@@hiqhduke that's a dumb analysis. Western society is nearing impending cultural collapse. Only turning to traditional models can save it. Secular liberal countries are no strangers to violence. They just have to be educated. Also, your obsession with anti-Islam material makes you unqualified to offer believable critique.
Personally I believe the elaboration of western justice system as well as social barriers based on “The Good Christian “ values would had set many things straight. Especially the points of disassociation of family development and unity
Also the rate and differential of violent and aggressive crimes in Majority Christian and Muslim countries. Vatican alone has the most thefts in the world on the low
I am Iranian as well. My story and Daniel is almost same . I got in uk and I left Shia . And I love you brother Daniel for the sake of ALLAH. I always watch your videos and use same techniques for giving dawah to my non Muslims colleagues. I won’t be apologetic . May ALLAH rewards you for all your actions
'Islam is not the learning of the truth in GOD but the delusional training of the mind to think it is the truth in a God'. Peace be unto all the misguided Only thru JESUS CHRIST can you walk the path towards the Kingdom of Heaven. Amen
Almost nobody converts to islam. If you're not born into islam there wouldn't be any way to convert to the ideology concocted by a 7th century caravan robber and a pedophile whose ambition was to conquer the World via jihad.
David has poorly articulated it in this topic. The couple of things that Daniel is not getting is that Christians are not looking for any man-made government system that can supplement their belief system. Their God promised them to have His kingdom be established in the future, the heavenly kingdom. Therefore, Christians main goal is to cooperate with God to usher in His kingdom not to establish any man-made kingdoms. Thus, it is okay for Christians to have any form of governments unless they enforce violent subjugation which Islam does endorse. And Daniel said, there are many cases in secular world that does have those subjugation. Yes. And they shouldn't do that.. that's the point. It's not because secular are doing the same thing so Islam would do the same thing too. No.. ideally no one should do it. However, it is understandable that no countries it is possible to have such extent of idealism. That's why the Scripture said that Christians will suffer and go through persecution. Therefore, Christians want the ideal world but thats coming from God's hand not through us. And we have to endure the suffering and persecution because world is not ideal. This is why Christians are condemning Islam for trying to establish the governmental system according to human ways that follows all other man-made governments in the history and endorcing the forceful subjugation on others. P.s. to Daniel. Catholic is not considered to be Christians. It is the Christo-political organization where they take the title of Christian faith to seek for the political supremacy. Bible did not say anything about setting a man-made government to enforce Christian doctrines.
@@sammyson3492 daniel just exposed islam is as bad as all systems that we find bad in general. and he is lying when he is saying that "every" system is based on infinite expansionism, it's just not true at all.
Haven't even started it, but if David Wood's ultimate goal is to embarrass himself over and over again… I'll just say that he has already accomplished that
No, you miss the point of Dr Woods goal with these debates. It's to get a Muslim admit to the extreme side of Islam so that ordinary people will be aware of what's in the korään and hadiths, we see both Muslims and non Muslims react to these debates with both disgust and surprise. This is the big picture behind Dr Wood's tactics, it's not about "winning", it's about exposing.
@@nemesis1291 He is a clown. What will he expose. A Christian debator using liberal arguments. Lol. Christianity has a much voilent history than Islam. Read blood and faith- the purging of Muslim spain to get a view in the mirror.
@@johnjohnny2702 seriously?? CP is your guy? Honestly?? We don’t even consider him because he doesn’t have manners in the first place. Besides he has been called to an open debate. He doesn’t come out of his bathroom. Take the initiative and bring him out
*Timestamps:* 0:00 - Sorting out the stream 0:46 - Introduction 1:26 - Opening Statement from David 13:04 - Opening Statement from Daniel 25:04 - Rebuttal from David 32:25 - Rebuttal from Daniel 39:54 - Offence/Defence strategies of Ideologies throughout History 46:17 - Does David Wood endorse Christianity favouring policies? 55:39 - Is there any better alternative Government for Christian Minorities except Islam? 1:01:33 - Is Christianity open to all beliefs or does it discriminate against some? 1:06:23 - Christians in power always trying to dominate Muslims 1:08:44 - Expansionist War ideology in Christianity 1:12:27 - Circular Reasoning & Hypocrisy of David Wood 1:19:51 - No Moral Objections of Christians against Muslims 1:24:16 - Islamic policies to curb the historically violent christians 1:26:54 - Closing Remarks from David 1:31:16 - Closing Remarks from Daniel _QnA_ 1:35:54 - Are Christians allowed to live in the Arabian Peninsula? 1:36:58 - Should Caliph Umar RA have been impeached for not repairing Churches? 1:40:07 - Treatment of Muslims Converting to Christianity in a Caliphate? 1:41:33 - Does Islam endorse the previous scriptures that it claims are corrupted? 1:44:01 - Is Anne Frank in Hell as per David? 1:47:36 - Treatment of Jinn in Human form converting from Islam to Christianity? 1:48:00 - Reason for Criminalization of Apostasy in Islam? 1:51:31 - Does David condemn the US Invasion of Iraq? 1:52:30 - Forced Conversion in Islam? 1:54:56 - Christians & Liberals endorsing violence against Muslims? 1:58:20 - Did Daniel concede to the Debate? 1:59:33 - Family Marriage in Zoroastrianism allowed under Caliphate? 2:01:57 - Are Islamic Countries bad for Women? 2:06:11 - Debate Challenge to David 2:06:40 - Why does God put enmity among Christians in the Qur'an? 2:08:51 - Islam being the solution to the highest Single Motherhood in the US? 2:10:37 - Treatment of Non-Muslims refusing to pay the Jizya in a Caliphate? 2:13:08 - Paying Zakat by helping feed people in Churches? 2:14:27 - Powerful Nations undermining Muslims? 2:20:23 - Daniel taking verses out of context? 2:22:09 - Early Church not teaching Religious Freedom? 2:23:46 - Jesus never commanded War? 2:26:58 - Can God command an Immoral thing? 2:31:34 - Does David oppose Abortion? 2:32:39 - Is Catholicism against Religious Liberty? 2:35:41 - Daniel focusing on Old Covenant regarding Violence in Christianity? 2:37:35 - Apostasy Law in Islam vs Treason Laws 2:39:33 - David's view of Toddler Cherubs in Christianity 2:40:17 - David's view of the Iraq War being branded as a Crusade? 2:42:12 - Should Laws be based on reason and not Faith? 2:43:44 - Wrapping Up
One thing I like about David is that he helps Islam by exposing how ignorant most Christians are about Islam. May Almighty Allah bless Haqiqatjou and his family, and all Muslim brothers and sisters defending Islam ☪️
@cat valentine no..raban was the first astronaut who fly trough the sky and snatched the wife of God (gandu) Rama..and f**k her brains out...pity on Rama who had a wife f**ed by his greatest enemy.. Lol😄😄...how pathetic god he is..and how pathetic his worshipers😜
@cat valentine Hindu religion where rape of women is allowed and where you don't fly on donkey but kill a horse and have sexual intercourse with it!!!!! Arthashastra 4.12 for allowing rape of rescue And ashvamedha ritual for intercourse with the dead horse
I am Christian and no way u can win any debate cos ur cult is anyway false. So wot do u expect ? BUT, David should really stop debating. He has no debating skills. He doesn’t know how to debate. He should just make small videos instead. He has no calibre to debate. Daniel also knows this and he made really good funny of him.
I dont think David comprehended Daniel's point in terms of discrimination. That was the root of the debate question. He really might have barrier to his understanding, or he knew how powerful that point was. In sha Allah, this is the source of guidance to the Christians.
Daniel also doesnt bother explaining because it might make him look apologetic. This is honestly a big flaw in Daniel that annoys me more than anything. He's all about the clickbait.. pff
@@misshouda1740 yeah I know he avoids going on tangents but it's still a bit annoying xD.. I'm screaming at the screen but I guess he's really talking to extreme christians. Makes sense !
@@muhammedPies He’s definitely inconsistent. But in this instance he’s saying IF he was in power, this is what he would do. Which is different to “Render unto Caesar”
Most christians in the west is only called as christian in their legal identity card, they have been pro grammed to this extent, and so much in fluenced by li beralism and f eminism, it's almost their values completely cor rupted and distor ted, they mos tly abandon the way of th eir own religion, this is way makes the m very po tent t o Muslims in the west, it's their own h ypocrissy , spr eading hatre d almost no bou nd, even do ing any di rty tactics to in vites their own e nemies (at heist) to fight m uslims
I am an Egyptian here christians are building churches monestery like a fortress they get to marry and have children and get education and health care just like muslims have property and have their schools they now get to say bad things about islam and interfere with azhar and cause some scholars like Ahmed Sobae to go to preson bcz he duscusses christianity several christians blastphemed against the prophet peace be upon him and no one judged them the reachist man in Egypt is Saweras who is against islam then the church keep sending masseges that says that they are discriminated against they lie it is their religion to lie I wish muslims in the west have half the rights that yhe christians have here
True! I lived in Misr for years and some copts are two- faced liars. They live a good life in Egypt. It only gets dangerous for them, if they convert to Islam!
@@forgivenesswallah3410 that turd is posting this under every comment. Nobody told him Hinduism doesn't survive in the next generation as soon as Hindus go abroad.
@@forgivenesswallah3410 cat valentine is an idiot bcoz he is only increasing the algo on the video by posting these stupid comments in reply to all comments 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
*Daniel is destroying the psuedo islam being promoted in the west of showing it being liberal , tolerating and non violent, Daniel has no qualms about saying that islam is a violent , hateful, discriminatory political religious system which actively discriminates against other faiths, treats women as brainless property, baby producing beings !!!*
*Your intelligence and ignorance are merged like in the case of most Mohammadans. Their knowledge stretches between knowing that the sun sets in a muddy pool to sun orbits in its own path.*😃😃😃
@@stargazer1405 while exposing how flawed David's fantasy stance is a joke. Anyone can take a fantasy stance, doesn't mean it coincides with reality. That went way over DW's head
@@briceboutet7810 I used the word “when”. Read my post properly. Do you think using terminology like “fascism”, makes you sound smart. There are two step of the process. Process and outcome. Have you tested the outcome? Or you are just complaining about the process without looking at the outcome?? How is your liberal society working so far? I suggest you educating yourself before making statements you have no clue of the details. Like mark Twain said it best “the biggest sign of ignorance is rejecting what you don’t know. Do you think you know ISLAM or sharia law??
@@briceboutet7810 You are actually perf ect example someone that only want to hear a truth that sounds good, but ignoring the truth when it tasted sour or bitter, not exactly unique , most people like you have different taste of tongue when it comes to the reality, unlike another ch istians counterpart like cop ic or orth odox, or even some honest cath olics,
I used to think Daniel’s views, although correct in every way, and backed up by evidence, were presented in extreme ways. I just told myself he was simply just a brutally straightforward guy in a time where even Muslims are too shy to tell the truth. However, overtime since knowing about brother Daniel, I’ve taken many classes in universities over the years pertaining to business, economy, accounting, and history. It’s staggering to mention just how many patterns you’ll see in history that repeat itself, granting humanity a giant sign about what human nature really is. There are so many facets of life tied to economy and government and studying its presence in societies show a dark truth about human nature. With this in mind I realized that brother haqiqatjou isn’t extreme at all. Too many Muslims conform to western ideologies and institutions to the point they end up being comfortable with its flaws. Study the histories and you’ll see so many similarities of our times in other times that resulted in a collapse of societies. There will be darker times ahead may Allah protect us. With this in mind it is noteworthy to mention the amount of amount of instances that historical figures from several eras across all the continents have quoted similar things in the Quran that people today don’t believe in. People are always in submission to Allah. Allah’s signs reach every man and woman whether he or she believes it or not. There are no atheist bcz knowing God is a language we all know. It’s just our nafs and desires that misguided us. “…and We are closer to him than his jugular vein” (50:16) May that also be a reminder to Muslims in their current stage of imaan, we are all hypocrites without realizing so it’s better for us now to be honest with our own actions. We are a part of many collective problems in society as well.
Most of us as a Muslim that reside in western countries want to live as a Muslim that blends with western culture which is impossible unless you want to be an apologist.
@@jonatand2045 that's a gross oversimplification, read history and you'll find that Muslim empires only fell after relaxing sharia and embracing other ideologies which resulted in the spread of degeneracy, yes ottomans, Abbasid and all Muslim empires fell after turning to nationalism and other false ideologies
@@jonatand2045 Origin of life came from the clay world. If you’re going to talk about evolution, you’ll have to see how life came about. And human originating from clay is not far from the truth at all. Besides, the Quran says that the father of Mankind is created from Clay and that all living organisms are also made of water. Living things are created from the nature of earth, and clay plus water is from earth. What did you expect we came from? Besides, the composition of earth products like clays/muds or soils have a strong commonality to the composition of human body.
mashallah bro I learned more about the world with the philosophical perspective from you , firas zahabi and sapience institute. you really made me to accept deen is superior than other laws. so much knowledge may Allah preserve you I ♥ love you for sake of allah.
@cat valentine Absolutely pathetic. You don't have anything better to do with your time than insult people online? What a pathetic excuse for a human being, I feel sorry for you!
As a Jew, Daniel hit it home with this one. Articulating the similarities of Islam and Christianity as Abrahamic religions always bugs Christians yet the main points of contingency are usually agreed upon by early Christians to Muslims. Most of these practices David so innocently claims Christians don’t do they had done for almost 500 years prior and after. And groups who misuse verses in Islam? I can think in the last 30 years multitudes of tragedy with Christian “unalive” cults that resulted in the deaths of all their followers usually. Jonestown, Branch Davidians, many Nazi Christian group attacks, I could go on and on. Whatever Christianity David speaks of only remains truthful to David, literally no other Christian in the past 300 years have thought of his religion so passively. We all know Christianity is the evangelical religion, not Islam, not that that’s bad, but it’s hypocritical to argue what he is rn.
Thank you!.. David lives in this diabolical utopia of fantasies that's divorced from reality. Forget about religion for a second, we're human beings & human beings for centuries have acted purely based on their instinct to survive and that's what drives majority of the violence and the just "war theory" in the past, present & the future. Sorry for bad grammar, English is not my native language.
Islam insists on killing apostates and non moslems as a matter of injunction by the quoran not just by the wish of extremists, this is not in Christian doctrine.
@@olumuyiwaasunmo This may be true if J himself didn’t recognize peters way of life as sufficient with Christianity as the whole live by the sword die by the sword isn’t a bad thing depending on who you talk to. I find that hating Islam just leads to hating Muslims themselves if you keep going far enough with it and it’s not productive, especially when there are bad people in all groups, this entire narrative your pushing almost the entire pagan world was screaming back when Christianity rose to power, surely they had religious values and rights that Christians burned and pillaged out of existence many of times. Throwing stones out of glass houses per se.
@@Snackitalist Why are Buhdists, Hindus, Zoroastrians not hated? Why is Islam and Moslems attracting hatred? Theirs is the only belligerent religion with hatred for others their manifesto. If you hate, you will be hated in return. It is the only religion making a subjective assessment of other religions with a view to vilifying them. It is the only religion prescribing death for apostates and non moslems.
Daniel : Islam is the best way of life... 👍 David : no it's not...😡 Daniel : so what is your alternatif?.. 😊 David : I don't know... I don't have one 🤪 Me: 🤣🤣🤣
That never happened, why are you lying? Wait... I know why you are lying. Proof of Islam not being an Abrahamic religion, the god of the Muslims tells them to be liars.
@@nemesis1291 Have you watch the whole stream? Or are you blind? Especially in the 54 minutes of the stream onward when Daniel ask David "the Alternatif".. see how he respond to it. 🤣🤣🤣 The point is you don't have to agree with us muslims.. the main question is as Daniel say "what is your Alternatif?" Or are you as delusion as David who thinks that the best way is the imaginary fantasy world that only exist in your head?🤣🤣🤣
Praying for my Indian brothers and sisters. We in the West have it easy compared to what you all are going through right now. Insahllah Allah rewards you for you perseverance along with all muslims facing oppresion across the globe.
47:09 this is an excellent move brother Daniel. A lot of people are on the back foot when it comes to apologists because we believe they genuinely want to know about Islam. They do not, they do this for money and fame. A questions like this shows that they are actually very shallow in their own beliefs and that they do not actually care about their own groups beliefs beyond the monetary value they bring.
This question doesn’t comprehend True Christianity. Christians see it as a true change of the heart and knowing Jesus, and He changes you to be loving by knowing him personally. We’re not after money and subjugating or forcing people to do things - *granted there are false Christians in history who have used the name of Jesus as an excuse to wage things like the Crusades*. David Wood isn’t after $, but rather truth. Stereotypes of muslims are mostly false & stereotypes of Christians are false. The thing is it’s not a religion - it’s knowing God & having salvation. It’s not about ruling others or forcing religion / only GOD can change a person. Religion is man earning his way and reaching up to God, Jesus rather reaches down to human kind & gives the gift of new life /// the focus on power is not the point // God gave us free will
@@steflondon88 theology. Judging by his content its fair to say thats the only reason he does it, whats fascinating is how blinded people become with emotions, its worst then drugs. Tell Dovid19 to take my debate challenge ;' satanic language the bible vs the quran' lets see which book is the pure word of God. Like they all didn't accept my ' true trinity belief challenge that 3 does equal 1. send me 3 million and ill return one. if they SINCERLY believe it, yet none do. Frauds for dollars, been hiding behind theology for so long already, even the Jesus in the gospels would not agree with what the hell you doing. You blind yourelves with emotions and lead by psychopath, at least Dovid admits that part. Its simple God is one without any images. Period. If those are direct commandments then all else can't go against it. if contrary to that its wrong period.
