Hey everyone just letting you know that I did in fact mean to say mass and not weight. This was a simulation to show how negative mass would react if it were real. I very much know the difference between mass and weight🙂 If you watched this video thinking I should be saying weight instead of mass then you need to watch it again until it sinks in.
The Action Lab look seriously read the term I’m not watching anymore of your videos as it’s feeling more and more akin to flat earther science The definition states it clearly to have a negative mass is to have a negative quantity of matter hence it’s impossible in most situations if not all A negative mass is not something that can be simplified to moving the opposite direction it’d be the opposite of anything that has matter present it would have no density and less than no matter present so it wouldn’t even something effected anywhere similar to what we know For instance would we even be able to touch it or would it be a void that we pass through and inside seriously this is a fundamentals tricky subject mass, in physics, the quantity of matter in a body regardless of its volume or of any forces acting on it. The term should not be confused with weight, which is the measure of the force of gravity (see gravitation) acting on a body.
The Action Lab, wouldn't an object with negative mass in motion continue to accelerate until it mass reaches zero or becomes positive since acceleration increases mass?
Metal Gear it's probabilities are possible but his example is flawed by using a ping pong ball pulled by a string and a balloon on a string because a negative mass object would still remain stationary for an unmeasurable time period outside a vacuum when pulled due to atmospheric pressure and then once in motion began to accelerate faster than force that caused it to move. In the jar and car example the negative mass object acted upon by the increase of atmospheric pressure in one direction would shoot out like a rocket in the opposite direction. Good theory, poor examples of it's actions and reactions to force and atmospheric pressure. Could go deeper into it by talking about if it is moving towards a gravitational pull verses away but it's way past my bed time. A small hint; he talks about it briefly when he talks about dropping it.
Yes this is very relatable, when I learn something in school my eyes turn in to periods, and when I learn something from action lab my eyes turn into capital o's.
The negative mass-related stuff is so interesting! If it actually exists, we (in the far future) could even use it as sort of a mass driver to help us reach incomprehensible speeds!
Even better than that, look into the Alcubierre drive if you haven't heard of it. Theoretically the drive moves space around a mass beyond light speed without violating physics. The drive requires the existence of negative mass with specific properties, but is consistent with Einstein's field equations. However, jury is still out on it since we haven't yet figured out how to merge general relativity with quantum mechanics. What we think of as dark energy could in fact be negative mass, or it could be even more complicated such as dark energy and dark matter might be two properties of the same thing: negative mass. The latter is being researched currently and might even be testable within the next couple decades.
I don't think it is possible. Mass, as I understand it, is not some property that can be whatever. Each element has an atomic mass, which describes how much of it there is in one unit. It doesn't make sense for there to be a negative amount of mass anywhere. There can be a deficit relative to something else, like a pressure differential, but it's never below 0. Think of it as an intricate 3D distribution of dots in the vacuum of 0. It's all additive, not subtractive.
@@davidmartensson273 i think if the force used to lift higher than the gravity, the ball would go up even faster than the force itself. It would go down if only the gravity is higher than the force then push down forward to the core of the gravity
magnetically sensitive negative mass, apply electromagnet field to push with varying intensity based on desired speed, slow down with opposing electromagnet. The issue would be that (to my knowledge) we have yet to observe any scenario where you can apply force to a contained object and have it return enough force to propel the containment, all that is fixed to said containment and itself in any sort of way.
Im pretty sure if it was a parallel universe, like the actual theory is shown,objects still react same ways and exist the same. Thus humans react the same way to a negative mass. So they still would ask the same question.
i've asked this to all my teachers and they said that it was impossible, when i say "ok but theoretically" they just kinda block and never give me a good answer. tnx for this videos ig
Cus they dont know themselves mate, dont ask such qs to teachers they are the least helpful when it comes to stuff outside the textbook ,there are exceptions of course.save such queries for yt and google
I now ship -Planet and +Planet. A tragic story of unrequited love, between one planet with mass that can't commit and and another planet with negative mass that doesn't know how to quit.
@@complicated6094 why do people have to force themselves not see a fcuking joke when in its so bloody obvious. Damn mate you must really be a complicated and interesting person to not a sense of humour.
Negative mass could be used for moving at the speed of light. We could keep create a simulation of negative mass (when we have the technology) and then keep a positive mass in front of it and move at the speed of light. Again, the negative mass must be very controlled or else we might never be able to stop.
one cant control neg mass my guy, you would be accelerated away so we can never really use neg mass for our convenience cuz theres literally no way of controlling it let alone using it
This comment breaks so many laws of physics. Off the top of my head I can count three of them: Special Relativity, and the Second and maybe Third Laws of Thermodynamics.
@@TaxPact Don't say that about yourself! You gotta become comfortable with yourself, and of course that's easier said than done. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
I appreciate the ending differential analyses between mass, negative mass, and finally, antimatter. It's an easy, quick, and simple Illustration to outline. It's just that our literacy has some tendencies that give false illusions of relevancy to other concepts that perhaps were not most aptly named (a very common issue in science;the last disciplines and their intuitive skills do not juxtapose well with those of the creative / linguistical / artistic sides of our brains. It takes a plethora of unique talents to integrate all of these skills in such a way that is minimally complex, ergo maximally accessible to the fullest extent of interpretation, analysis, and application, but simultaneously is also maximally potent, complete, intricate, and microcosmically borne with cohesion in its independently natural aptitudes for interpolation, extrapolation, application, and visibly taut with these self-explanatory "instructions" (which, majestically in its own exudence of pulchritudinous grandeur, sports the power and pure force of rendering that naturally follows the mental faculties and imaginative processes that produce the raw potential of advancement, but then also necessitate the brutal components that move and arrange the decoding of the original message for what to do, now put to work by way of some actual labor and deciding amongst the illustrious surroundings that make pragmatism Be, and Become via force and intent put onto the resources found within one system, married with the next system, integrated with another, and so on. In other words, what is for this video a small, but relatively unintuitive, unnatural step of post-accomplishment selective key integration - specifically instead of merely ending the video, or naming some resources or concepts to look into afterwards, the author actually takes on the responsibility of tackling a naturally curious next step, albeit most professors I know, work with, and have worked with, would ignore the antimatter explanation altogether in favor of efficiency, and literally saying as much as that these type of questions, - additional but natural by circumstance, yet so unique and innovative and potentially deviation of direction from the core concepts, - that they can interact or interfere with the core interfacing with the most basic simple and commonly expected of the curriculum. Ignoring these subtle facets can halt innovation and uninspire theorists, curious minds, and as it turns out, those who desire an even easier, more sensibly rational and intelligent learning route, by presenting a far richer portion of the universe in such a concise, minute little departure, that the remembering of the integration of these similar but necessarily differential parts makes future analyses and applications of any portion of the subjects at hand with newer, different parts so much easier, because it teaches a student to observe and study these naturally occurring elements of Nature, or Program Design, or any other detail or category of information so much more accessible and righteously justified to the student, who by nature of our learning institutions and the necessary trust bound with subordinate psychology are already nervous and typically scared, unsure, or disinterested in asking