It's funny how the most important thing is if I'm back or not. lol I'm not back. I had time today. If I need to explain myself to all of you - be it. My music PC is still dead. So I needed to find a way to use this gaming PC for music. Which I did, because you can see some videos on my main (music) channel: th-cam.com/channels/l6fuOrFU-Rx_pPF2whebIg.html But I don't have proper speakers in this room. And the speakers I do have are way too large for this room. So I had a lot of spare time to waste while waiting on the solution. And I'm hoping that I'll get to that solution in the next couple of weeks. So no, I'm not back. Don't get used to it. When I have spare time I will make videos on this channel, just as I've said in my goodbye video. idk how much spare time I'll have in the future. ] You guys asked me plenty of times to drop a video here and there. So idk what the issue is now? idk how much spare time I'll have in the future. See ya. Keep on bringing a towel when you're traveling through space!
Yes. Like Scientology, Star Citizen has orgs. If I had a Star Citizen account, I’d start an org call the Sea Org. Only taking members willing to pledge for a contract period of One Billion Years. No more questions, buy an Idris!
The year is 2037. AGI is out, flying cars are common, and humanity has colonized Mars. We can create a full-length movie with just one click. But Star Citizen? Still in alpha.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Star Citizen hasn't had a single year in the past 14 years, where they didn't either lie, deceive or spectacularly fail to meet goals.
This video is golden... All the ships released in the last 5 years have no real use. I'd like to say Yet, but they just said, all ships designed and released are launched into a functioning game loop... LUL
To me this is the most insane aspect of this whole thing. Its been 12 years and over $600,000,000 and they still don't have anything to do!!! Why do backers get so excited when CIG adds BASIC QOL features to a game with NO central purpose? Do they think CIG has been holding on to game play loops for full release all these years?? They spend entire TH-cam videos talking about ship functionality for ships that cost thousands of dollars!! How about, I don't know, actually making a game now?? As someone looking from the outside, and playing this "free fly" event, its painfully obvious its all about selling ships. I was convinced when i went to retrieve my starter ship after blowing up and having to pay to get it out, but it makes you wait, and the price goes down the longer you stand there staring at the screen to click just pay now before it hits 0 to save money... Then you have to wait some more... Why??? There was not one reason (even if it was for "game play" purposes) i could think of to justify that. Ill bet if you pay money IRL all that waiting goes away doesnt it?
Only a SC player who lives under a rock would not know that marketing runs decisions. Still the damn bed spawn is a genius thing with this buggy mess. I have died exiting an airlock so now I will fly my cutty red and not worry about it anymore. BTW, this was well edited, kudos Grumpy!
Possibly, but it's quite a coincidence they decided now to change their med bed plans they have had for a decade at a time when they are also selling a cheap medical vehicle.
@igorpniak8308 they've been probably thinking of it for a long time to fix this tedious gameplay of flying back which takes forever.. But they totally used it to make a lot of money a little slimey but hey cheap in game and only $50 real money.. I see it as essential for lower end players until they can pay for higher tier ships with med beds. I'm okay with this change as to what it means long term
This logic is all well and good, but they have ALREADY REMOVED THIS BEFORE. So if they really are concerned about wasting our time getting back to our bodies, why remove it to begin with??
Were you not there when the cutty red used to respawn, but then they removed it because it was never the intention that all medbeds could do that? I was, and I remember it clear as day.
@@hawkofthereborn43Oh yeah…. Cutty Red, tier 2, only’ tier 2 med beds and tier 3 were able to support respawn location features. Then they completely swapped it… so catty red could only heal tier 2 injuries,, but respawn capability was removed…. So…. Cutty red was absolutely useless at that point. That threw my whole bunker grind fest away for usability…. Now later after the flip-flop reality I was finally just over it…. Blk magic bait and swap / dangle the carrot in front of the sheep was finally just accepted after I had reached what is… “Wing Commander” in Concierge…. And while live streaming our desktop view of our computers, my friend actively speaking and emailing a CIG team member at customer support, where he wanted to buy a ship that was not available on the pledge store and was a limited sale ship when it does become available, he asked for a one-time purchase link specifically to buy more. They instantly responded and told him yes, sent him the one time purchase link, opened the email and bought it which was supposed to be unavailable. I proceed to do the exactly same thing, and I was instantly responded with “we do not do such things, I suggest you wait until it becomes available again next sale time”. Okay…… sure bro Another thought, 2024 this year has seen an explosion of news revelations coming out about various things. Did the Invictus display, at the convention center, really…..need to have to inverted triple 9’s from the jet smoke at the entrance of the place that is designed to display and sell ships for $$$$? I mean the thing that people spent hundreds of hours into this game, grinding rep, and bunker missions…. In order to gain the ability to increase their aUEC wallet cash in the event that a patch resets your in game wallet and you can buy ships again was at least to rank 5 in Security section of runs for lots of people… and then outa the blue, CIG entirely wipes all wallet cash in game, reputation bar progress (while also not including even reputation factors across the board with how factions and station clearance will be accepted if you have good/bad stuff as promised) while ‘also’ increasing the prices of all ships in game and even things like Railgun ammo clips…. If you want 20 Railgun ammo clips, it takes about an entire week long grind f missions credit payouts, to get a portion of that. Here’s my 50 cent and Kat Williams 😅contribution to the convo. o7
@@hawkofthereborn43 Yeah, but the website still advertised the cutty red as a respawn point and they left it that way for years. If this was a ship I would bet they would do their usual thing of waiting until the sale is over then 'discovering' the mistake and reverting it so the bed was useless but of course upselling you to the bigger version coming soon (tm) that would have the functional resapwn bed for only 2x the price. Since it's harder to make a useful (transportable) ground vehicle much fatter than the Ursa, the odds of this happening are low, though not zero. What's more likely is that they'll declare it was a mistake again, remove spawning from the smaller beds but then upgrade this thing to have the better bed, once again juicing ship sales even if this thing is a marketing dead end.
It would be good if they simply said, "We've decided to change this and let players respawn with any medical vehicle." But, to say, "we've always planned this" runs counter to everything said up to this point. Thank you for putting this together.
See this is exactly what they always do... They buff the stuff when it comes in, and then nerf it once everyone buys the ships or vehicles. Salvage for example, was really good and now they are nerfing it. Its not for testing the features, its for selling. Beds are gonna get nerfed when they add ships like apollo and stuff.
Don't worry we're going to get 5 one day, but probably move the planets close together and get rid of not being able to jump in atmo because... well certainly not a new ship or marketing.
This video tells me various things about CIG. Departments are either not properly communicating with each other, or they are straightup lying to you (to sell ships or whatever), or they have no steadfast longterm idea (one they will actually stick to) that they won't throw overboard when it's convenient for them (or their marketing). I'm starting to question whether CIG by now has become the very questionable kind of publisher/studio they oh so sought to avoid when this project first began. 9:23 Yes! Yes absolutely! They are NOT planning longterm and are from what I can discern only planning maybe 1 year ahead, as evident with all the countless reworks and [insert rare earth-metal]-passes they did AND STILL HAVE TO DO over the years. 'Star Citizen' is basically like 'Freelancer' all over again when Chris Roberts was still involved in that...and remember that Microsoft had to kick him out and cut/redo a lot of it with their own devs. to rework it into something release-worthy.