Yeah, but be aware that brother Daniel is against woman education. I hope what you wrote in your profile “اللهم ساعدني على تحقيق أحلامي" revolves around building a happy family. Regards,
@@sash991 Don't worry. This sister watched that debate and post analysis. Maybe she doesn't agree but that doesn't change the truth that women's education is actually harmful for the society. You guys when don't have any logic against Daniel's point just resort to fearmongering and shock factor. Pathetic!
*Daniel is destroying the psuedo islam being promoted in the west of showing it being liberal , tolerating and non violent, Daniel has no qualms about saying that islam is a violent , hateful, discriminatory political religious system which actively discriminates against other faiths, treats women as brainless property, baby producing beings !!!*
*Daniel is destroying the psuedo islam being promoted in the west of showing it being liberal , tolerating and non violent, Daniel has no qualms about saying that islam is a violent , hateful, discriminatory political religious system which actively discriminates against other faiths, treats women as brainless property, baby producing beings !!!*
i have a question for john smith if u don’t believe in God what do u think who created u? when u were nothing and u will die and get up again and go back to him
Its funny how these videos always start with comments like this Stop pretending we know you're muslin trying to make it seem like Daniel's point resonates with logic Its either I'm an Australian Christian but i supoort Daniel, I'm a southern Baptist Christian but i support Daniel Stop lying for fucks sake. Taqiyya wont save you
Daniel, your patience and knowledge is to be commended once again my brother. While you responded to each and every one of David’s cheap shots and random lies/generalizations about Islam, David failed to not only counter your factual and historical points but to back his own as well (which was to be expected), relying mainly on anecdotes and attacks. David’s acting like Christianity isn’t being publicly shunned more and more in modern Western society. Noooo, according to him big bad Islam is the main thing Christians should be focusing on instead of the massive surge in atheism within the West. But I digress. Well done my friend, may Allah grant you more wisdom and success.
@@jonatand2045 Atheism contradicts the logic of reality. You’re left with the infinite regress fallacy and the fact that logic itself is based on axioms which we are supposed to consider objectively true (like our brains producing absolute truths).
Muslims - how to be saved? So many people in the world are deceived but here is the truth for you! John 14:6 - King James Version 6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. Romans 1:16 - King James Version 16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. (The Letter of Paul to the Romans) Romans 5 - King James Version 18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. (offence of one - Adam's one trespass, one sin, led to the condemnation of all men - the righteousness act of one was Jesus' death on the cross to pay for human sin) Salvation is not getting your sins forgiven, it's believing they already are! We are all sinners and fall short in God his glory - how to be saved - this is the gospel of salvation - 1 Corinthians chapter 15 verses 1-4 by trusting and believing the gospel of salvation you are saved and sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise till the day of redemption and nothing can pluck you out of the Father his hand - (In whom we have redemption through his blood , even the forgiveness of sins: (Colossians 1:14 - King James Version) - eternal security is a free gift - it's a promise and God Almighty cannot lie!!! Have a blessed day! This is the gospel of salvation - 1 Corinthians chapter 15 verses 1-4 Witnesses of Christ's resurrection. 1) Moreover,brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2) ''By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3) For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4) And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures. IT IS FINISHED... Paid in Full !!! But, You Must BELIEVE IT - 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV. 2 Timothy 2 King James Version 15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. Romans 2:16 King James Version 16 In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel. (Paul's Gospel - 1 Corinthians chapter 15 verses 1-4). KJV - Bible verses about Jesus is God John 1:1 - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. John 1:14 - And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John 10:30 - I and my Father are one. Isaiah 9:6 - For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. John 20:28 - And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God. John 8:58 - Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.
Real Christians would prefer Islamic rule but David is more of a secular liberal atheist than a Christian. All his criticisms of Islam are rooted in liberalism not Christianity.
No people with any self respect would ever agree to live as second class citizens in their own country. Islamic law only works in Muslim majority nations. The moment you get a 50/50 split, you end up with Nigeria. A nation that clearly needs to divide itself into Christian half and Muslim half.
@@Mr1000IA In the West Christian have the ability to believe what they want. The problem with people like you is you think, you not being allowed to tell others what they can or can't do is oppressing your religion. Practice your religion however you like but keep it to yourself and don't try to impose your barbaric backwards practices that don't even work in countries where you are a majority. You barely get along because you take turns oppressing and hating each other. Sunni hating Shia hating Sufi hating Ahmadiya while all claiming to be doing that in the name of God and condemning each others as innovators and apostates who deserve death, then wonder why you have been in a state of war since the founding of your religion. Also, Christians would rather stay in the West than live in a Muslim majority country where they are oppressed. Look how they are treated in Egypt. Even in Indonesia Easter time is a dangerous time.
@@jamese5936 The truth is Westerners are not even primarily Christians anymore, they are primarily Liberals without even being aware of it. The Quran predicted the bloody genocide between Catholics and Protestants. As a result, Westerners adopted Liberalism for “freedom” but which paves the way for the Anti-Christ: propagation of atheism, homosexuality, fornication, abortion, predatory capitalism, widespread divorce, single mothers, abandoned elderly, over medication, unjust wars inspired by the greedy military industrial complex, widespread incarceration inspired by the prison-industrial complex, technologies that abuse the environment, the prevalence of the occult among decision makers such as freemasonry. And they export their “freedom” throughout the world, making all people vulnerable to the deception of the Anti-Christ. The subjugation of authentic Christianity by Liberalism has opened the door for the coming of the Anti-Christ. However, Pauline Christianity was bound to degrade to Liberalism because he abolished the Mosaic Law. The practices people like you find barbaric are found in the Bible. Liberals posing as Christians are agents of the Anti-Christ-Orthodox Christians seem a lot better off spiritually and morally.
The point of Jizyah is no discrimination. This is rather promotion of equality under islamic rule. Because muslims on one side have to pay zakah which non muslims don't have to. So the balance comes here that non muslims must pay jizyah. Also the point is that any system rules you to pay tax whether David wants to pay or not. So this doesn't mean islam is discriminatory for muslims to pay zakah and non muslims to pay jizyah. It would have been discriminatory if muslims had to pay zakah and non muslims had to pay nothing. Allah Allah Subhanallah
@@nemesis1291 i dont believe you can promote islam under christian ruling......they will burn them on the stakes....yes thats what they did to heretics.....christianity can only rule in a secularis system.....so they can blame atheists and the secularies people when they murdered for example iraq....``the US is not a christian country``....yet they have in God we Trust on their own money written on it..chruches all over the place....they use the bible when they swear and use it in the court...yet when they murder and rape they are atheists....lol.
David is a complete hypocrite! He is arguing because he believes that Islam is for killing Non-Muslims for their beliefs, which it isn't yet he forgets what Christians done when they conquered nearly the entire world. The Americans, Africa, most of Asia and Oceania even Europe were never Christian Regions. The religion of Christian was forced upon them and those who never believed were put to the sword, beaten, burnt and so on. Like Desmound Tutu said, “When the missionaries came to Africa, they had the Bible and we had the land. They said: 'Let us pray. ' We closed our eyes. When we opened them, we had the Bible and they had the land.”
It's become clear after David's rebuttal that he's ego driven. He's not seeking out the truth. The ego is always what blocks a person's intellect from "seeing" clearly, from seeing the truth.
@Manas Kumar man he literally embarasses himself always every single time can't you see that? Do you even watch his debates where he gets destroyed lmao
@Manas Kumar The problem all of you have is hatred, your hearts are full of hatred so it’s hard to be just ..you prefer to defend David even he is wrong … but we all will stand before GOD that day He will judge us
@Manas Kumar What is this “evil” within Islam you speak of? I doubt you’ve even read the Quran in it’s entirety. Instead you rely on hammer time to shape your opinions.
Excellent debate br Daniel. I always learn a lot when listening to you. I did have a question. You mentioned that you would be happy living under a Christian society (I believe you've mentioned this before) however what is a "Christian society"? I've always had the impression that what makes a Christian society is always in flux (e.g. Christian society after Constantine contrasted to Christian society in the 17th century).
He always said he preferrs to live under the subjugation of Christian Orthox State only in comparison to Secular State - because christianity as a paradigm functions in a theocentric manner, where secularism as paradigm in fundamentaly anti-theistic from its core. The point he made is only the case of dichotomous situation - i.e., when you have only two options. Ofcourse he as a Muslims prefers Islam to be Dominant rather than being dominated by anyone.
Actually Christianity has no leg to stand on it doesn't have any solid beliefs to base their culture on thats why it keeps changing according to time and place.
*Daniel is destroying the psuedo islam being promoted in the west of showing it being liberal , tolerating and non violent, Daniel has no qualms about saying that islam is a violent , hateful, discriminatory political religious system which actively discriminates against other faiths, treats women as brainless property, baby producing beings !!!*
@@MarkNamor45 Islam really grounded on solid beliefs, that sun sets in a muddy pool, the black stone Hajr e Aswad will be witness on day of judgement, if muslims circumbulate the pagan structure Kabbah seven times Jannah is assured with facility of a brothel having 72 juicy virgin for unlimited sexual intercourse.
Brother Daniel I wish you would put David Wood on the spot for all the lies and deceptions he spread. Point by point, face, to face refutation. Superb job as always. May Allah bless you🤲
@JoeM About God? About the last prophet Muhammad peace be upon him? About his wife? About every Muslim in general? Seriously you heard no lies? If he's saying the truth you won't see a religion with 1.7+ Billion muslims around the world in a rapidly growing number. You won't see intellectuals, scientists, academics, previous prieste and preachers of Christianity embracing Islam. You won't see this much hatred towards the true muslims and Islam.
@JoeM You live in your own world, just like David) First, his name is "Muhammad" so at least type his name correctly and don't disrespect. Second, 15 wives, even if he got 299 wives it will still be less than the number of prophet Sulaiman (Solomon)'s wives. So i don't think this should be your issue. And i can 110% guarantee you that the Christian scholars and people of knowledge who researched Islam before changing their beliefs to the true ones and finally chose to revert to Islam are not muslims by force, where do you get your claim from? Plus, we know that Jesus is the word of God and was sent by God, and that he will return in the end of times so he's living now (only God knows his current status and conditions). Our prophet Muhammad peace be upon him taught us all that, that's why we love Jesus and we defend him and his name more than you do.
@JoeM God appeard to Solomon peace be upon him (according to the bible) and asked him what he wanted from Him, Solomon asked for wisdom and God grandted him. If that alone doesn't hint that Solomon is one of the prophets then you have no idea what does "prophet" means. Even his father, David (PBUH) was a prophet... go read the bible and study it i guess... Plus, you're still disrespecting prophet Muhammad even when i asked nicely to (at least) type his name correctly. Your claim about his name is false, how can you ever "lOvE yOuR eNeMiEs" then? Just look how muslims mention any name of the prophets with "peace be upon him" and full respect, this is (again) one of the many things that prophet Muhammad taught us, so we stick to that. And we still defend their names against blasphemers. I'm done talking to you since you had a chance to talk with some respect but chose not to, I'm not interested in talking to people this way. Peace be with you and i hope God guides you.
No offence, but you being a Muslim, if Daniel had simply farted at every question posed by the Christian, you would still have said he won the debate. That's tribalism.
Alhumdulillah, Daniel embarrassed the guy one more time. The arguments were tremendously profound and based upon facts and the really of our our time and human history.|
No, you miss the point of Dr Woods goal with these debates. It's to get a Muslim admit to the extreme side of Islam so that ordinary people will be aware of what's in the korään and hadiths, we see both Muslims and non Muslims react to these debates with both disgust and surprise. This is the big picture behind Dr Wood's tactics, it's not about "winning", it's about exposing.
DW was waffling multiple times throughout the debate. An attentive observer should notice that he was clearly caught and didn't have a good response to several arguments.
Correct, numerous times where he would start stuttering and then turn it back against Islam or the good ole “iTs iRrEleVant” instead of actually addressing the point. Deluded, may Allah have mercy on him and those who blindly follow his lies.
It is IDOLATROUS for Muslims to prostrate and pray in the direction of the the blackstone (Hajr e aswad) Moses warned about the IDOLATRY of bowing to a stone image: “Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to BOW down unto it: for I am the LORD your God." Leviticus 26:1 Secondly, the blackstone imitates the divine attributes of Jesus Christ the Son of God which makes the blackstone BLASPHEMOUS. What is the coincidence that at the very least, 4 titles of Jesus known centuries and millenia earlier are EXACTLY as those TRANSFERRED to the blackstone (Haji e aswad) which Muhammad began to idolize in the 7th century without any instruction for him to do so? JESUS CHRIST 1. Jesus is referred to as the CORNER STONE of the church [Ephesians 2:19-21] 2. Jesus EXPIATED sins [Mark 2:5-7] 3. Jesus is seated on the 'RIGHT HAND ' of God [Luke 23:69 4. He is the VISIBLE image of the INVISIBLE God [Colossians 1:15] BLACKSTONE 1. It is positioned as a CORNER STONE 2. EXPIATES SINS.[al-Bukhaari, 4987] 3. It is called yamin-Allah (THE RIGHT HAND OF GOD!). 4. It is the VISIBLE IMAGE of the INVISIBLE Allah. Allah never knew about the sacrificial system practiced after Abraham for the forgiveness of sins because he is ignorant about the Passover Feast and the Day of Atonement. That's why Allah's copy of Abraham went on to build an IDOLATROUS Kaaba where one could kiss a stone to have their sins "expiated" [al-Bukhaari, 4987] The Hajr e aswad is an ABOMINATION through which billions of Muslims everyday are misled to commit IDOLATRY and BLASPHEMY against the true God who said to Moses: “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘The Lord, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is my NAME FOREVER, and thus I am to be remembered THROUGHOUT ALL GENERATIONS. Exodus 3:15 In which Surah or ayat does the Qur'an use this special and signature name of God?
@@TheWatchmanWebsite Nowhere in Islam does this blackstone you speak of hold any significance other than it's value as a historical relic. You're doing some massive mental gymnastics when in reality the Kaaba is a direction of worship for muslims to pray towards. Allah, al Ilah, the God, your God, is who we pray and seek refuge from. It is CHRISTIANS who have attributed images, and FALSE images at that, to their creator. Shame on you, for lowering the Lord in his status, exalted is he. The churches are full of statues and rituals that you have ascribed a high status to. Stop spreading your propaganda and embrace Islam before it's too late.
@@mhmd7028 Friend, I referred to Saheeh hadith clearly stating that the blackstone "expiates sins". So is it just a relic? Wasn't it once white but became black because of the sins of the sons of Adam? 2. Won't it be given eyes and a mouth to testify on the day of judgment? Is it just a relic? 3. Where in the Qur'an can we find the special name of God: “Say this to the people of Israel: ‘The Lord, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is my NAME FOREVER, and thus I am to be remembered THROUGHOUT ALL GENERATIONS. Exodus 3:15
@@TheWatchmanWebsiteAllah SWT expiated sins for touching the black stone not the black stone. "Touching the black stone is an expiation of sins" not the black stone expiated sins, don't change the wording of hadith because then it's not sahih but da'if and a fabrication/lie.
Personally I don't think our beloved Muslims brothers should entertain him, he just here for his paycheck. He got smack down by Hijab, Sheikh Uthman and now still being arrogant as ever. If he's sincere he will concede and learn Islam.
true, but the thing is the more he gets humiliated over and over again, it benefits him in terms of money. Remember, even clowns need to make a living!
@@commandar88 that's for him, what's for us ? As the brother or sister said we should not entertain him or his dumb audience, I bet all of Daniel's intellectual arguments went straight over their closed heads.
@@andydufresne4444 I won't lie, I was surprised to see this video in my feed because I didn't expect them to debate a topic again. I thought TH-cam was recommending the old video..
@@sonny7159 I’ll give you few laws: Law of gravity - what goes up at some point comes down- including one’s power too law of repelling - resist to exist (to avoid being bullied-qanun ad daffa) mentioned in surah Baqarah Law of preparation- anyone who fails to prepare has got to be prepared to fail (read the tafsir for ‘wal asr’) Law of motivation- appreciation is the best motivation eg: (employee relationship with employer) Law of attraction- opposites attract: I.e the magnetic field -North Pole attracts the South Pole hence opposite genders attract too. Etc……..
I love how hammerhead and apuss’s supporters try to use giant words in their arguments to sound smart when their entire arguments are clearly biased against Islam and they refuse to try and understand it
@cat valentine 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 frustrated cow worshipper who has been crying for three days for the cow who was butchered by us and then made rista and goshtaba out of that...
It seems to me wa Allahu a3lam: Christian missionaries are indirectly bearers of Islam, or I've heard that people have come to Islam through their sermons... I'm noticing it more and more often in English-speaking countries as well as here in Germany. Alhamdulillah
When the Jews lived under Christians Empires the Jews where oppressed the Muslims helped the Jews and 3 Jewish tribes in Medina left Syria because of oppression from Byzantine empire they left and went to Medina.
@@briceboutet7810 the historical fact on the ground says otherwise.. jews have their golden age under muslim land! You can't compare it with christian lands which was marred with massacres and genocide against jews. To put it bluntly jews have a cultural,psychological and social consubstantiallity with muslims! You can ask the mizrahi and sephardic fathers for confirmation, baruch Ata Adonai!
Glad you mentioned it. At the end of the day it's up to each person to decide whether they want to actually listen or brush off everything they just heard.
@@mhmd7028 Exactly, when people start coming up with fake problems like gender fluid and all that nonsense while people on the other side of the world are starving to death due to the hypocrisy of certain governments. Then you best believe certain 'agendas' will be swept away like the dust they are to make way for the root of the problem.