questions that would otherwise independently lead to the same conclusions and smoothness of presentation... This habit is criminal, but resurgent with its convenience for Instructors. I wish that more presenting bodied would take on the responsibilities of content inclusion and audience involvement the way this one does. Having taught many disparate areas of study at The John's Hopkins University for years now has perhaps made me crazy about these potential details in presentation and the purity of the risks for abandonment that I see commonplace in a top 10 institution (depending on the year) certainly shows that the endowments and budgetary investments are (as only to be expected) NOT going towards hiring and sourcing and applying the Elite of pedagogical benefit and resources reflecting and corresponding with ideal outcomes. Needless to say today has been a stretch, much like my post, cooked over a fire of vocational aggravation embedded with pure mediocrity, with nobody in over an hour's drive having an IQ as high as two-sigma how my own... It can be a struggle to get access outlets for the anger and stress and physical agony for neurological reasons, but still, I always ensure my communication is... "Intelligible", in the Epitome of Hyperbole as it comes with applying the term. Anyway, I truly was just excited that the creator mentioned and investigated the Antimatter element, and without actually directly saying as much, encouraged us to think about what we say and how we say things, how we create and coin concepts such that their integration into your field of study may be aptly and appropriately received, engaged with and understood by your colleagues and cohorts. A persistent, consistent, coherence and consistency of the quality, and the qualia of Perception, as that bit of extra effort may preselect additional food for thought and complete the goals of the lesson and maximize the quality of conversation (or presentation) by mode of subtle plus articulate details combined with the fortitude of the actively excited ongoings of the learned company in your wake generating such a massive success in going beyond the baseline obligations, elevating the scope of thought with access to key information on which to ponder with its conclusion, and setting a mindful, relatable, and brilliant example of what keeps me going, what keeps me professing, and what keeps me learning. Oh... And at the end of the day, what keeps me sane, or as close to it as I can be. Thank you for your contribution to the bounty of good information that is alive and well on TH-cam, and thank you for your powerful commitment to creativity and inspiration for yourself and of others who find purpose in the Analytic Philosophy concerning all things; Abnormal Psychology and the Metrics of the Mind; and of course with Physics - for me, mostly the Theoretical side, though frequently some wild Mathematics and less frequently the smaller, more rigid, localized microcosmic arrays of the field and beyond also find their way in and by way of wave stimulation, gravity/as, and the magnetics/ism of duality and electrical attraction vibrate at their own frequencies around me to synchronize my observations and incrementally give each of themselves their own time in productive, creative, sane-making ways, all relative in their necessary proportions, and ongoing as one video ends and the next one begins. Cheers. Hopefully nobody actually read this.
@@AkshatSinghania I wish I had that type of time... If I did I would have at the very least fixed some of my syntactical and punctuation-based errors. To take it one or two steps further, you seem implicitly insistent that there was far more at which I should be looking for revisionary planning and execution... Right? And if this assumption of yours was true, or even worthy of the absolute slightest, most wildly remote consideration, having been presented with or founded upon the flagrantly meager, fantastically infinitesimal excuse for any semblance of a singular piece of evidence at the foundational levels of your remotest, laziest, embarrassingly wholly absent corners of thought and argumentation framing the emptiest of claims to which you happen to be fully accustomed already - perhaps preceding your very faculties of awareness altogether. Otherwise... You would just be a redundantly whiny flare echoing the very same sentiments and humours I previously articulated in multiplicity - as when I found the silliness, the strangeness, and the heavy weight of the over articulated approach to writing I used in thematically shaping that comment (and to a lesser extent, this one, so that you have a second example of what I am talking about for reference). And how ridiculous it is, and how ridiculous must you feel, that I thought for sure nobody cared, myself included. And yet... Here you are. Proving every point against your very basic intellect, and utmost common sense, in favor of your insistence on the height of cringeworthy pitiable behavioral offenses and unjustifiably nonsensical lowbrow repetitive displaying of nonsensically flaming parading, intangibly soaked in backwards propositions and densely soaked oozing of smelly, infantile, disease-ridden social faux pas borne of the lowest class of toxic parasitical pangs of guilt and empty-headed insignificance hoping with all desperation for a context and a purpose of any feasibly recognizable nature. How's existential that identity crisis working out for you? Any luck feeding off of the existence of others in that sloppy minute carving of least eventful, purposelessly ineffectual, inconsiderately wasteful, hopelessly disregarded, all-around hideous and rank smelly caged cavernous perch from which you've grown accustomed to servicing, borrowing, burroughing, squatting, at best...? ...And, in tandem, as writers are to do on occasions involved in thematically and with motif's relation circumscription making calls back to a tagline or to tag a relational concept... I remark on how I hope nobody took the time to read this; for the same reasons implicit prior, including but not limited to the vast lengths of writing I went to, ironically for purposes absentia vis-à-vis les auditeurs instantia a vehementia qua having defeated all purposes of customary receptivity, convincingly conversationally exchanging ideas with merit and achieving progressions worthy of positive reflections... Pour l'instant, la fin. Enfin. C'est le moment de passer au noir. A tout le monde
If you lift negative mass, you *un-train your arm.* EDIT: JESUS THOSE LIKES! Let's add something to that statement. It helps those who don't want to just gradually train less and less.
5:39 I think a piece of negative mass object will eventually touch something with positive mass, so we can;t really find one because it’s already traveling at speed of light +it shouldn’t be strong enough to be indestructible, so they might just travel like light
With a budget of $0.25 action labs perfectly explained this physics issue. Brilliant. That's why action labs is a solid S tier science education channel.
I think this guy is great and does great real life type videos. He is very informative and has a lot of great material. Plus he reminds me of my best friend growing up.
Wouldnt negative mass be the best way to power spaceships? You could make the negative mass somehow float in a vakuum inside a globe and if this globe is on the backside of a spaceship you could take a piece of mass and push it against the globe so that they begin to chase until speed of light. And if you would take the mass away it would stop. Best engine concept ever thought of in history, thank me me later humanity. :D
jan_above would be very hard to control. The mass would be pushing the spaceship at such a high speed it would be hard to remove it. And also the globe would be repelled by the negative mass in the first place so we couldn't possibly put the globe anywhere near the negative mass.
@ultimateroblocksgawd I'm sorry but I highly doubt that he didn't get it. Seriously, r/woooosh is starting to turn into a catchphrase for some at this point. Can you guys stop posting that at every remote chance you get? You're not really being funny, you know?
@ultimateroblocksgawd The original comment is 9 months old, which means by the time you r/wooooshed him, it was 4 months old. Besides neither 4 months old or 5 months old is that old in my opinion. You usually say such a thing for 3 or 4 year old comments.
Yes. He is _exactly_ the kind of science teacher I would have fallen asleep to in public school. Not because he's boring, but because I'm too dumb to follow along.
@@WorthlessDeadEnd many people don't admin it, but u did. Those people then would comment on youtube videos- "omg I want him in my school...my school teaches nothing" Fakink retards
@T I don't think you know what a joke is. What he did was try and look clever with his 'perspective', and it's an old and worn out TH-cam ploy for losers.
I'm so glad I subbed. Complicated things to understand and clarified with real world examples that are relatable. You are one of the best teachers around. Thanks learning much.
“Water was just pushing the pingpong ball” “it’s just density” jeezbuz you kids did you even listen he said it was just a simulation of how a negative mass object is going to work. He didn’t say that the simulations he showed were the negative mass itself. 🙄
Evolution is being observed every day. Go back to primary school. Better yet - forget everything you think you know that isn't accepted by scientific majority and you'll be better off.