~4:57 - John Crewe not being able to sit still whilst attempting to stare down Disco Lando when given the mock question about marketing running the show - priceless! 🤣 Then, at 5:15 - you brought back _that_ music/clips and the quote at 5:40 ! - jeez @Grumpy ... I wee'd a little! 🤣 - It was p!$$ funny the first time ... and still funny Thanks for the laughs, dude! 🍻
The original game play design was flawed big time for medical game play! No one, and I mean no one wants to wait 1.5 hours to get healed! This makes a time sink of a game even more boring. The NURSA was an amazing addition to the verse because it has allowed for more ship game play. Regardless of what CIG said, I've always stated that death / healing needs to be faster and closer to the point of injury, as a massive time sink will kill the casuals / players.
That was not the original game design. That was made to push people to buy the Apollo and the Carrack/Galaxy (for the carrack loaner). And now that that's all done, they gave us the cheapest respawn points that some of us (including me) were asking for all along.
My opinion, as a $45 dollar package owner, who’s goal is to work his way up the ranks in-game: Med beds on smaller vehicles such as the C8 and rover, should work like an ambulance in real life. What I mean is that they should firstly stop the timer, so you won’t die, but also keep you incapacitated. Small healing should be possible for stopping bleeding, etc. until you are brought to a better med bed. For example, the med bed in the carrack. If that make sense and If you agree, like this comment so CIG can consider it.
@@PaganLinuxGeek Sorry Pagan I have to disagree. A claw in the future where there are tractor beams makes no sense other than it looks cool and will sell ships. I almost wish they would have just put a scoop on the front and you used the tractor beams to push stuff into the muncher.
@@jimflagg4009 It's not about that, it's about how many years they used it to talk about how awesome their procedural and physicalized damage system were and how they were spending all this effort to make it so you could tear ships apart that would add immersion to all the combat too. Fast forward.... a decade, and it turns out we have ships that just fall apart in a small number of predetermined pieces, not a physicalized damage system. Totally valid if they had decided to take this easy way out from the start, but that they used it as a marketing platform for years then turned it in to a siphon means they're dishonest scam artists.
Quick maths : 5000 javelins sold at price of $2700, that will sum up at $13.5 mil 10000 idris x $1000 something = more millions. Yeah, they are not here for money defo We can do easier ones too
Jared should be able to remember what they told him and if not he could just do a quick search and rewatch his old interviews. I haven't followed SC for years and I remembered it. I could not care less care what the tiers of med-beds end up as, as long as it makes sense. It is the lying that bugs me.
It's like when he lies about what was said about SATABall, NPC crew members being able to take your ships on missions, dedicated servers, mod support, VR support, the drop-in drop-out campaign for SQ42, and so forth. They keep baiting and switching on features to take money, then by dangling the new shiny in front of the whales and apologists they convince them it's OK they're not doing what they said they would do when taking money, because nobodies ever made such a big empty box as this one before.
We all want this to work and make sense. I've read all the drama concerning Medical Bed T2/T3 respawning and understand the solution won't fit what everyone wants/thinks due to things not making some sense. "Regenerating" from the back of my tiny truck is too much magic. I was thinking, what if we don't actually "regenerate" when we have a medical bed 50km/20km away (whatever the distance) but "teleport" to it just before we die. We would then appear in our T2/T3 Nursa/Pisces bed and get immediate medical assistance. Not a regeneration because we didn't die, and no need for regeneration "goo". And to make it more believable we would carry a device that would allow teleportation to the bed we had set as our "regeneration" point, except I wouldn't call it "regenerate". The device we carry is linked to our mobi-glas which will indicate how much time we have. One can be either rescued by another player OR if our wounds are severe our mobi-glas would indicate one's a goner and tells the device to "teleport" us to the medical bed Nursa/Pisces/etc... We would actually DIE if we are not carrying that teleport device and we would wake up properly regenerated at a T1 bed at a medical facility which will affect our overall regeneration cycles. The teleport device would be used in conjunction with the medical bed one set to "respawn" at. AND it would have a limited number of teleportations (limited energy usages... batteries?), meaning we need to be prepared to carry multiple batteries/devices or risk being regenerated back at a T1 bed back at a medical facility. Teleportation would also avoid all the dead bodies left behind AND in the future when death of a spaceman becomes active this could help minimize the counter towards eternal death, passing all our possessions to our dear nephew "Bob" who will continue our legacy... My two cents. Someone smarter can add/improve on this idea.
So you want to remove respawn magic with teleport magic? This does not make sense, why are we using ships when we can just teleport lol. There is already lore for respawning with injuries so : 1. Make the tier 3 beds retain tier 1 & 2 injuries on respawn to not make tier 1 & 2 obsolete. 2. The regeneration material for respawning will be limited like fuel and once used up in a ship, we will have to refuel it from a station or city that has a medical center. Known commonly as an ‘echo,’ this is the term used to describe the link between an imprint and its source. When a major traumatic event occurs, such as death or even regeneration itself, the psychological impact of it can sometimes be strong enough to permanently alter the imprint. For example, if a person’s legs are crushed prior to death, there’s a possibility that an echo will be created that will alter the imprint so that the individual’s legs are no longer functional. Echos are the reason why patients may regenerate bearing the scars and wounds of how they died and why only one copy of a person can exist at a time. Regeneration itself also creates echos, and over time an individual’s imprint will degrade and become less viable. This is also why imprints cannot be used to extend life as the process of aging itself echos through the imprints. However, testing has shown that the higher quality the medical equipment and sphere, the less severe the impact of echos will be.
@@dhwajgoyal Teleporting like Star Trek, if you ever heard of that show also used ships because clearly you can't teleport to open space or where there is no receiver. You couldn't teleport long distances... etc. So you do still need ships. T1 only for regeneration. T2 and T3 for teleporting to and receive medical assistance in the condition the person was teleported in. Crushed legs for example.
Wow I just said Nightrider CiG will be sent to Jareds house for wrongspeak (spectrum) and instant days ban ..I shall not be returning EVER ..I PRAY that Server Meshing fails NOW and this game dies inflames ...f**k this
@@GrumpyEyeGaming Sorry As I typed Damn I thought that was a safe joke I was gone hahah ,screw em ,ridiculous in there now and the most unproffesional moderating I have ever seen ..
MM was the straw that broke this camels back. I am giving them six months to unfuhq it and if not Im going to gray market my fleet and buy a project car. Six years Ive been playing and it feels more and more like an abusive relationship every year. I heard a podcaster( I think it was Thors pirate software) who said CIG sees their backers as a resource to be exploited. I have been feeling that the last year. Just so damn disappointing.