@@briceboutet7810 Yeah right, America, UK, France and other colonised half the world with their wars yet you single out Muslims. Do you know your history? I agree to some degree with you, fascism, supremacy, and democracy do not work because they are man-made systems of ruling. The only thing that will work is if mankind rules by laws and legislations which have been prescribed by God. Which are the Quran and Sunnah. Today's bibles have been corrupted and are not the original aramaic text which they were revealed to Jesus (may peace, mercy, and blessings be upon him). The supremacy belongs to God, The Supreme.
@@briceboutet7810 You are ignorant because you think that Saudi Arabia are operating under the Quran and the Sunnah, they are not. In fact, no muslim majority country is operating under the laws of the Quran and Sunnah at this time. If Saudi truly were then they wouldn't be at war with Yemen who are their Muslim brothers and sister, they would've sent military support to Palistian years ago, and they would not normalise ties with the USA who constantly oppress the muslims. You bring Saudi as the example but they are not any example, so therefore your ignorance on this matter debases your claims on the other matters which you have mentioned.
@@briceboutet7810 We are all human beings my friend. Different skin colors still bleed the same color. No one is better than anyone else except in terms of how much they worship the creator. Look far enough in your own DNA and you'll find there's no such things as "pure" in terms of race.
May Allah will give David hidayah and open his heart for the path of the beauty of Islam.. he learned a lot about Islam but his heart still like a stone.. don't be like Abu Lahab, David..Don't be arrogant like him after you find the truth.. I give a big respect to Daniel for his great job here 🙏
Daniel is an enemy of Islam. he is falsely claiming that Islam wages war against people just because of their non belief... this has been refuted countless number of times.
It is rather unfortunate that David uses his seemingly confident act for profit rather than truth. However keep in mind, and I say this sincerely, David is a diagnosed psychopath. We must keep in mind that pathological lying is in his nature. Who other than Allah knows what his true intentions are. May Allah guide him and his sheep to the truth.
@@briceboutet7810 Short Answer: Allah loves the patient, the steadfast, the doers of good, those who act justly, those who purify themselves and repent regularly, those who are righteous/God-fearing, the God-conscious, those who do what their Creator asked them to do and refrain from what He prohibited them from doing... Allah loves the humans that have any of these qualities,and that's what we strive for in Islam.
Failed as a Christian, failed as a debater, failed as a person of integrity overall, given The extreme level of hypocrisy and double standards that He Demonstrated, he showed his true colors as a secular liberal defender, no respect for Christian values.
It’s kinda orgasmic to see the chad Daniel with his stunning drip debating. Always exciting, and all I can do is nod in agreement. The man is knowledgeable and it’s very admirable. Insha’Allah I will join his institute soon.
@cat valentine just writing something cannot make an ideology true or false U have to prove that Like I can also say that Hinduism is false Without proving that it's false Does that mean that it's really false? But I can prove that the pantheistic concept of GOD in Hinduism is false Because In Hinduism u people believe that everything is GOD because it's created from the power of GOD That's a complete fallacy Because there's a criteria to be GOD in first place Like u have to be uncreated and u have to be independent and self sustaining and u have to be one U have to be uncreated because how can someone can be GOD if he's created If something is created then it's existence is dependant on the one who created him That's why if someone wants to be GOD he has to be uncreated And GOD has to be one because by definition If someone wants to be a GOD Then the attribute of will is essential attribute And if there are two GODS then two of them would make their own decisions based on their own will And the decisions would be different because both of them would have their own will and they would fight each other to be the one who's gonna make the ultimate decision So it's impossible to have two GODS By the definition of GOD itself The pantheistic concept of GOD in Hinduism Make zero sense Because Its like saying "I'm also GOD because me and GOD both exist" There's a criteria to be GOD in first place And a human and anything that's contingent cannot be GOD Because Its against the definition of GOD To be dependant,to be created, to be more than one,to have someone like him The pantheistic concept of GOD in Hinduism is just like saying "I'm also dog,rat,pigeon,pig,raccoon,bull etc Because me and every animal are living things"
@@nayeemather1252 The last line you said that I'm a dog, monkey and other animals bro they believe that we are living in 3 realms but experiencing only 1😑
No offence, but you being a Muslim, if Daniel had simply farted at every question posed by the Christian, you would still have said he won the debate. That's tribalism.
I dont think apostacy works like that in islam, just beacuse converting to another religion we have to kill them? Its not how its implemented, i heard there were spies to get information pretending to be muslims so if you see those guys kill em, its not like just they leave islam we should kill em, thats so barbaric and goes against the Qur'an
No offence, but you being a Muslim, if Daniel had simply farted at every question posed by the Christian, you would still have said he won the debate. That's tribalism.
2:07:05 Heard that verse and went to read it and understand the argument from Tafheem ul Quran by Maulana Abul Ala Maududi, what a great insight I got to know from that verse and beauty of the term "Nasara" which I thought that others should also know. _(Translation of interpretation of the verse)_ "We also took a covenant from those who said: 'We are Christians';1 but they forgot a good portion of the teaching they had been imparted with. Wherefore We aroused enmity and spite between them till the Day of Resurrection, and ultimately Allah will tell them what they had contrived." Taken from the *footnote* of Tafheem ul Qur'an - 5:14: "Some are of the opinion that the word Nasara (meaning Christians) is derived from Nasirah (Nazareth), the birth-place of the Messiah. In fact this word is not derived from Nasirah (Nazareth) but from the word nusrah, and the basis of this derivation is the question posed by the Messiah to his disciples: 'Who are my supporters (ansari) in the way of God?' In response to this they had said: 'We are the supporters (ansar) (in the way) of God.' Christian authors have been misled by the resemblance between the words Nasirah and Nasara into believing that the name of the sect founded in the early history of Christianity, and contemptuously characterized as either Nazarenes or Ebonites served as the basis of the Qur'anic designation of the Christians. But here the Qur'an categorically states that they had declared that they were 'Nasara' and it is obvious that the Christians never called themselves 'Nazarenes'. In this connection it should be recalled that Jesus never called his followers 'Christians' for he had not come to found a new religion named after him. His mission was to revive the religion of Moses and of all the Prophets who preceded him as well as of the one who was to appear after him. Hence, he neither formed any cult divorced from the Israelites and the followers of the Mosaic Law nor designated his followers by any distinctive name. Likewise, his early followers neither considered themselves to be separate from the Israelite community nor developed into an independent group nor adopted any distinctive symbol and name. They worshipped in the temple of Jerusalem along with other Jews and considered themselves to be followers of the Mosaic Law (see Acts 3:1-10; 21: 14-15,21). Later on the process of alienation began to operate on both sides. On the one hand, Paul, one of the followers of Jesus, declared independence from the Mosaic Law holding that faith in Christ was all that one needed for salvation. On the other hand, the Jewish rabbis declared the followers of Christ to be heretics and excommunicated them. Despite this, for some time the new sect had no distinct appellation of its own. The followers of Christ variously described themselves as 'disciples', as 'brethren', as 'those who believed', and as 'saints' (see Acts 2: 44; 4: 32; 9: 26; 11: 29; 13: 52; 15: 1; 23: 1 and Romans 15: 25 and Colossians 1: 2). The Jews sometimes designated them as 'Galileans' and as 'the sect of Nazarenes' (see Acts 24: 5; Luke 13: 2). These nicknames, which were originally contrived in order to ridicule them, referred to Nazareth, the home town of Jesus in the district of Galilee. These names, however, did not gain sufficient popularity to become the permanent names of the followers of Christ. They were called 'Christians' for the first time by the people of Antioch in 43 A.D. or 44 A.D. when Paul and Barnabas went there and began to preach their religion (Acts 11: 26). This appellation was flung at them by the opponents of the followers of Christ precisely in order to tease them by using an appellation which was unacceptable to them. But when their enemies began to call them consistently by this name their leaders reacted by saying that if they were called Christians because of their allegiance to Christ they had no reason to be ashamed of it (1 Peter 4: 16). It was thus that the followers of Christ also gradually began to call themselves by the same name which had originally been conferred upon them sarcastically. In the course of time the Christians ceased to realize that theirs had originally been a derogatory appellation chosen for them by outsiders rather than by themselves. The Qur'an, therefore, does not refer to the followers of Christ as Christians. It reminds them rather that they belong to those who responded to the query of Jesus: 'Who are my supporters (ansari) in the way of God?' by saying that they were his ansar (supporters) in God's cause. See (Surah al-Saff 61: 14 - Ed.) It is an irony of fate that far from feeling grateful at being referred to by a dignified appellation Christian missionaries take offence at the fact that the Qur'an designates them as Nasara rather than as 'Christians'." Subhan'Allah!
Read ibn katheer or tabari or Al-Saadi instead of mawdoodi--he didn't believe in the caliphate and pushed for democracy in islam. Many ikhwaani people consider him to be their imam.
This is the first time I watch any of this debate stuff (just isn’t my cup of tea), but I’m kind of pleasantly surprised, I expected content like this to just be yelling and insults and immaturity, but Daniel is actually surprisingly eloquent
Woodie stated he wants a system that's the best for the most people. So basically whatever the largest group of people desire even things explicitly against Christianity like abortion, LGBT, etc. I don't think he realizes the implications of what he says half the time
yeah it's so ok to do endless war for take money from others and take slaves if they fight for theire lifes and lose. daniel just show islam is as bad as any other shitty system. great.
@@davidjeanmichel8358 Endless war and take money from others and take slaves ( prisoners in abu gareeb and gwantanamo) .... you talking about USA and the west for sure hhhh yet no one talks shit about them And no ... Islam does not promote "endless war" and jizya is just like taxes that you're paying right now to your own government... and slaves are treated far much better then the iraqis prisoners were tortured by Americans... I don't know what planet does not yave wars and laws and people conquering each other's lands ... but it's not earth!
@@serine4044 my country france never participate in iraki war. but when america do bad things it's not the core of the value of america to do this, and peoples don't see it at the norm, as a project, or like if it was a desirable norm. daniel is saying infinite conquest, war and slavery are the project of islam. He accepted it, you don't. i think you are in pure cognitiv dissonance. and worst, you chose to compare prisoners and slaves, i know for muslim it's basicaly the same thing, but in many country in the world it's not and we don't conflate this with slavery. and no jizya is not "just a tax" it's a tax who is way higher than the tax for muslim... it's not just the same tax for everyone. it'swhy some caliphate were stoping the right to convert for christians in andalusia, for keep more taxes and possibles slaves. it's the level of dishonesty of muslims. you are just saying "hey look how america had do shitty things in irak for 10 years, we are just as great than them but for us it's our ultimate ideal to do theses things for eternity". GREAT. So fkin GREAT. What a good model. irak war stop at a point and it's considered like an illegal war (haram for west), but not islamic conquest if muslims really follow islam and they are hallal for muslims as daniel show it. I'm just happy that FINALY some muslims admit what islam is about aïicha, slavery and conquest. it was long.
@@davidjeanmichel8358 Oh lala t'es français .. Vraiment ! Mdr.. bonjour monsieur, je suis Algérienne hhhhh the irony !! So yeah, no need to explain more why I strongly believe that you are the last one to lecture me on ethics and tolerance during war, it may take pages of examples from your own history.... I mean Americans are basically angels compared to the French barbarism ! Hhhhh sorry I can't take this seriously anymore...and I am the one in cognitive dissonance !! Hhhhhh And who is to give the norms what to do and not to do during wars ? Geneva convention?? And before that?? 14 centuries ago The prophet pbuh set a code for wars for muslims to follow (I encarouge you to go read it ) ... And jizya is higher than zakat ?? Any evidence? Caliphate stopped Christians from converting! Same .. any evidence for such claims? And as muslim I do believe that our "ultimate project" is to spread Islam to all humanity. .. but it doesn't always have to be through wars , and indeed it wasn't ... Malaysia, Indonesia, west Africa. .... these countries accepted Islam through interactions with traders .. There maybe some black marks in Islamic history... I won't deny it, but compared to all others throughout history( including the shitty Americans hhhh ) muslims and Islam are far tolerant and peaceful..... and i dare you to give me better civilisations with zero violence ... from real life and from history. .. not the ideal world that does not exist.
@@serine4044 tu connais basile blandine ? sinon tu es en train de réfuter tout ce qu'a dit le type de la vidéo pour amoindrir la réalité, et la réalité c'est ce que daniel hakimachin reconnait pour les preuves sur la jizya va voir la chaine "averoes" c'est un musulman spécialiste de la periode andalouse musulmane, et très honnête. en tout cas il est maghrébin. quand a ce qu'a fait la france en algérie c'est ce que tous les califats ont fait, et en moins dur, car nous on a abolit de force l'esclavage chez vous. vous vous avez colonisé et esclavagisé le sud de l'europe des siècles, en ciblant particulièrement les femmes et surtout les blondes. :)
Daniel. You need to keep going, this is the most lacking part of the dawah towards both muslims and non-muslims, because most are afraid of other than Allah. People are indoctrinate and suppressed through institutions and your work is of out most necessity, i cannot express how important this is, May Allah grant you steadfastness and beneficial knowledge.
David Wood earns a living, not by promoting Christianity, but by taking cheap shots at Muslims. He likes to make it personal. I just fast forward thru his prattle. It's always the same tacky stick. Mr. Haqiqatjou on the other hand, although smug, at least tells it like it is. He is the President and founder of Reality Check 101 with a minor in Calling Out Hypocrites. Al- Haqq Mr. Wood, "This above all to thine own self be true and it shall follow as the night the day thou canst not be false to any man." The Bard.
“hypocrisy” refers to the act of claiming to believe something but acting in a different manner. The word is derived from the Greek term for “actor”-literally, “one who wears a mask”-in other words, someone who pretends to be what he is not. The Bible calls hypocrisy a sin. There are two forms hypocrisy can take: that of professing belief in something and then acting in a manner contrary to that belief, and that of looking down on others when we ourselves are flawed.
@@atan9258 Thanks for the share. I've never seen Mr. Wood wearing a mask but I have seen him masquerading in women's attire and I do believe he was quite proud of his performance. So if the shoe fits.....
David is helping good Christians and Atheists convert to Islam. TRUST ME. So he thinks he is working against Islam but in reality he is comforting evil human beings that have already made up their minds to not accept the Truth
Please pray for Indian muslim sisters to win their right to wear Hijab in educational institutions 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮
All David’s points has been answered to death in the past 5 years. Yet he insist to remain ignorant. I fast forwarded Wood’s introduction after the first two minutes. A broken record.
@@Just_logic Daniel justified taking concubines by "increasing fertility rates" in one of his debates. It couldn't be more ridiculous. Another one is Muhammad's marriage from Zaynab to prohibit adoption. Last but not least, the gymnastics done to justify those women who give themselves to Muhammad. God's scriptures were very convenient to Mo, and Aisha acknowledged that. Your iron is cold and broken.
@@mightbyson With regards to the concubine, that was not the justification he gave. Or at least not the only justification. The concubine concept is that there were many women left behind with out a guardian. There were no prison back then. So they were taken as concubine and treated as a wife. This has been explained to death. For those that have an open ears. And the Justification for Zaynab is correct. No one is seeking your approval.
Daniel bro why reengage with this disingenuous person. Once was understandable but now why give him a forum for his nonsense. Plus he is niether an intellectual nor informed, just a low grade waffler seeking attention to make money.
Am I the only one who noticed that david tried so hard to show off his mug which has "Jihadi tears" on it, but no one really gave a single damn about it. Lmao.
@cat valentine Hinduism ? Hinduism is more of culture than an actual religion lol , outside of India there is very little Hinduism. Can Hinduism even be considered a global religion .
Attention is bad for a fool. The ppl who aren't lost causes only get exposed to the fact that he is a fool. The point is for ppl who already watch him to start seeing how much of a fool he is
I think one thing David doesn't get is that from the perspective of the Law sometimes it is better to punish people with death and harsh penalties. Better for their own soul, this is a form of repentance.
@@abhmd4481 The Amalekites and the midiantes committed a terrible sin against Israel. When the nation was weak and vulnerable the Amalekites attacked the weakest and most vulnerable of the nation (Deuteronomy 25:18). They did this for no reasons except violence and greed. God hates it when the strong take cruel advantage over the weak, especially when the weak are His people. God waited 7 generations in order to give the Amalekites a chance to repent, but nothing changed during 400 years. The children grew up and became like their parents. Not only did the Amalekites attack and kill women and children, the old and the weak, their priests where sorcerers and practiced satanic deeds. They where known to transform into livestock and animals, this is why they where to be killed as well.
No offence, but you being a Muslim, if Daniel had simply farted at every question posed by the Christian, you would still have said he won the debate. That's tribalism.
I think this was Daniels weakest debate so far yet he exposed David. The topic was "Does Islam require violent prosecution of Christianity?" David started with usual bandwagon against Islam. To respond that, Daniel admit to all that and saying regardless Islam is the best solution, but imo Daniel needed to expand on that because the average Muslims and the Woods audience won't know why Daniel saying this is the best solution. I would have really liked if Daniel were pinning David to prove at least one of his allegations against Islam instead of Daniels strategy " I give you that, but you can't provide any better alternatives". For example pin David to explain how is paying a few bucks in Jizya as opposed to thousands in tax is violent prosecution against Christian for protection against outside enemies? Also Daniel said Islam will invade when it needs to, this needs to be phrased appropriately, so far what I come across abt Islam expansion is that, Islam only interfered when it needed to establish justice & peace (that is self defence & stop aggression) but just labeling it as "Invade" sounds like those bloody crusades of Christianity. We shouldn't lump Islam with anything as Daniel normally won't do. But at this point Daniel is allowed to have one weaker performance because so far he has been absolute 🔥 fire against all the propaganda labelled to Islam.