This is an excellent simulation of negative mass, and clearly shows rudimentary Relativity principles. The ping pong ball has negative mass relative to its standard surrounds (the water)
Girl: Wow, you can lift 250 pounds? Guy: yeah. Girl: prove it. *_Lifts 250 pound weight_* Guy: told you I could do it. Girl: that's *_negative_* 250 pounds. Guy: Shoot.
Guy, I don't know if I said it already or not ,but let me repeat. You are my science teacher for life,❤🤟🏾🤟🏾 n I will just continue to follow a part similar to yours 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
Okay. So I'm addicted your channel. Watched dozens of vids this month. Thanks for all you do. Gotta say, this video was kinda mind blowing for me. Thanks for explaining why all the balloons in my car kept pissing me off!
Question at 3:01 why then when you went forwards holding the base of the balloon did it still go backwards and not forwards when you moksed your hand and arm forwards? Just more force then it can Handle for the Negitave mass?
If you watched from outside the care the balloon would still move forward the air in the car is also being pushed foward creating the small pressure difference within the car.
When the whole car was accelerating, both the balloon and the air inside were accelerating. When he did it with his hand, only the balloon was accelerating. This was just an approximation to show how negative mass would behave. Obviously we can't replicate all of its properties in one demonstration, so trying to make other inferences and deductions would simply break down. I hope that helped, I'm not very knowledgeable in physics either
1:40 it is because a bouyant force is acting on it upward and a external force towards the left . the component of the two forces will make the ball move in the same direction of external force ( towards left)
I don't think you know how a physics class is. You just watched a guy throw random phrase about physics. He doesn't even make the difference between gravittional and inertial mass.
The reason i really respect u is not just limited by the fact that u are a good youtuber who makes fun scientific videos but also because u look a holy human (may be that's why u always qualify the cow as holy) and u always smile in your videos nd your videos give positive vibes. Thanks for such super cool stuff. Keep going. Fan from India ✌
Enes Doğancı any gravitational potential energy is negative (without the close-to-surface approximation. Intranuclear energy also has to be negative or else atoms wouldn’t exist.
If a black hole is a wormhole, the opposite end of it would be a white hole, which he basically described in the video, anything getting close to it would be pushed away. A white hole would make sense to be made of negative mass.
Just like how the positive mass acted like negative mass underwater, would the negative mass act like positive mass in the same way? In theory of course.
I think he explained it at 4:40. He said that negative masses would act like positive masses as long as there are no impacts on it. If an impact does occur, it'll shoot right through the impacting agent. It's difficult to explain it in easy terms. Let's take the negative ping-pong ball again!😂 A normal, positive ping-pong ball will bounce upwards after hitting the ground, but a negative one - oh no! It'll be thinking, "Who dareth attack me?👺" and will keep on pushing harder and harder into the soil until it goes through the core of Earth and out the land in the opposite side of the planet! The equilibrium of our planets forces will be majorly disturbed and life may no longer exist as we know it today. Man, that ping-pong ball is not only negative, but also toxic as hell now that I think harder on it! I'll assume it's a blessing that negative masses aren't found... Yet!😶
I think the negative mass would act like how we expect a positive mass to, in that it would accelerate in a direction opposite to the movement of the container/car. The force acting on the object in the container is due to a pressure differential across the object, pressure greater towards the back(b/c of the inertia of the fluid). This net force due to pressure acts in the direction of motion and the mass, negative or not, has no bearing on the pressure force because that depends only on the magnitude of the pressure differential and the area upon which the pressure is acting. You can think of this pressure force as just being a whole buncha physical impacts, just on the molecular scale, between the object and the gas molecules. Then, with the pressure force pushing from the back, or frequency of collisions greater on the back, the negative mass will accelerate in the opposite direction of that forwards push, which is backwards, in the direction opposite to the container motion.
@@Farhan_049 That's sorta wrong though. If an object with lesser mass and another object of greater mass propel toward each other and collide, the lesser mass (according to the math) bounces back away from the greater mass, and the greater mass slows down. The amount of bounce back/slow down depends on the difference in masses and the speed of propulsion. If the lesser mass object has a NEGATIVE mass, it will still bounce away, but the greater mass won't slow down, it'll speed up, again, the amount depending on the difference in masses and speed of propulsion. If the 2 objects have the same amount of mass but inverted (i.e one is 10 kg the other is -10 kg) and propel toward each other at the exact same speed, the mathematical result ends up in a divide by zero error, which means the two objects would annihilate each other and convert to pure energy Since the earth itself has a relative propulsion speed of zero, a negative mass pingpong ball would just bounce back up..BUT the weird part is if it bounced off the ground a few times it would bounce higher a few times and then awkwardly find equilibrium by suddenly appearing to "stick" to the ground after a few bounces
@@jeffthecoder Maybe that is the point. Positive masses react like that, and negative masses murder the impact source. At least that's what I absorbed from the video! Positive masses, of different magnitudes, would make the smaller mass bounce away due to inertia. However, if one of the masses are negative, it'll have something totally opposite of inertia, probably. That's how I conclude that it'd push through the positive mass. I know it does sound wrong, but I can think of no other explanation! 🤷🏻♂️
@@jeffthecoder that’s actually wrong itself. Yes, what you’re describing is what we typically see in physics, as all masses are positive, disregarding inelastic collisions. However, what you’re suggesting is a negative mass of lesser magnitude, (size), than the positive mass. The perfect example of which, he described in the video: “a positive mass Earth impacting a negative mass ping pong ball.” As described in the video, the positive, greater mass would be pushed backwards until either it accelerates faster than the negative mass, or the normal force exceeds its limit and is blown through. The negative mass, however, just keeps accelerating towards the positive mass.
Hey everyone just letting you know that I did in fact mean to say mass and not weight. This was a simulation to show how negative mass would react if it were real. I very much know the difference between mass and weight🙂 If you watched this video thinking I should be saying weight instead of mass then you need to watch it again until it sinks in.
The Action Lab look seriously read the term I’m not watching anymore of your videos as it’s feeling more and more akin to flat earther science
The definition states it clearly
to have a negative mass is to have a negative quantity of matter hence it’s impossible in most situations if not all
A negative mass is not something that can be simplified to moving the opposite direction it’d be the opposite of anything that has matter present it would have no density and less than no matter present so it wouldn’t even something effected anywhere similar to what we know
For instance would we even be able to touch it or would it be a void that we pass through and inside seriously this is a fundamentals tricky subject
mass, in physics, the quantity of matter in a body regardless of its volume or of any forces acting on it. The term should not be confused with weight, which is the measure of the force of gravity (see gravitation) acting on a body.
Yeah, what he said
The Action Lab I
The Action Lab, wouldn't an object with negative mass in motion continue to accelerate until it mass reaches zero or becomes positive since acceleration increases mass?
Metal Gear it's probabilities are possible but his example is flawed by using a ping pong ball pulled by a string and a balloon on a string because a negative mass object would still remain stationary for an unmeasurable time period outside a vacuum when pulled due to atmospheric pressure and then once in motion began to accelerate faster than force that caused it to move. In the jar and car example the negative mass object acted upon by the increase of atmospheric pressure in one direction would shoot out like a rocket in the opposite direction.
Good theory, poor examples of it's actions and reactions to force and atmospheric pressure.
Could go deeper into it by talking about if it is moving towards a gravitational pull verses away but it's way past my bed time. A small hint; he talks about it briefly when he talks about dropping it.
Positive mass: living peacefully
Negative mass: peace was never an option!
