey bro whats your thoughts on Chaos Theory book, and ofc i appreciate that long hard work and research you have put into this 🎉🎉kusdos to you bro
What book are you talking about exactly? There are a few related to trading.
Trading chaos by Bill Williams@@fractalflowpro
Bill Williams was important for the use of fractals in trading, so it deserves a lot of respect in my view. Some of his ideas were good, but many were not unfortunately. Especially his use of technical indicators like the alligator and the "awesome" oscillator, which have nothing to do with fractal geometry. If you really want to get into this I recommend the Edgar Peters' book called Fractal Market Analysis.
@@fractalflowprosuper thanks bro
how to identify Weekly bias?
It's in the part about the daily bias.
With ict rules and ideas we have lot of people profitable and disciplined that before tats it
We have a lot of people who don't know how to measure performance claiming they are profitable. That's for sure.
The exchange algorithms are designed to manage risk their risk
Finally 🎉
This mean is that ICT has miss mergs different concept theory (not completely) and discovered ICT
Most of the patterns revolve around the basis of Wyckoff and Steidlmayer. Renaming of stuff is not new in technical analysis. The problem I see is the claims around inventing it and the way algorithms work.
Sir I will also watch Wyckoff and steidlmayer theory ❤
Lol no wonder I would see weird lingo online for basic T.A. This ICT guy rebranded simple things and made them more complex 😂
I see ICT I click "dont recommended channel"
Watch the video and you'll understand I'm not promoting ICT. Quite the opposite.
@@fractalflowpro lil hater
Thank you
excellent
Thanks for the feedback
Thank you sir
Brother can you make a video on how traders with multimillion dollors or even billionaire do risk management and position sizing
I have a risk management and position sizing course on the way.
@@fractalflowpro That's great, please also talk about positinal risk, and how we should evaluate whether or not we should hold a trade or take the profit?
Thanks! 🙏
i remeber 10 dats ago i watched a video about daily bias or something and u put a link of ict course .. is what u r saying that people got the wrong understanding of ict concepts or ict is wrong ? xD
That video was a brief summary. At the time I didn't know that ict traders claimed ict invented all this stuff and "coded the algorithm". That's why I made this one. And to answer your question: Both.
Merci beaucoup
So you sell courses or have private discord ? 😅😂
Trying to teach the truth to the ICT minions is actually an exercise in futility. They already have surgically removed their brains and shipped them through FedEx, UPS, DHL and USPS to their brain-washer in chief ICT. However, I admire your effort and attempt in saving them, sadly to no avail.
Yes I know, but this stuff has been bothering me for a while now, and since I have a channel with a relatively large reach, I feel the responsability to share this. You're right though.
Yeahhhh!!!!
Ict the gost in the machine
1:26:07
you prepare this to say ICT is wrong. but he is the only one who teaches all these staff collections for free before nothing is free.. so we all respect ICT.
Did you notice this video is free? And like I said in the video, learning for free is not good if it has a high opportunity cost. ICT takes one year to explain something that can be explained in 10 minutes.
Great video. However, I don't think ICT ever claimed to be the creator of any of these concepts just the terminology and simplification as far as I know. You didn't have to expose bro like that😭
He claims to be the "inventor and engineer" behind smart money concepts, the "ghost in the machine", and the "mentor of your mentor".
@@fractalflowpro True lol that's been his bio kind of thing. But again the term "Smart Money Concept" in trading was never used which technically makes him the inventor and the way he puts it too makes it easier to understand. Which makes him say "I am the engineer" plus let's be fair he probably wants to take credit for whoever uses these concepts after him reviving these concepts back to trading (or at least trend it for some traders) and that's why he says "I am the mentor of your mentor"
I fully agree with your content tho all these concepts where created 100s of years ago and he probably shouldn't be taking all the credit, but I personally seen so many traders actually willing to learn these concepts again in depth because of ICT, if you know what I mean. In reality tho you should never try to outshine your master and you should always give them the credit. In this case he didn't, I agree but he did create a new trend which makes him say all of that and I think those masters would be proud.
Well, to give the devil his due, he is responsible for propagating these ideas to a broad audience, but the way he did that absolutely sucks.