You must have watched a different debate to deny the nuance that was discussed. Daniel made wood admit that what he claims about Islam is part of the political reality of the world thar includes Christianity. All wood is doing is exposing his bias
I dont want to live in an islamic controlled country. I am Roman Catholic and i will not pay no jizziah tax and i will not convert to islam… according to islam then i would be persecuted / enslaved. No thanks but islam is not a religion of peace. Islam goal is to subjugate the world and when its in the minority it tries to paint itself as candy colored rainbow drops. I respect all religions but i draw the line when a religion wants to subjugate me and impose on me its dictatorship.
I dont want to live in an islamic controlled country. I am Roman Catholic and i will not pay no jizziah tax and i will not convert to islam… according to islam then i would be persecuted / enslaved. No thanks but islam is not a religion of peace. Islam goal is to subjugate the world and when its in the minority it tries to paint itself as candy colored rainbow drops. I respect all religions but i draw the line when a religion wants to subjugate me and impose on me its dictatorship.
No offence, but you being a Muslim, if Daniel had simply farted at every question posed by the Christian, you would still have said he won the debate. That's tribalism.
@@shaz2761 Absolutely. Because his fart makes more sense than what D-Wood utters from his mouth. ~No offense~ It has nothing to do with tribalism, etc. Rather it has to do more with good vs evil. And we all need to choose a side.
Muhammad ﷺ is objectively the greatest and the most influential human in history. He unified Arabia, transformed a backward desert dwelling tribal society into one nation which obliterated and brought to it’s knees two world superpowers (Rome and Persia) and established itself as a new political and spiritual superpower for centuries and still counting. He brought laws, morals, dietary system, societal regulations, dress code and a complete way of life that 2 billion people vigorously follow to this day. He brought a book which is a linguistic miracle that serves as a basis for modern Arabic grammar and which became and still remains the most read book in history that is memorized by tens of millions of people to this day. He was an excellent and unmatched politician, statesman, diplomat, warrior, general (never lost a battle), commander, public speaker, businessman, religious preacher, devoted husband, loyal companion, loving father and a faithful friend. He was loved by his followers and family and was respected by his enemies. And he did all that while being a desert dwelling orphan in the middle of nowhere, who couldn’t read or write and without attending no universities or having any human mentors or guides. 📢 Opinions of prominent non-Muslims about Prophet Muhammad ﷺ 🔊 1⃣ Michael H. Hart, American astrophysicist, author, historian, researcher, Christian. He wrote a book titled “The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History”, where he compares biographies, achievements, legacies and influence of the greatest people in history in order to find out the greatest one. He puts Prophet Muhammad ﷺ number 1. For basically the same reasons I mentioned. 2⃣ William Montgomery Watt, Scottish Orientalist, historian, academic and Anglican priest. From 1964 to 1979, he was Professor of Arabic and Islamic studies at the University of Edinburgh. “His readiness to undergo persecutions for his beliefs, the high moral character of the men who believed in him and looked up to him as leader, and the greatness of his ultimate achievement - all argue his fundamental integrity. To suppose Muhammad an impostor raises more problems than it solves. Moreover, none of the great figures of history is so poorly appreciated in the West as Muhammad” 3⃣ George Bernard Shaw, Irish writer, winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1925. “I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much-needed peace and happiness.” 4⃣ James Maurice Gavin, Lieutenant General of United States Army, Christian. “Among leaders who have made the greatest impact through ages, I would consider Muhammad before Jesus Christ.” 5⃣ Jules Masserman, United States psychoanalyst and professor of the Chicago University, Jew. Time magazine in July 15, 1974, in an article titled “Who were history's greatest leaders?” He writes : “Leaders must fulfill three functions : 1) Provide for the well being of the led. 2) Provide a social organization in which people feel relatively secure. 3) And provide them with one set of beliefs. People like Pasteur and Salk are leaders in the first sense. People like Gandhi and Confucius, on one hand, and Alexander and Caesar on the other, are leaders in the second and perhaps the third sense. Jesus and Buddha belong in the third category alone. Perhaps the greatest leader of all time was Muhammad, who combined all three functions. To a lesser degree, Moses did the same." 6⃣ Mahatma Gandhi, a Hindu, as well as Indian lawyer, leader of anti-colonial movement and political ethicist who employed nonviolent resistance to lead the successful campaign for India’s freedom from British slavery, persecution and oppression, and to later inspire movements for civil rights and freedom across the world. "I wanted to know the best of the life of one who holds today an undisputed sway over the hearts of millions of mankind... I became more than ever convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the Prophet, the scrupulous regard for pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and his mission. These and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every obstacle. When I closed the second volume of the Prophet's biography, I was sorry there was no more for me to read of that great life." 7⃣ Thomas Carlyle, Scottish writer, historian and philosopher. Prophet Muhammad ﷺ found a place in his book titled "The Hero as Prophet" 1840. In his work, Carlyle outlined Muhammad ﷺ as a Hegelian agent of reform, insisting on his sincerity and commenting "how one man single-handedly, could weld warring tribes and wandering Bedouins into a most powerful and civilized nation in less than two decades" As an introductory remark in the beginning of his book Carlyle says he chose to write about Muhammad because he was free to speak about him because there was no danger of “any of us becoming Muhammedans” “As there is no danger of our becoming, any of us, Muhammadans (i.e. Muslim), I mean to say all the good of him I justly can.” Carlyle writes : “To the Arab Nation it was as a birth from darkness into light. Arabia first became alive by means of it. A poor shepherd people, roaming unnoticed in its deserts since the creation of the world. A Hero-Prophet was sent down to them with a word they could believe. See, the unnoticed becomes world-notable, the small has grown world-great. Within one century afterwards, Arabia is at Grenada (Spain) on this hand; at Delhi (India) on that; - glancing in valor and splendor and the light of genius, Arabia shines through long ages over a great section of the world. Belief is great, life-giving. The history of a Nation becomes fruitful, soul-elevating, great, so soon as it believes. These Arabs, that man Muhammad, and that one century, - is it not as if a spark had fallen, one spark, on a world of what seemed black unnoticeable sand; but lo, the sand proves explosive powder, blazes heaven-high from Delhi to Grenada! The Great Man Muhammad was as lightning out of Heaven; the rest of men waited for him like fuel, and then they too would flame.” “It is a great shame for anyone to listen to the accusation that Islam is a lie and that Muhammad was a fabricator and a deceiver. We saw that he remained steadfast upon his principles, with firm determination; kind and generous, compassionate, pious, virtuous, with real manhood, hardworking and sincere. Besides all these qualities, he was lenient with others, tolerant, kind, cheerful and praiseworthy and perhaps he would joke and tease his companions. He was just, truthful, smart, pure, magnanimous and present-minded; his face was radiant as if he had lights within him to illuminate the darkest of nights; he was a great man by nature who was not educated in a school nor nurtured by a teacher as he was not in need of any of this.” “Our current hypothesis about Muhammad, that he was a scheming Impostor, a Falsehood incarnate, that his religion is a mere mass of quackery and fatuity, begins really to be now untenable to any one. The lies, which well-meaning zeal has heaped round this man, are disgraceful to ourselves only. The word this man spoke has been the life-guidance now of a hundred and eighty millions of men these twelve hundred years. These hundred and eighty millions were made by God as well as we. Are we to suppose that it was a miserable piece of spiritual trickery, this which so many creatures of the Almighty have lived by and died by? I, for my part, cannot form any such supposition. One would be entirely at a loss what to think of this world at all, if quackery so grew and were sanctioned here. More godless theory, I think, was never promulgated in this Earth. A false man found a religion? Why, a false man cannot build a brick house! It will fall straightway.”
@cat valentine anyone with the minimum critical thinking abilities of an 8 year old laughs at the notion that you worship rats and monkeys. Biggest joke of a “religion”
I am not gonna even watch this debate, it just pisses me off that one of the biggest preachers of hate against islam in America is involved in a debate about intolerance and hate preaching where he will try to clean his own image when it was made clear to everyone how intolerant he is towards muslims
Daniel should explain those verses from the Quran, that David mentioned in the beginning. About fighting non Muslims, and pay retribution. Instead, he said " others r doing this,or that" why can't Muslims do it".
He's not required to justify everything. Muslim apolgists are to explain the religion in the manner of conveying the message, not justify why we believe that because it looks or sounds harsh to others. Unlike Christians, just ask them to justify trunity (let alone the clear killings and acts of terrorism persuaded by the bible), they will answer, "well, think of an egg... it has a shell, yolk and white... that's one egg." But when they get stuck, they move on and change the topic. We know firmly and clearly what we believe. We stand firmly on our religious principles. Others are astray. Happy?
MA I am sure I can help you here. Muslims were persecuted and oppressed but didn't fight back after thirteen these verses were revealed for the Muslims to stand up fight and defend themselves. So all the verses about fighting in the Quran are for self defence.. For too long critics and those who have hatred for Islam have generally downplayed the history around the Muslims who suffered persecution in the early period of Makkah in order to make the Muslims in that period as the aggressors when they retaliated against their persecutors.
@@farookdinaully8029 Jazaka Allah khayran. I am Muslim,I read and understand Arabic I know the answer already. My point is for Daniel, to explain to listeners, and focus on Islam ,and purpose of its ideology, not bringing other ideologies, to justify Islam.
Follow on Telegram: t.me/haqiqatjou
Support our work: muslimskeptic.com/contribute/
Что ты против Ислама имеешь?
@cat valentine you're kidding right? Hinduism is a dead religion once you leave India.
@@hiqhduke that's a dumb analysis. Western society is nearing impending cultural collapse. Only turning to traditional models can save it. Secular liberal countries are no strangers to violence. They just have to be educated. Also, your obsession with anti-Islam material makes you unqualified to offer believable critique.
Personally I believe the elaboration of western justice system as well as social barriers based on “The Good Christian “ values would had set many things straight. Especially the points of disassociation of family development and unity
Also the rate and differential of violent and aggressive crimes in Majority Christian and Muslim countries. Vatican alone has the most thefts in the world on the low
I am Iranian as well. My story and Daniel is almost same . I got in uk and I left Shia . And I love you brother Daniel for the sake of ALLAH. I always watch your videos and use same techniques for giving dawah to my non Muslims colleagues. I won’t be apologetic . May ALLAH rewards you for all your actions
Zindeh bashid brather
@@tkurd8472 mamnon agha Jan
ما شاء الله تبارك الرحمن وهو يهدي السبيل 🤲🏼💚
start debating bro :)
'Islam is not the learning of the truth in GOD but the delusional training of the mind to think it is the truth in a God'.
Peace be unto all the misguided
Only thru JESUS CHRIST can you walk the path towards the Kingdom of Heaven.
Amen
dude.... if i was a christian, just listening to david wood.. would make me convert to islam
Almost nobody converts to islam. If you're not born into islam there wouldn't be any way to convert to the ideology concocted by a 7th century caravan robber and a pedophile whose ambition was to conquer the World via jihad.
He is offering a system of government that kills Cristianity just to suppress muslim
💀
David has poorly articulated it in this topic. The couple of things that Daniel is not getting is that Christians are not looking for any man-made government system that can supplement their belief system. Their God promised them to have His kingdom be established in the future, the heavenly kingdom. Therefore, Christians main goal is to cooperate with God to usher in His kingdom not to establish any man-made kingdoms.
Thus, it is okay for Christians to have any form of governments unless they enforce violent subjugation which Islam does endorse. And Daniel said, there are many cases in secular world that does have those subjugation. Yes. And they shouldn't do that.. that's the point. It's not because secular are doing the same thing so Islam would do the same thing too. No.. ideally no one should do it.
However, it is understandable that no countries it is possible to have such extent of idealism. That's why the Scripture said that Christians will suffer and go through persecution.
Therefore, Christians want the ideal world but thats coming from God's hand not through us. And we have to endure the suffering and persecution because world is not ideal.
This is why Christians are condemning Islam for trying to establish the governmental system according to human ways that follows all other man-made governments in the history and endorcing the forceful subjugation on others.
P.s. to Daniel. Catholic is not considered to be Christians. It is the Christo-political organization where they take the title of Christian faith to seek for the political supremacy. Bible did not say anything about setting a man-made government to enforce Christian doctrines.
@@sammyson3492 daniel just exposed islam is as bad as all systems that we find bad in general. and he is lying when he is saying that "every" system is based on infinite expansionism, it's just not true at all.
I'm glad I'm living in this period of time where knowledge is easily accessible. Thank you Daniel.
You should easily realise that Muhammad is the most obvious false prophet in history then lol
Take Dankel's knowledge with a grain of salt... He also makes some outright silly claims and he's extremely hypocritical overall.
@@runeh3022 you from Denmark?
@@17813_ No
@@runeh3022 what are those silly claims?
Haven't even started it, but if David Wood's ultimate goal is to embarrass himself over and over again… I'll just say that he has already accomplished that
*many times
And daniel has shown the true colors of islam, which is if you dont believe in al islam we kill you!!!!!!!
No, you miss the point of Dr Woods goal with these debates. It's to get a Muslim admit to the extreme side of Islam so that ordinary people will be aware of what's in the korään and hadiths, we see both Muslims and non Muslims react to these debates with both disgust and surprise. This is the big picture behind Dr Wood's tactics, it's not about "winning", it's about exposing.
@@Leyla_Bat_Murrah Hitler was best friend with the grand mufti of Jerusalem and the biggest SS division was Muslim called handshar.
@@nemesis1291 He is a clown. What will he expose. A Christian debator using liberal arguments. Lol. Christianity has a much voilent history than Islam. Read blood and faith- the purging of Muslim spain to get a view in the mirror.
David Wood is the christian debater who gives liberal arguments
I am Christian and DW is definitely not our debater ! He doesn’t know how 2 debate. Our debater is CP and go debate him if u can ?!
@@johnjohnny2702 seriously?? CP is your guy? Honestly?? We don’t even consider him because he doesn’t have manners in the first place. Besides he has been called to an open debate. He doesn’t come out of his bathroom. Take the initiative and bring him out
@@johnjohnny2702 Princess..LOL We rather hear from William Craig..James White or Mike Licona.
@@johnjohnny2702 Yea..poeple are leaving bathroom all the time..only the poor gullible and the stinky ones stayed...😂🤣😂🤣
@@johnjohnny2702 Princess..LOL
*Timestamps:*
0:00 - Sorting out the stream
0:46 - Introduction
1:26 - Opening Statement from David
13:04 - Opening Statement from Daniel
25:04 - Rebuttal from David
32:25 - Rebuttal from Daniel
39:54 - Offence/Defence strategies of Ideologies throughout History
46:17 - Does David Wood endorse Christianity favouring policies?
55:39 - Is there any better alternative Government for Christian Minorities except Islam?
1:01:33 - Is Christianity open to all beliefs or does it discriminate against some?
1:06:23 - Christians in power always trying to dominate Muslims
1:08:44 - Expansionist War ideology in Christianity
1:12:27 - Circular Reasoning & Hypocrisy of David Wood
1:19:51 - No Moral Objections of Christians against Muslims
1:24:16 - Islamic policies to curb the historically violent christians
1:26:54 - Closing Remarks from David
1:31:16 - Closing Remarks from Daniel
_QnA_
1:35:54 - Are Christians allowed to live in the Arabian Peninsula?
1:36:58 - Should Caliph Umar RA have been impeached for not repairing Churches?
1:40:07 - Treatment of Muslims Converting to Christianity in a Caliphate?
1:41:33 - Does Islam endorse the previous scriptures that it claims are corrupted?
1:44:01 - Is Anne Frank in Hell as per David?
1:47:36 - Treatment of Jinn in Human form converting from Islam to Christianity?
1:48:00 - Reason for Criminalization of Apostasy in Islam?
1:51:31 - Does David condemn the US Invasion of Iraq?
1:52:30 - Forced Conversion in Islam?
1:54:56 - Christians & Liberals endorsing violence against Muslims?
1:58:20 - Did Daniel concede to the Debate?
1:59:33 - Family Marriage in Zoroastrianism allowed under Caliphate?
2:01:57 - Are Islamic Countries bad for Women?
2:06:11 - Debate Challenge to David
2:06:40 - Why does God put enmity among Christians in the Qur'an?
2:08:51 - Islam being the solution to the highest Single Motherhood in the US?
2:10:37 - Treatment of Non-Muslims refusing to pay the Jizya in a Caliphate?
2:13:08 - Paying Zakat by helping feed people in Churches?
2:14:27 - Powerful Nations undermining Muslims?
2:20:23 - Daniel taking verses out of context?
2:22:09 - Early Church not teaching Religious Freedom?
2:23:46 - Jesus never commanded War?
2:26:58 - Can God command an Immoral thing?
2:31:34 - Does David oppose Abortion?
2:32:39 - Is Catholicism against Religious Liberty?
2:35:41 - Daniel focusing on Old Covenant regarding Violence in Christianity?
2:37:35 - Apostasy Law in Islam vs Treason Laws
2:39:33 - David's view of Toddler Cherubs in Christianity
2:40:17 - David's view of the Iraq War being branded as a Crusade?
2:42:12 - Should Laws be based on reason and not Faith?