Cue: Yakkity Sax
Just when I thought the comments here are sane, you had to put this in!😂
It was an answer
Ereh
Plot twist:
Negative mass: living peacefully
Positive mass: peace was never an option!
This Guy taught me more than my Physics Teacher!
All my phisics teacher taughg me was if u draw a line , we get a line...???!!!!??!
yeah american schools are not that good. in europe we learn a lot
I bet you still couldn't solve his final
@@Cheech63b betting is also typical for Americans. Europeans know or don't know. we don't bet
@Brendan35shoot T are you serious????? haha omg you really think Hitler is still in Europe?
thank you for proving my point.
When I learn something in my school: ._.
When I learn something in "The Action Lab": O_O
Yes this is very relatable, when I learn something in school my eyes turn in to periods, and when I learn something from action lab my eyes turn into capital o's.
OwO
UwU
O_O 0_0 o_o ._. -_-
Bet 5$ you don't even listen to the teachers at your school.
The negative mass-related stuff is so interesting! If it actually exists, we (in the far future) could even use it as sort of a mass driver to help us reach incomprehensible speeds!
Even better than that, look into the Alcubierre drive if you haven't heard of it. Theoretically the drive moves space around a mass beyond light speed without violating physics. The drive requires the existence of negative mass with specific properties, but is consistent with Einstein's field equations. However, jury is still out on it since we haven't yet figured out how to merge general relativity with quantum mechanics. What we think of as dark energy could in fact be negative mass, or it could be even more complicated such as dark energy and dark matter might be two properties of the same thing: negative mass. The latter is being researched currently and might even be testable within the next couple decades.
@drewg2403 I'm no whale biologist but that sounds like how they explained the Planet Express ship to fly.
I don't think it is possible. Mass, as I understand it, is not some property that can be whatever. Each element has an atomic mass, which describes how much of it there is in one unit. It doesn't make sense for there to be a negative amount of mass anywhere. There can be a deficit relative to something else, like a pressure differential, but it's never below 0. Think of it as an intricate 3D distribution of dots in the vacuum of 0. It's all additive, not subtractive.
casually begins prop-clipping through walls using negative mass objects
"What if You Try To Lift a Negative Mass?"
The game crashes
**You can now play as Luigi**
It would behave just as when you try to bounce it I assume and try to go down even harder.
Lifting is just the same as pushing from below.
hey why does this sound like from NGNL lmao
@@davidmartensson273 i think if the force used to lift higher than the gravity, the ball would go up even faster than the force itself. It would go down if only the gravity is higher than the force then push down forward to the core of the gravity
You get weak?
Legend says his shirt is still thinking...
Hahaha
I’ll bet probably thinking about the mass of his forehead.
Where can i buy it?
Dumbass it can't think! It would still be buffering till it can think... Duh...
MR Derp so his shirt is a legend? Thats shit
i like how he continues smiling while explaining why negative mass would fly straight through our bodys basically killing us
Ya, It will oscillate through us until we die. Lol
@Horshu he doesn't love you your a mistake
@@doomdude6669 what was that for lol
@@普利加 Idk
@Horshu wrong timing Christian
Negative mass as a potential "warp speed" engine...quite interesting! Now to figure out how to control the negative mass... :)
magnetically sensitive negative mass, apply electromagnet field to push with varying intensity based on desired speed, slow down with opposing electromagnet. The issue would be that (to my knowledge) we have yet to observe any scenario where you can apply force to a contained object and have it return enough force to propel the containment, all that is fixed to said containment and itself in any sort of way.
Alcuberrie sort of figured it out, now we need to get negative mass
I'm not good at math.
I'm not good at chemistry.
I'm not good at physics.
But for some reason I like watching this type of videos. 😶
I think our teacher R same... Boring...
Abhishek Singh lol I think you're right 👍😂
Lmao me too
Heh....
Relatable 😅
*meanwhile in a parallel universe*
IS THERE ANY POSITIVE MASS???
MEKEX keep on mind that in a different universe, the meanings of positive and negative could be switched around 🙂
Im pretty sure if it was a parallel universe, like the actual theory is shown,objects still react same ways and exist the same. Thus humans react the same way to a negative mass. So they still would ask the same question.
But then again, positive and negative are subjective constructs
Calm down people I’m 78% sure that was a reference to a comedy sketch.
There's an infinite number of those infinities lol
i've asked this to all my teachers and they said that it was impossible, when i say "ok but theoretically" they just kinda block and never give me a good answer. tnx for this videos ig
Cus they dont know themselves mate, dont ask such qs to teachers they are the least helpful when it comes to stuff outside the textbook ,there are exceptions of course.save such queries for yt and google
Theoritically there is exotic matter with pushes the space time curvature outwards so idk if that would create a similar effect.
Never stop questioning!
Its possible....... And there are thousands of phenomenon which have been discovered in universe but not yet understood.
just literally ask them to work through the equations with you
no yelling, no homework but you still impress me with your devotion to science.
He impresses with his knowledge of science, but how does a teacher impress you with their devotion to science without yelling?
I now ship -Planet and +Planet. A tragic story of unrequited love, between one planet with mass that can't commit and and another planet with negative mass that doesn't know how to quit.
Unrequited love it is.....
TUMBLR MOMENT
reddit moment
Why do people have to force love in things that just don't go with each other????? It's not quirky. It's stupid.
@@complicated6094 why do people have to force themselves not see a fcuking joke when in its so bloody obvious. Damn mate you must really be a complicated and interesting person to not a sense of humour.
I’m thinking....... loading......... error....
I saw your comment, and it made me think.....
1kg is heavy
0 kg is none at all
-1 kg is less than no heavy at all
P 4 *During tests and exams* think.exe has stopped working
P 4
Runtime error- Download Dll.3
Command /R
*_"I'm thinking..."_*
*_"Error. Could not find solution"_*
"So here i have a pingpong ball on a string"
Me: stringpong ball
stringstrong ball
ⁿ⁰
“Stringpong ball” lol 😂 haha
That sounds a lot like paddle ball.
bringstong pall
Negative mass could be used for moving at the speed of light. We could keep create a simulation of negative mass (when we have the technology) and then keep a positive mass in front of it and move at the speed of light. Again, the negative mass must be very controlled or else we might never be able to stop.
one cant control neg mass my guy, you would be accelerated away so we can never really use neg mass for our convenience cuz theres literally no way of controlling it let alone using it
This comment breaks so many laws of physics. Off the top of my head I can count three of them: Special Relativity, and the Second and maybe Third Laws of Thermodynamics.
@@Marcelelias11 he probably meant near the speed of light
@@dane1382 Even if that's true, it only knocks Special Relativity off of my list of physics transgressions
Negative mass gyroscope with a space shuttle integrated! We solved the speed of light travel!
The story of my life. I am attracted to a girl and she runs away constantly accelerating.
Result of your negative attraction property
That means, ur heart is not empty(vacuum )
You must be full of electrons and her too
Stay Proton bruv
@@TaxPact Don't say that about yourself! You gotta become comfortable with yourself, and of course that's easier said than done. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
2018: What if You Try To Lift a Negative Mass?
2028: What if You Try To Lift an Imaginary Mass?
@Gurnaj Virk its called timmy, my imaginary friend from year 3
imaginary mass is called depression, anxiety
What if You Try To Lift a Zero Mass?
What if You Try To Lift a h.p077; Mass?
Hallucinations
What if You Try To Lift a Fictional Concept?