I don't think so. Now you have to sacrifise storage room on your ship to fit a vehicle with it. I have an MSR and plan on jamming a nursa into it. Well there goes almost my entire cargo and utility behicle space for another land vehicle provided I want to utilize ranged protection of my respawn. I could alternatively jam it into a Connie and use the snub. but same thing cargo space is gone. I could fill up a C2 with a small snub and a respawn bed. But now I loose my navigation/scanning/exploration suite. You are going to have this issue with almost every ship. Which a carrack you can still respawn, you have your top hanger and your cargo bay still fully intact. I think the carrack still 100% has its role and value.
@@th3count doing cargo transport right now in the c2 and I rather not having the nursa on board because it ends up being like a carrack but with less cargo and less feature
i do believe CiG finally figured out that the current death of bugs or just through current gameplay makes faster re entry more enjoyable for a wider audience. however the respawn move with the ursa medic (that will not be available ingame till 4.0) ist kinda marketing thing, ofc. however you could buy an c8 medic and let it rest in urs med size ship hangar. on the flip side the cutlass red is an good option for most people for like to try out fps mission, so not bad actually.
NOPE this doesnt support grumpy butts narrative, its all to get your money and give you nothing even though THERES ALREADY SHIPS IN THE GAME that do the same thing the URSA does & you dont have to spend any more at all lol
seems a bit sus they'd wait to implement a feature that needed to exist YEARS ago at the same time as they launch a new ground vehicle that would have zero utility otherwise. hmmmm....
@@GrumpyEyeGaming you do realize that its THEIR site & THEIR game so they can do what ever they want to it, market it how ever they want and moderate it how ever they want, why does a grown man like you still not get this? oh wait! you do! you're just trying to remain relevant lol
really well edited video - not only with the research done, the tidbits.. but the entire flow of it. Just shows that your heart is in music and composition. Earnest congrats for putting this together - also about this so very modern positive sensitivity your terra matra always needs more of !
I sort of think this happened only because the FPS team managed to wedge in unrealistic mechanics from other fps games which were considered good and that then expanded to being able to allow medical bed spawning back to game, which made the fps even better and more accessible. Fps team probably only got green light to ditch realism because of master modes and now, the entire game has shifted. Now, everyone has to backpedal on what they said, showcasing that they're either willing to gaslight themselves or say things they don't mean. Inside Star Citizen is therefore to be considered an extremely bad source of knowledge often doesn't reflect what the company does.
No it is totally not run by the marketing team. If it was run by the marketing team, we would be getting more ships instead of working on game loops, environments and physics, making them better and add more loops and features. We would also not be able to get any fauna, flora, planets etc. ohhhh................ shit. I see now....
loved the video but I think they are talking about ships that will allow respawn at launch, not so much in early access IDK though correct me if i missed something. My understanding is most ships will be able to give ambulatory care and some even able to heal severe injury but anything catatonic or deadly needs a specific ship and med bed
4:47 - 5:05 is so right on. If you only watch 20 seconds or so of this video, watch that segment. It has all you need to know about CIG and it's marketing team.
Still waiting for my hawk to see how it would work. It has a prisoner transport but its a locked chair not a pod...so all talk was about using pods for prisoners. Hope its not forgotten :(
SC has been ran by marketing for years. Everything from what gets worked on and put in the game for the IAE & Invictus events, what ships get worked on to sell as flight ready, what ship concepts come out, what features get pushed to come out with a certain patch, etc. ALL of that is driven by marketing.
3.23.1 modularity was added, hull munching came in during 3.22, hovering redone in 3.23 and turrets now ignore hover bikes which led to an exploit in 3.22 as you could take out hammer heads in space on dragonflies. Racing has been in since 3.21 or 3.22. So the list at 9:12 needs a rework, as I doubt you were going for ships released without game loops as you listed ships not yet released at all, I'd of thrown exploration in for 3.23.x but as they have not put the custom markers and selling them into the mobi glass map rework that is still valid, though it is slated for later in 3.23, though we were supposed to get live bounty capture in 3.21.x and that never happened so.
Absolutely golden, nicely done sir!!!!! Your take is spot on as usual, fantastic editing, and I love the music, fits perfectly!!!! That was so refreshing, I truly miss hearing Mr Grumpy Eye’s voice in the verse, keeping CIG in check. Not worth the ulcers though I get it, nonetheless thank you for that video good sir!!!
They said what they had to say to sell the Cutlass Red, then went back on their word. Now it's the same old story. Sadly I see CIG doing all kinds of alterations to the game for the sake of boosting their own profits
Can´t thank you enough for the Video :D:D. The entire truth packed into under 10 minutes, AMAZING HAHAHAHAHA... and that's why CIG hasn't received a cent from me for years.
The thing is.. there wasn't much to agree or disagree on. I had my opinions, but the truth is that I based them on facts. The issue is that I'm always expecting the worst, but hoping for the best. So I share my thoughts hoping that they'll listen.
When it comes right down to it at this point in time… it’s all about the money. Cig is realizing that funding may be slowing down. But, they are hurting themselves by what they’re doing with ships.
Everything in the game change all the time, its not about them lying about stuff, they also stated it many time in their weekly videos... med ursas is needed for distribution centers. There is turrets surrounding the place, so you have to walk like 5 km if you die if you use a med ship. Unless you want to destroy like 50 turrets, for a mission that gives 130k auec at rank 5.
I was confused as to why Jarrod said T3 bed re-spawning didn't get in as originally intended. I used to own the Cutty Red and i could respawn in it until one day they declared T3 beds would no longer be spawn points. Why are they acting like it never happened?
If buying ships and concepts is nasty, adulterous sex, then this video is like the math problem I’m trying to solve during the act to keep my soul pure 🙏
Sounds like dev infighting honestly Dev A) The game needs to be super restrictive and simmy because I am god, Dev B) The game needs to be more accessible because I am god Chris) Whatever sell more ships minions whatever sells more ships
I don’t mind honestly as long as they don’t sell the Nursa with this ability to respawn then remove it again at a later date. I like that you can respawn in more ways now, really don’t want death of a space man rubbish
The distribution centers are crushing people, the average player will need this to succeed and have fun. Also pretty sure you can buy the Nursa in-game.
hahaha - I don't really have a strong opinion about this med bed change, but CIG can't go on like they have been. They need to unify their message and get their plan for the gameplay loops organized and disclosed to their backers ASAP.
But that's the thing. As long as CIG has legions of players who'll happily throw buckets of money at "The Dream" no matter how much smoke is blown up their ass, they can, in fact, go on like this.
I almost feel bad for jared, having to push a certain narrative when there is so much overwhelming video footage explaining that every thing he is saying is a lie.