2:43:44 - Wrapping Up
Waiting for your timestamp
Saaid the lion
@@munirahmadqalam-mal5927 بارك اللٰه فيك أخي ❤️
MashAllah, May Allah reward you akhi
@@mono_art143
وَإِيَّاك أَخِي ❤️
One thing I like about David is that he helps Islam by exposing how ignorant most Christians are about Islam. May Almighty Allah bless Haqiqatjou and his family, and all Muslim brothers and sisters defending Islam ☪️
I disagree
David wood was very clear in his presentation
@cat valentine no..raban was the first astronaut who fly trough the sky and snatched the wife of God (gandu) Rama..and f**k her brains out...pity on Rama who had a wife f**ed by his greatest enemy.. Lol😄😄...how pathetic god he is..and how pathetic his worshipers😜
They are ignorant about there own religion .. lol 🤣 Jesus never ordered killed the infants .. blind faith Christianity
@cat valentine Hindu religion where rape of women is allowed and where you don't fly on donkey but kill a horse and have sexual intercourse with it!!!!! Arthashastra 4.12 for allowing rape of rescue And ashvamedha ritual for intercourse with the dead horse
I am Christian and no way u can win any debate cos ur cult is anyway false. So wot do u expect ? BUT, David should really stop debating. He has no debating skills. He doesn’t know how to debate. He should just make small videos instead. He has no calibre to debate. Daniel also knows this and he made really good funny of him.
I dont think David comprehended Daniel's point in terms of discrimination. That was the root of the debate question. He really might have barrier to his understanding, or he knew how powerful that point was. In sha Allah, this is the source of guidance to the Christians.
Daniel also doesnt bother explaining because it might make him look apologetic. This is honestly a big flaw in Daniel that annoys me more than anything. He's all about the clickbait.. pff
He does it on purpose don't be fooled
@cat valentine 🥳🥳🥳👍 well done👏👏💥👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏😱😱👏👏👏💥👏😱👏👏💥👏👏👏😱💥👏👏😱
@@misshouda1740 yeah I know he avoids going on tangents but it's still a bit annoying xD.. I'm screaming at the screen but I guess he's really talking to extreme christians. Makes sense !
@cat valentine enjoy the hellfire mate :D.. i'll be sure to look at you when I'm enjoying my throne inshaAllah ^^.
The most surprising part is David saying he would outlaw abortion if he got into power. That’s probably the only Christian thing he said.
So is it right or wrong ??
@@adnanrashtogi4553 I have no problem with that. I don’t support abortion.
But, then David in other places will argue give to Caesar what is Caesar
David? Why then you objecting to Abortion?
Be consistent 😂👍
@@muhammedPies He’s definitely inconsistent. But in this instance he’s saying IF he was in power, this is what he would do. Which is different to “Render unto Caesar”
Most christians in the west is only called as christian in their legal identity card, they have been pro grammed to this extent, and so much in fluenced by li beralism and f eminism, it's almost their values completely cor rupted and distor ted, they mos tly abandon the way of th eir own religion, this is way makes the m very po tent t o Muslims in the west, it's their own h ypocrissy , spr eading hatre d almost no bou nd, even do ing any di rty tactics to in vites their own e nemies (at heist) to fight m uslims
I am an Egyptian
here christians are building churches
monestery like a fortress
they get to marry and have children and get education and health care just like muslims
have property and have their schools
they now get to say bad things about islam and interfere with azhar
and cause some scholars like Ahmed Sobae to go to preson bcz he duscusses christianity
several christians blastphemed against the prophet peace be upon him and no one judged them
the reachist man in Egypt is Saweras
who is against islam
then the church keep sending masseges that says that they are discriminated against
they lie it is their religion to lie
I wish muslims in the west have half the rights that yhe christians have here
True! I lived in Misr for years and some copts are two- faced liars. They live a good life in Egypt. It only gets dangerous for them, if they convert to Islam!
So true! May Allah free our brother Ahmed sobae soon.
The one best comment I have ever seen by a Muslim
@@CB-so5wh I know, Christians are indeed privileged in your country. But be careful expressing your views on the internet while being in your country!
Like in my country in Indonesia they Attack muslim if majority in Sulawesi. And they missionaris talk Hatespeech
Thanks for coming on again, Daniel!
@cat valentine 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
@@forgivenesswallah3410 that turd is posting this under every comment. Nobody told him Hinduism doesn't survive in the next generation as soon as Hindus go abroad.
@@forgivenesswallah3410 cat valentine is an idiot bcoz he is only increasing the algo on the video by posting these stupid comments in reply to all comments 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@cat valentine This is a bot. Don’t bother responding to this.
@cat valentine Lindu go have your dung cakes
When David wood talks, it appears that he does not believes in Christianity.
Yes, I think he's so obsessed with trying to "destroy" Islam that he's turned his back on his own faith.
That's a stupid statement. He clearly believes in Christianity. You just don't like his points. Both had good points. Both had bad points.
Wasn't he diagnosed as a sociopath in the 90's?
@@shaz2761See, you're biased to David Wood and against Islam.
@@RAN73388 no I'm not in an atheist. I'll call out David Woods bs as much as anyone else
David not only insults my intelligence, he also insults my ignorance
*Daniel is destroying the psuedo islam being promoted in the west of showing it being liberal , tolerating and non violent, Daniel has no qualms about saying that islam is a violent , hateful, discriminatory political religious system which actively discriminates against other faiths, treats women as brainless property, baby producing beings !!!*
😂😂😂
*Your intelligence and ignorance are merged like in the case of most Mohammadans. Their knowledge stretches between knowing that the sun sets in a muddy pool to sun orbits in its own path.*😃😃😃
This...
Good one! LOL
I like how in Daniel's opening statement he wasn't trying to be "apologetic" but rather being confident in his faith and saying it the way it is.
He agreed to David point debate was over
@@stargazer1405 found my minion 😍
@@stargazer1405 while exposing how flawed David's fantasy stance is a joke. Anyone can take a fantasy stance, doesn't mean it coincides with reality. That went way over DW's head
@@commandar88 at 13.28 Daniel conceded defeat.
@@blingcicero6570 to set a trap that wood fell for, exposing him big time.
What is sad that even when Daniel is talking in favor or Christians David can’t recognize it.
David Wood will attack Islam no matter what cost, even if that cost is throwing his religion under the bus.
He likes secularism more than Christianity.
@@briceboutet7810 I used the word “when”. Read my post properly.
Do you think using terminology like “fascism”, makes you sound smart.
There are two step of the process. Process and outcome. Have you tested the outcome? Or you are just complaining about the process without looking at the outcome?? How is your liberal society working so far? I suggest you educating yourself before making statements you have no clue of the details. Like mark Twain said it best “the biggest sign of ignorance is rejecting what you don’t know. Do you think you know ISLAM or sharia law??
@@briceboutet7810 You are actually perf ect example someone that only want to hear a truth that sounds good, but ignoring the truth when it tasted sour or bitter, not exactly unique , most people like you have different taste of tongue when it comes to the reality, unlike another ch istians counterpart like cop ic or orth odox, or even some honest cath olics,
Daniel you should have mentioned Bible having rules to kill apostates and expose his double standards.
Also after liberalism it's okay.
I used to think Daniel’s views, although correct in every way, and backed up by evidence, were presented in extreme ways. I just told myself he was simply just a brutally straightforward guy in a time where even Muslims are too shy to tell the truth. However, overtime since knowing about brother Daniel, I’ve taken many classes in universities over the years pertaining to business, economy, accounting, and history. It’s staggering to mention just how many patterns you’ll see in history that repeat itself, granting humanity a giant sign about what human nature really is. There are so many facets of life tied to economy and government and studying its presence in societies show a dark truth about human nature. With this in mind I realized that brother haqiqatjou isn’t extreme at all. Too many Muslims conform to western ideologies and institutions to the point they end up being comfortable with its flaws. Study the histories and you’ll see so many similarities of our times in other times that resulted in a collapse of societies. There will be darker times ahead may Allah protect us.
With this in mind it is noteworthy to mention the amount of amount of instances that historical figures from several eras across all the continents have quoted similar things in the Quran that people today don’t believe in. People are always in submission to Allah. Allah’s signs reach every man and woman whether he or she believes it or not. There are no atheist bcz knowing God is a language we all know. It’s just our nafs and desires that misguided us.
“…and We are closer to him than his jugular vein” (50:16)
May that also be a reminder to Muslims in their current stage of imaan, we are all hypocrites without realizing so it’s better for us now to be honest with our own actions. We are a part of many collective problems in society as well.
Most of us as a Muslim that reside in western countries want to live as a Muslim that blends with western culture which is impossible unless you want to be an apologist.
@@jonatand2045 that's a gross oversimplification, read history and you'll find that Muslim empires only fell after relaxing sharia and embracing other ideologies which resulted in the spread of degeneracy, yes ottomans, Abbasid and all Muslim empires fell after turning to nationalism and other false ideologies
@@jonatand2045 Origin of life came from the clay world. If you’re going to talk about evolution, you’ll have to see how life came about. And human originating from clay is not far from the truth at all. Besides, the Quran says that the father of Mankind is created from Clay and that all living organisms are also made of water. Living things are created from the nature of earth, and clay plus water is from earth. What did you expect we came from? Besides, the composition of earth products like clays/muds or soils have a strong commonality to the composition of human body.
@@ShinSekaiAnimationz exactly 💯 and this fella called Jonatan has no clue whatsoever 😪🤦♀️
@@ShinSekaiAnimationz Adam was created from clay but there was some change to his body when he exited Jannah
What we thought the debate was : Islam vs Christianity
What the debate felt like: Islam vs Liberalism and its Christian puppet
Wood is a closets liberal athiest. He doesn't hold the core orthodox christian values
Christian not extreme like u islam
@@Liam-qk4uy you need to differ between christianity (Bible) and liberalism (christian apologists)
@@cornamenpython6760 why need to different..ur funny
@@Liam-qk4uy then wtf do you have a religion for lmao😂
mashallah bro I learned more about the world with the philosophical perspective from you , firas zahabi and sapience institute. you really made me to accept deen is superior than other laws. so much knowledge may Allah preserve you I ♥ love you for sake of allah.
@cat valentine 😂
@cat valentine there is no truth in cow dung. it's filth.
@cat valentine hello cowdung...
@cat valentine
Bye bye every -ism :)
@cat valentine
Absolutely pathetic.
You don't have anything better to do with your time than insult people online?
What a pathetic excuse for a human being, I feel sorry for you!
As a Jew, Daniel hit it home with this one. Articulating the similarities of Islam and Christianity as Abrahamic religions always bugs Christians yet the main points of contingency are usually agreed upon by early Christians to Muslims. Most of these practices David so innocently claims Christians don’t do they had done for almost 500 years prior and after.
And groups who misuse verses in Islam? I can think in the last 30 years multitudes of tragedy with Christian “unalive” cults that resulted in the deaths of all their followers usually. Jonestown, Branch Davidians, many Nazi Christian group attacks, I could go on and on.
Whatever Christianity David speaks of only remains truthful to David, literally no other Christian in the past 300 years have thought of his religion so passively. We all know Christianity is the evangelical religion, not Islam, not that that’s bad, but it’s hypocritical to argue what he is rn.
Thank you!.. David lives in this diabolical utopia of fantasies that's divorced from reality. Forget about religion for a second, we're human beings & human beings for centuries have acted purely based on their instinct to survive and that's what drives majority of the violence and the just "war theory" in the past, present & the future.
Sorry for bad grammar, English is not my native language.
Islam insists on killing apostates and non moslems as a matter of injunction by the quoran not just by the wish of extremists, this is not in Christian doctrine.
@@olumuyiwaasunmo This may be true if J himself didn’t recognize peters way of life as sufficient with Christianity as the whole live by the sword die by the sword isn’t a bad thing depending on who you talk to.
I find that hating Islam just leads to hating Muslims themselves if you keep going far enough with it and it’s not productive, especially when there are bad people in all groups, this entire narrative your pushing almost the entire pagan world was screaming back when Christianity rose to power, surely they had religious values and rights that Christians burned and pillaged out of existence many of times. Throwing stones out of glass houses per se.
@@Snackitalist Why are Buhdists, Hindus, Zoroastrians not hated? Why is Islam and Moslems attracting hatred? Theirs is the only belligerent religion with hatred for others their manifesto. If you hate, you will be hated in return. It is the only religion making a subjective assessment of other religions with a view to vilifying them. It is the only religion prescribing death for apostates and non moslems.
This is stupidity on a stick, plain and simple
Akhi Daniel, you should change the title from 'Islam vs Christianity' to 'Islam vs Liberalism'.
Agreed 💯
R u indian hindu girl?
@@mohammedzeeshan5393A Muslim Alhamdulillah
@@sneha6788 oh great.. But ur name sounds like hindu names.. Is it ur real name?
@@mohammedzeeshan5393I've been tired of telling people that I'm not a revert😅
Yes it's my real name
Love haqiqatjo, he is blessed by Allah to defend Islam, absolutely brilliant brother. May Allah protect you always
Daniel : Islam is the best way of life... 👍
David : no it's not...😡
Daniel : so what is your alternatif?.. 😊
David : I don't know... I don't have one 🤪
Me: 🤣🤣🤣
That never happened, why are you lying? Wait... I know why you are lying. Proof of Islam not being an Abrahamic religion, the god of the Muslims tells them to be liars.
@@nemesis1291 Have you watch the whole stream? Or are you blind? Especially in the 54 minutes of the stream onward when Daniel ask David "the Alternatif".. see how he respond to it. 🤣🤣🤣
The point is you don't have to agree with us muslims.. the main question is as Daniel say "what is your Alternatif?" Or are you as delusion as David who thinks that the best way is the imaginary fantasy world that only exist in your head?🤣🤣🤣
@@nemesis1291 lol cry
@@noodles2881 schhhhh kid.
@@nemesis1291 sayin the one who crying like a baby because they know they religion makes no sense. Lmao 3 gods
Mashallah Barakallah keep up this good work. Lots of Love from India 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Praying for my Indian brothers and sisters. We in the West have it easy compared to what you all are going through right now. Insahllah Allah rewards you for you perseverance along with all muslims facing oppresion across the globe.
@@mhmd7028 keep us in your Duas. ❤️
Kashmir Zindabad, may Allah grant you free you from the humilation of Hindutva and grant you free Shari'a based system
47:09 this is an excellent move brother Daniel. A lot of people are on the back foot when it comes to apologists because we believe they genuinely want to know about Islam. They do not, they do this for money and fame. A questions like this shows that they are actually very shallow in their own beliefs and that they do not actually care about their own groups beliefs beyond the monetary value they bring.
facts
This question doesn’t comprehend True Christianity. Christians see it as a true change of the heart and knowing Jesus, and He changes you to be loving by knowing him personally. We’re not after money and subjugating or forcing people to do things - *granted there are false Christians in history who have used the name of Jesus as an excuse to wage things like the Crusades*. David Wood isn’t after $, but rather truth. Stereotypes of muslims are mostly false & stereotypes of Christians are false. The thing is it’s not a religion - it’s knowing God & having salvation. It’s not about ruling others or forcing religion / only GOD can change a person. Religion is man earning his way and reaching up to God, Jesus rather reaches down to human kind & gives the gift of new life /// the focus on power is not the point // God gave us free will
@@steflondon88 theology. Judging by his content its fair to say thats the only reason he does it, whats fascinating is how blinded people become with emotions, its worst then drugs.
Tell Dovid19 to take my debate challenge ;' satanic language the bible vs the quran' lets see which book is the pure word of God.
Like they all didn't accept my ' true trinity belief challenge that 3 does equal 1. send me 3 million and ill return one. if they SINCERLY believe it, yet none do.
Frauds for dollars, been hiding behind theology for so long already, even the Jesus in the gospels would not agree with what the hell you doing. You blind yourelves with emotions and lead by psychopath, at least Dovid admits that part.
Its simple God is one without any images. Period. If those are direct commandments then all else can't go against it. if contrary to that its wrong period.
Thanks a lot for the timestamp.
Daniel bro, I learn a lot from your debates, Jazāk Allāhu Khayran
David's opening speech increased me in my imaan.
Really? How ?
Great debate as usual brother Daniel , you destroyed him twice.
Yeah, but be aware that brother Daniel is against woman education.
I hope what you wrote in your profile “اللهم ساعدني على تحقيق أحلامي" revolves around building a happy family.
Regards,
@@sash991
Nonsense joke....
@@sash991 Don't worry. This sister watched that debate and post analysis. Maybe she doesn't agree but that doesn't change the truth that women's education is actually harmful for the society. You guys when don't have any logic against Daniel's point just resort to fearmongering and shock factor. Pathetic!
*Daniel is destroying the psuedo islam being promoted in the west of showing it being liberal , tolerating and non violent, Daniel has no qualms about saying that islam is a violent , hateful, discriminatory political religious system which actively discriminates against other faiths, treats women as brainless property, baby producing beings !!!*
*Daniel is destroying the psuedo islam being promoted in the west of showing it being liberal , tolerating and non violent, Daniel has no qualms about saying that islam is a violent , hateful, discriminatory political religious system which actively discriminates against other faiths, treats women as brainless property, baby producing beings !!!*
I am an atheist but thank you Daniel for holding David's feet to the fire. Really well done.
So happy to see comments like these. Thank you
u don’t believe in God ? tell me how and who created you , God exist because u exist , read Quran u won’t regret
@@zohrapeni3196 how u know he's athiest?
i have a question for john smith if u don’t believe in God what do u think who created u? when u were nothing and u will die and get up again and go back to him
Its funny how these videos always start with comments like this
Stop pretending we know you're muslin trying to make it seem like Daniel's point resonates with logic
Its either I'm an Australian Christian but i supoort Daniel, I'm a southern Baptist Christian but i support Daniel
Stop lying for fucks sake. Taqiyya wont save you
When Daniel started "Guilty as charged" the debate was over. Great performance by Haqiqatjou as usual
It's not Aizza, it's i'zaa
@@juxtapositionMS there is no letter ع in Greco-Roman alphabet. Even I'zaa does not fully make it so yeah...