I appreciate the ending differential analyses between mass, negative mass, and finally, antimatter. It's an easy, quick, and simple Illustration to outline. It's just that our literacy has some tendencies that give false illusions of relevancy to other concepts that perhaps were not most aptly named (a very common issue in science;the last disciplines and their intuitive skills do not juxtapose well with those of the creative / linguistical / artistic sides of our brains. It takes a plethora of unique talents to integrate all of these skills in such a way that is minimally complex, ergo maximally accessible to the fullest extent of interpretation, analysis, and application, but simultaneously is also maximally potent, complete, intricate, and microcosmically borne with cohesion in its independently natural aptitudes for interpolation, extrapolation, application, and visibly taut with these self-explanatory "instructions" (which, majestically in its own exudence of pulchritudinous grandeur, sports the power and pure force of rendering that naturally follows the mental faculties and imaginative processes that produce the raw potential of advancement, but then also necessitate the brutal components that move and arrange the decoding of the original message for what to do, now put to work by way of some actual labor and deciding amongst the illustrious surroundings that make pragmatism Be, and Become via force and intent put onto the resources found within one system, married with the next system, integrated with another, and so on.
In other words, what is for this video a small, but relatively unintuitive, unnatural step of post-accomplishment selective key integration - specifically instead of merely ending the video, or naming some resources or concepts to look into afterwards, the author actually takes on the responsibility of tackling a naturally curious next step, albeit most professors I know, work with, and have worked with, would ignore the antimatter explanation altogether in favor of efficiency, and literally saying as much as that these type of questions, - additional but natural by circumstance, yet so unique and innovative and potentially deviation of direction from the core concepts, - that they can interact or interfere with the core interfacing with the most basic simple and commonly expected of the curriculum.
Ignoring these subtle facets can halt innovation and uninspire theorists, curious minds, and as it turns out, those who desire an even easier, more sensibly rational and intelligent learning route, by presenting a far richer portion of the universe in such a concise, minute little departure, that the remembering of the integration of these similar but necessarily differential parts makes future analyses and applications of any portion of the subjects at hand with newer, different parts so much easier, because it teaches a student to observe and study these naturally occurring elements of Nature, or Program Design, or any other detail or category of information so much more accessible and righteously justified to the student, who by nature of our learning institutions and the necessary trust bound with subordinate psychology are already nervous and typically scared, unsure, or disinterested in asking questions that would otherwise independently lead to the same conclusions and smoothness of presentation... This habit is criminal, but resurgent with its convenience for Instructors. I wish that more presenting bodied would take on the responsibilities of content inclusion and audience involvement the way this one does. Having taught many disparate areas of study at The John's Hopkins University for years now has perhaps made me crazy about these potential details in presentation and the purity of the risks for abandonment that I see commonplace in a top 10 institution (depending on the year) certainly shows that the endowments and budgetary investments are (as only to be expected) NOT going towards hiring and sourcing and applying the Elite of pedagogical benefit and resources reflecting and corresponding with ideal outcomes.
Needless to say today has been a stretch, much like my post, cooked over a fire of vocational aggravation embedded with pure mediocrity, with nobody in over an hour's drive having an IQ as high as two-sigma how my own... It can be a struggle to get access outlets for the anger and stress and physical agony for neurological reasons, but still, I always ensure my communication is... "Intelligible", in the Epitome of Hyperbole as it comes with applying the term.
Anyway, I truly was just excited that the creator mentioned and investigated the Antimatter element, and without actually directly saying as much, encouraged us to think about what we say and how we say things, how we create and coin concepts such that their integration into your field of study may be aptly and appropriately received, engaged with and understood by your colleagues and cohorts. A persistent, consistent, coherence and consistency of the quality, and the qualia of Perception, as that bit of extra effort may preselect additional food for thought and complete the goals of the lesson and maximize the quality of conversation (or presentation) by mode of subtle plus articulate details combined with the fortitude of the actively excited ongoings of the learned company in your wake generating such a massive success in going beyond the baseline obligations, elevating the scope of thought with access to key information on which to ponder with its conclusion, and setting a mindful, relatable, and brilliant example of what keeps me going, what keeps me professing, and what keeps me learning. Oh... And at the end of the day, what keeps me sane, or as close to it as I can be. Thank you for your contribution to the bounty of good information that is alive and well on TH-cam, and thank you for your powerful commitment to creativity and inspiration for yourself and of others who find purpose in the Analytic Philosophy concerning all things; Abnormal Psychology and the Metrics of the Mind; and of course with Physics - for me, mostly the Theoretical side, though frequently some wild Mathematics and less frequently the smaller, more rigid, localized microcosmic arrays of the field and beyond also find their way in and by way of wave stimulation, gravity/as, and the magnetics/ism of duality and electrical attraction vibrate at their own frequencies around me to synchronize my observations and incrementally give each of themselves their own time in productive, creative, sane-making ways, all relative in their necessary proportions, and ongoing as one video ends and the next one begins.
Cheers. Hopefully nobody actually read this.
Humm... interesting.
I read this and concluded that you have all the time in the universe and this actually doesnt make any sense
@@AkshatSinghania I wish I had that type of time...
If I did I would have at the very least fixed some of my syntactical and punctuation-based errors.
To take it one or two steps further, you seem implicitly insistent that there was far more at which I should be looking for revisionary planning and execution... Right? And if this assumption of yours was true, or even worthy of the absolute slightest, most wildly remote consideration, having been presented with or founded upon the flagrantly meager, fantastically infinitesimal excuse for any semblance of a singular piece of evidence at the foundational levels of your remotest, laziest, embarrassingly wholly absent corners of thought and argumentation framing the emptiest of claims to which you happen to be fully accustomed already - perhaps preceding your very faculties of awareness altogether.
Otherwise... You would just be a redundantly whiny flare echoing the very same sentiments and humours I previously articulated in multiplicity - as when I found the silliness, the strangeness, and the heavy weight of the over articulated approach to writing I used in thematically shaping that comment (and to a lesser extent, this one, so that you have a second example of what I am talking about for reference).
And how ridiculous it is, and how ridiculous must you feel, that I thought for sure nobody cared, myself included.
And yet... Here you are. Proving every point against your very basic intellect, and utmost common sense, in favor of your insistence on the height of cringeworthy pitiable behavioral offenses and unjustifiably nonsensical lowbrow repetitive displaying of nonsensically flaming parading, intangibly soaked in backwards propositions and densely soaked oozing of smelly, infantile, disease-ridden social faux pas borne of the lowest class of toxic parasitical pangs of guilt and empty-headed insignificance hoping with all desperation for a context and a purpose of any feasibly recognizable nature.
How's existential that identity crisis working out for you? Any luck feeding off of the existence of others in that sloppy minute carving of least eventful, purposelessly ineffectual, inconsiderately wasteful, hopelessly disregarded, all-around hideous and rank smelly caged cavernous perch from which you've grown accustomed to servicing, borrowing, burroughing, squatting, at best...?
...And, in tandem, as writers are to do on occasions involved in thematically and with motif's relation circumscription making calls back to a tagline or to tag a relational concept... I remark on how I hope nobody took the time to read this; for the same reasons implicit prior, including but not limited to the vast lengths of writing I went to, ironically for purposes absentia vis-à-vis les auditeurs instantia a vehementia qua having defeated all purposes of customary receptivity, convincingly conversationally exchanging ideas with merit and achieving progressions worthy of positive reflections...
Pour l'instant, la fin. Enfin. C'est le moment de passer au noir.