@@fractalflowpro True lol that's been his bio kinda of thing. But again the term "Smart Money Concept" in trading was never used which technically makes him the inventor and the way he puts it too makes it easier to understand. Which makes him say "I am the engineer" plus let's be fair he probably wants to take credit for whoever uses these words after him reviving these concepts back to trading (or at least trend it for some traders) and that's probably why he says "I am the mentor of your mentor"
I still fully agree with your content tho, in reality you should never try to outshine your master and you should always give them the credit for everything you learned from them. The problem with most people is that they misinterpret the fact that he created these concepts which is not true most of the stuff he refers to was already created. I think what he's trying to say is that he created a new way for traders to understand those concepts. This happens in every industry and people call themselves the creators of that new project and there's nothing wrong with that. Because I don't think he wanted to call himself the inventor without thinking that people will find out these concepts were already created by someone else, simply just an alleyway to those concepts. I personally seen so many traders that were willing to unlearn some of the stuff that was already out in order to learn Michael's concepts of trading and they became profitable because the problem wasn't the concepts itself it was learning it.
Sorry if Im writing this again, it shows my comment was deleted
thank u brother i had an strategy that is absolutely incredible
but iwas always saying to my self i need ict education to complete my trading life
but after i watched your video i will stick to my strategy only
Great!
Can you say strategy?
At this point, I can become an ICT. I am aware of the theory, just rebrand it and Profit 😅
lol!
Im new to trading, and ive started learning from TJRs bootcamp, and i believe he uses "ict" concepts. How am i supposed to learn technical analysis when every single mentor and strategy and concept has been debunked for being useless, or old etc. it seems like there is no real way to trade
every single mentor and strategy has been debunked?
@@fractalflowproseems like all the mentors I've seen people recommend are all frauds, or using debunked strategies, or have some sort of issue. I really am serious about getting into trading but it's difficult finding good advice on the internet, would you advise any good strategies/people to look into??
What I do here in the channel is to explain the theories and strategies that are accepted by the serious technical analysis community. You can't go wrong if you learn the work of the great names like Charles Dow, Elliott, Wyckoff, Steidlmayer and so on. An additional thing, and this is what I do here as well, is to provide scientific insights on why certain things work and others don't. You shouldn't believe people because you like their personality, or because they have showed you some sort of short term results, or because they have made some sort of promise. Good education is the one that you can verify for yourself without any sort of dependence on someone else. Beyond that, knowledge is only one of the variables in this. There are many others, some of which you can control, some of which you cannot.
@@fractalflowproIt's going to be difficult to get an unbiased opinion, but would you recommend learning about the works of the people you named, and then doing your course, or should I learn the works and apply it to my existing knowledge of ICT concepts
I don't suggest you purchase my course right away. You can watch the many courses I have produced here in the channel for free. The paid courses are more specific. The problem with ICT is not the concepts because they are very old ideas renamed. The problem is the narrative ICT uses to justify the new language and the way new traders like you will validate these ideas. There are several cognitive biases involved in this, and that a beginner will simply not understand (yet).
Alright, what about the GEM 💎 of Putting all our charts in the New York Time 😅😂🤣😎 for sure I know what ever we try to invent currently are already done by the people before us 📌📸🚀❤️
❤❤❤❤❤ wowowowowo😊
he did enough, it's your turn to translate it if you want to learn.
@meeladalsulaiman9193 I'm still watching 👀 and can't digest the information.... very content 👌 rich 🥰🥰🥰🥰😍
Even ict's logo is fractal😂😂😂
Ok so I guess the algorithm that moves the market as ICT claims doesn’t exist. But we are certain the algorithm that brought me to his content, abuse by a lot of arising Gurus on TH-cam does.
haha yes. There are algorithms in the market, but they compete with one another, they have different roles, they are very complex and they were definetely NOT coded by ICT.
What? How can you put "ICT" and "The Truth" in the same title?? That doesn't make any senes
It's "ICT" AND "The Truth". Keyword there is "AND".
@@fractalflowproYeah mb sorry xD
How do you guys that dont like ict have the nerve to discredit him whilst using his name and brand for clout. Michael Huddleston has given years of material for free and continues to do so.
Missed the point completely.
I wish all the inquisitive traders can come to this channel and devour every single video for at least 10 times.
Your level of mastery in explaining all this always amazes me.
But 90% of them will find it boring because they're mentally lazy and t ain't ready to learn.
Thank you for putting in the work,we love you 🎉🎉🎉
Thank you very much!