Daniel, your patience and knowledge is to be commended once again my brother. While you responded to each and every one of David’s cheap shots and random lies/generalizations about Islam, David failed to not only counter your factual and historical points but to back his own as well (which was to be expected), relying mainly on anecdotes and attacks. David’s acting like Christianity isn’t being publicly shunned more and more in modern Western society. Noooo, according to him big bad Islam is the main thing Christians should be focusing on instead of the massive surge in atheism within the West. But I digress. Well done my friend, may Allah grant you more wisdom and success.
@@jonatand2045 Atheism contradicts the logic of reality. You’re left with the infinite regress fallacy and the fact that logic itself is based on axioms which we are supposed to consider objectively true (like our brains producing absolute truths).
@@jonatand2045 nice another 'woke intellectual' that doesnt understand philosophy of science
@@jonatand2045 What are you even saying? An infinite regress invalidates your very existence. -_-
Wtf ? Death to the apostates ?
The worst thing about foolish ideas is that draconian policies are needed to make them stick
Muslims - how to be saved? So many people in the world are deceived but here is the truth for you!
John 14:6 - King James Version
6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
Romans 1:16 - King James Version
16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. (The Letter of Paul to the Romans)
Romans 5 - King James Version
18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. (offence of one - Adam's one trespass, one sin, led to the condemnation of all men - the righteousness act of one was Jesus' death on the cross to pay for human sin)
Salvation is not getting your sins forgiven, it's believing they already are!
We are all sinners and fall short in God his glory - how to be saved - this is the gospel of salvation - 1 Corinthians chapter 15 verses 1-4 by trusting and believing the gospel of salvation you are saved and sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise till the day of redemption and nothing can pluck you out of the Father his hand - (In whom we have redemption through his blood , even the forgiveness of sins: (Colossians 1:14 - King James Version) - eternal security is a free gift - it's a promise and God Almighty cannot lie!!! Have a blessed day!
This is the gospel of salvation - 1 Corinthians chapter 15 verses 1-4
Witnesses of Christ's resurrection. 1) Moreover,brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2) ''By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3) For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4) And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures.
IT IS FINISHED... Paid in Full !!! But, You Must BELIEVE IT - 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV.
2 Timothy 2
King James Version
15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
Romans 2:16
King James Version
16 In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel. (Paul's Gospel - 1 Corinthians chapter 15 verses 1-4).
KJV - Bible verses about Jesus is God
John 1:1 - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
John 1:14 - And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
John 10:30 - I and my Father are one.
Isaiah 9:6 - For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
John 20:28 - And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God.
John 8:58 - Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.
Wood's mug says, "Jihadi tears". Daniel wasn't crying, he was smiling throughout the debate.
Real Christians would prefer Islamic rule but David is more of a secular liberal atheist than a Christian. All his criticisms of Islam are rooted in liberalism not Christianity.
No people with any self respect would ever agree to live as second class citizens in their own country. Islamic law only works in Muslim majority nations. The moment you get a 50/50 split, you end up with Nigeria. A nation that clearly needs to divide itself into Christian half and Muslim half.
@@jamese5936 Real Christians live as second class citizens in secular liberalism in the West.
@@Mr1000IA In the West Christian have the ability to believe what they want. The problem with people like you is you think, you not being allowed to tell others what they can or can't do is oppressing your religion. Practice your religion however you like but keep it to yourself and don't try to impose your barbaric backwards practices that don't even work in countries where you are a majority.
You barely get along because you take turns oppressing and hating each other. Sunni hating Shia hating Sufi hating Ahmadiya while all claiming to be doing that in the name of God and condemning each others as innovators and apostates who deserve death, then wonder why you have been in a state of war since the founding of your religion.
Also, Christians would rather stay in the West than live in a Muslim majority country where they are oppressed. Look how they are treated in Egypt. Even in Indonesia Easter time is a dangerous time.
@@jamese5936 The truth is Westerners are not even primarily Christians anymore, they are primarily Liberals without even being aware of it. The Quran predicted the bloody genocide between Catholics and Protestants. As a result, Westerners adopted Liberalism for “freedom” but which paves the way for the Anti-Christ: propagation of atheism, homosexuality, fornication, abortion, predatory capitalism, widespread divorce, single mothers, abandoned elderly, over medication, unjust wars inspired by the greedy military industrial complex, widespread incarceration inspired by the prison-industrial complex, technologies that abuse the environment, the prevalence of the occult among decision makers such as freemasonry. And they export their “freedom” throughout the world, making all people vulnerable to the deception of the Anti-Christ. The subjugation of authentic Christianity by Liberalism has opened the door for the coming of the Anti-Christ. However, Pauline Christianity was bound to degrade to Liberalism because he abolished the Mosaic Law. The practices people like you find barbaric are found in the Bible. Liberals posing as Christians are agents of the Anti-Christ-Orthodox Christians seem a lot better off spiritually and morally.
@@jonatand2045 so you believe nature is uncreated?
Alhamdulillahi for islam, proud of you brother Daniel
The point of Jizyah is no discrimination.
This is rather promotion of equality under islamic rule. Because muslims on one side have to pay zakah which non muslims don't have to. So the balance comes here that non muslims must pay jizyah.
Also the point is that any system rules you to pay tax whether David wants to pay or not.
So this doesn't mean islam is discriminatory for muslims to pay zakah and non muslims to pay jizyah.
It would have been discriminatory if muslims had to pay zakah and non muslims had to pay nothing.
Allah Allah
Subhanallah
Not allowing Christians to publicly talk about Christianity is wrong
@@nemesis1291 i dont believe you can promote islam under christian ruling......they will burn them on the stakes....yes thats what they did to heretics.....christianity can only rule in a secularis system.....so they can blame atheists and the secularies people when they murdered for example iraq....``the US is not a christian country``....yet they have in God we Trust on their own money written on it..chruches all over the place....they use the bible when they swear and use it in the court...yet when they murder and rape they are atheists....lol.
@@nemesis1291 Christians implemented blasphemy laws you think I can preach islam in the Vatican
Don't forget non-muslims who pay jizyah, don't have to go to the army to fight the war.
Now that's what we call a privilege, not a discrimination.
@@mahamedjmal2536 that's not blasphemy, you don't know the meaning of the word my friend.
David is a complete hypocrite! He is arguing because he believes that Islam is for killing Non-Muslims for their beliefs, which it isn't yet he forgets what Christians done when they conquered nearly the entire world. The Americans, Africa, most of Asia and Oceania even Europe were never Christian Regions. The religion of Christian was forced upon them and those who never believed were put to the sword, beaten, burnt and so on. Like Desmound Tutu said, “When the missionaries came to Africa, they had the Bible and we had the land. They said: 'Let us pray. ' We closed our eyes. When we opened them, we had the Bible and they had the land.”
It's become clear after David's rebuttal that he's ego driven. He's not seeking out the truth. The ego is always what blocks a person's intellect from "seeing" clearly, from seeing the truth.
Ego and also he is just there to make money , he is not a true Christian , looking for fame, views and cash out from TH-cam videos
@Manas Kumar we can agree to disagree.. its ok.. you are entitled to your opinion. Truth, however, will remain standing.
@Manas Kumar man he literally embarasses himself always every single time can't you see that? Do you even watch his debates where he gets destroyed lmao
@Manas Kumar The problem all of you have is hatred, your hearts are full of hatred so it’s hard to be just ..you prefer to defend David even he is wrong … but we all will stand before GOD that day He will judge us
@Manas Kumar What is this “evil” within Islam you speak of? I doubt you’ve even read the Quran in it’s entirety. Instead you rely on hammer time to shape your opinions.
Excellent debate br Daniel. I always learn a lot when listening to you.
I did have a question. You mentioned that you would be happy living under a Christian society (I believe you've mentioned this before) however what is a "Christian society"? I've always had the impression that what makes a Christian society is always in flux (e.g. Christian society after Constantine contrasted to Christian society in the 17th century).
He always said he preferrs to live under the subjugation of Christian Orthox State only in comparison to Secular State - because christianity as a paradigm functions in a theocentric manner, where secularism as paradigm in fundamentaly anti-theistic from its core.
The point he made is only the case of dichotomous situation - i.e., when you have only two options.
Ofcourse he as a Muslims prefers Islam to be Dominant rather than being dominated by anyone.
I come back from time to time just to hear Daniel's Opening statement. Just Perfection.
51:30 what the hell david is saying. He's claiming Christianity but doesn't want Christianity as a rule/law. He's out of his mind. 😂😂😂
Hes barely a Christian.
Actually Christianity has no leg to stand on it doesn't have any solid beliefs to base their culture on thats why it keeps changing according to time and place.
@@shahid8545 Honestly he seems closeted atheist to me.
*Daniel is destroying the psuedo islam being promoted in the west of showing it being liberal , tolerating and non violent, Daniel has no qualms about saying that islam is a violent , hateful, discriminatory political religious system which actively discriminates against other faiths, treats women as brainless property, baby producing beings !!!*
@@MarkNamor45
Islam really grounded on solid beliefs, that sun sets in a muddy pool, the black stone Hajr e Aswad will be witness on day of judgement, if muslims circumbulate the pagan structure Kabbah seven times Jannah is assured with facility of a brothel having 72 juicy virgin for unlimited sexual intercourse.
Brother Daniel I wish you would put David Wood on the spot for all the lies and deceptions he spread. Point by point, face, to face refutation. Superb job as always. May Allah bless you🤲
@cat valentine bye pa...jeet
@cat valentine
Bye bye every -ism :)
@JoeM
About God?
About the last prophet Muhammad peace be upon him?
About his wife?
About every Muslim in general?
Seriously you heard no lies?
If he's saying the truth you won't see a religion with 1.7+ Billion muslims around the world in a rapidly growing number.
You won't see intellectuals, scientists, academics, previous prieste and preachers of Christianity embracing Islam.
You won't see this much hatred towards the true muslims and Islam.
@JoeM
You live in your own world, just like David)
First, his name is "Muhammad" so at least type his name correctly and don't disrespect.
Second, 15 wives, even if he got 299 wives it will still be less than the number of prophet Sulaiman (Solomon)'s wives. So i don't think this should be your issue.
And i can 110% guarantee you that the Christian scholars and people of knowledge who researched Islam before changing their beliefs to the true ones and finally chose to revert to Islam are not muslims by force, where do you get your claim from?
Plus, we know that Jesus is the word of God and was sent by God, and that he will return in the end of times so he's living now (only God knows his current status and conditions).
Our prophet Muhammad peace be upon him taught us all that, that's why we love Jesus and we defend him and his name more than you do.
@JoeM
God appeard to Solomon peace be upon him (according to the bible) and asked him what he wanted from Him, Solomon asked for wisdom and God grandted him.
If that alone doesn't hint that Solomon is one of the prophets then you have no idea what does "prophet" means. Even his father, David (PBUH) was a prophet... go read the bible and study it i guess...
Plus, you're still disrespecting prophet Muhammad even when i asked nicely to (at least) type his name correctly. Your claim about his name is false, how can you ever "lOvE yOuR eNeMiEs" then?
Just look how muslims mention any name of the prophets with "peace be upon him" and full respect, this is (again) one of the many things that prophet Muhammad taught us, so we stick to that. And we still defend their names against blasphemers.
I'm done talking to you since you had a chance to talk with some respect but chose not to, I'm not interested in talking to people this way.
Peace be with you and i hope God guides you.
Brother Daniel's opening speech is great! It's awesome!! David and his ATM machines certainly didn't expect this.
Daniel clearly couldn't debate our lord and savior the ultimate skalah *Christian princess*
@@revertDaWOOD hahaha not gonna lie, you got me on the first half
@@arianitonline8748 🙂🤍
@@revertDaWOOD 😂😂😂😂
No offence, but you being a Muslim, if Daniel had simply farted at every question posed by the Christian, you would still have said he won the debate. That's tribalism.
Alhumdulillah, Daniel embarrassed the guy one more time. The arguments were tremendously profound and based upon facts and the really of our our time and human history.|
No, you miss the point of Dr Woods goal with these debates. It's to get a Muslim admit to the extreme side of Islam so that ordinary people will be aware of what's in the korään and hadiths, we see both Muslims and non Muslims react to these debates with both disgust and surprise. This is the big picture behind Dr Wood's tactics, it's not about "winning", it's about exposing.
@@nemesis1291 precisely
@@nemesis1291 It's called coping...
@@nemesis1291 cope.
Embarrassed who the guy literally admitted that Islam requires the violent persecutions of non believers
DW was waffling multiple times throughout the debate. An attentive observer should notice that he was clearly caught and didn't have a good response to several arguments.
Correct, numerous times where he would start stuttering and then turn it back against Islam or the good ole “iTs iRrEleVant” instead of actually addressing the point. Deluded, may Allah have mercy on him and those who blindly follow his lies.
It is IDOLATROUS for Muslims to prostrate and pray in the direction of the the blackstone (Hajr e aswad)
Moses warned about the IDOLATRY of bowing to a stone image:
“Ye shall make you no idols nor graven image, neither rear you up a standing image, neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to BOW down unto it: for I am the LORD your God."
Leviticus 26:1
Secondly, the blackstone imitates the divine attributes of Jesus Christ the Son of God which makes the blackstone BLASPHEMOUS.
What is the coincidence that at the very least, 4 titles of Jesus known centuries and millenia earlier are EXACTLY as those TRANSFERRED to the blackstone (Haji e aswad) which Muhammad began to idolize in the 7th century without any instruction for him to do so?
JESUS CHRIST
1. Jesus is referred to as the CORNER STONE of the church [Ephesians 2:19-21]
2. Jesus EXPIATED sins [Mark 2:5-7]
3. Jesus is seated on the 'RIGHT HAND ' of God [Luke 23:69
4. He is the VISIBLE image of the INVISIBLE God [Colossians 1:15]
BLACKSTONE
1. It is positioned as a CORNER STONE
2. EXPIATES SINS.[al-Bukhaari, 4987]
3. It is called yamin-Allah (THE RIGHT HAND OF GOD!).
4. It is the VISIBLE IMAGE of the INVISIBLE Allah.
Allah never knew about the sacrificial system practiced after Abraham for the forgiveness of sins because he is ignorant about the Passover Feast and the Day of Atonement. That's why Allah's copy of Abraham went on to build an IDOLATROUS Kaaba where one could kiss a stone to have their sins "expiated" [al-Bukhaari, 4987]
The Hajr e aswad is an ABOMINATION through which billions of Muslims everyday are misled to commit IDOLATRY and BLASPHEMY against the true God who said to Moses:
“Say this to the people of Israel: ‘The Lord, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is my NAME FOREVER, and thus I am to be remembered THROUGHOUT ALL GENERATIONS. Exodus 3:15
In which Surah or ayat does the Qur'an use this special and signature name of God?
@@TheWatchmanWebsite Nowhere in Islam does this blackstone you speak of hold any significance other than it's value as a historical relic. You're doing some massive mental gymnastics when in reality the Kaaba is a direction of worship for muslims to pray towards. Allah, al Ilah, the God, your God, is who we pray and seek refuge from. It is CHRISTIANS who have attributed images, and FALSE images at that, to their creator. Shame on you, for lowering the Lord in his status, exalted is he. The churches are full of statues and rituals that you have ascribed a high status to. Stop spreading your propaganda and embrace Islam before it's too late.
@@mhmd7028 Friend, I referred to Saheeh hadith clearly stating that the blackstone "expiates sins". So is it just a relic? Wasn't it once white but became black because of the sins of the sons of Adam?
2. Won't it be given eyes and a mouth to testify on the day of judgment? Is it just a relic?
3. Where in the Qur'an can we find the special name of God:
“Say this to the people of Israel: ‘The Lord, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is my NAME FOREVER, and thus I am to be remembered THROUGHOUT ALL GENERATIONS. Exodus 3:15
@@TheWatchmanWebsiteAllah SWT expiated sins for touching the black stone not the black stone. "Touching the black stone is an expiation of sins" not the black stone expiated sins, don't change the wording of hadith because then it's not sahih but da'if and a fabrication/lie.
Personally I don't think our beloved Muslims brothers should entertain him, he just here for his paycheck. He got smack down by Hijab, Sheikh Uthman and now still being arrogant as ever. If he's sincere he will concede and learn Islam.
true, but the thing is the more he gets humiliated over and over again, it benefits him in terms of money. Remember, even clowns need to make a living!
@@commandar88 that's for him, what's for us ? As the brother or sister said we should not entertain him or his dumb audience, I bet all of Daniel's intellectual arguments went straight over their closed heads.
@@andydufresne4444 I won't lie, I was surprised to see this video in my feed because I didn't expect them to debate a topic again. I thought TH-cam was recommending the old video..
I don't want him to do that. David is so entertaining. I love to see him push other Christians towards Islam.
Daniel seems to make logical sense within the boundaries -laws of nature.
What does that even mean?
@@sonny7159 exactly what it says.
@@bones4464 Write out the laws of nature for me...
@@sonny7159 human nature ya bozo. Pretty soon you liberals won’t even be able to identity that either 😂
@@sonny7159 I’ll give you few laws:
Law of gravity - what goes up at some point comes down- including one’s power too
law of repelling - resist to exist (to avoid being bullied-qanun ad daffa) mentioned in surah Baqarah
Law of preparation- anyone who fails to prepare has got to be prepared to fail (read the tafsir for ‘wal asr’)
Law of motivation- appreciation is the best motivation eg: (employee relationship with employer)
Law of attraction- opposites attract: I.e the magnetic field -North Pole attracts the South Pole hence opposite genders attract too.
Etc……..
I love how hammerhead and apuss’s supporters try to use giant words in their arguments to sound smart when their entire arguments are clearly biased against Islam and they refuse to try and understand it
@cat valentine 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
@cat valentine This is more like a bot.