A tout le monde
lmao , you ran of random english words , you also added french , hilarious
@@sephiroth2847 what a remarkable concurrence of event , I just had my french exam before reading this
You teach me more than school will ever
You're not being attentive or you're still in high school or you're in a non-physics course. But that's not your problem maybe it's the system.
@@soulchandra3450 umm I'm pretty sure it was a joke.......... hahhahah
jack chiarenza to bad he can’t teach grammar
Hmm I'd start learning basic English. I have terrible grammar but urs is 100 times worse
This is clearly a joke for you grammar poliec
Everytime he says "negative mass" take a shot of alcohol
i would be fine
r.i.p everyone who tried this
I did.. i woke up in my kitchen floor...
But then again.. i didn't finish the video.... sooooo
@@arcticoutlawisacuck if u are from Poland or Russia its normal to drink that much and u would not die lmao
I guess I'm made of negative mass because everyone leaves me at the speed of light
R.I.P My heart
That's just sad....
Oof
this is the negative of a nerdy pick up line
Zoe Heaton that’s funny
I appreciate that this guy sticks to metric measurements.
Physics exclusively uses Metric units, even in the US
When you try to lift negative mass. You lose your gains lol
If you do bench with negative mass you actually workout your biceps and back
I WANT THAT
Best comment in this vid.
Hahahha
Snips underrated reply :D
*Negative mass exist*
Black holes: i fear no man but that thing it scares me
Black hole uses gravitational force so negative mass will react similar to black hole as positive mass
@@thedarksoul5670 i thought negative mass would get pushed away from gravity
Of course if the body of mass is going directly towards gravitational field then it depends on the speed the negative mass is moving at
@@justsomeguywithamask1564 um... Mmm.....Could be....
😅
My bank account is a negative mass.
IndeedNERD LMAO
100th like
IndeedNERD *Good one*
🤣😂👌
😆 😅. You can revert it.
Science tells us that should exert a positive force then. FIND A JOB
BTW, I'm Lebanese, live in Syria, and my 7 years old kid adores you
Thank you
If you lift negative mass, you *un-train your arm.*
EDIT: JESUS THOSE LIKES!
Let's add something to that statement.
It helps those who don't want to just gradually train less and less.
DropTheHat / AntonyCraft75 lol
DropTheHat / AntonyCraft75 Haha
hell yeah
DropTheHat / AntonyCraft75 (insert un-training montage)
DropTheHat / AntonyCraft75 ez
That dude went from crushing fruits to full genius O_o
He's a scientist
Vihang Lodh everyone is a scientist
He is a smart guy or just study's wiki hard
He's a chemical engineer.
Bassel Dahdouh he was always a genius he work full time as chemical engineer
*What if there was **_neggadiv mass_*
Bob McCoy *neggadiv masssssssssssssssss*
Niggadiv mess
*niggativ mass**
If there was it’s long gone now.
*NiGgAtIv MaS$*
5:39 I think a piece of negative mass object will eventually touch something with positive mass, so we can;t really find one because it’s already traveling at speed of light
+it shouldn’t be strong enough to be indestructible, so they might just travel like light
I want a teacher like him in my school i would never miss an period 🤩
A is used before consonants (bcdfghjklmnpqrstvwxyz) and AN is used before vowels (a,e,i,o,u).
@@johnsmith_treeler9031 lmfao
Must be skipping English as well.
@@iamJodieB lol hahahaha
@@johnsmith_treeler9031 bruh... You nuked the dude
IDK why youtube teach me more than my school?
Because the school system has been broken for decades.
Because you dont learn at all
becuase yall rarted
Self education > School
For real
My mother-in-law is the biggest ball of negative mass on the planet. 😶
Tim Michaels This made me laugh...
Chases you arround at a constant accelerating speed?
BIll Bill
How did you know? 😑
Kek
😂
The creator of that dumbbell:proceeds to put question mark at the end
With a budget of $0.25 action labs perfectly explained this physics issue. Brilliant. That's why action labs is a solid S tier science education channel.
His budget includes a garage door background and a camera
@Christian Rodgers lmao bruh
@Christian Rodgers perfectly accurate lmao
@Christian.L.RodgersHe's not a doctorate
well yea, money is the root of all evil, and people who care about their passions, really go beyond and teach everyone
Imagine if he dropped it and it just started flying up
uhoh I upped it
Helium balloon
Or just blew through the earth entirely.
IN games: Negitave values are bigger than normal
In real life: O p p o s i t e .
I think the tacos I ate last night were negative mass. They came out the other end and kept going down into the earth at a high rate of speed.
Geoff Carr lmao😂😂😂
Lol
omfg im dying
😂😂😂😂😂😂
TJar Bizzar The door 🚪
I think this guy is great and does great real life type videos. He is very informative and has a lot of great material. Plus he reminds me of my best friend growing up.
Everytime he talks his shirt does my talking
KiNg_ KaMbInG 1 year with no reply? Well, okay. I'm first!
@@chubob73 ill be second then
I’ll be third then @mergerous lorndaz
Ill be fourth then
Ill be 5th then :)
Wouldnt negative mass be the best way to power spaceships? You could make the negative mass somehow float in a vakuum inside a globe and if this globe is on the backside of a spaceship you could take a piece of mass and push it against the globe so that they begin to chase until speed of light. And if you would take the mass away it would stop. Best engine concept ever thought of in history, thank me me later humanity. :D
*_Harvard wants your location_*
thats just breaking the law of conservation of energy
How tho.
jan_above that would except use would need energy. You can’t generate energy and this speed. At least I think I don’t study this much
jan_above would be very hard to control. The mass would be pushing the spaceship at such a high speed it would be hard to remove it. And also the globe would be repelled by the negative mass in the first place so we couldn't possibly put the globe anywhere near the negative mass.
When military scientists discovered negative mass bullet...
They point the barrel of their guns to their head.
The bullet will be pointless because the air is denser and will stop the bullet
@FE2 and More -Roblox
I'm pretty sure he got the joke, he's just saying that it wouldn't work.
@FE2 and More -Roblox
Haha ok then
@ultimateroblocksgawd I'm sorry but I highly doubt that he didn't get it. Seriously, r/woooosh is starting to turn into a catchphrase for some at this point. Can you guys stop posting that at every remote chance you get? You're not really being funny, you know?
@ultimateroblocksgawd The original comment is 9 months old, which means by the time you r/wooooshed him, it was 4 months old. Besides neither 4 months old or 5 months old is that old in my opinion. You usually say such a thing for 3 or 4 year old comments.
0:12 wow I love that “I’m thinking…” shirt
naked singularity:
*atom comes near*
HOLY CRAP NEGATIVE MASS?
*leaves at the speed of light*
Oliver Wolff YEET
Naked singularity: is this because I'm white?
*OOF then you die some how*
This guy : Gives a long confusing speech about negative mass
His shirt : I am thinking
I am thinking with brain
Yes. He is _exactly_ the kind of science teacher I would have fallen asleep to in public school. Not because he's boring, but because I'm too dumb to follow along.
@@WorthlessDeadEnd many people don't admin it, but u did. Those people then would comment on youtube videos- "omg I want him in my school...my school teaches nothing"
Fakink retards
Your post is dumb.
@T I don't think you know what a joke is. What he did was try and look clever with his 'perspective', and it's an old and worn out TH-cam ploy for losers.
Now I get it ! All the dislikes here are just negative likes.