Still waiting for volume
I have a volume course: th-cam.com/video/ZCA6HcPedII/w-d-xo.html
Putting aside the fact that describing the market (even its past, let alone its future) will never be fully achieved with a single theory, there is also a discrepancy between the actual statistical effectiveness of a given method and our subjective trust in it. Honestly, I am not interested at all in who uses which methods, with what effectiveness and final results, as that's their personal matter. In fact, it's even better that everyone wants to find their own individual perspective. However, Mr. ITC, his strange behavior, and the cult he tries to create around himself completely discourage me from engaging with him.❤
Recalling that price action and volume are secondary information, you're right. There is no theory that will ever describe the market perfectly. It's always speculation.
@@fractalflowpro I would even say that I would blindly take a method that manages to describe the past in 30% and is supplemented with good risk management. Because if someone has set up their strategy in such a way that they can explain every event from the past with it, it means that they have just created an algorithm that controls the market. But unfortunately only the one that has already taken place earlier.
Well the theories are already there. We don't need to invent anything. That's the good part.
@@fractalflowpro Ed, you are the only creator on YT who, although he shows new methods and theories, does not forget in the new video what he said in the previous one and connects it in a logical, organized whole. Others either produce "new revolutionary strategies that will make you never lose again" on a conveyor belt every week, or they are rigidly blindly glued to one perspective and do not want to understand that it is absolutely not that simple.
Thanks. That's part of what I aim for. People tend to assume that trading is intuitive or can simply be learned by experience. Knowledge plays a much more prominent role in comparison to other fields where experience indeed is at the center stage.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Sorry, I can't like this video from you... I usually like your videos.. I am a fan of ICT, but not more than I am of you. I came here to see how you would teach it. But instead, you spend two hours bashing on ICT.
Anybody can say whatever they want about ICT. But he has created his own concept, with a collection of other concepts just like everyone else creating concepts does, making sense to him and many other traders and they are profitable with it.
Every trader collects ways of trading to create their own way of trading. And so has ICT. (Him claiming he has created the algo is not my concern. My concern is his way of trading)
I see this as a Like-hunt from you.. I would love you to teach your own way of trading, rather than bash others concepts.
There is no bashing at all. I explain the concepts using his terminology first, and then show where the idea comes from. Like I said in the video, the concepts are not a problem. The problem is this narrative that has hijacked the TH-cam space. I have lots of things to talk about here, but nobody will listen because new traders are indeed believing in this ridiculous narrative. Anyway, I just thought people should know this because the new traders are definetely not going after the information I have shared here. I'm also not sure why people want to defend someone who has been exposed left right and center. Maybe the backfire effect.
@fractalflowpro Fair answer and maybe it's just me being tired from hearing from usually good teachers picking apart how Michael trades. Like they are whining about he stole their thunder by taking the study of different strategies and put them under one umbrella and called it ICT.
By the way.. Love your Newtonian Course, which I bought studying the Pitchfork. One of the best courses out there about the Pitchfork.
If you're tired, imagine the good teachers. Glad you liked the course!
WOAH HOOH!
Wow! There are many people for whom the ICT methods work. You have done a great job of confusing them. You should have named this video Debunking ICT. Thanks, but no thanks!
What's confusing about this?
Wrong and I sense jealousy because these concepts do work
I always knew those ICT nerds were onto a whole lot of nothing new
Absolutely nothing new. Actually, incredibly old lol
!!!!!!
Please continue to think in this way, is not this simple unfortunately.
Another ICT hater.
He is not a hater he informed you he gave you facts😂if you can’t accept it then go cry somewhere else
2 hours of bs
1st of all really appreciate what you have done for trading community, I have been watching almost each video from you channel. One of the best "Technical Analysts Video" They are many TH-cam channels are suggested for any one newly walking in Trading. Your's channel is very highly recommended for newly and experience trader. My humble request so far I did not witness any one has crake W D Gann way of trading. Each You Tube channel on subject just making more confuse about the W D Gann. If possible create on W D Gann way of trading any content would be really help to each trader who is starting a new start or people are already in business.
I will eventually create a Gann course here in the channel, but only because people are asking. I absolutely hate Gann lol
@@fractalflowpro, salute in fact I did subscribe your paid videos on last black Friday. Every cents I do spend on those video are more worth. ❤❤
Great!