@cat valentine
Bye bye every -ism :)
@cat valentine 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 frustrated cow worshipper who has been crying for three days for the cow who was butchered by us and then made rista and goshtaba out of that...
@@Saarimul_masloolUnapologetic "logic error"
Just ignore them😅
It seems to me wa Allahu a3lam:
Christian missionaries are indirectly bearers of Islam, or I've heard that people have come to Islam through their sermons... I'm noticing it more and more often in English-speaking countries as well as here in Germany.
Alhamdulillah
When the Jews lived under Christians Empires the Jews where oppressed the Muslims helped the Jews and 3 Jewish tribes in Medina left Syria because of oppression from Byzantine empire they left and went to Medina.
@@briceboutet7810 the historical fact on the ground says otherwise.. jews have their golden age under muslim land! You can't compare it with christian lands which was marred with massacres and genocide against jews. To put it bluntly jews have a cultural,psychological and social consubstantiallity with muslims! You can ask the mizrahi and sephardic fathers for confirmation, baruch Ata Adonai!
I love how David Wood is against Jizya or imprisonment, but is okay with Tax or imprisonment.
The opening statement from Daniel was on point.
Regardless of the topic the truth will not bend to anyone's parameters.
Glad you mentioned it. At the end of the day it's up to each person to decide whether they want to actually listen or brush off everything they just heard.
@@mhmd7028 Exactly, when people start coming up with fake problems like gender fluid and all that nonsense while people on the other side of the world are starving to death due to the hypocrisy of certain governments. Then you best believe certain 'agendas' will be swept away like the dust they are to make way for the root of the problem.
@@briceboutet7810 Yeah right, America, UK, France and other colonised half the world with their wars yet you single out Muslims.
Do you know your history?
I agree to some degree with you, fascism, supremacy, and democracy do not work because they are man-made systems of ruling.
The only thing that will work is if mankind rules by laws and legislations which have been prescribed by God. Which are the Quran and Sunnah.
Today's bibles have been corrupted and are not the original aramaic text which they were revealed to Jesus (may peace, mercy, and blessings be upon him).
The supremacy belongs to God, The Supreme.
@@briceboutet7810 You are ignorant because you think that Saudi Arabia are operating under the Quran and the Sunnah, they are not.
In fact, no muslim majority country is operating under the laws of the Quran and Sunnah at this time.
If Saudi truly were then they wouldn't be at war with Yemen who are their Muslim brothers and sister, they would've sent military support to Palistian years ago, and they would not normalise ties with the USA who constantly oppress the muslims.
You bring Saudi as the example but they are not any example, so therefore your ignorance on this matter debases your claims on the other matters which you have mentioned.
@@briceboutet7810 We are all human beings my friend. Different skin colors still bleed the same color. No one is better than anyone else except in terms of how much they worship the creator. Look far enough in your own DNA and you'll find there's no such things as "pure" in terms of race.
May Allah will give David hidayah and open his heart for the path of the beauty of Islam.. he learned a lot about Islam but his heart still like a stone.. don't be like Abu Lahab, David..Don't be arrogant like him after you find the truth.. I give a big respect to Daniel for his great job here 🙏
Daniel is an enemy of Islam. he is falsely claiming that Islam wages war against people just because of their non belief... this has been refuted countless number of times.
It is rather unfortunate that David uses his seemingly confident act for profit rather than truth. However keep in mind, and I say this sincerely, David is a diagnosed psychopath. We must keep in mind that pathological lying is in his nature. Who other than Allah knows what his true intentions are. May Allah guide him and his sheep to the truth.
Amiin my beloved brother
@@briceboutet7810 Short Answer: Allah loves the patient, the steadfast, the doers of good, those who act justly, those who purify themselves and repent regularly, those who are righteous/God-fearing, the God-conscious, those who do what their Creator asked them to do and refrain from what He prohibited them from doing...
Allah loves the humans that have any of these qualities,and that's what we strive for in Islam.
He has kibr.
Failed as a Christian, failed as a debater, failed as a person of integrity overall, given The extreme level of hypocrisy and double standards that He Demonstrated, he showed his true colors as a secular liberal defender, no respect for Christian values.
Even James white finds David jihadi.wood disgusting...why Muslims want to engage/debate with him...
@@Kate.762 i don't know he doesn't even sound like a true christian
@@asm4912 if you r talking about David jihadi.wood, he's doing it for $$$ ..
@@Kate.762 did you see his face when danial destroyed him by his own argument 😂
Sup folks
It’s kinda orgasmic to see the chad Daniel with his stunning drip debating. Always exciting, and all I can do is nod in agreement. The man is knowledgeable and it’s very admirable. Insha’Allah I will join his institute soon.
I wonder how many reverts David will help create this time
Ma shaa Allah brother Daniel.
From the beginning destroyed this guy's inconsistent paradigm.
@cat valentine just writing something cannot make an ideology true or false
U have to prove that
Like
I can also say that Hinduism is false
Without proving that it's false
Does that mean that it's really false?
But I can prove that the pantheistic concept of GOD in Hinduism is false
Because
In Hinduism u people believe that everything is GOD because it's created from the power of GOD
That's a complete fallacy
Because there's a criteria to be GOD in first place
Like u have to be uncreated and u have to be independent and self sustaining and u have to be one
U have to be uncreated because how can someone can be GOD if he's created
If something is created then it's existence is dependant on the one who created him
That's why if someone wants to be GOD he has to be uncreated
And GOD has to be one because by definition
If someone wants to be a GOD
Then the attribute of will is essential attribute
And if there are two GODS then two of them would make their own decisions based on their own will
And the decisions would be different because both of them would have their own will and they would fight each other to be the one who's gonna make the ultimate decision
So it's impossible to have two GODS
By the definition of GOD itself
The pantheistic concept of GOD in Hinduism
Make zero sense
Because
Its like saying
"I'm also GOD because me and GOD both exist"
There's a criteria to be GOD in first place
And a human and anything that's contingent cannot be GOD
Because Its against the definition of GOD
To be dependant,to be created, to be more than one,to have someone like him
The pantheistic concept of GOD in Hinduism is just like saying
"I'm also dog,rat,pigeon,pig,raccoon,bull etc
Because me and every animal are living things"
@@nayeemather1252 The last line you said that I'm a dog, monkey and other animals bro they believe that we are living in 3 realms but experiencing only 1😑
@@shaikhfaizan3405 that's also a non sense concept
@cat valentine
Bye bye every -ism :)
@cat valentine cow dung tribe
Salam Alykum
Wow what an unexpected argument 🤣, i did not expect that brother Daniel, i was shocked so does David, I guess.
Mashaa Allah!
No offence, but you being a Muslim, if Daniel had simply farted at every question posed by the Christian, you would still have said he won the debate. That's tribalism.
The problem when a jew or Christman complains about apostasy when dotronomy 13 6 tells us about it
@cat valentine Hinduism 😂 …. Hinduism is another form of Xtianity Trimurti AKA trinity… Both heretics! JeZeus and Gayshirrii Kisssmyass
I dont think apostacy works like that in islam, just beacuse converting to another religion we have to kill them? Its not how its implemented, i heard there were spies to get information pretending to be muslims so if you see those guys kill em, its not like just they leave islam we should kill em, thats so barbaric and goes against the Qur'an
@cat valentine if we sign up, when do we get our first cow dung bath?
@@cjamo65able why cowdung bath? Do you get to eat their god... cow.. ?
@cat valentine
Bye bye every -ism :)
David Wood always stammered... and he seems unconvinced about his religion
To be honest I think that he might fall ont the category of atheist Christian.
@cat valentine 😆😆Robot
@@athenavdj4123 Exactly he only wants money
Of course he is not congratulation that jesus died for sins after lies and propaganda he spread...he knows he ain't gonna go away with that 😂🤷♀️
@cat valentine Go worship ur cow 🐄🤢🤢and hate on the British who raped ur country not on us
I don’t even need to watch the whole debate, Daniel’s Opening statement itself was enough to show who won.
Watch his whole statement before commenting
David Wood: Disparages and mocks Qur'an from 1:00 to 11:59. Proves that Qur'an (2:120) is true at 12:00
No offence, but you being a Muslim, if Daniel had simply farted at every question posed by the Christian, you would still have said he won the debate. That's tribalism.
2:07:05 Heard that verse and went to read it and understand the argument from Tafheem ul Quran by Maulana Abul Ala Maududi, what a great insight I got to know from that verse and beauty of the term "Nasara" which I thought that others should also know.
_(Translation of interpretation of the verse)_ "We also took a covenant from those who said: 'We are Christians';1 but they forgot a good portion of the teaching they had been imparted with. Wherefore We aroused enmity and spite between them till the Day of Resurrection, and ultimately Allah will tell them what they had contrived."
Taken from the *footnote* of Tafheem ul Qur'an - 5:14:
"Some are of the opinion that the word Nasara (meaning Christians) is derived from Nasirah (Nazareth), the birth-place of the Messiah. In fact this word is not derived from Nasirah (Nazareth) but from the word nusrah, and the basis of this derivation is the question posed by the Messiah to his disciples: 'Who are my supporters (ansari) in the way of God?' In response to this they had said: 'We are the supporters (ansar) (in the way) of God.' Christian authors have been misled by the resemblance between the words Nasirah and Nasara into believing that the name of the sect founded in the early history of Christianity, and contemptuously characterized as either Nazarenes or Ebonites served as the basis of the Qur'anic designation of the Christians. But here the Qur'an categorically states that they had declared that they were 'Nasara' and it is obvious that the Christians never called themselves 'Nazarenes'. In this connection it should be recalled that Jesus never called his followers 'Christians' for he had not come to found a new religion named after him. His mission was to revive the religion of Moses and of all the Prophets who preceded him as well as of the one who was to appear after him. Hence, he neither formed any cult divorced from the Israelites and the followers of the Mosaic Law nor designated his followers by any distinctive name. Likewise, his early followers neither considered themselves to be separate from the Israelite community nor developed into an independent group nor adopted any distinctive symbol and name. They worshipped in the temple of Jerusalem along with other Jews and considered themselves to be followers of the Mosaic Law (see Acts 3:1-10; 21: 14-15,21). Later on the process of alienation began to operate on both sides. On the one hand, Paul, one of the followers of Jesus, declared independence from the Mosaic Law holding that faith in Christ was all that one needed for salvation. On the other hand, the Jewish rabbis declared the followers of Christ to be heretics and excommunicated them. Despite this, for some time the new sect had no distinct appellation of its own. The followers of Christ variously described themselves as 'disciples', as 'brethren', as 'those who believed', and as 'saints' (see Acts 2: 44; 4: 32; 9: 26; 11: 29; 13: 52; 15: 1; 23: 1 and Romans 15: 25 and Colossians 1: 2). The Jews sometimes designated them as 'Galileans' and as 'the sect of Nazarenes' (see Acts 24: 5; Luke 13: 2). These nicknames, which were originally contrived in order to ridicule them, referred to Nazareth, the home town of Jesus in the district of Galilee. These names, however, did not gain sufficient popularity to become the permanent names of the followers of Christ. They were called 'Christians' for the first time by the people of Antioch in 43 A.D. or 44 A.D. when Paul and Barnabas went there and began to preach their religion (Acts 11: 26). This appellation was flung at them by the opponents of the followers of Christ precisely in order to tease them by using an appellation which was unacceptable to them. But when their enemies began to call them consistently by this name their leaders reacted by saying that if they were called Christians because of their allegiance to Christ they had no reason to be ashamed of it (1 Peter 4: 16). It was thus that the followers of Christ also gradually began to call themselves by the same name which had originally been conferred upon them sarcastically. In the course of time the Christians ceased to realize that theirs had originally been a derogatory appellation chosen for them by outsiders rather than by themselves. The Qur'an, therefore, does not refer to the followers of Christ as Christians. It reminds them rather that they belong to those who responded to the query of Jesus: 'Who are my supporters (ansari) in the way of God?' by saying that they were his ansar (supporters) in God's cause. See (Surah al-Saff 61: 14 - Ed.) It is an irony of fate that far from feeling grateful at being referred to by a dignified appellation Christian missionaries take offence at the fact that the Qur'an designates them as Nasara rather than as 'Christians'."
Subhan'Allah!
Lovely!! This makes lot of sense and in line with other parts of the Quran.
Read ibn katheer or tabari or Al-Saadi instead of mawdoodi--he didn't believe in the caliphate and pushed for democracy in islam. Many ikhwaani people consider him to be their imam.
This is the first time I watch any of this debate stuff (just isn’t my cup of tea), but I’m kind of pleasantly surprised, I expected content like this to just be yelling and insults and immaturity, but Daniel is actually surprisingly eloquent
I’ve seen some shit about David but he ain’t too bad tbf.
_Again and again .. david you just added more holes in the christian wall_
Woodie stated he wants a system that's the best for the most people. So basically whatever the largest group of people desire even things explicitly against Christianity like abortion, LGBT, etc. I don't think he realizes the implications of what he says half the time
Great point... Islam deals with the real world, not the fantasy world where wars and violence do not exist and everyone live in perfect harmony!
yeah it's so ok to do endless war for take money from others and take slaves if they fight for theire lifes and lose. daniel just show islam is as bad as any other shitty system. great.
@@davidjeanmichel8358
Endless war and take money from others and take slaves ( prisoners in abu gareeb and gwantanamo) .... you talking about USA and the west for sure hhhh yet no one talks shit about them
And no ... Islam does not promote "endless war" and jizya is just like taxes that you're paying right now to your own government... and slaves are treated far much better then the iraqis prisoners were tortured by Americans...
I don't know what planet does not yave wars and laws and people conquering each other's lands ... but it's not earth!
@@serine4044 my country france never participate in iraki war. but when america do bad things it's not the core of the value of america to do this, and peoples don't see it at the norm, as a project, or like if it was a desirable norm.
daniel is saying infinite conquest, war and slavery are the project of islam. He accepted it, you don't.
i think you are in pure cognitiv dissonance.
and worst, you chose to compare prisoners and slaves, i know for muslim it's basicaly the same thing, but in many country in the world it's not and we don't conflate this with slavery.
and no jizya is not "just a tax" it's a tax who is way higher than the tax for muslim... it's not just the same tax for everyone. it'swhy some caliphate were stoping the right to convert for christians in andalusia, for keep more taxes and possibles slaves.
it's the level of dishonesty of muslims.
you are just saying "hey look how america had do shitty things in irak for 10 years, we are just as great than them but for us it's our ultimate ideal to do theses things for eternity".
GREAT. So fkin GREAT. What a good model.
irak war stop at a point and it's considered like an illegal war (haram for west), but not islamic conquest if muslims really follow islam and they are hallal for muslims as daniel show it.
I'm just happy that FINALY some muslims admit what islam is about aïicha, slavery and conquest. it was long.
@@davidjeanmichel8358
Oh lala t'es français .. Vraiment ! Mdr.. bonjour monsieur, je suis Algérienne hhhhh the irony !!
So yeah, no need to explain more why I strongly believe that you are the last one to lecture me on ethics and tolerance during war, it may take pages of examples from your own history....
I mean Americans are basically angels compared to the French barbarism ! Hhhhh sorry I can't take this seriously anymore...and I am the one in cognitive dissonance !! Hhhhhh
And who is to give the norms what to do and not to do during wars ? Geneva convention?? And before that??
14 centuries ago The prophet pbuh set a code for wars for muslims to follow (I encarouge you to go read it ) ...
And jizya is higher than zakat ?? Any evidence? Caliphate stopped Christians from converting! Same .. any evidence for such claims?
And as muslim I do believe that our "ultimate project" is to spread Islam to all humanity. .. but it doesn't always have to be through wars , and indeed it wasn't ... Malaysia, Indonesia, west Africa. .... these countries accepted Islam through interactions with traders ..
There maybe some black marks in Islamic history... I won't deny it, but compared to all others throughout history( including the shitty Americans hhhh ) muslims and Islam are far tolerant and peaceful..... and i dare you to give me better civilisations with zero violence ... from real life and from history. .. not the ideal world that does not exist.
@@serine4044 tu connais basile blandine ?
sinon tu es en train de réfuter tout ce qu'a dit le type de la vidéo pour amoindrir la réalité, et la réalité c'est ce que daniel hakimachin reconnait
pour les preuves sur la jizya va voir la chaine "averoes" c'est un musulman spécialiste de la periode andalouse musulmane, et très honnête. en tout cas il est maghrébin.
quand a ce qu'a fait la france en algérie c'est ce que tous les califats ont fait, et en moins dur, car nous on a abolit de force l'esclavage chez vous.
vous vous avez colonisé et esclavagisé le sud de l'europe des siècles, en ciblant particulièrement les femmes et surtout les blondes. :)
Great debate. May Allah (SWT) reward you for your efforts, Ustādh Daniel. Ameen!
😂😂😂😂
@@danialassyrian4867 aye my lindu minion 🤩
@@revertDaWOOD 😂😂😂
Alhamdulillah, what a significant growth in subscribers!
@cat valentine I physically cringed, I’ve never had a reaction like that to a comment
@@zephaurith5591 this is a bot.
@@athenavdj4123 that is actually an indian hindu. throwing cow dung at each other is a part of their worship.
@cat valentine if we sign up, when do we get our first cow dung bath?
@cat valentine
Bye bye every -ism :)
Love brother Daniel's mindset. Refreshing cuts lies. It exposes others hypocrisy and hatred against Islam ☪️
Daniel. You need to keep going, this is the most lacking part of the dawah towards both muslims and non-muslims, because most are afraid of other than Allah. People are indoctrinate and suppressed through institutions and your work is of out most necessity, i cannot express how important this is, May Allah grant you steadfastness and beneficial knowledge.