Okay then all the likes are just negative dislikes.
trinitrojack or are they possitive dislikes 🤔
🤯
there are some anomalies this principle is only applicable to dislikes
Me again
Mind blown
I'm so glad I subbed. Complicated things to understand and clarified with real world examples that are relatable. You are one of the best teachers around. Thanks learning much.
Take a Shot of whiskey every time he says "Negative Mass"
I’m gonna be dead in the first 5 minutes
Comment stealer
That is called Alcohol poisoning
Gets drunk faster than the speed of light.
Mister Ghoul congratulations! You are now a drunk!
“Water was just pushing the pingpong ball” “it’s just density” jeezbuz you kids did you even listen he said it was just a simulation of how a negative mass object is going to work. He didn’t say that the simulations he showed were the negative mass itself. 🙄
Team Scorp Yeah that’s my point.
Right bro
Evolution is being observed every day. Go back to primary school. Better yet - forget everything you think you know that isn't accepted by scientific majority and you'll be better off.
*YOUR UGLY*
This is an excellent simulation of negative mass, and clearly shows rudimentary Relativity principles. The ping pong ball has negative mass relative to its standard surrounds (the water)
In Soviet Russia, Weights lifts you
Maiha I'm Slovanian XD idk why but this is so accurate
Maiha someone is from brody foxx here
Maiha In Soviet Russia, you dont have to pay your water bill, the government pays *YOU*
Maiha In Union America, you eat sandwich. In Soviet Russia Sandwich eats tou
I googled “negative mass” and you came up…I’m already subscribed it turns out
Me: negative mass is so cool! :D
"It would shoot right through you"
Me: D:
Just invert the pistol
*STONKS*
How this has
2 comments? Idj
Like an american stude-
I shouldn't post jokes about school shooters.
@@arke5713 when you understand youtube, you can bend comments to your will
Drink everytime he say‘s „Negative Mass“
bRuh I'm fuCKed uuPPp
Drink every time he blinks
*dead*
Fruit PornDesu Still alive?😳
Fruit PornDesu fake
Girl: Wow, you can lift 250 pounds?
Guy: yeah.
Girl: prove it.
*_Lifts 250 pound weight_*
Guy: told you I could do it.
Girl: that's *_negative_* 250 pounds.
Guy: Shoot.
What da hell
Is this supposed to be a joke?
Now we know.... There are at least 100 really, really nice people on TH-cam.
😆 😆 😅 😅 😁 😁 😁 😜
I think metric is a thing 😌
Guy, I don't know if I said it already or not ,but let me repeat. You are my science teacher for life,❤🤟🏾🤟🏾 n I will just continue to follow a part similar to yours 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
Take a shot every time he blinks
Lmaoo dam
Died of alcohol poisoning in the first 30 seconds
Israel Zapata I would have the worst hangover
Okay
Israel Zapata sorry I drowned
Negative mass sounds like a name for a weight loss pill. XD
Sunny Wu lol ikr
Hook me up
Sunny Wu hahaha
XD
Sunny Wu Order some. ASAP!
You dont lift negative mass, negative mass liftes you
Rui Filipe Pinho - maybe this mass exists in Soviet Russia
You forgot the “in Soviet Russia” part.
only in Russia.lmao
dam you stole my thunder..kudos
Negative mass = Chuck Norris
Confirmed
Okay. So I'm addicted your channel. Watched dozens of vids this month. Thanks for all you do. Gotta say, this video was kinda mind blowing for me. Thanks for explaining why all the balloons in my car kept pissing me off!
For 3 seconds I thought the video was loading because of your shirt
Pro Player 1⃣ a legend says that if you wear that buffering t-shirt you would stop aging.
*Pro Player 1⃣* bro you're everywhere in this channel!!!
Sreenikethan I
ok
Chetan K V S
I know.
Same lol
Question at 3:01 why then when you went forwards holding the base of the balloon did it still go backwards and not forwards when you moksed your hand and arm forwards? Just more force then it can Handle for the Negitave mass?
If you watched from outside the care the balloon would still move forward the air in the car is also being pushed foward creating the small pressure difference within the car.
When the whole car was accelerating, both the balloon and the air inside were accelerating. When he did it with his hand, only the balloon was accelerating.
This was just an approximation to show how negative mass would behave. Obviously we can't replicate all of its properties in one demonstration, so trying to make other inferences and deductions would simply break down.
I hope that helped, I'm not very knowledgeable in physics either
at 3:01 he moved back a bit before moving forwards
The balloon had air resistance acting on it at that point.
Because it’s just a mess
I took a shot everyone he said "negative mass".
I can now shoot through the negative mass.
Tanishq Chakravorty do it whenever he blinks
He say it 34 times.
1:40 it is because a bouyant force is acting on it upward and a external force towards the left . the component of the two forces will make the ball move in the same direction of external force ( towards left)
I just watched a physics class.
Edit: woahhhh 1.1K likesss thx ,and for those experts that replied,it's a jooookkkkeeeee chill out, have a great day!
KevinChris21566 i just pooped my pants when u said that.
I agree
I don't think you know how a physics class is. You just watched a guy throw random phrase about physics. He doesn't even make the difference between gravittional and inertial mass.
KevinChris21566 is this a science class?
Look at all the physicists in this comment section. Damn, who new the experts in a complicated field would be so triggered by a joke comment. 🙄
9:07 The positive mass is the last pea on my plate, and my fork is the negative mass.
True xD
I just gained some brain cells
Like lol me too
This is just a wow factor video you didnt learn anything of substance or improve any brain function.
Error: Unknown User Lol
Hi ! 👌
This was the best explanation so far. It does exist. Sound. Goes through you...but at a certain density can actually move objects.
When my mom comes home asking why I didn't do any work today. I'm gonna show her this channel.
Why is this guy trying not to laugh 24/7
Bunny exactly 😂😂😂
This is a look of an excited scientist when they talk about something they are passionate about.
becuase its a ballshit theory and only people with no knowledge of physics would buy into this.
SwanOnYT Right. 😂 lol
I have to admit this channel is fantastic and I have learned a lot more than school. Thankyou.
If I had a hands on science teacher like this, I wouldn't be failing
Naashon Williamson if you were stupid and didn’t pay attention in class you would fail anyways
R S y u stressed out
R S well isn’t that a little bit fast to say if you’re not in his classroom?
You still would
Michael Yachnis lol
If I had a dollar for every time he said negative mass....
I mean, he is explaining what a Negative mass is
You would have at least 40 dollars
@@thedukeofdeer7125 wronggg
Flying Pizza Gaming if I had a dollar no a cent for every time he said “the” I’d be richer than you
Raven PT maybe lol...
The reason i really respect u is not just limited by the fact that u are a good youtuber who makes fun scientific videos but also because u look a holy human (may be that's why u always qualify the cow as holy) and u always smile in your videos nd your videos give positive vibes. Thanks for such super cool stuff. Keep going.
Fan from India ✌
I’m convinced TH-cam can tell the most interesting parts. An ad appeared right at the moment you counted down to 1
Since negative mass accelerates the opposite way, in order to lift it, you'd have to push it...!😀😀
Srujay T damn nice
😂😂😂 I'd love to push dumbles in gym rather than lifting
More like youd have to do nothing itll fall upwards
Srujay T that's what I thought
ironman hulkbstr lol
I love this guy's smile while he is talking
Negative myaas
Kim Jana yooooo lmsaioooo
Kim Jana lmaaaaaoooi
ArMy
Myaaaas
I was gonna comment the exact same XD
I can't believe he showed us how fast his car was moving!