Once I heard the bed in the Carrack was supposed to disappear I decided to not buy one. They need to start making changes that ppl like. Med bed Corsair gonna be my life. My home away from home.
i have mixed feelings, the new med beds remove the need to have a medical ship. i like the new medivac rover but only if it was just an ambulance. i understand CIGs idea to want players to get back into the game faster but that is dumb to me without a medical ship
LOVE LOVE LOVE this editing -- it's just amazing, haha :) :) :) I get that things change, though, and I get your point, but I think respawning in T3 bed is a huge QOL benefit, else SC just drags on and on and on.
I do like the idea of having all med beds respawn. But I think they need a throughput limit. tier 3 for example in the nursa say 1 respawn every 20 minutes. shared between all played tied to it. otherwise you will have to wait or respawn at a hospital. if its unlimited a squad will have a fully stocked vessel and just keep respawning into battle with new equipment. the winning squad should be able to fully neutralize there oposition without having to worry about constant waves of players coming at them.
“balancing that with what’s best for the game” lol more like what’s best for selling ships and keeping the community hyped on hypothetical future changes
It's a very awkward look, and that "die a 1000 times" is in complete opposition to the supposed "vision" (who the hell let that go out?!) but let's see how this plays out once "balanced". (welcome back! ;) )
WoW! This is flawless consistency in design! More videos like this one please! Maybe, some more ppl will open their eyes. Politely asking ANYONE from cig to see this video.
The state of server performance is beyond sad, and still I feel like CIG only care about selling more ships. HOW ABOUT WE GET A PLAYABLE GAME? With 4.2 Server FPS the game is not playable at all. I wanted to show off the ships at Invictus event to some friends, the game was freezing every 10 sec for like 2 sec It was embarrassing... Just think about it more then a Decade of development and we still nowhere near a Game.
half a billion crowdfunded and still here we are. Server Mesh better be good if not and they say they need to implement more tech that’s a good indicator that everyone is being grifted. All this time they’ve been getting one chapter off SQ42 they could’ve pushed out completely finished ships and gameplay loops instead of jamming everything in. I don’t play SC too often but i believe this is a long time grifting project and when it finally releases a lot of things the backers bought into won’t even be there. Or at least it won’t be like anything you imagine.
I think T3 med beds should be respawn points. If it only heals then what is the point of it existing when the med gun does the same job? If they don't want spawn points over abused in game play, then stop giving so many ships T3 beds.
Its getting to a point that they need to just have share holders. I mean, even after all they've said and all the ships still not being worked on that they've sold years ago, we're still going to get a new concept Drake ship coming at drake defense day 😂 like why? Because money of course.
Got to say that I started watching your vids when you first started, and then stopped with a period of leaving & coming back & leaving SC as that's a personal choice like religion and such, an it seemed like that's all your content became for quite some time. With this video though, you really did lay clear the lies and discrepancies, especially regarding why they took away the Red's T2 medbed/spawning capability. My first upgrade from a Pisces C8X starter was the Red with a subscriber warbond, as deliveries in 3.8.2 were my jam, and respawning from bugs or murder hobos or doing bounties was the perfect answer at the time to how the game was. While I enjoy playing SC and will eventually spend a little more money rather than just cycling credit, I completely agree with you on this, and really respect the mixture of serious & humorous way you presented it. Whether or not you come back to SC, thank you.
It's funny how the most important thing is if I'm back or not. lol
I'm not back.
I had time today.
If I need to explain myself to all of you - be it. My music PC is still dead. So I needed to find a way to use this gaming PC for music. Which I did, because you can see some videos on my main (music) channel: th-cam.com/channels/l6fuOrFU-Rx_pPF2whebIg.html
But I don't have proper speakers in this room. And the speakers I do have are way too large for this room. So I had a lot of spare time to waste while waiting on the solution. And I'm hoping that I'll get to that solution in the next couple of weeks.
So no, I'm not back. Don't get used to it. When I have spare time I will make videos on this channel, just as I've said in my goodbye video. idk how much spare time I'll have in the future.
]
You guys asked me plenty of times to drop a video here and there. So idk what the issue is now? idk how much spare time I'll have in the future.
See ya.
Keep on bringing a towel when you're traveling through space!
A shame you aren't comingback :( let's hope you have more spare time in the future xD I'd like to know your thoughts about 3.23
Wouldn't want all those .jpgs to go to waste now.......
Welcome back!!
Dude, I dont care, I like your production, every clip of yours is welcome, true and fun, thank you!
CIG marketing team loves you.
Is Star Citizen the Scientology of gaming?
Yes now buy ship™️
Y E S
When u give 1, 2, 3k usd the first year, u have to defend ur choise even you know its bad so ppl dont call u stupid which clearely you are!
Yes. Like Scientology, Star Citizen has orgs. If I had a Star Citizen account, I’d start an org call the Sea Org. Only taking members willing to pledge for a contract period of One Billion Years. No more questions, buy an Idris!
@@Cpt_Kakashi Bro, if you're going to call people stupid you might want to figure out how to spell better than a 3rd grader.
The year is 2037. AGI is out, flying cars are common, and humanity has colonized Mars. We can create a full-length movie with just one click. But Star Citizen? Still in alpha.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Star Citizen hasn't had a single year in the past 14 years, where they didn't either lie, deceive or spectacularly fail to meet goals.
Players : Did you make the med beds respawn to only sell the new Ursa medivac.
CIG: You know we are here for the money.
This is not even a joke, just passing by their store and it becomes very obvious.
Dev: "We are not puppets of marketing."
Citizen: "Does marketing tell you to say this when asked?"
Dev: *starts to sweat strongly
12yrs development, with 700,000,000 in backing, and indecision seems to be the only thing, beyond marketing, that we can count on.
Remember, dont ask questions just buy more ships!
There is absolutely no way they could convince me that respawn wasn't changed to boost NUrsa sales.
This video is golden... All the ships released in the last 5 years have no real use. I'd like to say Yet, but they just said, all ships designed and released are launched into a functioning game loop... LUL
waddaya mean, I can swan about in my 890J and lord it over all other players? That's functionality right there! /s
To me this is the most insane aspect of this whole thing. Its been 12 years and over $600,000,000 and they still don't have anything to do!!! Why do backers get so excited when CIG adds BASIC QOL features to a game with NO central purpose? Do they think CIG has been holding on to game play loops for full release all these years?? They spend entire TH-cam videos talking about ship functionality for ships that cost thousands of dollars!! How about, I don't know, actually making a game now?? As someone looking from the outside, and playing this "free fly" event, its painfully obvious its all about selling ships. I was convinced when i went to retrieve my starter ship after blowing up and having to pay to get it out, but it makes you wait, and the price goes down the longer you stand there staring at the screen to click just pay now before it hits 0 to save money... Then you have to wait some more... Why??? There was not one reason (even if it was for "game play" purposes) i could think of to justify that. Ill bet if you pay money IRL all that waiting goes away doesnt it?