David: I ain’t your “dhemee” ذمي .
Daniel: maybe soon.
Hahahah 😂😂
David Wood is not eligible to such a title because he insults the prophet
@@convert2islaam500 if caliphate takes over im sure he ll claim to be convinced by islam, and he ll convert
Even the moderator laughed lol
which min?
David Wood earns a living, not by promoting Christianity, but by taking cheap shots at Muslims. He likes to make it personal. I just fast forward thru his prattle. It's always the same tacky stick. Mr. Haqiqatjou on the other hand, although smug, at least tells it like it is. He is the President and founder of Reality Check 101 with a minor in Calling Out Hypocrites. Al- Haqq Mr. Wood, "This above all to thine own self be true and it shall follow as the night the day thou canst not be false to any man." The Bard.
“hypocrisy” refers to the act of claiming to believe something but acting in a different manner. The word is derived from the Greek term for “actor”-literally, “one who wears a mask”-in other words, someone who pretends to be what he is not.
The Bible calls hypocrisy a sin. There are two forms hypocrisy can take: that of professing belief in something and then acting in a manner contrary to that belief, and that of looking down on others when we ourselves are flawed.
@@atan9258 Thanks for the share. I've never seen Mr. Wood wearing a mask but I have seen him masquerading in women's attire and I do believe he was quite proud of his performance. So if the shoe fits.....
MASHALLAH brother Daniel may Allah grant you jannatul firdaus .
@JoeM lol what?
Ameen.
@JoeM What do you believe is in heaven?
@JoeM When you mention "enjoy everything good" would that not include intimate relations?
@JoeM Did God not create Adam and his wife to dwell together in paradise? (May peace, mercy, and blessings be upon them both).
I wish you never give david a platform, he is not a respectful person
David is helping good Christians and Atheists convert to Islam.
TRUST ME.
So he thinks he is working against Islam but in reality he is comforting evil human beings that have already made up their minds to not accept the Truth
David Wood is no longer promoting Christianity.
Definitely secularism/liberalism
Excellent Daniel u completely exposed David Woods ignorance.
Please pray for Indian muslim sisters to win their right to wear Hijab in educational institutions
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮
May Allah protect and prepare jannah for you guys amiin
All David’s points has been answered to death in the past 5 years. Yet he insist to remain ignorant. I fast forwarded Wood’s introduction after the first two minutes. A broken record.
The Islamic answers are nothing but poor justifications.
@@mightbyson give me one example and let me break down so I can iron it for you.
@@Just_logic Daniel justified taking concubines by "increasing fertility rates" in one of his debates. It couldn't be more ridiculous.
Another one is Muhammad's marriage from Zaynab to prohibit adoption.
Last but not least, the gymnastics done to justify those women who give themselves to Muhammad. God's scriptures were very convenient to Mo, and Aisha acknowledged that.
Your iron is cold and broken.
@@mightbyson so basically you are saying if you don’t accept the rational, then the rational is not valid. Seriously??
I say stick to ironing
@@mightbyson
With regards to the concubine, that was not the justification he gave. Or at least not the only justification. The concubine concept is that there were many women left behind with out a guardian. There were no prison back then. So they were taken as concubine and treated as a wife. This has been explained to death. For those that have an open ears.
And the Justification for Zaynab is correct. No one is seeking your approval.
Daniel bro why reengage with this disingenuous person. Once was understandable but now why give him a forum for his nonsense. Plus he is niether an intellectual nor informed, just a low grade waffler seeking attention to make money.
@cat valentine thanks for increasing the algo by the number of comments you add 🤣🤣
@cat valentine
Bye bye every -ism :)
Am I the only one who noticed that david tried so hard to show off his mug which has "Jihadi tears" on it, but no one really gave a single damn about it. Lmao.
*You did great brother Daniel. May Allah protect you*
nice! this guy is amazing at debates. learned alot from him
Richard Spencer vs Daniel Haqiqatjou. Make it happen!
I’m sure it’s Robert spencer. Anyway he wouldn’t dare. After watching this
Yes your dream fulfilled
David already conceded that everything is okay if God ordered it, so on what basis does he object to anything really...
He objects to the common saying of Muslims that Islam is a religion of peace.
Mashallah, brother Daniel do be looking drippy In these debates
@cat valentine Hinduism ?
Hinduism is more of culture than an actual religion lol , outside of India there is very little Hinduism. Can Hinduism even be considered a global religion .
@cat valentine
Bye bye every -ism :)
@cat valentine Haha very funny..........
ماشاء الله بارك الله. مواكبة هذا العمل الجيد. حب من الهند. 🕋🇮🇳🕌🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 🕋🇮🇳🕌🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
I don't know why we give such people publicity. Giving him a platform is just giving one more attention than he deserves.
Attention is bad for a fool. The ppl who aren't lost causes only get exposed to the fact that he is a fool. The point is for ppl who already watch him to start seeing how much of a fool he is
I agree, there is no need for Daniel to engage with someone who HATES Allah, his messenger and his deen.
But through this, a lot of people learn Islam
I think one thing David doesn't get is that from the perspective of the Law sometimes it is better to punish people with death and harsh penalties. Better for their own soul, this is a form of repentance.
That totally depends on what side of the fence you are standing.
@@nemesis1291 you r very charged against Islam. Poor you.
@@wannabesage5870 charged?
David's god punishes children for the crimes of their ancestors in the old testement so i don't know what he's objecting about.
@@abhmd4481 The Amalekites and the midiantes committed a terrible sin against Israel. When the nation was weak and vulnerable the Amalekites attacked the weakest and most vulnerable of the nation (Deuteronomy 25:18). They did this for no reasons except violence and greed. God hates it when the strong take cruel advantage over the weak, especially when the weak are His people. God waited 7 generations in order to give the Amalekites a chance to repent, but nothing changed during 400 years. The children grew up and became like their parents. Not only did the Amalekites attack and kill women and children, the old and the weak, their priests where sorcerers and practiced satanic deeds. They where known to transform into livestock and animals, this is why they where to be killed as well.
Excellent job bro, may Allah accept from you and increase you in wisdom
No offence, but you being a Muslim, if Daniel had simply farted at every question posed by the Christian, you would still have said he won the debate. That's tribalism.
@@shaz2761 yes just by making an effort for the muslim Ummah that's an excellent job.
Islam ☪️ is true religion our creator is only Allah ❤ ❤❤❤❤❤
nah lol
@@swordsofrevealinglight4611 lets find out lol
@@apatheticpanda182 what you got?
@@swordsofrevealinglight4611 when we die
To summarise these debates it really is Logic (Daniel) against emotion (Guest Speakers)
I think this was Daniels weakest debate so far yet he exposed David.
The topic was "Does Islam require violent prosecution of Christianity?"
David started with usual bandwagon against Islam. To respond that, Daniel admit to all that and saying regardless Islam is the best solution, but imo Daniel needed to expand on that because the average Muslims and the Woods audience won't know why Daniel saying this is the best solution.
I would have really liked if Daniel were pinning David to prove at least one of his allegations against Islam instead of Daniels strategy " I give you that, but you can't provide any better alternatives".
For example pin David to explain how is paying a few bucks in Jizya as opposed to thousands in tax is violent prosecution against Christian for protection against outside enemies?
Also Daniel said Islam will invade when it needs to, this needs to be phrased appropriately, so far what I come across abt Islam expansion is that, Islam only interfered when it needed to establish justice & peace (that is self defence & stop aggression) but just labeling it as "Invade" sounds like those bloody crusades of Christianity.
We shouldn't lump Islam with anything as Daniel normally won't do.
But at this point Daniel is allowed to have one weaker performance because so far he has been absolute 🔥 fire against all the propaganda labelled to Islam.
You must have watched a different debate to deny the nuance that was discussed.
Daniel made wood admit that what he claims about Islam is part of the political reality of the world thar includes Christianity. All wood is doing is exposing his bias
I dont want to live in an islamic controlled country. I am Roman Catholic and i will not pay no jizziah tax and i will not convert to islam… according to islam then i would be persecuted / enslaved. No thanks but islam is not a religion of peace. Islam goal is to subjugate the world and when its in the minority it tries to paint itself as candy colored rainbow drops. I respect all religions but i draw the line when a religion wants to subjugate me and impose on me its dictatorship.
I dont want to live in an islamic controlled country. I am Roman Catholic and i will not pay no jizziah tax and i will not convert to islam… according to islam then i would be persecuted / enslaved. No thanks but islam is not a religion of peace. Islam goal is to subjugate the world and when its in the minority it tries to paint itself as candy colored rainbow drops. I respect all religions but i draw the line when a religion wants to subjugate me and impose on me its dictatorship.
Danial is honest about all political systems including Islaam. You just missed his point.
By the way may Allah reward you Daniel you did an amazing job as always.
46:19 That question changed David Wood into ' I-Wood ' (47:08) .
Daniel got him there really well.
No offence, but you being a Muslim, if Daniel had simply farted at every question posed by the Christian, you would still have said he won the debate. That's tribalism.
@@shaz2761 Absolutely. Because his fart makes more sense than what D-Wood utters from his mouth. ~No offense~
It has nothing to do with tribalism, etc. Rather it has to do more with good vs evil. And we all need to choose a side.
Subhanallah 33x
Alhamdulillah 33x
Allahuakbar 33x
Astagfirullah 33x
Muhammad ﷺ is objectively the greatest and the most influential human in history. He unified Arabia, transformed a backward desert dwelling tribal society into one nation which obliterated and brought to it’s knees two world superpowers (Rome and Persia) and established itself as a new political and spiritual superpower for centuries and still counting. He brought laws, morals, dietary system, societal regulations, dress code and a complete way of life that 2 billion people vigorously follow to this day. He brought a book which is a linguistic miracle that serves as a basis for modern Arabic grammar and which became and still remains the most read book in history that is memorized by tens of millions of people to this day.
He was an excellent and unmatched politician, statesman, diplomat, warrior, general (never lost a battle), commander, public speaker, businessman, religious preacher, devoted husband, loyal companion, loving father and a faithful friend. He was loved by his followers and family and was respected by his enemies.
And he did all that while being a desert dwelling orphan in the middle of nowhere, who couldn’t read or write and without attending no universities or having any human mentors or guides.
📢 Opinions of prominent non-Muslims about Prophet Muhammad ﷺ 🔊
1⃣ Michael H. Hart, American astrophysicist, author, historian, researcher, Christian.
He wrote a book titled “The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History”, where he compares biographies, achievements, legacies and influence of the greatest people in history in order to find out the greatest one.
He puts Prophet Muhammad ﷺ number 1. For basically the same reasons I mentioned.
2⃣ William Montgomery Watt, Scottish Orientalist, historian, academic and Anglican priest. From 1964 to 1979, he was Professor of Arabic and Islamic studies at the University of Edinburgh.
“His readiness to undergo persecutions for his beliefs, the high moral character of the men who believed in him and looked up to him as leader, and the greatness of his ultimate achievement - all argue his fundamental integrity. To suppose Muhammad an impostor raises more problems than it solves. Moreover, none of the great figures of history is so poorly appreciated in the West as Muhammad”
3⃣ George Bernard Shaw, Irish writer, winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1925.
“I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much-needed peace and happiness.”
4⃣ James Maurice Gavin, Lieutenant General of United States Army, Christian.
“Among leaders who have made the greatest impact through ages, I would consider Muhammad before Jesus Christ.”
5⃣ Jules Masserman, United States psychoanalyst and professor of the Chicago University, Jew.
Time magazine in July 15, 1974, in an article titled “Who were history's greatest leaders?”
He writes :
“Leaders must fulfill three functions :
1) Provide for the well being of the led.
2) Provide a social organization in which people feel relatively secure.
3) And provide them with one set of beliefs.
People like Pasteur and Salk are leaders in the first sense. People like Gandhi and Confucius, on one hand, and Alexander and Caesar on the other, are leaders in the second and perhaps the third sense. Jesus and Buddha belong in the third category alone. Perhaps the greatest leader of all time was Muhammad, who combined all three functions. To a lesser degree, Moses did the same."
6⃣ Mahatma Gandhi, a Hindu, as well as Indian lawyer, leader of anti-colonial movement and political ethicist who employed nonviolent resistance to lead the successful campaign for India’s freedom from British slavery, persecution and oppression, and to later inspire movements for civil rights and freedom across the world.
"I wanted to know the best of the life of one who holds today an undisputed sway over the hearts of millions of mankind... I became more than ever convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the Prophet, the scrupulous regard for pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and his mission.
These and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every obstacle. When I closed the second volume of the Prophet's biography, I was sorry there was no more for me to read of that great life."
7⃣ Thomas Carlyle, Scottish writer, historian and philosopher.
Prophet Muhammad ﷺ found a place in his book titled "The Hero as Prophet" 1840. In his work, Carlyle outlined Muhammad ﷺ as a Hegelian agent of reform, insisting on his sincerity and commenting "how one man single-handedly, could weld warring tribes and wandering Bedouins into a most powerful and civilized nation in less than two decades"
As an introductory remark in the beginning of his book Carlyle says he chose to write about Muhammad because he was free to speak about him because there was no danger of “any of us becoming Muhammedans”
“As there is no danger of our becoming, any of us, Muhammadans (i.e. Muslim), I mean to say all the good of him I justly can.”
Carlyle writes :
“To the Arab Nation it was as a birth from darkness into light. Arabia first became alive by means of it. A poor shepherd people, roaming unnoticed in its deserts since the creation of the world. A Hero-Prophet was sent down to them with a word they could believe. See, the unnoticed becomes world-notable, the small has grown world-great. Within one century afterwards, Arabia is at Grenada (Spain) on this hand; at Delhi (India) on that; - glancing in valor and splendor and the light of genius, Arabia shines through long ages over a great section of the world. Belief is great, life-giving. The history of a Nation becomes fruitful, soul-elevating, great, so soon as it believes. These Arabs, that man Muhammad, and that one century, - is it not as if a spark had fallen, one spark, on a world of what seemed black unnoticeable sand; but lo, the sand proves explosive powder, blazes heaven-high from Delhi to Grenada! The Great Man Muhammad was as lightning out of Heaven; the rest of men waited for him like fuel, and then they too would flame.”
“It is a great shame for anyone to listen to the accusation that Islam is a lie and that Muhammad was a fabricator and a deceiver. We saw that he remained steadfast upon his principles, with firm determination; kind and generous, compassionate, pious, virtuous, with real manhood, hardworking and sincere. Besides all these qualities, he was lenient with others, tolerant, kind, cheerful and praiseworthy and perhaps he would joke and tease his companions. He was just, truthful, smart, pure, magnanimous and present-minded; his face was radiant as if he had lights within him to illuminate the darkest of nights; he was a great man by nature who was not educated in a school nor nurtured by a teacher as he was not in need of any of this.”
“Our current hypothesis about Muhammad, that he was a scheming Impostor, a Falsehood incarnate, that his religion is a mere mass of quackery and fatuity, begins really to be now untenable to any one. The lies, which well-meaning zeal has heaped round this man, are disgraceful to ourselves only.
The word this man spoke has been the life-guidance now of a hundred and eighty millions of men these twelve hundred years. These hundred and eighty millions were made by God as well as we.
Are we to suppose that it was a miserable piece of spiritual trickery, this which so many creatures of the Almighty have lived by and died by? I, for my part, cannot form any such supposition.
One would be entirely at a loss what to think of this world at all, if quackery so grew and were sanctioned here. More godless theory, I think, was never promulgated in this Earth. A false man found a religion? Why, a false man cannot build a brick house! It will fall straightway.”
David Wood must have a humiliation fetish. Don’t see why else someone would be this adamant about getting humiliated routinely.
@cat valentine anyone with the minimum critical thinking abilities of an 8 year old laughs at the notion that you worship rats and monkeys. Biggest joke of a “religion”
@cat valentine typical Paulian embracing paganism
@@haideraliibnakhlaq8823 this peanut butter is attention seeker so don't give him a chance
@cat valentine
Bye bye every -ism :)
I am not gonna even watch this debate, it just pisses me off that one of the biggest preachers of hate against islam in America is involved in a debate about intolerance and hate preaching where he will try to clean his own image when it was made clear to everyone how intolerant he is towards muslims
Daniel should explain those verses from the Quran, that David mentioned in the beginning. About fighting non Muslims, and pay retribution. Instead, he said " others r doing this,or that" why can't Muslims do it".
He's not required to justify everything. Muslim apolgists are to explain the religion in the manner of conveying the message, not justify why we believe that because it looks or sounds harsh to others. Unlike Christians, just ask them to justify trunity (let alone the clear killings and acts of terrorism persuaded by the bible), they will answer, "well, think of an egg... it has a shell, yolk and white... that's one egg." But when they get stuck, they move on and change the topic.
We know firmly and clearly what we believe. We stand firmly on our religious principles. Others are astray. Happy?
MA
I am sure I can help you here.
Muslims were persecuted and oppressed but didn't fight back after thirteen these verses were revealed for the Muslims to stand up fight and defend themselves. So all the verses about fighting in the Quran are for self defence..
For too long critics and those who have hatred for Islam have generally downplayed the history around the Muslims who suffered persecution in the early period of Makkah in order to make the Muslims in that period as the aggressors when they retaliated against their persecutors.
@@farookdinaully8029 Jazaka Allah khayran. I am Muslim,I read and understand Arabic I know the answer already. My point is for Daniel, to explain to listeners, and focus on Islam ,and purpose of its ideology, not bringing other ideologies, to justify Islam.
@@sameerolail
You are absolutely correct I agree with you t yes Daniel should have explained those verses.