Naked singularity. ...hmmm
Sounds like a personal problem
ŤWĒNTÝ ØNĘ ŤÜŇËŞ lol
ŤWĒNTÝ ØNĘ ŤÜŇËŞ lol 'signal'
its because you were original haha you got me cracking
ŤWĒNTÝ ØNĘ ŤÜŇËŞ I know right
Mass is a scalar quantity and weight is vector...
Energy is a scalar also but it can still be negative
@@nathanrobinson3746 no my friendo, energy cannot be negative ; DELTA energy (last E - first E) can be nagetive
Enes Doğancı any gravitational potential energy is negative (without the close-to-surface approximation. Intranuclear energy also has to be negative or else atoms wouldn’t exist.
@@enesdoganc50 Of course it can, but not ALL kinds of energy can be negative
Where can I buy a negative mass
Patrik Frroku what????
Patrik Frroku amazon
Quark that's the joke.
Dark web
Ebay
If a black hole is a wormhole, the opposite end of it would be a white hole, which he basically described in the video, anything getting close to it would be pushed away. A white hole would make sense to be made of negative mass.
Take a shot every time he says "negative mass"
Because I'm Batman! Pr every time he blinks
Do it yourself ! 😂
Drink every time he says negative mass? No thanks I choose life over alcohol poisoning
Because I'm Batman! Lol stop copying
benni70 when I wrote this I didn't see any others, I thought I was the first
Take a shot every time he says mass.
Alcohol poisoning within the first 10 seconds
I'll do you one better, take a shot every time he blinks (he blinks A LOT)
Don’t do that!!! You WILL die
Whoops, I died just in 1 second.
*+FROSTYxICY E* I took a shot of water each time he said "mass," I think I drank too much water...
you dont lift negative mass, it lifts you.
In Soviet Russia...
Literally.
Golden Fedora only in Russia
fir eg - like a helium balloon .
but for than its mass has to be more than our mass. duh
We finally understand the energizing force behind the Infinity Improbability Drive in the Heart of Gold.
Im Thinking... The Action Lab.exe has stopped working.
Just like how the positive mass acted like negative mass underwater, would the negative mass act like positive mass in the same way? In theory of course.
I think he explained it at 4:40. He said that negative masses would act like positive masses as long as there are no impacts on it. If an impact does occur, it'll shoot right through the impacting agent.
It's difficult to explain it in easy terms.
Let's take the negative ping-pong ball again!😂 A normal, positive ping-pong ball will bounce upwards after hitting the ground, but a negative one - oh no! It'll be thinking, "Who dareth attack me?👺" and will keep on pushing harder and harder into the soil until it goes through the core of Earth and out the land in the opposite side of the planet! The equilibrium of our planets forces will be majorly disturbed and life may no longer exist as we know it today.
Man, that ping-pong ball is not only negative, but also toxic as hell now that I think harder on it! I'll assume it's a blessing that negative masses aren't found... Yet!😶
I think the negative mass would act like how we expect a positive mass to, in that it would accelerate in a direction opposite to the movement of the container/car. The force acting on the object in the container is due to a pressure differential across the object, pressure greater towards the back(b/c of the inertia of the fluid). This net force due to pressure acts in the direction of motion and the mass, negative or not, has no bearing on the pressure force because that depends only on the magnitude of the pressure differential and the area upon which the pressure is acting. You can think of this pressure force as just being a whole buncha physical impacts, just on the molecular scale, between the object and the gas molecules. Then, with the pressure force pushing from the back, or frequency of collisions greater on the back, the negative mass will accelerate in the opposite direction of that forwards push, which is backwards, in the direction opposite to the container motion.
@@Farhan_049 That's sorta wrong though. If an object with lesser mass and another object of greater mass propel toward each other and collide, the lesser mass (according to the math) bounces back away from the greater mass, and the greater mass slows down. The amount of bounce back/slow down depends on the difference in masses and the speed of propulsion. If the lesser mass object has a NEGATIVE mass, it will still bounce away, but the greater mass won't slow down, it'll speed up, again, the amount depending on the difference in masses and speed of propulsion.
If the 2 objects have the same amount of mass but inverted (i.e one is 10 kg the other is -10 kg) and propel toward each other at the exact same speed, the mathematical result ends up in a divide by zero error, which means the two objects would annihilate each other and convert to pure energy
Since the earth itself has a relative propulsion speed of zero, a negative mass pingpong ball would just bounce back up..BUT the weird part is if it bounced off the ground a few times it would bounce higher a few times and then awkwardly find equilibrium by suddenly appearing to "stick" to the ground after a few bounces
@@jeffthecoder Maybe that is the point. Positive masses react like that, and negative masses murder the impact source. At least that's what I absorbed from the video!
Positive masses, of different magnitudes, would make the smaller mass bounce away due to inertia. However, if one of the masses are negative, it'll have something totally opposite of inertia, probably. That's how I conclude that it'd push through the positive mass.
I know it does sound wrong, but I can think of no other explanation! 🤷🏻♂️
@@jeffthecoder that’s actually wrong itself. Yes, what you’re describing is what we typically see in physics, as all masses are positive, disregarding inelastic collisions. However, what you’re suggesting is a negative mass of lesser magnitude, (size), than the positive mass. The perfect example of which, he described in the video: “a positive mass Earth impacting a negative mass ping pong ball.” As described in the video, the positive, greater mass would be pushed backwards until either it accelerates faster than the negative mass, or the normal force exceeds its limit and is blown through. The negative mass, however, just keeps accelerating towards the positive mass.
In Russia, mass lift you
Trigger in Britain.. we drink tea
bahahaha
Steven Haskell lol
In India Mass scams you
In India you choose thug life.
What if you try to lift a negative mass?
"I'm thinking...just like the shirt is thinking and confused"
Red balloon inside a car and it's night... mkayyy
Would a blue balloon make more sense?
@@ericafleming5197 boi.
Oh no it's penny the wise lol
I saw that part when it was like 6 in the morning, then I was like" F**K THIS SH** I'M OUT!!! "
Can the knights who until recently said ni watch It and live?
Legends say that his shirt is still trying to process what he was saying
Processing the fact that i just watched a video on my least favorite subject
That means I’m succeeding
The Action Lab you're awesome 😊😊
Aryan TS smartereveryday did the exact same thing
Science and math are the best subjects what are you talking about
Ameer Rehman actually my favorite subject is chemistry... I dont like physics at all
My new favorite video! Best explanation of negative mass! Keep up the amazing work!!
In soviet russian weights lift you
In soviet russia weights are lifted by looking at them
Any Taras fan here😊
Wrong video
LATEST AWESOME CLIPS lol
Oh yea yea
Now thats the kind of science lessons that i like watching specially in holidays :D
Negative Mass-chan: "Notice me, Positive Mass-senpai!"
That's all I needed to fully understand the concept
ありがとう先生
I never thought I'd see this kind of comment
Negative Mass-chan is a Yandere
Thanks on behalf of all the weebs out there
I must admit... your very good! I love science so much! Keep up the good work!
God his shirt is not buffering why am I keep seeing it moving?
Danyal Ahmed acid
Danyal Ahmed shadows
Schizophrenia
Danyal Ahmed it's cuz of his arm shadows
the design is shiny And his arms shadow