They're patting themselves on the back for making the bare minimum of a game and even that is a lie lol
Only a SC player who lives under a rock would not know that marketing runs decisions. Still the damn bed spawn is a genius thing with this buggy mess. I have died exiting an airlock so now I will fly my cutty red and not worry about it anymore. BTW, this was well edited, kudos Grumpy!
Hear me out. Maybe they added respawning to it because making people respawn and run/fly back for 30+ minutes isn't a fun mechanic?
This seems very sensible. But the coincidence of Ursa sell and med bay change is too concerning
Possibly, but it's quite a coincidence they decided now to change their med bed plans they have had for a decade at a time when they are also selling a cheap medical vehicle.
that didnt seem to be an issue when they removed respawn from cutty red.
why is it an issue now?
@igorpniak8308 they've been probably thinking of it for a long time to fix this tedious gameplay of flying back which takes forever.. But they totally used it to make a lot of money a little slimey but hey cheap in game and only $50 real money.. I see it as essential for lower end players until they can pay for higher tier ships with med beds. I'm okay with this change as to what it means long term
This logic is all well and good, but they have ALREADY REMOVED THIS BEFORE. So if they really are concerned about wasting our time getting back to our bodies, why remove it to begin with??
The only people who are surprised by this are people who have not had the full CIG marketing black magic experience yet
Were you not there when the cutty red used to respawn, but then they removed it because it was never the intention that all medbeds could do that?
I was, and I remember it clear as day.
@@hawkofthereborn43 Pepperidge Farm membas...
@@hawkofthereborn43Oh yeah…. Cutty Red, tier 2, only’ tier 2 med beds and tier 3 were able to support respawn location features. Then they completely swapped it… so catty red could only heal tier 2 injuries,, but respawn capability was removed…. So…. Cutty red was absolutely useless at that point. That threw my whole bunker grind fest away for usability….
Now later after the flip-flop reality I was finally just over it…. Blk magic bait and swap / dangle the carrot in front of the sheep was finally just accepted after I had reached what is… “Wing Commander” in Concierge…. And while live streaming our desktop view of our computers, my friend actively speaking and emailing a CIG team member at customer support, where he wanted to buy a ship that was not available on the pledge store and was a limited sale ship when it does become available, he asked for a one-time purchase link specifically to buy more. They instantly responded and told him yes, sent him the one time purchase link, opened the email and bought it which was supposed to be unavailable. I proceed to do the exactly same thing, and I was instantly responded with “we do not do such things, I suggest you wait until it becomes available again next sale time”. Okay…… sure bro
Another thought, 2024 this year has seen an explosion of news revelations coming out about various things. Did the Invictus display, at the convention center, really…..need to have to inverted triple 9’s from the jet smoke at the entrance of the place that is designed to display and sell ships for $$$$? I mean the thing that people spent hundreds of hours into this game, grinding rep, and bunker missions…. In order to gain the ability to increase their aUEC wallet cash in the event that a patch resets your in game wallet and you can buy ships again was at least to rank 5 in Security section of runs for lots of people… and then outa the blue, CIG entirely wipes all wallet cash in game, reputation bar progress (while also not including even reputation factors across the board with how factions and station clearance will be accepted if you have good/bad stuff as promised) while ‘also’ increasing the prices of all ships in game and even things like Railgun ammo clips…. If you want 20 Railgun ammo clips, it takes about an entire week long grind f missions credit payouts, to get a portion of that. Here’s my 50 cent and Kat Williams 😅contribution to the convo. o7
@@hawkofthereborn43 Yeah, but the website still advertised the cutty red as a respawn point and they left it that way for years. If this was a ship I would bet they would do their usual thing of waiting until the sale is over then 'discovering' the mistake and reverting it so the bed was useless but of course upselling you to the bigger version coming soon (tm) that would have the functional resapwn bed for only 2x the price. Since it's harder to make a useful (transportable) ground vehicle much fatter than the Ursa, the odds of this happening are low, though not zero. What's more likely is that they'll declare it was a mistake again, remove spawning from the smaller beds but then upgrade this thing to have the better bed, once again juicing ship sales even if this thing is a marketing dead end.
Team has NO IDEA... what it's making. :(
didn't even need words to explain , on what BS is going on 👍
Getting a refund for this game back in 2016 was the best thing I ever did.
People need to watch this before deciding to give CIG money.
It would be good if they simply said, "We've decided to change this and let players respawn with any medical vehicle." But, to say, "we've always planned this" runs counter to everything said up to this point. Thank you for putting this together.
Yup ... nothing has changed ... same crap, different year.
Look, it's early days. And it's an alpha! In two or three decades everything will be amazingly balanced and fair.
See this is exactly what they always do... They buff the stuff when it comes in, and then nerf it once everyone buys the ships or vehicles. Salvage for example, was really good and now they are nerfing it. Its not for testing the features, its for selling. Beds are gonna get nerfed when they add ships like apollo and stuff.
come on we all know they will change their mind again to sell those Apollo
And backers will fall for it, I guarantee it.
@@avon_c6199 And mumble something about how the ship ponzi is OK because nobodies made such a big whatever this is before.
"supremely long distance exploration ship"... in a world with two tiny systems.
Don't worry we're going to get 5 one day, but probably move the planets close together and get rid of not being able to jump in atmo because... well certainly not a new ship or marketing.
This video tells me various things about CIG.
Departments are either not properly communicating with each other,
or they are straightup lying to you (to sell ships or whatever),
or they have no steadfast longterm idea (one they will actually stick to) that they won't throw overboard when it's convenient for them (or their marketing).
I'm starting to question whether CIG by now has become the very questionable kind of publisher/studio they oh so sought to avoid when this project first began.
9:23 Yes! Yes absolutely!
They are NOT planning longterm and are from what I can discern only planning maybe 1 year ahead, as evident with all the countless reworks and [insert rare earth-metal]-passes they did AND STILL HAVE TO DO over the years.
'Star Citizen' is basically like 'Freelancer' all over again when Chris Roberts was still involved in that...and remember that Microsoft had to kick him out and cut/redo a lot of it with their own devs. to rework it into something release-worthy.
Ill say it like my company tells us in I.T. marketing makes the company money... I.T. and Dev's are cash burners, so marketing gets what they want.
~4:57 - John Crewe not being able to sit still whilst attempting to stare down Disco Lando when given the mock question about marketing running the show - priceless! 🤣
Then, at 5:15 - you brought back _that_ music/clips and the quote at 5:40 ! - jeez @Grumpy ... I wee'd a little! 🤣 - It was p!$$ funny the first time ... and still funny
Thanks for the laughs, dude! 🍻
That was awkward to watch. I feel dirty. Off to take a shower!
no more money out of me thats for sure... until i see sand worms hahaha.
If there was a video to be hacked into a citcon play demo, this is the one.
The original game play design was flawed big time for medical game play! No one, and I mean no one wants to wait 1.5 hours to get healed! This makes a time sink of a game even more boring. The NURSA was an amazing addition to the verse because it has allowed for more ship game play. Regardless of what CIG said, I've always stated that death / healing needs to be faster and closer to the point of injury, as a massive time sink will kill the casuals / players.
That was not the original game design. That was made to push people to buy the Apollo and the Carrack/Galaxy (for the carrack loaner). And now that that's all done, they gave us the cheapest respawn points that some of us (including me) were asking for all along.
Thing is, you are both right. I think this is nuanced and they need to work this through so that the respawns aren't "equal"
My opinion, as a $45 dollar package owner, who’s goal is to work his way up the ranks in-game:
Med beds on smaller vehicles such as the C8 and rover, should work like an ambulance in real life. What I mean is that they should firstly stop the timer, so you won’t die, but also keep you incapacitated. Small healing should be possible for stopping bleeding, etc. until you are brought to a better med bed. For example, the med bed in the carrack. If that make sense and If you agree, like this comment so CIG can consider it.
"It was always the intention" to change our minds and then say we always intended it that way...
I would have said Reclaimer the Claw became a Straw.
It certainly does suck…
I refuse to call it the claw unless/until they make it actually claw. We've been trolled for YEARS by it. #NotFine
@@PaganLinuxGeek Sorry Pagan I have to disagree. A claw in the future where there are tractor beams makes no sense other than it looks cool and will sell ships. I almost wish they would have just put a scoop on the front and you used the tractor beams to push stuff into the muncher.
@@jimflagg4009you simply cannot change the main reason people bought the ship
@@jimflagg4009 It's not about that, it's about how many years they used it to talk about how awesome their procedural and physicalized damage system were and how they were spending all this effort to make it so you could tear ships apart that would add immersion to all the combat too. Fast forward.... a decade, and it turns out we have ships that just fall apart in a small number of predetermined pieces, not a physicalized damage system. Totally valid if they had decided to take this easy way out from the start, but that they used it as a marketing platform for years then turned it in to a siphon means they're dishonest scam artists.
Quick maths :
5000 javelins sold at price of $2700, that will sum up at $13.5 mil
10000 idris x $1000 something = more millions.
Yeah, they are not here for money defo
We can do easier ones too
Jared should be able to remember what they told him and if not he could just do a quick search and rewatch his old interviews. I haven't followed SC for years and I remembered it. I could not care less care what the tiers of med-beds end up as, as long as it makes sense. It is the lying that bugs me.
It's like when he lies about what was said about SATABall, NPC crew members being able to take your ships on missions, dedicated servers, mod support, VR support, the drop-in drop-out campaign for SQ42, and so forth. They keep baiting and switching on features to take money, then by dangling the new shiny in front of the whales and apologists they convince them it's OK they're not doing what they said they would do when taking money, because nobodies ever made such a big empty box as this one before.
"We lied about everything" - Cig the honest version
We all want this to work and make sense. I've read all the drama concerning Medical Bed T2/T3 respawning and understand the solution won't fit what everyone wants/thinks due to things not making some sense. "Regenerating" from the back of my tiny truck is too much magic.
I was thinking, what if we don't actually "regenerate" when we have a medical bed 50km/20km away (whatever the distance) but "teleport" to it just before we die. We would then appear in our T2/T3 Nursa/Pisces bed and get immediate medical assistance. Not a regeneration because we didn't die, and no need for regeneration "goo". And to make it more believable we would carry a device that would allow teleportation to the bed we had set as our "regeneration" point, except I wouldn't call it "regenerate". The device we carry is linked to our mobi-glas which will indicate how much time we have. One can be either rescued by another player OR if our wounds are severe our mobi-glas would indicate one's a goner and tells the device to "teleport" us to the medical bed Nursa/Pisces/etc...
We would actually DIE if we are not carrying that teleport device and we would wake up properly regenerated at a T1 bed at a medical facility which will affect our overall regeneration cycles.
The teleport device would be used in conjunction with the medical bed one set to "respawn" at. AND it would have a limited number of teleportations (limited energy usages... batteries?), meaning we need to be prepared to carry multiple batteries/devices or risk being regenerated back at a T1 bed back at a medical facility.
Teleportation would also avoid all the dead bodies left behind AND in the future when death of a spaceman becomes active this could help minimize the counter towards eternal death, passing all our possessions to our dear nephew "Bob" who will continue our legacy...
My two cents. Someone smarter can add/improve on this idea.
So you want to remove respawn magic with teleport magic? This does not make sense, why are we using ships when we can just teleport lol. There is already lore for respawning with injuries so :
1. Make the tier 3 beds retain tier 1 & 2 injuries on respawn to not make tier 1 & 2 obsolete.
2. The regeneration material for respawning will be limited like fuel and once used up in a ship, we will have to refuel it from a station or city that has a medical center.
Known commonly as an ‘echo,’ this is the term used to describe the link between an imprint and its source. When a major traumatic event occurs, such as death or even regeneration itself, the psychological impact of it can sometimes be strong enough to permanently alter the imprint. For example, if a person’s legs are crushed prior to death, there’s a possibility that an echo will be created that will alter the imprint so that the individual’s legs are no longer functional. Echos are the reason why patients may regenerate bearing the scars and wounds of how they died and why only one copy of a person can exist at a time. Regeneration itself also creates echos, and over time an individual’s imprint will degrade and become less viable. This is also why imprints cannot be used to extend life as the process of aging itself echos through the imprints. However, testing has shown that the higher quality the medical equipment and sphere, the less severe the impact of echos will be.
@@dhwajgoyal Teleporting like Star Trek, if you ever heard of that show also used ships because clearly you can't teleport to open space or where there is no receiver. You couldn't teleport long distances... etc. So you do still need ships. T1 only for regeneration. T2 and T3 for teleporting to and receive medical assistance in the condition the person was teleported in. Crushed legs for example.
Wow I just said Nightrider CiG will be sent to Jareds house for wrongspeak (spectrum) and instant days ban ..I shall not be returning EVER ..I PRAY that Server Meshing fails NOW and this game dies inflames ...f**k this
If you have screenshots post them in my community discord
@@GrumpyEyeGaming Sorry As I typed Damn I thought that was a safe joke I was gone hahah ,screw em ,ridiculous in there now and the most unproffesional moderating I have ever seen ..
PS I am actually GLAD in 5 years or so ALL games will be created by A.I at least it will be bug free lol ;)
MM was the straw that broke this camels back. I am giving them six months to unfuhq it and if not Im going to gray market my fleet and buy a project car. Six years Ive been playing and it feels more and more like an abusive relationship every year. I heard a podcaster( I think it was Thors pirate software) who said CIG sees their backers as a resource to be exploited. I have been feeling that the last year. Just so damn disappointing.
As Shroud would say, "next patch"
Shrouds take was on point and fairly typical of any average gamer.
S.S would be absolutely roasted if it was listed on steam.
Med beds not respawning was one reason and one reason alone, to sell the Carrack.
I don't think so. Now you have to sacrifise storage room on your ship to fit a vehicle with it.
I have an MSR and plan on jamming a nursa into it. Well there goes almost my entire cargo and utility behicle space for another land vehicle provided I want to utilize ranged protection of my respawn. I could alternatively jam it into a Connie and use the snub. but same thing cargo space is gone. I could fill up a C2 with a small snub and a respawn bed. But now I loose my navigation/scanning/exploration suite.
You are going to have this issue with almost every ship. Which a carrack you can still respawn, you have your top hanger and your cargo bay still fully intact. I think the carrack still 100% has its role and value.
@@th3count Get a bigger ship Scrub. LOL. The NURSA fits just fine in the MSR.
@@th3count couldn't have said it better
@@th3count doing cargo transport right now in the c2 and I rather not having the nursa on board because it ends up being like a carrack but with less cargo and less feature
@@jimflagg4009 That's not the point he was making. Of course it fits fine, but you're sacrificing you're whole cargo grid for it.
Thank you Grumpy! Always appreciate your honest take and calling out the marketing BS. (And thank you for entertaining us, as always!)
i do believe CiG finally figured out that the current death of bugs or just through current gameplay makes faster re entry more enjoyable for a wider audience. however the respawn move with the ursa medic (that will not be available ingame till 4.0) ist kinda marketing thing, ofc. however you could buy an c8 medic and let it rest in urs med size ship hangar. on the flip side the cutlass red is an good option for most people for like to try out fps mission, so not bad actually.
NOPE this doesnt support grumpy butts narrative, its all to get your money and give you nothing even though THERES ALREADY SHIPS IN THE GAME that do the same thing the URSA does & you dont have to spend any more at all lol
seems a bit sus they'd wait to implement a feature that needed to exist YEARS ago at the same time as they launch a new ground vehicle that would have zero utility otherwise.
hmmmm....
the feature that we already had, but they pulled out of the game so they could sell the apollo
I just got barred 72hrs from spectrum simply asking why so many threads quietly being deleted. Fuck this over moderated shit fight
Managed democracy
@@GrumpyEyeGaming you do realize that its THEIR site & THEIR game so they can do what ever they want to it, market it how ever they want and moderate it how ever they want, why does a grown man like you still not get this? oh wait! you do! you're just trying to remain relevant lol
@@urfavspacecadet You're the one catching feelings in his comment section
@@T51B1yet I'm not banning him. That's weird!
@@urfavspacecadet We shouldnt be able to offer criticism of a product we paid for with our own money? Really? Is that what you are saying?
really well edited video - not only with the research done, the tidbits.. but the entire flow of it.
Just shows that your heart is in music and composition.
Earnest congrats for putting this together - also about this so very modern positive sensitivity your terra matra always needs more of !
I sort of think this happened only because the FPS team managed to wedge in unrealistic mechanics from other fps games which were considered good and that then expanded to being able to allow medical bed spawning back to game, which made the fps even better and more accessible.
Fps team probably only got green light to ditch realism because of master modes and now, the entire game has shifted.
Now, everyone has to backpedal on what they said, showcasing that they're either willing to gaslight themselves or say things they don't mean. Inside Star Citizen is therefore to be considered an extremely bad source of knowledge often doesn't reflect what the company does.
A video that would make Golgot100 proud.
it did. he's in the comments :)
No it is totally not run by the marketing team. If it was run by the marketing team, we would be getting more ships instead of working on game loops, environments and physics, making them better and add more loops and features. We would also not be able to get any fauna, flora, planets etc.
ohhhh................ shit. I see now....
Then why do not all exploration ships have a med bed?
How else are they going to sell you multiple ships.
@unfalr true, sales keeps SC afloat but I can only fly one ship at a time... :/
@@christopherwells4253 True but you feel good when you have many ships waiting in the hangar :)
@@unfalr no argument there at all.
loved the video but I think they are talking about ships that will allow respawn at launch, not so much in early access IDK though correct me if i missed something. My understanding is most ships will be able to give ambulatory care and some even able to heal severe injury but anything catatonic or deadly needs a specific ship and med bed
4:47 - 5:05 is so right on. If you only watch 20 seconds or so of this video, watch that segment. It has all you need to know about CIG and it's marketing team.
You filthy backers! BUY! MORE! SHIPS! DAMMIT!
Still waiting for my hawk to see how it would work. It has a prisoner transport but its a locked chair not a pod...so all talk was about using pods for prisoners. Hope its not forgotten :(
In the Black, Angels Fall First, Spacebourne2 and others will hopefully pick up where Shart Citizen left off.
SC has been ran by marketing for years. Everything from what gets worked on and put in the game for the IAE & Invictus events, what ships get worked on to sell as flight ready, what ship concepts come out, what features get pushed to come out with a certain patch, etc. ALL of that is driven by marketing.
3.23.1 modularity was added, hull munching came in during 3.22, hovering redone in 3.23 and turrets now ignore hover bikes which led to an exploit in 3.22 as you could take out hammer heads in space on dragonflies. Racing has been in since 3.21 or 3.22. So the list at 9:12 needs a rework, as I doubt you were going for ships released without game loops as you listed ships not yet released at all, I'd of thrown exploration in for 3.23.x but as they have not put the custom markers and selling them into the mobi glass map rework that is still valid, though it is slated for later in 3.23, though we were supposed to get live bounty capture in 3.21.x and that never happened so.
Absolutely golden, nicely done sir!!!!! Your take is spot on as usual, fantastic editing, and I love the music, fits perfectly!!!! That was so refreshing, I truly miss hearing Mr Grumpy Eye’s voice in the verse, keeping CIG in check. Not worth the ulcers though I get it, nonetheless thank you for that video good sir!!!
So glad I refunded this shit after playing for about 20 hours back in like . . . 1994
ahahahah
SoonTM is never soon... now lets simplify every aspect of the game and make NPC bullet sponges that will fix poor planning...
They said what they had to say to sell the Cutlass Red, then went back on their word.
Now it's the same old story. Sadly I see CIG doing all kinds of alterations to the game for the sake of boosting their own profits
Can´t thank you enough for the Video :D:D. The entire truth packed into under 10 minutes, AMAZING HAHAHAHAHA... and that's why CIG hasn't received a cent from me for years.
Grumpy, i havent agreed with you in the past for the most part, but you are completely based in this video. Well done and demonstrated
The thing is.. there wasn't much to agree or disagree on. I had my opinions, but the truth is that I based them on facts. The issue is that I'm always expecting the worst, but hoping for the best. So I share my thoughts hoping that they'll listen.
And we're going to see a concept ship for Drake at Defense Con... yeah.. no thanks.
When it comes right down to it at this point in time… it’s all about the money. Cig is realizing that funding may be slowing down. But, they are hurting themselves by what they’re doing with ships.
Everything in the game change all the time, its not about them lying about stuff, they also stated it many time in their weekly videos... med ursas is needed for distribution centers. There is turrets surrounding the place, so you have to walk like 5 km if you die if you use a med ship. Unless you want to destroy like 50 turrets, for a mission that gives 130k auec at rank 5.
I was confused as to why Jarrod said T3 bed re-spawning didn't get in as originally intended. I used to own the Cutty Red and i could respawn in it until one day they declared T3 beds would no longer be spawn points. Why are they acting like it never happened?
because there's a ton of cultists that will nod their head to anything they say, and even more new players that have no idea what CIG is doing.
If buying ships and concepts is nasty, adulterous sex, then this video is like the math problem I’m trying to solve during the act to keep my soul pure 🙏
Sounds like dev infighting honestly Dev A) The game needs to be super restrictive and simmy because I am god, Dev B) The game needs to be more accessible because I am god Chris) Whatever sell more ships minions whatever sells more ships
It will all be better next patch. Stop hating, bro.
You can always tell when Jered is lying because this head bobbles. Ohh wait, his head always bobbles.
The bearded bullshitter
I think CIG is running low on capital. They jacked up ship prices in game and wiped wallets, while removing most larger payouts.
I don’t mind honestly as long as they don’t sell the Nursa with this ability to respawn then remove it again at a later date. I like that you can respawn in more ways now, really don’t want death of a space man rubbish
you know they will lol
To be frank... This new mechanic just really puts a nail in the coffin for medical focused gameplay... Medics were fun ... RIP 3.15 - 3.23.1
Lmao... wow! Crusader Door Runner was hilarious!
That silence was gold!
The distribution centers are crushing people, the average player will need this to succeed and have fun. Also pretty sure you can buy the Nursa in-game.
hahaha - I don't really have a strong opinion about this med bed change, but CIG can't go on like they have been. They need to unify their message and get their plan for the gameplay loops organized and disclosed to their backers ASAP.
Sometimes I doubt there actually IS a PLAN.
But that's the thing. As long as CIG has legions of players who'll happily throw buckets of money at "The Dream" no matter how much smoke is blown up their ass, they can, in fact, go on like this.
I almost feel bad for jared, having to push a certain narrative when there is so much overwhelming video footage explaining that every thing he is saying is a lie.
Don't. His six-figure salary has long overriden any moral squams he may have had. Just a mouth piece for Chris and co.
@@hirmor666 is it 6 figure? at a bar citizen he was all big on how he was taking massive paycut leaving his own business for CIG.
bRoOoOooOOo YoU DoN't UnDeRsTaNd GaMe DeVeLoPmEnT😂😂😂😂😂
Once I heard the bed in the Carrack was supposed to disappear I decided to not buy one. They need to start making changes that ppl like. Med bed Corsair gonna be my life. My home away from home.
i have mixed feelings, the new med beds remove the need to have a medical ship. i like the new medivac rover but only if it was just an ambulance. i understand CIGs idea to want players to get back into the game faster but that is dumb to me without a medical ship
Genious!!! Music is amazing too, presuming its yours. Thx for the idea dude! Thats Creative AF
lol this video is absolutely amazing, beauty is that people cant even argue with this video its 100% facts.
Wait and see. They will find a way to argue.
How many mates can imprint on a Tier 3 medbed?
LOVE LOVE LOVE this editing -- it's just amazing, haha :) :) :)
I get that things change, though, and I get your point, but I think respawning in T3 bed is a huge QOL benefit, else SC just drags on and on and on.
I bought and loved the unique trade-offs that the Cutty Red provided and felt so scammed when they took that away from me.. Fuck Star Citizen
I do like the idea of having all med beds respawn. But I think they need a throughput limit. tier 3 for example in the nursa say 1 respawn every 20 minutes. shared between all played tied to it. otherwise you will have to wait or respawn at a hospital.
if its unlimited a squad will have a fully stocked vessel and just keep respawning into battle with new equipment. the winning squad should be able to fully neutralize there oposition without having to worry about constant waves of players coming at them.
Can you explain why respawning in a nearby vehicle and having to re-equip is a problem?
@@RainOfFoddercorespawning is not an issue. Not having a plan dor the future is.
@@RainOfFodderco I don't think its a problem. an undending onslaught of clones coming at you is. There needs to be a restriction to its frequency.
Marketing is the only office with a say in any aspect of what goes into the test platform. Full stop.
Great video dude.
I love that beat, it works at 1.5x and Normal playback.
It's all so blatantly obvious by now that even blind Freddy can see what is going on.
“balancing that with what’s best for the game” lol more like what’s best for selling ships and keeping the community hyped on hypothetical future changes
It's a very awkward look, and that "die a 1000 times" is in complete opposition to the supposed "vision" (who the hell let that go out?!) but let's see how this plays out once "balanced". (welcome back! ;) )
Why is there a pentagram flashing on the screen?
Bro this shit will never release its the biggest scam in gaming history
WoW! This is flawless consistency in design!
More videos like this one please!
Maybe, some more ppl will open their eyes.
Politely asking ANYONE from cig to see this video.
Perfect format, I really liked this approach, you should look into going this way, Grumpy
The state of server performance is beyond sad, and still I feel like CIG only care about selling more ships.
HOW ABOUT WE GET A PLAYABLE GAME?
With 4.2 Server FPS the game is not playable at all.
I wanted to show off the ships at Invictus event to some friends, the game was freezing every 10 sec for like 2 sec It was embarrassing...
Just think about it more then a Decade of development and we still nowhere near a Game.
half a billion crowdfunded and still here we are. Server Mesh better be good if not and they say they need to implement more tech that’s a good indicator that everyone is being grifted. All this time they’ve been getting one chapter off SQ42 they could’ve pushed out completely finished ships and gameplay loops instead of jamming everything in. I don’t play SC too often but i believe this is a long time grifting project and when it finally releases a lot of things the backers bought into won’t even be there. Or at least it won’t be like anything you imagine.
ROFL - The MSR game play loop. I fell off my chair and the coffee snorted out of my nose. GJ!!!
I think T3 med beds should be respawn points. If it only heals then what is the point of it existing when the med gun does the same job? If they don't want spawn points over abused in game play, then stop giving so many ships T3 beds.
Its getting to a point that they need to just have share holders. I mean, even after all they've said and all the ships still not being worked on that they've sold years ago, we're still going to get a new concept Drake ship coming at drake defense day 😂 like why? Because money of course.
Got to say that I started watching your vids when you first started, and then stopped with a period of leaving & coming back & leaving SC as that's a personal choice like religion and such, an it seemed like that's all your content became for quite some time.
With this video though, you really did lay clear the lies and discrepancies, especially regarding why they took away the Red's T2 medbed/spawning capability. My first upgrade from a Pisces C8X starter was the Red with a subscriber warbond, as deliveries in 3.8.2 were my jam, and respawning from bugs or murder hobos or doing bounties was the perfect answer at the time to how the game was. While I enjoy playing SC and will eventually spend a little more money rather than just cycling credit, I completely agree with you on this, and really respect the mixture of serious & humorous way you presented it. Whether or not you come back to SC, thank you.